28/02/2014 The Film Review


28/02/2014

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 28/02/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

one-day international between the West Indies and England. And a

:00:00.:00:00.

report from the track cycling Championships. Now it is time for

:00:00.:00:00.

the Film Review. Hello and welcome to the Film Review

:00:00.:00:25.

here on BBC News. To take us through this week's cinema releases and

:00:26.:00:29.

discuss the Oscars, Mark Kermode. We have Non Stop, The Book Thief, an

:00:30.:00:41.

adaptation of Marcus Zusak's acclaimed novel and We Are What We

:00:42.:00:46.

Are, a remake of a Mexican cannibal movie.

:00:47.:00:53.

Right, Non Stop. Liam Neeson started out as a sensitive character actor

:00:54.:01:00.

and now he is the go to action guy. The story behind nonstop is he is an

:01:01.:01:05.

Air Marshal and he has a drink problem. He is on and aeroplane and

:01:06.:01:14.

he gets text messages from someone saying they are going to kill

:01:15.:01:21.

someone. He starts interrogating the passengers. Here is how he does it.

:01:22.:01:30.

What happened to Amsterdam? Show me your pass. What is your name? Why?

:01:31.:01:39.

Take it easy! I didn't do anything! I have rights! What the hell is

:01:40.:01:51.

going on? The threat is real. I have a suspect in custody, I need a

:01:52.:01:57.

background check, his name is Tom Bowen. Your supervisor -- you

:01:58.:02:09.

threatened your supervisor. I did not threaten anyone. I need a seat

:02:10.:02:16.

check on seat 23. If three minutes, someone on this plane is going to

:02:17.:02:21.

die. Do you hear me? I'm sorry, I find it hysterically funny. It is

:02:22.:02:27.

entertaining up to a point. The story is he hits a bunch of people

:02:28.:02:38.

before someone eventually opens up. If you look at a film like Read Why,

:02:39.:02:47.

, it is essentially a story like murder on the Orient express but on

:02:48.:02:51.

an aeroplane. It is not as good as it ought to be. It is fun but not as

:02:52.:02:58.

fun as some other upmarket films. The great comparison is, put it next

:02:59.:03:08.

to Red Eye. I'm concerned about how he got a text message on a plane. He

:03:09.:03:14.

is an Air Marshal. You have learned something new. Snakes on a plane is

:03:15.:03:25.

probably better than this? No, it is a terrible movie. I went in thinking

:03:26.:03:30.

I want great big popcorn fun. It is OK. It has one of the worst endings

:03:31.:03:34.

I have seen in a long time. The Book Thief? It is an up that

:03:35.:03:42.

patient -- it is an adaptation of a very successful difficult novel. It

:03:43.:03:46.

is about a young girl growing up in Nazi Germany. The problem is, they

:03:47.:03:51.

have the narrator who is death himself. At the beginning we have

:03:52.:03:56.

the voice of death. Then we have the young girl who becomes interested in

:03:57.:03:59.

literature at the same time the Nazis are burning books. She is a

:04:00.:04:06.

member of the Hitler youth. It is seeing the world through the eyes of

:04:07.:04:13.

children. You think of other films, these are child I've use of the war

:04:14.:04:17.

that managed to achieve a level of profundity. This does not manage to.

:04:18.:04:23.

It is a very handsome looking film by Brian Percival who did Downton

:04:24.:04:29.

Abbey. It feels a bit chocolate box like. It shies away from difficult

:04:30.:04:34.

subject matter. The fact we have the narration by death makes it feel

:04:35.:04:41.

more metaphysical than it is. Solid performances, looks very handsome

:04:42.:04:48.

but does not scrape the subject -- the surface of the subject. If you

:04:49.:04:52.

enjoyed the book you will think it is a failed adaptation. There is a

:04:53.:04:57.

theory that around the time of the Oscars, a month afterwards, that is

:04:58.:05:03.

when Hollywood buries movies which are not very good. The Book Thief

:05:04.:05:07.

was thought of as an Oscar contender. The fact it and has one

:05:08.:05:12.

nomination for the score says something, it is a movie which has

:05:13.:05:20.

awards written over it but it has not been nominated. What about We

:05:21.:05:28.

Are What We Are? At the beginning of the movie the mother dies. It is a

:05:29.:05:35.

Mexican film but this relocates the action to America. It changes the

:05:36.:05:43.

gender structure at the beginning. It is the mother who dies and the

:05:44.:05:47.

daughters have to take over the responsibility for the family's

:05:48.:05:50.

cannibalism, while at the same time wondering what it might be like to

:05:51.:05:55.

have a normal life. Here is a clip. So how old are you now? 14. 14.

:05:56.:06:12.

Grown-up. It happens. It does. Catch. Thank you. What is this? A

:06:13.:06:25.

bone I found out back. My dad would know, he is good at bones. There is

:06:26.:06:31.

an old surgery by the creek. We used to go there when we were little. How

:06:32.:06:39.

far? Not far. Maybe I should take a look? This might be from one of our

:06:40.:06:46.

relatives. I will show you where it is. You are really pretty, Rose,

:06:47.:06:55.

just like your sister. I will see you later. CU. That is really

:06:56.:07:02.

creepy. It has a very chilly palette, there

:07:03.:07:06.

is a lot of rain, the whole area is sodden and there is a vale of tears

:07:07.:07:11.

about the whole thing. They have fundamentally changed the genetic

:07:12.:07:16.

structure of the original. The original was about suburban

:07:17.:07:19.

alienation. The central theme is religious fundamentalism and

:07:20.:07:24.

obsession. It gives you a sense that you feel sympathy for these

:07:25.:07:28.

characters even though what they are doing seems completely terrible.

:07:29.:07:31.

Although it is not perfect and I do not think it will in any way

:07:32.:07:35.

challenge the supremacy of the original, I thought it was an honest

:07:36.:07:40.

and thought-provoking attempt to take the central ideas of the

:07:41.:07:43.

original film and do something original. We have seen so many

:07:44.:07:47.

horror remakes where they are essentially take a foreign language

:07:48.:07:50.

film and essentially gutted but change the language to English. This

:07:51.:07:55.

is trying to do something different. The writer and director have had a

:07:56.:08:01.

good bash at it. The two young women stars are really terrific, doing

:08:02.:08:04.

that thing in which they are trying to find their own way but there is

:08:05.:08:08.

this family heritage which they cannot escape. I thought it was

:08:09.:08:12.

interesting. Interesting indeed. Now, the Oscars this weekend. Is it?

:08:13.:08:23.

! Best movie? I think it will be 12 Years A Slave. Steve McQueen has

:08:24.:08:28.

done a fantastic job of telling the story. I think you will like it as

:08:29.:08:35.

much as I do. For me it was the absolute standout of the year. I

:08:36.:08:41.

think best director I do not think we'll go to the same film. I suspect

:08:42.:08:47.

it will be Alfonso Cuaron for Gravity. People say it is

:08:48.:08:54.

brilliantly directed. How did they do that? How did they create that

:08:55.:08:59.

world, essentially send us into space for 90 minutes. If you look at

:09:00.:09:04.

the BAFTAs for example, I think there is an awful lot of love for

:09:05.:09:09.

Alfonso Cuaron's work on Gravity as director and I suspect that means he

:09:10.:09:14.

will beat Steve McQueen. I think he is a brilliant director but I think

:09:15.:09:20.

Steve McQueen's direction of 12 Years A Slave is extraordinary. But

:09:21.:09:24.

it is not in your face so people do not say it is a brilliantly directed

:09:25.:09:29.

film but it is. Best male actor. We have talked about Matthew McConaghy

:09:30.:09:34.

a lot. He has gone the opposite way of Liam Neeson. He has gone from

:09:35.:09:39.

someone who you do not want to see the films to someone who is

:09:40.:09:52.

terrific. He is in ten three macro. -- Dallas Buyers' Club. The bookies

:09:53.:10:02.

are backing him to win. And I think he will. I think he has the edge. I

:10:03.:10:09.

suspect in America it will be him. And what about Jared Leto? I suspect

:10:10.:10:19.

that Jared Leto will win for Best supporting actor is at the Oscars.

:10:20.:10:24.

Female? Cate Blanchett, you can put your house on it. Don't actually do

:10:25.:10:29.

that! From the first moment of this film, people said clear Oscar

:10:30.:10:38.

contender. The film is not perfect. It is not Woody Allen's best work

:10:39.:10:42.

but she is Titanic in it. I think she will walk it. Any surprises or

:10:43.:10:50.

breakthroughs? I am still holding out for bar code Abdi winning for

:10:51.:10:55.

Captain Phillips. He was someone who you never see on screen. He's

:10:56.:11:01.

holding his own against Tom Hanks, two-time Oscar winner. It is a very

:11:02.:11:11.

good story. Abdi does a fantastic job. I would love to see him win. I

:11:12.:11:17.

suspect he won't but I would love to. He made something completely

:11:18.:11:24.

unacceptable but you started to have some sympathy. His casting was so

:11:25.:11:28.

important. You had to care for him or the story would not work. You can

:11:29.:11:32.

find more reviews from Mark on his blog. That is it from this week.

:11:33.:11:37.

Thank you for watching and goodbye. Hello. Funny spells for many on

:11:38.:11:53.

Saturday but first thing in the morning it will be a bit wintry --

:11:54.:12:01.

sunny spells. View fog patches moving through the night as

:12:02.:12:02.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS