Diane Abbott The Andrew Marr Show


Diane Abbott

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Diane Abbott. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

A lot of people who are only half of paying attention to the campaign

:00:14.:00:19.

thought it was in the bag for the Tories, but now the polls have been

:00:20.:00:23.

closing a bit, they have do focus on the real possibility of Jeremy

:00:24.:00:28.

Corbyn becoming Prime Minister. That means almost certainly with Diane

:00:29.:00:35.

Abbott in Home Office. Many watching this after Manchester, thinking

:00:36.:00:38.

about who to vote for, look at you and Jeremy Corbyn and think we do

:00:39.:00:43.

not completely trust you to be in charge of the security given what

:00:44.:00:48.

you have said and done in the past. You can take a moment to talk to

:00:49.:00:53.

them and tell them why they are wrong. Before we move on to the

:00:54.:00:56.

politics of it, I think it is too soon to forget the victims. 22

:00:57.:01:01.

people are dead and so many people, families and children who have seen

:01:02.:01:05.

things that will haunt them for many years. I think it is important to

:01:06.:01:10.

say that. In terms of why people should vote Labour in the general

:01:11.:01:17.

election, they should vote Labour because we have put forward a

:01:18.:01:21.

manifesto that will be transforming the manifesto investing in the NHS,

:01:22.:01:27.

in education and is also seeing how we would defend it. Before we go on

:01:28.:01:32.

to that, I want to ask about your own record and saying I do not trust

:01:33.:01:38.

Diane Abbott to be in charge of the Home Office. First of all, I think

:01:39.:01:43.

there is something to be said for a Home Secretary who is actually

:01:44.:01:46.

worked in the Home Office. I worked in the Home Office for nearly three

:01:47.:01:50.

years as a graduate trainee and I know how it works from the inside. I

:01:51.:01:54.

think there is something to be said for a Home Secretary who is a young

:01:55.:02:00.

woman who worked and campaigned with diverse communities and sees these

:02:01.:02:04.

issues as not just from the view of Democrats but from diverse treaties

:02:05.:02:09.

and there is something to be said for a Home Secretary who spent 30

:02:10.:02:13.

years as a constituency MP and knows how these issues work for ordinary

:02:14.:02:20.

people. What about someone who has said that we should abolish MI5? I

:02:21.:02:27.

think you have got back from... You signed in 1989... I can read it back

:02:28.:02:34.

to. She called for the abolition of conspiratorial groups like MI5 and

:02:35.:02:36.

Special Branch which are not accountable to the British people.

:02:37.:02:43.

Signed by about. At the time I felt MI5 needed reforming. It has since

:02:44.:02:47.

been reformed and I would not call for it to be got rid of now. So that

:02:48.:02:54.

Diane Abbott has gone and you support MI5? I'm saying that MI5 has

:02:55.:02:59.

gone. It is a different MI5 and that is why so many of us can support it

:03:00.:03:03.

now. And you fully support it, because also in your career, you

:03:04.:03:09.

have voted around 30 times against anti-terrorist legislation. What you

:03:10.:03:15.

have to remember is on many of those occasions I and Jeremy Corbyn were

:03:16.:03:19.

going through the lobby with Tory MPs. Theresa May herself voted

:03:20.:03:25.

against the 2005 invention of terrorism Bill, she voted against ID

:03:26.:03:36.

cards and against the... Nobody votes against it these things

:03:37.:03:41.

without a lot of thought. And the view of myself and Jeremy and Ms

:03:42.:03:44.

numbers of the Conservative Party including David Davis at the time

:03:45.:03:50.

was this counter-productive, counter terrorism legislation. Some of the

:03:51.:03:54.

positions we voted for work held up in the courts. You said nobody votes

:03:55.:03:58.

against the beings without a lot of thought. Just before 911, you voted

:03:59.:04:04.

against subscribing Al-Qaeda as an organisation. That was a huge

:04:05.:04:09.

mistake on your part. Have you read the legislation we are voting on? I

:04:10.:04:16.

have. What the legislation broke forward with a whole list of

:04:17.:04:21.

organisations, some of which some people would argue are not terrorist

:04:22.:04:28.

organisations. To say that because... Which ones? Al-Qaeda,

:04:29.:04:36.

Egyptian Islamic jihad, The Armed Islamic Group, The Liberation Tigers

:04:37.:04:45.

Of Tamil, The Islamic Jihad Grip, The Kurdistan Workers Party. . The

:04:46.:04:55.

reality of some of those groups, whether they were dissidents in

:04:56.:04:59.

their country of origin, and that is why some of us... Had they taken

:05:00.:05:07.

Al-Qaeda as one thing... This is a group of really dangerous

:05:08.:05:09.

organisations from all over the world who have killed a lot of

:05:10.:05:14.

people. This group carried out the Mumbai attacks that killed more than

:05:15.:05:20.

117 people. No list is perfect, but it was a pretty good list and you

:05:21.:05:23.

voted against prescribing those groups. Because there were groups

:05:24.:05:28.

that I did deemed to be dissidents rather than terror organisations.

:05:29.:05:32.

You have to give people credit for thinking about how they vote. As I

:05:33.:05:37.

said, we're hearing about all this anti-terror legislation that Jeremy

:05:38.:05:40.

and I voted against, but we're not hearing that the Tories voted

:05:41.:05:47.

against the same legislation. There is the list. Which of the

:05:48.:05:52.

organisations should not have been ascribed? You voted against the

:05:53.:05:55.

whole lot been prescribed because you thought somewhere OK. Which ones

:05:56.:06:00.

do you think are OK? It is not that I thought they were OK. I thought

:06:01.:06:05.

they were dissident organisations. I do not need it, and you, because the

:06:06.:06:11.

point is less than a week after those people died in Manchester, we

:06:12.:06:16.

should be talking about going forward to make this country safe.

:06:17.:06:21.

But to go forward, we have to look behind and look at people's record.

:06:22.:06:24.

That is why we are talking about you. Jeremy Corbyn got in some

:06:25.:06:27.

trouble with his interview because he said he had not met the IRA, but

:06:28.:06:32.

he was 40 craft with many during his career. You said a defeat for the

:06:33.:06:38.

British state would be a great liberation, Eamon forward. Do regret

:06:39.:06:44.

your support for the IRA? That particular quote is from a now

:06:45.:06:50.

defunct left newspaper and it had as well as... It was 34 years ago, I

:06:51.:06:58.

had a rather splendid Afro at the time, I do not have the same

:06:59.:07:03.

hairstyle, I do not have the same views. It is 34 years on. The

:07:04.:07:08.

hairstyle is gone and some have the views of corn. -- the views have

:07:09.:07:18.

gone. Still you do not regret? The hairstyle has gone, the views have

:07:19.:07:24.

gone. Do you regret what you said about the IRA at the height of the

:07:25.:07:28.

bombings? What specifically do you want me to regret? I can read the

:07:29.:07:34.

quote. What you said was that 80 feet of the IRA would be devastating

:07:35.:07:44.

for the British people. You said the reason for the violence was entirely

:07:45.:07:47.

caused by the British presence in Northern Ireland. To think those

:07:48.:07:51.

statements are now wrong? It was many years ago. I have moved on. You

:07:52.:07:57.

said that Ireland is our struggle. Every defeat of the British state is

:07:58.:08:03.

a victory for all of us. 34 years ago and I have moved on. Within a

:08:04.:08:08.

few weeks, you could be Home Secretary and one of the things we

:08:09.:08:12.

know from Amber Rudd is she spends to hours a day signing orders

:08:13.:08:16.

approving the surveillance of individual people. Would you be

:08:17.:08:20.

prepared to sit therein do that? Of course! Of the evidence was

:08:21.:08:23.

presented to me. I know how these things work. If the file that was

:08:24.:08:28.

imprint of me, I will sign for surveillance. That is part of the

:08:29.:08:37.

job. Another big issue, encrypted services on WhatsApp and other

:08:38.:08:40.

mobile messaging devices. Due oppose all support forcing those companies

:08:41.:08:47.

to show what they are doing? I think the problem is they are American

:08:48.:08:53.

companies and they feel strongly about the right to free speech. We

:08:54.:08:59.

do have to do work with them to you have access to these messages where

:09:00.:09:02.

it is an issue about end-to-end encryption. We have do work with

:09:03.:09:06.

them. If they will not cooperate, we will have two can sit what further

:09:07.:09:13.

action to take. Given the tragedy am Manchester, I would hope they would

:09:14.:09:15.

want to work with the British Government. Reported in today's

:09:16.:09:21.

papers, as recently as 2010, you told a dinner party we should not

:09:22.:09:25.

put innocent people's DNA on the database and we should not have

:09:26.:09:28.

guilty people on that database again. Do you still support that

:09:29.:09:36.

statement? I'm also its constituency MP and I had to deal with some very

:09:37.:09:41.

difficult cases of children who were not convicted of anything who had

:09:42.:09:47.

their DNA on the database and I had a huge struggle to have their DNA

:09:48.:09:51.

taken. We do need to be careful about taking children's DNA. But did

:09:52.:10:01.

you did not use the word children now. Added time, about a child,

:10:02.:10:08.

whose DNA had been taken. In terms of retaining a strong DNA database,

:10:09.:10:14.

IU in favour or against it. I'm in favour of the DNA deck to base. I'm

:10:15.:10:19.

not in the favour of keeping the DNA of children who have committed no

:10:20.:10:26.

crime. So the DNA should be kept of those who have committed a crime?

:10:27.:10:30.

Let's move on. One of the big announcements has been lots more

:10:31.:10:34.

officers, including another thousand people for the security services.

:10:35.:10:38.

They are now increasing by a thousand after David Cameron 's

:10:39.:10:45.

buttons marked the 1000 has not been recruited. They are not recruiting

:10:46.:10:52.

them yet. We want to recruit 10,000 extra police officers, community

:10:53.:10:57.

police officers because we think community policing is key. We want

:10:58.:11:04.

to recruit more firefighters, 3000 extra prison officers 1000, as you

:11:05.:11:11.

say, people in the security field and more bodyguards because we think

:11:12.:11:16.

protecting our borders is so important. How much extra will you

:11:17.:11:25.

spend on MI5. We are not spending extra because the Government has put

:11:26.:11:30.

the money aside. So this is announcement at all? It is part of

:11:31.:11:46.

our security's the reason we had to the's on Theresa's watch, there are

:11:47.:11:50.

20,000 police officers down. So the cost of the entire package

:11:51.:12:03.

Thank you very much indeed. In the Labour Party manifesto, it says

:12:04.:12:09.

freedom of movement will end when we leave the European Union. Are you in

:12:10.:12:17.

support of that policy? Freedom of movement obviously ends when we

:12:18.:12:24.

leave the EU. If we leave the European Union,, what we should be

:12:25.:12:32.

talking about is the immigration we have when freedom of movement ends.

:12:33.:12:36.

There is no question that it ends on we come out of the European Union.

:12:37.:12:41.

You have said ending free movement has been a synonym for

:12:42.:12:49.

anti-immigration racism. I don't think you're reading the manifesto

:12:50.:12:55.

properly. Of course, I think that anti-immigrant rhetoric is toxic and

:12:56.:13:01.

very bad for business. We are seeing the numbers of EU migrants going

:13:02.:13:07.

down at a time when we are 24,000 nurses short. Anti-immigrant

:13:08.:13:11.

rhetoric is unpleasant but also bad for the economy. On freedom of

:13:12.:13:16.

movement, freedom of movement ends when we come out of the EU. If you

:13:17.:13:22.

become Home Secretary, you will be the first black person in the any of

:13:23.:13:27.

the major home offices of state. Will you run it differently in terms

:13:28.:13:31.

of its attitude to racism and communities and so on? I will run

:13:32.:13:37.

the best Home Office that I can. I will draw on my experience, having

:13:38.:13:43.

worked there. I will draw on my experience at the grassroots. We

:13:44.:13:48.

will have the best Home Office that I can run, which will draw on some

:13:49.:13:52.

of the Home Office 's best traditions and above all, we'll keep

:13:53.:13:56.

this country safe. Thanks very much indeed for talking to us.

:13:57.:14:12.

Waiting for your mate to wake up after a sleepover.

:14:13.:14:23.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS