04/11/2015 The Papers

highest ever run chase on the Asian tour to win the final Test against

Pakistan and level the series. That is all coming up after the Papers.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers

With me are Isabel Hardman, Assistant Editor at the Spectator

and James Lyons, deputy political editor at the Sunday Times.

Tomorrow's front pages, starting with...

The Telegraph reports on the British tourists minutes away from take-off

who now find themselves stranded in Sharm el-Sheikh

after the government suspended all flights in and out of the resort.

The Guardian says the government was acting on specific intelligence

related to the crash, which it had received in the last 24 hours.

The Mirror has a photo of the plane wreckage with the stark headline,

There's a similar photo on the cover of the Times, which reports

on comments from US intelligence sources that IS was responsible

The Mail points out that David Cameron is the first world

leader to say the Russian airliner was downed by a bomb.

The Metro says the Government's concerns stem

from its own intelligence sources rather than anything coming out of

And finally, the FT is one of the only papers not

It leads on pleas from the national grid for heavy

users of electricity to curb their consumption after an unexpected

Let's begin with the Daily Mirror which has a dramatic front-page. Not

safe to fly home, the British government do not think it is safe

so they are suspending flights and leaving many stranded. Yes, the

front page doesn't leave us guessing as to why this decision has been

taken, but I suppose the question was why on Wednesday the decision

was taken when the flight came down on Saturday. And the reason the

government has given is that they received intelligence that wasn't

part of the flight investigation that suggested this may well have

been as a result of a terrorist package. They feel as a

precautionary measure, it is important to work out whether

security measures at the airport are adequate and not have any flights

going in and out until they have done that. Some are suggesting they

are not adequate. It is pretty substandard at Sharm el-Sheikh. The

British ex- Brits on the ground were looking at this before the decision

was made but it is a huge logistical nightmare for the government to sort

out -- experts. If they are not trusting the airport, how do we get

them home? This is the sort of thing David Cameron will be talking about

tomorrow and we will probably have more emergency Cobra meetings. There

is some suggest then the RAF may be flying them out -- suggestion. This

is all very awkward as Egypt's president has arrived here tonight

to meet David Cameron and the Egyptians are very angry because

they say this is an overreaction that will destroy their tourist

industry. Yes, they say it is a premature and unwarranted reaction,

that is the statement from the country's Foreign Minister. They

were quick to say that they didn't think it was terrorist action. But

they're obviously still continuing their investigation. You can

understand from the British politician's point of view, that if

you have been passed intelligence which suggests it might have been

terrorism, why would you not take extra measures? If you didn't and it

came out after that you had known something and had contacted on it,

you can understand how justifiably furious people would be. Phillip

Hammond had a pretty stark response. He said the Foreign

Minister hadn't seen the information that Britain had. The Times says,

the British are saying that they know more about this than the

Egyptians do. And there are statements

a stone satellite imagery of the plane going down. -- based on

satellite imagery. If it is truly Islamic State, it is deeply

alarming, because it and their terrorist activity. This

is the point that Egyptian ministers have been making. They have been

warning for a while about terrorism moving from Syria to Egypt and now

they say the same thing is happening from Libya to Egypt and they are

worried their reaction will be as slow as it was in regards to their

worries about Libya. It is dominating the Guardian as well, but

they have interestingly highlighted the question of new surveillance

powers of the government here in terms of tackling terrorism, in

particular. They are suggesting Theresa May will face significant

opposition to that. This is very much the Guardian going with their

own agenda. Blazing a trail. Interestingly, I'm not sure if you

can call it a split at the moment but there are certainly tensions

within Labour. Andy Burnham has forcibly welcomed the package today

which is nowhere near as Taccone and as many had feared. -- draconian. I

am not sure Jeremy Corbyn will be very happy about it. It does call

into question Labour's policymaking process. Andy Burnham is normally a

fierce opponent of many government propositions but he said he

supported most of what Theresa May was announcing. He said the house

shouldn't call this the snooper's charter, because that would be

unhelpful. Andy Burnham is, how can I put this, in line with more

traditional Labour voters who don't live in North London, on issues like

this. One of the reasons he took this job is that he sees his role as

to try to keep the Labour Party as he would see it, sensible on issues

like this. Another issue of interesting timing because Theresa

May is presenting this on the same day that we have got what looks like

a really alarming terrorist threat from Islamic State. I'm not sure

there are a great many people who would be looking at what is

happening in Egypt who are overly concerned by the access that the

intelligence agencies get. Although, their computer records are going to

be stored for a year. Do you think that is alarming for some people? It

depends what the details of those records are. What we were told today

was that it would only be... The police would be able to access

without a warrant, only the basic web address that people have

visited. If you want to see what page you visited, you would need a

warrant. There are safeguards within the legislation that campaigners

have been asking for. But this is a huge bill and there is a lot of

detail. You can see civil liberties groups going through it with a fine

tooth comb. Americans haven't gotten this far in their bills? Haven't

they? Officially. Good point. The Independent has a picture of student

protests. Grants not debts, says one placard. It is a very different

vision of Britain than the one we have at the moment, where students

would probably like to be employed by business at some point. Don --

John McDonnell addressed the students today. They were running

down Victoria Street with smoke bombs and other things going on. Not

quite as dramatic as it was at the height of the tuition fee protests.

They haven't trashed as many things, but there is dismayed Labour

circles that John McDonnell has addressed these people. People are

asking why the leadership haven't learned from Jeremy Corbyn going to

Manchester and making an address their where there were really ugly

scenes and really terrible things happening -- there. People going

into the conference, women being threatened by all sorts of

protesters, and a lot of anti-Semitism as well. The fear

amongst Labour moderates is, you go along and address these people, they

behaved badly and you get the blame. Let's talk about the Times.

To talk about carparks being cleared to impose huge penalties, after a

case in which a chip shop owner lost a battle in the High Court over an

?85 charge, because he overstayed his parking space time by 56

minutes. That seems like rather a lot of money to pay. Private car

park companies can impose the sort of charges, according to this

ruling. This is a Supreme Court judgement which actually could also

have imprecations for people who missed dental appointments and to

abuse hotel Wi-Fi -- implications. I am not sure how that works but there

are wider replications at this point. Right. ?85 is ?1 50 a minute.

Quite steep. Christmas is coming and the i is a minding us that we have

the John Lewis advert coming. Bah humbug. I love Christmas. But it is

awesome and I love that too -- autumn, and Christmas is infringing

upon it right now. When does Christmas start? In December. Then

you can bring up your decorations and make lots of lovely decorations

but it is still fall. So we can start until you say? Christmas is a

brilliant time of year and I have three young children, but it is only

at the start of December where you can threaten to take away the

chocolate Advent calendar. The only time I dread is when that is over

and you have nothing left to threaten them with except beer --

except their birthday which is months away. Do you like the John

Lewis adverts? I do. We will pass that on.

Coming up next, it's time for Sportsday.

Hello and welcome to Sportsday, I'm Azi Farni.

There's a much needed win for Chelsea against Dynamo Kiev