Browse content similar to 04/10/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Welcome to Manchester. The world's first industrial city, scene of the | :00:12. | :00:17. | |
Peter Loo massacre, the place where they split the at tomorrow, and now | :00:17. | :00:22. | |
the place of moinggate, going to the highest echelons of the | :00:22. | :00:28. | |
Government. Much will be explained. Much fancy Boris as the next leader, | :00:28. | :00:34. | |
but, according to us, he has written his own political obituary. | :00:34. | :00:38. | |
So there is no chance of you standing for parliament? Not a | :00:38. | :00:42. | |
snowball's chance in Hades. Tories and not a testicle between | :00:42. | :00:52. | |
them, what can this party do to make themselves more attractive to | :00:52. | :00:57. | |
the percentage of population that find themself in this state. | :00:57. | :01:04. | |
It must be the most powerful moggy in British history, not only has | :01:04. | :01:08. | |
had stopped an illegal immigrant being deported from this Government | :01:08. | :01:10. | |
t has caused a political split at the top of Government. It might | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
even rewrite the law. Before the said cat the Conservative Party was | :01:14. | :01:18. | |
planning to tackle the slightly more significant questions of this | :01:18. | :01:22. | |
summer's riots, and whether the Human Rights Act is obliging this | :01:22. | :01:31. | |
country to harbour foreign criminals. | :01:31. | :01:35. | |
She came to her conference in her kitten heels, but the Home | :01:35. | :01:38. | |
Secretary couldn't quite have imagined how the fate of a fee line | :01:38. | :01:43. | |
would come to dominate the coverage of her speech. We all know the | :01:43. | :01:46. | |
stories about the Human Rights Act. The robber who cannot be removed | :01:46. | :01:53. | |
because he has a girlfriend. The illegal immigrant, the illegal | :01:53. | :01:59. | |
immigrant who cannot be deported because, and I'm not making this up, | :01:59. | :02:08. | |
because he had a pet cat. That is why I remain of the view | :02:08. | :02:16. | |
that the Human Rights Act needs to But there was only a brief pause, | :02:16. | :02:20. | |
before judicial sources suggested the Home Secretary's account was | :02:20. | :02:25. | |
littered with errors. They said May was talked about a Bolivian | :02:26. | :02:28. | |
national, he had been allowed to stay, largely because he had | :02:29. | :02:33. | |
acquired a British girlfriend, rather than a pet. And one of | :02:33. | :02:36. | |
Theresa May's cabinet colleagues got into flap over her comments. He | :02:36. | :02:40. | |
hadn't been consulted over her wish to get rid of the Human Rights Act | :02:40. | :02:45. | |
all together. And cast doubt on the voracity of her tale. The cat | :02:45. | :02:50. | |
surprised me, I can't believe anybody was refused deportation | :02:50. | :02:53. | |
because they owned cat. If a cat featured in the case I would be | :02:53. | :02:57. | |
interested to see. In years gone by if a Conservative Home Secretary | :02:57. | :03:03. | |
mentioned a cat, you could be sure they were talking about a form of | :03:03. | :03:06. | |
corporal punishment. But these days anybody occupying the Home Office | :03:06. | :03:11. | |
would find it a tough audience here. With no mun more money to spend on | :03:11. | :03:15. | |
police officers or bigger prisoners, sometimes robust rhetoric has to | :03:15. | :03:19. | |
substitute for policy. If Theresa May hadn't been collared over her | :03:19. | :03:23. | |
comments about the cat, the focus today would have been on the crowd- | :03:23. | :03:26. | |
pleasing response to this year's riots. A lot has been said about | :03:26. | :03:32. | |
the riots and their causes. Let me get one thing straight. In the end, | :03:32. | :03:37. | |
the only cause of a crime is a criminal. Our feral underclass in | :03:37. | :03:43. | |
this country is too big, has been growing, and now needs to be | :03:43. | :03:47. | |
diminished. If people feel that there are no comebacks and no | :03:47. | :03:50. | |
boundaries, and no retribution for the small stuff, then I'm afraid | :03:50. | :03:55. | |
they will go on to commit worse crimes. As planned, all this went | :03:55. | :04:03. | |
down a storm, inside the conference haul hall. - hall. But, cach | :04:03. | :04:06. | |
beneath the surface, there was a discernable gap between the robust | :04:07. | :04:10. | |
rhetoric and reality. The papers had been blaring that Boris Johnson | :04:10. | :04:16. | |
was going to send feckless youths to boot camps. What he actually | :04:16. | :04:20. | |
announced was some afterschool clubs for kids. We set up Team | :04:20. | :04:26. | |
London, which is to make it easier for you, I'm looking at you, to be | :04:26. | :04:30. | |
a mentor, or to read to kids in schools, or to do something as | :04:30. | :04:34. | |
simple as us set up 25 new supplementry schools we will do, | :04:34. | :04:39. | |
modelled a bit on what Ray Lewis is doing, to give some of the most | :04:39. | :04:43. | |
difficult kids, the discipline, boundaries and the love they need. | :04:43. | :04:48. | |
And while Ken Clarke be moaned the lawlessness in some communities, he | :04:48. | :04:54. | |
also believes it would be a brain- free option to bang more people up. | :04:54. | :04:58. | |
Outside the conference, campaigners found a victim, they say it is a | :04:58. | :05:04. | |
more am ambitious response to the riots, which has fallen - a more | :05:04. | :05:08. | |
ambitious response to the riots which has fallen foul. Afterschool | :05:08. | :05:11. | |
clubs have been closing down and holiday play schemes. Those | :05:11. | :05:14. | |
responses are sensible. Let's look at what is missing in those areas | :05:14. | :05:18. | |
and put it back. But the scale so far has been small and it needs to | :05:18. | :05:26. | |
be expanded. Behind closed doors the Prime Minister is rehearsing | :05:26. | :05:30. | |
his speech, I'm told the tone will be optimistic. Nonetheless, he will | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
describe some of Britain's problems as the product of a broken society. | :05:34. | :05:38. | |
Pollsters say this language is very popular. They warn of political | :05:38. | :05:41. | |
dangers if very strong language isn't matched by equally strong | :05:42. | :05:44. | |
action. As on immigration where the Conservatives have talked tough, | :05:44. | :05:48. | |
but finding it harder to deliver in reality, there is a risk if they | :05:48. | :05:51. | |
talk tough on crime and young offenders, and then aren't able to | :05:51. | :05:54. | |
make a palpable difference, that people will become dissatisfied. | :05:54. | :05:57. | |
But they start with a begin presumption by the public that they | :05:57. | :06:02. | |
are the right people on the - a genuine presumption by the public | :06:02. | :06:06. | |
that they are the right people on the law and order policies. | :06:06. | :06:13. | |
this could be overshadowed by what is now being dubbed cat-gate. | :06:13. | :06:21. | |
Perhaps if politicians only mean to leave the party faithful feline | :06:22. | :06:26. | |
good, there is a chance all that was good will be lost. | :06:26. | :06:33. | |
What is the cat called? Maier. it - Maya. Was it consulted before | :06:33. | :06:38. | |
being dragged into it? It is unbelievable, but the junl judge | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
did say this illegal immigrant and his girlfriend had cat, and their | :06:42. | :06:46. | |
family life attributed to the fact he shouldn't be removed from this | :06:46. | :06:50. | |
country. It is extraordinary but it happened. You know what the | :06:50. | :06:53. | |
official position of the judicial officer at the Royal Courts of | :06:53. | :06:56. | |
Justice, that the cat had nothing to do with the decision. Let me | :06:56. | :07:00. | |
quote the judge "the evidence concerning the joint acquisition of | :07:00. | :07:05. | |
Maya, the cat, by the appleant and his partner, reinforces my | :07:05. | :07:09. | |
conclusion of the strength and quality of the family life his he | :07:09. | :07:14. | |
and his partner enjoy", the judge said it was ludicrous and why we | :07:14. | :07:17. | |
need to change the balance of the law. The Home Secretary said he's | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
not making it up, the illegal immigrant cannot be deported | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
because he had a pet cat. That is not what the judge said, he cites | :07:26. | :07:31. | |
the cat as evidence of stable home environment. What do we make of it, | :07:31. | :07:36. | |
the Home Secretary can't get Anam he can dot she has taken out of the | :07:36. | :07:40. | |
Mail right? In the last three months of this year, nearly two- | :07:40. | :07:44. | |
thirds of the deportation appeals succeeded, so we couldn't remove | :07:44. | :07:50. | |
the people, were based on this misinterpretation of Article 8, the | :07:50. | :07:52. | |
family rights under the Human Rights Act. What the Home Secretary | :07:52. | :07:56. | |
was saying today, which is perfectly sensible, we need to | :07:56. | :08:00. | |
rebalance it, to remove people who deserve to be removed. Dominic | :08:00. | :08:03. | |
Grieve, the Attorney General, said the matter of the cat is too | :08:04. | :08:09. | |
complicated for him to comment upon! The matter of the cat has | :08:09. | :08:13. | |
become appallingly complicated. You and I have managed not to have a | :08:13. | :08:16. | |
pun in the last two minutes, this is the longest period of today | :08:16. | :08:19. | |
nobody has made a cat joke. I will start. I don't think this is the | :08:19. | :08:23. | |
serious underlying issue. There is a really serious issue about who we | :08:23. | :08:27. | |
can remove from this issue, the cat flap is not contributing. Sorry, I | :08:27. | :08:31. | |
have started now. Just for the avoidance of doubt, the Justice | :08:31. | :08:36. | |
Secretary said he was sure she was wrong, Theresa May says she wasn't | :08:36. | :08:41. | |
making up. He bet her �5. Who gets the �5? I have heard what Ken said, | :08:41. | :08:45. | |
he said if the cat was involved he would be surprised, he will go and | :08:45. | :08:48. | |
have a look. There was a cat involved in this decision. | :08:48. | :08:53. | |
Theresa May won the �5? They can sort that out among themselves. | :08:53. | :08:56. | |
are now proposing you will rewrite the law? What we are saying is we | :08:56. | :09:00. | |
will change the immigration laws so you get the full effect of Article | :09:00. | :09:04. | |
8. Article 8 has two parts. One says everyone has a right to a | :09:04. | :09:08. | |
family life. The other says, that's OK, except in the following | :09:08. | :09:11. | |
circumstances, including if you are a threat to national security, if | :09:11. | :09:15. | |
you committed a serious crime, and illicit the sort of things you | :09:15. | :09:19. | |
would be expecting to be weighed in the balance. Too often the courts | :09:19. | :09:22. | |
have only taken the individual's right to a family life into account. | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
We need to change the rule so the courts are guided to take the other | :09:27. | :09:32. | |
side into account, so get a proper balanced approach to decide whether | :09:32. | :09:35. | |
or not someone stays in this country. This will never happen | :09:35. | :09:43. | |
again f indeed at all? It should never happen again. Surely this cat | :09:43. | :09:49. | |
did exist or didn't exist, we are moving into philosophy. Maya exists, | :09:49. | :09:53. | |
and she contributed to someone who probably should have been removed | :09:53. | :09:57. | |
from this country and wasn't. There are more serious cases where a | :09:57. | :10:04. | |
child has been killed and a parent claimed family life when they | :10:04. | :10:09. | |
weren't connected with the child. We wouldn't be talking about the | :10:09. | :10:12. | |
cat if the Home Secretary hadn't brought it up, he or she? | :10:12. | :10:16. | |
knowledge of the cat is not that extensive. The reason this is such | :10:16. | :10:21. | |
a vivid case, it is from three or four years ago. Lifted out of the | :10:21. | :10:25. | |
Mail? I think it was the Telegraph, to be strictly accurate. Are you | :10:25. | :10:30. | |
sure? I dare say several newspapers covered T precisely because it was | :10:30. | :10:35. | |
such a vivid case. It was, at the comic end of the spectrum of | :10:35. | :10:38. | |
judicial decisions that normal people would think this is not | :10:38. | :10:42. | |
common sense. There are much more serious decisions where things fly | :10:42. | :10:45. | |
in the face of common sense. What the Home Secretary has announced | :10:45. | :10:50. | |
today is we will change the balance so we get some common sense in the | :10:50. | :10:54. | |
deportation system. And most people in this country who have no right | :10:54. | :11:01. | |
to stay here won't be able to. Apart from the cat's contribution, | :11:01. | :11:06. | |
by a long margin the funnyist thing came from Boris Johnson, old Oxford | :11:06. | :11:11. | |
playmate of the Prime Minister. Mayor of London and cyclist, and | :11:11. | :11:14. | |
hairdresser's despair, is one of the most well known Tories in | :11:14. | :11:19. | |
Britain and has a towering ambition, so many consider him the next | :11:19. | :11:25. | |
perfect leader. I met with him and asked him about the riots. Da David | :11:25. | :11:29. | |
Cameron described the riots as revealing a sickness in parts of | :11:29. | :11:35. | |
society, do you agree? I certainly do. I think the riots were a | :11:35. | :11:38. | |
flipping up of a big fat rock and seeing some things I think we had | :11:38. | :11:44. | |
been hiding from ourselves. Obviously left-wing people will say | :11:44. | :11:47. | |
it is all about spending more money and it is about the budget cuts. | :11:47. | :11:50. | |
Others will say it is about boundaries and giving kids | :11:50. | :11:56. | |
discipline and all the rest of it. Certainly I think that there are | :11:56. | :12:01. | |
issues. You have to look at the sense of easy entitlement too many | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
young people have, and you also have to look at ways of steering | :12:05. | :12:13. | |
them on to better things. To say there is a problem, or a sickness | :12:13. | :12:17. | |
or whatever metaphor you want to use is to me quite sensible. Would | :12:17. | :12:21. | |
you like to withdraw your comment when you described the...I Know | :12:21. | :12:26. | |
what you are going to say. I don't withdraw my comment that if you say | :12:26. | :12:34. | |
Britain is broken. You said it was piffle? OK, I think I was right. | :12:34. | :12:37. | |
Because, this is a distinction without a difference. What I'm | :12:37. | :12:40. | |
saying, let's be absolutely clear, I think Britain is the most | :12:40. | :12:45. | |
fantastic country on earth. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It is a very important | :12:45. | :12:50. | |
point. The accusation that parts of it is sick is true? Yes, but that | :12:51. | :12:57. | |
doesn't mean that the machine, the organism as a whole is fatally | :12:57. | :13:02. | |
flawed. To say something is broken, if you say that camera is broken it | :13:02. | :13:06. | |
wouldn't function at all. Would it? It could be broken and still | :13:06. | :13:12. | |
function, obviously? No, if it was broken. In common parlance, Jeremy, | :13:12. | :13:18. | |
if you said that camera was broken it wouldn't function. If you had a | :13:18. | :13:20. | |
broken camera but it was still working people wouldn't understand | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
what you were saying. That camera is not broken, when I look at it | :13:24. | :13:30. | |
there are parts of the underside of that camera that are a bit scuffed. | :13:30. | :13:34. | |
Bits of Britain are scuffed, that is what you are saying? Things are | :13:34. | :13:38. | |
always in need of attention, there are problems always in need of | :13:38. | :13:41. | |
addressing and clearly there are very serious issues in our society | :13:41. | :13:47. | |
that need tackling. What the riots showed. Is inequality is one of | :13:47. | :13:53. | |
them, do you think we are too unequal as a society? Yes I do. | :13:53. | :13:57. | |
make it worse, you do want to make it worse, don't you? No. You have | :13:57. | :14:01. | |
to look at the reasons. You want to abolish the 50p rate of tax, that | :14:01. | :14:04. | |
would make inequality worse? Wouldn't or would? It would, | :14:05. | :14:08. | |
clearly it would. Richer people would have more money left? I'm not | :14:08. | :14:12. | |
certain that is true. As you know, you can't necessarily make poor | :14:12. | :14:18. | |
people richer by making rich people poorer. What you can do though you | :14:18. | :14:21. | |
can. Wouldn't richer people have more money in their pockets, by | :14:21. | :14:25. | |
definition? There is an argument to be had about competitiveness. | :14:25. | :14:29. | |
is a different argument? It is exactly the same argument. You have | :14:29. | :14:32. | |
conceded we are too unequal a society, I wonder why you think | :14:32. | :14:35. | |
rich people should be able to keep more of their country? The argument | :14:35. | :14:42. | |
s just to be clear. The argument is that if you create conditions, and | :14:42. | :14:48. | |
the right tax framework, safe city, all those. You create conditions in | :14:48. | :14:52. | |
which business can prosper, enterprise can flourish, then you | :14:52. | :14:58. | |
will drive jobs and growth for efb. That is the argument for - | :14:58. | :15:01. | |
everybody. That is the argument for a competitive tax regime. This is | :15:01. | :15:05. | |
another argument all together, I asked you about inequality? | :15:05. | :15:10. | |
asked me two questions, one about inequality and one about the 50p | :15:10. | :15:15. | |
tax rate. What I'm saying is that I can see the symbolic importance of | :15:15. | :15:21. | |
the 50p tax rate, in tough times I can certainly see it. Practically, | :15:21. | :15:24. | |
people retain more money if you remove the higher rate of tax, that | :15:25. | :15:28. | |
is self-evidently true? There is a lot of ambiguity about how much of | :15:28. | :15:33. | |
the 50p tax rate actually raises. If we're honest. And the Treasury | :15:33. | :15:37. | |
is looking into it. The second point is. That is another argument? | :15:37. | :15:42. | |
The second point is, that you have to look at the context in which a | :15:42. | :15:48. | |
city like London, the whole economy is competing. The way to tackle | :15:48. | :15:52. | |
inequality is look at what is happening to people in the bottom | :15:52. | :15:59. | |
deciles of society. Look at what they are being deprived of. We talk | :15:59. | :16:02. | |
about depravation, the issue is deprived of what by whom? It may | :16:02. | :16:08. | |
very well be what people need is they need better education, they | :16:08. | :16:11. | |
need a greater sense of...Stronger Framework, stronger sense of | :16:11. | :16:15. | |
community and sense of being loved. You have gone completely off the | :16:15. | :16:19. | |
point? I think we are completely on the point. That is what is causing | :16:19. | :16:24. | |
inequality. On the 50p rate of tax, does it bother you that the | :16:24. | :16:28. | |
Treasury, clearly regards you as an eccentric irrelevance? I'm not | :16:28. | :16:31. | |
certain that is what the Treasury thinks. If they didn't think that | :16:31. | :16:34. | |
they would have acted on your advice, wouldn't they? I think | :16:34. | :16:38. | |
there are people in the Treasury who understand very well that the | :16:38. | :16:42. | |
arguments for having high rates of taxation are not very well made out. | :16:42. | :16:49. | |
Particularly since it actually makes - the risk is it makes the UK | :16:49. | :16:54. | |
look less competitive. This is a very, very tough economic | :16:54. | :16:59. | |
environment we're in, people are being squeezed. People are facing | :16:59. | :17:03. | |
real increases in their cost of living. So when they see people | :17:03. | :17:08. | |
like me on the tele, saying high tax rates make Britain | :17:08. | :17:14. | |
uncompetitive, they think, sod all that, I don't care, the rich should | :17:14. | :17:18. | |
pay more. I can perfectly understand that argument. I'm | :17:18. | :17:22. | |
obliged to point out two things, one that the revenue that actually | :17:22. | :17:25. | |
accrues to the Treasury from the 50p tax rate is in doubt. And | :17:25. | :17:30. | |
secondly, in the long-term, perhaps even in the medium-term, you have | :17:30. | :17:36. | |
to question whether it is right for the UK to be hobbling itself with a | :17:36. | :17:41. | |
higher rate of taxation, than America, France, Germany, Japan. | :17:41. | :17:46. | |
You made that point, let's move on. What is the difference between you | :17:46. | :17:50. | |
and David Cameron? I'm Mayor of London and he's Prime Minister. I'm | :17:50. | :17:56. | |
older than him. I'm considerably heavier. What else? I beat him at | :17:56. | :18:00. | |
tennis the other day. Although I think he's probably better at | :18:00. | :18:03. | |
tennis than me. What else can I say. Politically what's the difference. | :18:03. | :18:10. | |
We know you differ on the 50p rate of tax the European referendum, | :18:10. | :18:14. | |
what else? You have just tried to answer the question. I'm trying to | :18:14. | :18:17. | |
help you, because you're talking about tennis and things, what we | :18:17. | :18:20. | |
really want to know is political differences, are there any | :18:20. | :18:26. | |
political differences between you and Cameron? Well, I think the | :18:26. | :18:29. | |
...is there really good, when did you stop beating your wife | :18:29. | :18:35. | |
questions, you cooked this one up carefully. I suspect there may be | :18:35. | :18:38. | |
some difference of emphasis, but I'm not disposed to go into them | :18:38. | :18:43. | |
now. What I want to talk about on your show, Jeremy, is I want to | :18:43. | :18:47. | |
talk about the things that matter to me. All right the things that | :18:47. | :18:51. | |
matter to you. I'm versed in the ways of the media and your | :18:51. | :18:54. | |
brilliant interviewing technique, if I talk about the differences | :18:54. | :18:57. | |
between me and Cameron, whatever they may be, all the things I have | :18:57. | :19:02. | |
been saying in the hall about what we are doing in London will be | :19:02. | :19:06. | |
completely obscured in some kind of Tory split Tory which is all you | :19:06. | :19:11. | |
want. I did want to talk about something that really matters to | :19:11. | :19:14. | |
you is your future in the party. People out there are talking all | :19:14. | :19:19. | |
the time about who will be the next leader, they see it as a race | :19:19. | :19:23. | |
between you and George Osborne. Would a Boris leadership be | :19:23. | :19:26. | |
different to the Cameron leadership? I think my chances of | :19:26. | :19:30. | |
leading the Conservative Party, are slightly less good than your | :19:30. | :19:36. | |
chances, so let's be clear. I have got, you may be about to make a bid | :19:36. | :19:41. | |
for it, I don't know. If they are that good, I might! So can we take | :19:41. | :19:47. | |
it, then, given your whole hearted commitment to your role as Mayor of | :19:47. | :19:49. | |
London, that if you are re-elected, there is no possibility of you | :19:49. | :19:53. | |
standing for parliament? There is not a snowball's chance in Hades, | :19:53. | :20:02. | |
or a cat's chance. No. Absolutely out of the question? If you are | :20:02. | :20:06. | |
someone, you love politics, and you are fascinated in doing things, the | :20:06. | :20:10. | |
job of Mayor of London is simply the most engrossing and | :20:11. | :20:15. | |
intoxicating in a metaphorical way, job that you could possibly do. It | :20:15. | :20:20. | |
gluts the appetite for power, executive authority, it is | :20:20. | :20:25. | |
endlessly absorbing. What else can I say about it. There are no | :20:25. | :20:29. | |
circumstances in which you would allow your name to go forward to | :20:29. | :20:33. | |
become an MP while you are Mayor of London? No, you can't seek a | :20:33. | :20:38. | |
mandate to do one thing. What is the scheme, you become the first | :20:38. | :20:43. | |
Tory leader in the House of Lords since Lord Salisbuy? What will | :20:44. | :20:47. | |
baffle me, I will be your campaign manager, as I have said you have a | :20:47. | :20:53. | |
better chance than I do. I think you might well, you have got the | :20:53. | :20:59. | |
gravitas, you have got the name recognition. Everybody knows that | :20:59. | :21:04. | |
you're probably quite Conservative, even though you levitate over party | :21:04. | :21:08. | |
politics. You would be an ideal candidate. What about it? Down the | :21:08. | :21:17. | |
line, Dave is eventually going to pack it in? Have you finished? | :21:17. | :21:23. | |
an offer. It's very generous, but I'm going to be declining it. You | :21:23. | :21:31. | |
mentioned Dave. Is it true that you have always felt yourself slightly | :21:31. | :21:36. | |
intellectually inferior? Inferior? No. No. To whom? To David Cameron, | :21:36. | :21:41. | |
your leader? No. That's a new one. No I haven't, I can see where this | :21:41. | :21:47. | |
is leading, it is not something you know, logically I must either think | :21:47. | :21:51. | |
myself superior or inferior to any human being. We know you are a | :21:51. | :21:55. | |
shrinking violet and naturally modest, but it is not true? No. It | :21:55. | :21:59. | |
is the first time I have heard of it. The first time you have heard | :21:59. | :22:06. | |
of it? Yes. This goes back to the days when he got a 1st and you | :22:06. | :22:16. | |
:22:16. | :22:16. | ||
didn't? Ah. Does that still rankle? It would if it wasn't his 1st was | :22:16. | :22:21. | |
in PPE. Which is an inferior subject to your own? Look, I mean, | :22:22. | :22:26. | |
this is playground stuff Jeremy. You are quite right, it is. This is | :22:26. | :22:30. | |
playground stuff. And your performance has not been | :22:30. | :22:34. | |
playground-like! I have done my best under some pretty...what | :22:34. | :22:38. | |
people want to hear about is the things that we are doing in London. | :22:38. | :22:44. | |
That was what I was talking about today. It certainly was. I'm very | :22:44. | :22:47. | |
proud of what we have achieved. What I said about crime matters a | :22:47. | :22:50. | |
great deal to people, what I said about investing in transport | :22:50. | :22:55. | |
matters a great deal to people. As everybody knows I'm hugely lucky to | :22:55. | :22:59. | |
be doing this job. The thrust of what you are asking me, is do I see | :22:59. | :23:03. | |
this as a stepping stone. It is not, it is something that I love doing, | :23:03. | :23:08. | |
I really don't, as I said ageing ago, I don't think I will do | :23:08. | :23:13. | |
another big - ages ago, I don't think I will do another big job in | :23:13. | :23:16. | |
politics now. It is a completely wonderful and fascinating job. All | :23:16. | :23:20. | |
I want to do is persuade people I have another four years of good | :23:20. | :23:26. | |
stuff in us, that is what I'm doing. Boris Johnson thanks. Thank you. | :23:26. | :23:31. | |
Let's see how our randomly selected or self-invited, indeed, audience | :23:31. | :23:37. | |
of Tory women, or ladies, feel about. Who thinks Boris Johnson is | :23:37. | :23:44. | |
a potential future leader then? That's finished his career. Not one | :23:44. | :23:50. | |
of you? Not one of you? Well that kills | :23:50. | :23:54. | |
that discussion. So, what is it about him, why isn't he suitable? | :23:54. | :23:59. | |
It's not that he's not suitable, he's just very good as the mayor. | :23:59. | :24:05. | |
Why should he want to be anything else. After that, he's still a | :24:05. | :24:12. | |
young man. He's not credible. isn't he credible? He's too out | :24:12. | :24:20. | |
there. His hair says it all, really, doesn't it. He hasn't got prime | :24:20. | :24:24. | |
ministerial hair? He hasn't got the look. He's great for the role he's | :24:24. | :24:29. | |
doing, he's doing a great job. is quite devisive, half the people | :24:29. | :24:33. | |
think he's great, others think he's mad. I wish I had spoken to you | :24:33. | :24:37. | |
before I interviewed him. You in the second row there, please? | :24:38. | :24:41. | |
are you discussing this, David Cameron hasn't had his time yet, I | :24:41. | :24:45. | |
hope he will be around for much longer. What a loyal person you are. | :24:45. | :24:51. | |
Anybody else like to enlighten us on Boris Johnson's prospects for | :24:51. | :24:59. | |
the leadership? There are stronger candidates out there. As these | :24:59. | :25:04. | |
party members are only too aware, the Conservatives haven't won an | :25:04. | :25:07. | |
overall majority in a general election since 1992. Nearly 20 | :25:07. | :25:10. | |
years ago. If they are to do it in the next election, and free | :25:10. | :25:13. | |
themselves of the questionable delights of sharing power with | :25:13. | :25:17. | |
people they so recently considered unfit to manage a cat litter tray, | :25:17. | :25:20. | |
they need to find a way of appealing to women again. The task | :25:20. | :25:25. | |
is made much harder by the economic conditions in which we find | :25:25. | :25:28. | |
ourselves. David Grossman has been thinking of how they might try to | :25:28. | :25:32. | |
do that and looking at what the party needs to do to win an | :25:32. | :25:37. | |
outright majority in 2015. The political contest is | :25:37. | :25:42. | |
essentially a battle for the future. That is why, the word is all over | :25:42. | :25:45. | |
the place. Victory sends to go to whoever comes up with the most | :25:45. | :25:49. | |
credible and compelling vision. For the Conservatives right now, | :25:49. | :25:54. | |
the date they are peering towards is 2015. | :25:54. | :25:57. | |
The date when we are supposed to get our next general election. | :25:57. | :26:01. | |
This, apparently, is what the car of the future is going to look like. | :26:01. | :26:08. | |
Compact, eye firbt, and it runs on hide - efficient, and it runs on | :26:08. | :26:11. | |
hydrogen. What is the Conservative path in the future will look, what | :26:11. | :26:15. | |
policies will they run on, come 2015. We are doing Conservative | :26:15. | :26:18. | |
things in Government, that is because, unlike the previous 13 | :26:18. | :26:23. | |
years, we started to listen to the British people, and what they are | :26:23. | :26:28. | |
interested in, rather than banging on at them about the things we are | :26:28. | :26:32. | |
obsessed about. As for our electoral expediency, ideolgical | :26:32. | :26:35. | |
purity is entirely worthless if you have a Labour Government. There | :26:35. | :26:40. | |
have been moments of passion at this country. Nick Bowles is very | :26:40. | :26:43. | |
close to David Cameron, he says the Conservatives are whistling in the | :26:43. | :26:49. | |
dark if they don't focus on exactly what voters want. Spending too much | :26:49. | :26:52. | |
time and energy talking about the possibility of a referendum on | :26:52. | :26:57. | |
membership of the EU, and spending too much time talking about getting | :26:57. | :27:01. | |
rid of the 50p top rate of tax for people earning a great deal of | :27:01. | :27:05. | |
money. If we spend time on either of those subjects we would be | :27:05. | :27:09. | |
quickly punished by the public, who say they have views on both subject, | :27:09. | :27:13. | |
but neither pressing concerns for them right now, and they would feel | :27:13. | :27:16. | |
we are wasting their time, and they pay us to be there, and they want | :27:16. | :27:21. | |
us to get back to the business of making their lives better every day. | :27:21. | :27:23. | |
David Cameron going back to school today. | :27:23. | :27:27. | |
Something the party needs to do as well, according to some. | :27:27. | :27:31. | |
It is not just that they need to learn to reconnect with the | :27:31. | :27:36. | |
concerns of the average voter, but specifically, the concerns of women | :27:36. | :27:40. | |
voters. I think David Cameron is very aware | :27:40. | :27:44. | |
that all of Margaret Thatcher's three victories in the 1980s were | :27:44. | :27:50. | |
built upon the women's vote. Unless he really improves his own standing | :27:50. | :27:54. | |
with women today, he won't get the elusive story majority that needs. | :27:54. | :27:58. | |
There is active consideration of individual policy things that will | :27:58. | :28:03. | |
make a difference to women. Initiatives on childcare, child | :28:03. | :28:08. | |
benefit, better neighbourhood policing. Those things will help at | :28:08. | :28:12. | |
the margin. But the overwhelming evidence is that women are much | :28:12. | :28:17. | |
more sensitive to inflation and some of the ill effects of the | :28:17. | :28:22. | |
recession. And Cameron's success with women will depend on | :28:22. | :28:25. | |
revitalising the economy and keeping a lid on prices. The fact | :28:25. | :28:30. | |
that David Cameron is Prime Minister has, it is alleged, left | :28:30. | :28:33. | |
some in his party for getting that they didn't really win the last | :28:33. | :28:37. | |
general election, it is just they were the most successful losers. | :28:37. | :28:41. | |
Where are the swing voters in reference to the Conservative Party | :28:41. | :28:44. | |
right now? They are spread right across the political spectrum. You | :28:44. | :28:48. | |
can't say as so many strategists like to say, it is over here and in | :28:48. | :28:55. | |
this case, they create things like "Worcester woman" and "Essex man", | :28:55. | :28:59. | |
they are highly mythological. Across the spectrum people are out- | :28:59. | :29:03. | |
of-touch with politicians and nervous about the economy, and | :29:03. | :29:07. | |
looking for confidence. Some of the new intake of Conservative MPs want | :29:07. | :29:12. | |
the party to be much bolder, to seek to lead public opinion. This | :29:12. | :29:18. | |
man is one of five MPs who have published a book called After The | :29:18. | :29:21. | |
Coalition. Issues like the 50p tax rate, and a | :29:21. | :29:25. | |
referendum on Europe, there are some in your party who suggest you | :29:25. | :29:29. | |
shouldn't touch those because they are not issues that speak to the | :29:29. | :29:33. | |
majority in the middle if you like? I don't think that's quite a right | :29:33. | :29:40. | |
way of looking at political leadership. If you look at 1939, we | :29:40. | :29:45. | |
decided to go to war against Nazi Germany, not through focus groups, | :29:45. | :29:48. | |
that was a job through leadership and carrying the country with them. | :29:48. | :29:52. | |
I don't think it is the right thing to do to echo what the electorate | :29:52. | :29:55. | |
is saying. You have to have convictions and beliefs. It is on | :29:55. | :29:58. | |
that basis you can get people to vote for you. | :29:58. | :30:03. | |
However, Nick Boles says the book, however interesting, is not enough | :30:03. | :30:07. | |
focused on voters' concerns. didn't feel that the book started | :30:07. | :30:13. | |
with the question, "what are those pressing concerns?" and "what is it | :30:13. | :30:17. | |
that would really help ordinary people?" t seemed a little bit to | :30:17. | :30:19. | |
be asking what would be the great Conservative idea for the future. I | :30:19. | :30:23. | |
don't want to knock ideas, I used to be in the ideas business. I do | :30:23. | :30:25. | |
think, particularly in this difficult time, we need to be | :30:25. | :30:29. | |
relevant. Above all EMS, we need to be relevant and folk - else, we | :30:29. | :30:34. | |
need to be he will vant and focused, and not have the indulgence of | :30:34. | :30:40. | |
arguments that don't really matter to people. | :30:40. | :30:43. | |
These are uncertain times for the country, and difficult times to be | :30:43. | :30:46. | |
in the future business. Getting the Conservative offer right is crucial | :30:46. | :30:56. | |
:30:56. | :30:57. | ||
to David Cameron's future. With us now is the journalist Jeni | :30:57. | :31:00. | |
Russell, who writes for the Guardian, and Claire Perry and | :31:00. | :31:03. | |
Elizabeth Truss. Let's take the pulse of our | :31:03. | :31:08. | |
audience here. When you look at your leadership, does it seem like | :31:08. | :31:15. | |
a leadership that is in tune with women? Yes? | :31:15. | :31:19. | |
The Home Secretary's a woman? That's true, yes. David Cameron | :31:19. | :31:24. | |
does as good a job as Boris Johnson's done over the last two | :31:24. | :31:30. | |
years running London, David Cameron will win the women's vote. But it | :31:30. | :31:36. | |
doesn't help when he has been caught out putting women down. | :31:36. | :31:39. | |
"don't get worked up dear", comments that doesn't help. That | :31:39. | :31:47. | |
was a joke he picked up off the tele, "calm down dear"? That came | :31:47. | :31:54. | |
across not in a foe male-friendly way. How - Female-friendly way. | :31:55. | :31:59. | |
What did you think about his need to apologise this weekend? I think | :31:59. | :32:02. | |
we should have a sense of humour, we can make jokes about men. | :32:02. | :32:07. | |
It was good to see a family man, a man with a young family, working | :32:07. | :32:12. | |
hard, not only for the nation, if you like, but also for his family. | :32:12. | :32:15. | |
He's obviously very involved with his children, that is a really good | :32:15. | :32:22. | |
role model to have. It particulars my box. - ticks my box. As my | :32:22. | :32:27. | |
colleague was saying, he's a good role model because he has a young | :32:27. | :32:30. | |
family. His involvement with his children is clear. Sometimes a | :32:30. | :32:35. | |
comment that is faced that female candidates tend to face is they are | :32:35. | :32:38. | |
involved with their family and perhaps that would detract time | :32:38. | :32:42. | |
from their politics. The fact he's open about his family involvement | :32:42. | :32:46. | |
is definitely a positive role model for men and women. Jeni Russell, | :32:46. | :32:51. | |
does this leadership strike you as one that instinctively understands | :32:51. | :32:55. | |
women? The polls show clearly not. The Tories came into the | :32:55. | :32:59. | |
administration with a strong lead amongst women, they have lost it. | :32:59. | :33:03. | |
They are now running, the polls are different in different areas, seven | :33:03. | :33:07. | |
points behind Labour. The fact is, women are clearly turning against | :33:07. | :33:11. | |
the Tories, a large section of them are. I would like to ask the | :33:11. | :33:15. | |
audience if the Tory Party is so good for women, why women don't | :33:15. | :33:18. | |
agree. Third row back, go on? don't think the polls are always | :33:18. | :33:22. | |
true. If you poll a woman who has just come out of the supermarket, | :33:22. | :33:29. | |
she's filled her car up with petrol, she's done a week's shop. She's | :33:29. | :33:33. | |
thinking gosh, I have spent more annual, she will think, | :33:33. | :33:36. | |
Conservative Party, no good. If you go with a sheet of paper after she | :33:37. | :33:40. | |
has put the children to be bed with a glass of wine and shoes off, she | :33:40. | :33:45. | |
might have a different answer. I don't trust the polls. | :33:45. | :33:48. | |
I'm afraid the Tory Party will be really in trouble if your answer is | :33:48. | :33:51. | |
I just don't believe the polls and everything is fine. The point is, | :33:52. | :33:56. | |
Labour came in 1997 with a big appeal to women. Up until that | :33:56. | :34:02. | |
point, women from 1945 onwards had always voted in favour of the | :34:02. | :34:06. | |
Conservative Party, overwhelmingly. We would have had Labour | :34:06. | :34:11. | |
administration without the women vote. Labour brought in Child Tax | :34:11. | :34:15. | |
Credits and childcare and all kinds of systems for women. Got rid of | :34:15. | :34:20. | |
the 10p tax rate. They gave a lot to women and now that the Tories | :34:20. | :34:24. | |
are in office and are beginning to cut away at the benefits system and | :34:24. | :34:27. | |
beginning to take childcare away, and the jobs away in which women | :34:27. | :34:30. | |
work. That is why they are turning against the Tories. If the party | :34:30. | :34:34. | |
doesn't recognise that it will be in trouble. The reality is | :34:34. | :34:38. | |
childcare costs under Labour doubled, and the number of kind | :34:38. | :34:42. | |
minders halved from 1997-2010, because Labour introduced lots of | :34:42. | :34:46. | |
regulation and bureaucracy. I think the issue is, that we perhaps | :34:46. | :34:50. | |
haven't focused enough on talking about some of our positive policies | :34:50. | :34:55. | |
like parental leave. Under Labour, maternity leave was hugely expanded, | :34:55. | :34:59. | |
but fathers weren't given a role. We said modern parents want to | :34:59. | :35:02. | |
share these responsibility, under Labour it was seen as the woman's | :35:03. | :35:05. | |
job. I think we are much more progressive on these issues, we | :35:05. | :35:09. | |
need to be talking about them more. But there clearly is a perception | :35:09. | :35:15. | |
in the leadership of this party that there is a problem about the | :35:15. | :35:20. | |
representation and the dealings with the female sex. That is why | :35:20. | :35:23. | |
David Cameron, every time he walks from the hotel over here is | :35:23. | :35:27. | |
accompanied by a woman. Usually a woman MP. He sits down with a woman | :35:27. | :35:31. | |
MP next to him. This is all about presentation. They know there is a | :35:31. | :35:36. | |
problem. You haven't been asked to do it have you? I haven't. Nor me. | :35:36. | :35:40. | |
Don't you think it is an incredibly patronising to say 50% of the | :35:40. | :35:43. | |
electorate, women, all care about the same things. It is such old | :35:43. | :35:46. | |
politics to try to come up with these dividing lines. Women want | :35:46. | :35:50. | |
this, women want that. APPLAUSE. We have working women, | :35:50. | :35:54. | |
this nation, by - notion about benefit cuts, what about the | :35:54. | :35:58. | |
million people, most of whom are women, who are being taken | :35:58. | :36:03. | |
completely out of tax. Jeremy don't interrupt, let us finish the | :36:03. | :36:06. | |
sentence, let's behave like women. There were people all over the | :36:06. | :36:10. | |
country not subjected to the public sector pay freeze, excluded from | :36:10. | :36:14. | |
that, and benefited. I have three kids, I go to the supermarket and | :36:14. | :36:18. | |
I'm sure we all do, we are all worried about where the country | :36:18. | :36:21. | |
will be in five or ten years time. Women are doing the shopping, | :36:21. | :36:24. | |
paying the bills, filling up the family cars, and are anxious. Our | :36:24. | :36:28. | |
job, as any responsible Government would think is to make sure people | :36:28. | :36:31. | |
feel reassured and we work relentlessly, with no money, thanks | :36:31. | :36:35. | |
to the last Government, to make sure that women and other groups, | :36:35. | :36:38. | |
and frankly, wherever we can, people are protected. You might be | :36:38. | :36:44. | |
trying to say that. The fact is women are overwhelmingly the people | :36:44. | :36:48. | |
employed in the public sector. 60%. Is that full-time equivalence, if | :36:48. | :36:52. | |
you look it will be less than that. The public sector are the people | :36:52. | :36:55. | |
losing their jobs, women are losing their jobs, they are overwhelmingly | :36:55. | :36:59. | |
the users of public services, at public services are being cut. They | :36:59. | :37:06. | |
are the people who live on benefits. That is a bit of a generalisation | :37:06. | :37:11. | |
about women living on benefits. Doing exactly the thing you accuse | :37:11. | :37:18. | |
men of doing, arguing. Sorry. is enough from you two. Back to the | :37:18. | :37:21. | |
original question, about how to appeal at the next election to | :37:21. | :37:25. | |
women voters. Cameron has done a fantastic job as leader bringing | :37:26. | :37:31. | |
new women into the party, changing our public face. We have gone up | :37:31. | :37:36. | |
from 16%-22% of new female MPs in the last intake. Remind us how many | :37:36. | :37:40. | |
Tory women there are in cabinet? There are a large number of new MPs | :37:40. | :37:45. | |
on the candidate list. He is opening it up to all different | :37:45. | :37:48. | |
backgrounds and walks of life. We will have a different party, we | :37:48. | :37:52. | |
showed that in the 2010 election with the number of female MPs. | :37:52. | :38:00. | |
will you do it? David Cameron has pledged to have a third of... | :38:00. | :38:04. | |
in the blue dress? That's me. We are doing it. There has been a huge | :38:04. | :38:08. | |
revolution in the way we have been processing our candidates to make | :38:08. | :38:12. | |
sure women can come forward with men on a completely level playing | :38:12. | :38:15. | |
field. As we did the changes in the process, what we found was more | :38:15. | :38:19. | |
women were coming forward, because they trusted the process, and they | :38:19. | :38:25. | |
could become MPs, just as Liz and Claire are showing us here. Are you | :38:25. | :38:31. | |
still committed to 50% of the Government being women, that was a | :38:31. | :38:36. | |
promise wasn't it? 50% of the candidates had to be women. There | :38:36. | :38:40. | |
is an historic problem, we have been underrepresented, you can't | :38:40. | :38:43. | |
make women ministers from nowhere. The greater intake of women this | :38:43. | :38:47. | |
time will mean there are more ministers next time. Jeremy nobody | :38:47. | :38:52. | |
wants to be a Blair Babe. How pitiful to promote through all- | :38:52. | :38:56. | |
women shortlists a group of women, some who have been fantastic | :38:56. | :39:01. | |
ministers, many of whom have sunk without a trace, for a photo | :39:01. | :39:05. | |
opportunity. The difference with the women candidates, we are | :39:05. | :39:08. | |
committed, as all new candidates are, to make a difference. We are | :39:08. | :39:11. | |
relentlessly holding the Government to account on all these issues. | :39:11. | :39:17. | |
of the issues is with the way that the women issue is being presented. | :39:17. | :39:21. | |
It is presented as being all about money. What I think it is about is | :39:21. | :39:25. | |
giving women and girls opportunities. So why is it, for | :39:25. | :39:30. | |
example, girls are performing worse at maths GCSe, will what we do | :39:30. | :39:34. | |
there. What about older woman who want to work? We have abolished the | :39:35. | :39:37. | |
compulsory retirement. There are all kinds of opportunities being | :39:37. | :39:40. | |
opened up. It is not just about transfer of wealth. I don't like | :39:40. | :39:44. | |
the kind of politics that pits men against women. That's not the way | :39:44. | :39:48. | |
families operate, it is not the way most people operate. If we want to | :39:48. | :39:53. | |
do - we want to do things like share parental leave and open up | :39:53. | :39:58. | |
the childcare market. In the same way Michael Gove has free cools | :39:59. | :40:02. | |
policy, let's open up childcare, and let parents run it, rather than | :40:02. | :40:06. | |
state bureaucrats being in charge, which is what happened under Labour. | :40:06. | :40:10. | |
The cost of childcare rose hugely. I don't think that point has been | :40:10. | :40:14. | |
answered by Jeni. I was talking to cabinet minister tonight who was in | :40:14. | :40:18. | |
no doubt the Government had got it wrong about women. He said there | :40:18. | :40:21. | |
were two things, there were no women making the case for the | :40:21. | :40:24. | |
Government out there. And secondly, in fact, the things the Government | :40:24. | :40:28. | |
has decided to do about childcare and so on, some of that has been a | :40:28. | :40:31. | |
mistake, and there will be a rolling back on some of the | :40:31. | :40:34. | |
decisions about cutting childcare, he was also expecting there to be | :40:34. | :40:38. | |
action on child benefit, those are the issues that really matter to | :40:38. | :40:41. | |
women, and why they are turning against the Government now. What we | :40:41. | :40:46. | |
need is a rowing back on all the Labour regulations. You're right in | :40:46. | :40:51. | |
the front row. Be quiet a second, please. | :40:51. | :40:56. | |
Do you think. Calm down dear. you want us to calm down, Jeremy. | :40:56. | :41:03. | |
You calm down if you like! Just do it! Charlotte, do you think | :41:03. | :41:07. | |
your party is doing enough? I think our party could do an awful lot | :41:08. | :41:12. | |
more. You were a candidate? I was in Brighton, and I lost, sadly. | :41:12. | :41:18. | |
Actually I'm really concerned that I'm sitting here in 2010, in an | :41:18. | :41:20. | |
all-female audience, this is madness, we have to be more | :41:21. | :41:26. | |
collaborative, we have to include men, we have to make sure that | :41:26. | :41:30. | |
women don't have the seed of all knowledge as to how to appeal to | :41:30. | :41:33. | |
other women. We have to bring in everybody. We are half of the | :41:33. | :41:36. | |
population, for goodness sake. As Claire was saying, not all women | :41:36. | :41:40. | |
think the same. Not all women are the same. It is a very, very | :41:40. | :41:42. | |
complex issue, but one the Government needs to recognise, and | :41:42. | :41:46. | |
needs to move forward with. Why were men denied access tonight | :41:46. | :41:53. | |
to comment on women's issues. Men have children as well you know. | :41:53. | :41:56. | |
disgraceful piece of discrimination. For obvious reasons. This is the | :41:56. | :42:03. | |
politics of the past. You were complaining about the | :42:03. | :42:07. | |
underrepresentation of women on Newsnight, now you are complaining | :42:07. | :42:10. | |
about the overrepresentation? said you were part of the problem | :42:11. | :42:14. | |
not the solution, it is the combattive style of politics is not | :42:14. | :42:18. | |
the way forward. We could have a bunch of vanity promotions, I'm | :42:18. | :42:22. | |
sure, where you have masses of people in bright jackets on the | :42:22. | :42:25. | |
front bench, let's get on with fixing the country, for goodness | :42:25. | :42:31. | |
sakes. With your hand up in the third row, yes, you in the pale | :42:31. | :42:35. | |
jumper? It is not about treating women differently, a lot of the | :42:35. | :42:38. | |
problems is the media need to address that. You have people | :42:38. | :42:41. | |
talking about Theresa May's kitten heels, and asking others if they | :42:41. | :42:46. | |
have had a face lift, nobody is asking male MPs those questions, | :42:47. | :42:52. | |
the media need to look at that. can't think who they would ask! | :42:52. | :42:55. | |
fascinating thing about this is the fall in support amongst women is | :42:56. | :42:59. | |
different in different social groups. Amongst ABs is actually the | :42:59. | :43:03. | |
support for Tories has gone up. Where the Tories are suddenly | :43:03. | :43:07. | |
losing support is among skilled manual workers, those are the ones | :43:07. | :43:10. | |
bearing the brunt of the job cuts and who haven't got the space in | :43:10. | :43:13. | |
the household budget to absorb an increase in childcare costs, who | :43:13. | :43:17. | |
are worried about tuition fees, who are worried about care for the | :43:17. | :43:20. | |
elderly and pensions. That is where the problem is coming from. It is | :43:20. | :43:22. | |
really hard to see what the Conservatives are able to do about | :43:22. | :43:26. | |
that. The fact is, that those are the people who are bound to be at | :43:26. | :43:29. | |
the brunt of all these changes. They are also the people who will | :43:29. | :43:32. | |
be often lifted out of tax completely. The problem with | :43:32. | :43:37. | |
politics, if I may. No you may not. You may not. Those woman who are | :43:37. | :43:40. | |
not watching us tonight, they are reading magazines and the local | :43:40. | :43:43. | |
papers, they are not watching politics and thinking about this, | :43:43. | :43:47. | |
you are quite right we have to do better. I tell you why I want to | :43:47. | :43:53. | |
wrap you up just there, is because this frankly rather underwomening | :43:53. | :43:56. | |
conference is coming to an end tomorrow with the usual speech from | :43:56. | :44:04. | |
the party leader, which by now must be on its umt ee nth incarnation | :44:04. | :44:10. | |
what will we hear? There are times in a leader's life where they have | :44:10. | :44:14. | |
to pull out the speech, they have to come to the hall like this and | :44:14. | :44:18. | |
use the force of their personality and turn round a desperate | :44:18. | :44:23. | |
situation. Tomorrow, Jeremy, is not one of them. What he will have to | :44:23. | :44:27. | |
do is restate many of the themes he has restated many times before, and | :44:27. | :44:31. | |
try to put them in a new way. If he could have waved a magic wand and | :44:31. | :44:34. | |
got rid of the conference and this speech, without that being the big | :44:34. | :44:37. | |
story, he would have done it. I have some quotes that he will say. | :44:37. | :44:44. | |
Are they interesting? Well, we're going to learn another one of his | :44:44. | :44:47. | |
builder's tips, you remember the fixing the roof. Tomorrow he will | :44:47. | :44:51. | |
tell us about laying the foundations of a house being | :44:51. | :44:56. | |
important. It will sound a bit like one of those big red war time | :44:56. | :45:01. | |
posters, "keep calm and carry on". He will talk about the spirit of | :45:01. | :45:04. | |
Britain, and turning the ship around. There will be optimisim, | :45:04. | :45:08. | |
not too much pessimism. You get the message. I think we have enough | :45:08. | :45:12. | |
excitement there for now. Have we time to have a few more questions | :45:12. | :45:16. | |
with the audience. I do hope so. No-one has told me what the time is. | :45:16. | :45:20. | |
You madame? What I want to say is we shouldn't belittle women. There | :45:20. | :45:23. | |
was a report in the newspaper last week that actually young women are | :45:23. | :45:28. | |
earning more at the moment than young men. So we have got to wait | :45:28. | :45:34. | |
and encourage those women. Don't believe everything you read in the | :45:34. | :45:37. | |
papers. You probably write some of it. Those women will feed through | :45:37. | :45:41. | |
and become more involved, and the politicians of the future. Just | :45:41. | :45:44. | |
keep calm and it will happen, Jeremy. | :45:44. | :45:49. | |
We will keep calm and carry on. I'm terribly sorry we will have to stop | :45:49. | :45:54. | |
there. We will make sure we have some men next time. That's all from | :45:54. | :45:58. | |
Newsnight tonight, this year's noble prize for physics has been | :45:58. | :46:03. | |
won by three scientists for their pioneering work on the expansion of | :46:03. | :46:07. | |
the universe. It led them to the discovery that the universe is | :46:07. | :46:13. | |
growing at an ever-accelerating rate. Those seeking the meaning of | :46:13. | :46:18. | |
life have known this for many years. # The universe itself | :46:18. | :46:23. | |
# Keeps on expanding and expanding # In all directions it can whizz | :46:23. | :46:28. | |
# As fast as it can go # The speed of light it can go | :46:28. | :46:32. | |
# 12 million miles a minute # That is the fastest | :46:32. | :46:35. | |
# Remember when you are feeling small and insecure | :46:35. | :46:38. | |
# How amazingly unlike is your birth | :46:38. | :46:41. | |
# And pray there is intelligent life | :46:41. | :46:45. | |
# Somewhere up in space # Because there is bugger all down | :46:45. | :46:54. | |
Turbulent weather over the next few days. Windy w lot of rain in | :46:54. | :46:58. | |
Northern Ireland and Scotland. Wet and windy here. Brighter further | :46:58. | :47:02. | |
south and east. We will hang on to brightness across parts of the | :47:02. | :47:05. | |
Midlands into the afternoon. Although it will gradually cloud | :47:05. | :47:10. | |
over. Always quite gusty those winds. A fine afternoon, for much | :47:10. | :47:14. | |
of East Anglia. Temperatures creeping back up into the low 20. | :47:14. | :47:19. | |
This is a not a return of the heatwave. It will not last. Patchy | :47:20. | :47:24. | |
rain across the south west, it will turn pretty wet across Wales, | :47:24. | :47:28. | |
especially out west with the gusty winds to factor in as well. After a | :47:28. | :47:31. | |
wet and windy start to the day, things will pick up across Northern | :47:31. | :47:35. | |
Ireland. Sunshine developing through the afternoon, just one or | :47:35. | :47:39. | |
two showers developing. Sunshine inbetween the showers after a very | :47:39. | :47:43. | |
wet and windy morning. So, rain heading in to the north | :47:43. | :47:47. | |
and the west. That will clear south-east wards by Thursday | :47:47. | :47:51. | |
morning, and then we have a whole lot of blustery showers, despite | :47:51. | :47:55. | |
sunshine it will be chilly. Even across the south, temperatures will | :47:55. | :48:00. | |
be much lower than they have been. A real taste of autumn for all of | :48:00. | :48:04. |