Browse content similar to The Legend of Tarzan, Maggie's Plan, The Neon Demon. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Britain at the European athletics Championships at 10:30 p.m.. Now, it | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
is time for the film review. Hello and welcome to | :00:00. | :00:16. | |
the Film Review on BBC News. To take us through this week's | :00:17. | :00:19. | |
cinema releases is Mark Kermode. We have The Legend of Tarzan, | :00:20. | :00:22. | |
which is the film I know you have Why isn't Tarzan | :00:23. | :00:26. | |
back on our screens? We have Maggie's Plan, a very | :00:27. | :00:39. | |
interesting sort of non-romcom,. And The Neon Demon, | :00:40. | :00:42. | |
the controversial new film You're absolutely right, you know, | :00:43. | :00:44. | |
Tarzan, King of the swingers, Yes, so this seems to be a cinematic | :00:45. | :00:50. | |
reboot of a very timeless creation from the director David Yates | :00:51. | :00:59. | |
who directed a number The script is co-written by | :01:00. | :01:01. | |
Craig Brewer. This begins with John Clayton, | :01:02. | :01:07. | |
Lord Greystoke, in London, where he has sort of become part | :01:08. | :01:17. | |
of gentrified society, and he is to be sent | :01:18. | :01:22. | |
back to the Congo where Christophe Waltz's emissary | :01:23. | :01:24. | |
to the Belgian King is involved in a very sinister | :01:25. | :01:26. | |
and horrible mission. With him is Samuel L Jackson's | :01:27. | :01:31. | |
George Washington Williams, who wants to prove that the Belgians | :01:32. | :01:33. | |
are involved basically So he provides the politics, | :01:34. | :01:35. | |
Tarzan provides the action. Kill one and the rest won't stop | :01:36. | :01:38. | |
until they've torn you to pieces. So how d'you want | :01:39. | :01:48. | |
to play this, then? Their leader will come | :01:49. | :01:50. | |
down and we'll fight. Promise | :01:51. | :01:53. | |
me. I mean, for all the, you know, | :01:54. | :02:21. | |
he's the interesting story and it's about exploitation, | :02:22. | :02:49. | |
well, actually, it's about a guy It's kind of an old-fashioned action | :02:50. | :02:51. | |
movie, albeit with Because he's acting with his abs | :02:52. | :02:55. | |
and they are the most interesting Christoph Waltz, who is the sort | :02:56. | :03:00. | |
of villain, does his sort of trademark sinister European | :03:01. | :03:14. | |
and Margot Robbie sort of plays Jane So there are all of these elements | :03:15. | :03:17. | |
that make you think this might be an interesting | :03:18. | :03:24. | |
new take on the story, but it does come out | :03:25. | :03:26. | |
as rather mudelled. There's a strange mixture | :03:27. | :03:28. | |
of something which wants to be modern, but feels | :03:29. | :03:30. | |
oddly old-fashioned. And I have to say that | :03:31. | :03:32. | |
for me, it didn't gel However, there are large amounts | :03:33. | :03:34. | |
of people who are going to the cinema who are going to see | :03:35. | :03:38. | |
that incredible six-pack, which is on display | :03:39. | :03:40. | |
for a lot of the film! I mean, the fundamental | :03:41. | :03:43. | |
problem with Tarzan, It was that it is sort of set | :03:44. | :03:46. | |
in the days of Empire. What this is trying to do | :03:47. | :03:51. | |
the sort of revisionist, And you think, well, | :03:52. | :04:03. | |
that's an interesting It still just feels like something | :04:04. | :04:08. | |
that doesn't quite come together. Which is in dark contrast | :04:09. | :04:12. | |
to Maggie's Plan which, I have to say, I went into thinking | :04:13. | :04:14. | |
I wasn't going to like that much. This is the sort of Jane Austen | :04:15. | :04:17. | |
influenced, as I said, non-romcom, So the story is, Greta Gerwig | :04:18. | :04:20. | |
is Maggie and she's a very controlling person, and she has this | :04:21. | :04:24. | |
plan that what she wants to do with her life is she's decided it's | :04:25. | :04:27. | |
time to have children, but she doesn't want to | :04:28. | :04:30. | |
have the inconvenience of a partner. So she plans everything out | :04:31. | :04:33. | |
and she plans everybody's fate. But then, of course, | :04:34. | :04:35. | |
what happens is that she comes across Ethan Hawke's academic | :04:36. | :04:45. | |
who is a ficto-critical And apparently, he's the bad boy | :04:46. | :04:47. | |
of this world and suddenly, And the thing I like about this | :04:48. | :04:51. | |
is firstly, it's genuinely funny. It's got a really good way | :04:52. | :04:55. | |
of sort of skewering The second thing is, | :04:56. | :04:59. | |
it's a romantic comedy which just doesn't see marriage | :05:00. | :05:03. | |
as an answer to anything, doesn't see romantic | :05:04. | :05:05. | |
ends as being neat and tidy. It's all about the way | :05:06. | :05:07. | |
in which people behave in odd ways Julianne Moore is fantastic | :05:08. | :05:10. | |
as the person who we are originally told is a really scarily successful | :05:11. | :05:16. | |
academic wife, but then actually turns out to be much more than just | :05:17. | :05:18. | |
a sort of punchline to a joke. People have sort of compared it | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
to Woody Allen a little bit, which I can understand, | :05:23. | :05:28. | |
but I think it's very much As I said, oddly enough, | :05:29. | :05:30. | |
the strongest influence Although as you quite rightly | :05:31. | :05:33. | |
say, moving on... Emma didn't quite plan | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
a family in the way... And Julianne Moore | :05:37. | :05:38. | |
is just incredible. But in this, she is absolutely | :05:39. | :05:41. | |
brilliant as the person who's playing Ethan Hawke's | :05:42. | :05:48. | |
allegedly scary wife, who then turns out to be much | :05:49. | :05:50. | |
more than that. Now, I loved | :05:51. | :05:52. | |
Drive. I'm a big fan of Drive and I'm a big | :05:53. | :05:53. | |
fan of Nicolas Winding Refn. So The Neon Demon, as you probably | :05:54. | :05:58. | |
know, when it played at Cannes, There has been some outrage, | :05:59. | :06:02. | |
some newspapers saying, oh, So the story's actually a very | :06:03. | :06:05. | |
old-fashioned story. It's part an expose | :06:06. | :06:09. | |
of the emptiness and shallowness Exactly, who could have imagined | :06:10. | :06:11. | |
such a thing?! But it's also - more importantly - | :06:12. | :06:16. | |
a fairy tale about an innocent going into the woods of Los Angeles | :06:17. | :06:19. | |
and being pursued by beasts, She arrives in LA, where | :06:20. | :06:22. | |
she is immediately surrounded by people who are sort of locked | :06:23. | :06:26. | |
into the fashion world and all of whom don't have | :06:27. | :06:29. | |
what she has, which is Don't you think that | :06:30. | :06:32. | |
she's just perfect? She just got out of the body | :06:33. | :06:53. | |
shop, she's still a Sweetie, plastics is | :06:54. | :07:05. | |
just good grooming. Imagine going in here | :07:06. | :07:10. | |
without brushing your teeth. It's kind of like a really | :07:11. | :07:12. | |
darker version of Ab Fab. That line about, sweetie, | :07:13. | :07:36. | |
plastics is just good grooming. It turns into something | :07:37. | :07:38. | |
much more ghoulish. It turns into, essentially, a kind | :07:39. | :07:42. | |
of 1970s Italian horror movie. And this is the thing that has sort | :07:43. | :07:47. | |
of scared some critics off. As a long-standing horror fan, | :07:48. | :08:06. | |
I am fine with all that stuff and I like the idea that | :08:07. | :08:09. | |
Nicolas Refn makes these movies that There are moments in Drive when it | :08:10. | :08:12. | |
suddenly becomes very, very sort of explicitly violent, | :08:13. | :08:23. | |
and other times, it's very romantic. You know, it's about a world | :08:24. | :08:26. | |
in which everything's to do with surface, everything's | :08:27. | :08:32. | |
to do with artifice, everything is to do with the sheen | :08:33. | :08:34. | |
of the way things look. And I think the film | :08:35. | :08:36. | |
is very much like that. But it but does also | :08:37. | :08:39. | |
have a certain amount of depth. And a fantastic score | :08:40. | :08:41. | |
by Cliff Martinez, which is kind of synthy and squishy, | :08:42. | :08:44. | |
and reminded me of Tangerine And also, when it turns | :08:45. | :08:46. | |
into full-blooded... And I think there's no question that | :08:47. | :08:49. | |
it's an explanation movie. And I think there's no question that | :08:50. | :08:57. | |
it's an exploitation movie. There's no question that it tips | :08:58. | :09:01. | |
over, it doesn't just dip into exploitation, it dives | :09:02. | :09:04. | |
deep into exploitation. But I'm glad that Nicolas Refn | :09:05. | :09:05. | |
is that kind of director. He is somebody who, for the critics, | :09:06. | :09:08. | |
can be both the beauty He can delight the critics | :09:09. | :09:11. | |
and then he can outrage What I liked about that little | :09:12. | :09:16. | |
clip was the dialogue There's a kind of Stepford | :09:17. | :09:23. | |
models about it. I'll just die if I | :09:24. | :09:27. | |
don't get the recipe. I think the Stepford Wives thing | :09:28. | :09:29. | |
is absolutely spot on, and I think that's exactly | :09:30. | :09:37. | |
what they are doing. And I've read some reviews which say | :09:38. | :09:39. | |
that the acting is really wooden. No, no, the acting is | :09:40. | :09:42. | |
meant to be like that. Particularly in that scene, | :09:43. | :09:44. | |
absolutely. It's based on the audio tapes | :09:45. | :09:47. | |
of theologian John Hull - we talked about it last week - | :09:48. | :09:57. | |
who sort of recorded losing his sight and then | :09:58. | :10:00. | |
discovering a sort of new awareness. And what the film does is, it uses | :10:01. | :10:02. | |
those tapes and it uses his stories, diaries and new interviews to create | :10:03. | :10:06. | |
an extraordinary cinematic portrait that helps you to understand | :10:07. | :10:08. | |
what that blindness means to him And it reminded me, I said before, | :10:09. | :10:11. | |
of a film called Black But it's so interesting to make | :10:12. | :10:16. | |
a film, you know, which is Doing this story and doing it | :10:17. | :10:20. | |
in a way which is adventurous. I mean, I honestly have not heard | :10:21. | :10:24. | |
one person who has seen this film And I would recommend | :10:25. | :10:27. | |
it to everybody. As I said, I will be really | :10:28. | :10:30. | |
astonished if this isn't in my list of best films of the year, | :10:31. | :10:33. | |
come the end of the year. It is really profound | :10:34. | :10:36. | |
and moving and engaging, It's basically a love letter | :10:37. | :10:38. | |
to old Hollywood. It's got musicals, aquatic | :10:39. | :10:51. | |
musical sequences. It's funny, because this was coming | :10:52. | :10:53. | |
out roundabout the same time And it's fun, sort of screwball | :10:54. | :10:56. | |
and crazy and quirky, but it does have some of the best | :10:57. | :11:05. | |
comic sequences I've We've discussed the scene | :11:06. | :11:08. | |
which I showed as a clip. I watched it again the other night | :11:09. | :11:11. | |
and I laughed at all the same I love the way the Coen brothers | :11:12. | :11:14. | |
know and understand the history A couple of reviews said they are | :11:15. | :11:30. | |
just sneering. They are in love with the medium. Ray finds is incredible | :11:31. | :11:35. | |
funny and I loved it to pieces and I would happily watch it again. I will | :11:36. | :11:40. | |
borrow the DVD. Before we go, you will find more film news and reviews | :11:41. | :11:45. | |
across the BBC online. And you can catch up on our preview shows on the | :11:46. | :11:50. | |
BBCi play. That is it for this week, and you for watching, enjoy the | :11:51. | :11:52. | |
movies, goodbye. Hello, if you are hoping for a long | :11:53. | :12:07. | |
and warm and dry settled weather, you are probably out of luck. No | :12:08. | :12:10. | |
significant changes in our | :12:11. | :12:12. |