Browse content similar to 29/10/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, everyone. | 0:00:38 | 0:00:39 | |
I'm Sarah Smith, and welcome
to The Sunday Politics, | 0:00:39 | 0:00:42 | |
where we always bring you everything
you need to know to understand | 0:00:42 | 0:00:44 | |
what's going on in politics. | 0:00:44 | 0:00:46 | |
Coming up on today's programme... | 0:00:46 | 0:00:50 | |
The Government says | 0:00:50 | 0:00:52 | |
the international trade minister
Mark Garnier will be investigated | 0:00:52 | 0:00:54 | |
following newspaper allegations
of inappropriate behaviour | 0:00:54 | 0:00:57 | |
towards a female staff member. | 0:00:57 | 0:00:59 | |
We'll have the latest. | 0:00:59 | 0:01:04 | |
The Prime Minister says she can
agree a deal with the EU and plenty | 0:01:04 | 0:01:08 | |
of time for Parliament to vote on it
before we leave in 2018. Well | 0:01:08 | 0:01:14 | |
Parliament play ball? New evidence
cast out on the | 0:01:14 | 0:01:22 | |
In the East Midlands: a call
to our MPs to fight for more | 0:01:22 | 0:01:25 | |
Government spending in the region,
as new figures show we're | 0:01:25 | 0:01:27 | |
bottom of the pile. | 0:01:27 | 0:01:28 | |
And the tourism boom bringing
in billions of pounds. | 0:01:28 | 0:01:29 | |
on from the abortion act white MPs
are lobbying the Home Secretary to | 0:01:30 | 0:01:32 | |
stop the alleged harassment of women
attending abortion clinics. | 0:01:32 | 0:01:38 | |
All that coming up in the programme. | 0:01:38 | 0:01:41 | |
And with me today to help make sense
of all the big stories, | 0:01:41 | 0:01:44 | |
Julia Hartley-Brewer,
Steve Richards and Anne McElvoy. | 0:01:44 | 0:01:48 | |
Some breaking news this morning. | 0:01:48 | 0:01:50 | |
The Government has announced
that it will investigate | 0:01:50 | 0:01:52 | |
whether the International Trade
Minister Mark Garnier broke | 0:01:52 | 0:01:54 | |
the Ministerial Code
following allegations | 0:01:54 | 0:01:56 | |
of inappropriate behaviour. | 0:01:56 | 0:02:01 | |
It comes after reports in the Mail
on Sunday which has spoken to one | 0:02:01 | 0:02:05 | |
of Mr Garnier's former employees. | 0:02:05 | 0:02:06 | |
News of the investigation
was announced by the Health | 0:02:06 | 0:02:08 | |
Secretary Jeremy Hunt
on the Andrew Marr show earlier. | 0:02:08 | 0:02:10 | |
The stories, if they are true,
are totally unacceptable | 0:02:10 | 0:02:13 | |
and the Cabinet Office will be
conducting an investigation | 0:02:13 | 0:02:16 | |
as to whether there has been
a breach of the ministerial code | 0:02:16 | 0:02:19 | |
in this particular case. | 0:02:19 | 0:02:20 | |
But as you know the
facts are disputed. | 0:02:20 | 0:02:22 | |
This is something that covers
behaviour by MPs of all parties | 0:02:22 | 0:02:25 | |
and that is why the other thing
that is going to happen | 0:02:25 | 0:02:28 | |
is that today Theresa May
is going to write to John Bercow, | 0:02:28 | 0:02:31 | |
the Speaker of the House of Commons,
to ask for his advice as to how | 0:02:31 | 0:02:35 | |
we change that culture. | 0:02:35 | 0:02:40 | |
That was Jeremy Hunt a little
earlier. I want to turn to the panel | 0:02:40 | 0:02:44 | |
to make sense of this news. This is
the government taking these | 0:02:44 | 0:02:49 | |
allegations quite seriously. What
has changed in this story is they | 0:02:49 | 0:02:53 | |
used to be a bit of delay while
people work out what they should say | 0:02:53 | 0:02:57 | |
about it, how seriously to take it.
As you see now a senior cabinet | 0:02:57 | 0:03:03 | |
member out there, Jeremy Hunt, with
an instant response. He does have | 0:03:03 | 0:03:07 | |
the worry of whether the facts are
disputed, but what they want to be | 0:03:07 | 0:03:11 | |
seen doing is to do something very
quickly. In the past they would say | 0:03:11 | 0:03:15 | |
it was all part of the rough and
tumble of Westminster. Mark Garnier | 0:03:15 | 0:03:20 | |
does not deny these stories, which
is that he asked an employee to buy | 0:03:20 | 0:03:25 | |
sex toys, but he said it was just
high jinks and it was taken out of | 0:03:25 | 0:03:29 | |
context. Is this the sort of thing
that a few years ago in a different | 0:03:29 | 0:03:33 | |
environment would be investigated?
Not necessarily quite the frenzy | 0:03:33 | 0:03:39 | |
that it is nowadays. The combination
of social media, all the Sunday | 0:03:39 | 0:03:46 | |
political programmes were ministers
have to go on armed with a response | 0:03:46 | 0:03:49 | |
means that you get these we have to
be seen to be doing something. That | 0:03:49 | 0:03:56 | |
means there is this Cabinet Office
investigation. You pointed out to us | 0:03:56 | 0:04:01 | |
before the programme that he was not
a minister before this happened. It | 0:04:01 | 0:04:05 | |
does not matter whether he says yes,
know I did this or did not, | 0:04:05 | 0:04:09 | |
something has to be seen to be done.
Clearly ministers today are being | 0:04:09 | 0:04:14 | |
armed with that bit of information
and that Theresa May will ask John | 0:04:14 | 0:04:18 | |
Bercow the speaker to look into the
whole culture of Parliament in this | 0:04:18 | 0:04:21 | |
context. That is the response to
this kind of frenzy. If we do live | 0:04:21 | 0:04:28 | |
in an environment where something
has to be seen to be done, does that | 0:04:28 | 0:04:31 | |
always mean the right thing gets
done? Absolutely not. We are in | 0:04:31 | 0:04:37 | |
witch hunt territory. All of us work
in the Commons over many years and | 0:04:37 | 0:04:41 | |
anyone would think it was a scene
out of Benny Hill or a carry on | 0:04:41 | 0:04:45 | |
film. Sadly it is not that much fun
and it is rather dull and dreary. | 0:04:45 | 0:04:51 | |
Yes, there are sex pests, yes, there
is sexual harassment, but the idea | 0:04:51 | 0:04:56 | |
this is going on on a huge scale is
nonsense. Doesn't matter whether it | 0:04:56 | 0:05:00 | |
is a huge scale or not? Or just a
few instances? Any workplace where | 0:05:00 | 0:05:07 | |
you have the mixing of work and
social so intertwined and you throw | 0:05:07 | 0:05:12 | |
a huge amount of alcohol and late
night and people living away from | 0:05:12 | 0:05:15 | |
home you will have this happen. That
does not make it OK. It makes sexual | 0:05:15 | 0:05:22 | |
harassment not OK as it is not
anywhere. This happens to men as | 0:05:22 | 0:05:26 | |
well and if they have an issue into
it there are employment tribunal 's | 0:05:26 | 0:05:31 | |
and they can contact lawyers. I do
not think this should be a matter of | 0:05:31 | 0:05:35 | |
the speaker, it should be someone
completely independent of any party. | 0:05:35 | 0:05:41 | |
People think MPs are employees of
the party or the Commons, they are | 0:05:41 | 0:05:45 | |
not. Because they are self-employed
to whom do you go if you are a | 0:05:45 | 0:05:49 | |
researcher? That has to be
clarified. I agree you need a much | 0:05:49 | 0:05:55 | |
clearer line of reporting. It was a
bit like the situation when we came | 0:05:55 | 0:06:01 | |
into the media many years ago, the
Punic wars in my case! You were not | 0:06:01 | 0:06:06 | |
quite sure who to go to. If you work
worried that it might impede your | 0:06:06 | 0:06:14 | |
career, and you had to talk to
people who work next to you, that is | 0:06:14 | 0:06:18 | |
just one example, but in the Commons
people do not know who they should | 0:06:18 | 0:06:23 | |
go to. Where Theresa May might be
making a mistake, it is the same | 0:06:23 | 0:06:27 | |
mistake when it was decided to
investigate through Levinson the | 0:06:27 | 0:06:31 | |
culture of the media which was like
nailing jelly to a wall. Look at the | 0:06:31 | 0:06:37 | |
culture of anybody's job and the
environment they are in and there is | 0:06:37 | 0:06:40 | |
usually a lot wrong with it. When
you try and make it general, they | 0:06:40 | 0:06:45 | |
are not trying to blame individuals,
or it say they need a better line on | 0:06:45 | 0:06:50 | |
reporting of sexual harassment,
which I support, the Commons is a | 0:06:50 | 0:06:55 | |
funny place and it is a rough old
trade and you are never going to | 0:06:55 | 0:06:59 | |
iron out the human foibles of that.
Diane Abbott was talking about this | 0:06:59 | 0:07:03 | |
earlier. | 0:07:03 | 0:07:07 | |
When I first went into Parliament so
many of those men had been to all | 0:07:07 | 0:07:11 | |
boys boarding schools and had really
difficult attitudes towards women. | 0:07:11 | 0:07:18 | |
The world has moved on and
middle-aged women are less likely | 0:07:18 | 0:07:22 | |
than middle-aged men to believe that
young research are irresistibly | 0:07:22 | 0:07:31 | |
attracted to them. We have seen the
issues and we have seen one of our | 0:07:31 | 0:07:36 | |
colleagues been suspended for quite
unacceptable language. | 0:07:36 | 0:07:42 | |
That is a point, Jarrod O'Mara, a
Labour MP who has had the whip | 0:07:42 | 0:07:47 | |
suspended, this goes across all
parties. The idea that there is a | 0:07:47 | 0:07:52 | |
left or right divide over this is
absurd. This is a cultural issue. In | 0:07:52 | 0:07:57 | |
the media and in a lot of other
institutions if this is going to | 0:07:57 | 0:08:02 | |
develop politically, the frenzy will
carry on for a bit and other names | 0:08:02 | 0:08:06 | |
will come out over the next few
days, not just the two we have | 0:08:06 | 0:08:10 | |
mentioned so far in politics. But it
also raises questions about how | 0:08:10 | 0:08:17 | |
candidates are selected for example.
There has been a huge pressure for | 0:08:17 | 0:08:22 | |
the centre to keep out of things. I
bet from now on there will be much | 0:08:22 | 0:08:27 | |
greater scrutiny of all candidates
and tweets will have to be looked at | 0:08:27 | 0:08:31 | |
and all the rest of it. Selecting
candidates is interesting. Miriam | 0:08:31 | 0:08:38 | |
Gonzalez, Nick Clegg's wife, says
that during that election they knew | 0:08:38 | 0:08:42 | |
about Jarrod O'Mara and the Lib Dems
knew about it, so it is difficult to | 0:08:42 | 0:08:46 | |
suggest the Labour Party did not as
well. There is very clear evidence | 0:08:46 | 0:08:52 | |
the Labour Party did know. But we
are in a situation of how perfect | 0:08:52 | 0:08:57 | |
and well-behaved does everyone have
to be? If you look at past American | 0:08:57 | 0:09:04 | |
presidents, JFK and Bill Clinton,
these men were sex pest | 0:09:04 | 0:09:08 | |
extraordinaire, with totally
inappropriate behaviour on a regular | 0:09:08 | 0:09:11 | |
basis. There are things you are not
allowed to say if you are feminists. | 0:09:11 | 0:09:16 | |
Young women are really attracted to
powerful men. I was busted for the | 0:09:16 | 0:09:20 | |
idea that there are young women in
the House of commons who are | 0:09:20 | 0:09:25 | |
throwing themselves at middle-aged,
potbellied, balding, older men. We | 0:09:25 | 0:09:31 | |
need to focus on the right things.
When it is unwanted, harassing, | 0:09:31 | 0:09:38 | |
inappropriate and criminal,
absolutely, you come down like a | 0:09:38 | 0:09:41 | |
tonne of bricks. It is not just
because there are more women in the | 0:09:41 | 0:09:45 | |
Commons, it is because there are
more men married to women like us. | 0:09:45 | 0:09:49 | |
We have to leave it there. | 0:09:49 | 0:09:52 | |
As attention turns in
Westminster to the hundreds | 0:09:52 | 0:09:54 | |
of amendments put down on the EU
Withdrawal Bill, David Davis has | 0:09:54 | 0:09:57 | |
caused a stir this week by saying
it's possible Parliament won't get | 0:09:57 | 0:10:00 | |
a vote on the Brexit deal
until after March 2019 - | 0:10:00 | 0:10:03 | |
when the clock runs out
and we leave the EU. | 0:10:03 | 0:10:05 | |
Let's take a look at how
the controversy played out. | 0:10:05 | 0:10:07 | |
And which point do you envisage
Parliament having a vote? | 0:10:07 | 0:10:11 | |
As soon as possible thereafter. | 0:10:11 | 0:10:13 | |
This Parliament? | 0:10:13 | 0:10:16 | |
As soon as possible
possible thereafter, yeah. | 0:10:16 | 0:10:18 | |
As soon as possible thereafter. | 0:10:18 | 0:10:19 | |
So, the vote in Parliament... | 0:10:19 | 0:10:20 | |
The other thing... | 0:10:20 | 0:10:22 | |
Could be after March 2019? | 0:10:22 | 0:10:23 | |
It could be, yeah, it could be. | 0:10:23 | 0:10:25 | |
The... | 0:10:25 | 0:10:26 | |
It depends when it concludes. | 0:10:26 | 0:10:28 | |
Mr Barnier, remember,
has said he'd like... | 0:10:28 | 0:10:30 | |
Sorry, the vote of our Parliament,
the UK Parliament, could be | 0:10:30 | 0:10:33 | |
after March 2019? | 0:10:33 | 0:10:34 | |
Yes, it could be. | 0:10:34 | 0:10:36 | |
Could be. | 0:10:36 | 0:10:38 | |
The thing to member... | 0:10:38 | 0:10:39 | |
Which would be... | 0:10:39 | 0:10:41 | |
Well, it can't come
before we have the deal. | 0:10:41 | 0:10:43 | |
You said that it is POSSIBLE that
Parliament night not vote | 0:10:43 | 0:10:45 | |
on the deal until AFTER
the end of March 2019. | 0:10:45 | 0:10:49 | |
I'm summarising correctly
what you said...? | 0:10:49 | 0:10:50 | |
Yeah, that's correct. | 0:10:50 | 0:10:52 | |
In the event we don't do
the deal until then, yeah. | 0:10:52 | 0:10:55 | |
Can the Prime Minister please
explain how it's possible | 0:10:55 | 0:10:57 | |
to have a meaningful vote
on something that's | 0:10:57 | 0:10:59 | |
already taken place? | 0:10:59 | 0:11:04 | |
As the honourable gentleman knows,
we're in negotiations | 0:11:04 | 0:11:07 | |
with the European Union, but I am
confident that the timetable under | 0:11:07 | 0:11:10 | |
the Lisbon Treaty does give time
until March 2019 | 0:11:10 | 0:11:14 | |
for the negotiations to take place. | 0:11:14 | 0:11:16 | |
But I'm confident, because it is in
the interests of both sides, | 0:11:16 | 0:11:19 | |
it's not just this Parliament that
wants to have a vote on that deal, | 0:11:19 | 0:11:22 | |
but actually there will be
ratification by other parliaments, | 0:11:22 | 0:11:24 | |
that we will be able to achieve that
agreement and that negotiation | 0:11:24 | 0:11:29 | |
in time for this Parliament
to have a vote that we committed to. | 0:11:29 | 0:11:32 | |
We are working to reach
an agreement on the final deal | 0:11:32 | 0:11:35 | |
in good time before we leave
the European Union in March 2019. | 0:11:35 | 0:11:38 | |
Clearly, we cannot say
for certain at this stage | 0:11:38 | 0:11:40 | |
when this will be agreed. | 0:11:40 | 0:11:42 | |
But as Michel Barnier said,
he hopes to get a draft deal | 0:11:42 | 0:11:45 | |
agreed by October 2018,
and that's our aim is well. | 0:11:45 | 0:11:50 | |
agreed by October 2018,
and that's our aim as well. | 0:11:50 | 0:11:54 | |
I'm joined now by the former
Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary | 0:11:54 | 0:11:56 | |
Benn, who is the chair
of the Commons Brexit Committee, | 0:11:56 | 0:11:58 | |
which David Davis was
giving evidence to. | 0:11:58 | 0:12:02 | |
Good morning. When you think a
parliamentary vote should take place | 0:12:02 | 0:12:08 | |
in order for it to be meaningful? It
has to be before we leave the | 0:12:08 | 0:12:13 | |
European Union. Michel Barnier said
at the start of the negotiations | 0:12:13 | 0:12:16 | |
that he wants to wrap them up by
October of next year, so we have | 0:12:16 | 0:12:21 | |
only got 12 months left, the clock
is ticking and there is a huge | 0:12:21 | 0:12:24 | |
amount of ground to cover. You do
not think there is any point in | 0:12:24 | 0:12:28 | |
having the vote the week before we
leave because you could then not go | 0:12:28 | 0:12:39 | |
and re-negotiate? That would not be
acceptable. We will not be given a | 0:12:39 | 0:12:42 | |
bit of paper and told to take it or
leave it. But the following day | 0:12:42 | 0:12:45 | |
Steve Baker, also a minister in the
department, told our committee that | 0:12:45 | 0:12:48 | |
the government now accepts that in
order to implement transitional | 0:12:48 | 0:12:52 | |
arrangements that it is seeking, it
will need separate legislation. I | 0:12:52 | 0:12:56 | |
put the question to him if you are
going to need separate legislation | 0:12:56 | 0:13:00 | |
to do that, why don't you have a
separate bill to implement the | 0:13:00 | 0:13:04 | |
withdrawal agreement rather than
seeking to use the powers the | 0:13:04 | 0:13:07 | |
government is proposing to take in
the EU withdrawal bill. If we stick | 0:13:07 | 0:13:12 | |
to the timing, you have said you do
not think it is possible to | 0:13:12 | 0:13:16 | |
negotiate a trade deal in the next
12 months. You say the only people | 0:13:16 | 0:13:20 | |
who think that is possible British
ministers. If you do not believe we | 0:13:20 | 0:13:25 | |
can get a deal negotiated, how can
we get a vote on it in 12 months' | 0:13:25 | 0:13:30 | |
time? If things go well, and there
is still a risk of no agreement | 0:13:30 | 0:13:34 | |
which would be disastrous for the
economy and the country, if | 0:13:34 | 0:13:48 | |
things go there will be a deal on
the divorce issues, there will be a | 0:13:53 | 0:13:56 | |
deal on the nature of the
transitional arrangement and the | 0:13:56 | 0:13:58 | |
government is to set out how it
thinks that will work, and then an | 0:13:58 | 0:14:01 | |
agreement between the UK and the 27
member states saying, we will now | 0:14:01 | 0:14:04 | |
negotiate a new trade and market
access arrangement, and new | 0:14:04 | 0:14:06 | |
association agreement between the
two parties, and that will be done | 0:14:06 | 0:14:08 | |
in the transition period. Parliament
will be voting in those | 0:14:08 | 0:14:10 | |
circumstances on a deal which leads
to the door being open. But we would | 0:14:10 | 0:14:15 | |
be outside the EU at that point, so
how meaningful can vote be where you | 0:14:15 | 0:14:20 | |
take it or leave it if we have
already left the EU? Surely this has | 0:14:20 | 0:14:25 | |
to happen before March 2019 for it
to make a difference? I do not think | 0:14:25 | 0:14:31 | |
it is possible to negotiate all of
the issues that will need to be | 0:14:31 | 0:14:35 | |
covered in the time available. Then
it is not possible to have a | 0:14:35 | 0:14:40 | |
meaningful vote on it? Parliament
will have to have a look at the deal | 0:14:40 | 0:14:51 | |
presented to it. It is likely to be
a mix agreement so the approval | 0:14:51 | 0:14:54 | |
process in the rest of Europe,
unlike the Article 50 agreement, | 0:14:54 | 0:14:56 | |
which will be a majority vote in the
European Parliament and in the | 0:14:56 | 0:14:59 | |
British Parliament, every single
Parliament will have a vote on it, | 0:14:59 | 0:15:02 | |
so it will be a more complex process
anyway, but I do not think that is | 0:15:02 | 0:15:07 | |
the time to get all of that sorted
between now and October next year. | 0:15:07 | 0:15:13 | |
Whether it is before or after we
have left the EU, the government | 0:15:13 | 0:15:17 | |
have said it is a take it or leave
it option and it is the Noel Edmonds | 0:15:17 | 0:15:22 | |
option, deal or no Deal, you say yes
or no to it. You cannot send them | 0:15:22 | 0:15:29 | |
back to re-negotiate. | 0:15:29 | 0:15:33 | |
If it is a separate piece of
legislation, when Parliament has a | 0:15:33 | 0:15:38 | |
chance to shape the nature of that
legislation. But it can't change | 0:15:38 | 0:15:44 | |
what has been negotiated with the
EU? Well, you could say to the | 0:15:44 | 0:15:48 | |
government, we're happy with this
but was not happy about that chukka | 0:15:48 | 0:15:53 | |
here's some fresh instructions, go
back in and... It seems to me what | 0:15:53 | 0:15:58 | |
they want is the maximum access to
the single market for the lowest | 0:15:58 | 0:16:02 | |
possible tariffs, whilst able to
control migration. If they've got to | 0:16:02 | 0:16:06 | |
get the best deal that they can on
that, how on earth is the Labour | 0:16:06 | 0:16:11 | |
Party, saying we want a bit more,
owing to persuade the other 27? We | 0:16:11 | 0:16:15 | |
certainly don't want the lowest
possible tariffs, we want no tariffs | 0:16:15 | 0:16:19 | |
are taught. My personal view is
that, has made a profound mistake in | 0:16:19 | 0:16:23 | |
deciding that it wants to leave the
customs union. If you want to help | 0:16:23 | 0:16:28 | |
deal with the very serious question
of the border between Northern | 0:16:28 | 0:16:33 | |
Ireland and the Republic of Ireland,
the way you do that is to stay in | 0:16:33 | 0:16:37 | |
the customs union and I hope, will
change its mind. But the Labour | 0:16:37 | 0:16:42 | |
Party is simply saying in the House
of Commons, we want a better deal | 0:16:42 | 0:16:45 | |
than what, has been able to get? It
depends how the negotiations unfold. | 0:16:45 | 0:16:53 | |
, has ended up on the transitional
arrangements in the place that Keir | 0:16:53 | 0:16:58 | |
Starmer set out on behalf of the
shadow cabinet in August, when he | 0:16:58 | 0:17:04 | |
said, we will need to stay in the
single market and the customs union | 0:17:04 | 0:17:07 | |
for the duration of the transition,
and I think that is the position, | 0:17:07 | 0:17:10 | |
has now reached. It has not been
helped by differences of view within | 0:17:10 | 0:17:15 | |
the Cabinet, and a lot of time has
passed and there's proved time left | 0:17:15 | 0:17:19 | |
and we have not even got on to the
negotiations. -- there's very little | 0:17:19 | 0:17:24 | |
time left. On phase two, the labour
Party have set out six clear tests, | 0:17:24 | 0:17:30 | |
and two of them are crucial. You say
you want the exact same benefits we | 0:17:30 | 0:17:35 | |
currently have in the customs union
but you also want to be able to | 0:17:35 | 0:17:39 | |
ensure the fair migration to control
immigration, basically, which does | 0:17:39 | 0:17:43 | |
sound a bit like having your cake
and eating it. You say that you will | 0:17:43 | 0:17:46 | |
vote against any deal that doesn't
give you all of that, the exact same | 0:17:46 | 0:17:50 | |
benefits of the single market, and
allowing you to control migration. | 0:17:50 | 0:17:54 | |
But you say no deal would be
catastrophic if so it seems to me | 0:17:54 | 0:17:58 | |
you're unlikely to get the deal that
you could vote for but you don't | 0:17:58 | 0:18:01 | |
want to vote for no deal? We
absolutely don't want a no deal. | 0:18:01 | 0:18:06 | |
Businesses have sent a letter to the
Prime Minister saying that a | 0:18:06 | 0:18:12 | |
transition is essential because the
possibility of a no deal and no | 0:18:12 | 0:18:14 | |
transitional would be very damaging
for the economy. We fought the | 0:18:14 | 0:18:18 | |
general election on a policy of
seeking to retain the benefits of | 0:18:18 | 0:18:20 | |
the single market and the customs
union. Keir Starmer said on behalf | 0:18:20 | 0:18:25 | |
of the shadow government that as far
as the longer term arrangements are | 0:18:25 | 0:18:30 | |
concerned, that should leave all
options on the table, because it is | 0:18:30 | 0:18:33 | |
the end that you're trying to
achieve and you then find the means | 0:18:33 | 0:18:36 | |
to support it. So we're setting out
very clearly those tests. If you | 0:18:36 | 0:18:42 | |
were to vote down an agreement
because it did not meet your tests, | 0:18:42 | 0:18:45 | |
and there was time to send, back to
the EU to get a better deal, then | 0:18:45 | 0:18:51 | |
you would have significantly
weakened their negotiating hand | 0:18:51 | 0:18:53 | |
chukka that doesn't help them? I
don't think, has deployed its | 0:18:53 | 0:18:57 | |
negotiating hand very strongly thus
far. Because we had a general | 0:18:57 | 0:19:02 | |
election which meant that we lost
time that we would have used for | 0:19:02 | 0:19:04 | |
negotiating. We still don't know
what kind of long-term trade and | 0:19:04 | 0:19:09 | |
market access deal, wants. The Prime
Minister says, I don't want a deal | 0:19:09 | 0:19:16 | |
like Canada and I don't want a deal
like the European Economic Area. But | 0:19:16 | 0:19:19 | |
we still don't know what kind of
deal they want. With about 12 months | 0:19:19 | 0:19:24 | |
to go, the other thing, needs to do
is to set out very clearly above all | 0:19:24 | 0:19:28 | |
for the benefit of the other 27
European countries, what kind of | 0:19:28 | 0:19:33 | |
deal it wants. When I travel to
Europe and talk to those involved in | 0:19:33 | 0:19:36 | |
the negotiations, you see other
leaders saying, we don't actually | 0:19:36 | 0:19:41 | |
know what Britain wants. With a year
to go it is about time we made that | 0:19:41 | 0:19:45 | |
clear. One related question on the
European Union - you spoke in your | 0:19:45 | 0:19:51 | |
famous speech in Syria about the
international brigades in Spain, and | 0:19:51 | 0:19:54 | |
I wonder if your solidarity with
them leads you to think that the UK | 0:19:54 | 0:19:59 | |
Government should be recognising
Catalonia is an independent state? | 0:19:59 | 0:20:02 | |
No, I don't think so. It is a very
difficult and potentially dangerous | 0:20:02 | 0:20:07 | |
situation in Catalonia at the
moment. Direct rule from Madrid is | 0:20:07 | 0:20:12 | |
not a long-term solution. There
needs to be a negotiation, and | 0:20:12 | 0:20:17 | |
elections will give Catalonia the
chance to take that decision, but I | 0:20:17 | 0:20:21 | |
am not clear what the declaration of
independence actually means. Are | 0:20:21 | 0:20:27 | |
they going to be borders, is they're
going to be an army? There will have | 0:20:27 | 0:20:31 | |
to be some agreement. Catalonia has
already had a high degree of | 0:20:31 | 0:20:35 | |
autonomy. It may like some more, and
it seems to me if you look at the | 0:20:35 | 0:20:40 | |
experience here in the United
Kingdom, that is the way to go, not | 0:20:40 | 0:20:45 | |
a constitutional stand-off. And I
really hope nobody is charged with | 0:20:45 | 0:20:48 | |
rebellion, because actually that
would make matters worse. | 0:20:48 | 0:20:52 | |
Now, the Government has this
week reopened the public | 0:20:52 | 0:20:56 | |
consultation on plans for a third
runway at Heathrow. | 0:20:56 | 0:20:58 | |
While ministers are clear
the £18 billion project | 0:20:58 | 0:21:00 | |
is still the preferred option,
new data raises further questions | 0:21:00 | 0:21:03 | |
about the environmental
impact of expansion, | 0:21:03 | 0:21:04 | |
and offers an improved
economic case for a second | 0:21:04 | 0:21:06 | |
runway at Gatwick instead. | 0:21:06 | 0:21:08 | |
So, with opponents on all sides
of the Commons, does the Government | 0:21:08 | 0:21:10 | |
still have the votes to get
the plans off the ground? | 0:21:10 | 0:21:13 | |
Here's Elizabeth Glinka. | 0:21:13 | 0:21:22 | |
The debate over the expansion
of Heathrow has been | 0:21:26 | 0:21:28 | |
going on for decades. | 0:21:28 | 0:21:30 | |
Plans for a third runway
were first introduced | 0:21:30 | 0:21:32 | |
by the Labour government in 2003. | 0:21:32 | 0:21:34 | |
Then, after spending millions
of pounds, finally, in 2015, | 0:21:34 | 0:21:37 | |
the airport commission recommended
that those plans go ahead, | 0:21:37 | 0:21:43 | |
and the government position
appeared to be fixed. | 0:21:43 | 0:21:46 | |
But, of course, since then,
we've had a general election. | 0:21:46 | 0:21:49 | |
The Government have lost
their Commons majority. | 0:21:49 | 0:21:53 | |
And with opposition on both front
benches, the Parliamentary | 0:21:53 | 0:21:55 | |
arithmetic looks a little bit up
in the air. | 0:21:55 | 0:22:00 | |
A lot has changed since the airport
commission produced its report, | 0:22:00 | 0:22:03 | |
and that don't forget
was the bedrock for the Government's | 0:22:03 | 0:22:06 | |
decision, that's why the government
supposedly made the decision | 0:22:06 | 0:22:08 | |
that it made. | 0:22:08 | 0:22:09 | |
But most of the assumptions
made in that report have | 0:22:09 | 0:22:12 | |
been undermined since,
by data on passenger numbers, | 0:22:12 | 0:22:14 | |
on economic benefits, and more
than anything, on pollution. | 0:22:14 | 0:22:17 | |
There's demand from international
carriers to get into Heathrow. | 0:22:17 | 0:22:20 | |
More and more people want to fly. | 0:22:20 | 0:22:22 | |
And after the referendum,
connectivity post-Brexit | 0:22:22 | 0:22:26 | |
is going to be absolutely critical
to the UK economy, so if anything, | 0:22:26 | 0:22:29 | |
I think the case is stronger
for expansion at Heathrow. | 0:22:29 | 0:22:35 | |
A vote on expansion had been due
to take place this summer. | 0:22:35 | 0:22:38 | |
But with Westminster somewhat
distracted, that didn't happen. | 0:22:38 | 0:22:40 | |
Now, fresh data means
the Government has had to reopen | 0:22:40 | 0:22:43 | |
the public consultation. | 0:22:43 | 0:22:49 | |
But it maintains the case
for Heathrow is as strong as ever, | 0:22:49 | 0:22:52 | |
delivering benefits of up
to £74 billion to the wider economy. | 0:22:52 | 0:22:57 | |
And in any case, the Government
says, action must be taken, | 0:22:57 | 0:23:00 | |
as all five of London's airports
will be completely | 0:23:00 | 0:23:04 | |
full by the mid-2030s. | 0:23:04 | 0:23:09 | |
Still, the new research does cast
an alternative expansion at Gatwick | 0:23:09 | 0:23:11 | |
in a more favourable economic light,
while showing Heathrow | 0:23:11 | 0:23:15 | |
is now less likely to meet
its environmental targets. | 0:23:15 | 0:23:23 | |
Campaigners like these in Hounslow
sense the wind is shifting. | 0:23:23 | 0:23:27 | |
We're feeling encouraged,
because we see all kinds | 0:23:27 | 0:23:30 | |
of weaknesses in the argument. | 0:23:30 | 0:23:32 | |
Certainly, quite a few MPs,
I think certainly Labour MPs, | 0:23:32 | 0:23:35 | |
are beginning to think perhaps it's
not such a great idea | 0:23:35 | 0:23:37 | |
to have a third runway. | 0:23:37 | 0:23:40 | |
Their MP is convinced colleagues
can now be persuaded | 0:23:40 | 0:23:42 | |
to see things their way. | 0:23:42 | 0:23:45 | |
The Labour Party quite
rightly set four key tests | 0:23:45 | 0:23:47 | |
for a third runway at Heathrow. | 0:23:47 | 0:23:50 | |
And in my view,
Heathrow is not able... | 0:23:50 | 0:23:53 | |
The Heathrow option is not able
to pass any of those. | 0:23:53 | 0:23:57 | |
So, I see a lot of colleagues
in the Labour Party around | 0:23:57 | 0:24:00 | |
the country beginning
to think twice. | 0:24:00 | 0:24:02 | |
And if you look at the cross-party
MPs supportin this anti-Heathrow | 0:24:02 | 0:24:08 | |
And if you look at the cross-party
MPs supporting this anti-Heathrow | 0:24:08 | 0:24:11 | |
protest this week, you will see
some familiar faces. | 0:24:11 | 0:24:13 | |
You know my position -
as the constituency MP, | 0:24:13 | 0:24:15 | |
I'm totally opposed. | 0:24:15 | 0:24:17 | |
I think this is another indication
of just the difficulties | 0:24:17 | 0:24:19 | |
the Government have got off
of implementing this policy. | 0:24:19 | 0:24:22 | |
I don't think it's going to happen,
I just don't think | 0:24:22 | 0:24:24 | |
it's going to happen. | 0:24:24 | 0:24:25 | |
So, if some on the Labour
front bench are, shall | 0:24:25 | 0:24:28 | |
we say, not supportive,
what about the other side? | 0:24:28 | 0:24:31 | |
In a free vote, we could have had up
to 60 Conservative MPs | 0:24:31 | 0:24:34 | |
voting against expansion,
that's the number that is normally | 0:24:34 | 0:24:36 | |
used and I think it's right. | 0:24:36 | 0:24:37 | |
In the circumstances where it
requires an active rebellion, | 0:24:37 | 0:24:39 | |
the numbers would be fewer. | 0:24:39 | 0:24:41 | |
I can't tell you what that
number is, but I can tell | 0:24:41 | 0:24:44 | |
you that there are people right
the way through the party, | 0:24:44 | 0:24:46 | |
from the backbenches
to the heart of the government, | 0:24:46 | 0:24:49 | |
who will vote against
Heathrow expansion. | 0:24:49 | 0:24:50 | |
And yet the SNP, whose Commons
votes could prove vital, | 0:24:50 | 0:24:54 | |
are behind the Heathrow plan,
which promises more | 0:24:54 | 0:24:55 | |
connecting flights. | 0:24:55 | 0:24:56 | |
And other supporters are convinced
they have the numbers. | 0:24:56 | 0:25:01 | |
There is a majority of members
of Parliament that support Heathrow | 0:25:01 | 0:25:04 | |
expansion, and when that is put
to the test, whenever that will be, | 0:25:04 | 0:25:07 | |
I think that will be
clearly demonstrated. | 0:25:07 | 0:25:09 | |
Any vote on this issue
won't come until next summer. | 0:25:09 | 0:25:11 | |
For both sides, yet more time
to argue about weather | 0:25:11 | 0:25:14 | |
the plans should take off
or be permanently grounded. | 0:25:14 | 0:25:21 | |
Elizabeth Glinka there. | 0:25:24 | 0:25:26 | |
And I'm joined now by the former
Cabinet minister Theresa Villiers, | 0:25:26 | 0:25:29 | |
who oversaw aviation policy
as a transport minister | 0:25:29 | 0:25:31 | |
under David Cameron. | 0:25:31 | 0:25:37 | |
Thanks for coming in. You have made
your opposition to a third runway at | 0:25:37 | 0:25:43 | |
Heathrow consistently clear. , have
reopened this consultation but it is | 0:25:43 | 0:25:46 | |
still clearly their preferred
option? It is but what I have always | 0:25:46 | 0:25:50 | |
asked is, why try to build a new
runway at Heathrow when you can | 0:25:50 | 0:25:54 | |
build one at Gatwick in half the
time, for half the cost and with a | 0:25:54 | 0:25:57 | |
tiny fraction of the environment
will cost average is that true, | 0:25:57 | 0:26:01 | |
though? Private finance is already
to go at Heathrow, because that's | 0:26:01 | 0:26:05 | |
where people want to do it and
that's where the private backers | 0:26:05 | 0:26:08 | |
want to put it. It would take much
longer to get the private finance | 0:26:08 | 0:26:12 | |
for Gatwick? Part of that private
finance is passengers of the future, | 0:26:12 | 0:26:17 | |
but also, the costs of the surface
transport needed to expand Heathrow | 0:26:17 | 0:26:21 | |
is phenomenal. I mean, TfL estimates
vary between £10 billion and £15 | 0:26:21 | 0:26:30 | |
billion. And there's no suggestion
that those private backers are going | 0:26:30 | 0:26:33 | |
to meet those costs. So, this is a
hugely expensive project as well as | 0:26:33 | 0:26:38 | |
one which will create very
significant damage. Heathrow is | 0:26:38 | 0:26:42 | |
ultimately where passengers and
airlines want to go to, isn't it? | 0:26:42 | 0:26:45 | |
Every slot is practically full.
Every time a new one comes up, it is | 0:26:45 | 0:26:49 | |
up immediately, it's a very popular
airport. Gatwick is not where they | 0:26:49 | 0:26:55 | |
want to go? There are many airlines
and passengers who do want to fly | 0:26:55 | 0:26:58 | |
from Gatwick, and all the forecasts
indicate that a new runway there | 0:26:58 | 0:27:03 | |
would be full of planes very
rapidly. But I think the key thing | 0:27:03 | 0:27:07 | |
is that successive elements have
said, technology will deliver a way | 0:27:07 | 0:27:12 | |
to resolve the around noise and air
quality. I don't have any confidence | 0:27:12 | 0:27:18 | |
that science has demonstrated that
technology will deliver those | 0:27:18 | 0:27:22 | |
solutions to these very serious
environmental limbs which have | 0:27:22 | 0:27:27 | |
stopped Heathrow expansion for
decades. Jim Fitzpatrick in the film | 0:27:27 | 0:27:29 | |
was mentioning that people think
there is a need for even more | 0:27:29 | 0:27:34 | |
collectivity in Britain post-Brexit.
We know that business has been | 0:27:34 | 0:27:37 | |
crying out for more routes, they
really think it hurts business | 0:27:37 | 0:27:40 | |
expansion that we don't get on with
this. More consultation is just | 0:27:40 | 0:27:45 | |
going to lead to more delay, isn't
it? This is a hugely controversial | 0:27:45 | 0:27:49 | |
decision. There is a reason why
people have been talking about | 0:27:49 | 0:27:52 | |
expanding Heathrow for 50 years and
it is never happened, it's because | 0:27:52 | 0:27:55 | |
it's a bad idea. So, inevitably the
legal processes are very complex. | 0:27:55 | 0:28:00 | |
One of my anxieties about, pursuing
this option is that potentially it | 0:28:00 | 0:28:05 | |
means another lost decade for
airport expansion. Because the | 0:28:05 | 0:28:08 | |
problems with Heathrow expansion are
so serious, I believe that's one of | 0:28:08 | 0:28:14 | |
the reasons why I advocated, anyone
who wants a new runway in the | 0:28:14 | 0:28:17 | |
south-east should be backing Gatwick
is a much more deliverable option. | 0:28:17 | 0:28:21 | |
Let me move on to Brexit. We were
talking with Hilary Benn about a | 0:28:21 | 0:28:27 | |
meaningful vote being given to the
House of Commons chukka how | 0:28:27 | 0:28:30 | |
important do you think that is? Of
course the Commons will vote on | 0:28:30 | 0:28:33 | |
this. The Commons is going to vote
on this many, many times. We have | 0:28:33 | 0:28:39 | |
also had a hugely important vote not
only in the referendum on the 23rd | 0:28:39 | 0:28:42 | |
of June but also on Article 50. But
will that vote allow any changes to | 0:28:42 | 0:28:46 | |
it? Hilary Benn seemed to think that
the Commons would be able to shape | 0:28:46 | 0:28:52 | |
the deal with the vote. But actually
is it going to be, saying, take it | 0:28:52 | 0:28:56 | |
or leave it at all what we have
negotiated? Our Prime Minister | 0:28:56 | 0:29:01 | |
negotiates on our behalf
internationally. It's | 0:29:01 | 0:29:06 | |
well-established precedent that
after an agreement is reached | 0:29:06 | 0:29:08 | |
overseas, then it is considered in
the House of Commons. What if it was | 0:29:08 | 0:29:14 | |
voted down in the House of Commons?
Well, the legal effect of that would | 0:29:14 | 0:29:18 | |
be that we left the European Union
without any kind of deal, because | 0:29:18 | 0:29:21 | |
the key decision was on the voting
of Article 50 as an irreversible | 0:29:21 | 0:29:26 | |
decision. Is it irreversible,
though? We understand, may have had | 0:29:26 | 0:29:31 | |
legal advice saying that Yukon
stopped the clock on Article 50. | 0:29:31 | 0:29:35 | |
Would it not be possible if the
Commons voted against to ask the | 0:29:35 | 0:29:38 | |
European Union for a little bit more
time to try and renegotiate? There | 0:29:38 | 0:29:41 | |
is a debate about the reversibility
of Article 50. But the key point is | 0:29:41 | 0:29:50 | |
that we are all working for a good
deal for the United Kingdom and the | 0:29:50 | 0:29:56 | |
I'm concerned that some of the
amendments to the legislation are | 0:29:56 | 0:30:00 | |
not about the nature of the deal at
the end of the process, they're just | 0:30:00 | 0:30:03 | |
about frustrating the process. I
think that would be wrong. I think | 0:30:03 | 0:30:10 | |
we should respect the result of the
referendum. Will it be by next | 0:30:10 | 0:30:13 | |
summer, so there is time for
Parliament and for other | 0:30:13 | 0:30:16 | |
parliaments? I certainly hope that
we get that agreement between the | 0:30:16 | 0:30:18 | |
two sides, and the recent European
summit seemed to indicate a | 0:30:18 | 0:30:24 | |
willingness from the European side
to be constructive. But one point | 0:30:24 | 0:30:28 | |
where I think Hilary Benn has a
point, if we do secure agreement on | 0:30:28 | 0:30:32 | |
a transitional deal, that does
potentially give us more time to | 0:30:32 | 0:30:35 | |
work on the details of a trade
agreement. I hope we get as much as | 0:30:35 | 0:30:40 | |
possible in place before exit day.
But filling out some of that detail | 0:30:40 | 0:30:44 | |
is made easier if we can secure that
two-year transitional deal. | 0:30:44 | 0:30:52 | |
That is interesting because a lot of
Brexiteers what the deal to be done | 0:30:52 | 0:30:59 | |
by the inflammation period, it is
not a time for that. I fully | 0:30:59 | 0:31:06 | |
recognise we need compromise, I am
keen to work with people across my | 0:31:06 | 0:31:11 | |
party in terms of spectrum of
opinion, and with other parties as | 0:31:11 | 0:31:15 | |
well to ensure we get the best
outcome. Let me ask you briefly | 0:31:15 | 0:31:20 | |
before you go about the possible
culture of sexual harassment in the | 0:31:20 | 0:31:24 | |
House of commons and Theresa May
will write to the Speaker of the | 0:31:24 | 0:31:29 | |
House of Commons to make sure there
is a better way that people can | 0:31:29 | 0:31:33 | |
report sexual harassment in the
House of commons. Is that necessary? | 0:31:33 | 0:31:37 | |
A better procedure is needed. It is
sad it has taken this controversy to | 0:31:37 | 0:31:43 | |
push this forward. But there is a
problem with MPs who are individual | 0:31:43 | 0:31:48 | |
employers. If you work for an MP and
have a complaint against them, | 0:31:48 | 0:31:53 | |
essentially they are overseeing
their own complaints process. I | 0:31:53 | 0:31:56 | |
think a role for the House of
commons authorities in ensuring that | 0:31:56 | 0:32:01 | |
those complaints are properly dealt
with I think would be very helpful, | 0:32:01 | 0:32:04 | |
so I think the Prime Minister's
letter was a sensible move. So you | 0:32:04 | 0:32:09 | |
think there is a culture of sexual
harassment in the House of commons? | 0:32:09 | 0:32:13 | |
I have not been subjected to it or
seen evidence of it, but obviously | 0:32:13 | 0:32:19 | |
there is anxiety and allegations
have made their way into the papers | 0:32:19 | 0:32:23 | |
and they should be treated
appropriately and properly | 0:32:23 | 0:32:27 | |
investigated. Thank you for talking
to us. | 0:32:27 | 0:32:28 | |
Thank you for talking to us. | 0:32:28 | 0:32:31 | |
Next week the Lord Speaker's
committee publishes its final report | 0:32:31 | 0:32:33 | |
into reducing the size
of the House of Lords. | 0:32:33 | 0:32:35 | |
With over 800 members the upper
house is the second largest | 0:32:35 | 0:32:38 | |
legislative chamber in the world
after the National People's | 0:32:38 | 0:32:40 | |
Congress of China. | 0:32:40 | 0:32:41 | |
The report is expected to recommend
that new peerages should be | 0:32:41 | 0:32:44 | |
time-limited to 15 years and that
in the future political peerage | 0:32:44 | 0:32:46 | |
appointments will also be tied
to a party's election performance. | 0:32:46 | 0:32:51 | |
The government has been under
pressure to take action to cut | 0:32:51 | 0:32:53 | |
members of the unelected chamber,
where they are entitled | 0:32:53 | 0:32:57 | |
to claim an attendance
allowance of £300 a day. | 0:32:57 | 0:33:00 | |
And once again these expenses
have been in the news. | 0:33:00 | 0:33:04 | |
The Electoral Reform Society
discovered that 16 peers had claimed | 0:33:04 | 0:33:06 | |
around £400,000 without speaking
in any debates or submitting any | 0:33:06 | 0:33:09 | |
questions for an entire year. | 0:33:09 | 0:33:13 | |
One of the Lords to be
criticised was Digby Jones, | 0:33:13 | 0:33:15 | |
the crossbencher and former trade
minister, he hasn't spoken | 0:33:15 | 0:33:19 | |
in the Lords since April 2016
and has voted only seven times | 0:33:19 | 0:33:22 | |
during 2016 and 2017. | 0:33:22 | 0:33:25 | |
Yet he has claimed around
£15,000 in this period. | 0:33:25 | 0:33:29 | |
When asked what he does
in the House he said, | 0:33:29 | 0:33:32 | |
"I go in and I will invite for lunch
or meet with inward | 0:33:32 | 0:33:34 | |
investors into the country. | 0:33:34 | 0:33:36 | |
I fly the flag for Britain." | 0:33:36 | 0:33:39 | |
Well, we can speak now
to Lord Jones who joins us | 0:33:39 | 0:33:42 | |
from Stratford Upon Avon. | 0:33:42 | 0:33:46 | |
Thank you very much for talking to
us. You provide value for money in | 0:33:46 | 0:33:51 | |
the House of Lords do you think?
Definitely. I am, by the way, very | 0:33:51 | 0:33:58 | |
keen on reform. I want to see that
15 year tide. I would like to see a | 0:33:58 | 0:34:02 | |
time limit, an age limit of 75 or
80. I would like attendants | 0:34:02 | 0:34:08 | |
definitely define so the whole
public understood what people are | 0:34:08 | 0:34:12 | |
paying for and why. The £300, as a
crossbencher I get no support, and | 0:34:12 | 0:34:19 | |
nor do I want any, speech writing,
secretarial assistance, none of | 0:34:19 | 0:34:27 | |
that, and the £300 goes towards
that. Whilst you are in there | 0:34:27 | 0:34:31 | |
because we will talk about the
reform of the Lords in general, but | 0:34:31 | 0:34:36 | |
in terms of you yourself, you say
you invite people in for lunch, is | 0:34:36 | 0:34:39 | |
it not possible for you to take part
in debates and votes and ask | 0:34:39 | 0:34:43 | |
questions at the same time? Have you
ever listened to a debate in the | 0:34:43 | 0:34:48 | |
laws? Yes, many times. Yes, many
times. You have to put your name | 0:34:48 | 0:35:01 | |
down in advance and you have to be
there for the whole debate. You have | 0:35:01 | 0:35:09 | |
to be around when the vote is called
and you do not know when the book is | 0:35:09 | 0:35:12 | |
called, you have no idea when the
boat is going to be called. This is | 0:35:12 | 0:35:16 | |
part of being a member of the House
of Lords and what it means. If you | 0:35:16 | 0:35:22 | |
are not prepared to wait or take
part in debates, why do you want to | 0:35:22 | 0:35:26 | |
be a member? It is possible to
resign from the House of Lords. | 0:35:26 | 0:35:31 | |
There are many things members of the
Lords do that does not relate to | 0:35:31 | 0:35:35 | |
parrot fashion following somebody
else, which I refuse to do, about | 0:35:35 | 0:35:40 | |
speaking to an empty chamber, or
indeed hanging on sometimes for | 0:35:40 | 0:35:45 | |
hours to vote. There are many other
things that you do. You quote me as | 0:35:45 | 0:35:50 | |
saying I will entertain at lunchtime
or show people around the House, | 0:35:50 | 0:35:54 | |
everything from schoolchildren to
inward investors. I will meet | 0:35:54 | 0:35:58 | |
ministers about big business issues
or educational issues, and at the | 0:35:58 | 0:36:01 | |
same time I will meet other members
of the Lords to get things moving. | 0:36:01 | 0:36:06 | |
None of that relates to going into
the House and getting on your hind | 0:36:06 | 0:36:10 | |
legs, although I do go in and sit
there and learn and listen to | 0:36:10 | 0:36:14 | |
others, which, if more people would
receive and not transmit, we might | 0:36:14 | 0:36:20 | |
get a better informed society. At
the same time many times I will go | 0:36:20 | 0:36:24 | |
after I have listened and I am
leaving and if I have not heard the | 0:36:24 | 0:36:29 | |
debate, I will not vote. Voting is
an essential part of being part of a | 0:36:29 | 0:36:35 | |
legislative chamber. This is not
just an executive committee, it is a | 0:36:35 | 0:36:40 | |
legislature, surpassing that law is
essential, is it not? Do you really | 0:36:40 | 0:36:45 | |
believe that an MP or a member of
the Lords who has not heard a moment | 0:36:45 | 0:36:49 | |
of the debate, who is then listening
to the Bell, walks in and does not | 0:36:49 | 0:36:56 | |
know which lobby, the whips tell
him, they have not heard the debate | 0:36:56 | 0:37:00 | |
and they do not know what they are
voting on and they go and do it? | 0:37:00 | 0:37:05 | |
That is your democracy? Voting seems
to be an essential part of this | 0:37:05 | 0:37:11 | |
chamber, and you have your ideas
about reforming the chamber. It | 0:37:11 | 0:37:15 | |
sounds as though you would reform
yourself out of it. You say people | 0:37:15 | 0:37:19 | |
who are not voting and who are not
taking part in debate should no | 0:37:19 | 0:37:22 | |
longer be members of the House. I
did not say that. I said we ought to | 0:37:22 | 0:37:29 | |
redefine what attendance means and
then if you do not attend on the new | 0:37:29 | 0:37:34 | |
criteria, you do not have to come
ever again, we will give you your | 0:37:34 | 0:37:37 | |
wish. I agree attendance might mean
unless you speak, you are going. | 0:37:37 | 0:37:43 | |
Fair enough, if that is what is
agreed, yes. Sometimes I would speak | 0:37:43 | 0:37:48 | |
and sometimes I would not. If I did
not, then off I go. Similarly after | 0:37:48 | 0:37:54 | |
15 years, off you go. If you reach
75 or 80, off you go. Why do we have | 0:37:54 | 0:38:00 | |
92 members who are only there
because of daddy. You are talking | 0:38:00 | 0:38:06 | |
about hereditary peers. You would
like to reduce the House to what | 0:38:06 | 0:38:09 | |
kind of number? I would get it down
to 400. You would get rid of half | 0:38:09 | 0:38:15 | |
the peers there at the moment? You
think you are active enough to | 0:38:15 | 0:38:19 | |
remain as one of the 400? No, I said
that might well include me. Let's | 0:38:19 | 0:38:27 | |
get a set of criteria, let's push it
through, because the laws is losing | 0:38:27 | 0:38:32 | |
respect in the whole of the country
because there are too many and all | 0:38:32 | 0:38:36 | |
these things about what people pay
for. I bet most people think the | 0:38:36 | 0:38:39 | |
money you get is paid. It is not, it
is re-funding for all the things you | 0:38:39 | 0:38:45 | |
have to pay for yourself. But I
understand how respect has been lost | 0:38:45 | 0:38:50 | |
in society. Let's change it now.
Let's get it through and then, yes, | 0:38:50 | 0:38:55 | |
if you do not meet the criteria, you
have got to go and that includes me. | 0:38:55 | 0:39:00 | |
Lloyd Jones, thank you for talking
to us. | 0:39:00 | 0:39:02 | |
Lloyd Jones, thank
you for talking to us. | 0:39:02 | 0:39:05 | |
It's coming up to 11.40,
you're watching the Sunday Politics. | 0:39:05 | 0:39:07 | |
Coming up on the programme,
we'll be talking to the former | 0:39:07 | 0:39:10 | |
business minister and Conservative
MP Anna Soubry about the Brexit | 0:39:10 | 0:39:12 | |
negotiations and claims of sexual
harassment in Parliament. | 0:39:12 | 0:39:22 | |
In the East Midlands:
The sweet smell of success - | 0:39:22 | 0:39:25 | |
the region's sugar beet industry
is booming and looking forward | 0:39:25 | 0:39:27 | |
to life after Brexit. | 0:39:27 | 0:39:31 | |
We'll be finding out why Brexit
gives opportunity to send what comes | 0:39:31 | 0:39:34 | |
from fields in the East
Midlands around the world. | 0:39:34 | 0:39:40 | |
And it's a five billion pound
industry and growing, | 0:39:40 | 0:39:42 | |
but could the East Midlands make
even more from tourism? | 0:39:42 | 0:39:45 | |
It's been wonderful. | 0:39:45 | 0:39:46 | |
A great day out. | 0:39:46 | 0:39:50 | |
We visited two museums
and here at the King Richard Museum. | 0:39:50 | 0:39:53 | |
I think it's great. | 0:39:53 | 0:39:54 | |
It is actually my second day
being here because you get a | 0:39:54 | 0:39:57 | |
return ticket. | 0:39:57 | 0:39:59 | |
I just want to sweep
around this again. | 0:39:59 | 0:40:04 | |
Hello, I'm Marie Ashby my guests
this week - Maggie Throup | 0:40:04 | 0:40:08 | |
is the Conservative MP for Erewash
and Liz Kendall is | 0:40:08 | 0:40:10 | |
Labour's Leicester West MP. | 0:40:10 | 0:40:11 | |
Welcome both. | 0:40:11 | 0:40:12 | |
First an issue you're
both passionate about - | 0:40:12 | 0:40:15 | |
Social care and how we pay for it. | 0:40:17 | 0:40:19 | |
In fact in the House
of Commons this week, | 0:40:19 | 0:40:21 | |
you followed each other in a debate
called by Labour on the subject. | 0:40:21 | 0:40:31 | |
And Maggie Throup, you talked
about your 94 year old father | 0:40:32 | 0:40:35 | |
who's in a care home. | 0:40:35 | 0:40:42 | |
do. So I've seen just what is needed
and what are the future and the | 0:40:42 | 0:40:48 | |
demands that will be around. | 0:40:48 | 0:40:49 | |
demands that will be around. | 0:40:49 | 0:40:51 | |
You praised the NHS
but were critical of successive | 0:40:51 | 0:40:53 | |
administrations for failing
to prepare our social care system | 0:40:53 | 0:40:55 | |
for an ageing population
with complex illnesses. | 0:40:55 | 0:41:05 | |
That's right. Today, people are
living through conditions they would | 0:41:05 | 0:41:10 | |
never have lived through before.
Heart attacks, strokes, cancer. And | 0:41:10 | 0:41:15 | |
their needs are changing so the NHS
has been a double-edged sword. And | 0:41:15 | 0:41:18 | |
we need to look at how we support
people through social care and we | 0:41:18 | 0:41:22 | |
really need to do something quite
dramatic to make those changes. | 0:41:22 | 0:41:24 | |
You want cross-party consensus on
this? | 0:41:24 | 0:41:28 | |
Yes. We saw what happened at the
last election with a conservative | 0:41:28 | 0:41:35 | |
proposals dubbed the dementia tax.
Labour's appraisals were called a | 0:41:35 | 0:41:39 | |
death tax and I can go on. It will
be older and disabled people who | 0:41:39 | 0:41:47 | |
suffer. If you want lasting change
we have to get cross-party | 0:41:47 | 0:41:50 | |
agreement. I am working with others
to call on the Prime Minister to set | 0:41:50 | 0:41:57 | |
up back party convention.
What is your Government planning to | 0:41:57 | 0:42:00 | |
do? We have people coming up shortly
and I'm pushing to bring health and | 0:42:00 | 0:42:06 | |
care together under one roof. They
are so intrinsically linked I don't | 0:42:06 | 0:42:08 | |
think we can separate it any longer.
We need to be bold and brave. We | 0:42:08 | 0:42:13 | |
need cross-party support. For too
many years and too many successive | 0:42:13 | 0:42:16 | |
governments people have failed to
make a decision and it is about time | 0:42:16 | 0:42:20 | |
that politicians did actually make a
decision for the future of our | 0:42:20 | 0:42:23 | |
elderly and the most vulnerable in
society. | 0:42:23 | 0:42:25 | |
We also need, clearly, an immediate
injection of cash in the Budget for | 0:42:25 | 0:42:32 | |
the NHS and social care. The
pressures are huge. Older people are | 0:42:32 | 0:42:37 | |
suffering and disabled people and
their family carers. We need that | 0:42:37 | 0:42:39 | |
immediate injection of cash and a
longer term cross arty approach. | 0:42:39 | 0:42:43 | |
It is not just cash but how to carry
out that Budget. | 0:42:43 | 0:42:49 | |
Money doesn't solve the problems.
But it is hugely needed. I am a | 0:42:49 | 0:42:54 | |
strong champion of reform. I agree,
one Budget, one commissioning body | 0:42:54 | 0:42:57 | |
for help and social care will better
meet people's needs. | 0:42:57 | 0:43:00 | |
In the last Budget the chance that
put £2 billion more into the pot. We | 0:43:00 | 0:43:03 | |
go on and on and on, we need reform
as well. | 0:43:03 | 0:43:05 | |
From funding social care to imagine
the quest for all of our MPs to work | 0:43:05 | 0:43:11 | |
together to get more money for the
whole region. East Midlands councils | 0:43:11 | 0:43:16 | |
which represent our local
authorities are looking at how much | 0:43:16 | 0:43:19 | |
money comes from central Government
and it seems that we're getting | 0:43:19 | 0:43:22 | |
something of a raw deal. If report
says that the East Midlands get that | 0:43:22 | 0:43:27 | |
lowest level of funding per head of
economic development, public | 0:43:27 | 0:43:30 | |
transport and on rail. The region is
the third levels for spending on | 0:43:30 | 0:43:34 | |
health, education, and overall
public spending. In fact, the | 0:43:34 | 0:43:40 | |
average public spending per head in
the East Midlands is £8,237. That is | 0:43:40 | 0:43:44 | |
more than £500 less than our
neighbours in the West Midlands. And | 0:43:44 | 0:43:48 | |
almost £1000 less than people living
in northern powerhouse areas. We | 0:43:48 | 0:43:56 | |
obviously have highlighted this
issue many, many times on this | 0:43:56 | 0:43:58 | |
programme. But looking at the stake
as it is pretty shocking. | 0:43:58 | 0:44:02 | |
The lowest funding per head of
economic development and public | 0:44:02 | 0:44:04 | |
transport just a start. It is a
problem. And I think sometimes | 0:44:04 | 0:44:11 | |
everybody blames each other. And I
think the East Midlands council | 0:44:11 | 0:44:16 | |
really need to communicate more. And
together with people like myself and | 0:44:16 | 0:44:18 | |
Liz so we can lobby the Government
fully. DHS to growth strategy that | 0:44:18 | 0:44:26 | |
was produced a couple of weeks ago,
I don't know about it until after it | 0:44:26 | 0:44:29 | |
was launched. Yet HS2 really affects
my constituency. If the council are | 0:44:29 | 0:44:37 | |
concerned about the funding want to
bring initially talking to people | 0:44:37 | 0:44:39 | |
like myself.
They've written to you asking for | 0:44:39 | 0:44:43 | |
your help, Berliners's help, have
you reply to them on that? | 0:44:43 | 0:44:45 | |
I have not reply directly
butterfingers two-way underling to | 0:44:45 | 0:44:51 | |
look at themselves as well what they
are doing to communicate with us. | 0:44:51 | 0:44:54 | |
To share what their vision is as
well so we can lobby on their | 0:44:54 | 0:44:58 | |
behalf. What do you say?
Will they get the help they are | 0:44:58 | 0:45:04 | |
asking for? I hope that they do. But
I'm not holding my breath. The | 0:45:04 | 0:45:07 | |
problem is not that they are not
communicate with us, the problem is | 0:45:07 | 0:45:12 | |
the Government does not have a
strategy to rebalance the economy | 0:45:12 | 0:45:16 | |
across the regions. Only London and
the south-east have seen their | 0:45:16 | 0:45:18 | |
economies go back to the crisis
levels. | 0:45:18 | 0:45:24 | |
We have a very geographically
unbalanced economy and very unequal | 0:45:24 | 0:45:29 | |
economy.
So what is the answer, then? | 0:45:29 | 0:45:31 | |
Firstly, we need investment in
infrastructure, and wrote, in | 0:45:31 | 0:45:34 | |
Braille. We need more investment in
skills, those things are crucial to | 0:45:34 | 0:45:39 | |
boosting productivity, which is
essential if the economy as a whole | 0:45:39 | 0:45:41 | |
is going to grow.
And if we're going to see some of | 0:45:41 | 0:45:45 | |
that growth come back into people's
earnings. Theresa May says this is a | 0:45:45 | 0:45:50 | |
priority for her to rebalance the
economy. | 0:45:50 | 0:45:51 | |
But nothing has been done. Nothing
has been done since the financial | 0:45:51 | 0:45:55 | |
crash. My real concern is that we
are still too reliant on London and | 0:45:55 | 0:45:59 | |
the south-east and financial
services. We're not seeing that | 0:45:59 | 0:46:01 | |
growth and productivity coming back
up in the regions like these. | 0:46:01 | 0:46:06 | |
But sometimes we don't actually sing
and shout about what we got another | 0:46:06 | 0:46:09 | |
region.
You're supposed to be doing that. I | 0:46:09 | 0:46:11 | |
did that in Parliament all the time.
What Rolls-Royce, we've got Toyota, | 0:46:11 | 0:46:17 | |
we've got the research that comes
out of the universities in our area. | 0:46:17 | 0:46:22 | |
It will either softly to health
Minister with responsibility life | 0:46:22 | 0:46:25 | |
sciences.
We are committed to light sign | 0:46:25 | 0:46:27 | |
strategy as well. This is something
that affects all of us in every | 0:46:27 | 0:46:31 | |
aspect of our lives, the way we get
around, how we work, the kind of | 0:46:31 | 0:46:34 | |
jobs that we will have the future.
There has been so much talk over the | 0:46:34 | 0:46:41 | |
years of MPs working together on
this but nothing really seems to | 0:46:41 | 0:46:44 | |
have changed.
Actually we have been working | 0:46:44 | 0:46:48 | |
together on the electrification of
the Midland mainline, which the | 0:46:48 | 0:46:50 | |
Government started stopped, started
and stopped again. That is something | 0:46:50 | 0:46:53 | |
that is good to go and make a big
difference. We need greater | 0:46:53 | 0:46:57 | |
conductivity with East Midland
airport and we really need to | 0:46:57 | 0:46:59 | |
address this issue of funding in
skills as well. Our people are our | 0:46:59 | 0:47:06 | |
best assets. With huge leaders,
universities, businesses. But they | 0:47:06 | 0:47:10 | |
need support from Government, too.
And the problem is, unless the | 0:47:10 | 0:47:13 | |
Chancellor and the Prime Minister
understand how to rebalance the | 0:47:13 | 0:47:18 | |
economy, and what steps are needed,
we will not see that action. | 0:47:18 | 0:47:22 | |
Championing greatness alone is not
going to deliver. | 0:47:22 | 0:47:24 | |
We've got to work together. We
should not be talking down the East | 0:47:24 | 0:47:30 | |
Midlands, which were talking up the
East Midlands. | 0:47:30 | 0:47:33 | |
However you dress this up it does
seem we're getting a really raw deal | 0:47:33 | 0:47:37 | |
heel. £500 per head less than
neighbours in the West Midlands. | 0:47:37 | 0:47:39 | |
How can that be justified? It cannot
be. What will it restrict me is we | 0:47:39 | 0:47:46 | |
have the Midlands in June and it is
all talking about the West Midlands. | 0:47:46 | 0:47:49 | |
Let's talk about the East Midlands.
Let's shout and go and fight for | 0:47:49 | 0:47:52 | |
that money. Shafting alone isn't
going to work. -- shouting alone is | 0:47:52 | 0:47:58 | |
not going to work. I do not believe
the Government has a strategy for | 0:47:58 | 0:48:02 | |
rebalancing the economy and dealing
with the biggest problem that we've | 0:48:02 | 0:48:05 | |
got, which is wage stagnation. The
British economy is not delivering | 0:48:05 | 0:48:09 | |
rising earnings for the majority of
the population. Until we grasp that | 0:48:09 | 0:48:12 | |
we will never see the economy
increase. | 0:48:12 | 0:48:16 | |
Make the investment in the roads and
railways. We are having investment | 0:48:16 | 0:48:22 | |
as well. Just look at my
constituency. We've got a new | 0:48:22 | 0:48:25 | |
railway station. There is continuing
lobbying from my predecessor and I | 0:48:25 | 0:48:32 | |
continued that. The County Council
would have let it die but I was | 0:48:32 | 0:48:35 | |
determined to get that.
The score by the East Midlands | 0:48:35 | 0:48:39 | |
councils is a real court action for
urgent action, will they see that | 0:48:39 | 0:48:42 | |
happen?
We need to get together. We need to | 0:48:42 | 0:48:44 | |
see what we can each do to work
together to find out what needs to | 0:48:44 | 0:48:49 | |
be working. When reports put in
front of us that actually they're | 0:48:49 | 0:48:55 | |
not taking the local knowledge of
what would work best to provide | 0:48:55 | 0:49:02 | |
instruction about HS2, that is
concerning. | 0:49:02 | 0:49:04 | |
You will be talking to the smooth
and councils? No reason why not. | 0:49:04 | 0:49:07 | |
Thank you. | 0:49:07 | 0:49:09 | |
And now another plea
for the region to work together - | 0:49:09 | 0:49:11 | |
this time on Tourism. | 0:49:11 | 0:49:12 | |
The East Midlands has
just had a record year. | 0:49:12 | 0:49:15 | |
The weak pound is helping boost
visitor numbers and Derbyshire has | 0:49:15 | 0:49:17 | |
become the first county
in the region to earn more | 0:49:17 | 0:49:20 | |
than two billion pounds
a year from tourists. | 0:49:20 | 0:49:22 | |
But are we making the most of our
world famous venues and history? | 0:49:22 | 0:49:25 | |
Alex Hamilton has been finding out. | 0:49:25 | 0:49:29 | |
There's no shortage of tourists in
the East Midlands. Visitors are | 0:49:29 | 0:49:31 | |
pouring in to Hardwick Hall. History
is a big attraction here in the | 0:49:31 | 0:49:38 | |
shape of the best of Hardwick, the
16th century serial widow who built | 0:49:38 | 0:49:41 | |
a hawk from a fortune amassed from a
series of marriages. And tourism is | 0:49:41 | 0:49:46 | |
big business in the East Midlands.
It is worth more than £2 billion to | 0:49:46 | 0:49:52 | |
Derbyshire alone. As Leicestershire
and Nottinghamshire are not too far | 0:49:52 | 0:49:55 | |
behind. And it's not just here.
Councils across the region reckon we | 0:49:55 | 0:50:00 | |
have seen 100 million visitors this
year. | 0:50:00 | 0:50:03 | |
So where are the coming from? People
are coming from all postcodes across | 0:50:03 | 0:50:06 | |
the country but also, hard look as
good an international collection and | 0:50:06 | 0:50:09 | |
so we see quite a lot of
international visitors from all | 0:50:09 | 0:50:12 | |
areas across the world coming to see
us to discover more about our story | 0:50:12 | 0:50:15 | |
here. We have Christmas opening
coming up soon. | 0:50:15 | 0:50:21 | |
We'll see a lot more local audience.
Derbyshire may top the table locally | 0:50:21 | 0:50:26 | |
in terms of the value of tourism to
its local economy. But it is | 0:50:26 | 0:50:29 | |
Leicester and Leicestershire that is
the rest of the last year, figures | 0:50:29 | 0:50:33 | |
are up 5%, perhaps some of the other
cities will start looking for a king | 0:50:33 | 0:50:38 | |
under their car park.
What we have seen as investors with | 0:50:38 | 0:50:41 | |
a lot more confidence in the city
and county. Particularly in new | 0:50:41 | 0:50:45 | |
hotels, for example. We will get new
hotels, 500 bed spaces in the next | 0:50:45 | 0:50:50 | |
few years.
That is unprecedented for Leicester | 0:50:50 | 0:50:52 | |
and a sign of confidence in the
future. It is clear there is a lot | 0:50:52 | 0:50:56 | |
to draw tourists to the East
Midlands. | 0:50:56 | 0:50:58 | |
Whether they are local, national or
international visitors. We come from | 0:50:58 | 0:51:00 | |
Hong Kong to visit our son in
Nottingham University. He is | 0:51:00 | 0:51:06 | |
studying today and then we come over
here to a nearby city to have a look | 0:51:06 | 0:51:12 | |
at Leicester.
It been wonderful. A great day out. | 0:51:12 | 0:51:14 | |
We visited two museums and here at
the King Richard Museum. | 0:51:14 | 0:51:19 | |
I figured as great. It is actually
my second day being here because you | 0:51:19 | 0:51:22 | |
get a return ticket. I just want to
sleep around this again. It's really | 0:51:22 | 0:51:27 | |
interesting.
The ones who come here may be happy | 0:51:27 | 0:51:33 | |
but our local council is missing a
trick. Could Robin Hood helped | 0:51:33 | 0:51:35 | |
Leicester's famous King Richard hit
new targets? And could the National | 0:51:35 | 0:51:43 | |
space Centre propel the stately
homes to new heights? The leader of | 0:51:43 | 0:51:46 | |
Derbyshire County Council reckons
working together to could boost | 0:51:46 | 0:51:50 | |
numbers still further.
We can do so much more by working | 0:51:50 | 0:51:53 | |
with the East Midlands Airport. They
arrived for international tourists | 0:51:53 | 0:51:56 | |
to tourists to come to this region
and it is about how we disperse | 0:51:56 | 0:51:59 | |
those tourists across the region.
And working together to make sure | 0:51:59 | 0:52:03 | |
that we are targeting places like
London, for example. The vast | 0:52:03 | 0:52:07 | |
majority of tourists coming. How do
we disperse those out of London and | 0:52:07 | 0:52:10 | |
into the East Midlands. When we got
to work together quite closely | 0:52:10 | 0:52:13 | |
around that to make sure that
happens. | 0:52:13 | 0:52:16 | |
Whatever the outcome of Brexit come
off the sun visitors now are on the | 0:52:16 | 0:52:19 | |
up. | 0:52:19 | 0:52:19 | |
up. | 0:52:19 | 0:52:23 | |
A positive outlook there but could
we be doing more to attract more | 0:52:23 | 0:52:26 | |
visitors?
I think we could. I think | 0:52:26 | 0:52:32 | |
Derbyshire, particularly, that of
the area I know really well. We have | 0:52:32 | 0:52:35 | |
something plastic countryside but
also some other places. A lot of | 0:52:35 | 0:52:38 | |
museums, celebrating the standing
ironworks and quite a lot of our | 0:52:38 | 0:52:43 | |
history. We have a fantastic theatre
in Nuneaton and we attracted over | 0:52:43 | 0:52:50 | |
15,000 visitors to the National
waterways Festival. It was one of | 0:52:50 | 0:52:55 | |
the hot weekend in August and people
couldn't really see Derbyshire and | 0:52:55 | 0:52:57 | |
the area.
It was beautiful, as you say. Can | 0:52:57 | 0:53:02 | |
you really say, as Barry Lewis was
saying there from the County | 0:53:02 | 0:53:05 | |
Council, that people will come up
from London to go to some of the | 0:53:05 | 0:53:09 | |
places you have been talking about?
London tourists go there for very | 0:53:09 | 0:53:13 | |
specific reasons, don't they? Is it
a capital in all its attractions. | 0:53:13 | 0:53:18 | |
She really targeting London
tourists? Absolutely we should be. | 0:53:18 | 0:53:22 | |
Offer to the third we've also got a
great comedy festival in Leicester, | 0:53:22 | 0:53:25 | |
we need to be able to promote our
work. I am concerned that some cuts | 0:53:25 | 0:53:28 | |
the local council has Howard will
reduce the amount we will spend on | 0:53:28 | 0:53:35 | |
marketing, the fantastic tourist
attractions we have here. And we go | 0:53:35 | 0:53:38 | |
back to the previous discussion
about making sure we have the road | 0:53:38 | 0:53:41 | |
and rail infrastructure to link us
up. But I think that is absolutely | 0:53:41 | 0:53:44 | |
right. To provide a package to
attract Londoners to our region to | 0:53:44 | 0:53:49 | |
see what fantastic things we've got,
and it's really important. | 0:53:49 | 0:53:52 | |
Do you think that could happen? I
don't see why not. We have the | 0:53:52 | 0:53:55 | |
mechanisms now. We can use the
Internet as I know a lot of people | 0:53:55 | 0:53:58 | |
go from London's to Stratford, at
York. And through Derbyshire to do | 0:53:58 | 0:54:04 | |
that transition.
Let's make sure they can stop here | 0:54:04 | 0:54:07 | |
as well. Leicester is really reaping
the rewards, isn't it? | 0:54:07 | 0:54:12 | |
It has been fantastic. I think
there's more that we can do in | 0:54:12 | 0:54:14 | |
future and I hope campaigners around
the world, that's our ambition. | 0:54:14 | 0:54:20 | |
Next: As Brexit continues
to dominate the national agenda, | 0:54:20 | 0:54:22 | |
many businesses are wondering
what life outside the | 0:54:22 | 0:54:24 | |
European Union will look like. | 0:54:24 | 0:54:25 | |
Well one East Midlands industry
is getting a glimpse - | 0:54:25 | 0:54:29 | |
sugar beet producers have no quotas,
and no fixed prices to contend | 0:54:29 | 0:54:31 | |
with after they were scrapped
by the EU at the beginning | 0:54:31 | 0:54:34 | |
of this month. | 0:54:34 | 0:54:35 | |
So how will they cope and what does
it tell us about the future | 0:54:35 | 0:54:39 | |
for other sectors after we leave? | 0:54:39 | 0:54:40 | |
Here's our Political
Editor Tony Roe. | 0:54:40 | 0:54:48 | |
From soil in the East Midlands to
sugar bag, six out of ten adults are | 0:54:48 | 0:54:51 | |
oblivious to the fact that we
produce sugar in Britain. Six of | 0:54:51 | 0:54:58 | |
these, and they are quite heavy,
produce one bag of sugar. 60% of the | 0:54:58 | 0:55:02 | |
sugar we use comes from home grown
sugar beet. | 0:55:02 | 0:55:04 | |
For our farmers, it is a lifeline.
Sugar beet for us is an important | 0:55:04 | 0:55:07 | |
crop because we're careful how we
grow the sugar, and the sugar beet, | 0:55:07 | 0:55:14 | |
we actually make some decent money.
It is usually one of our better | 0:55:14 | 0:55:17 | |
paying crops on the farm. This field
is 11 miles from the British sugar | 0:55:17 | 0:55:23 | |
plant. The average distance from the
old factory is 28 miles. For almost | 0:55:23 | 0:55:28 | |
50 years, the EU quota system has
limited what farmers can grow. That | 0:55:28 | 0:55:32 | |
has ended. It is news for British
Sugar, which processes 10,000 times | 0:55:32 | 0:55:35 | |
a day here.
When we had the quota system up to | 0:55:35 | 0:55:40 | |
October of this year we were
restricted in terms of how much we | 0:55:40 | 0:55:42 | |
could produce and sell.
And we were restricted from selling | 0:55:42 | 0:55:48 | |
on to the world market. And after
Brexit they believe they will be | 0:55:48 | 0:55:50 | |
able to be competitive on those
world markets as farmers yield per | 0:55:50 | 0:55:55 | |
acre is on the up, too.
We see it as an opportunity to grow | 0:55:55 | 0:55:59 | |
as a business. We are a really
efficient business and we see the | 0:55:59 | 0:56:03 | |
industry growing by up to 50%
compared with last year. We have | 0:56:03 | 0:56:08 | |
already grown by 30% this year, and
we could go beyond that, working | 0:56:08 | 0:56:12 | |
closely with our progress.
I can see us cutting down on the | 0:56:12 | 0:56:15 | |
acreage and growing more sugar beet
because the soil type we have suits | 0:56:15 | 0:56:19 | |
it. We grow good crops of sugar beet
and we lifted early and are able to | 0:56:19 | 0:56:24 | |
get a good week in after that.
These remain uncertain times for | 0:56:24 | 0:56:27 | |
farmers. There is a real fear that a
vote in Brussels this year failing | 0:56:27 | 0:56:30 | |
to approve the use a widely used
chemical will be damaging for the | 0:56:30 | 0:56:33 | |
industry.
Sign should dictate whether we can | 0:56:33 | 0:56:37 | |
use these products are not. And at
the moment, with this issue, it is | 0:56:37 | 0:56:42 | |
politics that is dictating it.
Playing with people's livelihoods, | 0:56:42 | 0:56:46 | |
displaying with genuine safe food
production and politics should not | 0:56:46 | 0:56:50 | |
have that amount of influence.
Then there is the Government push to | 0:56:50 | 0:56:52 | |
wean us off sugar treats. Does it
worry the industry? Not as much as | 0:56:52 | 0:57:00 | |
you would expect. Demand not
dropping, it is used in far more | 0:57:00 | 0:57:02 | |
than fizzy drinks. | 0:57:02 | 0:57:03 | |
than fizzy drinks. | 0:57:03 | 0:57:06 | |
It sounds confident of us live
outside the EU perhaps there is a | 0:57:06 | 0:57:09 | |
message therefore other businesses?
I think they are a highly efficient | 0:57:09 | 0:57:15 | |
and productive company. They will be
looking to export across the world | 0:57:15 | 0:57:19 | |
and they need all the support that
they can get in doing that but I do | 0:57:19 | 0:57:23 | |
know many other farmers are worried
about what will happen when we leave | 0:57:23 | 0:57:29 | |
the EU, what will happen to tariffs
on their goods. If we end up with no | 0:57:29 | 0:57:35 | |
deal, that is a 5% tariff on beef,
6% on dairy. Our food and doing | 0:57:35 | 0:57:44 | |
manufacturers are also concerned
about that. So it is an excellent | 0:57:44 | 0:57:48 | |
success story but there's nothing
stopping from exporting before we | 0:57:48 | 0:57:50 | |
even leave the EU. But there are
real worries, if we are out of the | 0:57:50 | 0:57:56 | |
single market and the customs union,
the NFU says it will be an absolute | 0:57:56 | 0:58:00 | |
disaster. And if you look at the
wider industries, across the East | 0:58:00 | 0:58:06 | |
Midlands, car manufacturing, acute
concern that there is no deal. We | 0:58:06 | 0:58:08 | |
had Toyota this week urging the
Government to lift the fog of | 0:58:08 | 0:58:15 | |
uncertainty. So what businesses want
a certainty. They wanted transition | 0:58:15 | 0:58:18 | |
deal and I think the Government
should be committing to one that is | 0:58:18 | 0:58:20 | |
keeping us in the single market and
the customs union and the very least | 0:58:20 | 0:58:28 | |
for the transition.
There is uncertainty out there. | 0:58:28 | 0:58:30 | |
There is. We will not do well in
negotiations in public. That is not | 0:58:30 | 0:58:33 | |
the way we conduct business at all.
What we've seen here with the sugar | 0:58:33 | 0:58:38 | |
beet industry is really good news
and it shows that there is life | 0:58:38 | 0:58:42 | |
outside of the EU. What I think we
do need to look at is the domestic | 0:58:42 | 0:58:46 | |
agricultural policy. So we can get
everything in place over the next | 0:58:46 | 0:58:49 | |
couple of years and the transition
period as well. The Prime Minister | 0:58:49 | 0:58:51 | |
has committed to a transition
period. | 0:58:51 | 0:58:56 | |
You mentioned the industry as well,
it is looking at it set by sector. | 0:58:56 | 0:59:05 | |
We have the strategy and it will be
on a sector by sector basis. | 0:59:05 | 0:59:09 | |
Not knowing what radio we're going
to get us a real problem. On Monday, | 0:59:09 | 0:59:15 | |
the Prime Minister told MPs there
will not be a transition deal until | 0:59:15 | 0:59:17 | |
the future trade deal has been
agreed which means there will be a | 0:59:17 | 0:59:21 | |
complete and utter cliff edge.
Businesses cannot wait. They need to | 0:59:21 | 0:59:24 | |
make decisions by the end of this
year or early next year. It is... A | 0:59:24 | 0:59:31 | |
complete shambles on Brexit this
week from the Prime Minister. A | 0:59:31 | 0:59:34 | |
complete lack of clarity on the
transition deal and whether | 0:59:34 | 0:59:36 | |
Parliament will have the final say
and it is not good enough. | 0:59:36 | 0:59:40 | |
It is quite clear.
The majority of people voted for | 0:59:40 | 0:59:42 | |
Brexit. No one is denying that.
That's not even... | 0:59:42 | 0:59:51 | |
That is not even in question. What
about the transition deal? Obviously | 0:59:51 | 0:59:54 | |
we know that the 29th of March 2019
of the day we will leave the EU. But | 0:59:54 | 0:59:59 | |
what the Prime Minister has been
quite clear about in her speech is | 0:59:59 | 1:00:02 | |
there will be a transition period
after that. Businesses can adapt to | 1:00:02 | 1:00:08 | |
the changes.
The whole point about the transition | 1:00:08 | 1:00:10 | |
deal is they know now. Businesses
need to take decisions now about | 1:00:10 | 1:00:13 | |
whether they can best, where they
can be based, what will happen to | 1:00:13 | 1:00:16 | |
their staff. They cannot wait. The
divisions within the Tory party have | 1:00:16 | 1:00:23 | |
absolutely... Listen, the Tory party
is completely split. | 1:00:23 | 1:00:29 | |
Let's not talk about it. Why not? We
need to talk about it. This is | 1:00:29 | 1:00:32 | |
because of delays.
The future of our country is about | 1:00:32 | 1:00:35 | |
getting a good deal from the EU so
we can move and we can export, we | 1:00:35 | 1:00:41 | |
can take...
Waiting to find out what that deal | 1:00:41 | 1:00:48 | |
will be.
We will not start those talks are | 1:00:48 | 1:00:50 | |
we? Until December. Thank you both. | 1:00:50 | 1:00:52 | |
Thank you both. | 1:00:52 | 1:00:53 | |
Time now to catch up with some
of the other political | 1:00:53 | 1:00:55 | |
stories of the week -
here's Tony, with 60 seconds. | 1:00:55 | 1:00:58 | |
The plight of an elite skater
from Nottingham who can't | 1:00:58 | 1:01:00 | |
use his sport towards a GCSE
is to be raised in Parliament. | 1:01:00 | 1:01:03 | |
He is a speed skater,
but his sport is not on | 1:01:03 | 1:01:06 | |
the syllabus. | 1:01:06 | 1:01:07 | |
His MP is to hold a debate
calling for all Olympic | 1:01:07 | 1:01:10 | |
sports to be included. | 1:01:10 | 1:01:11 | |
People studying to teach
modern languages or | 1:01:11 | 1:01:12 | |
sciences in Derby will get
their student loans repaid. | 1:01:12 | 1:01:12 | |
People studying to teach
modern languages or | 1:01:15 | 1:01:17 | |
sciences in Derby will get
their student loans repaid. | 1:01:17 | 1:01:19 | |
The Education Secretary
said it was to boost | 1:01:19 | 1:01:21 | |
recruitment to teachers. | 1:01:21 | 1:01:23 | |
Derby is one of ten
opportunity zones across | 1:01:23 | 1:01:26 | |
the country where money is to be
spent improving social mobility. | 1:01:26 | 1:01:31 | |
Plans to transform the site of one
of the region's last deep pit coal | 1:01:31 | 1:01:34 | |
mines have been unveiled. | 1:01:34 | 1:01:36 | |
The colliery in north
Nottinghamshire | 1:01:36 | 1:01:39 | |
closed last year. | 1:01:39 | 1:01:41 | |
Developers want to build 800
houses as well as school, | 1:01:41 | 1:01:44 | |
business premises
and a country park. | 1:01:44 | 1:01:45 | |
Rough justice for Nottingham North
MP Alex Norris in the | 1:01:45 | 1:01:47 | |
parliamentary dog of
the year competition. | 1:01:47 | 1:01:49 | |
His two border colleagues won
the popular vote, but | 1:01:49 | 1:01:51 | |
were pipped to the post by Rocky,
belonging to Labour colleague Tracy | 1:01:51 | 1:01:54 | |
Brogan. | 1:01:54 | 1:02:04 | |
That's the Sunday Politics
in the East Midlands, | 1:02:04 | 1:02:06 | |
thanks to Liz Kendall
and Maggie Throup for | 1:02:06 | 1:02:08 | |
being this week's guests. | 1:02:08 | 1:02:09 | |
Time now to hand you
back to Sarah Smith. | 1:02:09 | 1:02:15 | |
Ellie Reeves and Bob Blackman. | 1:02:15 | 1:02:16 | |
With that, it's back to Sarah. | 1:02:16 | 1:02:26 | |
Now, the much anticipated
EU Withdrawal Bill, | 1:02:26 | 1:02:28 | |
which will transfer EU law into UK
law in preparation for Brexit, | 1:02:28 | 1:02:32 | |
is expected to be debated
by MPs later next month. | 1:02:32 | 1:02:36 | |
Critics have called it a "power
grab" as it introduces so-called | 1:02:36 | 1:02:39 | |
Henry VIII powers for Whitehall
to amend some laws without | 1:02:39 | 1:02:42 | |
consulting parliament,
and it faces fierce resistance | 1:02:42 | 1:02:46 | |
from opposition parties
as well as many on the government's | 1:02:46 | 1:02:49 | |
own backbenches, with 300 amendments
and 54 new clauses tabled on it. | 1:02:49 | 1:02:54 | |
We're joined now by the Conservative
MP Anna Soubry who has been a strong | 1:02:54 | 1:02:57 | |
critic of the legislation. | 1:02:57 | 1:03:02 | |
Thank you very much for joining us.
Before we talk about the withdrawal | 1:03:02 | 1:03:06 | |
bill, I would like to bring up with
you that the Prime Minister has just | 1:03:06 | 1:03:11 | |
sent a letter to the Commons Speaker
John Bercow asking for an | 1:03:11 | 1:03:15 | |
independent body to be established
to investigate claims of sexual | 1:03:15 | 1:03:20 | |
harassment in Parliament. What are
your thoughts on that? A very good | 1:03:20 | 1:03:24 | |
idea, sounds like a great deal of
common sense. I had already this | 1:03:24 | 1:03:29 | |
morning sent a request to the
speaker asking for an urgent | 1:03:29 | 1:03:32 | |
statement from the Leader of the
House as to what could now be done | 1:03:32 | 1:03:36 | |
to make sure that any complaints
actually against anybody working in | 1:03:36 | 1:03:42 | |
Parliament, to extend the
protections that workers throughout | 1:03:42 | 1:03:44 | |
the rest of businesses and in other
workplaces have, they should now be | 1:03:44 | 1:03:49 | |
extended into Parliament and asking
for an urgent statement from the | 1:03:49 | 1:03:53 | |
leader. Clearly the PM is well onto
this and it is a good idea. We have | 1:03:53 | 1:03:58 | |
to make sure everybody who works in
Parliament enjoys exactly the same | 1:03:58 | 1:04:02 | |
protections as other workers, so I
welcome this. This should maybe have | 1:04:02 | 1:04:07 | |
happened a long time ago. We hear
stories of harassment that has been | 1:04:07 | 1:04:11 | |
going on for decades, but until now
it has been difficult to work out | 1:04:11 | 1:04:15 | |
who you could complain to about it.
It is my understanding that my Chief | 1:04:15 | 1:04:20 | |
Whip and the previous deputy Chief
Whip, and Milton, shared that view | 1:04:20 | 1:04:25 | |
and have shared that view for some
time but found it difficult to get | 1:04:25 | 1:04:30 | |
all the agreement necessary. Anyway,
we are where we are and we are | 1:04:30 | 1:04:34 | |
making that progress, but | 1:04:34 | 1:04:46 | |
my Chief Whip and the previous
deputy Chief Whip wanted this done | 1:04:46 | 1:04:49 | |
some time ago. That is an
interesting point. Let's move on to | 1:04:49 | 1:04:51 | |
the much anticipated EU withdrawal
bill which will finally be debated. | 1:04:51 | 1:04:53 | |
You have put your name to an
amendment which is calling for a | 1:04:53 | 1:04:56 | |
vote on the final agreement in
essence, do you really believe that | 1:04:56 | 1:04:58 | |
that will be a meaningful both
offered to the Commons? Yes, if you | 1:04:58 | 1:05:02 | |
look at the terms of the amendment,
it would deliver exactly that. It | 1:05:02 | 1:05:07 | |
would give members of Parliament the
opportunity to debated and voted on | 1:05:07 | 1:05:12 | |
it. It would be an effective piece
of legislation and would go through | 1:05:12 | 1:05:16 | |
both houses and should be done. One
of the problems with this process is | 1:05:16 | 1:05:22 | |
that Parliament has been excluded
from the sort of debate and | 1:05:22 | 1:05:26 | |
decisions that would have enabled
the government to move forward in | 1:05:26 | 1:05:31 | |
progress and form a consensus so we
get the very best Brexit deal. We | 1:05:31 | 1:05:41 | |
have been excluded, that has been
wrong in my view, but by the end we | 1:05:41 | 1:05:44 | |
should not be excluded. The
government have made it clear that | 1:05:44 | 1:05:46 | |
whilst there may well be a boat if
you win on this amendment, it will | 1:05:46 | 1:05:49 | |
be a take it or leave it vote. This
is a deal you should accept, or | 1:05:49 | 1:05:54 | |
there will be no deal. If you look
at the amendment we put forward | 1:05:54 | 1:06:01 | |
there will be other alternatives.
This is all hypothetical because we | 1:06:01 | 1:06:04 | |
want a good deal and it is difficult
to see that the government would not | 1:06:04 | 1:06:08 | |
bring a good deal to the House in
any event. But this is hypothetical, | 1:06:08 | 1:06:13 | |
it would mean Parliament would say
to government, go back and seek an | 1:06:13 | 1:06:19 | |
extension as we know it is there in
Article 50. It is perfectly possible | 1:06:19 | 1:06:24 | |
with the agreement of the other
members of the EU to seek an | 1:06:24 | 1:06:29 | |
extension so we continue the
negotiations and we get a deal that | 1:06:29 | 1:06:33 | |
is good for our country. It keeps
all options open and that is the | 1:06:33 | 1:06:37 | |
most important thing. How many
Conservative MPs really would take | 1:06:37 | 1:06:42 | |
that option in those circumstances?
It is only if you get enough votes | 1:06:42 | 1:06:47 | |
that you would be able to ask the
government to go back and | 1:06:47 | 1:06:50 | |
re-negotiate. | 1:06:50 | 1:07:00 | |
Have you for that? For give me, but
you are jumping way down the line. I | 1:07:03 | 1:07:06 | |
am talking about an amendment that
keeps the options open. I am not | 1:07:06 | 1:07:09 | |
speculating as to what would happen,
I am not going there, it is far too | 1:07:09 | 1:07:12 | |
speculative. Let's get this bill in
good shape. The principle of this | 1:07:12 | 1:07:16 | |
bill is right and we need to put
into British domestic law existing | 1:07:16 | 1:07:21 | |
EU laws and regulations into our
substantive law. We all agree that | 1:07:21 | 1:07:26 | |
must happen. It is the means by
which we do it that causes problems | 1:07:26 | 1:07:31 | |
and we have this argument and debate
about what we call the endgame. I am | 1:07:31 | 1:07:38 | |
sure we will talk about this many
more times before we get to that | 1:07:38 | 1:07:41 | |
vote. I will turn to our panel of
political experts. Listening to the | 1:07:41 | 1:07:47 | |
tone of what the remainders are
trying to achieve with the EU | 1:07:47 | 1:07:53 | |
withdrawal bill, will be achieved?
You can hear that tussled there, | 1:07:53 | 1:07:58 | |
they want the maximum space and room
for Parliament to have a say. But | 1:07:58 | 1:08:02 | |
they have to be careful. The reason
is that clock is ticking and if you | 1:08:02 | 1:08:09 | |
have a situation which may seem to
be more interested in finding | 1:08:09 | 1:08:15 | |
different things to object to and
saying no to, it is not getting a | 1:08:15 | 1:08:19 | |
good deal and it does not look good
for the remainders in this argument | 1:08:19 | 1:08:23 | |
and they will have to come through
with their proposals. I do not mind | 1:08:23 | 1:08:28 | |
Parliament saying it should have a
big say, but what do you do if | 1:08:28 | 1:08:31 | |
Parliament says this is not good
enough? The government must simply | 1:08:31 | 1:08:37 | |
say, I am sorry we have run out of
time. The 27 will say they cannot be | 1:08:37 | 1:08:43 | |
bothered to have another round
either. They have to be strong, but | 1:08:43 | 1:08:47 | |
realistic about what their role in
this is. Do you think the people | 1:08:47 | 1:08:51 | |
putting this amendment who say they
want a binding vote in parliament | 1:08:51 | 1:08:56 | |
are doing it because they think
Parliament should have a say or | 1:08:56 | 1:09:00 | |
because they want to obstruct it?
They do not think people should have | 1:09:00 | 1:09:04 | |
a say in the first place, they think
people got it wrong, so they need | 1:09:04 | 1:09:09 | |
more clever people than the voters
to have final say. Or they believed | 1:09:09 | 1:09:16 | |
taking back control means Parliament
should have the final say. | 1:09:16 | 1:09:20 | |
Parliament said they would like to
give that decision back to the | 1:09:20 | 1:09:23 | |
people. This is the issue. It seems
to me that people like Anna Soubry | 1:09:23 | 1:09:29 | |
are trying to delay of the
transition period a bit longer. | 1:09:29 | 1:09:33 | |
These negotiations will take as long
as they have got. The EU will take | 1:09:33 | 1:09:38 | |
it to the wire and if we do not get
a decent deal, and one of the | 1:09:38 | 1:09:46 | |
reasons is the level of incompetence
on this government's part I have to | 1:09:46 | 1:09:49 | |
say and the other one will be the
people who want to remain | 1:09:49 | 1:09:54 | |
undermining them. They undermined
the government at every single stage | 1:09:54 | 1:10:00 | |
and they undermine Britain's
interests. It is the timing of all | 1:10:00 | 1:10:03 | |
of this that is crucial and whether
the government can get a deal in | 1:10:03 | 1:10:07 | |
time. There will be a meaningful
vote, whether it is an shined in | 1:10:07 | 1:10:13 | |
legislation or not, there cannot be
an historic development as big as | 1:10:13 | 1:10:18 | |
this without Parliament having a
meaningful vote. I meaningful, | 1:10:18 | 1:10:23 | |
having the power to either stop it
or endorse it. You cannot have a | 1:10:23 | 1:10:28 | |
government doing something like this
with no vote in the House of | 1:10:28 | 1:10:30 | |
commons. When you say it will go to
the last minute I completely agree, | 1:10:30 | 1:10:38 | |
but last-minute in reality means
next summer. It has got to get | 1:10:38 | 1:10:42 | |
through the European Parliament and
the Westminster Parliament and quite | 1:10:42 | 1:10:46 | |
a few others as well. The trouble
with invoking Parliament is if it is | 1:10:46 | 1:10:53 | |
driven solely by remain, I would
love to say what people in the | 1:10:53 | 1:10:58 | |
league side think. I disagree with
Julia, I do not think you could say | 1:10:58 | 1:11:05 | |
people had their say and the terms
with which we leave are left open | 1:11:05 | 1:11:09 | |
and only the government should have
a say in it, Parliament clearly | 1:11:09 | 1:11:12 | |
should have a say in it. Do we want
a good deal or not? It does not mean | 1:11:12 | 1:11:21 | |
anything if you do not do it by next
summer I suggest. Does that leave | 1:11:21 | 1:11:27 | |
Parliament any room for changing the
deal or is it simply take it or | 1:11:27 | 1:11:31 | |
leave it? It will have to have that
rule because it cannot simply be | 1:11:31 | 1:11:36 | |
another of these binary votes were
you accept the deal or no Deal. | 1:11:36 | 1:11:39 | |
There has to be some space. How can
a few MPs in the House of Commons | 1:11:39 | 1:11:45 | |
change a deal that has been agreed
by the member states? Because of the | 1:11:45 | 1:11:51 | |
sequence, a huge if by the way, if
they vote down the deal that the | 1:11:51 | 1:11:56 | |
government has negotiated, the
government will have to re-negotiate | 1:11:56 | 1:11:59 | |
or there will have to be an
election. This will be a moment of | 1:11:59 | 1:12:03 | |
huge crisis, our government not
getting through its much topped | 1:12:03 | 1:12:06 | |
about... It is a mini Catalonia. I
think it would be as big as | 1:12:06 | 1:12:16 | |
Catalonia, but with the implication
that there would have to be a | 1:12:16 | 1:12:18 | |
practical change in the deal because
if Parliament has not supported | 1:12:18 | 1:12:22 | |
it... It is a remain fantasy that
this deal can be put off and off | 1:12:22 | 1:12:28 | |
until they get something that is as
close to remaining as they can | 1:12:28 | 1:12:32 | |
possibly get. I am very much for
trying to get the best and avoiding | 1:12:32 | 1:12:37 | |
the worst, but there is an unreality
to that position if you keep trying | 1:12:37 | 1:12:44 | |
to do it again and again, at some
point people will want clarity. I | 1:12:44 | 1:12:50 | |
labour putting forward a realistic
proposition? I thought Hilary Benn | 1:12:50 | 1:12:55 | |
was very realistic this morning, I
wish he was more in the driving seat | 1:12:55 | 1:13:00 | |
of Labour policy. He made clear
where he disagreed and he made clear | 1:13:00 | 1:13:05 | |
where he thought the negotiations
had gone off track or were bogged | 1:13:05 | 1:13:08 | |
down. I worry a bit about the Labour
position being incoherent, but that | 1:13:08 | 1:13:16 | |
is kept that way by the present
leadership because as far as they | 1:13:16 | 1:13:20 | |
are concerned the government is
suffering enough, why should they | 1:13:20 | 1:13:24 | |
have a position? Hilary Benn said we
needed to have clarity about the | 1:13:24 | 1:13:29 | |
timetable. It is like reading an
insurance contract and finding the | 1:13:29 | 1:13:33 | |
bit where you might get away with
it. That is not a policy. | 1:13:33 | 1:13:36 | |
That is not a policy. | 1:13:36 | 1:13:38 | |
That's all for today. | 1:13:38 | 1:13:40 | |
Join me again next Sunday
at 11 here on BBC One. | 1:13:40 | 1:13:42 | |
Until then, bye bye. | 1:13:42 | 1:13:47 |