Browse content similar to Wonder Woman, After the Storm and My Life as a Courgette. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Hello and welcome to The Film Review on BBC News. | :00:16. | :00:21. | |
To take us through this week's cinema releases is James King. | :00:22. | :00:23. | |
So, James, what do we have this week? | :00:24. | :00:27. | |
Well, it's a bit of a globetrotting week this week actually. From | :00:28. | :00:36. | |
America, via ancient Greece, we have the new blockbuster, Wonder Woman. | :00:37. | :00:42. | |
And from Japan, the quiet and pensive drama, After the Storm. And | :00:43. | :00:48. | |
from France and Switzerland, stop motion animation, My Life as a | :00:49. | :00:53. | |
Courgette. If nothing else, one of the best titles of the year, isn't | :00:54. | :01:00. | |
it? It certainly is! Intriguing. Let's start off with Wonder Woman, | :01:01. | :01:03. | |
which has had some pretty good reviews, actually? It is getting a | :01:04. | :01:12. | |
good buzz. Last year we had Batman versus Superman, fairly painful | :01:13. | :01:15. | |
experience but she was good in it. And she will be back next year with | :01:16. | :01:19. | |
various other superheroes, but this is her on her own, stand-alone movie | :01:20. | :01:25. | |
directed by Patty Jenkins, and it is an origin story. Where did she come | :01:26. | :01:28. | |
from? She is never referred to as Wonder Woman in the movie, by the | :01:29. | :01:32. | |
way, she is Diana. We learn about her upbringing on this island, from | :01:33. | :01:40. | |
these Amazon warrior women, her involvement in the First World War. | :01:41. | :01:44. | |
This is a clip. Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman, and this is her with | :01:45. | :01:48. | |
Chris Pine, an American pilot and spy who crash lands on this magical | :01:49. | :01:54. | |
island on which she lives, and he was taken prisoner... My name is | :01:55. | :02:10. | |
Captain Steve Trevor, serial number 8141921, and that is all I am at | :02:11. | :02:16. | |
liberty to say... British intelligence. What the hell is this | :02:17. | :02:27. | |
thing? The lassoo compels you to reveal the truth. What is your | :02:28. | :02:33. | |
mission? You are in more danger than you think. What is your mission? I | :02:34. | :02:45. | |
am asked by! I am a spy. I supposed to be used to seeing all of the male | :02:46. | :02:50. | |
superheroes, but this is a female one. Yes, it is refreshing because | :02:51. | :02:54. | |
of that, and a female director with Patty Jenkins as well. But part of | :02:55. | :02:58. | |
the reason I enjoyed this is it feels quite old-fashioned and | :02:59. | :03:01. | |
traditional, and what I mean by that, it has this refreshing lack of | :03:02. | :03:06. | |
cynicism about it. I remember in the 80s and early 90s, blockbusters were | :03:07. | :03:09. | |
not something to be embarrassed about, but full of fun, enjoyment | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
and excitement. This is like that. Some other comic book movies have | :03:16. | :03:21. | |
been pretty cynical and pretty moody and fairly miserable. They have done | :03:22. | :03:25. | |
very well but have not exactly been full of fun. Wonder Woman is fun and | :03:26. | :03:30. | |
feels like a stand-alone movie that does not particularly connect to | :03:31. | :03:36. | |
anything else, to the rest of the DC world that has, shock horror, a | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
beginning, middle and end, and it makes sense! If you have never seen | :03:41. | :03:43. | |
another comic book movie you could watch this and still enjoy it and I | :03:44. | :03:47. | |
think that is why people love it so much. We also have a Japanese film, | :03:48. | :03:53. | |
After the Storm? Yes, written and directed by Hirokazu Koreeda. He is | :03:54. | :04:01. | |
a great film-maker of family dramas. Our Little Sister was one he did a | :04:02. | :04:04. | |
couple of years ago, well worth seeing. It is about a writer who is | :04:05. | :04:09. | |
a bit washed up, in middle age he is struggling to write again and is | :04:10. | :04:13. | |
actually gambling more than writing. He is estranged from his son, his | :04:14. | :04:17. | |
ex-wife, has a difficult relationship with his mother, but | :04:18. | :04:19. | |
they are brought together in his mother's flat one night whilst | :04:20. | :04:24. | |
sheltering from a storm, a tornado. It takes quite a while to get to | :04:25. | :04:28. | |
that point and certainly perhaps for the first half an hour you wonder | :04:29. | :04:31. | |
where it is going, but I actually think that meandering quality it has | :04:32. | :04:35. | |
is ultimately its real power, because it is a film that take | :04:36. | :04:39. | |
things slowly, allows characters to blossom slowly, allows us to get to | :04:40. | :04:44. | |
know them slowly, and it is the antithesis is really of the | :04:45. | :04:47. | |
hyperactive blockbuster. Very much a slow character piece, reminding me a | :04:48. | :04:53. | |
little bit, oddly perhaps, of some Mike Leigh films, that domestic | :04:54. | :04:57. | |
kitchen sink setting, humour and drama. But again the characters... | :04:58. | :05:01. | |
It is a character driven rather than plot driven film, modest definitely, | :05:02. | :05:08. | |
but moving. You mentioned the great title My Life as a Courgette. My | :05:09. | :05:16. | |
Life As A Zucchini, for the American viewers. About a boy said to an | :05:17. | :05:21. | |
orphanage with other orphans his age? Yes, and it did well at the | :05:22. | :05:27. | |
words. To get to that was amazing, because it is small film. French and | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
Swiss, co-production, 66 minutes, really small-scale stuff, so to get | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
Oscar nominated was amazing. Like you said, a boy goes into a foster | :05:38. | :05:41. | |
home. I saw it with subtitles but this is the clip from the dubbed | :05:42. | :05:56. | |
version... How old are you, son? I'm nine. Can you tell me a little bit | :05:57. | :06:05. | |
about your mother? She really liked to drink beer, and her mashed | :06:06. | :06:09. | |
potatoes were always good, and sometimes we had fun. OK... Not | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
always? So where is your father? Here. Mm. It has my dad's beerchic | :06:15. | :06:34. | |
leader chick on it, too. My mum said he always liked chicks. I will put | :06:35. | :06:40. | |
you in a home with people like you, kid to have no mum or dad. Does it | :06:41. | :06:47. | |
work? It does, actually. Heartbreaking, but uplifting. It is | :06:48. | :06:50. | |
not a film about how miserable it is to be in care. There is misery in | :06:51. | :06:54. | |
the film, of course, but ultimately it is about the friendships this | :06:55. | :06:57. | |
character makes. Courgette is his nickname. And why it was a great | :06:58. | :07:02. | |
place for him to go to, so actually it is uplifting. I always think | :07:03. | :07:06. | |
children's movies should have a bit of darkness and pain in there, and | :07:07. | :07:10. | |
it is there but ultimately it is a feel-good movie. And short, as you | :07:11. | :07:16. | |
say, 66 minutes. It packs a lot in. People often complain films are too | :07:17. | :07:20. | |
long, but I wonder if they might complain this is too short? | :07:21. | :07:24. | |
Possibility, because you're paying the same money, but if you are | :07:25. | :07:30. | |
economical with the screenplay, write a great story, you can pack a | :07:31. | :07:33. | |
lot into a short running time. I have seen three-hour films that have | :07:34. | :07:36. | |
a lot less inept than this movie. OK, let's talk about best out at the | :07:37. | :07:40. | |
moment, which I think is The Hippopotamus? Yes, Stephen Fry wrote | :07:41. | :07:43. | |
the book on which this was based and he did a Q that was beamed to a | :07:44. | :07:54. | |
lot of cinemas. The title character is played by Roger Allam, this | :07:55. | :07:58. | |
rotund, boozy, writer and poet, investigating some rather strange | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
goings-on at a stately home, and he is the reason to watch it. Roger | :08:03. | :08:06. | |
Allam is a fantastic actor and has some outrageous lines in this. He is | :08:07. | :08:16. | |
definitely un-PC, but definitely by the end of the movie rather heroic, | :08:17. | :08:19. | |
but some jaw-dropping dialogue, and he is having a whale of a time, this | :08:20. | :08:24. | |
doozy couldn't care less kind of guy, although the film itself, the | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
plot is hardly edge of your seat stuff. It is a movie to watch | :08:29. | :08:33. | |
because of that performance. Mixed reviews, for that, but you would | :08:34. | :08:37. | |
recommend it? Yes, because of that performance, and Stephen Fry, who | :08:38. | :08:42. | |
wrote the book in 904I think, or a gimmick then, he said I like this | :08:43. | :08:45. | |
character so much I want to revisit ten -- he wrote the book in 94 I | :08:46. | :08:54. | |
think. Your best DVD at the moment? Yes, The Founder. This is about the | :08:55. | :09:00. | |
man who turned McDonald's into the huge franchise, the multinational | :09:01. | :09:03. | |
franchise, it is now. It stars Michael Keaton. There was a bit of | :09:04. | :09:08. | |
an Oscar buzz about this one when it was first announced but then a | :09:09. | :09:10. | |
couple of things happened. The release date changed which didn't | :09:11. | :09:14. | |
help things, then people watched the movie and said, Michael Keaton is | :09:15. | :09:17. | |
brilliant, but actually this guy does not seem that likeable or that | :09:18. | :09:21. | |
nice. It got great reviews and I would give it a great review but the | :09:22. | :09:34. | |
problem with this film, do you want to watch two hours about someone who | :09:35. | :09:36. | |
does not seem that likeable person? It is very interesting | :09:37. | :09:38. | |
business-wise, how driven and determined he was to make this | :09:39. | :09:40. | |
restaurant into a huge success, but he is not someone who you will think | :09:41. | :09:43. | |
is a real hero. But people do love success stories and how people | :09:44. | :09:46. | |
create things, like Steve Jobs, that sort of thing? And in that film as | :09:47. | :09:49. | |
well he was not lovable the whole way through, what he? I recommend | :09:50. | :09:53. | |
it. A lot of people missed it in the cinema and I for the small screen. | :09:54. | :10:00. | |
Michael Keegan is back form, of course, after Spotlight and Birdman, | :10:01. | :10:08. | |
great successes, and he can do this, play people who are not clear-cut. | :10:09. | :10:13. | |
Thank you for being with us. That is it for this week. Thank you for | :10:14. | :10:16. | |
watching The Film Review. Goodbye for | :10:17. | :10:17. |