Browse content similar to Florence Foster Jenkins, Knight of Cups, Evolution. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello and welcome to The Film Review on BBC News. | :00:19. | :00:21. | |
To take us through this week's cinema releases is Mark Kermode. | :00:22. | :00:24. | |
A very mixed bag this week. We have Florence Foster Jenkins with Meryl | :00:25. | :00:40. | |
Streep. Knight of Cups, the new movie by Terrence Malick. And | :00:41. | :00:46. | |
evolution, one of the strangest films I have seen in many a year. | :00:47. | :00:54. | |
And you have seen a few. Let's start with Meryl Streep. What is not to | :00:55. | :00:58. | |
like? Is it worth going to see it just for her? Well yes, but there is | :00:59. | :01:05. | |
so much more. It is based on true story of a New York socialite, | :01:06. | :01:09. | |
patron of the arts, somebody who loved opera. But she could not hear | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
her own singing voice. She loved to sing opera, but she was way off the | :01:15. | :01:19. | |
note. She was surrounded by people who told her she was fabulous, for | :01:20. | :01:25. | |
reasons both emotional and financial. They told her she sounded | :01:26. | :01:29. | |
wonderful. This was great until she decided she wanted to sing on stage | :01:30. | :01:33. | |
at Carnegie Hall. Then it became much harder to keep a lid on the | :01:34. | :01:40. | |
naysayers. Here is a clip of her doing her vocal lessons, getting | :01:41. | :01:42. | |
Maestro, it is true a lot of singers my age are | :01:43. | :02:10. | |
on a decline, but I seem to get better and better. | :02:11. | :02:12. | |
You were laughing all the way through that. But I think we are | :02:13. | :02:37. | |
laughing with her and not at her and that is crucial. Cosme McMoon is on | :02:38. | :02:43. | |
the piano and hearing her for the first time and he suddenly realises | :02:44. | :02:47. | |
what he has to do. There have been several stage plays and there was a | :02:48. | :02:51. | |
recent French film which won several awards. In this case Stephen Frears | :02:52. | :02:58. | |
directed in a way which is often funnier, but I think crucially it is | :02:59. | :03:04. | |
affectionate. Hugh Grant plays St Clair Bayfield, her partner and | :03:05. | :03:07. | |
manager, who is basically the person who constructs this world around her | :03:08. | :03:13. | |
in which she is able to believe in the sound of her own voice. The film | :03:14. | :03:18. | |
is generous not only to her, but also to him. You do believe he | :03:19. | :03:23. | |
actually does love her. He does want the very best for her. The film | :03:24. | :03:29. | |
walks a very fine line between very comedic, and it is funny, but also | :03:30. | :03:34. | |
having a real sense of pathos. It is a film in the end which turned the | :03:35. | :03:41. | |
central character into a heroic figure. Meryl Streep gives Florence | :03:42. | :03:46. | |
Foster is Jenkins real strength, somebody who believes in the | :03:47. | :03:50. | |
transformative power of music, regardless of which notes she is | :03:51. | :03:54. | |
hitting. During the course of the movie you come to love her as much | :03:55. | :03:59. | |
as the film-makers do. You see her as somebody who you want to applaud | :04:00. | :04:03. | |
and who is basically good-hearted. That is Florence Foster Jenkins. | :04:04. | :04:10. | |
Knight of Cups, can you explain the title? Tarot cards and the story of | :04:11. | :04:15. | |
looking for the Pearl and drinking from the cup and forgetting. This is | :04:16. | :04:22. | |
Terrence Malick. He is an extraordinary film-maker and it is a | :04:23. | :04:29. | |
stellar cast with Christian Bale, Christian Bale, who plays a creative | :04:30. | :04:34. | |
type who is wandering through a landscape of fabulous wealth and | :04:35. | :04:36. | |
extraordinary privilege and complaining about how it is that his | :04:37. | :04:42. | |
life has gone wrong. The film drifts in and out of focus. It reminded me | :04:43. | :04:52. | |
of the most expensive advert for Infinity by Calvin Klein that I have | :04:53. | :04:58. | |
ever seen. There is more than a hint of truth in that assessment. It is a | :04:59. | :05:03. | |
shame because it is a film that falls over into terrible indulgence. | :05:04. | :05:07. | |
You do not end up sympathising or engaging with the characters. You | :05:08. | :05:13. | |
end up thinking, which part of this am I meant to care about? Terrence | :05:14. | :05:17. | |
Malick is a brilliant film-maker, but this is a film that has lost its | :05:18. | :05:23. | |
way and lost its audience. I ended up being bored and that is the worst | :05:24. | :05:29. | |
possible thing. How do somebody like Cate Blanchett get involved in it? | :05:30. | :05:35. | |
It is a film which is finding its way and is trying to find a new | :05:36. | :05:39. | |
language, it is trying. It is very trying. Evolution on the other hand, | :05:40. | :05:47. | |
I was trying from what I have read to understand the story. I am not | :05:48. | :05:52. | |
clear whether there is a coherent one. There is. It is surrealist. It | :05:53. | :06:00. | |
is set on a fantastical island which appears to be peopled by young boys | :06:01. | :06:05. | |
and strangely detached women. We begin with a sequence of a young boy | :06:06. | :06:10. | |
swimming in the sea. He thinks he sees something, he rushes out of the | :06:11. | :06:14. | |
sea and Russia is home to tell stories of having seen a dead boy | :06:15. | :06:16. | |
and a starfish. Here is a clip. From there the film becomes stranger | :06:17. | :07:07. | |
and stranger. The boy is fed what looks like worms in spinach, the | :07:08. | :07:12. | |
woman meet on the beach at night to engage in some strange Congress. | :07:13. | :07:19. | |
There was something of the tone of Never Let Me Go which was | :07:20. | :07:28. | |
heartbreaking and strange. It also reminded me of the early films of | :07:29. | :07:32. | |
David Cronenberg, films that are referred to as body horror films, | :07:33. | :07:36. | |
films in which you feel that what they are doing is getting towards | :07:37. | :07:40. | |
some kind of emotional trick even though you do not understand the | :07:41. | :07:46. | |
narrative. But it is a film that has really stayed with me. In the few | :07:47. | :07:50. | |
days after I saw it, some really wanting, visual images. I was | :07:51. | :07:55. | |
sifting through it trying to find out what it may or may not mean, but | :07:56. | :08:02. | |
I did not want to solve its puzzle. It is bewildering, strange, baffling | :08:03. | :08:05. | |
and magical and often a very disturbing tale. I was really moved | :08:06. | :08:11. | |
by it because I did not know where it was going and I found it really | :08:12. | :08:15. | |
arresting and really haunting and those I2 things as a condiment. Take | :08:16. | :08:22. | |
a minute to talk about what is the best thing to see at the moment. I | :08:23. | :08:27. | |
know you feel it is something that I want to see and plan to see, but I | :08:28. | :08:36. | |
am anxious. This is son of soul and it is set in Auschwitz in 1944. From | :08:37. | :08:41. | |
the subject matter you know it will be a difficult film. I think it is | :08:42. | :08:47. | |
an extraordinary piece of work. It manages to find exactly the right | :08:48. | :08:51. | |
visual register to talk about this incredibly difficult subject. It is | :08:52. | :08:57. | |
a film in which watching it is an overpowering and overwhelming | :08:58. | :09:00. | |
experience. Indeed it ought to be. It is a film in which the style and | :09:01. | :09:04. | |
the substance are actually perfectly matched. My own feeling was that it | :09:05. | :09:11. | |
was made with real moral integrity. It was a film that absolutely wanted | :09:12. | :09:15. | |
to find the right way of talking about the subject. I have spoken to | :09:16. | :09:19. | |
many people who have seen it and feel exactly the same, it is an | :09:20. | :09:24. | |
overpowering, overwhelming experience, and that is as it should | :09:25. | :09:29. | |
be. If people want to stay in, let's talk about what might be... This is | :09:30. | :09:38. | |
on DVD and it is not the film you think it might be. It is the story | :09:39. | :09:43. | |
of a mother and child trapped in a room, which sounds like horror | :09:44. | :09:50. | |
story. But it is something completely different. It is a film | :09:51. | :09:53. | |
about the love between a mother and a child and it has wonderful music | :09:54. | :10:00. | |
and a superb central cast. It manages to approach what sounds like | :10:01. | :10:05. | |
an utterly horrible subject matter in a way that is not like that at | :10:06. | :10:10. | |
all. It is one of my favourite films over the last few years. You know | :10:11. | :10:15. | |
that the only thing it is? It is not that film. It is a difficult watch | :10:16. | :10:22. | |
as women, but it has rewards as well and brie lies in one lots of for it. | :10:23. | :10:27. | |
And rightly so because it is extraordinary. I think the director | :10:28. | :10:33. | |
has done a brilliant job of doing it and he has judged it just right. As | :10:34. | :10:36. | |
ever, many thanks. A quick reminder: You'll | :10:37. | :10:41. | |
find more film news and reviews on our website, | :10:42. | :10:43. | |
including all our previous shows. You may want to get out and about | :10:44. | :11:06. | |
and enjoy the | :11:07. | :11:08. |