29/01/2016 Daily Politics


29/01/2016

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 29/01/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Afternoon, folks, welcome to the Daily Politics.

:00:37.:00:38.

David Cameron is said to be closing in on a deal

:00:39.:00:41.

But will it wash with his MPs and the country at large?

:00:42.:00:48.

The Prime Minister is in Brussels to meet Commission President

:00:49.:00:51.

Jean-Claude Juncker amid reports that the UK may get an emergency

:00:52.:00:54.

brake on in-work benefits for EU workers.

:00:55.:01:00.

But one Eurosceptic Conservative MP says the idea is a sick joke.

:01:01.:01:04.

Is the Government too cosy to multinationals like Google?

:01:05.:01:09.

That's the accusation after a row about Google's ?130

:01:10.:01:11.

We speak to one lobbyist who welcomes greater transparency

:01:12.:01:17.

Donald Trump isn't exactly a shrinking violet but he stayed

:01:18.:01:23.

away from a Fox News debate last night.

:01:24.:01:33.

The last before Iowa votes in its Monday caucuses.

:01:34.:01:37.

But even when he's not in the room, is he still making the running?

:01:38.:01:40.

Journalist Matt Frei joins us to look at the Republican race.

:01:41.:01:43.

And what does it take to be Foreign Secretary?

:01:44.:01:45.

We have the latest in our series of films on the Great Offices of State.

:01:46.:01:48.

I think in my first year in office, I was able to recall one day,

:01:49.:01:52.

Christmas Eve, as it happens, when nothing happened.

:01:53.:02:07.

Santa happens on Christmas Eve, of course!

:02:08.:02:10.

All that in the next hour, and with us for the whole

:02:11.:02:13.

of the programme today two giants of political commentary.

:02:14.:02:15.

Or, at least, that's what we were aiming for but,

:02:16.:02:18.

in the end, we had to settle for these two -

:02:19.:02:20.

Julia Hartley-Brewer and Kevin Maguire.

:02:21.:02:23.

Now, as we speak, David Cameron is arriving in Brussels

:02:24.:02:26.

for a meeting with EU Commission President Jean-Claude

:02:27.:02:28.

It comes amid reports that Britain is apparently closing in on a deal

:02:29.:02:32.

that would allow it to deny in-work benefits to people from other parts

:02:33.:02:35.

But the idea of a so-called emergency brake has met

:02:36.:02:39.

with scepticism from - yep, you guessed it -

:02:40.:02:43.

So what is on Mr Cameron's shopping list? He said he wants four things

:02:44.:02:59.

for his shopping basket. First economic governance, the PM wants

:03:00.:03:02.

safeguards to ensure countries like the UK but do not use the euro are

:03:03.:03:07.

not disadvantaged, including not having to contribute to any future

:03:08.:03:12.

Eurozone bailouts. Secondly, competitiveness. He wants to end...

:03:13.:03:18.

Extend the single market, cut red tape and ease the burden of

:03:19.:03:24.

excessive regulation. Third, sovereignty, greater powers for

:03:25.:03:27.

national parliaments to block EU legislation and an opt out from the

:03:28.:03:31.

founding ambition in the Treaty of Rome to forge ever closer union.

:03:32.:03:38.

Fourth is the closest... Most specifically controversial, and

:03:39.:03:42.

esters want to restrict in work and some out of work and fits that can

:03:43.:03:47.

be claimed by EU migrants when they come here. Other EU countries say it

:03:48.:03:54.

is discriminatory. But reports today say that Britain could be offered

:03:55.:03:58.

emergency brake room, which could include curbing immigration by

:03:59.:04:02.

denying benefits for four years. Former Tory Cabinet Minister John

:04:03.:04:07.

Redwood has already called the suggestion, quote, a sick joke and

:04:08.:04:11.

an insult to the UK. It is a reminder to the Prime Minister that

:04:12.:04:15.

even if he can get a deal agreed in time for the EU Council meeting in

:04:16.:04:19.

the middle of February, he still needs enough to satisfy Tory

:04:20.:04:23.

Eurosceptics who will be waiting for him at the checkout. Let's get more

:04:24.:04:28.

on this story with our Europe correspondence Gavin Lee.

:04:29.:04:32.

on this story with our Europe when this idea of an emergency brake

:04:33.:04:36.

was first used, the idea was an emergency brake to stop migration

:04:37.:04:42.

into Britain, now it is being talked of as an emergency brake on welfare

:04:43.:04:49.

benefits, is that right? Yeah. It is a counter proposal. David Cameron

:04:50.:04:57.

has just come to know to face -- has just come to his Brussels lunch with

:04:58.:05:02.

Jean-Claude Junker. This fourth area that David Cameron is demanding

:05:03.:05:07.

change in Europe, the idea of curbing migrant benefits for up to

:05:08.:05:11.

four years, in work benefits, this is what it is in regard to. There

:05:12.:05:15.

has been deadlocked for weeks, neither side saying they would give

:05:16.:05:19.

ground, other member states saying it is a central pillar of the EU,

:05:20.:05:24.

freedom to live and work in any member state. The collision is

:05:25.:05:28.

putting this forward, we understand from a senior source. -- the

:05:29.:05:33.

commission is. It would mean that other member states get to look at

:05:34.:05:36.

the British position, Britain can apply for this four-year cap, they

:05:37.:05:42.

have to show that the welfare state simply cannot cope, and by a

:05:43.:05:45.

majority vote, other member states can agree. But suddenly not only the

:05:46.:05:51.

British upper special opt out, other member states can share the same

:05:52.:05:55.

emergency brake if they needed. It will not require a treaty change,

:05:56.:06:00.

that is another thing about how long it would take. It will be a lot more

:06:01.:06:04.

legislation, and the source who explains how it would work to the

:06:05.:06:09.

BBC says it is probably talking about more than a treaty would take

:06:10.:06:13.

but it is a better way of doing it. That appears to be on paper. David

:06:14.:06:18.

Cameron has arrived to start the very first of many talks with EU

:06:19.:06:23.

commission and Parliament leaders. Just to clarify, before any British

:06:24.:06:26.

governments can apply this emergency brake on welfare payments, they

:06:27.:06:32.

would need a majority of European union members, their permission,

:06:33.:06:40.

before this can be applied, not to the number of migrants coming in but

:06:41.:06:44.

to the kind of welfare they get once they are in? Yeah. As it stands at

:06:45.:06:50.

the moment it is not in the hands of Westminster, it is in the hands of

:06:51.:06:54.

Westminster to apply, which could happen before the referendum. David

:06:55.:06:59.

Cameron might have something in place in the boat was to stay in

:07:00.:07:03.

Europe. It has to be a majority approval by other member states. At

:07:04.:07:09.

the moment, it is a one-time only. If activated, it expires after four

:07:10.:07:14.

years. There is room for negotiation. The commission are

:07:15.:07:17.

proposing this as a counter proposal, we are told, the other

:07:18.:07:21.

member states are not informed formally about this. The Polish

:07:22.:07:25.

Foreign Minister has said in the last half hour that Poland thinks it

:07:26.:07:31.

is not acceptable. On BBC radio this morning David Cameron said that what

:07:32.:07:36.

seemed impossible now seems to be possible, but other member states

:07:37.:07:39.

say that some would find it hard to compromise.

:07:40.:07:44.

Thank you very much, let's see what happens over lunch, see of

:07:45.:07:46.

Jean-Claude Junker has his usual brandy. Orders he have that the

:07:47.:07:52.

breakfast?! -- or does he have that for breakfast?!

:07:53.:07:53.

Joining me now is the Eurosceptic Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan,

:07:54.:07:55.

and John Springford from the Centre for European Reform.

:07:56.:07:58.

John, isn't the idea that a British government would need the position

:07:59.:08:05.

of a majority of EU members to do anything on welfare payments for

:08:06.:08:13.

migrants so ludicrous that it has to B -- has to be an aunt Sally, that

:08:14.:08:17.

the government can say it has much more than that? The point of having

:08:18.:08:22.

a single market labour is that workers can move around the single

:08:23.:08:26.

market and not be discriminated against by their host state it makes

:08:27.:08:31.

sense if you think about it that way that the European Union would decide

:08:32.:08:36.

whether a welfare system was being overwhelmed or not. If we felt the

:08:37.:08:41.

welfare system was being overwhelmed, what would stop us

:08:42.:08:44.

under current European rules from going to ask a majority to change

:08:45.:08:50.

the rules? There is no clear mechanism and AE you rules for them

:08:51.:08:55.

to be able to stop migrants from coming -- under EU rules. But if we

:08:56.:09:00.

went to the rest of the EU and got a majority vote allowing this to

:09:01.:09:04.

change some of the welfare rules for migrant, I don't understand why we

:09:05.:09:10.

couldn't do that at the moment? There are rules in the Treaty, which

:09:11.:09:14.

underlies all the legislation which the EU creates, which makes that

:09:15.:09:20.

type of unilateral action... It would not be unilateral if we got a

:09:21.:09:26.

majority. The European Court of Justice defends the treaties. So

:09:27.:09:32.

even if it was a majority agreement, it would breach the treaties? So

:09:33.:09:38.

what is being proposed? We were talking about an emergency brake on

:09:39.:09:43.

migration, the Eurocrats said no. Then a complete ban on benefits,

:09:44.:09:48.

Eurocrats said no. Then we said, what about an emergency brake on

:09:49.:09:52.

benefits? Even the PM last year said it was unacceptable. If this is how

:09:53.:09:58.

we are being treated now, if the Eurocrats are those unable to make a

:09:59.:10:01.

significant concession won their second largest economy is about to

:10:02.:10:05.

hold a referendum on leaving, imagine how they would treat as the

:10:06.:10:12.

day after we had voted to stay? -- treat us. I think that cuts in

:10:13.:10:18.

another direction. If we vote to leave, and we have just try to

:10:19.:10:22.

renegotiate our position, and Daniel is right, we have not necessarily

:10:23.:10:27.

transformed our agreement with the EU, they are unlikely to give as

:10:28.:10:31.

major concessions in the negotiations over Brexit and market

:10:32.:10:35.

access. Over Brexit, we would make about world rules? Not necessarily,

:10:36.:10:43.

Norway or Switzerland had to abide by free movement rules to have

:10:44.:10:50.

market access in other areas. I am sure we would have sensible

:10:51.:10:54.

bilateral and multinational deals. Nobody is talking about withdrawing

:10:55.:10:59.

co-operation or involvement in the European continent. Post Brexit, the

:11:00.:11:05.

UK would remain interested and involved in every continent,

:11:06.:11:10.

including Europe. But I suspect the PM regrets ever going down this road

:11:11.:11:14.

of renegotiation. I think he would have been better holding a snap

:11:15.:11:19.

in-out referendum, because he is raising and dashing expectations. I

:11:20.:11:23.

think a lot of people would say, my goodness, there is the leader of the

:11:24.:11:27.

fifth-largest economy of the world touring foreign capitals, egging for

:11:28.:11:31.

the right to tweak welfare changes and still being denied. -- begging

:11:32.:11:36.

for the right. That is not the leader of an independent country. If

:11:37.:11:39.

that is how we are being treated now, imagine if we had run up the

:11:40.:11:43.

right flight, imagine what would come down the line? We know the

:11:44.:11:48.

Eurocrats are proposing a social union, harmonisation of welfare and

:11:49.:11:52.

social entitlements, we know we would be dragged into more bailouts,

:11:53.:11:56.

there is a greater risk in voting to stay than in taking back control. If

:11:57.:12:01.

you look at what is happening in Europe, the huge challenges Europe

:12:02.:12:07.

faces, Schengen, that is now struggling to survive, border

:12:08.:12:11.

controls even on the bridge between Copenhagen and Malmo, you can't get

:12:12.:12:17.

more symbolic than that. Nothing the Prime Minister is proposing would

:12:18.:12:20.

make a blind bit of difference to any of that Allbritton 's

:12:21.:12:25.

relationship with it? There is some sense to just say happen in-out

:12:26.:12:34.

referendum? I agree. It seems to me to make the referendum about whether

:12:35.:12:40.

being in the EU is good for Britain's labour market, Britain 's

:12:41.:12:43.

goods and services market, or whether leaving is better. Who said

:12:44.:12:50.

that an emergency brake was, quote, some arcane mechanism which would

:12:51.:12:54.

probably be triggered by the European Commission and not by us?

:12:55.:13:02.

David Cameron! Correct! At the grand old Duke of Downing Street has

:13:03.:13:05.

marched himself to the top of the hill, Martians held down, he is not

:13:06.:13:09.

even halfway up. He has made a complete and utter hash of this. He

:13:10.:13:14.

would have laughed this out of court not so long ago. That he is

:13:15.:13:18.

desperate now, whatever he gets in the next few weeks, he will hail it

:13:19.:13:25.

as the greatest deal ever. And they know that in Brussels, that is the

:13:26.:13:29.

point. If you Angela Merkel or Jean-Claude Junker, why would you

:13:30.:13:33.

make concessions now? As Dell bowed to leave, that is the real

:13:34.:13:38.

bargaining. I am a Eurosceptic and would vote to go out purely on a

:13:39.:13:43.

democratic basis, but it's David Cameron genuinely wanted reform, he

:13:44.:13:46.

should have said he would campaign for out, and only if I get the

:13:47.:13:52.

reforms... It is clear from the word go, there was never any scenario in

:13:53.:14:00.

which he would campaign to go out. ANDREW: this referendum, like the

:14:01.:14:04.

referendum in 1975 when Harold Wilson came back with potentially

:14:05.:14:07.

even less than David Cameron will, potentially, I said, I was involved

:14:08.:14:14.

in that referendum and it was not fought on what Harold Wilson had

:14:15.:14:17.

brought back, this will not be fought on what David Cameron brings

:14:18.:14:24.

back. On this one will not get a 2-1 majority, either side. It will be

:14:25.:14:28.

closer. It will come down to whether you feel more prosperous and secure

:14:29.:14:33.

within, or whether you want to be without. If that is the case, isn't

:14:34.:14:37.

the danger for people who want to stay in, to remain part of the EU,

:14:38.:14:43.

that it will be potentially a horrific backdrop to this

:14:44.:14:49.

referendum, escalating out of control, a migration crisis, with

:14:50.:14:53.

governments doing their own thing, Hungary putting up fences, the

:14:54.:14:58.

bridge closing, Hollande and Merkel not able to agree policy, the quota

:14:59.:15:03.

refugee policy in chaos, meant to cover 160,000, so far 415 have been

:15:04.:15:13.

covered. That is the danger? The refugee and migrant crisis within

:15:14.:15:17.

Schengen, which Britain is not a part, is a accident crisis. The

:15:18.:15:22.

question that I hope that people put to the front of their minds when

:15:23.:15:27.

voting is, would us leaving make any impact on that? I would argue that

:15:28.:15:31.

it would not. This is a Schengen issue. The difference between 75 and

:15:32.:15:37.

now, 75, people were voting about what they wanted going forward and

:15:38.:15:40.

signing up to a free-trade agreement. This time around, it is

:15:41.:15:44.

hopefully whether we agree with the handed over I have a democratically

:15:45.:15:49.

elected representatives, powers handed over to a foreign body

:15:50.:15:54.

without our permission or authorisation. I think it is utterly

:15:55.:15:57.

absurd that our Prime Minister is going around with a begging bowl

:15:58.:16:00.

asking if we can control our own borders.

:16:01.:16:07.

Never mind the immigration issue, there's problems with the euro, we

:16:08.:16:12.

could be dragged into that. We need to grab the steering wheel back

:16:13.:16:20.

before we hit the car crash. They gave us guarantees in written form

:16:21.:16:27.

in the clearest language lawyers could advise that we would not be

:16:28.:16:31.

required to bail out the row. We were dragged in in June. That's why

:16:32.:16:36.

there's a greater risk involved staying. There's a whole new world

:16:37.:16:41.

out there, every continent is growing apart from Antarctica.

:16:42.:16:45.

Viewers will be relishing the fact they have months of this left! I can

:16:46.:16:52.

hear the sets clicking. Before we go, what's your best bet on when the

:16:53.:16:56.

referendum will be? June, the opinion polls are moving towards

:16:57.:17:01.

exit, and every day that passes, it's not just a worsening migration

:17:02.:17:05.

crisis, there is another risk of spreading of the Eurozone crisis to

:17:06.:17:08.

France and it would make Greece look like a sideshow. I think it will be

:17:09.:17:13.

June as well. If we can get the deal in time. And it would be a lovely

:17:14.:17:17.

time of year to celebrate Independence Day in the future! What

:17:18.:17:23.

data put in my diary. It's the summer season. Every season is

:17:24.:17:32.

summer season for you. Ask .com Wimbledon, Test matches, the

:17:33.:17:33.

referendum. Parliament is falling apart -

:17:34.:17:34.

I'm sure you knew this already- but it is, in fact, in need

:17:35.:17:39.

of extensive refurbishment, so MPs are looking around

:17:40.:17:42.

for somewhere to go whilst the work Richmond House, the current home

:17:43.:17:44.

of the Department of Health, has been identified

:17:45.:17:49.

as a possible location. It sits right in the centre of

:17:50.:17:53.

Whitehall opposite Downing Street. However, according to press

:17:54.:17:58.

reports there's a catch. And existential capture some of the

:17:59.:18:05.

MPs. So our question today is,

:18:06.:18:08.

what won't MPs be allowed At the end of the show Julia

:18:09.:18:11.

and Kevin will give us the correct I think they might know what it is,

:18:12.:18:22.

they have a vested interest. David Cameron and George Osborne

:18:23.:18:31.

have been accused of being too close to Google amid growing anger

:18:32.:18:33.

at the company's Former Business Secretary Vince

:18:34.:18:37.

Cable said earlier this week that Google had a "great deal

:18:38.:18:42.

of influence" in No 10 Even Rupert Murdoch got

:18:43.:18:44.

in on the act, accusing the - and I quote - "posh boys

:18:45.:18:48.

in Downing Street" of being Nobody in Downing Street, of course,

:18:49.:18:50.

has ever been in awe of posh Steve Hilton, who used to be

:18:51.:18:54.

David Cameron's strategy chief, says there needs to be much greater

:18:55.:18:58.

scrutiny Do I appreciate the anger, yes, I

:18:59.:19:10.

very much do. I think there is a growing sense that companies who are

:19:11.:19:20.

so big and dominant, not just in the marketplace, but in the way they

:19:21.:19:26.

relate to government and so on, that they are above the law. I think in

:19:27.:19:31.

this particular case, I think they have made clear that they were

:19:32.:19:35.

abiding by the law then when the arrangement caused anger, and now

:19:36.:19:38.

they have the new arrangement. The truth is that those of us who really

:19:39.:19:43.

believe in the power of business and capitalism to do good things for

:19:44.:19:48.

society, and I am definitely one of those people, we have to make clear

:19:49.:19:52.

to businesses that they have a responsibility to behave in a way

:19:53.:19:53.

that earns public trust. Joining me now is Iain Anderson -

:19:54.:19:55.

chairman of Cicero Group, He also chairs the Association of

:19:56.:19:58.

Professional Political Consultants, Nothing new in the idea that big

:19:59.:20:10.

companies get to lobby governments, and governments can often be too

:20:11.:20:16.

close to big companies, so too for oppositions. But what will we do

:20:17.:20:21.

about it? The government 's lobbying register is not the answer to where

:20:22.:20:25.

we are now. It's a completely failed concept. In our view, it covers

:20:26.:20:30.

about 1% of the actual lobbying that is taking place. Google don't like,

:20:31.:20:38.

like me, don't actually have to be on the register, so the government

:20:39.:20:42.

plans hatched up under the coalition don't solve any of this. What we

:20:43.:20:47.

want to see is full disclosure of ministerial diaries. That gets rid

:20:48.:20:54.

of any perceived problem. You could see big companies, small companies,

:20:55.:20:58.

charities, trade unions, you can see the meetings. Surely we know

:20:59.:21:01.

something of the diaries, that's why we know there have been 21 meetings

:21:02.:21:04.

with Google, we just don't know what happened at them. We are calling for

:21:05.:21:12.

a better and more robust disclosure. Looking department by department,

:21:13.:21:16.

they are all at sixes and sevens as to who makes timely declarations

:21:17.:21:19.

over who's having these meetings. It's never really the meeting with

:21:20.:21:23.

the Minister that decides things, it's endless meetings, lunches,

:21:24.:21:27.

breakfasts and parties between special advisers and other people

:21:28.:21:33.

and big companies. That's where what you would call the Sherpa work is

:21:34.:21:38.

done. Again, the government's lobbying register completely fails

:21:39.:21:44.

because it doesn't require me or Google or any other company to

:21:45.:21:46.

declare when it meets a special adviser. You only have to declare

:21:47.:21:50.

when UA meet a minister or permanent secretary. I don think I met one

:21:51.:21:57.

permanent secretary last year. I would like to challenge what Steve

:21:58.:22:00.

Hilton said at the end of that package. No professional lobbyist I

:22:01.:22:07.

know lobby is about a company's tax bill. That's the job of the people

:22:08.:22:12.

not in this chair today, the accountants and tax advisers. I want

:22:13.:22:17.

to clear up the idea that lobbyists are trying to change the tax rules

:22:18.:22:21.

and bills themselves. It's not true. Don't you do that when you take HMRC

:22:22.:22:29.

to lunch? I don't do that. You get my point. I don't think HMRC are

:22:30.:22:34.

happy to be launched in that way. The current regime we have doesn't

:22:35.:22:39.

work. Frankly, we need not just new lobbying rules, but we need new

:22:40.:22:44.

corporate tax and personal tax rules because the system is far too copper

:22:45.:22:47.

gated. Lobbying is a mess in this country. It is, but they lobbied

:22:48.:22:53.

brilliantly on the register, so special advisers... I have read

:22:54.:23:02.

menus in bars that are more detailed than this lobbying register. And

:23:03.:23:09.

he's read a lot. You are never going to end it all together. I think

:23:10.:23:12.

there's nothing wrong with ministers and special advisers meeting people,

:23:13.:23:15.

but you want transparency and you want to know who they have met. It

:23:16.:23:20.

will not solve everything, of course, we have to keep moving to

:23:21.:23:23.

try to pin them down, but we could go further than we have already. I

:23:24.:23:27.

think the issue, there is nothing intrinsically wrong, immoral or

:23:28.:23:33.

dodgy about people lobbying, trade unionists and headteachers can

:23:34.:23:38.

lobby. They have more legislation around them though. The key thing

:23:39.:23:42.

is, the more you try to regulate this in this way, what will happen

:23:43.:23:47.

is exactly what has happened since freedom of information laws, it's

:23:48.:23:51.

like post-it notes. Ernest is don't have formal meetings in their office

:23:52.:23:54.

with a lobbyist, they will be directed to chat to them at a

:23:55.:23:57.

cocktail party and there will be no record. The key thing is taking

:23:58.:24:02.

money out of politics. If people lobbying can't offer funds towards

:24:03.:24:05.

political parties and campaigns because it's not allowed, you have a

:24:06.:24:10.

better chance of clearing things up. Politicians and ministers of all

:24:11.:24:15.

parties like to think they are with the zeitgeist. Cosying up to Google,

:24:16.:24:22.

a Brave New World, Apple, Amazon, and they don't spend much time with

:24:23.:24:27.

the widget company in West Birmingham. My hardest tasks are

:24:28.:24:34.

working for new entrants. We work for lots of new entrants, people try

:24:35.:24:39.

to get in to disrupt the market. At one point Google was a market

:24:40.:24:44.

disrupter, at one point Facebook was a market disrupter. But not now. In

:24:45.:24:52.

a way, this debate is a bit of a mirage from the bit that should be

:24:53.:24:56.

taking place, which is, are the corporate tax rules in this country

:24:57.:25:01.

fit for purpose? But they are less likely to go after these companies

:25:02.:25:04.

when they are for ever having a glass of perceptual, and a nibble

:25:05.:25:08.

around their offices. They are in and out of each other's restaurants

:25:09.:25:13.

will stop that's why you want transparency. You also want to push

:25:14.:25:18.

them away. We are all aware of the news of the settlement with Google.

:25:19.:25:24.

We know there have been 20 odd meetings between Google and

:25:25.:25:27.

ministers. People are making the connection, but it's still not shown

:25:28.:25:31.

that these meetings had anything to do with Google's tax returns. You

:25:32.:25:38.

are quite right on that. We have not seen the figures, and I understand

:25:39.:25:40.

personal privity and tax affairs even though I don't believe it

:25:41.:25:44.

should apply to big corporations will stop I would like to see the

:25:45.:25:48.

ballpark figures. But it creates an app sphere where you become very

:25:49.:25:54.

friendly. Ministers and opposition parties stop social mixing. HMRC

:25:55.:26:00.

inspectors like to go after big avoiders, as they see it. It's like

:26:01.:26:04.

red meat to them. They want to win the battle is. But they will not

:26:05.:26:09.

feel they have ministers on their side if they are always being the

:26:10.:26:12.

Pali Pali with companies like Google. One of the Prime Minister's

:26:13.:26:18.

formal advertisers was working for Google. -- advisers. It also happens

:26:19.:26:29.

at the Guardian as well! Wouldn't it lay a lot of suspicions? We don't

:26:30.:26:35.

need to see the massive detail of a big corporation's tax return, but if

:26:36.:26:41.

multinationals operating and making money in this country would be

:26:42.:26:45.

forced to publish the revenues they generated in this country, the

:26:46.:26:49.

profit generated in this country, as identified and agreed with HMRC, and

:26:50.:26:57.

then the tax they paid. Three lines would give us a fair idea if things

:26:58.:27:02.

were being fair or not. And that, and this is the ridiculous thing

:27:03.:27:06.

about George Osborne heralding this as a great deal, he announced it as

:27:07.:27:10.

a great deal, just as what we are talking about was agreed at

:27:11.:27:16.

international level by the OECD. Country by country reporting of tax

:27:17.:27:20.

deals. This Google tax, as we find out this morning, doesn't capture

:27:21.:27:24.

Google, there is something wrong with the tax system and that's the

:27:25.:27:25.

real story. A new national database to allow

:27:26.:27:29.

seriously ill patients to volunteer for innovative treatments looks

:27:30.:27:31.

set to get the go-ahead MPs are debating the Access

:27:32.:27:34.

to Medical Treatments Bill, which is the latest incarnation

:27:35.:27:38.

of legislation originally brought forward by the Conservative

:27:39.:27:42.

peer Lord Saatchi. It only applies to England and

:27:43.:27:53.

Wales, with Scottish health being a devolved subject.

:27:54.:27:55.

Lord Saatchi campaigned on the issue after his wife Josephine Hart died

:27:56.:27:58.

from ovarian cancer and was unable to volunteer to be treated

:27:59.:28:00.

Our reporter Ellie Price has been in the Commons monitoring

:28:01.:28:04.

This hill was first introduced in the last Parliament, first as a

:28:05.:28:13.

private members bill, and then by Lord Saatchi in the upper house. It

:28:14.:28:17.

rumbled on and was eventually blocked by the Liberal Democrats.

:28:18.:28:22.

Today is the Bill's reincarnation in this Parliament. Many of the

:28:23.:28:25.

controversial bits are likely to be watered down with amendments. That

:28:26.:28:29.

will take away some of the objections, politically and in the

:28:30.:28:37.

medical thinking in this. The life science Minister George Freeman

:28:38.:28:43.

joins me, alongside Heidi Alexander. Did you agree with Lord Saatchi's

:28:44.:28:48.

principals in the last Bill? We are today combining three different

:28:49.:28:54.

bills in one. Lord Saatchi's original intention was to try to

:28:55.:28:59.

promote innovative use of medicines by assuring doctors there was a

:29:00.:29:02.

pathway they could be assured would not trigger negligence. It had the

:29:03.:29:07.

opposite effect, it was a good intentioned but it concerned people

:29:08.:29:10.

we were changing the law make widgets, which we were not doing.

:29:11.:29:16.

Nick Thomas Simon's Bill promoting off label medicines, we wanted to

:29:17.:29:20.

see that but we didn't agree with the mechanism. I think we have been

:29:21.:29:25.

delighted to work with the opposition, the Lib Dems and SNP, a

:29:26.:29:29.

wonderful and rare moment of joined up politics, the house at its best,

:29:30.:29:33.

putting patients first, and I think the bill today will promote what

:29:34.:29:39.

people want to see, access for innovative medicines, new medicines

:29:40.:29:42.

and innovative uses for existing off label medicines. It has been watered

:29:43.:29:47.

down. The main thrust being met a database has been created. I

:29:48.:29:52.

wouldn't say watered down. We have taken out the negligence revisions

:29:53.:29:57.

that were concerning doctors and patients groups. That is a price far

:29:58.:30:02.

too high to pay. I was never going to approve those measures if they

:30:03.:30:06.

were not supported by the clinical community. What we are doing here,

:30:07.:30:10.

and what the bill does, is to say front-line doctors in a busy NHS

:30:11.:30:16.

should have information of drugs on trials and new drugs at the click of

:30:17.:30:21.

a mouse, so there patients get the access to the latest drugs

:30:22.:30:22.

available. What is the problem, you all agree

:30:23.:30:33.

on this? George is doing a very good job of spinning this. If the

:30:34.:30:37.

amendments are made, the bill is vastly different from the one

:30:38.:30:40.

originally proposed. The original bill would have change the law on

:30:41.:30:47.

clinical negligence. It is a bill that people in the Department of

:30:48.:30:50.

Health had worked on, we were clear it could not happen because it would

:30:51.:30:55.

have been a risk to patient safety and undermined participation in

:30:56.:30:58.

clinical trials, which is why charities like Cancer Research UK

:30:59.:31:03.

and the Wellcome trust were very, very clearly opposed. George, if you

:31:04.:31:10.

finish, if the amendments are made, this bill will amount to one

:31:11.:31:17.

substantive clause setting up a database which the Secretary of

:31:18.:31:20.

State for Health already has the power to do. Nobody is opposed to

:31:21.:31:24.

sharing information about innovative medical treatments. The Government

:31:25.:31:28.

got themselves into a Hull with this bill. I'm pleased it looks as if we

:31:29.:31:33.

might be making some changes to it which will hopefully share some of

:31:34.:31:39.

that best prep or so people can get treatments, access to treatments

:31:40.:31:46.

which work. A U-turn? We genuinely have cross-party agreement. I know

:31:47.:31:51.

Heidi has a job to do, she has to oppose, but we worked very hard, all

:31:52.:31:55.

of us. I was always clear that we would never support a bill that

:31:56.:32:00.

undermined patient and clinician confidence. This bill now, I

:32:01.:32:07.

believe, will move us forward. I'm afraid I think that George is

:32:08.:32:10.

reinventing history, to a certain extent, because this has been a bill

:32:11.:32:14.

which has moved forward at various stages with the support and

:32:15.:32:18.

involvement of Department of Health officials. I think if we can make

:32:19.:32:22.

the changes today that are being proposed, I don't think there is a

:32:23.:32:27.

problem with setting up a database, but I think the risks that were in

:32:28.:32:31.

the original bill, to patient safety and the risk that it would have

:32:32.:32:36.

undermined participation in clinical trials, that was something I could

:32:37.:32:39.

not live with, and it was right we are posted at second reading and I

:32:40.:32:43.

am hopeful that those amendments could be made. I will give you the

:32:44.:32:48.

final word in ten seconds. It is a great thing but we have a secured,

:32:49.:32:53.

cross-party agreement, and it is a shame, we have our clashes at the

:32:54.:32:58.

dispatch box, but this is the time to celebrate cross-party working for

:32:59.:33:02.

the good of patients. Heidi Alexander in George Freeman, thank

:33:03.:33:07.

you both. This is the bill's second reading, so if it gets the go-ahead

:33:08.:33:12.

today it is likely to pass, just not necessarily in the former Lord

:33:13.:33:13.

Saatchi might have wanted it to. Donald Trump loomed large over

:33:14.:33:16.

the final Republican debate ahead of the Iowa Causes on Monday

:33:17.:33:18.

despite not even being on stage. Mr Trump decided to boycott

:33:19.:33:25.

the Fox News debate after the channel refused

:33:26.:33:30.

to drop its host Megyn Kelly, whom Mr Trump had accused

:33:31.:33:32.

of bias towards him. We have the same problem with Shadow

:33:33.:33:45.

Ministers and Cabinet ministers here!

:33:46.:33:46.

Let's address the elephant not in the room tonight.

:33:47.:33:49.

Donald Trump has chosen not to attend this evening's

:33:50.:33:51.

I'm a maniac, and everyone on this stage is stupid,

:33:52.:33:54.

Now we've got the Donald Trump portion out of

:33:55.:34:02.

I kind of miss Donald Trump, he was a little teddy bear to me.

:34:03.:34:11.

We always had such a loving relationship during these debates,

:34:12.:34:14.

I kind of miss him, I wish he was here.

:34:15.:34:23.

That is the last debate before the people of Iowa go to vote on Monday.

:34:24.:34:28.

Well, Mr Trump held his own rally nearby in honour of war veterans.

:34:29.:34:32.

And I didn't want to be here, I have to be honest.

:34:33.:34:35.

I wanted to be about five minutes away.

:34:36.:34:37.

And I've enjoyed that, I've enjoyed that.

:34:38.:34:39.

All the online polls said I've done very well with this,

:34:40.:34:42.

But you have to stick up for your rights.

:34:43.:34:46.

When you are treated badly, you have to stick up

:34:47.:34:49.

Is it for me, personally, a good thing, a bad thing?

:34:50.:34:57.

But it's for our vets, and you're going to like it,

:34:58.:35:03.

because we raised over $5 million in one day.

:35:04.:35:05.

Joining me now is Matt Frei, formerly of this parish,

:35:06.:35:12.

He's just done a documentary about Donald Trump which aired

:35:13.:35:16.

Welcome to the programme. Is it not remarkable that Donald Trump has

:35:17.:35:31.

gone from the man that had no chance to the man that the Republican

:35:32.:35:35.

establishment is now needs to stop? It is extraordinary. He has taken

:35:36.:35:40.

the Republican rule book and, as you know, Andrew, Republicans like

:35:41.:35:45.

elections to be sort of organised, there is a corporate nurse, we will

:35:46.:35:49.

give John McCain a chance but ultimately George W Bush is our

:35:50.:35:53.

guide, this does not work any more. The first person to rip about rule

:35:54.:35:59.

book was Sarah Palin. When she appeared in 2008 and basically

:36:00.:36:03.

screamed out lots of white men in red tides, and the red tie is the

:36:04.:36:07.

Republican tie, their faces blanched because they thought, oh my God, we

:36:08.:36:13.

need this woman on our side but she will completely destroy our

:36:14.:36:15.

assumptions. That was forgotten for eight years, now she is back with a

:36:16.:36:20.

vengeance in the form of Donald Trump who basically, although he is

:36:21.:36:24.

a billionaire and only ever flies into these events with his private

:36:25.:36:28.

jet and flies out again to spend the night in his penthouse in Trump

:36:29.:36:32.

Towers on fifth Ave, occurs he says that people are afraid to say,

:36:33.:36:38.

because he embodies the American dream and because he is not a

:36:39.:36:42.

politician, he is able to convince people that one day they could be

:36:43.:36:46.

like him, or at least that he will kick sand into the face of the

:36:47.:36:52.

establishment. Here's a consequence like, I would suggest, Bernie

:36:53.:36:55.

Sanders on the Democrat side, probably the most left-wing

:36:56.:37:00.

candidate for the Democratic nomination since Mr McGovern in

:37:01.:37:06.

1972, of an anger on Main Street in America, of a feeling, particularly

:37:07.:37:11.

among working-class whites, what the Americans call middle-class whites,

:37:12.:37:15.

that they have not had a fair deal, that the world is passing them by,

:37:16.:37:19.

the country is changing in ways they don't like? You hear this anger over

:37:20.:37:25.

and over. You could argue, what is with the anger? Your country is

:37:26.:37:30.

growing faster than any developed economy, unemployment has gone down

:37:31.:37:35.

to 5.3%, you could have had a great depression but you only got a

:37:36.:37:39.

slightly rate recession which has now gone. Feel angry, because even

:37:40.:37:44.

though they have a job it is not paying great wages, they are almost

:37:45.:37:50.

underwater with their wages. -- mortgage. Lots of people, especially

:37:51.:37:55.

white, middle-class, lower middle-class, Americans, feel that

:37:56.:37:59.

history has gone on a different track and they are being left

:38:00.:38:03.

behind. Those are the people that Trump, despite his bombastic wealth,

:38:04.:38:09.

is able to plug into. Every time he opens his mouth and say something

:38:10.:38:14.

abrasive, something which crosses a political line that no other

:38:15.:38:17.

candidate in history would dare to cross, his poll ratings go up. The

:38:18.:38:22.

more we and others attack him, they go up further. I would suggest that

:38:23.:38:27.

the problem the Republicans face is that, popular as Mr Trump may be,

:38:28.:38:32.

with those in the caucuses and in the primaries, when you look at his

:38:33.:38:37.

poll ratings in the wider American electorate that he needs come

:38:38.:38:41.

November this year, his poll ratings are negative? They are. Americans

:38:42.:38:47.

are caught with an albatross around their neck called Donald J Trump. It

:38:48.:38:52.

is like a train crash, the train crashes, he becomes the nominee, we

:38:53.:38:56.

cannot stop the wave of anger which comes into its own in the primaries,

:38:57.:39:00.

he will be the nominee and then he will lose against Hillary Clinton.

:39:01.:39:04.

The Democrats have a similar an albatross called Hillary Clinton.

:39:05.:39:09.

She is perhaps a small albatross, but she is still an albatross. Some

:39:10.:39:14.

Democrats have said that no Democratic frontrunner has gone into

:39:15.:39:17.

the primary season with such negative ratings in modern times

:39:18.:39:23.

than Hillary Clinton. This is not just an American phenomenon, I would

:39:24.:39:26.

suggest. We have Marine Le Pen leading the polls in France, a hard

:39:27.:39:32.

right government in power in Poland, we have the Swedish Democrats, not

:39:33.:39:38.

the social Democrats, the Sweden Democrats, the third-largest party

:39:39.:39:42.

now in Sweden. And Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the Labour Party in

:39:43.:39:45.

Britain. You could see that all as a revolt against the mainstream? And

:39:46.:39:51.

the rise of Nigel Farage a few years ago. Western economies are changing.

:39:52.:39:56.

There is a crisis in capitalism when wages are very low, yet a company

:39:57.:40:01.

like Google can get away with making vast profits and paying very little

:40:02.:40:06.

tax. I think people have good reason to be angry. They feel the system is

:40:07.:40:12.

not working for them? Because it is not, but certainly with Donald Trump

:40:13.:40:16.

I find it ironically that you have a billionaire who is not known for

:40:17.:40:20.

paying high wages or having good employment conditions in his hotels

:40:21.:40:24.

and the rest of his empire, he is presenting himself as the champion

:40:25.:40:27.

of mainstream... And the presenting himself as the champion

:40:28.:40:31.

of disbelief by American voters is extraordinary. That there

:40:32.:40:36.

of disbelief by American voters is middle-class whites in America. In

:40:37.:40:40.

of disbelief by American voters is this country we would be very

:40:41.:40:42.

of disbelief by American voters is suspicious of a multimillionaire,

:40:43.:40:47.

that he would be in June. In America, they take the view that he

:40:48.:40:51.

that he would be in June. In cannot be bought. We are more

:40:52.:40:51.

sensible! I think that point cannot be bought. We are more

:40:52.:40:56.

been made on behalf of such goldsmiths. There is no evidence at

:40:57.:41:01.

all that rich people can't be bought. -- on behalf of Zac

:41:02.:41:06.

Goldsmith. This suspension disbelief and the willingness to believe that

:41:07.:41:09.

anybody who says the right thing, shouts out, I hate Washington, they

:41:10.:41:14.

will therefore help the little people, for want of a better phrase.

:41:15.:41:19.

There is a well worn path in American

:41:20.:41:23.

There is a well worn path in character is who rises up and then

:41:24.:41:26.

flames, Randolph Charles Lindbergh. They have a lot

:41:27.:41:34.

of money, they captured people's imaginations and then they flame. I

:41:35.:41:37.

am not sure that'll work this around. Ultimately, this boat in the

:41:38.:41:43.

general election, assuming that Trump will get the nomination, comes

:41:44.:41:48.

down to one question, who is more likely to get voters off their

:41:49.:41:54.

couches to vote? The Democrats, the Latinos, the Hispanic population,

:41:55.:41:58.

which is enormous busted not tend to vote, but now they have every reason

:41:59.:42:01.

because they are afraid of getting deported, or poor white men watching

:42:02.:42:07.

daytime television because they don't have a job. But then there is

:42:08.:42:12.

the possibility that the former mayor of New York, Michael

:42:13.:42:15.

Bloomberg, might go in, another billionaire going in as the centre

:42:16.:42:21.

ground. He only works if it is Trump versus Sanders. Mark our card on

:42:22.:42:26.

Monday night, the Iowa caucuses don't really matter much, they are

:42:27.:42:31.

rarely an indicator, but it gives momentum going into New Hampshire.

:42:32.:42:35.

The big danger is Mr Trump conservative New Hampshire, down to

:42:36.:42:39.

the south, with momentum. You call it a danger, it is an opportunity! I

:42:40.:42:46.

mentor the establishment! The establishment seems to be putting

:42:47.:42:53.

its hope on Marco Rubio, but Trump is 18 points ahead of him. Your

:42:54.:42:57.

analysis is spot apart from one thing. Trump rises on the

:42:58.:43:03.

assumption, on the aura that he is invincible, that he can say whatever

:43:04.:43:08.

he likes and prevail. If he loses Iowa, even though the last two

:43:09.:43:12.

candidates who have won Iowa have disappeared almost immediately...

:43:13.:43:22.

Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee... Very interesting. Your documentary

:43:23.:43:26.

has gone out already but it is available on the all four player?

:43:27.:43:31.

Yes, the all four catch up they are, which I should know the exact... You

:43:32.:43:38.

can watch it on the computer! And very good it was. I will be in

:43:39.:43:43.

trouble now. I will be watching at this weekend. Good to see you.

:43:44.:43:46.

David Cameron is busy working hard in Brussels as we speak,

:43:47.:43:48.

but what about his foreign secretary?

:43:49.:43:50.

Well, what with the creation of the European Union

:43:51.:43:58.

and Prime Ministers wanting to hog the limelight,

:43:59.:43:59.

it's a job that's undergone some fundamental changes,

:44:00.:44:02.

as Giles Dilnot found out in the latest in his series on how

:44:03.:44:05.

But could you travel the world being the face of the British

:44:06.:44:26.

Government, and still be able to explain what you're doing

:44:27.:44:29.

So, you want to be Foreign Secretary?

:44:30.:44:36.

I think in my first year in office, I was able to recall one day,

:44:37.:44:40.

Christmas Eve as it happens, when nothing happened in the world.

:44:41.:44:45.

I was warned that there were people in the office,

:44:46.:44:47.

perhaps at fairly senior level, who didn't necessarily think that

:44:48.:44:50.

a woman ought to be Foreign Secretary.

:44:51.:44:54.

Which was a bit of a surprise in this day and age.

:44:55.:44:58.

I sometimes used to think, even when things are really

:44:59.:45:00.

difficult, sitting round the table, thinking, what's going to happen

:45:01.:45:02.

here, what do we do next, thinking, cripes, I'm being paid for this.

:45:03.:45:05.

Nobody much likes the Foreign Office, I've found.

:45:06.:45:12.

They are suspicious, they just want to get

:45:13.:45:14.

Jill Rutter is a former civil servant, and now

:45:15.:45:23.

For her, the role of Foreign Secretary is about sharing

:45:24.:45:28.

the brief with the one person more important than you.

:45:29.:45:32.

Foreign Secretary is still nominally one of the top jobs in government,

:45:33.:45:35.

but it's quite interesting because it's being

:45:36.:45:37.

First, most of the top diplomacy is done by the Prime Minister

:45:38.:45:41.

at head of state level, whether it's at the European Council

:45:42.:45:44.

or the G-7, or just through bilaterals.

:45:45.:45:47.

Secondly, the whole area of Europe is increasingly done by the domestic

:45:48.:45:57.

department, who go and negotiate directly.

:45:58.:45:59.

Successful Foreign Secretarys need to have a very good relationship

:46:00.:46:01.

with the Prime Minister, because people will listen to them

:46:02.:46:03.

if they know they are speaking of behalf of the Prime Minister,

:46:04.:46:06.

rather than running their own agenda.

:46:07.:46:08.

It's not just that everything is done at Prime Ministerial

:46:09.:46:10.

level, it's the fact that, and I hesitate to be too dogmatic

:46:11.:46:13.

about it, but I think it's because Prime Ministers rather

:46:14.:46:18.

like to take control of foreign affairs and defence and sometimes

:46:19.:46:23.

it's rather a relief to get away from the nitty-gritty of domestic

:46:24.:46:29.

politics and sweep yourself into the wider global conflicts.

:46:30.:46:37.

There is a great temptation for Prime Ministers to do that.

:46:38.:46:43.

Yes, I think you have to face it, that the Foreign Office is no longer

:46:44.:46:46.

I mean, frankly, for the last 18 years, we've had only two

:46:47.:46:52.

great offices of state - the Prime Minister and

:46:53.:46:54.

However, not everyone who's been Foreign Secretary has had the PM

:46:55.:46:59.

We have a Prime Minister now, and I have worked with him

:47:00.:47:06.

as Foreign Secretary, who has very strong views about one

:47:07.:47:09.

or two areas of foreign policy, but is quite happy to let

:47:10.:47:12.

the Foreign Secretary lead on a vast range of other things.

:47:13.:47:18.

David Cameron would have very strong views on handling

:47:19.:47:21.

But he would look to me to determine how we are going to handle

:47:22.:47:28.

everything in Latin America, or the approach to Africa and so on.

:47:29.:47:34.

The Foreign Secretary sets the strategy with comments from him.

:47:35.:47:37.

Actually, he was very good at not trying to be his own Foreign

:47:38.:47:40.

On Iran, when Joschka Fischer and Dominique de Villepin,

:47:41.:47:47.

the German and French foreign ministers,

:47:48.:47:50.

with Iran, which have just completed, after 12 years,

:47:51.:47:59.

it was very much our initiative, and Tony went along with it.

:48:00.:48:03.

He effectively left that dossier to me.

:48:04.:48:06.

He would have handled it differently, had

:48:07.:48:08.

If you haven't got a good relationship with the Prime Minister

:48:09.:48:13.

when you are Foreign Secretary, I'm not sure what happens.

:48:14.:48:16.

Well, I do know what happens, because that's what happened under

:48:17.:48:18.

Essentially, what happened is that Robin became marginalised,

:48:19.:48:27.

and the Foreign Office officials were more reporting

:48:28.:48:31.

across the street directly into Downing Street.

:48:32.:48:36.

One old hand, in the job when he was young, has seen

:48:37.:48:39.

First of all it was a very surprisingly appointment,

:48:40.:48:47.

and secondly, I was young, but Callaghan went out of his way

:48:48.:48:51.

to demonstrate to everybody that the Foreign Secretary

:48:52.:48:53.

To some extent, after Peter Carrington, there was a shift.

:48:54.:48:59.

Francis Pym didn't get on at all well with Margaret Thatcher,

:49:00.:49:03.

and she became, post-Falklands, very dominant.

:49:04.:49:08.

And never mind number ten, there's the department

:49:09.:49:10.

Your department is not just the people sitting

:49:11.:49:17.

Most of them are remote, around the world, and they are in 260

:49:18.:49:23.

In the case of the Foreign Secretary,

:49:24.:49:28.

Sometimes leaving Britain and coming back more than once in a day.

:49:29.:49:38.

I visited more countries than any Foreign Secretary in history before,

:49:39.:49:41.

partly because there are more countries now.

:49:42.:49:44.

One of the things our doctor had said to me when I got the job

:49:45.:49:48.

As it happened, a former colleague, a man called Derek Fatchett,

:49:49.:49:54.

who had been a junior minister in the Foreign Office and had died

:49:55.:49:57.

very young, of this thrombosis thing that one can get,

:49:58.:50:00.

and pretty certainly as a result of the scale and nature

:50:01.:50:03.

Our GP said to me, whatever you do, make sure you build in downtime

:50:04.:50:11.

So we took the view that if I was on a programme that started

:50:12.:50:18.

on Monday morning, I would rather lose part of my weekend,

:50:19.:50:20.

go out over the weekend, do the adjustment, and then be

:50:21.:50:24.

there for the meeting on Monday morning.

:50:25.:50:28.

The problem is the endless travel abroad is not always seen by one's

:50:29.:50:32.

The Foreign Office is often sneered at at home for not

:50:33.:50:37.

having its patriotic priorites quite right.

:50:38.:50:42.

I think the problem is when people look at what the Foreign Office

:50:43.:50:46.

was doing, and they took the view, particularly if they didn't know

:50:47.:50:50.

much about it, that the Foreign Office was actually just

:50:51.:50:55.

This, then, is the key accusation levelled at the Foreign Office,

:50:56.:51:01.

that it's more interested in giving into its foreign friends,

:51:02.:51:04.

than standing up for its British compatriots.

:51:05.:51:08.

Of course, what is often not realised, including by some

:51:09.:51:10.

politicians and ministers, is that if you want to avoid

:51:11.:51:15.

going to war and you want to resolve an international crisis

:51:16.:51:19.

through diplomacy, then diplomacy means compromise.

:51:20.:51:24.

There is no negotiation in the real world where one side gets 100%

:51:25.:51:29.

of what they want, and the other side gets zero.

:51:30.:51:32.

If you want total victory, then you don't use diplomats

:51:33.:51:36.

or ambassadors, you use soldiers, sailors and airmen, and you hope

:51:37.:51:39.

So because diplomacy requires compromise, that's why some people

:51:40.:51:46.

who ought to know better, sometimes accuse the Foreign Office

:51:47.:51:49.

of caving in, or surrendering British interests,

:51:50.:51:51.

It's marvellous rhetoric, and it's grossly unfair.

:51:52.:51:58.

In a complex, more integrated world, the Foreign Secretary,

:51:59.:52:04.

however much the PM might like to step into the role from time

:52:05.:52:07.

to time, is still a key figure, even if their colleagues can

:52:08.:52:10.

consider your department a different country that speaks a different

:52:11.:52:12.

What else has been going in Westminster over

:52:13.:52:25.

Here's Giles with the week in 60 seconds.

:52:26.:52:32.

The Government was frantically searching the Internet for tips

:52:33.:52:34.

on how to get out of a crisis after declaring victory over

:52:35.:52:38.

Google's decision to pay ?130 million in back taxes.

:52:39.:52:41.

Jeremy Corbyn attempted to fling a couple of googlies

:52:42.:52:43.

towards David Cameron at PMQs over Google's tax arrangements,

:52:44.:52:47.

but it was the Prime Minister's comments on migrants that

:52:48.:52:49.

They met with a bunch of migrants in Calais, they said

:52:50.:52:54.

It was a better week for Mrs Cameron, though,

:52:55.:52:58.

who was crowned star baker in the Sport Relief Bake Off,

:52:59.:53:01.

wowing the judges with her showstopper cake

:53:02.:53:02.

Lib Dem peer Shirley Williams, one of the gang of four,

:53:03.:53:09.

I have to say that at least I've had the advantage of not actually having

:53:10.:53:14.

to lose my capacities entirely before I departed

:53:15.:53:16.

And meet Ukip councillor Denis Crawford, a public servant

:53:17.:53:21.

so hard working his family reported him missing to the police.

:53:22.:53:23.

Fortunately, the local constabulary found Councillor Crawford safe

:53:24.:53:26.

and well in yet another council meeting.

:53:27.:53:40.

Let's pick up on one of those stories.

:53:41.:53:45.

The Ukip councillor in Norfolk who was working so hard his family

:53:46.:53:47.

I'm delighted to say that Denis Crawford has found time

:53:48.:53:51.

in his busy schedule and joins us now from Norwich.

:53:52.:53:57.

Welcome to the programme, what exactly happened? Why did they think

:53:58.:54:01.

you had gone missing? Thank you, Andrew. I had been busy in County

:54:02.:54:10.

Hall in Norwich, I sit on a lot of the big committees there, the adult

:54:11.:54:15.

social services and children's services, and I tend to leave at

:54:16.:54:20.

7am. I have my first pre-meeting at 9am, going until ten. The councils

:54:21.:54:30.

can take five or six hours to sit through a committee meeting. On that

:54:31.:54:34.

particular Monday, I did that, and then returned to Thetford to go

:54:35.:54:39.

straight to a resident's meeting, meaning I didn't get home until

:54:40.:54:44.

about 9pm. The Tuesday was even worse. On Tuesday I had another 7am

:54:45.:54:55.

leave, a big children's services meeting, came back to Thetford, we

:54:56.:55:03.

had the local District Council meeting. I went to that. And then I

:55:04.:55:09.

went straight on through to the town council meeting. That's where it set

:55:10.:55:16.

off. I understand the police started to look for you. In the end, they

:55:17.:55:23.

found you at a council meeting. Who was more embarrassed? You or the

:55:24.:55:30.

police? I think it was me. We were getting quite a way through the

:55:31.:55:35.

agenda, and there was a tap on the door, a head appeared around it, and

:55:36.:55:42.

the officer said, are we found Denis Crawford. I said, do you want to

:55:43.:55:49.

talk to me? He said yes, and I thought, I don't think I've done

:55:50.:55:53.

anything wrong. He said everything was fine. You wonder whether

:55:54.:55:56.

something has gone wrong with the family. I asked the chairman to step

:55:57.:56:00.

out into the hall, and they explained to me that my neighbour

:56:01.:56:04.

had reported me missing initially, because he hadn't seen me for three

:56:05.:56:08.

days. It's really good you get neighbours like that. Are you under

:56:09.:56:15.

some pressure now to resign and spend more time with your family?

:56:16.:56:21.

No, but I have made a promise to my family that I will inform them more

:56:22.:56:25.

about what I'm doing and where I'm at. We are grateful, we now know

:56:26.:56:30.

exactly how busy your schedule is, so we are grateful you have taken

:56:31.:56:34.

time to be on this show. Would you like to ask the counsellor a

:56:35.:56:39.

question? This happens to Kevin Maguire's family, but they just turn

:56:40.:56:42.

on the television to find out where he is! Thank you for your time and

:56:43.:56:48.

for the work you're doing behalf are people you are doing in your area. A

:56:49.:56:55.

story. It's great, but he's sitting on three councils. We complain about

:56:56.:57:02.

productivity in this country! I commend his public service, somebody

:57:03.:57:05.

from Ukip involved with the police, but nothing nefarious! Do what the

:57:06.:57:11.

Queen does with the Privy Council, shorter meetings, make everybody

:57:12.:57:15.

stand up and it's amazing how much less people have to say. It looks

:57:16.:57:19.

like Europe will just move up the agenda now. It's about time it does,

:57:20.:57:26.

it's a huge issue. It's inevitable there will be a seismic referendum,

:57:27.:57:31.

we think June the 23rd. It will be huge for Britain and it will

:57:32.:57:37.

dominate all politics. Just time before we go to find out the answer

:57:38.:57:38.

to the question. The question was, Richmond House,

:57:39.:57:41.

a potential temporary home for MPs, What won't MPs be

:57:42.:57:44.

allowed to do there? Is it - a) use mobile

:57:45.:57:46.

phones, b) play football, The correct answer is by alcohol,

:57:47.:58:00.

you can't even consume, you can't even bring your own. It's in the

:58:01.:58:07.

stipulations and it could be very healthy for MPs and journalists like

:58:08.:58:11.

me who work in Westminster. It is the Department of Health. And here's

:58:12.:58:19.

just guessing, it won't happen! You cynic! Thank you for being with us

:58:20.:58:25.

today. Have a good weekend. Thank you to all the guests are today. The

:58:26.:58:29.

one o'clock news is starting on BBC One. I will be back on Sunday on BBC

:58:30.:58:37.

One with the Sunday Politics. We will have a line-up of politicians

:58:38.:58:41.

to go through the issues and no doubt we will be talking about

:58:42.:58:45.

Europe again. In particular, we will have a debate on how good or bad is

:58:46.:58:50.

our membership of the EU for business in the United Kingdom.

:58:51.:58:55.

That's from 11am on BBC One this Sunday. Goodbye.

:58:56.:59:03.

As we'll be discussing, cosmologists are studying...

:59:04.:59:05.

The way the French feel about Joan of Arc.

:59:06.:59:07.

You sat on a windowsill and said... How old are you, Grandad?!

:59:08.:59:13.

Shall we call the police? Obviously not.

:59:14.:59:15.

I still carry that little caterpillar.

:59:16.:59:17.

But then nobody wanted to eat the sushi.

:59:18.:59:18.

It was like... The most amazingly evocative....

:59:19.:59:21.

Complete and utter failure. There were ukuleles as well.

:59:22.:59:25.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS