Browse content similar to 13/04/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Now it's time for World Business Report. | :00:00. | :00:14. | |
Can America's banking giants back their sky-high share prices | :00:15. | :00:20. | |
Plus, scooter boys beware - why your takeaway food could soon be | :00:21. | :00:28. | |
Lots going on. If you give me about eight minutes I will give you a | :00:29. | :00:56. | |
snapshot of all the latest in the world of his ascent of money. -- | :00:57. | :01:01. | |
world of business. Also coming up, more surprises | :01:02. | :01:02. | |
from President Trump as he eases We start on Wall Street, | :01:03. | :01:05. | |
where it's a hugely important Now we know the share prices | :01:06. | :01:09. | |
of banks have soared in the months following President Trump's | :01:10. | :01:13. | |
election, led by America's biggest But in recent weeks doubts | :01:14. | :01:15. | |
have been creeping in, Today we get first quarter results | :01:16. | :01:25. | |
from the biggest US bank, JP Morgan Chase, and later | :01:26. | :01:33. | |
from its rival Citigroup. They're the first of | :01:34. | :01:43. | |
a barrage of reports Will they be good enough | :01:44. | :01:45. | |
to justify the Trump rally, or confirm those fears that it's | :01:46. | :01:49. | |
a bubble waiting to burst? President Trump has famously | :01:50. | :01:52. | |
promised to throw out the mass of banking regulation brought | :01:53. | :01:56. | |
in by the Obama administration after the financial crisis, | :01:57. | :01:59. | |
the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. But he's been struggling to pass | :02:00. | :02:01. | |
other legislation like healthcare reform, so this | :02:02. | :02:04. | |
is all up in the air. Still, the banks have had a boost | :02:05. | :02:11. | |
from rising US interest rates, which have now hit 1% | :02:12. | :02:14. | |
and are expected to hit 3% This means more profits, | :02:15. | :02:17. | |
because it helps their lending That's the difference | :02:18. | :02:21. | |
between the interest rate they offer to savers and the rate | :02:22. | :02:31. | |
they charge to borrowers. Here's the view of one top | :02:32. | :02:41. | |
Wall Street watcher. What has happened since the | :02:42. | :02:53. | |
presidential election in November is that the equity market has been | :02:54. | :02:57. | |
strong but the banking sector has been particularly strong because the | :02:58. | :03:00. | |
investors see the banks is benefiting specifically on some of | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
the policies the new administration is talking about. We have not really | :03:06. | :03:10. | |
seen any news about the tax cut proposals, the infrastructure | :03:11. | :03:13. | |
spending, some of the other policies to boost the economy and boost | :03:14. | :03:16. | |
lending, and therefore help ranks increased profits over the | :03:17. | :03:21. | |
long-term. US banking results for the first quarter of 2017 will be | :03:22. | :03:25. | |
deceptive. They will look very strong competitor first quarter of | :03:26. | :03:29. | |
last year, but the first quarter of last year was very weak indeed. If | :03:30. | :03:33. | |
we compare them with the first quarter of last year they will have | :03:34. | :03:36. | |
made very little progress because we are not really seeing any of the | :03:37. | :03:39. | |
economic and fits people were expecting from the incoming | :03:40. | :03:43. | |
administration's policies. -- economic benefits. I do not expect a | :03:44. | :03:48. | |
sell-off of banking stocks, it is a think the market is waiting for | :03:49. | :03:51. | |
further news from the new administration in terms of exactly | :03:52. | :03:55. | |
what they are going to do in terms of boosting the economy, cutting | :03:56. | :03:58. | |
taxes and listening banking regulation. I think all those | :03:59. | :04:01. | |
factors could be beneficial over the long-term, and I think those | :04:02. | :04:05. | |
investors want to be able to take advantage of that. | :04:06. | :04:12. | |
Well, let's stay with this story. One Wall St watches saying that he | :04:13. | :04:16. | |
does not think there will be a retreat on the banks, but it is an | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
expensive market at the moment, because the share prices are so | :04:21. | :04:23. | |
high. Investors and everybody are respecting the banks to deliver. | :04:24. | :04:28. | |
Will they? I think we will see good numbers, but it is not just about | :04:29. | :04:31. | |
the numbers for the last three months. That is backward looking. | :04:32. | :04:34. | |
What we are looking forward to is any legislative changes which will | :04:35. | :04:39. | |
make banking less regulated and open the floodgates for profitability | :04:40. | :04:43. | |
like the heyday of the 1980s. That is actually what is fuelling this | :04:44. | :04:47. | |
stock market rise from the banks and the financial sector. That was one | :04:48. | :04:54. | |
of President Trump's promises, the Dodd-Frank Act. What we have seen | :04:55. | :04:58. | |
some of his other promises not go through, he has struggled. He may | :04:59. | :05:05. | |
struggle with this. Even that Wall Street is watcher was seen to wait | :05:06. | :05:09. | |
and see... No, it is a win-win for banks. If he gets the legislation | :05:10. | :05:12. | |
through then markets move through the expectations. If he does not get | :05:13. | :05:16. | |
it through because of the gridlock in Congress, because some | :05:17. | :05:20. | |
Republicans, as they did with Obamacare, switch sides or do not | :05:21. | :05:23. | |
push the legislation through, it doesn't matter. He will bribe | :05:24. | :05:27. | |
congressmen, because that is what you do. So they will benefit not | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
from deregulation but from increased governmental spending, which is what | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
will happen. One way or another the banks are going to benefit. We are | :05:37. | :05:42. | |
extremely bullish about US banks. In fact, more bullish than on the | :05:43. | :05:47. | |
broader US economy, because we think what will happen is that he will | :05:48. | :05:51. | |
just end up taking the easy way out, which is spending more money. OK, so | :05:52. | :05:55. | |
you think these high prices are justified? We think they will be | :05:56. | :05:58. | |
even higher by the end of the year. Well, there you go committee heard | :05:59. | :06:00. | |
it. Let's stay in the US, | :06:01. | :06:01. | |
where President Trump has said his administration will not | :06:02. | :06:04. | |
label China a currency manipulator, despite his campaign | :06:05. | :06:06. | |
promise to do so. He told the Wall Street Journal | :06:07. | :06:08. | |
the dollar was "getting too strong" but that was partly his | :06:09. | :06:12. | |
fault because people had The comments to the Wall Street | :06:13. | :06:15. | |
Journal come after his meeting China has been accused | :06:16. | :06:20. | |
of suppressing the yuan to make its exports more | :06:21. | :06:25. | |
competitive with US goods. Before the US election, | :06:26. | :06:27. | |
Mr Trump likened this Sharanjit Leyl has been | :06:28. | :06:29. | |
following this for us in Singapore. Again, and other incredible story. | :06:30. | :06:53. | |
Higher US dollar week as he is so good, hey? Yeah, but you know what? | :06:54. | :07:00. | |
Those comments pretty much had the desired effect, because as soon as | :07:01. | :07:04. | |
he said he didn't want a strong US dollar and didn't like a strong US | :07:05. | :07:08. | |
dollar, the US dollar tumbled. So now we are seeing the yen and others | :07:09. | :07:12. | |
in Asia finding strength, and as a result the markets are falling | :07:13. | :07:15. | |
because nobody else likes their currency being too strong either. So | :07:16. | :07:19. | |
the Japanese are selling off all those export-oriented stocks. But, | :07:20. | :07:24. | |
yes, as you say, he went on to state in that interview that's a thing of | :07:25. | :07:28. | |
the label currency manipulator on China would hurt talks with Beijing | :07:29. | :07:31. | |
on dealing with North Korean threats. We knew that China had | :07:32. | :07:36. | |
suppressed the currency, the yuan, for years, to make its exports more | :07:37. | :07:41. | |
competitive with US goods. But Mr Trump said this was like reaping the | :07:42. | :07:45. | |
United States. He had promised to label China currency manipulator on | :07:46. | :07:49. | |
his first day in office, but in that interview he admitted that China had | :07:50. | :07:52. | |
not been currency manipulators for some time. They have actually been | :07:53. | :07:56. | |
trying to prevent further weakening. All of this, as we know, has not | :07:57. | :08:00. | |
helped the reality of the trade relationship between the United | :08:01. | :08:05. | |
States and China, with data out a few hours ago showing that the trade | :08:06. | :08:09. | |
surplus China has with the US has risen yet again. It rose in March to | :08:10. | :08:13. | |
over $17 billion. That is a big rise from February's $10 billion or so. | :08:14. | :08:18. | |
President Trump has focused on that in particular, that large trade | :08:19. | :08:22. | |
surplus that China has with the US. It was about $350 billion last year, | :08:23. | :08:27. | |
and he has been pressing Chinese President Xi Jinping to help reduce | :08:28. | :08:32. | |
the gap. Do you ever ordered delivery? Takeout food, I should | :08:33. | :08:39. | |
say? Yes, sometimes. Delivered to you by a man or a woman on a | :08:40. | :08:43. | |
scooter, right? Something like that? That's right. Watch this next story. | :08:44. | :08:49. | |
Are you happy to have your food delivered by a robot? | :08:50. | :08:50. | |
That's the question being asked of take-out food customers | :08:51. | :08:52. | |
of technology that could mean the end of the road for scooter | :08:53. | :08:58. | |
We think the best approach for this kind of system is one where there is | :08:59. | :09:35. | |
constant human oversight of the robots. The architecture we have | :09:36. | :09:39. | |
chosen is one where a person is capable of controlling one or two | :09:40. | :09:42. | |
robots, and overtime we would build in more and more autonomous | :09:43. | :09:45. | |
operation so there is one person then controlling five and then and | :09:46. | :09:49. | |
so on. It is effectively multiplying the ability of a given person to do | :09:50. | :09:54. | |
more work over the set of robots they are overseeing. | :09:55. | :10:39. | |
That's the future. I'll be back later to look at the newspapers from | :10:40. | :10:45. | |
around the world. | :10:46. | :10:49. |