Day 2 - Highlights Bowls: Scottish International Open


Day 2 - Highlights

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Day 2 - Highlights. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Hello and a warm welcome. Unless you

watched our live coverage earlier,

0:00:310:00:35

we will show you something I bet you

have never seen before. More on that

0:00:350:00:41

later plus we have highlights of

four amazing matches coming up.

0:00:410:00:51

This is the way the draw looked at

the start of play.

0:01:150:01:28

Let's go to the one eagerly

anticipated, two very good friends

0:01:310:01:38

of the ring, but fierce competitors

on it. It is Greg Harlow against

0:01:380:01:43

Mervyn King. Mervyn King is the

master of the draw game but recent

0:01:430:01:48

seasons have been barren by his

standards. A drop in the rankings

0:01:480:01:53

reflect that drop in form. Greg

Harlow, he is the current Scottish

0:01:530:02:02

International open champion and

world number one. Mervyn King took

0:02:020:02:06

the first two ends to build a two

shot lead. But Greg Harlow had

0:02:060:02:14

fought back and when we join the

action he's leading 5-4 going into

0:02:140:02:17

the seventh.

0:02:170:02:27

APPLAUSE

0:02:380:02:40

COMMENTATOR: A lot of players would

have changed on to the forehand. Can

0:02:510:02:55

see an edge of the jack and can get

the shot but from Mervyn, it is more

0:02:550:03:01

of I will stick with the hand I know

I get a good second shot. Just not

0:03:010:03:05

reaching. That is exactly what would

be going through his mind.

0:03:050:03:12

Just the one, 15 inch gap.

Time to

move now because any touch brings

0:03:380:03:48

the black into play. Gentle, gentle

to get back from there.

0:03:480:03:56

Greg Harlow senses an opportunity.

One shot up. Great opening bowl, if

0:04:110:04:19

you can add to the pressure.

Any

touch on the forehand on the jack

0:04:190:04:31

will bring it to that bowl. Mervyn

is going to try and use it as a

0:04:310:04:40

shoulder to drop off. Not even,

going for the weight. This is a

0:04:400:04:45

difficult shot. Holding on.

Tell you

what, he wasn't far away from

0:04:450:04:53

getting what he wanted, but that

movements of the jack is a major

0:04:530:04:57

bonus for him.

Also an inch or two

from disaster. If it touched the red

0:04:570:05:05

bowl, it was three against him. He

can look to the heavens, but I think

0:05:050:05:12

it has been kinder than he realised.

0:05:120:05:16

Just missed the line slightly, the

wait was bad.

It is one and a

0:05:490:06:03

measure. Maybe time-out is about to

come.

The forehand draw, the back

0:06:030:06:13

and play, risky. Three different

chances.

I would fancy two from the

0:06:130:06:22

indication of the rings.

If it is

two, I would contemplate playing

0:06:220:06:26

through it. It might just stop on

the green bowl. It is a hard effort

0:06:260:06:33

to draw, this. Going for it again.

Not surprised. Just needs to drop

0:06:330:06:42

down on the inside. Run-through and

it touched the jack, this might make

0:06:420:06:50

the double. Goodness me.

He held his

hand up an apology, not sure he had

0:06:500:06:58

to. He played the shot, got a

fortunate result to a certain

0:06:580:07:03

extent, but he was online to make

something happen.

I am with him on

0:07:030:07:07

the apology. Any run-through bowl is

very, very hard to judge. It really

0:07:070:07:15

is. It's normally a bit of luck on a

run-through bowl. He was just a

0:07:150:07:22

quarter bowl of target. If he came

of it and ran onto the jack, it was

0:07:220:07:29

a perfect shot. He just cannot gauge

run-through 's. They are lovely when

0:07:290:07:37

they work for you, but they do hurt.

That looks like it is a clear road.

0:07:370:07:47

It is a big two.

0:07:470:07:53

It is two, what a turnaround that

is.

0:07:580:08:04

STUDIO: With the lead retained,

Mervyn King didn't look back as he

0:08:040:08:10

took the next two ends and the first

set. In the second set, rejoin it

0:08:100:08:15

with Greg Harlow leading 3-1, going

into the fourth end.

0:08:150:08:21

COMMENTATOR: Strong, opening bowl.

0:08:400:08:43

It is a good start, but in a match

of this quality, you almost expect

0:08:520:08:57

Greg to beat it.

Making sure he was

arriving. Didn't want to take any

0:08:570:09:07

chances on that dropping short.

He

wasn't hanging back with that one.

0:09:070:09:15

He doesn't like it, it represents a

target that might not come into play

0:09:360:09:42

immediately. Greg isn't hanging

around. He's underneath. Just how

0:09:420:09:46

much underneath with his own bowl.

That is the one I was looking at, at

0:09:460:09:51

the back. Goodness me.

0:09:510:09:59

Greg's first two bowls, off the

rink. Mervyn, dropping in for

0:10:120:10:16

another. Doesn't want to leave a

target, but he would love to turn

0:10:160:10:20

that jack around the corner. He's

not going to. That has made the

0:10:200:10:26

target so much wider. Could end up

with the jack in the ditch.

Mervyn

0:10:260:10:35

want that back, fair to say.

Did he

pull it again?

He has come under.

0:10:350:10:43

You have just witnessed something

very rare. Wayward weight shots from

0:10:430:10:48

Greg Harlow on the forearm.

You

would lose money all day long

0:10:480:10:55

betting on that one. He did seem to

go a little bit faster than normal.

0:10:550:11:03

Greg is very dangers on that very

controlled weight shots. I don't

0:11:030:11:11

think he has a lot of choice, he may

have to go again. Take the risk.

He

0:11:110:11:23

doesn't have a bowl on the rink.

This is his final delivery and he

0:11:230:11:28

will go for it.

He is on the front

inside edge of the matter. Which

0:11:280:11:33

means he's going for it.

He likes

it.

Didn't matter in some respects

0:11:330:11:40

because unless he touched the jack,

but bowl was taken.

Three. Three

0:11:400:11:48

shots, Mervyn King.

Indeed he did.

His bowl, not touching, is lifted

0:11:480:11:56

out. He uses the end and he loses

the lead.

0:11:560:12:04

STUDIO: Be traded singles in the

next two ends.

0:12:040:12:10

APPLAUSE

He has tidied up his opening bowl,

0:12:290:12:35

Greg Harlow, after a few loose one.

0:12:350:12:40

That is a better one again.

0:12:490:12:54

That's not a very pretty target for

Greg Harlow. Great picture from what

0:13:080:13:12

he can see, effectively, from the

mats. Single bowl target.

0:13:120:13:21

That will not help Mervyn.

Your

bowl, there is an inch gap. You are

0:13:260:13:36

about inches short of jack high.

Interesting way to describe that.

0:13:360:13:48

The closest edge to Mervyn is about

six inches short. But the distance

0:13:480:13:55

is only an inch. That is obviously

enough for Mervyn.

He liked what he

0:13:550:14:06

heard. Beautifully played.

0:14:060:14:16

This target is a horrible one. He

has no choice. He doesn't want to

0:14:180:14:25

lose it two or three. He has got to

go for it. I think he knew that

0:14:250:14:32

actually from a couple of yards away

from Amat, the look on Greg's face

0:14:320:14:37

was enough to tell me he realised he

was getting half of his own. This is

0:14:370:14:44

really difficult now because I don't

think he can get the two bowls

0:14:440:14:51

without the jack going.

Both Greg

Harlow's bowls have gone off the

0:14:510:14:59

rink. The one you can see is the

only one he has on the rink.

0:14:590:15:08

That is a great place to put it.

0:15:130:15:22

He doesn't even have the advantage

of the last bowl, Greg Harlow. It is

0:15:320:15:37

a horrible situation he finds

himself in.

It certainly is.

0:15:370:15:42

Time-out called. He only has one

bowl, if he takes that out he will

0:15:420:15:49

be looking at losing four. What he

is trying to work out is where he

0:15:490:15:53

can put to help things. He's putting

his foot around the jack for this

0:15:530:15:59

sort of area. But if the jack goes

into this area, he's going to lose

0:15:590:16:03

three shots. I think he is in so

much trouble here. He is a minimum

0:16:030:16:15

two down. The third could be close.

The best would be to draw the bowl

0:16:150:16:24

of and lie in, but goodness me, that

is hard.

0:16:240:16:28

It is all about connections on the

outside of the bowl, that is what he

0:16:380:16:41

is looking for. If he wasn't going

to make a connection, that is the

0:16:410:16:46

best he can do. Guaranteed to take

the back bowl out. He will be

0:16:460:16:54

thinking if Mervyn makes a slip, I

will only use two.

Every chance he

0:16:540:17:03

will be four down with two to play

in a setting must win can Mervyn

0:17:030:17:09

deliver here?

0:17:090:17:11

This could change the whole

complexion.

He's playing wide just

0:17:170:17:23

to try and get in jack high.

Beautiful.

He plays it so well

0:17:230:17:30

whenever he has to go wide for a

jack high bowl. Wide, drifting shots

0:17:300:17:37

work because you don't have to get

to the jack, you just have to get

0:17:370:17:41

closer to the nearest one than the

opposition. People become to jack

0:17:410:17:47

focused and Mervyn is an expert in

avoiding that.

0:17:470:17:50

STUDIO: After that there was no way

back for the two-time defending

0:17:500:17:54

champion and with the writing on the

wall in the last end, Greg Harlow

0:17:540:17:58

conceded the match.

Congratulations, that was some

0:17:580:18:04

lovely stuff.

Obviously I am

delighted to win. I think we both

0:18:040:18:08

could have played a bit better, but

in and out, brilliant shots. But

0:18:080:18:13

glad to get over the line yes.

You

seem to be struggling a bit for your

0:18:130:18:19

line and length to be consistent?

To

be honest, I didn't get into my

0:18:190:18:25

rhythm today, I didn't get going.

Mervyn played well and he is a

0:18:250:18:30

worthy winner, I hope he goes on to

win the title, it will be nice. Some

0:18:300:18:35

scrappy stuff but he played the

better bowls, tight bowls on that

0:18:350:18:40

was the difference. I couldn't find

any answers to his close touches.

0:18:400:18:45

The most important thing, if you can

get your first bowl in, you will

0:18:450:18:49

always put pressure on your opponent

and you were doing that regularly?

0:18:490:18:57

Yes, it is key to get your first

bowl then, I did it most of the

0:18:570:19:00

time.

We know you as the master of

the drawer shot, but you are playing

0:19:000:19:05

with weight, and this is the second

end of the first set, hugely

0:19:050:19:11

important in turning things around?

I play with more weight than I have

0:19:110:19:15

done in the last 24 years. I wasn't

drawing as well and thought I would

0:19:150:19:19

just go for a few shots. I won one

of, got one and I thought I would

0:19:190:19:25

keep trying.

Hard to sit and watch

that, but he did well with them?

I

0:19:250:19:32

have played him hundreds of times

and plays that shot all day long.

0:19:320:19:36

But the some reason on the world

Bowls tour, he has not played as

0:19:360:19:40

many shots. But I am know he's

capable of it so I wasn't surprised

0:19:400:19:44

seeing them coming down.

Quarterfinal Mervyn. You must be

0:19:440:19:49

feeling pretty confident now?

Reasonable, take each game as it

0:19:490:19:54

comes and go out there and play as

well as that, I have a chance.

0:19:540:20:02

Congratulations. Commiserations,

Greg, always great to see you here.

0:20:020:20:05

I'm sure you will be back picking up

trophies on the tour.

0:20:050:20:10

Mervyn King, through to the

quarterfinals. Next up we have a

0:20:100:20:15

firm favourite, Andy Thomson, the

Anglo Scot, he was up against young

0:20:150:20:21

Jamie Chestney. 30-year-old chess

knee up against Thompson. Jamie

0:20:210:20:29

Chestney one his first ranking event

at the International open in

0:20:290:20:33

Blackpool and it was the younger man

who took the first set here. The key

0:20:330:20:37

moment coming in the seventh end

when the slightly fortunate weighted

0:20:370:20:40

shot gave Jamie Chestney trouble to

put him in control. It is 20 years

0:20:400:20:46

since Andy won this event. His luck

was going against him this year.

0:20:460:20:55

This squeeze through and a possible

gap to help Jamie Chestney get the

0:20:550:21:00

advantage.

0:21:000:21:04

There would be no way back that Andy

Thomson in this match, by now Jamie

0:21:060:21:14

Chestney was turning the screw. Andy

Thomson couldn't respond to it, and

0:21:140:21:23

Jamie Chestney into the quarters. He

is a really impressive player, Jamie

0:21:230:21:31

Chestney, I wonder how far he will

go. Next we have a match covering

0:21:310:21:38

Paul Foster against Mark Dawes.

The bowler from Blackpool earned a

0:21:380:21:42

place in the top 16 in 2016 and has

moved up to 12th in the last couple

0:21:420:21:48

of years. You are something special

when your list of achievements

0:21:480:21:52

spreads across three pages. Paul

Foster has picked up trophies and

0:21:520:21:56

gold medals across the globe. We

join the action in the fourth end

0:21:560:22:01

with Paul Foster leading 2-1. You

have your commentators of Paul

0:22:010:22:09

Mitchell and fresh from his match

earlier in the day, Andy Thomson.

0:22:090:22:14

COMMENTATOR: There is a big gap

forcing yourself into the top eight.

0:22:180:22:21

You have got to be the Paul Foster

of this tournament to get into the

0:22:210:22:27

top eight.

0:22:270:22:28

Paul Foster, former world number

one. Currently at number four.

0:22:450:22:53

He has found his line, Paul Foster.

0:23:350:23:42

I think Mark is contemplating

running bowl. Easy, wide target, I

0:23:490:23:57

think he likes it.

He is unlucky. He

was asking if the two bowls for

0:23:570:24:03

touching?

Yes, I think you probably

thought if he could take one, he

0:24:030:24:08

could take them both out. Unlucky

result, he hit the target again. If

0:24:080:24:18

he caught the other bowl, he could

have removed two of them. As it is,

0:24:180:24:26

there is room to draw another.

0:24:260:24:28

Looks like he will put it back in.

Exactly where it was.

Will it be

0:24:390:24:56

deja vu, knowing your opponent has

right to reply. Mark will be

0:24:560:25:02

feeling, what happens if I strike

this? I cannot see him getting a bad

0:25:020:25:07

result. I don't think any of Paul's

bowls are touches. Looks like he is

0:25:070:25:11

shaping up for the drawer. Playing

the same bowl.

Looked tight out of

0:25:110:25:21

the hand. Held up with the weight.

He was underneath, so he is still

0:25:210:25:27

two down. You expect him to draw

another.

You expect him to put it on

0:25:270:25:39

top, not just get it close.

0:25:390:25:44

Number three. Brilliant bowls.

Perfectly done. For bowls within a

0:25:580:26:08

couple of inches, effectively. He

had one lifted out.

Three shots,

0:26:080:26:12

Paul Foster.

Final bowl coming in

here. Plenty of room for Paul

0:26:120:26:19

Foster, perfect start, great

bowling. Paul Foster, bringing with

0:26:190:26:30

him, appeared to Perth this year.

It

is the fashion these days. Your

0:26:300:26:38

co-commentator has also got one,

what do you think of that one?

It is

0:26:380:26:43

a nice shade of grey! Looking very

smart.

He suits the beard, I

0:26:430:26:55

wouldn't admit that to him, but it

does suit him. I did sport a beard

0:26:550:27:00

for a little while, it was quickly

removed after instructions from my

0:27:000:27:07

good lady. To be fair, I also looked

ridiculous.

0:27:070:27:15

Good reply.

0:27:240:27:28

Keeping a close eye on this one,

Paul Foster. Has arguably improve

0:27:410:27:55

things for his opponent.

0:27:550:28:00

Beautifully played. Tempting target

for Paul Foster. Good back and

0:28:140:28:24

running here, wouldn't be surprised

to see this one. Bowl or jack.

0:28:240:28:29

It was out the side and that will go

on the restart. Paul Foster's is a

0:28:410:28:47

touch. It will turn into basically a

drawing contest.

Mark has the

0:28:470:28:54

advantage, two bowls to Paul's one.

I don't think any of these bowls

0:28:540:29:06

will count, so I don't think it

really matters.

0:29:060:29:11

Judge to perfection.

Better from

Paul. Too much room for Mark to draw

0:29:180:29:31

another.

0:29:310:29:32

Suddenly a wider line. It is, a lot

wider than Mark.

-- certainly.

0:29:430:29:52

You've not draw it, have you?!

That

is outrageous!

Give us a chance!

0:29:520:29:59

That is brilliant. Mark will be

thinking, what's going on here. We

0:29:590:30:07

thought he was too wide.

He was

right on the very edge of the ditch.

0:30:070:30:12

But he knows his bowls and that is a

work of art.

It's brilliant.

0:30:120:30:18

Time-out called. That is the first

for Mark.

0:30:180:30:25

I think Mark has probably got to

take a chance on the backhand and

0:30:320:30:35

try to run Paul's bowl off but the

danger is removing your own but he

0:30:350:30:41

has to take a chance and try to

score.

It is getting to that point

0:30:410:30:47

in the set, four down, you don't

really want to be five or six down.

0:30:470:30:53

He is playing backhand across the

head here. The line looks fair. He's

0:30:530:30:58

having a look.

He's given it every

chance.

Great bowl.

No wonder he

0:30:580:31:09

goes up the rink. That brings out

the best in some players and we have

0:31:090:31:15

just seen -- seen three exceptional

bowls. STUDIO: Dawes was still

0:31:150:31:24

trailing by two shots as we rejoin

it for the last end of the first

0:31:240:31:28

set.

0:31:280:31:29

The percentage success rate of Paul

Foster's opening bowl is

0:31:490:31:54

astronomical.

Yes, very good. Making

it hard for Mark to score. Two is

0:31:540:32:04

always gettable, though. You can't

fault that, it might give him a

0:32:040:32:07

chance later on.

The ideal bowl for

Paul Foster here is a foot or two

0:32:070:32:22

behind.

He has his hand to his face,

he knew it wasn't a good one.

It

0:32:220:32:28

might act as a protector somewhere

along the line.

He is not happy with

0:32:280:32:31

that.

With every reason.

0:32:310:32:34

Do you gamble and try to go for the

jack?

0:32:420:32:55

He is round it and again it might

not be the shot but it is a useful

0:32:550:33:02

bowl.

Mark has to be careful. He has

good position.

0:33:020:33:07

He gathers the information and

processes it.

Trying to split the

0:33:180:33:29

two red bowls, that will be the

target. I don't think he will be

0:33:290:33:33

happy with that, not at all. It

gives Mark still a big chance here.

0:33:330:33:41

Any movement of the jack, Paul

realises this has given him a

0:33:410:33:45

chance. He could be lying to all

three.

0:33:450:33:54

-- two or three. He is positive.

It

is a little under and a bad result

0:33:580:34:08

from that point of view. He will

have to try to find a drive.

This is

0:34:080:34:21

an awkward head for Paul. He cannot

cover everything. Mark has three

0:34:210:34:28

deep bowls.

The bowl to the right of

the picture is still in.

Yes.

And

0:34:280:34:40

that is going to be awkward for him.

He has called a time-out and you can

0:34:400:34:44

see the position on the right-hand

side. Paul Foster, it is difficult,

0:34:440:34:52

because he will work out where he

thinks it is likely to go.

This will

0:34:520:35:01

certainly be through but there might

be a chance for Mark Dawes to score

0:35:010:35:05

at least two. I think if he slices

that jack on the other angle the

0:35:050:35:16

score is two or three I think. The

dot on the right-hand side of the

0:35:160:35:27

screen, if he slices the jack into

the area he will certainly score two

0:35:270:35:32

and possibly three.

Paul Foster

watches his opponent. He has missed

0:35:320:35:40

it.

He doesn't like it. He never

gave it a chance and Paul Foster

0:35:400:35:45

will take the opening set.

0:35:450:35:48

STUDIO: Foster continued with his

brilliant bowls into the second set

0:35:510:35:57

and we picked it up with him leading

far one -- 5-1 after four ends.

0:35:570:36:05

COMMENTATOR: Winner twice of this

tournament, in 2009 against Ian Ward

0:36:080:36:13

and Nicky Brett in 2012.

0:36:130:36:17

He is hanging in.

It is so difficult

because look where Paul Foster is

0:36:470:36:54

and he pulls out a great bowl.

He is

not far away and he starts to build

0:36:540:37:05

the dangerous position. Mark Dawes

has played exceptionally well no

0:37:050:37:08

matter what happens but he needs to

take that next level and the next

0:37:080:37:14

few ends will be interesting.

Stating the obvious but he has to

0:37:140:37:19

score in this end.

He has given

himself an exceptional chance.

Great

0:37:190:37:23

bowl and we might see a drive from

Paul. Two down, he has to hit this.

0:37:230:37:32

He has not brought out the weight

too often.

Playing the running bowl

0:37:320:37:37

as opposed to the very fast drive.

Got it.

50% happy with that, it

0:37:370:37:43

takes one away.

If he had nudged

that jack out, his two green bowls

0:37:430:37:51

were in good receiving positions and

you're talking millimetres.

It was

0:37:510:37:57

only that. Mark will be trying to

replace the last bowl. Trying to get

0:37:570:38:03

a bit of pressure on Paul's final

delivery.

0:38:030:38:14

Paul is only one down, this will be

back to the draw.

0:38:180:38:30

A rare bowl not reaching from Paul

Foster. Shall we be critical of

0:38:420:38:47

him?!

He knows where to find us! But

he obviously didn't intend it. That

0:38:470:38:52

is David Gourlay. He will be

involved with Scotland for the

0:38:520:38:59

Commonwealth games which we were

talking about earlier.

He will be

0:38:590:39:05

happy that his player, Paul Foster,

is playing well. A chance for Mark

0:39:050:39:11

to score a double, this looks good

and very well played by Mark Dawes.

0:39:110:39:17

It is superb stuff.

0:39:170:39:20

And having lost three straight ends,

it gives him a chance to set the

0:39:230:39:29

mat, although it is causing some

discomfort at the moment!

He is very

0:39:290:39:34

undecided, really. Where do I put

this to put him off?

0:39:340:39:48

Always good when you change the

length to get the opening bowl close

0:40:010:40:06

but Mark probably realises that

isn't going to be close enough.

It

0:40:060:40:10

does not look bad from that

particular angle but you get the

0:40:100:40:13

feeling it is just not good enough.

0:40:130:40:24

It just puts added pressure on to

your next bowl.

0:40:250:40:33

And there is the improvement.

0:40:360:40:47

He has turned his back already on

that one. He missed the line.

He

0:40:510:41:00

knew it immediately.

0:41:000:41:06

He is going to come the other way.

Mark Dawes playing his fourth

0:41:090:41:16

Scottish International Open having

made his debut in 2014.

Nudging the

0:41:160:41:22

ball back, that is number two. This

might force Paul into weight here.

0:41:220:41:31

He doesn't hang about.

Close. He

likes it. Not a particularly kind

0:41:350:41:44

result for him but it does open

things up. And he still has a bowl

0:41:440:41:48

to play.

He hits the target. Two of

the bowls stay in but still two down

0:41:480:41:57

and Mark should draw a third shot

here.

0:41:570:42:00

In a way, he may be doesn't want

this want to go to close because it

0:42:080:42:15

gives him a target so interesting to

see where it finishes.

Very good.

0:42:150:42:23

That's the way to do it. Paul Foster

did have the best back bowl so if he

0:42:230:42:30

had left it either side it might

have been a tempting target.

Paul is

0:42:300:42:34

looking at a runner here, I think it

is still a backhand draw. Difficult

0:42:340:42:40

to get a shot but he should be able

to get a second. The forehand,

0:42:400:42:46

playing the drive. It is

full-blooded.

The jack has broken!

I

0:42:460:42:53

have never seen that before!

That is

coming out of his paycheque!

What is

0:42:530:42:59

the ruling?

I don't think I have

ever seen that! Part of the jack

0:42:590:43:05

remained on the rink and another

part of it is off the rink.

That

0:43:050:43:10

jack surely must go off and on to

the spot.

That is superb. He treated

0:43:100:43:18

it like Play-Doh. That's

unbelievable. I would have thought

0:43:180:43:26

that the bigger half would have

counted.

Surely that goes on to the

0:43:260:43:32

crease but I would think.

Absolutely.

-- onto the re-spot.

0:43:320:43:41

They are going to put it on the

re-spot and then it is going to have

0:43:410:43:46

to be a measure.

I think Paul will

score two here on the re-spot.

They

0:43:460:43:52

are checking here.

Paul is not happy

with that. That's not right, surely?

0:43:520:44:00

It is not a dead end.

I think he is

appealing it.

I would agree. That

0:44:000:44:07

jack was going off, surely it can't

be...

It is a conference of the

0:44:070:44:13

officials here and they are going to

have to I think consult the rule

0:44:130:44:18

book as to what happens.

He is

arguing and he is right to argue as

0:44:180:44:25

well that the jack was going off. I

agree with that. It has to be the

0:44:250:44:32

re-spot. He was not happy and right

to not be happy.

Two shots, Paul

0:44:320:44:42

Foster.

Paul Foster knows his bowls.

And to be fair, the markers and

0:44:420:44:51

umpires here are first class and

they were happy to listen.

That see

0:44:510:44:54

this strike again.

This is

brilliant.

It was definitely going

0:44:540:44:59

off.

And to meet the majority is in

the ditch and therefore it has to go

0:44:590:45:06

on the re-spot. STUDIO:

Unprecedented scenes leaving foster

0:45:060:45:10

with what was to prove an

unassailable lead and he went on to

0:45:100:45:13

win the second set for the victory

which takes him safely into the

0:45:130:45:18

quarterfinals.

0:45:180:45:20

which takes him safely into the

quarterfinals. Without doubt that

0:45:200:45:23

was the best matchwinner seen here

all week. Congratulations, well

0:45:230:45:26

played.

Once again, delighted with

how I played but all credit to Mark

0:45:260:45:33

Connolly stuck in there and I

couldn't really played much better

0:45:330:45:35

in the first set but it shows how

good he is. I'm just delighted.

It

0:45:350:45:41

was incredible because you did play

a wonderful match and many other

0:45:410:45:45

players would be out and you would

be standing next to me looking ahead

0:45:450:45:48

to the quarterfinal.

I'm a little

disappointed to be honest, the first

0:45:480:45:54

bowl, when Paul missed which was not

often, I did not get in and you know

0:45:540:45:58

he will play well. While I am

reasonably happy, I know I can play

0:45:580:46:02

better and you have do to beat Paul.

He does put so much pressure on

0:46:020:46:06

particularly with the first bowl.

That was key and the two times the

0:46:060:46:11

missed, it is like 18 inch and a

foot off and he puts three inside

0:46:110:46:16

and you can't leave that much.

You

certainly can't. Amazing stuff and

0:46:160:46:20

we should talk about the

controversial moment and the talking

0:46:200:46:24

point which was this split jack. We

will show you it but talk us through

0:46:240:46:30

it.

I knew I could run at it. I had

a chance of getting it but I was not

0:46:300:46:38

expecting the jack to crack! I was

trying to take a couple out and I

0:46:380:46:43

knew his bolt was in the ditch and I

would count two but it's not often

0:46:430:46:47

you see that.

I think the first call

was for the end to be played again

0:46:470:46:52

but you agreed that was wrong?

I

genuinely don't know what the rule

0:46:520:46:56

is and to be there to pull the jack

looked like it was going out of this

0:46:560:47:00

side. I was more disappointed that I

was good to get back in the set and

0:47:000:47:05

he hit the target and I was two

down. I did not know the rule and I

0:47:050:47:09

was happy to go with the umpire.

Have you experienced that before?

0:47:090:47:13

I've never seen it, I've never done

it. I know that our a lot of hard

0:47:130:47:18

hitters on the tour but you don't

expect the jack to crack like that.

0:47:180:47:20

I said I would never cheat in bowls

with the jack was only going one

0:47:200:47:25

way. You saw the look on my face, we

are talking a turning point in the

0:47:250:47:31

match. I know Mark is lane three but

the re-spot and I get two and I

0:47:310:47:35

think everybody thought it was going

that way and I think it is only

0:47:350:47:39

fair.

And you agreed?

Yes, it was

going that way is up I genuinely

0:47:390:47:44

didn't know the rule and it was fair

enough. I probably would have said,

0:47:440:47:48

if the rule is not clarified and we

have to go with that, I would have

0:47:480:47:54

said to Paul, you have the two.

Have

you ever seen a split jack?

0:47:540:48:01

Unbelievable. Let's deal with the

last match today which was Perry

0:48:010:48:05

Martin against Michael Stepney. The

joiner from Elgin is no stranger to

0:48:050:48:11

this portable rink in that having

played in the Champion of champions

0:48:110:48:15

final on two separate occasions. It

may have needed a tie-break but

0:48:150:48:19

Perry Martin's victory over Jonathan

Ross in the first round was

0:48:190:48:23

extremely impressive. It was a cagey

0:48:230:48:26

Ross in the first round was

extremely impressive. It was a cagey

0:48:260:48:27

start to this match with neither

player able to exert control and we

0:48:270:48:30

picked it up on the seventh end with

Michael Stepney leaving 4-3.

0:48:300:48:36

COMMENTATOR: Hopefully this jack

will stay the distance in this

0:48:380:48:42

match! Michael Stepney going for one

of his big drives, we might see

0:48:420:48:47

something happening to it.

It's not

often you see the jack... I have

0:48:470:48:53

seen them split in half sometimes

but not having the top sliced off

0:48:530:48:57

like a boiled egg.

I have seen them

almost disintegrate believe it or

0:48:570:49:01

not. But that would have been a much

harder as Ishant to make, the fact

0:49:010:49:08

that the jack was going off the rink

at that angle made it an easy

0:49:080:49:12

decision. The Paul Foster match with

Mark Dawes... But we have plenty of

0:49:120:49:19

jacks.

Michael Stepney likes that

one. And the jack split, it was

0:49:190:49:34

probably one quarter and three

quarters and the three quarters

0:49:340:49:37

smashed its way into the side.

It

was definitely going in that

0:49:370:49:41

direction but fortunately it was

covered by television and we were

0:49:410:49:44

able to analyse it. Good bowl,

really good correction. The

0:49:440:49:49

integrity of the jack is absolutely

key when you think how much of a

0:49:490:49:55

battering they take. They did try to

drill them at one stage and put a

0:49:550:50:02

camera into it but it wasn't really

a bright idea! For lots of reasons.

0:50:020:50:07

The fact that they lost a lot of

cameras when the jacks were

0:50:070:50:13

destroyed did not help but nobody

had actually worked out that if you

0:50:130:50:18

hit the jack the camera goes into

the carpet. You're not going to get

0:50:180:50:21

much out of that.

And it needs to be

in an almost perfect position, it's

0:50:210:50:27

not always going to be facing front

but worth a try. Here comes Perry

0:50:270:50:34

Martin again. A little touch on

that.

Even better. He got around it

0:50:340:50:41

nice and clean. I think he will look

at this and say it has to be worth

0:50:410:50:45

coming into, two down, seventh end.

No waste of time with this one. It

0:50:450:50:53

looks under. And the follow-through

and shot draw. You were saying with

0:50:530:51:01

the follow-through is before, you

just can't gauge them but he put his

0:51:010:51:04

hand up right away.

We have seen a

couple this week, the unexpected,

0:51:040:51:11

seeing it stunned and then coming

once more.

That her! He played two

0:51:110:51:20

beautiful bowls and got it on a

fluke. Trying hard with this one.

0:51:200:51:31

Very close to the jack. Just needed

anything past that and he was there.

0:51:310:51:43

So close. Past it and he was drawing

the shot. Michael Stepney has given

0:51:440:51:52

one away with the last bowl. He will

have to be canny here.

He will not

0:51:520:52:01

give this work the way, I can tell

you. Seventh end is a key end.

0:52:010:52:11

STUDIO: Stepney went on to take the

first set 8-3 and we will pick it up

0:52:220:52:28

again in the fifth end of the second

set with the Scot leading 5-2.

0:52:280:52:34

COMMENTATOR: Full length jack.

0:52:440:52:49

Perry Martin has talked about

becoming less uptight on the rink.

0:52:570:53:01

It is the complete opposite for

Michael Stepney, is reputation is as

0:53:010:53:06

laid-back as they come.

Unfortunately, so is this bowl.

0:53:060:53:16

I have seen Michael animated at

international level, I know he knows

0:53:220:53:26

how to get excited if he tries that

singles is different.

0:53:260:53:39

This one is struggling a little bit

as well.

It looked lazy and it is

0:53:500:53:55

lazier.

Not a time to go walkabout,

not at 5-2 with five ends to go.

0:53:550:54:09

He has a chance with this. It should

come right into the jack.

0:54:110:54:23

Two short bowls, you have to be a

little bit careful not to over

0:54:370:54:40

correct but this has to run all the

way to the jack. He has got it. A

0:54:400:54:46

big recovery bowl.

He has played

quite a few of those in the match to

0:54:460:54:53

great effect. That was two, possibly

three against him and now the

0:54:530:55:02

pressure goes back on his opponent.

He will play down the forehand and

0:55:020:55:09

just try to move the red bowl in.

This is a hard shot he is trying. I

0:55:090:55:15

am surprised he played with that

weight, I thought he would have

0:55:150:55:18

played with a bit less. He was

aiming for the right side that occur

0:55:180:55:22

outside edge of the bowl but it

would have been hard to have stayed

0:55:220:55:27

in for any more than one with that

sort of weight.

0:55:270:55:31

Forehand runners, you are always

conscious if you go wide that you

0:55:330:55:38

are just go to hold off.

The value

of Michael Stepney's third bowl, it

0:55:380:55:50

could have been 5-5 but instead he

is looking to go 6-2 ahead and

0:55:500:55:53

possibly more.

I don't think there

is enough room for that. It needed

0:55:530:56:00

to go past it. Still a big recovery.

0:56:000:56:05

STUDIO: And a double the next end

meant the writing was on the wall

0:56:080:56:13

for Perry Martin. It Michael Stepney

who went through to the

0:56:130:56:16

quarterfinals with a comfortable

8-3, 8-4 victory.

0:56:160:56:22

very happy with how you played. I

think David Corkill said that any

0:56:230:56:28

aggressive play from your opponent

and you have the answer.

I was

0:56:280:56:30

really happy, Perry had a very good

start in the first set and I thought

0:56:300:56:35

I had to stick in and I got one

lucky result early on. It spurred me

0:56:350:56:40

on to keep on sticking in and

getting better.

And I guess this

0:56:400:56:46

portable rink is different from what

you're used to but you are getting

0:56:460:56:50

experience of playing on it on the

World Bowls Tour.

Definitely it is a

0:56:500:56:54

lot different, I struggled on the

pace massively in the second set, a

0:56:540:56:58

lot of short bowls and Michael

played really well. The first set,

0:56:580:57:03

two ends stick out where I could

have scored seven shots and ended up

0:57:030:57:07

dropping two but that's how it goes

and he played really well and had

0:57:070:57:11

the answer to everything.

We have

completed half of the quarterfinal

0:57:110:57:15

draw and we know that Jamie Chestney

will be there with Mervyn King Paul

0:57:150:57:20

Foster and Michael Stepney. We will

deal with the bottom half tomorrow.

0:57:200:57:25

It has been a great day, no doubt,

but Corky saw some wonderful shots

0:57:250:57:30

but which did he think was the best?

0:57:300:57:33

My shot of the day comes from the

match between Mark Dawes and Paul

0:57:360:57:41

Foster, a brilliant game. Paul

Foster had been fantastic in the

0:57:410:57:47

first set, restricting Mark Dawes to

three singles and in the second set

0:57:470:57:51

and suddenly Mark Dawes is playing

so much better. Foster is 5-3 in

0:57:510:57:56

front but three down on the rink and

the next shot is really important.

0:57:560:58:00

Forehand drive, the jack split and

it goes across, which is very rare

0:58:040:58:10

but the important thing was that at

that moment Paul Foster had to

0:58:100:58:14

change the head and he was going to

be one shot down at 6-5 if he did

0:58:140:58:20

not strike but he did and got it

perfect with the front bowl. Reece

0:58:200:58:25

Burke position, picks up two and

goes into a 3-7 positive position

0:58:250:58:30

and cruise on to win the set and

match -- re-spot position.

That is

0:58:300:58:36

almost it from us but our live

coverage gets back under way

0:58:360:58:39

tomorrow at 1pm on BBC Two Scotland.

It had been a fantastic day here at

0:58:390:58:45

the Dewars Centre in Perth, please

join us tomorrow, it's going to be

0:58:450:58:49

another cracker but from all of us

here, goodbye for now.

0:58:490:58:52

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS