Browse content similar to 30/09/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
The welcome to NewsWatch. Later in the programme, was it responsible | :00:26. | :00:31. | |
to broadcast this interview, predicting financial Armageddon? | :00:31. | :00:36. | |
dream of another recession, another moment like this. Tuesday's speech | :00:36. | :00:40. | |
by the Labour leader at his party's annual conference was going fine, | :00:40. | :00:46. | |
until a quarter of an hour in, this happened. My message to the public | :00:46. | :00:53. | |
is simple... Ed Miliband, having a few technical problems... We are | :00:53. | :00:57. | |
having a few technical problems with our feet from Liverpool. I | :00:57. | :01:02. | |
think we are going to try to find think we are going to try to find | :01:02. | :01:12. | |
:01:12. | :01:13. | ||
another link to pick up on that. It was five minutes before the | :01:13. | :01:19. | |
picture was restored, during which time, BBC Two went blank. The news | :01:19. | :01:22. | |
channel played some of the audio feed of the speech. | :01:22. | :01:28. | |
An absolute disaster for his media press team. Everyone seems to have | :01:28. | :01:31. | |
lost power with Liverpool, which means nobody is able to broadcast | :01:31. | :01:34. | |
this speech alive. All television channels were | :01:34. | :01:39. | |
affected by the problem, which stemmed from a generator failure in | :01:39. | :01:46. | |
the contract to's truck. Which was supplying a feat to broadcasters -- | :01:46. | :01:56. | |
:01:56. | :01:57. | ||
The new channel broke into a report by Nick Robinson. The government's | :01:57. | :02:03. | |
austerity plan is failing. You can sense the fear we have as we watch | :02:03. | :02:09. | |
the economic crisis that stalked our country in 2008. Apologies to | :02:09. | :02:13. | |
leave that, we will return a little later, but we are heading back to | :02:13. | :02:17. | |
Los Angeles, because proceedings have resumed in the case against Dr | :02:17. | :02:23. | |
Conrad Murray. What was, who was the cause of Michael Jackson staff? | :02:23. | :02:33. | |
:02:33. | :03:00. | ||
One BBC interview caused a huge storm of protest. This is a man | :03:00. | :03:04. | |
described as an independent market trader, speaking to the news | :03:04. | :03:09. | |
channel on Monday. I am very confident that this particular | :03:09. | :03:12. | |
rescue plan, it doesn't matter how much money they want to put in, it | :03:12. | :03:17. | |
is not going to work. Because this problem cannot be solved. I am | :03:17. | :03:21. | |
fairly confident the euro is going to crash and fall pretty hard. | :03:21. | :03:27. | |
Because markets are ruled by fear. Foremost writers -- for most | :03:27. | :03:31. | |
traders, we don't really care too much, how they are going to fix the | :03:31. | :03:36. | |
economy or the whole situation. Or job is to make money from it. | :03:36. | :03:40. | |
Personally, I have been dreaming of this moment for three years. I go | :03:40. | :03:44. | |
to bed every night, I dream of another recession. If you could see | :03:44. | :03:48. | |
the people around me, jaws have collectively dropped at what you | :03:48. | :03:51. | |
have just said. We appreciate your candour but it doesn't help the | :03:51. | :03:57. | |
rest of us. I would say this to everybody who is watching this. | :03:58. | :04:01. | |
This economic crisis is like a cancer. If you wait and wait, | :04:01. | :04:05. | |
thinking this is going to go away, just like a cancer it is going to | :04:05. | :04:11. | |
grow, and be too late. Twitter users questioned his credentials? | :04:11. | :04:15. | |
Asking whether the news channel had been hoaxed. The BBC said it | :04:15. | :04:19. | |
carried out detailed investigations and couldn't find any evidence to | :04:19. | :04:24. | |
suggest the interview was a hoax. Was this trader is to double | :04:24. | :04:28. | |
interviewee anyway? It turned out he had never been authorised by the | :04:28. | :04:33. | |
Financial Services Authority -- was he a suitable interviewee? He said | :04:33. | :04:41. | |
he was an intention sika and he rebranded his YouTube channel as | :04:41. | :04:44. | |
trade on the BBC -- he said he was trade on the BBC -- he said he was | :04:44. | :04:54. | |
:04:54. | :05:23. | ||
an entire -- he said he was an We wanted to talk to someone from | :05:23. | :05:26. | |
BBC News about why he had been chosen to appear on the news | :05:26. | :05:31. | |
channel, but mac got request was refused. We were referred again to | :05:31. | :05:35. | |
the statement saying there was no evidence he was a hoaxer. I am | :05:35. | :05:40. | |
joined by the journalist and preventer of Radio 4's radio show - | :05:40. | :05:46. | |
- presenter. Was he an appropriate person to have a national news | :05:46. | :05:52. | |
channel? The problem is, that in his own words, he is a self- | :05:52. | :05:56. | |
confessed attention seeker who describes financial trading as not | :05:56. | :05:59. | |
really a business, more of a hobby. You are left wondering how he | :05:59. | :06:04. | |
appeared on BBC News. Not in any old role, but as an expert on the | :06:04. | :06:07. | |
financial crisis. Should his credentials have been better | :06:08. | :06:13. | |
checked before he was suddenly thrust to national fame? I don't | :06:13. | :06:17. | |
know what credentials he has. The BBC could fairly say, the news | :06:17. | :06:22. | |
channel has lots of people on it, represents a wide range of views. | :06:22. | :06:26. | |
You go on the street and talk to people, you take what you get. In | :06:26. | :06:30. | |
this case, he was put up as someone who knew what he was talking about | :06:30. | :06:33. | |
the relation to the global financial crisis and business | :06:33. | :06:38. | |
matters. He is a self-confessed potential sicker he describes | :06:38. | :06:44. | |
financial trading, which was his designation... Self-confessed | :06:44. | :06:49. | |
attention seeker. He describes financial trading as a hobby. Is he | :06:49. | :06:53. | |
credible as a financial trader? Make your own mind up, but not as | :06:53. | :06:59. | |
credible as others. With markets so volatile and potentially influenced | :06:59. | :07:03. | |
by broadcasts like that, should the BBC have been more careful? On the | :07:03. | :07:09. | |
face of it, they did not represent -- did not misrepresent him. He is | :07:09. | :07:13. | |
technically a financial trader. But is the most credible voice, given | :07:13. | :07:20. | |
that if he happened to... If his views ended up representing a broad | :07:20. | :07:23. | |
opinion amongst financial traders, one would guess it was more by luck | :07:23. | :07:27. | |
than judgment. This apparently went through a general producer rather | :07:27. | :07:31. | |
than the specialist business unit. Is that likely to have been a | :07:31. | :07:40. | |
problem? I would be surprised if given the minor rumpus... It wasn't | :07:40. | :07:45. | |
a hoax and what is it doesn't appear to be that far out of kilter. | :07:45. | :07:50. | |
I would be surprised if BBC are not reviewing how they assess their | :07:50. | :07:55. | |
contributors in matters like this. Thank you. | :07:55. | :07:59. | |
There were more question-marks over guests election after Wednesday | :07:59. | :08:04. | |
night's Newsnight. Jeremy Paxman showed a discussion about the euro | :08:04. | :08:08. | |
which involved a spokesman from the European Commission and the | :08:08. | :08:12. | |
opinionated journalist, Peter Oban. These guys are in total and utter | :08:12. | :08:18. | |
denial. It is terribly frightening, listening to that idiot in Brussels. | :08:18. | :08:24. | |
Would you like to respond? No, I think these words speak for | :08:24. | :08:29. | |
themselves. This idiot in Brussels... Will you stop referring | :08:29. | :08:36. | |
to him as that. If you listen to the catastrophic quality... You may | :08:36. | :08:40. | |
think he is out of contact with reality... He is now walking out of | :08:40. | :08:44. | |
the studio. Well done, we can't even hold him to account, because | :08:44. | :08:46. | |
you have been gratuitously offensive. | :08:46. | :08:56. | |
:08:56. | :09:19. | ||
Sarah Miller was one of a number of If I said we are currently in the | :09:19. | :09:24. | |
year 2011 C E, would you know what I was talking about? It stands for, | :09:24. | :09:28. | |
an era, and newspapers reported that the BBC had decided to use | :09:28. | :09:35. | |
that instead of AD, and B C E, instead of BC, or before Christ. | :09:35. | :09:40. | |
Many of you were furious about the Many of you were furious about the | :09:40. | :09:50. | |
:09:50. | :10:00. | ||
The Andrew Marr showed discussed the story in its paper review, but | :10:00. | :10:04. | |
presenter and guests appeared to be off-message. According to the Mail | :10:04. | :10:08. | |
on Sunday, BBC turns its back on year of Our Lord, and we are going | :10:08. | :10:16. | |
to say, nearer, and before, era. I'm not. I say AD, and BC, because | :10:16. | :10:21. | |
that is what I understand. Good, I agree. What was going on? The Mail | :10:21. | :10:26. | |
on Sunday and Boris Johnson based their stories on a statement on BBC | :10:26. | :10:32. | |
religion's website, saying it used these C and C, instead of BC and AD. | :10:32. | :10:37. | |
Is there a corporation wide band? No, according to a statement we | :10:37. | :10:47. | |
:10:47. | :10:57. | ||
No shortage of criticisms about BBC News this week, but there was a | :10:57. | :11:00. | |
reminder on Tuesday that other broadcasters are not all perfect. | :11:00. | :11:05. | |
ITV admitted that images used in its new current affairs series, | :11:05. | :11:09. | |
supposedly of the IRA shooting down a helicopter with weapons supplied | :11:09. | :11:17. |