I, Daniel Blake; Ouija: Origin of Evil; Queen of Katwe The Film Review


I, Daniel Blake; Ouija: Origin of Evil; Queen of Katwe

Similar Content

Browse content similar to I, Daniel Blake; Ouija: Origin of Evil; Queen of Katwe. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

will look forward to the Grand Prix, and the NFL's LA Rams and New York

:00:00.:00:00.

Giants meet at Twickenham. That is all to come on Sportsday.

:00:00.:00:10.

But now on BBC News it is time for The Film Review.

:00:11.:00:19.

Hello and welcome to The Film Review on BBC News.

:00:20.:00:22.

To take us through this week's cinema releases is Mark Kermode.

:00:23.:00:24.

So, Mark, what do we have this week?

:00:25.:00:29.

We have I, Daniel Blake, which as you know is the new film by Ken

:00:30.:00:33.

Loach which I know you have seen before. Ouija: Origin of Evil, does

:00:34.:00:42.

what it says on the packet. And Queen of Katwe, a very interesting

:00:43.:00:47.

family film. Like they just do not make any more. Who are you talking

:00:48.:00:53.

to? Spirit, can you hear me? I will lay my cards on the table. I think

:00:54.:00:58.

Loach is a genius. Yes, I think he has proved once again he is an

:00:59.:01:04.

incomparable talent. The Wind That Shakes The Barley in 2006. This one

:01:05.:01:10.

star is a 15 a new joiner who has had a heart attack at work, played

:01:11.:01:14.

by Johns, who is told he cannot go back to work by his doctor. At the

:01:15.:01:19.

start of the film see him taking a questionnaire asking if he can walk,

:01:20.:01:23.

move his arm to hold something in his top pocket, and he then scored

:01:24.:01:28.

12 points which means he is not eligible for employment but to get

:01:29.:01:31.

his Jobseeker's Allowance he has to slip in his CV around town, looking

:01:32.:01:35.

for jobs that do not exist and which he cannot take any way because his

:01:36.:01:40.

doctor has told him he cannot work. He cannot manage computers, so he

:01:41.:01:45.

gives up, and he sees single mother, played by Hayley Squires, who has

:01:46.:01:49.

been homeless for two years, giving a home hundreds of miles from anyone

:01:50.:01:53.

she knows and as a result she turns up late and is not being treated,

:01:54.:01:57.

shall we say, compassionately? Here is a clip from the film. I tried to

:01:58.:02:02.

explain to the woman, I have never been to Newcastle before. We just

:02:03.:02:07.

moved up from London, I don't know where I am going. The boss went the

:02:08.:02:11.

wrong way. She just doesn't want to know. What I want you to do is

:02:12.:02:17.

listen carefully. The lady has told you what is right. There are rules

:02:18.:02:21.

here we have to stick to. It is not against you... You have a duty to be

:02:22.:02:27.

here on time. And I am explaining why I wasn't here on time. I got

:02:28.:02:33.

lost. I understand but what I gather is the decision maker will send you

:02:34.:02:36.

a letter through the post. You will have to wait for that... I have

:02:37.:02:41.

about 12 times in my purse all because you cannot down come and

:02:42.:02:43.

listen to people when they talk. Your role -- about 12 quid in my

:02:44.:02:49.

purse. If I was going to create a scene you would know about it. This

:02:50.:02:55.

is ridiculous. Jesus Christ, who is first in this queue? Do you mind if

:02:56.:02:59.

this young lass signs on first? There you go, go back to your desk,

:03:00.:03:04.

let her sign on and do the job the taxpayer pays you for. He is the

:03:05.:03:10.

decision maker! Yes, that phrase, it is terrifying. This is brilliantly

:03:11.:03:16.

written by Paul Laverty, one of my favourite screenwriters. Ken Loach

:03:17.:03:20.

said this is partly about the deliberate use of bureaucratic

:03:21.:03:23.

inefficiency as a political weapon, to basically punish people and stop

:03:24.:03:28.

them from claiming benefits by making things ridiculous. On the one

:03:29.:03:31.

hand it is a very angry film about people at the sharp end of

:03:32.:03:35.

austerity, however it is also and this is overlooked a film which

:03:36.:03:40.

celebrates unbreakable bonds between people at the sharp end. What

:03:41.:03:44.

happens is Daniel Blake takes her under his wing, he is a carpenter,

:03:45.:03:52.

starts to do up her flat, is impressed that she wants to go back

:03:53.:03:55.

to the open University to make something of herself. I think the

:03:56.:03:57.

film is a brilliant balancing act of Kent opposing that compassion with

:03:58.:04:01.

the lack of compassion of the system which demands somebody fills out a

:04:02.:04:04.

form online when they do not have any idea how to use a computer. He

:04:05.:04:09.

has never seen a mouse and when someone says Ron the cursor up the

:04:10.:04:12.

screen, he literally runs at up the side of the screen. It works on a

:04:13.:04:16.

personal level. I have seen it a couple of times now. There is one

:04:17.:04:20.

scene in a food bank which is one of the most profoundly moving things I

:04:21.:04:27.

have ever seen on screen. The great thing about Loach and Paul Laverty

:04:28.:04:30.

together, because they are a great double act, is the find a way of

:04:31.:04:36.

humanising people on the margins of society which goes right back to

:04:37.:04:40.

Cathy Come Home and so on, which makes people who may not be

:04:41.:04:45.

sympathetic, sympathetic. It lets you see the world through their

:04:46.:04:49.

eyes. As I said, the thing that sometimes gets overlooked, it is a

:04:50.:04:56.

kind of absurdist tragic situation, like Kafka, but the bond between

:04:57.:05:00.

them and the way that contrasts with the faithlessness of the situation

:05:01.:05:04.

they are dealing with. You're right. It is a personal story, like all of

:05:05.:05:09.

Loach's stuff, but it is also very political. You come out feeling

:05:10.:05:13.

enraged but saddened. It is also very human. The performances are

:05:14.:05:18.

terrific and you believe in the characters. I think it is a really

:05:19.:05:22.

important film. Any decision makers in Ouija: Origin of Evil? If there

:05:23.:05:27.

are, they are on the other side. A step up from its predecessor. Period

:05:28.:05:32.

setting, 1960s. The story is there is a woman two kids, running a fake

:05:33.:05:40.

seance session, and she is surprised when she gets double-mac Ouija board

:05:41.:05:43.

and is surprised that her daughter is speaking to spirits -- gets a

:05:44.:05:51.

Ouija board. The funny thing about it is although it was digitally

:05:52.:05:54.

projected when I saw it, it has these blemishes built in. Making it

:05:55.:06:01.

look like an old film, this kind of nostalgic retro thing going, which

:06:02.:06:03.

is quite charming and seems to behave quite well in the first half

:06:04.:06:07.

of the film. It loses its nerve in the second half, turning into all

:06:08.:06:14.

that silliness from Poltergeist, Exercised numerically, and also a

:06:15.:06:19.

film called Screamers which nobody remembers any more, I think it owes

:06:20.:06:26.

a debt to that -- Exercised numerically. I wished it could stay

:06:27.:06:33.

that drama from the beginning. You heard the shrieks of enjoyment

:06:34.:06:40.

watching it. The moral is, if you are interested, don't mess around

:06:41.:06:44.

with the spirits. Do not mess around with Ouija board under any

:06:45.:06:48.

circumstance! And Ouija: Origin of Evil? Yes, Phiona Mutesi who grew up

:06:49.:06:56.

in an impoverished area of Kampala was discovered to have a great skill

:06:57.:07:01.

at chess. David Oyelowo things are and thinks this is fantastic and

:07:02.:07:05.

wants to take her away the competition is about which she is

:07:06.:07:14.

very worried. He was a clip. -- away to competitions. Never tip your king

:07:15.:07:25.

so quick. Why not? When you're going to be beaten anyway? Focus on what

:07:26.:07:30.

you have. I do not think you come from here. When I was a child my

:07:31.:07:38.

mother left me. In that moment, I wanted to die. But it was a good

:07:39.:07:42.

thing I did not take my life then, otherwise I would not have seen my

:07:43.:07:48.

daughter, I would not have met them or due. Me?

:07:49.:07:54.

Do not be quick to take your king, Phiona? You must never surrender. A

:07:55.:08:06.

Disney film in mainstream cinemas. Telling a story perhaps you may

:08:07.:08:10.

never have seen before and it does that thing old family films used to

:08:11.:08:14.

do, suitable for everyone, PG rated movie. I think the whole family can

:08:15.:08:19.

get something out of it. Really uplifting, a true story which

:08:20.:08:21.

apparently sticks pretty close to the original story. It has a real

:08:22.:08:26.

sense of location. You feel they are with those characters. It is clearly

:08:27.:08:30.

made with passion, very well directed by Mira Nair who made

:08:31.:08:35.

Salaam Bombay!. I went in with very little expectations and did not know

:08:36.:08:38.

much about the story. And when everyone mentions chess on film, you

:08:39.:08:45.

think... Yes, I can imagine. There have been a few good chess movies

:08:46.:08:49.

but it is a harder sell. This was really vibrant, engaging, and as I

:08:50.:08:54.

said, it is that rarest of things, a family film. From Rocky the Slum Dog

:08:55.:09:01.

Millionaire, will of the underdog. Someone who does really well. Any

:09:02.:09:06.

story of aspiration, very cinematic, but also very easy to make that

:09:07.:09:10.

stuff cheesy, and the real clemency is it is not cheesy but really

:09:11.:09:18.

moving. Your best is American Honey? Yes, her best work I think since Red

:09:19.:09:27.

Road. She is 18, on the road, shot in the old square Academy ratio, and

:09:28.:09:31.

it is the most perfect use of that ratio. It is long, two hours and 40

:09:32.:09:36.

minutes, and I tend to be really picky about long films but it did

:09:37.:09:39.

not feel wrong to me. I think it is a really engaging film. -- did not

:09:40.:09:49.

feel long to me. She makes a certain type of film I think nobody else can

:09:50.:09:53.

make. A fine piece of work. And you were the world's biggest fan of this

:09:54.:10:02.

DVD, Notes On Blindness. Had he seen it? It is based on the audio tape

:10:03.:10:06.

diaries of his compassionate account of losing his sight. -- have you

:10:07.:10:14.

seen it? No. It also develops this kind of soundscape world. I think it

:10:15.:10:18.

is genuinely spiritual, I think it has transcended quality to it. On

:10:19.:10:22.

the one hand it is a love story. On the other, it is a real sort of

:10:23.:10:27.

voyage of exploration, and the greatest compliment to give it is

:10:28.:10:30.

that I cannot think of another film that does what it does in the way it

:10:31.:10:35.

does it. Again, if it is not on my list of top ten films at the end of

:10:36.:10:45.

the year I would very surprised. And he is theologian having to deal

:10:46.:10:47.

with, why does God do this? Why have I gone blind? Yes, and he raises

:10:48.:10:51.

that sort of question and the conclusion he comes to... There are

:10:52.:10:54.

moments of genuine revelation and you hear this on the audio tape. It

:10:55.:11:01.

is superb, Gavin. Believe me. OK, I have to do it. So much good stuff

:11:02.:11:07.

out. Yes, and the weather is getting cold saw a good time to get DVDs!

:11:08.:11:14.

You can see all of The Film Review online including all of our previous

:11:15.:11:18.

shows. That is it from The Film Review and Mark Kermode. Enjoy the

:11:19.:11:22.

movies. Thanks for watching. Goodbye.

:11:23.:11:31.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS