Browse content similar to 14/05/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
It's Sunday morning and this is the Sunday Politics. | :00:36. | :00:39. | |
Theresa May unveils plans to build many more affordable homes | :00:40. | :00:42. | |
in England, but with no price tag, timetable or building targets - | :00:43. | :00:45. | |
Labour takes aim at the City with what it calls a Robin Hood Tax | :00:46. | :00:52. | |
to fund public services, but will traders just | :00:53. | :00:54. | |
Don't look at the polls - Jeremy Corbyn, at least, | :00:55. | :00:58. | |
insists he can win this election - so which way will | :00:59. | :01:01. | |
We'll hear from a focus group in Leeds. | :01:02. | :01:05. | |
Has the bubble burst or can Ukip rise again? | :01:06. | :01:09. | |
We'll assess the post-Brexit battle for votes in Blackpool. | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
and here, what the parties are saying about tackling the air | :01:15. | :01:16. | |
pollution problem in London. And with me, our own scientifically | :01:17. | :01:24. | |
selected focus group of political pundits - | :01:25. | :01:28. | |
they're not so much undecided as clueless - | :01:29. | :01:30. | |
Tom Newton Dunn, Isabel Oakeshott They'll be tweeting | :01:31. | :01:32. | |
throughout the programme. So, we've got two new | :01:33. | :01:39. | |
policies this morning. Labour say they will introduce | :01:40. | :01:41. | |
a financial transaction tax if they win the general election | :01:42. | :01:43. | |
and what they're calling "the biggest crackdown on tax | :01:44. | :01:46. | |
avoidance in the country's history". The Conservatives say they'll work | :01:47. | :01:48. | |
with local authorities in England to build council houses | :01:49. | :01:50. | |
with the right to buy. Theresa May says the policy | :01:51. | :01:53. | |
"will help thousands of people get on the first rung | :01:54. | :01:55. | |
of the housing ladder". Steve, what do you make of them? I | :01:56. | :02:08. | |
have been conditioned after doing tax and spend debates in | :02:09. | :02:12. | |
pre-election periods for many decades to treat policy is not as | :02:13. | :02:16. | |
literal but as arguments. In other words if you look back to 2015 the | :02:17. | :02:20. | |
Tory plan to wipe out the deficit was never going to happen and yet it | :02:21. | :02:25. | |
framed and large event. In that sense the Robin Hood tax is a | :02:26. | :02:29. | |
sensible move for Labour to make at this point because it is part of a | :02:30. | :02:34. | |
narrative of reconfiguring taxation to be fair. Treating it as an | :02:35. | :02:37. | |
argument rather than something that would happen in day one of Labour | :02:38. | :02:45. | |
government is sensible. In terms of building houses Theresa May said | :02:46. | :02:47. | |
right from the beginning when she was in Number Ten that there is a | :02:48. | :02:50. | |
housing deficit in this country rather than the economic deficit | :02:51. | :02:54. | |
George Osborne was focusing on, and this is an example of trying to get | :02:55. | :02:59. | |
house-building going. It seems entirely sensible, not sure how it | :03:00. | :03:03. | |
works with right to buy but again as framing of a 90 minute it makes | :03:04. | :03:08. | |
sense. I disagree with Steve on one front which is how sensible Theresa | :03:09. | :03:16. | |
May's policy is on the housing announcement. I think more broadly | :03:17. | :03:20. | |
these two announcements have something in common which is that | :03:21. | :03:23. | |
over the next 24 hours both will probably unravel in different ways. | :03:24. | :03:30. | |
Ye of little faith! The Mayor of London has already said he doesn't | :03:31. | :03:34. | |
agree with this, and when people see the actual impact of what looks like | :03:35. | :03:40. | |
a populist tax will very potentially affect people's pensions, it might | :03:41. | :03:45. | |
become a lot less popular. On the Tory housing plans, I think it is | :03:46. | :03:49. | |
difficult to imagine how they are going to implement this huge, what | :03:50. | :03:54. | |
looks like a huge land and property grab. Through compulsory purchase | :03:55. | :03:59. | |
orders, which are not a simple instrument. They say they will | :04:00. | :04:03. | |
change the law but really the idea of paying people below the market | :04:04. | :04:07. | |
value for their assets is not something I can see sitting easily | :04:08. | :04:12. | |
with Tory backbenchers or the Tories in the House of Lords. Tom. Both | :04:13. | :04:19. | |
would appear superficially to be appealing to traditional left and | :04:20. | :04:23. | |
traditional right bases. What is more Tory than right to buy, then | :04:24. | :04:30. | |
councils sell on these houses, and Labour slapping a massive tax on the | :04:31. | :04:37. | |
city. The Tories' plan, I would say look a bit deeper and all of the | :04:38. | :04:40. | |
Tory narrative from the last six years which hasn't worked well is | :04:41. | :04:45. | |
talking about the private sector increasing supply in the market. Now | :04:46. | :04:49. | |
Mrs May is talking about the role for the state after all so this is | :04:50. | :04:57. | |
the shift creeping in. On the Labour transaction tax, one of the most | :04:58. | :05:01. | |
interesting things I heard in days was from Paul Mason, former BBC | :05:02. | :05:08. | |
correspondent, now a cog in Easter extreme. On Newsnight he said don't | :05:09. | :05:11. | |
worry about whether the Labour manifesto will add up, I'm promising | :05:12. | :05:16. | |
it will, the bigger Tory attack line should be what on earth will be the | :05:17. | :05:23. | |
macroeconomic effect of taking so much tax out of the system. Very | :05:24. | :05:29. | |
well, we shall see. At least we have some policies to talk about. | :05:30. | :05:31. | |
Now, on Tuesday Labour will launch its manifesto. | :05:32. | :05:33. | |
But we've already got a pretty good idea of what's in it - | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
that's because most of its contents were leaked to the media | :05:37. | :05:39. | |
Labour has a variety of spending pledges including an extra | :05:40. | :05:47. | |
?6 billion a year for the NHS, an additional ?8 billion for social | :05:48. | :05:50. | |
care over the lifetime of the next parliament, | :05:51. | :05:52. | |
as well as a ?250 billion in infrastructure over | :05:53. | :05:54. | |
The party will support the renewal of the Trident submarine system, | :05:55. | :06:02. | |
although any Prime Minister should be extremely cautious | :06:03. | :06:03. | |
about its use, and the party will hold a strategic defence | :06:04. | :06:06. | |
and security review immediately after the election. | :06:07. | :06:09. | |
In terms of immigration, Labour will seek "reasonable | :06:10. | :06:11. | |
management of migration", but it will not make "false | :06:12. | :06:13. | |
Elsewhere, university tuition fees will be abolished, | :06:14. | :06:20. | |
and the public sector pay cap, which limits pay rises | :06:21. | :06:22. | |
for public sector workers to 1%, will be scrapped. | :06:23. | :06:26. | |
The party also aims to renationalise the railways, the Royal Mail | :06:27. | :06:29. | |
and the National Grid, as well as creating at least one | :06:30. | :06:36. | |
A senior Labour backbencher described it to the Sunday Politics | :06:37. | :06:41. | |
as a manifesto for a leadership who don't "give a toss | :06:42. | :06:44. | |
about the wider public", and several other Labour candidates | :06:45. | :06:46. | |
told us they thought it had been deliberately | :06:47. | :06:48. | |
leaked by the leadership, with one suggesting | :06:49. | :06:52. | |
the leak was intended to "bounce the National Executive" | :06:53. | :06:54. | |
And we're joined now from Salford by the Shadow Business Secretary, | :06:55. | :06:57. | |
Welcome to the programme. The draft manifesto proposed to renationalise | :06:58. | :07:06. | |
the number of industry. You will wait for the franchises to run out | :07:07. | :07:11. | |
rather than buy them out at the moment so can you confirm the | :07:12. | :07:15. | |
railways will not be wholly nationalised until 2030, after three | :07:16. | :07:19. | |
Labour governments, and Jeremy Corbyn will be 80? I'm not going to | :07:20. | :07:26. | |
comment on leaks, you will just have to be patient and wait to see what | :07:27. | :07:32. | |
is in our manifesto. But you have already announced you will | :07:33. | :07:36. | |
nationalise the railways, so tell me about it. We have discussed taking | :07:37. | :07:41. | |
the franchises into public ownership as they expire, however the detail | :07:42. | :07:45. | |
will be set out in the manifesto so I'm not prepared to go into detail | :07:46. | :07:50. | |
until that policy is formally laid out on Tuesday. That doesn't sound | :07:51. | :07:54. | |
very hopeful but let's carry on. You will also nationalise the National | :07:55. | :08:01. | |
Grid, it has a market capitalisation of ?40 billion, why do you want to | :08:02. | :08:06. | |
nationalise that? Again, I'm not going to speculate on leaks, you | :08:07. | :08:11. | |
will just have to be patient. But you said you will nationalise the | :08:12. | :08:17. | |
National Grid so tell's Y. The leaks have suggested but you will just | :08:18. | :08:21. | |
have to wait and see what the final manifesto states on that one. So is | :08:22. | :08:26. | |
it a waste of time me asking you how you will pay for something that | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
costs 40 billion? Be patient, just couple of days to go, but what I | :08:31. | :08:36. | |
would say is there is growing pressure from the public to reform | :08:37. | :08:40. | |
the utilities sector. The Competition and Markets Authority | :08:41. | :08:43. | |
stated in 2015 that bill payers were paying over till debt -- ?2 billion | :08:44. | :08:49. | |
in excess of what they should be paying so there is a clear need for | :08:50. | :08:55. | |
reform. The bills we get are from the energy companies, you are not | :08:56. | :08:59. | |
going to nationalise them, you are going to nationalise the | :09:00. | :09:02. | |
distribution company and I wondered what is the case for nationalising | :09:03. | :09:07. | |
the distribution company? As I said, our full plans will be set out on | :09:08. | :09:12. | |
Tuesday. In relation to the big six energy companies, we know in recent | :09:13. | :09:15. | |
years they have been overcharging customers... There's no point in | :09:16. | :09:23. | |
answering questions I am not asking. I am asking what is the case for | :09:24. | :09:29. | |
nationalising the National Grid? There is a case for reforming the | :09:30. | :09:32. | |
energy sector as a whole and that looks at the activities of the big | :09:33. | :09:37. | |
six companies and it will look at other aspects too. You will have to | :09:38. | :09:42. | |
be patient and wait until Tuesday. What about the Royal Mail? Again, | :09:43. | :09:49. | |
you will have to wait until Tuesday. Why can't you just be honest with | :09:50. | :09:53. | |
the British voter? We know you are going to do this and you have a duty | :09:54. | :10:00. | |
to explain. I'm not even arguing whether it is right or wrong. The | :10:01. | :10:06. | |
Royal Mail was sold off and we know it was sold under value and British | :10:07. | :10:10. | |
taxpayers have a reason to feel aggrieved about that. There is a | :10:11. | :10:14. | |
long-term strategy that would ensure the Royal Mail was classified as a | :10:15. | :10:18. | |
key piece of infrastructure but the details of that will be set out in | :10:19. | :10:23. | |
our manifesto because we want to ensure businesses and households | :10:24. | :10:26. | |
ensure the best quality of service when it comes to their postal | :10:27. | :10:31. | |
providers. You plan to borrow an extra 25 billion per year, John | :10:32. | :10:36. | |
McDonnell has already announced this, on public investment, on top | :10:37. | :10:40. | |
of the around 50 billion already being planned for investment. You | :10:41. | :10:46. | |
will borrow it all so that means, if you can confirm, that many years | :10:47. | :10:53. | |
after the crash by 2021, Labour government would still be borrowing | :10:54. | :11:00. | |
75 billion a year. Is that correct? We have set out ?250 billion of | :11:01. | :11:06. | |
capital investment, and ?250 billion for a national investment bank. Our | :11:07. | :11:10. | |
financial and fiscal rules dictate we will leave the Government in a | :11:11. | :11:14. | |
state of less debt than we found it at the start of the parliament so we | :11:15. | :11:17. | |
won't increase the national debt at the end of our Parliamentary term. | :11:18. | :11:24. | |
How can you do that if by 2021 you will still be borrowing around 75 | :11:25. | :11:28. | |
billion a year, which is more than we borrow at the moment? The 500 | :11:29. | :11:35. | |
billion figure is set out over a period of ten years, it's a figure | :11:36. | :11:39. | |
that has been suggested by Peter Helm from Oxford University as a | :11:40. | :11:42. | |
figure that is necessary to bring us in line with other industrial | :11:43. | :11:46. | |
competitors. Similar figures have been suggested by groups such as the | :11:47. | :11:55. | |
CBI. By the way I have not included all 500 billion, just the 250 | :11:56. | :11:59. | |
billion on public spending, not the extra money. You talk about the | :12:00. | :12:04. | |
fiscal rules. The draft manifesto said you will leave debt as a | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
proportion of trend GDP law at the end of each parliament, you have | :12:09. | :12:15. | |
just said a version of that. What is trend GDP? In clear terms we will | :12:16. | :12:19. | |
ensure the debt we acquire will be reduced by the end of the | :12:20. | :12:23. | |
parliament. We won't leave the Government finances in a worse state | :12:24. | :12:31. | |
than we found them. OK, but what is trend GDP? Our rule is we will | :12:32. | :12:35. | |
ensure public sector net debt is less than we found it when we came | :12:36. | :12:39. | |
to power in Government on June the 8th. But that is not what your draft | :12:40. | :12:47. | |
manifesto says. I'm not going to comment on leaks, you are just going | :12:48. | :12:50. | |
to have to wait until Tuesday to look at the fine detail and perhaps | :12:51. | :12:55. | |
we will have another chat then. You have published your plans for | :12:56. | :12:59. | |
corporation tax and you will increase it by a third and your | :13:00. | :13:03. | |
predictions assumed that will get an extra 20 billion a year by the end | :13:04. | :13:08. | |
of the parliament. But that assumes the companies don't change their | :13:09. | :13:12. | |
behaviour, that they move money around, they leave the country or | :13:13. | :13:17. | |
they generate smaller profits. Is that realistic? You are right to | :13:18. | :13:23. | |
make that point and you will see when we set out our policies and | :13:24. | :13:26. | |
costings in the manifesto that we haven't spent all of the tax take. | :13:27. | :13:32. | |
We have allowed for different differentials and potential changes | :13:33. | :13:34. | |
in market activity because that would be approved and direction to | :13:35. | :13:39. | |
take. But corporation tax is allowed to be cut in France and the United | :13:40. | :13:47. | |
States, it's only 12.5% in Dublin. Many companies based in Britain are | :13:48. | :13:50. | |
already wondering whether they should relocate because of Brexit, | :13:51. | :13:55. | |
if you increase this tax by a third couldn't that clinch it for a number | :13:56. | :14:00. | |
of them? No, we will still be one of the lowest corporation tax rate in | :14:01. | :14:06. | |
the G7. Let's look at what's important for business. Cutting | :14:07. | :14:10. | |
corporation tax in itself doesn't improve productivity, or business | :14:11. | :14:14. | |
investment and there's no suggestion cutting corporation tax in recent | :14:15. | :14:17. | |
years has achieved that. Businesses need an investment in tools in | :14:18. | :14:24. | |
things they need to thrive and prosper, they also need to reduce | :14:25. | :14:28. | |
the burden at the lower end of the tax scale, before we get to the | :14:29. | :14:33. | |
Prophet stage. One key example is business rates. We have made the | :14:34. | :14:40. | |
proposal to government to in -- exclude machinery so businesses can | :14:41. | :14:43. | |
invest and grow operations in the future but the Government refused. | :14:44. | :14:50. | |
Corporation tax has been cut since 2010. When it was 28% it brought in | :14:51. | :15:00. | |
?43 billion a year. Now it is down to 20%, it brought in ?55 billion a | :15:01. | :15:07. | |
year. By cutting it in the last year, it brought in 21% more, so | :15:08. | :15:13. | |
what is the problem? It might have brought in more money, but has it | :15:14. | :15:17. | |
increased business investment in the long term. It is not just about | :15:18. | :15:23. | |
cutting corporation tax, but it is on the ability of businesses to | :15:24. | :15:27. | |
thrive and prosper. Business investment in the UK is below are | :15:28. | :15:33. | |
industrial competitors. Wages are stagnating which doesn't indicate | :15:34. | :15:40. | |
businesses are not doing well. Let me get it right, you are arguing if | :15:41. | :15:44. | |
we increase business tax by a third, that will increase investment? I am | :15:45. | :15:51. | |
not saying that. You just did. Know I didn't, I said reducing business | :15:52. | :15:59. | |
tax isn't enough, you have to invest in the things businesses need to | :16:00. | :16:03. | |
thrive and prosper. You have also got to lessen the burden on | :16:04. | :16:14. | |
business. You have announced a financial transaction tax. Your own | :16:15. | :16:19. | |
labour Mayor of London said he has vowed to fight it. He said I do not | :16:20. | :16:24. | |
want a unilateral tax on business in our city, so why are you proceeding | :16:25. | :16:29. | |
with it? This isn't a new initiative, there is a growing | :16:30. | :16:33. | |
global pressure to make sure we have fairness in the financial sector. | :16:34. | :16:37. | |
Ordinary British people are paying for our banking crisis they didn't | :16:38. | :16:43. | |
cause. Another important point, stamp duty reserve tax was brought | :16:44. | :16:48. | |
in in the 1600 and there have been little reforms. The sector has | :16:49. | :16:52. | |
changed and we have do provide changes to the system for that | :16:53. | :16:57. | |
change. High-frequency trading where we have a state of affairs where a | :16:58. | :17:02. | |
lot of shares are traded on computers within milliseconds. We | :17:03. | :17:06. | |
need a tax system that keeps up with that. What happens if they move the | :17:07. | :17:13. | |
computers to another country? Emily Thornaby said this morning, other | :17:14. | :17:18. | |
countries had already introduced a financial transaction tax, what | :17:19. | :17:21. | |
other countries have done that? There are ten countries looking at | :17:22. | :17:29. | |
introducing a transaction tax. Which ones have done it so far? They will | :17:30. | :17:36. | |
be later announcing a final package, going through the finer detail at | :17:37. | :17:41. | |
the moment. But the European Commission tried to get this done in | :17:42. | :17:45. | |
2011 and it still hasn't happened in any of these countries. But you are | :17:46. | :17:50. | |
going to go ahead unilaterally and risk these businesses, which | :17:51. | :17:55. | |
generate a lot of money, moving to other jurisdictions. There is not a | :17:56. | :17:59. | |
significant risk of that happening. The stamp duty reserve tax is levied | :18:00. | :18:10. | |
at either where the person or company is domiciled or where the | :18:11. | :18:15. | |
instrument is issued rather than worth the transaction takes place. | :18:16. | :18:20. | |
This tax in itself is not enough to make people leave this country in | :18:21. | :18:23. | |
terms of financial services because there is more to keep these | :18:24. | :18:28. | |
businesses here in terms of the investment we are making, the | :18:29. | :18:32. | |
economy that Labour will build, in terms of productivity improvement we | :18:33. | :18:36. | |
will see. Thank you very much, Rebecca Long-Bailey. | :18:37. | :18:40. | |
And listening to that was the Home Office Minister, Brandon Lewis. | :18:41. | :18:46. | |
Over the years, you have got corporation tax by 20%, it is lower | :18:47. | :18:52. | |
than international standards, so why are so many global companies who | :18:53. | :18:59. | |
make money out of Great Britain, still not paying 20%? It is one of | :19:00. | :19:04. | |
the problems with the point Labour were making and Rebecca could not | :19:05. | :19:07. | |
answer, these companies can move around the world. One of the | :19:08. | :19:13. | |
important things is having a low tax economy but these businesses, it | :19:14. | :19:17. | |
encourages them to come at a rate they are prepared to pay. People may | :19:18. | :19:22. | |
say they are right, if they were paying 19, 20% incorporation tax. | :19:23. | :19:28. | |
But they are not. Google runs a multi-million pound corporation and | :19:29. | :19:37. | |
did not pay anywhere near 20%. There are companies that are trading | :19:38. | :19:41. | |
internationally and that is why we have to get this work done with our | :19:42. | :19:49. | |
partners around the world. Has there been an improvement? It is more than | :19:50. | :19:53. | |
they were paying before. Whether it is Google or any other company, | :19:54. | :19:57. | |
alongside them being here, apart from the tax they pay, it is the | :19:58. | :20:03. | |
people they employ. The deal was, if you cut the business tax, the | :20:04. | :20:07. | |
corporation tax on profits, we would get more companies coming here and | :20:08. | :20:12. | |
more companies paying their tax. It seems it doesn't matter how low, a | :20:13. | :20:16. | |
number of companies just pay a derisory amount and you haven't been | :20:17. | :20:23. | |
able to change that. As you outlined, the income taken from the | :20:24. | :20:25. | |
changing corporation tax has gone up. That is from established British | :20:26. | :20:33. | |
companies, not from these international companies. It is | :20:34. | :20:36. | |
because more companies are coming here and paying tax. That is a good | :20:37. | :20:40. | |
thing. There is always more to do and that is why we want to crack | :20:41. | :20:46. | |
down. In the last few weeks in the Finnish Parliament, Labour refused | :20:47. | :20:50. | |
to put to another ?8.7 billion of tax take we could have got by | :20:51. | :20:56. | |
cracking down further. You claim to have made great progress on cracking | :20:57. | :21:01. | |
down on people and companies to pay the tax they should. But the tax gap | :21:02. | :21:06. | |
is the difference between what HMRC takes in and what it should take in. | :21:07. | :21:12. | |
It has barely moved in five years, so where is the progress? He have | :21:13. | :21:18. | |
brought in 150 billion more where we have cracked down on those tax | :21:19. | :21:22. | |
schemes. The gap is still the same as it was five years ago. It's gone | :21:23. | :21:32. | |
from 6.8, 26.5. It has gone down. The Prime Minister and the | :21:33. | :21:34. | |
Chancellor said they want to continue work on to get more money | :21:35. | :21:39. | |
on these companies while still having a competitive rate to | :21:40. | :21:45. | |
encourage these companies. While big business and the wealthy continue to | :21:46. | :21:50. | |
prosper, the Office for Budget Responsibility tell us those on | :21:51. | :21:53. | |
average earnings in this country will be earning less in real terms | :21:54. | :21:59. | |
by 2021 than they did in 2008. How can that be fair? I don't see it | :22:00. | :22:05. | |
that way. I haven't seen the figures you have got. What I can say to you, | :22:06. | :22:09. | |
Andrew, we have made sure the minimum wage has gone up, the actual | :22:10. | :22:15. | |
income tax people pay has gone down. So in their pocket, real terms, | :22:16. | :22:24. | |
people have more money. You are the self-styled party of work. We keep | :22:25. | :22:26. | |
emphasising work. Under your government you can work for 13 years | :22:27. | :22:30. | |
and still not earn any more at the end of it, and you did at the start. | :22:31. | :22:37. | |
Where is the reward for effort in that? I have not seen those figures. | :22:38. | :22:42. | |
There are 2.8 million more people, more jobs in economy than there was. | :22:43. | :22:49. | |
1000 jobs every day and people are working and developing through their | :22:50. | :22:52. | |
careers. This is what I thought was odd in what Rebecca was saying, | :22:53. | :22:56. | |
investing in people is what the apprenticeship levy is about, | :22:57. | :23:01. | |
companies are investing their works force to take more opportunities | :23:02. | :23:06. | |
that there. We are talking about fairness, politicians talk about | :23:07. | :23:09. | |
hard-working people and we know the average earnings are no higher than | :23:10. | :23:14. | |
they were in 2008. We know the pay and bonuses of senior executives | :23:15. | :23:19. | |
have continued to grow and the Institute for Fiscal Studies has | :23:20. | :23:22. | |
shown 3 million of the poorest households will lose an average of | :23:23. | :23:28. | |
?2500 a year in the next Parliament, benefits frozen, further sanctions | :23:29. | :23:34. | |
kick in. 3 million of the poorest losing 2500. Under the Tories, one | :23:35. | :23:38. | |
law for the rich and another for the poor. It is quite wrong. First of | :23:39. | :23:44. | |
all, we have got to be fair to the taxpayer who is funding the welfare | :23:45. | :23:49. | |
and benefit system. Which is why the welfare was right. Get more people | :23:50. | :23:55. | |
in work and then it is important to get more people upscaling. As that | :23:56. | :24:02. | |
allowance rises, people have more of the money they earn in their pocket | :24:03. | :24:07. | |
to be able to use in the economy. People will be worse off. 2500, | :24:08. | :24:13. | |
among the poorest already. They will have more money in their pocket as | :24:14. | :24:19. | |
we increase the allowance before people pay tax. We have seen | :24:20. | :24:25. | |
millions of people coming out of tax altogether. The reason I ask these | :24:26. | :24:29. | |
questions, you and the Prime Minister go on and on about the just | :24:30. | :24:34. | |
about managing classes. I am talking about the just about managing and | :24:35. | :24:38. | |
below that. It is all talk, you haven't done anything for them. We | :24:39. | :24:42. | |
have made sure they have an increasing minimum wage, it has gone | :24:43. | :24:47. | |
up more under us than any other previous government. Their wages | :24:48. | :24:54. | |
will be still lower in real terms. Let me come on to this plan for | :24:55. | :24:58. | |
housing. We have announced a new plan to increase affordable housing, | :24:59. | :25:03. | |
social housing, some council housing and social housing built by the | :25:04. | :25:07. | |
associations. How much money is behind this? It is part of the 1.4 | :25:08. | :25:11. | |
billion announced in the Autumn Statement. How many homes will you | :25:12. | :25:19. | |
get for 1.4 billion? That depends on the negotiations with local | :25:20. | :25:22. | |
authorities. It is local authorities, who know the area best. | :25:23. | :25:29. | |
I will not put a number on that. 1.4 billion, if you price the house at | :25:30. | :25:33. | |
100,000, which is very low, particularly for the South, back at | :25:34. | :25:39. | |
you 14,000 new homes. That is it. What we have seen before, how the | :25:40. | :25:44. | |
local government can leveraged to build thousands more homes. That is | :25:45. | :25:48. | |
what we want to see across the country. It is not just about the | :25:49. | :25:52. | |
money, for a lot of local authorities it is about the | :25:53. | :25:55. | |
expertise and knowledge on how to do this. That is why support from the | :25:56. | :26:01. | |
housing communities minister will help. What is the timescale, how | :26:02. | :26:07. | |
many more affordable homes will be built? I will not put a number on | :26:08. | :26:12. | |
it. You announced it today, so you cannot tell me how many more or what | :26:13. | :26:17. | |
the target is? It is a matter of working with the local authorities | :26:18. | :26:21. | |
who know what their local needs are, what land they have got available. | :26:22. | :26:24. | |
What we saw through the local elections with the Metro mayors, | :26:25. | :26:29. | |
they want to deliver in their areas, whether it is the West of England, | :26:30. | :26:32. | |
the north-east, Liverpool, Manchester and we want to work with | :26:33. | :26:37. | |
them. You have said variations of this for the past seven years and I | :26:38. | :26:41. | |
want some credibility. When you cannot tell us how much money, what | :26:42. | :26:47. | |
the target and timescale is, and this government, under which | :26:48. | :26:50. | |
affordable house building has fallen to a 24 year low. 1.2 million | :26:51. | :26:56. | |
families are on waiting lists for social housing to rent. That is your | :26:57. | :27:02. | |
record. Why should we believe a word you say? This is different to what | :27:03. | :27:06. | |
we have been doing over the last two years. We want to develop and have a | :27:07. | :27:11. | |
strong and stable economy that can sustain that 1.4 billion homes. This | :27:12. | :27:18. | |
is important. In 2010, we inherited the lowest level of house building, | :27:19. | :27:24. | |
75,000 new homes. That is about 189,000 over the last four years. | :27:25. | :27:29. | |
That is a big step forward after the crash, getting people back into the | :27:30. | :27:33. | |
industry. More first-time buyers onto the market. Final question, in | :27:34. | :27:44. | |
2010, 2011, your first year in government, there were 60,000 | :27:45. | :27:49. | |
affordable homes built. May not be enough, but last day it was 30 2000. | :27:50. | :27:57. | |
So why should we trust anything you say about this? On housing, we have | :27:58. | :28:04. | |
delivered. We have delivered more social housing. Double what Labour | :28:05. | :28:10. | |
did in 13 years, in just five years. This is what this policy is about, | :28:11. | :28:14. | |
working with local authorities to deliver more homes to people in | :28:15. | :28:15. | |
their local areas. Thank you. Now, they have a deficit | :28:16. | :28:19. | |
of between 15 and 20% in the polls, but Jeremy Corbyn and those | :28:20. | :28:22. | |
around him insist Labour can win. If the polls are right they've got | :28:23. | :28:25. | |
three and half weeks to change voters' minds and persuade those | :28:26. | :28:28. | |
fabled undecided voters We enlisted the polling organisation | :28:29. | :28:30. | |
YouGov to help us find out how the performance of party leaders | :28:31. | :28:35. | |
will affect behaviour Leeds, a city of three quarters | :28:36. | :28:37. | |
of a million people, eight Parliamentary seats and home | :28:38. | :28:47. | |
to our very own focus group. Our panel was recruited | :28:48. | :28:52. | |
from a variety of backgrounds and the majority say they haven't | :28:53. | :28:54. | |
decided who to vote for yet. Watching behind the glass, | :28:55. | :28:58. | |
two experts on different sides Giles Cunningham, who headed up | :28:59. | :29:00. | |
political press at Downing Street under David Cameron | :29:01. | :29:07. | |
and Aaron Bastani, Corbin supporter, under David Cameron | :29:08. | :29:14. | |
and Aaron Bastani, Corbyn supporter, I think Theresa May sees herself | :29:15. | :29:16. | |
as a pound shop Thatcher. Milliband's policies but when it | :29:17. | :29:20. | |
came about who you want, | :29:21. | :29:40. | |
if you wake up on maybe a 2015, We found in a couple of focus | :29:41. | :29:44. | |
groups, people saying we'd be quite relieved, | :29:45. | :29:48. | |
even though some of those same people have been saying we quite | :29:49. | :29:50. | |
like the Labour policies. I think the fact that Corbyn's | :29:51. | :29:53. | |
going so hard on his values, this is a really progressive | :29:54. | :29:57. | |
manifesto, they live But I think that's a new challenge, | :29:58. | :29:59. | |
that wasn't there in 2015. Is there anyone here that | :30:00. | :30:03. | |
you don't recognise? After a little warm up, | :30:04. | :30:05. | |
the first exercise, recognising I think it's nice to have a strong | :30:06. | :30:07. | |
woman in politics, I do. But I've got to say, | :30:08. | :30:14. | |
when she comes on the news, I kind of do think, | :30:15. | :30:16. | |
here we go again. Tell me about Tim Farron, what | :30:17. | :30:19. | |
are your impressions of Tim Farron? It isn't going to do anything, | :30:20. | :30:21. | |
it isn't going to change anything. You'll be surprised to hear it's | :30:22. | :30:26. | |
actually the Greens. Strong and stable leadership | :30:27. | :30:35. | |
in the national interest. Yes, Team May, it's | :30:36. | :30:47. | |
the British equivalent of make What do we think about this one | :30:48. | :30:52. | |
for the many and not the few? It's not quite as bad | :30:53. | :31:02. | |
as strong and stable, but it will probably get | :31:03. | :31:04. | |
on our nerves after a while. We must seize that chance today | :31:05. | :31:07. | |
and every day until June the 8th. But that's not quite my | :31:08. | :31:17. | |
question, my question is, if you are Prime Minister, | :31:18. | :31:25. | |
we will leave, come hell or high water, whatever is on the table | :31:26. | :31:27. | |
at the end of the negotiations? If we win the election, | :31:28. | :31:31. | |
we'll get a good deal with Europe. Assertive and in control | :31:32. | :31:33. | |
and he felt comfortable But the second one, I thought | :31:34. | :31:35. | |
he was very hesitant. I thought he was kind of, | :31:36. | :31:40. | |
hovering around, skirting around and that's the second | :31:41. | :31:49. | |
time I've seen a similar interview with the question | :31:50. | :31:52. | |
being asked regarding Brexit. I don't think I'd have | :31:53. | :31:54. | |
any confidence with him You think you are going up | :31:55. | :31:56. | |
against some quite strong people, how are you going to stand | :31:57. | :32:00. | |
up for us? When you are in negotiations, | :32:01. | :32:02. | |
you need to be tough. And actually is right | :32:03. | :32:07. | |
to be tough sometimes, particularly when you are doing | :32:08. | :32:09. | |
something for the country. There's a reason for talking | :32:10. | :32:11. | |
about strong and stable leadership. It's about the future | :32:12. | :32:13. | |
of the country, it's It's just that people kind of listen | :32:14. | :32:15. | |
to that kind of thing and think Both on The One Show | :32:16. | :32:20. | |
and in the news. She attracts the public better | :32:21. | :32:25. | |
than what Corbyn does. She didn't answer the question | :32:26. | :32:31. | |
in a more articular way than Corbyn Imagine that Theresa | :32:32. | :32:34. | |
May is an animal. So, in your minds, | :32:35. | :32:40. | |
what animal is coming to mind I've done a Pekinese because I think | :32:41. | :32:43. | |
she's all bark and no bite. Alpaca because she's | :32:44. | :32:57. | |
superior looking and woolly I don't think his policies | :32:58. | :33:04. | |
are for the modern, real world. A mouse because they are weak | :33:05. | :33:19. | |
and they can be easily bullied, but also they can catch | :33:20. | :33:23. | |
you by surprise if you're What do you take away | :33:24. | :33:25. | |
from what you saw then, and what message would you send back | :33:26. | :33:33. | |
to the Tories now? I think what came over is people see | :33:34. | :33:36. | |
Theresa May as a strong politician, not everyone likes her, | :33:37. | :33:39. | |
but you don't need to be liked to be elected, | :33:40. | :33:42. | |
because ultimately it's about who do you trust with your future | :33:43. | :33:44. | |
and your security. I think what I also take out | :33:45. | :33:46. | |
of that focus group, was it was a group of floating | :33:47. | :33:49. | |
voters, there was no huge appetite for the Lib Dems and there was no | :33:50. | :33:52. | |
huge appetite for Ukip. So my messaged back to CCHQ | :33:53. | :33:55. | |
would be stick to the plan. I thought the response | :33:56. | :33:58. | |
to the manifesto was excellent. It's clear that people aren't | :33:59. | :34:01. | |
particularly keen on Theresa May, There are some associations with her | :34:02. | :34:03. | |
about strength and stability, which is exactly what the Tory party | :34:04. | :34:08. | |
want of course, but they are not positive and nobody thinks | :34:09. | :34:12. | |
that she has a vision So, what I'd say the Jeremy Corbyn, | :34:13. | :34:13. | |
what I'd say to the Labour Party is, they need to really emphasise | :34:14. | :34:20. | |
the manifesto in Jeremy Corbyn himself has to perform | :34:21. | :34:22. | |
out of his skin and I think he has to reemphasise those | :34:23. | :34:28. | |
characteristics which may be have come to the fore may be | :34:29. | :34:31. | |
over the last 12 months, resilience, strength and the fact | :34:32. | :34:33. | |
that he's come this far, why not take that final step and go | :34:34. | :34:36. | |
into ten Downing Street? We're joined now by the American | :34:37. | :34:38. | |
political consultant For the sake of this discussion, | :34:39. | :34:46. | |
assume the polls at the moment are broadly right, is there any hope for | :34:47. | :34:53. | |
Mr Corbyn in the undecided voters? Know, and this is a very serious | :34:54. | :34:59. | |
collection with serious consequences to who wins. Nobody cares whether | :35:00. | :35:02. | |
you can draw and what animal they represent, they want to know where | :35:03. | :35:07. | |
they stand, and I felt that was frivolous. I come to Britain to | :35:08. | :35:11. | |
watch elections because I learned from here. Your elections are more | :35:12. | :35:16. | |
substantial, more serious, more policy and less about personality | :35:17. | :35:20. | |
and that peace was only about personality. That's partly because | :35:21. | :35:25. | |
Mrs May has decided to make this a presidential election. You can see | :35:26. | :35:35. | |
on the posters it is all Team May. I agree with that, and in her language | :35:36. | :35:42. | |
she says not everyone benefits from a Conservative government, I don't | :35:43. | :35:46. | |
see how using anything Republicans have used in the past. In fact her | :35:47. | :35:51. | |
campaign is more of a centrist Democrats but it is a smart strategy | :35:52. | :35:56. | |
because it pushes Corbyn further to the left. Of course you said Hillary | :35:57. | :36:01. | |
Clinton have won. On election night the polling was so bad in America, | :36:02. | :36:06. | |
the exit polls that were done, the BBC told America she had won. No, I | :36:07. | :36:12. | |
was anchoring the programme that night, I ignored your tweet. The BBC | :36:13. | :36:20. | |
had the same numbers. Yes, but we did not say she had won, I can | :36:21. | :36:24. | |
assure you of that. Because of people like you we thought she had | :36:25. | :36:30. | |
but we didn't broadcast it. That was a smart approach. My point is other | :36:31. | :36:37. | |
than teasing you, maybe there is hope for Jeremy Corbyn. I think you | :36:38. | :36:42. | |
will have one of the lowest turnout in modern history and I think Labour | :36:43. | :36:47. | |
will fall to one of the lowest percentages, not percentage of | :36:48. | :36:51. | |
number of seats they have had, and this will be a matter of | :36:52. | :36:55. | |
soul-searching for both political parties. What you do with a sizeable | :36:56. | :37:00. | |
majority, and she has a responsibility to tell the British | :37:01. | :37:03. | |
people exactly what happens as she moves forward. He and Labour will | :37:04. | :37:09. | |
have to take a look at whether they still represent a significant slice | :37:10. | :37:14. | |
of the British population. Do you see a realignment in British | :37:15. | :37:19. | |
politics taking place? I see a crumbling of the left and yet there | :37:20. | :37:23. | |
is still a significant percentage of the British population that once | :37:24. | :37:27. | |
someone who is centre-left. And they like a lot of Mr Corbyn's policies. | :37:28. | :37:36. | |
I'm listening to Michael foot. I went to school here in the 1980s and | :37:37. | :37:39. | |
I feel like I'm watching the Labour Party of 35 years ago, in a | :37:40. | :37:42. | |
population that wants to focus on the future, not the past. Thank you. | :37:43. | :37:48. | |
It's just gone 11.35, you're watching the Sunday Politics. | :37:49. | :37:50. | |
We say goodbye to viewers in Scotland, who leave us now | :37:51. | :37:53. | |
Coming up here in 20 minutes, the Week Ahead. | :37:54. | :38:03. | |
Coming up in the North West: Is the bubble about to burst | :38:04. | :38:08. | |
Ukip polled more than 5000 votes in both Blackpool seats two years | :38:09. | :38:19. | |
ago but is the party's purple patch now over? | :38:20. | :38:23. | |
Well, they might like to be beside the seaside, but this | :38:24. | :38:26. | |
week's guests are stuck in the studio with me. | :38:27. | :38:28. | |
Julie Cooper is the Labour candidate for Burnley, | :38:29. | :38:30. | |
Mark Menzies the Conservative contesting Fylde and John Bickley | :38:31. | :38:33. | |
is standing for Ukip in Eddisbury in Cheshire. | :38:34. | :38:38. | |
So, trusts in all of your patches - Blackpool, East Lancashire | :38:39. | :38:40. | |
and Cheshire and Wirral - were affected by this | :38:41. | :38:43. | |
Another NHS crisis that could have been prevented by better funding? | :38:44. | :38:51. | |
This is a crisis that has affected 150 countries around the world, some | :38:52. | :38:58. | |
of the biggest companies, FedEx, Nissan, this is the act of | :38:59. | :39:03. | |
terrorists and extortionists. The government setting up the national | :39:04. | :39:06. | |
cyber Security Centre anticipated attacks like this and put money into | :39:07. | :39:10. | |
it but what we need to do is ensure we cannot be complacent and we need | :39:11. | :39:13. | |
to be vigilant because there are people out there who want to disrupt | :39:14. | :39:17. | |
our way of life and we cannot allow that to happen. Would Labour have | :39:18. | :39:22. | |
prevented this? Labour would have taken the advice over 12 months ago. | :39:23. | :39:26. | |
The systems need upgrading desperately. We could have avoided | :39:27. | :39:30. | |
this chaos. It has put patients record and treatment at risk. What | :39:31. | :39:36. | |
is your take on this John Bickley? The NHS does not have enough money | :39:37. | :39:40. | |
because Labour gave it all away. I guarantee now there will be no | :39:41. | :39:43. | |
manager sacked over this. The managers in the public service, | :39:44. | :39:52. | |
particularly at -- the NHS, will not be sacked, they earn over ?100,000, | :39:53. | :39:59. | |
it's not good enough. Examples over and over again, this is the latest, | :40:00. | :40:03. | |
this is an incident that has been waiting to happen. We were told the | :40:04. | :40:07. | |
money for this was pulled by the government. I don't know where you | :40:08. | :40:11. | |
got that from because ?50 million has gone into protect the NHS. The | :40:12. | :40:16. | |
government has put in ?1.5 billion as part of this National cyber | :40:17. | :40:22. | |
Security strategy said Gutman has anticipated, acted on and we are | :40:23. | :40:26. | |
doing coming. We're not doing it to grab votes. -- so this and has | :40:27. | :40:31. | |
anticipated. It is sad that the Labour Party is trying to weaponised | :40:32. | :40:35. | |
the NHS to get votes. Is it not a shame that we are closing the gate | :40:36. | :40:41. | |
after the horse has bolted? Promise of money tomorrow for systems in the | :40:42. | :40:46. | |
NHS. If the system had been put in place 12 months ago when the advice | :40:47. | :40:48. | |
was given, this could have been avoided. ?50 million from the | :40:49. | :40:52. | |
government has gone in. Now, maths was never my strong | :40:53. | :40:54. | |
point, and both Labour and the Lib Dems reckon | :40:55. | :40:57. | |
the Conservative sums on school spending should have them standing | :40:58. | :40:59. | |
in the corner in a dunce's cap. Both parties say they'll find | :41:00. | :41:02. | |
billions more for education, which should please one local head, | :41:03. | :41:04. | |
who's written to parents for help I've only got enough | :41:05. | :41:07. | |
for packet of crisps. Grange Hill's notorious bully | :41:08. | :41:16. | |
Gripper Stebson was pretty direct It didn't end well for Gripper | :41:17. | :41:20. | |
and the head teacher at Sale High is hoping a more diplomatic approach | :41:21. | :41:29. | |
to asking parents for money Lynne Nichol said her school, | :41:30. | :41:32. | |
where more than foul in ten pupils receive free meals, | :41:33. | :41:38. | |
faces a big funding gap. It's about sharing with parents | :41:39. | :41:42. | |
and getting them engaged So, in my letter I'm not asking | :41:43. | :41:47. | |
directly for funding. What kind of things | :41:48. | :41:53. | |
could you contribute? Would you be able to offer | :41:54. | :41:56. | |
a financial contribution? Would you be able to offer us | :41:57. | :41:58. | |
support with your time? The National Audit Office says | :41:59. | :42:01. | |
the education budget will have a ?3 billion deficit | :42:02. | :42:03. | |
within three years and opposition parties are very keen to put | :42:04. | :42:06. | |
problems at schools at the centre Labour this week pledged an extra | :42:07. | :42:10. | |
?5 billion through education. Jeremy Corbyn said reversing | :42:11. | :42:16. | |
cuts to corporation tax The Liberal Democrats reckon | :42:17. | :42:18. | |
they can find an extra ?7 billion and will tell us where it's coming | :42:19. | :42:27. | |
from in due course. The Conservatives say school | :42:28. | :42:30. | |
funding is at record levels and will increase further as pupil | :42:31. | :42:32. | |
numbers rise over What Labour and the Liberal | :42:33. | :42:34. | |
Democrats are saying is really quite different from what the current | :42:35. | :42:38. | |
government policy is but, as ever, You either raise taxes, | :42:39. | :42:40. | |
Labour is talking about raising taxes significantly to pay | :42:41. | :42:44. | |
for better public services or you reduce spending on the public | :42:45. | :42:46. | |
service and you keep Back in the Sale, parents | :42:47. | :42:51. | |
so they understand why the head has You want the best education | :42:52. | :42:56. | |
for workloads and if they are asking for money then personally I don't | :42:57. | :43:00. | |
see anything wrong with it. Isn't a bit unusual to ask parents | :43:01. | :43:04. | |
to fund the school when we're I am disgusted by it really | :43:05. | :43:08. | |
because we do pay our taxes for that and I would expect schools | :43:09. | :43:16. | |
to be properly funded. But will promises to balance | :43:17. | :43:19. | |
the books in our schools I will come to you first, Mark, | :43:20. | :43:38. | |
thousands of teachers face the sack, in Cheshire they are talking about | :43:39. | :43:42. | |
going back to a four day week. What is being done about that? Due had a | :43:43. | :43:47. | |
situation under Labour where some schools were getting 50% more than | :43:48. | :43:51. | |
others but not under that familiar in the Northwest the majority of | :43:52. | :43:58. | |
schools will lose out stop yellow constituents will... In Cheshire, | :43:59. | :44:04. | |
West funded in the country. I'm sorry, schools in my constituency, | :44:05. | :44:09. | |
historically were underfunded, are getting more money. But we want more | :44:10. | :44:14. | |
still. We can only get that if you have a strong and stable economy. | :44:15. | :44:17. | |
The Labour Party donor how to run an economy said you can promise giving | :44:18. | :44:21. | |
a lot of money to schools but if your economy has crashed your debt | :44:22. | :44:23. | |
have money to spend -- be Labour have money to spend -- be Labour | :44:24. | :44:27. | |
Party don't know how to run an economy. I'm sure headteachers would | :44:28. | :44:34. | |
welcome the funding increase but it comes at the expense of a | :44:35. | :44:37. | |
corporation tax, which it shrink the economy, it isn't worth it, is it? | :44:38. | :44:42. | |
We had to invest in education and skills to make sure that every | :44:43. | :44:44. | |
citizen, every pupil coming out of citizen, every pupil coming out of | :44:45. | :44:47. | |
school is fully able to contribute to the economy. The vast majority of | :44:48. | :44:52. | |
schools in my constituency are going to lose funding to the tune of ?435 | :44:53. | :44:59. | |
per child. I ask a question, how is that going to help them contribute? | :45:00. | :45:03. | |
How will they come out of school fit to take up the employment | :45:04. | :45:05. | |
opportunities that we are all working hard to create for them? If | :45:06. | :45:11. | |
these improvements are going to be funded by corporation tax increases, | :45:12. | :45:14. | |
the Robin Hood tax being talked about today, an extra fee for | :45:15. | :45:19. | |
financial transactions in the city, if ultimately that causes companies | :45:20. | :45:21. | |
to leave the UK, in the end it doesn't help? We already have the | :45:22. | :45:28. | |
lowest corporation tax in the developed world. There is plenty of | :45:29. | :45:32. | |
scope for us to raise corporation tax that will have no impact on | :45:33. | :45:36. | |
business. We can raise it to a level that will bring millions into the | :45:37. | :45:41. | |
education system and still will not impact adversely on the economy. | :45:42. | :45:49. | |
Heritage is making it up, is she? I don't think she is making it up full | :45:50. | :45:53. | |
stop -- the headteacher is not making it up, is she? But we have | :45:54. | :45:59. | |
put in record sums of money in our government. Record sums of money, | :46:00. | :46:05. | |
the National funding from Europe, in the past there was no such thing. | :46:06. | :46:09. | |
The ridiculous situation -- the national funding formula. The | :46:10. | :46:13. | |
ridiculous situation in the past where it was unfair. I am happy for | :46:14. | :46:19. | |
the money coming up north from London. All you get from the Labour | :46:20. | :46:26. | |
increased taxes. In our manifesto, increased taxes. In our manifesto, | :46:27. | :46:30. | |
we will demonstrate that by leaving the EU and saving ?10 billion a year | :46:31. | :46:36. | |
by stop giving ?12 billion away in foreign aid, we can use that money, | :46:37. | :46:40. | |
charity begins at home. But that money has been promised for | :46:41. | :46:46. | |
everything, the NHS, education... Sample social care but somebody | :46:47. | :46:50. | |
education system. -- some for social care. We can stop the overcrowding | :46:51. | :46:58. | |
but we need to put priorities right and put British people first. Stop | :46:59. | :47:02. | |
throwing money away and is adapting the easy thing to do is put up | :47:03. | :47:06. | |
taxes, how about we stop trying to spend so much money? If I don't earn | :47:07. | :47:09. | |
enough money, I have to stop spending and... Putting British | :47:10. | :47:15. | |
people first on education, John Bickley says. But we have | :47:16. | :47:17. | |
commitments to help people are commitments to help people are | :47:18. | :47:20. | |
people in the world. Like North Korea? We don't give money to them. | :47:21. | :47:28. | |
This is all Ukip stuff. You can open their mouth and rubbish comes out. | :47:29. | :47:33. | |
It is a good job that when we are dealing with helping some of the | :47:34. | :47:35. | |
poorest people in the world, the victims of Syria, this government | :47:36. | :47:40. | |
has a proud record on that. When you talk about your policies for | :47:41. | :47:43. | |
education you want more grammar schools. Would that not take money | :47:44. | :47:48. | |
away from the contented school struggling? Not necessarily. It | :47:49. | :47:55. | |
would. When I grew up on every council estate there was a grammar | :47:56. | :47:58. | |
school. Those schools were there to help working class kids. Both of | :47:59. | :48:02. | |
your governments took the opportunity away from working class | :48:03. | :48:05. | |
kids. It used to be there for them and we want to get it back again so | :48:06. | :48:09. | |
on council states around this country there will be a grammar | :48:10. | :48:13. | |
school. So for every grammar school there will be five secondary moderns | :48:14. | :48:15. | |
and that's what you are advocating that is the mass of it. This is a | :48:16. | :48:23. | |
red herring. We need properly funded schools. Headteachers and teachers | :48:24. | :48:27. | |
are saying that we cannot do the job that we are trained to do. Our | :48:28. | :48:30. | |
children are suffering. We can't maximise their potential. The | :48:31. | :48:35. | |
business of the funding formula, there is nothing fair about a | :48:36. | :48:38. | |
funding formula that takes out of every child's School in my | :48:39. | :48:42. | |
constituency, one of the most deprived constituencies. But there | :48:43. | :48:51. | |
has been underfunding everywhere... But instead of a levelling down, I | :48:52. | :48:56. | |
don't want to take away from the education of any child. Should not | :48:57. | :49:02. | |
did the that if we are serious about growing our economy, it starts in | :49:03. | :49:05. | |
the schools, it starts in the nursery schools and primary schools | :49:06. | :49:07. | |
and through the secondary schools. Two years ago John Bickley's Ukip | :49:08. | :49:09. | |
contested more than 95% of seats But this time around they're | :49:10. | :49:12. | |
standing in less than half the 72 in our region, | :49:13. | :49:15. | |
including none in Liverpool. And in last week's local elections, | :49:16. | :49:17. | |
the party's share of the vote was less than half what it | :49:18. | :49:20. | |
polled in 2015. So where will those Ukip voters | :49:21. | :49:24. | |
put their cross on June the 8th? More people in Blackpool | :49:25. | :49:28. | |
voted Leave than anywhere else in the North West | :49:29. | :49:42. | |
- nearly 70%. The town, then, should be a snapshot | :49:43. | :49:44. | |
of perfect Ukip territory. Two years ago, one | :49:45. | :49:47. | |
of their candidates here, Are you seriously saying that Ukip | :49:48. | :49:49. | |
can win Blackpool South? Now the political outlook has | :49:50. | :49:54. | |
shifted and so has he. What's changed in | :49:55. | :49:59. | |
the last two years? I think when I was asked to stand | :50:00. | :50:01. | |
as a candidate this time I realised that it's not about me, | :50:02. | :50:04. | |
it's about the people of Blackpool The only way that change | :50:05. | :50:07. | |
is going to come about is by people voting Conservative, | :50:08. | :50:12. | |
as they have a real Peter's also worried about some | :50:13. | :50:14. | |
of the party's policies. Do you fear for Ukip | :50:15. | :50:19. | |
with the way things are going? I think they run the risk | :50:20. | :50:24. | |
of being wiped out in this election. The concern as well is I can't | :50:25. | :50:27. | |
describe some of the policies that It's almost going back | :50:28. | :50:30. | |
to Neanderthal times. But Ukippers preparing | :50:31. | :50:36. | |
their campaign in Blackpool are convinced that their balloon | :50:37. | :50:44. | |
hasn't been popped. Now that Brexit is happening, | :50:45. | :50:46. | |
there's not as much point to Ukip. Well, no, there's every point | :50:47. | :50:48. | |
to Ukip because the job The job is only half done | :50:49. | :50:51. | |
because we haven't actually left anything and we're still actually | :50:52. | :50:56. | |
paying ?350 million Have you got a realistic chance | :50:57. | :50:58. | |
inside of the seats to using? I wouldn't like to bet on it quite | :50:59. | :51:08. | |
frankly but nevertheless we'll have a good go and every vote | :51:09. | :51:11. | |
for Ukip is a message Blackpool has two seats, | :51:12. | :51:14. | |
on this side of the North Pier it's the Conservatives in charge | :51:15. | :51:23. | |
but if you head over here to the south, down | :51:24. | :51:25. | |
past the tower there, Ukip polled well in both | :51:26. | :51:28. | |
constituencies last time around with more than 5000 votes in each, | :51:29. | :51:31. | |
so what now happens to those voters will go a long way to deciding | :51:32. | :51:34. | |
the outcome in this town. You wouldn't consider Ukip, | :51:35. | :51:38. | |
even with a top that colour? Ukip if there was a proper option | :51:39. | :51:42. | |
but it's obvious they're not going to get in because everybody's | :51:43. | :51:44. | |
switching to the Conservatives. I think they've done | :51:45. | :51:47. | |
what they set out to do. Because I believe in Labour, | :51:48. | :51:57. | |
that's why, I think At the moment, the Ukip vote | :51:58. | :52:05. | |
is breaking three to one That could make a difference in some | :52:06. | :52:09. | |
of our key marginals, particularly in the Lancashire area | :52:10. | :52:13. | |
where, frankly, Ukip's vote transparent over | :52:14. | :52:15. | |
to the Conservatives puts Thank you so much | :52:16. | :52:17. | |
for supporting Ukip. Ukip does still have it supporters | :52:18. | :52:21. | |
but are there enough of them to keep the party relevant in this | :52:22. | :52:27. | |
changing political landscape? So, John Bickley, Neanderthal | :52:28. | :52:43. | |
policies, time gone, is that the reality? No, we want to deliver | :52:44. | :52:47. | |
Brexit, we want to put the country before the party and we recognise | :52:48. | :52:50. | |
that the Conservatives are likely to be the government on June eight. We | :52:51. | :52:54. | |
know the Tory government mugged the British people when they took them | :52:55. | :52:59. | |
into the EU under false fences. Theresa May is telling us she will | :53:00. | :53:03. | |
deliver Brexit. She will get a large mandate to do that. Many Ukip people | :53:04. | :53:09. | |
will support her. We hope some Ukip MPs will be in Parliament. Not why | :53:10. | :53:14. | |
not support you to be in government to put it through? We are living in | :53:15. | :53:17. | |
the real world. It is obvious that this moment in time the Tories will | :53:18. | :53:22. | |
get elected in June. They are telling the British people they will | :53:23. | :53:26. | |
deliver Brexit so what Mark could do to prove that, will you guarantee on | :53:27. | :53:31. | |
this show that we will get 100% control of our fishing back, 100% | :53:32. | :53:35. | |
control of our wars and punched percent control of immigration and | :53:36. | :53:42. | |
trade? Here is somebody who doesn't know how to negotiate. You don't go | :53:43. | :53:45. | |
into a beginning of a negotiation saying what you are going to get and | :53:46. | :53:48. | |
what you are not going to get. This is why you cannot trust Ukip. They | :53:49. | :53:53. | |
are a spent force, a one trick pony. What I have got in my part of the | :53:54. | :54:00. | |
world is decent people who voted for Ukip who realise they cannot vote | :54:01. | :54:04. | |
for Ukip again because what they want is a strong Prime Minister who | :54:05. | :54:07. | |
will deliver Brexit but they also looked at a Labour Party that is | :54:08. | :54:11. | |
committed to defence jobs being destroyed across Lancashire with a | :54:12. | :54:15. | |
ban on arms sales and Theresa May is the only person they can put their | :54:16. | :54:19. | |
vote into. Decent people are rejecting Ukip. Conservative vote is | :54:20. | :54:26. | |
going to the Tories but in Bury North, a tight marginal | :54:27. | :54:29. | |
constituency, you are actively telling people to vote Conservative | :54:30. | :54:32. | |
and you are not standing. When you ask the Tory party to confirm to the | :54:33. | :54:36. | |
British people that when we leave the EU we will get back control of | :54:37. | :54:39. | |
the sovereign item such as fishing, you avoid it. I have not avoided | :54:40. | :54:48. | |
of immigration back? You know fine of immigration back? You know fine | :54:49. | :54:56. | |
well we will. You know fine well... It is better than on the record, it | :54:57. | :55:03. | |
is on telly. You know the Conservative Party's position is to | :55:04. | :55:07. | |
get control of immigration and fishing. 100% control of immigration | :55:08. | :55:13. | |
and lawmaking? Ukip does not understand the art of negotiation. | :55:14. | :55:19. | |
That is why we need Theresa May. Let's bring julienne. You would hope | :55:20. | :55:25. | |
that the predicted demise of Ukip would lead to some of your former | :55:26. | :55:31. | |
supporters coming back but if they are due to vote for the | :55:32. | :55:33. | |
Conservatives this is a disaster for Labour isn't it? This is complex. | :55:34. | :55:39. | |
Where the original support of Ukip came from is a mixture. I | :55:40. | :55:40. | |
on doorsteps that some of the on doorsteps that some of the | :55:41. | :55:44. | |
support came from Labour voters, conversations I had yesterday where | :55:45. | :55:49. | |
people said I voted Ukip last time because I wanted to come out of the | :55:50. | :55:54. | |
EU. The job has been done, now I am going back to Labour. We have other | :55:55. | :55:57. | |
people who will go back to being Conservatives. People feel this is a | :55:58. | :56:04. | |
election on Brexit, as Theresa May wants to make it. People don't have | :56:05. | :56:07. | |
confidence that Jeremy Corbyn would confidence that Jeremy Corbyn would | :56:08. | :56:11. | |
definitely take us out of Europe. What I am finding is that people in | :56:12. | :56:15. | |
Burnley are saying, and I have not on hundreds of doorsteps, and people | :56:16. | :56:21. | |
are saying that Brexit is behind us and you supported our position, we | :56:22. | :56:28. | |
are out of it. Is it behind us now? The result was decisive, we accept | :56:29. | :56:31. | |
that. People across the country and that. People across the country and | :56:32. | :56:38. | |
especially in my constituency, it's important we get the right deal | :56:39. | :56:42. | |
going forward and you cannot trust the Tories. Can you trust the Tories | :56:43. | :56:49. | |
on the promise to reduce the immigration to tens of thousands. | :56:50. | :56:53. | |
supporters with this? No, because we supporters with this? No, because we | :56:54. | :56:57. | |
have decent Ukip people who are looking at Theresa May as a strong | :56:58. | :57:01. | |
Prime Minister who will stand up to the EU 27 and get a good deal for | :57:02. | :57:05. | |
Britain. We are told it could be bad for the economy, you felt to do it | :57:06. | :57:10. | |
after promising into macro elections. Wannabe huge differences | :57:11. | :57:15. | |
is after Brexit you can control your that is one of the fundamental | :57:16. | :57:18. | |
differences and Prime Minister Theresa May has been clear that we | :57:19. | :57:24. | |
will have control of borders and she will negotiate get a good deal and I | :57:25. | :57:27. | |
would ask you, who do you think will get a better deal for Britain, | :57:28. | :57:30. | |
Jeremy Corbyn or Theresa May? I think people out there, though the | :57:31. | :57:32. | |
answer to that question. Julie, as well as the leaked | :57:33. | :57:35. | |
manifesto, there were some more local issues for | :57:36. | :57:38. | |
the Labour Party this week. Steve Rotheram won't stand | :57:39. | :57:40. | |
again in Liverpool Walton after he was installed as mayor | :57:41. | :57:43. | |
for the Liverpool City Region, He said he wanted his | :57:44. | :57:46. | |
successor chosen locally. But the Mayor of the city | :57:47. | :57:51. | |
of Liverpool, Joe Anderson here, He was passed over for Dan Carden | :57:52. | :57:54. | |
an aide to the Unite Union's General Local members said they'd resign | :57:55. | :58:00. | |
and Joe Anderson responded by stating that "today | :58:01. | :58:05. | |
we are reminded that the Labour So, Julie, we know the public don't | :58:06. | :58:23. | |
like divided parties. Why parachute someone in like this? You will | :58:24. | :58:27. | |
understand that I have not been able to give a lot of time to worrying | :58:28. | :58:31. | |
about the selection of candidates in Liverpool. I have been busy running | :58:32. | :58:34. | |
my own election campaign. What I would say is that as we go into this | :58:35. | :58:38. | |
general election, as we left rest minster ready to fight for a Labour | :58:39. | :58:44. | |
government, we could not have been more united. -- as we left | :58:45. | :58:53. | |
Westminster. People from all corners of the party visit my constituency | :58:54. | :58:57. | |
to help pull the campaign and that is because... I had Jeremy Corbyn in | :58:58. | :59:12. | |
my constituency supporting me. You are one of the only few who does. | :59:13. | :59:17. | |
Labour Party was not united. Hundreds 70 of your colleagues did | :59:18. | :59:23. | |
not want Jeremy Corbyn made them. -- 170 of York colleagues did not want | :59:24. | :59:30. | |
Jeremy Corbyn near them. Aaron Banks saying he is a dead man walking | :59:31. | :59:35. | |
ahead of this election. He is not the party's biggest donor, he has | :59:36. | :59:39. | |
not given us any money of any substance for a long time now. Paul | :59:40. | :59:42. | |
Nuttall said he wanted to target Labour voters in the Northwest. | :59:43. | :59:45. | |
We're this election has changed everything. Let's be truthful. On | :59:46. | :59:53. | |
June eight we are going to get a Tory government with a large wedge | :59:54. | :59:57. | |
oratory. In some respects we are not happy about that, we would like more | :59:58. | :00:05. | |
Ukip MPs -- with a large majority. Quick word on the reality, are you | :00:06. | :00:09. | |
getting cocky in the Conservative Party? Theresa May bringing up fox | :00:10. | :00:16. | |
hunting, unnecessary and divisive. We are not getting cocky, which is | :00:17. | :00:20. | |
why we are going to areas that have never voted Conservative in a | :00:21. | :00:24. | |
generation. We are taking every vote that is out there to be won. We are | :00:25. | :00:27. | |
speaking to every electorate as an individual. We are not going to | :00:28. | :00:31. | |
unite and asking, who do we want as candidate. We're not going to Len | :00:32. | :00:35. | |
McCluskey to write a manifesto for us. These are the priorities of the | :00:36. | :00:42. | |
real Conservative Party, that's what we can expect is Theresa May | :00:43. | :00:43. | |
increases her mandate. Thanks to Julie Cooper, | :00:44. | :00:45. | |
Mark Menzies and John Bickley. Graham Brady and Lucy Powell will be | :00:46. | :00:48. | |
among next week's guests. And we'll have candidates | :00:49. | :00:51. | |
from the Liberal Democrats, Greens and other parties over | :00:52. | :00:53. | |
the next few weeks as well. Tories are saying. It is a very | :00:54. | :00:57. | |
emotive subject and we have run out of time. | :00:58. | :01:04. | |
On Thursday nominations closed in the 650 parliamentary | :01:05. | :01:09. | |
seats across the country, so now we know exactly who's | :01:10. | :01:11. | |
We've been analysing the parties' candidates to find out | :01:12. | :01:18. | |
what they might tell us about the make-up of the House | :01:19. | :01:21. | |
Well, we know Theresa May is committed to delivering Brexit and | :01:22. | :01:25. | |
analysis of Conservative candidates has shown that | :01:26. | :01:30. | |
in their top 100 target seats, 37 candidates supported leave | :01:31. | :01:33. | |
during last year's referendum campaign | :01:34. | :01:41. | |
and 20 supported remain; 43 have not made public | :01:42. | :01:43. | |
In the last parliament, the vast majority of Labour MPs | :01:44. | :01:49. | |
were hostile to Jeremy Corbyn so how supportive are Labour | :01:50. | :01:51. | |
Well, of 50 of Labour's top 100 target seats | :01:52. | :01:58. | |
17 candidates have expressed support for Mr Corbyn. | :01:59. | :02:00. | |
20 candidates supported Owen Smith in last year's leadership contest | :02:01. | :02:05. | |
or have expressed anti-Corbyn sentiment, and | :02:06. | :02:09. | |
If they won those, the Labour benches would be | :02:10. | :02:15. | |
marginally more sympathetic to Mr Corbyn than they are now. | :02:16. | :02:17. | |
What do the figures tell us about where the other | :02:18. | :02:19. | |
Well, the Lib Dems have decided not to stand against the Greens | :02:20. | :02:23. | |
in Brighton Pavilion, and are fielding 629 | :02:24. | :02:25. | |
candidates this year - that's two fewer than 2015. | :02:26. | :02:28. | |
The number of Ukip candidates has fallen dramatically. | :02:29. | :02:32. | |
They are standing in 247 fewer constituencies than 2015, | :02:33. | :02:38. | |
throwing their support behind solidly pro-Brexit Tories | :02:39. | :02:40. | |
in some areas such as Lewes and Norfolk North. | :02:41. | :02:44. | |
The Greens are fielding 103 fewer candidates | :02:45. | :02:48. | |
than at the last election, standing down to help | :02:49. | :02:59. | |
other progressive candidates in some places. | :03:00. | :03:05. | |
The most liking statistic is the demise in Ukip candidates, is this | :03:06. | :03:18. | |
their swansong? And I think so. It is remarkable how few Ukip | :03:19. | :03:24. | |
candidates are standing. It is hard to see they will suddenly revive in | :03:25. | :03:28. | |
the next couple of years. I think this is probably the end. Frank | :03:29. | :03:38. | |
Luntz mentioned the fragmentation of the left was a feature of this | :03:39. | :03:42. | |
election, but also there is the consolidation of the right, and if | :03:43. | :03:45. | |
you take the things together that could explain why the polls are | :03:46. | :03:50. | |
where they are. Absolutely, that's precisely what happened at the start | :03:51. | :03:55. | |
of the 1980s, the right was incredibly united and that's when we | :03:56. | :04:00. | |
started talking about majorities of over 100 or so. No matter what the | :04:01. | :04:07. | |
size of Theresa May's majority, it will be the total collapse of Ukip, | :04:08. | :04:11. | |
but not just because we are now leaving the EU and that was their | :04:12. | :04:17. | |
only reason for being, but a whole lot of people voted for Ukip because | :04:18. | :04:21. | |
they felt the Tories were no longer listening. Theresa May has given the | :04:22. | :04:29. | |
impression that she is listening, and that is the biggest possible | :04:30. | :04:32. | |
thing that could happen to the Tory vote. Fragmentation of the left, | :04:33. | :04:40. | |
consolidation of the right? It's one of the lessons that is never learnt, | :04:41. | :04:47. | |
it happened in the 1980s, it doesn't take much for the whole thing to | :04:48. | :04:51. | |
fracture so now you have on the centre-left the SNP, the Labour | :04:52. | :04:57. | |
Party, the Greens, the Liberal Democrats all competing for the same | :04:58. | :05:02. | |
votes and when you have, fleetingly perhaps, large numbers coalescing on | :05:03. | :05:06. | |
the right in one party, there is only going to be one outcome. It | :05:07. | :05:12. | |
happens regularly. It doesn't mean the Tories haven't got their own | :05:13. | :05:17. | |
fragility. Two years ago, David Cameron and George Osborne the | :05:18. | :05:21. | |
dominant figures, neither are in Parliament now which is a symptom of | :05:22. | :05:25. | |
the fragility this election is disguising. Mrs May's position in a | :05:26. | :05:31. | |
way reminds me of Mrs Thatcher in the 1980s, I won't be outflanked on | :05:32. | :05:36. | |
the right, Nicolas Sarkozy in France, I won't be outflanked on the | :05:37. | :05:40. | |
right, so the National Front didn't get through either timed he ran to | :05:41. | :05:43. | |
the second round on like this time, and now Mrs May on Brexit won't be | :05:44. | :05:50. | |
outflanked Iver and as a result has seen off right flank. And also she | :05:51. | :05:54. | |
is looking to the left as well with some of the state interventions. | :05:55. | :05:58. | |
What was interesting about the analysis you showed a few minutes | :05:59. | :06:01. | |
ago was the number of Tory candidates who have apparently not | :06:02. | :06:06. | |
declared which way they voted in the referendum, and you would have | :06:07. | :06:10. | |
thought if this election was all about Brexit, as some would claim, | :06:11. | :06:14. | |
that would become an unsustainable position, and actually more it's | :06:15. | :06:19. | |
about leadership. But the point that I'm now hearing from a number of | :06:20. | :06:24. | |
Labour candidates that they are seeing Tory leaflets that don't even | :06:25. | :06:30. | |
have the Tory candidate's name on them, it is just about Theresa May. | :06:31. | :06:35. | |
I am glad they are keeping to the law because by law they have to put | :06:36. | :06:40. | |
it on. It has been harder for some of the smaller parties too because | :06:41. | :06:46. | |
of the speed of the election being called. We have the manifesto is | :06:47. | :06:52. | |
coming out this week. I think Labour Forshaw on Tuesday, we are not yet | :06:53. | :06:56. | |
sure when the Tories will bring bears out. I suggest one thing, it | :06:57. | :07:00. | |
will at least for people like me bring an end to the question you | :07:01. | :07:08. | |
will have to wait for the manifesto. And Rebecca Long baby will never | :07:09. | :07:11. | |
have that excuse again, isn't it wonderful! She is not the only one. | :07:12. | :07:21. | |
When you are trying to take the north and Midlands from Labour, I | :07:22. | :07:27. | |
would go to one or the other. For me, I can barely hold back my | :07:28. | :07:32. | |
excitement over the Tory manifesto. This will be, I think, the most | :07:33. | :07:35. | |
important day for the British government for the next five years. | :07:36. | :07:44. | |
That wasn't irony there? You actually meant that? I'm not even | :07:45. | :07:49. | |
being cynical at all on Sunday Politics! This is a huge day and | :07:50. | :07:56. | |
it's because I think we will see... I don't think Mrs May will play it | :07:57. | :08:01. | |
safe and I don't think we will get the broadbrush stuff that she might | :08:02. | :08:06. | |
be advised to do. I think she will lay out precisely what you want to | :08:07. | :08:10. | |
do over the next five years and take some big risks. Then finally after a | :08:11. | :08:15. | |
year of this guessing and theorising, we will finally work out | :08:16. | :08:19. | |
what Mrs May is all about. She will say she doesn't want the next | :08:20. | :08:22. | |
parliament to be all about Brexit, though she knows that's the next | :08:23. | :08:26. | |
important thing she has to deliver in some way, so she gets a mandate | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
for that if the polls are right but she | :08:31. | :08:41. | |
does have very different ideas from Mr Cameron about how to run a | :08:42. | :08:46. | |
country. She will I assume one to mandate for what these different | :08:47. | :08:47. | |
ideas are. Otherwise there is no point in holding an early election. | :08:48. | :08:50. | |
You will get a majority, but if you get a mandate to carry on | :08:51. | :08:54. | |
implementing the Cameron and Osborne manifesto it would be utterly | :08:55. | :08:57. | |
pointless. I agree, it is the pivotal event of the election and it | :08:58. | :09:00. | |
will be interesting to see the degree to which she expands on the | :09:01. | :09:04. | |
line which interests me about its time to look at the good that | :09:05. | :09:09. | |
government can do. Because in a way this moves the debate on in UK | :09:10. | :09:16. | |
politics from, from 97 the Blair Brown governments were insecure | :09:17. | :09:19. | |
about arguing about the role of government. Cameron Osborne | :09:20. | :09:24. | |
government similarly so, so here you have a Labour Party talking about | :09:25. | :09:28. | |
the role of government and the state, and Tory leader apparently | :09:29. | :09:32. | |
doing so was well. I think that will be really interesting to see whether | :09:33. | :09:36. | |
it is fleshed out in any significant way. And it is not a natural Tory | :09:37. | :09:41. | |
message. Harold Macmillan talked about the role of the state, Ted | :09:42. | :09:49. | |
Heath Mark two was pretty big on the state, the industrial policy and so | :09:50. | :09:54. | |
on, and even if it is not thought to be that Tory, does she get away with | :09:55. | :09:58. | |
it because she deliver such a big victory if that's what she does | :09:59. | :10:03. | |
deliver? Just inject a little note of scepticism, I wonder how much of | :10:04. | :10:09. | |
this is authentically Theresa May. I was interested to and talk to | :10:10. | :10:17. | |
someone who used to sit in cabinet meetings during which Theresa May | :10:18. | :10:20. | |
never expressed an opinion on anything outside the Home Office | :10:21. | :10:23. | |
briefs. Other ministers were roving all over their colleagues' briefs. | :10:24. | :10:32. | |
So where are the ideas coming from? I think we can point to Nick | :10:33. | :10:39. | |
Timothy. One of her closest advisers in Downing Street. It will be | :10:40. | :10:44. | |
interesting to see how that evolves. On Thursday I think we will all be | :10:45. | :10:50. | |
talking about something called Urdington Toryism. Urdington is the | :10:51. | :11:00. | |
suburb of Birmingham where Nick Timothy comes from, who is very much | :11:01. | :11:05. | |
Theresa May's policy brain and leading inspiration. Urdington | :11:06. | :11:10. | |
Toryism is about connecting the party with traditional working class | :11:11. | :11:15. | |
voters, and their belief to do that is not just taking away government | :11:16. | :11:19. | |
out of their lives but showing them that government can actually help | :11:20. | :11:23. | |
their lives. It can be a force for good to rebuild the trust. A lot of | :11:24. | :11:35. | |
what Mrs May talks about is all... It is talk and then a lot of it | :11:36. | :11:39. | |
suddenly goes by the wayside. What happened to worker directors on the | :11:40. | :11:48. | |
boards. It is designed to appeal to that constituency and then nothing | :11:49. | :11:52. | |
happens. She had an excuse before in the sense that it wasn't in the 2015 | :11:53. | :11:57. | |
manifesto and she had a small majority so therefore she arguably | :11:58. | :12:00. | |
had to water down some of the stuff for example in her Tory conference | :12:01. | :12:06. | |
speech, which had a lot of this active government material in it. If | :12:07. | :12:10. | |
she puts it in the manifesto, it is a sign she plans to do it and will | :12:11. | :12:15. | |
have no excuse if she then gets nervous afterwards because it will | :12:16. | :12:19. | |
be in there. If it wasn't for Brexit, this great overwhelming | :12:20. | :12:24. | |
issue, I think this election will be seen as quite a significant | :12:25. | :12:27. | |
development in terms of an argument around the role of government, | :12:28. | :12:32. | |
much-needed. But Brexit unfortunately overshadows it all. As | :12:33. | :12:37. | |
much as we like our arguments over the role of government we will hear | :12:38. | :12:41. | |
strong and stable, stable and strong ad nauseam, aren't we? Absolutely, | :12:42. | :12:49. | |
and we heard the same old lines from the Labour Party as well so they are | :12:50. | :12:55. | |
all at it. It will be a fascinating week, stop talking it down! Thanks | :12:56. | :12:58. | |
to our panel. The Daily Politics will be | :12:59. | :13:01. | |
back on BBC Two at noon I'll be back here at the same time | :13:02. | :13:03. | |
on BBC One next Sunday. Remember - if it's Sunday, | :13:04. | :13:08. | |
it's the Sunday Politics. When it came to my TV habits, | :13:09. | :13:42. | |
I'd watch anything... But now I can sign in online | :13:43. | :13:45. | |
and get more of what I love. I'm kept up to date | :13:46. | :13:49. | |
with the shows I love and I get suggestions | :13:50. | :13:52. | |
on subjects I'll like. A new personalised BBC | :13:53. | :13:55. | |
is on its way. To tailor the benefits to you, | :13:56. | :14:08. | |
sign in and introduce yourself. | :14:09. | :14:12. |