22/07/2016 Victoria Derbyshire

It's 9 o'clock, I'm Joanna Gosling, welcome to the programme.

Donald Trump has accepted the nomination to run for President

In his speech, he promised to stop immigration

from anywhere in the world where there was terrorism.

The billionaire once again said he would build a great

border wall to stop gangs, immigrants and drugs

And we will make America a great again. God bless you and good night.

I love you. Mps are warning that new measures

to combat extremism could be driving a wedge between communities

and could be making Yet more advice on how much

alcohol is safe for us, it seems every day there

is a new report telling us how much We will talk to the author

of a new study who says drinking alcohol can cause seven different

types of cancer. Welcome to the programme,

we're live until 11 this morning. It seems we get

new advice all the time. Today, yet another report says

if we want to reduce the chances of getting cancer then there is no

safe level of drinking. Do get in touch on that

and all the stories we're talking about this morning -

use the hashtag Victorialive and if you text,

you will be charged the Republican nomination

for the White House. He told the party's convention

in Cleveland, Ohio that he'd put a stop to crime and violence,

and that America couldn't afford to be so politically

correct any more. He also accused President Obama

of dividing America along Our North America Correspondent

Laura Bicker reports. Amid the building excitement

and the Republican show of bling, after a week of drama on this stage,

the chosen champion arrives. Few would have believed a year ago

that it would be the billionaire But can he unify a fractured party,

and can he appeal to voters who feel Friends, delegates and fellow

Americans, I humbly and gratefully accept your nomination

for the presidency The often pantomime politics

of Donald Trump were replaced by a man determined to show

he could be presidential. He kept to a theme of Americanism,

not globalism, controlling borders, dealing with crime and building that

wall with How Mexico. We are going to build a great border

wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence

and to stop the drugs from pouring And so, his official

campaign begins. And we will make

America great again. This has been one of the most

controversial Republican conventions in decades,

but Donald Trump courts it, After achieving what many

thought was impossible, he has now made a strong and defiant

start in his bid to be let's catch up with the rest of the

day's news. Breaking news in the last few minutes. Police have

confirmed that the body of an 11-year-old boy has been recovered

from a canal in Rotherham. That is all we have on the story at the

moment but we will bring you more information as we get it. A damning

report by MPs has accused Sports Direct of failing to treat its

employees as human beings. The Business, Innovation and Skills

committee said working practices in the company where houses and shops

were closer to a Victorian workouts than a high-street retailer. The

committee also said the company boss, Mike Ashley, should be held

accountable for what it described as appalling working conditions at the

firm. The Business, Innovation

and Skills Committee launched an investigation into Sports Direct

shops and its huge warehouse after complaints by whistleblowers,

journalists and trade unions. It discovered what it calls

"a disturbing picture of the working practices and the business

model" at Sports Direct. It includes workers who had been

paid below the national minimum wage, staff being penalised

for taking a short break to drink water and for taking time off work

when ill and for repeated ambulance calls to the warehouse,

including in one case for a woman We found the culture and practices

for employees absolutely More akin to a Victorian workhouse

than to what we would see Mike Ashley was also

told he must be held The committee said he turned a blind

eye to the conditions in order It is a damning indictment

to the working conditions at Sports Direct and MPs

and the committee warned that treating workers like

commodities rather than human beings could become

the norm across Britain, because it has proved

so successful for Mr Ashley. A spokesman for

Sports Direct said it was its policy to treat all people

with dignity and respect and it welcomed the fact that the committee

recognised Mike Ashley's commitment to address any shortcomings

in the working practices at Sports A study has suggested that there's

a strong and direct link between alcohol consumption

and seven different types The research, published

in the journal "Addiction" says there is strong

evidence of a direct, harmful effect from drinking,

although the biological reasons Alcohol is estimated to have

caused almost 6% of cancer Norfolk Police are appealing

for help in finding two people who tried to abduct a serviceman

near RAF Marham. Detectives say two men

of Middle Eastern appearance, who were armed with a knife,

tried to bundle the airman into a vehicle while he was jogging

on Wednesday. terrorism cannot be

ruled out as a motive. What is the latest that police are

saying about the investigation? Good morning. Norfolk police are still

searching for two men this morning after what they describe as an

attempted abduction of an off-duty servicemen in broad daylight on

Wednesday afternoon. The service man involved is a man in his late 20s,

and airmen, who is married and he was running his usual route. Several

thousand service men and women and support staff are based at RAF

Marham as our three Tornado bombers who have been in operation against

the so-called Islamic State. It is crucial that they find the two men

in the vehicle so they can establish a motive and only then can they rule

out the possibility that this was terror related. That is what is most

worrying for the friends and families of people who work here

because there has been an attack on duty service men in the past, three

years ago in Woolwich, when Lee Rigby lost his life after being

brutally murdered. There is a heightened security presence here

this morning. Roads remained closed and there is a very visible police

presence. People working on the base have been told to be cautious, not

to come out of the base alone wearing the uniform. I should say

that this is not the only military base this morning that is

experiencing high security measures. We are told that in Wiltshire, at

Bulford military camp, police helicopters and armed police were

scrambled overnight after reports of a sighting of three people with a

rifle. There is no reason to believe that these incidents are in any way

related. The Ministry of Defence is not saying much about the threat

level, simply that security is always paramount importance. The

investigation here in Norfolk continues this morning. Sophie,

thank you for that. In the last half hour it's been

announced that the search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight

MH370 is to be suspended, if the plane is not found

on completion of the current The Malaysian transport minister

says hopes are 'fading' of finding the plane,

which vanished in 2014, but insists it doesn't mean they're

giving up completely on the search. It follows calls from relatives

of the missing to extend an underwater search

for the airliner. Today in our tripartite meeting, and

in absence of credible new evidence, Australia, China and Malaysia have

collectively decided to suspend the search upon the completion of the

120,000 kilometre search area. I must emphasise that this does not

mean that we have given up on locating MH370.

A Parliamentary report has warned the government's counter extremism

strategy may be driving a wedge between communities by overly

The Joint committee on human rights is calling for a review

of the strategy, saying the definition of extremism is not

clear enough in a legal sense, and the government should

reconsider its Prevent strategy - which is a key part

There's been a dramatic increase in the number of people using mobile

The latest figures show the technology is more popular

than high street branches, home phones and computers combined.

Finance apps are being used 11 million times a day,

up more than 50% in a year, according

The first person in the UK to have a double hand transplant

says he feels "whole again", and is looking forward to holding

a bottle of beer and wearing shirts with real buttons.

Chris King lost both his hands, except the thumbs, three years ago,

in an accident at work involving a metal pressing machine.

He received two new hands from a donor and says he already has

It feels quite normal, as it normally would do.

There is feeling there, more feeling than I thought

That's a summary of the latest BBC News - more at 9.30.

Lots of you getting in touch on the two stories we are covering today,

Donald Trump formally accepting the nomination to stand as president of

the United States. Sarah Louise said, stop scoffing at Trump,

democracy and unique culturalism unifies country -- countries.

Extremism does not drive a wedge and communities. Muslim communities do

when they don't integrate with society. We will be talking about

extremism and how to tackle the threat with various guests,

including Harriet Harman a little later, so do get in touch with us on

that if you want to be part of the conversation and don't forget the

hash tag. Remember, if you are text and you

I've had a bit of a treat today as we've had some

special visitors here to the BBC Sport Centre,

in fact, just outside, where I got to play a bit of cricket

who joined me to discuss the start of a new Twenty20 tournament,

And a year to go until England hosts the Women's World Cup, take a look.

Hello, Heather. Good bowling. I hope the technique was OK. Thanks for

joining us. The England captain, as well. We will talk about the 16 day

tournament involving some of the best players in women's cricket,

8020 tournament. How much will it help grow the game in England?

Massively exciting to see it all come together and to be here for the

launch is really exciting. The standard of competition will be

really good and hopefully people will and supporters and the young

girls will see that professional cricket is a career path and they

will enjoy watching us and carry on playing. Hopefully the super league

will go well and we will come away with the trophy. The competition

includes some of the world's best players. How much do you think the

inclusion of the overseas talons will add to the popularity of the

tournament? -- talents. Massively. They really are the world's best

players, some of them, so as England players it's great to play against

them and the younger girls coming through, to play against the world's

best and test their skills and be put under pressure, that will bode

well and create a really high standard of competition and we will

see some really good games. Of course, the increased media

popularity and sponsorship will help feed into the professional game.

that an important aspect? I think so. With the start of the Super

League and the other tournaments like the Big Bash I think it's a

really exciting time to be involved in women's cricket. It's going in a

good direction and hopefully at the Super League goes well it will

attract people to come and watch the game and the things that will come

with that. Really exciting times. You, of course, the England captain.

How much do you think your success over the recent years has helped

bring the tournament to England? It was property something needed in

terms of bridging the gap between England and the domestic game. We

went professional couple of years ago in the last thing people wanted

was to see that get widened. The start of the Super League will

bridge the gap and I think it will bode well for the England team to

have the girls playing against the world's best. And obviously the

younger girls coming through to play against them, like Suzie Bates and

Rachel Priest. Some fantastic skills on show this

morning here in Salford, of the Kia Super League

across BBC Radio and of course coverage of the Second Men's Test

between England and Pakistan starts at 10.25 on the BBC Sport Website

and Radio 5live. I'll be back with more sport

at around half past. Well, Donald Trump has

made his big acceptance speech at the Republican Party's convention

in Cleveland Ohio. He spoke for more than an hour

and his supporters in the hall were euphoric -

but can the billionaire political outsider actually go on to win

the White House in November? Repeating his central

message yet again to "make America great again",

much of the speech ranged over We are going to build a great border

wall to stop illegal immigration, to stop the gangs and the violence and

to stop the drugs from pouring into our communities.

We must work with all of our allies who share our goal of destroying

Isis and stamping out Islamic terrorism and doing it now, doing it

quickly. We are going to win, we are going to win fast.

In Libya, our consulate the symbol of American prestige around the

globe, was down in flames. America is far less safe, and the world is

far less stable than when Obama made the decision to put Hillary Clinton

in charge of America's foreign policy.

I have a message to every last person threatening the peace on our

streets and the safety of our police. When I take the oath of

office next year, I will restore law and order our country. The most

important difference between our plan and that of our opponent is

that our plan will put America first!

USA! USA! To all Americans tonight, in all of our cities and in all of

our towns, I make this promise. We will make America stronger again. We

will make America proud again. We will make America safe again. And we

will make America great again. God bless you, and good night. I love

you. I spoke to three Republicans a little earlier, Clarence Mingo,

Hossein Khoram and Alex Chalgren. We started by asking

Alex Chalgren, a Trump supporter, whether he was impressed

by what he heard during Trump's I like that he was able to unify

both the ultra conservative and the more liberal leaning Republicans.

Especially when he said he would try to strengthen our borders,

strengthen our military. He even touched on a more progressive idea,

to protect the LGBT community. When you say you liked the fact that he

is effectively unifying the party, many see him as a divisive

candidate. I don't see him as that. Some of his ideas are divisive, he

is an outsider. But in the long term, his ideas will bring this

country together to strengthen us. Clarence, you don't like him. You

have been a Republican for 25 years but you will vote Democrat rather

than vote for Donald Trump. Why? Well, I certainly will not be voting

for Hillary Clinton, but for the first time in my life, I am unable

to support the Republican nominee for president. I say this respect,

but Donald Trump has demonstrated almost one full-year's worth of

character issues. I listened to him heavily tonight. I have listened to

the tone at the convention, and the big takeaway is a lot of negative

rhetoric. I don't believe he represents the Republican party. He

is not a good reflection of what it means to be a Republican. We have

great policies that will help the American people, and Donald Trump

has yet to be specific in terms of what those policies are and how they

will be implemented if he is the president. Mr Trump has also managed

to offend nearly every constituency in America. He mocked a disabled

person. We know he showed a lack of respect for Senator John McCain, a

war hero. We know he has made many negative comments about Hispanics

and Muslims who are in America. So I am very challenged by Mr Trump and

find myself being unable to support him, primarily because of character

issues. Hossein Khoram, what do you think of what you heard from Donald

Trump? I think Donald Trump delivered a fascinating speech while

accepting the Republican nomination for the presidency. His speech was a

comprehensive listing of his future policies on important matters from

the economy to national and global security, while placing himself as a

law and order candidate. What was important in my view was the human

factor, the fact that he was able to bring his family so close to him. He

tried to make the same kind of connection to his country that he

would care for the country and make it great again like he does for

family. I thought it was a fascinating speech, and I think we

will have the key to the White House almost in our grasp. What do you

think of the anti-Muslim rhetoric he has come out with, as you are

Muslim? Let's be honest about this. There have been plenty of terror

attacks in my country and yours. There is something wrong with the

way Islam is practised in both our countries. He is the first candidate

who had the guts to say it the way it is. All the previous candidates

in my country and yours have been talking about Islam being a religion

of peace and therefore, we shouldn't talk about the acts of the few. We

are not here to judge the religion, we are judging the people who

practise it and commit these acts of violence. Unless we start accepting

the challenges we face from this group of people, we will not be able

to have a solution. But by putting the message forward in the way he

puts it, though, does it make Americans safer or less safe? As

long as you pursue a solution, it will make us safer in the medium and

long run. We have to face the challenge should. We have to see why

we have these challenges from this group of radicals. In England and

here, there are those who promote sharia law. These are issues we need

to deal with, and we need to empower the Muslim Americans and Muslim

British citizens who are secular, who oppose these groups, and have

them challenge these radicals. I don't know about your country, but

in my country, the extremists are very small people. The problem is,

the majority are silent and they don't confront them because they

have not been asked to. Donald Trump is the person inspiring them.

Clarence, do you think Donald Trump's rhetoric would make America

safer or less safe? I have a two part response to that. Number one, I

think the words of the president of the United States or a potential

president matter. We have nations around the world watching to see how

both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump respond to what is happening

in the world. And Donald Trump's rhetoric has agitated and angered

and invoked fear amongst our allies. We have watched for nearly one

full-year the leading candidates in the Republican party failed to

articulate himself in a way the American people find acceptable. And

certainly, our allies abroad, who depend on the word of the president

of the United States to ensure that the United States is what it should

be abroad and that we do the things we can to keep the world safe and to

protect our allies, Donald Trump has not articulated what his plans are

interims of foreign policy. I have yet to hear a substantive approach

to foreign policy from Mr Trump. We know today that the world is in a

state of chaos. Alex, sorry to cut across you, but I want to put to

Alex what Arnold Trump has said on immigration and how to tackle

terrace. He said he would suspend immigration from nations compromised

by terrorism. Is that a clear policy and is it something you like? That

is definitely a clear policy and I love that. How do you define it, is

it just a way of him saying what he said before, which was to stop

Muslims coming into the United States? No. In our laws, he has the

authority to ban any immigration from countries that are deemed

threatening to our citizens. So I think that is perfect. What do you

think, Clarence? I think there are individuals in the State Department

who have a lot of experience. I think there are past secretaries of

state who would immediately tell you that that approach to dealing with

immigration is simply not practical. There would be a ripple effect

across the world if Donald Trump Wittig and that public policy, which

is not practical or reasonable -- if Donald Trump were to implement that

policy. It would be if the stored mistake of sizeable proportions. The

United States would lose respect from nations across the world who

count on us to be a free and peace-loving people. I am not

suggesting which would go soft on terrorism and immigration. There is

a way to deal with that. I have yet to hear Donald Trump articulate what

that way is, but the approach that calls for banning certain countries

from allowing their publishers to enter the United States is not

appropriate. It doesn't reflect freedom or democracy. Clarence, you

have said you will not vote for Donald Trump. Does that mean you

will not vote in the election at all, and have you come across many

others who feel the way you do? Yeah, there is a group of

Republicans who are struck by our conscience. We look at Donald Trump,

we appreciate the fact that he won the primary, but our hearts and

minds and conscience will not allow us to support a candidate who has

yet to demonstrate the practical ability to lead the nation and the

free world. We cannot endorse a candidate, who for seven long

months, behaved through the pram receives an almost like a

16-year-old. I don't know that there has been another time in American

politics we have watched a leading candidates believe in -- behave in a

way that was juvenile, less than responsible and often simply

inappropriate. So despite being a lifelong Republican, my conscience

does not allow me to support this candidate. But I will remain

faithful to the party and I will work hard for other Republicans to

make sure that Republicans win. But I cannot support the leading

candidate. Hossein Khoram, has there been a more divisive figure at this

level in US politics amongst their own party before? If you are asking

whether somebody like Donald Trump has been nominated before? Well, we

are hearing from Clarence and other Republicans say they cannot get

behind the official public candidate in this election. Well, if you look

at the videos taken when Donald Trump accepted the nomination, we

had about 2600 delegates. Everything was on fire. They were excited and

jubilant. The whole arena was full of life. The people who were there

were excited about the comp and the path forward -- about Donald Trump.

The other Republicans are the old guard of the Republican party, and

they are not happy with this. Jeb Bush and Bromley and these folks --

Mitt Romney. But this is the vote of the people. Arnold, has struck a

nerve. He has created a movement for the Americans who are concerned

about the future and security. They don't want terrorists to move into

the neighbourhood and blow themselves up and kill the family

and their children. So when Donald Trump is talking about a temporary

ban on Muslims whose countries have been compromised terrorism, he is

talking about Syria. In Syria, there are no ID cards. They will just go

to Turkey, and they can give a name, register under any name. They can be

taken as refugees to our country. Isis and archived and Daesh have

stated repeatedly that they are embedding their own people to send

to our nations to target us. Well, do you think it would be a betrayal

of our obligations to our citizens if we accept these people on a

temporary or permanent basis to our country, who kill our citizens? We

need to get this figured out. This has nothing to do with religion and

everything to do with preserving the security of citizens in our country.

Ian says, Donald Trump is elected, America will be down the drain.

Trump the president, God help America, it will only get worse.

Lawrence on Twitter says Donald Trump deserves a chance to put the

USA right. And Enigma on twitter says that when politicians start

talking about Laura in order not justice it's time to stop worrying.

Rubicon twitter says Trump will not get in but we should listen to the

cause of the anger he is talking about. More news on the 11-year-old

boy whose body has been found in Rotherham Canal. We have a little

bit more detail to bring you on that. Specialist teams have

recovered a body from Rotherham Canal and had been searching the

canal after police received a report at around 7pm last night the boy had

been seen entering the canal, but had disappeared soon after. South

Yorkshire Fire and rescue and the Ambulance Service joined along with

other specialist divers and we are hearing that those specialist teams

have recovered the body of an 11-year-old boy, found that around

11pm last night. His family has been informed and they are being

supported by officers. The circumstances are under

investigation. Still to come: A warning that

new measures to combat extremism could drive a wedge

between communities and make We will be speaking to Harriet

Harman, chairman of the joint committee on human rights which

produced the report into the counter extremism strategy and Peter Taylor

who has been reporting on terrorism for the BBC in 40 years. Why shad

Ali, a Four years since the London 2012

Olympics, athletes head back to East London for

the Anniversary Games. We'll be hearing from 2012 games

makers and ticket holders Here's Annita in the BBC Newsroom

with a summary of todays news. Donald Trump has formally accepted

the Republican nomination for the US presidency,

promising to restore The property tycoon called

for an immediate suspension of immigration from countries

he said had been compromised by terrorism, and claimed that

President Obama had been responsible A damning report by MPs has accused

Sports Direct of failing to treat its employees

as human beings. The Business Innovation

and Skills Committee said working practices in the company's warehouse

and shops were closer "to a Victorian workhouse

than a High Street retailer". The Committee also said

the company's boss, Mike Ashley, should be held accountable

for what it described as appalling A study has suggested that there's

a strong and direct link between alcohol consumption

and seven different types of cancer. The research, published

in the journal "Addiction" says there is strong evidence

of a direct, harmful effect from drinking,

although the biological reasons Alcohol is estimated to have

caused almost 6% of cancer It's been announced that the search

for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 is to be suspended,

if the plane is not found The Malaysian transport minister

says hopes are 'fading' of finding the plane,

which vanished in 2014, but insists it doesn't mean they're

giving up completely on the search. It follows calls from relatives

of the missing to extend an underwater search

for the airliner. That's a summary of

the latest BBC News. The main headlines in sport today,

James Anderson is back for England as for the second

Test against Pakistan. They're 1-0 down, so England need

to win at Old Trafford to have any chance of taking

the four-match series. Usain Bolt says he's fully fit

for the 200 metres at the London Bolt was struggling last month

with a hamstring problem. He also believes the Olympic ban

for the Russian athletics team sends Britain's Chris Froome won the stage

18 time trial to edge closer to his third Tour de France

title in four years. He now leads by three minutes

and 52 seconds. Froome has two more Alpine stages

to negotiate plus the final Mercedes driver Nico Rosberg has

signed a new deal with the team It means the German

will continue to partner World Champion Lewis Hamilton

until the end of the 2018 season. And I'll be back just after 10

to look ahead to the second Test between England and Pakistan

at Old Trafford. The Joint Committee on Human Rights

is calling for the government to review its counter extremism

strategy because it says it risks The committee found that ministers'

proposals were based on an assumption that there

was an "escalator" of radicalisation which began with religious

conservatism and ended with support Extremism could therefore be tackled

by imposing restrictions The committee also said

the definition of extremism was not clear enough in a legal sense,

and said the government should review its Prevent strategy,

a key part of the government's Harriet Harman MP is Chair

of the Joint Committee on Human Rights which produced this

report into the Government's Peter Taylor has been reporting

on terrorism for the BBC and Panoram for 40 years and has written several

books on terrorism Rashad Ali is a counter-terrorism

practitioner and trainer and senior fellow at the Institute for

Strategic Dialogue. just launched a schools project

called "Extreme Dialogue" which aims to reduce the appeal

of extremism among young people. Dilly Hussain is the Deputy Editor

of 5Pillars UK, a British He disagrees with

the Prevent Strategy. Harriet Harman, first of all, you

say the government strategy risks making the situation worse. Why? The

most precious asset in tackling terrorism, and it is the job of the

government to make a save, is the most precious relationship between

Muslim authorities and local authorities. If you go heavy-handed

and criminalise people for their religious views you risk actually

making a worse relationship between police and Muslim communities,

alienating people and leading to the radicalisation you are trying to

stop in the first place. The government appear to have made lots

of announcements about counter extremism but they don't how they

will do it. As you said in the introduction, just because somebody

has conservative religious views, and I disagree with them, but I

don't think banning them is the way to deal with them and it's not

justified unless there is a clear connection between the views and

criminal activities. So you are saying it's wrong from start to

finish, the Prevent strategy is completely wrong? I think that is

something slightly different because its duties, where is counter

extremism is about the orders, banning orders, disruption orders

and closure orders. These orders will be put down on individuals and

organisations who are regarded as extremist, whatever that means, and

if they breach the orders there will be a criminal offence committed.

They say if you are intolerant and if I am intolerant of religions that

regard homosexuality as evil, that doesn't make me an extremist, so

they have real problems. You are saying it's not the right way to

look at it, it's the psychological make-up of somebody, where they come

from, how they see foreign policy. Are you saying those are strong

indicators than religious views? The latest iteration of the Prevent

strategy has been going for a year. Look at the evidence that those

people who think it's working or not working and then learn from that

before you take a whole load of Draconian powers which could

alienate the communities you need to work with. Is it possible to find

out where it is working and not working? I think it is difficult and

not black-and-white. Where Prevent has been successful, and it's a

broad strategy. Actually explain in a nutshell, the people watching,

what exactly Prevent is? It is a range of strategies that goes from

schools to universities and colleges through to communities that is

designed to dissuade in particular young Muslims who are deemed to be

vulnerable to radicalisation from going down that path. Where it has

been quite successful is in deterring young Muslims from going

to join Isis. I'm informed about the Muslim community about people who

are vulnerable, concerned about what their children are going to do, and

that is coming through in a way it was in before. So Prevent is

designed, as it says, to prevent radicalisation. One of my concerns

about what they call the escalator process, whereby there is a link

between religious conservatism and jihad is is established, there is no

doubt that the bedrock of so-called Islamic State's ideology is based on

religious conservatism, but it would be wrong and erroneous to associate

religious conservatism with jihadism. I have dealt with

fundamentalists who are deeply opposed to jihadism, who are

actually involved in part of Prevent which is called the channel, and

they are dissuading young Muslims from going down that route. The

danger is one of oversimplification. Is it being oversimplified? The

problem is they're trying to tackle a complicated issue. If you look at

the counter extremism strategy it seems to veer into territories which

are difficult to understand. It has a section on religious heresy and

I'm sure most people would find it odd that an ostensibly secular

government is starting to discuss where religious heresy is and what

role it plays in the process of radicalisation. What do you think

comes into play when somebody is radicalised? What are the factors?

This is one thing the Prevent strategy has made clear, the

escalator approach or this conveyor belt, actually. When it comes down

to the individual cases there are lots of different factors that are

affecting it. Individuals may well be radicalised because, let's be

honest, if you are a family member has been killed in a drone strike in

the subcontinent you don't need an ideology to radicalise you. On the

other hand, if some eyes considering travelling to the UK over to Syria

and Iraq to join Islamic State, or what they believe it to be, then

there is an ideological element at play. There are various different

factors for different people and what is important is being able to

have a new 1's perspective. Harriet and the other MPs are saying the

government strategy could be making it worse. Do you think that is the

case? Absolutely. There seems to be an issue of definition, consensus

and implementation, and essentially what that is is the importance of

having an evidence -based approach to the matter. The Prevent strategy

itself is widely opposed in the Muslim community, and this is a

matter which is now affecting communities beyond the Muslim

community. We have had academics and senior police officers who have

criticised the Prevent strategy and this proposed counter extremism

strategy is seriously Draconian in nature and the reason why nothing

has come out from the government is because barristers and lawyers are

running around like headless chickens to define what extremism

means. In the absence of the legal definition all of the measures will

fall flat on their face. So where does that send up, Harriet? One

point you make reminds me about the point of universities. They have a

duty by law to promote intellectual freedom and free speech, but they

also have a legal duty to stop people promulgating radical views.

The point is they are being given to on predicting responsibilities. The

government so far -- two contradicting responsibilities. The

government have made speeches and said they would have a counter

extremism bill but they haven't come up with it. Do you think it is

achievable? If they review the Prevent strategy, forensically and

independently, and listen to all the people involved as to what works and

doesn't work it might be that ending up refining and improving the

prevent strategy is better than coming in with a whole load of

orders, criminalising people, which will create outrage. If you

criminalise conservative views in the conservative -- Islamic

community, but if the same views are held by Orthodox Jews or evangelical

Christians are not criminalised you have people saying this is

completely unjustified. I'm a religious conservative but I'm

nothing to do with violence, as Peter said. Amber Rudd, the new Home

Secretary, has something big in her in tray left by Theresa May needs to

it out. I am not sure it's true to say that

the majority of the Muslim community are opposed to the Prevent strategy.

Certainly, there is opposition to it. Well, let's let Dilley and

Rashad Ali big. A couple of things. First, we are looking at strategy

across the board in dealing with the far right and what used to be

described as archived and is now Islamist extremist inspired

terrorism. In the Midlands and the south of Wales, in the majority of

cases we deal with our far right extremists. That is something

important to understand. Regarding the issue of how we deal with this,

this is where the counter extremism strategy has sections we would

broadly agree with. For example, there is a need for enhancing social

cohesion and stopping fringe element politics. We were just looking at

what is happening in the US with the likes of Trump, which is a fringe

element becoming mainstream and having a lot of influence. There are

problems with that across society which are huge. French politics do

divide us. -- fringe politics. It is one thing for extremists to want to

kill homosexuals. Tim Farron is an example of someone who has views

regarding homosexuality and was questioned about it. That is a

personal religious conviction, that is fine. But there is something in

between. You have an individual who says, I believe the government

should try homosexuals and execute them. That is not illegal. It is not

an incitement to terrace, but it is very extreme, just as we would say

somebody saying all Muslims should be banned from the UK or the US is

very extreme. It is disharmony as for our society and creates trouble.

A quick final word from Rashad Ali? It is important to distinguish

between the Prevent strategy and the success stories of normal policing.

That is the grey area. We tend to conflate good work done by the

police force in preventing terrorist acts with that of Prevent. To

respond to a point that Peter made, if you look at the recent opposition

to Prevent from the likes of Waltham Forest Council of mosques, from the

independent mosque initiative, the mosques Council, which represents

thousands of Muslims, has voiced its concern about the Prevent strategy,

which they feel is analysing mainstream Islamic beliefs and

activists. We are almost out of time. The elephant in the room with

the sidelining of foreign policy grievances, which is not a causative

issue, but it is a big point. Thank you all very much for coming in.

The Home Office told us in a statement that they will

carefully consider today's report and respond in due course.

Coming up: More warnings that alcohol causes cancer.

We'll be talking to the author of a new study who says there really

It's been four years since we watched David Beckham

cruise up the River Thames and the Queen jump out

of a helicopter in the opening ceremony of the London Olympics.

And to mark the occasion, the fourthth annual Anniversary Games

get under way tonight at the Olympic Stadium.

We'll talk more about the games in a moment, but first let's remind

ourselves of some of the highlights of the 2012 Olympics.

More than seven years after London was

announced as the Olympic venue, the eyes of the world will once again

# You better fire off your gun and stand forever.

# He said go dry your eyes and live your life...

Thousands of competitors are here to take part in

Billions of people around the globe are preparing to tune in to see

In the next two weeks, we will show all that has made

London one of the greatest cities in the world.

# We are the heroes of our time.

For the athletes gathered here, I say that to you is given something

precious and irreplaceable, to run faster, to jump higher,

# We are the heroes of our time. # Heroes, heroes.

# We are dancing with the demons in our minds.

# Don't say a word, don't make a sound.

# Wake up and turn this world around, an inspiration.

# When you were lost, I will follow right behind as your salvation.

It's a golden triumph for Andy Murray.

There is a truth in sport, a purity, a drama,

This is what I dreamt of for my entire life.

In every Olympic sport, there is all that matters in life.

and our grandchildren that when our time came, we did it right.

Here now are Tony Coalville, who is after the games tonight with a group

of friends. He now lives in the old athletes' village. Ali Speechly is

heading there over the weekend and was also a games make at the London

Olympics, and Jonathan love it has some unique memories of the games.

He was a volunteer in the Olympic opening ceremony and is partly

dressed up in the costume. Ali, you were a games maker. Great memories

there of the 2012 games. If the event this week about nostalgia for

you, or you will you be hoping some of the magic is recreated?

Definitely. I am going to the Anniversary Games tomorrow. It will

be amazing to be back at the stadium. I worked in the basketball

arena during the Paralympic Games, which was a temporary arena. But I

went to the main stadium when I went for the dress rehearsal of the

opening ceremony. And I have not been back to the main stadium since,

so it will be good to go back. Jonathan, you are wearing some of

the costume you walk. I don't wear this every day, I haven't worn it

every day for the last four years! But it is obviously special to you

and an amazing opportunity you had. It was a fantastic opportunity. None

of us realised at the time how good it was going to be. There was a lot

of bad press about how this was going to be an embarrassment and a

national humiliation. Even some of my friends said, why are you doing

this? But it turned out to be one of the most life affirming experiences

I have ever had. Tony, you live in the place that housed the athletes.

Did you go there because it had that history? Yes, it is a huge

attraction to have an Olympic venue -- to have Olympic venues on your

doorstep. The vibe around the park in the last few months, we have had

Tom Daley casually wandering through on his way to diving training. We

have seen Usain Bolt practise this morning before this evening. You

can't get that anywhere else in London. And you are off to watch

tonight? We are. We are taking a big friends who have never watched a

track and field event before, for their last chance to see Usain Bolt

before he probably retires after these Olympics. Ali, what are you

going to sit? As I said, I am looking forward to just being back

in the stadium. I love the long jump and triple jumps, so I am looking

forward to those. Jonathan, will you get to go? I don't think so. I would

love to go back. The only time I have been was the opening ceremony,

but it would be a thrill to be there again. You reminded us of the

build-up and how there was a lot of negative talk around the games. When

everybody remembers it now, it was a golden moment. That's right. It gave

you a good collective mentality of us against the world, because

everybody was saying this was going to be a disaster. So you felt very

loyal towards your fellow competitors, and people like Danny

Boyle inspired that loyalty. He wanted it to work for him and for

your fellow volunteers and for yourself. It was a great communal

event. So much blood was said about the games makers, Ali. -- so much

good was said. Do you still feel the pride? Definitely. I have still got

my games make a uniform stored away somewhere. Even in and around

London, you obviously had to be in your uniform on your way to and from

your shift, so travelling on the tube, people would stop you and ask

you what you were doing as part of the games. And that in itself is

unique in London, because usually nobody talks to each other on the

tube! Good to have you all joining us with your reminiscences.

The Anniversary Games are kicking off tonight. Coming up, we will hear

from the man who has had the UK's first double hand transplant. You

can use the sums now? Yes, I can. -- use the funds.

Now, let's show you some pictures just released by Kensington Palace

of Prince George. It is his third birthday. The pictures have been

taken by a photographer at the family home in Norfolk to mark the

third birthday. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge said in a statement

that they are hoping people will enjoy seeing the photographs and

they have thanked everyone for all the lovely messages they have

received as Prince George celebrates his third birthday.

There you go, with the family dog. And a couple more.

Let's catch up with the weather. We have a bit of everything thrown into

the weather forecast today. We have had some mist and fog patches around

first thing, some sunshine on offer as we had through the day, but we

are also set to see heavy showers and thunderstorms later. Our weather

watchers have been capturing the scene. There was quite a bit of folk

earlier in the day, but that is now lifting. -- quite a bit of fog. In

Jersey, you can see the sunshine and a bit of fair weather cloud turning

things hazy but I couldn't resist showing you this scene from

Aberdeenshire. As we head through the day, we will keep sunshine in

central and eastern parts of the country, but the cloud is increasing

and that cloud will bring with it heavy downpours across parts of

central and eastern England. That is where we could see scattered heavy

showers and thunderstorms. Further north, and improving story for

Northern Ireland and the west of Scotland. That car breaks to leave

sunshine the afternoon. A few spots of rain in the north-east of

England. Further south, we could see those heavy showers and

thunderstorms. Quite a lot of dry weather for Wales and the south-west

of England, but we can't rule out some sharp showers. A dry spell of

weather through Oxfordshire, but for eastern England, we will continue to

have heavy downpours. They will fade away through the evening hours,

becoming dry for most places overnight. Another mild and muggy

night, with temperatures holding up in the high teens again. But

slightly more comfortable compared to recent nights. Tomorrow, we keep

the sunshine across much of England and Wales. Dry and bright here.

Further north-west, the cloud will bring outbreaks of rain at times for

Northern Ireland and Scotland. It will feel fresher towards the

north-west. Towards the south-east, we could once again see 28 or 29

Celsius. Through Sunday, we will see a weather front moving in from the

Atlantic. That is said to affect northern and western parts of the

country. There will be rain at times across Northern Ireland, Scotland,

more than England and parts of Wales. It will be warm on a sunny

and humid in the south-east. High teens to low 20s further north. Next

week, temperatures return to being more typical for the time of year,

not as hot as a has-been. There will be a mix of sunshine and scattered

showers, mostly towards the north and west.

Welcome to the programme if you've just joined us.

Donald Trump, has formally accepted the Republican nomination

In an hour-long speech he promised put a stop to crime and violence,

and said that America couldn't afford to be

We are going to build a great border wall to stop illegal immigration. To

stop the gangs and the violence, and to stop the drugs.

We've been hearing from Republicans in America on what they made

I liked that he was able to unify the ultra conservatives and the more

liberal leaning Republicans and unify the party again. We have great

policies and agendas that I think will help the American people and

Donald Trump has yet to be specific in terms of what the policies are

and how they will be implemented if he is the President of the United

States. I think it was a fascinating speech, and with this speech, we

will have the key to the White House almost in our grasp.

We will talk to the author of a new study who says drinking

alcohol can cause seven different types of cancer.

MPs are warning that new measures to combat extremism could be driving

a wedge between communities and could be making

We will hear Muslim views on government policy.

Here's Annita in the BBC Newsroom with a summary of today's news.

Philip Hammond says he might have to change the fiscal policy Britain. It

suggests economic activity has fallen to its lowest level since

2009. He said he would review the economic situation in coming months.

Of course we understand the decision, particularly the

unexpected nature of the decision on June the 23rd has caused some

turbulence in markets and we have the tools necessary to respond to

that. the Republican nomination

for the White House. He told the party's convention

in Cleveland, Ohio that he'd put He also accused President Obama

of dividing America along Our North America Correspondent

Laura Bicker reports. If you watch the full 75 minutes of

the speech from Donald Trump is a picture of America in chaos and

crisis. It was full of remarks about terrorism, crime and also illegal

immigrants. The picture he is trying to paint is one of an America that

he and only he can fix. He is saying that politicians have had their turn

and it is time for an outside candidate, and he says he is the one

that can do it, because he has built an empire. He also talked about

renegotiating trade deals and said it was about Americanism, not

globalism. What he is trying to do is say, look, it will be all about

America first, not about America's place in the world. He is trying to

put neighbourhoods, states and people versed in the country, and I

think that will have played well to middle America. It certainly played

well in the hall, but it had to. This has been one of the most

controversial Republican conventions in decades. First we had the

controversy over the millennia trump speech, plagiarise, a rip-off of a

Michelle Obama speech in 2008 -- Mullaney trump. There were many

shouts of lock her up over Hillary Clinton. The Secret Service are also

looking into one of Donald Trump's aides who is said to have put

forward the notion that she should be shot for treason. That is very

dark rhetoric indeed. Donald Trump has managed to stay away from it.

The normal pantomime politics we associate with Donald Trump during

his rallies was missing tonight, and instead he stuck to the script. And

when those shouts of lock her up came from the crowd, he stepped back

and said, no, let's defeat her in November. They are trying to paint

this as a choice between a candidate of change, Donald Trump or the

status quo of Hillary Clinton. Again, it played very well to the

hall tonight. The key will be is how it is played out in living rooms

across America. A damning report by MPs has accused

Sports Direct of failing to treat its employees

as human beings. The Business Innovation

and Skills Committee said working practices in the company's warehouse

and shops were closer "to a Victorian workhouse

than a High Street retailer". The Committee also said

the company's boss, Mike Ashley, should be held accountable

for what it described as appalling Police have confirmed the body

of an 11-year-old boy has been South Yorkshire officers say

the boy was seen entering the water in the Parkgate area

at around 7pm last night, Specialist emergency services teams,

including crews recovered the boy's His family has been informed

and are being supported by officers. An investigation into

what happened is underway. In the last half hour it's been

announced that the search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight

MH370 is to be suspended, if the plane is not found

on completion of the current search. The Malaysian transport minister

says hopes are 'fading' of finding the plane,

which vanished in 2014, but insists it doesn't mean they're

giving up completely on the search. It follows calls from relatives

of the missing to extend an underwater search

for the airliner. A study has suggested that there's

a strong and direct link between alcohol consumption

and seven different types of cancer. The research, published

in the journal "Addiction" says there is strong evidence

of a direct, harmful effect from drinking,

although the biological reasons Alcohol is estimated to have

caused almost 6% of cancer New pictures have been released

of Prince George to mark his third They were taken by

photographer Matt Porteous The Duke and Duchess said

in a statement that they hope people will enjoy seeing them and thanked

everyone for all the lovely messages they have received as Prince George

celebrates his third birthday. That's a summary of the latest news.

We will have a look at new findings about how much alcohol we should not

be drinking with a report just out saying there is no safe limit and

that alcohol causes up to seven types of cancer. You have also got

in touch about Donald Trump. Sylvia says I am sick of all the negativity

about him, he's the only one to say it as it is. No wonder Brexit was

victorious, and hopefully trump will be too. On twitter, Donald Trump as

leader of the free world fills me with dread. I hope and pray the

American people do not elect him. Do get in touch with everything we are

talking about. If you text, you will be charge of the standard network

rate. Let's catch up with the sport. England's cricketers begin

the Second Test against Pakistan at Old Trafford later this morning -

still smarting from their defeat James Anderson and Ben Stokes return

for England who know it's case of must do better

from their defeat at Lord's. Patrick Gearey is at

the ground for us. Patrick, there are so many things

to discuss going into this match. It's going to be a close contest. A

beautiful morning at Old Trafford here. Like the first episode in a

drama series, the first test has hooked people in. It has the

intrigue and the plot twist of England losing to this resurgent,

spirited Pakistan side. The England response has been to change the cast

slightly. Income then Stokes and James Anderson. A lot of talk about

why Anderson did not play in the first test as he was fit enough to

play the County Championship match at Southport but according to the

selectors, not fit enough to play in the first test. Alastair Cook has

called it a messy affair. The other England decision to make today's

weather to play a second spinner in Adil Rashid. Old Trafford

traditionally takes spin, so it might England go with two spinners?

As the Pakistan, they would want more of the same. An excellent

display at Lord's and if the pitch takes spin, Yasir Shah might play a

part. He took ten wickets in the last test. The last time they lost a

Test match was 2001 at Old Trafford, for England, and the opponents were,

yes, Pakistan. Thanks for joining us.

Chris Froome is moving ever closer to his third Tour de France

He's now almost four minutes clear of his closest challenger,

after winning the 18th Stage time trial.

Alpine stages to get through safely before a procession into Paris

Usain Bolt races over 200 metres for the first time this season,

The six-time Olympic champion says he's fully fit,

after hamstring problems and claims he's in much better

Bolt has also been supportive of the decision to ban Russian track

and field athletes from Rio, saying it sends out

The chairman of UK Athletics says he believes all Russian competitors

should be banned from the Olympic Games, following confirmation

Ed Warner is also confident that doping has been rooted

There is temptation in all walks of life but we can make sure the

British athletes are well-educated and the system is robust and they

understand the penalties for cheating and the benefits of

competing clean so the British public can believe in what they say.

I believe the British team to be clean, and I think they will go to

Rio and win a load of medals. Sports Xtra for the build

up to the Test Match. It seems like every week we get

another report telling us how much alcohol is safe for us to drink

and what the links are Today one such report says

that there is strong evidence that points to alcohol causing

seven types of cancer. So maybe that glass of red

wine that we are told is good for the heart

is in fact causing harm. Let's talk now to Jennie Connor,

Chair in Preventive Social Medicine at the University

of Otago who conducted the review. We can also talk to Doctor John

Holmes, a research fellow at the Sheffield alcohol research group at

the University of Sheffield. And Sarah Toole, head of research at the

world Cancer research fund. Jenny, it is your research, so tell us more

about you or concerns over alcohol and cancer. Which cancer

specifically are you linking alcohol to? I would just like to start by

saying that this was a review of the state of the evidence to date, so

the paper discusses the quality of the evidence linked to cancer and

finds the evidence of causation, but alcohol causes cancer is very

strong. The types of cancer that have been definitely link before,

cancers of the head and neck in particular, and cancer of the liver,

which is the best known. But also it is a common cause of bowel cancer

and breast cancer, those are causally linked to drinking. Explain

how strong the link is exactly. What I've done in this review is looked

at whole body of research that back many decades that links alcohol to

cancer, and what I've tried to do is examine alternative explanations for

these findings in a standard way. And you come to the conclusion when

you do that that there really is compelling evidence that these

associations described for some time represent a causal association. And

in the paper I have contrast of that to what you have just mentioned

about the idea that small amounts of alcohol are good for your heart.

When you look at the similar type of evidence for that association, it is

much less strong. Are you saying that any amount of alcohol could

cause cancer and people should not drink alcohol at all? Well, what the

evidence suggests is that there is no threshold. So although we are

familiar with the idea of drinking guidelines on keeping us at a safe

level of drinking, in fact, any amount of alcohol appears to

increase your risk somewhat of these types of cancer. Obviously the

highest risks are associated with the heaviest drinking and it is a

gradient of risk, so the less you drink, the lower the extra risk is.

But there is not a level at which you can feel confident that your

drinking is not contributing to the risk of cancer.

So you are saying that if you want to do what you can to minimise your

risk of cancer, you shouldn't drink anything? There is a reasonable

scientific consensus that if you want to find the safest level of

drinking, it's nothing. But people drink for other reasons.

So my advice would be for people to think about how much they are

drinking and to think about reducing how much they drink. But more

importantly, I would urge people who are interested in reducing the risk

of cancer to support policies at a population level that reduce

drinking across the whole population. That will make these

cancers arise less frequently. How do you work out when I cancer has

been caused, effectively, by alcohol or whether alcohol was a factor in

its? You are saying that 6% of all cancer deaths because of alcohol.

How do you arrive at that figure? That figure comes from a global

disease study. That is not a matter of assessing each cancer is being

caused by alcohol or not, it's about taking information about how much

people drink in a obligation, what the patterns of drinking are and the

information about how those patterns increase risk and calculating how

many of those deaths or cases of cancer would have been avoided if

nobody had drunk any alcohol at all. So we attribute those cases to the

drinking. We don't ascertain each case, because we cannot do that. Dr

John Holmes, you work at the Sheffield alcohol research group at

the University of Sheffield. What do you think about this research? It is

important that people are aware of the harm that alcohol can cause. We

have been doing some research with Cancer Research UK, which shows that

just 13% of people mention cancer when you ask them what harms can be

caused by alcohol. So people are not thinking about cancer as a potential

risk from heavy drinking or from drinking at all. That becomes more

remarkable when you look at the kinds of cancers that people link

alcohol too. If you ask people, does alcohol cause liver cancer? 'S view

your prompting them, and 80% of people say yes, it causes liver

cancer. But when you ask, does alcohol cause breast cancer, just

18% of people say it does. So there are big gaps in public awareness and

big variations in public awareness, depending on what cancer we are

talking about. If we are to make informed decisions about drinking,

if people are to use the thought process is Jennie has been talking

about, people need to be aware that this link exists. At the moment in

the UK, people don't seem to have that level of awareness. Sarah

Toule, you are from the world Cancer research fund. What do you think

research should be? Our message for cancer project is, as the research

has said, not to drink any alcohol at all, because any amount will

increase your risk. But we do recognise that that is difficult. If

you are going to drink, follow the national guidelines, which were

recently reduced. The latest review showed that the harm from drinking

alcohol was more than previously thought. Just remind us, because it

gets so confusing with different guidelines. What are the official

guidelines? It used to be that there was a higher allowance for men

compared to women. They have now been brought down so that for both

men and women, it is 14 units a week, spread over at least three

days. We know it is difficult to understand what units are. So we

talk about the guidance in terms of the standard drinks we are used to

having. That equates to seven drinks a week maximum, spread over at least

three days. One thing people do not realise as well is that one drink is

equal to half a pint, not a pint. If you stuck to those guidelines, what

would that do to your level of cancer risk? It would still have an

impact on your cancer risk, because we have found that any alcohol

increases your risk, it is the level the government have found from the

review they did that is a threshold that, looking at all of health,

would be the safest limit if you are going to drink. But for cancer

specifically, we recommend that you do not drink at all, but we

recognise that that is difficult, so we have tips to reduce the alcohol

you drink. Jennie Connor, there are lots of factors that come into play

when somebody gets ill. We hear what you are saying about alcohol. Are

you saying there are cases of cancer where is the person had not drunk

any alcohol, they would not have got cancer? I am talking about

populations rather than individual people, but when it comes down to

who gets cancer and individual people, they are of course

individual people -- when it comes down to who gets cancer and who

doesn't. If there was less drink at a national level, there would be

fewer cases of cancer in that population. What is impossible to

predict is which of those cases would have been prevented, which

individuals would not have got the cancer. It is quite hard to get your

head around that when you are specifically linking it, not you

personally, but the research you have looked at is linking alcohol to

seven specific types of cancer. But then you are not able to say

categorically that alcohol would be a factor in every case and if

individuals who had got that cancer had not drunk alcohol, they would

not have got it? One of the things I have tried to discuss in the paper

was that part of the motivation of the paper was to try to clarify some

of these issues, not really for the public, but for professionals and

journalists and people who are interested in these areas so that we

can try to communicate this more clearly. But for individuals, there

are a number of causal factors that come together to cause cancer. It is

not usually going to be one thing on its own. Jonathan Holmes, does this

being put out there today in the way it has, is it helpful? Is there a

clear message that come through? I think so. We can increasingly see

the message that alcohol can increase your risk of cancer and can

cause cancer. This will help people think about how to moderate their

drinking, how much risk they are willing to take. And it also creates

a sense in Society of what moderate drinking is and whether, as a

society, we want to reduce the harm from drinking. Thank you all for

joining us. Zachary on Twitter says alcohol had health benefits, now it

is bad for you. What is the truth? Hopefully, that conversation has

enlightened you. Another says, the British are far too in love with

alcohol. It causes mayhem in society. Keep getting in touch.

Let's get the latest now on the argument within the Labour Party.

This morning the leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he "deeply

regrets" comments by the Labour MP Angela Eagle, who said Mr Corbyn

had allowed a permissive environment for the abuse of MPs opposed to him.

Our Political Correspondent Iain Watson can explain more.

yes, Angela Eagle's constituency party has been suspended by the

Labour national executive for investigating claims of bullying,

intimidation and abuse. She herself has complained of homophobic abuse.

A brick was thrown through her constituency office window and she

was subject to a death threat and there has been an arrest, although

not in her area. The arrest took place in Scotland. In an interview

with the Telegraph, she seemed to be suggesting that that kind of

environment was being indulged by the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is a

permissive atmosphere he had rated the allowed that to take place. I

put those criticisms to him this morning, and this was what he said.

I regret that Angela has used comments like that. I regret the

incident at her office and I didn't apologise, because I didn't cause

it, but I said to her, I am sorry for what happened to her office. I

called her straightaway and told her that. I made it clear that

harassment, abuse of language has no place in our political discourse. I

received plenty of abusive language. I don't respond to it because I

don't wish to demean myself or promote the person using that

language. I think we should lower the temperature and increase the

quality of our debate. Jeremy Corbyn, perhaps suggesting

that Angela Eagle should rise above the abuse, as he says he ignores

criticism of him, as well he might, because the party seems very split

between the majority of Labour MPs at Westminster and an increasingly

left-wing membership. Jeremy Corbyn will be launching what he calls his

grassroots campaign in Salford tomorrow, but he has come in for

criticism from his own MPs about remarks he made yesterday suggesting

that perhaps there would be unopened selection procedure when boundary

guidelines were reduced. Usually, the MPs involved in those

constituencies sort it out amongst themselves. He seemed to be

suggesting something quite different. Labour's deputy leader

Harriet Harman denounced him not just for suggesting that yesterday,

but for talking about the whole issue of reselection is rather than

other things which Labour should be concentrating on.

People in the country want to see an effective opposition and a credible

alternative Labour government. The idea that we should be arguing

amongst ourselves about the rules of how MPs at the next general election

become candidates for the Labour Party, it is more evidence, I'm

afraid, that Jeremy Corbyn's leadership has failed and we need a

fresh start with Owen Smith. Not surprisingly, Harriet Harman is

endorsing Owen Smith rather than Jeremy Corbyn. I asked Jeremy Corbyn

about those criticisms, and he said he was simply repeating the existing

procedure in the Labour Party, which is that if more than 50% of members

in any constituency want unopened selection, it is up to them to ask

for it. He was not suggesting there should be a free for all and he was

not suggesting that he would sack his own MPs.

MPs say working practices in Sports Direct's warehouse

and shops were closer "to a Victorian workhouse

And MPs are warning that new measures to combat extremism

could be driving a wedge between communities and could be

We'll be hearing Muslim views on government policy.

Let's catch up with the news in the BBC newsroom.

The new Chancellor, Philip Hammond says he may have to "reset"

Britain's economic policy following the country's decision

at the start of a trip to China, as an index of business activity

suggests the UK economy is contracting at its steepest

Mr Hammond said he would review the economic situation

A damning report by MPs has accused Sports Direct of failing

to treat its employees as human beings.

The Business, Innovation and Skills Committee said working

practices in the company's warehouse and shops were closer

"to a Victorian workhouse than a high street retailer".

The Committee also said the company's boss, Mike Ashley,

should be held accountable for what it described as appalling

In the last half hour, it's been announced that the search

for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 is to be suspended

if the plane is not found on completion of the current search.

The Malaysian transport minister says hopes are fading

of finding the plane, which vanished in 2014,

but insists it doesn't mean they're giving up completely on the search.

It follows calls from relatives of the missing to extend

an underwater search for the airliner.

Police have confirmed the body of an 11-year-old boy has been

South Yorkshire officers say the boy was seen entering

the water in the Parkgate area at around 7pm last night,

Specialist emergency services teams recovered the boy's

His family has been informed and are being supported by officers.

An investigation into what happened is under way.

The first person in the UK to have a double hand transplant

says he feels "whole again", and is looking forward to holding

a bottle of beer and wearing shirts with real buttons.

Chris King lost both his hands, except the thumbs,

three years ago, in an accident at work involving a metal

He received two new hands from a donor and says he already has

Join me for BBC newsroom like that 11.

He was a flavour of what people are saying on Donald Trump's speech. One

says his speech was on the ball and it was what people want to hear.

Someone has to take drastic action over Isas. We cannot keep going down

this track, and camp looks like the person to do this. Another says, the

man scares me, divisive and inappropriate he opens his mouth.

Americans are being reactive rather than proactive towards the issues

affecting everyone. Another says the man is nothing more than a petulant

child in Amman's body. If he wins, I fear for the world. I queue for

those comments. -- thank you for those comments.

for England as for the second Test against Pakistan.

They're 1-0 down, so England need to avoid defeat at Old Trafford

to have any chance of taking the four-match series.

Usain Bolt says he's fully fit for the 200 metres at the London

Bolt was struggling last month with a hamstring problem.

He also believes the Olympic ban for the Russian athletics team sends

Britain's Chris Froome won the Stage 18 time trial to edge closer

to his third Tour de France title in four years.

He now leads by three minutes and 52 seconds.

Froome has two more Alpine stages to negotiate plus the final

Mercedes driver Nico Rosberg has signed a new deal with the team

His teammate Lewis Hamilton is fastest so far in first prcatice

And I'll have more sport on BBC News.

We can return now to the news we brought you earlier -

an influential group of Lords and MPs has called on the government

to re-think a key part of its counter-extremism policy.

Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights said Theresa May

should review the controversial Prevent strategy, which is intended

to stop young Muslims from being radicalised.

In particular, the committee's report said conflicting duties

whilst at the same time preventing the expression of extremist views."

The report goes on to say that it's likely to cause

"uncertainty, particularly for university administrators."

So is should the government call time on Prevent and how difficult

is it really to enforce on university campuses?

We can chat now with Rupert Sutton at the Henry Jackson

Society's Student Rights, which campaigns to raise awareness

of extremism on University campuses, and Dr Arshad Isakjee,

from Birmingham University, who has looked at Muslim views

How much of an issue is extremism on campuses? Research shows there is a

number of factors around university campuses where extremism is an issue

both in conviction of students for terrorist offences and the number of

events we seek where speakers with extreme or intolerant views face no

challenge. There are other elements and we are seeing increases in far

right graffiti and activism in universities and it's also worth

considering that universities actually create quite fertile

environment for people to be radicalised regardless if they

attend those areas. People go through a transitional period in

their lives and it leaves them by rubble and isolated and easy prey

for recruiters. Where do you draw the line between freedom of speech

and something that does radicalise someone? Where is the evidence on

when somebody gets radicalised? Everybody's pathways different. What

Prevent looks to do is to give university 's advice and guidelines

on how to help their staff become most confident in identifying people

who are at risk of being radicalised, but also having

policies in place so when people are invited onto campus they have an

idea of how they can best mitigate the risk whilst ensuring the event

goes ahead, how they are best ensuring universities as place where

we see free speech and robust debate but at the same time students are

able to challenge speakers and neutral moderators ensure questions

are taken from both sides of the argument. In the cases where

speakers have a long history of extremism that there is somebody on

the panel who can challenge them from the same position of authority.

Doctor Arshad Isakjee, how do you see this point that is made by the

MPs and the Lords on the conflict potentially between the duty to

promote free speech while preventing extremist views being expressed?

They definitely have a point. I think Rupert is right in terms of

safeguarding young people, students and pupils and in schools from

various Harms, social harms including being radicalised but also

more mundane than normal things like the potential for mental health

difficulties or suspicions of abuse. That is something universities take

seriously and I think universities across the country do. In relation

to countering radicalisation, there is a real danger, especially with an

emphasis on nonviolent extremism that there would be too much

suspicion around dialogues that take place in relation to politics, in

relation to religion. Universities have a culture of openness and Mac

culture of openness is really important for the safeguarding of

young people and really important for lecturers and teachers in

schools, that if they spot signs of vulnerability in young people it is

important there is trust. Would individuals be banned from speaking

at your university because their views are unpalatable? Have they

been banned on that basis? To my knowledge, I don't think the

university bans people on the basis that their views were simply

unpalatable. But I think Rupert is right and you need to ensure that

voices are coming in and saying controversial things, that there is

a counter voice and counter narrative. But there is a

contradiction inherent in legislation and the contradiction in

the new Prevent strategy that says we need to be mindful and wary of

people who have views against democracy and the rule of law and

existing legislation in relation to universities that gives a statutory

legal responsibility to ensure that there is freedom of speech including

on issues where views against the norm, controversial views are

expressed and there are inherent contradictions between the

legislation and the new strategy and guidance being given. These

contradictions are inevitable when you try to police thought, in a way,

which is inherently not criminal. Rupert, do you think the balance is

right at the moment? I think challenging extremism on university

campuses and protecting freedom of speech is probably the most

difficult policy challenge any sector subject to the Prevent Judy

faces. I think the current legislation that exists has gone a

long way to make universities take the issue more seriously and in

terms of putting policies in place to make sure they are aware of what

is happening on campus and they have policies in place to mitigate risk.

Universities have to be aware of the need to be proportionate, and

something mentioned in the legislation and has been focused on

by government... Do you know how often universities pick out

individuals and deal with someone they think may be causing problems?

What they ideally need to be doing is making the same procedures go for

every event. I myself have spoken at events at universities where the

same procedures are applied to summary with a long history of

extreme views. You have do sign up to a document of rights and

responsibilities that the University holds as a policy. You have to

commit to speaking on a panel with someone who disagrees with you. You

have to commit to an open Q session. What we want to see is

universities putting the policies in place for all events, if we can,

where they touch on politics or any other contentious issue. Are you

aware of many students actually being picked out and questioned or

looked at specifically because their behaviour is giving rise to

concerns? At my institution I'm not aware of any such cases. But the

negative impacts can be more subtle than that. The negative impacts are

around the fact that pupils see cases such as the one at

Staffordshire University where someone is reading a book on

terrorism in the library, which is provided for the purpose of studying

the course, and he was escorted out because of the suspicion of a staff

member and then interviewed three times by counterterrorism police.

Incidents like that, and there was one in schools about this happening

there as well, the net effect of that is that parents can tell their

children and indeed students at universities can feel it is not

worth risking talking about politics or religion. The people it will

disproportionately affect those that are Muslim or, by virtue of their

ethnicity, might be construed as Muslim. So not necessarily

intentionally, there will be a discriminatory effect and

counter-productive one in terms of eroding Mac culture openness,

dialogue, that actually allows us to safeguard students in schools and

universities. Are you concerned about division among students at

your university? I'm concerned the legislation will affect students

disproportionally in different ways, those that don't necessarily fear

that they will be at risk might not be affected that much, but those who

do feel they might be under suspicion, they will regulate their

views to a way which is unhelpful. I have colleagues at the University of

Birmingham that run excellent courses which really look at the

sort of dividing lines, those thin lines between freedom of expression

on one hand, a fence on the other, and those dialogues take place

between experts and really engage the students. That constitutes a

really important social Forum for discussions to take place that

liberal values and discussions at universities. If those things are

threatened by legislation, we have to look again at the proposed

legislation and guidance given to universities. Arshad Isakjee and

Rupert Sutton, thank you very much. Bringing you some of your comments

on alcohol and it's link to cancer. It

is linked to seven cancer. Don't you think it's devastating enough to be

told who have cancer and to be told all of these things that can cause

it? We cannot ignore findings but it seems just being alive can

contribute to having cancer. Dave says that moderate drinking in

social settings is beneficial. The daily alcohol limits are absurd. Tim

says, alcohol is a class a drug that would be banned if it hit the

streets today. Ian on Twit that said it would be a serious drink problem

that would cause cancer. Everything is linked to cancer, you drink too

many soft drinks, Gareth Fry up, if you smoke, drink, everything -- if

you have a fry up. When people say Donald Trump is not afraid to speak

his mind mostly what they mean is he's not afraid be racist. Dan on

Twitter says the trump policies are nothing short of revolutionary but

the government and media hate this so they report on him only

negatively. Chris King lost both of his hands

involving an incident with a metal pressing machine. He received two

new hands from a donor and says the operation has given him a new lease

of life. Simon Kay, part of the team responsible for the transplant says

he is delighted with the results. He was working on a press and then he

pushed the material in and it came down and amputated his hands, both

of them across this line from the base of the thumb across to the

wrist. He retained his thumb but he lost everything else. Furthermore,

it was sloping away so he had nothing to work his thumbs against.

We saw him two years ago and began evaluating him then. Just over ten

days ago, in the last ten days, he underwent a hand transplant. It is

the first time we have done that in the UK and it's the first time, as

far as I'm aware that hand transplants have been done that has

not been above the wrist, but within the substance of the hand which

makes it more difficult and complex. So as far as I know, that is a

unique feature. Nobody cares what their kidney looks like as long as

it works, but not only do we have to match the hands in the same way we

would have to match the kidneys and livers, they have to look

appropriate, because the hands-on view the whole time, so in a way,

that makes the job of finding the correct donor even harder. There's a

good reason why we are asking people to bear this in mind when making a

donation. Because hand transplantation is such a new thing,

people have been slow to donate and we have had many opportunities to

ask the donations that had not been given, and I think that's entirely

understandable. I think I should emphasise that the people you work

for the NHS transplant services have a difficult job of asking for

donations at the time of death a loved one. It's extraordinary

difficult to them to make that decision, but now that hand

transplantation is a reality and people can see the good it does, I

hope they will consider making that donation as readily as they do

liver, kidney and heart. When all the structures that pass into the

hand go against the wrist, they split into small structures to

provide each digit with its nerves, arteries and veins and tendons. Each

of those has to be repaired individually. We had eight surgeons

for 12 hours working on this with a volunteer team of 15 people. So it

was a long and quite a complex day. Chris is doing really well. We are

in the first ten days still. And the measure of success, and it's

interesting you ask me about movement, because everybody latches

onto movement but it's very important that he regains the

feeling as well, and I would anticipate and expect he will regain

very good movement and very good feeling. Movement at his level of

transplantation, we should anticipate, should be very good

function. Sensation is related to age, and those of us over 16 don't

recover as well as those over 16, but -- and those under 16 but he is

a healthy manner. There is a huge psychological aspect and the

screening process we undertake is a psychological screening to make sure

the patient understands the concept and they are prepared to commit to

it and they are reliable and take their medications and go through the

programme. They will rehabilitate the way they need to do. That is

very important, and then the psychological impact of having Hans

or not having hands is very great, because like the face they are on

view all the time and you look and judge people's hands for what they

say in what they do and what they tell you about the person. So

Chris's most rewarding commented ages that he feels whole again, and

that is incredibly important. The search for the missing Malaysia

Airlines flight MH370 is to be suspended if the plane is not found

in the current Dutch area. The plane disappeared Billy two and half years

ago. Ministers from Malaysia, China and nearby said the search would not

end, but would be suspended. Today, in the absence of credible new

evidence, Australia, China and Malaysia have collectively decided

to suspend the search upon the completion of the 120,000 square

kilometres search area. I must emphasise that this does not mean

that we have given up on locating MH370. Let's go live to Sydney and

talk to Phil Mercer. He is saying they have not given up, but they

have thrown so much at trying to find it and after two and a half

years, they have still come up with nothing. Yes, this is a question of

wording, really. Ministers from China, Australia and Malaysia were

meeting in Kuala Lumpur, saying the search will be suspended until such

time as any credible new information turns up. But if you look at the

cold, hard reality, 120,000 square kilometres of the southern Indian

Ocean is the current searches are, and more than 110 thousandths where

kilometres have so far been searched by underwater teams led by

Australia. That is more than 90% of the zone that has been scoured, and

still no clues, nothing to indicate that the Boeing 777 came down in