Browse content similar to Flooding Debate. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
The Somerset Levels are still underwater after a deluge that | :00:07. | :00:15. | |
started in December. The floods have sparked a domestic and political | :00:16. | :00:16. | |
crisis. Welcome. Good evening, and welcome to the | :00:17. | :00:41. | |
canalside centre. We meet as part of the West country struggles `fter the | :00:42. | :00:47. | |
worst floods in years. The water is now going down, but many of the | :00:48. | :00:51. | |
people here tonight are out of their homes after the Somerset Levels were | :00:52. | :00:56. | |
hit by a series of storms that went on for two months. Not far from | :00:57. | :01:01. | |
here, livelihoods have been lost and property destroyed, and there is a | :01:02. | :01:05. | |
feeling amongst some that a lot of it could have been avoided, which | :01:06. | :01:11. | |
has made people angry. Before we debate, let's hear a few personal | :01:12. | :01:19. | |
stories. James and Becky, you were affected by this. The beginning of | :01:20. | :01:26. | |
the year, we experienced a surge on the floodwater started to rhse into | :01:27. | :01:33. | |
my parent `` my parents house and I had to evacuate my farm. Wh`t about | :01:34. | :01:41. | |
your livestock? All of the livestock had to be removed and taken to other | :01:42. | :01:45. | |
farms. A lot of them have bden sold. I have lost potential earnings | :01:46. | :01:52. | |
for the last `` next three or four months. It makes me angry bdcause it | :01:53. | :01:57. | |
could have been avoided. If they had just listened to the local people. | :01:58. | :02:05. | |
Alastair, you live on an island What has the experience been like | :02:06. | :02:09. | |
for you is to mark it has bden extraordinary. `` like for xou? It | :02:10. | :02:17. | |
is extraordinary. There is ` community on the island with 20 | :02:18. | :02:20. | |
children who go to school. Xou cannot just get into your c`r and | :02:21. | :02:26. | |
take the children to school. You have to think about it. You have to | :02:27. | :02:30. | |
dress up in wet weather gear, get your boots and trousers and. `` on. | :02:31. | :02:39. | |
It is really difficult. Food, all of the bits and pieces. It all takes a | :02:40. | :02:47. | |
huge amount of time. Most pdople can cope with hardship for a short | :02:48. | :02:50. | |
period of time, but this has been going on for nine weeks. Yes. We | :02:51. | :02:56. | |
have had it before, once evdry nine or ten years, but nine weeks is a | :02:57. | :03:02. | |
huge amount of time and somdthing obviously went badly wrong. Some | :03:03. | :03:06. | |
initial thoughts of their al a but let's meet our panel. James, a | :03:07. | :03:13. | |
farmer who has become the f`ce of the floods at times. His falily have | :03:14. | :03:17. | |
been working the land here for 50 years. The acting Chief Executive of | :03:18. | :03:26. | |
Somerset County Council. Sud Brown from the RSPCA. They managed 20 0 | :03:27. | :03:34. | |
acres on the levels. And Richard Creswell from the Environment | :03:35. | :03:38. | |
Agency, which has come in for a lot of criticism, much of it thdy claim | :03:39. | :03:39. | |
it is unfair. We also have among our audidnce the | :03:40. | :03:53. | |
police, local politicians and many volunteers who have come to the | :03:54. | :04:00. | |
rescue. No`one from DEFRA, `s it is called, was able to come tonight. UN | :04:01. | :04:07. | |
home can get involved and Twitter, using this hash tag. `` you at home. | :04:08. | :04:14. | |
Let's take our first question from counsellor Justine Baker. Why did it | :04:15. | :04:18. | |
take so long as local authorities to get involved? Why do you thhnk? I do | :04:19. | :04:28. | |
not think people realised how bad it was. I think people thought it would | :04:29. | :04:33. | |
go away a lot quicker. I am part of a community group that stepped up to | :04:34. | :04:39. | |
the mark to fill the gap. The County Council is working extremelx well, | :04:40. | :04:42. | |
but it took a lot of time to get to that. Let's bring in the panel. You | :04:43. | :04:55. | |
must have had a well rehearsed plan sitting on the shelf for an event | :04:56. | :05:00. | |
like this. It was a question of blowing the dust off it and getting | :05:01. | :05:05. | |
to work. Is that what happened? I believe we were there from very | :05:06. | :05:12. | |
early on, from before Christmas We looked at our duty, what we head to | :05:13. | :05:15. | |
do, which was to keep peopld safe, and we worked with our soci`l care | :05:16. | :05:20. | |
teams to keep people safe from day one. We clearly needed to move on | :05:21. | :05:25. | |
from there, and there was that need for communities of, how can we help? | :05:26. | :05:33. | |
Knowing into the new year wd were helping in any way we could. `` | :05:34. | :05:39. | |
gull`wing. We provided boats and supportive communities. That was | :05:40. | :05:46. | |
towards the end of January. There was a airy bad weather forecast | :05:47. | :05:52. | |
coming forward and work `` very bad weather forecast coming forward Did | :05:53. | :06:02. | |
you feel isolated or a in the early days of this emergency? We get to | :06:03. | :06:12. | |
start off with. Enough was dnough. 40 square miles of Somerset was | :06:13. | :06:18. | |
flooded in conjunction with other areas. We needed to declare a major | :06:19. | :06:26. | |
incident. What happened then? We wanted the response that we got We | :06:27. | :06:29. | |
wanted others to recognise what was going on in Somerset, and everything | :06:30. | :06:36. | |
that has happened we hoped would happen to bring the eyes of the | :06:37. | :06:40. | |
world on what was happening. We wanted to bring government to bear | :06:41. | :06:52. | |
in terms of recognizing... H was pleased, not pleased to declare a | :06:53. | :06:56. | |
major incident, but we wantdd governments to recognise wh`t was | :06:57. | :07:00. | |
happening in Somerset. What sort of help that you get? Is it addquate? | :07:01. | :07:11. | |
Last year the floods went under the radar. We were flooded for six | :07:12. | :07:20. | |
months and it went under thd radar. Thanks to such more for acttally | :07:21. | :07:25. | |
declaring it a major incident. We head the resources in place to help | :07:26. | :07:28. | |
us. At the start we were left in the dark. No`one was helping and we head | :07:29. | :07:36. | |
to evacuate. We started evacuating on a Wednesday afternoon, Wddnesday | :07:37. | :07:42. | |
morning we asked for assist`nce and none was coming forward. Evdrything | :07:43. | :07:48. | |
took so long we did not havd time. Are you sure you did not have help? | :07:49. | :08:00. | |
Somerset County Council sent some people out, they came out at nine | :08:01. | :08:03. | |
o'clock and said, do not worry, the Army is coming, we are going to put | :08:04. | :08:09. | |
pumps in place and sandbags. By lunchtime, nothing had turndd up. I | :08:10. | :08:13. | |
rang my friend who is a contractor and he started a gang, and H said, | :08:14. | :08:22. | |
do not worry, the Army are coming. By four o'clock we made the decision | :08:23. | :08:28. | |
that we had to evacuate. Who do you hold responsible for not helping you | :08:29. | :08:36. | |
out? There did not seem to be a joint approach from the start. The | :08:37. | :08:44. | |
police are here. You are in charge of... I chair the strategic | :08:45. | :08:55. | |
coordinating group. We coordinate with the blue light responsds, with | :08:56. | :09:03. | |
the local authorities, and ht is to coordinate... Did that seem to work? | :09:04. | :09:15. | |
In what way did it not work? It clearly not work `` it clearly did | :09:16. | :09:22. | |
not work. Local people were coming together and doing their tasks, but | :09:23. | :09:29. | |
it needed to be run from thd bottom up. The lady behind you. I have got | :09:30. | :09:40. | |
to congratulate the police hn what they did for me. I have got 12 | :09:41. | :09:45. | |
German Shepherd dogs. I havd seven policemen turned up and let my dogs | :09:46. | :09:51. | |
out, and one of them admittdd he was terrified of German shepherds. I am | :09:52. | :09:59. | |
getting emotional. He built a bridge to get my Shetland pony out. The | :10:00. | :10:05. | |
police were leading marvelots, but nobody else turned up. Nobody. We | :10:06. | :10:13. | |
were cut off on December five. In our village, the police takd took a | :10:14. | :10:17. | |
long time to Ternopil stop there was no security, very little difficulty | :10:18. | :10:24. | |
and all of the warning we h`d was an announcement from a helicopter | :10:25. | :10:28. | |
telling us to be. Very little personal contact, cooperate in and | :10:29. | :10:33. | |
very badly organised. Yelling from a helicopter is not much use. We had | :10:34. | :10:37. | |
worked considerably harder for them and had done a number of warning and | :10:38. | :10:43. | |
informing exercises. We had neighbourhood teams that were out | :10:44. | :10:48. | |
constantly, knocking on doors, dropping letters, using sochal | :10:49. | :10:51. | |
media. Did anyone know who was in charge? Was it David Cameron, you, | :10:52. | :10:57. | |
the Council, the Environment Agency? Who was it? Because the major | :10:58. | :11:03. | |
incident was then declare, that is when the process sets up. As a | :11:04. | :11:07. | |
consequence, it takes a small amount of time to get the right pl`yers | :11:08. | :11:12. | |
around the table. How many times did you visit from the council `nd see | :11:13. | :11:16. | |
what was on? We had people visiting on a very regular basis. Did you pop | :11:17. | :11:22. | |
down? Islet in the area so H have been more or less constantlx in the | :11:23. | :11:26. | |
levels since the beginning. `` eyelids in the area. The cotncil was | :11:27. | :11:33. | |
involved in troubles, did you take your eye off the ball? Never. No, we | :11:34. | :11:39. | |
did not. My leadership has been there since the beginning so there | :11:40. | :11:42. | |
has been no ambiguity. That other issue did not feature. Rich`rd from | :11:43. | :11:48. | |
the moment agency, have you been satisfied with the way that your | :11:49. | :11:51. | |
people have responded Mr Mike `` the moment agency? We had three months | :11:52. | :11:58. | |
which has amounted to the wdttest winter for 250 years. Through that | :11:59. | :12:03. | |
three months, I think there were probably only two or three days | :12:04. | :12:07. | |
where it did not claim, which gives major problems for the Somerset | :12:08. | :12:10. | |
Levels. It has resulted in the massive flooded we have seen. `` | :12:11. | :12:15. | |
where it did not rain. I must say how sorry and sympathetic Hxam for | :12:16. | :12:18. | |
everybody and I have seen some of it first`hand. I think right from the | :12:19. | :12:23. | |
start, we set up our incident rooms and our job is to do the warning and | :12:24. | :12:31. | |
informing and get everybody geared up to what is happening. But of | :12:32. | :12:35. | |
course, what happened was it rained and then get training. I thhnk some | :12:36. | :12:41. | |
of the stories is because it has kept raining for three months | :12:42. | :12:44. | |
without stop. `` then it kept raining. Could you have brotght the | :12:45. | :12:52. | |
pumps in earlier? One of thd problems with pumps is that we have | :12:53. | :12:57. | |
one main river out of the p`tch All the water that is pumped nedds to go | :12:58. | :13:02. | |
out through that route. We cannot turn on the pumps until there is | :13:03. | :13:05. | |
capacity in the river. Right late on in the incident, we have bedn | :13:06. | :13:15. | |
working to get the flood relief channel working so that we can take | :13:16. | :13:17. | |
water from the top. That cale in much later, when the incident got to | :13:18. | :13:24. | |
the sort of portions of it has no. James, is it realistic the sort of | :13:25. | :13:29. | |
help that you were expecting? The police are here to catch crhminals | :13:30. | :13:33. | |
and do crimper vigilant. Thdy are not used to moving cattle. H just | :13:34. | :13:37. | |
want to respond to Richard. `` they do crime prevention. It started | :13:38. | :13:43. | |
flooding after an inch and ` half of water. It is not acceptable. This | :13:44. | :13:47. | |
was in December, before all the other room. That was fool for the | :13:48. | :13:56. | |
extra rain. We were calling for a week before Christmas, eight days | :13:57. | :14:03. | |
before Christmas, for Northloor pumping station to put the | :14:04. | :14:05. | |
excellently pumps on and I was told they were not needed. I havd lived | :14:06. | :14:09. | |
there all my life and my father before and there did not sedm to be | :14:10. | :14:12. | |
anybody listening to the locals We know, you know, just by going out on | :14:13. | :14:16. | |
the moors and farming the l`nd just how high the water was getthng. It | :14:17. | :14:22. | |
went way above winter level. Let's speak to somebody who came here as a | :14:23. | :14:27. | |
volunteer. Welcome. What struck you? What struck me? As a member of the | :14:28. | :14:34. | |
international relief team, H work around the world in major | :14:35. | :14:39. | |
disasters. To be honest, if you ask me as an observer what went on here, | :14:40. | :14:44. | |
in our own country, compared to third World countries, it w`s an | :14:45. | :14:50. | |
absolute failure. Because I was here for a week and really, lots of these | :14:51. | :14:57. | |
volunteers were getting stuck in and there was no, absolutely no presence | :14:58. | :15:01. | |
from any official agencies. Let s get this clear... We were lhfting | :15:02. | :15:09. | |
everything ourselves. I did not see any presence. In other parts of the | :15:10. | :15:13. | |
world, it is completely different. They are not so rich. In thhs | :15:14. | :15:16. | |
country, we have everything and yet we have nothing. We are worse at | :15:17. | :15:24. | |
responding to an emergency hnvolving 100 flooded houses than thex are in | :15:25. | :15:28. | |
some developing countries. Obviously the community coming togethdr as | :15:29. | :15:35. | |
they have done is just a relarkable response. But who should be lifting | :15:36. | :15:39. | |
the sandbags? Is that actually down to ours, the public, or shotld we | :15:40. | :15:46. | |
look to the authorities? It is a mixed picture and that is exactly | :15:47. | :15:50. | |
why I asked and the marines came in when needed because the sittation | :15:51. | :15:54. | |
was getting worse. More comlunities were being overwhelmed. We knew that | :15:55. | :15:58. | |
we needed more people on thd ground and that is why we effectivdly | :15:59. | :16:00. | |
changed national policy to get the marines in so that they could help | :16:01. | :16:05. | |
with whatever we needed to be done. You came here, did you not, for a | :16:06. | :16:10. | |
day to help? I have used it? On the 8th of February, I think thd worst | :16:11. | :16:15. | |
flooding at the time. I camd for one day and stayed a week. Therd was | :16:16. | :16:19. | |
much to do. The marines... H only saw the marines towards the last few | :16:20. | :16:25. | |
days of my stay for a week here What all of the sandbagging was | :16:26. | :16:28. | |
being done by the locals, bx the volunteers. `` while all of the | :16:29. | :16:34. | |
sandbagging was being done, I think if there had been better qu`rter | :16:35. | :16:38. | |
nation, we would have turned up earlier, on the seventh, whhch is a | :16:39. | :16:46. | |
Friday, I heard somebody from Somerset really upset, wherd are the | :16:47. | :16:50. | |
international agencies? We responded. I rang every single | :16:51. | :16:53. | |
agency, every single agency, "we can help, what do you need? How is good | :16:54. | :17:02. | |
they all turned away. `` wh`t do you need? " We are very glad yot are | :17:03. | :17:10. | |
here. You have a question also. How will the Government and its | :17:11. | :17:13. | |
associated agencies build trust with the local communities build trust | :17:14. | :17:16. | |
with Somerset after such a monumental failure? You are sticking | :17:17. | :17:22. | |
to your view that it was a failure? Is that a general consensus? | :17:23. | :17:27. | |
CHEERING From the Environment Agency? How are | :17:28. | :17:33. | |
you going to rebuild trust? Colon I think one of the things, as people | :17:34. | :17:38. | |
have said, sitting down and talking. We did a lot of that after 2012 and | :17:39. | :17:44. | |
indeed... It did not change much. I disagree. In 2012, we sat down with | :17:45. | :17:50. | |
the internal drainage boards and local people and said that we need | :17:51. | :17:53. | |
to do something to try to alleviate the problem. We looked at three | :17:54. | :17:58. | |
major initiatives that would have helped and one of them was hndeed | :17:59. | :18:02. | |
the eight kilometre dredge that many people will know about. We | :18:03. | :18:09. | |
immediately, over 12 months ago rebuilding trust. Your imagd has | :18:10. | :18:12. | |
been tarnished perhaps down here. What are you going to do? Wd will | :18:13. | :18:16. | |
talk to people but at the moment, the priority is to get the water off | :18:17. | :18:19. | |
the land, get the people back into their houses. You know, with the | :18:20. | :18:23. | |
best will in the world, it hs not the right time to be trying to | :18:24. | :18:27. | |
engage with the locals on what is going to be the future becatse the | :18:28. | :18:31. | |
future for people, I hope, will be getting people back first and then | :18:32. | :18:35. | |
talking. We can do the rest in parallel. Let's talk to Tessa, one | :18:36. | :18:42. | |
of the local MPs. How badly his trust and the relationship with the | :18:43. | :18:46. | |
authorities been affected? H think it is pretty serious, actually. I | :18:47. | :18:49. | |
would say that rather than sitting down and talking it should be | :18:50. | :18:52. | |
sitting down and listening. Actually, local people have a very | :18:53. | :18:55. | |
clear idea of how some of this may be sorted out. I do not blale your | :18:56. | :18:58. | |
Environment Agency staff because they have worked very hard where | :18:59. | :19:02. | |
they have been placed in a very impossible situation by an | :19:03. | :19:06. | |
emergency. But this was a crisis. We saw this happening last year. Not | :19:07. | :19:12. | |
very much happened. The loc`l farmers and landowners have been | :19:13. | :19:16. | |
saying dredge, dredge, dredge. I recovered one area, not the river. | :19:17. | :19:21. | |
What we need to do, perhaps, is something I have been asking for 18 | :19:22. | :19:24. | |
months and that is saying that the Environment Agency is there to look | :19:25. | :19:27. | |
after wildlife and flora and fauna, but actually my view is let's do not | :19:28. | :19:32. | |
just buttercups. We need to actually make sure that we may be agdncy | :19:33. | :19:35. | |
reflect the value of productive land. It's got to be like that. We | :19:36. | :19:41. | |
are going to be talking abott dredging a lot but what's t`lk about | :19:42. | :19:49. | |
the response. This Mac let's talk about `` but let's talk abott the | :19:50. | :19:56. | |
response. Being a volunteer and helping first`hand, no disrdspect | :19:57. | :20:00. | |
but will lead to gold and shlver command, I am sure many will agree, | :20:01. | :20:03. | |
it was way slow. People needed help and they did it now. It was too | :20:04. | :20:12. | |
slow. One last response to `ll that? I think with the quarter nation | :20:13. | :20:16. | |
response, and I do accept some of the comments to see that thdy did | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
not see it `` coordination response, there were very many good pdople | :20:22. | :20:29. | |
working 24/7. Anyway, we were a victim are on success in th`t the | :20:30. | :20:32. | |
flag and the community resilience and the can`do attitude acttally | :20:33. | :20:34. | |
created an additional demand and for others to come in... So if xou had | :20:35. | :20:38. | |
fallen to pieces, more help would have arrived? From our point of | :20:39. | :20:44. | |
view, with some of the needs, the concentration of effort wherever was | :20:45. | :20:48. | |
demanded at the time, with other coordinated groups, needed to | :20:49. | :20:52. | |
respond in a coordinated wax. Everybody had such a device set of | :20:53. | :21:00. | |
needs. Let's pause for a molent I see will come back to the atdience | :21:01. | :21:04. | |
but let's go back onto the levels to remind ourselves of how this drama | :21:05. | :21:05. | |
unfolded. There is nothing I can do... This is | :21:06. | :21:19. | |
my life. What really did catse the worst floods in living memory? In | :21:20. | :21:25. | |
spite of the frantic efforts to pump it out, the water is still there. | :21:26. | :21:44. | |
Families in temporary homes. I've got my crate! Who knows for how | :21:45. | :21:55. | |
long. In this village on thd Somerset Levels, people are still | :21:56. | :21:59. | |
having to reach their homes by boat. Now, if you want the clearest | :22:00. | :22:04. | |
possible indication of just how much the extent of this flooding to | :22:05. | :22:08. | |
people by surprise, the County Council actually hired this boat for | :22:09. | :22:13. | |
two weeks. They thought, as did most people, that the floodwaters would | :22:14. | :22:17. | |
have gone by then. But as I speak, it is now nine weeks since the | :22:18. | :22:25. | |
village was marooned. When xou visit, you realise that with every | :22:26. | :22:29. | |
waterlogged day that passes, the anger gets deeper. | :22:30. | :22:36. | |
What do you think next year? Do you think we will be sure standhng on | :22:37. | :22:44. | |
the edge of a flooded village again next year? I think there will be a | :22:45. | :22:48. | |
riot if we are doing that. There is jolly near a riot right now. We are | :22:49. | :22:52. | |
very close to the edge. We have had enough. When the clock back and | :22:53. | :22:57. | |
there was a taste of what w`s to come. James took me on a totr of his | :22:58. | :23:08. | |
farm near Rowland. 560 acres. We have got 790 underwater. `` 960 | :23:09. | :23:16. | |
acres. Back then there was `nger that there had been a lack of river | :23:17. | :23:20. | |
maintenance, dredging, caushng the floods. The chairman of the | :23:21. | :23:25. | |
Environment Agency, Lord Smhth, felt the full force of anger when he | :23:26. | :23:30. | |
visited the Somerset Levels towards the end of 2012. And when I pressed | :23:31. | :23:36. | |
him on that word, dredging, this is what he said. What we need to do is | :23:37. | :23:43. | |
find out here where the best places to dredge are going to be and then | :23:44. | :23:47. | |
we will get on and do it and that will be as soon as possible. When? I | :23:48. | :23:53. | |
would certainly be very dis`ppointed if we were not seen some improvement | :23:54. | :23:57. | |
happening in the course of the next six months. And yet 12 months on, | :23:58. | :24:01. | |
that pledge failed to materhalise. Our main story tonight, the West | :24:02. | :24:14. | |
under water. Part of Somersdt remain cut off and the bad weather is not | :24:15. | :24:19. | |
over yet. Every road into mtch only a flooded... I was hiring a boat | :24:20. | :24:26. | |
again to reach the stranded village. Farmer James was fast beginning to | :24:27. | :24:31. | |
realise that the floods of 2012 were nothing compared to what he was | :24:32. | :24:37. | |
facing now. In the end, he had to evacuate his farm to save hhs | :24:38. | :24:44. | |
animals from drowning. And one night in February, what had | :24:45. | :24:48. | |
already become a major incident came an emergency, as the villagd was | :24:49. | :24:54. | |
evacuated, homes that had ndver flooded before, overwhelmed and just | :24:55. | :25:00. | |
a few hours. I now, the worst floods in living memory were attracting | :25:01. | :25:06. | |
national attention and VIP visitors, from royalty to | :25:07. | :25:14. | |
politicians. Some were more welcome than others. In the end, thd Prime | :25:15. | :25:21. | |
Minister himself stepped in to promise what the people of Somerset | :25:22. | :25:24. | |
have been demanding for years. More dredging needs to be done and it | :25:25. | :25:31. | |
will be done. As I said on Friday, we need to learn lessons from the | :25:32. | :25:36. | |
past him and that means mord dredging will take place. `` from | :25:37. | :25:43. | |
the past, and that means. Pdople want solutions, not answers. This | :25:44. | :25:51. | |
man, now retired was once the flood defence manager with the Environment | :25:52. | :25:56. | |
Agency in Somerset. My concern is that what we `re doing | :25:57. | :26:02. | |
here, in doing the dredging but `` because the Prime Minister says so, | :26:03. | :26:08. | |
is giving people hope. Thesd people have been devastated and thdy need | :26:09. | :26:12. | |
to plan their future and it would be fair to tell them the truth, not | :26:13. | :26:19. | |
that dredging will solve evdrything. So, politicians of the highdst level | :26:20. | :26:24. | |
have reacted to the ongoing flooding crisis here in Somerset, but the | :26:25. | :26:30. | |
question is, how they reactdd to genuinely fix the problem, or are | :26:31. | :26:34. | |
they merely telling the flood victims of Somerset what thdy want | :26:35. | :26:38. | |
to hear? Oh they make good on their pledges? And even if they do, will | :26:39. | :26:44. | |
that prevent flooding like this from happening again. `` will thdy make | :26:45. | :26:50. | |
good. Let's talk about that word, dredging. | :26:51. | :26:57. | |
We have already talked about it Our next question comes from a lan who | :26:58. | :27:03. | |
runs a business. Hello. Why did the Environment Agency not dredge the | :27:04. | :27:13. | |
rivers when the cost of it pales in significance in comparison to the | :27:14. | :27:17. | |
cost of cleaning it up? We were constantly told there was no budget | :27:18. | :27:20. | |
and the cost of the clean`up was absolutely enormous by comp`rison. | :27:21. | :27:26. | |
We have completely lost our business. We have had to move our | :27:27. | :27:30. | |
business to another factory that we have had to rent. We owned the | :27:31. | :27:35. | |
property on the Somerset Levels and we have had to set up again. Why | :27:36. | :27:44. | |
have you not stretched? Over the past 25 years, successive | :27:45. | :27:47. | |
governments have moved investment towards using the money to protect | :27:48. | :27:53. | |
as many people and propertids as possible. That inevitably h`s meant | :27:54. | :27:57. | |
that sparsely populated are`s have not benefited of `` as much. 1. | :27:58. | :28:04. | |
million houses have been protected over this three month. . Huge | :28:05. | :28:14. | |
sympathy for the 120 or 150 that have been flooded, but it does not | :28:15. | :28:20. | |
stack up against benefit cases for other parts of the country. So if | :28:21. | :28:24. | |
you spend ?1 and flood prevdntion you have to sound `` save ?8 in | :28:25. | :28:37. | |
damages? We wanted to do thd dredge after 2012, and that was worked out | :28:38. | :28:42. | |
with the IDB, but the amount of money that the... ?160,000 was put | :28:43. | :28:52. | |
forward for that. The Countx Council put in ?300,000. We then nedded to | :28:53. | :28:59. | |
raise the rest of the money. Is it that you wanted to dredge btt you | :29:00. | :29:03. | |
could not afford it, or you did not really want to dredge? After 20 2, | :29:04. | :29:10. | |
we employed consultants to look at what the right options were, and | :29:11. | :29:15. | |
trudging with most definitely have delayed the onset of flooding in | :29:16. | :29:25. | |
2013`14. It would have meant the flooding was not as extensive. So it | :29:26. | :29:32. | |
was a mistake not to do it? It is a shame, and that is a real | :29:33. | :29:38. | |
understatement, that we did not get flooding `` funding through 201 so | :29:39. | :29:42. | |
we could get on with that. So you wanted to dredge but you cotld not | :29:43. | :29:46. | |
afford it? If that is the w`y you want to put it. Is that the way you | :29:47. | :29:52. | |
want to put it? Well, in terms of competing demands in the cotntry, we | :29:53. | :29:59. | |
have to follow that formula. Chris Parker is here. Where are you? Just | :30:00. | :30:04. | |
give us the academic view of the dredging. Dredging can work in some | :30:05. | :30:13. | |
places at certain times. Thd way it works is you increase the | :30:14. | :30:18. | |
cross`sectional area, and there you `` thereby you increase the volume | :30:19. | :30:25. | |
of water that can fit through the channel. It has been less stccessful | :30:26. | :30:32. | |
on the levels for three different reasons. The first reason is the | :30:33. | :30:39. | |
slope of the levels. Even though you are increasing the cross`sectional | :30:40. | :30:47. | |
area, the amount of water that can lead is reduced. Let's just cut to | :30:48. | :30:51. | |
the Chase. Does that mean that they should not be dredged? It mdans that | :30:52. | :30:59. | |
money spent on dredging and Somerset Levels could be better spent | :31:00. | :31:04. | |
elsewhere. `` and the Somerset Levels. You are saying it is not | :31:05. | :31:10. | |
worth the money. That is not so If you look at the results dond in the | :31:11. | :31:19. | |
1960s, you will find that the river is now running at less than 60% of | :31:20. | :31:24. | |
its capacity at that time. The riverbed has come up I nearly three | :31:25. | :31:33. | |
metres. `` by nearly three letres. I was in a meeting with Lord Smith a | :31:34. | :31:38. | |
few weeks ago when he came to visit, and he guaranteed us that | :31:39. | :31:43. | |
they were going to dredge two different rivers. Why did hd say | :31:44. | :31:50. | |
that if I was no point in doing it? Let's bring in Sue Armstrong Brown | :31:51. | :32:04. | |
from the RSPCA `` RS DB. Yot are not a fan of dredging, are you? It can | :32:05. | :32:10. | |
be used to speed up water going down the river. It would not havd stopped | :32:11. | :32:17. | |
these floods. It would have helped the water get out quicker if it had | :32:18. | :32:21. | |
been done. We use it sometiles as a conservation tool am a but broadly, | :32:22. | :32:28. | |
it is an incredible `` tool, but broadly, it is hard to get right. | :32:29. | :32:35. | |
This crisis has left so manx people in awful situations am a but there | :32:36. | :32:40. | |
has been an oversimplificathon of the solutions. `` awful sittations, | :32:41. | :32:45. | |
but there has been an oversimplification of the solutions. | :32:46. | :32:52. | |
Apparently the government rtns the flood defence agency, which is | :32:53. | :32:55. | |
marvelous, but is not reallx true. We do not have that amount of power. | :32:56. | :33:01. | |
We do campaign against dredging too much. Rivers are a place whdre water | :33:02. | :33:09. | |
flows from land to sea, and that is the critical function we ard talking | :33:10. | :33:14. | |
about at the moment. But also, there are habitats for wildlife, things | :33:15. | :33:18. | |
that most of the people herd in the audience loves. | :33:19. | :33:25. | |
The gentleman with the fluorescent jacket. You say about the money not | :33:26. | :33:31. | |
being well spent, but how mtch is it with the costing the governlent and | :33:32. | :33:35. | |
the taxpayer to higher in the palms and engineers to run them, the | :33:36. | :33:40. | |
authorities, all the people working on this, and how much is thd clear | :33:41. | :33:44. | |
up going to cost? What about the wider point about the environment, | :33:45. | :33:49. | |
and that we share the environment with these creatures? | :33:50. | :33:56. | |
These are man`made channels in Somerset. I would agree with the | :33:57. | :34:03. | |
lady from the RSPB. There are not `` there are places where you would not | :34:04. | :34:07. | |
want to dredge because it could increase the flow into it the dam | :34:08. | :34:14. | |
stream regions. The function of them is drainage and not environlent We | :34:15. | :34:20. | |
need to get the balance right between the environment and the | :34:21. | :34:24. | |
dredging, but they are therd to perform a function of drain`ge and | :34:25. | :34:30. | |
to pass the water to the lowland. Do people accept that just to say | :34:31. | :34:36. | |
dredge is just an oversimplification? It is the | :34:37. | :34:41. | |
obvious thing to do. We worked out the cost of dredging over a 20 year | :34:42. | :34:49. | |
period, and it is far cheapdr than the cost of pumping over th`t same | :34:50. | :34:54. | |
period. This was over three of the Moore's. We did not know at that | :34:55. | :34:59. | |
time that the flood of this winter were going to be nearly as high in | :35:00. | :35:05. | |
fact the cost of all this ptmping his ruinous compared to the cost of | :35:06. | :35:09. | |
dredging. I want to bring in James one more time. Your family have been | :35:10. | :35:16. | |
on these lands for 150 years. You think there should be more dredging. | :35:17. | :35:26. | |
It will run down and run all over the house and caused more d`mage. If | :35:27. | :35:31. | |
you clear the cutter, the w`ter will go into the drains. If you have a | :35:32. | :35:37. | |
channel that is silted up, ht is 50% more water going down the channel. | :35:38. | :35:44. | |
What is your land like? How high is the water now? ) is `` right now it | :35:45. | :35:53. | |
is about 12 foot deep. It h`s gone down for foot in the last shx days. | :35:54. | :35:58. | |
What would it have been likd had they dredged? It would not have been | :35:59. | :36:03. | |
flooded. We have had a huge amount of rain but it would not have | :36:04. | :36:08. | |
thought about it might have come `` it would not have come into the | :36:09. | :36:17. | |
house. Following on from thd house the `` comment about man`made, the | :36:18. | :36:21. | |
Somerset Levels is a man`made environment, and therefore requires | :36:22. | :36:26. | |
men of management, and my qtestion is, should the conference `` | :36:27. | :36:30. | |
conservationists not seek ott natural help with tats elsewhere in | :36:31. | :36:38. | |
the country? `` habitats. That is absolutely right. This is a unique | :36:39. | :36:42. | |
place that has evolved over centuries of men, and would need | :36:43. | :36:47. | |
think about it, they have evolved along with it. One of the local MPs | :36:48. | :36:58. | |
claimed that ?31 million had been spent to bring a bird sancttary but | :36:59. | :37:03. | |
they couldn't find any monex to dredge. I would like to shoot a few | :37:04. | :37:10. | |
sacred cows if I could. It was ?20 million, not ?31 million. | :37:11. | :37:18. | |
Let me finish, please. Second, that was something to protect hotses in | :37:19. | :37:23. | |
the village from the coastal surges that we had seen. That is p`rt of | :37:24. | :37:29. | |
the solution for the future. You cannot pour enough can't trdat to | :37:30. | :37:34. | |
protect all of our houses from the storm surges. `` enough concrete. | :37:35. | :37:40. | |
The statistics show that we are very likely to see that our flood risk | :37:41. | :37:48. | |
nationally is going to go up. ? 0 million extra is going to h`ve to be | :37:49. | :37:52. | |
spent year on year I'll stop what really matters is thinking of the | :37:53. | :37:57. | |
proactive management solutions were the future. `` spent year on year. | :37:58. | :38:05. | |
Do not forget, you can get hnvolved and footer. Richard from thd | :38:06. | :38:13. | |
Environment Agency. `` on Twitter. Were you being bullied not to | :38:14. | :38:18. | |
dredge? Absolutely not. Our main interest is to protect | :38:19. | :38:25. | |
people. Are you as one agency.. You are you looking after? Birds or | :38:26. | :38:30. | |
people? We are looking after people and property. | :38:31. | :38:38. | |
In the pecking order. Peopld come first and property, second. Then | :38:39. | :38:44. | |
there has to be a balance, because we do not want to live in a concrete | :38:45. | :38:49. | |
jungle. This is about getting a balance. People in Somerset live in | :38:50. | :38:53. | |
a very special place and it is the people there that make it a special | :38:54. | :38:56. | |
place because of the way thdy farm, and a lot of the money that comes in | :38:57. | :39:00. | |
through those subsidies to lake sure that there are little bits of | :39:01. | :39:05. | |
fields, that is money that comes into the economy and is part of the | :39:06. | :39:12. | |
farming economy and the levdls. If we cannot farm, the birds would not | :39:13. | :39:14. | |
be there. At the moment, the situation is one | :39:15. | :39:20. | |
where we cannot farm. I do not care how much money you pump in, unless | :39:21. | :39:25. | |
the ground is farmed, the bhrds will not be there. That is true, so the | :39:26. | :39:31. | |
nature that lives in Somersdt Levels depends on management. If you took | :39:32. | :39:35. | |
the farmers out to the song, you would not have the wildlife that | :39:36. | :39:38. | |
makes this such a unique and special place. `` outs to the swamp. We need | :39:39. | :39:44. | |
to manage the levels to a place where they... The people who work | :39:45. | :39:50. | |
the land and that this area extremely well, and the academics | :39:51. | :39:55. | |
and the people in Whitehall who know the subject from a different point | :39:56. | :39:58. | |
of view, who is right? Who should be believe as taxpayers | :39:59. | :40:05. | |
will protect the environment? We should believe the farmers. A couple | :40:06. | :40:13. | |
more comments. There is a fundamental question which has not | :40:14. | :40:17. | |
been answered. We back in the 1 00 and 1700 is the Dutch enginders | :40:18. | :40:20. | |
designed a system for water management. The question th`t has to | :40:21. | :40:27. | |
be asked is whether it is fht for Palm has today given climathc | :40:28. | :40:31. | |
changes and whatever the thdn minister says he cannot change the | :40:32. | :40:36. | |
jets scream. `` isn't fit for purpose. If it is, it `` is it an | :40:37. | :40:42. | |
eight kilometre dredge or is there something else? That is somdthing we | :40:43. | :40:48. | |
are going to come onto it. Some people are still out of thehr homes | :40:49. | :40:52. | |
and who knows for how long. Like many families, Dee and her daughter | :40:53. | :41:05. | |
had to leave their house and will be in rented accommodation for many | :41:06. | :41:06. | |
months. The helicopter came right over our | :41:07. | :41:24. | |
house. They started shouting to evacuate. So we all worked together | :41:25. | :41:30. | |
in my family, got all worked together in my family, got `ll of | :41:31. | :41:37. | |
the stuff in the attic. We lived in what we stayed in so I was stood in | :41:38. | :41:44. | |
pyjamas. That is always it. `` all iLife in. It had a very tangible | :41:45. | :41:52. | |
feel of utter panic. Nobody knew what to say. Nobody knew how to | :41:53. | :41:57. | |
advise. Everybody had a different opinion about it. As a result, the | :41:58. | :42:04. | |
villagers were left, scarpered, lost and frightened. `` left scarpered. I | :42:05. | :42:17. | |
felt like I was in, like, Thtanic. But without a boat! And I w`s | :42:18. | :42:23. | |
just... The whole village w`s going down in water. I did actually go | :42:24. | :42:30. | |
into school with my welly boots on because I did not have my school | :42:31. | :42:34. | |
shoes. We did a 30 hour danceable and in my wellies. It was vdry | :42:35. | :42:41. | |
painful. `` I did a 30 hour dance contest. We endeavour to make sure | :42:42. | :42:48. | |
that she is kept stable bec`use she has to function as a nine`ydar`old. | :42:49. | :42:52. | |
We do not want her to feel like a thick but I want all my children to | :42:53. | :42:57. | |
eventually come back in ten years' time and say, " do you remelber when | :42:58. | :43:02. | |
we were flooded?!" And see ht as the positive. `` feel like a victim I | :43:03. | :43:09. | |
want to go back to my house because it feels like this is a holhday home | :43:10. | :43:16. | |
and I am staying here for, like five or two days. But it is not It | :43:17. | :43:21. | |
is actually a year and sometimes I really want to go back to mx house. | :43:22. | :43:35. | |
If I was offered the money to buy my house outright to go, as much as I | :43:36. | :43:43. | |
love my village and my neighbours, I probably would. As much as H would | :43:44. | :43:47. | |
hate to leave everybody behhnd those I cannot do this again. I c`nnot! I | :43:48. | :43:52. | |
cannot do this again. I cannot see my kids go through it. I cannot see | :43:53. | :43:56. | |
myself and my partner go through it. No. That would be it. | :43:57. | :44:07. | |
And Dee is here now. What a remarkable daughter you havd got! | :44:08. | :44:14. | |
Chatty to say the least. How are things now? Still hard. Not as hard | :44:15. | :44:18. | |
as the people that rely on the labels for a living but yes, it is | :44:19. | :44:24. | |
hard. `` relying on the land for a living. It is hard to keep lorale | :44:25. | :44:28. | |
and when you think that you have got 12 months minimum to keep going | :44:29. | :44:35. | |
yes. Can you see the end in sight? No. We have been told 12 months but | :44:36. | :44:42. | |
living with five children, day to day, it is hard. So for somdbody to | :44:43. | :44:48. | |
say that they are sorry and we are going to take your house and | :44:49. | :44:53. | |
everything you considered normal and sort yourself out for 12 months and | :44:54. | :44:56. | |
then we will think about giving it back, I cannot see the light at the | :44:57. | :45:01. | |
end of the tunnel. Do you own your house or rented question we are | :45:02. | :45:07. | |
mortgage. How much is your house worth no question zero, as luch as | :45:08. | :45:12. | |
everybody else in this room. We have lost everything. The water hs well | :45:13. | :45:18. | |
received. The council will bring the mobs and buckets and will do the | :45:19. | :45:23. | |
best that they can to mop up the job that sadly was left to lead in the | :45:24. | :45:27. | |
first place. `` the mops and buckets. It will be ours sat here | :45:28. | :45:34. | |
working out the cost. My qudstion is that raising five small children, if | :45:35. | :45:41. | |
I was, as I said on the BT, if I was to have to go through this `gain | :45:42. | :45:45. | |
next year, we would fail. As a family, we would fill. My qtestion | :45:46. | :45:50. | |
is, if you cannot guarantee that this water will not come ag`in and | :45:51. | :45:55. | |
they are not going to flood an entire village... This is not the | :45:56. | :45:59. | |
Thames where it was an overspill, you flooded an entire community If | :46:00. | :46:03. | |
you cannot guarantee that, who is going to buy my house? Wherd is my | :46:04. | :46:08. | |
children's inheritance? At the minute, it is gone. Tessa, hf the | :46:09. | :46:14. | |
people here cannot be guaranteed a drive home, should the Government | :46:15. | :46:18. | |
step in and say that they whll buy the house? No. I think therd is an | :46:19. | :46:25. | |
alternative to stop I think there are plans... I gather there is a | :46:26. | :46:29. | |
plan being put together at the moment that was meant to be | :46:30. | :46:32. | |
completed this week. `` I think there is an alternative. Thdre are | :46:33. | :46:37. | |
things that could have been done to alleviate the problem. Frankly, you | :46:38. | :46:42. | |
know, in my area, the land hs all man managed. It was man cre`ted She | :46:43. | :46:50. | |
wants to know if anybody will Biros. We need to... `` if anybody will | :46:51. | :47:00. | |
buy. The lady said herself house is nothing. How many people ard in the | :47:01. | :47:05. | |
position that their houses worth nothing? Six people. James behind | :47:06. | :47:11. | |
me. There are little pots of money that I am trying to work out whether | :47:12. | :47:16. | |
they are one, two or three or they are being sent to multiple counties. | :47:17. | :47:19. | |
There are various things put together to make it better for | :47:20. | :47:22. | |
people but actually we need to take action. We talked about it last year | :47:23. | :47:26. | |
and here we are. There is no guarantee it is not going to happen | :47:27. | :47:29. | |
at some point. We have had ht happened three times in six years. | :47:30. | :47:33. | |
We have to make sure that somebody is control, the plan is ready and we | :47:34. | :47:37. | |
do something. Will those people who do have properties at our flooded | :47:38. | :47:40. | |
will be put their hands up `nd keep them up if you would know, hf the | :47:41. | :47:43. | |
Government said they would give you a check to buy your house at market | :47:44. | :47:49. | |
value and you can leave, how many people would leave? Keep yotr hands | :47:50. | :47:53. | |
up if you would. One, two, three, four, five. We have five people who | :47:54. | :47:58. | |
would call it a day. What would it mean for you to leave your home It | :47:59. | :48:03. | |
is something we have lived hn this house for 28 years. This is our | :48:04. | :48:07. | |
heritage. We have got so much involvement and it would me`n | :48:08. | :48:12. | |
leaving our friends and famhly. You would do it? If there was going to | :48:13. | :48:17. | |
be going through this, we would do it if there was no guaranted and it | :48:18. | :48:20. | |
would be year, year out it happened last year, what I am appalldd by, | :48:21. | :48:26. | |
there have been successive government reports produced in 002, | :48:27. | :48:32. | |
the flooding summit last ye`r and national politicians and local | :48:33. | :48:34. | |
politicians did not listen `nd see where the resources where to sort | :48:35. | :48:41. | |
out the problem. Richard, is it sensible to try to save A`ldvels, | :48:42. | :48:45. | |
given that we are told the climate is changing, levels are rishng? `` | :48:46. | :48:51. | |
to save the land. A lot of properties are at or near sda level. | :48:52. | :48:54. | |
Should people say they will go and live summer elves and we should hand | :48:55. | :49:00. | |
is over to nature? I think this is a mixed economy. `` somewhere else. I | :49:01. | :49:06. | |
think everybody knows that some dredging of the type we are talking | :49:07. | :49:08. | |
about will help it. We're also talking about a number of other | :49:09. | :49:12. | |
things, like relief channel. In the long term, should the `` should the | :49:13. | :49:21. | |
Levels be abandoned? If you abandon them, you will lose two or three | :49:22. | :49:26. | |
things. You will lose a lot of communities, the wildlife that is | :49:27. | :49:35. | |
there, that is there to `` why it is designated as a special place. This | :49:36. | :49:38. | |
is something that the community and agencies can work together on. I | :49:39. | :49:41. | |
think it would be wrong to say that we can prevent flooding bec`use I do | :49:42. | :49:46. | |
not think we can. I think it could need substantially reduced. Full | :49:47. | :49:54. | |
like it or lump it? We are one of the last hours before Bridgwater and | :49:55. | :49:58. | |
really, if we had had two more inches of rain, another eight inches | :49:59. | :50:02. | |
or more, Bridgwater, and we have seen by all the work of makhng the | :50:03. | :50:08. | |
Dutch pumps in and emergenches, they are next. There is no other alleged | :50:09. | :50:10. | |
to fill up. CHEERING | :50:11. | :50:18. | |
You cannot use the moors as a storage pen to have them flooded all | :50:19. | :50:21. | |
the time. Is that what you are doing? Of | :50:22. | :50:31. | |
course they are. Certainly the moors her historical and these lands which | :50:32. | :50:35. | |
have been flooded in the wax that they are for hundreds of ye`rs. Not | :50:36. | :50:39. | |
at this level. But we have to remember that we have just had the | :50:40. | :50:45. | |
wettest winter for 250 years. One of the things we will have to consider | :50:46. | :50:50. | |
is what do we do? Do we protect up to a 250 euros event or do we say | :50:51. | :50:55. | |
100 year event? We have got to work out what is economic. `` 250 year | :50:56. | :51:00. | |
event. There was some properties that flood every year. Have you | :51:01. | :51:05. | |
deliberately allowed areas to flood to protect Bridgwater? The spillway | :51:06. | :51:12. | |
is... The spillways are where they have been and we do not open these | :51:13. | :51:19. | |
then the water goes over thdm. The reason there are spillways hs | :51:20. | :51:24. | |
because we try to control when it goes. If we did not have a spillway, | :51:25. | :51:29. | |
it would go over it. It is not an unreasonable thing to do thhs to | :51:30. | :51:34. | |
protect Bridgwater. It is there to protect the whole of the levels and | :51:35. | :51:37. | |
murders. If you let it come out everywhere, it would randomly flood | :51:38. | :51:42. | |
all sorts of different parts of the levels and murders. `` moors. Sugar | :51:43. | :51:48. | |
levels be abandoned? They should not be abandoned but we do need to be | :51:49. | :51:52. | |
much more creative about wh`t the future is going to be. Clim`te | :51:53. | :51:57. | |
change... All of the predictions of thing that we are going to see more | :51:58. | :52:02. | |
of this sort of event. This year, it was a crisis and unique. An amazing | :52:03. | :52:08. | |
response from the community and the huge volunteer effort. Would that be | :52:09. | :52:11. | |
there if it happened every xear I do not think so. I think we need to | :52:12. | :52:18. | |
have a plan and that is to not only include making sure the | :52:19. | :52:20. | |
infrastructure is suitable `nd can move the water around appropriately | :52:21. | :52:24. | |
and get it but it also needs to look at the wider area. This is ` | :52:25. | :52:28. | |
national problem. 50% of thd foil, about half of the soil and the | :52:29. | :52:33. | |
catchment, are managed so that their companion compacted. A response | :52:34. | :52:37. | |
would be nice for somebody who has not spoken before. I am the animal | :52:38. | :52:44. | |
quart meter for Flag. We have got most of the animals moved, re`homed, | :52:45. | :52:46. | |
flight and lots of donations coming in. 20 years ago, my partner was | :52:47. | :52:51. | |
employed to dredge the banks. The silt was put on top of the banks, | :52:52. | :52:56. | |
the banks where rotating, replanted, problem solved. Hn the | :52:57. | :53:01. | |
last four days, I have had hn three dead barn owls. I run my own rescue | :53:02. | :53:07. | |
centre. Now, everybody wants to protect the British wildlifd. These | :53:08. | :53:11. | |
barn owls are dying because the farmland is under water, thdre is no | :53:12. | :53:14. | |
crops, there is no mice, thdre is no food. | :53:15. | :53:18. | |
Are you under the impression, do you believe, that the labels can be | :53:19. | :53:26. | |
saved? Exactly as Jane said. If you're guttering is blocked, you | :53:27. | :53:29. | |
unblock it. The water will run. Years ago, the rivers were dredged, | :53:30. | :53:34. | |
it was put on the banks which made the banks higher. It wasn't so much | :53:35. | :53:40. | |
housing with all of the watdr coming from other areas, Taunton, Xeovil, . | :53:41. | :53:52. | |
. Lots of houses planned and where is the water going to go? Pdople | :53:53. | :53:56. | |
have to live summer. Control the water so it does not flow any more | :53:57. | :54:01. | |
than when it was Greenfield. What other options are there? Thd 20 year | :54:02. | :54:05. | |
plan for is due out later this week and well we do not know what will be | :54:06. | :54:09. | |
in it, lots of suggestions `re being made, including raising the roads, | :54:10. | :54:13. | |
becoming more resilient and even a barrage on the River. What hs the | :54:14. | :54:19. | |
best way to progress from hdre? What should we do? Is there anything that | :54:20. | :54:24. | |
can stop these people going through what they have had to go through? As | :54:25. | :54:30. | |
I have said before, it can be substantially reduced. But not | :54:31. | :54:35. | |
eliminated? See Iraq not lilited. It will not be limited, does everybody | :54:36. | :54:38. | |
get that and accepted? `` it will not be eliminated. We expect it to | :54:39. | :54:45. | |
be flooded in the winter but we do not expect it to come so quhck and | :54:46. | :54:50. | |
last for long. If they had maintained the waterways and all of | :54:51. | :54:55. | |
the waterways they are meant to maintain to the proper standard we | :54:56. | :54:58. | |
would not have half the problem we have at the moment. Was this | :54:59. | :55:02. | |
neglect? From everybody? Is this neglect? I think we would nded to | :55:03. | :55:08. | |
take the matter of managing the levels a lot more seriously. I think | :55:09. | :55:13. | |
this is doable. I do not thhnk we should give up on Ted Mack `t all. | :55:14. | :55:18. | |
What joy to see in the future? We have already said we would like to | :55:19. | :55:21. | |
see the rivers dredged quitd quickly. `` we should not ghve up on | :55:22. | :55:29. | |
the Levels at all. Why not plan that we keep pumping as plan B? To stop | :55:30. | :55:36. | |
the tide coming in and lockhng the system and many more things beyond. | :55:37. | :55:41. | |
We have done this for centuries Let's go to the landscape Institute. | :55:42. | :55:46. | |
What is your view on the future I am not a Somerset person so I | :55:47. | :55:51. | |
feel... You are allowed in Bridgwater! I am a visitor from | :55:52. | :55:56. | |
Gloucestershire and we cert`inly experienced the floods in 2007. We | :55:57. | :56:02. | |
had a lot of concern that there seemed to be some knee jerk | :56:03. | :56:06. | |
responses to problems that were happening not just here but | :56:07. | :56:10. | |
elsewhere in the country. I think we are very concerned to feel that | :56:11. | :56:13. | |
there should be a much more detail and Confederate response about | :56:14. | :56:16. | |
catchment management, about what we do and how we planned throughout | :56:17. | :56:22. | |
catchment. But also about how we look at our towns and cities, as the | :56:23. | :56:26. | |
gentleman mentioned. `` much more detailed and considered response. | :56:27. | :56:30. | |
How we look at making our chties and towns more resilient. There is a | :56:31. | :56:33. | |
whole range of measures that need to be put in place. All right. I think | :56:34. | :56:40. | |
the main problem is that thd agencies are not communicathng with | :56:41. | :56:43. | |
the real people like James. There is a real big gap in real life. I think | :56:44. | :56:48. | |
we are crossing about it here but what I hear from people in | :56:49. | :56:51. | |
Boroughbridge, there is not any people from the community on these | :56:52. | :56:55. | |
consulting boards. Any other points? We have not heard from you. The | :56:56. | :56:59. | |
volunteers were there and wdre hoping. The teams are sitting here | :57:00. | :57:03. | |
in front of you, young men who have been out there at the beginning or | :57:04. | :57:07. | |
stop there as a lot more contingency and things have been worked on since | :57:08. | :57:11. | |
then. But I would just like to say a personal thank you for workhng with | :57:12. | :57:15. | |
all of these wonderful teams of people who have just come from all | :57:16. | :57:19. | |
over the place to actually be there on the front line and help out. Who | :57:20. | :57:24. | |
here has had to take help from these volunteers? I have already spoken | :57:25. | :57:29. | |
and said they were marvellots. But you had to go and ask for assistance | :57:30. | :57:35. | |
question I I did not but thdy have saved me a lot of time. Givd | :57:36. | :57:47. | |
yourself a round of applausd. How long will the community response be | :57:48. | :57:51. | |
going before you wind it down? Some houses today were straight by 1 , | :57:52. | :58:00. | |
but it will take weeks and weeks. `` stripped by teams. Where is this | :58:01. | :58:06. | |
help coming from? The Counchl and the government? It is coming from | :58:07. | :58:11. | |
volunteers and businesses and individuals that are donating from | :58:12. | :58:15. | |
across the country. Essenti`lly it is the hard work of voluntedrs at | :58:16. | :58:18. | |
this helping out, and if yot want to take part, there has been a disaster | :58:19. | :58:25. | |
on our doorstep, but we havd seen the very best people come ott to | :58:26. | :58:29. | |
help. Very good. Thank you. And that is | :58:30. | :58:37. | |
eight from this special BBC debate. We have had a passionate and | :58:38. | :58:45. | |
sometimes heated discussion. Dredging is scheduled to st`rt soon. | :58:46. | :58:52. | |
We await the 20 year plan. Our thanks to the panel on to otr | :58:53. | :58:58. | |
audience, and to you at homd for watching tonight. Let's hopd for a | :58:59. | :59:01. |