Florence Foster Jenkins, Knight of Cups, Evolution The Film Review


Florence Foster Jenkins, Knight of Cups, Evolution

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Florence Foster Jenkins, Knight of Cups, Evolution. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Hello and welcome to The Film Review on BBC News.

:00:19.:00:21.

To take us through this week's cinema releases is Mark Kermode.

:00:22.:00:24.

A very mixed bag this week. We have Florence Foster Jenkins with Meryl

:00:25.:00:40.

Streep. Knight of Cups, the new movie by Terrence Malick. And

:00:41.:00:46.

evolution, one of the strangest films I have seen in many a year.

:00:47.:00:54.

And you have seen a few. Let's start with Meryl Streep. What is not to

:00:55.:00:58.

like? Is it worth going to see it just for her? Well yes, but there is

:00:59.:01:05.

so much more. It is based on true story of a New York socialite,

:01:06.:01:09.

patron of the arts, somebody who loved opera. But she could not hear

:01:10.:01:14.

her own singing voice. She loved to sing opera, but she was way off the

:01:15.:01:19.

note. She was surrounded by people who told her she was fabulous, for

:01:20.:01:25.

reasons both emotional and financial. They told her she sounded

:01:26.:01:29.

wonderful. This was great until she decided she wanted to sing on stage

:01:30.:01:33.

at Carnegie Hall. Then it became much harder to keep a lid on the

:01:34.:01:40.

naysayers. Here is a clip of her doing her vocal lessons, getting

:01:41.:01:42.

Maestro, it is true a lot of singers my age are

:01:43.:02:10.

on a decline, but I seem to get better and better.

:02:11.:02:12.

You were laughing all the way through that. But I think we are

:02:13.:02:37.

laughing with her and not at her and that is crucial. Cosme McMoon is on

:02:38.:02:43.

the piano and hearing her for the first time and he suddenly realises

:02:44.:02:47.

what he has to do. There have been several stage plays and there was a

:02:48.:02:51.

recent French film which won several awards. In this case Stephen Frears

:02:52.:02:58.

directed in a way which is often funnier, but I think crucially it is

:02:59.:03:04.

affectionate. Hugh Grant plays St Clair Bayfield, her partner and

:03:05.:03:07.

manager, who is basically the person who constructs this world around her

:03:08.:03:13.

in which she is able to believe in the sound of her own voice. The film

:03:14.:03:18.

is generous not only to her, but also to him. You do believe he

:03:19.:03:23.

actually does love her. He does want the very best for her. The film

:03:24.:03:29.

walks a very fine line between very comedic, and it is funny, but also

:03:30.:03:34.

having a real sense of pathos. It is a film in the end which turned the

:03:35.:03:41.

central character into a heroic figure. Meryl Streep gives Florence

:03:42.:03:46.

Foster is Jenkins real strength, somebody who believes in the

:03:47.:03:50.

transformative power of music, regardless of which notes she is

:03:51.:03:54.

hitting. During the course of the movie you come to love her as much

:03:55.:03:59.

as the film-makers do. You see her as somebody who you want to applaud

:04:00.:04:03.

and who is basically good-hearted. That is Florence Foster Jenkins.

:04:04.:04:10.

Knight of Cups, can you explain the title? Tarot cards and the story of

:04:11.:04:15.

looking for the Pearl and drinking from the cup and forgetting. This is

:04:16.:04:22.

Terrence Malick. He is an extraordinary film-maker and it is a

:04:23.:04:29.

stellar cast with Christian Bale, Christian Bale, who plays a creative

:04:30.:04:34.

type who is wandering through a landscape of fabulous wealth and

:04:35.:04:36.

extraordinary privilege and complaining about how it is that his

:04:37.:04:42.

life has gone wrong. The film drifts in and out of focus. It reminded me

:04:43.:04:52.

of the most expensive advert for Infinity by Calvin Klein that I have

:04:53.:04:58.

ever seen. There is more than a hint of truth in that assessment. It is a

:04:59.:05:03.

shame because it is a film that falls over into terrible indulgence.

:05:04.:05:07.

You do not end up sympathising or engaging with the characters. You

:05:08.:05:13.

end up thinking, which part of this am I meant to care about? Terrence

:05:14.:05:17.

Malick is a brilliant film-maker, but this is a film that has lost its

:05:18.:05:23.

way and lost its audience. I ended up being bored and that is the worst

:05:24.:05:29.

possible thing. How do somebody like Cate Blanchett get involved in it?

:05:30.:05:35.

It is a film which is finding its way and is trying to find a new

:05:36.:05:39.

language, it is trying. It is very trying. Evolution on the other hand,

:05:40.:05:47.

I was trying from what I have read to understand the story. I am not

:05:48.:05:52.

clear whether there is a coherent one. There is. It is surrealist. It

:05:53.:06:00.

is set on a fantastical island which appears to be peopled by young boys

:06:01.:06:05.

and strangely detached women. We begin with a sequence of a young boy

:06:06.:06:10.

swimming in the sea. He thinks he sees something, he rushes out of the

:06:11.:06:14.

sea and Russia is home to tell stories of having seen a dead boy

:06:15.:06:16.

and a starfish. Here is a clip. From there the film becomes stranger

:06:17.:07:07.

and stranger. The boy is fed what looks like worms in spinach, the

:07:08.:07:12.

woman meet on the beach at night to engage in some strange Congress.

:07:13.:07:19.

There was something of the tone of Never Let Me Go which was

:07:20.:07:28.

heartbreaking and strange. It also reminded me of the early films of

:07:29.:07:32.

David Cronenberg, films that are referred to as body horror films,

:07:33.:07:36.

films in which you feel that what they are doing is getting towards

:07:37.:07:40.

some kind of emotional trick even though you do not understand the

:07:41.:07:46.

narrative. But it is a film that has really stayed with me. In the few

:07:47.:07:50.

days after I saw it, some really wanting, visual images. I was

:07:51.:07:55.

sifting through it trying to find out what it may or may not mean, but

:07:56.:08:02.

I did not want to solve its puzzle. It is bewildering, strange, baffling

:08:03.:08:05.

and magical and often a very disturbing tale. I was really moved

:08:06.:08:11.

by it because I did not know where it was going and I found it really

:08:12.:08:15.

arresting and really haunting and those I2 things as a condiment. Take

:08:16.:08:22.

a minute to talk about what is the best thing to see at the moment. I

:08:23.:08:27.

know you feel it is something that I want to see and plan to see, but I

:08:28.:08:36.

am anxious. This is son of soul and it is set in Auschwitz in 1944. From

:08:37.:08:41.

the subject matter you know it will be a difficult film. I think it is

:08:42.:08:47.

an extraordinary piece of work. It manages to find exactly the right

:08:48.:08:51.

visual register to talk about this incredibly difficult subject. It is

:08:52.:08:57.

a film in which watching it is an overpowering and overwhelming

:08:58.:09:00.

experience. Indeed it ought to be. It is a film in which the style and

:09:01.:09:04.

the substance are actually perfectly matched. My own feeling was that it

:09:05.:09:11.

was made with real moral integrity. It was a film that absolutely wanted

:09:12.:09:15.

to find the right way of talking about the subject. I have spoken to

:09:16.:09:19.

many people who have seen it and feel exactly the same, it is an

:09:20.:09:24.

overpowering, overwhelming experience, and that is as it should

:09:25.:09:29.

be. If people want to stay in, let's talk about what might be... This is

:09:30.:09:38.

on DVD and it is not the film you think it might be. It is the story

:09:39.:09:43.

of a mother and child trapped in a room, which sounds like horror

:09:44.:09:50.

story. But it is something completely different. It is a film

:09:51.:09:53.

about the love between a mother and a child and it has wonderful music

:09:54.:10:00.

and a superb central cast. It manages to approach what sounds like

:10:01.:10:05.

an utterly horrible subject matter in a way that is not like that at

:10:06.:10:10.

all. It is one of my favourite films over the last few years. You know

:10:11.:10:15.

that the only thing it is? It is not that film. It is a difficult watch

:10:16.:10:22.

as women, but it has rewards as well and brie lies in one lots of for it.

:10:23.:10:27.

And rightly so because it is extraordinary. I think the director

:10:28.:10:33.

has done a brilliant job of doing it and he has judged it just right. As

:10:34.:10:36.

ever, many thanks. A quick reminder: You'll

:10:37.:10:41.

find more film news and reviews on our website,

:10:42.:10:43.

including all our previous shows. You may want to get out and about

:10:44.:11:06.

and enjoy the

:11:07.:11:08.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS