Ayad Allawi, Vice President of Iraq HARDtalk

Download Subtitles



Ayad Allawi, Vice President of Iraq

Stephen Sackur speaks to one of the great survivors of Iraqi politics, vice president Ayad Allawi. Does he think Iraq has a viable future?

Similar Content

Browse content similar to Ayad Allawi, Vice President of Iraq. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!



Welcome to HARDtalk, I am Stephen Sackur.


This summer, Iraqis can perhaps see a glimmer of light amid the darkness


that's enveloped their country for so long.


The country's second city, Mosul, is no longer in the hands


of jihadist fanatics, with the so-called Islamic State


But will any semblance of stability and unity follow?


My guest today is veteran Vice President Ayad Allawi.


Let's begin with the fallout from Iraq's national army victory over


so-called Islamic State in Mosul. Your Prime Minister, Mr Abadi,


hailed it as a great victory for Iraq. There was a sense of


triumphalism in his voice. Are you feeling triumphant today? Not


really. Winning a battle or two was not like winning the war. We want to


win the war against extremism and against terrorism. In Mosul of


course this was a good in achievement but indeed we have not


to Lucite of the people of most Oar and what he international community


did -- Mosul. And I want them that this is not the end of the story. I


want Abadi, I want the President, we need to win the war, and winning the


war should be political. By abolishing extremism as a whole from


society, and this can only be done by having a political process and by


having a quality amongst the people of Iraq. So, so, just to stick with


the military situation for a second, I one of the leaders for the Iraqi


armed forces in Mosul the other day and he said they would retake Tal


Afar, another town under IS control within days and the military ever


since they can eradicate the caliphate on Iraqi soil but you seem


to be saying it's not as simple as that. I don't think we are going to


see the end of ISIS at all. It will be with us for a long time not only


in Iraq but it will spread, it is spreading already. It has reached to


Thailand and to the Philippines eastwards and definitely to Europe


westwards. But in Iraq you are suggesting, what, they won't hold


territory so much as conduct an underground insurgency? Holding


territories is finished for them. But they will do insurgency, perform


insurgencies and embark on insurgencies and resorting to the


terrorist activities of explosions and killing associations. That is


why we have to win the war rather than battles. One aspect of Iraq's


approach to the Mosul conflict and the wider struggle against IS is the


allegation among many quarters, not least from the Kurdish leader, that


with the focus on the military struggle the Iraqi government has


consistently failed to prepare for the post battle political and


humanitarian settlement. Absolutely correct. Well, you're part of that


government. I have said it. I was the first one to say this. Neither


the humanitarian aspect was respected and treated well, nor the


fact that looking beyond the military activities, looking into


the political horizon of what should happen, this has not happened in two


areas, and I told Abdai, by the way. Let's talk basic human rights. I am


sure Mr vice president you have seen the shocking videos... Shocking. Of


what appear to be Iraqi forces executing men, we don't know who


they are, in Mosul after the end of the conflict. We've seen one graphic


video of an individual being thrown off a cliff and shot. How can the


Iraqi government allow this to happen, given the history of Iraq


over the last 15 years? Because this plays into more extremism. Because


this has gone out of the hands of the government. This has gone into


the militia ares and to the lawless people, and indeed to a government


that is unable to control the situation in Mosul. This is one I


refer to the collateral damage that has been happening. Let alone what I


have witnessed and seen myself, people living, displaced people,


living really beneath what animals live in Iraq. The UN has said the


humanitarian crisis in and around Loza today is so pressing... It is a


ticking bomb, it will explode in our face in future, I assure you. --


Mosul. There are thousands without parents, without families coming out


of tunnels and rooms in Mosul and no one it seems in your government has


a clue what to do with them. There is bitterness now amongst the


people. The people are quite bitter, especially the people who are living


in tents, who are refusing to go back to Mosul, people who have had


their parents to streak in the conflict, and people who are left in


the shelters. There is bitterness there and it will only increase with


time, and it will be an exploding bomb. This is what nobody looked at.


The humanitarian side. I keep reminding myself you are the vice


president of the country. You may tell me that is meaningless, that


you are a figurehead. Or alternatively what on earth are you


doing about it? Because your government needs to be held to


account. Of course, I agree. And I have raised this issue in the


meetings with the Prime Minister and with the President, of course. And I


have been raising this issue in the media, and in the meetings, but


nothing is happening. They say the military conflict should take


precedence in the conflict. But the humanitarian issue is really very


bad. And, indeed, the political horizon of what may happen in future


is very bad. We have been talking for a few minutes and on every


aspect of what we discuss in Mosul and the security situation around


Mosul, you seem to be saying that the government you represent as vice


president is incapable of imposing its will and its authority. And is


actually stoking the flames of the conflict which, although we have


just seen Mosul "Liberated" in your view it is actually going to get


worse. Well, they don't want to see the reality, the government, they


don't want to see the humanitarian side, although they speak about it.


And they don't want to see the political side. But I am getting a


feeling that you are pretty powerless in this situation. On the


bigger picture, that of the militias and indeed the popular mobilisation


forces as well, we know that five of the largest of the popular


mobilisation forces, including the Badder brigade for example, they


have support, money and direct assistance from Tehran. Now, what


should be done about that? -- Badr. Well, that has always been a problem


for Iraq. And I want since a long time ago that Iran is moving


gradually, systematically to controlling the situation in Iraq.


You know, let me exclaimed one thing which is very important. The vice


president, the President, the president do not have any executive


powers. I am getting that feeling during this interview... It is more


or less protocol. Yes. And I joined them because of the reconciliation


process, which was undermined. To be blunt about it, you are there as a


figleaf. Yes, yes, yes. And they useful figleaf. As long as you sit


as vice president you are giving some sort of credibility to a


government which you appear to be saying, is in essence right now


being run by the Iranians. Not run completely by the Iranians but Iran


is making the macro and micro decisions. The macro decisions


started in 2010 when we won the elections and the United States


sided with the Iranians then. What colour you think the US and Iran


ensured that you, even though your coalition actually won the most


seats, you didn't take power, and you're saying it was the combination


of the United States and Iran... ? Air I made it clear that it would


run against Allawi, and the Americans were with this and this


was conveyed to us of course by Biden, the vice president of the


United States, that we are not ready to accept that, that Iran will


intervene in Iraq and we are going to pull out from Iraq, so we will


have to toe the rope with Iran. I mean, Prime Minister al Maliki


seemed close with Tehran. It always seemed Prime Minister al Abadi was


somewhat less beholden to Iran. He is, yes, but he is overpowered. By?


Iranian forces. Sylla money, who is sometimes seen on Iraqi territory,


he spends a great deal of time surgery Dick Lee planning Iran's


role. Tactically. We are talking about the command of the


revolutionary forces. He spends more time in Iraq and in Iran. The more


you tell me about what is happening in your country today as you see it,


the more I am thinking that any talk of Mosul's liberation being a


watershed moment, something Iraqis can hold onto as a sign that things


are going to and get better, it is wrong. I don't see this happening


personally. I called for political resolutions. That will lead to


equality in Iraq. I call that they should stop by -- bifercation, which


is happening these days. They should really take care of the displaced.


They should stop the... I spoke to the leaders of the liberation, by


the way, and I told them that the only person eligible is those who


joined the army and the police. Iraq should not have two parallel armies,


both for the mobilisation and in the ordinary army and police. And I told


this to Abadi and I said this to the media. But we don't have executive


powers. Even the president doesn't have executive powers. This is


contrary to the Constitution, by the way. The Constitution says that the


President, the presidency, should oversee the implementation of the


Constitution. If you are so concerned about these threats to


unity in Iraq, and the preponderance of militias and mobilisation units


in the end represent sectarian forces inside your country, why oh


why have you in recent weeks decided to throw in your lot politically


with Muqtada al-Sadr, one of the firebrand members of the political


situation? No, no, I never signed any political deal. But we are


trying to explore who is closest to us in terms of the basic issues in


Iraq. And so far he is the closest as far as the quality, as far as


anti- sectarian, as far as attacking Iran. But forgive me, Muqtada


al-Sadr is trusted by no one in the Sunni community and now you appear


with your party and your coalition intent on using him to try to win


power in the next Iraqi election. It is opportunism... No, no, no. I


haven't signed any agreement with him, believe me. I am saying is on


TV, open TV. I haven't signed any agreement. We are talking to all


parties in Iraq, Sunni, Shia, Baathist, believe me, we want to


forge any kind of coalition ultimately. We don't feel now is the


time for coalitions and definitely I don't feel that I am ready to force


agreements and coalition with any sectarian force at all. I am


secular. I am against sectarianism. I am against this and I am not going


to move away from this position at all.


Let's's talk about the Kurds. The Kurdish regional area. In just a


month or so, September 25, we are going to see a referendum organised


by the ruler of the Kurdish region. Yes or no to Kurdish independence.


It is predicted that the Kurdish people are going to vote yes. What


impact will that have on Iraq's chances of staying as a unitary


state? It would be dismantled completely. That is why I spoke to


some of those in Kurdistan who I am going to see once I get back to


Iraq. I think the referendum is pretty much sure. The dismemberment


of Iraq would makes the Kurds the losers in this case. Do you believe


that this referendum could hasten a future conflict between the Baghdad


government... Yes, it will, I am sure. Even the regional governments


and the Kurds. You mean war? Well, conflict... Taking it step-by-step.


There will be complex. I don't think any of the regions will acknowledge


this. Neither Iran or Turkey... It has been conveyed to me that Iran is


putting pressure, this was discussed last week, Iran is putting a lot of


pressure on the Kurds, because they don't accept what is happening. The


Iranian is, let alone the Kurds... Your message to the Kurds is, be


careful what you wish for? Yes, and rationalise even the question. This


is very important. One factor in all of these publications...


Self-determination is something in the nature of Iraq. Independence


from Iraq is something else. Really, the wording of the questions should


be very clear. One factor we have... This is what the Iraqi government


should focus on when they talk to Mosul. The referendum has to take


place. They cannot run away from this. But there is another way of


rationalising the issue of the referendum in the questioning. The


statement that should come out on this issue of the referendum, if


they continue this is to separate Iraq and Kurdistan, this is going to


be very bad for everybody in the region, not only Iraq. This is the


promises that have been laid down, I am not blaming anybody but powers


including the United States have a hand in this, when they occupied


Iraq... They dismantled the whole country. I was going to ask you


about the United States. One factor we have not discussed is the role of


the United States. President Trump, for the last six months in power in


Washington... Do you believe the Americans are actually understanding


just how dangerous the situation in Iraq is? I don't think they are


understanding, I don't think they want to understand. I think even be


a conflict on Isis, they were only thinking on the functionality side


of things. They wouldn't even look at how to prepare for post- Isis,


what to do in Mosul and elsewhere. America have a very distinct


imagination for the greater Middle East area. Donald Trump has made it


plain that as far as he is concerned, his primary focus and


responsibility is to destroy so-called Islamic State and protect


America from terrorism in Iraq, in Syria, and that is, beyond all else,


his objective. Fine, we don't dispute this. On the other hand, he


should take into account care of what is legal and political, as well


as... Taking care of Iraq and the future of Iraq, because after all,


they hold legal responsibility when they dismantle the country. Iraq


wanted US forces out, Obama withdrew all forces in 2011. Do you think


American forces me to come back? No, no, I am not suggesting this. I am


suggesting that the United States should have clear policies and they


need to advise the Iraqi government because they have a moral obligation


to do so -- need. They have a legal obligation to do so. They are


defending the United States in the world from Islamic State, but Iraq


is the theatre for this conflict. They need to be more careful and


work more clearly with the moral as well as the other obligations.


Talking about the moral obligations, have you met Donald Trump? Not yet.


You said not long ago, there is a vacuum in the overall leadership in


the world. Really pointing a finger at the Americans. Gas. You said the


Americans need to get back to their role as the international power.


Yes. I agree with this statement -- Yes. Not using the military. But to


exercise their political role as well as the military role. There is


a vacuum in the leadership. In world leadership. There is nothing. In the


end, you can't blame anybody else for the state of Iraq today. You and


your generation... I just want to develop the sport. We have spoken


several times and it seems your generation of Iraq, the post- Saddam


generation of Iraqi leaders, have failed to deliver stability, in


unity and the most basic security to the people of your country. I agree,


and this is not because of the fault of politicians only. It is the


dismantlement of the state, the institutions of the state of Iraq


that had to do with occupation. We are paying the price now. Not only


was Saddam overthrown, but the state of Iraq was overthrown. The army,


the security, the intelligence. The judiciary. The process of


political... Politicising the dismantling. There was a vacuum in


Iraq. We first spoke many years ago, and I wonder if we speak again in


ten years, you actually believe Iraq as we know it today will exist. We


have talked about your belief that Islamic State is not eradicated and


that the struggle will continue, and the Terror and the violence. We have


talked about the Kurds and your belief that there could be a


conflict looming with the Kurdish in the north of your country. Yes. Iraq


doesn't seem to have a viable future? For now, there is that


sense. But it is something that is changing in Iraq. The movement of


the people, talking to the clerics of the Shia and Sunni, they are


calling for a civic state, for dismantling sectarianism and moving


towards an equal citizenship. That is talk, and the reality on the


ground is that the sectarian militia, popular mobilisation


forces, these sad... The clerics are aware, this was due to be


mobilisation of people, millions went to the streets. -- these are.


This is change. This is very clear change. The government are starting


to impose these popular organisations. Other issues are not


being taken into account. But the mood of the populace has changed in


Iraq. This is what you should encourage. Ayad Allawi, we have to


end there, but thank you very much. Thank you.


Stephen Sackur speaks to one of the great survivors of Iraqi politics, vice president Ayad Allawi. The country's second city, Mosul, is no longer in the hands of jihadist fanatics, with the so-called Islamic State caliphate shrinking fast. But will any semblance of stability and unity follow? And does Allawi think Iraq has a viable future?