Browse content similar to 31/08/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Now it's time for World Business Report. | :00:00. | :00:16. | |
A taxing task for Trump, as he pushes plans to ease | :00:17. | :00:20. | |
the burden on business and the middle classes. | :00:21. | :00:23. | |
But can he sell it to a sceptical Congress? | :00:24. | :00:26. | |
Plus, crude warning - the boss of Shell says the price | :00:27. | :00:29. | |
of oil could soon be heading higher as lack | :00:30. | :00:32. | |
Also coming up, unexpected good news as China's factories move up | :00:33. | :00:44. | |
where President Trump has begun a speaking tour to try and build | :00:45. | :00:56. | |
He described the US tax code - which hasn't been reformed for three | :00:57. | :01:02. | |
And he called for a more competitive system to boost jobs and wages, | :01:03. | :01:07. | |
repeating his ambition to cut America's corporate tax rate | :01:08. | :01:10. | |
On paper the US corporation tax rate is one of the world's | :01:11. | :01:15. | |
Taking into account various tax breaks, top US firms pay a bit less | :01:16. | :01:22. | |
That still compares unfavourably with the 25% rate in China, | :01:23. | :01:26. | |
19% in the UK, and just 12.5% in Ireland - | :01:27. | :01:29. | |
where many top US firms have their overseas headquarters. | :01:30. | :01:31. | |
Which has led of course to this - $2.5 trillion worth of profits | :01:32. | :01:35. | |
channelled overseas by top US companies as they look | :01:36. | :01:37. | |
The US national debt is spiralling towards $20 trillion. | :01:38. | :01:55. | |
So would cutting taxes boost the economy, and tempt US firms | :01:56. | :01:59. | |
Or would it just do more damage to the government's finances? | :02:00. | :02:13. | |
That's an argument the President will have to take to Congress, | :02:14. | :02:16. | |
as Michelle Fleury reports from New York. | :02:17. | :02:25. | |
These stock market is art. The unemployment rate is at an all-time | :02:26. | :02:35. | |
low. If you listened to Donald Trump on Wednesday, you heard him say the | :02:36. | :02:39. | |
system is rigged. In a speech to introduce tax reform, the US | :02:40. | :02:42. | |
President told the crowd, the country's tax system was broken. His | :02:43. | :02:47. | |
sales pitch, which was light on details, focused on how it would | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
then that the middle class. Our self-destructive tax code costs | :02:53. | :02:55. | |
Americans millions and millions of job, trillions of dollars, and | :02:56. | :03:00. | |
billions of hours spent on compliance and paperwork. One | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
proposal he has been pushing is cutting the nation's 35% corporate | :03:06. | :03:11. | |
tax rate to 15%. Those in favour say it would encourage companies to stay | :03:12. | :03:14. | |
in the United States and create jobs, but not so fast. Budget | :03:15. | :03:19. | |
experts say the plan could cost the government $2 trillion, and critics | :03:20. | :03:23. | |
argue there is no evidence that companies saving more on taxes will | :03:24. | :03:28. | |
expand their workforces. Plus, the tax code is so full of loopholes | :03:29. | :03:31. | |
that most firms already pay less. There is bipartisan support to | :03:32. | :03:37. | |
simpler by America's tax code. But given potential impact on workers, | :03:38. | :03:40. | |
businesses and the country's deficit, modernising the rules would | :03:41. | :03:41. | |
get for water. Professor Alan Auerbach is Professor | :03:42. | :03:43. | |
of Economics at the University Good to see you again, Professor. | :03:44. | :03:54. | |
Can you give us your take on President Trump's challenge? Will he | :03:55. | :03:59. | |
pull it off and get a 15% corporation tax rate in the US? I | :04:00. | :04:06. | |
think he is still talking about 15%, but others in his administration | :04:07. | :04:11. | |
have begun talking about 20% or 25%. So maybe he is still talking about | :04:12. | :04:16. | |
that in speeches, but I think it is extremely unlikely we are going to | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
see a 15% tax rate. So we will see some kind of political fudge at the | :04:21. | :04:25. | |
end of it? Well... Will it either desired effect of American companies | :04:26. | :04:30. | |
bringing profits home? -- will it see the desired effect. I think it | :04:31. | :04:35. | |
depends on the details, and as you said, that has been very light so | :04:36. | :04:39. | |
far. If we just have a cut in the corporate tax rate, that in itself | :04:40. | :04:43. | |
would encourage companies to bring profits home and perhaps to locate | :04:44. | :04:46. | |
more production in the United States. The big question is how he | :04:47. | :04:50. | |
will pay for it. Simply issuing more debt in order to do that would | :04:51. | :04:55. | |
equate counter-productive. All in all, that would not be a good policy | :04:56. | :05:02. | |
to follow. They are taking a path of least resistance right now and | :05:03. | :05:05. | |
promising benefits without really indicating how they are going to | :05:06. | :05:08. | |
balance the package. And of course that is where the difficulty comes | :05:09. | :05:13. | |
in. Partick million trying to hold their fragile Republican coalition | :05:14. | :05:17. | |
together, especially in the senate. -- particularly in trying to hold. | :05:18. | :05:24. | |
From your perspective, how are the public finances? We have given the | :05:25. | :05:28. | |
barebones facts, with public debit heading towards $20 trillion. That | :05:29. | :05:34. | |
is such an enormous sum. But the US economy, we had a revision of the | :05:35. | :05:37. | |
latest GDP numbers upwards, I mean, the economy is healthy. The economy | :05:38. | :05:43. | |
is very healthy. We are experiencing a very low unemployment rate. We | :05:44. | :05:46. | |
just had a revision upward of our recent growth. The US economy is | :05:47. | :05:51. | |
doing well, which is not to say that we couldn't do better, with a more | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
sensible tax system. But I would say that taking harsh or extreme | :05:57. | :06:03. | |
measures right now in the name of rhetoric thing and economy, I think | :06:04. | :06:10. | |
that would be inappropriate. A cheerful, well-designed tax reform | :06:11. | :06:13. | |
would be a benefit for the US economy. -- careful, well-designed. | :06:14. | :06:20. | |
But simply passing a tax cut to declare victory, that something has | :06:21. | :06:23. | |
been accomplished, that would be a big mistake. We will watch this | :06:24. | :06:26. | |
space closely. Thank you for your time. | :06:27. | :06:31. | |
Let's go to Asia and talk about the economy. China moved up in August in | :06:32. | :06:41. | |
terms of their factory sector, better than most economists were | :06:42. | :06:43. | |
predicting. That will ease concerns about the help of the Chinese | :06:44. | :06:51. | |
economy. Sharanjit Leyl joins us. The numbers are looking good for | :06:52. | :06:55. | |
China, following hot on the heels of the US revision upwards as well? | :06:56. | :07:00. | |
Absolutely. You said it. Most markets in the region are going up | :07:01. | :07:04. | |
as a result, because of all this good news. China, as you said, | :07:05. | :07:07. | |
posted stronger than expect the factory sector growth in August. The | :07:08. | :07:14. | |
purchasing managers index, that is the official one, it is a gauge of | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
the help of the manufacturing sector, and it came in at 51.7, | :07:19. | :07:21. | |
crucially above the 50 point mark that separates growth from | :07:22. | :07:25. | |
contraction. Analysts had expected it to actually be fairly little | :07:26. | :07:30. | |
change from July. So China's resilience is giving something of an | :07:31. | :07:34. | |
extra boost to the global recovery, especially, like you said, at a time | :07:35. | :07:38. | |
in the US economy also seems to be bouncing back. You just said US | :07:39. | :07:41. | |
growth would be revised up to register growth, the fastest pace in | :07:42. | :07:45. | |
more than two years. China has had to manage its economy much more | :07:46. | :07:49. | |
carefully, because it has cracked down on riskier lending, it has put | :07:50. | :07:53. | |
in place tough curbs to get its housing market under control, and we | :07:54. | :07:56. | |
saw a growing by a better-than-expected 6.9% in the | :07:57. | :08:02. | |
first half. -- saw it growing. So we have seen this better data, but the | :08:03. | :08:06. | |
services sector has not shown as much growth. Thank you, Sharanjit | :08:07. | :08:08. | |
Leyl. The industry has got | :08:09. | :08:10. | |
used to lower prices, but the boss of Shell, | :08:11. | :08:14. | |
Ben van Beurden, has told the BBC that prices could start rising soon, | :08:15. | :08:17. | |
as underinvestment reduces Good news for oil companies, | :08:18. | :08:20. | |
you might think. But not necessarily, | :08:21. | :08:23. | |
as he told our business editor If you look at it in the slightly | :08:24. | :08:35. | |
longer term, I think the fundamentals are such that supply is | :08:36. | :08:39. | |
going to be a little bit tight. Not necessarily next quarter, not | :08:40. | :08:46. | |
necessarily very predictably. There might be seasonal effects, there | :08:47. | :08:50. | |
might be other effects. But I think the market is actually in balance, | :08:51. | :08:56. | |
and it will tighten a bit more. So there is probably more propensity | :08:57. | :08:59. | |
for the oil price to drift higher than lower. But you have to bear in | :09:00. | :09:04. | |
mind come in the short term, it is driven by sentiment, so it can go in | :09:05. | :09:08. | |
any direction. That is interesting. You are saying that underinvestment | :09:09. | :09:11. | |
in bigger projects over the last couple of years, because of the low | :09:12. | :09:16. | |
oil price, is so -- is selling PCs for a potential oil price spike | :09:17. | :09:19. | |
knowing forward? -- selling in the seeds. -- sowing. I think that is a | :09:20. | :09:28. | |
risk, and nobody would benefit from that. You would. I don't think so. | :09:29. | :09:33. | |
It is a popular belief, that this is good for oil companies, but I can | :09:34. | :09:37. | |
tell you that it isn't. What is important to us as a relatively | :09:38. | :09:41. | |
predictable market, a relatively predictable outlook for supply and | :09:42. | :09:44. | |
demand, prices, et cetera. Because look at what happens, if oil prices | :09:45. | :09:50. | |
drop down from over 100 to less than 30, you know, there in mind every | :09:51. | :09:58. | |
$10 in the oil price is like $5 billion of cash per year for me. -- | :09:59. | :10:05. | |
bear in mind. So the amount of impact on our operations is massive. | :10:06. | :10:09. | |
We cannot, as an industry, have a predictable and efficient way of | :10:10. | :10:13. | |
running our business, when you have so much disruption and so much | :10:14. | :10:16. | |
cycling. Of course, we can take costs out of a weak and simple by | :10:17. | :10:21. | |
projects, but also you have to put people out of business because you | :10:22. | :10:24. | |
can't afford it any more, or you are not going to build as much as you | :10:25. | :10:28. | |
would like to build. And next time around, you know, it all reverses | :10:29. | :10:32. | |
again. That is a very inefficient way of actually running the | :10:33. | :10:35. | |
industry, and nobody benefits from that. Least of all customers, but | :10:36. | :10:37. | |
definitely also not us. That was the boss of Shell, speaking | :10:38. | :10:47. | |
to Simon Jack. Looking at markets now, the price of oil has declined, | :10:48. | :10:51. | |
but gasoline is going up and up. This has to do with Hurricane Harvey | :10:52. | :10:55. | |
pounding the energy rich Gulf of Mexico coastline. Mixed markets, | :10:56. | :11:00. | |
slightly down for Hong Kong. Overall, sentiment is positive, | :11:01. | :11:03. | |
thanks to the news from China and also the GDP figures from the US the | :11:04. | :11:07. | |
night before. I will see you again shortly. | :11:08. | :11:13. | |
From tomorrow, working parents across England will be able to get | :11:14. | :11:16. | |
30 hours of free childcare a week, and the deadline to apply is today. | :11:17. | :11:21. |