02/05/2014 The Papers

and there are playable places up for grabs in rugby, we will have the

results, that is in Sportsday `` play`off places. `` tells us that he

thinks. Hello, and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers

will be bringing us tomorrow. With me are the broadcaster Alice Arnold

and Alison Phillips, weekend editor at The Mirror. Let's have a look at

tomorrow's front pages now. The Independent has more on Pfizer's

rejected bid for British drugs company Astrazeneca` it claims a

former top scientist for Pfizer has warned against the takeover. The

Mail has an interview with one of Max Clifford's victims who says

she's angry at the celebrities who defended him. The Express says

exercise, even a gentle walk, can help beat arthritis. The FT says the

Treasury is set to benefit to the tune of 4.5 billion pounds thanks to

the new Help to Buy scheme. The Telegraph has a photo of Stephen

Sutton, the teenager who has raised more than three million pounds for

charity while fighting cancer. He's been discharged from hospital,

describing his own recovery as 'quite remarkable' The Mirror says

Lord Hanningfield, the peer whose expenses scam the paper exposed,

said he needed the money so he could pay someone to look after his

chickens while he was in Westminster. The Guardian leads on

the sentencing of celebrity publicist Max Clifford. The paper

says his contemptuous attitude during the trial added to the length

of his sentence. We will stay with that story for the beginning of the

review, we will look at how the Guardian is covering it, eight years

in prison for his crimes and his contempt for women. We can tell from

the picture that those eyes are his. He showed some extraordinary

behaviour in that trial. He seemed to parade himself in front of the

cameras. What he did was horrific, there are four women who, for the

rest of their lives, will have had to deal with the consequences of how

he treated them. What has worsened his sentence is the fact that he

wound up the judge, there was the issue that he refers to when he was

mimicking the Sky News reporter, which has angered the judge. Even in

the dot`com he was raising his eyebrows, shaking his head. You

mentioned that clip will stop `` dock. Here is a clip of the

behaviour, this is what the judge had seen. It is not becoming of the

seriousness of the case. It is as if he could not quite understand

himself. The enormity of what he had done. He has remained convinced to

the end that he was innocent. It is like he could not quite grasp that

what he had done was illegal. I don't understand it, do you think

you understand that tonight? He has for years in prison and four years

on licence if he gets parole. There are rumours that other people have

come forward during the trial, for prosecutions, when his sentence

could be increased. You are right, it is his attitude, that has angered

everyone I think. That is what the judge said. He thought he was

untouchable. It is that arrogance. That is what is so heartening, he

has been found guilty, those brave women who have come forward to tell

those stories and go through that procedure, it is pretty awful for

them, they have at least been rewarded. The irony of a lot of this

is that the first reason he came to the police, is after the Jimmy

Savile business, he went on the television and said it was a

witch`hunt, all these girls are making it up. It was a woman who saw

that who said that was it, she had had enough and it was that. His own

PR machine has been his downfall. He is pictured in the sun, smoking

until the end. That is the headline. The judge at his sentence for being

flippant. `` smirking. A woman in court, the judge said that he would

have been found guilty for the crime he committed against her in Spain,

but it was committed before the law changed, so that crimes committed

abroad could be included in the case, but for her to have travelled

here, the judge said that he would have been found guilty, even though

he was not tried. The alleged victim was very young as well. It is this

posing for cameras. Most people when they are about to be sentence, they

do not pose for the cameras. They keep their heads down. I saw the

footage of him walking to the court. It is like he did not quite believe

that it was real. He had manufactured so many stories over

the years, and been behind so many stories over the years. It is like

it was another story playing out rather than a horrible reality.

Let's move on to the Mirror, Lord fraud, I did it for my chickens ``

Fraud. Lord Hanning Field said that he took his daily allowance from the

House of Lords without doing a great deal of work for it. So that he

could hire a man to look after his paltry. `` Hanningfield. We have

been an investigation at the Daily Mirror. He had been to prison once

before for his expenses, but he had been allowed to walk back in, given

?300 as an allowance. We saw that he was regularly turning up, going in

for 45 minutes, one day it was only 21 minutes. A couple of days for

about one hour. You had a reporter keeping an eye? Yes, watching him as

he went into to the House of Lords, we watched him every day, had him

time not, we knew, it was not just randomly, we knew that there were a

handful of people doing it. When he was confronted, he said that there

were 50 people doing it. He has not given us any names. But this is

public money. We are within our rights to know who is going to work

and who isn't. He is then investigated internally by the House

of Lords, they have said to him, what are you playing at? He said

that he needed the money needed ?300 a day to pay someone to look after

my chickens as I was working in Westminster. Was it lunchtime, when

he was going in and out? It varied, kind of mid`morning. What are they

going to do about this? They have said they are going to do something.

The rules on expenses will be tightened, they have said. I have

heard that before, and people get away with far more than they would

in any other... Maybe they need a clocking in card? Maybe a half day

or a full day allowance. That is a clever idea. Up to four hours, you

get ?150, but if you spend more... You get the full amount. Like normal

jobs, where people are paid for the work that they do. Let's have a look

at the Guardian. There is this story about the death rates for children

under five. Children in the UK are more likely to die before they reach

their fifth birthday, then any other country in the Western world, aside

from Malta. That came as a surprise to researchers in Seattle, looking

at the figures. It is a worrying report, of all the countries in

Europe, there we are, second worst after Malta. The reasons that are

being given by the researchers is an economic problem, and it is children

from poor families who are born, low birth rates, parents may be smoking,

that, coupled with some failures in early years healthcare, particularly

possibly around midwifery, that is worth looking at. When the service

come out, we are often surprised at how low we come. And we have the

NHS, and we are proud of it, and we are an advanced nation. Then we find

out that the statistics do not really bear that out. Maybe it is a

good thing. It makes people had to think a bit, and say, we cannot

continue to be so low down in the health figures. But, we are. Every

statistic that comes out seems to bear the same thing. We are not as

good as we think. If it is to do with smoking and low birth rates,

and a newborn baby, parents have to take responsibility. We need more

education. Parents have to take responsibility, but you have to work

in the context, why are there still parents smoking during pregnancy?

That message has been put up the years. If the messages put out,

people know it, but you had to listen as to why they are not doing

things about it. Deprivation is also listed as a reason. You can be told

things repeatedly, but unless you believe it and would implement it,

it is pointless. Let's have a look at the times. Page 11, we do not

always delve so deeply into the paper, this is looking at the

predicament, Gerry Adams, the president of Sinn Fein, you find

himself then, with police given permission to question him for a

further 48 hours. He presented himself at the police station in

Antrim voluntarily. That was on Wednesday. Looking at how difficult

his position is and the problems he is creating for the Sinn Fein party,

and for his family, what some of his family members have been doing as of

late. It is a piece asking whether he is suitable to be leading Sinn

Fein or whether we need a new generation of leaders, without the

baggage that he has. You know, regardless of this claim about the

murder. He strongly denies this. But he carries with him baggage that in

the sense that his brother was sentenced for 16 years, for raping

and abusing his own daughter. That is the brothers daughter. The

daughter waived her right to anonymity. Gerry Adams... He says

that he did not have any association with his brother. He always believed

the victim. What did he do about that? Was he strong and went forward

against his brother? It appears not. If he is still associated with his

brother then he is not a suitable person to be leading the party. The

whole thing brings together that maybe now, they cite some good

candidates who could lead the party into the future in a more positive

way. And baggage in all sorts of ways could be let go. He remains a

charismatic figure in Northern Ireland. There are new murals

painted in the last couple of days in support of him. Support outside

police headquarters, people parading for him. It is a difficult time I

think for him there. Martin McGuinness has come out, saying that

he is an estate controlled anger over the arrest. It affect whether

they continue to support the police service in Northern Ireland. We have

other people from other parties, coming out saying that Martin

McGuinness cannot say this. It is all very tense again. I would

mention who it is, but someone on social media got in touch with me

saying that we can all feel the tension. It is palpable in the

atmosphere. It is heating up. They are very worried about the potential

fallout of this. Depending on what happens next, if they charge him,

where on earth does that take us all? That was the Good Friday

agreement, semi` people have been released for things that happened in

the 1970s, and someone new could be charged potentially. Twitter loses

500 million as the trend for tweaking slows `` tweeting. How does

this work? Are you still doing it? You know I am not. I think there was

an initial excitement. I have been on there for years but it says that

we are reducing the time we spend on their by 10%. Many people are still

using it. More people still prefer Facebook it is a very ``, it is a

very London media kind of thing. That is all for tonight. We will

have more on Max Clifford at midnight as he is jailed for

indecent assault on women and young