Browse content similar to Live Energy and Climate Change Questions. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
her ministerial team. First question today from, making, concerning the | :00:00. | :00:00. | |
EU's renewable heat targets. Questions to the Secretary of State | :00:00. | :00:15. | |
for Energy and Climate Change. Question number two, Mr Speaker. A | :00:16. | :00:23. | |
reformed domestic supply obligation from 2017 which will run for five | :00:24. | :00:28. | |
years will upgrade the energy efficiency of over 200,000 homes per | :00:29. | :00:33. | |
year, tackling the root cause of fuel poverty. The extension to the | :00:34. | :00:37. | |
warm homes discount in 2021, at current levels of ?300 million per | :00:38. | :00:42. | |
annum, would also help vulnerable households with energy bills. We | :00:43. | :00:47. | |
intend to focus the efforts through eco-and the warm home discount more | :00:48. | :00:51. | |
effectively and we will be consulting on the future approach in | :00:52. | :00:56. | |
the spring. I thank the Minister for her answer. Fuel poverty is a sign | :00:57. | :01:03. | |
of inequality. New research by the National charity has found that one | :01:04. | :01:09. | |
in two low-income households are struggling to afford energy costs | :01:10. | :01:13. | |
despite being in work. Many households rely on in work social | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
assistance. Can I ask the Secretary of State if she or her Cabinet | :01:18. | :01:21. | |
colleagues have made an assessment of the effect of welfare reform on | :01:22. | :01:25. | |
low-income households judged to be in fuel poverty? We do in fact, in | :01:26. | :01:32. | |
my department, work closely with the Department for Work and Pensions to | :01:33. | :01:37. | |
ensure the support we give goes to the most honourable. Energy costs | :01:38. | :01:43. | |
are always at the centre of our minds in this government. -- most | :01:44. | :01:51. | |
vulnerable. When Hastings, Motherwell and the rest of the | :01:52. | :01:56. | |
United Kingdom votes to leave the European Union in the referendum, we | :01:57. | :02:01. | |
hope to abolish the 5% VAT on domestic fuel bills, which will | :02:02. | :02:05. | |
really help those suffering from fuel poverty. Is that something you | :02:06. | :02:11. | |
would welcome? The honourable gentleman will be aware that this | :02:12. | :02:14. | |
government is focused always on making sure that the bills are kept | :02:15. | :02:19. | |
down for householders in all constituencies. I would tactfully | :02:20. | :02:23. | |
suggest that the Chancellor might have something to say about reducing | :02:24. | :02:31. | |
VAT income on such a service. Evidence has suggested that | :02:32. | :02:33. | |
disproportionately raw raw communities are affected or | :02:34. | :02:37. | |
adversely by fuel poverty. One way of combating this is with the | :02:38. | :02:42. | |
development of domestic energy syndicates, collective purchasing, | :02:43. | :02:46. | |
if you will. What proactively should be department can do and should be | :02:47. | :02:50. | |
doing to support such initiatives? The honourable gentleman is right | :02:51. | :02:56. | |
and we are ensuring there is a focus on oral areas which often have the | :02:57. | :03:00. | |
largest problem with fuel poverty. My partner works closely with | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
various community energy schemes to make sure we assist them and we will | :03:05. | :03:13. | |
continue to do so. David" top cat" Davies. LAUGHTER | :03:14. | :03:21. | |
Fine by me, Mr Speaker. Would the honourable lady agree with me that | :03:22. | :03:27. | |
renewable energies are two to three times more expensive than fossil | :03:28. | :03:32. | |
fuels, and therefore the more renewables we use, the more fuel | :03:33. | :03:38. | |
poverty we will create. The question should be intelligible to people | :03:39. | :03:41. | |
beyond it. The explanation is that the middle initials are TC. My | :03:42. | :03:49. | |
apologies. I don't share that view, I think energy supplies should be a | :03:50. | :03:56. | |
mix and that means a combination of fossil fuels and renewable energy, | :03:57. | :04:00. | |
and investing in renewable energy is an essential part of energy security | :04:01. | :04:04. | |
as well as reducing carbon emissions and meeting targets. | :04:05. | :04:13. | |
With permission, I will answer this question, question 18 together. We | :04:14. | :04:21. | |
are currently considering the indications of the Paris outcome | :04:22. | :04:24. | |
domestically and with EU partners. The 2015 target of at least 80% | :04:25. | :04:31. | |
reduction from the 1990 baseline is already in statute and we are set on | :04:32. | :04:36. | |
meeting it. We look forward to meeting the carbon targets later | :04:37. | :04:41. | |
this year. The floods over the last few weeks are a reminder of the | :04:42. | :04:44. | |
effects of climate change. As we have known for a while, these | :04:45. | :04:48. | |
extreme weather events are here to stay. Given the government claims | :04:49. | :04:54. | |
for the UK ambition at the Paris climate change talks, why were they | :04:55. | :05:00. | |
at the same time undermining policies? I don't accept we are | :05:01. | :05:05. | |
undermining those policies. What we are trying to do is get the right | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
balance to support policies, support renewable energy, but also look | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
after the bill payer and make sure not too much is added to their | :05:15. | :05:17. | |
bills. I would remind the honourable lady that the UK is responsible for | :05:18. | :05:22. | |
1% of the world's emissions. The success of Paris is that we deal | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
with nearly 100% of the world's emissions, and that is where we will | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
see the real difference in change. I hope the Secretary of State will | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
agree that delivering the Paris climate agreement requires a cross | :05:38. | :05:41. | |
departmental approach. If that is the case, can she explain why there | :05:42. | :05:45. | |
appears to be no mention of climate change in the remit of the national | :05:46. | :05:49. | |
infrastructure commission. Can she urged colleagues to remedy that, and | :05:50. | :05:55. | |
can she say the rapid need for deep carbonisation will be a | :05:56. | :05:56. | |
non-negotiable criteria for every single one of its projects. I thank | :05:57. | :06:02. | |
the honourable lady for bringing up the national infrastructure | :06:03. | :06:06. | |
commission. I had a preliminary meeting with the head of it, and we | :06:07. | :06:11. | |
will shortly consult on which projects to prioritise. I can say | :06:12. | :06:14. | |
the projects they have already said they will look at in our sector, | :06:15. | :06:18. | |
which is interconnected as, systems operations, will be important for | :06:19. | :06:26. | |
delivering on the less carbon future, and it will play an | :06:27. | :06:30. | |
important role in getting cross-party consensus on getting the | :06:31. | :06:35. | |
investment we need going forward. The secretary of state will be aware | :06:36. | :06:40. | |
that the legally binding UK commitment is about 30 or 40% faster | :06:41. | :06:45. | |
than that signed up by the EU in Paris. Some countries like Austria | :06:46. | :06:49. | |
have increased emissions by about 20% since 1990. What discussions | :06:50. | :06:55. | |
that she planned to have with her colleagues in Europe regarding | :06:56. | :06:57. | |
getting their process up to the same level as the UK? You raise an | :06:58. | :07:03. | |
interesting point. The fact is that the UK is leading in this area. Not | :07:04. | :07:09. | |
only in terms of the commitment to the Climate Change Act, but also the | :07:10. | :07:14. | |
structure of the commitment of fewer carbon emissions. The transparency | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
of the regime and the five-year review. I will talk to colleagues in | :07:19. | :07:21. | |
Europe to make sure they also step up and participate in the important | :07:22. | :07:26. | |
sharing decisions taking place this year. The Secretary of State's words | :07:27. | :07:32. | |
are one thing, but credibility with the public is another. My | :07:33. | :07:38. | |
constituents are worried about jobs and renewables and our real | :07:39. | :07:41. | |
commitment as a country to the deal we made in Paris. Will the Secretary | :07:42. | :07:46. | |
of State be absolutely clear, is she going to do any more to protect | :07:47. | :07:50. | |
worked in the renewables sector that affects my constituents? I know the | :07:51. | :07:55. | |
honourable lady will be concerned about offshore wind, so close to her | :07:56. | :07:59. | |
constituency. I hope she will share with me and welcome that Dong energy | :08:00. | :08:11. | |
wants to invest ?6 million by 2020, which will be important for offshore | :08:12. | :08:15. | |
element. Having signed up to the Paris agreement and with the UK | :08:16. | :08:22. | |
agreements on this basis, we will see more investment and her | :08:23. | :08:26. | |
constituents will benefit as well. Can I ask the Secretary of State, if | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
Paris happened one year ago, would you still make the same | :08:31. | :08:34. | |
announcements you have made in the last six months, adversely affecting | :08:35. | :08:38. | |
onshore wind and solar, impacting badly on jobs and investor | :08:39. | :08:43. | |
confidence. I don't accept the honourable member's interpretation | :08:44. | :08:47. | |
of the announcements I have made. Those announcements have set out a | :08:48. | :08:50. | |
clear path in getting a balance between making sure we continue to | :08:51. | :08:53. | |
support renewable energy and getting the investment we need and also | :08:54. | :08:58. | |
looking after people's bills. Paris was a triumph, let's recognise the | :08:59. | :09:02. | |
fact it starts to bring other countries up to the high standards | :09:03. | :09:06. | |
that the UK has placed on it and we encourage further investment. The | :09:07. | :09:18. | |
decision to pull ?1 billion. The Prime Minister said we have to make | :09:19. | :09:22. | |
decisions about technology that works and technology not working. | :09:23. | :09:25. | |
How was that assessment made given the competition had not yet been | :09:26. | :09:30. | |
completed? We don't rule out carbon capture and storage in the future. | :09:31. | :09:35. | |
This government made substantial investments through the entrepreneur | :09:36. | :09:41. | |
fund through early starts. We have industrialised carbon capture and | :09:42. | :09:44. | |
storage operating and testing in Teesside. The decision was made not | :09:45. | :09:48. | |
to have a ?1 billion investment, and it was a difficult decision made in | :09:49. | :09:52. | |
a difficult spending round, but we recognised carbon capture and | :09:53. | :09:55. | |
storage will have an important future in a low-carbon economy. The | :09:56. | :09:59. | |
Prime Minister said it wasn't working, but the Secretary of State | :10:00. | :10:02. | |
says it will work. One of them is clearly wrong, Mr Speaker. In his | :10:03. | :10:09. | |
list of technology that was working, the Prime Minister included | :10:10. | :10:11. | |
small-scale nuclear reactors. Can I ask the Secretary of State where | :10:12. | :10:15. | |
this technology is working, and whether it is working as the Prime | :10:16. | :10:20. | |
Minister would claim, why does it require ?250 million of taxpayer | :10:21. | :10:24. | |
money? I can bring together some of the questions by highlighting the | :10:25. | :10:28. | |
investment we are making in innovation. Innovation is an area | :10:29. | :10:32. | |
where is we think we can see great steps forward in renewable energy | :10:33. | :10:37. | |
and technology that will help to develop important new technologies | :10:38. | :10:42. | |
to renewable energy. For instance, at Paris different countries came | :10:43. | :10:45. | |
together to double investment in this area and I believe carbon | :10:46. | :10:49. | |
capture and storage and small modular reactors will benefit from | :10:50. | :10:50. | |
that investment going forward. This has told us further away, now | :10:51. | :11:07. | |
we are on falls short of it by some 10% or 187 million tonnes, it is | :11:08. | :11:13. | |
also predicted we will miss out 2020 renewal target. Could she explained | :11:14. | :11:18. | |
precisely what steps you will be taking in the remainder of this | :11:19. | :11:22. | |
Parliament to make good on the Prime Minister's. The UK is leading the | :11:23. | :11:30. | |
way in order to cut emissions? I don't accept his depressing | :11:31. | :11:36. | |
interpretation of our progress towards our targets. Our green new | :11:37. | :11:41. | |
Bulls targets are difficult to make, but I can point out we have exceeded | :11:42. | :11:46. | |
the interim target. We know we need to make more progress to do so, | :11:47. | :11:53. | |
which is why I working across departments to make sure actions | :11:54. | :11:56. | |
taken on heat and transport. In terms of the fourth carbon budget, | :11:57. | :12:01. | |
it was recognised in 2011 that there was a problem with it and it is | :12:02. | :12:04. | |
about making sure now that we put in place policies necessary to meet it. | :12:05. | :12:09. | |
But being no doubt, we remain committed to doing that. The | :12:10. | :12:18. | |
honourable member will be aware that the cost of UK reaction to reduce | :12:19. | :12:25. | |
emissions is already committed. The Paris agreement will help ensure | :12:26. | :12:28. | |
that all countries acting, helping to make sure climate change | :12:29. | :12:37. | |
effectively addressed. Greater opportunities for UK business in low | :12:38. | :12:44. | |
carbon transformation. Thank you for the answer, but would she accept | :12:45. | :12:48. | |
that the estimates suggesting the UK is on track predate the cuts to the | :12:49. | :12:54. | |
budget under allergic date: meaning that meeting the 2 degrees target | :12:55. | :12:58. | |
would require further support from the government, particularly for low | :12:59. | :13:06. | |
carbon generation. I do accept that this government needs to put in | :13:07. | :13:10. | |
place more policies in order to make sure we beat our carbon budgets, | :13:11. | :13:15. | |
which we have just been referring to. I would also point out how it | :13:16. | :13:21. | |
the Palace climate change agreement is not as ambitious as the ambition | :13:22. | :13:25. | |
that we already have in place through the climate change act, | :13:26. | :13:28. | |
which is legally binding and is delivered through our carbon | :13:29. | :13:34. | |
budgets. She rightly says the Palace climate agreement is not as | :13:35. | :13:37. | |
ambitious as the climate change bill we have. National action plans and | :13:38. | :13:44. | |
Palace commit the world's 22.7 degrees of warming. Bush outlined | :13:45. | :13:50. | |
what or conversation she has had with her counterparts in Europe | :13:51. | :13:58. | |
before the next uptake in 2018? She raises a very important point, the | :13:59. | :14:03. | |
current proposals only achieve a reduction of 2.7 degrees and we | :14:04. | :14:06. | |
would be ambitious to make sure we reached not only to degrees but | :14:07. | :14:10. | |
would like to see it go further. There will be conversations this | :14:11. | :14:14. | |
year to make sure we meet their EU renewables targets. We have | :14:15. | :14:20. | |
discussions ahead of us, but the triumph of the Paris agreement is | :14:21. | :14:25. | |
that it is not just the UK, but the whole of the world, where the | :14:26. | :14:29. | |
largest emitters like China and India, are also participating. | :14:30. | :14:38. | |
Number seven. With permission, Alain answer this question with number 13. | :14:39. | :14:44. | |
My honourable friends will be aware that the agreement reached in Paris | :14:45. | :14:48. | |
in December was a historic step forward. Almost 200 countries | :14:49. | :14:56. | |
committed to climate action, there will now be follow-up work in the UN | :14:57. | :14:59. | |
to agree the detailed rules and prepare for the five-year reviews. | :15:00. | :15:05. | |
Does she agree that the deal agreed in Paris actually sees the world is | :15:06. | :15:09. | |
signing up for the approach adopted by the UK in tackling climate change | :15:10. | :15:15. | |
is in marked and she confident her approach means we will meet the | :15:16. | :15:21. | |
goals agreed in Paris? He's absolutely right. The UK can take | :15:22. | :15:25. | |
pride in the structure that was put together in Paris, because it mimics | :15:26. | :15:28. | |
in some way the climate change act we have put in place so many years | :15:29. | :15:32. | |
ago. The five-year review, the transparency, we need to combat all | :15:33. | :15:37. | |
the time with an improved offer, it's absolutely the right way to go | :15:38. | :15:40. | |
and I'm confident we'll be able to deliver on that. I'm excited about | :15:41. | :15:45. | |
talking further to my international partners to make sure we have the | :15:46. | :15:50. | |
right system to deliver it. Does she agree that making sure all countries | :15:51. | :15:57. | |
who have signed up to the agreement submit regular and full updates and | :15:58. | :16:00. | |
that data on progress is crucial, so we can see which countries are | :16:01. | :16:06. | |
actually sticking to the agreement? He raises a very important point. | :16:07. | :16:13. | |
Transparency in these reviews is absolutely essential and it is | :16:14. | :16:17. | |
something that the UK for very hard for during the Paris negotiations, | :16:18. | :16:21. | |
to make sure that when other countries come back with their | :16:22. | :16:25. | |
five-year reviews, they have actually made it clear, so we can be | :16:26. | :16:30. | |
certain that carbon emissions are being reduced. New figures from this | :16:31. | :16:34. | |
department show that renewables are the biggest source of carbon | :16:35. | :16:47. | |
reduction. Will she sure her department's own commitment to this | :16:48. | :16:50. | |
vital sector by now accepting the case for the inclusion of projects | :16:51. | :16:56. | |
in the period of renewables obligation, which have attracted | :16:57. | :16:59. | |
significant investment and achieved all the technical requirements to | :17:00. | :17:07. | |
meet the cut-off date of June 2015, including the farm in my | :17:08. | :17:17. | |
constituency. The renewable industry, offshore wind and onshore | :17:18. | :17:23. | |
is wind are great success story. It is a great opportunity for export | :17:24. | :17:27. | |
for business and am happy to say a number of ministers spoke to me | :17:28. | :17:30. | |
about this in Paris and I think there will be great opportunities. | :17:31. | :17:36. | |
As regards individual wind Farms, I must ask her to write me separately, | :17:37. | :17:41. | |
so a look at those. But I remind her that on the side of the house we are | :17:42. | :17:47. | |
committed to making sure we deliver on our carbon targets while keeping | :17:48. | :17:58. | |
the bills down. Number eight. Firstly, I'm delighted to see him | :17:59. | :18:01. | |
fully recovered and back in his place. We support AD and wind, with | :18:02. | :18:21. | |
full support from the government. These technologies can make a | :18:22. | :18:26. | |
valuable contribution to our decarbonisation targets and we will | :18:27. | :18:31. | |
continue to support them. Thank you. I recently met with residents at my | :18:32. | :18:44. | |
surgery to discuss AD and biogas. Does she agree with me that compared | :18:45. | :18:51. | |
to wind solo, biogas has anything since delivering consistent and | :18:52. | :18:53. | |
reliable amounts of energy into the network? I do absolutely agree, | :18:54. | :19:00. | |
there are real benefits for the UK in having a wide range of renewable | :19:01. | :19:05. | |
energy sources, but he's quite right to point out that as the sector | :19:06. | :19:08. | |
develops in the UK, biogas technologies could bring additional | :19:09. | :19:15. | |
benefits, Inc including injecting into the gas grid and transporting. | :19:16. | :19:25. | |
In her letter to other departments on the 29th of October, the | :19:26. | :19:29. | |
Secretary of State, who I congratulate on her letter of | :19:30. | :19:34. | |
stressing the importance of reaching renewable targets to recover to | :19:35. | :19:38. | |
departments, she indicated that the highest potential for additional | :19:39. | :19:43. | |
renewable heat is from bio methane injection into the grid, but you'll | :19:44. | :19:47. | |
is said we would face a shortfall against part of that target related | :19:48. | :19:51. | |
to the heat sector, even if support for her agreed measures was agreed | :19:52. | :20:02. | |
in the spending review. Now that she does have the reduced amount of | :20:03. | :20:06. | |
money for the renewables up to 2020, does she consider that amount is | :20:07. | :20:12. | |
going to enable us to reach our heat targets by 2020? And if not, what | :20:13. | :20:17. | |
new proposals will she be bringing forward to make sure that this | :20:18. | :20:21. | |
investment in the sector that can enable us to reach that target? He | :20:22. | :20:28. | |
is right to point out that we had a good settlement in the comprehensive | :20:29. | :20:33. | |
spending review. We were very pleased with the commitment in this | :20:34. | :20:38. | |
pension review to enhancing increasing renewable heat | :20:39. | :20:42. | |
insensitive, and we're making good progress towards that. He will | :20:43. | :20:47. | |
realise the fourth carbon budget is for a 23 to 27 and he wouldn't | :20:48. | :20:52. | |
expect us to meet it today. Putting plans in place and working towards | :20:53. | :20:57. | |
that progress as we speak, and we'll be continuing to set out plans | :20:58. | :21:02. | |
choosing this year. Despite more effective use of packaging, better | :21:03. | :21:06. | |
date labelling and programmes by supermarkets to distribute unsold | :21:07. | :21:10. | |
food, we still generate substantial quantities of food waste. Does she | :21:11. | :21:14. | |
agree that using this resource to generate electricity is better than | :21:15. | :21:19. | |
sending it to landfill? I completely agree with them, and recently, I | :21:20. | :21:23. | |
went to see a proposed new project in my own county of | :21:24. | :21:26. | |
Northamptonshire, which is looking to use landfill to create a | :21:27. | :21:31. | |
renewable heat scheme. There are contrasting the ideas coming | :21:32. | :21:34. | |
forward, and I admire officials was very keen to hear about them and | :21:35. | :21:38. | |
support them where we can. Number nine, please. And I commend my | :21:39. | :21:46. | |
honourable friend for the first not commitment he has shown to | :21:47. | :21:48. | |
researching best practice in this area. The government is committed to | :21:49. | :21:54. | |
protecting our most valuable spaces from server strolling of wells for | :21:55. | :21:59. | |
fracking. On the 4th of November, we set out how we plan to do this and | :22:00. | :22:06. | |
will issue a response to our industry consultation closed on | :22:07. | :22:12. | |
December 16 as soon as possible. I very much welcome the minister's | :22:13. | :22:16. | |
comments. The task force Rush Elgar first called for a single regulator | :22:17. | :22:21. | |
and increased levels of individual monitoring. But the ministers agree | :22:22. | :22:26. | |
this would improve public confidence and provide further protection, | :22:27. | :22:28. | |
particularly for a more sensitive areas? The task force is 2015 report | :22:29. | :22:36. | |
says that the regulatory regime is currently fit for purpose, but my | :22:37. | :22:41. | |
honourable friend rightly points out their proposal that if a shield gas | :22:42. | :22:45. | |
industry does develop, the government should consider creating | :22:46. | :22:49. | |
a bespoke regulator and I can is your him we will keep the regulatory | :22:50. | :22:53. | |
regime under review to make sure it remains fit for purpose. This second | :22:54. | :22:58. | |
point about independent monitoring, I entirely agree with them and that | :22:59. | :23:01. | |
is why we are already grant funding baseline monitoring in | :23:02. | :23:08. | |
Northamptonshire and Lincolnshire. Does the Minister accept that is | :23:09. | :23:12. | |
widespread opposition to fracking in all parts of Britain? Will she | :23:13. | :23:19. | |
congratulate, as I have done, the residents in Bolsover for refusing | :23:20. | :23:23. | |
to allow drilling operation and getting it stopped, not all made by | :23:24. | :23:29. | |
the local authority, but by her own inspectorates? I think it's quite | :23:30. | :23:38. | |
extraordinary at honourable members opposite continually talk about the | :23:39. | :23:43. | |
potential for shale is as if it is some kind of disaster. The | :23:44. | :23:47. | |
honourable gentleman himself comes amid very honourable and | :23:48. | :23:53. | |
long-standing mining area. Mining has a legacy that we will be dealing | :23:54. | :23:59. | |
with for many years to come. The shale industry offers the | :24:00. | :24:04. | |
opportunity to really create a new home-grown energy source that is | :24:05. | :24:10. | |
vital for our energy security into the next decade. When will the | :24:11. | :24:19. | |
Secretary of State produce some legally enforceable protection | :24:20. | :24:21. | |
against service level fracking in our national parks and areas of | :24:22. | :24:29. | |
interest? Hopefully, she will have heard my initial comments, which is | :24:30. | :24:36. | |
that we have been able to put forward a proposal to restrict | :24:37. | :24:40. | |
surface gelling in any of our most protected areas, not limited to | :24:41. | :24:43. | |
national parks, but including many other valuable spaces, through the | :24:44. | :24:49. | |
licensing, and as things stand, we are waiting for our report and | :24:50. | :24:52. | |
response of the industry consultation that closed on December | :24:53. | :24:56. | |
16, and we will be announcements very soon. Question number ten. As | :24:57. | :25:05. | |
more domestic community and business generators come on stream, the | :25:06. | :25:12. | |
demand for a grid connection is increasing. Accommodating this is | :25:13. | :25:17. | |
the responsibility of the network companies, overseen by Jen. Network | :25:18. | :25:21. | |
companies publish long-term plans to see how a generation will be | :25:22. | :25:28. | |
managed. She might want to look at the ten year statement as a good | :25:29. | :25:35. | |
example of this. Let's face it, the National Grid is notorious for | :25:36. | :25:39. | |
stifling new energy projects. Given that the tough bill involves | :25:40. | :25:45. | |
devolving stations up to 350 megawatts, but not transmission, how | :25:46. | :25:48. | |
will the Minister work with the Welsh government to make sure this | :25:49. | :25:49. | |
isn't a empty promise. about 1.7 billion of this is for the | :25:50. | :26:18. | |
distribution company that is responsible for North Wales that | :26:19. | :26:20. | |
includes the Lady's own constituency. Does the Minister | :26:21. | :26:26. | |
share my concern is that in the short to medium turn our energy | :26:27. | :26:33. | |
security might be put at risk if capacity markets put in place to | :26:34. | :26:36. | |
bring forward new gas capacity, not only fails to bring forward new gas | :26:37. | :26:41. | |
capacity, but also works to make current gas capacity, such as | :26:42. | :26:47. | |
provided by the power station in my constituency, to be no longer | :26:48. | :26:50. | |
worthwhile doing, and that comes off stream. I can tell the honourable | :26:51. | :26:57. | |
gentleman we have just completed the second capacity market auction, | :26:58. | :27:02. | |
achieved a very competitive price for consumers, and as you will know, | :27:03. | :27:05. | |
a top row or two for this covenant is to keep the bills down. At the | :27:06. | :27:08. | |
same time we can ensure national Grid has the tools at its disposal | :27:09. | :27:19. | |
to don't share his concerns. We want to bring a new gas, but there are | :27:20. | :27:26. | |
not concerns about renewable energy. Number 11. Solar is an enormous UK | :27:27. | :27:31. | |
success story and one this government continues to support. As | :27:32. | :27:36. | |
my right honourable friend the Prime Minister said yesterday, 98% of all | :27:37. | :27:40. | |
solar deployment has taken place since 2010. We announce the feeder | :27:41. | :27:52. | |
tariff scheme would remain open. We can potentially deliver 1.2 | :27:53. | :27:57. | |
gigawatts across 220,000 installations by 2019. I would like | :27:58. | :28:02. | |
to thank my honourable friend for that answer. I have the opportunity | :28:03. | :28:05. | |
recently of meeting a company in the solar sector industry in my | :28:06. | :28:11. | |
constituency, and was very impressed with the technology innovation and | :28:12. | :28:15. | |
job creation of that company. Would she give me an assurance that the | :28:16. | :28:18. | |
government will do everything possible to continue supporting this | :28:19. | :28:23. | |
important energy source. As my honourable friend will know, it's a | :28:24. | :28:28. | |
key priority to keep consumer bills down, so it's always a balance | :28:29. | :28:32. | |
between supporting what is a superb UK industry with making sure | :28:33. | :28:36. | |
consumer bills remain affordable. We will continue to support the further | :28:37. | :28:40. | |
growth of the sector, but not at any price. So the changes we have made | :28:41. | :28:45. | |
another feeding tariff six to maintain a solar industry which in | :28:46. | :28:48. | |
the medium term can continue to reduce cost and move towards a | :28:49. | :28:53. | |
subsidy free deployment. Could the Minister update the house on what | :28:54. | :28:59. | |
steps she is taking to make sure the rate of VAT on solar installations | :29:00. | :29:03. | |
doesn't arise as potentially proposed from 5% to 20%, so | :29:04. | :29:10. | |
affecting about ?9 on average solar installations. He's exactly right to | :29:11. | :29:15. | |
raise this, an important point. He will know this is a result of | :29:16. | :29:20. | |
proceedings by the European Commission who believe our VAT rates | :29:21. | :29:23. | |
on solar installation should be higher than they are. It's something | :29:24. | :29:29. | |
HMRC are looking at closely and consulting on, and taking into | :29:30. | :29:32. | |
account what the outcome of that consultation is, we will look | :29:33. | :29:35. | |
further at the regime we have in place. Bexhill and Battle | :29:36. | :29:41. | |
constituency has a number of thriving solar businesses, some of | :29:42. | :29:45. | |
which I have worked with over the recent changes for feed in tariffs. | :29:46. | :29:48. | |
As the government looks for the industry to expand, can I ask how | :29:49. | :29:55. | |
the Minister will support the delivery of energy storage solutions | :29:56. | :29:58. | |
for existing and future solar systems. My honourable friend is | :29:59. | :30:04. | |
exactly right to point out the huge potential for energy storage to | :30:05. | :30:08. | |
enhance the value of solar installations. My department has | :30:09. | :30:12. | |
provided more than ?18 million of innovation support since 2012 to | :30:13. | :30:18. | |
support and demonstrate a range of technologies. We also investigating | :30:19. | :30:22. | |
the potential barriers to the deployment of energy storage, | :30:23. | :30:26. | |
focusing in the first instance of removing regulatory barriers and we | :30:27. | :30:29. | |
plan to hold a call for evidence in the spring on specifically this | :30:30. | :30:36. | |
area. Many constituencies fear the end of solar. What about the ?1 | :30:37. | :30:43. | |
rescue scheme, and what is the response to that? As I think my | :30:44. | :30:50. | |
right honourable friend and I have made clear on many occasions, there | :30:51. | :30:55. | |
is a fine balance. As a new technology, as the costs come down, | :30:56. | :31:00. | |
as they have done so with this excellent UK solar industry, so we | :31:01. | :31:04. | |
must focus on the needs of people in this country to be able to afford | :31:05. | :31:09. | |
their energy bills. Fuel poverty is an enormous problem here. What we | :31:10. | :31:14. | |
don't want to do is over subsidise, so it's a fine balance. We think our | :31:15. | :31:19. | |
results in December to the consultation provide that fine | :31:20. | :31:23. | |
balance, giving a 5% investment return to installations on solar. | :31:24. | :31:26. | |
That's fair to consumers and the industry. EU minimum import prices | :31:27. | :31:37. | |
on Chinese, Taiwanese and Malaysians sells inflate the cost of an average | :31:38. | :31:43. | |
solar installation by ?385. The Minister is working to extract the | :31:44. | :31:46. | |
UK from this, but will she update the house on her progress and set a | :31:47. | :31:50. | |
date by which she hopes to end these price controls. I certainly agree | :31:51. | :31:56. | |
with my honourable friend that this is an unwelcome drain on the UK | :31:57. | :32:03. | |
solar industry. I also agree it would be fairer and simpler to | :32:04. | :32:07. | |
remove it while the UK review is under review. It's one for the | :32:08. | :32:15. | |
commission, not member states. The anti-dumping and anti-subsidy | :32:16. | :32:18. | |
regulations require the commission to maintain existing trade defence | :32:19. | :32:21. | |
measures while the expiry review takes place. It could be some months | :32:22. | :32:30. | |
yet. Last year the solar trade Association estimated 27,000 workers | :32:31. | :32:35. | |
would lose their jobs as a result of the government proposed 87% cut to | :32:36. | :32:39. | |
the feed in tariff. Following public outcry, which included both sides of | :32:40. | :32:44. | |
the house, her department reduced the cut to 64%, saving around 8000 | :32:45. | :32:48. | |
jobs. Something I'm sure the Minister would love to take credit | :32:49. | :32:52. | |
for. However, can she say what the message is to the remaining 19,000 | :32:53. | :32:56. | |
solar workers who now face redundancy in the coming year as a | :32:57. | :33:02. | |
result of the tariff cuts? What I can say to the honourable gentleman | :33:03. | :33:06. | |
is that UK solar is a huge success story. It has grown rapidly since | :33:07. | :33:14. | |
2010 with enormous support from energy consumers in the UK. As we | :33:15. | :33:20. | |
have said time and again, there is a balance. We absolutely welcome the | :33:21. | :33:24. | |
jobs and growth that has been provided in the sector, but what we | :33:25. | :33:28. | |
can't do is to continue to support jobs just through bill payer | :33:29. | :33:35. | |
subsidy, it's not fair. What our members can ensure is that there is | :33:36. | :33:39. | |
good potential for the industry to continue to grow and jobs be | :33:40. | :33:43. | |
supported whilst bills remain affordable. Number 12. The | :33:44. | :33:51. | |
government is making it quicker and easier for consumers to switch | :33:52. | :33:54. | |
supplier and moved to the best value tariffs. We have a national | :33:55. | :33:58. | |
switching campaign, worked with the industry to cut the time it takes to | :33:59. | :34:01. | |
switch to 17 days, and are working with Ofgem to move towards reliable | :34:02. | :34:08. | |
next day switching. We also are working to wards and energy | :34:09. | :34:13. | |
switching guarantee to be produced later this year. It's the vulnerable | :34:14. | :34:19. | |
customers where this is particularly important, and they should be able | :34:20. | :34:23. | |
to find the best value tariffs. Would she say more about what the | :34:24. | :34:27. | |
government is doing to spread that message and ensure these consumers | :34:28. | :34:29. | |
are getting the best deals available. Would she agree with me | :34:30. | :34:36. | |
that perhaps organisations such as carers organisations and children's | :34:37. | :34:40. | |
centres that support vulnerable younger families, that they could | :34:41. | :34:45. | |
have a role to play. I do agree with my right honourable friend, it's | :34:46. | :34:49. | |
absolutely essential that we improve access for vulnerable people to the | :34:50. | :34:52. | |
switching that could provide such great benefits. If people can | :34:53. | :34:57. | |
benefit from a ?200 saving on energy bill, it's no good unless they can | :34:58. | :35:04. | |
access it. That's why we have launched the big energy saving | :35:05. | :35:08. | |
network, and are ensuring vulnerable people who particularly need the | :35:09. | :35:10. | |
improvement of the energy bills this can deliver can access it. One of | :35:11. | :35:15. | |
the ways this is done to is through the citizens advice bureau. We will | :35:16. | :35:17. | |
look at other suggestions put forward. It has been identified that | :35:18. | :35:26. | |
the sticky customer base are not being served well by their energy | :35:27. | :35:31. | |
suppliers. Something like 70% of those customers on the standard | :35:32. | :35:34. | |
variable tariff are paying over the odds. As the secretary looked into | :35:35. | :35:38. | |
the suggestion I have made in the last year and before that, that we | :35:39. | :35:42. | |
need to protect those customers as well, with maybe a default or | :35:43. | :35:48. | |
protection tariff to make sure suppliers provide tariffs that are | :35:49. | :35:53. | |
fair to their customers. The Right Honourable Lady raises an important | :35:54. | :35:57. | |
point, and it's helpful to have the suggestion about the competition and | :35:58. | :36:01. | |
market authority who have just begun to include in their consideration | :36:02. | :36:05. | |
the issue of vulnerable customers on prepayment meters. We are interested | :36:06. | :36:07. | |
in the recommendations they will make over the next few months, we | :36:08. | :36:12. | |
hope, to make sure we look after vulnerable customers who are not | :36:13. | :36:16. | |
able to switch. We have said before that we will take seriously and act | :36:17. | :36:20. | |
on the recommendations they make to make sure we look after those | :36:21. | :36:27. | |
customers who haven't engaged in switching, but should be doing so, | :36:28. | :36:30. | |
and we look forward to seeing their suggestions on Redmond remedies to | :36:31. | :36:35. | |
do so. I welcome the concern by members across the house for | :36:36. | :36:39. | |
consumers and best value. Last month the Secretary of State agreed to | :36:40. | :36:41. | |
hand out hundreds of millions of pounds in new public subsidies to | :36:42. | :36:47. | |
diesel and coal power generators through the capacity market scheme. | :36:48. | :36:51. | |
Can she tell the house how much family energy bills will rise as a | :36:52. | :36:58. | |
consequence? The capacity market is specifically designed to ensure that | :36:59. | :37:02. | |
energy security is not negotiable. Energy security is something this | :37:03. | :37:06. | |
government takes very seriously. Because of the lack of investment in | :37:07. | :37:09. | |
energy infrastructure over the past decades we have needed to make sure | :37:10. | :37:13. | |
the capacity market is in place to make sure we do not have any problem | :37:14. | :37:18. | |
at all with energy security. Diesel will form a part of the future, but | :37:19. | :37:23. | |
only in very small amounts. Let's remember, is there as back-up, and | :37:24. | :37:26. | |
will be switched on occasionally when it's needed. The condition of | :37:27. | :37:31. | |
the capacity market to people's bills will be a matter of a few | :37:32. | :37:35. | |
pounds. It's astonishing she comes to the house and repeatedly said, | :37:36. | :37:38. | |
and I quote, that the government wants to put as little pressure as | :37:39. | :37:44. | |
possible onto hard-pressed households, and is spectacularly | :37:45. | :37:46. | |
unable to answer a very simple question about how much this will | :37:47. | :37:52. | |
put on to family energy bills. In just one day in December, she agreed | :37:53. | :37:56. | |
to subsidise highly polluting diesel generators to the tune of ?175 | :37:57. | :38:04. | |
million, paid for by increasing family energy bills. Can she and is | :38:05. | :38:08. | |
this, are those companies now expected to make returns of more | :38:09. | :38:11. | |
than 20% at the expense of bill payers? What is astonishing is the | :38:12. | :38:17. | |
honourable ladies's lack of understanding of the fact that the | :38:18. | :38:22. | |
capacity market is needed because of Labour's woeful underinvestment in | :38:23. | :38:25. | |
infrastructure under their government. We are left with the | :38:26. | :38:30. | |
consequences of making sure their energy security is completely | :38:31. | :38:34. | |
reliable. The capacity market is essential to ensure that hole is | :38:35. | :38:37. | |
filled. We are proud of the way it has delivered at a second auction | :38:38. | :38:43. | |
just completed. As I said, it's a few pounds, it will be under ?10, | :38:44. | :38:47. | |
and we will ensure that energy security is never going to be a | :38:48. | :38:53. | |
question under this government. Number 14, Mr Speaker. I can assure | :38:54. | :39:01. | |
the honourable member that the good progress is being made. Energy | :39:02. | :39:05. | |
suppliers have now installed over 200 metres in homes and small | :39:06. | :39:08. | |
businesses across Britain ahead of the main installation state this | :39:09. | :39:16. | |
year. -- stage this year. In September 2014 the Public Accounts | :39:17. | :39:18. | |
Committee raised real concerns about the roll-out of smart meters. | :39:19. | :39:23. | |
Recently a former Conservative energy adviser warned the Secretary | :39:24. | :39:26. | |
of State that the roll-out would at best be regarded as a waste of | :39:27. | :39:33. | |
money, and that it is now a ghastly mess, I quote. What are you doing to | :39:34. | :39:38. | |
resolve these problems. I don't agree with that particular position. | :39:39. | :39:43. | |
I think smart meters are going to have a great future in this country. | :39:44. | :39:48. | |
We discussed earlier in these questions the issue of energy | :39:49. | :39:51. | |
security and fuel poverty and smart meters will be a very good way for | :39:52. | :39:56. | |
people to reduce their bills and use less energy, therefore creating less | :39:57. | :39:59. | |
carbon emissions and smart meters are an aborted part. No doubt the | :40:00. | :40:04. | |
introduction of smart meters will help customers control their energy | :40:05. | :40:09. | |
bills. Just so they are aware of the background to this, can the Minister | :40:10. | :40:13. | |
confirm that the UK is rolling out smart meters because of the European | :40:14. | :40:26. | |
Union's directive 2009 Stoke 72 EC. The honourable gentleman is right | :40:27. | :40:29. | |
that the European Union does have directives that give us guidance on | :40:30. | :40:34. | |
this. But there is no question that this initiative of smart meters is | :40:35. | :40:38. | |
of huge advantage to the UK customers, and it's the UK customers | :40:39. | :40:41. | |
and consumers who will always be put first. Number 15, Mr Speaker. As my | :40:42. | :40:51. | |
right honourable friend announced in her November speech, we are | :40:52. | :40:54. | |
committed to the continued growth of UK offshore wind where Britain is | :40:55. | :40:58. | |
already the world leader. This industry is a huge potential source | :40:59. | :41:01. | |
of jobs and growth and we will always focus on maximising UK | :41:02. | :41:05. | |
content in the supply chain. He will appreciate the decision on where to | :41:06. | :41:09. | |
base one company's operations is a commercial decision for them, | :41:10. | :41:13. | |
however, my officials are working closely with the developer can | :41:14. | :41:16. | |
Scottish Gottman to maximise the use of UK Government in his wind farm. | :41:17. | :41:18. | |
-- Scottish Government. Dundee and its port is ideally | :41:19. | :41:31. | |
placed to provide operation maintain and air supply. | :41:32. | :41:37. | |
Well, I absolutely agree with him. I am thinking, recently I visited one | :41:38. | :41:42. | |
of the ports in Scotland, Aberdeen, to hear how they are trying to | :41:43. | :41:48. | |
expand to accommodate not just their growth of offshore wind but the | :41:49. | :41:51. | |
potential for decommissioning in the future. It is vital that whatever | :41:52. | :41:58. | |
our energy policy we focus as far as possible on maximising all the | :41:59. | :42:04. | |
content we can in the supply chain. Number 19, Mr Speaker. | :42:05. | :42:10. | |
The oil and gas industry is vital to our economy, providing over 350,000 | :42:11. | :42:14. | |
jobs and the Government is committed to supporting it. Our latest | :42:15. | :42:19. | |
projections show in 2030 oil and gas will still be a core part of our | :42:20. | :42:25. | |
energy mix, providing nearly 70% of the UK's primary energy | :42:26. | :42:27. | |
requirements. Our commitment to the industry is why we have established | :42:28. | :42:32. | |
the oil and gas authority which is charged with working the industry to | :42:33. | :42:37. | |
maximise the economic recovery of the UK's gas and oil resources. I | :42:38. | :42:41. | |
thank the minister. The oil and gas industry has asked her Government | :42:42. | :42:51. | |
for further tax relief. And the and a professor has said it is necessary | :42:52. | :42:55. | |
to explore the potential of the North Sea. What considerations has | :42:56. | :43:00. | |
she given to refundable tax credit for exploration? | :43:01. | :43:04. | |
So the honourable lady will be aware that the Chancellor has already | :43:05. | :43:12. | |
significantly improved the fiscal the regime to encourage for | :43:13. | :43:16. | |
exploration in the North Sea basin. We had a series of meetings before | :43:17. | :43:22. | |
Christmas with the oil and gas authority and others to discuss | :43:23. | :43:26. | |
exactly what other measures could take and certainly that further | :43:27. | :43:30. | |
fiscal measure is on the table. So too is the vital importance of | :43:31. | :43:37. | |
getting production costs down, making more efficiencies, sharing | :43:38. | :43:40. | |
infrastructure and that is what the OGA is focussed on doing. I am | :43:41. | :43:45. | |
grateful to my honourable friend for raising that question and the reply. | :43:46. | :43:48. | |
I can acknowledge the work the Government has done in this sector. | :43:49. | :43:53. | |
Can the minister give me her assurance in the lead up to the | :43:54. | :43:57. | |
Budget in March that she will leave no stone unturned in ensuring this | :43:58. | :44:03. | |
vet lally important industry secures the support it needs at this | :44:04. | :44:07. | |
difficult time? I am grateful to my honourable friend who has done so | :44:08. | :44:12. | |
much - #230e cusses so much on this -- focuses so much on this sector. | :44:13. | :44:16. | |
We are focussed on what can be done in all areas to try and support this | :44:17. | :44:21. | |
vital UK sector. THE SPEAKER: Order. Topical | :44:22. | :44:26. | |
questions. Mr Mann. Topical one, Mr Speaker. Mr Speaker, my thoughts are | :44:27. | :44:31. | |
with all of those affected by the recent flooding. Energy security is | :44:32. | :44:36. | |
our number one priority. We are working closely with the industry to | :44:37. | :44:42. | |
look at the risks, including severe weather, to put protections in place | :44:43. | :44:48. | |
and stop disruptions. We have ensured that power is restored to | :44:49. | :44:52. | |
customers as soon as possible in very challenging circumstances. | :44:53. | :44:57. | |
Everyone in this chamber benefits this year from the electricity the | :44:58. | :45:05. | |
cool burnt - coal burnt at power stations. What contingency | :45:06. | :45:10. | |
arrangement has been reached with EDF to ensure that in 2026 and | :45:11. | :45:17. | |
beyond, when we don't have enough power available, the decision to | :45:18. | :45:22. | |
close down coal-based power stations can be reversed? Well, Mr Speaker, | :45:23. | :45:28. | |
can I reassure the honourable gentleman that we are moving to a | :45:29. | :45:33. | |
consultation on ending coal-fired pou irstations by 2025 -- power | :45:34. | :45:37. | |
stations by 2025. I am sure he'll want to participate in it. This | :45:38. | :45:40. | |
Government is taking the long-term view on getting the right mix of | :45:41. | :45:45. | |
decarbonising and having nerge security. That is why we are making | :45:46. | :45:49. | |
this plan well ahead of time. It is ten years ahead. Thank you, Mr | :45:50. | :45:55. | |
Speaker. Given the revisions to the feed-in tariffs which will come into | :45:56. | :45:59. | |
force, has my friend made assessment on the likely effects on the solar | :46:00. | :46:04. | |
industry, particularly in the south west, where the sun nearly always | :46:05. | :46:10. | |
shines? Well, of course, he's absolutely right the sun always | :46:11. | :46:15. | |
nearly shines there. It is a great place for solar has been a | :46:16. | :46:20. | |
spectacular success there. The tariffs aim to give it sited with | :46:21. | :46:28. | |
well-sighted projects. Around 5% for solar. We believe this will be by | :46:29. | :46:35. | |
2021 save up to ?330 million a year to bill payers. At the same time | :46:36. | :46:40. | |
enable 220,000 new installations to be subsidised under the new feeding | :46:41. | :46:43. | |
tariff. Thank you. Can I welcome the | :46:44. | :46:48. | |
Secretary of State's update to the House on the actions take no-one | :46:49. | :46:51. | |
response to the floods. Particularly welcome the Prime Minister's | :46:52. | :46:56. | |
decision to set up a cross-Whitehall review of the Government's approach | :46:57. | :46:59. | |
to flood defences, which will consider the rising flood risk posed | :47:00. | :47:03. | |
by climate change. Mr Speaker, we know now that the last review, in | :47:04. | :47:08. | |
2014, which was also led by the member for West Dorset met just | :47:09. | :47:13. | |
three times and didn't publish a single finding K the Secretary of | :47:14. | :47:18. | |
State confirm to the House that she personally attends this committee? | :47:19. | :47:21. | |
Can she tell us whether it has met yet? Can she tell us how often it | :47:22. | :47:26. | |
plans to meet? Which independent expeshts are on it and what this | :47:27. | :47:31. | |
time -- expects are on it and what she time she expects it to achieve? | :47:32. | :47:35. | |
This Government takes seriously the impact of climate change and the | :47:36. | :47:39. | |
fact it has had such a devastating impact in terms of the flooding | :47:40. | :47:45. | |
recently. I can reassure here that we participated, this department, in | :47:46. | :47:52. | |
regular meetings of COBRA on a almost daily basis, to ensure that | :47:53. | :47:56. | |
electricity source were restored as quickly as possible. The review will | :47:57. | :48:02. | |
take place and we will keep a careful, watchful eye on making sure | :48:03. | :48:06. | |
it does meet and make sure it looks carefully at what impact it has had. | :48:07. | :48:11. | |
Thank you, Mr Speaker. What steps is the Government taking to address the | :48:12. | :48:15. | |
increasing shortage of skills in the nuclear industry? Well, we have | :48:16. | :48:21. | |
already taken a lot of action to tackle the skills problem at a all | :48:22. | :48:25. | |
levels, from programmes to attract more school children to stem | :48:26. | :48:29. | |
careers, to apprenticeships and training at all levels, as well as | :48:30. | :48:34. | |
setting in train work for transfer of skills from wider sectors. He's | :48:35. | :48:38. | |
right to highlight the need for new nuclear skills. Hiply will provide | :48:39. | :48:45. | |
25,000 jobs and 1,000 apprenticeships. Thank you Mr | :48:46. | :48:50. | |
Speaker. It suggests 18700 jobs could be lost as a result of the 65% | :48:51. | :48:57. | |
reduction to the solar feed-in tariff. What loss in income tax will | :48:58. | :49:02. | |
this mean to Government, in light of the ?16 billion fall short of tax | :49:03. | :49:09. | |
receipts last year? What is the combined effect if HMC press forward | :49:10. | :49:14. | |
with the increase of tax to solar installations? I can assure the | :49:15. | :49:19. | |
honourable gentleman this Government remains committed to the on-going | :49:20. | :49:23. | |
success of the solar industry. As I explained in an earlier reply. What | :49:24. | :49:27. | |
we cannot do is simply keep jobs going as a result of subsidy. Our | :49:28. | :49:33. | |
best guess under our tariff is that will support up to 23,000 jobs in | :49:34. | :49:38. | |
the solar sector. Of course it is up for the sector to bring down the | :49:39. | :49:43. | |
costs, as far as possible, to reach a subsidy-free stage by 2020. Of | :49:44. | :49:46. | |
course we will do everything we can, as I have said, if the VAT rate has | :49:47. | :49:50. | |
to go up, then we will look at what more we can do within the tariff to | :49:51. | :49:55. | |
ensure we don't penalise the sector. Thank you. Can I refer the House to | :49:56. | :50:01. | |
my register, the register of interests as chairman of globe | :50:02. | :50:05. | |
international, which held a successful summit recently in Paris | :50:06. | :50:10. | |
as part of a process. Can I ask the Secretary of State, does she agree | :50:11. | :50:18. | |
with me that the world's leading network of parliamentarians devoted | :50:19. | :50:21. | |
to leadership, legislative leadership in climate change, has a | :50:22. | :50:27. | |
key role to play to make sure it is reality. And to meet with me p to | :50:28. | :50:33. | |
make sure this is achieved? Well, I thank the honourable gentleman for | :50:34. | :50:37. | |
his question. I am aware that Globe is one of the largest forums on | :50:38. | :50:44. | |
sustainable development. I acknowledge his important role in | :50:45. | :50:48. | |
chairing it. I will be delighted to meet him to discuss how we can | :50:49. | :50:52. | |
promote parliamentarian international development on this | :50:53. | :50:57. | |
important subject. I was absolutely delighted when the minister said in | :50:58. | :51:02. | |
June at her renewable summit that we will remove subsidies. When does she | :51:03. | :51:09. | |
expect the subsidies to disappear completely? Projects just off the | :51:10. | :51:15. | |
coast of the honourable member's constituency provide enough | :51:16. | :51:20. | |
electricity for over 100,000 homes, follows hundreds of millions | :51:21. | :51:23. | |
invested by the developer, much of which was spent locally. I am sure | :51:24. | :51:28. | |
he'll welcome that. We have to get the balance between supporting newer | :51:29. | :51:32. | |
technologies and being tough on subsidies to keep bills as low as | :51:33. | :51:39. | |
possible. We will work towards getting technology subsidy, free. | :51:40. | :51:49. | |
By far and aware in the EU one third of electricity comes from that | :51:50. | :51:53. | |
source. China has 50 stations under construction. We need small modular | :51:54. | :51:58. | |
reactors. Can the minister set up her plans and in this regard? | :51:59. | :52:05. | |
Nuclear is an important part of our energy future. I am very proud we | :52:06. | :52:09. | |
have signed the first new nuclear deal in over 20 years. It will have | :52:10. | :52:18. | |
an important part. We are using part of our substantial innovation | :52:19. | :52:22. | |
funding to make sure we bring them on as early as possible. It will not | :52:23. | :52:28. | |
be at the expect of reactors going forward. Smaller nuclear is what we | :52:29. | :52:36. | |
will aim for. Earlier this week the SNP agreed a support package to | :52:37. | :52:43. | |
retain staff at DL and Clydebridge steel plans, this will address | :52:44. | :52:49. | |
costs. Can I ask what consideration the Secretary of State or of Cabinet | :52:50. | :52:55. | |
colleagues va given to bringing forward a co-her hent strategy to | :52:56. | :52:59. | |
address the high energy costs facing businesses across the UK? We are | :53:00. | :53:04. | |
well aware of the importance of keeping energy costs down in order | :53:05. | :53:07. | |
to support businesses and households. My honourable friend, | :53:08. | :53:13. | |
the Prime Minister, announced that intensives would be given a specific | :53:14. | :53:18. | |
package of support and that has got state aid clearance and will be put | :53:19. | :53:21. | |
in place as soon as possible. The minister will be aware that just | :53:22. | :53:27. | |
before Christmas, the European Commission announced new tariffs in | :53:28. | :53:33. | |
Malaysian power and they would back these to May last year. That could | :53:34. | :53:39. | |
result in many solar companies having an unwant and devastating tax | :53:40. | :53:44. | |
-- unwanted and devastating tax bill. Will she make sure this does | :53:45. | :53:48. | |
not happen? I think the honourable gentleman is right to raise this. It | :53:49. | :53:51. | |
is a real concern that in spite of the fact that the cost of solar | :53:52. | :53:57. | |
panels have developed dramatically, nevertheless in Europe they remain | :53:58. | :54:02. | |
higher than elsewhere in the world as a result of the import tariffs. | :54:03. | :54:06. | |
The commissioner was writ on the explaining how bad this is for the | :54:07. | :54:09. | |
onof going success of the UK industry. We will do everything we | :54:10. | :54:14. | |
can to ensure that those get removed as soon as possible. | :54:15. | :54:19. | |
Mr Speaker, we were disapointed in the Humber last year not to be | :54:20. | :54:24. | |
granted the national wind college in the locality, especially in light of | :54:25. | :54:28. | |
the renewables which is important to the future of the Humber area. I | :54:29. | :54:34. | |
wonder if ministers would meet with me and representatives to discuss | :54:35. | :54:40. | |
what can be done to promote a national wind college to promote | :54:41. | :54:44. | |
funding in the area. I would be delighted to meet with her and | :54:45. | :54:50. | |
colleagues. I had a huge u poer to see the new blade -- I - there have | :54:51. | :55:00. | |
been new jobs and apprenticeships in her area. I think we should do | :55:01. | :55:05. | |
everything we can to promote this northern energy powerhouse, which is | :55:06. | :55:08. | |
taking off and doing so well. THE SPEAKER: There is an arm of | :55:09. | :55:15. | |
opposition members to catch my eye. I say to the member that I don't | :55:16. | :55:21. | |
want him to feel excluded. If he wishes to contribute now we will | :55:22. | :55:25. | |
happily hear him. Not at the moment. As soon as he wants to, he can. Mr | :55:26. | :55:30. | |
Newlands. These households are more likely to | :55:31. | :55:49. | |
have prepaid metres. These are ?200 more ex-penive per year. Can the | :55:50. | :55:54. | |
speck of state tell me what she will do to make sure they have | :55:55. | :56:01. | |
availability to lower prices, as those on other methods? | :56:02. | :56:08. | |
In Paisley and Renfrewshire North, there have been eco-measures that | :56:09. | :56:15. | |
will help your constituents. 119 measures per 100,000 households to | :56:16. | :56:20. | |
be installed by 2015, compared to the average 77 per thousand in the | :56:21. | :56:26. | |
rest of the UK. Rest assured we are focused on making sure bills stay | :56:27. | :56:31. | |
low and making sure fuel poverty is addressed and the ecosystem is one | :56:32. | :56:36. | |
of the best ways to do that. In Northern Ireland one in five | :56:37. | :56:41. | |
pensioners are defined as living in income poverty. 65% of those are in | :56:42. | :56:48. | |
fuel poverty. What about the dealings with colleagues in Northern | :56:49. | :56:55. | |
Ireland to address these issues? Keeping fuel poverty up they are | :56:56. | :56:58. | |
making sure we can keep bills down is a absolute priority. Regarding | :56:59. | :57:02. | |
the statistics, I'd have to write to him. Outside Hinkley Point C, the | :57:03. | :57:11. | |
proposed new power station the government is considering, this | :57:12. | :57:16. | |
means yet again the government will be held to hostage. No guaranteed | :57:17. | :57:20. | |
programme, high profits for the suppliers, extortionate rates | :57:21. | :57:26. | |
agreed, for the just to users. Should the government not do the | :57:27. | :57:29. | |
decent thing and rethink this nuclear at all cost policy? The | :57:30. | :57:37. | |
government thinks nuclear reactors are an important part of delivering | :57:38. | :57:40. | |
on a low carbon future. There is a great opportunity to make sure we | :57:41. | :57:45. | |
develop skills. On the particular example he has referred to, I will | :57:46. | :57:49. | |
ensure my department looks at it carefully and comes back with | :57:50. | :57:54. | |
answers. In her attempt to explain the hugely unpopular cuts to solar, | :57:55. | :57:58. | |
the Secretary of State constantly pretends it's about reducing costs | :57:59. | :58:02. | |
to householders. Given industry analysis shows solar costs around | :58:03. | :58:05. | |
half the cost of Hinckley over 35 years and save consumers around ?15 | :58:06. | :58:12. | |
billion, how can she keep justifying such blatant double standards when | :58:13. | :58:16. | |
it comes to nuclear power? The honourable ladies not dealing with | :58:17. | :58:20. | |
the facts. The facts are that the solar changes will still deliver 5% | :58:21. | :58:25. | |
yields to people who put them up. The fact is that nuclear provides | :58:26. | :58:30. | |
important baseload. When the sun isn't shining, or when the wind | :58:31. | :58:33. | |
isn't blowing. The honourable lady can have her own views but not her | :58:34. | :58:41. | |
own facts. Last, but never forgotten, Mr Skinner. With the | :58:42. | :58:47. | |
Chinese economy hitting the buffers, week after week, does it make sense | :58:48. | :58:58. | |
to continue with this Chinese connection of nuclear power in | :58:59. | :59:01. | |
Britain? Isn't it time it was abandoned? A shine has been knocked | :59:02. | :59:06. | |
off it every single day. Change your mind. Can I reassure the honourable | :59:07. | :59:14. | |
gentleman that we are ambitious for this country, confident in our | :59:15. | :59:18. | |
regulations, open for business, and if the Chinese want to make a | :59:19. | :59:21. | |
substantial investment in delivery new nuclear then we will be able to | :59:22. | :59:25. | |
take it and make a great success of it. Order, business question. Chris | :59:26. | :59:32. | |
Bryant. We'll be leader give us the business for this week and next week | :59:33. | :59:39. | |
and all the rest? Probably not all the rest, Mr Speaker, but the | :59:40. | :59:43. | |
business next week on Monday the 11th, we will debate the remaining | :59:44. | :59:47. | |
stages of the Armed Forces Bill. After that, a general debate on | :59:48. | :59:51. | |
local government funding for rural areas nominated by the backbench | :59:52. | :59:55. | |
business committee. On Tuesday the 12th, the conclusion of the | :59:56. | :59:58. | |
remaining stages of the Housing and planning Bill. On Wednesday the | :59:59. | :00:03. | |
13th, an opposition day with a debate on trade exports, innovation | :00:04. | :00:07. | |
and productivity in the name of the Scottish National party. On Thursday | :00:08. | :00:14. | |
the 14th, another day of business nominated by the backbench business | :00:15. | :00:15. |