Browse content similar to 26/03/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
It's Sunday morning, this is the Sunday Politics. | :00:43. | :00:47. | |
The police believe the Westminster attacker Khalid Masood acted alone, | :00:48. | :00:49. | |
but do the security services have the resources and | :00:50. | :00:51. | |
We'll ask the leader of the House of Commons. | :00:52. | :00:55. | |
As Theresa May prepares to trigger Brexit, details of | :00:56. | :00:58. | |
Will a so-called Henry VIII clause give the Government too much power | :00:59. | :01:04. | |
Ukip's only MP, Douglas Carswell, quits the party saying it's "job | :01:05. | :01:08. | |
And in the Midlands, our MPs and and the party's | :01:09. | :01:18. | |
And in the Midlands, our MPs and their reflections on naturists | :01:19. | :01:20. | |
outrage. I'll be And with me - as always - | :01:21. | :01:21. | |
the best and the brightest political panel in the business - | :01:22. | :01:33. | |
Toby Young, Polly Toynbee and Janan Ganesh, who'll be tweeting | :01:34. | :01:35. | |
throughout the programme. First, it was the most | :01:36. | :01:41. | |
deadly terrorist attack The attacker was shot dead trying | :01:42. | :01:43. | |
to storm Parliament, but not before he'd murdered four | :01:44. | :01:47. | |
people and injured 50 - one of those is still in a critical | :01:48. | :01:49. | |
condition in hospital. His target was the very | :01:50. | :01:53. | |
heart of our democracy, the Palace of Westminster, | :01:54. | :01:55. | |
and he came within metres of the Prime Minister | :01:56. | :01:58. | |
and senior Cabinet ministers. Without the quick actions | :01:59. | :02:01. | |
of the Defence Secretary's close protection detail, | :02:02. | :02:05. | |
fortuitously in the vicinity at the time, the outcome | :02:06. | :02:07. | |
could have been even worse. Janan Ganesh it is four days now, | :02:08. | :02:19. | |
getting on. What thoughts should we be having this weekend? First of | :02:20. | :02:25. | |
all, Theresa May's Parliamentary response was exemplary. In many | :02:26. | :02:29. | |
ways, the moment she arrived as prime minister and her six years as | :02:30. | :02:32. | |
Home Secretary showed a positive way. No other serving politician is | :02:33. | :02:37. | |
as steeped in counterterror and national security experience as she | :02:38. | :02:41. | |
is and I think it showed. As to whether politics is going now, it | :02:42. | :02:44. | |
looks like the Government will put more pressure on companies like | :02:45. | :02:50. | |
Google and Facebook to monitor sensor radical content that flows | :02:51. | :02:54. | |
through their channels, and I wonder whether beyond that the Government, | :02:55. | :02:58. | |
not just our Government but around the world, will start to open this | :02:59. | :03:03. | |
question of, during a terror attack, as it is unfolding, should there be | :03:04. | :03:08. | |
restrictions on what can appear on social media? I was on Twitter at | :03:09. | :03:12. | |
the time last week, during the attack, and people were posting | :03:13. | :03:15. | |
things which may have been useful to the perpetrators, not on that | :03:16. | :03:20. | |
occasion but future occasions. Should there be restrictions on what | :03:21. | :03:24. | |
and how much people can post while an attack is unfolding? I think we | :03:25. | :03:30. | |
have learned that this is like the weather, it is going to happen, it | :03:31. | :03:33. | |
is going to happen all over the world and in every country and we | :03:34. | :03:38. | |
deal with it well, we deal with it stoically, perhaps we are more used | :03:39. | :03:43. | |
to it than some. We had the IRA for years, we know how to make personal | :03:44. | :03:47. | |
risk assessments, how to know the chances of being in the wrong place | :03:48. | :03:52. | |
at the wrong time are infinitesimal, so people in London didn't say, I'm | :03:53. | :03:58. | |
not going to go to the centre of London today, everything carried on | :03:59. | :04:01. | |
just the same. Because we know that the odds of it, being unlucky, are | :04:02. | :04:06. | |
very small. Life is dangerous, this is another very small risk and it is | :04:07. | :04:14. | |
the danger of being alive. I think from an Isis Islamist propaganda | :04:15. | :04:17. | |
point of view, it showed just what a poor target London and the House of | :04:18. | :04:21. | |
Commons is, and it is hard to imagine the emergency services and | :04:22. | :04:26. | |
local people, international visitors, reacting much better than | :04:27. | :04:31. | |
they did. And the fact that our Muslim mayor was able to make an | :04:32. | :04:36. | |
appearance so quickly afterwards shows, I think, that we are not city | :04:37. | :04:41. | |
riddled with anti-Islamic prejudice. It couldn't really have been a | :04:42. | :04:44. | |
better advertisement for the values that is attacking. | :04:45. | :04:46. | |
OK, thank you for that. So, four days after the attack, | :04:47. | :04:49. | |
what more do we know The police have made 11 arrests, | :04:50. | :04:51. | |
but only one remains Here's Adam with the latest | :04:52. | :04:55. | |
on the investigation. According to a police timeline, | :04:56. | :05:00. | |
that's how long it took Khalid Masood to drive | :05:01. | :05:05. | |
through a crowd on Westminster to crash his car into | :05:06. | :05:07. | |
Parliament's perimeter... to fatally stab PC Keith Palmer, | :05:08. | :05:14. | |
before being shot by a bodyguard The public are leaving tributes | :05:15. | :05:18. | |
to the dead at Westminster. The family of PC Palmer released | :05:19. | :05:29. | |
a statement saying: "We would like to express our | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
gratitude to the people who were with Keith in his last | :05:35. | :05:36. | |
moments and who were There was nothing more | :05:37. | :05:39. | |
you could have done, you did your best and we are just | :05:40. | :05:42. | |
grateful he was not alone." Investigators say Masood's motive | :05:43. | :05:45. | |
may have gone to the grave with him. Officers think he acted alone, | :05:46. | :05:48. | |
despite reports he spent a WhatsApp The Home Secretary now has | :05:49. | :05:51. | |
such encrypted messaging There should be no place | :05:52. | :05:58. | |
for terrorists to hide. We need to make sure that | :05:59. | :06:04. | |
organisations like WhatsApp, and there are plenty of others | :06:05. | :06:06. | |
like that, don't provide a secret place for terrorists | :06:07. | :06:09. | |
to communicate with each other. It used to be that people | :06:10. | :06:12. | |
would steam open envelopes or just listen in on phones when they wanted | :06:13. | :06:16. | |
to find out what people were doing, legally, through warrantry, | :06:17. | :06:25. | |
but in this situation we need to make sure | :06:26. | :06:27. | |
that our intelligence services have the ability to get | :06:28. | :06:29. | |
into situations like encrypted She will ask the tech industry | :06:30. | :06:31. | |
to suggest solutions at a meeting this week, | :06:32. | :06:35. | |
although she didn't rule out But for those caught up | :06:36. | :06:37. | |
in the attack, perhaps it will be ..not the policy implications that | :06:38. | :06:41. | |
will echo the loudest. We're joined now from the Hague | :06:42. | :06:49. | |
by the Director of Europol, the European Police Agency, | :06:50. | :06:51. | |
Rob Wainwright. What role has Europol played in the | :06:52. | :07:03. | |
aftermath of Wednesday's attacks? I can tell you we are actively | :07:04. | :07:06. | |
supporting the investigation, because it is a live case I cannot | :07:07. | :07:10. | |
of course go into the details, but to give you some context, Andrew, | :07:11. | :07:14. | |
this is one of about 80 counterterrorist cases we have been | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
supporting across Europe this year, using a platform to shed thousands | :07:19. | :07:22. | |
of intelligence messages between the very large counterterrorist | :07:23. | :07:26. | |
community in Europe, and also tracking flows of terrorist finance, | :07:27. | :07:30. | |
illegal firearms, and monitoring this terrible propaganda online as | :07:31. | :07:34. | |
well. All of that is being made available now to the Metropolitan | :07:35. | :07:41. | |
Police in London for this case. Do we know if there is any European | :07:42. | :07:44. | |
link to those who may have inspired or directed Khalid Massoud? That is | :07:45. | :07:49. | |
an active part of the inquiry being led by Metropolitan Police and it is | :07:50. | :07:52. | |
not for me to comment or speculate on that. There are links of course | :07:53. | :07:58. | |
in terms of the profile of the attacker and the way in which he | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
launched these terrible events in Westminster, and those that we've | :08:03. | :08:06. | |
seen, for example, in the Berlin Christmas market last year and the | :08:07. | :08:11. | |
attack in Nice in the summer of last year, clear similarities between the | :08:12. | :08:15. | |
fact that the attackers involved have criminal background, somewhat | :08:16. | :08:19. | |
dislocated from society, each of them using a hired or stolen vehicle | :08:20. | :08:26. | |
to deliberately aim at pedestrians in a crowded place and using a | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
secondary weapon, whether it is a gun or a knife. So we are seeing a | :08:31. | :08:34. | |
trend, I think, of the kind of attacks across Europe in the last | :08:35. | :08:37. | |
couple of years and some of that at least was played out unfortunately | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
in Westminster this week as well. Mass and was known to the emergency | :08:42. | :08:45. | |
services, so were many of those involved in the Brussels, Paris and | :08:46. | :08:49. | |
Berlin attacks, so something is going wrong here, we are not | :08:50. | :08:54. | |
completely across this, are we? Actually most attacks are being | :08:55. | :08:59. | |
stopped. This was I think at least the 14th terrorist plot or attempted | :09:00. | :09:04. | |
attack in Britain since 2013 and the only one that has got through, and | :09:05. | :09:09. | |
that fits a picture of what we see in France last year, 17 attempted | :09:10. | :09:14. | |
attacks that were stopped, for example. Unfortunately some of them | :09:15. | :09:18. | |
get through. But people on the security services' Radar getting | :09:19. | :09:22. | |
through, in Westminster, Brussels, Paris and Berlin. There is clearly | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
something we are not doing that could stop that. Again, if you look | :09:28. | :09:34. | |
at what happened in Berlin and at least the first indications from | :09:35. | :09:38. | |
what police are saying in London, these are people that haven't really | :09:39. | :09:42. | |
appeared on Baha'i target list of the authorities, they are on the | :09:43. | :09:47. | |
edge at best of radicalised community -- on the high target | :09:48. | :09:51. | |
list. When you are dealing with a dispersed community of thousands of | :09:52. | :09:54. | |
radicalised, Senate radicalised individuals, it is very difficult to | :09:55. | :09:59. | |
monitor them 24/7, very difficult when these people, almost out of the | :10:00. | :10:03. | |
blue and carry out the attacks that they did. I think you have to find a | :10:04. | :10:08. | |
sense of perspective here around the work and the pressures of the work | :10:09. | :10:12. | |
and the difficult target choices that police and security authorities | :10:13. | :10:16. | |
have to make around Europe. The Home Secretary here in London said this | :10:17. | :10:20. | |
morning it is time to tackle apps like WhatsApp, which we believe | :10:21. | :10:24. | |
Massoud was using, because they encrypt from end to end and it is | :10:25. | :10:28. | |
difficult for the security services to know what is happening there. | :10:29. | :10:32. | |
What do you say, are you up for that? Across the hundreds of cases | :10:33. | :10:38. | |
we have supported in recent years there is no doubt that encryption, | :10:39. | :10:42. | |
encrypted communications are becoming more and more prominent in | :10:43. | :10:46. | |
the way terrorists communicate, more and more of a problem, therefore, a | :10:47. | :10:50. | |
real challenge for investigators, and that the heart of this is a | :10:51. | :10:53. | |
stark inconsistency between the ability of the police to lawfully | :10:54. | :10:57. | |
intercept telephone calls, but not when those messages are exchanged | :10:58. | :11:02. | |
via a social media messaging board, for example, and that is an | :11:03. | :11:07. | |
inconsistency in society and we have to find a solution through | :11:08. | :11:11. | |
appropriate legislation perhaps of these technologies and law | :11:12. | :11:14. | |
enforcement agencies working in a more constructive way. So you back | :11:15. | :11:21. | |
that? I agree that there is certainly a problem, absolutely. We | :11:22. | :11:24. | |
know there was a problem, I'm trying to find out if you agree with the | :11:25. | :11:34. | |
Home Secretary's solution? I agree certainly with her calls for changes | :11:35. | :11:38. | |
to be made. What the legislative solution for that is of course for | :11:39. | :11:41. | |
her and other lawmakers to decide but from my point of view, yes, I | :11:42. | :11:44. | |
would agree something has to be done to make sure we can apply more | :11:45. | :11:49. | |
consistent interception of communication in all parts of the | :11:50. | :11:54. | |
way in which terrorists invade our lives. Rob Wainwright of Europol, | :11:55. | :11:56. | |
thank you very much. Here with me in the studio now | :11:57. | :11:58. | |
is the Leader of the House What did last week's attack tell us | :11:59. | :12:06. | |
about the security of the Palace of Westminster? It told us that we are | :12:07. | :12:10. | |
looked after by some very courageous, very professional police | :12:11. | :12:18. | |
officers. There is clearly going to be a lessons learned with you, as | :12:19. | :12:23. | |
you would expect after any incident of this kind. That will look very | :12:24. | :12:27. | |
carefully at what worked well but also whether there are changes that | :12:28. | :12:30. | |
need to be made, that is already under way. And that is being run by | :12:31. | :12:36. | |
professionals, by the police and security director at Parliament... | :12:37. | :12:46. | |
Palace authorities, we will get reports from the professionals, | :12:47. | :12:50. | |
particularly our own Parliamentary security director, and just as | :12:51. | :12:54. | |
security matters in parliament are kept under constant review, if there | :12:55. | :12:57. | |
are changes that need to be made as a result, then they will need to be | :12:58. | :13:02. | |
made. Let's look at some of the issues it has thrown up, as we get | :13:03. | :13:05. | |
some distance from these appalling events when our first reaction was | :13:06. | :13:10. | |
always the people who lose their lives and suffer, and then we start | :13:11. | :13:14. | |
to become a bit more analytical. Is it true that the authorities removed | :13:15. | :13:19. | |
armed guards from Cowbridge gate, where the attacker made his entry, | :13:20. | :13:22. | |
because they looked to threatening for tourists? -- carriage gate. No, | :13:23. | :13:30. | |
the idea that a protest from MPs led to operational changes simply not | :13:31. | :13:33. | |
the case. What happened in the last couple of years is that the security | :13:34. | :13:40. | |
arrangements in new Palace Yard have actually been strengthened, but I | :13:41. | :13:43. | |
don't think your view was would expect me to go into a detailed | :13:44. | :13:48. | |
commentary upon operational security matters. Why were the armed guards | :13:49. | :13:53. | |
removed? There are armed guards at all times in the Palace of | :13:54. | :13:58. | |
Westminster, it is a matter for the security authorities and in | :13:59. | :14:02. | |
particular for the police and direct command of those officers to decide | :14:03. | :14:09. | |
how they are best deployed. Is it because, as some from Scotland Yard | :14:10. | :14:13. | |
sources have reported to the papers this morning, was it done because of | :14:14. | :14:18. | |
staffing shortages? I'm in no position to comment on the details | :14:19. | :14:22. | |
of the operation but my understanding is that the number of | :14:23. | :14:27. | |
people available is what the police and the security authorities working | :14:28. | :14:31. | |
together have decided to deploy and that they think was commensurate | :14:32. | :14:36. | |
with the threat that we faced. Is it not of concern that as the incident | :14:37. | :14:42. | |
unfolded the gates were left unguarded by armed and unarmed, they | :14:43. | :14:46. | |
were just unguarded, so much so that, as it was going on, a career | :14:47. | :14:50. | |
with a parcel on a moped at was able to drive through? -- up career. I | :14:51. | :14:59. | |
think we will need to examine that case as part of looking into any | :15:00. | :15:02. | |
lessons learned, but what I don't yet know, because the police are | :15:03. | :15:06. | |
still interviewing everybody involved, witnesses and police | :15:07. | :15:11. | |
officers involved, was exactly who was standing where in the vicinity | :15:12. | :15:17. | |
of the murder at a particular time. We have seen pictures, the gates | :15:18. | :15:21. | |
were unguarded as people were concentrating on what was happening | :15:22. | :15:25. | |
to the police man and to the attacker, but the delivery man was | :15:26. | :15:31. | |
able to come through the gates with a parcel?! You have seen a | :15:32. | :15:34. | |
particular camera angle, I think it is important before we rush to | :15:35. | :15:39. | |
judgment, and we shouldn't be pointing fingers, we need... We are | :15:40. | :15:45. | |
trying to get to the bottom of it. To get to the bottom of it means we | :15:46. | :15:48. | |
have to look at what all the witnesses and all the police | :15:49. | :15:52. | |
officers involved say about what happened, and then there needs to be | :15:53. | :15:56. | |
a decision taken about what if any changes need to be made in light of | :15:57. | :15:58. | |
that. We know the attacker was stopped in | :15:59. | :16:07. | |
his tracks by the Defence Secretary's bodyguard, where was the | :16:08. | :16:13. | |
armed roving unit that had replaced the armed guard at the gate? I | :16:14. | :16:18. | |
cannot comment on operation details but my understanding is there were | :16:19. | :16:22. | |
other armed officers who would have been able to prevent the attacker | :16:23. | :16:27. | |
from getting to the chamber, as has been alleged it would be possible | :16:28. | :16:34. | |
for him to do. Were you aware that a so-called table top simulation, | :16:35. | :16:38. | |
carried out by Scotland Yard and the Parliamentary authorities, ended | :16:39. | :16:41. | |
with four terrorists in this simulation able to storm parliament | :16:42. | :16:51. | |
and killed dozens of MPs? No, that is the first time that has been | :16:52. | :16:57. | |
mentioned to me. You are the leader of the house. These matters are | :16:58. | :17:03. | |
dealt with by security professionals who are involved, they are advised | :17:04. | :17:10. | |
by a security committee, chaired by the Deputy Speaker, but we do not | :17:11. | :17:13. | |
debate operational details in public. I'm not asking for a debate, | :17:14. | :17:20. | |
I raise this because it's been reported because it's quite clear | :17:21. | :17:24. | |
that after this simulation, it raised serious questions about the | :17:25. | :17:28. | |
security of the palace. Actions should have followed. What I've said | :17:29. | :17:34. | |
to you is that these matters are kept under constant review and that | :17:35. | :17:41. | |
there are always changes made both in the deployment of individual | :17:42. | :17:47. | |
officers and security guards of the palace staff and other plans to | :17:48. | :17:51. | |
strengthen the hard security of the perimeter. If you look back at | :17:52. | :17:56. | |
Hansard December last year, they was a plan already been brought forward | :17:57. | :18:02. | |
to strengthen the security at carriage Gates, looking at questions | :18:03. | :18:10. | |
of access. Will there be armed guards now? You need to look not | :18:11. | :18:18. | |
just at armed guards, you need to look at the entirety of the security | :18:19. | :18:23. | |
engagements including fencing. There's lots about the security we | :18:24. | :18:27. | |
don't need to know and shouldn't know, but whether or not there are | :18:28. | :18:31. | |
armed guards is something we will find out quite soon and I'm asking | :18:32. | :18:37. | |
you if you think there should be. If you think the judgment is by our | :18:38. | :18:41. | |
security experts that there need to be more armed guards in certain | :18:42. | :18:46. | |
places, then they will be deployed accordingly, but I think before we | :18:47. | :18:50. | |
rush to make conclusions about lessons to be learned from | :18:51. | :18:55. | |
Wednesday's appalling attack, it is important the police are allowed to | :18:56. | :18:59. | |
get on with completing the interview of witnesses and their own officers, | :19:00. | :19:04. | |
and then that there is considered view taken about what changes might | :19:05. | :19:08. | |
need to be made and then they will be implemented. Let me come onto the | :19:09. | :19:14. | |
triggering of Article 50 that begins our negotiations to exit the | :19:15. | :19:18. | |
European Union. It will happen on Wednesday. John Claude Juncker told | :19:19. | :19:23. | |
Germany's most popular newspaper that he wants to make an example of | :19:24. | :19:27. | |
the UK to make everyone realise it's not worth leaving the EU. What do | :19:28. | :19:34. | |
you make of that? I think all sorts of things are said in advance of | :19:35. | :19:38. | |
negotiations beginning. Clearly the commission will want to ensure the | :19:39. | :19:45. | |
EU 27 holds together. As the Prime Minister has said, that is a British | :19:46. | :19:49. | |
national interest as well. She has been very clear... What do you make | :19:50. | :19:56. | |
of President Juncker's remark? It doesn't surprise me ahead of | :19:57. | :19:59. | |
negotiations but I think if rational mutual interest is to the fore that | :20:00. | :20:07. | |
it's perfectly possible for an agreement to be negotiated between | :20:08. | :20:12. | |
the UK and our 27 friends and allies that addresses all of the issues | :20:13. | :20:17. | |
from trade to security, police cooperation, foreign policy | :20:18. | :20:21. | |
co-operation, works for all countries. The EU wants to agree a | :20:22. | :20:25. | |
substantial divorce bill before it will even discuss any future UK EU | :20:26. | :20:32. | |
relations, what do you make of that? Article 50 says the terms of exit | :20:33. | :20:38. | |
need to be negotiated in the context of the kind of future relationship | :20:39. | :20:43. | |
that's going to exist between the departing country and the remaining | :20:44. | :20:47. | |
member states. It seems it is simply not possible to separate those two. | :20:48. | :20:52. | |
Clearly there will need to be a discussion about joint assets and | :20:53. | :20:56. | |
join liabilities but I think if we all keep to the fore the fact we | :20:57. | :21:00. | |
will continue to be neighbours, we will continue to be essential allies | :21:01. | :21:04. | |
and trading partners, then it is possible to come to a | :21:05. | :21:18. | |
deal that works for all size. The question is do you agree the divorce | :21:19. | :21:22. | |
bill first and then look at the subsequent relations we will have or | :21:23. | :21:25. | |
do you do them both in parallel? Article 50 itself says they have to | :21:26. | :21:30. | |
run together. Do you think they have to be done together or sequentially? | :21:31. | :21:35. | |
I think it is impossible to separate the two but we will get into | :21:36. | :21:40. | |
negotiations very soon and then once David Davis is sitting down with | :21:41. | :21:44. | |
Michel Barnier and others and the national governments become involved | :21:45. | :21:49. | |
too, then I hope we can make steady progress. An early deal about each | :21:50. | :21:53. | |
other's citizens would be a good piece of low hanging fruit. Is the | :21:54. | :21:57. | |
Government willing to pay a substantial divorce bill? The Prime | :21:58. | :22:06. | |
Minister has said we don't rule out some kind of continuing payments, | :22:07. | :22:11. | |
for example there may be EU programmes in the future in which we | :22:12. | :22:16. | |
want to continue to participate. 50 billion? We don't envisage long-term | :22:17. | :22:25. | |
payments of vast sums of money. So 50 billion isn't even the Government | :22:26. | :22:30. | |
ballpark? You are tempting me to get into the detail of negotiation, that | :22:31. | :22:34. | |
is something that will be starting very soon and let's leave it to the | :22:35. | :22:38. | |
negotiations. During the referendum there was no talk from the Leave | :22:39. | :22:46. | |
side about any question of separation bill, now the talk is of | :22:47. | :22:50. | |
50 billion and I'm trying to find out if the British government thinks | :22:51. | :23:02. | |
that of amount is on your radar. The Government is addressing the | :23:03. | :23:07. | |
situation in which we now are, which is that we have a democratic | :23:08. | :23:10. | |
obligation to implement the decision of the people in the referendum last | :23:11. | :23:15. | |
year, and that we need to do that in a way that maximises the | :23:16. | :23:19. | |
opportunity, the future prosperity and security of everybody in the UK. | :23:20. | :23:24. | |
Let me try one more thing on the Great Repeal Bill, the white Paper | :23:25. | :23:28. | |
will be published I think on Thursday, is that right? We haven't | :23:29. | :23:32. | |
announced an exact date but you will see the white Paper very soon. Let's | :23:33. | :23:39. | |
say it is Thursday, it will enshrine thousands of EU laws into UK law, it | :23:40. | :23:42. | |
will use what's called Henry VIII powers, who of course was a | :23:43. | :23:48. | |
dictator. Is this an attempt to avoid proper Parliamentary scrutiny? | :23:49. | :23:55. | |
No, we are repealing the Communities Act 1972, then put existing EU legal | :23:56. | :24:01. | |
obligations on the UK statutory footing, so business know where they | :24:02. | :24:07. | |
stand. Then, because a lot of those EU regulations will for example | :24:08. | :24:15. | |
refer to the commission or another regulator, you need to substitute a | :24:16. | :24:20. | |
UK authority in place so we need to have a power under secondary | :24:21. | :24:25. | |
legislation to tweak the European regulators so it is coherent. This | :24:26. | :24:34. | |
is weather Henry VIII powers come in. It is secondary legislation and | :24:35. | :24:40. | |
the scope, the definition of those powers and when they can be used in | :24:41. | :24:44. | |
what circumstances is something the parliament will have to approve in | :24:45. | :24:49. | |
voting through the bill itself. And if it is as innocuous as you say, | :24:50. | :24:53. | |
will you accept the proposal of the Lords for an enhanced scrutiny | :24:54. | :24:58. | |
process on the secondary legislation? Neither the relevant | :24:59. | :25:04. | |
committee of the House of Lords, the constitution committee, nor anyone | :25:05. | :25:08. | |
else has seen the text of the bill and I think when it comes out, I | :25:09. | :25:12. | |
hope that those members of the House of Lords will find that reassuring, | :25:13. | :25:18. | |
but as I say the definition of those powers are something the parliament | :25:19. | :25:24. | |
itself will take the final decision. David Lidington, thank you for being | :25:25. | :25:26. | |
with us. So, Ukip has lost its only MP - | :25:27. | :25:27. | |
Douglas Carswell. He defected to Ukip | :25:28. | :25:30. | |
from the Conservative Party almost three years ago, | :25:31. | :25:32. | |
but yesterday announced that he was quitting | :25:33. | :25:33. | |
to sit as an independent. His surprise defection came | :25:34. | :25:35. | |
in August 2014 saying, "Only Ukip can shake up that cosy | :25:36. | :25:37. | |
little clique called Westminster". But his bromance with Nigel Farage | :25:38. | :25:40. | |
turned sour when Mr Carswell criticised the so-called "shock | :25:41. | :25:44. | |
and awful" strategy as Then, during the EU referendum | :25:45. | :25:46. | |
campaign last year, Nigel Farage was part of the unofficial Leave.EU | :25:47. | :25:51. | |
campaign, whereas Douglas Carswell opted to support the official | :25:52. | :25:54. | |
Vote Leave campaign. Just last month, former | :25:55. | :26:00. | |
Ukip leader Nigel Farage accused Douglas Carswell | :26:01. | :26:02. | |
of thwarting his chances of being awarded a knighthood, | :26:03. | :26:04. | |
writing that, Announcing his resignation | :26:05. | :26:06. | |
on his website yesterday, Mr Carswell said, "I desperately | :26:07. | :26:14. | |
wanted us to leave the EU. Now we can be certain that | :26:15. | :26:16. | |
that is going to happen, I have decided that I will be leaving | :26:17. | :26:19. | |
Ukip." When Mr Carswell left | :26:20. | :26:22. | |
the Conservative Party in 2014 he resigned as an MP, | :26:23. | :26:24. | |
triggering a by-election. "I must seek permission | :26:25. | :26:27. | |
from my boss," he said referring This time, though, Mr Carswell has | :26:28. | :26:30. | |
said there will be no by-election. We're joined now from Salford | :26:31. | :26:39. | |
by Ukip leader, Paul Nuttall. Welcome back to the programme. Are | :26:40. | :26:50. | |
you happy to see the back of your only MP? Well, do you know, I'm | :26:51. | :26:57. | |
always sad when people leave Ukip at a grass roots level or Parliamentary | :26:58. | :27:03. | |
level, but I'm sad but I'm not surprised by this. There has been | :27:04. | :27:07. | |
adrift by Douglas and Ukip over the past couple of years, his | :27:08. | :27:12. | |
relationship with Nigel Farage certainly hasn't helped, and it is a | :27:13. | :27:16. | |
hangover from the former regime which I inherited. I try to bring | :27:17. | :27:20. | |
the party together, I thought I had done that for a few months but it | :27:21. | :27:25. | |
seems now as if I was only papering over the cracks. Douglas has gone | :27:26. | :27:29. | |
and I think we will move on and be a more unified party as a result. Did | :27:30. | :27:35. | |
Douglas Carswell jump because he expected to be pushed out your | :27:36. | :27:38. | |
national executive committee tomorrow? He came before the | :27:39. | :27:42. | |
National executive committee to answer questions regarding issues | :27:43. | :27:45. | |
that have come to the fore over the last couple of months. There was the | :27:46. | :27:50. | |
knighthood issue, the issue surrounding the Thanet election and | :27:51. | :27:56. | |
his comments in a book which came out regarding Brexit. So was he | :27:57. | :28:02. | |
under suspicion? He was coming to answer these questions and they | :28:03. | :28:06. | |
would have been difficult. So he did jump in your view? No, I'm not | :28:07. | :28:13. | |
saying he would have been pushed out of the party but he would have faced | :28:14. | :28:16. | |
difficult questions. What is clear is that a fissure had developed and | :28:17. | :28:25. | |
I'm not surprised by him leaving the party. You have also lost Diane | :28:26. | :28:30. | |
James, Stephen Wolf, Arron Banks, you failed to win the Stoke by | :28:31. | :28:36. | |
election, Mr Carswell is now a pundit on US television, Ukip now | :28:37. | :28:41. | |
stands for the UK irrelevance party, doesn't it? Paul's hard us yesterday | :28:42. | :28:47. | |
on 12%, membership continues to rise. -- the polls had us on 12%. 4 | :28:48. | :29:04. | |
million people voted for Ukip. Over the summer exciting things will be | :29:05. | :29:09. | |
happening in the party, we will rewrite the constitution, | :29:10. | :29:11. | |
restructure the party, it will have a new feel to it and we will be | :29:12. | :29:16. | |
launching pretty much the post Brexit Ukip. Arron Banks, who used | :29:17. | :29:21. | |
to pay quite a lot of your bills, he said the current leadership, that | :29:22. | :29:26. | |
would be you, couldn't knock the skin off a rice pudding, another way | :29:27. | :29:30. | |
of saying you are relevant, isn't it? I don't think that's fair. I've | :29:31. | :29:36. | |
only been in the job since November the 28th, we have taken steps to | :29:37. | :29:40. | |
restructure the party already, the party is on a sound financial | :29:41. | :29:44. | |
footing, we won't have a problem money wise going forward. It is a | :29:45. | :29:49. | |
party which can really unified, look forward to the post Brexit Iraq, | :29:50. | :29:54. | |
tomorrow we are launching our Brexit test for the Prime Minister. If it | :29:55. | :29:58. | |
wasn't for Ukip there wouldn't have been a referendum and we wouldn't | :29:59. | :30:05. | |
have Brexit. Every time you say you will unified, someone else leaves. | :30:06. | :30:10. | |
Is Arron Banks still a member? No, not at this moment in time. He has | :30:11. | :30:14. | |
been a generous donor in the past, he's done a great job of ensuring we | :30:15. | :30:19. | |
get Brexit and I'm thankful for that but he isn't a member. He has just | :30:20. | :30:24. | |
submitted an invoice of ?2000 for the use of call centres, will you | :30:25. | :30:35. | |
pay that? No. That should be interesting to watch. | :30:36. | :30:39. | |
In the aftermath of the Westminster attack, Nigel Farage told Fox News | :30:40. | :30:43. | |
that it vindicates Donald Trump's extreme vetting of migrants. Since | :30:44. | :30:48. | |
the attacker was born in Kent, like Nigel Farage, can you explain the | :30:49. | :30:53. | |
relevance of the remark? I personally haven't supported Donald | :30:54. | :30:57. | |
Trump's position on this, but what I will say, this is what Nigel has | :30:58. | :31:02. | |
said as well, we have a problem within the Muslim community, it is a | :31:03. | :31:06. | |
small number of people who hate the way we live... Can you explain the | :31:07. | :31:12. | |
relevance of Mr Farage's remark? Mr Farage also made the point | :31:13. | :31:26. | |
about multiculturalism being the problem as well and he is correct on | :31:27. | :31:30. | |
that because we cannot have separate communities living separate lives | :31:31. | :31:32. | |
and never integrating. How would extreme vetting of migrants help you | :31:33. | :31:34. | |
track down a man who was born in Kent? In this case it wouldn't. | :31:35. | :31:37. | |
Maybe in other cases it would. But, as I say, I'm not a supporter of | :31:38. | :31:40. | |
Donald Trump's position on extreme vetting, never have been, so I'm the | :31:41. | :31:44. | |
wrong person to ask the question too, Andrew. That has probably | :31:45. | :31:48. | |
become clear in my efforts to get you to answer it. Let me as too, | :31:49. | :31:53. | |
should there be a by-election in Clacton now? Douglas has called | :31:54. | :31:56. | |
by-elections in the past when he has left a political party, I know | :31:57. | :32:00. | |
certain people in Ukip are keen to go down this line, Douglas is always | :32:01. | :32:06. | |
keen on recall and if 20% of people in his constituency want a | :32:07. | :32:08. | |
by-election then maybe we should have won. Ukip will be opening | :32:09. | :32:15. | |
nominations for Clacton very soon. Hold on with us, Mr Nuttall, I have | :32:16. | :32:20. | |
Douglas Carswell here in the studio. Why not call a by-election? I'm not | :32:21. | :32:29. | |
switching parties. You are, you are becoming independent. There is a | :32:30. | :32:32. | |
difference, I've not submitted myself to the whip up a new party, | :32:33. | :32:37. | |
if I was, I would be obliged to trigger a by-election. If every time | :32:38. | :32:40. | |
an MP in the House of Commons resigned the whip or lost the whip, | :32:41. | :32:45. | |
far from actually strengthening the democracy against the party bosses, | :32:46. | :32:49. | |
that would give those who ran parties and enormous power, so I'm | :32:50. | :32:53. | |
being absolutely consistent here, I'm not joining a party. It is a | :32:54. | :32:58. | |
change of status and Nigel Farage has just said he will write to every | :32:59. | :33:04. | |
constituent in Clacton and he wants to try and get 20% of constituents | :33:05. | :33:10. | |
to older by-election. We are going to testing, he says, write to every | :33:11. | :33:15. | |
house in Clacton, find out if his constituents want a by-election, if | :33:16. | :33:20. | |
20% do we will find out if Mr Carswell is honourable. I'm sure | :33:21. | :33:23. | |
they will be delighted to hear from Nigel. There have been several | :33:24. | :33:29. | |
by-elections when Nigel has had the opportunity to contact the | :33:30. | :33:32. | |
electorate we did -- which did not always go to plan. If you got 20%, | :33:33. | :33:39. | |
would you? Yesterday I sent an e-mail to 20,000 constituents, I | :33:40. | :33:44. | |
have had a lot of responses back, overwhelmingly supported. Recently | :33:45. | :33:48. | |
you said you were 100% Ukip, now you are 0%. What happened? I saw Theresa | :33:49. | :33:55. | |
May triggering article 50, we won, Andrew. You knew a few months ago | :33:56. | :34:00. | |
she was going to do that. On June the 24th I had serious thought about | :34:01. | :34:04. | |
making the move but I wanted to be absolutely certain that Article 50 | :34:05. | :34:08. | |
would be triggered and I think it is right. This is why ultimately Ukip | :34:09. | :34:13. | |
exists, to get us out of the European Union. We should be | :34:14. | :34:15. | |
cheerful instead of attacking one another, this is our moment, we made | :34:16. | :34:21. | |
it happen. Did you try to sideline the former Ukip leader during the | :34:22. | :34:25. | |
referendum campaign? Not at all, I have been open about this, the idea | :34:26. | :34:29. | |
I have been involved in subterfuge. You try to sideline him openly | :34:30. | :34:35. | |
rather than by subterfuge? I made the point we needed to be open, | :34:36. | :34:40. | |
broad and progressive to win. I made it clear in my acceptance speech in | :34:41. | :34:43. | |
Clacton and when I said that Vote Leave should get designation that | :34:44. | :34:46. | |
the only way Euroscepticism would win was by being more than just | :34:47. | :34:50. | |
angry natives. What do you make of that? I am over the moon that we | :34:51. | :34:58. | |
have achieved Brexit, unlike Douglas I rarely have that much confidence | :34:59. | :35:04. | |
in Theresa May because history proves that she is good at talking | :35:05. | :35:07. | |
the talk but in walking the walk often fails, and I'm disappointed | :35:08. | :35:11. | |
because I wanted Douglas to be part of the post Brexit Ukip where we | :35:12. | :35:15. | |
move forward with a raft of domestic policies and go on to take seat at | :35:16. | :35:20. | |
Westminster. Do you think you try to sideline Mr Farage during the | :35:21. | :35:24. | |
referendum campaign? Vote Leave certainly didn't want Nigel Farage | :35:25. | :35:29. | |
front of house, we know that. They freely admit that, they admitted it | :35:30. | :35:36. | |
on media over the past year. Nigel still was front of house because he | :35:37. | :35:40. | |
is Nigel Farage and if it wasn't for Nigel, as I said earlier, we | :35:41. | :35:44. | |
wouldn't have at the referendum and we wouldn't have achieved Brexit | :35:45. | :35:49. | |
because Nigel Farage appeals, like Ukip to a certain section of the | :35:50. | :35:53. | |
population. If our primary motive is to get us out of the European Union, | :35:54. | :35:57. | |
why are we having this row, why can't we just celebrate what is | :35:58. | :36:01. | |
happening on Wednesday? We can, but you are far more confident that | :36:02. | :36:04. | |
Theresa May will deliver on this than I am. Ukip may have been a | :36:05. | :36:09. | |
single issue pressure group ten years ago, it wasn't a single issue | :36:10. | :36:13. | |
pressure group that you joined in 2014, it wasn't a single issue | :36:14. | :36:17. | |
pressure group that you stood for in 2015 at the general election, and | :36:18. | :36:21. | |
I'm disappointed that you have left us when we are moving onto an | :36:22. | :36:25. | |
exciting era. What specifically gives you a lack of confidence in | :36:26. | :36:30. | |
Mrs May's ability deliver? Her record as Home Secretary, she said | :36:31. | :36:34. | |
she would deal with radical Islam, nothing happened, she said she would | :36:35. | :36:39. | |
get immigration down to the tens of thousands, last year in her last | :36:40. | :36:42. | |
year as Home Secretary as city the size of Newcastle came to this | :36:43. | :36:46. | |
country, that is not tens of thousands. I think we need to take | :36:47. | :36:50. | |
yes for an answer eventually. The problem with some Eurosceptics is | :36:51. | :36:54. | |
they never accept they have won the argument. We have one, Theresa May | :36:55. | :36:59. | |
is going to do what we have wanted her to do, let's be happy, let's | :37:00. | :37:03. | |
celebrate that. But let's wait until she starts bartering things away, | :37:04. | :37:08. | |
until she betrays our fishermen, just as other Conservative prime | :37:09. | :37:10. | |
ministers have done in the past. Let's wait until we end up still | :37:11. | :37:15. | |
paying some sort of membership fee into the European Union or a large | :37:16. | :37:18. | |
divorce bill. That is not what people voted for on June the 23rd | :37:19. | :37:22. | |
and if you want to align yourself with that, you are clearly not a | :37:23. | :37:31. | |
Ukipper in my opinion. So for Ukip to have relevance, it has to go | :37:32. | :37:34. | |
wrong? I'm confident politics will come back to our terms but -- our | :37:35. | :37:40. | |
turf but there will be a post Brexit Ukip that will stand for veterans, | :37:41. | :37:44. | |
book slashing the foreign aid bill and becoming the party of law and | :37:45. | :37:49. | |
order. Finally, to you, Douglas Carswell, you say you have | :37:50. | :37:53. | |
confidence in Mrs May to deliver in the way that Paul Nuttall doesn't. | :37:54. | :37:57. | |
You backed her, you were Conservative, you believe that | :37:58. | :38:03. | |
Brexit will be delivered under a Conservative Government. Why would | :38:04. | :38:08. | |
you not bite the 2020 election as a Conservative? I feel comfortable | :38:09. | :38:12. | |
being independent. If you join a party you have to agree to a bunch | :38:13. | :38:15. | |
of stuff I would not want to agree with. I am comfortable being | :38:16. | :38:23. | |
independent. So you will go into 2020 as an independent? If you look | :38:24. | :38:27. | |
at the raising of funds, what Vote Leave did as a pop-up party... We | :38:28. | :38:31. | |
only have five seconds, will you fight as an independent in the next | :38:32. | :38:34. | |
general election? Let's wait and see. Very well! Thank you both very | :38:35. | :38:38. | |
Hello again. much. | :38:39. | :38:57. | |
Welcome to the Sunday Politics in the Midlands after a | :38:58. | :38:59. | |
And sadly, yes, confirmation that this | :39:00. | :39:02. | |
latest terrorist outrage has clear links with Islamist extremism | :39:03. | :39:07. | |
So, can Parliament remain a public meeting | :39:08. | :39:11. | |
place, or must it become even more of a fortress? | :39:12. | :39:17. | |
Well, our guests today both endured that five hour | :39:18. | :39:20. | |
lockdown of Westminster and both, thank goodness, are safe | :39:21. | :39:25. | |
With us here today, game Dame Caroline Spelman, the Conservative | :39:26. | :39:29. | |
MP for Meriden, and Richard Burden, Labour MP for Birmingham Northfield. | :39:30. | :39:34. | |
Good to have you both with us here today. | :39:35. | :39:36. | |
So, we begin, of course, with the horror visted upon | :39:37. | :39:38. | |
Westminster from here in the Midlands on Wednesday. | :39:39. | :39:46. | |
Parliament bristles with armed police, CCTV and | :39:47. | :39:48. | |
In the event, though, all it took was one man with a | :39:49. | :39:52. | |
Islamic State, so-called, say he was one of their | :39:53. | :39:55. | |
But one of our Muslim MPs assured the Prime | :39:56. | :39:59. | |
Minister this outrage had nothing whatsoever to do with the religion | :40:00. | :40:02. | |
This attacker and people like him are not of my | :40:03. | :40:07. | |
religion, nor are they of our community. | :40:08. | :40:09. | |
We should condemn all of them who pretend to be of a particular | :40:10. | :40:12. | |
religion, because they are not of religion. | :40:13. | :40:14. | |
If they were of religion, they wouldn't be carrying | :40:15. | :40:16. | |
We have to say united and show them that they can't win on these | :40:17. | :40:22. | |
And I do realise it must have been a dreadful ordeal, so | :40:23. | :40:28. | |
in a way, I hesitate to ask you to relive it, but can I | :40:29. | :40:32. | |
ask you first of all, Caroline, exactly what happened to you on | :40:33. | :40:34. | |
Well, I'd just been talking to three groups of | :40:35. | :40:42. | |
schoolchildren from Walsall Common junior school, who had made | :40:43. | :40:44. | |
the journey to London, and I went to the chamber | :40:45. | :40:49. | |
to vote because we had a vote at 2:40pm. | :40:50. | :40:51. | |
So, one of my main concerns, as I had no phone signal, | :40:52. | :40:54. | |
But I'm very pleased to say, when I rang the head | :40:55. | :41:01. | |
once I had a phone much later, he told me they had got away safely | :41:02. | :41:05. | |
and he said something I think which was | :41:06. | :41:07. | |
He said, "Caroline, this would not stop me | :41:08. | :41:10. | |
from bringing children to visit Parliament another year." | :41:11. | :41:12. | |
You say you were locked down, as it were, yourself. | :41:13. | :41:15. | |
Yes, well, I voted and I found myself in the corridors where quite | :41:16. | :41:19. | |
a lot of my colleagues were locked into the chamber of the House of | :41:20. | :41:22. | |
So, I wasn't quite sure where I should go | :41:23. | :41:26. | |
from the corridors but, actually, we were directed to a secure room | :41:27. | :41:32. | |
below the chamber and, yeah, that's where | :41:33. | :41:34. | |
Well, I had some guests down in connection | :41:35. | :41:40. | |
with my work as part of the All-party Motor Group and, like | :41:41. | :41:43. | |
Caroline, I'd been called to vote, I'd just been in to vote, | :41:44. | :41:45. | |
was going back to meet them and that's when all the doors | :41:46. | :41:48. | |
were shut and I was locked down in central lobby with my guests, | :41:49. | :41:52. | |
which is the dead centre of the building. | :41:53. | :41:55. | |
It's were the term "lobbying your MP" comes from. | :41:56. | :42:01. | |
I did have a phone signal, so, unlike Caroline, we were | :42:02. | :42:09. | |
able to pick up a bit of what was going on about that had to | :42:10. | :42:15. | |
When we realised the whole of what was going on outside | :42:16. | :42:27. | |
unfolding, obviously it was chilling for all of us. | :42:28. | :42:29. | |
Making it very isolated, as we are hearing, where you were. | :42:30. | :42:32. | |
You had plenty of time, obviously, to reflect on your | :42:33. | :42:34. | |
predicament, possibly the significance of what was going on. | :42:35. | :42:36. | |
I desperately wanted to contact my family to tell them | :42:37. | :42:41. | |
that I was safe and I also wanted to be sure that my staff were safe. | :42:42. | :42:45. | |
We do practice the procedure and I knew | :42:46. | :42:46. | |
that my staff would be evacuated to another part of the building. | :42:47. | :42:51. | |
I was just hoping and praying they were | :42:52. | :42:53. | |
safely there but, when we were all let go, the first thing we did | :42:54. | :42:56. | |
was head back to try and find our | :42:57. | :42:58. | |
members of staff and I gave them a very big hug. | :42:59. | :43:01. | |
We heard Khalid Mahmood speaking, I thought, with great | :43:02. | :43:06. | |
The community response in terms of social cohesion | :43:07. | :43:15. | |
in and around Birmingham has been very strong in the days since | :43:16. | :43:19. | |
Wednesday, and yet we do hear these reports about jihad | :43:20. | :43:21. | |
and those seven wards that have a particularly big | :43:22. | :43:23. | |
concentration of people who have had terror related convictions. | :43:24. | :43:26. | |
How do we balance how to make sense of all this? | :43:27. | :43:30. | |
I think Khalid had it absolutely right there. | :43:31. | :43:32. | |
Yes, clearly, were police enquiries lead | :43:33. | :43:35. | |
out of this incident and others, they need to be followed up, whether | :43:36. | :43:38. | |
that is in Birmingham or anywhere else, but the idea that the person | :43:39. | :43:41. | |
who committed this atrocity in Parliament or indeed other | :43:42. | :43:44. | |
atrocities are anything to do with the vast, | :43:45. | :43:46. | |
Muslims in this country, it's an aberration of Islam | :43:47. | :43:49. | |
and I think Khalid did speak with great force in | :43:50. | :43:51. | |
saying, "This is not in my religion." | :43:52. | :43:59. | |
I would really like to add that the local imam from Solihull is | :44:00. | :44:02. | |
one of the first people to e-mail me and say, | :44:03. | :44:05. | |
I'm so glad you're safe, I condemn absolutely these attacks | :44:06. | :44:07. | |
Muslims who are misinformed about their faith, this | :44:08. | :44:14. | |
is the hijacking of religion, it's been known in the | :44:15. | :44:16. | |
past the world, it's a prime example of it | :44:17. | :44:20. | |
Birmingham, the Church of England receive a ?1.5 million of funding | :44:21. | :44:28. | |
for a "near neighbours" programme to help people of different faith | :44:29. | :44:32. | |
better understand their differences and also to draw closer together. | :44:33. | :44:34. | |
And so, like Parliament itself, let's get back to business. | :44:35. | :44:48. | |
When the Bromsgrove MP and communities secretary, | :44:49. | :44:50. | |
Sajid Javid, approved the council's plan for 6000 homes on the green | :44:51. | :44:53. | |
belt near Sutton Coldfield, he put himself on a collision course | :44:54. | :44:55. | |
Well, Mr Javed did promise tough decisions, didn't he? | :44:56. | :45:02. | |
Well, our political correspondent explains why this is getting | :45:03. | :45:05. | |
A green and pleasant land, but not for long. | :45:06. | :45:16. | |
This particular bit of green belt in Sutton Coldfield is shortly to | :45:17. | :45:19. | |
Where we are walking is actually just the start. | :45:20. | :45:22. | |
If you look to the left, over there, that's one of the | :45:23. | :45:25. | |
borders and behind you again, it goes right the way to the A38, | :45:26. | :45:28. | |
another two or three fields that way. | :45:29. | :45:35. | |
It's the only way, Birmingham City Council said, to | :45:36. | :45:42. | |
Campaigners argue it is short-sighted. | :45:43. | :45:46. | |
In Birmingham, we actually haven't got | :45:47. | :45:48. | |
It has been released into brown field effectively, | :45:49. | :45:57. | |
so we have no urban fringe, we have no green belt remaining. | :45:58. | :45:59. | |
And it's created a political row between | :46:00. | :46:01. | |
your local Conservative MP and the Conservative minister | :46:02. | :46:03. | |
responsible for giving it the go ahead. | :46:04. | :46:05. | |
Where the independent planning Inspectorate | :46:06. | :46:06. | |
has said that it meets all the rules and regulations, then the Government | :46:07. | :46:09. | |
has no valid reason to stand in their way. | :46:10. | :46:11. | |
And this may not be the only green belt land that disappears | :46:12. | :46:14. | |
The West Midlands combine authority has a vision. | :46:15. | :46:22. | |
It wants to increase the region by more | :46:23. | :46:24. | |
than 500,000 people over the next 15 years. | :46:25. | :46:27. | |
An independent report said, for that to happen, the region needs | :46:28. | :46:30. | |
That's 50,000 more than currently planned for by local | :46:31. | :46:33. | |
Let's use brown field, that's what we keep hearing. | :46:34. | :46:40. | |
That means sites like this, Friar Park in Sandwell, | :46:41. | :46:42. | |
Just to prove this in context, the report says, to meet | :46:43. | :46:51. | |
the West Midlands housing need, you'd need 70 more of these sites | :46:52. | :46:53. | |
They take a long time to clear up and that means | :46:54. | :47:01. | |
Last week, the combined authority announced it was putting ?53 | :47:02. | :47:06. | |
million into reaching brown field land with more on the way. | :47:07. | :47:09. | |
But the report said it is green belt that must | :47:10. | :47:11. | |
I think there's a misunderstanding about what green belt land is. | :47:12. | :47:16. | |
I don't think we will need, as people will try to argue, | :47:17. | :47:19. | |
We need to concentrate on the brown field land sites | :47:20. | :47:22. | |
first because those are the ones that blight all our communities | :47:23. | :47:25. | |
Green belt was originally put in place to prevent | :47:26. | :47:32. | |
urban sprawl and protect the character of certain areas. | :47:33. | :47:37. | |
Some say times have changed and a 21st-century problem | :47:38. | :47:39. | |
-- As we've heard, Sutton Coldfield MP Andrew Mitchell | :47:40. | :48:01. | |
is fighting this proposal all the way, but given the need to | :48:02. | :48:04. | |
accommodate a growing population, I suggested | :48:05. | :48:06. | |
to him down the line to | :48:07. | :48:07. | |
Westminster that this meant some green belt development was | :48:08. | :48:09. | |
Well, it made you got the case certainly wasn't made in | :48:10. | :48:13. | |
I attended part of the public enquiry, the case was never | :48:14. | :48:20. | |
There is a very strong feeling that there were | :48:21. | :48:23. | |
alternatives and that the views of the 100,000 people who live in Royal | :48:24. | :48:26. | |
Sutton Coldfield have been completely ignored. | :48:27. | :48:28. | |
These are Labour proposals from Labour Birmingham | :48:29. | :48:30. | |
City Council, but we're also dismayed that the Government wades | :48:31. | :48:32. | |
through these are Labour proposals without calling them and looking | :48:33. | :48:34. | |
Have you had any further conversations with Sajid | :48:35. | :48:45. | |
Javid about this and have you had that set to in the House of Commons? | :48:46. | :48:52. | |
Well, you know, he is a friend of mine, but I stand up for | :48:53. | :48:55. | |
Sutton Coldfield and anyone who, in my view, of whatever party, does | :48:56. | :48:58. | |
something that will damage Sutton Coldfield, I express myself | :48:59. | :49:00. | |
politely, but forcibly in that context. | :49:01. | :49:02. | |
What do you say about the accusation | :49:03. | :49:04. | |
I say that Sutton Coldfield, its residents, protest | :49:05. | :49:12. | |
movement, cancel, Conservative councils, have made clear | :49:13. | :49:17. | |
want to build more homes but we are determined that the | :49:18. | :49:26. | |
next-generation have the same advantages in terms of home | :49:27. | :49:28. | |
ownership and rental, and so forth, that our generation has had. | :49:29. | :49:30. | |
But they've got to go somewhere and the | :49:31. | :49:32. | |
lesson, again and again is that we have people say, well, | :49:33. | :49:35. | |
There nwere a whole series of alternatives that were | :49:36. | :49:38. | |
properly discussed and examined and, above all, we came up, as a | :49:39. | :49:41. | |
community, with the proposal that there should be an HM | :49:42. | :49:44. | |
moratorium of all the green belt was built on it, | :49:45. | :49:46. | |
so that better statistics, knowledge, would be available with | :49:47. | :49:48. | |
which to make the decision to spoil the green belt. | :49:49. | :49:51. | |
Once you build on the green belt, it is removed for ever from | :49:52. | :49:54. | |
the enjoyment of future generations and that proposal was not even | :49:55. | :49:56. | |
properly examined, let alone granted. | :49:57. | :49:58. | |
The community in Sutton Coldfield have been incredibly | :49:59. | :50:01. | |
Richard, as a Birmingham MP, of course, you | :50:02. | :50:07. | |
have a real feel for the pressures actually in the city. | :50:08. | :50:09. | |
Do you have sympathy for the folk then Sutton | :50:10. | :50:11. | |
Coldfield to feel that the valuable bits of green space is going to be | :50:12. | :50:15. | |
The presumption should always be that you don't build on green fields | :50:16. | :50:28. | |
I absolutely understand where they are | :50:29. | :50:32. | |
The pressures are real and Birmingham, for example, at the | :50:33. | :50:35. | |
moment, has over 20,000 people waiting for homes. | :50:36. | :50:37. | |
We need between 80,000-90,000 new homes over the | :50:38. | :50:39. | |
So, these things need to be looked at strategically. | :50:40. | :50:44. | |
It needs to have a situation whereby if | :50:45. | :50:46. | |
plans are made to build on green field sites, | :50:47. | :50:48. | |
then there needs to be a proper procedure for considering | :50:49. | :50:54. | |
There is actually what has happened in relation to Sutton Coldfield and, | :50:55. | :51:02. | |
as your report showed, it's the Government | :51:03. | :51:07. | |
Birmingham plans to build on that land were sound. | :51:08. | :51:18. | |
Your colleague, Andrew Mitchell, is convinced that Sajid Javid | :51:19. | :51:20. | |
should have called it in, that | :51:21. | :51:21. | |
he wasn't satisfied with the way the Government | :51:22. | :51:23. | |
Well, Andrew Mitchell and I both suffer from the problem we don't | :51:24. | :51:27. | |
have much Brownfield in either of our constituencies. | :51:28. | :51:29. | |
You've got the Garden Village in your area, haven't | :51:30. | :51:32. | |
But I think the right approach to this is a strategic one and Andy | :51:33. | :51:37. | |
There's a full list of all the candidates | :51:38. | :51:41. | |
Well, he has pointed out there are 1600 hectares of | :51:42. | :51:48. | |
Now the West Midlands combined authorities do need to get to see | :51:49. | :51:53. | |
strategically the region's housing need added as possible to bring | :51:54. | :51:56. | |
these sides that have languished for decades into use. | :51:57. | :52:00. | |
I've taken you, Patrick, to an estate in my | :52:01. | :52:02. | |
constituency, where Solihull managed to build 1000 extra homes. | :52:03. | :52:04. | |
There are more ways of finding new, affordable | :52:05. | :52:18. | |
housing without tearing up green field and green belt which, in | :52:19. | :52:21. | |
Caroline mentioned who is about to be elected actually | :52:22. | :52:30. | |
and the Institute for Public Policy Research who elect | :52:31. | :52:33. | |
that they may should have a bigger role in housing | :52:34. | :52:35. | |
actually to ensure that the team unity voices heard. | :52:36. | :52:37. | |
What they may position gives us is the opportunity | :52:38. | :52:40. | |
to have a strong voice for the West Midlands. | :52:41. | :52:42. | |
There's far too many decisions, frankly, made in London | :52:43. | :52:45. | |
and that's why the Labour candidate for West Midlands Mayor, Sean Simon, | :52:46. | :52:48. | |
is making the return of local control. | :52:49. | :52:49. | |
Of course, and there are other candidates, as I was saying, | :52:50. | :52:53. | |
but isn't the danger that, when you involve | :52:54. | :52:56. | |
they just say, not here, thank you very much? | :52:57. | :53:06. | |
We've been consulting on our local plan and, in | :53:07. | :53:10. | |
my constituency, the council has been very transparent about where | :53:11. | :53:13. | |
all these sites are and people say, very clearly, we recognise we need | :53:14. | :53:16. | |
affordable housing in our own backyard. | :53:17. | :53:17. | |
Let's leave that there for the moment. | :53:18. | :53:21. | |
Well, of that Government climb-down on national insurance contributions | :53:22. | :53:24. | |
recently, I wonder if we sense and U-turn coming on. | :53:25. | :53:27. | |
When they saw the close of the consultation period on | :53:28. | :53:29. | |
the Government's controversial national funding formula for | :53:30. | :53:31. | |
Its planned replacement system for the present | :53:32. | :53:33. | |
Ministers say it's fairer than the existing poscode lottery, | :53:34. | :53:37. | |
but it has triggered a storm of protest inside | :53:38. | :53:40. | |
Hundreds march against cuts to school budgets | :53:41. | :53:44. | |
proposed under a funding formula advocated by ministers in the name | :53:45. | :53:46. | |
They say lump-sum payments to individual schools will better match | :53:47. | :53:59. | |
The National Audit Office calculates its | :54:00. | :54:02. | |
an 8% cut their people over this Parliament with urban areas, | :54:03. | :54:11. | |
including Coventry and Birmingham, fairing worst. | :54:12. | :54:15. | |
Birmingham, where 96% of schools will lose a total of | :54:16. | :54:23. | |
Windsor and Maidenhead gained ?300,000. | :54:24. | :54:32. | |
But Tory shires are not happy either. | :54:33. | :54:38. | |
Even though the lowest funding would get more. | :54:39. | :54:41. | |
The Conservative MP Geoffrey Clifton Brown had | :54:42. | :54:42. | |
a deputation of nine Conservatives to lobby Prime | :54:43. | :54:44. | |
Minister and later won the Education Secretary | :54:45. | :54:45. | |
their formula would not be carried in its present form. | :54:46. | :54:48. | |
I can tell you and this programme that the Government whips | :54:49. | :54:54. | |
office also think she could well be right. | :54:55. | :54:55. | |
So, look, this isn't a final solution. | :54:56. | :54:58. | |
clear that Staffordshire should be at least getting, AT LEAST getting | :54:59. | :55:07. | |
I hope they will respond and I hope they go back, | :55:08. | :55:14. | |
Justin Greening will go back to the Chancellor of the Exchequer | :55:15. | :55:17. | |
and say that this is not going to work. | :55:18. | :55:19. | |
The Government say they are spending more on schools | :55:20. | :55:22. | |
than ever but the current system is unfair, opaque and outdated. | :55:23. | :55:25. | |
That message may be difficult to sell any | :55:26. | :55:29. | |
typical secondary school facing a ?300,000 a year cut. | :55:30. | :55:31. | |
I wonder if another Government climb-down is | :55:32. | :55:34. | |
Do you think they will tweak that formula, Caroline, and | :55:35. | :55:39. | |
because the present formula formula simply isn't fair. | :55:40. | :55:45. | |
Solihull pupils get 22% less per capita then | :55:46. | :55:52. | |
-- than wards that are adjacent to these, and identical | :55:53. | :55:54. | |
That is ?989 less per pupil right now. | :55:55. | :55:58. | |
For a long time, there has been a commitments to try | :55:59. | :56:01. | |
and improve the formula is, as a result of | :56:02. | :56:03. | |
this, Solihull gets an | :56:04. | :56:04. | |
uplift of 3% and Birmingham overall reduces by 2.4%. | :56:05. | :56:06. | |
It has benefited by 22% more than we have to this | :56:07. | :56:09. | |
I think it's a consultation, the Government will do the work unit | :56:10. | :56:21. | |
again, but there does need to be changed. | :56:22. | :56:22. | |
And only happening, as Caroline said, only because Labour | :56:23. | :56:25. | |
in office neglected to update this very out of date system. | :56:26. | :56:27. | |
When Labour was in power, our priority | :56:28. | :56:30. | |
Major increases in the schools' budget. | :56:31. | :56:35. | |
This new formula simply isn't fair and it's not | :56:36. | :56:37. | |
All but seven will actually lose money per | :56:38. | :56:54. | |
The equivalent of one, two, three, four in some | :56:55. | :56:59. | |
Where do you find the extra money for all this? | :57:00. | :57:05. | |
Reversing the cut in corporation tax, for example, will | :57:06. | :57:08. | |
Only find the money to keep school happy | :57:09. | :57:12. | |
there are more winners than losers in this | :57:13. | :57:17. | |
but obviously it's the losers that | :57:18. | :57:18. | |
There really isn't more winners than losers in this. | :57:19. | :57:23. | |
96% of schools will lose and, as you have in your | :57:24. | :57:25. | |
report, the National Audit Office has recognised and decided that | :57:26. | :57:28. | |
there will be about an 8% the pupil in schools. | :57:29. | :57:30. | |
We need to be able to grow our economy. | :57:31. | :57:33. | |
That is what we have been consistently arguing. | :57:34. | :57:35. | |
Frankly, if we were to talk about levelling up of | :57:36. | :57:41. | |
But don't take money away from schools in some | :57:42. | :57:45. | |
Including parts of Caroline's constituency. | :57:46. | :57:47. | |
Emphasises yet again the power of these | :57:48. | :57:51. | |
backbencher revolts at the | :57:52. | :57:54. | |
moment and the group carries nation of the 17 seat majority. | :57:55. | :57:57. | |
No wonder there's talk about a general | :57:58. | :57:59. | |
It's not easy with a small majority but let's not get, | :58:00. | :58:02. | |
the Government is actually spending more money on education. | :58:03. | :58:04. | |
Yeah, but there is more being spent on education. | :58:05. | :58:15. | |
It's what the National Audit Office say. | :58:16. | :58:21. | |
In my most deprived wards, they get 22% | :58:22. | :58:23. | |
unless funding per capita converted the pupils | :58:24. | :58:25. | |
just over the border in | :58:26. | :58:26. | |
There has come from Birmingham to be educated in | :58:27. | :58:29. | |
Solihull to bring the money with them, | :58:30. | :58:31. | |
the money they would God have | :58:32. | :58:32. | |
I wish we could pursue this further but I'm afraid we are being counted | :58:33. | :58:37. | |
Right, let's get up to speed now with the rest of the | :58:38. | :58:42. | |
political development is making the news here over the past week | :58:43. | :58:44. | |
with our round-up in 60 seconds, brought | :58:45. | :58:46. | |
A Chinese company opening a factory in giving | :58:47. | :58:59. | |
making electric versions of London taxis creating 1000 jobs. | :59:00. | :59:07. | |
This is now being run by the National Trust. | :59:08. | :59:09. | |
Staffordshire County Council has handed over control to | :59:10. | :59:11. | |
The NHS Trust which runs the whilst out on county hospitals | :59:12. | :59:15. | |
has been placed into special financial measures. | :59:16. | :59:16. | |
The University hospitals of north midlands is one | :59:17. | :59:18. | |
of ten trusts listed as failing to meet spending targets. | :59:19. | :59:20. | |
The Conservative MP for Solihull, Julian | :59:21. | :59:22. | |
Knight, organised a letter to the BBC | :59:23. | :59:24. | |
signed by 72 MPs accusing the | :59:25. | :59:25. | |
cooperation of being "pessimistic and skewed" | :59:26. | :59:27. | |
in its Brexit coverage since | :59:28. | :59:31. | |
Labour's deputy leader claims there's a | :59:32. | :59:34. | |
secret plot by hard left to seize control of the party. | :59:35. | :59:36. | |
He said the momentum group is trying to increase | :59:37. | :59:40. | |
its influence by obtaining funding from the Unite union. | :59:41. | :59:42. | |
If this is a hard left plenty take over the | :59:43. | :59:44. | |
Labour Party coming to Paris, then our very | :59:45. | :59:46. | |
electoral existence is in | :59:47. | :59:47. | |
This interim place into that Unite leadership | :59:48. | :59:53. | |
election in which the Midlands Secretary Gerard Coyne is | :59:54. | :59:57. | |
challenging the Len McCluskey, who we just seen is one of Jeremy | :59:58. | :00:00. | |
A dire warning, Richard, from your deputy | :00:01. | :00:03. | |
There has always been differences and | :00:04. | :00:12. | |
different wings of all political party. | :00:13. | :00:16. | |
What Tom, I think, is concerned about here and this is what he said, | :00:17. | :00:20. | |
is that it is the danger is that go beyond that and you could actually | :00:21. | :00:23. | |
end up with a change in the character of the Labour Party. | :00:24. | :00:26. | |
Well, I don't know, but my concern about | :00:27. | :00:30. | |
this is these things need to be looked at. | :00:31. | :00:32. | |
Tom has made some serious allegations and they need to be | :00:33. | :00:34. | |
As far as the viewers are concerned of this programme and the | :00:35. | :00:39. | |
people are concerned, what they hear is a row | :00:40. | :00:41. | |
within a political party and frankly, that is no use to | :00:42. | :00:43. | |
anybody and I think they would be saying to ask, get your act together | :00:44. | :00:47. | |
And get behind Jeremy Corbyn, presumably. | :00:48. | :00:49. | |
For the Conservatives, your colleagues would really rather like | :00:50. | :00:51. | |
to see Jeremy Corbyn still there as leader in the time | :00:52. | :00:54. | |
of the next election, so you're keeping a close | :00:55. | :00:56. | |
They say that to govern well, you need | :00:57. | :01:05. | |
a strong opposition and actually, what is happening to the Labour | :01:06. | :01:08. | |
I was disturbed to hear what Tom had to say and he said that there seems | :01:09. | :01:13. | |
to be more will to be a British protest movement and TV be serious | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
-- more will to be a protest movement than take part. | :01:18. | :01:30. | |
In our democracy, we need an opposition. | :01:31. | :01:32. | |
Thanks, as I say, to Caroline Spelman and Richard Vernon. | :01:33. | :01:37. | |
can see you nodding in agreement but we don't have any more time! Thank | :01:38. | :01:49. | |
you both for coming in, Andrew, back to you. | :01:50. | :01:55. | |
So yesterday the European Union celebrated its 60th birthday | :01:56. | :02:12. | |
at a party in Rome, the city where the founding document | :02:13. | :02:15. | |
Leaders of 27 EU countries were there to mark the occasion - | :02:16. | :02:19. | |
overshadowing it, though, the continued terrorist threat, | :02:20. | :02:21. | |
And on Wednesday Theresa May, who wasn't in Rome yesterday, | :02:22. | :02:24. | |
will trigger Article 50, formally starting | :02:25. | :02:26. | |
The President of the European Council, Donald Tusk, | :02:27. | :02:29. | |
made an appeal for unity at the gathering. | :02:30. | :02:35. | |
Today in Rome, we are renewing the unique alliance of free nations | :02:36. | :02:40. | |
that was initiated 60 years ago by our great predecessors. | :02:41. | :02:48. | |
At that time, they did not discuss multiple speeds, | :02:49. | :02:51. | |
they did not devise exits, but despite all the tragic | :02:52. | :02:55. | |
circumstances of the recent history they placed all their faith | :02:56. | :02:58. | |
Mr Tusk, he is Polish, the man that has the Council of ministers, and on | :02:59. | :03:17. | |
that council where every member of the EU sits he is an important | :03:18. | :03:21. | |
figure in what is now about to happen. We have got to negotiate our | :03:22. | :03:25. | |
divorce terms, we've got to agree a new free trade deal, new | :03:26. | :03:32. | |
crime-fighting arrangements, we've got to repatriate 50 international | :03:33. | :03:35. | |
trade agreements, and all of that has to be ratified within two years, | :03:36. | :03:41. | |
by 27 other countries. Can that really happen?! I don't think it is | :03:42. | :03:47. | |
inconceivable because it is in the interests of those 27 EU member | :03:48. | :03:51. | |
states to try and negotiate a deal that we can all live with, because | :03:52. | :03:54. | |
that would be preferable to Britain crashing out within two years. But I | :03:55. | :04:00. | |
think this is why Labour's position is becoming increasingly incoherent. | :04:01. | :04:02. | |
Keir Starmer has briefed today that he will be making a speech tomorrow | :04:03. | :04:08. | |
setting out six conditions which he wants the deal to meet, otherwise | :04:09. | :04:11. | |
Labour won't vote for it, but if Labour doesn't vote for it that | :04:12. | :04:29. | |
doesn't mean we will be able to negotiate an extension, that would | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
be incredibly difficult and require the consent of each of the 27 member | :04:34. | :04:36. | |
states, so if Labour votes against it we will just crash out, it is | :04:37. | :04:38. | |
effectively Labour saying no deal is better than a poor deal, which is | :04:39. | :04:41. | |
not supposed to be their position. Labour's position may be incoherent | :04:42. | :04:43. | |
but I was not asking about their position, I was asking about the | :04:44. | :04:45. | |
Government's position. The man heading the Badila said he wants it | :04:46. | :04:48. | |
ready by October next year so that it can go through the ratification | :04:49. | :04:50. | |
process, people looking at this would think it is Mission: | :04:51. | :04:54. | |
Impossible. It seems impossible to me to be done in that time. The fact | :04:55. | :05:00. | |
that it is 27 countries, the whole of the European Parliament as well, | :05:01. | :05:04. | |
there will be too many people throbbing spanners in the works and | :05:05. | :05:09. | |
quite rightly. We have embarked on something that is truly terrible and | :05:10. | :05:14. | |
disastrous, and the imagery we can have of those 27 countries | :05:15. | :05:20. | |
celebrating together 60 years of the most extraordinary successful | :05:21. | :05:23. | |
movement for peace, for shared European values, and others not | :05:24. | :05:29. | |
there... We were not there at the start either, and we are not there | :05:30. | :05:33. | |
now! And we have been bad partners while we were inside, but now that | :05:34. | :05:40. | |
we are leaving... They did not look like it was a birthday party to me! | :05:41. | :05:45. | |
I think it was, there was a sense of renewal, Europe exists as a place | :05:46. | :05:51. | |
envied in the world for its values, for its peacefulness, that is why | :05:52. | :05:54. | |
people flocked to its borders, that is why they come here. Can you look | :05:55. | :06:00. | |
at the agenda that faces the UK Government and EU 27, is it not | :06:01. | :06:05. | |
possible, in fact even likely, that as the process comes to an end they | :06:06. | :06:12. | |
will have to agree on a number of areas of transitional arrangements? | :06:13. | :06:16. | |
I think they will and they will have to agree that soon, I would not be | :06:17. | :06:20. | |
surprised if sometime soon there is an understanding is not a formal | :06:21. | :06:23. | |
decision that this is a process that will extend over something closer to | :06:24. | :06:28. | |
buy or seven than two years. On Wednesday article 50 will be filed | :06:29. | :06:32. | |
and there will be lots of excitement and hubbub but nothing concrete can | :06:33. | :06:35. | |
happen for a while. Elections in France in May, elections in Germany | :06:36. | :06:39. | |
which could really result in a change of Government... That is the | :06:40. | :06:52. | |
big change, Mrs Merkel might not be there by October. And who foresaw | :06:53. | :06:55. | |
that a few months ago? So you might be into 28 Dean before you are into | :06:56. | :06:58. | |
the substantive discussions about how much market access or regulatory | :06:59. | :07:00. | |
observance. I cannot see it being completed in two years. I could see, | :07:01. | :07:03. | |
if negotiations are not too acrimonious, that transitional | :07:04. | :07:07. | |
agreement taking place. Let's look at the timetable again. The council | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
doesn't meet until the end of April, it meets in the middle of the French | :07:12. | :07:14. | |
elections, the first round will have taken place, they will need a second | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
round so not much can happen. President Hollande will be | :07:19. | :07:25. | |
representing France, then the new French government, if it is Marine | :07:26. | :07:29. | |
le Pen all bets are off, but even if it is Mr Mac run, he does not have a | :07:30. | :07:33. | |
party, he will not have a majority, the French will take a long while to | :07:34. | :07:37. | |
sort out themselves. Then it is summer, we are off to the Cote | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
d'Azur, particularly the Bolivian elite, then we come back from that | :07:43. | :07:45. | |
and the Germans are in an election, it may be very messy, Mrs Merkel no | :07:46. | :07:51. | |
longer a shoo-in, it could be Mr Schultz, he may have to try to form | :07:52. | :08:04. | |
a difficult green red coalition, that would take a while. Before you | :08:05. | :08:07. | |
know it, it is Guy Fawkes' Day and no substance has taken place, yet we | :08:08. | :08:10. | |
are then less than a year before this has to be decided. It is a big | :08:11. | :08:13. | |
task and I'm sure Jana is right that there will be transitional | :08:14. | :08:15. | |
arrangements and not everything will be concluded in that two year | :08:16. | :08:19. | |
timetable, but in some respects what you have described helps those of us | :08:20. | :08:23. | |
on the Eurosceptic site because it means they cannot really be a | :08:24. | :08:27. | |
meaningful parliamentary vote on the terms of the deal because nothing is | :08:28. | :08:30. | |
going to be agreed quickly enough for them to be able to go back and | :08:31. | :08:35. | |
agree something else if Parliament rejects it, so when the Government | :08:36. | :08:38. | |
eventually have something ready to bring before Parliament it will be a | :08:39. | :08:42. | |
take it or leave it boat. How extraordinary that people who have | :08:43. | :08:47. | |
campaigned. Indeed give us our country back and say, isn't it | :08:48. | :08:51. | |
wonderful, we won't have a meaningful boat for our | :08:52. | :08:54. | |
parliamentarians of the most important... We don't know what the | :08:55. | :08:59. | |
negotiation, the package is, day by day we see more and more complicated | :09:00. | :09:03. | |
areas nobody ever thought about, nobody mentioned during the | :09:04. | :09:06. | |
campaign, all of which has to be resolved and the European Council | :09:07. | :09:12. | |
and the negotiators say nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. | :09:13. | :09:18. | |
You lead us into a catastrophe. There will be plenty of opportunity | :09:19. | :09:23. | |
for Parliament to have its say following the introduction of the | :09:24. | :09:26. | |
Great Repeal Bill, it is not as if there will be no Parliamentary time | :09:27. | :09:29. | |
devoted. The final package is what counts. We have two years to blog | :09:30. | :09:33. | |
about this! There was a big Proview -- pro-EU | :09:34. | :09:45. | |
march yesterday... I was there! Polly Toynbee was there, down to | :09:46. | :09:50. | |
Parliament Square, lots of people there marching in favour of the | :09:51. | :09:54. | |
European Union. We can see the EU flags there on flags, lots of | :09:55. | :09:59. | |
national flags as well, the British one. Polly, is it the aim of people | :10:00. | :10:08. | |
like you still to stop Brexit, or to soften Brexit? I think the aim is | :10:09. | :10:13. | |
for the best you can possibly do to limit the damage. Of course, if it | :10:14. | :10:18. | |
happens that once people have had a chance to see how much they were | :10:19. | :10:22. | |
lied to during the campaign and how dreadful the deal is likely to be, | :10:23. | :10:26. | |
if it happens that enough people in the population have changed their | :10:27. | :10:30. | |
minds, then maybe... There is no sign up yet. But we have not even | :10:31. | :10:35. | |
begun, people have not begun to confront what it is going to mean. | :10:36. | :10:39. | |
Wait and see. I think it is just being as close as we can. Is that | :10:40. | :10:44. | |
credible, do you think, to stop it or to ameliorate it in terms of the | :10:45. | :10:49. | |
Remainers? I think it is far more credible to try and stop it but even | :10:50. | :10:54. | |
then the scope is limited. It is fairly apparent Theresa May's | :10:55. | :10:57. | |
interpretation of the referendum is the country wants an end to free | :10:58. | :11:16. | |
movement, there is probably no way of doing that inside the single | :11:17. | :11:20. | |
market. She also wants external trade deals, no way of doing that | :11:21. | :11:22. | |
outside the customs unit, said the only night you can depend if you are | :11:23. | :11:25. | |
pro-European is, let's not leave without any trade pact, at least | :11:26. | :11:27. | |
let's meet Canada and have a formalised trade agreement. The idea | :11:28. | :11:30. | |
of ace -- of a very soft exit is gone now because the public really | :11:31. | :11:33. | |
did want an end to free movement and the Government really does want | :11:34. | :11:35. | |
external trade deals. It depends what changes in Europe. I think the | :11:36. | :11:42. | |
momentum behind the Remoaning movement will move away. One of the | :11:43. | :11:46. | |
banners I saw being held up yesterday by a young boy on the news | :11:47. | :11:50. | |
was, don't put my daddy on a boat. It gets a lot of its moral force | :11:51. | :11:55. | |
from the uncertainty surrounding the fate of EU nationals here and our | :11:56. | :12:00. | |
resident in the remainder of the EU and I think David Lidington is right | :12:01. | :12:04. | |
that it will be concluded quite quickly once negotiations start and | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
that will take a lot of the heat and momentum out of the remaining | :12:09. | :12:11. | |
movement. Why didn't Theresa May allow that amendment that said, we | :12:12. | :12:18. | |
will do that, as an act of generosity, we will say, of course | :12:19. | :12:21. | |
those European citizens here are welcome to stay? It would have been | :12:22. | :12:25. | |
such a good opening move in the negotiations, instead of which she | :12:26. | :12:29. | |
blocked it. It does not augur well. I have interviewed many Tories about | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
this and put that point to them but they often say the Prime minister's | :12:36. | :12:42. | |
job is to look after UK citizen in the EU... Bargaining chips, I think | :12:43. | :12:46. | |
you have to be generous and you have to wish you people in Spain and | :12:47. | :12:50. | |
everywhere else where there are British citizens would have | :12:51. | :12:53. | |
responded. The British Government did try and raise that with their EU | :12:54. | :12:56. | |
counterparts and were told, we cannot begin to talk about that | :12:57. | :13:00. | |
until article 50 has been triggered. Next week we will be able to talk | :13:01. | :13:04. | |
about it. How generous it would have been, we would have started on a | :13:05. | :13:09. | |
better note. Didn't happen, we will see what happens next with EU | :13:10. | :13:13. | |
citizens. That is it for today, the Daily Politics will be back tomorrow | :13:14. | :13:17. | |
at midday and every day next week on BBC Two as always. | :13:18. | :13:20. | |
And there's also a Question Time special live tomorrow | :13:21. | :13:22. | |
night from Birmingham - with guests including | :13:23. | :13:23. | |
the Brexit Secretary David Davis, Labour's Keir Starmer, | :13:24. | :13:26. | |
former Ukip leader Nigel Farage and the SNP's Alex Salmond - | :13:27. | :13:28. | |
I'll be back next week at 11am here on BBC One. | :13:29. | :13:34. | |
Until then, remember - if it's Sunday, it's | :13:35. | :13:37. | |
MUSIC: The Elements by Tom Lehrer | :13:38. | :14:44. | |
# There's Attenborough, micro.bit, The Bottom Line and In Our Time | :14:45. | :14:47. | |
# And Terrific Scientific and Ten Pieces and All In The Mind | :14:48. | :14:51. |