06/07/2017 100 Days+

12. But it would have meant moving to London at the age of 12 summer

parent said no. We know that you are parent said no. We know that you are

no stranger to a campaign. -- so my parents said no.

Last time you were on the show you were petitioning the Welsh

government to help homeless teenagers in Wales -

and as a result the Welsh Government is now issuing new instructions

to councils making it clear it does not want 16 and 17

And Michael's been back to Wales to help the homeless again -

Donald Trumps on display in Europe - one, carefully scripted,

The other is the off the cuff President,

who slams fake news, criticises his predecessor

and undermines the US intelligence agencies.

In Poland crowds gave him a friendly welcome -

he gave them a speech about the end of western civilisation.

The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has

Tomorrow he has his first ever meeting with Vladimir Putin -

Mr Trump is calling on Russia to stop interfering in Ukraine,

will he also tell Russia not to interfere in US elections?

The threat of North Korea's nuclear advance weighs over the G20 summit

as does the growing rift between China and the US

Also: The man who led the British inquiry

Sir John Chilcot tells the BBC the former Prime Minister Tony Blair

was emotionally involved in the argument and relied more

And: It's a beach day for the leaders of Israel and India.

We'll tell you why they are hitting the waves.

I am Katty Kay in Washington, Christian

There is a monument in Krazinksi Square in Warsaw that commemorates

the Polish uprising of 1944, which liberated the city

Today Donald Trump stood in front of that monument

to evoke a new struggle - the battle for western civilisation.

And it that moment the American President committed himself

The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to

survive, do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any

cost? Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders?

Mr Trump also clearly called on Russia to stop its "destabilizing

activities" including its support for "hostile regimes"

He confirmed that Poland, Russia's neighbour, will be supplied

with the Patriot missile defense system AND standing on European

soil, he committed the United States to Nato's Article 5,

The United States has demonstrated not merely with words but with its

actions that we stand firmly behind Article five, the mutual defence

commitment. CHEERING APPLAUSE

Words are easy but actions are what matters and for its own protection

and you know this, everybody knows this, everybody has to know this,

Europe must do more. By some margin this was the most pro

European speech we have had yet And his commitment to Nato

is particular has been welcomed A short while ago President

Trump started a meeting She has made it clear she wants

to focus on issues, on which Mr Trump has parted ways with much

of the European Union, climate The BBC's Ros Atkins

is there for us. He's been basking in the acclaim in

Poland today but it might be a different picture in Hamburg, what

do we know of this bilateral meeting between the president and the

Chancellor this evening? You're quite right, Donald Trump is not

even scheduled any public speeches here in Hamburg, the US authorities

now it would be too complicated so it's bilateral meetings, group

meetings behind closed doors which will take place at the summit. We

know of the bilateral meeting between Angela Merkel and Donald

Trump, Donald Trump arrived about 90 minutes ago and as you have been

stating on key issues such as immigration, trade, security and

climate change these are not two leaders who see eye to eye. Angela

Merkel has put aside her normal diplomatic language and said in the

past few months that we can no longer rely on America. When you add

that into the back to Donald Trump is not a man who favours taking

steps backwards it's hard to see how they will bash on common ground

which will have a meaningful impact on policy. I think we'll get a

better picture of how Germany and America proceed into the future in

parallel rather than together. It's looking positively beach like you

are but we are hearing reports there are protests in the city, how is it?

Well it's definitely tense. I look like I'm on the beach because I am

at the beach bar overlooking the port of Hamburg, one of the biggest

in Europe. This bar would normally be teaming on a summers evening but

it's very quiet because of what's happening in the centre of time. As

I talk to you, echoing across main rubber is the sound of CES canisters

being fired. We also know water cannon has been used. It was

interesting hearing from the police earlier predicting there would be

violence. Talking to protest as they said the police would try to provoke

violence. Both sides have their own narrative but there was an

inevitability about this protest turning violent and judging by the

sounds we are now hearing in the background across the centre of

Hamburg that what's happening. They said 20,000 police have been drafted

into Hamburg today, all eyes are going to be on this meeting tomorrow

between President Trump and President Putin, what are people

saying about that particular meeting? Well it's interesting, and

event of this scale further are so many fascinating dynamics so many

different meetings, Donald Trump and Theresa May for instance that would

normally dominate our attention but your right to highlight Vladimir

Putin and Donald Trump meeting for the first time. We think they may

encounter each other twice, a family photo in the morning were all the

leaders get a group photo and they will both be in that so there is a

chance they might bump into one another but in the afternoon we have

a scheduled bilateral conversation. I think a couple things of note, the

speech in Warsaw you mentioned, Donald Trump said Russia needs to

stop destabilising the Ukraine but what he did not mention was

allegations Russia also try to destabilise the United States. The

big question as it always is with diplomatic conversation is what

subjects will come up and we have to wait and see which subjects the men

choose to broach. For the moment, thank you very much.

Here in Washington the President's Warsaw speech was generally well

received but not so, his appearance at an earlier

In his unscripted comments, there was more criticism

of President Obama, another attack on the fake media AND when it comes

to Russia and its inteference in the 2016 election -

there are always mixed messages from this President.

Will you once and for all year saw no definitively say Russia

interfered in the 2016 election? Well I think it was Russia and it

could've been other people in other countries, could have been a lot of

people interfered, I said it very simply, I think it could have been

Russia but I think it could well have been other countries and I want

be specific. I think a lot of people interfered and it's been happening

for a long time. One of the fiercest critics

of the Trump administration's handling of Russian meddling has

been Nicholas Burns, I spoke to him a brief time

ago in Rhode Island. Clarify something for me, his

position on Russia? We heard today a full throated rejection of Russian

interference in Ukraine, he criticised Russia for destabilising

areas of the world and then moments beforehand in a press conference he

seemed to reject the idea Russia had been responsible for hacking into

the American election, where does he stand? We saute different Trump's,

we saw the scripted speech which was tougher on Russia, the destabilising

actions in eastern Ukraine. Then we saw President Trump at the press

conference where he was critical of the press, where he went very soft

on President Putin on the issue of Russia launching a cyber attack on

the US elections, saying not completely sure which country

attacked the United States. Your guess is as good as mine as to which

we will see tomorrow but it's very important he meet two tests, will

the United States continued to sanction Russia over Ukraine? I hope

we will. And we'll President Trump agree with the US Senate which

ported 97-2 to impose tough new sanctions on Russia over attacking?

Those are critical bars for tomorrow's meeting with President

Putin. We heard him defend article five of the Nato treaty, you were

ambassador to Nato or the United States, do you think your former

Nato colleagues will be fully reassured by that? I think you have

to give credit where it's due, it was the first time we had heard a

complete reaffirmation of the article five commitment, an attack

on one is an attack on all. That was positive but he spent more time in

the speech criticising the Nato alliance than he did praising it.

There were veiled criticisms as I understood them of the European

Union, Steve Bannon like language decrying the power of government. I

thought the speech played well among the far right in Eastern Europe and

Poland but I think it was not a speech for Western Europe where he

is right now. He meets Vladimir Putin for the first time tomorrow,

what would you I was going to ask what you would want to say, but what

do you think he will say? I think the first order of business is to

get to know each other and establish effective communications. We are two

powerful countries, there will be crises and misunderstandings ahead,

so you want to have a relationship where you can clearly communicate,

that job number one. Number two, both presidents will set out what is

truly important for them and I think President Putin will want to argue

for an end to sanctions on Ukraine. He will deny interfering in the

elections, the American elections and I think President Putin will

want to see if the United States can work with him in Syria where the

Russians are trying with the Iranians and the Syrian government

and Turkey to create safe havens and exclusive zones in Syria itself. I

don't know how much of that President Trump can abide and I hope

President Trump will take a tougher line on Ukraine and the hacking

scandal but I'm not sure he will particularly on Russian interference

in the elections. He is morale check on this issue, he seems to see it as

an issue which delegitimise is his election, as an affront to himself.

The implication that the Russians intervened to help Donald Trump

defeat Hillary Clinton. I'm sorry to say I don't think we will see a

tough President Trump tomorrow and that will be a major mistake. It

will separate him from Republicans in Congress who watch a much darker

line -- you want a much tougher line.

You alluded to it, so many contradictions, at the beginning

saying it could've been Russia and other countries and then at the end

of it he said it probably was Russia and then he says President Obama do

enough from August way through the new the Russians were involved but

didn't do anything but he's not done anything since coming to power. So

if you are the Russians watching this you must kind of wonder which

Donald Trump you will meet tomorrow. Yes and I think you will meet one

who wants to do some deals, he is a deal-maker. He will try to project

strength, they may talk about some kind of negotiation over Syria,

there is speculation today there may be some cooperation we could have on

that no-fly zone, inside Syria. It's the atmospherics of the meeting

which people here in Washington are going to be watching, if there is a

photograph of the two of them standing together looking friendly

it will go badly for President Trump because people will say there he is

in the pocket of President Putin. I think the visuals will be very

carefully planned and as we are being told by the Trump team it's

not a meeting with a specific agenda so will be push them on

interference? The odds are slightly stacked again

then, you look at North Korea, Syria, Ukraine, there's not much he

can come away with. Syria is the only area and even that

I think you would find a lot of sceptics here in Washington

wondering if they can trust anything Vladimir Putin says. It President

Trump comes away with some sort of deal of cooperation on Syria the

question immediately here in Washington is going to be do we

trust Vladimir Putin to stick to that? How can we possibly believe

anything the Russian leader is saying at the moment?

One of the other key meetings president Trump will have tomorrow

is the one with China's leader Xi Jinping.

Washington is not at all happy at Beijing's response

Yes he thinks they could do more on pressuring Pyongyang

"Trade between China and North Korea grew almost 40%

So much for China working with us - but we had to give it a try!"

And at the United Nations this was the message his ambassador

Nikki Haley delivered to anyone not standing with the US.

They have not had any care for Russia or China in this. They have

not listened to anything you have said. They are not going to listen

to anything you say. So it's time we all stand together and say we will

not put up with this action. To sit there and opposed sanctions or to

sit there and go in defiance of a new resolution means you are holding

the hands of them. For more on the tensions

between Beijing and Washington at the moment we are joined now

from New York by the BBC's Nada Tawfik who covered

that UN session for us. Are you getting any indication of

how Beijing is responding to the change of tone from the White House?

Certainly Beijing is not changing their approach, they are completely

against more sanctions on North Korea and the Trump administration

is learning what past presidents has learned, there is a limit to how

much China is willing to squeeze North Korea and risk instability on

the doorstep. Beijing today in several statements called for the US

to tone down their rhetoric. They said they have been relentlessly

working to get the sanctions working against Pyongyang. In this warning

the Chinese Vice Finance ministers said they would implement the

relevant resolutions but the US should not use domestic laws as

excuses to levy sanctions against Chinese financial institutions. Does

not look like President Xi Jingping will succumb to the threats the US

were using. We have spoken to a Japanese minister on the programme

this week and two Michael Fallon about whether sanctions can work, it

sanctions can work previous presidents, president Obama, George

W. Bush, they would have imposed these sanctions, it's been under

sanctions for 20 years so it's not making a difference. Absolutely and

I think that's the sticking point. When you talk to anyone at the

security Council, they all agree this is not changed the willingness

to abandon the nuclear ambitions. The US believes if the sanctions are

tight enough and that is where China comes in on implementing them,

because that's always been the key issue, how those sanctions are

implemented, then that could force North Korea to get to the

negotiating table and abandon weapons. China think it's the exact

opposite, they have never understood American logic. They say the more

that Kim Jong-un feels under threat the more they will cling to his

nuclear programme. This is what we are seeing in the UN Security

Council, China going along with the United States and issuing

resolutions but there is no of opinion. Thank you. I was just going

to say strong words today from President Trump talking about North

Korea, saying he has severe options on the table but would not say when

or if they would be used. They are obviously still talking about the

military option. Interesting to note there is a

dinner between the Japanese, South Koreans and Americans in Hamburg but

the Chinese are not invited. Interesting, we will talk more about

the G20 in a second but let's turn to the UK.

Tony Blair was "not straight with the British people"

about his decisions in the run up to the Iraq War.

That's the view of the man who chaired the long-running

Speaking for the first time since publishing his report a year ago,

Sir John Chilcot said the evidence Mr Blair gave the inquiry

was "emotionally truthful" but that he relied on his beliefs

He was speaking to our political editor Laura Kuenssberg.

Do you feel the politicians you dealt with were as straight

And I have to name names because these were public sessions.

Tony Blair is always and ever an advocate.

He makes the most persuasive case he can.

Do you believe that Tony Blair was as straight

with you and the public as he ought to have been?

Can I slightly reword that to say, I think any Prime Minister taking

a country into war has got to be straight with the nation

and carry it, so far as possible, with him or her.

I don't believe that was the case in the Iraq instance.

Do you feel he gave you the fullest version of events?

I hesitate to say this, rather, but I think from his

perspective and standpoint, it was emotionally truthful.

I think that came out also in his press conference

I think he was under very great emotional pressure

during those sessions, far more than the committee were.

In that state of mind and mood, you fall back on your instinctive

But he was relying, you suggest, therefore on emotion, not fact?

So interesting because for all the time I covered the invasion of Iraq

and the aftermath of that, the difference between the attitude here

in America and the attitude in Britain was so clear, we did not

have hear those enormous street protests, not a groundswell of

opinion against President Bush for taking America into Iraq. It's

something which has dogged British politics since then and was people

here question why we went in there's not been this hand-wringing and

soul-searching which could lead to in the UK.

No, and I think the Chilcot enquiry extended that, it went on for so

long that it extended the process and it's become a reference point,

the questions we have about British foreign policy and also official

expertise. Do you remember George Osborne putting forward this

document on how Brexit would affect the British economy and everyone

dismissed it as a dodgy dossier and it's become a generational thing

within both parties. The angle about Tony Blair and new Labour in some

ways propelling Jeremy Corbyn to the leadership of the Labour Party and

on the opposite benches where as you have had a president in President

Obama who voted against the Iraq war we have had three Prime Minister's,

Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Theresa May who voted for the Iraq

war. We've never moved on from it and I think really the question you

come to at the end and I think this is the important question going

forward, it is the overarching thing, how does Britain pursue its

own strategic interests going forward without and you difference

to the United States? How do we maximise our presence, we felt we

were duped and in some way the lapdog of the United States.

Donald Trump mentioning it again today.

Yeah, talking about Russian interference, was in Russia

interfered but we remember the dodgy dossier, you'll said there were

weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Leaders of Japan and

the European Union have hailed an agreement in principle on a major

free trade deal. Once the details are finalised,

the deal is expected to liberalise European leaders said the pact

showed that the world did not have to move towards isolationism

and that it was a statement on the A newly discovered photograph

from the 1930s has added to the mystery of US pilot

Amelia Earhart. This grainy black and white

photograph was found Experts examining it say the woman

seated with her back to the camera is Amelia Earhart and another figure

on the far left is Fred Noonan - her navigator on that

last flight in 1937. It adds to a theory that

Ms Earhart was taken prisoner by the Japanese in the then

Japanese Marshall Islands. This is one of those who done it

kind of mysteries which has resonance for people who grew up on

this heroine of adventure, the first woman to fly around the world and

then what happened? I would love to have the technology to examine that

photograph properly. Earlier this week Christian,

we were having a bit of fun with those pictures

of Chris Christie relaxing on the empty beach, he had

closed to the public - well today I have got another

beach photo for you. This is from the Twitter account

of the Israeli Prime Minister, "There's nothing like going

to the beach with friends!" Standing alongside the Indian Prime

Minister Nahrendra Modi who has been Who goes to the beach in trousers?

It must be so uncomfortable. Then they go back to their meetings.

Apparently there were politics behind this.

Apparently they were in discussion about clean water -

the Israeli's are selling the Indians some of their

It got us thinking about other presidents who have been to the

beach so we pulled out some historic pictures, this is Richard Nixon in

California. This was taken in his 1972

pre-election campaign to make him look more casual if you can believe

it. But apparently he insisted on wearing his dress shoes. Don't go on

a beach in your dress shoes, it's worse than rolling up your trousers

and going into the ocean. I am more uncomfortable about this,

he is 55, President Obama. LAUGHTER It feels awkward.

You're watching 100 Days Plus from BBC News.

Still to come - We'll hear why Donald Trump made Poland his first

stop on this trip and what that means relations in Europe.

And with Donald Trump meeting with Vladimir Putin on Friday -

we'll talk to a Russian journalist about how it's reported in Moscow.

That's still to come on 100 Days Plus, from BBC News.

The day has brought quite a variety of weather, 32 degrees at Heathrow,

the wise woman had the sense to be indoors as the thunderstorm rolled

over the top of Norwich but a way to the West Leicestershire glorious

guys, a glorious picture sent in from a weather watcher. Those

conditions matched widely across the southern half of Britain but that's

not the end of variety, further north weather front line in crowd

and rain. The last of the days 's thunderstorms gradually rolling into

the North Sea on what's going to be another sticky night especially

across central and southern parts, temperatures not much lower than 13

or 15 even into the Scottish Borders. How do we start ready?

Fairly cloudy through a good part of the South West, western facing hills

and shores of Wales, further east to glorious start the day, but a breeze

coming in from the north-west but captures even at this stage about

17, 18, 19 degrees. As we just that bit further north of frontal system

will have brought cloud and rain. Friday a fairly quiet day certainly

by comparison for some of you to Thursday, cloud filling in all the

while across the heart of England, but it does not stop the

temperatures climbing across the South East to about 25-27. All

through the evening cloud filling in all the more as the frontal system

makes its presence felt, it trails its way ever further towards the

East to bring that figure band of cloud which were some at the start

of Saturday will bring disappointing fair for July. We'll have some bits

and pieces of rain and even as that fades through the day it will leave

a legacy of cloud, best of the brightness either to the south or in

places on the eastern side of Scotland where you will get a bit of

brightness. Saturday on into Sunday and new set of weather front

beginning to hover close by to the north-western corner of Scotland and

a chance we may import some of these thunderstorms from the near

continent into the southern parts of Britain. Somewhat drier conditions

in between. President Trump has suggested

that the future of Western civilisation is under threat

from terrorism and bureaucracy, and he urged Russia

to stop causing instability. Arriving at G20 meetings in Germany

- the president will meet face-to-face with eight other world

leaders on the sidelines. What will the Russians make

up-to-date's Spieth in Poland? There were moments today

when the President took an unusually Will he be as bold tomorrow

when he meets with Vladimir Putin Will he be as bold tomorrow

when he meets with Vladimir Putin Yes and crucially, will he raise

that issue of Russian meddling So often, President Trump

fights shy of criticising But on the issue of Syria and North

Korea there are frustrations. Today, the West is also confronted

by the powers that seek to test our will, undermine our confidence

and challenge our interests. To meet new forms of

aggression, including propaganda, financial crime

and cyber warfare, we must adapt our reliance to compete effectively

in new ways and on all new We urge Russia to seize

its destabilising activities in Ukraine and elsewhere and support

for hostile regimes, including Syria and Iran, and instead

to join the community our fight against common

enemies and in defence Dmitri Babich is a political analyst

with the Russian national broadcasting company

Sputnik International. What will they make in Moscow of

what President Trump said about Russian meddling in the Ukraine

adults were, and Howard has to stop? There is, of course, a general

feeling of disappointment in Russia. Because Mr Trump had a chance to add

need beginning. If only he had met President Putin met earlier, when he

was inaugurated, there was a possibility for a new beginning but

now, obviously, Trump has squandered his chances. He bowed to the

pressure of the American establishment, of the European Union

which Trump called a threat to European security just a few months

ago at the summit in Malta. Now, Poland is the last country where he

needs to go if you want to have a new beginning with Russia. So

basically, Trump, by coming to Poland with all of its historic

antagonisms with Russia, by making that speech, he is disappointing his

own supporters, he is betraying the hopes that were associated with him.

President Putin's spokesman said today that we still have no

understanding of what Washington wants in this meeting. She's pretty

astute, he knows full well this is a meeting in Russia needs just as

badly as Washington? Obviously, I think he is sincere. The Russian

elite, and President Putin, want peace and good relations with the

USA. Let me remind you of the fact that Putin started his tenure as

president in the early 2000 by helping the Americans to destroy the

Taliban regime in Afghanistan. There were many other concessions that

President Putin made in his -- to Europe. If you look at the origins,

these were western initiative. It was the West that wanted to change

and to improve the government in Ukraine, headed by and

and to improve the government in Ukraine, headed by a legally elected

president. There was changes in government in Syria, Russia only

reacted. So it straight for to hear Trump asking Russia not to

destabilise. The United States of the stabilised a lot more. Thanks

for joining us. The view there from Sputnik International, or as close

as you can get to the gremlin probably.

President Trump's first stop in Europe, was Warsaw -

An endorsement - implicit or otherwise - of Polands'

The ruling Law and Justice party takes a similar stance

to President Trump on many an issue, including immigration

The President won't get many better receptions on this trip.

In Warsaw the crowds were chanting his name.

In his speech he said the Poles had set the world an example

From Warsaw we're joined by Agaton Kozinski -

the International editor at Polska Times

Thanks for joining us. How will this visit be remembered in Poland? It's

very surprising and pleasant for us as well. First of all, nobody

expected that Donald Trump would be so well-prepared of Polish history,

able to comment about Polish past, about Polish traditions about Polish

habits, he was quoting from John Paul II, for instance, and we didn't

expect that. It will be well remembered. It was one of the most

inspiring and the most important speeches of American president in

Poland. Those are strong words! Let me ask

you about the Russia issue, this is a huge issue in Poland, about

Russian expansionism. Trump criticised Russia about its meddling

Joe Murphy meddling in other countries, do you think you will

follow through on taking tougher action against Moscow? I hope so. He

mentioned Russian aggression against the Ukraine, secondly, he reminded

us about his commitment to article five of Nato. It looks like he's

ready to help Poland if anything happens on our eastern border, if

Russia became more aggressive even in 2014. I hope we can believe

Donald Trump and we can think about him as a true ally of Poland. Thanks

for joining us. Lately Donald Trump has been

taking a lot of credit Today in Poland he boasted

the markets had put on almost $4 trillion dollars

since he took office. And earlier in the week

he boasted... The June jobs report

comes out tomorrow. Lets speak to Jeanne Cummings,

political editor for Thanks for joining us. He's talk

about growth, he wanted at 4%. Of all the indications are that it is

is under what it was under Obama. Can he do more? They are certainly

bank banking on a major tax bill creating more growth. Our growth is

at 2%, it has been there for a long time. In general, presidents take

more credit for the economy than they should and they often get

blamed more than they should. Because their influence on the

economic growth is not that great. What this particular White House

believes is if they can get the tax package through, combined with lower

regulations, that will create some fluidity that will lead to faster

growth. That all depends on politics, at the moment he hasn't

been able to do anything in big terms of legislation, can he do it?

We don't know, we really don't know if the Camelot. We also don't know,

we don't believe the market has factored in a fairly on the tax

bill, that is a big risk to him. If they don't get the tax bill through,

it could affect the economy in a big way. Do we attach too much

significance in general to how a president can shift sides? Do we

blame him too much when there is an upswing or if it doesn't uptick

enough? I would say that is absolutely true. With the economy,

it is a global economy. There are some tweaks may be that the White

House can do that 40 of certain industries more confidence, for

instance. Some of the regulations that he has removed, they haven't

taken effect, because it is the very last thing is that President Obama

taking place. -- put in place. But those companies can look forward to

planning the future with confidence the regulations are not the way. We

have talked about China in the context of North Korea but there is

a booming trade story about China and one of the stories about Trump

when he came into office was that he will be protectionist and imposed

Harris. He hasn't done so far. If he's about to, what impact does that

have on the US and world economies? That is one of the biggest questions

about the administration. Will he get us into a trade war with Mexico,

China or wherever? I'm hearing more mutterings that about that this week

than I have been. You interviewed people from the G20, they are also

concerned about his position on trade and the America First psyche

that is driving him. An interesting time for the US and global economy.

We are seeing that play out in Hamburg at the moment.

With any large gathering of World leaders one thing is certain -

Thousands of protestors have come together in Hamburg -

for various reasons - pro-climate, pro-globalisation,

Police have set up a security corden to prevent the protestors

The main day of meetings is tomorrow, but we've been watching

Some of the more peaceful ones, as well. This is the live shot this

evening. There were 12,000 people for the demonstration the night and

apparently that demonstration has now been cancelled, the March house,

because of some of the scenes we are seeing right now was a lot of gas

and water cannons being fired. I want to show you a more peaceful one

that we were looking at today. It's quite creative, this one.

Here we have 1,000 grey zombies who are walking the town.

Can we bring up the sound for a second?

The group of undead said their goal was to motivate other people to get

You will see that as they walk through the streets suddenly

they come to life , and then the zombies free themselves

Quite effective that, isn't it? The end here looks more like my teenage

kids going to a music festival in Europe. But the point of it, you're

right, this is a more creative protest the many, the point is the

same. People have been dehumanised by the global economy and inequality

has produced the winners and losers and that is what they are in Hamburg

four. I can't quite understand why pictures of Barack Obama make you

uncomfortable but zombies don't? At the end of 100 Days Plus, I walk out

of Broadcasting House and the colour comes back. It's a pretty similar

experience. Slightly Orwellian. On a serious note, we are not on air

tomorrow, but it's a dramatic day with some pretty dramatic things

that could unfold? I think the meeting with Vladimir Putin is

something everyone will be watching. Some critical things including North

Korea. We are at a moment where the world might face this crisis, this

test of this president. And what he can figure out with China will be

essential. This is have veered from being so close to China and trusting

China to fix this to almost swimming in the opposite direction, I'm not

sure how helpful that about turn is on China either. A big day not just

for American politics but global affairs in Hamburg. We will have it

all on the BBC. Goodbye for now.