01/02/2018 The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look ahead

to what the the papers will be

bringing us tomorrow.

With me are

the FT's political correspondent

Laura Hughes

and Charlie Wells, who's Deputy

Snapcha Editor at the Economist.

Many of tomorrow's front

pages are already in.

We can walk you through them. The I

has the headline are guilty of

murder at the mosque. Prince Harry

and Meghan Markle attempt I first

evening function together.

Compensation payoffs must be cut or

the NHS will go bust. The Mirror

says its own poll shows that 70% of

us would pay more to save the NHS.

And the Guardian claims labourers in

forcing landowners to give up sites

at knock-down prices to build more

council houses. Brussels has lined

up sanctions to stop Britain

undercutting the EU economy, that's

the lead in the Financial Times. And

the express newspaper reports that

snoring raises your risk of

dementia. Bit of a mixed bag on the

front pages! Prince Harry and Meghan

Markle make headlines on several of

them. What we start with the very

serious one. The Metro newspaper say

devious and hate filled, the verdict

coming in today on Darren Osborne.

Tell us more about this story.

This

is the moment this man crashed into

a mosque and killed one man. The

jury decided very quickly he was

guilty. One of the more shocking

things that came out of it was he

had been radicalised in just three

weeks. It's claimed he watched the

BBC series three girls about the

Rochdale scandal, then went online

and was looking at far right groups

and very quickly became radicalised

enough to the point that he would go

and drive into London to try to kill

people, to try to kill Muslims

living in London.

This has brought a

lot of discussion about different

forms of extremism and the rise of

far right extremism is becoming more

of an issue.

So often we hear about

radicalisation of Muslim people in

whatever country it is. Of this is

quite a stark reminder that anyone

of any release, any religion, can

become radicalised. We need to be

careful about what kind of materials

are available online and politicians

need to be careful about their

rhetoric. Has been a lot of dog

whistle racism on both sides of the

Atlantic and now this father was

killed in the attack, a father of

six children, and they will live

their lives without a father. The

words that we say have very serious

consequences.

It is this issue of

course of online radicalisation.

It's not necessary to have a huge

network, but people are quite

self-contained can decide to take

very drastic action.

Government

ministers have been calling on the

big social media companies like

Facebook and accused them of not

doing enough to remove radicalising

content from their website, which is

very easy for anyone to access. They

have various rules and regulations

and categories. There is a huge

pressure I think the big companies

to be doing more and this is a

reminder of what happens when they

don't.

Were starting up with

Brussels lines up sanctions.

Brussels planning all sorts of

nasties down the line for the UK?

Trouble in Brexit Ville. The FT has

reported that Brussels will

essentially not allowed the UK to

simply become a low tax haven once

it is outside the jurisdiction of

the rules of the European Union and

it will not allowed British

companies to be very heavily

subsidised by the state.

Theoretically, those two moves could

be a tactic that Britain employs

once it leaves the European Union to

become a more attractive place for

businesses to settle and it could

theoretically jeopardise the economy

of the European Union. The difficult

part of the story and something I

find very interesting is that Europe

has put forward these very strict

bargaining positions and yet some

ministers have been saying it will

be very difficult to enforce these.

How do you tell a country no longer

in the EU that your tax rate cannot

be that low. It is an interesting

challenge and it will be fun to see

how that plays out.

Politically this

will play out very badly for Brexit

backing Tory MPs who would hate the

idea of any sort of sanction put on

Britain because it would limit our

ability to do trade deals and stand

on our own. They need something a

bit different because we have a

slightly different relationship.

Theresa May's advisers are looking

at some sort of customs agreement

that covers trade.

While we're on

the Financial Times, take us higher

up paper. Theresa May and she's in

pain and having a nice cup of tea.

She is in China and saying that

business deals have been signed up.

This is all part of Britain trying

to exercise some authority. China

has said it is willing to help

import meat and agricultural

products post Brexit. It looks like

she is enjoying that cup of tea with

Xi Jinping.

Going all-out to think

about the picture outside of the EU,

even though she is being constantly

asked to comment on Brexit.

There

was a report about her emphasising

Britain being a member of the

Security Council. I think something

the story talks about briefly as

their discussion about Hong Kong.

And I do wish that in the reporting

I've seen on Theresa May's trip, she

would've spoken a bit more about

human rights and a bit about the

situation in Hong Kong.

They said it

came up in discussions, but not very

much came out about that. Moving on

to the Telegraph newspaper and back

to the EU again. Their story is

ministers are watering down the EU

migrant plan. All about the numbers.

This is an analysis reportedly drawn

up by the Home Secretary. The

Telegraph saying the rules we are

potentially going to impose which

would see EU citizens given the

right to come over here if they are

earning just over £20,000 a year,

actually would not reduce the number

of citizens coming over by a great

number, only 40,000. Which again

would frustrate some backbench Tory

MPs. David Saker production is not

enough and it is not what people

voted for.

I think there is a

comedic irony to the fact that we

are talking about how certain people

hope there will be fewer migrants

from the EU in one story and inches

above we are talking about staffing

shortages in the NHS.

You have taken

that link away from me. Costs are

spiralling in the NHS?

The costs of

mistakes in operations are

ballooning. The NHS could go bust if

these pay-outs continue, according

to the story. I am not from this

country, as you may be able to tell

from my accent, and from the United

States were we have massive

malpractice lawsuits. And the

numbers are staggering. So it's

surprising to see that sort of thing

discussed here. It's fascinating

because this seems to be obviously

here in the UK we have the NHS paid

for by taxpayers. So the issue of

negligence cut a lot closer to home.

We need to move on. Laura, you can

take us to the Guardian newspaper

who have a lovely picture of a

dragon, but it's not the Dragon were

talking about as we've done China.

We will speak about Labour plans for

landowners to part with some of

their rather precious land but not

for a rather huge price?

It is a

topical issue from Labour to jump up

on. We have a housing crisis and

they are talking about making it

legally enforceable for landowners

to sell their land at less of a

price. At the moment, we have this

thing called Hope value. Gland cells

for much more than it is worth

because people expect it to be worth

more when the land is granted

planning permission to build

housing. Labour's argument here is

it takes a lot longer and is more

expensive to do it that way and

actually if you reduce the cost of

land, it would speed up the

purchasing of it and therefore speed

up the cost of building houses which

we all know I desperately needed.

I

know there is more to say that, but

Charlie I would like you to get me

to the next story. You are good on

technical things. Matt Hancock, the

Culture Secretary, has his new app.

This was the talk of the town in

political spheres of London today.

The Culture Secretary has released

this app where it has created means

and people have allegedly claimed to

meet their significant other. Fun

aside, there have been some fears

that this potentially could have

some pro-Russian purgation is. There

were some concerns over the course

of the day as people are downloaded

this app that the Culture Secretary

wanted to access photographs. At

social media is changing. One of the

reasons why Matt Hancock has said he

came up with this app is because

people are tired of Twitter and they

feel they can't believe what they

see on user generated content

platforms. He is saying, you trust

me, here is my app. Or my question

is, can you trust a politician?

You

select! Politicians are having to

rethink the way they communicate. He

is saying this is about his

constituents seeing what he is doing

day-to-day.

Everyone can communicate

with each other, make new friends

and make mischief. The Tories are

trying to rebrand them to better on

social media. The content have been

putting out on Facebook and Twitter

is not in the same level as the

Labour Party and I think this is him

taking it into his own hands.

What

would it be like to describe this

app to someone from 1998. There will

be a tiny piece of glass in your

pocket with a square on it and you

push it and speak to a politician.

A

late arrival, the Daily Mail has

come through past we have been

talking. Prostate cancer has now

become a bigger killer than breast

cancer. The paper says it receives

half the funding and is asking if

there is a bias against men. We have

brought you up to speed. Don't

forget, you can see the front pages

online.

online

on the BBC News website.

It's all there for you

seven days a week

at bbc.co.uk/papers -

and if you miss the programme

any evening you can watch it

later on BBC iPlayer.

Thank you, Laura and Charlie.