29/10/2015 The Papers

We'll be taking a look at tomorrow morning's papers

Friends of family of Bailey Gwynne, the 16-year-old stabbed to death

at school in Aberdeen, have tonight been staging

A 16-year-old boy will appear in court tomorrow over his death.

The founder of the failed charity, Kids Company, has said it provided

Relatives of soldiers killed in the Iraq War criticise the latest

It was announced today that the Chilcot report will be out next

summer - Labour says the wait is beyond ridiculous.

A 16-year-old boy will appear in court tomorrow over his death.

The founder of the failed charity, Kids Company, has said it provided

exceptional value after a report revealed it was handed ?46

million of public money despite concerns over the way it was run.

Two men are charged with raping a soldier, who was later found

Coming up in Sportsday, the former Chelsea doctor is pursuing a case

for constructive dismissal. Former player as, colleagues and fans

gather in Liverpool. And the best of the action from the world gymnastics

championships in Glasgow is all coming up in 15 minutes after the

papers. Hello and welcome to

our look ahead to what the papers With me are the former trade

minister Lord Digby Jones The FT says that David Cameron

and George Osborne are seeking an emergency brake

on new laws affecting economies outside the eurozone as part

of its renegotiations for the EU The I quotes a new report

which says young people are suffering the worst economic

prospects for several generations. The Independent carries the news

that China has announced the end of And the Guardian front pages

features the China story, along with the news that

the long-awaited report from the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war

is scheduled to appear next summer. Spending on credit is

at its highest level for a decade, with borrowers owing some ?176

billion, according to the Metro. The Telegraph says one ambulance

trust is making patients wait twice as long for help

if they dial '111' , even if they The Times leads with news that

police have demanded the power to see the internet browsing history

of everyone in Britain. And a police pilot scheme is telling

victims of crime to call them on Skype,

according to the Daily Mirror. Let us get started. The Times, the

headline is that police want powers to see the public's Web history. The

broad picture. We consider ourselves to be a country that is very free,

separation of powers, the police controlled by politicians. In this

story, the police have been lobbying behind the scenes ahead of a major

surveillance bill that will be published next week. They want the

government to force Telecom companies to retain data that would

disclose specific addresses visited by customers. The police would not

have access to the content, but it would know which websites you have

been visiting. They need this because there isn't much potential

suspect behaviour carried out online. -- is so much. Civil

liberties will say it is evidence of an overweening police desire to

intervene in our lives. Some politicians, this critics of the

surveillance state, they say there should be rejected. One senior

officer said that it was about everyday investigation rather than

surveillance. We sit here and we can afford when we have got people who

want to do us real harm, we can afford the luxury of having a debate

as to whether this should happen. And then when an atrocity happens,

why it are we not being kept safe? At the end of the day, do I really

care if the police are not going to look at what I did, but look at the

various websites I chose to look at? If I have got nothing to hide,

what am I worried about? Frankly, if somebody is going to try and access

help to hate a lot of different groups... If the price I pay for

that is the police also look at the websites I have been looking at,

that is the price I will pay. Parliament has already said no to

this. Parliament is saying, keep us safe. But we are going to tie your

hands behind your back. This is mission creep. Police have to prove

this works. Here is what David Davis is saying. We have to monitor the

monitors. Would you mind if the police looked at yours? Not at all.

And we come from and divides. Neither of us minds. But it is the

principle. I am a law-abiding citizen. What I think is the

hallmark of an advance democracy, at least we are having a debate. We are

talking about the thin end of the wedge. And there are European

rulings. What they say, there are European court rulings on data

retention. Look at security of data. If this is held for a year or

longer buy these telecom companies and they are not secure, we are more

vulnerable. We have got to get a way in which we can stop people from

doing us harm. We have to give those people entrusted with that task to

have all the power in the world to keep us safe. They always say they

need these powers. Can we trust them. There are good and bad things

we do in our lives. The mirror getting a bit of outrage

against on policeman running around. That is

the first thing he said. What is the story about? This is what it is. The

police are saying, how do we get more value for money? We have got to

give more services. What can we do? One thing they have come up with, we

will interview certain people who might be assisting on Skype. It

sounds reasonable. And what happens, complete copout, this is dreadful.

It starts out as an idea, and then it becomes default. In terms of the

actual quality of police response, the body in your house reassuring

you. Victims will lose out. You want a police officer in your house

showing concern. Of course. But police plan to ditch home visits,

slammed as a copout. It is newspaper language. What they are saying,

public sector cuts, we have got this. This is the overall

narrative. That is what newspapers do. You will find the same thing

when we get to the Daily Mail about population. Something that might not

get us so steamed up. I think this falls to you, Henry. It is about

motorcars. One cannot feel sorry for vaults weighed in. -- Volkswagen.

Think about the amount it will cost to fix one of the cars brought in.

It counteracts the cheating of the emissions test. The question is

whether every single one of those people will come forward and claim

from Volkswagen. Whether every single one of those people will be

entitled to that particular compensation. They claim that

something between 10-20 employees were involved in this particular

scandal. The one thing I would say, a policeman working in Newcastle, a

businesswoman in Manchester, this is not about business at it. There are

loads of people, 99% of business people in Britain, do not want this

image that all businesses are like this. You have got one of the major

car companies who have been at it and they deserve serious punishment

and serious putting right the wrong. Because they have been breaking the

rules. It does not mean everybody has been breaking the rules. But you

trust to the brand. It is a massive and global. People thought they were

more fuel-efficient. Now it is a sham. This is not about breaking the

rules, this is about consequential loss. Somebody has got a diesel

engine and it is worth ?500 less. Who is going to give them the ?500?

Argue surprised that no other car company, I thought others would be

discovered. But it seems to have been one rogue business. The testing

regime has allowed car companies to do things to make sure they get

within the tests. A good example, and I think we owed this to Jeremy

Clarkson, on some fuel consumption test. They used to go past the beam,

switch off the engine, go into neutral, and then start it again.

What I think was coming here was, VW have taken it another step. This is

now taking the Mickey. I am not surprised that one has been

hammered. I would not be surprised that in the boardrooms, most people

are saying, please tell me we are not doing this. There are regular --

rigourously auditing verse. A lot of these tests, the it is going on. You

have to look whether regulation was poorly implemented. I would have

thought that within the boardrooms of the automotive world, you are

going to have everybody scrambling around saying this is not happening.

The Metro, spending on credit hits a ten year high. The figures are

absolutely colossal. But we need to be clear on what we are talking

about. Why does it matter? When you look at the component parts of the

financial crisis, there are four or five different things happening

creating a perfect storm. Some was poor regulation, poorly implemented.

Some of it was politicians basking in the sunshine of people feeling

good. One of them was arsenic. The average Joe in the street who was

saying, I love this, I can borrow a lot of money cheaply. Is it

dangerous? If it is not asset backed, if what you are doing is

borrowing for something that is worth more than that, so there is a

degree of equity, and you can service it is not of your income,

nothing wrong with that. If the value comes down, and you cannot

service it any more, because interest rates go up, the debt

service goes up, then you are in trouble. That is what you have to be

careful of. Are we heading for a correction? I think we are. History

repeats itself. Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are

tuned to repeat it. I do not want people to suffer. But we had it so

good for quite sometime. I am getting letters from banks and all

sorts of things. Some people will say, OK, brilliant. And the cold

winter will come at some point. He is absolutely right. I am worried

that I am agreeing with you. There is a front-page picture in the Daily

Telegraph of some actor with a sword. It is all about the Battle of

Agincourt. Henry just said, we have not talked about this. This is a

nice segue. People do not know history. Here is an example of where

we should learn from history. 600 years ago last Saturday, Henry fifth

took his guys over to France and eat an army five times his size. --

beat. What the photograph is about, there was a service for the 600 is

since Agincourt. The lesson, complacency. In sport, and media, in

business, in public sectors, one of the greatest evils is where you

think, all you have to do is turn up and you will win. The French made an

enormous stake. They got absolutely wiped out. We won. Get him off. I do

not know what French for enough is. But the other thing we got out of

this was all the vineyards. And you very much. -- thank you. Well done,

both of you. Great fun with the papers. Coming up next, Sportsday.