Flooding: Are You as Safe as You Think? Week In Week Out


Flooding: Are You as Safe as You Think?

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Flooding: Are You as Safe as You Think?. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

They have got to use the bottom of the house as the stairs.

:00:00.:00:36.

Yes, it's been another winter of storms.

:00:37.:00:41.

But are the official excuses wearing a bit thin?

:00:42.:00:49.

This is the 13th flood we have had in two and a half months.

:00:50.:00:55.

Now new evidence suggests we may need to go back

:00:56.:00:57.

We are grossly underestimating the flooding.

:00:58.:01:00.

More lives, more properties and more livelihoods are at risk.

:01:01.:01:04.

There are huge challenges ahead, so why don't those in charge

:01:05.:01:06.

Flooding has brought misery to thousands across Britain

:01:07.:01:31.

with properties devastated, lives disrupted and a clean-up

:01:32.:01:32.

For some of us, it is a familiar story...

:01:33.:01:42.

They say as a journalist, the first thing you need is a good

:01:43.:01:45.

pair of shoes, but sometimes I've felt as if what I needed was a good

:01:46.:01:48.

They've carried me from one flood disaster to the next for 30 years.

:01:49.:02:04.

With the sea defences breached behind my .Mac

:02:05.:02:19.

It's a bit like Groundhog Day, with the nagging feeling you're not

:02:20.:02:22.

The big picture raises big questions.

:02:23.:02:31.

In 2005, a devastating flood took me to Carlisle.

:02:32.:02:38.

the pressure is growing to ensure that communities across the country

:02:39.:02:44.

do not have to face this kind of problem again.

:02:45.:02:50.

It's been 10 years and I can't quite believe it but I'm back in Carlisle.

:02:51.:02:54.

People were being told it wouldn't happen again.

:02:55.:02:55.

House after house is empty, house after house is being

:02:56.:03:02.

Again, after David Heath -- again, after devastating floods.

:03:03.:03:15.

Both her home and her bakery business were flooded out.

:03:16.:03:23.

The floodwater came up to here, you can see where it got to

:03:24.:03:26.

When I came here in 2005, I seem to remember people being told

:03:27.:03:34.

subsequently, "We won't allow this to happen again."

:03:35.:03:37.

We were told it was a once-in-a-lifetime event.

:03:38.:03:44.

Unprecedented. Yet, here we are again.

:03:45.:03:46.

Did flood defences do their job here then?

:03:47.:03:55.

I don't think the flood defences could have done any more.

:03:56.:03:59.

They were built to a certain height that the experts said they had to be

:04:00.:04:03.

ten years ago, and the water still came over.

:04:04.:04:09.

I don't think Carlisle could cope with it happening a third time,

:04:10.:04:12.

Flood defences like these costing ?38 million were meant

:04:13.:04:24.

They were supposed to have been built high enough to take climate

:04:25.:04:31.

But these blue ribbons show the flood water level was a half

:04:32.:04:35.

It feels like something is being missed.

:04:36.:04:49.

The answer could be hidden away in these hills

:04:50.:04:51.

A team of experts, headed by world-renowned geologist

:04:52.:04:54.

have been gathering information for decades.

:04:55.:04:57.

He took me to one location that could unlock the puzzle of why

:04:58.:05:00.

we are seeing such large floods events.

:05:01.:05:03.

We're standing on the south bank tributary of the Cambrian Mountains.

:05:04.:05:10.

This is the Nant Cwmdu and it's got a wonderful record

:05:11.:05:13.

These table-size boulders have been moved over the last 100 years

:05:14.:05:19.

Well, Mark, how do you read this landscape?

:05:20.:05:32.

These are significant, Tim, as they're a record

:05:33.:05:34.

That tells us they were moved here by a very

:05:35.:05:43.

large flood and as they move down, they tumble over

:05:44.:05:46.

That shape tells us it's been moved by water and that shape

:05:47.:05:55.

is essential because it tells us we are measuring a flood deposit

:05:56.:05:58.

The size of the boulders reveals the scale of the flood.

:05:59.:06:08.

And the scientists can work out when it happened thanks

:06:09.:06:10.

The growth rate of lichen on these boulders shows they were deposited

:06:11.:06:22.

In terms of flow depth, it would have just been

:06:23.:06:28.

I would have been swept down, so, yes, a very big flow of water,

:06:29.:06:44.

which we estimate to be at about 4 metres a second.

:06:45.:06:46.

What happens in the hills plays out further down in our river valleys.

:06:47.:06:51.

And this year, there were floods again in Wales.

:06:52.:06:56.

Well, the skies are clear, but it's been raining all night

:06:57.:06:59.

and look what it's done to this river.

:07:00.:07:03.

Conwy Valley's rising flood water has become a fact of life

:07:04.:07:06.

and for the people of Llanrwst, that makes them feel

:07:07.:07:08.

On Boxing Day, Llanrwst was hit by floods - again.

:07:09.:07:22.

Defences which were meant to protect part of the town didn't hold back

:07:23.:07:25.

Are you dry? Hello, I am Tim, nice to meet you.

:07:26.:07:49.

A very nicely decorated living room, put a lot of care and attention in

:07:50.:07:53.

and here we are with the furniture all piled up again.

:07:54.:07:55.

The council said this would never happen again in Conwy Terrace,

:07:56.:07:58.

It's your home and it's been flooded four times now.

:07:59.:08:01.

I checked the back drain, that is often a sign.

:08:02.:08:04.

Then I flushed the toilet and the water was staying up

:08:05.:08:06.

I said to Debbie, we'd better get the family down and start moving

:08:07.:08:19.

People on the street and were looking and coming down to help

:08:20.:08:32.

others. After flooding ten years ago,

:08:33.:08:33.

a new Dutch dam system was installed But on Boxing Day, flooding brought

:08:34.:08:39.

confusion and the barrier which might have helped

:08:40.:08:46.

wasn't put up in time. They were actually trying to get

:08:47.:08:50.

the plates off the road. With six inches of water on them,

:08:51.:08:56.

it was too late. Then water was coming

:08:57.:09:04.

into the houses next door. When that barrier was

:09:05.:09:07.

constructed, did you think, "We won't have to go

:09:08.:09:09.

through this again?" The only thing we can do now is move

:09:10.:09:13.

upstairs. We have to use the bottom of the

:09:14.:09:19.

house as a seller. Natural Resources Wales

:09:20.:09:28.

plans, builds and repairs Five years ago, it spent ?7 million

:09:29.:09:31.

to protect Llanrwst. It says it only spends money on such

:09:32.:09:34.

schemes after carrying out Despite this, locals

:09:35.:09:37.

are still left frustrated. I think the people particularly

:09:38.:09:40.

are angry that there was a preventative measure

:09:41.:09:42.

in place that wasn't used. When the scheme was first initiated,

:09:43.:09:48.

the idea was to take the wall down and waterproof it and rebuild it,

:09:49.:09:55.

and to raise higher the section, but when it was implemented,

:09:56.:10:01.

money could not be found for that, Presumably, an assessment was made

:10:02.:10:04.

that they could not afford to do it. We can't afford it and

:10:05.:10:18.

perhaps we don't need to. Oh, yes, the gentleman

:10:19.:10:20.

in Conway Terrace you've spoken And it will go on flooding

:10:21.:10:22.

unless something quite drastic is done to increase the height

:10:23.:10:28.

of that wall and improve that wall. Even though hundreds of millions

:10:29.:10:36.

have been spent on flood defences across the country, every year

:10:37.:10:40.

in recent years they fail somewhere. When that happens, one word

:10:41.:10:43.

is trotted out again and again... We are talking about the nature with

:10:44.:10:57.

the unprecedented rainfall. This is unprecedented.

:10:58.:11:02.

On Saturday night we saw an unprecedented amount of rainfall.

:11:03.:11:10.

I want to scream because it's not true.

:11:11.:11:16.

There were much bigger floods in the past and they need

:11:17.:11:19.

These are real floods that have happened in the past, not models.

:11:20.:11:33.

Across Wales, river levels are monitored by gauges like these.

:11:34.:11:39.

It's information used by Natural Resources Wales

:11:40.:11:41.

The NRW's flood map has a lot of information about the type

:11:42.:11:51.

of flood risk for those who live and work in vulnerable areas.

:11:52.:11:55.

But there is a fundamental problem because that information is almost

:11:56.:11:59.

all based on data gathered by river gauges, or instrumental records

:12:00.:12:01.

So it's a bit like reading a really good history book

:12:02.:12:12.

that ignores anything that happened before 1960.

:12:13.:12:14.

And according to the geologists at Aberystwyth University,

:12:15.:12:18.

it means that huge floods they have discovered on our rivers have not

:12:19.:12:21.

been included in the NRW's flood risk model.

:12:22.:12:23.

So crucially, they say the risk is being underestimated.

:12:24.:12:29.

We had, in the late 18th century, 20% to 30% larger floods

:12:30.:12:42.

than what we're seeing in the instrumental records.

:12:43.:12:44.

If you go further back to long-term sedimentary records,

:12:45.:12:46.

you're looking at floods 20% larger than that as well.

:12:47.:12:49.

So we're actually at flood magnitudes that may be approaching,

:12:50.:12:52.

in some areas, the Upper Severn to parts of Mid Wales,

:12:53.:12:57.

where flood magnitudes could be anywhere between 20%,

:12:58.:13:01.

and let's say, 40% higher than what we've seen

:13:02.:13:03.

We will need to re-think and re-map our flood plains to look

:13:04.:13:13.

Then we're going to put more properties and lives

:13:14.:13:20.

Natural Resources Wales says it doesn't accept

:13:21.:13:29.

that it is underestimating flood risk in Wales.

:13:30.:13:32.

It says it does use historic river gauge data where it exists,

:13:33.:13:36.

and it continues to update its flood maps as techniques improve.

:13:37.:13:42.

Wales might not have been affected as much as other parts of the UK

:13:43.:13:46.

this year, but those who've been flooded feel flooding

:13:47.:13:48.

In the Vale of Glamorgan, the owners of this pub feel

:13:49.:13:52.

they are running out of answers, as they are counting the cost

:13:53.:13:55.

of their fourth flood in seven years.

:13:56.:14:04.

We were closed for two weeks in December.

:14:05.:14:12.

Here, it's the River Ely that's the culprit.

:14:13.:14:27.

The NRW have been out and had a look but it's not cost effective to do

:14:28.:14:31.

any work, as I'm the only person affected.

:14:32.:14:34.

My hands are tied and before long, I won't be able to pay

:14:35.:14:40.

In Llanrwst, another business is suffering.

:14:41.:14:58.

Here one of the great old houses of Wales,

:14:59.:15:00.

which has undergone 20 years of restoration,

:15:01.:15:02.

could be destroyed if the floods persist.

:15:03.:15:10.

Judy and Peter are the owners the historic Tudor Gwydir Castle

:15:11.:15:14.

which they have opened to the public.

:15:15.:15:18.

This is the 13th flood we've had in two months,

:15:19.:15:20.

Are those people who are in a position to do something about it

:15:21.:15:41.

listening? We get political answers to our questions, it is very

:15:42.:15:43.

frustrating. Nothing is happening, we are talking, they just keep

:15:44.:15:45.

telling us they're going to review the situation but it doesn't help

:15:46.:15:50.

us. The Boxing Day Flood was just a foot of the top of the war, so the

:15:51.:15:56.

sellers were 7 feet underwater, so we were just about to evacuate the

:15:57.:16:01.

famous 17th-century dining room, brought back with public money from

:16:02.:16:06.

the New York Metropolitan Museum, 1 of the most famous rooms of its date

:16:07.:16:12.

from Wales and we were about to evacuate. We only weren't flooded

:16:13.:16:17.

because the embankment, the flood defence to the north of this point

:16:18.:16:26.

here, failed. Had that not failed, we would have been completely

:16:27.:16:27.

inundated. The NRW says there are no current

:16:28.:16:34.

plans to update the flood defences But if the flood risk plans

:16:35.:16:38.

are underestimating the real flood risk, then communities like Llanrwst

:16:39.:16:41.

could be living on borrowed time. It's not just geologists

:16:42.:16:44.

in Aberystwyth who are finding evidence that we're

:16:45.:16:46.

underestimating the risk. Just down the road from the college

:16:47.:16:49.

is the National Library of Wales. Within its walls are local papers

:16:50.:16:54.

going back to the 19 century - So while government ministers and

:16:55.:17:09.

heads of the environment agency have been talking about unprecedented

:17:10.:17:14.

floods, the Aberystwyth Observer was using the same expression in 1879.

:17:15.:17:23.

It says here, a storm of unprecedented severity... August 9

:17:24.:17:31.

netted 57, we are told a thunderstorm which swooped on Monday

:17:32.:17:40.

afternoon (Trail of havoc. But anyone who cares to look my history

:17:41.:17:43.

and report of today are readily available, showing major flooding

:17:44.:17:50.

between 1840 and 1957. Surprisingly, it is evident which is used by

:17:51.:17:53.

Natural Resources Wales when it decides how best to protect

:17:54.:17:57.

communities from flooding in the future. The report of destruction

:17:58.:18:06.

much the date of geological Flood data being gathered by Professor

:18:07.:18:16.

Macklin and his team. We need to aggregate the evidence in new ways,

:18:17.:18:23.

and I think it that is vitally important in protecting UK society

:18:24.:18:28.

as we move through the 21st century. The vocation of what is being

:18:29.:18:35.

claimed his huge -- the implication. It's not just the real level of risk

:18:36.:18:42.

faced by those already living on floodplains but it affects every

:18:43.:18:45.

decision we make on where we can safely build in future. Well today

:18:46.:18:51.

this valley looks benign enough, when it does Flood, the water comes

:18:52.:18:57.

here onto the floodplain which for centuries was left for that purpose.

:18:58.:19:01.

Today, the developers are moving in here and across the country, in the

:19:02.:19:03.

belief that man can defeat nature. in the belief that man

:19:04.:19:09.

can defeat nature. Four years ago, this flood plain

:19:10.:19:15.

lived up to its name and many newly Yet building continues

:19:16.:19:19.

in flood risk areas. In Colwinston in the

:19:20.:19:28.

Vale of Glamorgan, villagers were surprised how little

:19:29.:19:31.

official fuss was made about a new housing

:19:32.:19:33.

development there. This field is wet and it's known

:19:34.:19:40.

as pond field in old mats. The report said the said the NRW had

:19:41.:19:43.

not commented adversely Yes it does as I think a part

:19:44.:19:49.

of this field is down here does appear in the NRW flood

:19:50.:20:00.

map as a flooding risk. And if you look at the photographs

:20:01.:20:02.

that we provided to the council in responding to the planning

:20:03.:20:10.

application, that dip The community council decided

:20:11.:20:12.

to hire their own expert. A lecturer at UCL,Dr Harvey Rodda

:20:13.:20:19.

is also an independent hydrologist. Often called in to look

:20:20.:20:24.

at developers' plans, he's increasingly worried

:20:25.:20:28.

by the standard of checking carried The main frustration is I literally

:20:29.:20:30.

feel I am doing the job the EA or NRW should be doing in properly

:20:31.:20:43.

assessing these reports. Following Dr Rodda's report,

:20:44.:20:48.

the developer submitted a revised flood risk assessment and planning

:20:49.:20:50.

permission was granted last year. The council says this was done

:20:51.:20:53.

after consulting NRW. But the NRW say they no longer

:20:54.:20:58.

object to flood risk schemes But Dr Rodda says they should be

:20:59.:21:01.

involved in every case where there is any

:21:02.:21:05.

suggestion of flood risk. So based on my experience,

:21:06.:21:13.

I'm sure there are schemes that have been built where flooding hasn't

:21:14.:21:20.

properly been assessed There are going to be number

:21:21.:21:22.

of examples that already fallen through the net

:21:23.:21:27.

so to speak. We will provide our expert flood

:21:28.:21:40.

risk advice to the local authority and if necessary we will object. Any

:21:41.:21:47.

development on a floodplain is a seriously bad idea, isn't it? That

:21:48.:21:52.

is taking an extreme view. You need to look at the exact type of risk

:21:53.:21:56.

and you need to be able to see whether or not you can actually

:21:57.:21:57.

manage that. Natural Resources Wales says it

:21:58.:22:00.

continues to object to developments But homes are still being

:22:01.:22:03.

built on flood plains. Much of the development we see the

:22:04.:22:28.

place in the 80s and 90s in this period, as a consequence, we are

:22:29.:22:35.

turning to more frequent and larger flood events, that existing

:22:36.:22:40.

government is under threat and it in my view would be madness in terms of

:22:41.:22:44.

continued the government in areas which we now have a significant

:22:45.:22:46.

flood risk. This winter flooding has

:22:47.:22:50.

brought misery to homes, hit businesses, and disrupted

:22:51.:22:52.

our transport system. Even Natural Resources Wales'

:22:53.:22:57.

own river gauges show flood levels And that backs up the

:22:58.:23:00.

geologists' research. Natural Resources Wales said it's

:23:01.:23:05.

interested in Prof Macklin's data but believes there are uncertainties

:23:06.:23:09.

around techniques and estimates. They are not yet using it to assess

:23:10.:23:14.

flood risk in Wales. But some countries have been

:23:15.:23:18.

using the methodology It's an official report written

:23:19.:23:21.

in US about dam safety In it they are using geological

:23:22.:23:27.

flood methodology to work One of the authors is a Government

:23:28.:23:34.

official, the equivalent The report finds the data reliable,

:23:35.:23:40.

not that expensive to gather, and should be used as a matter

:23:41.:23:47.

of course to help "reduce the uncertainty in estimates

:23:48.:23:52.

of maximum flood potential." Many European countries, like Spain,

:23:53.:24:00.

also use this information And on the other side of the world,

:24:01.:24:02.

in New Zealand, Prof Macklin is currently busy gathering data

:24:03.:24:08.

that will be used to assess the real flood risk for thousands of people

:24:09.:24:11.

in the town of Lower Hutt. What frustrates me is over the last

:24:12.:24:20.

30 years, particularly 10 years - research groups I've been

:24:21.:24:24.

involved with in Newcastle, Leeds and Aber and also

:24:25.:24:30.

in New Zealand we have built up a very large database

:24:31.:24:35.

about of pre instrumental floods, both documentary

:24:36.:24:40.

and sedimentary . We can give precise and accurate

:24:41.:24:43.

estimates of flood magnitude that extend and pre date

:24:44.:24:45.

the instrumental records. If we just use the instrumental

:24:46.:24:50.

record, we are grossly Larger and more frequent floods

:24:51.:24:52.

that we haven't planned for will test defences,

:24:53.:25:03.

not only in Llanrwst and Aberyswyth, but every community

:25:04.:25:07.

in Wales - including the cities of Swansea,

:25:08.:25:11.

Newport and here in Cardiff. That has to be of major interest

:25:12.:25:14.

for those at the Welsh Government who have to finance future flood

:25:15.:25:17.

defences and decide where We wanted to speak to the Minister

:25:18.:25:19.

for Natural Resources, Carl Sargeant,

:25:20.:25:27.

but he declined our invitation. Instead, we had a statement

:25:28.:25:31.

in response to our many questions. They pointed out that December

:25:32.:25:39.

had been unprecedented. They said everybody knew the risk

:25:40.:25:42.

that they faced from flooding - They also say they're confident that

:25:43.:25:48.

correct data is being used to assess While the Government won't talk

:25:49.:25:54.

to us, it says it is trying But its critics say

:25:55.:26:00.

it has to do more. The implications are huge,

:26:01.:26:06.

the implications are absolutely huge.

:26:07.:26:10.

Financially and structurally and emotionally and psychologically

:26:11.:26:13.

for some of these people living There are practical questions

:26:14.:26:17.

about insurance levels for homes, mitigating measures that they,

:26:18.:26:21.

as individuals, should put in around their properties,

:26:22.:26:23.

for local government and ultimately It's a huge piece of work that

:26:24.:26:26.

would need to be undertaken, I think, to re-assess all the

:26:27.:26:31.

catchment areas in Wales, but really, if other countries

:26:32.:26:34.

are looking at this evidence and we are not, we should be

:26:35.:26:36.

asking - why not? So what about Natural

:26:37.:26:44.

Resources Wales? It's curious that the body

:26:45.:26:45.

responsible for protecting us from rising floods, refused to talk

:26:46.:26:48.

to us about flooding. Natural Resources Wales, this is the

:26:49.:27:12.

BBC. Many more people might need a boat in future!

:27:13.:27:19.

Your flood maps have sprung a leak! Help, we're sinking! Natural

:27:20.:27:26.

Resources Wales, please come and talk to us!

:27:27.:27:32.

Come and talk to us about flooding! This is Week in, Week out. I don't

:27:33.:27:41.

think they want to talk to us. The Welsh Conservatives

:27:42.:27:53.

are tabling a question tomorrow Meanwhile, those communities already

:27:54.:27:55.

dealing with the cost of flooding can only hope that

:27:56.:28:00.

warnings will be heard. What would your message be to the

:28:01.:28:12.

authorities? What would you take to the people responsible for defending

:28:13.:28:19.

this community? I wouldn't be able to say it on camera! I really feel

:28:20.:28:28.

strongly. It's very, very bad for the morale of the community. Living

:28:29.:28:32.

with this kind of constant threat is very exhausting. We need to bring

:28:33.:28:38.

even more pressure to bear to make them take proper account of the

:28:39.:28:43.

flood risk here. And if they don't? We will flood again and again and

:28:44.:28:49.

again. This is the 13th flood we have put in 2 1/2 months for sub I

:28:50.:28:51.

call that precedent it. Not unprecedented perhaps,

:28:52.:28:54.

but recent floods are So, is this, my Groundhog Flooding

:28:55.:28:55.

Day, coming to an end? A few minutes ago this water was a

:28:56.:29:07.

few inches deep and It's been said after these winter

:29:08.:29:12.

storms it's time to re-think how We can only hope for

:29:13.:29:15.

those on the front line, that the decision-makers

:29:16.:29:25.

are listening, but for now, I might

:29:26.:29:27.

just hang on to these.

:29:28.:29:31.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS