Browse content similar to 01/10/2011. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Welcome. Later in the programme - it was it responsible to broadcast | :00:25. | :00:30. | |
this interview, predicting financial Armageddon. I dream of | :00:30. | :00:35. | |
another recession. First, it was Ed Miliband's moment in the public eye. | :00:36. | :00:41. | |
His speech on Tuesday was going fine, until 15 minutes in, this | :00:41. | :00:50. | |
happened. My message to the public is simple... Ed Miliband having a | :00:50. | :00:57. | |
few technical problems, we rather having technical problems. We would | :00:57. | :01:06. | |
try to find another link to pick up on this. This led to this, and, | :01:06. | :01:10. | |
what kind of broadcaster are you? It is only from the double, it is | :01:10. | :01:15. | |
not rocket science. It took five minutes until the picture was | :01:15. | :01:20. | |
restored. The news channel played some of the audio feed from the | :01:20. | :01:25. | |
speech. An absolute disaster for his media Presteigne here. Everyone | :01:25. | :01:29. | |
seems to have lost power with Liverpool, which means nobody is | :01:29. | :01:34. | |
able to broadcast this page life. All TV channels were affected by | :01:34. | :01:37. | |
the problem, which stemmed from a generator failure in a contractor's | :01:37. | :01:44. | |
truck. No plane to be attached to the BBC there. On Tuesday evening, | :01:44. | :01:48. | |
Ed Miliband was again cut off, this time as a result of an editorial | :01:48. | :01:57. | |
decision. The Government's austerity plan is failing. You can | :01:57. | :02:03. | |
sense the fear people have as we watch the economic crisis that has | :02:03. | :02:09. | |
bought a country in 2008... Arab ologies, we will return to the | :02:09. | :02:15. | |
Labour Party Conference later. We go back to Los Angeles, where | :02:15. | :02:21. | |
proceedings have continued against Dr Conrad Murray. Who was the cause | :02:21. | :02:27. | |
of Michael Jackson's death? Here is what a viewer had to say it - I am | :02:27. | :02:30. | |
aghast that you are suddenly speaking -- switching from a Labour | :02:30. | :02:36. | |
leader's speech to inconsequential vision of a trial from Michael | :02:36. | :02:42. | |
Jackson's doctor. I am a Tory voter, so I am simply left utterly | :02:42. | :02:47. | |
speechless and frustrated at the decision of this trial being more | :02:47. | :02:54. | |
important than British politics. When BBC interview this week caused | :02:54. | :03:00. | |
a huge storm of protest. This man is described as an independent | :03:01. | :03:05. | |
financial trader speaking to us on Monday. I am very confident that | :03:05. | :03:10. | |
this particular rescue plan - it does not matter how much money they | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
put in - it will not work. This problem cannot be solved. I am | :03:16. | :03:21. | |
fairly confident the euro is going to crash. It will fall harder. | :03:21. | :03:26. | |
Markets are ruled by fear. For most traders, it is not about - we do | :03:26. | :03:31. | |
not care much about how to fix the economy. Our job is to make money | :03:31. | :03:36. | |
from it. Personally, I have been draining of this moment for three | :03:37. | :03:40. | |
years. I have a confession, I go to bed every night and dream of | :03:40. | :03:45. | |
another recession. If you could see the people around me, jaws have | :03:45. | :03:48. | |
collectively dropped at what you have just said. We appreciate your | :03:48. | :03:54. | |
candour, but it does not help the rest of the eurozone. I will say | :03:54. | :03:58. | |
this to everybody who is watching this. These economic crisis is like | :03:58. | :04:03. | |
a cancer. If you just wait thinking this is going to go away, just like | :04:03. | :04:08. | |
a cancer it will grow. Tweedy users immediately question his | :04:08. | :04:14. | |
credentials, asking whether the new channel had been hoaxed. -- Twitter. | :04:14. | :04:17. | |
The BBC said it had carried out detailed investigations and could | :04:17. | :04:22. | |
not find any suggestion that it was a hoax. Was is a suitable | :04:22. | :04:29. | |
interviewee? It turns out he had never been approved. He told a | :04:29. | :04:33. | |
newspaper that he was an attention seeker. By Wednesday he had | :04:33. | :04:40. | |
capitalised on the interview Bibury branding his YouTube Journal. It is | :04:40. | :04:45. | |
guidance of as one more concerned about the interview. -- one viewer | :04:45. | :04:55. | |
:04:55. | :05:24. | ||
We wanted to talk to somebody from BBC News about why he had been | :05:24. | :05:30. | |
chosen to appear on the Channel, but our request was refused. They | :05:30. | :05:33. | |
referred to the state then there was no evidence that he was a | :05:33. | :05:39. | |
hoaxer. Instead, I am joined by the presenter of Radio's for news show. | :05:39. | :05:43. | |
He may not have been a hoaxer, but was the appropriate to have on a | :05:43. | :05:48. | |
national news channel on the subject? The problem is that in his | :05:48. | :05:53. | |
own words, he is a self-confessed attention seeker, who describes | :05:53. | :05:57. | |
financial trading as more of a hobby. You are left wondering quite | :05:57. | :06:03. | |
how this person appeared on BBC News. Not just in any or raw, but | :06:03. | :06:08. | |
in a role of financial expertise. Should his credentials had been | :06:08. | :06:12. | |
checked before he was suddenly thrust to national fame? I do not | :06:12. | :06:22. | |
know what can do Chelsea has. -- credentials. The BBC represents a | :06:22. | :06:26. | |
wide view of the opinions. In this particular case, this man was put | :06:26. | :06:30. | |
up as someone who knew what he was talking about the global financial | :06:30. | :06:36. | |
crisis and matters of business. As I said, he is a buy at -- self- | :06:36. | :06:40. | |
confessed attention seeker who does financial trading as a hobby, not a | :06:40. | :06:45. | |
profession. He has never been registered already a thing of the | :06:45. | :06:50. | |
sword. His incredible as a financial trader? Make your own | :06:50. | :06:57. | |
mind. With markets in volatile and possibly influenced by a broadcast | :06:57. | :07:02. | |
like that, should the BBC had been more careful? They did not race | :07:02. | :07:05. | |
represent in in the says they said he was not something he wanted -- | :07:05. | :07:12. | |
wasn't. But is he the most credible voice of opinion on these things? | :07:12. | :07:17. | |
Iffy happen to agree... If his views ended up representing a | :07:17. | :07:20. | |
broader base of opinion amongst financial traders, one would guess | :07:20. | :07:25. | |
that it was good judgement. This apparently went through a general | :07:25. | :07:29. | |
producer, rather than a specialist business producer. Is that a | :07:29. | :07:38. | |
problem? I would be surprised at this being a big problem. It was | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
not a hoax. And what he said it does not to be too far out of | :07:42. | :07:52. | |
:07:52. | :07:52. | ||
kilter with what other big -- others think. Thank you very much | :07:52. | :07:57. | |
indeed. They were more question marks over | :07:57. | :08:03. | |
best selection after Wednesday night's question night. It involved | :08:03. | :08:06. | |
a spokesman from the European Commission and an opinionated | :08:06. | :08:12. | |
journalist. These guys are in total and utter denial. It is terrible | :08:12. | :08:17. | |
frightening listening to that idiot in Brussels. Mr idiot in Brussels, | :08:17. | :08:25. | |
would you like to respond? I think the words speak for themselves. | :08:25. | :08:35. | |
:08:35. | :08:35. | ||
Will be stopped to have -- the Beast of referring to him as that? | :08:35. | :08:40. | |
You may think he is out of contact with reality, but that one has | :08:40. | :08:47. | |
stopped him walking out of the studio in Brussels. | :08:47. | :08:52. | |
There were a number of viewers who were offended by what they saw. One | :08:52. | :09:02. | |
:09:02. | :09:18. | ||
Meanwhile, I never asked: -- If I said we are currently in the | :09:18. | :09:22. | |
year of 2011 C E, what you know what I was talking about? Well, the | :09:22. | :09:27. | |
sea stands for, and Iraq. A newspaper has reported that the BBC | :09:27. | :09:35. | |
has decided to use this term instead of BC or ad. Many of you | :09:35. | :09:45. | |
:09:45. | :09:59. | ||
were furious about the suggestion. Sunday's into Marcio discussed the | :09:59. | :10:04. | |
story in the pay review. According to the Mail on Sunday, BBC turns | :10:04. | :10:08. | |
its back on year of Our Lord. We are going to say, Iraq and the poor, | :10:08. | :10:17. | |
near Rye. I say ad and PC, because that is what I understand. I agree. | :10:17. | :10:22. | |
What was going on? The Mail on Sunday and Boris Johnson on the | :10:22. | :10:28. | |
next paper based their stories on the BBC website, saying it used BC | :10:29. | :10:34. | |
and BC be. Is there a corporation wide then on the use of the terms? | :10:34. | :10:44. | |
:10:44. | :10:54. | ||
No, according to a statement we No shortage this week of criticisms | :10:54. | :10:58. | |
about BBC News. Finally, there was a reminder on Tuesday that other | :10:58. | :11:02. | |
broadcasters are not perfect. ITV admitted that images used in its | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
new current affairs series, supposedly of the IRA shooting down | :11:06. | :11:10. | |
a helicopter with pilot -- weapons supplied by Colonel Gaddafi, or | :11:10. | :11:17. | |
actually taken from a computer game. Please keep your eyes and ears on | :11:17. | :11:23. |