Live Business Questions Business Questions

his constituents. We're working to make sure that these schemes are

delivered as soon as possible. I will keep them informed of progress.

Business question, Paul Flynn. World leader given a House the business

for next week? -- world leader. The Leader of the House of Commons Chris

Grayling. The business for next week, on Monday fourth July we'll

have the first awarded estimates day when they debate important tribunal

fee is followed by a debate on impacts on investors and consumers.

Details will be given in the official report. At 10pm the House

will be asked to agree all outstanding estimates. On Tuesday

fifth July, we will have proceedings on the supply and probation Main

estimates Bill followed by consideration in committee, the

first day of consideration. Wednesday 6th of July, opposition

day on a motion to be announced and decided by the opposition. On

Thursday seventh, a statement on a publication of the defence

committee, Russia, implications for UK defence and security, followed by

a debate on a motion on online abuse, followed by a general debate

on support for the UK creative industries and their contribution to

the economy. All decided by the backbench business committee. Friday

in July, we are not sitting. The provisional business for the week

commencing the 11th July will be on the final day of consideration of

committee of the Wales Bill. I would like to inform the House the

business in Westminster Hall on the 11th and 14th of July will be on the

debate on the new petition relating to school penalty fines and

authorised absence from schools and on 14th July a debate on the

consultation of cooperatives to the economy forward by a debate in

general terms on dissemination. You may be a tad surprised to see me in

this position. Because the past 26 years I've been backbencher by

choice. That wasn't just my choice. It was the choice of the past five

leaders of my party! Today, for very positive reasons as part of our

diversity project in my party, of which we have done splendidly, we

have far more women in the front bench and in Parliament than ever

before. Far more ethnic minorities and an absence in the front bench of

octogenarians. And I believe that my appointment to this post will be a

trailblazer one. It will lead to all octogenarians in the party and the

experience and wisdom amongst my fellow octogenarians being available

to the House. It is important that we have people in the House who can

remember life before there was a health service. The Wales Bill is

back on Tuesday. I hope that the leader of the has lost his

curmudgeonly attitude to it, because to dismiss the idea that both the

beautiful languages of the House should be allowed to be spoken here

also Welsh has the same status as spitting on the carpet. It is

disorderly behaviour. Welsh has been used in committees of the House when

they are held in Wales. And it can be done here at little cost. There

is no reason to oppose the will of the Welsh Conservative Labour MPs.

We have a total number of frontbenchers of Conservative Party,

party, nor Welsh speaking now and it is a sign of the great health of the

language and it is marvellous to recall that Welsh was an ancient,

sophisticated language, centuries before English existed. In fact it

was spoken as was Gaelic at the time when the ancestors of those who

created English were pagan barbarians who dressed in woad,

painting themselves blue, and went on top of mountains howling at the

moon! Desperately must be taken seriously. There is also lessons

from the football field about leaving Europe, that the government

would well he'd. The English team Brexited swiftly and ignominiously.

Wales and domains with honour. I would appeal to the leader of the

for his party not to dismiss the very sensible idea of having a

second referendum supported by one of the candidates in the election in

his party. They are good precedents for this. In the European Union,

which has a splendid tradition of keeping voting until you reach the

right decision. It happened in Denmark and in two other countries

where they held a referendum and one year later reversed that decision

and the reason is, people voted on false agendas, and were is the ?365

million for the health service? Where is the emergency budget? And

the public are rightly outraged by the mysteries that they were told by

the propagandists on both sides. It's not a surprise that we have a

position -- petition of historic by mentions, as big as the petitions

for the chartists and the suffragettes, 4 million signatures

and counting people who said that they were deceived by the boat, by

the propaganda which was largely determined by the proprietors of the

daily newspapers rather than by a sensible realisation of the horrors

to come. So it is quite reasonable that, after the issue has settled

down, when, we are told that it is going to take five years, that the

public should have the right to consider on that. It is timely, now,

to look at the role of the independent adviser on ministerial

interests. This man is virtually unemployed. He has only looked at

one case in the last five years. That involved a baroness who

confessed to a minor misdemeanour. There have been six other cases

since that have not been reported to the adviser. Because the only person

who had been reported is the Prime Minister. Two of them occurred a

year ago. The involve the Cabinet Office ministers who gave ?3 million

to kids company in spite of the advice of civil servants not to do

it, published advice and in fact kids company went bankrupt three

days later. There is another far more serious matter, which is of

current concern. And it is one case in some five years ago when the

Secretary of State for Defence stood down and the adviser on ministerial

interest recommended, he recommended that the case should be heard by

him. And the minister involved achieved absolution by resignation.

He got out of a job and nobody knows what he did, what was so serious

that occurred, that meant he had to leave office. The problem is that

now that person is offering himself not only as leader of the

Conservative Party but as Prime Minister. It is a matter of concern

to all of us that we know what happened and why he left that job.

The first question you would ask anyone applying for the job of Prime

Minister is why do you leave your last job, and we don't know. This

week is going to be dominated by one event, and that is the publication

of the children report. There was no information available yesterday. And

the answer given by the Prime Minister to the member for Gordon.

And we must remember that when this report is coming out, Parliament is

on trial. It wasn't just one man. It was hundreds of MPs. Because the

three Select Committees of this House, the military and the press

were in favour of joining a war in pursuit of nonexistent weapons of

mass destruction. Those who saw the very moving programme on BBC Two,

which featured Reg Keyes will understand the true costs of war.

Here was a man who for the last seven years has not been able to...

Let me just very gently say to the honourable gentleman, who is an

immensely experienced parliamentarian, I know that he is

beginning his apprenticeship in this role, and I always enjoy listening

to him, because he speaks with great experience. He has exceeded his

time. It is the first time he is at the box and I don't wish to cut him

off. He must now bring his remarks toward a conclusion, maybe with a

couple of pithy questions. And we will have had our dose for today. Mr

Paul Flynn. I am grateful to Mr Speaker. The question is, what is a

programme that will allow the loved ones of the 179 soldiers who died

the opportunity to present their case? We know that those who are

likely to be accused by the Chilcott report have employed lawyers to go

over their defences. We want to make sure that Parliament takes

responsibility for a decision taken in This Place in 2003, that resulted

in the deaths of 179 of our brave soldiers, probably in vain, and an

uncounted number of deaths from other people. The Chilcott report

must be debated fairly. What are the arrangements for doing it? Gary Stal

by welcoming the honourable gentleman to his place on the

opposition front bench and congratulate him on an extraordinary

comeback. It is 26 years since he last sat than those benches. What he

has in common with his immediate predecessor, indeed, quite a lot of

people on those benches is that the last time he sat on that seat he

also resign. Since then he has become a distinct backbencher. So

much so, writing books on how to be a backbencher, which contain some

substantial words of wisdom. For example, his advice to the Minister

and waiting. Cultivate the virtues of dullness and safety. And... And,

Mr Speaker, some advice for a job title called the Speaker in waiting

which, of course, is something that may be entirely appropriate. The

honourable gentleman who has now got time to concentrate on preparing his

campaign, he's got plenty of time, although we know he is already

getting his campaign team together. Mr Speaker, at one point, I

absolutely agree with the honourable gentleman. I suspect even our good

friends of the SNP benches, where all, this week, Welsh. With regret

for the result last week and the Scottish side for the qualification

period, we are all gunning for Wales to get to the final and do us all

proud as a nation. We wish the team well and we are all keeping our

fingers crossed. We are all absolutely the iron them. -- behind

them. I take his point about the history and traditions of the Welsh

language, but I have to say to them, the language of This Place has

decided over the years many times that it is English and I do not

propose to make any changes as I indicated previously. About the

second referendum, it just does not work like that. Any more than I am

going to ask for a rematch between Iceland and England. The people have

spoken. We have had a referendum and the result. That is democracy. If we

have a general election and our side loses we don't get another about a

month later. We had arguments put on both sides. Huge amount of

information set before the nations of the public decide one way or the

other and they have reached their decision and it is our job to follow

that and deliver the will of the people. It is nice, after four

months of hedging my bets on these benches, and not always speaking to

the government, to be back in a clear way speaking for the whole

government and saying that we, now, need to get on with the job that the

British people have given us. Now, they could be that there has

not been the basis for investigations. If Members of the

House have concerns about the conduct of other members, ways and

means are available within procedures of this House. If the

honourable gentleman has concern about what has happened, you can use

those channels. They should only be used when it is a genuine matter to

investigate. It is for the Prime Minister and advisers to decide what

should happen. On the Chilcot report... Of course this is a matter

of great seriousness and of course we understand how important it is we

understand what happened and what went on. I don't think anyone can

set the stage this has not been an exhaustive process. I wish it had

been published years ago. Angry with the honourable member that I have

wanted to see this report published for a long time. It is now

happening, not before time. Not a single person on these benches does

not wish it could not have happened a long time ago. It will come next

week. We will have a plan file will be debated in this House. It is

right and proper that lesson should be learned and what happened should

be considered and this should be fully debated. I am proud to have

written the preface and hosted the launch of the most recent

publication by the honourable gentleman, the member for Newport

West. That was a very happy occasion indeed. The chairman of the

Backbench Business Committee is unfortunately unable to be here. He

has asked me to convey the message to the Leader of the House that

through our great queue of backbench business, we now have sufficient

debates, including the one has announced, for six days before

recess. I trust that the leader will allocate more time to the Backbench

Business Committee. For my side, Mr Speaker, this weekend sees the

demonstration, the annual demonstration ending in London which

has increasingly become anti-Semitic with slogans which are absolutely

disgraceful. With flags of terrorist organisations shown on British

streets, on the streets of London. And I do think it is paramount and

the Government to actually make sure that if anyone commits hate crime in

this way, if anyone is guilty of that, those people should be

arrested and face the thought force of the law. And they would seek the

Leader of the House to ensure that that happens this weekend. Can I

start by saying that we will do our best for the Backbench Business

Committee. It seems like they are quite ambitious but we will see what

we can do. I echo the words of my honourable friend about hate crime

in this country. It is really important to say that. As someone

who campaigned for Britain to leave the European Union, I did not

campaign for Britain to become an intolerant, racist nation. Any

comments that are racist or intolerant are utterly unacceptable.

I deplore them and they should be dealt with with the full force of

the war. Can I also finally to the House for announcing the business

for next week. We sought for the cameras are now ago, and there was a

whole nation hoping and praying he would throw his hat into the ring

instead of becoming just a cheerleader for the Home Secretary

with a friend winning message of divisive nationalists. Wish it was

as referring to me and my honourable friends. I congratulate the

honourable member... I am very fond of the honourable gentleman. Can I

say ever so charitably to him, he wasn't exactly the first choice for

this post and I know that Labour have been scrambling around all week

to try and get this sorted, so regardless with what happens in this

awful, raging civil war, Parliamentary Party versus

membership, I'll things turn out well when this is all finished. To

the Leader of the House, well done. Well done. This is as much his Leave

the victory as it is the right honourable gentleman, Nigel Farage

and Ukip's to the victor belongs the spoils. And what a spoils he has. A

divided economy, ugly, racist attacks on the streets, a nation

baffled and confused about this result and a Government without an

idea or plan. The nation has every right to feel internally grateful to

the right honourable gentleman in his stunning victory last week. So

when do we get the debate which clarifies when this free and ?50

million come back to the NHS, as promised by the honourable gentleman

and his friends? When do we get the debate about control over the

borders, again missed by the honourable gentleman friends? When

we get the debate that this is a Government that has no clue about

this to take it forward. We need a debate about the nations of the

nation 's of the UK and how they will fit in with this. Scotland will

not be getting out of the European Union against our collective will.

We were forced to choose in a referendum that we did not want, we

were forced to make a decision, we have given that decision. It is

abundantly clear what Scotland once. When will he now respect the

decision of the Scottish people? -- Scotland wants. Well, Mr Speaker, I

see the honourable gentleman is back on form. We didn't have the

opportunity of forming the dream ticket to leave this country, since

he is so determined to not be part of it. I would simply say that

Scotland voted to be part of the mighty kingdom. The United Kingdom

voted to leave the European Union. That, I am afraid, is democracy. And

we as a Government are Democrats, we listen to the will of the people

across Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as supported in that

Scottish referendum, and I simply say to them that we will carry on

Government for the whole United Kingdom and listen to the people of

the whole United Kingdom. We will do the right thing for the whole United

Kingdom and Scotland is a part of the United Kingdom. Thank you, Mr

Speaker. If you indulge me, I would like to congratulate the honourable

member for Newport West on his position in front bench. There is

clearly hold for us all, Mr Speaker, if the honourable gentleman can make

it onto the front bench. It seems anyone can make it on a front bench.

He is an inspiration to us all. Could the Leader of the House... Can

we have a debate on the status of the referendum result so that we can

find out who in this House our are true Democrats and who are not? On

the Government website, it said the result of the referendum on the UK's

membership in the European Union will be final. The Government will

have a democratic duty to implement the result. The BBC's hysterical

coverage since their referendum has been nothing short of a disgrace.

But we should reassure people that the have had the result, there is

money for any more campaigning, and we must get together to implement

the will of the public. Does you except that every member of the

Government should accept the result of the referendum and implement the

will of the people? It is very simple. We are democracy. We

thought. The result stands. If we have a general election, and we have

experienced years when we have not been successful, we sit on the

opposition benches and do our best to oppose. We don't demand another

general election one month later. That is a the democracy works. The

people are spoken, the Government will act. The contribution of my

Parliamentary colleague is an illustration of how we are willing

to give assistance when necessary, when firm leadership is needed on

both sides. We do not be more useful, arising from the various

exchanges since the referendum result, to have a debate on the

alienation and resentment felt on so many parts of the country. Certainly

in the Black Country Boroughs, which voted to a slight majority to leave

the EU. The House of Commons is not understood sufficiently in the past

few months, perhaps longer, that feeling of resentment and

alienation. I ought really to congratulate, somewhat belatedly,

the honourable gentleman on his recent birthday. Off the top of my

head, and if I am wrong, you will tell me, I think his birthday was

last Sunday. The Leader of the House. The honourable gentleman was

perhaps a bit too pessimistic about his prospects. It looks like there

could be a Labour leadership contest shortly. And judging by the

commitment coming from the octogenarian is on the benches

opposite, maybe one of them should put their hats in the ring. On the

subject of the impact of changes in recent years on the economy of the

country and individual communities up and down the country, what I

would say to him is that one of the things I'm proudest of that this

Government has achieved is the huge fall, more than 500,000, growing up

in workers' councils. That'll make a transformational difference to the

lives of children. Parents getting up in the morning and going to work

with a sense of purpose and direction. It is something I am

proud that my party has contributed to achieving in Government. Mr

Speaker, I thank the leader in the House for announcing that we will

have a debate on online abuse next week. Does he agree that we all need

to view the result of the referendum with respect and good grace? We all

may need to work together to get the best result for Britain and we must

all stand up against racism, extremism and abuse from all sides

of the political divide and referendum divides.

I will reiterate that, I am absolutely condemn any racist

attacks and abuse, any xenophobic abuse in this country. It is not

acceptable and should not be permitted. It is illegal and should

be dealt with accordingly. I did not make reference in my remarks to

security for members. Just to say two things. The first is that since

the tragic loss of Jo Cox, work is taking place on this important issue

and I and the chairman of ways and Means will bring back further. The

House shortly but I want to reassure members that that is very much a

matter of concern and attention. Particularly given the point from My

Honourable Friend, it is a matter of concern that members continue to be

subject to some pretty unpleasant abuse on social media. But that is

also something being discussed by the police and where I want to see

firm action. It is not acceptable in any shape or form, particularly that

female colleagues get the kind of abuse that they have been. It must

stop and we must deal with appropriately. Another aspect of the

league campaign that of the leader allows was part of force to wrongly

state that decisions of the EU are taken by unelected bureaucrats. When

will the leader of the commit to get rid of the more than 800 lifelong

peers who are unelected bureaucrats next door? Mr Speaker, I know the

SNP feel deeply committed to abolishing the House of Lords but

right now I'm afraid we have other priorities as a nation. As the only

Welsh member currently sitting in This Place at the moment, may I

offer on this side of the House, may I, my congratulations for the

honourable member for Newport West on his great elevation and I wish

many long hours and years ahead and many happy years ahead in that role.

Mr Speaker, areas such as mine which has had large numbers of tourists to

the Hay literary festival and the Royal wish show our hotbeds for the

industry but this industry is being held back by high VAT rates. Can we

have a debate about what can be done about lowering VAT for the tourism

ministry to make sure that the British tourist industry is among

the most competitive in the world? Regardless of 1's views on the

random, we will ask that the government be able to make

modifications to Reg Keyes race in ways not previously permissible so

the future of the tourism industry is something that the government

will be able to focus on to a greater degree than has been a case

in the past. My constituent has a severely disabled mother and works

16 hours a week. Due to the increase in the minimum wage and the trees on

the early threshold, he's now ?3200 a year worse off. Many thousands are

in the same position. The government claims to get the most vulnerable in

society and say that they want to make work pay but this clearly

isn't. Can we have an urgent debate on this issue? This is the purpose

of Universal Credit. There have been some extraordinary cliff edges in

the welfare system. We are now implementing Universal Credit being

rolled out in geographic areas and different categories of claimants.

When it is pennies, it will make a transformation difference to the

type of site stands she has described. -- when it is finished.

In a week that has seen the start of the Hennelly regards, can we have a

debate on the important role that growing plays in national life and

contrary to the image that is created, the contribution that it

makes to young people's sporting activities? Meilleroux will friend

makes an important point. I commend everyone in his constituency for the

work they put in to make the Henley Regatta such a successful event. It

is a sport we should be proud of. We have excelled at it and you'll have

the games. I hope that when the Rio games start, again, be successful

and win large numbers of medals and be proud of the athletes to make a

difference to our country and our sport. I commend those in Henley

because that regard is part of the success that this sport has enjoyed

in recent years. It is with regret that we learned of yet another

deferral on the decision about capacity in the South-East of

England. We understand the context in which this is happening. Surely

decisions about the security and events of the country cannot be

deferred. Can the leader of the syndicate when we are likely to get

a vote on the renewal of Triton? -- the Leader of the House indicate. --

Trident. I understand the concern. That many members want to have that

vote. It is certainly on the government 's mind. The crisis

facing North Middlesex Hospital is aggravated by a tale of two health

cities within London. Borrowers like Camden and Islington received the

lion share whilst government support for Enfield continues to go. We in

Enfield need fair funding and we need it now. My Honourable Friend is

a fierce advocate for his constituency. The Secretary of State

will be taking questions on Tuesday and will be happy to respond to that

issue. I understand it as a matter of concern to him. Mr Speaker, may I

follow the unanswered question from my friend for Perth and North

Perthshire, and can we have a debate on the Scotland will get the Barnett

Consequentials of the three ?50 million promised to the English NHS

and it is not coming to Scotland as promised on the side of the league

campaign bus, would My Honourable Friend like to apologise to the

country now? Two points to make. First of all, can I express my good

wishes do the honourable gentleman after his change of role this week?

I'm sure that he will return to his position as shadow Scottish

secretary, but I pay tribute to him for the bravery he has shown. What I

would say is two things, first, the government position is that we have

to negotiate carefully now that we're out of the European Union, and

until we have done so, we carry on making contributions as normal. Can

we have a debate in government time on the involvement of celebrities

and politics? On referendum night a week ago, the pro-remain American

actress Lindsay Lohan, in a series of bizarre cleats, slapped off areas

of this country that voted to leave the European Union. At one point she

directed a fierce, offensive to at Kettering, claiming she had never

heard of it and implying that no one knew where it was. Apart from the

fact that it might be the most average down in the country,

everybody knows where Kettering is. It is famous as the home of Weetabix

breakfast cereal, and Loakes shoes and Kettering town football club has

scored more goals in the FA Cup on any other team in history the

country, so would he support my invitation to Lindsay Lohan to come

and switch on the Christmas lights Kettering thus redeeming her

political reputation and raising money for good causes? And Kettering

is principally famous for the honourable gentleman. Mr Speaker, as

those of us who have children will know, over the years, Lindsay Lohan

has been a star child and the movies, a very entertaining actress

of the time, but she has not necessarily fulfil the professional

potential. That's now we know the reason why. As she visited

Kettering, she might have seen her career turnaround, and I think the

invitation My Honourable Friend has made to her today is one she should

accept that she should visit the fine town of Kettering and find

herself return to stardom. Mr Alex Salmond. Can we have a week-long

debate on the political backstabbing? We're going to need a

week, because all of the PLP will want to take part, but they are like

amateurs compared to the right on all member for Surrey Heath, the

Lord Macbeth of this Chamber, who, having dispatched the Prime

Minister, today is despatching the Prime Minister 's greatest rival.

What makes the leader of the Houston that Lord Macbeth 's draggable not

soon be turned to him and I'm secretary? The honourable member for

Surrey Heath has been, in my view, an excellent Education Secretary,

excellent Chief Whip and is now doing an excellent job in the role I

used to perform as Lord Chancellor. He has friends on the side of the

House and he is for the Scottish National Party... Woodville leader

about reassure us that two strands of particular interest to the

business community will be discussed at some length? Firstly something

that has been brought up, that the rover will be a confirmation that

you will carry on with correctness to large-scale infrastructure

projects up and down the country to ensure that stability, calmness and

jobs continue, and then secondly that a special Cabinet department

for the EU is making full use of industry experts and leaders outside

of government in key areas in order to ensure that our negotiators will

be fully briefed, have clear objectives and be good to go when

required? Let's be absolutely clear. We may be electing a new leader and

the new Prime Minister but quite apart from containing to pursue a

one nation agenda, this government will continue the modernisation of

infrastructure, where we have made a real difference. I remember when I

was Shadow Transport Secretary a decade ago, campaigning around the

country for infrastructure improvements they said were

desperately needed. Now when I drive round the country, those projects

are finished or are being built at the moment. I am proud of what we're

doing for infrastructure. In terms of team negotiating for the future

outside the EU, it is the government view that we should draw from the

broadest possible expertise to make sure that the strategy we have is

the right one for this country. Mr Speaker, the leader of that is said

huge amount of information was sent before the country in the Europe in

them. This is one piece of that information, about league campaign

leaflet that says the EU costs us ?350 million bill week, we could

spend that on the NHS instead. Isn't the truth that there was a huge

amount of misinformation placed before the country? When can we

debate when we are getting that ?350 million? Let's be clear. The

government has this week set out in this House the first steps we are

taking towards negotiating our exit from the EU. He will know that

whilst we remain members of the EU, and we are today, normal

contributions will continue. When we leave, we will no longer make

attributions in the way that we do now. Given the recess periods we

have had in the last two weeks, can we have a statement next week from

ministers about the situation in relation to the steel industry? It

is important, as steelworkers and MPs know that exactly what is

happening in those situations. I understand My Honourable Friend 's

concerns and they will make sure that they are past the Business

Secretary today. It is helpful for MPs representing steel producing

areas to get updates and I will see if that can be done. We should

provide closure of the families of Armed Forces personnel on a and

murky passage in our history. Am convinced hundreds of members will

want an extended debate on this report. Will the Leader of the House

ensure that two consecutive days are made available to debate the

Chilcott report before the summer recess? I understand the desire to

debate the Chilcott report. We are discussing that and we will set out

plans shortly. I have only a nice business on till Monday week. I am

very aware of the issues he raises. -- announced business. Last weekend

was a 130,000 people visited Cleethorpes for events connected

with the national Armed Forces event. It clearly demonstrates the

commitment and support of our local communities for those who serve in

the military past and present. Could we have a debate to look at further

developments of the military covenant and how we support the

welfare of those concerned? I absolutely agree with my aunt will

friend. I pay tribute to the people of Cleethorpes for organising such

an important event last week. I pay tribute to all of those who are this

week celebrating commemorating, with poignancy, the anniversary of the

Battle of the Somme. We should always value the people who serve

this country in Armed Forces. We should always continue to do so. I

have to say also, it is my hope that the weather brightens up and the

prospects for Cleethorpes this summer grows rather than diminishes.

Now that we know according to what he has just said that the National

Health Service will get no money, will he tell the Hardwicke

commissioning group, make a statement, till the Secretary of

State for Health, that the Hardwicke commissioning group in Derbyshire

that proposes to close the Bolsover and Bakewell hospitals should now

keep them open, because we have got the money? It would be a bold person

who try to make changes in his constituency. I don't know about the

local circumstances. I can say to him, regardless of the process for

negotiation of our exit for the EU, we will continue to spend more money

on the National Health Service. Can we please have a debate on what

we can do to improve the understanding of the way that

democracy works? Including, it seems, even amongst some members of

this House. It really is quite simple. In a referendum, when one

side gets more than 1 million votes more than the other, that site has

one. -- that side has won the referendum. We shouldn't pursue the

illusion that you simply rewrite democracy because you simply Almagro

not like the result. The right thing for the country is negotiating a

Brexit, planning it for the best interest of the country, but taking

advantage of the opportunity this now brings to the country. Forging

new free-trade partnerships around the world. I am very encouraged that

only this week, the Speaker of Representatives, all Ryan, has said

very clearly he wants to take an early step to agreeing a free-trade

agreement with the United Kingdom from the United States. That is the

kind of opportunity available. The Care Quality Commission has ordered

not in a --... Care Quality Commission has ordered

not in a We have a shortage of doctors, and in an unprecedented

move, the general health Council are threatening to withdraw junior

doctors from the hospital due to inadequate support. This is a

disaster for that hospital and everyone who uses it. It is one of

the busiest emergency departments in London and probably nationally. It

would have a domino effect on also endings hospitals should accord. --

also endings hospitals should it close. Can we have an early debate

on this crisis? I actually underpins that the -- understand our concerns.

The care of constituents is of paramount importance. But hospitals

are not doing well in these cases, and if they are not, it is not

simply national policy issue, it is about making sure that best

practices spread across the whole the Health Service. Even though we

were on different sides of the referendum debate, I am sure that we

both want to move forward in the right way, and in a way that gets

the detail right. Once the Government has agreed terms of

negotiation, is that not the point where the Leader of the House will

give enough time for this chamber to debate those terms, compelling to

the promises made by the League campaign, and make sure that what

the public voted on was the right thing? Mr Speaker, I am absolute

certain that as we go through the next few months, as we prepare our

strategy for negotiation and begin negotiations, the Government will

wish to provide ample occasion for what is being done to debate this

issue in this House. The oh that is why we need -- that is why we need

and a statement after this referendum to find out if there are

sufficient expats and expertise. We will keep the House informed but we

are assembling the team at the moment. The Government will keep

this House informed as we move forward. The premise to made a very

full statement on Monday, three days ago. He will be back and assess next

week and will want to make sure that members every opportunity to

question about what we're doing. The Leader of the House has clearly been

very busy with his reading, not only reading my boyfriend's book, but he

has also been reading The Darling Buds Of May. If we can have added

data in all seriousness, a lengthy debate about many constituents it is

mine overwhelmingly voted to leave, even though it was not my view, but

I respect that. But we should leave properly and in good order. But can

we have debate about concerns and get them out there before the units

Tasers what? -- the unit starts its work. It is very important. But we

had a debate yesterday as well. We will make sure there are plenty of

opportunities and we will consult extensively. It is really important

that we get this right. Yes, it is important that we listen to

industries like the ceramics industry to understand how best to

look after their interests in the negotiations that lie ahead. And I

can give an absolute assurance to this House that every single member

of the Government and indeed many people outside Government, and we

will want to take part of this, will work absolutely assiduously to make

sure that we do the right thing for Britain. I acknowledge the leader's

inadvertent honesty in telling the chamber that we now have carry on

Government. The leaders of the sea proud of his role in a referendum.

He is also proud of his role in giving us English votes for English

laws. Could he marry those positions with English votes for English

excellence? I know he takes readers. We're one United Kingdom and we

remain so. -- English votes for English X it's. I would be deeply

disappointed that if we were forging these new trade ties, I would hate

to see any part of the United Kingdom losing out on those deals.

After this momentous and tragic decision that the British people

made last birthday, are we in the business efficiently to hold the

people who championed Brexit to account? The effects of people in my

constituency, people working in universities and the textile

industry, the manufacturers, all their lives are going to be

threatened in a serious way. Is this House of Commons, in its present

make up, able to assess what the damage is, how we can put it right

and hold those who make false promises to account? Mr Speaker, I

really don't think that over the last four months anyone can say that

inadequate arguments have been made to the United Kingdom. People had

the opportunity to set out their views and analysis statistics and

reports exhaustively. The British public have not been short of

information on which to base their decision. They have decided. It is

now our job to make sure the decision they had taken for our

country is implemented in the best possible way for all our futures.

Can we please have a debate on Government time on the impact of

leaving the EU on important infrastructure investment in the

north, particularly around the concept of the Northern Powerhouse

and the devolution agenda? I think a lot of us on this side of the House

are very concerned that our northern constituencies that voted to come

out of the EU, now we're faced, where there will be large gaps in

funding, particularly for electrification in the North. We

remain committed to the Northern Powerhouse and investing in it. That

is immensely important for those politically, for this country and

the committees she and others representing them. -- represent in

the North. Today is the deadline for the great exhibition in the North in

division and 18. My home city of Bradford has already submitted a bid

which, with an excellent vision and venue, I believe is a strong

contender. The great exhibition will celebrate the huge cultural and

economic contributions that the North of England has made to the

rest of the UK in both the past and present. So can I please urge the

Leader of the House to allocate time for a debate on this very important

subject? I wish everyone in Bradford well with this bid. Bradford is a

city that feels transformed and it has changed in the sense that things

are happening in Bradford to take the city forward. Everyone in

Bradford is pleased and proud of that. I wish them well for this bid.

I hope it is not just celebrating the past and present, but setting up

after the future, as the country that his stitches and other

committees in Yorkshire can make to the country. Could I asked the

leader of the host range for an statement regarding significant

changes that the DWP has introduced regarding how he deals with MPs'

Klizan Universal Credit? East Lothian is one of the silken --

first constituencies to have a full roll-out. There are lots of

problems. Unfortunately, the DWP's hotline no longer takes queries on

the full-service roll-out. And be -- I am being redirected to Bolton,

which will handle the queries, which is insufficient. I was speed my

colleague, the Secretary of State and say we can get a proper

response. -- I will speak to my colleague. Yesterday the Prime

Minister claimed yet again that the Smiths are his favourite band, and

I'm sure he will hear from Johnny Martyn, if he hasn't already. His

management of this has been much less of Charming Man and much more

of Big Mistakes Again. I can't comment on the Smiths, but I

was a fan of Pink Floyd. Indeed, I spent many happy hours, even 30

years later, listening to the dark side of the moon. I know the subject

on voting for six D and 17-year-olds is alive one, but it remains of your

Government that the right age is 18. It will continue to be a debate and

those who wish to bring that before the British people can put it in the

next manifesto, if they are bright enough to have a next Manifesto. Can

we have a debate on Palace -- palliative care? I visited the

hospice newly opened in my constituency to see the great work

they do. It is a dream important that those in the latter stages of

their life have this ability to have their cases heard in Parliament and

that we take for this debate swiftly. Mr Speaker, I welcome the

opening of the new hospice in her constituency. I think we all owe

huge amount to those who work in palliative care. It is an enormously

challenging area but an enormously compassionate, kind, caring area of

our society. I am sure we would all pay tribute to all of those who work

to make the last days of those suffering from serious illness happy

ones, rather than difficult ones. Get a Government misunderstanding of

supported accommodation, it is set to watch a review of its own policy

on the issue. That is being led by a minister in the other house. Whilst

the review is under way, councils, housing associations and thousands

of my constituents are left in limbo. When all members of the

Southgate chancing Government time to debate that view and when is it

expected to report? I don't know when it will report. It is right and

proper that Members of the House will listen if there is pleased we

have got something wrong. That is something we need to look at in more

detail. We will bring that report back to the House in due course and

there will be an opportunity to question ministers about it. In

order to ensure proper Parliamentary scrutiny, can the leader of the

suits is best officers to ensure there is no Article 50 invocation of

the Lisbon Treaty unless the full proposals of the issue are debated

filly in Parliament? We will have plenty of opportunities in autumn to

discuss and debate what is planned. That'll be for the new Government

and new parameter to decide. May I congratulate Wales on getting

through in the Euros, and may I congratulate the Northern Irish and

Irish fans who have been given an award by the mayor of Paris for

their behaviour and their humour. When the fines started singing away

in a Manger, and we wondered what it was going until it gets to the

words, look down where he lay" and it all say here, you realise there's

terrific humour in that and we congratulate all of the fans from

everywhere who have behaved themselves. The Northern Irish and

Irish teams played very well. Whilst we're all Welsh, now, I must say

that the Northern Irish as was common said at the end of the match,

didn't really deserve the result they got. Wales have played

brilliantly and made it through to the quarterfinals and we hope they

go much further, but we think Northern Ireland did the whole

United Kingdom proud as well. Much of the anti-immigration rhetoric in

the Brexit debate was driven by a lack of availability of housing.

Particularly secure social housing tenancies that gave family security

and stability. Can we expect a statement from the government in

which they will join the Welsh Assembly government in removing the

right to buy and the right to acquire and will we have a statement

to ensure an appropriate level of new investment in social housing for

the United Kingdom? There's two set of points here. We believe in home

ownership, that people should have the right to own their homes. One of

the reasons it has been for a long time government policy to reduce

levels of immigration is because it puts pressure on public services and

infrastructure and housing. And B, first and foremost have to make sure

that we can make the provision that we need to for the next generation

here. A constituent of mine was one of my earliest cases over a year

ago, despite my best efforts is due to be aborted on Tuesday morning.

This removal did not go ahead and she's now back at Yarlswood having

suffered injury. This alleged brutality was so severe that Alec

passengers on the plane allegedly tried to intervene. Can be have a

debate to discuss that treatment of those who claim asylum in this

country? I can't comment on the detail of a case like that. I simply

say that it is right and appropriate that anyone in the asylum system is

treated with decency. It is also the case that the people don't have the

legal right to be here, it is appropriate that we should take them

and bought them. -- deport them. Does the government really believe

the current Private Members' Bill system is perfect? Slap down the

procedure committee recommendations, but will he make government time

available on the floor of the House so the House can have a vote on the

recommendations? My response said precisely that. It is right and

proper order should be back edge debate, because this is about

private members bills and backbench activity and then this committee can

organise such a debate any time it wishes. My recommendation was that

before we can assess how broadly the proposals were supported, that

debate should take place. Between This Place, the Other Place and the

European Parliament, around 52.5% of our lawmakers are currently

unelected. When the UK leaves the EU, that rises to 55% and after the

boundary review it will rise again to 57% stock can be have a debate on

potential reform of our democratic process and to reopen discussion on

plans for a reduction in constituencies, before we climb

further into this severe democratic deficit? The Scottish National Party

have a number of days will do it for debate. It is dogma to bring forward

those subjects for debate if it chooses to do so. My view is that

reform of the House of Lords is something that is not something

among the priorities of this country. Point of order, Ardron. We

have had no update on any UK citizens affected by the estimable

airport attack or if there have been any UK citizens affected and what it

is for security in the region