23/10/2016 The Papers

pursuit quartet in Rio. Congratulations to hurt them.

Now on BBC News here's Gavin Esler with The Papers

Hello and welcome to our look at The Papers. Let's have a look at the

front pages. The Observer leads and the claim by the British bankers

Association that some of the UK's biggest banks are preparing to be

located outside the UK next year overpacked -- Praxiteles.

The Times also mentions Calais and refugee arrivals,

but their main story is an account from reporter Louise Callaghan

of the Iraqi mission to liberate the city of Mosul

The situation in Calais also dominates the Telegraph's front

page, but the paper focuses on claims that the Home Office

ignored warnings about the issues - such as age checks -

And the Express claims to have an exclusive on its front

page, a row between Prince Charles and Prince Andrew over the official

roles of Andrew's daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.

Leading banks set to pull out of the UK early next year overpacked said.

City chiefs are poised to hit the relocated button. Is this Project we

are again or somehow project fact when it happens? It is probably a

bit of both. He is saying, rather graphically, that some banks are

offering their fingers over the relocated button and are thinking of

going. They would say that. They are lobbying for their own interests. We

have heard this before from the banks. There have been reports of

the 70,000 jobs could go. There is a fundamental truth which is that the

banks like being in London. While there is talk of them being lured to

Paris or Frankfurt, bankers enjoy living in London. His lobbyist for

banks lobbying for bikers. Bikers also like Monday -- like money and

if they thought they had a better chance in France, the France -- the

French were trying to lure them to Paris with little adverts. I think

they will go where they think they make the biggest profits and they

can afford to let up on these leases in London which are overpriced

anyway. Restaurants are better in Britain than in France, anyway.

Paris isn't as interesting in as many ways. It is thanks to the

bankers that we have such fantastic food in London and all these things

because they have pumped money through London for 20 years. They

ordered the most sympathetic lobby group after 2008. They have become

literally pantomime villains. With some justification. The problem is

as an economy we are over relied on the financial sector, so this is

part of the intense lobbying campaign with the government. It is

special pleading if you like, but it is pleading the government cannot

ignore because they are important to the economy. The Observer also have

this. 50 refugee girls arrive after U-turns by officials. They also have

Kerry Mulligan clutching a toy bear. What do you make of this story and

the way in which some people who are celebrities, Lily Allen as well,

have come out and talked about this? I am not sure what the use of

celebrities does except to make people more cross. As a woman, it is

lovely to see girl children being brought in because one of the

biggest problems for all people deal with the refugee crisis is that all

we see is young men. To most of this, even when we see our

home-grown young men standing on the corners in groups all we see is a

trouble. The idea we will bring in even more young men who stand on

street corners and get cross with each other is pretty terrifying to

people. It is very important to be reminded that there are girls there

and young women there because we see them possibly as an integrated

future. They tended to be invisible in much of the coverage. When the

young men came in, there were a lot of photographs. I am not sure why

that is. Are we protecting them from traffickers or whatever. We seem to

treat women differently and we are not sing enough girls and women. The

Observer coverage is about the young girls and the pictures that have

been around, they are very young. The journey between 13 and 17. There

is a problem of perception because the first draft of people coming in

looked of dubious age. There were warnings from border officials that

many migrants were posing as children to get into the country

when they were substantially older. There is good coverage around the

fact that the latest group of refugees are girls. It is

unfortunate that are in the second set of arrivals, rather than the

first. Even the Brexit problems are that you are only seeing male

refugees coming in. Again, it is that sense, to me, of an importation

of aggression. Good for Kerry Mulligan for speaking up. It

wouldn't have got the coverage if it wasn't for this sort of celebrity

endorsement. It is what it is. It is done for a reason, quite rightly. It

expands the coverage and that is a good thing. There is a different

take from the Telegraph. Warnings as child migrants try to cross the

Channel. It is the typical photo of young men with their faces covered,

which makes us feel anxious because those images we associate with

violent activities. If you juxtapose that with the Observer story, it is

two different sides of the same story. It depends where you sit and

look at it. The Telegraph have a lot of the warnings. There is a

suggestion Chief inspectors of workers have warned that people were

posing as migrants and children as much as three years ago. Suggestions

that council officials offered to help with age verification have been

shunned by various authorities. The Telegraph agenda is to pull together

all the fears and preconceptions about the fact people are trying to

pose as children to get in and reaffirming it. The picture is the

key part of that. There is not too much mentioned about the group of

young girls the kingpin. It is the focus on the bogus element. One of

my favourite cartoonists is on the front page. It says children on

board apparently. On the front page of the Telegraph we also have a

story which will please a lot of people. Nuisance phone call bosses

to face Avei million pounds in fines. You get these nuisance phone

calls and that they could face fines. They come often via internet

phones so that is no redress because in the old days you could keep them

hanging on until they were paying huge phone bills if nothing else for

the price of knowing you. Now they bring fire escape or similar and

just stay on for ever. I think the problem with this isn't that most of

these companies close. They go into liquidation as soon as they are

fined. Somebody phoned up and it was a person who said how are you today?

I thought this is completely anonymous. They are just trying to

come up with an introduction other than I heard you have been involved

in an accident. The key thing is pinning it on the directors. They

liquidate the company is immediately so what the government is saying,

good work has been done on this by consumer groups who have led the way

on this in terms of saying that crackdown on these people. Let's see

if it works. It is all good work has been done on this by consumer groups

who have led the way on this in terms of saying that crackdown on

these people. Let's see if it works. The result was in theory, but I

don't think it. These calls, unfortunately. You can of course

ring the telephone service and get your phone number ticking off these

lists. I do it regularly for me and my mum. Top consumer tips. The

Sunday Times. I was entrapped by Isis Dons. This is about Mosul and

other parts of that conflict. It points out the risks people, war

correspondents, have to take to do their job. It is an extremely

dangerous job and I think it will get more dangerous for these

embedded correspondents were those on the outskirts of Mosul as they

get closer to the city and the fighting is likely to get harder and

more difficult and dangerous. There is already a suggestion that as many

as 250 men and boys used as human shields have been killed in Mosul.

It is going to get worse before gets better and the idea that Islamic

State or so embedded with the population just that everybody at

greater risk, both soldiers and civilians. They have been there for

more than two years. Children are not quite to school for two years

because they have been indoctrinated. It is terribly sad.

On a point of process, I am not sure I like personal stories on front

pages. I want the personal stories inside, even on a Sunday newspaper

and a more conventional story on the front page. I don't want something

that starts with the reporter on the front page. It doesn't diminish her

bravery in doing the job. She doesn't have to be there in the

sense she is doing her job and is reasonably well-paid by the Sunday

Times for doing it and that is very different for the people who are

trapped in their everyday. One of the reason I like Sunday newspaper

is that they have done something like what the Observer has done.

Three pages on Trump and Clinton. It has great graphics. This is rather

good. What they do is they say what would happen if you took out a black

voters or female voters or college educated voters or Hispanic voters?

How would it change the result? It shows, America is not unique in

this, how divided America is between these various groups. It also draws

a parallel with the UK with the Brexit foot. It looks at different

states, different areas. It looks at how white menfolk, generally Trump.

Of the black and Hispanic population thought, were women. It basically

says that Clinton is ahead by 48-2, the margin of error is still pretty

good, she is less unpopular than Trump, which seems to be key to this

election. It is 48-42, but a margin of error of 4%. The other big

question which is raised here is you don't count people who don't

normally vote. If they come out in big numbers it will change

everything. Trump only came top in the graphic that showed no black

voters. In every other combination, Clinton is ahead. That is quite

interesting. Our final story of the day is Ed balls. Out on a limb. This

is from the mail on Sunday. Why you should never ask Ed for a lift. What

is this about? He looks like a butcher. The EP member when a

butcher would wear a waistcoat and a hat? They were dancing. The looked

like Mr Morris, the old butcher in Morris when I was growing up,

sweeping some of the street and throwing around. He did really well

until that particular left and he just didn't pull off that list and

that is what cost. He is very stiff. He looked like a hammer, not like a

woman. He is the first to admit he is the worst dancer on the show but

everyone loves a try. Some of these people have been in West End

musicals. They are pretty good at it. It would be interesting to see

if he survives because he comes bottom of the leaderboard but does

better on the public vote. You can't help but admire him. He is like John

Sergeant but not so charming. There is a rigidity in him which is

difficult. You didn't notice it, I always thought he would be the sort

of man who would be good in a fight. When you see him it is like he is

frozen. I admire anyone who goes on it. In terms of his progress, he is

a pretty good. A lot of were pretty good at the start. Those of us who

are challenged by two left feet just admire the guts of taking part,

never mind how he did. That is it for The Papers. A reminder, we look

at the front pages every evening at a quarter to 11 on BBC News.

A cold start to the day, feeling like an autumnal morning out there.

Some mist and