Browse content similar to 03/04/2014. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Afternoon, folks, welcome to the Daily Politics. More personal, more | :00:37. | :00:42. | |
passionate, more insulting. Round two of Clegg v Farage over Britain's | :00:43. | :00:45. | |
membership of the European Union wasn't exactly a pretty affair. But | :00:46. | :00:49. | |
the polls put Mr Farage further ahead than they did first time | :00:50. | :00:52. | |
round. The coalition's in a spin over wind | :00:53. | :00:56. | |
farms. The Tories have turned against them. The Lib Dems still | :00:57. | :00:58. | |
love them. It's tough out there providing | :00:59. | :01:02. | |
public services. We'll be analysing one council's "graph of doom". | :01:03. | :01:07. | |
And this programme is brought to you by the CIA. We'll be dissecting some | :01:08. | :01:10. | |
good old-fashioned conspiracy theories. | :01:11. | :01:21. | |
The signal has just clicked in! All that in the next hour. And with | :01:22. | :01:27. | |
us for the duration, journalist David Aaronovitch. Welcome to the | :01:28. | :01:29. | |
programme. Now first today, let's kick off with | :01:30. | :01:32. | |
the Culture Secretary, Maria Miller, who has been ticked off over her | :01:33. | :01:35. | |
expenses. Our political correspondent Carole Walker has | :01:36. | :01:39. | |
more. She has been cleared of the central | :01:40. | :01:43. | |
charge of billing her expenses, but she has been strongly criticised? | :01:44. | :01:48. | |
That's right, and she is about to make an unprecedented apology by a | :01:49. | :01:51. | |
serving Cabinet Minister over her expenses. This was a lengthy and | :01:52. | :01:56. | |
complicated investigation into claims totalling around ?90,000 over | :01:57. | :02:03. | |
four years for their house in south London, which she designated as her | :02:04. | :02:06. | |
second home, even though that was where she lived with her parents and | :02:07. | :02:12. | |
her husband. What the committee was looking at is whether it was right | :02:13. | :02:15. | |
to call it her second home, whether her parents benefited from taxpayers | :02:16. | :02:21. | |
money, whether she claims the right amount, and so on. What the | :02:22. | :02:27. | |
committee found was that they cleared her of benefiting her | :02:28. | :02:31. | |
parents from the claims that she had made. They did say that she had over | :02:32. | :02:36. | |
claimed for her mortgage repayments. They have ordered her to reap a | :02:37. | :02:46. | |
?5,800 -- to repay ?5,800. But the most serious charge was that she | :02:47. | :02:50. | |
failed to respond adequately to the various questions put to her over | :02:51. | :02:53. | |
the course of the investigation, and it is for this that she is about to | :02:54. | :02:59. | |
apologise to the House of Commons. Obviously a huge relief for her, and | :03:00. | :03:04. | |
for David Cameron in the Government. That's right. He has said he has | :03:05. | :03:14. | |
great support for Maria Miller. She has agreed to repay the money and | :03:15. | :03:19. | |
apologise to the House, and we should leave it at that, he says. So | :03:20. | :03:24. | |
it is clear that he believes he can hang on to her. I think the Prime | :03:25. | :03:28. | |
Minister would have been very reluctant to lose one of the few | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
women in his Cabinet, and so she will carry on in that role. But | :03:33. | :03:36. | |
there is no doubt that this does leave something of a black mark on | :03:37. | :03:41. | |
her reputation, and it will be something of a difficult and | :03:42. | :03:43. | |
embarrassing moment for her to have to apologise to the Commons in the | :03:44. | :03:50. | |
next hour. Carole Walker, thank you. David, are | :03:51. | :03:56. | |
you surprised? I think people have had enough of this. The report seems | :03:57. | :04:03. | |
to exaggerate her from the charges. So we are talking about her attitude | :04:04. | :04:08. | |
towards the committee and so on. And I don't know whether this is the | :04:09. | :04:11. | |
public perception, possibly the public doesn't have a perception | :04:12. | :04:15. | |
about it. But to me, the committee is the sign of everything that has | :04:16. | :04:21. | |
gone wrong with this situation. I don't even treat my children like | :04:22. | :04:24. | |
this, forcing them to account for every tiny little thing. It is so | :04:25. | :04:29. | |
long past time that we just created a situation where we give MPs and | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
lump sum, they don't have to account for it, this is the account we think | :04:34. | :04:39. | |
-- the amount we think is right for doing the job, spend it how you | :04:40. | :04:44. | |
like. And some say that is the way forward, but if you think about the | :04:45. | :04:47. | |
furore over the expenses scandal, and fair treatment of people, they | :04:48. | :04:54. | |
say, who didn't commit any more of an offence than Maria Miller, why is | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
there not more of a fuss? You think because we got so cross with people | :05:00. | :05:02. | |
in the past, we should keep on being that cross? There are a whole series | :05:03. | :05:07. | |
of discrepancies with people who have been treated much worse than | :05:08. | :05:12. | |
other people during the hold parliamentary scandal. Nobody cares. | :05:13. | :05:28. | |
The public do. Nobody cares about the people who are being affected by | :05:29. | :05:31. | |
this. Now it's time for our Daily Quiz. | :05:32. | :05:34. | |
The question for today is: What has David Cameron been complaining about | :05:35. | :05:38. | |
the price of? Is it: a) A white sliced loaf of bread. B) A first | :05:39. | :05:42. | |
class stamp. C) An England football team shirt. Or d) An Ed Miliband | :05:43. | :05:46. | |
souvenir mug? At the end of the show, David will give us the correct | :05:47. | :05:52. | |
answer. Even I know the answer to that! Don't give it away. | :05:53. | :06:02. | |
Now, the idea of an in/out debate on Europe was Nick Clegg's. He threw | :06:03. | :06:05. | |
down the gauntlet to the the UKIP leader, Nigel Farage. Nigel Farage, | :06:06. | :06:08. | |
no wilting wallflower, rose to the challenge. But after two debates and | :06:09. | :06:12. | |
with Mr Farage declared, by the pollsters at least, as victor, one | :06:13. | :06:15. | |
wonders if Mr Clegg might be regretting his decision. Let's take | :06:16. | :06:18. | |
a look back at last night's contest. It is 40 years since the BBC debated | :06:19. | :06:22. | |
this great question. The one thing that has remained the same as David | :06:23. | :06:26. | |
Dimbleby. We want to trade with Europe, get on well with our | :06:27. | :06:29. | |
next-door neighbours, but we don't want to be part of a political | :06:30. | :06:34. | |
union. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If you do what | :06:35. | :06:38. | |
Nigel Farage recommends, and you isolate Britain, sort of Billy no | :06:39. | :06:44. | |
mates Britain, a Billy no jobs Britain... The principle that drives | :06:45. | :06:50. | |
my entire political career is that I think the best people to govern | :06:51. | :06:53. | |
Britain are the British people themselves. Let's be in independent | :06:54. | :06:56. | |
United Kingdom, and I want the rest of Europe to free themselves from | :06:57. | :07:02. | |
the European Union, too. 200 people dying in Syria, being mown down, | :07:03. | :07:07. | |
killed, every single day, and Nigel Farage says he admires, he admires | :07:08. | :07:13. | |
the way that Vladimir Putin has played, as if it is a game... The | :07:14. | :07:17. | |
difficulty is we can't plan anything, because we don't know how | :07:18. | :07:21. | |
many are going to come. We have a chronic problem in schools, we need | :07:22. | :07:27. | |
to make a quarter of a million new primary school places immediately, | :07:28. | :07:30. | |
and housing, goodness me. We need to build a house every seven minutes | :07:31. | :07:34. | |
just to cope with immigration into this country. So whichever way you | :07:35. | :07:39. | |
look at it, we have huge problems with a population over which we have | :07:40. | :07:44. | |
no control at all. It is simply not true to say that anyone can come | :07:45. | :07:49. | |
here. People can only come here from the European Union and stay here if | :07:50. | :07:52. | |
they want to support themselves and want to work. It is good for the | :07:53. | :07:57. | |
rich, because it is cheaper nannies, chauffeurs, gardeners. But it is bad | :07:58. | :08:01. | |
news for ordinary people in Britain. We need to have control | :08:02. | :08:05. | |
over the number of people who come here and the quality of people who | :08:06. | :08:09. | |
come here. I don't want to discriminate against India and New | :08:10. | :08:12. | |
Zealand because we have an open door to Bulgaria and Romania. When the | :08:13. | :08:19. | |
rules change, a new treaty, powers that belong to you are being given | :08:20. | :08:24. | |
up, it shouldn't be for the government to decide, it should be | :08:25. | :08:28. | |
for you to decide. Let's free ourselves up and given examples of | :08:29. | :08:31. | |
the of Europe. I know that people are behind this, and I would urge | :08:32. | :08:36. | |
people, come and join the people's army. Let's topple the establishment | :08:37. | :08:40. | |
who have led us to this mess. And there are those of us who believe | :08:41. | :08:45. | |
and love modern Britain as it is today. Compassionate, diverse, | :08:46. | :08:53. | |
outward facing. We have challenges and complexities, but by working | :08:54. | :08:56. | |
with other countries, you deal with those challenges and make Britain | :08:57. | :09:01. | |
richer, stronger and safer. So, that gives you a flavour of last | :09:02. | :09:10. | |
night's debate. And here's what David Cameron had to | :09:11. | :09:13. | |
say on BBC Breakfast this morning when he was asked who he'd been | :09:14. | :09:16. | |
rooting for last night. The problem with the debate is that | :09:17. | :09:19. | |
the people taking part have quite extreme views. Nick thinks there is | :09:20. | :09:22. | |
nothing wrong with Europe and we shouldn't have a referendum, and | :09:23. | :09:25. | |
Nigel thinks that there is nothing right with Europe and we should | :09:26. | :09:31. | |
leave. They are both wrong. We should get tough with Europe, | :09:32. | :09:34. | |
negotiate a better deal, and then give people a choice and a | :09:35. | :09:38. | |
referendum. And that is what I will do if I am Prime Minister after the | :09:39. | :09:42. | |
next election. That is what people want, a proper choice on changing | :09:43. | :09:46. | |
Europe, and that is what these European elections should be about, | :09:47. | :09:47. | |
too. We're joined now by the former | :09:48. | :09:50. | |
Liberal Democrat director of communications, Olly Grender, UKIP's | :09:51. | :09:52. | |
director of communications, Patrick O'Flynn, and the political editor of | :09:53. | :10:01. | |
the Sun, Tom Newton Dunn. We will see what things are like! Whose | :10:02. | :10:09. | |
bright idea was it to give you get a foreign policy which involves | :10:10. | :10:13. | |
respecting Mr Putin for what he has done in Syria and Crimea? Our | :10:14. | :10:19. | |
foreign policy, as I told you last week when you predicted we would | :10:20. | :10:22. | |
have to back down, seems to have been extremely well received by many | :10:23. | :10:27. | |
people in Britain. It is not a matter of backing Mr Putin. But you | :10:28. | :10:32. | |
respect what he does. What we haven't said is that we admire him | :10:33. | :10:37. | |
as a human being or someone who runs a country which flout human rights. | :10:38. | :10:42. | |
But what we are focusing on is that it is outcomes that matter, not | :10:43. | :10:46. | |
sanctimonious student policies. The road ahead is paved with good | :10:47. | :10:50. | |
intentions, and we feel that the political class in this country, it | :10:51. | :10:56. | |
is an exercise in vanity. They like to look at themselves in the mirror | :10:57. | :10:59. | |
in the morning and think, I am on the side of the good guys. But if | :11:00. | :11:02. | |
you look at the outcomes in Syria and Libya and now in Ukraine, they | :11:03. | :11:07. | |
are terrible. And was it not quite clever of UKIP to get into position | :11:08. | :11:10. | |
where, in last night's debate against the Lib hems, they were busy | :11:11. | :11:19. | |
as posturing, the anti-war party. I think there is a Tony Blair legacy | :11:20. | :11:23. | |
on the Iraq war that is very difficult. If you were against it, | :11:24. | :11:31. | |
and you still didn't get credit. And Mr Clegg was having to defend | :11:32. | :11:34. | |
intervention in parts of the world. What did you think to that? I think | :11:35. | :11:39. | |
is right to defend intervention in parts of the world. I think it was | :11:40. | :11:44. | |
extraordinary. I think the foreign affairs stuff will come back again | :11:45. | :11:48. | |
and again and again. It was an extraordinary moment. The stuff | :11:49. | :11:56. | |
about having played Syria right, that was brilliant and will come | :11:57. | :12:01. | |
back to haunt him. But given that you are positioning ourselves as the | :12:02. | :12:05. | |
anti-war party, it was difficult to let UKIP paint you into a different | :12:06. | :12:12. | |
box. We are anti-illegal wars, and if Putin did anything with regard to | :12:13. | :12:15. | |
the UN, something legally could be done. Hopefully, about these | :12:16. | :12:22. | |
hundreds of children and women persecuted every day in Syria. Even | :12:23. | :12:28. | |
the Lib Dems, powerful as they are... Maybe Nigel Farage could have | :12:29. | :12:34. | |
a word with him. What did you make of that part of the debate? Nick | :12:35. | :12:43. | |
Clegg... Let's look at what has changed in four years. Nick Clegg in | :12:44. | :12:46. | |
2010 was the outsider, the fresh face. He had an extraordinary poll | :12:47. | :12:52. | |
rating. He turned the general election on its head. He is now the | :12:53. | :12:58. | |
insider. It didn't turn out that way on the day. It all went down to | :12:59. | :13:06. | |
nothing at the election. What happened last night was Nick Clegg, | :13:07. | :13:10. | |
four years on, has the scars of government all over his back. He has | :13:11. | :13:14. | |
had to take decisions, locking salt into policies, he is now the | :13:15. | :13:18. | |
ultimate insider, and so is Nigel Farage. -- locking himself into | :13:19. | :13:30. | |
policies. Political brilliance from Nigel Farage, talking about the | :13:31. | :13:35. | |
people's army, and he probably put ten point poll rating. Imagine Tony | :13:36. | :13:42. | |
Benn having come out with the same phrase, I don't know whether it | :13:43. | :13:45. | |
would have had quite the same resonance. Does this have perches on | :13:46. | :13:55. | |
the politics of this moment? If you look at the economic situation in | :13:56. | :13:58. | |
the last five or six years, what Nigel Farage has shown clearly is | :13:59. | :14:02. | |
that he stands for a significant portion of the population who | :14:03. | :14:05. | |
doesn't like Britain as it is, doesn't like the world as it is, and | :14:06. | :14:09. | |
wants to cut itself off. It is isolationist in foreign policy, and | :14:10. | :14:16. | |
I don't think for a second that he likes Vladimir Putin, but what he is | :14:17. | :14:19. | |
saying is I don't want to have much to do with the world, I wanted to go | :14:20. | :14:23. | |
away, I want to get out of the EE you. -- EU. I think Alex Salmond | :14:24. | :14:34. | |
thinks the same about Scotland. And on immigration, there hasn't been | :14:35. | :14:45. | |
the predicted influx of body -- people from Bulgaria and Romania. We | :14:46. | :14:52. | |
haven't had any figures apart from one that covered the year up to | :14:53. | :14:59. | |
November 2013. If I can just bring you to the person with the best | :15:00. | :15:03. | |
projections, time and time again, it is Andrew Green at Mine -- Migration | :15:04. | :15:14. | |
Watch. It has always been the case that the whole EU immigration issue | :15:15. | :15:19. | |
has been wider than Bulgaria and Romania. We have what are called | :15:20. | :15:25. | |
eurozone refugees, people locked into Mediterranean economies that | :15:26. | :15:35. | |
are going down the pan. We are going to inherit the best and the | :15:36. | :15:40. | |
brightest? It would be nice to have some volume control, but last night, | :15:41. | :15:52. | |
with respect, we have neither. A native American poster that Mr Clegg | :15:53. | :15:55. | |
unveiled from UKIP, do you think it work? Yes, it makes a point. It | :15:56. | :16:03. | |
makes a compelling point. There is a scare tactic which is deployed by | :16:04. | :16:08. | |
Nigel Farage with regard to economic migrants seek and immigration. I | :16:09. | :16:17. | |
thought it worked. Did it work in terms of the kind of fears and | :16:18. | :16:23. | |
concerns and thought people about immigration? That continues to be a | :16:24. | :16:27. | |
debate that needs to be held on as rational a level as possible. If you | :16:28. | :16:32. | |
look at the line that UKIP took, in terms of positioning it is clever. | :16:33. | :16:38. | |
They came out as the anti-war and the anti-politics party, which plays | :16:39. | :16:43. | |
well in this country, and then he cast immigration almost in terms of | :16:44. | :16:48. | |
class. It is fine if you can afford servants or chauffeurs, but not if | :16:49. | :16:53. | |
you are low paid and having to compete with people coming in. That | :16:54. | :17:02. | |
is an anti-establishment position. He went further than that, and went | :17:03. | :17:08. | |
into racial terms and topped about creating an underclass and that set | :17:09. | :17:14. | |
alarm bells ringing. Ten seconds. I am not saying whether you agree or | :17:15. | :17:17. | |
disagree, but what he did was very clever. Nick Clegg's personal rating | :17:18. | :17:26. | |
went up four breast-fed for people who watched the debate. But Nigel | :17:27. | :17:33. | |
Farage's went up by 12%. He speaks the people's language and it works. | :17:34. | :17:39. | |
The antiestablishment training ground of the city and stockbroking. | :17:40. | :17:48. | |
He taps into that. He is not an MP, so he is not tainted. People do not | :17:49. | :17:55. | |
trust his judgement, and that will be held over him, but it is very | :17:56. | :17:58. | |
difficult to interrogate these things. I spent a lot of time | :17:59. | :18:03. | |
writing that the evidence does not stack up behind the notion that | :18:04. | :18:08. | |
ordinary Britons have not benefited from immigration, they have and the | :18:09. | :18:12. | |
evidence is there. But when somebody says the elite have walked away with | :18:13. | :18:16. | |
all the benefits and we have suffered together, people like that. | :18:17. | :18:24. | |
Very quickly, why did Mr Farage do even better in the second one? I | :18:25. | :18:30. | |
think he had the stronger arguments. I must go back to the race thing. He | :18:31. | :18:35. | |
made one mention of the white, working-class in an hour and he made | :18:36. | :18:39. | |
mention of African Caribbean young men in London. The difficulties of | :18:40. | :18:46. | |
white, working-class kid is well established in literature. Why did | :18:47. | :18:52. | |
he do better? I think he was more relaxed and more confident in his | :18:53. | :18:57. | |
arguments. I thought Nick Clegg was worse because he was rattled. Why | :18:58. | :19:04. | |
did he do better? This is an argument that has only had one side | :19:05. | :19:08. | |
to it for the last two decade and finally somebody is standing up with | :19:09. | :19:13. | |
the pro-European argument. You cannot argue the more you hear, the | :19:14. | :19:20. | |
more we come round. He lost by more. If we had a sustained period of | :19:21. | :19:24. | |
anti-European commentary, I think things would improve. Why did he do | :19:25. | :19:32. | |
better this time? Because Nick Clegg was disingenuous and he tried to be | :19:33. | :19:35. | |
Nigel Farage and Nigel Farage tried to be Mr Clegg. They swapped roles. | :19:36. | :19:46. | |
There we go, on that line. Stay where you are. The Westminster | :19:47. | :19:53. | |
village set up camp in New Broadcasting House last night. Chris | :19:54. | :19:56. | |
Mason was brave enough to enter the spin room. Not a place for the | :19:57. | :20:05. | |
faint-hearted. Here is his report. All right, so it looks like a | :20:06. | :20:09. | |
roomful of people doing an accountancy exam and someone has | :20:10. | :20:14. | |
left the TV on. Welcome to the spin room, reporters and spin doctors in | :20:15. | :20:20. | |
a conference room over the road from the debate, watching it on the box | :20:21. | :20:24. | |
like people at home. But the minute it finished, this room was the | :20:25. | :20:29. | |
centre of things. Let's see what various journalists are making of | :20:30. | :20:33. | |
it. I can just see Kevin Maguire from the Daily Mirror. Let's see if | :20:34. | :20:44. | |
we can grab a quick word. Could you have a quick word with the Daily | :20:45. | :20:49. | |
Politics? Always. What do you make of it? Last week Nigel Farage was a | :20:50. | :20:56. | |
bit all over the place. He looked calmer. Nick Clegg came out like a | :20:57. | :21:03. | |
terrier and started out well, but it did not last and Nigel Farage | :21:04. | :21:07. | |
knocked him out of the park. Nick Clegg came out very fast and he was | :21:08. | :21:13. | |
painting Nigel Farage is a bit of a crank and that was effective. He | :21:14. | :21:19. | |
tired at the end and Nigel Farage began to find his rhythm, but | :21:20. | :21:23. | |
tonight I found it was won by Nick Clegg. Some were left smiling by | :21:24. | :21:29. | |
Nick Clegg's reference to a cricket England could be proud of. My | :21:30. | :21:35. | |
favourite cricketer is WB grace, because I had the idea of all the | :21:36. | :21:39. | |
Eurocrats watching this debate as thing, who is she? But this room was | :21:40. | :21:49. | |
something of a bearpit. We will not tolerate this rude interruption. I | :21:50. | :21:57. | |
just had my interview nicked by Norman Smith on the news channel. | :21:58. | :22:02. | |
Typical. These audience members reflected the opinion polls, | :22:03. | :22:07. | |
claiming it was a UKIP victory. I think Nick started off strong, but | :22:08. | :22:12. | |
undoubtedly it was a Nigel Farage victory. Did Nigel Farage win? He | :22:13. | :22:18. | |
did, he knew what he was talking about and he knew what he was | :22:19. | :22:24. | |
wanting to get out of it. We might have expected Ukraine to come up in | :22:25. | :22:29. | |
the conversation, but perhaps not Derby County Council and Orpington. | :22:30. | :22:34. | |
They got a mention. Now the room has seemed to stop spinning and the | :22:35. | :22:37. | |
deadlines are approaching for the journalists. But the big question is | :22:38. | :22:43. | |
will we get the same thing again in a couple of months? That is during | :22:44. | :22:50. | |
the general election campaign. Chris Mason braving it inside. What | :22:51. | :22:56. | |
was the atmosphere like? It was slightly flat, I will not lie to | :22:57. | :23:00. | |
you. Last week was quite interesting. They had to drink, | :23:01. | :23:09. | |
which always gets the adrenaline going. How to get the debate | :23:10. | :23:16. | |
swinging. It was the second time around and both these debates have | :23:17. | :23:21. | |
not changed anything at all. It is man bites dog, dog bites man, they | :23:22. | :23:26. | |
confirmed the stereotypes. Nigel Farage is on a roll and Nick Clegg | :23:27. | :23:32. | |
is not going to do very well. We see the spin doctors standing around, | :23:33. | :23:36. | |
what did you say to the journalists immediately afterwards? That he is | :23:37. | :23:42. | |
right to hold this debate and he is right to stand up for his beliefs. A | :23:43. | :23:47. | |
lot of people question is he true to his beliefs and no one can question | :23:48. | :23:53. | |
that he believes in a positive, pro-European message. What was | :23:54. | :23:58. | |
telling in the polling yesterday was that again a large swathe of Labour | :23:59. | :24:05. | |
supporters are finally opening their ears to Nick Clegg, which I thought | :24:06. | :24:12. | |
would always be a struggle. More people to UKIP, to be honest. 51%. | :24:13. | :24:19. | |
More Labour voters went to UKIP, sorry. I thought it was a shift. For | :24:20. | :24:30. | |
you, then, what was the main thrust of your strategy after the debate? I | :24:31. | :24:36. | |
instinctively knew that he had won by more than last week and if I can | :24:37. | :24:43. | |
mention Kate Burley, she was interviewing me live, implying we | :24:44. | :24:46. | |
were on the back foot in foreign policy and we would struggle and I | :24:47. | :24:50. | |
said, we had won by more and the poll came through and indeed we had. | :24:51. | :24:55. | |
It was important for Nigel to emotionally connect with the | :24:56. | :24:59. | |
audience and I thought he did that several times really well, | :25:00. | :25:02. | |
particularly in the final closing minutes. What did you do between | :25:03. | :25:08. | |
last week and last night to improve the performance. I suspect on both | :25:09. | :25:14. | |
sides there was a secondary round of anything coming out of the last | :25:15. | :25:18. | |
debate, what will the other guy do? The fact that Nigel had one last | :25:19. | :25:23. | |
week, Nick Clegg could argue it was a points victory, but it was a | :25:24. | :25:28. | |
victory nonetheless. That was important to us, to try and deliver | :25:29. | :25:33. | |
a knockout win. We were very focused and feeling quite bullish. One of | :25:34. | :25:39. | |
the criticisms was that people felt that Nick Clegg, who believes what | :25:40. | :25:44. | |
he thinks about, he does not have to have scripted lines, but last night | :25:45. | :25:48. | |
it was too scripted and he did not do it in a natural enough weight to | :25:49. | :25:54. | |
be convincing. Would you accept that? If anyone is scrutinised on | :25:55. | :25:58. | |
telly they will know it is not a natural environment. I thought a few | :25:59. | :26:05. | |
of the jugs personally did not work. Anti-tried to get to them a bit | :26:06. | :26:10. | |
more. What about the difference between what the Westminster bubble | :26:11. | :26:15. | |
things and as things and outside in the real world? Thanks to LBC we | :26:16. | :26:23. | |
were all pretty tanked up by the end of it and we had had lots of booze. | :26:24. | :26:29. | |
We knew what was going to happen, but everyone was calling it for Nick | :26:30. | :26:35. | |
Clegg. We listen to the debates, people who know the arguments and | :26:36. | :26:40. | |
heart as you are being paid to, listen to the words being said. The | :26:41. | :26:45. | |
TV viewers feel the words coming out and they look at the guys and they | :26:46. | :26:49. | |
react to the person rather than the policy. But you think there is a | :26:50. | :26:54. | |
difference in how big can be interpreted? Interestingly I do not | :26:55. | :27:00. | |
think the bubble was necessarily with Nick Clegg, I think the bubble | :27:01. | :27:06. | |
found him disingenuous. That was not him last night. If the polls were | :27:07. | :27:10. | |
indicating it was a clear Nigel Farage win, you were mentioning that | :27:11. | :27:19. | |
he had not lost? If we were doing the usual run-up to the European | :27:20. | :27:23. | |
elections it would be business as usual and not much discussion and | :27:24. | :27:29. | |
not much of a look in for the Lib Dems and UKIP. The fact there has | :27:30. | :27:35. | |
been a strong, public debate, with quite large viewing figures last | :27:36. | :27:42. | |
week and this week... 1.7 million. Whatever you say, yesterday I was | :27:43. | :27:47. | |
part of a 10% team and today I am part of a 31% team. That is | :27:48. | :27:52. | |
progress. What about the guys who work there? I joined the 58.3 | :27:53. | :27:59. | |
million who were not watching the debate. That is not to denigrate it, | :28:00. | :28:04. | |
I think it is a good thing to do. Firstly, I think it is important to | :28:05. | :28:09. | |
have this discussion precisely because of the reasons Nick Clegg | :28:10. | :28:14. | |
thinks we should. The big parties go for the 60-40 split. They try and | :28:15. | :28:22. | |
palliate the 60% and the 40% never get heard. I watched the billy no | :28:23. | :28:30. | |
mates jokes go down and Alan Johnson can get away with them, but he | :28:31. | :28:35. | |
cannot. And then looking at the polling reflection this mooring it | :28:36. | :28:41. | |
was an interesting indication of where the arguments will have to be | :28:42. | :28:44. | |
made and which ones will have to be taken more seriously. What about | :28:45. | :28:49. | |
David Cameron's view that these were the two extreme views? They were not | :28:50. | :28:57. | |
there. They do not have to take part in the bear garden public debate, | :28:58. | :29:02. | |
but it is not good for the public. They do not have answers, neither of | :29:03. | :29:08. | |
them have answers on this. Is there anyone who believes David Cameron | :29:09. | :29:11. | |
will successfully negotiate a change that will satisfy even his own | :29:12. | :29:17. | |
party? This will come up in the prime ministerial debates and | :29:18. | :29:20. | |
everyone thinks they will come up in some form. How will the impact on | :29:21. | :29:29. | |
those debates? Both David Cameron and Ed Miliband will think we have | :29:30. | :29:32. | |
to have them, but not anywhere near us. We can all make silly bets, but | :29:33. | :29:40. | |
I think it will be Cameron and Milliband and they will knockout | :29:41. | :29:45. | |
Nigel Farage and Nick Clegg. How can you justify that? You can think of a | :29:46. | :29:52. | |
million ways. But what this debate is told as... And very relieved | :29:53. | :30:01. | |
Thomas in these negotiations. No one knows what the outcome is going to | :30:02. | :30:06. | |
be and that is too much of a mess for Cameron and Ed Miliband. David | :30:07. | :30:14. | |
Cameron did say he wanted these debates ahead of the campaign. He | :30:15. | :30:18. | |
wasn't willing to come and debate. When Nigel said yes, it was on the | :30:19. | :30:27. | |
proviso that David Cameron and Ed Miliband were invited along, but | :30:28. | :30:33. | |
they both said no. We wanted them to come, because we had some good | :30:34. | :30:37. | |
arguments about blue-collar wages and pressures on social housing that | :30:38. | :30:39. | |
would have shown up their weaknesses, plenty of arguments for | :30:40. | :30:47. | |
both of them. Time for a new strategy for Nick Clegg? He was | :30:48. | :30:52. | |
always going to be against the tide of a large amount of opinion, but | :30:53. | :30:57. | |
the fact that he stood up for what he believes in makes me proud today. | :30:58. | :31:04. | |
Thank you to all of you. Now here's something that's going to | :31:05. | :31:08. | |
surprise you. There's a disagreement rumbling in the coalition. I know, I | :31:09. | :31:11. | |
know, who would have thought it? This time it's over wind farms. Most | :31:12. | :31:15. | |
Lib Dems still love them, but quite a few Conservatives have fallen out | :31:16. | :31:27. | |
of love with them. Here's JoCo with the details. | :31:28. | :31:29. | |
Wind farms are becoming quite a battle ground within the coalition. | :31:30. | :31:32. | |
Yesterday Lib Dem sources told the BBC that David Cameron's hopes to | :31:33. | :31:36. | |
restrict the number of onshore wind farms have been blocked by Nick | :31:37. | :31:39. | |
Clegg, who sees them as a vital source to help the UK hit its target | :31:40. | :31:43. | |
of 15% of the county's energy coming from renewable sources by 2020. | :31:44. | :31:46. | |
There are currently over 4,000 wind turbines onshore and over 1,000 | :31:47. | :31:52. | |
offshore. Together these provide enough energy to power the | :31:53. | :31:55. | |
equivalent of just over six million homes. However, it's not cheap. | :31:56. | :32:02. | |
Energy producers are paid a guaranteed amount above the market | :32:03. | :32:05. | |
price for their electricity as a way of encouraging firms to invest. | :32:06. | :32:09. | |
Called a strike price, for onshore wind farms the figure is ?95 per | :32:10. | :32:12. | |
megawatt hour, and for offshore it's ?155 per megawatt hour. Compare that | :32:13. | :32:19. | |
to the ?50 per megawatt hour for wholesale electricity and you get | :32:20. | :32:24. | |
the idea. What's more, the building of new onshore wind farms is | :32:25. | :32:27. | |
controversial, with many complaining the turbines ruin the countryside | :32:28. | :32:30. | |
and can cause health problems for people living nearby. | :32:31. | :32:37. | |
And we're joined now by the Conservative MP, Peter Bone. We did | :32:38. | :32:44. | |
try to get a Liberal Democrats come and talk about this as well, but | :32:45. | :32:47. | |
none of them wanted to talk this morning. What have you got against | :32:48. | :32:53. | |
them? If you were trying to watch your programme in some areas this | :32:54. | :33:00. | |
morning, you wouldn't be able to, because the wind farms affect the | :33:01. | :33:06. | |
television signal. ?8.7 million last month we paid to turn the wind farms | :33:07. | :33:10. | |
off because it is too windy. It is just subsidy for subsidy's fake. | :33:11. | :33:16. | |
What do you think? It is complete nonsense. We had overcapacity in the | :33:17. | :33:22. | |
grid, and that is when you decide to turn it off. Because it is too | :33:23. | :33:31. | |
windy. Because every body is producing too much electricity, so | :33:32. | :33:33. | |
that is the cheapest point at which to turn it off. But if you are | :33:34. | :33:38. | |
looking in the long term, which is a greater desire for renewables, and | :33:39. | :33:42. | |
defender thing, this business with Russia has told us that we don't | :33:43. | :33:46. | |
want to be alive as we have been on the importation of fuel and so on, | :33:47. | :33:51. | |
let alone discussions about climate change, then we need to have | :33:52. | :33:56. | |
renewables, and we have them. Some of the arguments against onshore | :33:57. | :34:00. | |
wind farms are preposterous to say the least. The television signal | :34:01. | :34:08. | |
argument is one of them. You tell that to the people affected? ! But | :34:09. | :34:16. | |
they will also have cheap sources of renewable energy in the long term. | :34:17. | :34:23. | |
It is not cheap! Cheaper compared to what we will be paying. Why don't we | :34:24. | :34:30. | |
go for fracking? If you look at the USA, they didn't sign up to Kyoto, | :34:31. | :34:35. | |
but they met the targets by going to fracking. So now people are coming | :34:36. | :34:40. | |
back because energy prices are falling in the States. Here, we are | :34:41. | :34:45. | |
putting prices up the people, driving people into fuel poverty and | :34:46. | :34:48. | |
sending industry offshore. It is madness. I am in favour of fracking | :34:49. | :34:59. | |
too, as it happens. But your equivalent is saying that we don't | :35:00. | :35:02. | |
want it in our area, we don't like it. You are just displacing the name | :35:03. | :35:18. | |
nimbyism from one place to another. What you can't get away from is that | :35:19. | :35:21. | |
wind farms cost the taxpayer billions of pounds. We already have | :35:22. | :35:25. | |
enough to commit to the energy target. We don't need a single | :35:26. | :35:33. | |
turbine more. You should turn your back if another wind farm comes up. | :35:34. | :35:40. | |
We have selected the Conservative candidate to fight the Corby general | :35:41. | :35:45. | |
election who is the director of together against wind. It is in | :35:46. | :35:55. | |
important issue in my area. I love that there is an organisation called | :35:56. | :36:06. | |
Together Against Wind! People are concerned. Take it seriously. You | :36:07. | :36:10. | |
say we have enough wind farms to hit the target, but at the moment, wind | :36:11. | :36:17. | |
generates an average 9% of our electricity. Sometimes it is more, | :36:18. | :36:22. | |
sometimes less. Our target for 2020 is 30%. On the wind farm side of it, | :36:23. | :36:30. | |
with all of the planning applications approved, we have | :36:31. | :36:33. | |
reached the target. I am personally not a great fan of these wind farm | :36:34. | :36:38. | |
targets. What I want to see is, as you mentioned earlier, energy | :36:39. | :36:41. | |
security. And wind farms cannot please energy security, because of | :36:42. | :36:45. | |
the wind doesn't blow, you have no energy. You need sensible | :36:46. | :36:50. | |
alternatives like nuclear power and fracking. Nuclear is at least as | :36:51. | :36:55. | |
expensive as onshore wind. Indeed, it is more, because as Jo showed, we | :36:56. | :37:05. | |
have just done a strike deal and ?92 50 per megawatt hour for nuclear. It | :37:06. | :37:15. | |
gives you energy security, that is what I was talking about. It is | :37:16. | :37:20. | |
cheaper than offshore wind. We should be making sure we have energy | :37:21. | :37:24. | |
security. We had a debate earlier today in the Commons. David | :37:25. | :37:35. | |
Aaronovitch, when these prices were agreed, the offshore price was by | :37:36. | :37:39. | |
far the most extensive. It was done at a time when the Westminster | :37:40. | :37:47. | |
consensus was that fossil fuels would continue to rise in price, so | :37:48. | :37:52. | |
that by 2020, this wind wouldn't seem so expensive, because fossil | :37:53. | :37:56. | |
fuels and got up to that price as well. Since then, most of the | :37:57. | :38:00. | |
evidence suggests, that probably isn't true any more. Although it | :38:01. | :38:10. | |
could. It always seems to me to be prudent to invest in renewables, | :38:11. | :38:12. | |
precisely because they were renewable, and precisely because... | :38:13. | :38:20. | |
And the wind usually does blow somewhere in the United Kingdom. I | :38:21. | :38:24. | |
am in favour of fracking as well, but it does have carbon emissions. I | :38:25. | :38:29. | |
am also in favour of nuclear power being part of the mix. We are | :38:30. | :38:35. | |
probably agreeing that there should be a moratorium on future wind farm. | :38:36. | :38:41. | |
I don't think we should agree on any such thing. You are just paying | :38:42. | :38:48. | |
subsidies for people. And it is affecting our long-term plan. We | :38:49. | :38:52. | |
have run out of time, I'm afraid. No doubt we will come back to it. Peter | :38:53. | :38:56. | |
bone, thank you very much. You're watching the Daily Politics, | :38:57. | :38:59. | |
and we've been joined by viewers in Scotland who have been watching | :39:00. | :39:02. | |
First Minister's Questions from Holyrood. Wind power has been very | :39:03. | :39:05. | |
big north of the border, too. Now, we all know local councils have | :39:06. | :39:09. | |
been feeling the pinch. But let me introduce you to Barnet's "graph of | :39:10. | :39:14. | |
doom". Be warned - it doesn't make pretty reading, and there's even a | :39:15. | :39:19. | |
video. It is a projection, not a | :39:20. | :39:23. | |
prediction. The instance, the council will be failing to run seven | :39:24. | :39:27. | |
statutory services in 2025 if this came true. But as a projection, or | :39:28. | :39:32. | |
we receive national coverage, and it is a clear expression of the | :39:33. | :39:38. | |
financial challenge facing the government, and it became known as | :39:39. | :39:43. | |
the Barnet graph of doom. The gap between the services and the Budget | :39:44. | :39:47. | |
is the money left over to provide services such as libraries, rubbish | :39:48. | :39:50. | |
collections, recycling, road maintenance, street cleaning. | :39:51. | :39:54. | |
And I'm joined now by Barnet's deputy leader, Dan Thomas, and from | :39:55. | :39:58. | |
the LSE by Professor Tony Travers, who knows everything there is to | :39:59. | :40:03. | |
know about local government. We always Bill you that we! Time will | :40:04. | :40:12. | |
judge if you are correct. You said by the end of the decade, you would | :40:13. | :40:16. | |
only be able to fund children's services and adult social care for | :40:17. | :40:21. | |
the power things changed? They have. The population was due to expand, | :40:22. | :40:26. | |
but also, the council tax base will go up. But also, as a council, we | :40:27. | :40:31. | |
are making major headway in savings. At the end of this year, we will | :40:32. | :40:38. | |
have saved ?70 million, added time when satisfaction with the council | :40:39. | :40:41. | |
has gone up 20%, so those are the sorts of things changing for the | :40:42. | :40:45. | |
better. So the projection is not as bad as you first thought? It is | :40:46. | :40:50. | |
going to be difficult. You heard in the presentation, the graph of doom, | :40:51. | :40:55. | |
but they asked -- there are still pressures. Do you think that by | :40:56. | :41:02. | |
2022, the vast majority of your funding will have to be spent on | :41:03. | :41:06. | |
social care and children services? If we don't change what we do. We | :41:07. | :41:11. | |
need to work more with the resident bloomer and the community, which is | :41:12. | :41:13. | |
why we are carrying out this consultation. We are asking | :41:14. | :41:18. | |
residents what their priorities are, what they want to keep. And we have | :41:19. | :41:23. | |
a second stage and are going where we are saying, those are your | :41:24. | :41:25. | |
priorities of how can we deliver them? But in a commissioning way, so | :41:26. | :41:29. | |
that the council won't be able to deliver things directly. We will | :41:30. | :41:33. | |
have to work with allsorts of groups throughout the borough to keep | :41:34. | :41:38. | |
services going. Is this scaremongering by an authority that | :41:39. | :41:41. | |
has basically said, we need more money if you want is to actually | :41:42. | :41:44. | |
provide service outside those two important areas? Not this particular | :41:45. | :41:50. | |
graph of doom, because ministers will interpret this as a graph of | :41:51. | :41:57. | |
delayed doom, so they will think that they can squeeze them a bit | :41:58. | :42:01. | |
more and the doom will be in the future. If they want to make major | :42:02. | :42:11. | |
reductions in public spending, but they can still protect schools and | :42:12. | :42:15. | |
the health service. If you protect big items and try to level off the | :42:16. | :42:20. | |
total, local government gets cut. Except councils have proved across | :42:21. | :42:23. | |
the country that they can make savings and they have made savings, | :42:24. | :42:27. | |
and even Dan Thomas has said that there has been good news. So your | :42:28. | :42:33. | |
delayed doom may just forever be delayed. That is what the Treasury | :42:34. | :42:40. | |
will read into this. They will think, if we squeeze local | :42:41. | :42:43. | |
government, it can deliver cuts. You wouldn't dare to do that to the NHS, | :42:44. | :42:46. | |
because heaven knows what will happen. So they will read this as an | :42:47. | :42:52. | |
incentive not to reward local government but to put them under | :42:53. | :42:56. | |
greater pressure in the future. Is your authority unique? I think it is | :42:57. | :43:01. | |
in the way that we have met the challenge. Is it unique in terms of | :43:02. | :43:04. | |
the burden you are having to deal with in terms of an ageing | :43:05. | :43:08. | |
population, for example, and social care? I would say that ours is one | :43:09. | :43:13. | |
of the lowest funded councils in London, and with the reduction in | :43:14. | :43:19. | |
our Budget... A lot of councils will say either that they don't get as | :43:20. | :43:24. | |
much money as other boroughs, or that they have more problems. It is | :43:25. | :43:28. | |
quite difficult to know that in the whole scheme of things, who really | :43:29. | :43:38. | |
is suffering. When you live in a centralised system such as ours when | :43:39. | :43:41. | |
the government allocates the spending power, everyone will feel | :43:42. | :43:44. | |
hard done by because the government allocates it to them, so they will | :43:45. | :43:50. | |
also there are hard done by. I think Barnet deserves much credit for | :43:51. | :43:53. | |
articulating the issue in this clear way. But you still have to come back | :43:54. | :43:58. | |
to the fact that it is councils more than any other part of the public | :43:59. | :44:02. | |
sector that are being put under pressure. What you think central | :44:03. | :44:08. | |
government should do? Rather than just talk about what they should do, | :44:09. | :44:11. | |
one of the things the graph tells you is that there are very | :44:12. | :44:14. | |
significant long-term shift in this country, and the question you have | :44:15. | :44:17. | |
to ask yourself is whether you think in the run-up to the 2015 elections | :44:18. | :44:21. | |
what you have heard so far from any of the parties actually addresses | :44:22. | :44:24. | |
them, because I can't think that they do. Even in terms of the NHS, | :44:25. | :44:33. | |
we have two major statements out of the NHS, the new head of the NHS | :44:34. | :44:37. | |
saying, in effect, we haven't got anything like enough money for the | :44:38. | :44:43. | |
health care we think we are going to need ten or 15 years ahead. So you | :44:44. | :44:47. | |
have Lord Warner suggested copayment is one of the ways, but we will have | :44:48. | :44:52. | |
to grasp nettles like that. If you shove a load of stuff onto councils, | :44:53. | :44:56. | |
you will then reap the whirlwind when it comes to what happens in | :44:57. | :45:02. | |
accident and emergency or in parts of the health service, and parts of | :45:03. | :45:06. | |
the education service the Government says it is trying to grapple with | :45:07. | :45:09. | |
the problems of long-term care and how we are going to deal with an | :45:10. | :45:14. | |
ageing population. But if they do, as David Aaronovitch predicts, keep | :45:15. | :45:17. | |
pushing it on to local councils, when you think the penny will drop? | :45:18. | :45:26. | |
I am not sure they were ever quite get to that point. There is a | :45:27. | :45:31. | |
tipping point, somewhere between what the councils are spending now | :45:32. | :45:35. | |
and the rope. To pick up David's issue, he is absolutely right that | :45:36. | :45:40. | |
what we have got is all the parties unwilling or unable to put up the | :45:41. | :45:45. | |
level of taxes in total. They stay at the same level year in, year out, | :45:46. | :45:50. | |
but they want to promise higher spending. They cannot bring | :45:51. | :45:53. | |
themselves to tackle that inconsistency. What about the | :45:54. | :45:59. | |
division between health care and social care? Will that change? We | :46:00. | :46:05. | |
will have to have more integration and collaboration with other public | :46:06. | :46:11. | |
service bodies. We need to temper up with other councils. We have done | :46:12. | :46:19. | |
that successfully and the big prizes are with the big services and social | :46:20. | :46:23. | |
care and with the police and the NHS and the DWP. But politically it is | :46:24. | :46:30. | |
not palatable which is why the Government will not talk about the | :46:31. | :46:35. | |
issues you have outlined. That is true and the question is at which | :46:36. | :46:39. | |
point does it become inevitable where we have to get people to pay | :46:40. | :46:48. | |
an allowance to their GP? I heard somebody say, we do not have a | :46:49. | :46:55. | |
funding problem, we can just do this and that. I sympathised with that, | :46:56. | :47:01. | |
but that is not the answer. Interesting, thank you very much. | :47:02. | :47:04. | |
David Aaronovitch is on the programme. He has written a book | :47:05. | :47:07. | |
about conspiracy theories you know. He is more of a denier than a | :47:08. | :47:11. | |
believer, but it always makes good telly. Take a look at this. The | :47:12. | :47:19. | |
problem is with conspiracy theory like best... I am here to warn | :47:20. | :47:26. | |
people, you keep telling me to shut up. This is not a game. You have an | :47:27. | :47:32. | |
arrest for public safety, life in prison. You are the worst person... | :47:33. | :47:43. | |
No, it is off with their heads! You are watching the Sunday Politics, we | :47:44. | :47:46. | |
have an idiot on the programme today. You cannot stop the Republic! | :47:47. | :47:59. | |
It is like that every morning. It makes pretty good television and you | :48:00. | :48:03. | |
Tube liked it and so did the BBC online service. And here are David | :48:04. | :48:07. | |
's top five conspiracy theories. Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The | :48:08. | :48:12. | |
assassination of JFK. Princess Diana's death. 9/11. And finally, | :48:13. | :48:27. | |
the secret bloodline of Christ. Joining us now from Bristol 's Tony | :48:28. | :48:31. | |
Gosling who investigates conspiracy theories. What attracts people to | :48:32. | :48:38. | |
conspiracy theories? Because they make order of aiders ordered world. | :48:39. | :48:46. | |
They suggest a world that is as chaotic as it is, somebody is behind | :48:47. | :48:53. | |
it all. Take the case of the disappeared Malaysian plane. That is | :48:54. | :48:57. | |
scary, but if you could bring yourself to believe somebody had | :48:58. | :49:00. | |
planned to do it and there are people who believe it, then you take | :49:01. | :49:04. | |
some of the frightening elements away. Tony Gosling, what do you | :49:05. | :49:12. | |
regard as the current, most important thing you think some would | :49:13. | :49:18. | |
regard as a conspiracy theory? That is easy. The Malaysian airline. If | :49:19. | :49:23. | |
you were to talk to families of the relatives of people on edge, a lot | :49:24. | :49:27. | |
of them are starting to say, we have not been told the truth. What is | :49:28. | :49:34. | |
your theory? There are a fact that we know and we know news management | :49:35. | :49:38. | |
has been going on on a big way in the story. First of all, when | :49:39. | :49:44. | |
Rolls-Royce announced the plane looked like it had been travelling | :49:45. | :49:47. | |
for five hours there was an avalanche of stories saying no, by | :49:48. | :49:52. | |
people who could not have known. They even got Rolls-Royce to retract | :49:53. | :49:57. | |
that story. There are also sightings in the Maldives. People could not | :49:58. | :50:02. | |
have known if people in the Maldives had seen the aircraft or not. I | :50:03. | :50:09. | |
understand all that. What I am trying to get is do you have a | :50:10. | :50:15. | |
theory as to what happened to that plane? It is impossible to tell. A | :50:16. | :50:21. | |
cover-up certainly of some sort is going on. Planes do not fly for five | :50:22. | :50:27. | |
hours and crash into the sea. Ask any pilot. If it is in trouble, it | :50:28. | :50:32. | |
will bitch or a land on the ground. It is the wife of Philip Wood, , the | :50:33. | :50:40. | |
guy from IBM, she says it feels like Howard Government is lying to her. | :50:41. | :50:46. | |
The banking conspiracy, the massive fraud going on in the city. I guess | :50:47. | :50:52. | |
because of all the uncertainty and the fact the plane has not been | :50:53. | :50:56. | |
located it is an ideal subject for conspiracy theories. It absolutely | :50:57. | :51:01. | |
is and Tony has outlined the classic build-up of the notion of what is | :51:02. | :51:07. | |
odd or strange or anomalous about it, quite apart from the | :51:08. | :51:12. | |
disappearance, and then in comes somebody's wife, what her | :51:13. | :51:17. | |
qualifications are, we do not know, to say something about it. There | :51:18. | :51:21. | |
will be websites which will build upon this. Gradually a theory will | :51:22. | :51:28. | |
emerge from it. And it comes from the same impossibility about not | :51:29. | :51:37. | |
knowing, which is appalling. Can you give an example of a conspiracy | :51:38. | :51:41. | |
theory which in the fullness of time proved to be true beyond doubt? The | :51:42. | :51:48. | |
JFK assassination, which David deals with in his book. I have not seen | :51:49. | :51:52. | |
the book, but there is a similar book which David may know that deals | :51:53. | :51:58. | |
very well with it. Lyndon Johnson was clearly meeting with the boss of | :51:59. | :52:05. | |
the FBI in the days running up to the assassination. There is somebody | :52:06. | :52:13. | |
who has confessed to having worked with the Mafia. With JFK he had come | :52:14. | :52:17. | |
to power with the help of the Chicago Mafia and he got his brother | :52:18. | :52:21. | |
after he was elected to start clamping down on the Mafia in | :52:22. | :52:28. | |
Chicago. I understand the motive, but it does not prove the conspiracy | :52:29. | :52:34. | |
theory. One of the things about theories like this is they are | :52:35. | :52:38. | |
completely hydra headed. As soon as you think you have dealt with one | :52:39. | :52:42. | |
set of facts, somebody will raise another. There are a few that you do | :52:43. | :52:48. | |
not hear and you date you know the literature pretty well. There is not | :52:49. | :52:52. | |
a great deal of mystery about the murder of JFK and there is no | :52:53. | :52:57. | |
mystery about who killed him. But the psychic impact of the death of a | :52:58. | :53:01. | |
president in that way gave rise to the need for it to be something | :53:02. | :53:07. | |
other than this single, disoriented side, Lee Harvey Oswald. The | :53:08. | :53:13. | |
industry that has grown up around it is absolutely massive. Tony is | :53:14. | :53:16. | |
completely sincere in believing these things. You any example of a | :53:17. | :53:23. | |
conspiracy theory which was ridiculed at the time, but turned | :53:24. | :53:28. | |
out to either be true or there seemed to be something in it? There | :53:29. | :53:33. | |
are all times of cover-ups which people say are true. The most | :53:34. | :53:40. | |
heinous was it was thought the Conservative Government of 1956 had | :53:41. | :53:43. | |
made a secret agreement with the Israeli Government to launch the | :53:44. | :53:46. | |
attack which led to us entering into Suez. That was true. That was true, | :53:47. | :53:55. | |
and it was denied in the House of Commons. I know you are interested | :53:56. | :54:00. | |
in this, but do you meet people who think that the world is run by | :54:01. | :54:15. | |
losers? No, David has mixed in real conspiracy in with some completely | :54:16. | :54:19. | |
bogus stuff like the moon landings. We know Hillsborough was a cover-up. | :54:20. | :54:24. | |
We heard the other day statements had been altered by the police to | :54:25. | :54:28. | |
protect their friends. That is a conspiracy. I would hope some of | :54:29. | :54:32. | |
those people who did that will go to jail in the fullness of time. We | :54:33. | :54:38. | |
have got the builder burg conferences. The next one will be in | :54:39. | :54:44. | |
Denmark at the end of May. I hope the BBC will cover it. This is | :54:45. | :54:50. | |
NATO's political lobbying arm which is not being looked at by our press | :54:51. | :54:54. | |
in this country and they are extremely powerful, set up by a | :54:55. | :55:00. | |
former SS officer. I hope we do cover it in Denmark. Last time it | :55:01. | :55:06. | |
was in Watford. Denmark will be much more fun. The land of Corgan, it is | :55:07. | :55:15. | |
much better. What is not a conspiracy is finding out the answer | :55:16. | :55:20. | |
to the daily quiz. The question was what has David Cameron been | :55:21. | :55:25. | |
complaining about the price of? A white sliced loaf of bread? A | :55:26. | :55:30. | |
first-class stamp? An England football team shirt? Or a souvenir | :55:31. | :55:36. | |
mug of Ed Miliband. David, what is the answer? It is the football | :55:37. | :55:44. | |
shirt. Well done, you say that with a sad look. I do. They are charging | :55:45. | :55:51. | |
?90 for a replica England shirt. I looked up some of the average prices | :55:52. | :55:56. | |
this morning, not because I knew it would come up, but because I was | :55:57. | :56:00. | |
interested in the subject and roughly clubs sell their replica | :56:01. | :56:04. | |
shirts for ?50. This is very close to being double. Let me introduce a | :56:05. | :56:12. | |
guest who disagrees. Mark Littlewood does not think it is a rip-off. Why | :56:13. | :56:19. | |
not? It is a prestigious, very heavily branded piece of kit. I do | :56:20. | :56:25. | |
not want to sound sexist, but I am amazed what women spend on clothes. | :56:26. | :56:30. | |
Way beyond ?90 because it is a brand in fashion. I know David Cameron | :56:31. | :56:38. | |
suggested he could cap the price, but it strikes me we have got to | :56:39. | :56:43. | |
bear in mind the FA is going to reinvest quite a bit of this money. | :56:44. | :56:48. | |
Do you want the shirts to be ?10 so loads of people can wear them in the | :56:49. | :56:56. | |
pub? Or do you want it to be ?90 and ?80 is invested by the FA in the | :56:57. | :57:00. | |
grassroots game or improving the training of referees? Maybe I do not | :57:01. | :57:08. | |
know how to work these things out, but I would have thought you would | :57:09. | :57:14. | |
sell fewer at ?90. Markets do not tell you everything. They do not | :57:15. | :57:19. | |
tell you about the kid in Sunderland or Kettering who might conceivably | :57:20. | :57:25. | |
have got one of these shirts at ?45, but will not get one at 90p. | :57:26. | :57:30. | |
They may invest the rest, but we are being asked to invest emotionally in | :57:31. | :57:37. | |
the progress of a football team. It is not exactly the same as any other | :57:38. | :57:41. | |
transaction, it has an additional element to it. You can invest in the | :57:42. | :57:47. | |
England football team without investing in a replica shirt. It | :57:48. | :57:52. | |
will not be affordable for a lot of people. They have to price it to | :57:53. | :58:01. | |
maximise their return. They want to bring in the maximum amount of money | :58:02. | :58:07. | |
to reinvest in football. There is a reputational question here as well. | :58:08. | :58:10. | |
Not everything is in the pricing, a lot of it is in people's reactions. | :58:11. | :58:15. | |
Should David Cameron have interfered? Yes,. The joke is they | :58:16. | :58:26. | |
will get knocked out in the first round and you will not have paid | :58:27. | :58:34. | |
enough to cover it. That is all for today. Thanks to our guests. The one | :58:35. | :58:39. | |
o'clock News is starting over on BBC One and I will be on BBC One tonight | :58:40. | :58:43. | |
with Rachel Johnson, Angela Rippon, Quentin Letts, Miranda Green, Diane | :58:44. | :58:46. | |
Abbott and Michael Portillo on This Week from 11:35pm. I will be here at | :58:47. | :58:52. | |
noon tomorrow with all the big political stories of the day. | :58:53. | :58:53. | |
Bye-bye. | :58:54. | :58:57. |