Browse content similar to 13/10/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, welcome to the veritable Sunday Politics. We have Alastair | :00:41. | :00:47. | |
Moore hadn't. Ken Clarke just keeps Charmichael. We'll ask him what | :00:47. | :00:57. | |
Moore hadn't. Ken Clarke just keeps going on and on and on. He'll bang | :00:57. | :00:57. | |
Free of the shackles of Government, In the capital, a report by the | :00:57. | :01:11. | |
Diane Abbott will join us. That In the capital, a report by the | :01:11. | :01:36. | |
pundits who we try to shuffle out of a job but failed miserably, Mick | :01:36. | :01:41. | |
watt, Miranda Green Andijan an Ganesh. They'll Tweet like mad as if | :01:41. | :01:50. | |
Is Ed Miliband's Labour Party moving chid owe Cabinet reshuffle was seen | :01:50. | :02:00. | |
a a shift to the lot of. Two have announced policy changes which could | :02:00. | :02:08. | |
Pensions Secretary Rachel Reeves says Labour will be tougher on the | :02:08. | :02:13. | |
Tories. While Tristram Hunt says Labour loves Tory-style free schools | :02:13. | :02:17. | |
after all. Here he is on the BBC viewers. If you are a group of | :02:17. | :02:25. | |
parents, social entrepreneurs, teachers, interested in setting | :02:25. | :02:29. | |
parents, social entrepreneurs, school in areas where you need new | :02:29. | :02:32. | |
school place, the Labour Government will be on your side. That's free | :02:32. | :02:34. | |
enterprise and innovation. It will will be on your side. That's free | :02:34. | :02:41. | |
be in areas of need. We have a school places crisis going on. It | :02:41. | :02:46. | |
teachers in these schools. And accountability. What is going on | :02:46. | :03:00. | |
with the Al Madina school is because of terrible mistakes with Michael | :03:00. | :03:07. | |
changed, the change of tone is I'm not sure if the policies have | :03:08. | :03:11. | |
changed, the change of tone is remarkable, both on welfare and | :03:11. | :03:13. | |
changed, the change of tone is schools. A significant change of | :03:13. | :03:17. | |
reshuffle on the Labour frontbench last week was init wered as a purge | :03:17. | :03:24. | |
of Blair rights. It seemed to be a purge of anti-reform thinking. | :03:24. | :03:35. | |
of Blair rights. It seemed to be a Labour will be tough than the Tories | :03:35. | :03:40. | |
on welfare. You've seen that clip social entrepreneurs who want to set | :03:40. | :03:58. | |
these up. A different change. Why are they doing this? On education, | :03:58. | :04:06. | |
polarised. You've had the Michael department. This weekend, we've | :04:06. | :04:12. | |
polarised. You've had the Michael leaked memos from one of Michael | :04:12. | :04:14. | |
Gove's advisers which are extreme views about the state of education. | :04:14. | :04:19. | |
And on the other side teaching unions. It hasn't led to a healthy | :04:19. | :04:25. | |
debate which represents what parents want out of schools or employers. | :04:25. | :04:30. | |
This is a huge move from the Labour Party to sound more reasonable. | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
This is a huge move from the Labour have been silent on education which | :04:33. | :04:38. | |
is a huge policy area on the left. Is this a focus group-driven change? | :04:38. | :04:46. | |
They've seen the polls. Welfare reforms are hugery popular and free | :04:46. | :04:52. | |
only apiece the focus groups by changing the policy substantially. I | :04:52. | :04:58. | |
always thought a test for this Labour reshuffle was not whether Ed | :04:58. | :05:02. | |
Miliband would promote Blair rights, it is clear he did, it is whether | :05:02. | :05:06. | |
they would be allowed to be Blair rights. When Stephen Twigg carried | :05:06. | :05:12. | |
the education portfolio it was clear his own views were closer to the | :05:12. | :05:16. | |
Government than he was allowed to let on. He was constrained. There is | :05:16. | :05:21. | |
no point of giving Tristram Hunt this job if he is not allowed to say | :05:21. | :05:25. | |
what he thinks. I wouldn't mind betting privately he thinks free | :05:25. | :05:29. | |
schools should be available beyond just areas of need. He hasn't yet | :05:29. | :05:35. | |
defined need. It could be, we've run schools are so bad we need schools. | :05:36. | :05:44. | |
defined need. It could be, we've run If that is it, it is the same Asics | :05:44. | :05:50. | |
itsing Government policy. In they unsatisfactory that's no different. | :05:50. | :05:58. | |
itsing Government policy. In they He wanted to say he was in favour of | :05:58. | :06:00. | |
itsing Government policy. In they higher educational standards and | :06:00. | :06:00. | |
rigour, he had to tell the audience higher educational standards and | :06:00. | :06:11. | |
from Cambridge? Obviously to him it that. Is that worth something, | :06:11. | :06:23. | |
from Cambridge? Obviously to him it is. He said they would demand proper | :06:23. | :06:24. | |
teaching qualifications. That could teaching? Independent schools do not | :06:24. | :06:34. | |
have to have teachers with formal teaching qualifications. I've never | :06:34. | :06:39. | |
been to one? What about you? That decision by Michael Gove to allow | :06:39. | :06:48. | |
free schools to employ nonunionised and non-trained people, so he has to | :06:49. | :06:54. | |
Watch this space. The dust settled after the party resufficients. Do | :06:54. | :06:58. | |
the Tories look a bit more like Britain. Do the Tories look more | :06:58. | :07:11. | |
#4 With reshuffles, you're never really certain. There's whispers, | :07:11. | :07:16. | |
rumours, guesses. But the only way to know it is underway is keeping | :07:16. | :07:22. | |
beady eyes on a front door. Up until now, the only way we knew who was in | :07:22. | :07:28. | |
and who was out was who came walking down this bit of Downing Street | :07:28. | :07:31. | |
and who was out was who came walking a smile on their face after going to | :07:31. | :07:34. | |
see the boss. The once who are to be sacked, they usually go round the | :07:34. | :07:39. | |
back. Not this time. No, something new alerted us all. The-PM started | :07:39. | :07:47. | |
can't remember a triple decker reshuffle where you've three parties | :07:47. | :07:51. | |
changing ministerial teams at the resufficient happened on Twitter. | :07:51. | :07:57. | |
Not that the press stopped watching the door as well. News was a bit | :07:57. | :08:05. | |
Charmichael replaced Michael Moore, the first to be pounced on. I'm | :08:05. | :08:10. | |
disappointed to be leaving office now but pleased at what I've been | :08:10. | :08:12. | |
able to achieve in the last couple now but pleased at what I've been | :08:12. | :08:17. | |
of years. Not as pleased as one now but pleased at what I've been | :08:17. | :08:19. | |
imagines as the man receiving the welcome that went on, and on and | :08:19. | :08:24. | |
simultaneously having Jeremy Browne, welcome that went on, and on and | :08:24. | :08:41. | |
simultaneously having Jeremy Browne, the Home Office in conspiracy to let | :08:41. | :08:48. | |
# Blowing hi Jude through a traffic Democrats. We tend to think they are | :08:48. | :09:00. | |
herbivorous. Sacking a Cabinet Minister, another minister, Jeremy | :09:01. | :09:05. | |
Browne. By lunch time, the Tory ranks were shifting too. The PM | :09:05. | :09:09. | |
Browne. By lunch time, the Tory to boost the numbers of telegenic | :09:09. | :09:11. | |
women walking into Government and turning perceptions around. He | :09:11. | :09:14. | |
tipped a so-called flatcap to men backgrounds with room for some which | :09:14. | :09:22. | |
fitted neither label but are friends of George Osborne. And, all the | :09:22. | :09:24. | |
while, those new Tory ministers of George Osborne. And, all the | :09:24. | :09:31. | |
learning of Labour's changes. Labour too knows the value of new young | :09:31. | :09:35. | |
blood striding into the limelight. Again some with TV experience of | :09:35. | :09:42. | |
that. Tristram Hunt and Gloria de peer row would be hard to describe | :09:42. | :09:43. | |
as hard left. But Blairbrushing peer row would be hard to describe | :09:43. | :09:48. | |
past out of the picture seemed to be the name of the day. Liam Byrne | :09:48. | :09:56. | |
With Diane Abbott also gone, was this really a Blair right cull? It | :09:56. | :10:00. | |
depends what you mean. Blair right used to mean someone who wanted | :10:00. | :10:03. | |
depends what you mean. Blair right Blair to be leader of the Labour | :10:04. | :10:05. | |
Party. Somebody who worked closely with him. Now it means sometimes | :10:05. | :10:07. | |
people who believe in a certain with him. Now it means sometimes | :10:07. | :10:12. | |
of ideologyies or ideas. There are still very much those kind of Blair | :10:12. | :10:14. | |
rights within the party. But we still very much those kind of Blair | :10:14. | :10:18. | |
seeing the group around Tony Blair are not long assassin flew enjoys as | :10:18. | :10:25. | |
they once were. By evening, it was over. New bees were sharing the | :10:25. | :10:32. | |
ministers quietly thanked commits raters. Or -- commiserators. Or | :10:32. | :10:47. | |
the case, you are unlikely to get standing here might want it to | :10:47. | :10:57. | |
the case, you are unlikely to get "how could." And running off crying! | :10:57. | :11:03. | |
the case, you are unlikely to get Secretary Alastair Charmichael joins | :11:03. | :11:07. | |
the case, you are unlikely to get us from Orkney on a line that hasn't | :11:07. | :11:12. | |
been used since the fleet was used in the outbreak of World War I! I | :11:12. | :11:17. | |
wasn't around at the time. I'm hearing you loud and clear. Why | :11:18. | :11:21. | |
wasn't around at the time. I'm you agreed to run a department? | :11:21. | :11:26. | |
wasn't around at the time. I'm you wanted to abolish six years | :11:26. | :11:30. | |
wasn't around at the time. I'm Hello? Maybe our connections are not | :11:30. | :11:31. | |
Charmichael. Can you hear me? I Hello? Maybe our connections are not | :11:31. | :11:37. | |
hear you now. There was a nasty second there where you disappeared. | :11:37. | :11:42. | |
Let me try the question again. Why have you agreed to run a department | :11:42. | :11:44. | |
you wanted to abolish six years have you agreed to run a department | :11:44. | :11:50. | |
Because this is the, probably one of the most important jobs in British | :11:50. | :11:54. | |
politics at the moment. To ensure that Scotland remains part of the | :11:54. | :12:00. | |
UK. Even when I was talking about the reconfiguration of rep sen Taigs | :12:01. | :12:06. | |
of Scotland -- representation of Scotland within Whitehall, there was | :12:06. | :12:10. | |
always a job to be done. That is true in spades now. I will focus on | :12:11. | :12:14. | |
making sure the UK Government has a real voice in that debate. What | :12:14. | :12:18. | |
making sure the UK Government has a you that Michael Moore didn't have? | :12:18. | :12:19. | |
Look, I think Michael Moore did you that Michael Moore didn't have? | :12:19. | :12:24. | |
excellent job. The work he did delivering the Edinburgh agreement | :12:25. | :12:32. | |
clear legal and decisive referendum, the work delivering extra powers to | :12:32. | :12:40. | |
substantial piece of work. I'm not friend of mine. I will say that | :12:40. | :12:47. | |
substantial piece of work. I'm not we go forward into this, this is now | :12:47. | :12:48. | |
about the actual debate itself. we go forward into this, this is now | :12:48. | :12:53. | |
will be putting the case, with some passion, I hope, for Scotland to | :12:53. | :13:02. | |
just some abstract debate about nationhood, sovereignty, this is a | :13:02. | :13:04. | |
mortgage. That and an awful lot nationhood, sovereignty, this is a | :13:04. | :13:20. | |
mortgage. That and an awful lot you're being put in there to save | :13:20. | :13:21. | |
alley ahead. Mr Moore was doing you're being put in there to save | :13:21. | :13:32. | |
alley ahead. Mr Moore was doing pretty well to save the union. I | :13:32. | :13:35. | |
suspect you've been given the job to Scotland? And lieu, you misread | :13:35. | :13:42. | |
suspect you've been given the job to situation if you -- Andrew, you | :13:42. | :13:45. | |
misread the situation new think anybody is going to be the person | :13:45. | :13:48. | |
who will save the union. The people who will save the union are the | :13:48. | :13:50. | |
people of Scotland if they turn who will save the union are the | :13:50. | :13:54. | |
next year and vote to save the union. We have to put the case for | :13:54. | :13:59. | |
that. That is what I will be doing. Look at the position of your own | :13:59. | :14:05. | |
party. You came fourth in the last Scottish parentry elections. You | :14:05. | :14:12. | |
were even behind the Conservatives. The latest poll has you still in | :14:12. | :14:18. | |
fourth. Are you there because you're a bruiser and you will pep up the | :14:18. | :14:22. | |
Liberal Democrats opportunity in Scotland. If I had a pound for | :14:22. | :14:25. | |
everybody to referred to me as being Scotland. If I had a pound for | :14:25. | :14:30. | |
a bruiser, I wouldn't need to be sitting here this morning. I could | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
have retired by now. The truth of this, if I can address it once and | :14:34. | :14:39. | |
for all, I have done probably one of the most complex and subtle jobs in | :14:39. | :14:45. | |
three-and-a-half years, Liberal Democrat Chief Whip in a Coalition | :14:45. | :14:51. | |
survived in that job a week, let alone three-and-a-half years, if I | :14:51. | :14:54. | |
was the sort of person who went around picking unnecessary fights. | :14:54. | :14:59. | |
So, can we just please forget about this business about being a bruiser. | :14:59. | :15:04. | |
As far as the position of the party in the polls, this is true also | :15:04. | :15:08. | |
As far as the position of the party the referendum vote, opinion polls | :15:08. | :15:11. | |
are a snapshot. They are not a prediction of what will happen in | :15:11. | :15:14. | |
the future. I will be out there putting the case. Neither the next | :15:14. | :15:20. | |
or lost yet. One of the things I election nor the referendum is one | :15:20. | :15:24. | |
or lost yet. One of the things I really want to be guarding against | :15:24. | :15:29. | |
because we are a good margin ahead Believe me, Andrew, it is not. As | :15:29. | :15:41. | |
the polls. You came fourth in the you know, wasn't for the Liberal | :15:41. | :16:03. | |
the polls. You came fourth in the David Cameron face him? I am happy | :16:03. | :16:08. | |
debate. Should David Cameron face him? No, because that allows Alex | :16:08. | :16:15. | |
Nationalists to portray this as him? No, because that allows Alex | :16:15. | :16:20. | |
sort of contest or choice between a vision of Scottish social democracy | :16:21. | :16:25. | |
is not. This is a debate that has to is not. This is a debate that has to | :16:25. | :16:30. | |
be held in Scotland about the future of Scotland amongst Scots. David | :16:30. | :16:38. | |
Cameron has a very important part in Scotland's public life, but he is | :16:38. | :16:43. | |
not Scottish and I think he will accept Commies edit himself in fact, | :16:43. | :16:47. | |
the person who should be debating Darling. He has got a Scottish name | :16:47. | :16:57. | |
wealthiest of Scotland at some stage in the past. Anyway, you described | :16:57. | :17:04. | |
the campaign to keep the union together as lacking passion, were | :17:04. | :17:10. | |
you referring to the campaign or referring to Alistair Darling. I | :17:10. | :17:17. | |
think what I was saying is that referring to Alistair Darling. I | :17:17. | :17:24. | |
we move into this new stage, and Alistair Darling said it himself, we | :17:24. | :17:30. | |
are now campaigning for people Alistair Darling said it himself, we | :17:30. | :17:35. | |
hearts because if you look at the range of papers the Government has | :17:35. | :17:41. | |
published, it is pretty clear the arguments lie in relation to the | :17:41. | :17:50. | |
for the hearts and Scotland because head. I am not giving up the battle | :17:50. | :17:55. | |
for the hearts and Scotland because there is a good strong case, as | :17:55. | :17:58. | |
somebody who is proud to be Scottish and to be British, for Scotland | :17:58. | :18:03. | |
celebratory drink for your new post. remain part of the UK. You come | :18:03. | :18:18. | |
celebratory drink for your new post. Not a drop has touched my lips. | :18:18. | :18:21. | |
celebratory drink for your new post. supporting local business! I will be | :18:21. | :18:22. | |
making up for lost time on the supporting local business! I will be | :18:22. | :18:27. | |
of November, I will be doing it supporting local business! I will be | :18:27. | :18:29. | |
aid of Macmillan Cancer care and if website, they can donate. It is | :18:29. | :18:36. | |
worthwhile. I cannot think of a better cause. One Cabinet minister | :18:36. | :18:39. | |
who many thought might get Reef better cause. One Cabinet minister | :18:39. | :18:51. | |
Clarke. Welcome to Sunday Politics. This reshuffle was about new blood, | :18:51. | :18:54. | |
minorities, where did you fit in? I minorities, where did you fit in? I | :18:54. | :19:03. | |
would describe myself as the elder statesman, to be polite, but it | :19:03. | :19:09. | |
would describe myself as the elder difficult to replace them. I enjoy | :19:09. | :19:11. | |
it. It is a great privilege to have a role in Cabinet and I will carry | :19:11. | :19:13. | |
on as long as David wants me to a role in Cabinet and I will carry | :19:14. | :19:19. | |
I have seen many reshuffles, they are dreadful and I seem to have | :19:19. | :19:24. | |
survived them so far. Did David Cameron talk to you before this | :19:24. | :19:30. | |
reshuffle? No, he didn't. I would have had expected a phone call, | :19:30. | :19:37. | |
asking, how do you think about stepping down, but he didn't and my | :19:37. | :19:47. | |
role is one of giving my wit and wisdom to the Cabinet and meetings | :19:47. | :19:51. | |
of the Security Council so he has got to put up with me a bit longer. | :19:52. | :19:56. | |
You said you are going to stand again at the next election, why | :19:56. | :20:03. | |
You said you are going to stand you keep going? What do you hope to | :20:03. | :20:05. | |
achieve in politics? I am mostly a political anorak, I have been since | :20:05. | :20:13. | |
politics but the older I get I get governance of the country and at the | :20:13. | :20:19. | |
moment the combination of problems of tackling the modern world is | :20:19. | :20:25. | |
moment the combination of problems difficult and I find it fascinating. | :20:25. | :20:29. | |
The old argument that attracts every decent person into politics, you | :20:29. | :20:30. | |
might be able sometimes to make decent person into politics, you | :20:30. | :20:40. | |
experience but we will have a lot of tackle. You opposed referenda on | :20:40. | :20:50. | |
Maastricht, the Lisbon Treaty, you were even against one on Britain | :20:50. | :20:57. | |
adopting the euro. It must follow that you are against the referenda | :20:57. | :21:04. | |
on Britain's membership to the EU? I accountable to the long-term and | :21:04. | :21:13. | |
representatives, but this is a minority now and my colleagues have | :21:13. | :21:19. | |
firmly decided a referendum needs to be held to settle the question of | :21:19. | :21:23. | |
Britain's relationship with the European Union which I think is | :21:23. | :21:28. | |
Britain's relationship with the of the most important things in | :21:28. | :21:32. | |
Britain's place in the modern world politicians are able to look after | :21:32. | :21:38. | |
the living standards, the economy, the safety against terrorism. Last | :21:38. | :21:45. | |
the living standards, the economy, summer you said that only extreme | :21:45. | :21:49. | |
nationalists wanted a silly EU referendum. It follows your party | :21:49. | :21:54. | |
must be full of extremely silly nationalists. The people who are | :21:54. | :22:00. | |
desperate to have a referendum are all the people who actually want to | :22:00. | :22:07. | |
referendum will involve the public and people like me have got to get | :22:07. | :22:12. | |
across to the public, don't just feel angry about the last thing | :22:12. | :22:15. | |
across to the public, don't just read in the newspaper about what the | :22:15. | :22:17. | |
commission is or is not doing, do commission is or is not doing, do | :22:17. | :22:22. | |
bear in mind this is our base in the modern world. We happen to be a | :22:22. | :22:29. | |
leading member, almost as valuable and rich as the Americans, from | :22:29. | :22:31. | |
influence in events. That is not and rich as the Americans, from | :22:31. | :22:37. | |
influence in events. That is not just how the politicians get on | :22:37. | :22:40. | |
influence in events. That is not politicians look after us when we | :22:40. | :22:48. | |
spilling over from the Middle East, threatened. You didn't even turn | :22:48. | :22:53. | |
spilling over from the Middle East, to vote for the bill which will | :22:53. | :23:04. | |
spilling over from the Middle East, It seemed to get through without my | :23:04. | :23:04. | |
Look, many of your colleagues I It seemed to get through without my | :23:04. | :23:17. | |
interviewed say that if the choice was between the state -- the status | :23:17. | :23:26. | |
quo with the European Union and leaving, they would leave. The truth | :23:26. | :23:32. | |
is that you would vote to stay in even on the status quo, wouldn't | :23:32. | :23:41. | |
supporting the EU to leave now if I got chance. I think our economy | :23:41. | :23:44. | |
supporting the EU to leave now if I much stronger than it would have | :23:44. | :23:45. | |
investment, as in Washington last been if we were outside the EU. | :23:45. | :23:54. | |
investment, as in Washington last week. We are trying to roll forward | :23:54. | :24:02. | |
the prospect of free trade and I have to reassure Americans that | :24:02. | :24:05. | |
the prospect of free trade and I are not likely to leave the EU to | :24:05. | :24:10. | |
That is true but it also needs reform. The cry for reform, which is | :24:10. | :24:15. | |
particularly Germany, is a good reform. The cry for reform, which is | :24:15. | :24:22. | |
Even if David Cameron came back reform. The cry for reform, which is | :24:22. | :24:25. | |
nothing from Brussels, you would still vote to stay in, correct? | :24:25. | :24:34. | |
one which is dwindling in comparison with others, in the modern world it | :24:34. | :24:39. | |
would be dangerous. I also think the dangers of the Middle East and the | :24:39. | :24:44. | |
dangers of some of the countries disengage. I will take that as a | :24:44. | :24:54. | |
strengthen the case, and of some members of the public don't agree | :24:54. | :25:03. | |
reforms. The latest poll gives Labour a ten point lead over the | :25:03. | :25:08. | |
Paul to 27%. How would you see off ten point lead is because UKIP are | :25:08. | :25:26. | |
Paul to 27%. How would you see off and effective Government. We faced | :25:26. | :25:26. | |
popular as the previous Government I and effective Government. We faced | :25:26. | :25:40. | |
popular as the previous Government I have served in under the three | :25:40. | :25:42. | |
previous prime ministers. When you get an election, people have to | :25:43. | :25:46. | |
previous prime ministers. When you themselves who do we want to decide | :25:46. | :25:49. | |
the issues of war and peace in this country? Who do we want to get us | :25:49. | :25:55. | |
out of our economic problems. I don't think Ed Miliband is up to it. | :25:55. | :25:59. | |
That generalised stuff will not don't think Ed Miliband is up to it. | :25:59. | :26:04. | |
off UKIP. People will not listen to that. When people answer an opinion | :26:04. | :26:08. | |
poll, they tell you how annoyed that. When people answer an opinion | :26:08. | :26:12. | |
are by something that has recently upset them, but people are more | :26:12. | :26:18. | |
sensible than this. Every Government I have served in has been behind in | :26:18. | :26:25. | |
the polls. At a general election you have to mobilise the public to start | :26:25. | :26:29. | |
thinking, who do we want to govern us? They did take over a calamitous | :26:29. | :26:41. | |
important problems to be decided going forward. UKIP represents | :26:41. | :26:48. | |
anti-immigration, anti-foreigners, anti-Europe, anti-politics but I | :26:48. | :26:52. | |
Thank you. Once upon a time, a politician whose career ended in | :26:52. | :27:25. | |
disgrace might choose to lie low for a while, perhaps to spend a bit | :27:25. | :27:29. | |
disgrace might choose to lie low for time tending the tulips and doing | :27:29. | :27:31. | |
the odd bit of charity work. Not Chris Huhne. He walked free from | :27:31. | :27:32. | |
prison only five months ago but Chris Huhne. He walked free from | :27:32. | :27:42. | |
interview. So is he working on a inviting me back. You have set your | :27:42. | :28:03. | |
on that front in terms of business non-governmental organisations, | :28:03. | :28:09. | |
on that front in terms of business I am doing a column for the Guardian | :28:09. | :28:09. | |
on Mondays. You obviously get a I am doing a column for the Guardian | :28:09. | :28:14. | |
of material from the Sunday Politics to write about. Have you embarked on | :28:14. | :28:20. | |
political rehabilitation? It was clear from the point of view of | :28:21. | :28:24. | |
political rehabilitation? It was George when I was sentenced, he | :28:25. | :28:29. | |
rehabilitating you, because I had not offended for ten years, it was | :28:29. | :28:33. | |
actually about stopping people like you, Andrew, Ron doing the same | :28:33. | :28:39. | |
thing. It was a deterrent effect for the public. That is I think why | :28:39. | :28:45. | |
thing. It was a deterrent effect for prosecution was brought. I had not | :28:45. | :28:47. | |
offended for ten years on this, rehabilitate yourself in the public? | :28:47. | :29:17. | |
coalition to the bitter end? Or should they re-establish their own | :29:17. | :29:23. | |
Coalition agreement is for the whole Parliament, and the Lib Dems are | :29:23. | :29:30. | |
going to stay, and should stay. What would be a good result for the Lib | :29:30. | :29:33. | |
Dems in 2015? The loss of ten, would be a good result for the Lib | :29:33. | :29:41. | |
interesting election because I think you will have essentially three | :29:41. | :29:46. | |
party leaders, all of whom are negative ratings so it will be a | :29:46. | :29:55. | |
battle between the walking wounded. In those circumstances, in my view, | :29:55. | :29:58. | |
the Lib Dems can come out very In those circumstances, in my view, | :29:58. | :30:04. | |
well. But you will lose seats, won't In those circumstances, in my view, | :30:04. | :30:12. | |
the Liberal Democrats do badly in could come fourth on fifth behind | :30:12. | :30:17. | |
in countless cycles where we've could come fourth on fifth behind | :30:17. | :30:31. | |
very low poll ratings. The normal pickup to the subsequent general | :30:31. | :30:35. | |
election on average has been 10 percentage points. So he's not in | :30:35. | :30:40. | |
jeopardy? I think Nick will be there at the next general election. I | :30:40. | :30:41. | |
think he'll lead the party into at the next general election. I | :30:41. | :30:45. | |
next general election. I expect we'll do much better than most | :30:45. | :30:48. | |
people think. If we are heading we'll do much better than most | :30:48. | :30:53. | |
another hung Parliament, which is Let's be honest, you'd rather be in | :30:53. | :30:57. | |
coalition with the Labour Party Let's be honest, you'd rather be in | :30:57. | :31:01. | |
have a repeat of the Conservatives? One of the key things I sawed to | :31:01. | :31:06. | |
colleagues, whatever your personal preference, I used to be a Labour | :31:06. | :31:10. | |
Party member, you can derive from that I'm on the left of centre of | :31:10. | :31:15. | |
the party. I always said to my colleagues in the party, it is | :31:15. | :31:21. | |
the we are in politics because we are Liberal Democrats, not because | :31:21. | :31:24. | |
we are either Conservatives or second best Labour. If you don't | :31:24. | :31:29. | |
take that view, you don't have any bargaining position when it comes to | :31:29. | :31:33. | |
coalition. You have to be able, genuinely, to do a coalition with | :31:33. | :31:38. | |
either of the other parties. I understand that, but you'd prefer | :31:38. | :31:42. | |
Labour? Your personal preference really should not come into this. It | :31:42. | :31:46. | |
is about making sure you get the best possible deal for the things | :31:46. | :31:53. | |
you get that with one party rather than another, that's fine. You stand | :31:53. | :31:56. | |
up for Liberal Democrat values, than another, that's fine. You stand | :31:56. | :32:00. | |
for Conservative or Labour second best values. You said you're keeping | :32:00. | :32:04. | |
up your interest in energy matters. Is Ed Miliband right to promise | :32:04. | :32:11. | |
up your interest in energy matters. temporary price freeze? There's | :32:11. | :32:13. | |
up your interest in energy matters. pop ewe louse posturing. It is not | :32:13. | :32:17. | |
up your interest in energy matters. sensible policy. It was tried in | :32:17. | :32:20. | |
California in 2,000 and 2001 which led to blackouts. We had the Prime | :32:20. | :32:23. | |
Minister promising we should sift led to blackouts. We had the Prime | :32:23. | :32:34. | |
getting clap trap. You're against the political cycle where we are | :32:34. | :32:41. | |
getting clap trap. You're against the freeze? It is a bad idea when | :32:41. | :32:42. | |
getting clap trap. You're against are trying to encourage investment. | :32:42. | :32:46. | |
base price? The other European Ian the lowest gas and electricity | :32:47. | :32:54. | |
base price? The other European Ian prices are only higher because they | :32:54. | :32:57. | |
put a lot more taxes on to it? Our base energy prices are among the | :32:57. | :33:02. | |
highest in Europe? No, if you look at EU comparisons in what goes out | :33:02. | :33:06. | |
to people's households. That's after all the taxes have been put on them? | :33:06. | :33:10. | |
to people's households. That's after . The Conservatives are claiming | :33:10. | :33:10. | |
green taxes is George Osborne with should no better. One the-hip ok | :33:10. | :33:51. | |
not want it. We do not need it to agreement because the Conservatives | :33:51. | :34:00. | |
not want it. We do not need it to electricity system. It was a revenue | :34:00. | :34:03. | |
raising measure by the Tories. It set off a whole load of hairs about | :34:03. | :34:07. | |
green taxes which are now coming home to roost. Final point to you, | :34:07. | :34:12. | |
wish we'd more time to talk, you're a big supporter of Leveson-style | :34:12. | :34:18. | |
press regulation. Will you stop writing for The Guardian if it | :34:18. | :34:21. | |
refuses to sign up to the Leveson charter? I think that's neither | :34:21. | :34:27. | |
refuses to sign up to the Leveson nor there. The Guardian gives me a | :34:28. | :34:30. | |
up to what you believe in will you up to what you believe in will you | :34:30. | :34:36. | |
support it? No because I'm sure point. I think newspapers will sign | :34:36. | :34:44. | |
up for it. They've had a collapse in public trust and confidence in | :34:44. | :34:48. | |
recent years. Unparalleled. They you can come back and we'll talk | :34:48. | :35:05. | |
Coming up in about 20 minutes, we'll Coming up in about 20 minutes, | :35:05. | :35:21. | |
Welcome to the London part of the show. I'm joined by my guests for | :35:21. | :35:25. | |
the next 20 minutes or so, the Conservative MP for Bromley and | :35:25. | :35:30. | |
chisel Hurst Bob Neill and the Labour MP for Poplar and Limehouse. | :35:30. | :35:38. | |
A report from the Conservatives about the London Assembly says we've | :35:38. | :35:42. | |
misunderstood human trafficking about the London Assembly says we've | :35:42. | :35:45. | |
men are the forgotten victims. Robinson, leader of the English | :35:45. | :35:49. | |
claiming the organisation's become Robinson, leader of the English | :35:49. | :35:59. | |
departure strengthen or weaken the organisation? I think it weakens it. | :35:59. | :36:05. | |
He has been a very well listened to, too well listened to spokesperson. I | :36:06. | :36:15. | |
gave as good as he got. A very good interview. Andrew was very robust | :36:15. | :36:20. | |
with him. But he was very much the most articulate of the EDL spoke | :36:21. | :36:26. | |
persons. His departure weakens them and that's a good thing. The other | :36:26. | :36:32. | |
side of the coin, he acted as a brake on the more extreme parts | :36:33. | :36:36. | |
side of the coin, he acted as a the group. If he's gone, is there a | :36:36. | :36:39. | |
risk they become more extreme? We have to see what his real motives | :36:39. | :36:44. | |
are about this departure. He has other matters hanging over him. | :36:44. | :36:46. | |
Let's see what happens on that. other matters hanging over him. | :36:46. | :36:55. | |
extreme and nasty people. We are extreme Is. There is a risk any | :36:55. | :37:02. | |
organisation that has a lot of fan to be careful to avoid. But we have | :37:02. | :37:11. | |
to make it very clear that the EDL, whoever was leading it, was a nasty | :37:11. | :37:14. | |
disenfranchised and feel the EDL whoever was leading it, was a nasty | :37:14. | :37:36. | |
disenfranchised and feel the EDL gives them a voice? I think both | :37:36. | :37:39. | |
parties recognised questions of immigration and the like. People on | :37:39. | :37:44. | |
the white working class end of society have felt let down and not | :37:44. | :37:49. | |
listened to. The trouble with the EDL however, as Bob says, it was too | :37:49. | :37:54. | |
extreme. Even the majority of white voters were not interested in it. | :37:54. | :37:59. | |
Robinson's departure, we've history. The National Front self-destructed. | :37:59. | :38:04. | |
The BNP self-destructed. EDL are going the same way. That is a good | :38:04. | :38:08. | |
thing. Because of the scrutiny from mainstream political parties on | :38:08. | :38:15. | |
thing. Because of the scrutiny from extreme issues they put forward | :38:15. | :38:20. | |
deprives them of their respect ability. Is there good waiting for | :38:20. | :38:27. | |
the group to collapse if those are the concerns of the people who | :38:27. | :38:32. | |
support them? I think that's what we are doing. The Government is getting | :38:32. | :38:33. | |
fairness in immigration. I'm glad are doing. The Government is getting | :38:33. | :38:37. | |
the Labour Party is in a similar place. That's why for a lot of hard | :38:37. | :38:43. | |
working, the traditional white trying to bring fairness into the | :38:44. | :38:50. | |
system on redressing genuine issues. You must do it in a way that as | :38:50. | :38:57. | |
proportionate. Doesn't stigmatise people and is not divisive in our | :38:57. | :39:01. | |
communities. All the major parties need to continue to be on the front | :39:01. | :39:06. | |
Next week, the Government's expected to come forward with details of | :39:06. | :39:10. | |
Next week, the Government's expected new Anti-Slavery Bill. Before that, | :39:10. | :39:12. | |
will tomorrow release a report Conservatives on the London Assembly | :39:12. | :39:17. | |
will tomorrow release a report arguing human trafficking is not | :39:17. | :39:28. | |
young women. Words, which for some slavery, the sexual exploitation of | :39:28. | :39:32. | |
young women. Words, which for some people, may almost be synonymous. In | :39:32. | :39:37. | |
Conservatives on the London Assembly will argue that link between sexual | :39:37. | :39:41. | |
Conservatives on the London Assembly slavery and human trafficking is | :39:41. | :39:49. | |
Conservatives on the London Assembly attention, they say, need to be | :39:49. | :39:54. | |
Conservatives on the London Assembly Conservatives introduced us to this | :39:54. | :39:55. | |
someone's home. Once arrived, she Conservatives introduced us to this | :39:55. | :40:08. | |
someone's home. Once arrived, she movement was very limited. I was not | :40:08. | :40:09. | |
allowed to go out on my own as I allowed to go out on my own as I | :40:09. | :40:15. | |
like. She was beating me. She was controlling me. If it was to be | :40:15. | :40:19. | |
like. She was beating me. She was my country I would just run back and | :40:19. | :40:22. | |
say I don't want to stay. But here, I can't run back. I don't have | :40:22. | :40:30. | |
money. She took away my passport, documents. Everything. So, I was | :40:30. | :40:36. | |
slave. I was a prisoner. At some point, I think about committing | :40:36. | :40:43. | |
suicide. Then I remember my family back home. I remember my mum, my | :40:43. | :40:55. | |
feel worth living. What am I living for. When finally she spoke Stott | :40:55. | :40:59. | |
police, she did not get the response she was looking for. The policeman | :40:59. | :41:04. | |
got very upset. Did I know how long investigate. For them to do this. | :41:04. | :41:10. | |
For them, it was my own decision to employment. It is nothing to do | :41:10. | :41:24. | |
For them, it was my own decision to trafficking. I mean, that just made | :41:24. | :41:33. | |
The green acres caravan site near Luton, four men were et convicted | :41:33. | :41:42. | |
for keeping four men test toot. There needs to be more recognise on | :41:42. | :41:47. | |
of people being trove #yked in the UK and male victims who are often | :41:47. | :41:57. | |
Britain is men. When you say men slaves, it is men exploited at work. | :41:57. | :42:01. | |
They are brought into this country I'm joined by the author of the | :42:01. | :42:35. | |
report, Conservative Andrew Boff and Andrew, you accept trafficking | :42:36. | :42:42. | |
exists and it is a big problem? It certainly does. But my concern is | :42:42. | :42:48. | |
while you view trafficking through sexual exploitation into brothels, | :42:48. | :42:53. | |
you're missing a whole range of trafficking, of suffering, of people | :42:53. | :42:59. | |
testimony. Is that what's happening? Are the authorities missing out | :43:00. | :43:03. | |
testimony. Is that what's happening? layer of people, men particularly, | :43:03. | :43:05. | |
being trafficked? They absolutely are. One of the things we did in our | :43:05. | :43:10. | |
report was to survey social workers, police officers, teachers, to find | :43:10. | :43:16. | |
trafficking was. It was shocking. The lack of knowledge they had about | :43:16. | :43:21. | |
what made a person a trafficked victim. What in your view makes | :43:21. | :43:26. | |
somebody trafficked? Somebody who is brought into a country against their | :43:26. | :43:31. | |
will and held and forced to do is nearly all about exploiting | :43:31. | :43:38. | |
people for labour, of undercutting other people in the destination | :43:38. | :43:42. | |
country. People are brought into this country not necessarily under | :43:42. | :43:45. | |
Dewar rest. But once they are here, they have no way of escaping from | :43:45. | :43:51. | |
that commitment they've initially victim. What do you say to that | :43:51. | :43:58. | |
Mary, do you agree there as been a whole layer of people and victims | :43:58. | :44:04. | |
ignored and forgotten about? I'm not sure they have. There has been, | :44:04. | :44:06. | |
rightly in fact, a concentration on sure they have. There has been, | :44:06. | :44:11. | |
trafficking of women and girls for sexual exploitation because that is | :44:11. | :44:15. | |
very serious indeed. It is a real problem in London. The statistics | :44:15. | :44:17. | |
women who are prostituted in London, problem in London. The statistics | :44:17. | :44:38. | |
women who are prostituted in London, have been trafficked. It is a huge | :44:38. | :44:50. | |
women who are prostituted in London, them at all. But the trafficking of | :44:50. | :44:55. | |
women who are prostituted in London, issue. Why are you shaking your | :44:55. | :45:01. | |
the evidence I received indicates it is nowhere near that number of | :45:01. | :45:05. | |
people who are trafficked into brothels. The majority of people | :45:05. | :45:11. | |
trafficked. Very clearly, are not trafficked. The Metropolitan Police | :45:11. | :45:15. | |
were given £500,000 before the Olympics in order to find these | :45:15. | :45:21. | |
were given £500,000 before the period, they found the same number | :45:21. | :45:25. | |
in the year before. And that money was therefore waisted. They should | :45:25. | :45:30. | |
have been looking at the grooming of example, there's been an increase in | :45:30. | :45:36. | |
the number of cases of young boys 13% in the space of two years. | :45:36. | :45:47. | |
The point is, I'm trying to alert people to the fact this is the next | :45:47. | :45:53. | |
Jimmy Savile scandal waiting to happen. Unless we attend to it now, | :45:53. | :45:58. | |
we are going to have a crisis about trafficking in this country. We | :45:58. | :46:02. | |
we are going to have a crisis about missing the syringe Tims of the | :46:02. | :46:16. | |
we are going to have a crisis about -- Vic timings. - Vic #2i78s. Do you | :46:16. | :46:16. | |
think there needs to be a shift -- Vic timings. - Vic #2i78s. Do you | :46:16. | :46:23. | |
the focus now? Trafficking is a disagreeing with Andrew. I wouldn't | :46:23. | :46:34. | |
want and -- resources taken away. The statutory agencies who seem | :46:34. | :46:37. | |
want and -- resources taken away. be not performing terribly well | :46:37. | :46:41. | |
want and -- resources taken away. more money. One of the things that | :46:41. | :46:43. | |
is very controversial that you say opportunities. What are you talking | :46:43. | :46:57. | |
a fairly dangerous course of action opportunities. What are you talking | :46:57. | :47:21. | |
a fairly dangerous course of action under 18, they do not have the | :47:21. | :47:24. | |
ability to make any kind of consent whatsoever and we need to protect | :47:24. | :47:26. | |
them but the fact is that while whatsoever and we need to protect | :47:26. | :47:30. | |
concentrate on trafficking only taking place in brothels, we are | :47:30. | :47:37. | |
missing the young victims. Do these distinctions help the argument? | :47:37. | :47:41. | |
missing the young victims. Do these sounds like an intellectual argument | :47:41. | :47:43. | |
about something which is terrible gang masters act, that was after | :47:43. | :47:51. | |
Cotton pickers died in their dozens and this is the other side of the | :47:51. | :47:56. | |
same coin. Mary is right and I don't think Andrew is disagreeing, this is | :47:56. | :48:01. | |
exploited for sex and who have been exploited for sex and who have been | :48:02. | :48:13. | |
exploited for Labour. I don't think we are giving enough attention | :48:13. | :48:20. | |
across the piece. He is saying there have dealt with some nasty cases | :48:20. | :48:31. | |
over the years, young people are exploited both male and female with | :48:31. | :48:36. | |
dreadful consequences either way. Sometimes there are sectors of | :48:36. | :48:42. | |
victims who are not as readily perceived as others, but I think the | :48:42. | :48:44. | |
police have upped their game as perceived as others, but I think the | :48:45. | :48:51. | |
as that is concerned. We need better working between the agencies, often | :48:51. | :48:56. | |
the information is already there. problem is that the agencies are not | :48:56. | :49:05. | |
pleas from people who have come problem is that the agencies are not | :49:05. | :49:15. | |
the police stations, not recognising them as victims of trafficking. | :49:16. | :49:19. | |
the police stations, not recognising much as we may think we are arguing | :49:19. | :49:35. | |
are missing a whole level of abuse. police just got a mere few hundred | :49:35. | :49:47. | |
brothels during the Olympics, one of the major sporting events of the | :49:47. | :49:52. | |
brothels during the Olympics, one of last decade. You are right, but | :49:52. | :49:54. | |
brothels during the Olympics, one of the resources are not that great, | :49:54. | :49:56. | |
brothels during the Olympics, one of surely it concentrates your mind on | :49:56. | :50:02. | |
spending them even more wisely. What is your response to the anti-slavery | :50:02. | :50:08. | |
act that will be proposed? I think it could be a good thing. I think it | :50:08. | :50:13. | |
act that will be proposed? I think is very good that the Home Secretary | :50:13. | :50:15. | |
is taking notice of this issue and it is a good thing it is being | :50:15. | :50:18. | |
introduced. I think we need to look introduced. I think we need to look | :50:18. | :50:21. | |
carefully at it to make sure it introduced. I think we need to look | :50:21. | :50:24. | |
the sorts of things which are going to deal with the issues we have | :50:24. | :50:28. | |
the sorts of things which are going racing today so we need to watch it | :50:28. | :50:31. | |
but in principle it is a good thing. against their will, difficult for | :50:31. | :50:35. | |
the authorities to know what to against their will, difficult for | :50:35. | :50:40. | |
but if people come to the police station and tell them, why don't | :50:40. | :50:44. | |
they respond? I'm glad we have all recognised Theresa May has taken an | :50:44. | :50:49. | |
important initiative and I think there is crossed -- cross-party | :50:49. | :50:54. | |
consensus but it comes down to making sure police officers on the | :50:54. | :51:01. | |
middle management and front line are aware of the issues and respond | :51:01. | :51:03. | |
appropriately. It is not unique aware of the issues and respond | :51:03. | :51:08. | |
this issue that sometimes you find the police frankly not giving the | :51:08. | :51:13. | |
response that they should be. We strengthen the framework within | :51:13. | :51:23. | |
which the officers are working. London is producing more rubbish | :51:23. | :51:32. | |
than it can process. The gap is growing and there are ambitious | :51:32. | :51:33. | |
targets to end household waste going growing and there are ambitious | :51:34. | :51:38. | |
targets to end household waste going to landfill by 2025, and to double | :51:38. | :51:38. | |
the average recycling rates by to landfill by 2025, and to double | :51:38. | :51:43. | |
New facilities are needed to get on rarely popular with the locals. | :51:43. | :51:54. | |
New facilities are needed to get on 850,000 tonnes of rubbish each | :51:54. | :52:13. | |
New facilities are needed to get on and burn the rest as fuel. This | :52:13. | :52:21. | |
New facilities are needed to get on million. This was a massive exercise | :52:22. | :52:22. | |
in logistics, in financing, and million. This was a massive exercise | :52:22. | :52:25. | |
technology so you are going to spend the right amount of money to get the | :52:25. | :52:30. | |
right and proper information to decision. The authority says the | :52:30. | :52:36. | |
plan was dropped because local planning changes over the summer | :52:36. | :52:40. | |
mean it is more likely to be able to replace this incinerator in Edmonton | :52:40. | :52:47. | |
and save money. But the pink way allowance has long warned about | :52:47. | :52:52. | |
and save money. But the pink way cost and said the whole process | :52:52. | :52:56. | |
and save money. But the pink way been badly handled. It is a terrible | :52:56. | :52:57. | |
waste of taxpayers' money and it been badly handled. It is a terrible | :52:57. | :53:09. | |
waste of taxpayers' money and it Campaigners say they will not let | :53:09. | :53:13. | |
the Pinkham Way site become an industrial site. Has it been a waste | :53:13. | :53:16. | |
of time and money? Listening to industrial site. Has it been a waste | :53:16. | :53:22. | |
interview, clearly an assessment has been made that the money spent has | :53:22. | :53:27. | |
identified what could or could not have been done, the alternative | :53:27. | :53:32. | |
identified what could or could not they say will save £900 million | :53:32. | :53:34. | |
identified what could or could not in these austere times I don't think | :53:34. | :53:37. | |
it is a difficult question for local authorities to conclude. The life of | :53:38. | :53:40. | |
the incinerator in Edmonton has authorities to conclude. The life of | :53:40. | :53:44. | |
extended. Is that the right way authorities to conclude. The life of | :53:45. | :53:47. | |
deal with the waste issues Londoners will be facing? The waste issues are | :53:47. | :53:53. | |
difficult ones, I remember years ago Lucky you! I used to get all of | :53:53. | :54:06. | |
difficult ones, I remember years ago fun jobs, but it is a serious issue | :54:06. | :54:08. | |
he is now working with the London and my concern about this is making | :54:08. | :54:39. | |
he is now working with the London million of abortive expenditure | :54:39. | :54:42. | |
he is now working with the London get where we are. The recycling | :54:42. | :54:45. | |
board says there will be 4 million tonnes of rubbish that the city | :54:45. | :54:48. | |
board says there will be 4 million not have the infrastructure to deal | :54:48. | :54:52. | |
with in the future, that is a crisis waiting to happen, isn't it? It | :54:52. | :54:57. | |
with in the future, that is a crisis an indictment, we need to get on top | :54:57. | :55:09. | |
of that. How? It has taken so long backbench MP! The government have | :55:09. | :55:22. | |
there, Boris has got all his finger got to make sure the regulations are | :55:22. | :55:28. | |
there, Boris has got all his finger out and make sure the GMA delivers. | :55:28. | :55:30. | |
The fact we have going to have out and make sure the GMA delivers. | :55:30. | :55:35. | |
million tonnes of extra waste is acceptable. Now it is time for the | :55:35. | :55:49. | |
seconds. Former transport Secretary Andrew Adonis dismissed the call for | :55:50. | :55:53. | |
season ticket tax breaks from Boris Johnson as a classic Boris gimmick | :55:53. | :55:57. | |
saying it would only apply to ticket bought the stuff by employers. | :55:57. | :56:05. | |
Research by the charity Leonard Cheshire Disability found half of | :56:05. | :56:08. | |
London councils make home care visits of only 15 minutes. The | :56:08. | :56:13. | |
government says Short visits can be useful sometimes but the charity | :56:13. | :56:17. | |
wants them banned. A study has suggested a link between exposure to | :56:17. | :56:21. | |
noise pollution from living near airports and an increased risk of | :56:21. | :56:28. | |
strokes and cardiovascular illness. The advertising standards authority | :56:28. | :56:31. | |
says the claim on Home Office vans driven through London in July and | :56:31. | :56:39. | |
106 arrests made in your area last week were misleading. It added | :56:39. | :57:01. | |
106 arrests made in your area last good thing to be dissuading people | :57:01. | :57:03. | |
106 arrests made in your area last to be here illegally. At the end of | :57:03. | :57:05. | |
the day, we were talking about this earlier on, the issue over the EDL, | :57:05. | :57:13. | |
illegally and it makes it hard for communities who have come here | :57:13. | :57:17. | |
properly and they are working hard. If you are here illegally, I don't | :57:17. | :57:21. | |
think this is something to apologise for. The authority said it was not | :57:21. | :57:28. | |
offensive, it was just inaccurate. If we are going to be prejudiced, we | :57:28. | :57:32. | |
have to deal with that truthfully and the fact that the advertising | :57:32. | :57:37. | |
standards agency said that the adverts were not factual, that plays | :57:37. | :57:41. | |
into the hands of the extremists because that says the government is | :57:41. | :57:48. | |
everything to camouflage the issue. think it was pandering to the EDL, | :57:48. | :57:59. | |
we need to have an argument with the think it was pandering to the EDL, | :57:59. | :58:04. | |
communities and build a cohesive society. Everybody wants to see | :58:04. | :58:09. | |
communities and build a cohesive and these tactics were plain wrong. | :58:09. | :58:12. | |
That is all we have time for. Back ministerial team this week with | :58:12. | :58:26. | |
That is all we have time for. Back commentators calling it the purge of | :58:26. | :58:29. | |
the Blairites, but one poor lamb who fell victim to this perch was Diane | :58:29. | :58:34. | |
Abbott, not somebody who worshipped at the altar of Tony Blair. Life on | :58:34. | :58:39. | |
the backbenches means she can pursue other interests such as attending | :58:39. | :58:43. | |
the Cheltenham literary Festival, and where she joins us now. Welcome. | :58:43. | :58:52. | |
Why did Ed Miliband fire you? He think the thing that did it for | :58:52. | :59:10. | |
Why did Ed Miliband fire you? He no idea but the fact that I was | :59:10. | :59:14. | |
Why did Ed Miliband fire you? He public about my concerns on Syria | :59:14. | :59:19. | |
probably tipped my enemies in the end he agreed with your line on | :59:19. | :59:27. | |
probably tipped my enemies in the Syria so why would that be for | :59:27. | :59:33. | |
dismissal? I agree with you - you're fired. Because I actually spoke | :59:33. | :59:37. | |
dismissal? I agree with you - you're and it was the fact that I spoke up, | :59:37. | :59:39. | |
which was like a pebble falling and it was the fact that I spoke up, | :59:39. | :59:49. | |
forest or something. I am glad I spoke up on Syria. He doesn't like | :59:49. | :59:56. | |
people around them than who are outspoken, who speak their minds? I | :59:56. | :00:12. | |
think he's convinced he needs people who read from the scripts. People | :00:12. | :00:15. | |
increasingly upset that even though who read from the scripts. People | :00:15. | :00:21. | |
I was speaking party policy, I was reading from the script. Since Mr | :00:21. | :00:28. | |
Miliband bid you farewell, you've said he's doing his best. Is his | :00:28. | :00:34. | |
best good enough? I am sure it will be. I've always said the Labour | :00:34. | :00:38. | |
Party chose the right Miliband. be. I've always said the Labour | :00:38. | :00:44. | |
will remain loyal to him on the backbenches. You're going to be | :00:44. | :00:50. | |
loyal? However, I want to join in the debate. You're going to be | :00:50. | :00:55. | |
loyal? Absolutely. I was loyal both in public and private when others | :00:55. | :00:59. | |
were bitching about him behind the from the backbenches, I hope to | :00:59. | :01:05. | |
were bitching about him behind the involved in the debate particularly | :01:05. | :01:08. | |
around nick policy. Et's see how loyal you are. You must be happy | :01:08. | :01:12. | |
with all this new tough talk on welfare and free schools? Well, | :01:12. | :01:20. | |
with all this new tough talk on think both Rachel and Tristram are | :01:20. | :01:22. | |
sure Tristram will be aware of that. thing. But diminishing the role | :01:22. | :01:45. | |
sure Tristram will be aware of that. As for welfare, I'm sure Rachel | :01:45. | :01:47. | |
knows some of the cuts the Tories ublingtive in -- productive in terms | :01:47. | :01:56. | |
of spending. You wouldn't call that your full-hearted endorsement, would | :01:56. | :01:58. | |
you? What are you on, and lieu? your full-hearted endorsement, would | :01:58. | :02:06. | |
haven't seen the detail of Rachel's new position. You have to wait and | :02:06. | :02:10. | |
see the detail. It is in the papers. You haven't stopped reading the | :02:10. | :02:15. | |
papers. It was the Observer. When will you announce you're running for | :02:15. | :02:21. | |
Mayor of London? I have no plans to announce that I'm running for Mayor | :02:21. | :02:26. | |
Mayor of London? I have no plans to of London. No plans. That's what | :02:26. | :02:26. | |
Michael his I will Tyne used to of London. No plans. That's what | :02:26. | :02:30. | |
me. He had no plans to run against Margaret Thatcher. Are these the | :02:30. | :02:35. | |
same kind of plans you have? I know. No, no. I have no plans. You know | :02:35. | :02:42. | |
going for it. Everybody knows you're going for it. Just fess up to your | :02:42. | :02:52. | |
old mate! ! I have no plans to run. If you did run, who would be, what | :02:52. | :02:58. | |
would be your biggest threat other than yourself? I think there's a lot | :02:58. | :03:07. | |
of very talented candidates, David They are all talented. I would have | :03:07. | :03:16. | |
to weigh up the field. What do you think your chances would be of | :03:16. | :03:20. | |
getting the taxi drivers' vote? Well, you know, Andrew, some of | :03:20. | :03:28. | |
getting the taxi drivers' vote? most loyal viewers of This Week | :03:28. | :03:32. | |
getting the taxi drivers' vote? were taxi drivers and their wives. | :03:32. | :03:34. | |
I'm not frightened of reaching out to middle England. You will find if | :03:35. | :03:39. | |
you walk around London sub usual ya, to middle England. You will find if | :03:39. | :03:42. | |
you walk around London sub usual ya, they all know me and they all love | :03:42. | :03:43. | |
This Week. Love This Week. I thought they all know me and they all love | :03:43. | :03:47. | |
you were going to say they all love Michael Portillo. He wasn't a happy | :03:47. | :03:55. | |
chappie on Thursday night. You can't her. She had decided to leave this | :03:55. | :04:07. | |
something else in politics. She had taken what appeared to be a | :04:07. | :04:15. | |
something else in politics. She serious and was committed to the | :04:15. | :04:20. | |
issues. I'm quite disappointed for her. Why would Ed Miliband do such a | :04:20. | :04:29. | |
thing. You just mentioned about London mayor, did Diane not ask | :04:29. | :04:37. | |
thing. You just mentioned about Someone who's an eminent person | :04:37. | :04:40. | |
thing. You just mentioned about this programme, I don't know how he | :04:40. | :04:42. | |
could do that. I think Michael's missing you. Are you free this | :04:42. | :04:47. | |
Thursday night? Make him a happy man, come back to the fold. I think | :04:47. | :04:52. | |
I may be free this Thursday night. So, if he'll have me, I'll be there. | :04:52. | :04:57. | |
My people will speak to your people. We'll get it sorted out. Diane, | :04:57. | :05:02. | |
watch that big vase behind you, you're not insured for. That thanks | :05:02. | :05:07. | |
Does she have a chance of being Mayor of London? She's very well | :05:07. | :05:13. | |
known as Michael pointed out. That is important. People who are outside | :05:13. | :05:19. | |
known as Michael pointed out. That the party fold have traditionally | :05:19. | :05:21. | |
done well in the mayoral election. The job of being a London mayor | :05:21. | :05:26. | |
done well in the mayoral election. running an economy the size of a | :05:26. | :05:29. | |
nation. It is a very serious job. There may be problems with her | :05:29. | :05:31. | |
running? That was a transparent There may be problems with her | :05:31. | :05:39. | |
for it. She's potentially a very compelling Coll ticks. People have | :05:39. | :05:50. | |
left-winger but she's quite tough and conservative. Michael Gove said | :05:50. | :05:57. | |
he had fallen in love with Diane which That's one vote he has. What | :05:57. | :06:07. | |
Abbott is she has a fantastic way of connecting. She has a really good | :06:07. | :06:10. | |
way of connecting wi people. She would be a very strong candidate in | :06:10. | :06:16. | |
way of connecting wi people. She candidate. It will probably be a | :06:16. | :06:21. | |
Labour wins the 2015 election it may Labour win next time. Depends, if | :06:21. | :06:25. | |
Labour wins the 2015 election it may be more difficult. There's a danger | :06:25. | :06:25. | |
That's true. London is traditionally primary but isn't necessarily a | :06:25. | :06:42. | |
That's true. London is traditionally a Labour city. But Boris managed to | :06:42. | :06:46. | |
win as an outsider. There are big dangers for Labour with that. I | :06:46. | :06:51. | |
think, as I said before, somebody who seems a bit independent from | :06:51. | :06:55. | |
their own party machinery tend to do We've only had mayors so far that | :06:55. | :07:04. | |
were independent? Indeed. And how well Ken Livingstone did last time. | :07:04. | :07:06. | |
Not that far behind bar Is Johnson. well Ken Livingstone did last time. | :07:06. | :07:10. | |
Not that far behind bar Is Johnson. He was and is much more left-wing | :07:10. | :07:11. | |
than Diane Abbott. Diane didn't He was and is much more left-wing | :07:11. | :07:21. | |
stray on Syria, it was immigration. Why was Jeremy brown replaced by | :07:21. | :07:29. | |
This is very much to do with Clegg deciding he has to go back to those | :07:29. | :07:34. | |
people who abandoned the Liberal Democrats the day they went into | :07:34. | :07:38. | |
coalition with the Conservatives really, and convince them there | :07:38. | :07:43. | |
coalition with the Conservatives some holy areas of policy, sacred | :07:43. | :07:46. | |
areas which they will defend. That includes civil liberties. In the | :07:46. | :07:49. | |
Home Office, that incident with includes civil liberties. In the | :07:49. | :07:52. | |
immigration vans went down very badly across the whole nation. Went | :07:52. | :07:58. | |
down particularly badly with Liberal Democrats and voters. In the Home | :07:58. | :08:03. | |
somebody there to put a shield on purpose behind it. And Nick Clegg | :08:03. | :08:13. | |
has won the argument against the left, Vince Cable on the economy, | :08:13. | :08:18. | |
away day in July, briefings say DrCable's been put in his box. He's | :08:18. | :08:22. | |
won the argument on economic policy against the left. When it comes | :08:22. | :08:27. | |
won the argument on economic policy the touchstone issue in the Home | :08:27. | :08:31. | |
vote on the left. And please The Guardian. This is important for | :08:31. | :08:37. | |
that Nick Clegg has to keep his something else going on which is | :08:37. | :08:41. | |
that Nick Clegg has to keep his parliamentary party happy. That | :08:41. | :08:43. | |
involves giving them ministerial jobs. A lot of Liberal Democrats | :08:43. | :08:47. | |
because vacancies have to be created losing their jobs, Michael Moore, | :08:47. | :09:03. | |
because vacancies have to be created Liberal Democrat MPs will have been | :09:03. | :09:07. | |
on the payroll. It is effective party management. I want to move on | :09:07. | :09:13. | |
to press regulation. Brian Leveson's famous report, appeared before the | :09:13. | :09:15. | |
parliamentary select committee. famous report, appeared before the | :09:15. | :09:20. | |
will run you a clip from Connor politicians got involved in this. We | :09:20. | :09:31. | |
moved away from the press 300 years ago. The centr commitment is Lord | :09:31. | :09:37. | |
Leveson wanted a system the press self-regulation. This is state | :09:37. | :09:45. | |
involvement which I worry about profoundly. He sits on the media | :09:45. | :09:51. | |
interviews and investigations into the media. Chris Huhne said earlier | :09:51. | :09:56. | |
he thought all the newspapers would sign up to the Government-backed | :09:56. | :10:01. | |
Royal Charter. I think he's totally should. But he did say they would. I | :10:01. | :10:07. | |
think he's wrong. They won't sign up. All the mood music when that | :10:07. | :10:12. | |
Royal Charter was agreed on Friday was they would not sign up. It is | :10:12. | :10:19. | |
Maria Miller, is essentially saying to the press industry, if you don't | :10:19. | :10:21. | |
sign up, the Royal charter will to the press industry, if you don't | :10:21. | :10:25. | |
ahead. I cannot control the Labour to the press industry, if you don't | :10:25. | :10:30. | |
industry is wind the clock back to the press industry, if you don't | :10:30. | :10:32. | |
what they are calling the Puttnam stage. That was earlier this year, | :10:33. | :10:40. | |
Lord Puttnam was tack amendments which would introduce statutory | :10:40. | :10:45. | |
regulation. Maria Miller says you statutory legislation but if you | :10:45. | :10:54. | |
don't sign up to this, it will be a lot worse. Will that work? Playing | :10:54. | :11:02. | |
the good cop, bad cop routine? Will that pressurise everyone to sign up. | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
Lots of people are saying this will be a club with no members. It won't | :11:06. | :11:08. | |
but most, will go the legal route be a club with no members. It won't | :11:08. | :11:30. | |
Government's proposing and will be a club with no members. It won't | :11:30. | :11:33. | |
it to strains Bowring where freedom of the press is enshrined. They | :11:33. | :11:41. | |
it to strains Bowring where freedom fight this? There is enough fury | :11:41. | :11:43. | |
amongst Fleet Street to result in that. The big political question | :11:43. | :11:47. | |
going forward is which of the party leaders does the press blame the | :11:47. | :11:51. | |
most for the emergence of press regulation? The Tories are very | :11:51. | :11:55. | |
confident they'll blame Ed Miliband the most. They'll target him before | :11:55. | :12:00. | |
2015. David Cameron gave us Brian Leveson. You appoint a judge who | :12:00. | :12:08. | |
shouldn't be surprised with what you got in the Leveson report? I big | :12:08. | :12:13. | |
chunk of press will look at David Cameron saying, you were the guy who | :12:13. | :12:22. | |
intended what will happen. If he had have appointed Brian Leveson. If | :12:22. | :12:32. | |
they face more punitive fines over Labour ale cases they take that | :12:33. | :12:37. | |
they face more punitive fines over Europe. The Daily Mail and the | :12:37. | :12:41. | |
tallest presumably will have to suspend their campaign of Britain to | :12:41. | :12:46. | |
leave the European Convention of suspend that. We must never come out | :12:46. | :12:54. | |
Churchill was behind it. He was indeed. But it is actually a major | :12:54. | :13:01. | |
constitutional issue whether you regulate the press or not. There was | :13:01. | :13:05. | |
constitutional issue whether you a lot of ill feeling that this Marie | :13:05. | :13:08. | |
ya miller statement was snubbing out on Friday afternoon. Somebody said | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
freedom of the press too important to sneak out on afully afternoon. | :13:13. | :13:17. | |
The whole subject should be treated to sneak out on afully afternoon. | :13:17. | :13:20. | |
The whole subject should be treated with respect. We've run out of time. | :13:20. | :13:24. | |
I'll be back next Sunday with the Communities Secretary Eric Pickles | :13:24. | :13:27. | |
at our usual time of 11.00am. If | :13:27. | :14:00. |