07/05/2016 The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be

With me are Anne Ashworth, Assistant Editor of The Times

and The Evening Standard's columnist Mihir Bose.

Tomorrow's front pages, starting with...

The new Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has written in tomorrow's Observer

claiming the Conservative tactics in the campaign were "straight out

The main picture shows the Leicester City players lifting

The Independent online says the Shadow Chancellor,

John McDonnell, is calling on Labour to support

Two former heads of MI5 and MI6 have told the Sunday Times that leaving

the European Union could undermine the UK's "ability to protect

The Telegraph reports on new figures which the paper claims show schools

in the UK are under increasing pressure because of EU migration.

According to the Mail on Sunday, a navy officer who trained in the UK

has fled to Syria to join so-called Islamic State.

"Dignity For Diana At last" is the main headline in the Express,

with news that her grave at Althrop House is to

We are starting with the Sunday Times. More on the Brexit debate.

This time it is spy chiefs weighing into the debate. The ex-MI5 and MI6

spy chiefs have colourfully said that if we leave the EU it would be

like a father leaving the wife and children behind. I am not sure we

see ourselves as the father of the EU, but, nevertheless, quite

interesting. What they are saying is we cooperate, coordinate security

information about what is happening in various parts of the world and

that we will not be able to do. The other point they make is that they

were not coached by Downing Street to say this, they have independently

come up with the idea that they we are the father of the EU and we

shouldn't be doing this. So remain and we stay safe is the message. The

tone is very interesting. In the first weeks of the campaign we had

many figures thrown at us about how much worse or better off we would be

in or out. Now it is almost becoming an emotional campaign and that we

are going to feel the EU as a family in which we have all got a stake. It

seems as if there is going to be a lot of speeches in the week coming

up with Boris apparently being unleashed to travel the country in a

bus. I suppose it has to be a Boris pass. It seems as though maybe those

figures that were being thrown at us like we would be 4,000 or ?5,000

better off in or out have not been persuading people and maybe we need

to feel a great sense of security in the heart of the family that is the

EU. It is an interesting analogy. Royal Family work for people? I am

surprised that the people who wanted us to remain have not contacted

cloud you run the area! You as an Italian have come to this country

because of the EU and you couldn't have done that without the EU and

the free movement of labour. Get the Leicester City fans on board! Let's

stay with the Brexit. The Sunday Telegraph are focusing on education,

saying that the influx of migrant families are putting schools under

huge pressure. In this paper, which seems to have sat somewhere in the

House of Commons and not been made freely available until it was

discovered by the Sunday Telegraph, this massive pressure on schools

with children coming here, 700,000 new pupils for whom there are a lot

of schools, and also because English is not the first language, it

requires the schools to lay on English classes. Again, it is a new

kind of fronts in the EU for, this idea that maybe we are too many, we

are uncomfortably overcrowded on this island and that could be one of

the main thrust of the argument coming up. This is where the

emotional thing will come in. I believe this referendum will be

decided on a motion. What this argument is about we have lost our

country, we have allowed too many people to come in, we are a small

island and look what it is going to do to our schools and future

generations, which you will be able to properly. If this is presented it

would be quite an appealing argument. I am not endorsing it, but

it could be quite an appealing argument, trying to integrate these

people live, teach them English and things like that. As you mentioned,

the paper was quietly released and hopefully buried in an election

week, and they think much will be made, the people who want us to

leave will make much of this argument. That point about hearts

and minds is interesting. A lot of the narrative seems to be that a lot

of people will not make up their minds until the last minute and it

will be a cut moment. When I went to vote on Thursday for the elections

for the Mary-Anne Monckton, I got the impression that a lot of people

get the pencil in the hands and then they almost make up their mind in

the booth. It will B in those last hours that this battle is won and

all of those figures thrown at us will be white noise. Most people

just get on with their lives and are not intensely involved in political

debate. Let's return to the Sunday Times. From... This is all about

Jeremy Corbyn jetting off on holiday, allegedly. This follows on

from Sadik Khan winning in London. He did not call to his inauguration.

-- Sadiq Khan. He is going on holiday for ten days. If the people

who want to remain are going to win, then Jeremy Corbyn has got to lead

the Labour Party into this. He seems to give the impression he doesn't

much care about it. He cares about not being involved. He has not led

the campaign so far. Is he really committed to it? Going back several

years he was a backbench MP he often voted against EU measures. He is

giving the impression that he has not got his heart in this campaign.

Do we need to another Brexit type word? It is too much fun! Is the

tone of this piece, how very dare he? Maybe he is just going to try to

get away from it all! I think there is this feeling that Jeremy Corbyn

isn't really up for the job. Forget about his ideas, but he often gives

the impression of being a leader caught in the headlights. It is like

he has been told to manage a football team never having managed

one before. His supporters would take we are seeing too many of these

articles trying to undermine him. The front of the observer is all

about Sadiq Khan's piece inside the observer in which he talks about the

plans used during the London mayoral election and likens those plans to

those of Donald Trump. On social media, this whole piece is not

playing as an attack on Jeremy Corbyn. It is a very interesting way

the uneasy feelings among many of the Labour Party about Jeremy Corbyn

are being tired. You can read what Sadiq Khan rights as an attack both

on the Ed Miliband regime and that of Jeremy Corbyn. Sadiq Khan is

Colin Ford laboured to get together, to pull together as one, to think as

one Dundee United. That is not surprising because this election,

before the results, or meant to be a referendum on Jeremy Corbyn. The

expectation was that the results would be very bad. Some Labour MPs

were planning at two, had been reported. Now they can do that. The

hard-core of Labour MPs who refuse to believe that Jeremy Corbyn could

be a leader that would take them to number ten. I think this argument

will go on. Sadiq Khan's article is about saying I have managed to win,

I am one of the few successes you have had on the selection and they

did it cause I appeal to everyone, Labour has to be a broad church, it

can be an narrow political party which believes in only one

philosophy. So a call to unity from Sadiq Khan. It is interesting that

as you said, the line that the observer have died of what he said

is this attack on Zac Goldsmith, using fear and innuendo to turn

religious and ethnic groups against each other. That seems to be the

accepted view of how the campaign was run. Zac Goldsmith's Sister

thinks so. I would love to know what Zac Goldsmith things himself. If he

is thinking he wishes he could have done it otherwise. This attack on

Sadiq Khan does not seem to have played well. Zac Goldsmith give the

impression that he didn't want to do it. He often give the impression

that he was questioned about Sadiq Khan's alleged extremism that he did

not believe in the attack, he had been tutored to have to set. The

point about the attack, OK, Sadiq Khan to been on platforms with

people you shouldn't have been, but the point about the attack is

attacking him as a human rights lawyer defending people who are

accused of all sorts of crimes. Surely in our system you defend

people whatever crimes they are accused of. You can't blame the

lawyer fitting that unless of course the lawyer says he sympathised with

the crime, which there is absolutely no evidence Sadiq Khan ever did. It

is going to kick off in America. There is an article about just how

bloody and terrible and highly insulting the whole thing will be in

America, so maybe we should think about what happened in the London

this as very mild. Staying with politics, the independent have an

exclusive Suntory -- story, sent the Shadow Chancellor is demanding a new

voting system here. What he is saying is that we should have

proportional representation. It is very interesting. The Labour Party

have a chance in 1997, but Tony Blair did not think you would win

that bigger majority. They have discussions with Paddy Ashdown about

having proportional representation. They didn't go for it. Now that

Labour is in trouble, the Shadow Chancellor calls for proportional

representation. Even with it, which exists in Scotland, where is Labour

with proportional representation in Scotland? Proportional

representation by itself, helping Labour get some share of power, I

don't think it works. The party would need to have some message. In

Scotland we have proportional representation and the SNP is so

dominant that Labour are in third. John McDonnell, is nearby to bid to

replace Jeremy Corbyn? There is some talk that he was at the front of

trying to censure Ken Livingstone, and that McDonnell has been lining

up to hope that if there is a coup he will be the first one to succeed.

There is a lot of talk about that. Did he thinks this is a policy they

can't agree on. We had a referendum a couple of years ago didn't we? A

fee in 2011. The proper political animals with said that isn't the

same thing. How exciting this proportional representation? Not at

all. Thank you very much. We will be back

at 11:30 p.m.. To join us. You'll both be back at 11.30pm

for another look at the stories