Browse content similar to Episode 5. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Insurance fraud has reached epidemic levels in the UK. | 0:00:05 | 0:00:09 | |
It's costing us more than £1.3 billion every year, | 0:00:09 | 0:00:14 | |
that's almost 3.6 million every day. | 0:00:14 | 0:00:17 | |
Deliberate crashes, bogus personal injuries, | 0:00:19 | 0:00:23 | |
even phantom pets. | 0:00:23 | 0:00:24 | |
The fraudsters are risking more and more | 0:00:26 | 0:00:28 | |
to make a quick killing | 0:00:28 | 0:00:29 | |
and, every year, it's adding around £50 to your insurance bill. | 0:00:29 | 0:00:33 | |
But insurers are fighting back, | 0:00:33 | 0:00:35 | |
exposing just under 15 fake claims every hour. | 0:00:35 | 0:00:39 | |
Armed with covert surveillance systems... | 0:00:39 | 0:00:42 | |
Subject out of vehicle. | 0:00:42 | 0:00:44 | |
..sophisticated data analysis techniques... | 0:00:44 | 0:00:47 | |
..and a number of highly skilled police units... | 0:00:49 | 0:00:51 | |
Police! Don't move. Stay where you are. | 0:00:51 | 0:00:53 | |
..they're catching criminals red-handed. | 0:00:53 | 0:00:55 | |
Just don't lie to us! | 0:00:55 | 0:00:57 | |
All those conmen, scammers, and cheats on the fiddle | 0:00:57 | 0:01:01 | |
are now caught in the act and claimed and shamed. | 0:01:01 | 0:01:04 | |
A pedestrian's claim | 0:01:10 | 0:01:11 | |
that he was clipped by a car wing mirror. | 0:01:11 | 0:01:14 | |
is caught on camera. | 0:01:14 | 0:01:16 | |
What we decided to do was take a look at the CCTV footage | 0:01:16 | 0:01:19 | |
from lots of different angles, | 0:01:19 | 0:01:20 | |
just to make sure that we hadn't missed the impact. | 0:01:20 | 0:01:23 | |
But it was nowhere to be found. | 0:01:23 | 0:01:26 | |
A man claiming he's too injured to work | 0:01:26 | 0:01:29 | |
appears to be fighting fit. | 0:01:29 | 0:01:31 | |
They were able to find video evidence of a claimant | 0:01:31 | 0:01:35 | |
fighting in a kick-boxing competition, | 0:01:35 | 0:01:38 | |
only five weeks after the accident. | 0:01:38 | 0:01:40 | |
And, in America, a father confesses to killing his son | 0:01:40 | 0:01:44 | |
in a shocking life insurance scam. | 0:01:44 | 0:01:47 | |
Now, if any aspect of an insurance claim is falsified, | 0:02:05 | 0:02:08 | |
then that's fraud. | 0:02:08 | 0:02:09 | |
Pretty straightforward, you'd reckon. | 0:02:09 | 0:02:11 | |
While scammers often think that providing fake details | 0:02:11 | 0:02:14 | |
to allow an innocent third party to make a claim will protect them | 0:02:14 | 0:02:18 | |
but they're wrong | 0:02:18 | 0:02:20 | |
because it is still fraud, pure and simple, | 0:02:20 | 0:02:22 | |
and insurers will pursue these cheats at all costs. | 0:02:22 | 0:02:26 | |
Whether you are hiring a car, bike, or cement-mixer, | 0:02:27 | 0:02:31 | |
these things will all be covered by insurance, should anything happen. | 0:02:31 | 0:02:35 | |
Scott Clayton is a fraud and investigations manager for Zurich, | 0:02:37 | 0:02:41 | |
and it's his job to deal with suspicious claims. | 0:02:41 | 0:02:44 | |
He was asked to review one case | 0:02:44 | 0:02:46 | |
where a hire company had leased professional camera equipment | 0:02:46 | 0:02:49 | |
to a customer travelling abroad to make a movie. | 0:02:49 | 0:02:52 | |
The claim we got was that Mr Kakaie | 0:02:55 | 0:02:57 | |
had put this video equipment into four holdalls | 0:02:57 | 0:03:01 | |
and checked them in on a flight from Aberdeen to Istanbul, via Heathrow, | 0:03:01 | 0:03:05 | |
and the bags had been lost somewhere in transit between the two places. | 0:03:05 | 0:03:09 | |
The value was quite significant | 0:03:09 | 0:03:11 | |
because it was very expensive camera equipment. | 0:03:11 | 0:03:13 | |
So, in total, it was approximately £189,000. | 0:03:13 | 0:03:16 | |
With such a massive loss, all eyes were on the airline. | 0:03:16 | 0:03:20 | |
However, lost luggage isn't unheard of. | 0:03:20 | 0:03:23 | |
It does usually turn up somewhere. | 0:03:23 | 0:03:26 | |
It's not very often that you get a suggestion that bags | 0:03:26 | 0:03:30 | |
have been completely lost, | 0:03:30 | 0:03:31 | |
with all the technology the airlines have tracking bags, etc, | 0:03:31 | 0:03:35 | |
so to suggest that four bags were lost between these airports | 0:03:35 | 0:03:39 | |
was quite suspicious, in its own right. | 0:03:39 | 0:03:42 | |
So, obviously, that prompted the investigation. | 0:03:42 | 0:03:45 | |
And there was one very obvious first port of call | 0:03:45 | 0:03:48 | |
for Scott's investigation. | 0:03:48 | 0:03:50 | |
We took steps to contact the airline because, | 0:03:50 | 0:03:53 | |
with the technology the airlines have these days | 0:03:53 | 0:03:55 | |
tracking bags through airports, | 0:03:55 | 0:03:57 | |
we wanted to find out exactly what records they had. | 0:03:57 | 0:03:59 | |
And as it turned out, the airline in question | 0:03:59 | 0:04:02 | |
was able to provide some very revealing information. | 0:04:02 | 0:04:06 | |
We were pleasantly surprised to learn | 0:04:06 | 0:04:08 | |
that the bags had actually been X-rayed | 0:04:08 | 0:04:10 | |
as they passed through the airport. | 0:04:10 | 0:04:11 | |
So, the images were clearly of significant interest to us. | 0:04:11 | 0:04:14 | |
But no-one could have predicted what these X-rays would - | 0:04:14 | 0:04:18 | |
or rather would not - show. | 0:04:18 | 0:04:20 | |
We were quite shocked to see that, instead of having £189,000 worth | 0:04:20 | 0:04:23 | |
of camera equipment, they had nothing in them. | 0:04:23 | 0:04:26 | |
This was crucial evidence, | 0:04:28 | 0:04:30 | |
as it competently disproved Kakaie's account, | 0:04:30 | 0:04:32 | |
which stated the camera equipment | 0:04:32 | 0:04:34 | |
had been checked in at the airport to begin with, | 0:04:34 | 0:04:37 | |
and strongly suggested foul play. | 0:04:37 | 0:04:40 | |
At this point, we're thinking | 0:04:40 | 0:04:42 | |
this is clearly somebody who's tried to claim that | 0:04:42 | 0:04:45 | |
he's lost all this camera equipment, | 0:04:45 | 0:04:47 | |
when he's probably kept it for himself | 0:04:47 | 0:04:49 | |
and even used it, sold it, whatever. | 0:04:49 | 0:04:51 | |
So it was a fraud. | 0:04:51 | 0:04:53 | |
And we were obviously keen to get the bottom of it. | 0:04:53 | 0:04:55 | |
At this point, it was looking likely that Kakaie had submitted | 0:04:55 | 0:04:59 | |
a completely made-up insurance claim to the hire company | 0:04:59 | 0:05:02 | |
in order to steal the camera equipment he had hired. | 0:05:02 | 0:05:05 | |
Clearly, when we got the X-ray images | 0:05:05 | 0:05:08 | |
showing that the bags were empty, this was the gotcha moment, | 0:05:08 | 0:05:11 | |
because the evidence was compelling and, armed with that, | 0:05:11 | 0:05:14 | |
we could then look to refer the matter to the police. | 0:05:14 | 0:05:17 | |
The case was passed on to the City of London Police's | 0:05:18 | 0:05:21 | |
Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department, | 0:05:21 | 0:05:23 | |
where it was handled by DCI Oliver Little and his team. | 0:05:23 | 0:05:27 | |
When we received the case, it was clear to us | 0:05:27 | 0:05:29 | |
that what we needed to do was go and see Mr Kakaie, | 0:05:29 | 0:05:32 | |
get his account, and find out if there's any property | 0:05:32 | 0:05:35 | |
linking him to that missing equipment at his home address. | 0:05:35 | 0:05:39 | |
Armed with a search warrant, IFED detectives paid Mr Kakaie a visit. | 0:05:39 | 0:05:44 | |
When we got to Mr Kakaie's address, we did a thorough search. | 0:05:44 | 0:05:48 | |
We were able to find five of the batteries of the cameras | 0:05:48 | 0:05:52 | |
that were supposedly stolen during this theft. | 0:05:52 | 0:05:55 | |
It was the hard evidence that detectives were hoping to find. | 0:05:55 | 0:05:59 | |
Kakaie was arrested and charged with theft | 0:05:59 | 0:06:02 | |
and fraud by false representation. | 0:06:02 | 0:06:05 | |
But when he was questioned, he refused to deviate from his script. | 0:06:05 | 0:06:09 | |
We interviewed Mr Kakaie on two occasions. | 0:06:10 | 0:06:13 | |
On the first occasion, he stuck to his version of events. | 0:06:13 | 0:06:16 | |
He put the items in the bags, as described, and they'd been stolen. | 0:06:16 | 0:06:21 | |
On the second interview, faced with the overwhelming evidence, | 0:06:21 | 0:06:24 | |
he didn't cooperate, he didn't speak, he just turned around. | 0:06:24 | 0:06:27 | |
His sudden stage fright would do him no good | 0:06:27 | 0:06:30 | |
as, by this point, IFED detectives | 0:06:30 | 0:06:32 | |
had secured all the proof they needed | 0:06:32 | 0:06:34 | |
that Kakaie was starring in his own criminal caper. | 0:06:34 | 0:06:38 | |
Taking all the evidence into account, | 0:06:38 | 0:06:41 | |
it was quite clear that Mr Kakaie had attempted | 0:06:41 | 0:06:44 | |
a fairly major fraud here. | 0:06:44 | 0:06:46 | |
He was after well over £100,000 for this camera equipment. | 0:06:46 | 0:06:49 | |
So, we put that through to the Crown Prosecution Service | 0:06:49 | 0:06:53 | |
and prosecuted him in the court. | 0:06:53 | 0:06:54 | |
The case proceeded to trial at the Old Bailey. | 0:06:54 | 0:06:58 | |
Taking it all together, | 0:06:58 | 0:07:00 | |
the evidence we presented to the court was compelling. | 0:07:00 | 0:07:03 | |
We had some of the items that he reported as being stolen | 0:07:03 | 0:07:06 | |
in his home address, | 0:07:06 | 0:07:08 | |
and his account of how they had moved | 0:07:08 | 0:07:11 | |
through the airports just wasn't true. | 0:07:11 | 0:07:14 | |
The evidence of the scanner was a critical part of the case. | 0:07:14 | 0:07:17 | |
After a six-day trial, Kakaie was found guilty | 0:07:19 | 0:07:22 | |
of two counts of fraud by false representation | 0:07:22 | 0:07:25 | |
and one count of theft. | 0:07:25 | 0:07:26 | |
And the penalty for his crimes would be severe. | 0:07:26 | 0:07:30 | |
After trial, at which Mr Kakaie | 0:07:30 | 0:07:32 | |
again tried to protest his innocence, he was found guilty | 0:07:32 | 0:07:35 | |
and convicted to a sentence of imprisonment for two years. | 0:07:35 | 0:07:39 | |
A hefty punishment for this movie-making fraudster, | 0:07:41 | 0:07:44 | |
which may have been reduced if he'd come clean. | 0:07:44 | 0:07:46 | |
I think the level of sentence reflects the amount of money | 0:07:46 | 0:07:50 | |
that he was trying to defraud, so the greed of Mr Kakaie, | 0:07:50 | 0:07:53 | |
and the fact that he never, ever admitted | 0:07:53 | 0:07:56 | |
that what he'd done had been wrong. | 0:07:56 | 0:07:58 | |
He never held his hands up. He kept sticking to his story. | 0:07:58 | 0:08:01 | |
This was a brazen attempt at fraud and, like so many others, | 0:08:01 | 0:08:04 | |
it's got them absolutely nowhere but in prison. | 0:08:04 | 0:08:07 | |
Still to come, | 0:08:14 | 0:08:16 | |
a woman secretly records her husband in an attempt | 0:08:16 | 0:08:19 | |
to get the truth about her son's death. | 0:08:19 | 0:08:21 | |
Now, we've all had near misses, | 0:08:41 | 0:08:42 | |
whether it's not looking before crossing a road, | 0:08:42 | 0:08:45 | |
or using quick reflexes to avoid a falling object. | 0:08:45 | 0:08:48 | |
While most of us are just relieved to be unscathed, | 0:08:48 | 0:08:51 | |
there are some people who see a near miss | 0:08:51 | 0:08:53 | |
as a chance to collect a juicy pay-out they don't deserve. | 0:08:53 | 0:08:58 | |
Cars, buses, trains, cyclists, angry dogs and rogue runners | 0:08:59 | 0:09:05 | |
are just a few everyday hazards that could cause you harm | 0:09:05 | 0:09:09 | |
if you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. | 0:09:09 | 0:09:13 | |
BLM lawyer Sarah Hill, instructed by insurers Direct Line | 0:09:13 | 0:09:17 | |
to handle one personal injury case that appeared legitimate. | 0:09:17 | 0:09:21 | |
The circumstances surrounding the claim was that | 0:09:21 | 0:09:24 | |
the policyholder was leaving his employment | 0:09:24 | 0:09:27 | |
and he was on his way out of the business park in his vehicle | 0:09:27 | 0:09:30 | |
when he came across an obstacle. | 0:09:30 | 0:09:33 | |
There was a car with a pedestrian by the side of it, | 0:09:33 | 0:09:36 | |
another employee, | 0:09:36 | 0:09:37 | |
and the driver had to overtake to pass him to leave. | 0:09:37 | 0:09:41 | |
This doesn't sound good. | 0:09:42 | 0:09:44 | |
In doing so, it's alleged that he didn't leave enough room | 0:09:44 | 0:09:48 | |
between his vehicle and the pedestrian, and that his | 0:09:48 | 0:09:52 | |
wing mirror clipped the lower back of the pedestrian, | 0:09:52 | 0:09:55 | |
causing him injury. | 0:09:55 | 0:09:57 | |
The claim in total was around about £18,000. | 0:09:57 | 0:10:01 | |
It may have just been the car's wing mirror, | 0:10:01 | 0:10:03 | |
but it had clipped the claimant good and proper. | 0:10:03 | 0:10:06 | |
The injuries were serious enough for him to say that it impacted upon his | 0:10:06 | 0:10:11 | |
life for a period of seven months, and for four months in particular, | 0:10:11 | 0:10:14 | |
he was unable to do anything that was normal | 0:10:14 | 0:10:17 | |
in his life, such as gardening or going to the gym | 0:10:17 | 0:10:21 | |
or even undertaking his normal working duties. | 0:10:21 | 0:10:24 | |
The report suggested this claimant had really been through it, | 0:10:24 | 0:10:28 | |
but any sympathy for his case would soon disappear. | 0:10:28 | 0:10:31 | |
On the surface, it looked like a genuine claim, | 0:10:31 | 0:10:35 | |
that is until evidence started to come in. | 0:10:35 | 0:10:38 | |
A crucial piece of evidence that we obtained was | 0:10:40 | 0:10:42 | |
a copy of the CCTV footage for the business park. | 0:10:42 | 0:10:46 | |
Clearly, what you can see from the CCTV footage is that there was | 0:10:46 | 0:10:50 | |
no impact between the wing mirror and the lower back, | 0:10:50 | 0:10:53 | |
and there actually was enough room between the two, | 0:10:53 | 0:10:56 | |
and the claimant was clear of any overtaking manoeuvre. | 0:10:56 | 0:11:00 | |
Yeah, not the faintest of feather touches, but let's double-check. | 0:11:01 | 0:11:05 | |
We were quite surprised, actually. | 0:11:08 | 0:11:11 | |
What we decided to do was take a look at the CCTV footage from | 0:11:11 | 0:11:15 | |
lots of different angles just to make sure that we hadn't missed... | 0:11:15 | 0:11:18 | |
erm, the impact. But it was nowhere to be found. | 0:11:18 | 0:11:22 | |
It may have been close, | 0:11:22 | 0:11:24 | |
but the claimant's roadside shimmy had saved him. | 0:11:24 | 0:11:28 | |
And how would you expect someone who's just been hit by a car | 0:11:28 | 0:11:30 | |
to be feeling? | 0:11:30 | 0:11:32 | |
Rather bizarrely, the claimant, A, doesn't hold his back, | 0:11:32 | 0:11:35 | |
doesn't look as if there's been any impact, | 0:11:35 | 0:11:38 | |
he's certainly not crying | 0:11:38 | 0:11:39 | |
and he's walked away from the vehicle smiling. | 0:11:39 | 0:11:44 | |
But what about the claimant's reported injuries | 0:11:44 | 0:11:47 | |
and chronic pain? | 0:11:47 | 0:11:49 | |
He went to see a physiotherapist 12 days after the alleged impact | 0:11:49 | 0:11:54 | |
and he told the physiotherapist | 0:11:54 | 0:11:56 | |
that he was well, that his movement was fine. | 0:11:56 | 0:12:00 | |
The physiotherapist couldn't see any sign of injury in the lower back, | 0:12:00 | 0:12:04 | |
in the lumbar spine, | 0:12:04 | 0:12:05 | |
yet that completely conflicted with what he told the medical expert. | 0:12:05 | 0:12:09 | |
Miraculous... | 0:12:09 | 0:12:11 | |
considering he'd alleged to have suffered for seven months | 0:12:11 | 0:12:14 | |
following the accident. | 0:12:14 | 0:12:16 | |
Given the weight of evidence, the claim was repudiated. | 0:12:16 | 0:12:19 | |
What happened next was that the claimant issued legal proceedings, | 0:12:19 | 0:12:24 | |
which was quite a surprise, | 0:12:24 | 0:12:26 | |
given that the claimant had actually seen the CCTV footage at this stage. | 0:12:26 | 0:12:31 | |
But even conclusive video evidence wouldn't deter this claimant. | 0:12:31 | 0:12:35 | |
With all the evidence, the claimant decided to try his luck in court | 0:12:35 | 0:12:41 | |
and present his evidence to a judge. | 0:12:41 | 0:12:43 | |
He upheld the fact that, actually, there hadn't been an impact | 0:12:43 | 0:12:48 | |
and that the claimant hadn't told the truth | 0:12:48 | 0:12:50 | |
through the course of the proceedings. | 0:12:50 | 0:12:52 | |
The claimant may have had a near miss with the wing mirror, | 0:12:52 | 0:12:55 | |
but he would regret his brush with the law. | 0:12:55 | 0:12:58 | |
The outcome was the judge dismissed the claim on the basis that he found | 0:12:58 | 0:13:01 | |
that no impact had occurred, so no injury could've been sustained | 0:13:01 | 0:13:05 | |
and to penalise the claimant, the claimant was ordered to pay costs. | 0:13:05 | 0:13:10 | |
He's now facing a hefty bill of nearly £12,000 for his efforts. | 0:13:10 | 0:13:16 | |
And despite Sarah's experience, | 0:13:16 | 0:13:18 | |
she's still amazed by the behaviour of insurance chancers. | 0:13:18 | 0:13:23 | |
I am surprised at the extent and the level and the nature that | 0:13:23 | 0:13:28 | |
people will go to, in light of really strong evidence, | 0:13:28 | 0:13:32 | |
still to progress what in fact is a lie. | 0:13:32 | 0:13:35 | |
Now, if you've ever had an accident, | 0:13:40 | 0:13:42 | |
you may have been contacted by a claims management company | 0:13:42 | 0:13:45 | |
telling you that you're entitled to compensation and that making | 0:13:45 | 0:13:48 | |
a personal injury claim is easy and hassle free. | 0:13:48 | 0:13:51 | |
What they might not tell you is that making | 0:13:51 | 0:13:53 | |
a false or exaggerated claim is fraud, | 0:13:53 | 0:13:56 | |
and if your case is found to be bogus in any way, | 0:13:56 | 0:13:59 | |
then you alone are 100% responsible. | 0:13:59 | 0:14:02 | |
The days of submitting a cheeky whiplash claim for | 0:14:05 | 0:14:07 | |
a guaranteed pay-out are long gone, as insurance companies like Esure | 0:14:07 | 0:14:11 | |
now have a zero-tolerance attitude towards this type of activity. | 0:14:11 | 0:14:16 | |
Any suspicious claim received by Esure is investigated | 0:14:16 | 0:14:20 | |
and, if need be, referred to a specialist insurance law firm, | 0:14:20 | 0:14:24 | |
Horwich Farrelly. | 0:14:24 | 0:14:26 | |
Partner Ronan McCann recently handled an all-too-common case. | 0:14:26 | 0:14:30 | |
This was a claim for a personal injury | 0:14:30 | 0:14:33 | |
as a result of a road traffic accident, | 0:14:33 | 0:14:35 | |
so roughly £2,000. There was also a claim for vehicle repairs, | 0:14:35 | 0:14:40 | |
which cost around £500. | 0:14:40 | 0:14:43 | |
And it was Esure's policyholder who was at fault in one of the | 0:14:43 | 0:14:47 | |
most everyday accident scenarios on the road. | 0:14:47 | 0:14:51 | |
The circumstances to this accident was that it was after work. | 0:14:51 | 0:14:56 | |
The defendant was travelling home. | 0:14:56 | 0:14:58 | |
In front of him, in very heavy traffic, was a claimant. | 0:14:58 | 0:15:02 | |
No prizes for guessing where this is going. | 0:15:02 | 0:15:05 | |
The defendant assumed the claimant was going to move forward | 0:15:05 | 0:15:09 | |
and he moved off at very low speed. | 0:15:09 | 0:15:12 | |
Unfortunately, the claimant didn't move, | 0:15:12 | 0:15:15 | |
and there was a slight kissing of the vehicles. | 0:15:15 | 0:15:18 | |
And this coming together really was a fleeting peck | 0:15:20 | 0:15:23 | |
on the claimant's rear end. | 0:15:23 | 0:15:24 | |
This accident was the most minor of impacts. | 0:15:24 | 0:15:27 | |
The defendant described it as a "touching of the vehicles". | 0:15:27 | 0:15:32 | |
The damages to both cars might have been minor, | 0:15:32 | 0:15:34 | |
but the same couldn't be said for the claimant. | 0:15:34 | 0:15:38 | |
The allegation from the claimant was that he sustained | 0:15:38 | 0:15:40 | |
a whiplash-type injury to his neck lasting four months. | 0:15:40 | 0:15:44 | |
And the claimant's first port of call after the accident | 0:15:48 | 0:15:51 | |
wasn't where you might expect. | 0:15:51 | 0:15:53 | |
The chronology after the accident was suspicious. | 0:15:53 | 0:15:58 | |
The claimant did not first attend upon his GP | 0:15:58 | 0:16:01 | |
to complain about his injuries | 0:16:01 | 0:16:03 | |
but instead went first to see solicitors to pursue | 0:16:03 | 0:16:07 | |
a personal injury claim. | 0:16:07 | 0:16:09 | |
So it seemed as if the claimant had money on his mind | 0:16:09 | 0:16:12 | |
rather than his health. | 0:16:12 | 0:16:14 | |
This immediately rang alarm bells. | 0:16:14 | 0:16:16 | |
Why would anybody first attend upon solicitors | 0:16:16 | 0:16:19 | |
to pursue a personal injury claim as opposed to attending | 0:16:19 | 0:16:23 | |
upon a GP to get their treatment for their injuries? | 0:16:23 | 0:16:28 | |
Good question, especially when you consider this guy's hobby. | 0:16:28 | 0:16:33 | |
The claimant, who was a keen amateur kick boxer, | 0:16:33 | 0:16:37 | |
suggested that he couldn't partake in any sports | 0:16:37 | 0:16:40 | |
during the period that he was injured. | 0:16:40 | 0:16:44 | |
Well, that's a given. Or so you'd think. | 0:16:44 | 0:16:47 | |
But the claimant's bid for compensation was about to take | 0:16:47 | 0:16:49 | |
a real body blow as Esure did some digging online. | 0:16:49 | 0:16:53 | |
They were able to find video evidence of the claimant | 0:16:53 | 0:16:57 | |
fighting in a kick boxing competition | 0:16:57 | 0:17:00 | |
only five weeks after the accident. | 0:17:00 | 0:17:03 | |
This showed the claimant taking kicks and punches to the head | 0:17:03 | 0:17:07 | |
and for Esure, this clearly suggested to them | 0:17:07 | 0:17:10 | |
that it was a fraudulent claim. | 0:17:10 | 0:17:12 | |
A quite amazing feat, considering the claimant | 0:17:13 | 0:17:16 | |
was reportedly suffering with chronic neck pain | 0:17:16 | 0:17:19 | |
as a result of the accident. | 0:17:19 | 0:17:21 | |
Only two weeks before the fight, | 0:17:23 | 0:17:25 | |
the claimant had attended upon a medical legal practitioner | 0:17:25 | 0:17:28 | |
and described that he was suffering from severe injuries. | 0:17:28 | 0:17:33 | |
In no way could somebody with severe injuries to the neck | 0:17:33 | 0:17:37 | |
take part in such a kick boxing fight. | 0:17:37 | 0:17:39 | |
Well, considering it's one of the most ferocious forms | 0:17:39 | 0:17:43 | |
of fighting, you'd assume not. | 0:17:43 | 0:17:45 | |
When the medical records were reviewed, | 0:17:45 | 0:17:48 | |
it seemed completely inconsistent that the claimant first | 0:17:48 | 0:17:52 | |
mentioned to the GP initially that his only injuries were to his neck. | 0:17:52 | 0:17:58 | |
It seemed to us that he invented the suggestion that his head | 0:17:58 | 0:18:03 | |
and knee injuries were as a result of the road traffic accident. | 0:18:03 | 0:18:08 | |
Ronan's team had all the evidence they needed to take action. | 0:18:08 | 0:18:12 | |
As a result, we took the view that we would disclose the video footage | 0:18:12 | 0:18:16 | |
and invite the claimant to discontinue. | 0:18:16 | 0:18:19 | |
But instead of throwing in the towel, | 0:18:19 | 0:18:21 | |
the claimant opted to go toe to toe with Horwich Farrelly in court. | 0:18:21 | 0:18:26 | |
When this case got to trial, the video footage was crucial. | 0:18:26 | 0:18:31 | |
When that was considered by the judge against | 0:18:31 | 0:18:34 | |
the inconsistencies in the chronology, in the evidence, | 0:18:34 | 0:18:37 | |
the judge could not accept a word that the claimant had said. | 0:18:37 | 0:18:41 | |
And when it came to deciding a verdict, | 0:18:41 | 0:18:44 | |
the decision didn't take long. | 0:18:44 | 0:18:46 | |
The judge dismissed the claimant's case | 0:18:46 | 0:18:49 | |
and looked at the video evidence and commented that the claimant | 0:18:49 | 0:18:53 | |
looked perfectly fit and healthy. | 0:18:53 | 0:18:55 | |
The judge found that the claimant was fundamentally dishonest, | 0:18:55 | 0:18:59 | |
and was ordered to pay approximately £8,000. | 0:18:59 | 0:19:03 | |
The kickboxer's claim had hit the canvas | 0:19:04 | 0:19:07 | |
and he'd ended up with a whopping court bill | 0:19:07 | 0:19:10 | |
for both solicitors' costs. | 0:19:10 | 0:19:12 | |
In my view, these individuals are convinced to bring claims | 0:19:12 | 0:19:17 | |
by accident management companies or claimant solicitors | 0:19:17 | 0:19:21 | |
who explain to them that they are extremely straightforward. | 0:19:21 | 0:19:24 | |
The result in this case shows the risks of anyone who believes that. | 0:19:24 | 0:19:29 | |
Although, the claimant in this case has a significant cost order, | 0:19:29 | 0:19:33 | |
he was very lucky that he didn't spend some time in prison. | 0:19:33 | 0:19:37 | |
We've all seen how far UK scammers will go to collect | 0:19:42 | 0:19:45 | |
an insurance pay-out, but fraudsters are an international problem. | 0:19:45 | 0:19:49 | |
In fact, our American cousins have it just as bad, with cases | 0:19:49 | 0:19:53 | |
that will shock you to your very core. | 0:19:53 | 0:19:57 | |
The rural farming town of Varick in Upstate New York | 0:20:04 | 0:20:07 | |
was home to the Karlsen family farm. | 0:20:07 | 0:20:09 | |
In 2008, 23-year-old Levi | 0:20:11 | 0:20:13 | |
was fixing his father's pick-up truck in the barn | 0:20:13 | 0:20:17 | |
when something went horribly wrong. | 0:20:17 | 0:20:21 | |
Tragically, Levi had been killed. | 0:20:51 | 0:20:54 | |
Father Karl and stepmother Cindy | 0:20:55 | 0:20:58 | |
had left Levi working alone earlier that day. | 0:20:58 | 0:21:01 | |
It appeared that he'd been trapped underneath the truck for hours. | 0:21:01 | 0:21:06 | |
At the time, investigators determined the event | 0:21:08 | 0:21:11 | |
just to be an awful accident. | 0:21:11 | 0:21:14 | |
That was until an anonymous family member contacted the police | 0:21:14 | 0:21:18 | |
with an unbelievable allegation. | 0:21:18 | 0:21:20 | |
They claimed Levi's death was no accident | 0:21:22 | 0:21:25 | |
and that he was the victim of a ruthless insurance fraud | 0:21:25 | 0:21:29 | |
perpetrated by his own father. | 0:21:29 | 0:21:33 | |
It was alleged Karl Karlsen had engineered Levi's fatal | 0:21:38 | 0:21:41 | |
accident in a plot to cash in on his son's life insurance policy. | 0:21:41 | 0:21:45 | |
As a result of this call, | 0:21:45 | 0:21:48 | |
the sheriff's office reopened the investigation into Levi's death. | 0:21:48 | 0:21:52 | |
Investigations revealed that Karl had persuaded Levi to take out | 0:21:54 | 0:21:58 | |
a life insurance policy worth 700,000 just 17 days | 0:21:58 | 0:22:03 | |
before his son's death. | 0:22:03 | 0:22:05 | |
Karl had also convinced Levi not to disclose a serious throat | 0:22:05 | 0:22:09 | |
condition he suffered from in fear that the policy might be rejected, | 0:22:09 | 0:22:14 | |
meaning this 700,000 insurance policy | 0:22:14 | 0:22:17 | |
had been obtained fraudulently. | 0:22:17 | 0:22:20 | |
Karlsen came under further suspicion as he had also persuaded Levi | 0:22:22 | 0:22:26 | |
to write a will on the morning of the day he died, making his | 0:22:26 | 0:22:29 | |
father the sole beneficiary of his life insurance policy. | 0:22:29 | 0:22:33 | |
Investigators were convinced that this was far more than coincidence | 0:22:33 | 0:22:38 | |
but as compelling as it was, the evidence was circumstantial. | 0:22:38 | 0:22:42 | |
They would need further proof. | 0:22:42 | 0:22:44 | |
So detectives turned to Karl's wife | 0:22:44 | 0:22:47 | |
and Levi's stepmother, Cindy Karlsen. | 0:22:47 | 0:22:50 | |
In 2012, Cindy was contacted by investigators. | 0:22:52 | 0:22:56 | |
To their surprise, she also had growing suspicions | 0:22:56 | 0:22:59 | |
that Levi's death was no accident. Six months after Levi's death, | 0:22:59 | 0:23:04 | |
Karlsen received over 700,000 from the life insurance policy. | 0:23:04 | 0:23:09 | |
Cindy explained how her husband went on a cash-feeding frenzy | 0:23:09 | 0:23:13 | |
as soon as he had the money. | 0:23:13 | 0:23:15 | |
Cindy hired a private investigator to dig into her husband's life. | 0:23:15 | 0:23:20 | |
The PI discovered a terrifying fact. | 0:23:20 | 0:23:23 | |
Without her knowledge, Karl had taken out various insurance | 0:23:25 | 0:23:28 | |
policies, which meant that in the event of Cindy's death, Karlsen | 0:23:28 | 0:23:33 | |
would be the sole beneficiary of assets and pay-outs | 0:23:33 | 0:23:36 | |
totalling 1.2 million. | 0:23:36 | 0:23:39 | |
Worried for her own life, | 0:23:41 | 0:23:43 | |
Cindy left Karlsen and they were officially separated. | 0:23:43 | 0:23:47 | |
However, Cindy agreed to co-operate with investigators and wear | 0:23:47 | 0:23:51 | |
a wire in the hope she could record her husband | 0:23:51 | 0:23:54 | |
confirming suspicions about Levi's death. | 0:23:54 | 0:23:57 | |
She arranged to meet Karl in a diner under the guise | 0:23:58 | 0:24:01 | |
of reconciling their marriage. | 0:24:01 | 0:24:04 | |
Remember, Karl previously claimed | 0:24:25 | 0:24:27 | |
to have had no knowledge of the accident | 0:24:27 | 0:24:30 | |
until he returned home with Cindy to find Levi underneath the truck. | 0:24:30 | 0:24:34 | |
He has just admitted he was present during his death. | 0:24:34 | 0:24:39 | |
The conversation Cindy covertly recorded | 0:24:54 | 0:24:58 | |
was far from a full confession but Karlsen did admit | 0:24:58 | 0:25:01 | |
he was there and in fact caused the alleged accident, | 0:25:01 | 0:25:05 | |
which contradicted everything he'd said to date. | 0:25:05 | 0:25:08 | |
Investigators now had all they needed to arrest | 0:25:08 | 0:25:11 | |
and interrogate Karl Karlsen. | 0:25:11 | 0:25:13 | |
Karlsen was interviewed for over nine hours, | 0:25:13 | 0:25:17 | |
in which he repeatedly denied planning to kill his son. | 0:25:17 | 0:25:21 | |
Initially, Karlsen stuck to his original story - | 0:25:34 | 0:25:37 | |
that he had returned home with his wife and found his son dead. | 0:25:37 | 0:25:42 | |
He then admits that he was there and, in fact, | 0:25:42 | 0:25:45 | |
caused the truck to fall on Levi. | 0:25:45 | 0:25:47 | |
Karlsen maintains this was a genuine accident | 0:26:00 | 0:26:03 | |
and due to the shock, | 0:26:03 | 0:26:05 | |
he was overwhelmed and was unable to help his trapped son. | 0:26:05 | 0:26:09 | |
While Karlsen acknowledged being responsible | 0:26:36 | 0:26:39 | |
for Levi's death, he was insistent it wasn't | 0:26:39 | 0:26:42 | |
a deliberate act to kill him. | 0:26:42 | 0:26:44 | |
Despite this, investigators had enough evidence. | 0:26:44 | 0:26:48 | |
Karl Karlsen was charged with second-degree murder | 0:26:48 | 0:26:51 | |
and insurance fraud. | 0:26:51 | 0:26:52 | |
Karlsen was so anxious to get his hands on the 700,000 | 0:26:52 | 0:26:56 | |
from his son's fraudulently obtained life insurance, | 0:26:56 | 0:26:59 | |
he'd done the unthinkable. | 0:26:59 | 0:27:01 | |
In 2013, the case went to court, where, | 0:27:01 | 0:27:04 | |
faced with the overwhelming evidence against him, | 0:27:04 | 0:27:08 | |
Karlsen at last told the truth. | 0:27:08 | 0:27:10 | |
He admitted to intentionally knocking the pick-up truck | 0:27:10 | 0:27:13 | |
off its jack and leaving his son underneath to die. | 0:27:13 | 0:27:17 | |
Karl Karlsen pleaded guilty to murder. | 0:27:17 | 0:27:20 | |
In his closing statement, | 0:27:20 | 0:27:22 | |
the judge told Karlsen he was not fully human and said, | 0:27:22 | 0:27:25 | |
"You belong in prison and you belong there until you die." | 0:27:25 | 0:27:29 | |
Karl Karlsen was sentenced | 0:27:29 | 0:27:31 | |
to between 15 years and life behind bars | 0:27:31 | 0:27:34 | |
Karlsen had facilitated a 700,000 insurance fraud | 0:27:34 | 0:27:38 | |
and murdered his son to make sure he was paid every penny of that money. | 0:27:38 | 0:27:43 | |
He could now spend the rest of his life behind bars. | 0:27:43 | 0:27:47 | |
From people chancing their luck by exaggerating their injuries to | 0:27:52 | 0:27:56 | |
organised criminal gangs, insurance fraud hits all of us in the pocket. | 0:27:56 | 0:28:01 | |
But instead of getting away with it, | 0:28:01 | 0:28:03 | |
more and more of these fraudsters are being claimed and shamed. | 0:28:03 | 0:28:07 |