Bingo the King of the Mornings, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and The Unseen The Film Review


Bingo the King of the Mornings, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and The Unseen

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Bingo the King of the Mornings, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and The Unseen. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

look ahead to the main award on

Sunday in Liverpool as well, and all

0:00:000:00:01

of the weekends Premier League

football. Now on BBC News, it's time

0:00:010:00:04

for the film.

0:00:040:00:15

Hello and welcome to The Film Review

on BBC News. Taking us through this

0:00:240:00:29

weeks cinema releases is Mark

Kermode. What have you been

0:00:290:00:32

watching, Mark?

Very, very

interesting week. We have Bingo: The

0:00:320:00:37

King Of The Mornings, a film about

the dark side of clowning. We have,

0:00:370:00:42

of course, Star Wars: The Last Jedi,

you might have noticed that this is

0:00:420:00:45

opening in cinemas! And a low-key

British! , The Unseen.

Bingo: The

0:00:450:00:55

King Of The Mornings, this is a

really curious looking one?

Very

0:00:550:00:59

interesting one, submitted for the

foreign-language Oscar although it

0:00:590:01:01

has not made it through to the short

list. It comes across as a cross

0:01:010:01:06

between the Chuckle Brothers and the

last third of Goodfellas. It is

0:01:060:01:09

inspired by a real-life story of

eight kids TV icon, this is a

0:01:090:01:14

fictionalised version in which there

is struggling actor who has made his

0:01:140:01:19

name in soft-core sex films and

manages to get a break as bingo,

0:01:190:01:22

this cloud on morning television,

and realises that he may actually

0:01:220:01:26

have found something for which he

can become celebrated and famous.

0:01:260:01:30

The downside is, he is not allowed

to say who he is, he has to be

0:01:300:01:34

completely anonymous, so he is

caught between fame and anonymity.

0:01:340:01:38

However he wants to stretch his

wings and see what he can do with

0:01:380:01:41

the role. Here's a clip.

0:01:410:01:44

Now, you can see from that, it has

got a strange turn to it, it is a

0:02:550:02:59

fantastic performance I Vladimir

Brichta as Bingowhat I like about it

0:02:590:03:04

is that it has a bit of the

backstage madness of live

0:03:040:03:07

television, something like Network.

It also has that sense as in

0:03:070:03:14

Accelerate, in that success goes to

his head, he falls into drink and

0:03:140:03:18

drugs and reckless behaviour, but he

is tortured because he can't tell

0:03:180:03:21

anyone who he is. It becomes that

classic tale of someone who is

0:03:210:03:25

famous in one area and completely

anonymous and another. It is not

0:03:250:03:29

without flaws, there are certain

moments when the drama oversteps

0:03:290:03:32

itself somewhat, but I didn't know

this story at all, it is inspired by

0:03:320:03:36

a true story, and I found it

gripping and weirdly enjoyable, not

0:03:360:03:40

least because there is something...

Amine, clowns are a strange presence

0:03:400:03:44

anyway...

Could go either way!

And

we saw the success of what has now

0:03:440:03:50

become the biggest selling horror

movie of all time. So, this is

0:03:500:03:54

something about different, it is not

entirely successful but when it

0:03:540:03:57

works, it has a kind of crazed

energy, which is down to the central

0:03:570:04:01

performance largely, which is very,

very magnetic.

And apparently there

0:04:010:04:05

is a new Star Wars film out of! They

should do some publicity, really.

0:04:050:04:10

Are you a fan?

To a degree, I lived

with someone who really, really is,

0:04:100:04:18

so it is on the list.

This ticks up

where the last one left off.

0:04:180:04:23

Arriving on the island and she is

looking for her true self. The thing

0:04:230:04:27

with any Star Wars film is that

there is a balancing at.

Light and

0:04:270:04:30

the shade, between the action and

the introspection and also between

0:04:300:04:34

satisfying the fans and the first

timers.

I think that Ryan Johnson

0:04:340:04:39

has done a fantastic job, and Ukip

all the stuff that you want from a

0:04:390:04:44

Star Wars film, the sabre battles,

the deep space explosions, the

0:04:440:04:48

dogfights, but you also get an awful

lot of internal character develop

0:04:480:04:51

and. What I liked most about this is

that it has a number of disparate

0:04:510:04:56

narrative strands, as they all do,

but each character arc is followed

0:04:560:05:00

through properly. It is a film in

which characters do what that

0:05:000:05:04

character would do. It's a film in

which action is character,

0:05:040:05:09

characters are defined not by what

they say but by their actions. Now,

0:05:090:05:13

I saw it with a home crowd, I saw it

at the premiere and in the final act

0:05:130:05:20

of it, people were laughing,

cheering, bursting into spontaneous

0:05:200:05:23

applause. My suspicion is that that

will be marched around the country,

0:05:230:05:28

because it's very well-made, very

confident, there is a little baggy

0:05:280:05:31

nest in it, there is one section

which I think is perhaps somewhat

0:05:310:05:35

overstretched, but I think it works

really well as a film. That said all

0:05:350:05:38

Star Wars films have a divisive

element. And nothing is going to

0:05:380:05:41

satisfy everybody. I have never been

a hard-core Star Wars fan but I did

0:05:410:05:47

enjoy this very much. I thought as a

piece of masterful storytelling in

0:05:470:05:51

which it obeys the rules of the

characters, the characters make

0:05:510:05:56

sense. It may be fantastical and

inventive but the characters make

0:05:560:06:00

sense, and that, for me, is the key.

And does it look fantastic?

Oh, yes,

0:06:000:06:06

it looks fantastic. In a way we sort

of take that for granted. It looks

0:06:060:06:11

really great, but it also feels

really solid. It feels like a

0:06:110:06:15

proper, you know, well-made,

stand-alone film.

That's excellent.

0:06:150:06:21

The Unseen, it is nearly Christmas -

have you brought me another horror

0:06:210:06:25

film, is this what you are doing?

This is a psychological chiller.

0:06:250:06:32

What is the distinction?! Broom

stick with me, this was 12 years in

0:06:320:06:40

development, it is a young couple

who suffered a terrible loss of a

0:06:400:06:43

child and after that, their

relationship is in crisis.

The

0:06:430:06:48

character played by Jasmine Hyde is

having panic attacks, and with those

0:06:480:06:54

panic attacks come strange fits of

blindness. Meanwhile, her partner is

0:06:540:06:58

haunted by the voice of the child.

Here's a clip.

0:06:580:07:03

I hear him.

Where?

In this room. I

hear him.

When?

At night. Sometimes

0:07:090:07:28

during the day. You don't believe

me.

What does he say?

He says he

0:07:280:07:48

loves me...

Now, you were asking

what the difference is between a

0:07:480:07:54

horror film and a chiller. I think

it is a tenuous distension, however,

0:07:540:07:58

it is to do with a sense of

creepiness. In its early stages,

0:07:580:08:02

this film is actually very, very

what a common very well played by

0:08:020:08:06

the central actors. And it has a

real atmosphere of unease, of the

0:08:060:08:10

uncanny, which is very hard to

achieve. I have to say in its later

0:08:100:08:14

stages it kind of loses some of

that, the more the plot starts to

0:08:140:08:19

explain itself, the more mechanical

it becomes and the less it became

0:08:190:08:26

interesting. But for its first

movement, it does establish that

0:08:260:08:28

sense of the cold hand on the back

of the net. The genuinely uncanny

0:08:280:08:32

sense that you're not quite sure

what's going on. You believe in the

0:08:320:08:36

characters, you believe in the

situation. And you share their

0:08:360:08:40

distress. But you also have that

sense we're in is, that sense of

0:08:400:08:44

unease. It's a very flawed film, and

I think overall, as I said, there

0:08:440:08:49

are missteps in the later acts that

let it down. But at the beginning it

0:08:490:08:57

has an atmosphere which I think

validates it, and it is really nice

0:08:570:09:00

to see something like that going up

against a behemoths like Star Wars:

0:09:000:09:06

The Last Jedi. And it's not a horror

film.

OK!

I may be just saying that,

0:09:060:09:11

but it's not a horror film!

Next, of

the rerelease of a classic.

I think

0:09:110:09:18

this is one of the greatest movies

ever made, A Matter Of Life And

0:09:180:09:24

Death. When was the last time you

saw it on a big screen?

When I was

0:09:240:09:29

at university, 300 years ago. I love

that image of wind therein have an,

0:09:290:09:38

looking down.

You need to see it on

the big screen, the idea of having

0:09:380:09:42

the other world as being

black-and-white, and the

0:09:420:09:47

Technicolor, so gorgeous, the

performances are brilliant. And

0:09:470:09:49

every time you see it, it just gets

better and better and better. And

0:09:490:09:53

incidentally, that is a film which

you can view as a fantasy or you can

0:09:530:09:58

view as a psychological, you know,

psychological romance. I would say

0:09:580:10:02

it's not a million miles away

from... I'm trying!

It is fantastic,

0:10:020:10:10

it is wonderful, worth seeing on a

big screen, you make a good point, I

0:10:100:10:14

haven't seen it on a for aeons. On

the smaller screen, DVDs...

Dunkirk.

0:10:140:10:22

Acquired in visit watching it on a

small screen?

I have seen it twice

0:10:220:10:28

on a big IMAX screen and wants on a

television screen, although the

0:10:280:10:30

television screens are now much

bigger. When you see it on a small

0:10:300:10:35

screen, you start to notice things

about the cleverness of the

0:10:350:10:37

structure, the fact that it has

these three interweaving time

0:10:370:10:42

periods and the fact that it into

weaves them so well, sometimes on

0:10:420:10:46

the big screen you're just so

overwhelmed by the spectacle of it,

0:10:460:10:49

don't realise just how smart the

construction of the film is.

0:10:490:10:54

Watching it on a smaller screen you

really admire the narrative... It is

0:10:540:10:58

a simple narrative but it is told in

a way which is really complex and

0:10:580:11:03

really crystalline. And actually I

saw things in it on the small screen

0:11:030:11:06

that I hadn't seen on the big

screen. Yes, the big-screen

0:11:060:11:10

experience is still the primary one

but it does work on the small

0:11:100:11:14

screen, for different reasons.

Mark,

good to see you as ever. Interesting

0:11:140:11:17

week.

0:11:170:11:25

All our previous programmes are on

the BBC iPlayer, of course. Enjoy

0:11:250:11:29

your cinema going! Goodbye!

0:11:290:11:39

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS