Browse content similar to Leanne Wood. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Plaid Cymru's Leanne Wood. This all takes place in the aftermath of | :00:16. | :00:23. | |
Manchester, and Wales has not been immune from jihadi 's peak pull | :00:24. | :00:27. | |
victims of jihadi attacks. Can I ask you what Plaid Cymru's messages to | :00:28. | :00:32. | |
people thinking about how to vote and the security issue in | :00:33. | :00:35. | |
particular, what is your message to them this morning? It makes no sense | :00:36. | :00:41. | |
to us for those public services that rose to the challenge and supported | :00:42. | :00:49. | |
so many people in Manchester, the health service, the emergency | :00:50. | :00:54. | |
services, the police, obviously, for those to be cut. And just's police | :00:55. | :00:59. | |
service has been putt and there are plans for more cut wood. It is all | :01:00. | :01:05. | |
for what has happened. It is awful to see how you can prevent it in the | :01:06. | :01:11. | |
future, but you can get people some more confidence by making there are | :01:12. | :01:16. | |
plans in place and emergency services are properly resourced to | :01:17. | :01:20. | |
deal with things. We would not need troops on the street if there were | :01:21. | :01:24. | |
enough police officers on the streets. That is a very good answer | :01:25. | :01:29. | |
about the aftermath, but what about catching people first? Plaid Cymru | :01:30. | :01:36. | |
have voted again and again against a surveillance, surveillance. I do on | :01:37. | :01:42. | |
the wrong side of this argument? We are against mass surveillance. We | :01:43. | :01:46. | |
are in favour of more targeted surveillance. It makes sense that if | :01:47. | :01:50. | |
people are under suspicion that the police need to keep an eye on them, | :01:51. | :01:56. | |
so we support resources for that. The idea of watching everyone and | :01:57. | :02:01. | |
being able to access everyone's e-mails and communications, that is | :02:02. | :02:06. | |
where we have a problem and where our MPs have voted consistently, | :02:07. | :02:11. | |
against this. This is the heart of the argument, because no one really | :02:12. | :02:15. | |
thinks the police are going to look at all of our e-mails, survey | :02:16. | :02:19. | |
everyone. They have got 23,000 suspected jihadi is in his country | :02:20. | :02:23. | |
and they cannot deal with them, so this fantasy there will be mass | :02:24. | :02:27. | |
surveillance of everyone, everyone is under threat and be watched by | :02:28. | :02:31. | |
the big state if we allow these laws, it is ridiculous. If you look | :02:32. | :02:38. | |
into surveillance, there is a very resource intensive activity. The | :02:39. | :02:42. | |
police need to be adequately resourced to do it. It is better | :02:43. | :02:47. | |
they watch the people most at risk and keep a close eye on those rather | :02:48. | :02:52. | |
than the entire population. There is such a thing as information overload | :02:53. | :02:55. | |
and it is better to concentrate resources. They never asked to look | :02:56. | :03:01. | |
at the entire population. They know who they need to look at and they | :03:02. | :03:06. | |
need the resources for that. After Manchester, people are thinking we | :03:07. | :03:10. | |
need to think again about security. Are you in Plaid Cymru thinking | :03:11. | :03:14. | |
about it again? You have to review security all the time. It is | :03:15. | :03:20. | |
terrible that this has happened, but it is not as alert as market is the | :03:21. | :03:28. | |
most serious incident since 2005, so there is something working in some | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
ways, but on the other hand, the person responsible for this was | :03:33. | :03:35. | |
brought to the attention of authorities, is there are serious | :03:36. | :03:40. | |
questions that need to be answered and as to why action was not taken | :03:41. | :03:45. | |
earlier to prevent this. We need to learn lessons from this, that is a | :03:46. | :03:51. | |
cliche to say, but you have to review at all times. The army and | :03:52. | :03:54. | |
some of the armoured police are coming off the streets quite soon. | :03:55. | :04:00. | |
You got a huge event in Cardiff, Champions League coming up. Do you | :04:01. | :04:04. | |
want to see more armed police back for that? Are you concerned about | :04:05. | :04:10. | |
that event? I want to see it adequately resourced, security wise, | :04:11. | :04:14. | |
obviously. It is going to be a big event. Many people will come to | :04:15. | :04:17. | |
Wales. I do not think people should be put from coming. It will be an | :04:18. | :04:23. | |
amazing event. I'm sure by making sure the security side is resourced | :04:24. | :04:26. | |
that people will have that confidence and reassurance. Thank | :04:27. | :04:28. | |
you for talking to us. Order! Order act... MPs are polite | :04:29. | :05:02. | |
and good-tempered. Order! Or, at least they are meant to be. | :05:03. | :05:07. | |
According to the rule book, good temper and moderation are the | :05:08. | :05:09. | |
characteristics of Parliamentary language. But politics is a dirty | :05:10. | :05:14. | |
game. Indeed at the moment, MPs often resort to language which is, | :05:15. | :05:18. | |
for want of | :05:19. | :05:19. |