19/05/2017 Newswatch


19/05/2017

Similar Content

Browse content similar to 19/05/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!

Transcript


LineFromTo

Coming up at ten, a full round-up of the day's news. First, it's

:00:00.:00:08.

Newswatch. Hello and welcome to Newswatch

:00:09.:00:10.

with me Samira Ahmed. Coming up: the party

:00:11.:00:12.

manifestos are all out. How well has the BBC

:00:13.:00:14.

done on explaining their policies fairly

:00:15.:00:16.

and impartially? And, are we hearing too many random

:00:17.:00:19.

opinions from not always With the main parties

:00:20.:00:22.

publishing their offers to voters, this week has seen the

:00:23.:00:32.

general election campaign in full The BBC's political editor

:00:33.:00:35.

Laura Kuenssberg was on hand and on Here she is on Thursday

:00:36.:00:38.

reporting on the Conservatives' proposals,

:00:39.:00:46.

and first on Tuesday reacting And remember not so long ago in 2015

:00:47.:00:53.

Ed Miliband made a few little tiptoes to the left of where

:00:54.:00:58.

Labour had been and he lost that Jeremy Corbyn is making a much

:00:59.:01:01.

bigger step in the same direct of Middle England are really ready

:01:02.:01:09.

for the policies that he believes And, of course, the

:01:10.:01:12.

complications of Brexit means whatever else she is promising

:01:13.:01:18.

could be derailed by that becoming extremely difficult,

:01:19.:01:21.

and not just hard to deliver So, broadly, though, as with any

:01:22.:01:24.

political idea leader for the mainstream, easier

:01:25.:01:33.

to say than to prove. Some viewers object

:01:34.:01:35.

to what they see as a running commentary on what politicians

:01:36.:01:38.

are saying and doing during the campaign, with David Jowett

:01:39.:01:40.

putting it like this. "It seems the news bulletins

:01:41.:01:46.

are becoming the Laura Her pieces to camera

:01:47.:01:48.

and the questioning of political figures are not the broad

:01:49.:01:51.

unbiased approach that one should expect from the BBC but come across

:01:52.:01:54.

as the presentation of personal The BBC should be providing

:01:55.:01:57.

a broader approach with a considerably higher

:01:58.:02:09.

factual content." Allegations of bias,

:02:10.:02:10.

as we've mentioned before in recent weeks, have been rife with some

:02:11.:02:12.

viewers feeling the BBC has given the lion's share of screen time

:02:13.:02:15.

and prominence to the Labour Party. Tom and Jan Borland

:02:16.:02:18.

profess themselves, "Bemused and somewhat annoyed,

:02:19.:02:20.

to say the least, by the total airtime given over

:02:21.:02:22.

to the Labour Party, and to Jeremy Corbyn in particular,

:02:23.:02:24.

who is the lead story every time This amount of press

:02:25.:02:27.

coverage is, to my mind, highly disproportionate, biased

:02:28.:02:31.

towards a single person and his party and not conducive to a level

:02:32.:02:33.

political playing field." For the majority of

:02:34.:02:42.

those contacting the BBC, though, the bias

:02:43.:02:50.

is in the other direction with Rav Dhillon speaking for many

:02:51.:02:52.

who feel, "There is a sneering and condescending tone

:02:53.:02:55.

in the interviewing and reporting Elsewhere, the BBC's

:02:56.:02:57.

economics editor Kamal Ahmed also came under attack after his

:02:58.:02:59.

piece on Labour's manifesto on Those earning above ?80,000

:03:00.:03:02.

will pay a tax rate of If you earn above that amount

:03:03.:03:22.

the loss will be around ?400. For those earning ?123,000

:03:23.:03:26.

the rate rises to 50p. That could leave some

:03:27.:03:28.

with a loss of up to ?23,000. Many viewers took to their

:03:29.:03:32.

calculators and then to social media to point out that those sums

:03:33.:03:34.

were wrong as the BBC later acknowledged, though not on-air,

:03:35.:03:37.

those earning ?123,000 under Labour's

:03:38.:03:39.

plans would actually pay an extra ?2150 in

:03:40.:03:40.

income tax, not 23,000. You'd have to earn ?500,000 to be

:03:41.:03:50.

taxed that much more. Philip Jones told us,

:03:51.:03:52.

"I will assume this was a genuine error, albeit a gross one,

:03:53.:03:57.

and not a deliberate ploy to mislead potential voters into

:03:58.:04:00.

mistrusting the Labour Party." But Louis Mendee spoke for many

:04:01.:04:02.

when he posted, "This It is wildly unacceptable for

:04:03.:04:05.

the BBC to be reporting falsehoods Later that night there

:04:06.:04:09.

were several examples of the BBC's efforts to get out

:04:10.:04:20.

and about during this election campaign and hear the views

:04:21.:04:23.

of so-called Here's Deputy Political

:04:24.:04:24.

Editor John Pienaar soliciting opinions

:04:25.:04:29.

in a gym in Bradford. Labour under Jeremy Corbyn,

:04:30.:04:33.

what do you think? Well, I quite like his

:04:34.:04:36.

policies but I don't I agree, yeah, I don't think

:04:37.:04:38.

they're doable myself. Kenny Watt was watching

:04:39.:04:45.

that and thought the views of the gentlemen

:04:46.:04:49.

exercising there, and more generally vox pops like that, did not add

:04:50.:04:51.

greatly to the sum of human He's got a journalist coming

:04:52.:04:55.

in when he's in the middle of his work-out asking him questions

:04:56.:04:59.

when he's probably just thinking, "Oh my god, when's this hill

:05:00.:05:01.

climb going to end?" And that's the problem

:05:02.:05:05.

with vox pops, because basically you're not getting a true

:05:06.:05:07.

representation of the population. This is how we get into the position

:05:08.:05:09.

of sound bites winning elections. Stick to having trained journalists

:05:10.:05:15.

telling us about the facts in a story rather than the opinions

:05:16.:05:17.

of the ill informed. Well, let's discuss some of those

:05:18.:05:31.

issues with the BBC's editor of political news Katy Searle who's

:05:32.:05:33.

in our Westminster studio. Katy, let's start with

:05:34.:05:36.

the allegations of bias, mostly claiming that the BBC has

:05:37.:05:38.

an anti-Corbyn bias You've seen the examples that

:05:39.:05:40.

viewers have raised. We have very strong and clear

:05:41.:05:44.

guidelines that we follow, editorial guidelines, and they're

:05:45.:05:48.

in line with the Ofcom code of conduct as well,

:05:49.:05:50.

which show that we have strict rules period and to reflect all parties'

:05:51.:05:53.

positions and policies. And that's something

:05:54.:06:01.

we do absolutely and we Labour supporters are

:06:02.:06:03.

complaining that too much coverage is

:06:04.:06:14.

attacking the party. Tory supporters are saying Labour

:06:15.:06:15.

get more air time, so how is BBC News approaching that whole

:06:16.:06:18.

issue of balance and fairness? What we have to do

:06:19.:06:33.

is take our editorial judgments and that's always

:06:34.:06:37.

going to have to guide our coverage. And that's why programme

:06:38.:06:39.

editors across the BBC and correspondents on air,

:06:40.:06:41.

as well as Laura, the political editor, have long and careful

:06:42.:06:44.

discussions about what stories we're going to cover, what are the values

:06:45.:06:46.

in the news terms of those stories, and then how do they fit in line

:06:47.:06:50.

with the guidelines that I've just What's noticeable already in this

:06:51.:06:53.

election campaign is that perceived errors, and indeed

:06:54.:06:56.

some factual ones, amplified on social media when people

:06:57.:06:58.

try to build a campaign around them saying, look,

:06:59.:07:00.

the BBC's being unfair. How should the BBC deal

:07:01.:07:02.

with those examples? Look, we're all human,

:07:03.:07:16.

we do make mistakes. Look, you know, we're

:07:17.:07:17.

working to tight deadlines with lots of information

:07:18.:07:19.

coming in all the time In those circumstances you just have

:07:20.:07:22.

to look and see where you can correct it as

:07:23.:07:26.

quickly as possible. And just on the detail I think

:07:27.:07:28.

it's worth adding that sometimes graphics actually

:07:29.:07:30.

can not be as clear. You are trying to sum up quite

:07:31.:07:32.

a lot of detail in one simple picture of

:07:33.:07:35.

numbers and figures. What we need to do is be very clear

:07:36.:07:37.

that our scripting goes around that and tells

:07:38.:07:40.

the full story. We have seen a particularly vocal

:07:41.:07:43.

campaign online against Laura Kuenssberg alleging

:07:44.:07:45.

anti-Labour bias. Laura Kuenssberg is a first-class

:07:46.:07:46.

political editor who has worked incredibly hard

:07:47.:08:01.

to get her job right. Laura does the daily analysis

:08:02.:08:03.

of all of the political parties and, of course, no personal views

:08:04.:08:06.

are reflected in any sense on any party, and that's true not just

:08:07.:08:09.

of Laura but across the BBC. So Laura's doing her job and she's

:08:10.:08:12.

doing that brilliantly. More broadly, though,

:08:13.:08:20.

viewers do complain that there's too much personal commentary

:08:21.:08:22.

from political correspondents who are kind of filling airtime

:08:23.:08:23.

and it is not fact-based, Wouldn't the BBC be better,

:08:24.:08:26.

as at least one of our viewers has suggested, just sticking

:08:27.:08:30.

to factual reporting? Well, I think analysis is really

:08:31.:08:40.

important actually, as part Certainly in elections,

:08:41.:08:42.

and as we saw in the referendum last year,

:08:43.:08:45.

parties and campaigns have their own positions to push

:08:46.:08:47.

and they will do that And really, an important part

:08:48.:08:49.

of our job is to try and analyse and say to the viewer,

:08:50.:08:54.

well, on balance this That's why we have very experienced

:08:55.:08:56.

people from Laura down across the BBC working on that

:08:57.:09:00.

and trying to give the audience something that means something

:09:01.:09:03.

and not just slogans and numbers. We have to talk about vox pops

:09:04.:09:13.

because they come up every election and the charge is two things,

:09:14.:09:16.

one is if they are too gimmicky you're not going to get much

:09:17.:09:19.

of an answer if people But also that they're not informed

:09:20.:09:22.

and are representative, and shouldn't the BBC be more

:09:23.:09:25.

careful about using them? -- But also that they're not

:09:26.:09:28.

informed and are not representative, and shouldn't the BBC be more

:09:29.:09:30.

careful about using them? Yeah, vox pops are tricky actually

:09:31.:09:33.

because I have a bit of However, if we're doing

:09:34.:09:36.

a lot of politicians, and we are at the moment, and it's

:09:37.:09:39.

a very formalised way of presenting their views and opinions, I think

:09:40.:09:42.

vox pops gives us a bit of colour. It also does the most important

:09:43.:09:45.

thing which is to reflect the And in this campaign which goes

:09:46.:09:48.

on for several weeks we want to hear from our audience

:09:49.:09:52.

as well and try and, if you like, Vox pop is an unscientific

:09:53.:09:55.

way of doing that but it's the best way that we

:09:56.:09:58.

can do when we're dealing with tight Away from the cut and thrust

:09:59.:10:02.

of the election but not entirely unconnected to it was

:10:03.:10:12.

the coverage of last Friday's cyber-attack which use ransomware

:10:13.:10:14.

to lock files in 150 different countries demanding

:10:15.:10:17.

payment to allow access. Some viewers were unhappy

:10:18.:10:18.

with the way the story was reported and one of them Alex McGill recorded

:10:19.:10:21.

this video to explain why. Clearly the real story

:10:22.:10:30.

was that businesses large and small across the world had

:10:31.:10:32.

been attacked and damaged done. But from the initial reports one

:10:33.:10:40.

could easily have concluded that This unbalanced reporting

:10:41.:10:42.

is particularly bad in the middle of an election campaign and can only

:10:43.:10:49.

heighten the perception of editorial Finally, the Moors murderer

:10:50.:10:52.

Ian Brady died on Tuesday. The 79-year-old had

:10:53.:10:59.

tortured and killed five children in the 1960s with his

:11:00.:11:00.

partner Myra Hindley and buried them Some viewers objected

:11:01.:11:04.

to the prominence given to the news. Why was it necessary for it to be

:11:05.:11:15.

in the number one spot, to have so much time given to this story,

:11:16.:11:20.

for the BBC to then try and find people that they could

:11:21.:11:23.

interview on this story? By doing this all they were actually

:11:24.:11:26.

doing was causing yet more distress to the families

:11:27.:11:29.

of these children, who have to live with

:11:30.:11:31.

this day in day out This could have been dealt

:11:32.:11:33.

with with a simple one-liner Thank you for all your

:11:34.:11:37.

comments this week. If you want to share your opinions

:11:38.:11:45.

on BBC News and current affairs, you can call us on 0370 010 6676, or

:11:46.:11:49.

e-mail [email protected]. You can find us on Twitter

:11:50.:11:59.

@NewswatchBBC, and do The address for that is

:12:00.:12:02.

bbc.co.uk/newswatch. We'll be back to hear

:12:03.:12:08.

your thoughts about BBC

:12:09.:12:12.

Download Subtitles

SRT

ASS