20/10/2016 This Week

Stand-by for the most extraordinary chain of events ever

swept up into high adventure by Airplane.

All right now, everybody, get in crash positions.

Is the party heading for a crash landing?

Let's hear from First Officer, Suzanne Evans.

There's been some turbulence of late but the sky's the limit for Ukip.

I am serious, and don't call me Shirley.

Luckily, we are in safe hands with captain Andrew Rawnsley.

Fog over Heathrow, lightning over Brexit.

Is it safe to fly with Captain May and her quarrelsome cabin crew?

Charlie Brooker's keeping up appearances.

I may look happy to be here, but trust me, on the inside, I am

nosediving. Hold onto your seats,

we could be in for a turbulent ride. Knock back the Blue Nun

and inhale some oxygen. And I begin with the news that is

rocking the media world tonight. As of US election Day on November

8th, we're leaving this godforsaken late-night wasteland to which we've

been consigned by pitiless schedulers and BBC Yentobs,

and we're moving to Yes, The Donald, who will clearly

have time on his hands from November 9th, is setting up his own channel

and we will be the crown jewels. We'll take no notice

of our overnight ratings, because these will obviously be

rigged by a jealous Newsnight. We won't build a wall

to keep viewers out. But we might have to resort

to a very high fence We will, of course, test all guests

for drugs before they appear, to make sure they've

taken their contractual minimum. If only we could get

Michael to take more. And we will never, ever,

ever have a bad word to say about President Putin,

whom Mr Trump assures us It doesn't mean we're puppets but it

does mean just about every member of the Stop The War Coalition

is bound to watch us. And there could be residuals to

pocket from reruns on Russia Today. Speaking of those who'd

sell their granny just to be on an infomercial

in the middle of the night, I'm joined on the sofa by two

child migrants who refuse to give their age but,

looking at their teeth, I speak, of course,

of the Walter Mondale and Dan Quayle of late-night political chat

has-beens, Chuka #smoothoperator Umunna and

Michael #choochoo Portillo. Your moment of the week. On the

subject you have valued at two, Britain did commit to take from the

Calais Campbell vulnerable children. Many of us have the idea of eight,

ten, 12-year-olds who could be very vulnerable, in great danger and it

would be a great humanitarian act to take them. But as I understand it,

none of the children that one would designate as vulnerable have been

taken by Britain. It seems to have been a complete failure of policy.

But we have been amused, outrage, shocked to see these wrinkly people

with stubble claiming to be children, emerging from the camps.

My point is that the incompetence of the British immigration authorities

seems to know no bounds. If one is trying to think back to why we voted

Brexit, there are many reasons but one is that the public simply does

not trust written to control to understand or to manage immigration

in the least. And at a time when it is not terribly convenient to

Theresa May, that perception seems to have been reinforced. My moment

has to be the debate, the Hillary- Trump final debate, and in

particular, adding he was the one who brought it up, going to her 30

years of experience. She went into this wonderful diatribe when she

said in the 1970s when she was working in the children's defence

fund, fighting against discrimination, you were being

prosecuted for discriminating against people in your apartments.

In the 1980s when I was working to resolve problems in Arkansas

schools, you borrowed 4 million from your father to start a business. In

the 1990s when I was fighting for women's rights in Beijing, seeing

them as human rights, you were having a row with Miss universe. She

finished by saying, when I was sitting in the situation room with

the President watching over the operation to get in lard, you were

hosting an episode of The Apprentice. A wonderful knock-down

of a vile human being who wear hope never becomes President of the night

to the. You are referring to Trump, presumably. Well, it looks like you

might get your way. The debate was a disaster -- was not a disaster for

Mr Trump but did not give him the breakthrough needed.

"Once you hear the details of victory, it is hard

So said French philosopher Jean Paul Sartre.

Anyway, neither would be natural advisers for Ukip to turn to.

But when you look at what's happened to Ukip since it helped

win the referendum, you can see that Jean Paul,

A new poll suggests that support for Ukip has halved

We turned to Suzanne Evans, who's in training, though I can't

Ukip's on the ropes, says the Westminster commentariat.

We're not the sort of party that's going to throw in the towel,

and if anyone can roll with the political punches,

The first thing our new leader needs to do is get stuck into the fight

They are trying to beat us back to Brussels,

so we need to grab the gloves, roll up our sleeves

and drag the government through the EU exit door.

Next, they have to be up for a rumble in the Westminster

jungle, ready to take the battle to both the blue

Right, lads, that's enough in the ring.

Take that, you anti-British Corbynites.

Theresa, you Tories have gone soft on law and order.

Ukip will take that vacancy, thank you.

Ukip needs to get MPs in Parliament so we need a new strategy to get

I think that means ditching the right-wing Trump-style rhetoric

and taking command of the patriotic common sense centre.

I mean a strong, sensible centre that cuts the foreign aid budget,

spends more on defence, slashes energy bills,

acts tough on corporate tax avoidance and backs

a National Health Service, not an international one.

Ukip can reach a Britain of proud people who have been

Reach out to women, broaden our appeal,

and I reckon millions more votes are within our grasp.

So let's get the gloves and deliver a knockout blow to the opposition.

Thank you to the ladies and gentleman at Balham Boxing Club

Now you know what I have to put up with every week. Suzanne Evans joins

us. They had to be very patient. Boxing does not come naturally. Do

you want to be next leader of Ukip? I am considering it carefully. I

think our last leader did not perhaps consider it carefully

enough, lasting only 18 days. I am taking soundings. It sounds like a

yes to me. I have yet to reach a decision. It is a momentous task.

What would be a consideration for you wanting to be leader and a

consideration against? For leader, is the fact that I have quite a lot

of pressure to stand. I am very aware that there are people who want

me to stand. I suppose against, to be leader of any political party,

particularly Britain's third largest political party, is a massive

lifestyle change and an enormous stress on anyone. Nigel is talking

about how he wants his life back. The new leader of Ukip will be

giving up their life for some considerable period. The last leader

resigned within days, the favourite to succeed her got thumped and left

the party. Are you sure you want the job? That is what I am weighing up.

That you might get thumped? I do not think I will get thumped. Ukip does

not have the best reputation. I know there are stories. I have been out

campaigning myself where people seem to think we are a party that we are

not. And our campaigners get spat at and it is difficult. I was thinking

more abuse from your own fellow politicians. Isn't the truth that

the party is dysfunctional without Nigel Farage? I don't agree with

that, absolutely not. I think Nigel's going is a chance for a

fresh approach and some fresh blood. Not literally. I had better get that

in. You are walking into this. I don't need to say anything. I don't

agree. Any organisation... That is what it seems like, otherwise he

would not be on his third coming. He keeps on coming back. I don't think

he wants to cling on any longer. I would not be so sure. Any

organisation which has a strong central figure will have growing

pains. Business, politics, whatever it is. Does Ukip have a future? It

depends who leads it. Probably Suzanne would be the best person. I

think if it has a leader the public is unaware of, it has no chance.

Because, as Suzanne said, there are certain things to go for but they

are competing directly with the Conservatives to gain Labour voters,

mainly, I think, in the North of England. So the position on Brexit,

the position on a more equal society, on criticising companies

that do not pay tax, those are the things that Ukip wants to talk about

but also what Theresa May is talking about. Theresa May is a prominent

figure. Unless it Ukip can produce someone who is outstanding, a

household name, they do not stand a chance. Otherwise, they do stand a

chance because the government is always vulnerable to things going

wrong. For example, I just mention that immigration is more going well.

It is very well talking about it, but the government are vulnerable on

it. You cannot get away, like the Liberal Democrats, you cannot have a

Tim Farron, otherwise you had might as well or go home. I'm sure Tim

Farron enjoy that! Does Ukip have a future? In the short term, yes. In

the medium to long term, the jury is out. In some senses, who leads it is

irrelevant unless they actually establish their purpose and how they

want to position themselves. There seems to be a division. I get a

sense from Suzanne, who wants to go for building a broader support base

for Ukip, attack some of the stereotypes and characteristics that

people have seen promoted around Ukip. On the other hand, you have

those like the person who would be her principal opponent, Rahim, a

different politician of the Donald Trump tea party Republican school.

He would not be the principal opponent if Paul Nuttall was going

to run. I don't think he is going to. Is he going to run? Paul and I

are talking. A North- South ticket? I don't know if that is going to

happen. To whom do you think you are a bigger threat if you could get the

show back on the road, the Tory party or the Labour Party? With the

current state of politics in Britain, I think it is the Labour

Party. We are the Patriot party. With the Labour Party at the moment

you have the leader who will not sing the British National Party

them. You have his Shadow Foreign Secretary who is, who has supported

the IRA, over the British Army, in the past, the Shadow Chancellor. You

have the Shadow Home Secretary, Diane Abbott, once open door

immigration, and Emily Thornberry you can't stand the England flag.

Working-class people are proud of their community and their country

and Labour is letting them down. That has to be our primary audience.

Isn't that a fair analysis, in the sense that when Ukip came to

prominence it was above all a threat to the Tories, which is why Mr

Cameron called a referendum to see off the threat. They began by

picking off votes in the south, Tory votes, disillusioned Tories. But now

that we are getting Brexit and it is not an issue for Tory- inclined

voters, isn't it Labour voters, the ordinary Labour vote in the north

that could be in danger, when you have a London- dominated Labour

Party that does not appeal for the reasons Suzanne has said?

There is no denying. All parties will claim to be patriotic. Nobody

has a monopoly on that. I've been clear in terms of the Labour Party.

I'm pay rattic and we cannot afford to be seen as not so. Is this Labour

Leadership patriotic? I think this Labour Leadership is. They would

argue they are. But is it? I believe they are. I don't believe any party

has a monopoly on that. But symbols matter. Whether you sing the

National Anthem, whether you have pride in our Armed Forces, for

example, that kind of stuff matters. Is Ukip, if it could reconstitute

itself, get its show back on the road, do you agree with the

analysis, it would be a bigger threat to Labour than the North in

the Tories and the south? Yes, but I think the Tories are a very big

threat to Labour in the North as well. So it's competition between

those two parties for the same lot of voters. I do think Labour is

extraordinarily vulnerable to losing those votes, well probably to both

those parties. If you look at the polls, it would seem that the Advent

of Theresa May and the way she's seeking to position the Tories as a

fiscally almost Kensian reforically it is, we await to see whether it's

in the Autumn Statement and socially Conservative, if she's making a huge

grab for Ukip votes. Labour vote. She's trying to do that on the

Labour side as well but it seems in polling terms she's had more success

against Ukip than she has on us, maybe I'm wrong on that. Ukip has

one seat and Labour has hundreds, it's worth mentioning, so it's clear

where the target is. Suzanne, the Tories like strong female leaders,

why don't you go there? Been there, done that, got the T-shirt, it

doesn't fit any more. I'm not sure it ever did, to be honest. I'm at

home in Ukip, it suits me. We look forward to your announcement which

you almost did tonight. I don't think so. Oh, I do. The viewers will

make up their minds. Thank you. too-late-to-hold-on-to-your-gong

late. But enough of Philip Green,

I never liked his underpants anyway, because waiting in the wings is TV

satirist Charlie Brooker, who's coming on just

to be rude about us. Or maybe he wants to plug his own

dystopian television programme. And if, like Charlie,

you're paranoid about technology, snap shut the Snap Numpty,

sell your Instagranny and abandon I have absolutely no

idea what I'm on about. Now it's 100 days since Theresa May

became Prime Minister. And a short time to go

from hero to zero. But with Brexit blues,

bottled runway decisions, economic uncertainty as far

as the eye can see, a child abuse inquiry in chaos and a cabinet

bickering like every night is fright night, I think we can safely say

the May honeymoon is over. Anyway, here's Andrew Rawnsley

with his Round Up of the week. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen,

I'd like to welcome passengers aboard this Theresa May Airways

flight to destination...unknown. I've just spoken to air traffic

control and I'm sorry to report that they still won't give us

clearance to take off anywhere. There's continuing fog over

the runway to Brexit, the inquiry into historic child

abuse can't get airborne and the tower won't even give us

a decision about runway capacity Everyone now assumes

what the Prime Minister's privately calmed down for Heathrow expansion

but she won't even confirm that. The Davis Commission identified

three sites, all of which they said would be credible and deliverable,

and Government will take Not really; the final vote

in Parliament may be Oh, well, what's another 18 months

after going on for half a century Cheerleaders for Heathrow weren't

the only ones complaining. Champions of Gatwick

were also air sick. The Government decision to yet again

delay deciding where to build a new runway will cause unnecessary

uncertainty for British businesses Part of the reason for further delay

is this, Captain May's Cabinet The Prime Minister's solution

is to allow a free vote in Parliament and allow ministers

to campaign for and against. It's just like David Cameron did

with the Brexit referendum. If you are a minister,

if you sit round the Cabinet table as I've done in the past,

you have to go along with the collective decisions

or you don't have to be a minister, This fudge, this in-between world,

that's unacceptable and will do One of the reasons Mrs May

won her Prime Ministerial wings back in the summer is because she sold

herself as a cool, competent pilot of the nation,

someone you could trust So the row over the child

refugee policy is unwelcome to her and the continuing

controversies over the child abuse inquiry now on its fourth chair

are a serious embarrassment and an opportunity

for the opposition. She was the Home Secretary in April

and she was the only person So can she now finally tell us

when she personally learnt of the serious problems developing

in this inquiry and why it was There were stories around

about the inquiry and about But the Home Secretary cannot

intervene on the basis And did she do anything

about what she knew? The Government's hit its first patch

of serious turbulence over Brexit. Rival ministers are squabbling

over the flight plan, leaking accounts of their internal

debates to the media Who to send out to try

to pretend that they all Who else, but trolley

dolly, Boris Johnson. We are a nest of singing birds,

Mr Speaker, as you can imagine. Things are working extremely well,

which may come as a surprise to the honourable lady to know

and I have no doubt whatever that Boris on one of his

flights of fancy. One or more of the hard Brexiteers

have definitely been briefing him against the Chancellor,

Philip Hammond, and his friends A distinguished former

occupant of the office urged the Prime Minister to get a grip

on her quarrelsome crew. One or more Brexiteer members

of her Cabinet have been briefing the newspapers copiously on every

proposal being put forward, giving papers to the relevant Cabinet

committee by their colleagues and launching political attacks

on their Cabinet colleagues who seem Will she take firm action

to stop this process? # You can go your own way,

go your own way #. In his quiet way, the Chancellor

himself issued a coded rebuke of the hard Brexiteers

in the Cabinet fighting I think it would be far more helpful

to this debate if we were able to conduct these internal

discussions privately We need space to explore different

options, to discuss among ourselves. It's no secret that there

are different views. It's going to be a bumpy ride

on May Airways and we haven't even Andrew Rawnsley having rather too

much fun at Aces High, And from Air Traffic Control

in Central London, let's cross now to the Witney by-election,

Call Me Dave's old seat The Lib Dems came a poor third in

the general election, poor fourth sorry in the general election last

year, they were hoping for some kind of breakthrough, I guess maybe

second is the best they could hope for. Any sign of that?

They certainly are feeling extremely bullish, Andrew. I was just chatting

to one party aide watching some of the votes pile up saying that they

were feeling pretty confident about this. I don't think anyone thinks

they could seriously win this by-election but a good second

position would be important for them. Why, because they've been

campaigning on a pro- Remain ticket, if you like, they've been talking

about staying inside the single market. This was an area of the

country that voted to remain by about 54%. So they say in that way

it's a verdict on Theresa May and her approach to Brexit, her first

significant electoral test. Of course, David Cameron won the seat

with a stonking great majority last year, 25,000. Voters here have

returned a Conservative ever since the seat was created. The only time

it didn't have a Conservative MP was when the Conservative MP defected in

the late 1990s, that was Shaun Woodward. Anything that eats into

the majority would be considered by the Lib Dems to be a success and

also a problem for Labour if they knock them out of second place.

We'll see. Turnout looking low, 47%, we have had the provisional figure,

and we expect the result some time around 3 or 4 o'clock this morning.

Thank you. There is another by-election taking place today in

Huddersfield. This was caused by the tragic death, murder of Jo Cox, and

it's been uncontested by the other major parties, obviously minor

candidates standing. Our correspondent can't hear us

there. We are just going to have to leave that there. We did have some

sound problems, but it was worth having a go. Apologies to the

viewers. Chuka, both Remain and Leave made it

clear during the referendum that if we voted to leave the EU, that meant

leaving the single market. So why is this now a matter of dispute? Well,

I'm not so sure that people did say that. Let me just interrupt you. I

have David Cameron on tape and George Osborne on tape saying quite

clearly beyond per adventure, if you vote to leave the European Union,

you vote to leave the single market. Yes, but I think the difference was,

was that inextricably was linked to a debate around free movement. I've

argued for, I think what Theresa May should seek to do is to try to prove

both Leave and Remain wrong. Remain, and I was part of that campaign,

argued that you cannot have access to the single market, or Mercship,

without accepting the free movement. You can have access but not

membership? Yes, but... The politicians tend to fudge these two

things. The key thing is, you have to accept free movement as well

because there is no country that has membership of the single market and

doesn't are the free movement that goes with it. The thing that's

changed is that across the EU, they've got a massive issue with

this free movement. There's discontent around free movement.

It's going to hit the Germans, the French have general elections next

year, the Italians have it the year after. So there is a general

imperative. I follow German politics carefully, there is no way in which

Mrs Merkel is talking of interfering with free movement. I accept that.

If she doesn't move... Slightly different debate. Migration

generally, population... It's an issue.

What can be done there as a result of Brexit? Brexit has changed the

terms of debate. There is an opportunity to argue with European

counterparts, look, you need to reform. From the Leave point of

view, she could prove them wrong. It was not just about free movement. We

had Mr Cameron and George Osborne, the leaders of the Remainer campaign

categorical that if we vote to leave, we leave the single market.

Mr Cameron said at one stage that he would trigger article 50 immediately

to start the process. But the leaders of the Leave campaign, from

Nigel Farage through to Boris Johnson and others, said that if we

leave we would not be part of the jurisdiction of the European Court

of Justice, that we would end free movement in the way you have been

talking about and we would have the ability to make our own free trade

deals, which by definition been due are not in the customs union. All of

that together, or any one of them, means we leave the single market. So

I ask again, since Leave and Remain were so clear about it, why are you

now trying to fudge it? Identity any one is trying to fudge it. You are.

The Lib Dems are fighting in Witney tonight on saying we should stay in

the single market. With this negotiation we do not know what we

will be able to get. The negotiating positions of our counterparts are

not necessarily going to remain the same, because they could be a change

in government. The thing about the single market, tariff free access is

important. You look at the 10% tariff that would otherwise apply to

our cars. You don't know that. If we were trading under WTO rules. The EU

could decide that the 10% tariff is a maximum that you can do. The EU

could decide not to and we could decide not to. We don't know because

negotiations have barely started. This is why the point around

parliamentary scrutiny and consultation is important because we

have a mandate to the government to take us out of the European Union,

but terms which we have just been debating, they have no mandate

about. Isn't it the truth that we cannot, given our conditions, we

cannot be a member of the single market and it will come down to how

good a free-trade deal we can negotiate, that gives us the maximum

possible access without being a member? If we can't get that, we

will be forced back onto WTO rules, the default position. I thought the

first part of that has been made clear by Theresa May and I have said

on this programme before that I thought what she had said about the

single market, for instance at the party conference, was a statement of

the obvious. Saint is -- it is clear you cannot come back to the British

people and cannot come back to the Conservative Party. We are still

under the European Court of Justice and still cannot control

immigration. We cannot say those things so you have to leave the

single market. But those who will not accept the vote, the Financial

Times, the markets, have gone into meltdown about this. The markets

have been ignorant about the whole affair from the beginning. They

pumped up sterling thinking it would be Remain. They did not see the vote

coming and have not followed through the logic. Apparently when Theresa

May said a statement of the blinding obvious, the markets go into

meltdown. Apparently Number Ten has not ruled out altogether continued

membership of the single market. There is a reason for that but I

have not got time to explain it because I want to go to another

issue. Heathrow, is it the right decision to have another runway?

Yes, we should do it and stop dithering. She is not quite bottling

it, but it is a fudge, isn't it? This is the problem with major break

multiple parliament infrastructure decisions. You have constant dither

and delay because short-term political inconvenience gets in the

way of the long-term decision in the interests of our country. There are

a number of things that need to be taken into account. Will it deliver

the extra capacity? Yes. Can you deal with environmental concerns? I

believe so. Will it deliver growth for London and the whole of the

country? Yes, so get on with it. I think she did bottle it. The

briefing to the press was that we will have a clear-cut announcement.

I cannot understand how the day that she appointed Boris Johnson to the

Cabinet, Boris, who deserved nothing whatsoever, least of all Foreign

Secretary, why didn't she say, I am giving you something you don't

deserve and have done nothing for and I jolly well expect you to toe

the party line when I make a decision on Heathrow. I can't

understand why she didn't make that condition. Why would she appoint any

minister without making clear that they had to subscribe to Cabinet

responsibility? A number of them have two potentially resign, Justine

Greening... Fine, let them go. If they feel so strongly, by all means

go to the backbenches. After his London mayoral campaign, would it

matter if Zac Goldsmith resigned in Richmond? There is a solution to

that. He must do a David Davis, resign and fight as a Conservative.

That is fine. It causes no ructions at all.

Now some of you have had the utter cheek to accuse Michael and Chuka

of being rather too obsessed with how they look.

We've had complaints that Chuka's haute couture trousers

are rather too haute, that Michael's cerise shirts

Heinous insults indeed which is why we've decided to put appearance

Vulnerable children or opportunistic adults?

Some say looks can deceive when it comes to young refugees seeking

If we want to help children, that's great, but I'm not

in favour of allowing people in their 20s

to say, "I'm a child", and

then to come into the UK and make a mockery of our rules.

# You can't judge a book by looking at the cover.#

Melania Trump said this week that she didn't

recognise her husband when she first heard him brag about groping women.

I was surprised because that is not the man that I know.

Donald, on the other hand, reckons he can tell that

Hillary Clinton's on drugs just by looking at her.

We should trade a drug test, right, cos I don't know

Charlie Brooker has devoted column inches

and airtime to taking the Mick out of people's TV appearances.

The news has progressively seemed more and

So, should we judge a book by its cover?

You can go downhill so quickly on late-night television. Charlie

Brooker is with us. I suppose we have always judged a book by its

cover. Are we doing it more now? It is certainly easier to do it. We all

do it. I don't know that we should. We are certainly getting stronger

characters in merging, and I kind of miss a few years ago when everything

was, oh well, and everyone was complaining that politicians were

the same and everything was bland and awful. Now, everything is either

brilliant or terrible, in critical terms. And you have got interesting

characters emerging who are mildly terrifying. It is not boring. It is

interesting. Not boring on either side of the Atlantic at the moment.

As social media made judgment more democratic and that everyone can now

judge. There is an echo chamber, and it improves -- it includes

appearance and looks. I think social media is a good thing. I do think it

is structured like a video game. I am an avid gamer, and directed Mize

the mechanics of a game when I see it. And games are all about giving

you a little dopamine hit, a bit of feedback when you obey the rules,

and social media is structured in a way that, for performing your

opinions or your personality and a strident and entertaining way, you

are rewarded with the likes and followers. It activates the same

synapses in the brain as the noise when Mariella connects -- collects a

coin or something. So it encourages you to be strident and possibly

slightly facile and in authentic, I think. And I think that is something

we have to come to terms with as a species, because social media is not

going away. It is an amazing invention. I think we need to come

to terms with the fact that it is easy to be in authentic. We have

often thought the Americans were more obsessed with appearance. If

you look at their anchormen and women on TV they are immaculately

groomed and beautiful. And even their politicians, JFK, Harold

Wilson, Harold Macmillan. But if you look at this crop. Bernie Sanders

gave Hillary Clinton a run for her money. Hillary Clinton herself.

Donald Trump himself. So maybe they are not quite as obsessed as we

thought. But I think what people are craving is authenticity. Trump, for

his bizarre appearance, he feels like, people believe him. For

someone who tells so many lies, people believe he represents

something. Bernie Sanders seemed authentic as well, the boy from

Brooklyn, with the Brooklyn accent seemed authentic for what he

believed. Maybe part of Mrs Clinton's problem is that for many

she does not seem so authentic. I guess. I don't get it. It seems like

a no-brainer to me. The choice seems a no-brainer. I understand that she

is widely hated and Shirov presents the status quo to a lot of people

and they want someone who will come in and tip over the table and smash

everything up. Are we to obsessed with appearance. I'm not sure about

that. Maybe the advent of the selfie would suggest that we all are. It is

interesting what you said about the characters. The lack of characters

in some sense have put spitting image out of business. And now there

is a new version... It is not as good. Maybe they bring it back

because there are more characters. The bad thing about social media is

that it enables people to lock themselves away in an echo chamber

where you just follow and interact with people who are like you and

agree with you and that is not the best thing in some senses. Is Chuka

obsessed with his appearance? I have not studied him enough to know. Is

Michael obsessed with his appearance? No, but he things about

it. My man thinks about what he's wearing here. The echo chamber thing

is true. The algorithm feeds you things it knows that you like. You

see news stories you like and agree with and end up following people who

are nodding in agreement. But there is a lot of virtue signalling.

Liking something, following someone to signal how right and morally

correct and virtuous you are. In that sense, your thing about

authenticity is right. RUSI scruffy? At home I am just kicking back. Are

you ever scruffy? I don't want to let you down on your show. That is

an effort? Yes, this is nice... He looks like Charlie Brooker. Black

Mirror was on Channel 4, and I remember enjoying it. Now coming on

Netflix. That's right. It's a new series. We've moved to the cloud.

Someone pulls a lever, I guess. It is going to appear at about 8am. But

you can see it at any time. From eight o'clock in the morning,

everywhere in the world. But not for us because it's bring

a child migrant night at Lou Lou's. And given you have to be over 21

to get in, we expect the place to be We leave you with some

early Crimbo inspo. Hot off the Pravda press,

Vlad's sexy 2017 calendar. # Dig the hair on my chest

# Macho, macho man Dig my big thick moustache

# I've got be be a mucho, mucho, macho, macho man

# I've got to be a macho Big, broad shoulders

# Dig my muscles I've got to be a macho man.#

I'm investigating a worldwide illegal ivory trade that

continues despite a ban imposed over 25 years ago.

This scene's being played out all over Africa.

Who's doing the killing, and who's doing the buying and selling?

Can we stop the desire to own ivory from wiping out one of the