27/08/2016 The Papers

of public service is to expose inequalities in the way that ethnic

minorities and white working-class people are treated.

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be

With me are broadcaster Rachel Shabi and journalist Eva Simpson.

Good evening to you both. Before we hear from them, let's have a quick

look at what the papers are bringing us.

The Observer quotes a former Tory health minister calling

for a new tax to fund the NHS and social care.

The Sunday Times has pictures of Theresa May enjoying

The Sunday Telegraph says Theresa May is asking her

ministers for their personal Brexit blueprints.

More lives could be lost on Britain's beaches according

to the Sunday Express - which blames cuts for leaving coast

The Mail on Sunday claims victory over plans they say are in place

to divert tens of millions of pounds in foreign aid

So Brexit is back. The Sunday Times and the Sunday Telegraph, and get to

that a moment, pictures the of the reason me enjoying a cup of tea and

watching the cricket. It can't be more British than that for a British

Prime Minister. What do you think she is thinking of? Probably the

cricket photo is to enable the strapline may prepares to umpire

Brexit clash and that is very much what this study and others are

focused on, which is that there is this almighty tussle with various of

her ministers. This story in the Sunday Times is talking about the

Chancellor trying to muscle in on Brexit deals, in a way that the

other ministers do not particularly welcome. I imagine she is going to

have two sort of pull them apart and ask them to focus on the task at

hand. The other interesting thing is that all along she said Brexit means

Brexit but still no one knows what that means. According to the Sunday

Times she has told her Cabinet ministers to come to a meeting with

the idea of how to get the best out of Brexit. Who has been quoted?

There are no Cabinet ministers who have been quartered. There are

reliable sources in this. Has split at the Cabinet supposed to be? Three

quarters of them are remain supporters so they must come to this

meeting with the plans on how did best go forward with Brexit.

Meanwhile there is a turf war going on with people trying to muscle in

with other people. Is that what the papers want us to believe? How

reliable are the Westminster lobby? The government and they must listen

to the people who voted for Brexit, they must see it through. One

wonders how divided the Cabinet are. Yes the country voted for Brexit but

no one knows what that means so now they must come up with a plan. There

is no plan, that is what I'm taking from this piece. She wants everyone

to come together. This will be the staff meeting from hell. This will

be worried a lot of people at home who voted for Brexit and the people

who are in power who are being asked to make it happen and come up with a

plan. The Sunday Telegraph describes it as May is the Brexit -- Brexit

enforcer. Then makes you wonder how many people when they voted for

Brexit realise that there wasn't that much of a plan. People may have

thought there was a Pied Piper ultimately things by campaigners but

the one thought for one minute that the people reading the Brexit

campaign didn't really know how this would manifest itself if indeed we

voted to leave the EU. Now we have really lies there is no plan. There

are lots of divisions. People said no to the EU but we don't know what

kind of know that was. There is disagreement in the Cabinet. Do we

stay in the single market? If we do the week at a the controls on

migration that we think we can and should control. Or presumably that

some people do. It is almost inevitable that there would be these

divisions given that we did not know the first place what Brexit would

mean. Do you think what the Times and Telegraph are suggesting our big

divisions in the Cabinet? Cabinet falling apart over Brexit. Not that

they are falling apart but the sense that they all must come up with the

strategy. There is no strategy and now they must come up with one. They

are all coming at it from different perspectives. Both newspapers

highlight the divisions between different departments. There are

suggestions that some departments have been briefing negative stories

about new departments. See what I mean? Be careful what you read! It

is fascinating but I guess the headline is correct. This is why

until perhaps we have heard from the horses mouth about divisions in the

capital, Debbie takes... I am asking the question, Adi... It will never

say, I am cross with Boris because he will not let the muscle in. We

know that with the lobby. We will see what happens after Wednesday.

Showery moved on to the mild on Sunday? At last MOS victory on

foreign aid is the claim. This has been a long-running campaign. It has

with the mild on Sunday. They claimed a victory because Priti

Patel the new International developer secretary has said that

she plans to divert the foreign aid budget to go towards funding the war

on terror. There is not much more meat to the silly that we have seen

but it is a heartbreaking headline to read. We know that she is not in

favour of foreign aid. I think it is a bit of an easy win for her. An

easy headline. Quite a populist thing for her to do. For me it is

quite a sad thing because as much as we have read headlines with the

foreign aid budget funding some despot doing this and it is all

going to corrupt regimes, who actually does a lot of good and why

should people suffer? It does a lot of good. Pakistan is among the

biggest receivers of foreign aid, it is huge, and there is an issue of

terrorism there but there's poverty and problems. Refugees. It is

difficult to know where the money is going to go. Not really. I think

eyebrows and should have raised when Priti Patel was appointed the new

international developer secretary. She does not believe in

international development because she has decided to scrap it. This is

0.7% of Britain's budget. It is going to places like Pakistan and

helping to send girls to school in Pakistan and helping with

immunisation programmes in Africa and helping Syrian refugees. The

bulk of it is funnelled through the UN. You say why should they suffer

because some of that money in certain parts of the country ends up

in the wrong hands are being misspent? That is just a way of

saying, that is a way of avoiding paying it. It would be hard to

imagine that most of it is not going to the right place. And the idea

that it is an either or scenario. We can't fund counterterrorism and

foreign aid as though we need to make that choice, we don't. We also

need to find the NHS. Also an ideal logical choice. The Observer UK

needs new tax to save NHS and social care from collapse according to top

Tory. MP demands action by made to solve cash crisis for NHS. Is this a

new tax for the NHS? This is something else for treason these

injury. There is a long list of things for her to do. Dan Poulter

suggests there should be a tax so that we can safeguard money for

social care. It is a long-running issue the idea that elderly people

once they go into hospital they stay in hospital because there isn't a

social care plan that there is nowhere for them to go so instead of

leaving the stay in hospital, which costs them more. He is suggesting

that there should be some ring fencing of funds to prevent that

happening. Because he said it is urgently required I'd is a crisis.

It is good to see this issue raised. He was from the Department of Health

but he is also a part-time NHS doctor and this correlation between

starving social services, of course if you cut social services to the

extent that we have in the UK through austerity that will have an

impact on the NHS. Of course it will affect the NHS in a negative way. So

to connect those dots I think is a really important things. Obviously

we should be seeing, trying to fund the two together because they work

so closely in tandem. Not strike to staff one and overburdened the

other. The Sunday express, this is not an issue that seems to be going

away it has been going for some time. It started in local papers in

Sussex and now graces the national papers. Cuts led to drownings, no

cash to guard our beaches are still die in one week. There has been a

lot of calls from lifeguards to be there but it is quite a quiet beach,

but very popular. The local council, I read that they said there is no

need for lifeguards. According to this and people in the government,

local government for these cuts and he is demanding that something be

done about it in the light of all these tragedies over the summer.

Other tweet I saw saying, I don't not it is true, but they claim that

the local council make between 30 and ?50,000 per year out of the car

park on the beach. That could go some way towards putting some

lifeguards on the beach to make sure people don't get trapped in the

sand. Local authorities are having to decide what to cut, these cuts

have been imposed upon the idea must decide which of the local services

they can get rid of. It is no grey surprise to discover that we do not

have enough coastguards, and that service has been starved of funds

given so much about local authorities provide has been. We

just have time to squeeze in a story that I really want to about,

snoring. Talk It is the traffic's fault. It sleepiness during the day

is linked to traffic pollution. I have just moved to the countryside

and I definitely stop snoring. I sleep like a baby. Your nostrils get

blocked up. Is it a pollution related thing? They discovered that

25% of men snort. Added his traffic pollution there is the likelihood

that snarling increased with the exposure to traffic. One more thing

caused by pollution. Thank you very much for taking us to the papers. We

will do it again at 30p.m.. Goodbye. Thank you very much for watching.

Coming up next is this weeks edition of reporters. A full round-up of the

best reports from that week. From here in the BBC newsroom,

we send out correspondents to bring