Browse content similar to 11/07/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Daily Politics. Don't expect it to go down a storm. MPs have been | :00:46. | :00:50. | |
falling over each other do say they don't want it. The regulator in | :00:50. | :00:53. | |
charge of their paces they should get a rise of about ten grand a | :00:53. | :01:01. | |
year. Ian Kennedy, the regulator, says refusing the increase could | :01:01. | :01:04. | |
create another expenses style scandal. We sent Giles out with his | :01:04. | :01:09. | |
moodbox to get your views. They don't do nothing. They promised | :01:09. | :01:12. | |
us everything. They say they are going to do this and that, and then | :01:12. | :01:16. | |
they make it worse. The Communities Secretary will tell | :01:16. | :01:23. | |
us why all immigrants should learn English. | :01:23. | :01:27. | |
And we will be taking a look at the man all politicians fear. The | :01:27. | :01:34. | |
loudest man in Westminster. No, it's not Andrew Neil! | :01:34. | :01:43. | |
It is debatable. All of that in the next hour. With us is Labour MP and | :01:43. | :01:45. | |
chair of the Public Accounts Committee, one of the most powerful | :01:45. | :01:50. | |
in Parliament, Margaret Hodge. Welcome. Let's talk first about the | :01:50. | :01:55. | |
warning that the NHS faces a �30 billion funding gap by the end of | :01:55. | :01:58. | |
the decade if current spending levels are maintained. The | :01:58. | :02:04. | |
solution? Mass hospital closures and the creation of huge GP centres. You | :02:04. | :02:12. | |
would think he would have told us all of that before he left? Indeed. | :02:12. | :02:16. | |
I accept the analysis. We have been looking at NHS finances over the | :02:16. | :02:21. | |
past few years. I've always said the most fragile of our public services | :02:21. | :02:24. | |
is the NHS. Whatever the government said about giving it the same amount | :02:24. | :02:28. | |
of money, which is questionable, I think people think they have had | :02:28. | :02:36. | |
less. Every year since the NHS was funded -- founded, there's been a 4% | :02:36. | :02:46. | |
:02:46. | :02:48. | ||
increase in its expenditure. What is really the point is that if we carry | :02:48. | :02:53. | |
on at this budget level and those changes in medicine, there's going | :02:53. | :03:00. | |
to be a gap. Doesn't this mean that if it is decided that in Britain, | :03:00. | :03:06. | |
the state has to make up the �30 billion gap down the political | :03:06. | :03:10. | |
parties, in their own ways or together, need to sit down and work, | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
what is the state not going to do now so that we can afford the 30 | :03:15. | :03:22. | |
billion we believe the state should up the NHS by? I don't think we have | :03:22. | :03:30. | |
got to that point yet. Let me go through. I think the reorganisation | :03:30. | :03:33. | |
has been a waste of money. We could have saved billions by not doing | :03:33. | :03:36. | |
that. It doesn't address the pub of funding. Secondly, what does he talk | :03:36. | :03:45. | |
about? He talks about putting much more money into prevention rather | :03:45. | :03:47. | |
than acute services. I couldn't agree more. We looked the other day | :03:47. | :03:50. | |
at diabetes. If everybody who had diabetes had the checks they need to | :03:50. | :03:56. | |
make sure that the heart and cholesterol was all right, if they | :03:56. | :04:02. | |
had that, you would save 20,000, I think the figure was, 20,000 lives | :04:02. | :04:06. | |
per year, and you would stop people from getting the conditions they get | :04:06. | :04:12. | |
from it not being treated. So, early intervention, I agree. No other | :04:12. | :04:20. | |
meant as ever done it. -- no government. When you look at the | :04:20. | :04:24. | |
NHS, the only way they have managed to get the efficiencies they have so | :04:24. | :04:29. | |
far is by freezing pay. That's not sustainable over time. You need | :04:29. | :04:35. | |
efficiencies. If they bought more cleverly, they would save billions. | :04:35. | :04:42. | |
We found that in looking at something like 60 trusts, we found | :04:42. | :04:47. | |
there were hundreds of different gloves that were being bought, | :04:47. | :04:53. | |
hundreds of different kinds of paper. So, cleverer procurement | :04:53. | :04:59. | |
could save millions. Then you go to... I have got to stop you. Thank | :04:59. | :05:06. | |
you for that. It's time for our daily quiz. The | :05:06. | :05:12. | |
question is what our Conservative MPs planning to do at next week 's | :05:12. | :05:14. | |
PMQs to protest against John Bercow? The mind boggles. Not turn | :05:14. | :05:24. | |
:05:24. | :05:26. | ||
up? Wear a badge? Defaces coat of arms? Or tweet about his wife? At | :05:26. | :05:33. | |
the end of the show, Margaret will give us the correct answer. | :05:33. | :05:38. | |
You've got an innocent face? ! Should MPs get more money? Don't all | :05:38. | :05:44. | |
shot that once! -- don't all shout. Independent Parliamentary Standards | :05:44. | :05:52. | |
Authority things they should. It's things a backbencher 's page | :05:52. | :05:57. | |
and rise from just over �66,000 per year to �74,000. -- Independent | :05:57. | :06:03. | |
Parliamentary Standards Authority thinks. An 11% increase. It would be | :06:03. | :06:06. | |
controversial at any time, but especially when public page rises | :06:06. | :06:12. | |
are capped. MPs used to be able to vote down any proposed pay rises | :06:12. | :06:17. | |
that proved unpopular with the public. That will be all of them, | :06:17. | :06:22. | |
then. Following the expenses scandal, Independent Parliamentary | :06:22. | :06:27. | |
Standards Authority took over how to set pay. They say that pay has | :06:27. | :06:30. | |
fallen behind other top jobs and they get less than civil servants, | :06:31. | :06:35. | |
police and headteachers. They also paid less than representatives in | :06:35. | :06:40. | |
France, Germany, the US and Japan. The package does include some | :06:40. | :06:45. | |
significant savings. It includes an end to golden goodbyes for MPs | :06:45. | :06:51. | |
losing their seats. The �15 even in meal allowance for late sittings | :06:51. | :06:59. | |
will also go. -- evening meal. But it's likely to be the rate -- | :06:59. | :07:04. | |
writing the basic salary that will be the focus of public attention and | :07:04. | :07:08. | |
leaves Westminster in a tight spot. We wanted to gauge public opinion in | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
the most scientific way possible. As it wasn't possible, we dispatched | :07:11. | :07:17. | |
Giles with the moodbox. Should MPs get a pay rise? Maybe | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
they will have one imposed upon them. What do the public think about | :07:21. | :07:25. | |
that? We can guess the answer, but you never can tell with these | :07:25. | :07:35. | |
:07:35. | :07:54. | ||
No pay rise. Why not? I don't think it's necessary when there's loads of | :07:54. | :08:04. | |
:08:04. | :08:11. | ||
people who are already struggling to for it. | :08:11. | :08:16. | |
I thought we might get a bit of that. They should get a pay rise | :08:16. | :08:25. | |
because you want people of high calibre and quality. Why do you | :08:25. | :08:27. | |
think that's a reasonable? You've got to attract talent. Plus, you | :08:27. | :08:31. | |
want to make sure they are not looking for alternative methods of | :08:31. | :08:38. | |
income. I think there are more people voting | :08:38. | :08:42. | |
yes than I thought. Maybe because people who work in Parliament are | :08:42. | :08:48. | |
walking past. Why absolutely not? Most of us haven't had a pay rise | :08:48. | :08:54. | |
for three years. They have made cuts to people with disabilities and | :08:54. | :08:58. | |
everybody else is struggling. We are supposed to be in it together. | :08:58. | :09:03. | |
more a gut instinct. There's something to be said for them being | :09:03. | :09:07. | |
paid enough for them not to do anything corrupt. Ultimately, at the | :09:07. | :09:12. | |
moment, they haven't done enough to deserve it. I know I won't make many | :09:12. | :09:15. | |
friends, but if this is what Independent Parliamentary Standards | :09:15. | :09:19. | |
Authority once, this is what everybody should get. Brave man. | :09:19. | :09:23. | |
At the end of the day, they promise of everything, they say they are | :09:23. | :09:33. | |
:09:33. | :09:39. | ||
going to do this and that, and when came out on top. No to a pay rise. | :09:39. | :09:44. | |
There were some arguments. But this moodbox is very clear. No, you don't | :09:44. | :09:51. | |
get a pay rise, MPs. Those are the views of the great | :09:51. | :09:57. | |
British public. At least, some of them. Earlier, the head of the | :09:57. | :10:01. | |
Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority had this to say. | :10:01. | :10:04. | |
Body after body, organisation after organisation, over the past 15 | :10:04. | :10:08. | |
years, has recommended that there should be appropriate pay rises for | :10:08. | :10:15. | |
MPs. Governments of the day have not followed those and looked -- not | :10:15. | :10:24. | |
implement them. They chose always to say that there is a good political | :10:24. | :10:27. | |
reason why they shouldn't, and at the same time, of course, we know | :10:27. | :10:33. | |
what happened - allowances grew and grew, came more bloated. That ended | :10:33. | :10:37. | |
in tears in 2009. Enter Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, | :10:37. | :10:44. | |
with a remit to put things right. are joined by a businessman who was | :10:44. | :10:49. | |
a board member. Michael Brown used to be a Conservative MP. Margaret | :10:49. | :10:55. | |
Hodge is still with us. Michael Brown is our most loyal viewer. In | :10:55. | :11:03. | |
fact, he's our only loyal viewer. There's never a good time to | :11:03. | :11:08. | |
introduce a pay rise for MPs, is that? No, but this is a bad time. | :11:08. | :11:13. | |
It's such a difficult issue. At when you ask all public servants to take | :11:13. | :11:20. | |
a 1% pay increase, it just seems inappropriate. -- but when you ask. | :11:20. | :11:25. | |
But it's a difficult issue. It's difficult to have a grown-up debate | :11:25. | :11:29. | |
on what we should get paid, how we should get selected, how political | :11:29. | :11:34. | |
parties should be funded. That whole process and the way in which we run | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
our politics, which is hugely important for society... You should | :11:38. | :11:45. | |
have done it in the era of no more boom and bust. Remember that? | :11:45. | :11:50. | |
always better in the past. I know, I know. But these are such hard times. | :11:50. | :11:55. | |
I think it's difficult. This pay rise doesn't come in until after the | :11:55. | :12:00. | |
next election, meaning the election will be partly people like me asking | :12:00. | :12:05. | |
MPs or people standing for election, if elected, will you | :12:05. | :12:09. | |
accept the pay rise? The people who say yes, the local paper we go for | :12:09. | :12:18. | |
them. People will feel obliged to say no. It is a nonsense time. | :12:18. | :12:23. | |
real issue is there is never a good time. Look at what's happening this | :12:23. | :12:27. | |
time. The public is being consulted. The document today is a | :12:27. | :12:32. | |
consultation, not a decision. If the vast majority of the public have an | :12:32. | :12:39. | |
Aga and for not increasing MPs' pay. -- an argument for not increasing | :12:39. | :12:41. | |
MPs' pay, I am sure the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority | :12:42. | :12:50. | |
will have something to say to that. If people were told what MPs did, | :12:50. | :12:54. | |
they thought they should get paid more. If the public are educated in | :12:54. | :12:58. | |
the issues, which is what this paper does, I think they will come to the | :12:58. | :13:04. | |
right conclusion. That they should get a pay rise? They will come to | :13:04. | :13:11. | |
the right conclusion. It is the wisdom of crowds. No, it's | :13:11. | :13:18. | |
democracy. Democracy doesn't mean the right conclusion, it means a | :13:18. | :13:24. | |
democratic conclusion. They answer the severally the same thing. -- the | :13:25. | :13:32. | |
aren't necessarily the same thing. Margaret Hodge is saying we are into | :13:32. | :13:41. | |
the third year of a 1% pay rise freeze. If you are in the private | :13:41. | :13:46. | |
sector, average pay rises in the private sector are about 1% as well. | :13:46. | :13:50. | |
So you must have a whole package, not just pay. One of the biggest | :13:50. | :13:58. | |
problems was the so-called gold-plated MPs' pensions. It would | :13:58. | :14:03. | |
be unfair to say we are going to take away your pension rights and | :14:03. | :14:08. | |
not compensate you. The net result of these recommendations is that it | :14:08. | :14:17. | |
is broadly neutral. I'm told it adds half a million overall. He is | :14:18. | :14:27. | |
:14:28. | :14:29. | ||
rounding. If you were standing for election and you asked them if | :14:29. | :14:37. | |
elected, will you accept this 9% pay rise? What would your answer be? | :14:37. | :14:47. | |
:14:47. | :14:47. | ||
Yes. I was put in that position in almost every general election. When | :14:47. | :14:56. | |
I got elected to Parliament in 1979, the salary was �6,700. When I sought | :14:56. | :15:02. | |
pre-election in 1983, it had doubled �14,000. During that time, 20% of my | :15:02. | :15:06. | |
constituents were made redundant. I had to bite the bullet. The reason I | :15:06. | :15:11. | |
did that was because if you get into an auction, a member of Parliament | :15:11. | :15:21. | |
:15:21. | :15:26. | ||
being forced to say they will do it for less than another politician... | :15:26. | :15:34. | |
Margaret is worth every penny. But seriously, the doctor in her | :15:34. | :15:38. | |
constituency, the headmaster in her constituency, in one of the | :15:38. | :15:41. | |
secondary schools, the borough commander of the police force, they | :15:41. | :15:51. | |
:15:51. | :15:53. | ||
are all paid 6-figure salaries. Margaret, are you standing in the | :15:53. | :15:57. | |
next election? And will you accept the pay rise? | :15:57. | :16:01. | |
This is where I agree with Michael. It is dangerous. Our leaders should | :16:01. | :16:05. | |
not enter into a Dutch auction, because you end up with people | :16:05. | :16:12. | |
putting themselves forward for 20,000. But you could afford to. I | :16:12. | :16:18. | |
am in a lucky position. But then you end up with the rotten boroughs we | :16:18. | :16:24. | |
had in the past. So would you take the pay rise? I would do what all | :16:24. | :16:31. | |
MPs do. I don't want a Dutch auction between MPs. But your leader says he | :16:31. | :16:40. | |
will not accept it. I don't agree with him or Cameron or Clegg. | :16:40. | :16:47. | |
Cameron and Mr Clegg. The Right Honourable members. If David Cameron | :16:47. | :16:50. | |
doesn't want this pay increase, he can do what Margaret Thatcher used | :16:50. | :16:54. | |
to do and put legislation before the House of Commons and their members | :16:54. | :16:59. | |
of Parliament to accept or reject it. Is there not a risk that | :16:59. | :17:04. | |
political leaders like Mr Miliband and Mr Cameron will instruct their | :17:04. | :17:09. | |
candidates not to accept the pay rise? I hope that doesn't arise. But | :17:09. | :17:18. | |
is there a risk? Let's wait and see. At this point in time, we are never | :17:18. | :17:21. | |
going to win. We did it ourselves, and everybody thought we did it | :17:22. | :17:25. | |
badly. We set up an independent organisation over which we have no | :17:25. | :17:35. | |
:17:35. | :17:35. | ||
control. But I really think the Dutch auction point is so important. | :17:35. | :17:39. | |
We don't want to end up with politics where you can choose what | :17:39. | :17:48. | |
your salary is. We will come back to rotten boroughs. It is strange that | :17:48. | :17:55. | |
the people regulating MPs' pay, and MPs earn �66,000 at the moment, Ian | :17:55. | :18:00. | |
Kennedy gets �72,000 a year for a two-day week. How does that work? | :18:00. | :18:05. | |
The director of communications on a never seems to communicate with | :18:05. | :18:15. | |
:18:15. | :18:17. | ||
anybody, we can't get him on the programme, is on 85,000. So a PR | :18:17. | :18:25. | |
person gets way more than an MP. are not talking about the salaries | :18:25. | :18:31. | |
of the regulators. That is a matter of public record. It fits with the | :18:31. | :18:39. | |
market. Why do you need a director of communications? Because we have | :18:39. | :18:45. | |
to deal with programmes like you. You don't. You are not with them any | :18:45. | :18:55. | |
more. I happily came on this programme when I was with IPSA, and | :18:55. | :19:01. | |
there is an enormous communication job to do with the public. I agree. | :19:01. | :19:05. | |
There are question marks on why on earth we have such an expensive | :19:05. | :19:10. | |
hobby. A lot of people feel unhappy about the cost of the regulator. It | :19:10. | :19:16. | |
is less than it was before, and our accounts were not qualified by the | :19:16. | :19:21. | |
National Audit Office. We have reduced pay a 7 million a year, so | :19:21. | :19:26. | |
the costs are down. I will give you the final word. Remember, many | :19:26. | :19:31. | |
members of Parliament don't do the job until the day of their | :19:32. | :19:36. | |
retirement. They are retired by their voters. I hope Margaret is | :19:36. | :19:44. | |
therefore ever. He is a big fan! But they are getting rid of the big | :19:44. | :19:49. | |
redundancy payment. Do you agree with that? I got six months' pay | :19:49. | :19:59. | |
when I got kicked out. Not as high as some of the BBC. If you want to | :19:59. | :20:03. | |
encourage people into politics and you don't remunerate them, you will | :20:03. | :20:07. | |
just get research assistants becoming MPs. Speaking of the BBC, | :20:07. | :20:16. | |
that is what we are going to move on to. Seamless! | :20:16. | :20:22. | |
Now, our guest of the day, Margaret Hodge, was busy laying into BBC | :20:22. | :20:24. | |
bosses yesterday, metaphorically, when they gave evidence to the | :20:24. | :20:31. | |
committee over severance pay. He was a flavour of that debate. | :20:31. | :20:34. | |
Could you explain why, in your professional judgement, it was value | :20:34. | :20:41. | |
for money to pay Roly Keating beyond his contractual term? Because if we | :20:41. | :20:44. | |
didn't pay him money to go, you would stay. We would then be making | :20:44. | :20:48. | |
him redundant when that will closed 12 months later, and therefore the | :20:48. | :20:55. | |
cost would be, in addition to what we paid him, �500,000. But with all | :20:55. | :21:03. | |
your experience, you have not come from an easy organisation, why did | :21:03. | :21:12. | |
you not just put your foot down? are head of HR. The overwhelming | :21:12. | :21:18. | |
focus was to get numbers out of the door as quickly as possible. But it | :21:18. | :21:28. | |
:21:28. | :21:30. | ||
is licence fee payers' money. It is our money. I understand that, and | :21:30. | :21:34. | |
the BBC has accented many of the criticisms within the National Audit | :21:34. | :21:38. | |
Office report that we were too generous. Culturally, as Lucy Adams | :21:38. | :21:48. | |
and others have said, I think we lost the way. We got bedevilled by | :21:48. | :21:56. | |
zeros on various salaries. One of the issues was that there was not | :21:56. | :22:03. | |
enough grit at the centre of the organisation. There has not been a | :22:03. | :22:10. | |
senior remuneration committee. Things were devolved. I will be | :22:10. | :22:16. | |
bringing that back to a proper level at the heart of the organisation. | :22:16. | :22:20. | |
We did ask someone from BBC management to come onto the show, | :22:20. | :22:25. | |
but they declined. So we are delighted to have the media | :22:25. | :22:30. | |
commentator Steve Hewlett with us. Before we come to you, Margaret | :22:30. | :22:34. | |
Hodge, we saw you grappling with the senior executives. Overall, what was | :22:34. | :22:39. | |
your impression as to why some senior BBC executives were given | :22:39. | :22:44. | |
such high severance payments? I think there was just a cosy culture | :22:44. | :22:48. | |
at the top. They had known each other all their working lives, and | :22:48. | :22:51. | |
they rubbed each other's backs and thought somehow, they were | :22:51. | :22:56. | |
entitled, although as I said on that clip, it is not their money, it is | :22:56. | :23:00. | |
the licence fee payer's money. thought they were entitled to the | :23:00. | :23:06. | |
biggest deal they could get, and it was outrageous. The most outrageous | :23:06. | :23:09. | |
thing was probably G3 who got hundreds of thousands and then went | :23:09. | :23:15. | |
straight out of the door into other well-paid jobs, and think they are | :23:15. | :23:21. | |
entitled to it? Please! We will come back to the issue of the culture and | :23:21. | :23:27. | |
how this sort of thing arose. want to come back to the issue of | :23:27. | :23:31. | |
how severance payments were made beyond people's contracts. Not only | :23:31. | :23:37. | |
were they high, but they went well beyond what was due. Mark Thompson, | :23:37. | :23:41. | |
the former director-general, was the head of the BBC at the time. I | :23:41. | :23:47. | |
understand you have his statement? do. There is no doubt that people's | :23:47. | :23:50. | |
payments went beyond their entitlements. That has been | :23:50. | :23:55. | |
established beyond doubt. In the most high-profile case, the deputy | :23:55. | :24:00. | |
director general, Mark Byford, who was the one who departed with close | :24:00. | :24:06. | |
to �1 million, they decided to make him redundant in October 2010. He | :24:06. | :24:13. | |
then left in August 2011 and was then paid, in addition to his | :24:13. | :24:17. | |
redundancy entitlement, he was paid for 12 months in lieu of notice. So | :24:17. | :24:21. | |
the National Audit Office said Hang on, you decided to make him | :24:21. | :24:26. | |
redundant in October. He then works for eight months and you pay him 12 | :24:26. | :24:29. | |
months' notice. Shouldn't you have started the notice period and the | :24:29. | :24:35. | |
clock ticking? In other words, he gets 20 months' pay when he was only | :24:35. | :24:43. | |
entitled to 12. How did that happen? The issue yesterday was, were the | :24:43. | :24:51. | |
trust aware of what was going on? They claimed they did not know and | :24:51. | :24:57. | |
that Mark Thompson had not informed them fully. They invited Margaret | :24:57. | :25:00. | |
Hodge to ask Mark Thompson to come to the committee and spill all. When | :25:00. | :25:06. | |
Margaret said, has Mark Thompson live? They said, we are not saying | :25:06. | :25:10. | |
he has lied, but there is an inconsistency. Mark Thompson is now | :25:10. | :25:14. | |
president of a big New York company, and he said today in a statement, I | :25:14. | :25:19. | |
look forward to laying the facts in front of the committee. I would like | :25:19. | :25:22. | |
to clear up firstly that the BBC trust was fully informed in advance, | :25:22. | :25:27. | |
in writing as well as orally, about the proposed severance packages for | :25:27. | :25:33. | |
Mark Byford. They were told it was proposed that formal notice would | :25:33. | :25:36. | |
not be served immediately, but in the following year. An e-mail from | :25:36. | :25:41. | |
my office to the head of the trust unit makes this clear. I made sure | :25:41. | :25:47. | |
the trust were aware of all potentially contentious issues, | :25:47. | :25:51. | |
including the fact that formal notice would not be served at once. | :25:51. | :25:55. | |
I have a copy of the e-mail here. This is significant because if the | :25:55. | :26:05. | |
:26:05. | :26:08. | ||
trust were aware that the Byford lied. They lied? They said they were | :26:08. | :26:13. | |
not aware. Precisely was aware of what, goodness only knows, and the | :26:13. | :26:18. | |
best of luck to you when you get down to finding out. But Mark | :26:18. | :26:27. | |
Thompson says they were informed, and they are saying, he misled us. | :26:27. | :26:32. | |
These two cannot both be right. It could not be worse that the BBC. It | :26:32. | :26:36. | |
is the most unedifying spectacle. It is almost down to name-calling. That | :26:36. | :26:40. | |
statement is electrifying in the light of what you were told in front | :26:40. | :26:43. | |
of the committee, because the BBC trust member Anthony Fry was | :26:43. | :26:46. | |
questioned about a letter from Mark Thompson, the former | :26:46. | :26:51. | |
director-general, to the trust, which said the payoff to Mr Byford | :26:51. | :26:56. | |
was within contractual arrangements, when it was not. They can't both be | :26:56. | :27:01. | |
right? We are in a really difficult position. Either Mark Thompson did | :27:01. | :27:06. | |
or did not tell the trust, and if, as he alleges, he did tell the | :27:06. | :27:10. | |
trust, the trust, in their evidence yesterday, asserted that they were | :27:10. | :27:17. | |
not told. We have another issue with the BBC, which is the digital media | :27:17. | :27:24. | |
initiative, this attempt to use archive material, where 100 million | :27:24. | :27:28. | |
has been spent and nothing gained. That was also on Mark Thompson's | :27:28. | :27:33. | |
watch, so we want to bring him back about that. He has agreed to come | :27:33. | :27:38. | |
back. I was not going to return to this until we have the relevant | :27:38. | :27:42. | |
reports for the digital media initiative but given what Steve | :27:42. | :27:45. | |
Hewlett has uncovered this morning, we will have to return to this more | :27:45. | :27:50. | |
quickly. I want all the players in front of us so that we try to | :27:50. | :27:55. | |
uncover the truth. You want Mark Thompson sitting next to members of | :27:55. | :28:05. | |
:28:05. | :28:05. | ||
the trust. And also the nonexecutive members of the executive committee. | :28:05. | :28:08. | |
Marcus aegis, the ex-chairman of Barclays bank, is said to have | :28:08. | :28:15. | |
signed off all these deals. He would think these deals were peanuts. I | :28:15. | :28:20. | |
would like to hear his side of the story. It would also be important to | :28:20. | :28:30. | |
:28:30. | :28:32. | ||
hear from Michael Rylands, the director-general at the time. | :28:32. | :28:38. | |
does this do to public trust in the BBC? Margaret has hit the nail on | :28:38. | :28:43. | |
the head. If you put together the digital media initiative, �100 | :28:44. | :28:51. | |
million written off, as time goes on, we may see that slightly more | :28:51. | :28:54. | |
benefit has accrued, but nevertheless, it is the | :28:54. | :29:00. | |
mismanagement of �100 million. The trust have to say they are sorry. | :29:00. | :29:03. | |
Then just six weeks later, they are there again because it appears, | :29:03. | :29:09. | |
following another NAL enquiry, that the BBC have paid executives more | :29:09. | :29:14. | |
than they were titled to. It looks like a structural, systemic | :29:14. | :29:20. | |
failings. And that is the problem. I was talking to somebody who is big | :29:21. | :29:25. | |
in the world of politics, a journalist, who says the damage that | :29:25. | :29:29. | |
has been done to the BBC by the combination of factors is not | :29:29. | :29:35. | |
insignificant. When staff pay has been all but frozen for the last few | :29:35. | :29:40. | |
years. When arguing about who knew what, the big picture is that too | :29:40. | :29:43. | |
much was paid to senior executives in their severance packages, more | :29:43. | :29:50. | |
than they needed. To give the context, it was �25 million over a | :29:50. | :29:55. | |
three-year period to 150 senior executives. That is the same as half | :29:55. | :30:01. | |
the total expenditure on Radio 4 programming. We believe that figure | :30:01. | :30:05. | |
hanging in the air. Now we know we are doing this programme for three | :30:05. | :30:15. | |
:30:15. | :30:17. | ||
and sixpence and a Lucky Bag! Leonardo DiCaprio uses them a lot. | :30:17. | :30:24. | |
MPs use them. So the 1.3 million people in the UK. They are supposed | :30:24. | :30:31. | |
to be an aid to quitting smoking. Now the EU is trying to pacify | :30:31. | :30:37. | |
electric cigarettes as medicines. -- classifier. Let's remind ourselves | :30:37. | :30:43. | |
of Laurie Penny 's appearance on the Daily Politics last year, electronic | :30:43. | :30:53. | |
:30:53. | :30:56. | ||
cigarette in hand. This is not a real cigarette. If any | :30:56. | :31:04. | |
of you are calling the police it a fake cigarette. It's the future. I'm | :31:04. | :31:08. | |
on a 1-person mission to make them popular. What's your vision on | :31:08. | :31:16. | |
this? I'm in the same position. I hate to do agree with George on | :31:16. | :31:24. | |
anything... That might not be a real cigarette but it ain't doing you any | :31:24. | :31:32. | |
good! Oh, it's in the! Joining me now is | :31:32. | :31:38. | |
Stephen Williams and the director of a small business selling Ellington | :31:38. | :31:46. | |
cigarette. Why do people smoke the cigarettes? -- selling eggs Tronic | :31:46. | :31:55. | |
cigarettes. There's a lot of stigma with traditional cigarettes. A lot | :31:55. | :32:04. | |
of people try the traditional chewing tobacco or chewing gum, | :32:04. | :32:06. | |
medicinal spray and things like that. They find it doesn't do the | :32:06. | :32:13. | |
trick. Electronic cigarettes brings another sensation to smoking. | :32:13. | :32:16. | |
just clarify, do people smoke these cigarettes to get off smoking the | :32:16. | :32:24. | |
traditional cigarettes, or as an alternative? There's two sides to | :32:24. | :32:30. | |
the coin. We sell ours as an alternative to smoking. We don't say | :32:30. | :32:33. | |
it will help you to quit smoking, because we don't think it will. It's | :32:33. | :32:43. | |
:32:43. | :32:43. | ||
an alternative. Are they health consequences? None have been proven. | :32:43. | :32:46. | |
They are potentially a good thing if they help people to wean themselves | :32:46. | :32:52. | |
off the real thing. We know that tobacco, if consumed as the | :32:52. | :32:57. | |
manufacturer intends, if the only product that will shorten your life | :32:57. | :33:07. | |
span. -- is the only product. The tobacco companies are busily buying | :33:07. | :33:11. | |
up all of the manufacturers of these products. They are only doing that | :33:11. | :33:14. | |
because they believe it is in their interests. They want to normalise | :33:14. | :33:21. | |
the experience of smoking again. Last week, when I got home from | :33:21. | :33:27. | |
Westminster, I saw a big advert of somebody who, superficially, it | :33:27. | :33:34. | |
looks like they were smoking. It was an electronic cigarette. | :33:34. | :33:41. | |
You can smoke them indoors? Correct. There is no damage to passive | :33:41. | :33:49. | |
smokers? There's no evidence so far. We would support them being | :33:49. | :33:54. | |
classified as a medicinal product. Our products are an alternative is | :33:54. | :34:02. | |
to smoking. We don't make any claims that the product will help you to | :34:02. | :34:06. | |
quit smoking. The majority of our customers don't feel that way. | :34:06. | :34:11. | |
you think there are any health dangers? That's what we need to look | :34:11. | :34:20. | |
at. There has been a review of all iniquity in products, -- nicotine | :34:20. | :34:30. | |
:34:30. | :34:33. | ||
products. You would only get them by prescription? I'm not sure I would | :34:33. | :34:41. | |
go that far. This is something none of us had heard of two years ago. I | :34:41. | :34:48. | |
certainly think the advertising needs to be looked at. I wouldn't | :34:48. | :34:53. | |
want them to get a back door way of normalising the appearance of | :34:53. | :35:00. | |
smoking, or, for instant, targeting them at children. At the moment, | :35:00. | :35:07. | |
these can be advertised in children 's magazines. | :35:07. | :35:14. | |
I was a cigarette smoker. I gave up, oh, God, 30 years ago, and I still | :35:14. | :35:19. | |
think of myself as an addict. I worry would be just that cash that | :35:19. | :35:28. | |
you go back to the feel -- that you go back to the feel of having a | :35:28. | :35:32. | |
cigarette. I have seen people in restaurants complaining because they | :35:32. | :35:42. | |
:35:42. | :35:43. | ||
think somebody is smoking, but in fact they are vaping. For us, we | :35:43. | :35:49. | |
think that overregulation would make it difficult for us to obtain a | :35:49. | :35:53. | |
license. It would price us out of the market. The price of electricity | :35:53. | :36:01. | |
cigarettes, getting the licence, the price would move on to the | :36:01. | :36:09. | |
consumers. -- electronic cigarettes. And you smoke them? And you feel all | :36:09. | :36:18. | |
right? Yes, and I feel fine. haven't. I've seen other MPs doing | :36:18. | :36:26. | |
it. I'm not trying it. Are you? I don't think we will have them in the | :36:26. | :36:31. | |
studio. Should English MPs have a veto legislation applying only to | :36:31. | :36:36. | |
England? According to reports, that is what the government is | :36:36. | :36:39. | |
considering. They say it's unfair that other MPs can determine laws | :36:39. | :36:44. | |
affecting England. But English MPs have no say on devolved matters and | :36:44. | :36:49. | |
are looking for ways to redress the balance. Tom Harris and Conservative | :36:50. | :36:54. | |
MP Harriett Baldwin are on College Green to debate the proposals. | :36:54. | :36:58. | |
Welcome to both of you. Harriett Baldwin, these proposals would | :36:58. | :37:03. | |
create two tiers of MPs in Parliament. You would reduce MPs | :37:03. | :37:07. | |
from Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland to one day per week MPs. | :37:07. | :37:16. | |
haven't see the -- seen the proposals. But we think they did not | :37:17. | :37:23. | |
propose creating categories of MPs. A proposed changes to the order in | :37:23. | :37:30. | |
the House of Commons. Let's call this the English question. Let's | :37:30. | :37:34. | |
make sure that any legislation in Westminster that applies only to | :37:34. | :37:39. | |
England is carried by a majority from English MPs. That sounds | :37:39. | :37:45. | |
sensible, Tom Harris? It's more complicated than that. Take the Same | :37:45. | :37:48. | |
Sex Marriage Bill, which applied only to England and Wales. There | :37:48. | :37:56. | |
were another -- number of technical aspects regarding Scotland. It is | :37:56. | :38:00. | |
difficult to get a bill that only applies to England. I can think of | :38:00. | :38:06. | |
lots! There are plenty of these bills for England on health and | :38:06. | :38:13. | |
education, for example. And the last health Bill, which only apply to | :38:13. | :38:17. | |
Ian, had technical provisions applying to Scotland. It included | :38:17. | :38:21. | |
the training of certain professionals. Let's go back to | :38:21. | :38:29. | |
Isaac principles. The Scottish Parliament was introduced to | :38:29. | :38:36. | |
address... England does not suffer, never has suffered, will never | :38:36. | :38:44. | |
suffer, a democratic deficit. The only time that English teeth -- MPs | :38:44. | :38:48. | |
could be before the -- defeated would be if every single non-English | :38:48. | :38:56. | |
MP plus 209 image MPs got together and voted against it. It is unfair. | :38:56. | :39:06. | |
:39:06. | :39:09. | ||
Labour MPs, wouldn't it? This is about fairness for England. It has | :39:09. | :39:16. | |
rarely been an issue in the past. I would expect it to be rarely an | :39:16. | :39:21. | |
issue in the future. But when it is, it should be highlighted. It is a | :39:21. | :39:25. | |
cost that usual crisis that is waiting to happen. It is something | :39:25. | :39:31. | |
that needs to be dealt with in this Parliament. It's also more and more | :39:31. | :39:38. | |
the case that with more devolution but just as Scotland but, as the | :39:38. | :39:46. | |
silk commission recommends, Wales, there will be more legislation that | :39:46. | :39:52. | |
refers to England only. All sorts of things apply to England only. It's | :39:52. | :39:59. | |
important that we tackle this thorny question now. Well done for shouting | :39:59. | :40:04. | |
over that motorbike. Tom Harris, isn't this, on the other hand, | :40:04. | :40:10. | |
disastrous for Labour? They rely on their MPs in Scotland and Wales. You | :40:10. | :40:15. | |
would find it difficult to get a majority in England of English MPs. | :40:15. | :40:20. | |
I'm sure that's the case. Let's go back to another first principle. The | :40:20. | :40:25. | |
Prime Minister is known as a first among equals. They have the same | :40:25. | :40:30. | |
voting rights as other members. If you lose that, you lose the | :40:30. | :40:34. | |
functionality of the House of Commons. We have been here before. | :40:34. | :40:38. | |
For 50 years, a devolved Northern Ireland Parliament had its own | :40:38. | :40:42. | |
primers do but still sent MPs to Westminster and nobody ever raised a | :40:42. | :40:46. | |
question about old stuff. Why was that? Was it because the Ulster | :40:46. | :40:53. | |
Unionist MPs to the Conservative whip? -- took the Conservative | :40:53. | :41:00. | |
whip? It's been raised for 100 years. | :41:00. | :41:07. | |
There's never been a Labour majority without a majority of Labour MPs in | :41:07. | :41:17. | |
England. Thank you both very much. Lunch is on the way. Not clear the | :41:17. | :41:23. | |
Australians will make it to lunch, however. They have one wicket to | :41:23. | :41:31. | |
fall. The Coalition have a target to get net migration down by the tens | :41:31. | :41:36. | |
of thousands by 2015. They are making progress. But what about | :41:36. | :41:40. | |
those who decide to move here? Should they be forced to learn | :41:40. | :41:44. | |
English? Should they be helped to integrate into the community? Eric | :41:44. | :41:54. | |
:41:54. | :41:55. | ||
Pickles thinks so. This is his soapbox. | :41:55. | :41:59. | |
Speaking English is essential to living and working in Britain. It is | :41:59. | :42:04. | |
a passport to prosperity, and without it, people are very limited | :42:04. | :42:09. | |
in what they can do. In some communities, learning English | :42:09. | :42:15. | |
doesn't happen. This is not right. I believe that if you want to live | :42:15. | :42:25. | |
:42:25. | :42:33. | ||
here, you must learn to speak the east of London, which is there to | :42:33. | :42:37. | |
help people to learning which. It runs a number of courses, including | :42:37. | :42:43. | |
mental ring services, and some specifically to help mothers who | :42:43. | :42:50. | |
have migrated to this country and have virtually knowingly should. | :42:50. | :42:57. | |
-- no English. Learning the language is important. When you come to a | :42:57. | :43:01. | |
country, one of the things to get to grips with first and foremost is the | :43:01. | :43:06. | |
language. There are a lot of other areas. What we provided a range of | :43:06. | :43:12. | |
life skills to help the women to integrate. | :43:12. | :43:16. | |
Looking at the bigger picture, the census of two years ago showed that | :43:17. | :43:22. | |
a crossing in and Wales, 2% of the population can't speak English or | :43:22. | :43:27. | |
speak it poorly. When you look across London, the figure jumps to | :43:27. | :43:37. | |
:43:37. | :43:38. | ||
9%. That is 150,000 people who can't speak English, can't communicate | :43:38. | :43:46. | |
with their fellow citizens. That is going to create difficulties for | :43:46. | :43:49. | |
people even going to the shops. They are going to have difficulty talking | :43:49. | :43:55. | |
to their neighbours. It's important for me. I come from a | :43:55. | :44:00. | |
different country, different background, different language. This | :44:00. | :44:06. | |
country is new for me. I want to know about this country, about the | :44:06. | :44:10. | |
transport, about the shopping, and other things. I want to make | :44:11. | :44:15. | |
friends. It's also good for the wider | :44:15. | :44:19. | |
community. I want people to live together and work together, to | :44:20. | :44:29. | |
integrate and form friendships and get along with each other. How can | :44:29. | :44:32. | |
you interact with people from other cultures and countries if you can't | :44:32. | :44:36. | |
talk to them? There are also financial benefits. Translation | :44:36. | :44:42. | |
services are very expensive. Independent research shows that | :44:42. | :44:48. | |
local authorities alone spends nearly �20 million per year | :44:48. | :44:58. | |
:44:58. | :45:03. | ||
translating a variety of documents from English to 75 languages. This | :45:03. | :45:05. | |
money will be better directed to help all residents and all | :45:05. | :45:07. | |
communities. But it isn't just about the money. It's about making Britain | :45:08. | :45:17. | |
a better place to live. That is what centres like this are doing. | :45:17. | :45:21. | |
Eric Pickles joins us now. Is it that migrants are refusing to learn | :45:21. | :45:27. | |
English, or is there not enough provision? We need encouragement. It | :45:27. | :45:31. | |
is perfectly possible to survive in this country, to be able to shop in | :45:31. | :45:34. | |
this country, to receive entertainment without speaking | :45:34. | :45:38. | |
English. But it does mean that their life chances are so much more | :45:38. | :45:43. | |
narrow. And it means their children's life chances are | :45:43. | :45:53. | |
:45:53. | :45:53. | ||
narrowed. George Osborne wants to encourage them with the stick rather | :45:53. | :45:56. | |
than the current. He says if you are not prepared to learn English, your | :45:56. | :45:59. | |
benefits will be cut. That is not encouragement, that is from marching | :45:59. | :46:02. | |
you to the English classes, isn't it? That is tough love. It is about | :46:02. | :46:11. | |
getting people to understand the reality. Encouragement will be | :46:11. | :46:14. | |
there, but they should not see this in the way of getting a benefit. It | :46:14. | :46:19. | |
is a way to become a full citizen. I don't want people to forget where | :46:19. | :46:25. | |
they come from all their own language. I want them to be a | :46:25. | :46:30. | |
vibrant part of British society and have an equal chance. How would you | :46:30. | :46:35. | |
judge if someone's English was not adequate enough that they did not | :46:35. | :46:42. | |
deserve their benefits? Well, I am not a linguist, but I think being | :46:42. | :46:47. | |
able to have sufficient English to be able to do the job you are | :46:47. | :46:50. | |
employed for. For example, for your job, I would expect them to be very | :46:50. | :47:00. | |
:47:00. | :47:01. | ||
fluent. He is still taking classes! And showing enormous progress. | :47:01. | :47:05. | |
have been arguing for a long time that it is really important for | :47:05. | :47:15. | |
:47:15. | :47:19. | ||
migrants who settle here, and I am one myself, that you learn the | :47:19. | :47:22. | |
language. But let me say two things to Eric that I have argued for a | :47:22. | :47:25. | |
long time. For women, it is a sensitive issue, because they don't | :47:25. | :47:28. | |
get a job. They are often at home. If they are good mums, it is | :47:28. | :47:30. | |
important for them to talk to teachers. How would you get them to | :47:30. | :47:34. | |
learn? Let me tell you how we have tried to do it and the problems we | :47:34. | :47:38. | |
have faced. We had a lot of English provision in our children's centres, | :47:38. | :47:41. | |
where the mums were encouraged to come when the babies were born, and | :47:41. | :47:48. | |
start learning English. That provision has been cut because local | :47:48. | :47:52. | |
authorities have faced bigger cuts than anybody else. And it is not | :47:52. | :47:54. | |
because I have an inefficient council that is spending money | :47:55. | :48:02. | |
elsewhere. We are looking at different ways of trying to get | :48:02. | :48:05. | |
English across. I launched a competition at the beginning of the | :48:05. | :48:15. | |
:48:15. | :48:17. | ||
year to find unique ways to get English going. The young lady that | :48:17. | :48:20. | |
was interviewed, she was, up to 18 months ago, a newsreader on | :48:20. | :48:23. | |
Pakistani television. She came to this country with not much English, | :48:23. | :48:26. | |
and it demonstrates what is possible. You are avoiding the | :48:26. | :48:33. | |
issue. Margaret, you see everything in this narrow political way. That | :48:33. | :48:43. | |
:48:43. | :48:45. | ||
was a local choice. We are making a difference. If it is all going to be | :48:45. | :48:48. | |
about the wicked cuts, we will not make progress. I have been doing | :48:48. | :48:51. | |
this work for a long time, so frankly, we should be encouraging | :48:51. | :48:54. | |
this and not blaming everything on economic circumstances. I doing | :48:54. | :49:02. | |
courage this. -- I do encourage this. I think it is essential for | :49:02. | :49:06. | |
community go huge on, but the reality on the ground, Eric, in the | :49:07. | :49:12. | |
children's centre I visited recently, is that when you really | :49:12. | :49:15. | |
cut local authority expenditure so badly, they are forced back to their | :49:15. | :49:22. | |
statutory duties and they cut out all this provision which is | :49:22. | :49:32. | |
:49:32. | :49:33. | ||
non-statutory. That is a very old-fashioned view. Let me ask you, | :49:33. | :49:40. | |
is there not at least a chance, at a time when cuts are all over the | :49:40. | :49:44. | |
place, and when local government has had its grant frozen, that some | :49:44. | :49:49. | |
councils may decide, one way to save a few bob is by not doing English | :49:49. | :49:55. | |
classes? Then they are very foolish councils, because it is important | :49:55. | :49:58. | |
that we don't find ourselves with a subclass where people of enormous | :49:58. | :50:08. | |
:50:08. | :50:13. | ||
talent can't get jobs. They are not foolish. It is wrong to say | :50:13. | :50:16. | |
everything has to be done by local authorities. We are looking at | :50:16. | :50:18. | |
different ways of doing it, and it is a very old-fashioned view that | :50:18. | :50:22. | |
Margaret is expressing. Don't talk over me. You and I used to talk | :50:22. | :50:26. | |
about this issue is a lot. I am not saying local authorities should | :50:26. | :50:36. | |
:50:36. | :50:37. | ||
deliver it. It is important for voluntary organisations to be | :50:37. | :50:40. | |
involved. I am just saying that the reality on the ground in my | :50:40. | :50:42. | |
community is that they are being forced back to only funding | :50:42. | :50:51. | |
statutory services. You have both had to say. Very interesting. | :50:51. | :50:55. | |
Now, onto a pressing constitutional matter. How do we hold our | :50:56. | :51:00. | |
politicians to account? As we saw earlier, our guest today, Margaret | :51:00. | :51:10. | |
:51:10. | :51:24. | ||
Hodge, head up the Public Accounts Committee, who rigorous Lee | :51:24. | :51:26. | |
interrogate officials and ministers. But there is another essential part | :51:26. | :51:28. | |
of the British political system that keeps MPs in check. He is usually | :51:28. | :51:30. | |
found loitering outside government departments, or waiting at sunrise | :51:30. | :51:32. | |
on cabinet ministers' doorsteps. And he is armed with nothing more than | :51:33. | :51:35. | |
the simple ray mac of truth and a trusty foghorn voice fair play. Very | :51:35. | :51:37. | |
poetic! Rarely seen, but always heard, he is the BBC's Chief | :51:38. | :51:47. | |
Parliamentary Stalker, Gobby. You have heard him. Now meet him, | :51:47. | :51:51. | |
BBC producer Paul Lambert, known in the Westminster village as Gobby. I | :51:51. | :52:00. | |
wonder why? Has George looked after you? Are the children happy? Are the | :52:00. | :52:10. | |
:52:10. | :52:13. | ||
soldiers happy? His shout outs are as much a part of TV news here as | :52:13. | :52:17. | |
pictures of Big Ben. The point is to fill in the pieces in a TV bulletin | :52:17. | :52:20. | |
piece that you have not got pictures to fill in. You know someone will | :52:20. | :52:26. | |
not say anything, but you just need something. That will be the office. | :52:26. | :52:30. | |
It does involve a lot of standing around, though, which means there is | :52:30. | :52:39. | |
plenty of time to hear some of Gobby's famous war stories. During | :52:39. | :52:41. | |
Blair's last conference, he walked across after the speech and I | :52:41. | :52:49. | |
shouted across, oi, Bill, are you going to miss Tony? But sometimes it | :52:49. | :52:51. | |
is very physical, like this hilarious attempts to get pictures | :52:51. | :53:01. | |
:53:01. | :53:04. | ||
of David Cameron jogging. Jogging, boys! Or dangerous. Watch the wall. | :53:04. | :53:12. | |
Let's see that again. Although sometimes it is painful in other | :53:12. | :53:17. | |
ways. We are going live to Downing Street in a few minutes' time, | :53:17. | :53:22. | |
because the prime minister will be holding a news conference. He is | :53:22. | :53:26. | |
setting up, with a BBC producer standing whether Spanish prime | :53:26. | :53:31. | |
minister will be standing. Now here's where the British prime | :53:31. | :53:36. | |
minister will be standing. He has ideas above his station. | :53:36. | :53:40. | |
Frequently, it is very newsworthy, like the time Gobby cornered sharia | :53:40. | :53:46. | |
Blair at the height of speculation that her husband was standing down. | :53:46. | :53:50. | |
Darling, that is a long way in the future. That quote made the front | :53:50. | :53:56. | |
page of most national papers the next day, but can anyone do this? | :53:56. | :54:06. | |
Why did it take you so long to settle? How was that? Very good. | :54:06. | :54:11. | |
Well, that is Cabinet over for today. What is next, a press | :54:11. | :54:15. | |
conference, a stakeout at a government department or home of an | :54:15. | :54:19. | |
MP? Actually, it is a bacon sandwich. | :54:19. | :54:23. | |
Well, you need sustenance for these jobs. Adam Fleming, you need to | :54:23. | :54:28. | |
practice more with the shouting. We are joined now by the BBC's IPD | :54:28. | :54:32. | |
political editor, James Landale. Gobby, as he is affectionately | :54:32. | :54:38. | |
known, is something of a legend in the West Mr bubble, but he is also | :54:38. | :54:41. | |
respected by the politicians? Yes, he is a legend because they have all | :54:41. | :54:51. | |
:54:51. | :54:55. | ||
had him on their doorstep at some point, and they know that all he | :54:55. | :54:58. | |
will do is ask a question. He gets on with everybody. He has more brass | :54:58. | :55:00. | |
than anybody in Westminster. He has a better new sense than many people | :55:00. | :55:03. | |
in Westminster. If there is any flaw in this perfect human being, he is | :55:03. | :55:05. | |
possibly got a pathological obsession with his mobile phone and | :55:05. | :55:09. | |
injurious reluctance to work on some Fridays. But apart from that, he is | :55:09. | :55:15. | |
amazing. Moving on to the issue of MPs' pay, which we talked about at | :55:15. | :55:20. | |
the start of the programme, is there a sense that there is now a growing | :55:20. | :55:23. | |
division between what party leaders are saying, and they are saying it | :55:23. | :55:27. | |
is not the right time for a pay rise, and backbenchers, who are paid | :55:27. | :55:34. | |
considerably less, and think it is long overdue? It is not a clear-cut | :55:34. | :55:39. | |
division. Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband have said they will turn down this | :55:39. | :55:43. | |
pay rise. David Cameron's spokesman has said he opposes it and thinks it | :55:43. | :55:47. | |
is the wrong time for a pay rise, but will not specify whether Mr | :55:47. | :55:51. | |
Cameron will hand this back. Education Secretary Michael Gove has | :55:52. | :55:56. | |
been far more rude. In the last few minutes, he has said MPs should | :55:56. | :56:00. | |
absolutely not receive these pay rises. MPs are well paid anyway. | :56:00. | :56:06. | |
IPSA is a bit of a silly organisation, and that pay rise, | :56:06. | :56:10. | |
they can stick it. Charming! It is not clear whether Mr Gove speaks on | :56:10. | :56:13. | |
behalf of the government, but he certainly speaks for himself. | :56:13. | :56:18. | |
are loads of MPs who think this is the wrong time and IPSA are putting | :56:18. | :56:22. | |
them in an invidious position. will reduce public trust in them, | :56:22. | :56:27. | |
and they have no control over it. But he quickly, privately a lot of | :56:27. | :56:31. | |
them say there is clearly an issue about pay that has to be resolved. | :56:31. | :56:38. | |
But publicly, we are scarring Westminster to find someone who will | :56:38. | :56:40. | |
defend this, and we are not succeeding, for obvious reasons. The | :56:40. | :56:44. | |
risk is that if you do get into a bit of a Dutch auction, as Margaret | :56:44. | :56:49. | |
says, where does it stop? What about the package, that there are other | :56:49. | :56:52. | |
things which will be reduced as part of this proposal to increase MPs' | :56:53. | :57:02. | |
pay? There was some encouragement from government to see if IPSA could | :57:02. | :57:04. | |
come up with a package that overall reduces the cost to the public | :57:04. | :57:07. | |
purse. They have not managed that. They are over that by �3.5 million, | :57:07. | :57:10. | |
which in the grand scheme of things might be a modest proportion of the | :57:10. | :57:14. | |
whole, but it is still above the line, which makes it harder for the | :57:14. | :57:20. | |
government to support this. There will be no immediate decision on | :57:20. | :57:23. | |
this. So it will be interesting to see if the party leaders can find a | :57:23. | :57:29. | |
way of finessing this further down the road. This is not a policy, it | :57:29. | :57:35. | |
is a proposal. We have just had some other news from the Justice | :57:35. | :57:40. | |
Secretary, Chris Grayling, who has asked the serious fraud office to | :57:40. | :57:42. | |
consider investigating gene for us after the government was left with | :57:42. | :57:46. | |
bills worth millions of pounds for electronic tags that were not used. | :57:46. | :57:55. | |
Sounds like a scandal. Yes. It is something we look that not long | :57:55. | :58:01. | |
ago. There is a general point here about how more private providers are | :58:01. | :58:05. | |
providing public services, and the government has to be better with its | :58:05. | :58:11. | |
openness. I want the National Audit Office to go and see how they spend | :58:11. | :58:16. | |
taxpayers' money when they provide a public service. I am glad he has | :58:16. | :58:21. | |
called in the serious fraud office. Very quickly with the quiz, the | :58:21. | :58:26. | |
question was, what are Conservative MPs planning to do at next week's | :58:27. | :58:31. | |
PMQs to protest against John Bercow 's do you know? IR may John Bercow | :58:31. | :58:38. | |
fan. James, the answer is? They are going to start wearing badges with | :58:38. | :58:48. | |
:58:48. | :58:49. | ||
the letters BBB. The first letter refers to a ticking off that begins | :58:49. | :58:51. | |
with B. Ticked off by John Bercow, but in slightly more fruity | :58:51. | :58:56. |