26/06/2017 Outside Source

I am Ross Aitken is what Outside Source. Part of Donald Trump's

travel ban will come into force. The Supreme Court has ruled that a 90

day ban on people travelling from six Muslim majority countries can

apply in some circumstances. We will explain what they are in a moment.

More details in the UK's plans for EU citizens after Brexit. I want to

completely reassure people that under these plans now EU citizen

currently in the UK lawfully will be asked to leave at the point the UK

we see you. We want you to stay. The Conservative Party has cut a deal

with Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party, that means Theresa

May will have the votes to get laws through Parliament as long as all of

the MPs stay in line. And Donald Trump welcomes the Indian

Prime Minister to the White House, we will take you through what is on

the agenda and as usual if you're watching if you have issues you want

me to pick up on any of the stories we are covering, ABC OS is to reach

us. -- BBC or S is how to retailers.

Let's begin with a major political story here in the UK. Theresa May

has a deal in place to help her government get a Parliamentary

majority. He's it is being signed by the Prime Minister's Conservative

Party along with the Democratic changes party for Northern Ireland.

This is not a coalition, the DUP is not in government in that way. It

has agreed to support the government on key votes in parliament such as

those on the national budget and multiple times on Brexit. Needless

to say the DUP will be getting plenty in return, you can read the

entire agreement online. It has been posted by the government but the

headline figure getting the attention is that Northern Ireland

will get around ?1 billion in extra funding over the next two years.

That is. $1.3 billion. That has had a mixed response. The other devolved

nations are not impress -- impressed. Use the Welsh First

Minister saying that they still represent a straight bunk to keep

the week Prime Minister and a faltering government in office.

Nicola Sturgeon said any sense of fairness sacrificed on the altar of

Gobain EU P deal to let the PM cling to power and Scots Tories influence

in number ten shown to be zero. It is there to say the government would

have predicted that this criticism would have come its way, I haven't

talking to Eleanor Guiney. BR insisting that they can afford to

make this deal because they are investing elsewhere, for example in

the NHS but the criticism has been strong from some politicians, in

other areas of the letters came in, for example the leader of the Welsh

assembly calling this cash for votes saying it was a bunker and it wasn't

fair, and bitterly the DUP have the Conservatives over a barrel and they

will come back a couple of years' time asking for more money. In

Scotland politicians saying we don't mind investment and extra cash for

Northern Ireland, but we need to get some, too, as they get extra money

we want some, too. Where has the money come from? Well the

Conservatives were determined to get the deal done so they have promised

an extra ?1 billion for not the DUP to spend specifically but for the

Northern Ireland executive to spend and I think the Conservatives were

pretty keen to make that clear. This money will be spent on

infrastructure, education projects, things like that but also there has

been some extra flexibility given to ?500 million of money that was

already pledged to Northern Ireland. Yes this money has been promised but

it has some criticism, clearly it is a price Conservatives were willing

to pay because they desperately needed this deal in order to be able

to govern. That is one important element today, here is another

because the government has released this document in which it gives us a

lot of detail on how the UK proposes for EU citizens to live in the UK

once Brexit has happened. Remember on Thursday outside source was live

from the EU in Brussels before we read an heard the news cube out that

Theresa May had leased the basics of this proposal. This is her giving is

much detail on it. There has been some anxiety about what would happen

to EU citizens at the point we leave the EU. Today I want to put that

anxiety to rest. I want to completely be assure people that

under these plans now EU citizen currently in the UK lawfully would

be asked to leave at the point the UK leave the EU. We want you to

stay. Jeremy Corbyn from the Labour Party. The Prime Minister has

dragged the issue of citizens and families deeply into the complex and

delicate negotiations of our future trade relations with the EU. She

herself has been willing to say this may result in failure. This is not a

generous offer. This is confirmation the government is prepared to use

people as bargaining chips. We already have some details of this,

Theresa May on Thursday told EU leaders that if anyone from the EU

had been in the UK for five years they would get settled status, and

that those who have been in the UK for two years would be able to apply

for that status but the would not be any guarantees. We wanted to the

difference between what we were told of 30 and what we have been told

today, he was Eleanor. There are still some questions that remain

unanswered and that is because some of the issues associated with these

reciprocal rights are going to have to be sorted out in the negotiations

between the UK Government and those in Brussels but we do know from what

the Prime Minister said in the Commons today that EU citizens who

have been living here in the UK lawfully for at least five years,

they will get this settled status and they will also be able to bring

over their children and spouses as well. They will be able to work,

live and also have access to certain benefits like health care and

pensions, so quite similar rights the government is claiming to what

British citizens get. But there is already a row brewing over who's

going to apply the rules for this new system. Will it be British laws

as the government here once? Will it be judges in the European Court of

Justice? Or perhaps could it be a combination of the two? Some sort of

international jurisdiction. The -- it is interesting how cool the

reaction was in the EU. Now we have the lead negotiator on Brexit for

the EU tweeting today, the EU goal of citizens rights, same level

protection as an EU law, one ambition clarity and guarantees

needed than in today's UK position. This is not a done deal at all. That

right, there was a pretty lukewarm response last week when Theresa May

was in Brussels setting out the broad outline, then we have had this

treat today which shows I think that things have not gone down quite that

much better, the -- the European Parliament will vote on this final

deal and it's Brexit coordinator said today that the document

contained limitations that were worrisome and he thinks EU citizens

staying in the UK should have a state is above that of immigrants

from non-European countries. Alan Watson as in Yorkshire asking other

any circumstances and which this money in the DUP Conservative deal

go straight to the DUP? Far as I can see that no circumstances under

which happens. The government and Conservative Party are saying the

money will go to the executive in Northern Ireland, and be spent on

Northern Ireland as a whole, it will not in any point be funnelled

through any one party. We will learn about the practicalities as a deal

plays out. And to a big announcement in the US because part of Donald

Trump's travel ban will now take effect, this is because of an

intervention by the US Supreme Court, they have also confirmed it

will rule on the band's overall legality in October. He made a

member when the ban was announced that was a 90 day ban from people

coming from six Muslim countries, and on top of that there was a

proposed 120 day ban on refugee applications. The Supreme Court

today has said that foreign nationals with a relationship

through personal identity in the US can come in, but if you do not have

a connection to the US you will not be coming in as goal of the

lightest, he is saying that the unanimous decision is a clear

victory for national security. That is ruling allows me an important

tool for protecting our nation 's homeland. Let's find out exactly

what this means. On the refugee issue, as the Supreme Court

supported that 120 bad? The Supreme Court talked about the refugee issue

as well and the details of this lifting of the stay on the ban

applied to the refugee issue as well so refugees who are coming into the

United States who have existing relatives in the US or have jobs

lined up coming in with some sort of student die, as coming in with those

connections they can come in but otherwise the Supreme Court said

that Donald Trump can suspend the refugee programme for that set

period of time. The also endorsed the Trump administration loading the

total cap on refugees coming into the US down to a 50,000 refugees

although they said the cap could be exceeded if the number includes

refugees who have these won a fight, the template, ties the United

States. Along this battle has gone on the more politically valuable

outcome became. Absolutely, this had been pointed to since the beginning

of Donald Trump's presidency as a key political battle. Donald Trump

was criticised for what was seen as someone -- for a ham-handed roll-out

of his immigration policy, there was chaos in the airport if you remember

because the immigration officials did not quite know how to implement

the details of this policy. He second immigration travel ban as he

template was somewhat more ordered in a trivial but it got suspended by

the court fairly quickly. Now the man security department say they

will be the ban in a professional manner, and they will try to inform

airlines and the immigration officials on how to do it in a

prompt and professional manner. In the odd situation where it is likely

to come in, will pass through in 90 days and then the Supreme Court will

decide if it was legal all along? Exactly, and the court justice has

made a specific provision in this order they have released saying that

they want to consider whether the whole challenge was moot and I

assume that is because the 90 day rule would have expired so they

could take a look at this, the lawyers could make arguments and

they could decide that the Trump administration has had plenty of

time to permit changes in immigration law so the original

order should have expired and then you might get a brand-new legal

battle on whatever the Trump administration comes up with in the

meantime. The court said they should go ahead with the executive review

and implement the policies would have decided on them. Thank you. We

have wired reports now from Washington and Westminster, we are

going to turn in the next few minutes to Mosul the of Iraq. Senior

commanders have been telling BBC News that the fight for the city is

entering its final stages. Nationwide safety checks are being

undertaken on high-rise buildings after the Grenfell Tower fire. The

government has said all samples of cladding received from the high-rise

buildings and 26 local authority areas have failed fire safety tests.

In an update to MPs following the fire this is sided Janet with more

details. The cladding from 75 high-rise buildings and 26 local

authorities has filled the combustibility test. I know members

will rightly want to know if the residents are affected and my

department will publish regular updates on the government website.

The fact that all samples have so far failed underlines the value of

the testing programme and the vital importance of submitting samples

urgently. I am concerned about the speed at which samples are being

submitted. I would urge all landlords to submit the samples

immediately. On Thursday we were live from

Brussels but today we are back in our usual spot. Our lead story is

that Donald Trump is hailing the Supreme Court decision to implement

part of his travel ban, he says it is a victory for national security.

To pick up some of the main stories from the World Service, in China

more than 90 people are still missing after a landslide at the

weekend in the Sichuan province. At least ten bodies have been recovered

but rescuers do not expect to find anyone else alive. BBC Burmese

report that police in me and Mark and Thailand have found more than

$800 million worth of illegal drugs. It was burnished to tie in with the

UN's the against drug abuse. The Court of Madrid has ordered that the

body of Salvador Dali be exchanged to get the any samples for a

paternity suit, a Spanish woman claims that she is his daughter and

that her mother had an affair with him. Let's go back to Washington

because the Indian Prime Minister has arrived at the White House to

meet Donald Trump in the past few minutes. Here's the moment the two

men met. You can see Mullaly at camp getting ready to beat the Indian

Prime Minister as well. Some would say that you have any as they both

portray themselves as outsiders, outside of the political elite, both

campaigns to bring jobs back into the economy, both have huge

followings on social media, too, with over 30 million followers each.

This is what Donald Trump said a few months ago. It is a great honour to

have a Minister Modi, who has been such a great Prime Minister. I had

been speaking with him and reading about you and you have done a great

job. Economically. India is doing very well. I would like to

congratulate you. I would like to congratulate you very much. Let's

bring in our correspondent from BBC Hindi who is live from Washington.

In the Indian Prime Minister looked very relaxed as he got out of the

car. He was received very warmly by the President and first Lady and

that would have gone down as a good start for the Indian officials, and

also the kind of praise that the two leaders lavished on each other seems

to be fine. What I did sense was it was a very formal sort of meeting

compare to the great Prime Minister Modi and President Obama used to

meet, it had taken a while but they were on first terror -- first name

terms and the way a Minister Modi was addressing President Trump, it

is difficult to translate what he said in Hindi to English but it was

almost very close to honourable president, but again so far so good.

Donald Trump mentioned the Indian economy because Mr Trump has been

critical of free trade, has been protectionist in his approach to

American jobs and American industry, does that pose a threat to the

Indian economy? That has been a concern for the Indian economy and

particularly President Trump has been talking about the trade

surplus, with several other countries and that includes India.

Prime Minister Modi, one of his challenges is to ensure President --

to assure President Trump that India is a partner, Andy Nicol needled for

the Wall Street Journal today there were hints of how the two countries

can work together increasing jobs and he gave examples of how India is

importing $40 billion worth of gas and this is for its energy needs and

the defence still being signed, the state Department issued a statement

that a helicopter deal was worth more than $300 million and had just

been signed. These are the things that would go down well as far as

president Trump is concerned and he also mentioned that Indian companies

are investing big time, in at least 35 states in the US so one has to

see how that plays in the Trump White House. What are they up to

through the day? After about an hour or so the issued a joint statement

for the reporters and then there is a working dinner at around six

o'clock local time at the White House, which the White House

officials say is a special thing that in fact the first official

dinner that has been thrown for a visiting foreign dignitary and even

the Indians have really appreciated that and then Prime Minister Outside

Source leaves for the Netherlands this evening. We appreciate the

update, thank you. Often broadcasting from here in London I

talk about the advantages of being so close to my colleagues from BBC

World Service, those advantages extend around the world because

along with Anthony and other colleagues in the Washington

newsroom there are lots of representatives from the BBC World

Service like Rajesh from BBC Hindi. Talking about yesterday matter mash,

reported reaction to a study that has been going for a couple of days

now. The demand that Saudi Arabia and its allies are making of Qatar,

you may well have saw them, strong demand, the US Secretary of State

Rex Tillotson says some of these demands will be difficult to meet.

That is not putting it mildly. There are 13 of them in total and they

include entirely closing the Al Jazeera TV network, funded by Qatar,

and Saudi Arabia and others want a Turkish military base in Doha to be

close, talking of Qatar are very close and that is a huge ask. And

they want relations between Qatar and Iran to be cooled. When you

better mind that Iran and Qatar share huge natural resources that

also would be very difficult and all love that comes off the back of

diplomatic ties been cut with Qatar are a number of Gulf countries. They

claim Qatar is funding terrorism, Qatar says that is not true. Earlier

I spoke to a correspondent to get help in working out what the

American position is. There is a difference in approach between the

White House and the State Department, you had President Trump

coming down firmly on the side of the Saudis and the welfare of allies

against Qatar, seeing this as a way to fade against financing to

terrorism and this would be a way to fight terrorism effectively and then

you have the State Department would have tried to take a much more

neutral nuanced position and the Secretary of State has been

involved, not in a formal mediation but certainly a lot of contacts with

the Gulf Arab states on both sides trying to get this resolution, this

crisis resolved and you had some quite strongly worded statements

from him last week saying to the Saudis and allies, come up with your

demands, why are you waiting around? We are beginning to think it is not

about terrorism, it is about a long-standing political disputes

that you're trying to air, and whether the mad committee said some

of those look quite difficult for Qatar to meet but at the same time

there is some basis for you to start talking in June and the dialogue and

a complete inclusion here. So it is something that the State Department

wishes was resolved and is trying to press the different parties to do

so, you have the Qatari Foreign Minister in town and he will be

meeting with Secretary Tillotson tomorrow. But at the moment the

State Department is not really putting forward a formal mediation,

they are not organising a joint meeting of the parties to try to

bang some heads together. They're seeing you guys need to do this but

we are monitoring it closely. There is another thing I would like to run

value, copied from the Reuters news agency, saying the US chairman of

the Senate foreign affairs related midi said he would withhold consent

for US arms sales to members of the Gulf cooperation Council until the

path forward to resolving the discipline -- the dispute in the

region. If that were to happen that would hurt some of those countries

you are trying to pressure Qatar. -- who are trying to pressure Qatar. It

would also act Qatar because he did not say which Gulf countries they

would withhold weapons from. It is interesting the way you are seeing

Congress a more activist under this administration, taking stands and

pressing issues if they feel the White House is straying from

traditional foreign policy or if they feel the State Department is

being ineffectual. In this case Mr Corcoran said he strongly supported

resident on's reserves to Saudi Arabia in which there been a

unifying statement about fighting terrorism, but now we hear there was

a dispute and things were not happening as they should and until

the dead then Congress would withhold consent on the weapons

sales which is quite a strong tool of leverage that they have and it

would be something that people in the region would take notice of.

Let's talk about Jakarta, and Japanese company that is behind the

biggest recall in the car industry's yesterday. It has filed for

bankruptcy and that is because it is facing billions of dollars in

liabilities because of defective airbags. These airbags have been

linked to at least 17 deaths worldwide. Let's bring in a

correspondent from Europe. My first thought when I was reading about the

story was to those people making claims because of injuries or death

relating to these airbags, do they now lose the chance of getting any

money? Elmer that is definitely not the case, what is happening as the

Company has set aside $850 million. This is all part of an agreement

with the US Department of Justice. The problem was that the sum was not

good to cover the scale of this event, of this recall, and that was

part of what was the issue. In going forward with this bankruptcy process

and it is a process involving court in Delaware in the US and also in

Japan, they are selling some of the assets to an American firm that is

Chinese owned but the rest of the assets relating to these airbags

they will continue to make those so that they can issue replacements

forecasters are still on the road and still affected. To be clear for

those watching, the airbags have been a lot of different

manufacturers cars? Yes, you're talking multiple car companies, not

just one manufacturer, so the likes of Honda amongst others who have

been affected by this and that is why they have very little support,

if you like, or allies, feeling much synergy for them, BMW and Toyota,

they have all been involved in the three calls and it has been a huge

black eye, really, for Japan's an industry, once they were wanted for

the technical agility and now of course that has all come under

question and you're seeing as I mentioned this US rival key safety

systems buying them up. The Chinese owned American company now buying a

gaining a foothold in the Japanese car industry. Thank you.

That ends this first half of outside source, I'll be back with you in a

couple of minutes time. Welcome along to the latest update

on a number of stories from motocross world that have