20/03/2018 The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look ahead

to what the the papers will be

bringing us tomorrow.

With me are Former Trade Minister,

Lord Digby Jones and broadcaster

and campaigner, Henry Bonsu.

Many of tomorrow's front

pages are already in.

The FT reports that Facebook is set

to face questions from US regulators

about how data from its users

were leaked to Cambridge Analytica,

the UK company that worked for

Donald Trump's election campaign.

The Guardian claims it laid a key

role in bringing him

The I says Facebook's founder,

Mark Zuckerberg has been called

to Parliament to give evidence

on privacy and fake news.

The Daily Telegraph has an interview

with a British surgeon based

who help direct operations

in the Syrian city of Aleppo

via the web, who fears

that the hacking of his computer led

to a hospital being bombed

by suspected Russian jets.

The daily melts as a per plant to

transform care for the elderly was

unveiled by Jeremy Hunt today.

Meanwhile the daily express says

there are calls for the health and

social care Secretary to solve the

care crisis at a social workers

conference.

A mixture of stories there. But

plenty on Cambridge Analytica and

Facebook. Of course. Digby, the eye,

let's start with them. The UK

demands answers from Zuckerberg. He

seems to be in the dark on this. Do

you think there will be answers from

Facebook from him?

Not from him. I'm

not saying there'll satisfactory

answers, but I think Facebook will

deliver the usual general counsel or

operations directed to the select

committee. I cannot see Zuckerberg

coming over. I think he should.

Facebook is this lovely, wonderful

thing isn't it? The moment, that is

what he enables is. I would hope

they would. One thing I think you

should distinguish is between the

single domain essential part of this

which was data given either

legitimately or intentionally by an

organisation to another organisation

with or without consent, or with the

same but for a different person,

purpose. Give that to an

organisation to use it in a way

which others would want. The problem

is I think the second part is going

to swap it. Which is it was used for

Donald Trump. It will all be about

my modem. If it wasn't about to

jumping somebody else have these

newspapers would make the same

headline out of this. It is that bit

that they are all going wild about.

I think it should be overran. The

thing they should be wild about is

this organisation called Facebook

has let down the customers big-time.

There are going wild about it.

People are getting very exercised

about it on both sides. At the

Atlantic, we've got a millennial

generation and people are casual

about sharing their data and putting

every aspect of their lives on

Facebook, Twitter, on Instagram.

Because they think there is no harm

as a result of it. What seems to be

the case here is that people are

making huge amounts of money out of

it, Facebook through advertising,

there are Gateway companies that use

global research and global science

research organisation run by

haemorrhage in diversity, no

relation between him and cameras as

analytical before they came knocking

and got the data from him. 270,000

different protocols which lead to

all the friends of those 270,000

people and that is why we get 50,000

profiles being harvested and being

used possibly to target messages

towards the to do Trump supporters.

Lets us show you the FT. They are

making the point that it is not just

in Britain that there is pressure on

Facebook. It is US regulators as

well.

The US have actually asked the

same thing before a committee, and

expanding yourself. Something Henry

has just said I think, onto

something here which is this will

lead towards a generation of

millennial, understanding their data

is their own.

It's valuable.

And I

think over a period of time you

might just get people making a

decision to sell their data for

money, so they get the money not

Facebook. Or they get the money not

Twitter. Or whoever.

Do you think

people on so some idiot generally,

then a bit naive about the way they

data is used as my almost putting

your whole life on something like

Facebook.

Absolutely. I'm amazed at

just how much people are prepared to

share with others. How casually they

are prepared to accept friends,

people just soliciting a

relationship out of nowhere. I'm

quite careful about who I accept

whether it is Almaden, Facebook or

Instagram. Partly use Facebook these

days. When it comes to apps and I

think people share rose via an app,

I think they got paid if you dollars

for it. I'm very careful because it

does warn you that you are agreeing

to share audio data, give this app

permission to tap into almost

everything about you.

And remember

store cards and loyalty cards.

Harvesting data.

In a store can work

out if you buy lots of green

vegetables and you buy

apparel, it

starts to build a profile of what

you are.

I'm sure you do buy lots of

green vegetables, don't you?

Targeted ads to pop up on your

timeline. It it's a bit creepy.

Let's go also to the FT, NHS pay

cap.

Well, isn't this good news.

That at last we can say to nurses

who have deserved this for a long

time, over three years at 6.5%, that

is the headline. It is not that in a

year. It is 615% over three years.

It is about inflation, isn't it? --

6.5% over three years. Acumen

relation to that, you get 6.5. The

only downside of this will be that

some of the public sector who

possibly as not as deserving as

nurses will turn and say, me too.

He

makes it sound so trivial.

I'm not

trivial in the slightest, but with

great respect a local full for the

assisted walks into a comp offer 40

hours a week, in my view, is not as

deserving of a pay rise as a nurse

working in a any at 3am.

Might be

something you would never get over

in the morning.

That is not the

point. For once can we understand

that in the public sector not

everybody is the same.

As goes to

another story about nurses in the

telegraph. Henry, misconduct cases

against nurses may be held in

secret. What is this about?

I think

you will be very alarmed by this

development because the nursing and

midwifery Council was to replace"

commerce in an adversarial fitness

of practise processes with a system

in which most cases will be heard

going postal orders". What they're

tried to encourage is for people,

nurses in this tasty fess up if they

have made a mistake and not try to

cover up their mistakes because what

we have seen time and again

following successive inquiries is

that errors people have made and

could have been learned from, why

they are being repeated because

people are worried about losing

their jobs. Hopefully this will also

be the case for doctors, too. Even

though if you are the victim or your

child is a victim of this, you'll

want to see blood and justice.

Digby, and of the story on the front

pages of the telegraph. Quite

disturbing. David Knott is a surgeon

who has become very distinguished

for his work in Syria. He is a

hackers may have led war crimes...

By the way, you said but injustice.

This guy, that he of technology

where he sits in front of the

computer screen elsewhere. And he

actually held on an operation in a

bunker in Syria.

Incredible.

It

takes every box. It is technology in

the best way. What he is saying, we

must be careful he is alleging this,

but he is saying somebody hacked

that while he was going on, and they

therefore got the Gordon as of the

hospital in the bunker. Weeks later

it uses the words "Weeks later" they

think Russian aircraft, except

possibly Russian in the piece. Big

bunker busting bomb destroys the

hospital. They could only have copy

location on board next through this.

-- they could only have gotten the

location awkwardness through this.

Doctor using technology for all the

right reasons, might have led to

hacking through the bad side of

technology. Into the destruction of

the hospital.

It is distressing.

Particularly for him because a very

red guy who has been to Aleppo

himself and been underground and

taking the same risks as those

doctor he is helping remotely

thousands of miles away from the

safety and comfort of Britain. They

call him the Indiana Jones of

surgery. He is building hugely high

esteem.

Trying to save lives and

inadvertently maybe has led to the

loss of lives.

He is not going to be

able to do this any more. It means

people on the ground who would stand

to be held by someone Mike M, ones

who

are going to to pay the ultimate

price.

This is an interesting story

in the mirror. A clinic, and

assisted dying, suicide clinic in

the mirror called it. It could be

set up on our doorstep. If there is

a vote in favour of a law change

there.

Yes, if there is a vote. The

headlines looks like his is going to

happen in the morning. The other

side of the English Channel.

Actually is coming up for a vote in

May. While they are going to vote

for is a consultation period of 18

months. Until there is a long way to

go, and at the same time one student

and independent legislator do this.

It is not part of the United Kingdom

although they have British

passports. Interesting point in the

story, Switzerland is the only place

by the way where you can do this for

money in that way. But the mirror

also carry a pole. Is it right to

give people the choice to end their

lives on assisted dying? There also

saying who is yes and who is no, not

a problem. Matt Coles I'm sorry,

just opinions. The idea is that here

are some people who say yes it

should happen and come up by the way

what is the problem with it

happening and Guernsey. Other people

say it should not happen. Wrong word

goal, but it is the rehearsed

arguments about religion, about

ethics and morals.

Crucially about

quality of life. And also there are

people who in their lives or have to

choose to end their wives several

months before they otherwise might

have because they have got to be

well enough to get onto a plane and

go over, and it cost £10,000.

Rudy's

dad, Henry?

Increasingly toward

legislation like this where people

with safeguards built in, if they

feel they can no longer cope with

the conditions of life, that they

are suffering, then perhaps to allow

them to do that.

And I'm with you.

Of course the counter arguments are

that this could be abused.

Family

waiting there to get rid of one for

the money.

People, especially young

men, kill themselves in the most

catastrophic ways everything will

day.

I think the location is not the

point. By the location is

interesting to a newspaper is

because...

It brings it closer to

home.

Also there is a Union flag

flying over it and all the rest.

That is the interesting part of the

story. It awakens again...

You're

not sure it is actually going to

happen.

It might, but not yet. The

headlines are running as if it will

happen in the morning.

It is

important to add the privy Council

still has the power to block it in

this country. UK PLC as it were,

privy Council has the authority to

block it.

Let's look at our last the

story of the evening. This is the

very sad story about the northern

white rhino, about to face extension

because the last mail, Sudan, has

sadly died.

Sudan, the name, not the

country.

This is the inevitable pun.

The shame that he was the last mail

and he is 45 years old. Died of

natural causes, well, he was

actually euthanized. He could no

longer stand up, he was in great

pain. The only two other northern

white rhinos are female, his

daughter and granddaughter. So they

have got some DNA from him and they

are trying to keep the species alive

but the problem is they cannot use

it on his doctor or his

granddaughter because of species

diversity.

But they are going to try

to grow a rhinoceros in a test tube.

That actually is something I can't

get my mind around.

I think what

they're doing, they're going to use

it...

Matt in the telegraph has a

cartoon about the same subject. The

readers in the morning Will Stevens

on the front page, to rhinos

standing and looking at an iPad. One

says to the other "Is this a dating

app for northern white rhinos. I

haven't swiped right yet also. " we

should say you have a tie with

elephants. I do.

Species are here

before us.

And there is real danger

to them.

We can all but this is the

last item on the news. I don't

understand why, but at the end of

the day these fellows, elephants,

are close to extension and parts of

the world simply because of human

beings want in their ivory. And for

no other reason.

That right.

We

really have got to get on top of

this. By the way, rhinos are close

behind them.

Absolutely, only 35,000

left.

They are wonderful creatures.

And they are big guys,.

There the

second biggest mammal, land mammal.

Digby and Henry, thank you very much

indeed.

That's it for The Papers tonight.

Don't forget you can see the front

pages of the papers online

on the BBC News website.

It's all there for you,

seven days a week at

bbcdot.uk/papers, and if you

miss the programme any

evening you can watch it

later on BBC iPlayer.