
Browse content similar to 21/09/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
| Line | From | To | |
|---|---|---|---|
Now it is time for Dateline London. Welcome to Dateline London. Labour | :00:06. | :00:31. | |
begins to flesh out what it would do in government, Germany goes to the | :00:31. | :00:33. | |
remains uncertain, and a little in government, Germany goes to the | :00:33. | :00:42. | |
of wind between the United States and Iran. I am joined by Mustapha | :00:42. | :00:53. | |
Karkouti of Gulf News, Greg Katz of Associated Press, Eunice Goes, a | :00:53. | :01:01. | |
We are in the middle of conference season, and the Labour Party has | :01:01. | :01:05. | |
government. It comes as the UKIP begun to explain what it would do in | :01:05. | :01:12. | |
government. It comes as the UKIP Does any of this feel as if British | :01:12. | :01:17. | |
politics is changing significantly? All of the party conferences are | :01:17. | :01:26. | |
setting up the election pitch. Labour starts off a little bit on | :01:26. | :01:34. | |
the back foot because of the big about Gordon Brown 's former spin | :01:34. | :01:36. | |
doctor —— by Gordon Brown 's former #ColourWhite which was that they | :01:36. | :01:46. | |
that it is quite bad. Although the were all knifing each other. Yes. | :01:46. | :02:01. | |
that it is quite bad. Although the Daily Mail has made a valiant effort | :02:01. | :02:03. | |
to link Ed Miliband to it I do not think that that really quite works. | :02:03. | :02:07. | |
But of course it is true that you have a leader of the Labour Party | :02:07. | :02:14. | |
and the Chancellor that both worked for Gordon Brown. It is not a great | :02:14. | :02:22. | |
they will do their best. That said, things like reversing the bedroom | :02:22. | :02:28. | |
tax, that the spending commitment, something which they said they would | :02:28. | :02:34. | |
not do Tilney wrote that —— that they would not do until nearer the | :02:34. | :02:38. | |
election. That is put in some meat in. It is quite a big step for Ed | :02:38. | :02:47. | |
Miliband to take. It will be popular with the supporters. They have to | :02:47. | :02:50. | |
fight to show that it does not mean that they are against all forms | :02:50. | :02:54. | |
fight to show that it does not mean welfare reform. But they need to | :02:54. | :02:54. | |
make a strong case that this is welfare reform. But they need to | :02:54. | :03:04. | |
very unfair tax. It seems to be unpopular and a campaign against it | :03:04. | :03:08. | |
seems to have been quite vocal, mobilised and so on. If you are | :03:08. | :03:11. | |
going to do something on welfare from the Labour perspective and | :03:11. | :03:20. | |
going to do something on welfare is perhaps the easiest one to pick. | :03:20. | :03:26. | |
They are saying that they are going to put a cap on welfare spending, | :03:27. | :03:32. | |
essentially copying the coalition. They are trying to mark themselves | :03:32. | :03:35. | |
resonance with the waves of most out, by showing a difference. The | :03:35. | :04:00. | |
resonance with the waves of most voters. —— the lives of most voters. | :04:00. | :04:00. | |
But he has to get rid of that clunky voters. —— the lives of most voters. | :04:00. | :04:08. | |
language about widening access to childcare. What does that mean? | :04:08. | :04:12. | |
language about widening access to does he not see that we are going to | :04:12. | :04:20. | |
raise the minimum wage? It needs to be easy to understand and direct. In | :04:20. | :04:27. | |
this morning 's papers, Douglas Alexander has said that they might | :04:27. | :04:32. | |
take a leaf out of the Ronald Regan saying, are you better off than | :04:32. | :04:39. | |
take a leaf out of the Ronald Regan were four or five years ago? Which | :04:39. | :04:42. | |
was his saying that sank Jimmy Carter. Cancer to that for most | :04:42. | :04:48. | |
people would possibly be now. —— the answer to that. David Cameron will | :04:48. | :04:55. | |
come back and say that he was left with such a mess that he could not | :04:55. | :05:01. | |
have made it any better. But Ed Miliband 's very predictable less | :05:02. | :05:09. | |
than charismatic delivery, no one has done anything that has really | :05:09. | :05:13. | |
blown up in his face, and maybe has done anything that has really | :05:13. | :05:16. | |
is the person to lead the party has done anything that has really | :05:16. | :05:21. | |
this election. It was interesting to see pictures of him with his family, | :05:21. | :05:24. | |
on the beach, something which I see pictures of him with his family, | :05:24. | :05:27. | |
before. Is it him saying, I am like before. Is it him saying, I am like | :05:27. | :05:36. | |
you, I am a family guy? We mentioned Ronald Reagan. His people invented | :05:36. | :05:39. | |
this beautiful staging of political events to make them look perfect, | :05:39. | :05:43. | |
somebody said. But it showed him in events to make them look perfect, | :05:43. | :06:04. | |
somebody said. But it showed him in jeans. And he would jeans that | :06:04. | :06:08. | |
time, we see him with his family. I do not recall seeing him with his | :06:08. | :06:12. | |
it will happen. But what really do not recall seeing him with his | :06:12. | :06:28. | |
it will happen. But what really strictly the most is the latest | :06:28. | :06:35. | |
Yes, Rachel Reeves saying that they to £60,000 area. A lot of people | :06:35. | :06:48. | |
think that that is rich. I have worked for about 50 years in my | :06:48. | :06:54. | |
think that that is rich. I have yet. So it is hard work to earn | :06:54. | :06:58. | |
£60,000. Watched you make of the have the UKIP leader, Nigel Farage, | :06:59. | :07:06. | |
who manages to connect with people in this country. He made what a | :07:06. | :07:10. | |
who manages to connect with people of observers thought was a good | :07:10. | :07:17. | |
speech. —— a rude speech by Godfrey Bloom. It was a dramatic and fairly | :07:17. | :07:23. | |
holy area is a dramatic and fairly holy area solicitor and UKIP 's | :07:23. | :07:34. | |
fundamental problem —— hilarious illustration of UKIP 's fundamental | :07:34. | :07:40. | |
problem. They have a charismatic leader but not very many friendly | :07:40. | :07:44. | |
types around him. It was a bit of a should not write this man off, Nigel | :07:44. | :07:55. | |
Farage, the leader of UKIP. They are riding the tide of Eurosceptics | :07:55. | :08:01. | |
in a rather toxic week, into a major this country quite well. He is | :08:01. | :08:18. | |
want our country back, but the point issue. —— immigration. He said, | :08:18. | :08:24. | |
months time and that is unacceptable he made was that you could have | :08:24. | :08:40. | |
months time and that is unacceptable —— Bulgarians. It is a good lesson | :08:40. | :08:42. | |
for the Conservative party, because UKIP managed to wait in their appeal | :08:42. | :08:46. | |
by moving from Europe into widening their message on immigration. What | :08:46. | :09:04. | |
Euroscepticism, it is immigration. These are the issues people care | :09:04. | :09:10. | |
about. In a very curious way, Manuel endorse UKIP, but was suggesting | :09:10. | :09:17. | |
that many voters may choose to vote Conservative party. Manuel Barroso | :09:17. | :09:31. | |
should keep out of the national politics, because before he went to | :09:31. | :09:34. | |
Brussels he had already ruined the Portuguese national economy, so | :09:34. | :09:47. | |
Brussels he had already ruined the other big change in British politics | :09:47. | :09:51. | |
is the possibility of another hung parliament, another coalition. | :09:51. | :10:01. | |
European country. That is the irony. The Lib Dems this week, Nick Clegg | :10:01. | :10:05. | |
government for the rest of your has said that we have got used to | :10:05. | :10:18. | |
more European with the coalitions, life, possibly. I agree that it | :10:18. | :10:22. | |
more European with the coalitions, but I thought that if Nick Clegg, if | :10:22. | :10:25. | |
that is the best thing that he can say, it is pretty weak. If the best | :10:25. | :10:31. | |
thing he can say is that he is in the middle and not as bad as the | :10:31. | :10:37. | |
also there is a restlessness among as his previous election promises. | :10:37. | :10:51. | |
also there is a restlessness among British voters to find something | :10:52. | :10:55. | |
different to break the mould. I think that Nigel Farage is very | :10:55. | :10:59. | |
astute in the way that he presents himself and is good at tapping into | :10:59. | :11:02. | |
it. Without meaning to insult Manuel Barroso, any time you would put | :11:02. | :11:10. | |
it. Without meaning to insult Manuel picture on the television, British | :11:10. | :11:15. | |
voters will think of UKIP. You will bureaucrats, faceless people, that | :11:15. | :11:30. | |
they might vote for Nigel Farage. It is very likely to continue to the | :11:30. | :11:34. | |
end of the government time. I will happening again, whether Labour | :11:34. | :11:40. | |
end of the government time. I will Conservative wins the majority at | :11:40. | :11:46. | |
coalition now, yes it is a European fact of life, it has become a fact | :11:46. | :11:53. | |
of life in Britain as well. I was going to ask, Donald, about your | :11:53. | :12:01. | |
thoughts. It is one year to go until the Scottish referendum. That throws | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
a lot of calculations, it is fair to say that many people in England | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
a lot of calculations, it is fair to wondering why they should care about | :12:08. | :12:14. | |
it. As someone who listening wind of Scottish ancestry, I think we should | :12:14. | :12:19. | |
care a lot. This is a very big political events coming down the | :12:19. | :12:22. | |
of... What at the moment is slightly track. Although there is a sort | :12:22. | :12:26. | |
of... What at the moment is slightly dangerous is that in government | :12:26. | :12:30. | |
of... What at the moment is slightly it is going to be all right because | :12:30. | :12:32. | |
for independence which I personally in the end the Scots will not fought | :12:32. | :12:38. | |
rather more engaged with this. think that English people should | :12:38. | :12:42. | |
rather more engaged with this. Because although in my view cutting | :12:42. | :12:42. | |
think this is a big event coming yourself off from England would | :12:42. | :13:00. | |
think this is a big event coming down the track and of course would | :13:00. | :13:03. | |
be disastrous and domestic political times for David Cameron. Being the | :13:03. | :13:13. | |
Angela Merkel remains the most powerful woman in the world and | :13:13. | :13:16. | |
Europe 's most powerful leader. powerful woman in the world and | :13:16. | :13:19. | |
it a good thing for all of Europe if she receives a new mandate from | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
German voters this weekend? What coalition will we expect and will | :13:24. | :13:30. | |
she be able to offer the kind of leadership that Europeans say that | :13:30. | :13:33. | |
they need but do not much like if it comes from Berlin. Is there much | :13:33. | :13:36. | |
cheerleading in Portugal for Angela Merkel? Not really. And I do not | :13:36. | :13:44. | |
capitals, because she is going to continue to be chancellor and there | :13:44. | :13:48. | |
is no hope in times of change of strategy. We are going to continue | :13:48. | :13:52. | |
to muddle through the year is on the crisis. No big bank solutions, no | :13:52. | :13:56. | |
crisis. She will probably start crisis. No big bank solutions, no | :13:56. | :14:03. | |
the budget targets, the budget deficit targets, to the countries | :14:03. | :14:08. | |
that have been bailed out. Greece is going to need another bailout. And | :14:08. | :14:16. | |
in Portugal as well. I —— a new bailout is going to be needed. We | :14:16. | :14:23. | |
massive interest on debt and the are paying out this massive debt, | :14:23. | :14:25. | |
massive interest on debt and the deficit is still pretty large. There | :14:25. | :14:28. | |
in the end result and the collapse deficit is still pretty large. There | :14:28. | :14:47. | |
in the end result and the collapse Any German leader would take broad | :14:47. | :14:50. | |
note of what the German electorate countries and would be moving along | :14:50. | :14:55. | |
in the same direction. There is countries and would be moving along | :14:55. | :14:58. | |
small party that would pull out countries and would be moving along | :14:58. | :15:01. | |
the whole thing. Whether it is a grand coalition or a continuation of | :15:01. | :15:05. | |
we will see much change in terms of grand coalition or a continuation of | :15:05. | :15:18. | |
we will see much change in terms of charismatic and not reaching out to | :15:18. | :15:20. | |
people in southern Europe, but she has been steadfast in keeping her | :15:20. | :15:38. | |
charismatic German leaders before! absolutely pivotal, and she has | :15:38. | :15:47. | |
charismatic German leaders before! absolutely consistent. The leader | :15:47. | :15:49. | |
here does not really matter. What really matters is the country. | :15:49. | :16:01. | |
Just imagine Europe without Germany. There will never be Europe without | :16:01. | :16:05. | |
Germany. What makes the leader more effective is the country. In this | :16:05. | :16:17. | |
case, whoever is there, Angela Merkel will still be working. I | :16:17. | :16:25. | |
think an even more weird thoughts Germany without Europe. That is | :16:25. | :16:31. | |
quite a scary thought. I think Angela Merkel is a traditional | :16:31. | :16:34. | |
politician who also understands Angela Merkel is a traditional | :16:34. | :16:39. | |
and believes that it is essential Europe. Two other quick points. | :16:39. | :16:48. | |
and believes that it is essential you were hinting at earlier, she | :16:48. | :16:50. | |
to be hugely successful. I think believes that you do not have to be | :16:50. | :16:58. | |
to be hugely successful. I think that is quite a plus for her. Also, | :16:58. | :17:00. | |
about her, which is that she clearly that is quite a plus for her. Also, | :17:00. | :17:16. | |
about her, which is that she clearly European Union. As Cameron goes | :17:16. | :17:20. | |
negotiating and having a referendum, I think it is probably quite a good | :17:20. | :17:25. | |
thing from his point of view, and Angela Merkel at the helm. I am | :17:25. | :17:36. | |
thing from his point of view, and too sure about that. I am not so | :17:36. | :17:38. | |
sure that she will cave into the demands David Cameron. She may be | :17:38. | :17:53. | |
more sympathetic. She may help to gloss a significant negotiating | :17:53. | :17:57. | |
victory for David Cameron. You could say that if the Conservative Party | :17:57. | :18:01. | |
are given what they want to do and they cannot get on with Angela | :18:01. | :18:03. | |
Merkel, it will be difficult to they cannot get on with Angela | :18:03. | :18:06. | |
a relationship with anybody in Europe, because they come from the | :18:06. | :18:21. | |
same place in terms of austerity David Cameron is putting huge hopes | :18:21. | :18:31. | |
in David —— Angela Merkel. The General assembly is coming up. It | :18:31. | :18:37. | |
points to the potential of a new and better relationship between Iran and | :18:37. | :18:41. | |
the United States, with Syria now weapons. Should we begin to be | :18:41. | :18:51. | |
optimistic? There is a general feeling around the region that the | :18:51. | :19:02. | |
new language and approach. He has new president will bring with him | :19:02. | :19:10. | |
new language and approach. He has exchanged letters, for example. | :19:10. | :19:12. | |
new language and approach. He has is meeting the French resident on | :19:12. | :19:21. | |
Tuesday during the meetings in the General assembly. But he is not | :19:21. | :19:24. | |
meeting Obama. There are rumours General assembly. But he is not | :19:24. | :19:28. | |
meeting Obama. There are rumours that he might. Beside that, whether | :19:28. | :19:28. | |
or not he meets Obama, certainly he that he might. Beside that, whether | :19:28. | :19:43. | |
or not he meets Obama, certainly he certainly Iran is a speaking a | :19:43. | :19:48. | |
different language now. He has been at the helm of nuclear negotiations | :19:48. | :19:50. | |
for many years. On security, he at the helm of nuclear negotiations | :19:50. | :19:55. | |
sitting on committees for at least 16 years. On top of that, he has got | :19:55. | :20:03. | |
the blessing of the spiritual leader of the country, and he has got an | :20:03. | :20:13. | |
authority. He told ABC television that he has the full authority of | :20:13. | :20:14. | |
the Ayatollah. The only problem that he has the full authority of | :20:14. | :20:23. | |
that is that, from the American perspective, there have been so | :20:23. | :20:27. | |
that is that, from the American moderates of Iran over the last | :20:28. | :20:32. | |
that is that, from the American years. The Obama administration | :20:32. | :20:34. | |
that is that, from the American be very cautious about this. This is | :20:35. | :20:38. | |
positive until the instant where it seems to follow apart. There is | :20:38. | :20:43. | |
positive until the instant where it of good reason to hope that the | :20:43. | :20:45. | |
moment. All of the signals being sent back and forth, there could be | :20:45. | :20:49. | |
substance behind them. This is the time for Obama, if he is going to a | :20:49. | :20:52. | |
comp which anything in the foreign accomplish anything in the foreign | :20:52. | :21:04. | |
Some commentators think that America just is not in the game properly. I | :21:04. | :21:08. | |
influence in the Middle East than we influence in the Middle East than we | :21:08. | :21:16. | |
did 15 or 30 years ago. But the influence in the Middle East than we | :21:16. | :21:20. | |
that Obama's this plot —— diplomacy has been in disarray, I do not buy | :21:20. | :21:22. | |
and Obama is some big loser, I do has been in disarray, I do not buy | :21:22. | :21:30. | |
and Obama is some big loser, I do not buy that. Obama with that out of | :21:30. | :21:32. | |
There is a ground to be optimistic not buy that. Obama with that out of | :21:32. | :21:50. | |
There is a ground to be optimistic here. Let's not forget that America | :21:50. | :21:55. | |
could have never withdrawn from Afghanistan and now Iraq next year | :21:55. | :22:00. | |
without some kind of agreement and understanding with Iran itself. | :22:00. | :22:10. | |
without some kind of agreement and government running Iraqi —— Iraq has | :22:10. | :22:14. | |
influence. Now it wrong can deliver Syria as well. They have Hezbollah | :22:14. | :22:20. | |
working and upgrading next to the Syria Army in Syria, killing Syrian | :22:20. | :22:29. | |
people, and that is affecting things in the political game at the moment. | :22:29. | :22:33. | |
One of the bizarre things about years is that Iran has been helped | :22:33. | :22:43. | |
immensely by American policy. They neutralize the Taliban regime in | :22:43. | :22:46. | |
Afghanistan. Now perhaps there will be a deal in. That would be in the | :22:46. | :22:56. | |
is trysts —— that will be a deal in interest. Even before the president | :22:56. | :23:04. | |
was elected, it was thought that Iran would have to play some role if | :23:04. | :23:11. | |
there would ever be a successful piece conference to end the civil | :23:11. | :23:15. | |
war. Now it has become even clearer. I think it is very pragmatic. I | :23:15. | :23:20. | |
something and achieve something about this being a disaster and | :23:20. | :23:32. | |
something and achieve something really sensible and a much more | :23:32. | :23:33. | |
pragmatic way towards Iran. And really sensible and a much more | :23:33. | :23:39. | |
is without dropping a bomb with really sensible and a much more | :23:39. | :23:40. | |
on anybody. American influence in the Middle East might have been | :23:40. | :23:44. | |
on anybody. American influence in greater in the last 30 years, but it | :23:44. | :23:49. | |
extent. This is a great opportunity, agree. The US has never used their | :23:49. | :24:12. | |
extent. This is a great opportunity, because it is showing what the | :24:12. | :24:16. | |
possibilities are of diplomacy and patients rather than, let's drop | :24:16. | :24:21. | |
some bombs and see what happens afterwards, like some people were | :24:21. | :24:26. | |
defending. I do not know how much the Congress will cooperate with | :24:26. | :24:30. | |
Obama. This is going to be the next headache. We should cherish this | :24:30. | :24:37. | |
moment of rationalism, of people should be cherished. We do not often | :24:38. | :24:46. | |
and on an optimistic note about should be cherished. We do not often | :24:46. | :24:51. | |
Middle East. I am really optimistic about that. I hope the leadership | :24:51. | :25:06. | |
will work. That is it for this week. You can comment on the programme on | :25:06. | :25:10. |