Browse content similar to 19/05/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Coming up at ten, a full round-up of the day's news. First, it's | :00:00. | :00:08. | |
Newswatch. Hello and welcome to Newswatch | :00:09. | :00:10. | |
with me Samira Ahmed. Coming up: the party | :00:11. | :00:12. | |
manifestos are all out. How well has the BBC | :00:13. | :00:14. | |
done on explaining their policies fairly | :00:15. | :00:16. | |
and impartially? And, are we hearing too many random | :00:17. | :00:19. | |
opinions from not always With the main parties | :00:20. | :00:22. | |
publishing their offers to voters, this week has seen the | :00:23. | :00:32. | |
general election campaign in full The BBC's political editor | :00:33. | :00:35. | |
Laura Kuenssberg was on hand and on Here she is on Thursday | :00:36. | :00:38. | |
reporting on the Conservatives' proposals, | :00:39. | :00:46. | |
and first on Tuesday reacting And remember not so long ago in 2015 | :00:47. | :00:53. | |
Ed Miliband made a few little tiptoes to the left of where | :00:54. | :00:58. | |
Labour had been and he lost that Jeremy Corbyn is making a much | :00:59. | :01:01. | |
bigger step in the same direct of Middle England are really ready | :01:02. | :01:09. | |
for the policies that he believes And, of course, the | :01:10. | :01:12. | |
complications of Brexit means whatever else she is promising | :01:13. | :01:18. | |
could be derailed by that becoming extremely difficult, | :01:19. | :01:21. | |
and not just hard to deliver So, broadly, though, as with any | :01:22. | :01:24. | |
political idea leader for the mainstream, easier | :01:25. | :01:33. | |
to say than to prove. Some viewers object | :01:34. | :01:35. | |
to what they see as a running commentary on what politicians | :01:36. | :01:38. | |
are saying and doing during the campaign, with David Jowett | :01:39. | :01:40. | |
putting it like this. "It seems the news bulletins | :01:41. | :01:46. | |
are becoming the Laura Her pieces to camera | :01:47. | :01:48. | |
and the questioning of political figures are not the broad | :01:49. | :01:51. | |
unbiased approach that one should expect from the BBC but come across | :01:52. | :01:54. | |
as the presentation of personal The BBC should be providing | :01:55. | :01:57. | |
a broader approach with a considerably higher | :01:58. | :02:09. | |
factual content." Allegations of bias, | :02:10. | :02:10. | |
as we've mentioned before in recent weeks, have been rife with some | :02:11. | :02:12. | |
viewers feeling the BBC has given the lion's share of screen time | :02:13. | :02:15. | |
and prominence to the Labour Party. Tom and Jan Borland | :02:16. | :02:18. | |
profess themselves, "Bemused and somewhat annoyed, | :02:19. | :02:20. | |
to say the least, by the total airtime given over | :02:21. | :02:22. | |
to the Labour Party, and to Jeremy Corbyn in particular, | :02:23. | :02:24. | |
who is the lead story every time This amount of press | :02:25. | :02:27. | |
coverage is, to my mind, highly disproportionate, biased | :02:28. | :02:31. | |
towards a single person and his party and not conducive to a level | :02:32. | :02:33. | |
political playing field." For the majority of | :02:34. | :02:42. | |
those contacting the BBC, though, the bias | :02:43. | :02:50. | |
is in the other direction with Rav Dhillon speaking for many | :02:51. | :02:52. | |
who feel, "There is a sneering and condescending tone | :02:53. | :02:55. | |
in the interviewing and reporting Elsewhere, the BBC's | :02:56. | :02:57. | |
economics editor Kamal Ahmed also came under attack after his | :02:58. | :02:59. | |
piece on Labour's manifesto on Those earning above ?80,000 | :03:00. | :03:02. | |
will pay a tax rate of If you earn above that amount | :03:03. | :03:22. | |
the loss will be around ?400. For those earning ?123,000 | :03:23. | :03:26. | |
the rate rises to 50p. That could leave some | :03:27. | :03:28. | |
with a loss of up to ?23,000. Many viewers took to their | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
calculators and then to social media to point out that those sums | :03:33. | :03:34. | |
were wrong as the BBC later acknowledged, though not on-air, | :03:35. | :03:37. | |
those earning ?123,000 under Labour's | :03:38. | :03:39. | |
plans would actually pay an extra ?2150 in | :03:40. | :03:40. | |
income tax, not 23,000. You'd have to earn ?500,000 to be | :03:41. | :03:50. | |
taxed that much more. Philip Jones told us, | :03:51. | :03:52. | |
"I will assume this was a genuine error, albeit a gross one, | :03:53. | :03:57. | |
and not a deliberate ploy to mislead potential voters into | :03:58. | :04:00. | |
mistrusting the Labour Party." But Louis Mendee spoke for many | :04:01. | :04:02. | |
when he posted, "This It is wildly unacceptable for | :04:03. | :04:05. | |
the BBC to be reporting falsehoods Later that night there | :04:06. | :04:09. | |
were several examples of the BBC's efforts to get out | :04:10. | :04:20. | |
and about during this election campaign and hear the views | :04:21. | :04:23. | |
of so-called Here's Deputy Political | :04:24. | :04:24. | |
Editor John Pienaar soliciting opinions | :04:25. | :04:29. | |
in a gym in Bradford. Labour under Jeremy Corbyn, | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
what do you think? Well, I quite like his | :04:34. | :04:36. | |
policies but I don't I agree, yeah, I don't think | :04:37. | :04:38. | |
they're doable myself. Kenny Watt was watching | :04:39. | :04:45. | |
that and thought the views of the gentlemen | :04:46. | :04:49. | |
exercising there, and more generally vox pops like that, did not add | :04:50. | :04:51. | |
greatly to the sum of human He's got a journalist coming | :04:52. | :04:55. | |
in when he's in the middle of his work-out asking him questions | :04:56. | :04:59. | |
when he's probably just thinking, "Oh my god, when's this hill | :05:00. | :05:01. | |
climb going to end?" And that's the problem | :05:02. | :05:05. | |
with vox pops, because basically you're not getting a true | :05:06. | :05:07. | |
representation of the population. This is how we get into the position | :05:08. | :05:09. | |
of sound bites winning elections. Stick to having trained journalists | :05:10. | :05:15. | |
telling us about the facts in a story rather than the opinions | :05:16. | :05:17. | |
of the ill informed. Well, let's discuss some of those | :05:18. | :05:31. | |
issues with the BBC's editor of political news Katy Searle who's | :05:32. | :05:33. | |
in our Westminster studio. Katy, let's start with | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
the allegations of bias, mostly claiming that the BBC has | :05:37. | :05:38. | |
an anti-Corbyn bias You've seen the examples that | :05:39. | :05:40. | |
viewers have raised. We have very strong and clear | :05:41. | :05:44. | |
guidelines that we follow, editorial guidelines, and they're | :05:45. | :05:48. | |
in line with the Ofcom code of conduct as well, | :05:49. | :05:50. | |
which show that we have strict rules period and to reflect all parties' | :05:51. | :05:53. | |
positions and policies. And that's something | :05:54. | :06:01. | |
we do absolutely and we Labour supporters are | :06:02. | :06:03. | |
complaining that too much coverage is | :06:04. | :06:14. | |
attacking the party. Tory supporters are saying Labour | :06:15. | :06:15. | |
get more air time, so how is BBC News approaching that whole | :06:16. | :06:18. | |
issue of balance and fairness? What we have to do | :06:19. | :06:33. | |
is take our editorial judgments and that's always | :06:34. | :06:37. | |
going to have to guide our coverage. And that's why programme | :06:38. | :06:39. | |
editors across the BBC and correspondents on air, | :06:40. | :06:41. | |
as well as Laura, the political editor, have long and careful | :06:42. | :06:44. | |
discussions about what stories we're going to cover, what are the values | :06:45. | :06:46. | |
in the news terms of those stories, and then how do they fit in line | :06:47. | :06:50. | |
with the guidelines that I've just What's noticeable already in this | :06:51. | :06:53. | |
election campaign is that perceived errors, and indeed | :06:54. | :06:56. | |
some factual ones, amplified on social media when people | :06:57. | :06:58. | |
try to build a campaign around them saying, look, | :06:59. | :07:00. | |
the BBC's being unfair. How should the BBC deal | :07:01. | :07:02. | |
with those examples? Look, we're all human, | :07:03. | :07:16. | |
we do make mistakes. Look, you know, we're | :07:17. | :07:17. | |
working to tight deadlines with lots of information | :07:18. | :07:19. | |
coming in all the time In those circumstances you just have | :07:20. | :07:22. | |
to look and see where you can correct it as | :07:23. | :07:26. | |
quickly as possible. And just on the detail I think | :07:27. | :07:28. | |
it's worth adding that sometimes graphics actually | :07:29. | :07:30. | |
can not be as clear. You are trying to sum up quite | :07:31. | :07:32. | |
a lot of detail in one simple picture of | :07:33. | :07:35. | |
numbers and figures. What we need to do is be very clear | :07:36. | :07:37. | |
that our scripting goes around that and tells | :07:38. | :07:40. | |
the full story. We have seen a particularly vocal | :07:41. | :07:43. | |
campaign online against Laura Kuenssberg alleging | :07:44. | :07:45. | |
anti-Labour bias. Laura Kuenssberg is a first-class | :07:46. | :07:46. | |
political editor who has worked incredibly hard | :07:47. | :08:01. | |
to get her job right. Laura does the daily analysis | :08:02. | :08:03. | |
of all of the political parties and, of course, no personal views | :08:04. | :08:06. | |
are reflected in any sense on any party, and that's true not just | :08:07. | :08:09. | |
of Laura but across the BBC. So Laura's doing her job and she's | :08:10. | :08:12. | |
doing that brilliantly. More broadly, though, | :08:13. | :08:20. | |
viewers do complain that there's too much personal commentary | :08:21. | :08:22. | |
from political correspondents who are kind of filling airtime | :08:23. | :08:23. | |
and it is not fact-based, Wouldn't the BBC be better, | :08:24. | :08:26. | |
as at least one of our viewers has suggested, just sticking | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
to factual reporting? Well, I think analysis is really | :08:31. | :08:40. | |
important actually, as part Certainly in elections, | :08:41. | :08:42. | |
and as we saw in the referendum last year, | :08:43. | :08:45. | |
parties and campaigns have their own positions to push | :08:46. | :08:47. | |
and they will do that And really, an important part | :08:48. | :08:49. | |
of our job is to try and analyse and say to the viewer, | :08:50. | :08:54. | |
well, on balance this That's why we have very experienced | :08:55. | :08:56. | |
people from Laura down across the BBC working on that | :08:57. | :09:00. | |
and trying to give the audience something that means something | :09:01. | :09:03. | |
and not just slogans and numbers. We have to talk about vox pops | :09:04. | :09:13. | |
because they come up every election and the charge is two things, | :09:14. | :09:16. | |
one is if they are too gimmicky you're not going to get much | :09:17. | :09:19. | |
of an answer if people But also that they're not informed | :09:20. | :09:22. | |
and are representative, and shouldn't the BBC be more | :09:23. | :09:25. | |
careful about using them? -- But also that they're not | :09:26. | :09:28. | |
informed and are not representative, and shouldn't the BBC be more | :09:29. | :09:30. | |
careful about using them? Yeah, vox pops are tricky actually | :09:31. | :09:33. | |
because I have a bit of However, if we're doing | :09:34. | :09:36. | |
a lot of politicians, and we are at the moment, and it's | :09:37. | :09:39. | |
a very formalised way of presenting their views and opinions, I think | :09:40. | :09:42. | |
vox pops gives us a bit of colour. It also does the most important | :09:43. | :09:45. | |
thing which is to reflect the And in this campaign which goes | :09:46. | :09:48. | |
on for several weeks we want to hear from our audience | :09:49. | :09:52. | |
as well and try and, if you like, Vox pop is an unscientific | :09:53. | :09:55. | |
way of doing that but it's the best way that we | :09:56. | :09:58. | |
can do when we're dealing with tight Away from the cut and thrust | :09:59. | :10:02. | |
of the election but not entirely unconnected to it was | :10:03. | :10:12. | |
the coverage of last Friday's cyber-attack which use ransomware | :10:13. | :10:14. | |
to lock files in 150 different countries demanding | :10:15. | :10:17. | |
payment to allow access. Some viewers were unhappy | :10:18. | :10:18. | |
with the way the story was reported and one of them Alex McGill recorded | :10:19. | :10:21. | |
this video to explain why. Clearly the real story | :10:22. | :10:30. | |
was that businesses large and small across the world had | :10:31. | :10:32. | |
been attacked and damaged done. But from the initial reports one | :10:33. | :10:40. | |
could easily have concluded that This unbalanced reporting | :10:41. | :10:42. | |
is particularly bad in the middle of an election campaign and can only | :10:43. | :10:49. | |
heighten the perception of editorial Finally, the Moors murderer | :10:50. | :10:52. | |
Ian Brady died on Tuesday. The 79-year-old had | :10:53. | :10:59. | |
tortured and killed five children in the 1960s with his | :11:00. | :11:00. | |
partner Myra Hindley and buried them Some viewers objected | :11:01. | :11:04. | |
to the prominence given to the news. Why was it necessary for it to be | :11:05. | :11:15. | |
in the number one spot, to have so much time given to this story, | :11:16. | :11:20. | |
for the BBC to then try and find people that they could | :11:21. | :11:23. | |
interview on this story? By doing this all they were actually | :11:24. | :11:26. | |
doing was causing yet more distress to the families | :11:27. | :11:29. | |
of these children, who have to live with | :11:30. | :11:31. | |
this day in day out This could have been dealt | :11:32. | :11:33. | |
with with a simple one-liner Thank you for all your | :11:34. | :11:37. | |
comments this week. If you want to share your opinions | :11:38. | :11:45. | |
on BBC News and current affairs, you can call us on 0370 010 6676, or | :11:46. | :11:49. | |
e-mail [email protected] You can find us on Twitter | :11:50. | :11:59. | |
@NewswatchBBC, and do The address for that is | :12:00. | :12:02. | |
bbc.co.uk/newswatch. We'll be back to hear | :12:03. | :12:08. | |
your thoughts about BBC | :12:09. | :12:12. |