Browse content similar to 19/09/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, folks, this is the Daily Politics. Are we heading for a | :00:43. | :00:46. | |
European foreign policy, a European army and a European border police? | :00:46. | :00:50. | |
That is what the foreign ministers of the EU's biggest countries say | :00:50. | :00:55. | |
they want. Not including Britain, of course, where the idea of a | :00:55. | :01:00. | |
powerful new pan-European foreign ministry -- midges -- ministry and | :01:00. | :01:03. | |
a shared defence policy could be a hard sell. | :01:03. | :01:06. | |
Whispers of green economic ships. Britain's businesses tell us what | :01:06. | :01:10. | |
could help them prosper. Is the Football Association done | :01:10. | :01:19. | |
enough to stamp out racism? MPs think it could do more. | :01:19. | :01:24. | |
# Outsourcing jobs, playing cover- up, two years of tax returns really | :01:24. | :01:29. | |
ain't enough. # And we will be asking, is Mitt | :01:29. | :01:37. | |
Romney's campaign heading in the wrong direction? | :01:37. | :01:40. | |
You never thought you would see one direction on the Daily Politics, | :01:40. | :01:46. | |
and you didn't. It is a cover-up. All that and more coming up in the | :01:46. | :01:49. | |
next hour. No PMQs today. Parliament has shut up shop for | :01:49. | :01:54. | |
three and a half weeks. They have been back for two weeks, so only | :01:54. | :01:57. | |
right that they should go away again to their party conferences. | :01:57. | :02:03. | |
But never fear, Digby Jones will soon be here to find us. He is a | :02:03. | :02:07. | |
former trade minister under Gordon Brown. He will be with us for most | :02:07. | :02:11. | |
of the programme when he has sorted out his transport issues. | :02:11. | :02:15. | |
First today, let's turn our eyes to the tragic shooting of two female | :02:15. | :02:19. | |
police officers in Greater Manchester yesterday. Fiona Bone, | :02:19. | :02:23. | |
who was 32 and Nicola Hughes, who was 23, were killed when they | :02:23. | :02:27. | |
responded to a false report of a burglary of a hat as the housing | :02:27. | :02:30. | |
estate in Mottram. The suspect, Dale Cregan, is also being | :02:30. | :02:34. | |
questioned on suspicion of murdering a man and his father in | :02:34. | :02:37. | |
two attacks in Greater Manchester earlier this year. It has emerged | :02:37. | :02:40. | |
that he was initially arrested three months ago as part of that | :02:40. | :02:46. | |
inquiry, but was released on bail. Earlier I spoke to the chairman of | :02:46. | :02:49. | |
the Home Affairs Select Committee, Keith Vaz. I put it to him that | :02:49. | :02:52. | |
people would find it hard to understand why a man wanted in | :02:52. | :02:56. | |
connection with two other murders was out on police bail. They are | :02:56. | :02:59. | |
right to be concerned. This is an issue that has been raised in the | :02:59. | :03:03. | |
past by myself and the Home Affairs Select Committee. We need to look | :03:03. | :03:08. | |
at the whole issue of bail. Baileys of course granted in the end by a | :03:08. | :03:12. | |
judge. We don't know the circumstances as to whether the | :03:12. | :03:17. | |
police objected to bail. I imagine they did, but that is just a guess. | :03:17. | :03:23. | |
I think this forms part of the inquiry that needs to happen, | :03:24. | :03:31. | |
conducted by Greater Manchester Police. The inquiries that the | :03:31. | :03:35. | |
Chief Constable spoke of yesterday, in order to find out what brought | :03:35. | :03:38. | |
these two young police officers into this position where they lost | :03:38. | :03:45. | |
their lives. It is essential that we know why. The figures are | :03:45. | :03:52. | |
shocking. 142,000, 537 crimes were carried out by suspects already on | :03:52. | :03:55. | |
bail for a separate events, according to official figures. That | :03:55. | :04:01. | |
can't go on. These are shocking figures and it can't go on. We need | :04:01. | :04:07. | |
not just an ability to understand why this happens, it is also a | :04:07. | :04:11. | |
proper dialogue between the prosecution part of the criminal | :04:11. | :04:15. | |
justice system and the judiciary. We are not trying to put pressure | :04:15. | :04:21. | |
on judges to find out why they make these decisions. But it is | :04:21. | :04:24. | |
important to go back to the judiciary and say to them in an | :04:24. | :04:28. | |
open way, as a result of the decisions that have been taken, X | :04:28. | :04:33. | |
number of people have subsequently committed offences. The point of | :04:33. | :04:37. | |
putting someone on bail is to give them their freedom in exchange for | :04:37. | :04:44. | |
them not committing offences. This therefore adds a new dimension to | :04:44. | :04:49. | |
already tragic events. What about the case which will now be argued | :04:49. | :04:53. | |
no doubt more forcefully for arming police officers? Britain has always | :04:53. | :04:57. | |
been proud of the fact that we don't wittingly armed police | :04:57. | :05:01. | |
officers. They don't walk down the streets with heavy weaponry. Should | :05:01. | :05:06. | |
that change? I am certain that this will be a debate we have to have. I | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
am against the idea of arming our police, and I think the police | :05:10. | :05:15. | |
service itself is against having answer on a routine basis. But do | :05:15. | :05:21. | |
you think it will happen? For no, I don't, because once you start | :05:21. | :05:25. | |
arming your police force, it will mean those who are criminal | :05:25. | :05:31. | |
elements will ensure that they also carry arms. And that will start an | :05:31. | :05:35. | |
escalation process. In America, of course, police officers routinely | :05:35. | :05:40. | |
carry weapons. But the situation in America is quite different. Here, | :05:40. | :05:46. | |
even if they want to use Tasers, they have to be specially trained | :05:46. | :05:50. | |
and a senior officer has to authorise it. This is something we | :05:50. | :05:56. | |
need to ask the police. I am personally against it. But at the | :05:56. | :06:00. | |
end of the day, circumstances of this kind will raise these issues. | :06:00. | :06:03. | |
On the issue of capital the -- capital punishment, it has been | :06:03. | :06:08. | |
debated long and hard, but now there are renewed calls for that to | :06:08. | :06:11. | |
be looked at in the context of police officers being murdered, not | :06:11. | :06:15. | |
just from the families of the victims, but also from Norman | :06:15. | :06:21. | |
Tebbit, not surprisingly, and another Tory MP. I can perfectly | :06:21. | :06:24. | |
understand what the families have said and I can understand why they | :06:24. | :06:29. | |
want to take this course of action. However, I am against the death | :06:29. | :06:34. | |
penalty and I don't think one can extend it to certain classes of | :06:34. | :06:39. | |
people and professions. If you want to have a debate about the death | :06:39. | :06:43. | |
penalty, the place to have that debate is in Parliament. I am not | :06:43. | :06:47. | |
surprised Norman Tebbit has said this. He has always held this view. | :06:47. | :06:51. | |
I hold a different view. This is something that members debate from | :06:51. | :06:57. | |
time to time, but I don't think we should change our position. | :06:57. | :07:02. | |
Digby Jones, welcome to the programme. What is your response? | :07:02. | :07:06. | |
It is an absolute tragedy. Arming those two female police officers | :07:06. | :07:10. | |
would not have stopped them being killed. They would not have gone | :07:10. | :07:15. | |
into this situation with guns drawn. That is not what this is about. In | :07:15. | :07:19. | |
my view, this guy should not have been out on bail. In America and | :07:19. | :07:23. | |
France, he would never have seen the light of day when they | :07:23. | :07:30. | |
suspected what he had done. There is a problem with a lot of the | :07:30. | :07:33. | |
liberal elite, which is that they concentrate more on the freedom of | :07:33. | :07:38. | |
the individual, which in other circumstances is acceptable, rather | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
than the Risk Society has won a certain sort of person goes back | :07:42. | :07:47. | |
out on the street. If there is going to be interference or | :07:47. | :07:52. | |
pressure put on judges to make decisions... Well, we are back into | :07:53. | :07:57. | |
the whole issue of 42 days and all that, which was probably too long. | :07:57. | :08:06. | |
But the whole concept of how to protect society from people who, | :08:06. | :08:10. | |
without charge, can walk the streets. This is not about arming | :08:10. | :08:15. | |
the police. 80% of the police, when polled, say they don't want guns. | :08:15. | :08:20. | |
But they want to be protected. we want them protected. I can | :08:20. | :08:24. | |
remember as a kid when Harry Roberts shot those three police | :08:24. | :08:28. | |
officers in 1966, and this is the worst one since then. I remember | :08:28. | :08:32. | |
seeing those bodies on the street of those three detectives, and I | :08:32. | :08:37. | |
was about 10. It had quite an effect on me. And yesterday brought | :08:37. | :08:43. | |
it all back. We have to look very seriously at the rules about bail, | :08:43. | :08:47. | |
release and charge, as opposed to arming the police. It would not | :08:47. | :08:51. | |
have helped those poor ladies yesterday. | :08:51. | :08:54. | |
Now, some of the more keen-eyed viewers among you may recall a | :08:54. | :08:59. | |
speech we reported last week by this man, a Jose Manuel Barroso. He | :08:59. | :09:04. | |
is the president of the European Commission. Here, he was giving us | :09:04. | :09:08. | |
his so-called State of the Union address in Strasbourg, in which he | :09:08. | :09:14. | |
called for a federal Europe with a directly elected President. Now a | :09:14. | :09:17. | |
group of the EU's most powerful foreign ministers have weighed in, | :09:17. | :09:22. | |
calling for radical new steps to strengthen the EU foreign, defence | :09:22. | :09:28. | |
and security policy. Funnily enough, this group does not include Britain, | :09:28. | :09:32. | |
surprise, surprise. So what is this group saying, and how seriously | :09:32. | :09:38. | |
should we take the proposals? What do you know, JoCo? | :09:38. | :09:42. | |
The future of Europe group, as it is known, consists of 11 EU | :09:42. | :09:46. | |
countries, not including Britain. The group, which also includes five | :09:46. | :09:50. | |
of the six biggest EU countries, has spent months brainstorming | :09:50. | :09:54. | |
ideas for the future of the EU. Yesterday it published a report at | :09:54. | :09:57. | |
a meeting in Warsaw, headed by the German foreign minister Guido | :09:57. | :10:01. | |
Westerwelle. The report says the EU must take decisive steps to | :10:01. | :10:06. | |
strengthen its act on the world stage. It suggests creating a | :10:06. | :10:09. | |
powerful new pan-European foreign ministry. It also suggests creating | :10:09. | :10:12. | |
a new police force to patrol the borders of the Schengen passport | :10:12. | :10:18. | |
free zone. And it suggests greater defence co-operation, including the | :10:18. | :10:21. | |
possibility one day of a European army. The report is a long way from | :10:21. | :10:25. | |
becoming a reality, but will obviously raised more questions for | :10:25. | :10:28. | |
David Cameron and issue of Britain's ongoing relationship with | :10:29. | :10:34. | |
Europe. We are joined now from Brussels by | :10:34. | :10:38. | |
the German member of the European Parliament Elmar Brok, who chairs | :10:38. | :10:43. | |
the European Parliament's foreign affairs committee. Good to see you | :10:43. | :10:50. | |
again. There has been talk of a European foreign policy, a European | :10:50. | :10:54. | |
army and European security for some time. Should we take this report | :10:54. | :11:04. | |
seriously? Go I think so. We have already made a lot of progress in | :11:04. | :11:07. | |
this sector on implementing the Treaty of Lisbon, but we have to | :11:07. | :11:11. | |
come forward with a response which includes the possibility of a | :11:11. | :11:16. | |
coalition of the willing. But Europe's roar around the world | :11:16. | :11:21. | |
cannot be handled by nation states, only by pulling and sharing out of | :11:21. | :11:30. | |
-- abilities have we a chance to be taken seriously. If you look at the | :11:30. | :11:35. | |
differing European attitudes, say, to the second Iraq war or even the | :11:35. | :11:41. | |
invasion of Afghanistan and other foreign policy issues, Libya, for | :11:41. | :11:44. | |
example, why would it be possible to ever have a common European | :11:44. | :11:50. | |
foreign policy, given the disagreements on this? Your country | :11:50. | :11:56. | |
would not get involved in Libya. not everyone has to take part in | :11:56. | :12:01. | |
everything, but they should not stop others if they want to do | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
something. Germany supported the Libyan case, but because of certain | :12:05. | :12:09. | |
problems, including the reform of the German army, Germany did not | :12:09. | :12:16. | |
take part in that militarily. But we supported everything else. We | :12:16. | :12:26. | |
:12:26. | :12:27. | ||
still have a lot of shortcomings. That is why we have to build things | :12:27. | :12:37. | |
:12:37. | :12:38. | ||
up further. Then Europe can play its role. The citizens, including | :12:38. | :12:43. | |
British citizens, believe we need - - we need more foreign and security | :12:43. | :12:49. | |
policy. Again, looking at opinion in your own country, in Germany, | :12:49. | :12:53. | |
there was a poll this week showing that 65% of Germans wanted no | :12:53. | :12:57. | |
further European integration. How does that square with what you have | :12:57. | :13:02. | |
just said? We have totally different opinion polls. The | :13:02. | :13:06. | |
majority of Germans are 70% in favour of Europe, but some are not | :13:06. | :13:11. | |
happy with how we conduct Europe at the moment. But I did not say | :13:11. | :13:15. | |
Europe. I did not say they were not in favour of Europe, of course they | :13:15. | :13:20. | |
are. They are also in favour of keeping the euro. But the poll said | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
65% of them did not want more European integration. And another | :13:24. | :13:30. | |
poll said that 65% of French people, if they had a vote, would not vote | :13:30. | :13:33. | |
for the treaty of Maastricht, which was, of course, the previous | :13:33. | :13:38. | |
integration. So where is the democratic mandate for these | :13:38. | :13:45. | |
foreign ministers calling for these changes? These foreign ministers | :13:45. | :13:49. | |
have developed these ideas in order to bring the debate forward. They | :13:49. | :13:55. | |
cannot decide anything, but I think it is a very good thing if such | :13:55. | :14:00. | |
foreign ministers try to develop European debate. Others may come to | :14:00. | :14:04. | |
different opinions. I would like to have an open debate between | :14:04. | :14:14. | |
:14:14. | :14:16. | ||
different opinions in Europe. If the German and Polish foreign | :14:16. | :14:22. | |
ministers agree on such positions, that is a remarkable step forward. | :14:22. | :14:27. | |
Stay with us, we have Digby Jones with us in the studio in London. He | :14:27. | :14:30. | |
was once a government trade minister and is also head of the | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
CBI, the British business organisation, a few years back. | :14:34. | :14:39. | |
Where are you on this? The problem is that you get polemic views, and | :14:39. | :14:43. | |
then you get the Euro-sceptic and the Europhile debate, instead of | :14:43. | :14:47. | |
looking at the actual strengths of Europe. If you stop the average guy | :14:47. | :14:50. | |
in the street in most countries, especially northern Europe, they | :14:50. | :14:54. | |
will say this was about free trade between 500 million people getting | :14:54. | :14:58. | |
richer, and probably about the environment as well. By the Germans | :14:58. | :15:03. | |
and French have gone well beyond that. That is not where we are now. | :15:03. | :15:07. | |
The problem is, if you look at Britain in this, we have a | :15:07. | :15:11. | |
different world aspect of virtually every other country in Europe. We | :15:11. | :15:15. | |
have a Commonwealth, we have a different relationship with America. | :15:15. | :15:19. | |
And at the same time, we are a powerful economy and a powerful | :15:19. | :15:23. | |
nation. We are militarily different to everybody else, with the | :15:23. | :15:29. | |
possible exception of France. And because of all that, 54 I would not | :15:29. | :15:39. | |
:15:39. | :15:39. | ||
Is it your view that if Europe and there is a constituency for this, | :15:39. | :15:43. | |
Elmar Brok is quite right, but if Europe wants to go down this route | :15:43. | :15:49. | |
or a big chunk, which would be significant, no mainstream British | :15:49. | :15:54. | |
politician could sell this to the British people? Absolutely spot on. | :15:54. | :16:01. | |
What you'll end up with is you'll end up with the - a country called | :16:01. | :16:05. | |
Europe and then there will be a trade relationship with others who | :16:05. | :16:12. | |
are geophotographically in Europe. We'll be one of those who have a -- | :16:12. | :16:18. | |
geographically in Europe. We'll be one of those who have such a | :16:18. | :16:21. | |
reslaitionship. It won't include -- relationship. The Swedes would | :16:21. | :16:27. | |
never be part? No doubt about that. Elmar Brok, coming back to you, | :16:27. | :16:33. | |
isn't it a bit daunting, like Groundlog Day that the British, | :16:33. | :16:37. | |
whether it's Labour or Conservative government, are going to be yet | :16:37. | :16:44. | |
again a drag on all the things you want to do? Firstly, we have to | :16:44. | :16:47. | |
debate this. We would not leave the debates on Europe to the euro | :16:47. | :16:53. | |
sceptics. We do it in a positive way. Everyone has to make its their | :16:53. | :16:59. | |
minds. Even the conclusions - this was always about politics, not just | :16:59. | :17:04. | |
trade from the very beginning. one told the British people that. | :17:04. | :17:08. | |
That is your problem. It's not my problem. I agree with that. It was | :17:08. | :17:13. | |
discussed that way. Secondly, Britain is not the most powerful | :17:13. | :17:18. | |
country. Economically it's not a force in the EU. We have to see | :17:18. | :17:21. | |
that on the world stage. Britain doesn't matter very much, that's | :17:21. | :17:25. | |
what you are saying? Neither Britain nor Germany matter very | :17:25. | :17:27. | |
much in the future. None of our countries will matter very much in | :17:27. | :17:32. | |
the future. This special relationship with the United States, | :17:32. | :17:37. | |
I think there are also other countries. If you had a referendum | :17:37. | :17:44. | |
- You can become the 51st state of the United States. If you had a | :17:44. | :17:48. | |
referendum in Germany now or in the next couple of years, saying you | :17:48. | :17:53. | |
will abolish the German army and it will become wholly part of a | :17:53. | :17:58. | |
European army, how would Germany vote? First of all, it's to develop | :17:58. | :18:02. | |
a different direction, but we have all low budgets. Not every country | :18:02. | :18:06. | |
should do everything. Europe has 40% of the military like the United | :18:06. | :18:12. | |
States, but only with 10% - understand that. I asked you how | :18:12. | :18:17. | |
would Germany vote? Germany will vote in this case with yes. What's | :18:17. | :18:22. | |
the evidence for that, because I've seen no poll that would suggest | :18:22. | :18:29. | |
that at all? It was never asked for that. If we talked to citizens it's | :18:29. | :18:39. | |
:18:39. | :18:39. | ||
very much not so. There isure poon and defence policies. -- European | :18:39. | :18:45. | |
and defence policies. If you had a French general in charge of German | :18:45. | :18:49. | |
soldiers, do you think the people of Europe would vote for that? | :18:49. | :18:58. | |
have it already, a big part of the German army and 80% of the Dutch | :18:58. | :19:08. | |
:19:08. | :19:08. | ||
army are together. They are having one who is Dutch and then another | :19:08. | :19:13. | |
germ nan and it works. There's a French and German brigade. We have | :19:13. | :19:20. | |
similar things with Denmark and Poland and Germany, on top of that. | :19:20. | :19:23. | |
Elmar Brok, it's always great to talk to you. Thank you for joining | :19:23. | :19:31. | |
us. It's time for our quiz and today we are going to be marking | :19:31. | :19:36. | |
education secretary Michael Gove on his French. He wants all of us to | :19:36. | :19:45. | |
parlez Francais, so Digby watch this. Which one is direct? Vive le | :19:45. | :19:55. | |
:19:55. | :20:00. | ||
delifrpbs. -- difference. Let' find out whether he scored nil points. | :20:00. | :20:05. | |
can answer now. Don't give me it. You'll muck it up. Don't give the | :20:05. | :20:11. | |
answer now. Come closer. Closer. Whispering. Some people are | :20:11. | :20:17. | |
beginning to talk about green shoots of economic recovery. Green | :20:17. | :20:19. | |
shoots! Not Government ministers of course, they're not that stupid, | :20:19. | :20:24. | |
well most of them. Even those using the words say it's all very early | :20:24. | :20:28. | |
and it's fragile, but let's just assume for a couple of minutes that | :20:28. | :20:33. | |
it's true, that there are some green shoots around. What sort of | :20:33. | :20:39. | |
fertiliser is required to make them grow? You like this?! Here's what a | :20:39. | :20:48. | |
few experts thought. # I want to break free... # For the | :20:48. | :20:53. | |
economy to grow, businesses need to be set free, which means less | :20:53. | :20:56. | |
regulation, simple taxes and lower tax rates and the second to be more | :20:56. | :20:59. | |
connect today the world. That means the Government should unblock the | :20:59. | :21:02. | |
planning delays that are stopping us getting new airport capacity, | :21:02. | :21:12. | |
:21:12. | :21:13. | ||
rail and road projects. # God knows I want to break free... | :21:13. | :21:16. | |
# Access to finance is a problem for small businesses who can't get | :21:16. | :21:21. | |
the finance they need for business, so we very much welcome the | :21:21. | :21:24. | |
Government's announcement around the formation of a small business | :21:24. | :21:28. | |
bank. # It's strange, but it's true... # | :21:28. | :21:32. | |
British businesses are crying out, especially the smaller ones, to be | :21:32. | :21:38. | |
set free from the legislation that makes their life a nightmare. | :21:38. | :21:41. | |
need to look to the future to get the right technology for the | :21:41. | :21:45. | |
internet age to actually deal with people in this country and abroad | :21:45. | :21:52. | |
to strike new deals. Another initiative that we think they ought | :21:53. | :21:58. | |
to look at, as we come up to the autumn statement, is the extension | :21:58. | :22:02. | |
of the national insurance contributions holiday to all small | :22:02. | :22:08. | |
businesses. Another thing the Government needs to do, it needs to | :22:08. | :22:11. | |
use its force to convince, especially smaller companies, to | :22:11. | :22:15. | |
export more. The way out of our present economic woes is through | :22:15. | :22:18. | |
exporting, especially to the big countries. The Government needs to | :22:18. | :22:26. | |
make sure it gets that message across with the most force possible. | :22:26. | :22:36. | |
:22:36. | :22:38. | ||
I'm joined by the Conservative MP Mr Quateng. Have you spotted any | :22:38. | :22:46. | |
green shoots? It's too early to say. There's optimism. You haven't | :22:46. | :22:50. | |
spotted them? It's dangerous to say we're out of the recession. That's | :22:50. | :22:53. | |
an aunt Sally. I didn't ask you if we were out of the recession. | :22:53. | :22:59. | |
Nobody is saying that. I simply asked you if you had spotted - | :22:59. | :23:02. | |
There are certainly green shoots, and whether they rise and grow we | :23:02. | :23:06. | |
have to wait and see. Have you spotted them? If you are making | :23:06. | :23:10. | |
things, which Asia wants to buy, you are having not a good time, but | :23:10. | :23:13. | |
a very sustainable time. Good employment and good levels of | :23:13. | :23:19. | |
profit. If you are doing something which is only dependent on the | :23:19. | :23:23. | |
British or Western European market there are no shoots whatsoever. | :23:23. | :23:27. | |
need some green shoots, don't you now, politically, because there's | :23:27. | :23:31. | |
been a long time acoming? Absolutely. I think we are gripping | :23:31. | :23:37. | |
the nettle, if you like. You should never grip a nettle. Well the | :23:37. | :23:42. | |
problem. I think there's the bold policies on welfare in terms of | :23:42. | :23:46. | |
trying to freeze benefits and cut spending and I think on the supply | :23:46. | :23:49. | |
side, business side and growth side, we'll have very bold policies | :23:49. | :23:55. | |
hopefully in the next year or so. Isn't the real problem as to why | :23:55. | :23:58. | |
the economy's been in these quarters of no growth, indeed, | :23:58. | :24:07. | |
decline, is not the supply side at all, but a lack of demand? | :24:07. | :24:10. | |
Households' real incomes are cut and export markets have not been | :24:10. | :24:14. | |
growing that fast until recently, public spending's been cut as well, | :24:14. | :24:17. | |
business hasn't been investing. There's a lack of demand in the | :24:17. | :24:21. | |
economy? You're right to focus on the lack of demand, but there's a | :24:21. | :24:24. | |
thing called business confidence and the whole point about the | :24:24. | :24:28. | |
supply side and low taxes is that it will actually increase business | :24:28. | :24:32. | |
confidence. I was looking at Nigel Lawson's book and his account of | :24:32. | :24:36. | |
when he cut the top rate of tax from 60 to 40%. That was an | :24:36. | :24:41. | |
unfunded tax cut. He didn't know the consequences, but it was a | :24:41. | :24:44. | |
strong signal of intent. I think we have missed a trick slightly. | :24:44. | :24:49. | |
are saying it's a lack of big confidence and the balance sheets | :24:49. | :24:55. | |
of Britain are full and they are not investing, but when you see a | :24:55. | :25:00. | |
Secretary of State for business, who buys his cars from Tokyo and | :25:00. | :25:04. | |
his trains from elsewhere, why should people think the Government | :25:04. | :25:09. | |
is behind the country? I think it's very good for Government to give a | :25:09. | :25:13. | |
clear signal of intent over how and what we value in terms of people | :25:13. | :25:17. | |
going out and making a living. you get demand up, you need more | :25:17. | :25:22. | |
people in work. You could put one million people in work if every | :25:22. | :25:27. | |
small business in Britain employed one more person? That's right. | :25:27. | :25:32. | |
tax jobs? Why do you tax jobs and not profit. You could do that in a | :25:32. | :25:37. | |
stroke? Sure. Why don't you? not here to defend Government | :25:37. | :25:44. | |
policy. As head of the group I'm suggesting that - I'm on your side. | :25:44. | :25:51. | |
I understand that. Why are David Cameron and George Osborne so | :25:51. | :25:55. | |
reluctant to go down the route you are advocating? I think there are | :25:55. | :25:59. | |
issues with the coalition. Digby's mentioned the fact that Vince Cable | :25:59. | :26:02. | |
is the Business Secretary. This was a gentleman who until he was my age | :26:02. | :26:07. | |
was a Labour activist, I think he was a Labour councillor and his | :26:07. | :26:12. | |
instincts are not as free epbt surprise focused as some of ours -- | :26:12. | :26:17. | |
free enterprise focused as some of ours. There may be issues in the | :26:17. | :26:23. | |
Treasury in terms of unfunded tax cuts. You will probably know, that | :26:23. | :26:28. | |
in the run-up to the last Budget there was a major move in Downing | :26:28. | :26:34. | |
Street to have a dramatic cut in corporation tax. I favoured that. | :26:34. | :26:37. | |
It never reached the Lib Dems, but it was stopped by the Prime | :26:37. | :26:40. | |
Minister and the Chancellor. not privy to discussions. | :26:40. | :26:45. | |
telling you it was, so why the reluctance? There are issues with | :26:45. | :26:48. | |
the coalition. The Liberal Democrats didn't stop this? You can | :26:48. | :26:52. | |
understand that if they are within a coalition they will know what | :26:52. | :26:55. | |
appetite there is for the coalition partners to adopt or promote | :26:55. | :26:59. | |
policies that we have put forward. They probably felt this was | :26:59. | :27:02. | |
something perhaps that the Liberal Democrats would not have supported. | :27:02. | :27:07. | |
If I can put some words in your mouth, which I appreciate given who | :27:07. | :27:13. | |
your boss is, you might not say - He's an MP. I meant your leader, | :27:13. | :27:19. | |
I'm not too sure that David Cameron has business through his veins. I'm | :27:19. | :27:24. | |
not - he's accused of being too business friendly, but business | :27:24. | :27:29. | |
doesn't see him like that. I don't mean against, but he's not perhaps | :27:29. | :27:31. | |
absolutely on the wealth creation message as business would like him | :27:31. | :27:35. | |
to be. He's not just there all the time either. Could I put words in | :27:35. | :27:40. | |
your mouth? I wouldn't disagree with that entirely. You would say | :27:40. | :27:44. | |
he's probusiness? I think so and the Government. If you look at | :27:44. | :27:48. | |
Michael Fallon and Matthew Hancock, pro-business people. To keep an eye | :27:48. | :27:54. | |
on Vince Cable? Yes. There's only one department in Government that | :27:54. | :27:57. | |
has capitalism at its core and that's the department of business | :27:57. | :28:00. | |
and the Secretary of State of that department is in the gift of the | :28:00. | :28:05. | |
Prime Minister. That's right. put someone who is a Labour Party | :28:05. | :28:10. | |
activist in charge of it? Let me remind you, we're in a coalition. | :28:10. | :28:16. | |
lot of people on the backbenches and you know this as well as I, so | :28:16. | :28:20. | |
let's be honest here, they don't - people like you say to me privately | :28:20. | :28:24. | |
they don't think, when it comes to all the lists of things that you | :28:24. | :28:30. | |
want, they don't think David Cameron's heart's in it. I think | :28:30. | :28:33. | |
he's a Conservative and a strong probusiness leader who is | :28:33. | :28:37. | |
constrained by a coalition. It's that simple. We are going to move | :28:37. | :28:43. | |
on, but I'm told privately by the Treasury and the Cabinet Office as | :28:43. | :28:47. | |
well and even by Downing Street that they expect - they will never | :28:47. | :28:50. | |
say this publicly, but expect third-quarter growth, the quarter | :28:50. | :28:56. | |
that is just coming to an end, to be at least 0.5%. There won't be | :28:56. | :28:59. | |
another decline and some people think 0.7. They won't say this | :28:59. | :29:02. | |
publicly. That's what they're hoping for and what the early | :29:02. | :29:05. | |
indications they believe say. That will be the real test, won't it? | :29:06. | :29:09. | |
The growth will be a real test of green shoots? Of course. If you are | :29:09. | :29:12. | |
suggesting that we can see the green shoots and we get a positive | :29:12. | :29:16. | |
number, then that would confirm that. Don't go away. We are going | :29:16. | :29:20. | |
to keep you hostage for a few minutes. There will be a lot of | :29:20. | :29:24. | |
sighs of relief in Number Ten. If there isn't there will be some real | :29:24. | :29:27. | |
trouble. Which is why they won't say it. How do you give an | :29:27. | :29:31. | |
advantage to local business in tough economic times? Yes, we'll | :29:31. | :29:35. | |
ask you two how to encourage people spending cash locally and give a | :29:35. | :29:38. | |
strong sense of identity to your town or city. The people of Bristol | :29:38. | :29:43. | |
have come up with a cunning plan. It seems that money talks. So does | :29:43. | :29:50. | |
our west of England reporter David Harvey. What's this all about? | :29:50. | :29:54. | |
extraordinary. Right here we have the first Bristol pound. I'll just | :29:54. | :30:02. | |
show that to you. Steal it. That is a Bristol pound, printed specially | :30:02. | :30:06. | |
for this city. The Mayor has bought this loaf of bread. You better have | :30:06. | :30:11. | |
it back and give the local baker his pound, because that is the | :30:11. | :30:17. | |
first transaction made here. This is the centre of trading and | :30:17. | :30:20. | |
finance and banking and now very much a local market. They are | :30:20. | :30:23. | |
trying to bring the two together, finance and local trading by | :30:23. | :30:33. | |
:30:33. | :30:36. | ||
printing their own currency. Do They do fivers, tenors and twenties. | :30:36. | :30:41. | |
Lots of interest. Quite a celebratory feel. The exchange rate | :30:41. | :30:44. | |
is 1-1 with sterling. Technically, I had better keep quiet, because | :30:44. | :30:48. | |
people don't like this - it is actually a voucher, because you | :30:48. | :30:53. | |
hand over your sterling, and you are given over Bristol pounds in | :30:53. | :31:00. | |
return. You can use them in many places in the city. They include | :31:00. | :31:03. | |
the old marketplace here. You can see the sort of independent local | :31:03. | :31:10. | |
traders you often find in places like this. So here we have lots of | :31:10. | :31:16. | |
local Bristol T-shirts. Are you Bristol born-and-bred? Yes, indeed. | :31:16. | :31:22. | |
Why are you taking this currency? think the Bristol bound is | :31:22. | :31:26. | |
celebrating everything that is great about Bristol, and we support | :31:26. | :31:30. | |
everything that is local. So it is a lovely local feel-good factor. | :31:30. | :31:35. | |
This morning, lots have joined in that spirit. Do you think your | :31:35. | :31:39. | |
actual customers, after the launch has died away, will come back and | :31:39. | :31:45. | |
use this can see? At our customers already shop local. So when they | :31:45. | :31:49. | |
see their friends using it, they will join in. If it is certainly | :31:50. | :31:53. | |
something that the politicians want to have a slice of. There is a | :31:53. | :31:57. | |
mayoral election under way here in Bristol, and all the would-be | :31:57. | :32:01. | |
mayors have been here this morning. I have seen several MPs. Let's keep | :32:01. | :32:05. | |
the politicians out of it for a moment and have a word with Chris | :32:05. | :32:08. | |
Sunderland, one of the directors of the Bristol pound. You want to | :32:08. | :32:12. | |
change the way we think about money? Yes, I suppose we are trying | :32:12. | :32:16. | |
to say you can use your money to back your city and your local | :32:16. | :32:21. | |
independent traders, who need a leg-up in these times. Also, with a | :32:21. | :32:26. | |
local currency liked this, which, say it changes hands eight times, | :32:26. | :32:31. | |
each Bristol pound, then it is like there are �8 for every �1. It is | :32:31. | :32:35. | |
called the local multiplier effect. The have done some serious research | :32:35. | :32:41. | |
on this, and they discovered that if you spend with a multi-national | :32:41. | :32:46. | |
retailer, it disappears? Absolutely. Money spent with a chain store goes | :32:46. | :32:50. | |
straight to London. We have all got suspicious about that process. Our | :32:50. | :32:55. | |
local currency is for the city region. And it will ricochet around | :32:55. | :33:01. | |
the city region and add to its wealth. Lovely idea, lovely | :33:01. | :33:04. | |
aspiration, interesting theory. Will people really signed up? They | :33:04. | :33:08. | |
have to hand over sterling for this stuff, it is not just toy money. | :33:08. | :33:12. | |
They have already sold out on that store, and they are telling me I | :33:12. | :33:16. | |
have to rush up and get some more. So there is enormous interest in | :33:16. | :33:20. | |
this, and we know there are 300 businesses either signed up or | :33:20. | :33:27. | |
signing up right now. In a year's time, we expect there will be at | :33:27. | :33:31. | |
least 1004 stores who are part of this and 2000 in two years. They | :33:31. | :33:36. | |
say it is the biggest scheme in the world already. There are big | :33:36. | :33:41. | |
schemes in Germany and America as well. To give you an idea of how | :33:41. | :33:49. | |
the world is watching this city, somebody from Russian television | :33:49. | :33:52. | |
told me the people of St Petersburg would like to have their own | :33:52. | :33:57. | |
currency, but he doesn't think they will get one any time soon. | :33:57. | :34:02. | |
Well, it looks great. It is a good idea, but will it actually work? My | :34:02. | :34:06. | |
immediate thought was, would I go down and take my pounds and | :34:06. | :34:14. | |
exchange them for those vouchers? Give me your �20... That can go | :34:14. | :34:24. | |
:34:24. | :34:27. | ||
from Sydney to Sweden. Give him a Daily Politics voucher. This is a | :34:27. | :34:31. | |
really interesting initiative. Why wouldn't it work? We it make people | :34:31. | :34:34. | |
spend more? We were talking about lack of demand and trying to | :34:34. | :34:38. | |
encourage people to spend more in Bristol. It might have a short-term | :34:38. | :34:42. | |
effect. Clearly in the long term, it will not solve the economic | :34:42. | :34:49. | |
problems. It is good for two things, one being City morale. It is good | :34:49. | :34:52. | |
to get a connection between what you spend in your city and your | :34:52. | :34:56. | |
small trader employing someone because of it and feeling you have | :34:56. | :34:59. | |
contributed something. It is a gimmick, but what is wrong with | :34:59. | :35:07. | |
that? If you do it well and you are a trader, suddenly you have 1000 of | :35:07. | :35:11. | |
these and you go to somebody and say, I would like some more of | :35:11. | :35:15. | |
these. But the problem is that this will give you what you want all of | :35:15. | :35:20. | |
the world. If somebody says I will give you 99p for yours, you have a | :35:20. | :35:25. | |
problem. But if businesses locally do better as a result even in the | :35:25. | :35:29. | |
short-term, they will then put at that extra money back into the | :35:29. | :35:32. | |
economy, whether with their Bristol pounds ore than normal British | :35:32. | :35:39. | |
pounds. Does it matter? In terms of business confidence, we mentioned | :35:39. | :35:42. | |
the idea of getting people out there and spending money. An | :35:42. | :35:48. | |
initiative like this can work. always frustrated at the fact that | :35:48. | :35:51. | |
politicians and journalists think business at is somewhere over there | :35:51. | :35:58. | |
and everything else happens around here. Business is part of society. | :35:58. | :36:02. | |
Therefore, by the use of a transferable currency, if you can | :36:02. | :36:06. | |
get a job related to buying things, then suddenly business takes its | :36:06. | :36:11. | |
place in the core of our society instead of being seen as out there. | :36:11. | :36:17. | |
Do you think it would take off in other cities? It might. But then | :36:17. | :36:21. | |
would you have a Birmingham pound O brave Bristol Crown? We will have | :36:22. | :36:26. | |
that talk another day. Now, is another general strike on | :36:26. | :36:32. | |
the cards? We have not really had one since 1926. I was driving the | :36:32. | :36:39. | |
buses. Or not. It is highly unlikely, although not impossible | :36:40. | :36:43. | |
after the TUC voted to explore the practical it is a staging one at | :36:43. | :36:47. | |
their conference last week. Some Conservatives believe this is why | :36:47. | :36:52. | |
new laws need to make it harder for unions to call their members are | :36:52. | :36:55. | |
out. Boris Johnson, forever differentiating himself from Mr | :36:55. | :36:58. | |
Cameron, has been demanding that kind of action. But have we | :36:58. | :37:05. | |
actually become more militant in this country, or is the trade union | :37:05. | :37:08. | |
much less representative of the country as a whole. Do we really | :37:08. | :37:17. | |
need tough new legislation? The General Strike of 1926, an | :37:17. | :37:22. | |
iconic moment in trade union folklore. 86 years on, the TUC | :37:22. | :37:27. | |
votes to explore the practicalities of reviving these scenes live, and | :37:27. | :37:31. | |
in colour. This will be the finishing point of a major demo | :37:31. | :37:35. | |
next month, which the organisers hope will see thousands of people | :37:35. | :37:39. | |
marching in protest against the coalition's spending cuts. But some | :37:40. | :37:44. | |
union leaders want it to be at the start of a bigger campaign up to | :37:44. | :37:47. | |
and including a modern-day version of the General Strike, which is why | :37:47. | :37:51. | |
some Conservatives think it is time to nip what they see as a | :37:51. | :37:56. | |
groundswell of militancy in the bud. We need a threshold so that unless | :37:56. | :38:00. | |
you have 50% support from your own rank-and-file membership, you can't | :38:00. | :38:05. | |
inflict chaos on the rest of the public with strike action. We could | :38:05. | :38:08. | |
keep appeasing this militant minority, which don't represent | :38:08. | :38:11. | |
their run wider membership, or we could protect the hard-working | :38:11. | :38:19. | |
majority. Union membership peaked in the 1980s, at more than 30 | :38:20. | :38:24. | |
million. It is half that now. But almost 1.4 million working days | :38:24. | :38:28. | |
were lost to strike action last year, a 20 year high. However, most | :38:28. | :38:32. | |
of those were down to last November's day of action, and we | :38:32. | :38:36. | |
still lose about five times fewer days than the French. It is a lot | :38:36. | :38:39. | |
lower than the 1980s, when an average of 7.2 million days were | :38:39. | :38:43. | |
lost every year. Some experts believe tough and distract laws | :38:43. | :38:46. | |
would actually be counter- productive. If you make it harder | :38:46. | :38:50. | |
for people to strike lawfully and put up more obstacles in the path | :38:50. | :38:54. | |
of legitimate strikes, there is always the danger of more wildcat | :38:54. | :38:58. | |
spontaneous action out of the control of union leaders. A general | :38:58. | :39:03. | |
strike would be upping the ante a lot, if the unions decide to do it. | :39:03. | :39:07. | |
I think we will see a lot of co- ordination between unions, in the | :39:07. | :39:14. | |
same way we saw last November with the big protest over pensions, when | :39:15. | :39:19. | |
almost 30 unions took part. No one would call that a general strike, | :39:19. | :39:21. | |
but there were several million workers out on strike, and I | :39:21. | :39:24. | |
suspect we will see something similar in the future. The problem | :39:24. | :39:28. | |
with having a general strike and calling it a general strike is that | :39:28. | :39:32. | |
under current employment law, that is unlawful. But if something looks | :39:32. | :39:37. | |
and works like a political strike, isn't it a political strike? These | :39:37. | :39:41. | |
strikes are less about call workplace issues or issues | :39:41. | :39:45. | |
affecting rank-and-file members and more a concerted attack on the | :39:45. | :39:48. | |
coalition and the government's attempt to try and rain in debt and | :39:48. | :39:52. | |
rising public spending and a period of huge financial constraints. That | :39:52. | :39:56. | |
is why we need a voting threshold to safeguard the hard-working | :39:56. | :40:01. | |
majority. The general strike was a key moment in the history of | :40:01. | :40:05. | |
Britain had the 20th century. If push comes to shove now, it could | :40:05. | :40:12. | |
become one in the 21st. We are joined now by Sarah Veale, head of | :40:12. | :40:16. | |
employment rights at the TUC. I find it hard to take this talk of | :40:16. | :40:21. | |
a general strike seriously. Am I right or wrong? You should take it | :40:21. | :40:25. | |
seriously, because the congress expressed its anger about the | :40:25. | :40:29. | |
difficulties now faced by working people in the UK. But we were not | :40:29. | :40:32. | |
asked to call a general strike, we were asked to look into the | :40:32. | :40:36. | |
possibility. How likely is it? There is likely to be industrial | :40:37. | :40:40. | |
action. A general strike would be almost impossible, partly because | :40:40. | :40:45. | |
the laws in this country are very restrictive in terms of what trade- | :40:45. | :40:48. | |
union leaders can do. It would be illegal unless they could find a | :40:49. | :40:52. | |
legitimate dispute in every industry. From our point of view, | :40:52. | :40:57. | |
some people do not make the choice to be in a trade union. Most people | :40:57. | :41:05. | |
do not. Not in the public sector. And in the private sector, you are | :41:05. | :41:11. | |
down to 15%. So I am right not to take a general strike seriously? | :41:11. | :41:15. | |
You should take seriously the industrial militancy. That is an | :41:15. | :41:20. | |
expression of real anger. Let's come on to that. There was a lot of | :41:20. | :41:26. | |
talk of industrial militancy at the TUC conference. And the leaders of | :41:26. | :41:30. | |
the big public sector unions are now largely militant and are on the | :41:30. | :41:34. | |
left of the union movement and on the far left of the Labour Party. | :41:34. | :41:41. | |
would not go that far. McCluskey? They are not far left. | :41:41. | :41:46. | |
They are on the far left of the Labour Party. They are on the left | :41:47. | :41:51. | |
of the mainstream Labour Party, but this is a diversionary arguments. | :41:51. | :41:55. | |
Where is the evidence that the top third and -- tub-thumping we had at | :41:55. | :41:58. | |
the TUC is reflected in the public mood? A few look at the numbers | :41:58. | :42:03. | |
that turned out 18 months ago in our big demonstration in March 2010 | :42:03. | :42:07. | |
and the numbers that turned out last November when we called a day | :42:07. | :42:13. | |
of action, they are massive. one day. To leave work for a day | :42:13. | :42:16. | |
and sacrifice a day's wages is a big gesture of anger. People are | :42:16. | :42:21. | |
not well paid these days. If you are willing to stop work to express | :42:21. | :42:25. | |
your anger, the Government should take that seriously. A but if you | :42:25. | :42:29. | |
call people out on strike in the public sector, because they hardly | :42:29. | :42:34. | |
ever do in the private sector, and when they do, they usually use, | :42:34. | :42:39. | |
which happened with British Airways, most people do not even vote in the | :42:39. | :42:43. | |
public sector. A lot of people do vote. The turnouts for some of | :42:43. | :42:49. | |
those ballots have been very high. In the teaching and other | :42:49. | :42:53. | |
professions, it varies enormously. People are still angry enough to | :42:53. | :42:59. | |
come out on Saturday and have a demonstration. They have plenty of | :42:59. | :43:03. | |
grievances, that is not my argument. They are obviously concerned about | :43:03. | :43:09. | |
public sector cuts. I understand that, and many jobs are in jeopardy. | :43:09. | :43:13. | |
I just don't see the connection between the kind of rhetoric we | :43:13. | :43:18. | |
heard at the TUC from the hardline union leaders, and the ordinary | :43:18. | :43:26. | |
union members. Unions are very democratic organisations. They do | :43:26. | :43:30. | |
now use modern technology to consult. They get Twitter and | :43:30. | :43:32. | |
Facebook comments from their members, and they can't legally do | :43:32. | :43:37. | |
these things unless the majority want it. There is great support in | :43:37. | :43:42. | |
the unions for these activities. Unions are not suicidal. They would | :43:42. | :43:46. | |
not do these things if they did not have permission to do them. If they | :43:46. | :43:51. | |
were suicidal, we would not have any public services! If you look at | :43:51. | :43:56. | |
some of the great success stories of creating jobs, creating wealth, | :43:56. | :44:02. | |
Nissan, Honda, Toyota, JCB, they are all fully unionised. And the | :44:02. | :44:06. | |
unions are so responsible. They give the management a hard time, | :44:06. | :44:10. | |
and so they should. Welcome to negotiation. But they understand | :44:10. | :44:15. | |
that the nation will only get out of trouble if these companies work | :44:15. | :44:22. | |
together. In the private sector, you just don't get the same rapid, | :44:22. | :44:27. | |
irresponsible rhetoric you get in the public sector. If you do it in | :44:27. | :44:33. | |
the private sector, you can move to China. But you can't move a | :44:33. | :44:37. | |
hospital to China. But in the public sector, there are | :44:37. | :44:43. | |
negotiations going on all the time. They do not get written about. The | :44:43. | :44:47. | |
media abscesses with industrial militancy and strikes. It was the | :44:47. | :44:55. | |
only part of our conference that got any attention. But if there is | :44:55. | :45:02. | |
a call to go on strike, don't blame the media. The members do a lot of | :45:02. | :45:08. | |
work within the Union. These things that get people excited are a tiny | :45:08. | :45:13. | |
little pinprick, compared to the hard work the armies of unpaid | :45:13. | :45:23. | |
:45:23. | :45:24. | ||
Eknows that when he says it. You know that and I know that. I'm not | :45:25. | :45:30. | |
going to comment. Thank you very much for joining us. Is racism | :45:30. | :45:33. | |
still a big problem in football? A committee of MPs seem to think so. | :45:33. | :45:36. | |
The Culture, Media and Sport Committee have published a report | :45:36. | :45:38. | |
which says that the Football Association need to take more | :45:38. | :45:41. | |
action following the recent high- profile cases of ex-England captain, | :45:41. | :45:44. | |
John Terry and Liverpool striker, Luis Suarez. Well, joining us from | :45:44. | :45:46. | |
outside Parliament is Therese Coffey, who is a menmber of the | :45:46. | :45:49. | |
Culture, Media and Sport Committee, and Garth Crooks, former footballer, | :45:49. | :45:57. | |
now TV commentator. Thank you both for joining us, Garth Crooks, is | :45:57. | :46:02. | |
racism, as the report suggests, still a big problem in football? | :46:02. | :46:05. | |
you read the report that's just been issued and I've read aspects | :46:05. | :46:10. | |
of it, I would agree with it. I think there's still a lot of work | :46:10. | :46:17. | |
to be done in the areas of racism, or dealing with racism in football. | :46:18. | :46:24. | |
In my experience, when Government inquiries get involved they respond, | :46:24. | :46:29. | |
so I welcome this. When you say you agree with aspects that it's a big | :46:29. | :46:36. | |
problem, how is it manifesting itself these days? A number of ways. | :46:36. | :46:42. | |
One is when Football Association, who are the organisation that | :46:43. | :46:46. | |
organises the coaching qualifications for jobs, who they | :46:46. | :46:51. | |
employ at the clubs, not enough people have been qualified for | :46:51. | :46:55. | |
group and that's been a consistent thing for 20 years. Recruitment | :46:55. | :46:58. | |
policy. Do you think that would make a big difference, but there | :46:58. | :47:02. | |
are recommendations about training for stewards to spot abuse and | :47:02. | :47:04. | |
encouraging more black coaches and referees. Will that be enough to | :47:05. | :47:10. | |
tackle the problem? It would give the clubs the qualification of | :47:10. | :47:16. | |
individuals to employ them. It's critical. I don't see why football | :47:16. | :47:18. | |
should be different than any other employer throughout the country. | :47:19. | :47:23. | |
This is one of the reasons I feel the Government get involved because | :47:23. | :47:28. | |
it's only when the Government get involved that the Government | :47:28. | :47:38. | |
:47:38. | :47:39. | ||
respond. Miss Foffey, what would you like to see? Several recent | :47:39. | :47:43. | |
high-profile incidents showed racism has not gone away. Some of | :47:43. | :47:49. | |
it may be quite casual. There's too much excusing of banter, so there | :47:49. | :47:52. | |
are elements of stamping out the casual side that needs to go. | :47:52. | :47:56. | |
do you do that? It's very difficult? One of it to some extent | :47:56. | :48:01. | |
will be about players holding each other to account and one is about | :48:01. | :48:05. | |
encouraging our referees at the grass roots games to make sure that | :48:05. | :48:09. | |
people are reporting this, to their county FAs and stewards have better | :48:09. | :48:13. | |
training so they tackle it. You are not going to necessarily challenge | :48:13. | :48:17. | |
the guy next door and you become the torrent of abuse, but we should | :48:17. | :48:21. | |
be encouraging people to say it's not acceptable and tackling it and | :48:21. | :48:25. | |
more exclusions from grounds and similar. It's only when you start | :48:25. | :48:27. | |
to exclude them perfect their passion that you make others | :48:27. | :48:31. | |
realise what's going on. You are nodding your head there, you think | :48:32. | :48:36. | |
that's the right approach? We are not where we were in the 70s and | :48:36. | :48:41. | |
80s, but that's largely due to progressive legislation. Not self- | :48:41. | :48:46. | |
regulation. Let's be clear here. In terms of taking people - making | :48:46. | :48:50. | |
people accountable, the rules exist. The referee has the rules. He can | :48:50. | :48:54. | |
employ them on the field of play. The governing body have the rules. | :48:54. | :49:00. | |
Something has to be done. They can take action. For example, the issue | :49:00. | :49:04. | |
surrounding John Terry. He's been charged by the FA and acquitted by | :49:04. | :49:10. | |
the court, but that hearing to support the charge is not been made. | :49:10. | :49:14. | |
Why are we waiting? That of course is talking about the footballers | :49:14. | :49:18. | |
themselves, top professional players, you know the pressure that | :49:18. | :49:21. | |
they should set examples, but what about at the grass roots? It's not | :49:21. | :49:26. | |
just about the players. Obviously, there's a very big burden on them | :49:26. | :49:30. | |
to behave, but what about at that level? Absolutely. It's one of the | :49:30. | :49:34. | |
key challenges. That's why we are encouraging monitoring and | :49:34. | :49:38. | |
reporting of particularly incidents, so that the FA can focus. We have | :49:38. | :49:41. | |
also suggested they have an independent assessment and the | :49:41. | :49:43. | |
effectiveness on some of their education programmes. I understand | :49:43. | :49:48. | |
the FA is trying hard, but if it's not tackling the problem then | :49:48. | :49:51. | |
they've got to think again about how they tackle that. Thank you | :49:51. | :49:56. | |
both very much. In one moment we'll talk about all things America, but | :49:56. | :50:01. | |
first a little earlier, we tested Digby's command of the language of | :50:01. | :50:05. | |
love. And diplomacy, that will be French. We asked him to tell us | :50:05. | :50:15. | |
:50:15. | :50:18. | ||
which of the following is correct. Veef la difference. Veef le | :50:18. | :50:23. | |
difference. French is no longer the language of diplomacy. English is. | :50:23. | :50:31. | |
I don't think it's the language of love. It's vive la differs with an | :50:31. | :50:39. | |
acute on the last E. -- difrpbs with an acute on the last E. We do | :50:39. | :50:43. | |
know the right answer, but Michael Gove when he spoke to MPs earlier | :50:43. | :50:48. | |
this week. Let's take a look at what he said. The growth of | :50:48. | :50:53. | |
language teaching is central to what this coalition Government | :50:53. | :51:00. | |
wishes to achieve. We diverge from the last government vive le | :51:00. | :51:08. | |
difference. He said le. I wish he had done something else. I get this | :51:08. | :51:11. | |
all over Britain. If you are watching this programme and you | :51:11. | :51:15. | |
have got children thinking do they do languages, the answer is | :51:15. | :51:19. | |
definitely yes, but there should be two. Chinese and Spanish. If you go | :51:19. | :51:24. | |
into the world anywhere in the world equipped with English, | :51:24. | :51:28. | |
Spanish and Chinese you have equipped yourself for the 21st | :51:28. | :51:34. | |
century. With great respect to our friends over the channel rblgs | :51:34. | :51:39. | |
French and German, their -- the Channel, French and German, they're | :51:40. | :51:44. | |
yesterday's language. It's true. Schools aren't putting them in. | :51:45. | :51:48. | |
French and Germans will hate it. But they're having a common foreign | :51:48. | :51:54. | |
policy soon. It's not easy. Things have been holding up in the race | :51:54. | :52:04. | |
:52:04. | :52:05. | ||
for the White House no more ways than one. Cop a whack at this. | :52:05. | :52:09. | |
# You're insecure # Some say a bore | :52:09. | :52:15. | |
# Not only branch rupt, but your profit is needed more | :52:15. | :52:20. | |
# Outsourcing jobs # Two years of tax returns | :52:20. | :52:26. | |
# Really ain't enough # Everyone else can see it | :52:26. | :52:31. | |
# Everyone else but Fox News # You lied to voters like nobody | :52:31. | :52:36. | |
else # Your super pac gets them | :52:36. | :52:39. | |
overwhelmed # But when you smile at your wealth | :52:39. | :52:43. | |
# It ain't hard to tell # You won't show | :52:44. | :52:52. | |
# What you're hiding downbelow # We understanding the voters | :52:52. | :52:57. | |
matter so desperately # You won't show | :52:57. | :53:07. | |
# What you're hiding down below # You have got to tell us... # Are | :53:07. | :53:12. | |
they coming on the show? That wasn't One Direction I'm reliablely | :53:12. | :53:16. | |
informed but Full Frontal Productions. I wonder why they're | :53:16. | :53:21. | |
called that. I've no idea. Apparently they like making | :53:21. | :53:25. | |
political films. Apparently that was one. It was a take on One | :53:25. | :53:31. | |
Direction's What Makes You Beautiful. That's what it says here. | :53:31. | :53:36. | |
They don't think much of Mitt Romney's tax return record. We hope | :53:36. | :53:46. | |
to be joined by Charlie Wolf, but he's late and Marcus robe erts is | :53:46. | :53:52. | |
here working for the Fabian Society -- Roberts is here working for the | :53:53. | :53:57. | |
Fabian Society. Does President Obama have it in the bag? Probably | :53:57. | :54:01. | |
yes, because what has happened now to Mitt Romney is just about the | :54:01. | :54:05. | |
worst thing that can happen to a politician. He's lost control of | :54:05. | :54:09. | |
his public imagine and been defined by his opponents and now reading | :54:09. | :54:13. | |
from ray script that seems like it's been written by the Obama | :54:13. | :54:16. | |
campaign. The problem with this gaffe is that and why it's more | :54:16. | :54:20. | |
than just a normal Washington gaffe, is that it confirms the very idea | :54:20. | :54:23. | |
that the Obama campaign has been trying to put into the minds of | :54:23. | :54:28. | |
swing voters - the idea that Mitt Romney is against people. That Mitt | :54:28. | :54:32. | |
Romney is against the middle class. You can't be against 47% of America | :54:32. | :54:36. | |
and say you're going to be a President for all Americans. That's | :54:36. | :54:39. | |
why he's in such trouble now. American election campaigns partly | :54:39. | :54:44. | |
because they are so long, are strewn with gaffes. Ours are too, | :54:44. | :54:48. | |
thanks to Mr Brown in roach Dale, but particularly because of the | :54:49. | :54:54. | |
length of time. Am I right in thinking though that this in the | :54:54. | :54:58. | |
league of gaffes this is premier division tough? Absolutely. There's | :54:58. | :55:03. | |
a difference -- stuff? Absolutely. There's a difference between the | :55:03. | :55:09. | |
little-league gaffes that Mitt Romney made. That was over the | :55:09. | :55:15. | |
Olympics. It turns out that was a dress rehearsal for how things were | :55:15. | :55:18. | |
to get. If this is what he's liked now, I would be concerned about the | :55:18. | :55:25. | |
debates too. Charlie Wolf has finally made it here. He has given | :55:25. | :55:32. | |
a small tip to Digby Jones' taxi driver, the late one. Exactly. | :55:32. | :55:38. | |
me ask you this on what he said, he talked about the 76 million, it's | :55:38. | :55:44. | |
46% of the people who file taxes who don't pay federal tax. I have | :55:44. | :55:49. | |
been looking at this and two thirds of them pay federal pay roll taxes | :55:49. | :55:56. | |
so they are taxpayers, two thirds of them. Most of the 76 million are | :55:56. | :56:00. | |
either elderly, what we call old folks, or they are on less than | :56:01. | :56:05. | |
$20,000 a year, so I think everybody agrees they shouldn't be | :56:05. | :56:09. | |
paying tax. Why is he not interested in their votes? Well, | :56:09. | :56:13. | |
what he was saying was, listen, these are people who will not vote | :56:13. | :56:17. | |
for me. I'll not waste my time just as you wouldn't if you were a | :56:18. | :56:21. | |
Conservative go to the safest Labour seat in the country. Did he | :56:21. | :56:26. | |
conflate some numbers? Was it inarticulate, yes? Why would he not | :56:26. | :56:30. | |
be interested even if they don't pay tax or a striver? 20,000 a year | :56:30. | :56:40. | |
:56:40. | :56:45. | ||
in America is peanuts. Why has he said, "I'll never get their | :56:45. | :56:49. | |
votes."? There are some people who will not vote and it's clear it's | :56:50. | :56:54. | |
split right down the middle, even after gaffes and conventions or | :56:54. | :57:01. | |
whatever, it's still 47 or 47%. It's pretty much a dead heat. One | :57:01. | :57:06. | |
poll had Romney up on a few points. I still don't understand why he's | :57:06. | :57:10. | |
riding -- writing off 76 million people, which is what the clip says, | :57:10. | :57:15. | |
however you try to gloss it. Also those who don't pay federal tax. | :57:15. | :57:21. | |
There are 13,000 people earning over $500,000 a year who don't pay | :57:21. | :57:26. | |
federal income tax. Does he not want their vote either? I'm sure he | :57:26. | :57:30. | |
does. He wants the vote over half a million, but not less than 20,000? | :57:30. | :57:36. | |
Andrew, listen, he was in a campaign fundraising speech. He was | :57:36. | :57:41. | |
not giving a statement to the press. He was not giving a policy speech. | :57:41. | :57:47. | |
He was raising money. Under false pretences? No. What he was stating | :57:47. | :57:51. | |
was obvious. There are a group of the population that is not going to | :57:51. | :57:58. | |
vote for him. Including swing voters? No, he wants those. Aren't | :57:58. | :58:05. | |
they included? No, he was saying he's not going after Obama's voters. | :58:05. | :58:09. | |
The great leaders on both sides of the Atlantic in electoral winning | :58:09. | :58:13. | |
terms, if you look at them, they were the people who actually said - | :58:13. | :58:19. | |
Blair said to the richer, "I want to take my message to you." | :58:19. | :58:24. | |
Thatcher said to Labour people, "I want to bring the message to you." | :58:24. | :58:30. | |
We have only got 50 seconds. Why should Obama get a second term? | :58:30. | :58:32. | |
He's provided healthcare to millions of Americans and bailed | :58:32. | :58:36. | |
out the economy and he has begun cleaning up President Bush's mess. | :58:36. | :58:41. | |
Wait a minute. There are 23 people out of work in the United States. | :58:41. | :58:49. | |
Want to talk about gaffes. The President of the United States who | :58:49. | :58:56. | |
doesn't know if Egypt is an ally or not. That's a gaffe. I lit the blue | :58:56. | :59:00. |