30/09/2011 Newswatch


30/09/2011

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 30/09/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

The welcome to NewsWatch. Later in the programme, was it responsible

:00:26.:00:31.

to broadcast this interview, predicting financial Armageddon?

:00:31.:00:36.

dream of another recession, another moment like this. Tuesday's speech

:00:36.:00:40.

by the Labour leader at his party's annual conference was going fine,

:00:40.:00:46.

until a quarter of an hour in, this happened. My message to the public

:00:46.:00:53.

is simple... Ed Miliband, having a few technical problems... We are

:00:53.:00:57.

having a few technical problems with our feet from Liverpool. I

:00:57.:01:02.

think we are going to try to find think we are going to try to find

:01:02.:01:12.
:01:12.:01:13.

another link to pick up on that. It was five minutes before the

:01:13.:01:19.

picture was restored, during which time, BBC Two went blank. The news

:01:19.:01:22.

channel played some of the audio feed of the speech.

:01:22.:01:28.

An absolute disaster for his media press team. Everyone seems to have

:01:28.:01:31.

lost power with Liverpool, which means nobody is able to broadcast

:01:31.:01:34.

this speech alive. All television channels were

:01:34.:01:39.

affected by the problem, which stemmed from a generator failure in

:01:39.:01:46.

the contract to's truck. Which was supplying a feat to broadcasters --

:01:46.:01:56.
:01:56.:01:57.

The new channel broke into a report by Nick Robinson. The government's

:01:57.:02:03.

austerity plan is failing. You can sense the fear we have as we watch

:02:03.:02:09.

the economic crisis that stalked our country in 2008. Apologies to

:02:09.:02:13.

leave that, we will return a little later, but we are heading back to

:02:13.:02:17.

Los Angeles, because proceedings have resumed in the case against Dr

:02:17.:02:23.

Conrad Murray. What was, who was the cause of Michael Jackson staff?

:02:23.:02:33.
:02:33.:03:00.

One BBC interview caused a huge storm of protest. This is a man

:03:00.:03:04.

described as an independent market trader, speaking to the news

:03:04.:03:09.

channel on Monday. I am very confident that this particular

:03:09.:03:12.

rescue plan, it doesn't matter how much money they want to put in, it

:03:12.:03:17.

is not going to work. Because this problem cannot be solved. I am

:03:17.:03:21.

fairly confident the euro is going to crash and fall pretty hard.

:03:21.:03:27.

Because markets are ruled by fear. Foremost writers -- for most

:03:27.:03:31.

traders, we don't really care too much, how they are going to fix the

:03:31.:03:36.

economy or the whole situation. Or job is to make money from it.

:03:36.:03:40.

Personally, I have been dreaming of this moment for three years. I go

:03:40.:03:44.

to bed every night, I dream of another recession. If you could see

:03:44.:03:48.

the people around me, jaws have collectively dropped at what you

:03:48.:03:51.

have just said. We appreciate your candour but it doesn't help the

:03:51.:03:57.

rest of us. I would say this to everybody who is watching this.

:03:58.:04:01.

This economic crisis is like a cancer. If you wait and wait,

:04:01.:04:05.

thinking this is going to go away, just like a cancer it is going to

:04:05.:04:11.

grow, and be too late. Twitter users questioned his credentials?

:04:11.:04:15.

Asking whether the news channel had been hoaxed. The BBC said it

:04:15.:04:19.

carried out detailed investigations and couldn't find any evidence to

:04:19.:04:24.

suggest the interview was a hoax. Was this trader is to double

:04:24.:04:28.

interviewee anyway? It turned out he had never been authorised by the

:04:28.:04:33.

Financial Services Authority -- was he a suitable interviewee? He said

:04:33.:04:41.

he was an intention sika and he rebranded his YouTube channel as

:04:41.:04:44.

trade on the BBC -- he said he was trade on the BBC -- he said he was

:04:44.:04:54.
:04:54.:05:23.

an entire -- he said he was an We wanted to talk to someone from

:05:23.:05:26.

BBC News about why he had been chosen to appear on the news

:05:26.:05:31.

channel, but mac got request was refused. We were referred again to

:05:31.:05:35.

the statement saying there was no evidence he was a hoaxer. I am

:05:35.:05:40.

joined by the journalist and preventer of Radio 4's radio show -

:05:40.:05:46.

- presenter. Was he an appropriate person to have a national news

:05:46.:05:52.

channel? The problem is, that in his own words, he is a self-

:05:52.:05:56.

confessed attention seeker who describes financial trading as not

:05:56.:05:59.

really a business, more of a hobby. You are left wondering how he

:05:59.:06:04.

appeared on BBC News. Not in any old role, but as an expert on the

:06:04.:06:07.

financial crisis. Should his credentials have been better

:06:08.:06:13.

checked before he was suddenly thrust to national fame? I don't

:06:13.:06:17.

know what credentials he has. The BBC could fairly say, the news

:06:17.:06:22.

channel has lots of people on it, represents a wide range of views.

:06:22.:06:26.

You go on the street and talk to people, you take what you get. In

:06:26.:06:30.

this case, he was put up as someone who knew what he was talking about

:06:30.:06:33.

the relation to the global financial crisis and business

:06:33.:06:38.

matters. He is a self-confessed potential sicker he describes

:06:38.:06:44.

financial trading, which was his designation... Self-confessed

:06:44.:06:49.

attention seeker. He describes financial trading as a hobby. Is he

:06:49.:06:53.

credible as a financial trader? Make your own mind up, but not as

:06:53.:06:59.

credible as others. With markets so volatile and potentially influenced

:06:59.:07:03.

by broadcasts like that, should the BBC have been more careful? On the

:07:03.:07:09.

face of it, they did not represent -- did not misrepresent him. He is

:07:09.:07:13.

technically a financial trader. But is the most credible voice, given

:07:13.:07:20.

that if he happened to... If his views ended up representing a broad

:07:20.:07:23.

opinion amongst financial traders, one would guess it was more by luck

:07:23.:07:27.

than judgment. This apparently went through a general producer rather

:07:27.:07:31.

than the specialist business unit. Is that likely to have been a

:07:31.:07:40.

problem? I would be surprised if given the minor rumpus... It wasn't

:07:40.:07:45.

a hoax and what is it doesn't appear to be that far out of kilter.

:07:45.:07:50.

I would be surprised if BBC are not reviewing how they assess their

:07:50.:07:55.

contributors in matters like this. Thank you.

:07:55.:07:59.

There were more question-marks over guests election after Wednesday

:07:59.:08:04.

night's Newsnight. Jeremy Paxman showed a discussion about the euro

:08:04.:08:08.

which involved a spokesman from the European Commission and the

:08:08.:08:12.

opinionated journalist, Peter Oban. These guys are in total and utter

:08:12.:08:18.

denial. It is terribly frightening, listening to that idiot in Brussels.

:08:18.:08:24.

Would you like to respond? No, I think these words speak for

:08:24.:08:29.

themselves. This idiot in Brussels... Will you stop referring

:08:29.:08:36.

to him as that. If you listen to the catastrophic quality... You may

:08:36.:08:40.

think he is out of contact with reality... He is now walking out of

:08:40.:08:44.

the studio. Well done, we can't even hold him to account, because

:08:44.:08:46.

you have been gratuitously offensive.

:08:46.:08:56.
:08:56.:09:19.

Sarah Miller was one of a number of If I said we are currently in the

:09:19.:09:24.

year 2011 C E, would you know what I was talking about? It stands for,

:09:24.:09:28.

an era, and newspapers reported that the BBC had decided to use

:09:28.:09:35.

that instead of AD, and B C E, instead of BC, or before Christ.

:09:35.:09:40.

Many of you were furious about the Many of you were furious about the

:09:40.:09:50.
:09:50.:10:00.

The Andrew Marr showed discussed the story in its paper review, but

:10:00.:10:04.

presenter and guests appeared to be off-message. According to the Mail

:10:04.:10:08.

on Sunday, BBC turns its back on year of Our Lord, and we are going

:10:08.:10:16.

to say, nearer, and before, era. I'm not. I say AD, and BC, because

:10:16.:10:21.

that is what I understand. Good, I agree. What was going on? The Mail

:10:21.:10:26.

on Sunday and Boris Johnson based their stories on a statement on BBC

:10:26.:10:32.

religion's website, saying it used these C and C, instead of BC and AD.

:10:32.:10:37.

Is there a corporation wide band? No, according to a statement we

:10:37.:10:47.
:10:47.:10:57.

No shortage of criticisms about BBC News this week, but there was a

:10:57.:11:00.

reminder on Tuesday that other broadcasters are not all perfect.

:11:00.:11:05.

ITV admitted that images used in its new current affairs series,

:11:05.:11:09.

supposedly of the IRA shooting down a helicopter with weapons supplied

:11:09.:11:17.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS