Browse content similar to 13/01/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello and welcome to Wednesday in Parliament, our look at the best | :00:14. | :00:16. | |
of the day in the Commons and the Lords. | :00:17. | :00:18. | |
Is sending in the bulldozers a good idea? | :00:19. | :00:23. | |
Jeremy Corbyn criticises David Cameron's plans to demolish | :00:24. | :00:25. | |
We'll be Prime Minister guarantee that all existing tenants of the | :00:26. | :00:40. | |
council estates earmarked for redevelopment will be be housed in | :00:41. | :00:44. | |
new council housing in their current communities? The House of Lords | :00:45. | :00:51. | |
discusses the House of lords. Should their powers be curbed? Use your | :00:52. | :01:00. | |
Use your vote prudently, yes, use it sparingly, yes. | :01:01. | :01:03. | |
And if God Save the Queen has to go, what should become | :01:04. | :01:06. | |
I want to say which area it was says the most reasonable choice was | :01:07. | :01:17. | |
Could housing be one of the main political issues during the time | :01:18. | :01:23. | |
At the weekend David Cameron unveiled his ?140 million plan | :01:24. | :01:29. | |
to tackle poverty by bulldozing so-called 'sink' estates to make way | :01:30. | :01:32. | |
The Prime Minister pledged to demolish 'brutal high-rise' | :01:33. | :01:34. | |
towers and bleak housing in an effort to tackle drug abuse | :01:35. | :01:37. | |
So was this an attempt by the Conservative leader to march | :01:38. | :01:42. | |
across Labour's traditional territory? | :01:43. | :01:48. | |
The Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn challenged David Cameron | :01:49. | :01:50. | |
This week the Prime Minister rather belatedly acknowledged | :01:51. | :01:57. | |
there is a housing crisis in Britain. | :01:58. | :02:03. | |
He announced a ?140 million fund to transform 100 housing estates | :02:04. | :02:07. | |
around the country, which amounts to ?1.4 million per housing estate | :02:08. | :02:11. | |
It is not even going to pay for the bulldozers, is it? | :02:12. | :02:30. | |
What we have done is double the housing budget. We're going to be | :02:31. | :02:37. | |
investing ?8 billion in housing. That comes after having built | :02:38. | :02:42. | |
700,000 homes since becoming Prime Minister. We have over a quarter of | :02:43. | :02:47. | |
a million more affordable homes. Every estate he announces you wishes | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
to build those will include tenants and people who have bought their | :02:53. | :02:58. | |
homes under Right to Buy. Will those people, the leaseholders, will be be | :02:59. | :03:01. | |
guaranteed homes on those be built estates that he has proposing to | :03:02. | :03:07. | |
build? Of course I accept this is not as carefully thought through as | :03:08. | :03:13. | |
his reshuffle. I gather is still going on. It has not actually | :03:14. | :03:19. | |
finished yet. What we want to do is to go to human tears where there are | :03:20. | :03:23. | |
a sink estates and housing estates that have helped people back and | :03:24. | :03:27. | |
agree with those local councils, those local people and make sure | :03:28. | :03:32. | |
tenants get good homes, make sure home owners get rehoused in new | :03:33. | :03:37. | |
houses. That is what we want. I noticed the Prime Minister did not | :03:38. | :03:42. | |
give any guaranteed to leaseholders on states. So there is another | :03:43. | :03:48. | |
larger groups on those as states that have two I have a question to | :03:49. | :03:55. | |
ask him. Daryl says, will be Prime Minister guarantee that all existing | :03:56. | :03:59. | |
tenants of the housing estates earmarked for a reader redevelopment | :04:00. | :04:06. | |
will be rehoused in council housing in their current amenities with the | :04:07. | :04:13. | |
same conditions that we have now? Isn't it interesting, Mr Speaker, | :04:14. | :04:17. | |
who here is the small see conservative who is saying to people | :04:18. | :04:21. | |
stay in your sink estates, have nothing better than what Labour | :04:22. | :04:26. | |
agave after the war. We are saying if you are a tenant, have the Right | :04:27. | :04:32. | |
to Buy. If you are in a sink estate, we will help you out. That is the | :04:33. | :04:38. | |
fact of politics today. A party on the side of the House that once to | :04:39. | :04:43. | |
give people life chances and a Labour opposition that wants them to | :04:44. | :04:49. | |
stay stuck in poverty. Mr Speaker, the Prime Minister doesn't seem to | :04:50. | :04:53. | |
understand. He doesn't understand the very serious concerns that | :04:54. | :05:00. | |
council tenants have when they feel they are going to be forced away | :05:01. | :05:04. | |
from the community where they live, where their children go to school | :05:05. | :05:10. | |
and their community is so strong. But there is another area where the | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
Prime Minister might be able to help us today. His party's manifesto | :05:15. | :05:19. | |
said, everyone who works hard should be able to own a home of their own. | :05:20. | :05:25. | |
So we'll families earning his so-called national living wage be | :05:26. | :05:30. | |
able to afford one of his discount starter homes? I very much hope they | :05:31. | :05:39. | |
will. As well as starter homes, we are having shared ownership homes. | :05:40. | :05:45. | |
We are saying to the 1.3 million tenants of Housing associations, we | :05:46. | :05:49. | |
are on your side. You can buy your own home, why does he still oppose | :05:50. | :05:58. | |
that? Well, Mr Speaker, I hope this what hope goes a long way. Research | :05:59. | :06:07. | |
by shelter found that families on his so-called living wage will be | :06:08. | :06:12. | |
unable to afford the average Tartar home in 98% of local authority | :06:13. | :06:26. | |
areas. He didn't answer the question about the 1.3 million housing | :06:27. | :06:32. | |
association tenants. I want what is best for everybody. He owns his | :06:33. | :06:39. | |
home, I own my home, why weren't we let those 1.3 million own their | :06:40. | :06:44. | |
homes? Why not? The Prime Minister gave no assurances to tenants, no | :06:45. | :06:51. | |
assurances to leaseholders, no assurances to low-paid people who | :06:52. | :06:53. | |
want to get somewhere decent to live. He quoted the words of Linda, | :06:54. | :07:00. | |
a council tenant for the last 25 years. The council bill being put | :07:01. | :07:05. | |
through Parliament, we will have two signed a new agreement, if we say we | :07:06. | :07:11. | |
will have to pay the bedroom tax and debt. If we downsize, we lose our | :07:12. | :07:17. | |
secure home. It is a real problem that Linda and others are facing. If | :07:18. | :07:23. | |
she was in the advice you grow, what advice would you give her? It has | :07:24. | :07:31. | |
not paid by pensioners, but that's another point I would make to Linda | :07:32. | :07:38. | |
and all those who are in council housing or other two Council | :07:39. | :07:44. | |
Association homes. We are giving you the chance to buy your own home. It | :07:45. | :07:49. | |
is interesting what this exchange has shown. We now have a Labour | :07:50. | :07:54. | |
Party with a housing policy that does not support home ownership. | :07:55. | :07:58. | |
They have a defence policy that does not believe in defence. We have a | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
Labour Party that does not believe in work and a Labour leader who does | :08:03. | :08:08. | |
not believe in Britain. David Cameron. | :08:09. | :08:10. | |
The SNP Westminster's leader Angus Robertson opted | :08:11. | :08:12. | |
He supported the idea of a post-study work visa that | :08:13. | :08:19. | |
would allow university students from overseas to stay | :08:20. | :08:21. | |
He said the Commission led by the economist Lord Smith had | :08:22. | :08:25. | |
recommended the creation of schemes to allow overseas graduates | :08:26. | :08:27. | |
to remain in Scotland and work for a period of time once | :08:28. | :08:30. | |
Why did the UK Government this week ruled out a return of a post study | :08:31. | :08:45. | |
work Visa without discussions and before parliamentary reports? There | :08:46. | :08:51. | |
is no limit on the number of people who can stay after they have | :08:52. | :08:54. | |
graduated, as long as they have a graduate level job. That is a clear | :08:55. | :09:01. | |
message. The return of post study abusers is supported by all of | :09:02. | :09:06. | |
Scotland's publicly funded colleges, College Scotland, universities | :09:07. | :09:11. | |
Scotland, the representative body for higher institutions. All | :09:12. | :09:16. | |
parties, including the Scottish Conservative Party. Why does the | :09:17. | :09:21. | |
Prime Minister think they are all wrong and he is right? I think the | :09:22. | :09:29. | |
disadvantage of inventing a new post-work-study route, we are | :09:30. | :09:33. | |
effectively saying to people coming to our universities, it is OK to | :09:34. | :09:37. | |
stay with a less than graduate job. There are lots of people in our own | :09:38. | :09:43. | |
country desperate for a those jobs. We do not need the world's brightest | :09:44. | :09:47. | |
and best to come here and study and then to do a menial and Labour job. | :09:48. | :09:53. | |
That is not what our immigration system is for. What we want is a | :09:54. | :09:58. | |
system that we can advertise to the world, com study and work here. Onto | :09:59. | :10:06. | |
gambling and the potential dangers of fixed odds betting terminals. | :10:07. | :10:12. | |
Some of the Government's backbenchers would agree with me, | :10:13. | :10:19. | |
despite my background would be menial, in calling to a reduction to | :10:20. | :10:26. | |
fixed betting terminals. They seem reluctant to review this ?1.6 | :10:27. | :10:31. | |
million industry and refuses to bring it under scrutiny. Can the | :10:32. | :10:37. | |
Prime Minister ensure that the Government will undertake a review | :10:38. | :10:40. | |
of this dangerous and addictive problem? We keep this important | :10:41. | :10:48. | |
situation under review. A former oil trader raised | :10:49. | :10:49. | |
the falling global price of oil: 30 billion I'll is good for... It is | :10:50. | :11:02. | |
bad in other respects. If it goes on like this, we risk seeing regimes | :11:03. | :11:09. | |
under pressure, enormous financial transfers out of our markets to pay | :11:10. | :11:14. | |
for other country's deficit, a possible collapse in share prices | :11:15. | :11:18. | |
and dividends for pensions and a liquidity problem in our banking | :11:19. | :11:22. | |
sector. May I invite the Prime Minister initiate a review across | :11:23. | :11:29. | |
Whitehall to assess the effects of low oil prices on our economy and | :11:30. | :11:35. | |
beyond? It has a effect on our our constituents who are able to fill up | :11:36. | :11:40. | |
their cars were less than ?1 per litre. That is a very big increase | :11:41. | :11:46. | |
in people's disposable income. A low oil price is good for the British | :11:47. | :11:52. | |
economy as an economy that is a production economy. There are other | :11:53. | :11:56. | |
consequences and union to many of them. We need to look carefully at | :11:57. | :11:58. | |
how we can help our industry. Now, cast your mind back to the end | :11:59. | :12:01. | |
of October and there was something of a constitutional | :12:02. | :12:05. | |
crisis at Westminster. The House of Lords had blocked | :12:06. | :12:06. | |
the Government's planned cuts to tax credits and this despite the Lords | :12:07. | :12:09. | |
supposedly having little or no say Conservative Ministers | :12:10. | :12:12. | |
were not best pleased. A review was ordered into the powers | :12:13. | :12:18. | |
of the Lords. It concluded that peers should | :12:19. | :12:21. | |
lose their veto over what's known Peers would instead be allowed | :12:22. | :12:23. | |
to send these laws back to the Commons, forcing MPs to vote | :12:24. | :12:29. | |
again, but would only be able The person in charge of the review | :12:30. | :12:33. | |
led a debate on his proposals. My Lords, by having the ability to | :12:34. | :12:48. | |
do what the House of lords traditionally does so well, ask the | :12:49. | :12:52. | |
House of commons to think again, we are doing what we have always done. | :12:53. | :12:59. | |
To limit it to a ping without a pong, we are giving the House of | :13:00. | :13:04. | |
lords writes that they do not have at the moment. In other words we | :13:05. | :13:09. | |
have a conversation between the two houses that they have the final say. | :13:10. | :13:15. | |
Speaking as someone who has served the Government for 30 years, it is | :13:16. | :13:20. | |
no bad thing that the House of lords does have the opportunity to revise | :13:21. | :13:25. | |
legislation, to seek no matter how inconveniently or uncomfortably to | :13:26. | :13:28. | |
the Government of the day, go back and think about this again. | :13:29. | :13:34. | |
Particularly in relation to tax credits. I sometimes reflect that | :13:35. | :13:38. | |
members of the Government party in the other house might be grateful of | :13:39. | :13:42. | |
being speared several months of being quite rightly have ranked by | :13:43. | :13:47. | |
their constituents, who would have lost sums of money. The House | :13:48. | :13:56. | |
sometimes sells itself sought. -- sells itself short. In that context | :13:57. | :14:06. | |
of the constitutional democracy, to deal with legislation on issues as | :14:07. | :14:15. | |
sensitive as the level income of people who are hard-pressed because | :14:16. | :14:16. | |
of the economic crisis,... Why is this change being proposed? | :14:17. | :14:28. | |
Part of a wider concern by the government, no government likes it | :14:29. | :14:31. | |
when they are defeated but join the club. I know what it is like to be | :14:32. | :14:39. | |
defeated. In the five and three quarters years of this government, | :14:40. | :14:45. | |
it suffered 123 defeats and any five and three quarters years between | :14:46. | :14:49. | |
2002 and 2008, which I am particularly familiar with, the | :14:50. | :14:56. | |
government suffered 325 defeats. I urge the size not to abandon its | :14:57. | :15:02. | |
right to say no. Use it prudently, yes, sparingly, yes, but retain this | :15:03. | :15:09. | |
we must. The application of the proposals in the report is that we | :15:10. | :15:16. | |
have gone beyond the point where the present self-regulatory framework | :15:17. | :15:23. | |
can be allowed to continue and something that is more laid down in | :15:24. | :15:28. | |
statute might be required in place of the current convention. | :15:29. | :15:33. | |
You're watching our round-up of the day in the Commons | :15:34. | :15:35. | |
An MP bids to replace God Save the Queen with an anthem | :15:36. | :15:40. | |
The British economy risks once again becoming dependent on consumption | :15:41. | :15:46. | |
by households and not led by export performance. | :15:47. | :15:53. | |
You're watching our round-up of the day in the Commons | :15:54. | :15:55. | |
The British economy risks once again becoming dependent on consumption | :15:56. | :16:00. | |
by households and not led by export performance. | :16:01. | :16:02. | |
That was the claim of the Scottish Nationalists | :16:03. | :16:03. | |
during a Commons debate they'd called, focusing on the UK's current | :16:04. | :16:06. | |
Opening the debate, the SNP's finance spokesman noted that in 2012 | :16:07. | :16:10. | |
the Chancellor George Osborne had declared he wanted to double | :16:11. | :16:12. | |
Mr Speaker, total export sales in 2013 were ?521 billion, | :16:13. | :16:16. | |
which was a reasonable start, but that fell to ?513 | :16:17. | :16:18. | |
The numbers are moving in the wrong direction, | :16:19. | :16:30. | |
yet the Chancellor and this Government still expect us | :16:31. | :16:35. | |
to believe that exports could, in effect, double over this | :16:36. | :16:39. | |
The OBR s most recent forecast suggests that they will miss that | :16:40. | :16:44. | |
target by about ?350 billion, so the target set | :16:45. | :16:47. | |
I have to say that I really struggle to take lessons on the economy | :16:48. | :16:58. | |
It is a party that built its whole idea of independence, | :16:59. | :17:05. | |
which mercifully the good people of Scotland rejected, | :17:06. | :17:10. | |
on the idea that oil was going to be the lubricant, | :17:11. | :17:15. | |
the foundation of their independent economy. | :17:16. | :17:17. | |
Oil is now $35 a barrel and it is accepted that if the SNP | :17:18. | :17:24. | |
had been successful, the cost would have been somewhere | :17:25. | :17:26. | |
in the region of ?5,000 for every single household. | :17:27. | :17:31. | |
Scotland would have been in the most atrocious economic place if it had | :17:32. | :17:35. | |
The Chancellor s latest wheeze is to open the door to Chinese cash. | :17:36. | :17:42. | |
China has no track record of building nuclear power plants, | :17:43. | :17:45. | |
yet the Chancellor has offered massive subsidies over the next 20 | :17:46. | :17:48. | |
years in the hope of encouraging Chinese state companies to invest | :17:49. | :17:51. | |
So much for encouraging British manufacturing! | :17:52. | :17:59. | |
I believe that the Chancellor s cunning plan has little to do | :18:00. | :18:02. | |
with energy security and everything to do with getting China to cover | :18:03. | :18:05. | |
Britain s disastrous current account deficit. | :18:06. | :18:06. | |
With Chinese money coming in, foreign currency will stay | :18:07. | :18:08. | |
The head of the Tax Office, Dame Lin Homer, has announced | :18:09. | :18:17. | |
that she will be leaving her post in April. | :18:18. | :18:20. | |
Until then, though, it's business as usual, | :18:21. | :18:21. | |
so MPs on the Public Accounts Committee have been | :18:22. | :18:23. | |
questioning her with their usual robustness. | :18:24. | :18:25. | |
She was challenged over whether enough is being done | :18:26. | :18:27. | |
A Conservative, Stephen Phillips, suggested that wealthy people | :18:28. | :18:31. | |
in particular had been "getting away" with tax evasion. | :18:32. | :18:35. | |
A claim that led to tetchy exchanges with Lin Homer. | :18:36. | :18:40. | |
You are prosecuting 35 a year at the moment. | :18:41. | :18:42. | |
By 2020 you are going to be prosecuting 100. | :18:43. | :18:46. | |
That means that each and every year at the moment there are about, | :18:47. | :18:50. | |
let's say, no, in fact, 65 is an underestimate because even | :18:51. | :18:53. | |
in 2020 you will not be prosecuting everyone. | :18:54. | :18:55. | |
But there are a lot of wealthy individuals who are evading | :18:56. | :18:58. | |
their taxes and who are not prosecuted. | :18:59. | :18:59. | |
You can agree with that and it will reflect credit on you. | :19:00. | :19:05. | |
I said a few minutes ago, you probably didn't hear | :19:06. | :19:08. | |
so I will say again, that across the whole spectrum | :19:09. | :19:10. | |
we do not prosecute everybody in every category. | :19:11. | :19:13. | |
So there will always be individuals who we don't prosecute. | :19:14. | :19:16. | |
Wealthy, less wealthy, not so wealthy. | :19:17. | :19:19. | |
It has never been our intention to prosecute everybody. | :19:20. | :19:26. | |
You assess the risk in terms of evasion yourself at 40% | :19:27. | :19:32. | |
in relation to individuals evading personal taxation. | :19:33. | :19:35. | |
A message which goes out loud and clear, doesn't it? | :19:36. | :19:39. | |
It is "evade your taxes and you are not going | :19:40. | :19:42. | |
No, I don't think it is, Mr Phillips, and I am not | :19:43. | :19:46. | |
But I think the message is that we will use a range | :19:47. | :19:50. | |
of approaches to dissuade people from evading their taxes. | :19:51. | :19:52. | |
And the assertion that we have ignored rich people... | :19:53. | :19:59. | |
Well, the problem with that is that on your own figures, | :20:00. | :20:03. | |
you have asked the Treasury for more money so that you can prosecute more | :20:04. | :20:08. | |
wealthy tax evaders and another 65 a year by 2020. | :20:09. | :20:11. | |
I want more money to do volume crime, which is what led | :20:12. | :20:14. | |
I don't understand why you are so defensive. | :20:15. | :20:18. | |
I don't want the message to get out there that there are certain people | :20:19. | :20:25. | |
that we will not go after and I think... | :20:26. | :20:27. | |
I reject words being placed in my mouth, I'm afraid. | :20:28. | :20:29. | |
I honestly don't quite understand why you are being so defensive | :20:30. | :20:42. | |
about this because it does seem to me that if you have gone | :20:43. | :20:48. | |
from looking at the numbers of prosecutions of wealthy | :20:49. | :20:51. | |
individuals, 35 was mentioned, and you have got some additional | :20:52. | :20:56. | |
funding to increase prosecutions to 100 a year. | :20:57. | :21:00. | |
I sort of feel, that says to me that maybe there are some people, | :21:01. | :21:05. | |
maybe not all of the 65 added on, some people who might, | :21:06. | :21:08. | |
through other things, because maybe that became part | :21:09. | :21:13. | |
of the way that HMRC worked, maybe some of those 65, | :21:14. | :21:16. | |
and obviously not the same individuals, who are going to be | :21:17. | :21:19. | |
prosecuted in the future and maybe in the past they came | :21:20. | :21:23. | |
in for a conversation and something would be sorted out. | :21:24. | :21:31. | |
And, yes, they might have to sort out their affairs and pay | :21:32. | :21:33. | |
a backdated cheque or something like this. | :21:34. | :21:35. | |
But ultimately, there will not be a prosecution. | :21:36. | :21:37. | |
Because it seems to me, we have seen too many of those | :21:38. | :21:41. | |
conversations happening rather than prosecutions and quite rightly, | :21:42. | :21:47. | |
public concern at that has led to more funding coming in, | :21:48. | :21:54. | |
which maybe more of those cases or types of those cases should end | :21:55. | :21:57. | |
with prosecutions, so, honestly, I don't think this is a trap. | :21:58. | :22:01. | |
It is just saying, don't be defensive. | :22:02. | :22:05. | |
Public pressure and unhappiness in this particular area | :22:06. | :22:09. | |
is going to lead to more prosecutions and that will mean that | :22:10. | :22:13. | |
maybe some individuals in the way they carried out their affairs | :22:14. | :22:16. | |
in the past will not be acceptable in the future | :22:17. | :22:19. | |
Please don't be defensive about that. | :22:20. | :22:22. | |
I am not, and can I just say, that is our approach | :22:23. | :22:25. | |
across the piece and has been since 2010 so we have gradually been | :22:26. | :22:29. | |
expanding prosecutions, not maybe as fast as we could have done. | :22:30. | :22:37. | |
But we do believe that we need to signal clearly that for anyone | :22:38. | :22:41. | |
who evades tax, there is a risk of prosecution. | :22:42. | :22:47. | |
Now, have we had enough of God Save The Queen? | :22:48. | :22:50. | |
The UK national anthem always gets an airing when the England football | :22:51. | :22:52. | |
team or England rugby team is about to play | :22:53. | :22:55. | |
But shouldn't England be represented by something more English? | :22:56. | :23:00. | |
Land of Hope and Glory is one of the songs now being put forward | :23:01. | :23:18. | |
as an alternative to God Save the Queen. | :23:19. | :23:20. | |
Introducing his own Bill in Parliament, a Labour MP believed | :23:21. | :23:23. | |
an English national anthem was an idea whose time | :23:24. | :23:25. | |
It has often seemed incongruous to me that when England play | :23:26. | :23:33. | |
against other home nations on the football or rugby field, | :23:34. | :23:36. | |
while the Welsh and Scots sing an anthem that reflects the identity | :23:37. | :23:39. | |
of their nations, England sings about Britain. | :23:40. | :23:42. | |
That reflects a sense that we see Britain and England as synonymous, | :23:43. | :23:45. | |
and this not only denies us English an opportunity to celebrate | :23:46. | :23:48. | |
the nation that is being represented, but it is a cause | :23:49. | :23:51. | |
of resentment among other countries within the British Isles, | :23:52. | :23:54. | |
who feel that England has requisitioned the British song. | :23:55. | :23:57. | |
I spoke to radio stations in all corners of England this | :23:58. | :23:59. | |
morning, such was the interest in the debate about what our | :24:00. | :24:02. | |
There were voxpops on the streets of towns far and wide, | :24:03. | :24:09. | |
and each area reflected the specific differences | :24:10. | :24:10. | |
I will not say which area thought that the most appropriate choice | :24:11. | :24:17. | |
for an English national anthem would be Heaven Knows I m Miserable Now | :24:18. | :24:20. | |
` that will remain a secret between me and the listeners | :24:21. | :24:25. | |
But that reflects the fact that each local area has its own sense | :24:26. | :24:32. | |
He said there had been suggestions for an English anthem | :24:33. | :24:35. | |
The three options were God Save the Queen, Jerusalem and Land | :24:36. | :24:39. | |
of Hope and Glory, and Jerusalem was the clear winner, | :24:40. | :24:41. | |
Land of Hope and Glory received 32% and God Save the Queen just 12%. | :24:42. | :24:48. | |
Just as Jerusalem was the favoured choice of those who voted | :24:49. | :24:55. | |
in the Commonwealth Games poll, so it seems to be an early favourite | :24:56. | :24:58. | |
among members of the public who have engaged with me. | :24:59. | :25:00. | |
The campaign group England in my Heart is specifically | :25:01. | :25:02. | |
campaigning for Jerusalem to be played before England rugby matches. | :25:03. | :25:05. | |
One MP believed a separate English anthem was wrong. | :25:06. | :25:07. | |
What greater pleasure can there be for a true-born English man | :25:08. | :25:12. | |
or true-born English woman than to listen to our own national | :25:13. | :25:19. | |
anthem ` a national anthem for our whole country, | :25:20. | :25:24. | |
for our whole United Kingdom, of which England is but a part, | :25:25. | :25:27. | |
but an important part, and to listen to those words that | :25:28. | :25:34. | |
link us to our Sovereign, who is part of that chain that takes | :25:35. | :25:37. | |
Despite that opposition, Toby Perkins was allowed to bring | :25:38. | :25:43. | |
How far it progresses remains to be seen. | :25:44. | :25:47. | |
Do join me for our next daily round-up. | :25:48. | :25:52. | |
Until then, from me, Keith Macdougall, goodbye. | :25:53. | :25:56. |