How has the death of Jo Cox changed the course of the referendum? And from Bognor, the take of the older generation.
Browse content similar to 20/06/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
We've heard a lot about what we think, so what does
There will maximum be two years to negotiate. It could be done quicker.
I would be in favour of a very quick solution to this.
Brussels won't be happy if we take the Tippex to Heath's signature.
We'll look at what happens on Friday, if we do.
Former Tory leader, and Brexiteer, Michael Howard will take us
Also tonight, we take our referendum truck to Bognor Regis,
Is it a problem if you guys take us out, and the young wanted to be in?
I'm thinking beyond the next five or ten years, which I don't think
the politicians are, and I'm thinking for my grandchildren.
And more to the point, they will know, too.
The rest of the EU will find out what has hit it.
The first meeting of the European Council is a week tomorrow.
That's when the European reaction will be crystallised.
If we vote to leave, they'll have a lot to talk about.
Could it even be that the other 27 leaders meet ahead of time,
or ask David Cameron to take a short walk, while they work out
The big question in the event of Brexit is what the new UK-EU
Then there's a smaller, tactical question, too;
do we invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty?
Article 50 provides for a nation to leave the EU.
It gives us a system to negotiate our way out.
But it imposes a time limit, too, that may not be very helpful
Our diplomatic editor Mark Urban has been visiting European capitals,
to get the view of Brexit from there.
Across Europe, the ministers and bureaucrats are thinking the
unthinkable. A British exit from the EU may be imminent. We've been
travelling through some key countries in northern Europe, trying
to get a handle on how they'd deal with it, what arguments they might
deploy in talks. In Denmark, they know about saying
no to the EU. Denmark's vote against the Maastricht Treaty 24 years ago
is just one example of when a referendum has derailed EU plans,
and what has tended to happen in the past is that the commission has gone
back to the drawing board and crafted a new offer. So the first
dilemma that other European countries would face if Britain
voted for Brexit is whether to offer a better deal to the UK. Former
members of the commission, the EU civil service, suggest it would be
hard to come up with further concessions for the UK. With all the
challenges now, will the economic situation in Europe, will Russia and
Putin, with the security issues, with terrorism, and immigrants, they
would not be a lot of appetite to spend too much time on finding these
solutions. Remember, the other thing, that they gave Britain,
basically, what the British government asked for. They think
they have been forthcoming already. So I just think it is still
extremely risky, what could happen after there would be a no.
Underlying all talks would be a fear of other nations trying to get their
own bespoke deals. I think first of all the commission would try to
avoid precedents, they certainly would not support a solution which
could create appetite for other member states to follow the British
example. For that reason, many European politicians feel further
concessions after Britain's vote would be pointless, and argue that
27 would want to move swiftly and to Britain's exit talks. In principle,
I would say that there should be no doubt that a No vote, that is a vote
to leave the EU, should be respected. And, after that, I also
think that we should go for a quick decision, according to the EU
treaty, there will maximum be two years to negotiate. It could be done
quicker. I would be in favour of a very quick solution to this. The
Sicilian Hof Palace was built in an English style a century ago. It is
located in Potsdam in Germany. Allied leaders met here after the
Second World War to shape the peace come and to prevent Germany from
rising again to military domination of Europe. The summit that would
follow a Brexit, inevitably nations would take different positions.
European politicians tell us the French the Italians and possibly the
Spanish could be expected to want the toughest possible terms for
Britain. The Scandinavians and Dutch, on the other hand, would want
to be as reasonable as they could. And in between, synthesising those
different positions, and providing leadership, as in so many recent
crises for the EU, would be Chancellor Merkel's Germany. Germany
will be very exposed in the EU, and Germany will get more or less
automatically the only leadership fall. Germany will be whether
Germany wants it or not, and we can tell you Germany doesn't want it,
they will have to accent leadership in the European Union, and I'm not
sure, but if this is something that the British would clearly want.
Contagion, euro scepticism, is present in Germany of course. The
AFD, or all turn it for Germany party has been eating into the
Chancellor's vote of late. -- alternative for Germany. The leader
would rather Britain stays in to fight for reform and believes the
project is in serious trouble. We have already seen that projects on
the integration have failed, for example the euro. As attempts to
have a common migration policy, or turn at off common social policies.
So whatever the EU commission does, we will see that the problems will
become even more evident on a European level, and therefore I
think with Britain or without Britain, the EU will have to change.
This is the where the -- the Bundesrat, where the leaders of
Germany's states meet. What strategy with a advocate? If the views of
Chancellor Merkel's president are anything to go by, even single
market access on Swiss or Norwegian terms must be ruled out for Britain.
Another minister president from Angela Merkel's party, though, took
a more moderate line, arguing a way would have to be found to create a
new relationship. In Berlin's fortress-like
chancellery, Angela Merkel would have two balance those different use
within her party and within the EU. Just how hard a bargain to drive,
how far to protect German markets in the UK, this is prioritising the
survival of the EU project as a whole. Germany has an interest to
show all the other Eurosceptics, let's say maybe parts of Denmark,
the Netherlands, maybe the Poles, that they have something to lose.
That is why they have to be tough on Britain, after the article 50 is
involved. It might seem like the most rigid diplomacy imaginable,
stay in or we will make an example of you. But today there are many
here, and elsewhere in Europe, who insist they are in earnest. Mark
Urban there. Well, most of the other
Europeans hope the Brexit One person who hopes it
will is Michael Howard, former Home Secretary and former
leader of the Conservative Party. Now Lord Howard. A very good evening
to you. First of all, do you think if we vote for Brexit on Thursday,
as I think you once said, it's worth pausing for a month to see if a
better offer comes along, remaining in the EU, and then we maybe have a
second referendum and discuss whether the new terms are
acceptable? I think there's something to be said for that. I
don't think we would make any approach, we would have voted to
leave, but if the Europeans came forward with some other offer, which
looked credible, I personally would be prepared to talk to them about
it. Even though we have just voted to leave, and it is OK, guys, you
can stay in? It depends on what terms. What would it need to be for
a Prime Minister to go back to a country and say look, let's do it
all again? Look, it might not happen, and it would be up to them.
It would need to be a fundamental and far-reaching reform, which David
Cameron originally asked for in his speech. But that's not going to
happen. If that's not bad to happen, there would be no point in talking.
On Friday, fuming that doesn't happen, and maybe you want to wait a
few days, -- assuming, do you invoke article 50? I am not in charge, but
I think that is the logical thing to do. I agree with Mr Rasmussen, who
thought it would be a rather quick negotiation. He is wrong when he
says there is a two-year limit. It can be extended. By unanimity. It is
Germany who calls the shots, and forgot to two years and Angela
Merkel were still in office and wanted it extended, it would jolly
well be standard. Tell us why someone on your side of this are
keen not to invoke article 50 very quickly, because the official Leave
campaign is we don't need to do that for a while, we can sit and light a
cigar. I agree with the tours. Some are even saying, John Redwood has
told this programme this afternoon, you don't ever have to invoke
Article 50. Why do it? That is to respect the Treaty of Lisbon which
others would reject. I have told you what I would think would happen. So
we invoke article 50 at a reasonable price? Yes. And it doesn't bother
you that the clock is ticking against us and they could string it
out, we get a worse deal? What we have got to get it into our heads is
that we will not be supplicants. We are the fifth biggest economy in the
world, they sell us what much more than we sell them, they will not
what of their nose to spite their face. Your specific concern, the
reason you feel so strongly, is about the sovereignty of Parliament,
and the court of the European court of justice back and tell Parliament
what it is able to do and not. And it is about to do that. I think
Thursday may be our last chance to vote for a democratic self-governing
country. People don't understand that the European court of justice
now has the power to overrule Acts of Parliament. It has already
overruled an act of the Scottish parliament, the first act, actually,
passed by the SNP when it got a majority in the Scottish Parliament,
and an act that was passed by our Parliament in 2014, which the Home
Secretary said was critical to protecting children, fighting
terrorism and commenting crime, is coming before the European court of
justice, of course not before Thursday, but in a few weeks' time,
and they would be perfectly entitled, as things stand, to strike
it out, to overrule it. And you know, Evan, there was a passage in
the Queen's speech, which said the government pledges to uphold the
sovereignty of Parliament, and the primacy of the House of Commons.
Those words are not worth the paper they are written on as long as we
remain members of the European Union. Right, and that's because if
you join a club like that, somebody has to be the final arbiter between
whether you have obeyed the rules of the club or not. The keywords are if
you join a club like that. I quite agree, if you have a club that is
limited to economic issues, trade issues, you have to have some
adjudication on the trade issues, but the Charter of fundamental human
rights goes far, far beyond that, and they can override practically
anything our Parliament would pass. I understand the point you are
making, there are many on your side of the debate to say letters not
wait for the two years to be up, or the four years to be up while we in
the go shoot our exit from the EU. If we vote leave, we need to pass a
bill amending the European Community 's act of 1972, where Ted Heath got
a sin. We need to amend that Bill to stop the European court of justice
for example being able to tell us whether we have our Data Protection
Act or not, our data use act or not. Do you believe we should change the
law before we have negotiated our exit, or should we wait until we
finally have agreed an exit. We might well have to do that. Do what?
We might well have to legislate before the end of the negotiation.
Suppose you had a two-year period and then it was extended and so on,
we are not going to wait forever, not going to wait for four years
before making it clear that our Parliament is supreme. If the
negotiation is a quick thing, and it should be, there is a food trade
area from Iceland to Turkey, so the obvious solution would be let's have
a free trade area. You are contemplating passing a law,
Parliament passing a bill, in breach of our treaty obligations. If that
is necessary I would support it. Is this meant to be a way to a
harmonious separation from the EU? Will this lead to them being well
disposed to giving us a good deal? I don't think it would be necessary,
if they want a harmonious relationship which they should do
and we should do, it was Jack Delors who said if the United Kingdom
doesn't want to agree to further European integration we should have
a different relationship with them, a friendly relationship. How long do
we give them before we start passing laws that basically unilaterally
say, stuff you, we are not part of your club anymore and we will not
negotiate? First of all, I will not be in charge. But you are providing
guidance. It would be ridiculous to set out arbitrary deadlines. It is
the official policy of Vote Leave that we should do this very quickly
after we leave, not waiting two years, within weeks we should say,
sorry guys, the European Court will not be telling us what to do. I'm
happy with that because I have a fundamental objection to the
European Court telling us what to do, it is fundamentally undemocratic
and we never signed up to that. Tony Blair promised us that the Charter
of fundamental rights did not apply to us, we never signed up to it,
that's the point! So you are happy with a position as Vote Leave has
suggested that we pass laws in breach of the our treaty
obligations, if you like, without having negotiated? If I have to do
that, yes, but I'm in favour of a quick negotiation as Mr Rasmussen
intimated and its possible and desirable. My understanding is Vote
Leave want to do it not given the EU 18 months, or two years, to sort it
out, they want to do it in a few weeks. There is no way we will sort
it out in three or four weeks, that spy in the sky. If we need to make
it clear that we are a self-governing Parliamentary
democracy and we need to pass legislation to achieve that we
should do it. That is our birthright, our heritage, our
tradition, and something we have a last chance to recover on Thursday.
Lord Howard, thank you very much. Thank you.
One striking development in the last few days - big
movements in the markets, apparently predicting that the odds
The pound has soared, the FTSE had its best
day for four months, and the bookies' odds have shifted.
The betting market had put the chance of a Brexit win above 40%
Yesterday, Brexit was seen as having a 33%
A couple of polls tonight putting Remain ahead.
Something has changed, it could be a late swing
to the status quo, that is something we often see.
But, obviously, it could also be a Jo Cox effect.
For a fifth day today, the campaign has been
affected by her death, with Parliament recalled,
to hear moving tributes from her colleagues.
Just before we came on air, I spoke to Professor John Curtice.
He is a pollster and I began by asking him the current state of play
in the referendum. It is perhaps worth reminding
ourselves where we seemed to be towards the end of last week before
the tragic murder of Jo Cox. We had just seen a whole sequence
of opinion polls that were the worst figures for Remain and the best
figures for Leave at any stage And for the first time perhaps
a real prospect that Remain were, on the consensus
of the opinion polls, behind. Then at the weekend we saw the polls
move back again to some degree, though even then the polls
being done over the Internet said it was a 50-50 call,
which is what they've been saying And we had one telephone
poll putting the Remain Tonight we have two more polls,
one Internet poll from YouGov, Another one from ORB,
a phone poll, depending a bit on how you interpret it,
but again it looks like So we are frankly looking
at a referendum which is still extraordinarily tight but maybe not
quite so bad for Remain as it looked So, the markets, the prediction
markets, the bookies, basically, thinking it is a 25%
chance of Brexit now, which has diminished
very, very rapidly. I think the truth is that they are
now seriously underestimating Given that most of the recent
opinion polls we have been having are saying it is somewhere
between maybe 49% for Remain and about 52% for Remain,
I would suggest something like 40-45% would be a more serious
and sensible probability for the prospect of
Leave at this juncture. Clearly something has changed
from the worst polls that Because, people were saying that
maybe there will be a late I think the truth is it's impossible
to tell whether there There is nothing directly in
the opinion polls to support that. Maybe there has been a little bit
of movement back towards Remain, but perhaps we shouldn't also simply
discount the most boring hypothesis which is that maybe last week
the polls happened all to slightly exaggerate Leave's position and that
maybe not a great deal has ever happened at all,
although I think in truth probably Remain's position still looks
somewhat weaker than it did certainly before we got
into the pre-election Since then, if you look
across the piece, the polls have just not looked quite so good
for Remain as they did beforehand. John Curtice, thank
you very much indeed. Our political editor
Nick Watt joins me now. You were in the Commons today for
what was a very special day, remembering Jo Cox. Yes, they were
very powerful scenes in the House of Commons as Jo Cox's closest
Parliamentary colleagues paid a warm tribute to her, but really the most
poignant moment was when there were often moments of complete silence in
the chamber of the House of Commons and all you could hear were the
voices of her three and five-year-old making the noises that
any three or five-year-old makes when their father, in this case can
or their grandparent, is reading a book to them. The referendum
obviously wasn't directly addressed in these tributes, but it was never
far away. There was real anger today amongst Tory Vote Leave supporters
in the way in which they believe the Prime Minister is seeking to use the
death of Jo Cox to sort of bolster the Remain side, they cited the
Sunday Telegraph article in which the Prime Minister praised her work
for the Remain campaign and one former Tory Cabinet minister who I
spoke to who was still wearing his white rose of Yorkshire as a mark of
respect to Jo Cox and he said the Prime Minister had walked across a
line and behaved in a disgusting way. The Vote Leave leadership had
to send out a message this afternoon, they have a WhatsApp
group to communicate with their supporters, and they said to their
side, do not say anything, hold your horses, this is the time for silence
on this particular issue. Does the behind-the-scenes annoyance with the
Prime Minister, does it indicate anything about their worries and
anxieties about how this is going in the last week? I think it shows that
the Vote Leave side is nervous because they appeared to be moving
some way ahead in the polls and the polls are more difficult to read
now. It's interesting, I was speaking to Labour Brexit minister
last week who said it is all over are in the shouting, we have won. I
spoke to the same minister today and he said I still think we are going
to win but I think there were a few more caveats. It's important to say
that the Remain side are also very nervous and thought they had won on
the economy and they know that Vote Leave have had a great run on
immigration. Nick, thank you very much indeed.
There is so much to talk about in the referendum,
Much of the campaign has been devoted to a relatively
short playlist of issues, but you might remember that last
week, we had been taking Newsnight travelling - a short road trip
through the UK to get some fresh perspectives on the EU debate.
That was put on hold, but could we at least retrieve one
For obvious reasons the journey of the Newsnight truck
and our referendum road trip was suspended along
We had started in Glasgow and Stornoway last Monday,
made stops in Middlesbrough and Leicester, before pausing.
The schedule had the truck ending its journey in the southern resort
And we decided to keep to that date with just a brief visit to the town
to record some material on its perspective
on the referendum, a debate about the future of Britain,
We didn't have time to stop at the famous Butlins,
one of three in the country but we did get to see
The beaches are proud to regularly fly the European blue flag
The south coast is physically closer to the Continent than most
of the country and Bognor is not alone among towns here in fostering
But politically the local constituency's Conservative
and is one where Ukip performed well at the last election with 22%
You don't need me to tell you that the demographics of seaside towns
are often skewed to the elderly. About the Regis of the world make a
great place to retire but the sea also offers attractions to youthful
visitors as well. Here it turns out there are more of the older than the
young but still there is nowhere better to think about what kind of
generational divide exists in attitudes to the EU. Are Wallasey
editor Chris Cook came down here to find out for stop -- policy editor.
When the votes are tallied on Thursday night, a lot of seaside
towns will end up as strong supporters of Leave.
And Bognor Regis, on the Sussex coast, is likely to be one of them.
Now, Bognor is perhaps best known as a holiday resort,
despite its sometimes unreliable weather, but it has also got unusual
demographics that make it prime territory for Leave.
For one thing, we know that people with fewer qualifications,
be they academic or technical, are more likely to vote for Leave,
and here in Bognor, only 28% of people have any sort
of significant postsecondary qualification, as opposed to 37%
We also know that people who earn less are more
likely to vote for Leave, and here in Bognor the average wage
is around ?475 a week, that's ?50 a week less
than the national average, it's a full ?100 a week
less than the average for the Southeast of England.
Finally, and this is the big one for Bognor, we also know that older
people are more likely to vote for Leave, and here in Bognor around
A recent poll by Populous implies that if the population
was split 50-50 on Brexit, around 69% of under 24s
Conversely, 62% of over 65s would vote for Leave,
You can see that split when you talk to members of the
How do you intend to vote for the referendum?
I've not spoken to one who wants to stay in.
With all the immigration, all the benefits, the hospitals
straining at the seams, all the cancelled operations,
as I said about the schools and everything.
So you don't trust Mark Carney, or the Chancellor,
or the Prime Minister, or Martin Lewis, or any of these
people, when they say we will be poorer
They don't know any more than we do, do they, really?
The Governor of the Bank of England is a specialist economist,
central banker, brought in from Canada to help
run our economy, and he thinks it's a bad idea.
Yes, but does he know what it's like to go around Sainsbury's
shopping, or into where all people that are on benefits are spending
One of the things nationally is we think younger people
are going to be more likely to vote Remain.
It's their future, you see. They don't know the history.
We have known a different way, you see, so that is what we
are falling back on, because we knew it as it was.
We ask this not quite retired Remainer, who chairs a local
business, why he thinks older people tend to be pro-Leave.
I see it with my mother's generation that they really feel somehow
threatened by all the immigrants around.
They think that's changed the character of the place,
but the health service and the care homes they are going to end up
in just couldn't function without some immigration.
We caught up with some sporty young people at a local beach who had
rather different politics to their older neighbours.
Of your friends who you know are voting, what do
All of them are in, all of them are in, I can't see any idea why
Why is it you think that older people generally tend to disagree
More of that generation are geared towards having Britain as more
independent before the EU was really fully formed, and with our
generation we are much more about travelling,
much more about being free, much more about creating a wider
The reason why I am voting for In is that the deal we have
at the moment with Europe is great, you know, free movement of labour,
especially for watersports enthusiasts like us,
It means we can go and work in any country in Europe
without having to get a visa, and for us especially,
But the reason to leave the EU is to control immigration.
That seems to be a real emotional standpoint to take,
and I think, honestly, are we really going to curtail
immigration that much, and if we are, is that going
Is immigration a problem for people your age?
I think it's ridiculous that it is even considered a problem.
The local Ukip chair explains why he thinks young people
The young people have been very badly served by the politicians.
I don't think the politicians have been open and honest
They have fought a fear campaign, which has been devoid of the facts.
On Thursday, one generation will prevail.
Family arguments might be more ferocious this year than ever.
Well, I am joined by three local people, all at the more elderly
end of the spectrum, all over the age of 60.
Thank you all very much for joining us on this
First of all, why do you think there is this age
gap between the younger and the older in attitudes?
I think that people of my age can remember before we joined
the European Economic Community and we were able to manage.
The European Economic Community was a good thing.
And you are veering to Out, aren't you?
Yes, I haven't made up my mind completely but I'd like to be
I've yet to be convinced there is necessarily a strict divide
But I tend to agree with what Jane says, that I think the young people
haven't necessarily experienced what has gone before and haven't
seen that Britain can perfectly easily survive and the world isn't
going to fall in if we come out of the European Union.
You've got your own sign-writing business.
I think there has been a lot of pontificating about
To the detriment of the strengths that we have been living
with for a long time and just take for granted now.
I think taking it for granted is a massive mistake
which we could fall into if there is this sway to leave
Would it bother you, let's put it crudely,
if the old pulled us out of the EU and the young had wanted to stay in?
People say is it a problem if England votes us out
But is it a problem if you guys take us out and the young
Does that bother you, Jane?
I think it's a very important point, because they are the ones that
have to make it work, whatever we decide.
But I'm thinking beyond the next five or ten years, which I don't
I'm thinking for my grandchildren who are now aged eight to 13.
In a way I think it might be their only chance
Yeah, I agree with that, this will be the only chance
they will get because I don't think there will be another chance.
If we look at the issues in this campaign, mostly immigration
and the economy are being talked about a great deal.
Do we think that the elderly put more weight on immigration
My generation and slightly older than me have to think about,
as we get older and we are all now expecting to live to 80 plus,
Jane and Hugh, that is a paradox isn't it?
Care workers are disproportionately...
Yes, but I really seriously think this is a non-issue,
because immigration, for example myself, I know
lots of immigrants around here who are truly excellent people
and they do a terrific job and they are real
All that is being asked in relation to the European Union or anywhere
else is that we are able to choose those people that come here.
That means that we will still have the excellent
Those who say that it's not an issue have their heads in the sand.
Can you imagine if we come out that we retreat over the bit
as a nation and maybe we don't build High Speed 2,
and we don't build a third runway at Heathrow?
Do you see these kinds of things as connected?
I'm just interested in your bigger vision of Britain.
The future of Britain, as can happen outside the EU,
There is a tremendous future for Britain, as there is for a lot
I don't really see that that makes a lot of difference.
But I am very positive about the many excellent things
Britain can do if it is able to trade freely with all the other
countries of the world, instead of just being restricted
Whatever the outcome may be, and I'm passionate about the Remain
in because of all the benefits it will bring the future generations
of our children and their children as it goes forward.
Because, the strength that it will give all of us,
it beggars belief that we can see ourselves as little Englanders
being run by politicians that have no vision, no imagination.
This little Englander thing kind of irritates me in a sense
because we are not little Englanders, we are Great Britain
and Great Britain can survive perfectly well, as David Cameron has
Do you think Britain was a better country in the days before
No, so you are not in any way attached
Is there an emotional bond, do you think, that young people
Do you think younger people feel more European in identity,
a bit more, clearly not completely, but a bit more of a European
identity and the ability to travel there, friends there,
It's all they've done, it's all they know.
So, yes, I think they do have an attachment.
They are European and their understanding of what Europe is all
about is what they've lived through, what they've been educated in,
what they've seen, what they've experienced full stop.
what they've seen, what they've experienced, full stop.
Hugh, Jane, Steve, thank you very much indeed.
You may not have made up your mind yet.
In the recent polls, the undecideds have been
Anyway, through the campaign we've been helping you make your mind up,
by letting some engaging people who are not active campaigners,
set out their argument for or against.
We are in the last legs, and have to make sure we get
to Thursday having balanced up the quota on each side.
Tonight, our My Decision slot goes to the founder of lastminute.com
and philanthropist, Martha Lane Fox.
I'm wildly pro-Europe, both for reasons that
are from my heart and for reasons that are from my head.
If I had to describe the two, I guess I'd say that the head
reasons are based around my experiences as an entrepreneur
and a businessperson, and now a social entrepreneur,
and the experience I've had in the technology sector.
No surprises, you spend your entire time in the technology
sector thinking about how to connect the world more,
how to scale things, how to grow, how to use something that is small
and local, and help reach a global market.
The idea that you would retract into the smaller place is just
something that is so countercultural in my working life.
But my heart part is more important, I believe, and more dominant actuary
in my thinking and my decision-making.
I so strongly believe that we should always be part of the discussion,
and inclusion is a better position to take than exclusion.
Where do you sit on voting in or out?
I think like any enormous system in any country,
in any political structure, things can improve and change.
If I look at it from my own perspective, the technology world,
it's still a pretty bureaucratic organisation, I'm not sure
When I visited Brussels, the Commission is full of paper.
There is lots of change and excitement you could reorganise
around the internet, but I'm not sure that is particular
to Brussels, it is particular to most political systems.
The fear that I would have is that we have lost an ability
to impact the most important debates of our times, and we need to have
as big a voice as possible to solve the big challenges,
whether that is climate change, whether that is the mass
migration of peoples, whether that is gender
equality, or whether that is technological shifts.
I fear for us as a country we are looking backwards not
forwards and that we would become much diminished.
Emily will be at Wembley tomorrow for the really
But we leave you with a celebration of the Welsh football
team's third goal against Russia, which left them and not
Not bad, as the comedian David Schneider noted, for a country
Good evening, despite starting on a very wet note, Midsummer's day