26/01/2016 The Papers

semi-final line-up is confirmed. That is in the next 15 minutes with

me, after The Papers. Welcome to our look ahead to what

the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. Let us have a look at some

of the front pages. The I alleges secret deals

between big business After Google, the paper says

negotiations are now underway The Metro leads on what it calls

The Great Dane Robbery, following today's vote in the Danish

parliament to seize assets The Guardian says Ofsted is to get

tough with schools that allow girls to wear a full Islamic

veil, or niqab, The Telegraph says

the Government is backing higher council tax charges in flood risk

areas, to pay for improved defences. The Daily Mail reports on the cases

of three more children, who it claims died after

allegedly being failed The Express says many people

will have to keep on working till they're eighty, after cashing

in their pensions with no idea how The Star says that people making

false claims to the missing ?33 million lottery ticket

could face ten years I should be careful. It hasn't

changed me, my ?33 million. We will start with The Metro. Denmark is to

seize refugees' possessions. It is hard to see how this will work. It

is symbolic. The numbers given is that people will be allowed to keep

things taken of people will include things taken of people will include

phones and so on. It is hard to remember seeing anyone swimming

ashore in Greece with the laptop and phone. They have also said that

items that have sentimental value, wedding rings and family portraits,

will be immune from this. But what if you keep your wedding photos on a

laptop, presumably you still have it after travelling across the whole of

Europe. I am not sure what would take priority. It seems like gesture

politics. They are trying to say to migrants that if they do have stuff

it will be taken off them. It will also be a message that they have to

do something. We live in a country where we lock up asylum seekers for

years and will not give them money to buy food even though we have that

record we are shocked by this. The headline is very disapproving. The

have been around 30,000 migrants to Denmark. You can only assume that in

that country there is hysteria sufficient that the need to do

something like this. Although the focus is on the proposal to seize

valuables, refugee groups are more concerned about the fact that

refugees will not be allowed to bring their families for three

years. I suppose that is the proposal that might have the biggest

bearing on a migrant refugee thinking they do not want to go to

Denmark. If you think that you want something to have the desired effect

of not having people arrive in Denmark, saying he will be separated

from your spouse and children for three years, this seems to be a

stronger case than the laptop that you can have any more. It would not

make such a good headline. They have planned their way to the top. Ofsted

chief backs schools that restricts the Vale. He is getting tough on

those people out there who might want to take a particular headmaster

or mistress to task for preventing the wearing of the full veil in

class. I think any teacher or parent reading this will be confused about

what the government wants when it comes to the wearing of the Vale.

They want to have it both ways. They want to send the message that we

think that they'll should not be worn in the classroom, but all

schools can have a uniform policies. The chief inspector is saying that

the deal could lead to a school being marked down. How will you make

that judgment? You cannot make that judgment. This has been going on for

ten years. A teaching assistant was struck off for refusing to take off

her daily decade ago. I think most schools would wish that the

inspector gives out altogether makes up his mind. A lot of people reading

this story would say, good on them. I am not sure that it will be... It

will be the Spectre's actual visits and what he sees. I would have

thought since the only instance that they are considering here is

hindering communication and effective teaching, that would have

already got that school markdown. If an inspector went into a lesson and

no one was speaking or they felt strongly that students can read the

expression of a teacher, this doesn't just apply to pupils but the

staff, I am sure any inspector would have said that there was a problem

with communication there. I'm pretty sure that she would have mentioned

it. That is why these people are classrooms to do these inspections.

I find it hard to see what has changed other than the language has

been rendered specific to the Vale. I think it feels a little bit like a

big press release of the back of what is probably quite a small but

of their daily work. Flood risk areas raise council tax increases.

This is the front page of The Daily Telegraph. This is another story

that you look at the headline and you don't think it is the worst idea

in the world, but then you read it and think, wait a moment. Not just

areas that might be flooded will be paying, but areas that are close to

places that Ford will also be included. Those people will be

paying a sort of tax on being in the same environment as places that

flood, which begs the question why is it not national? Why we're not

doing this nationally? Where I live this not floods but I would pay ?15

for people who are getting flooded. It seems like an unhappy fudge and a

local solution has been found for what is quite a big national

problem. Someone has to pay for it and we clearly need more defences

against flood risk. It is a tiny sum. That cannot add up to a big

story. There are two things that make it into a splash. The

background is that when the coalition came to power the

dramatically cut spending on for the fences and many planned the fences

were approved. People are aware that the government have refused to pay

for defences. It is the local taxpayer that is going to pay. We

also got used to council tax freezes. Now it is going to go up by

2% as a standard increase to pay for social care and another 1.5% to pay

for flood protection. These are quite significant council tax rises.

The Daily Star says he will have to pay muggers attacked if you are the

winner. And if you are not only pretend to be UK get ten years. Stop

pretending, people who do not have a lottery ticket for ?33 million, that

you do. They are grumpy. Ten years since like a long time. There is

fraud. As fraud goes it is quite mild. You're not robbing old people.

Do we know how these 400 people expect to get away with it. Look how

sad the lottery faces. You will be back in an hour to look at some more

of the stories. Thank you for that. We stay with news. Now the