Browse content similar to 22/05/2016. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Leave campaigners say Turkey is on course to join | :00:37. | :00:43. | |
the European Union and, if we remain in the EU, | :00:44. | :00:46. | |
that will mean more criminals here and greater pressure | :00:47. | :00:48. | |
The Prime Minister says it's nonsense. | :00:49. | :00:51. | |
We'll have the latest on this developing row. | :00:52. | :00:55. | |
This woman claims to be the voice of business - | :00:56. | :00:57. | |
and that most businesses in the UK want to remain in the EU. | :00:58. | :01:01. | |
But is the business case that clear cut? | :01:02. | :01:03. | |
We speak to the Director General of the CBI. | :01:04. | :01:07. | |
When it comes to gauging public opinion on the referendum, | :01:08. | :01:10. | |
which is better: telephone polls or online polls? | :01:11. | :01:12. | |
Even the pollsters are having trouble answering that one. | :01:13. | :01:16. | |
And I tell you what, if I don't know, | :01:17. | :01:20. | |
having done all this opinion polling for lark for 21 years, | :01:21. | :01:23. | |
As the battle lines are drawn around opposition, | :01:24. | :01:26. | |
more Stormont manoeuvrings this week over the Justice Ministry. | :01:27. | :01:29. | |
which school principals say they now face. | :01:30. | :01:35. | |
wrath citizens are eligible to vote in the EU referendum. Which way did | :01:36. | :01:38. | |
they tilt? And with me - as always - | :01:39. | :01:42. | |
a political panel of the best and the brightest in the business, | :01:43. | :01:45. | |
hopefully they do know which way to jump: Tom Newton Dunn, | :01:46. | :01:48. | |
Isabel Oakeshott and Janan Ganesh who'll be tweeting | :01:49. | :01:50. | |
throughout the programme. Turkey has taken centre-stage | :01:51. | :01:54. | |
in the referendum debate today. Vote Leave are launching | :01:55. | :01:56. | |
a new poster campaign warning that Turkey is on course to join the EU, | :01:57. | :01:58. | |
leaving the UK vulnerable to criminals, mass migration and | :01:59. | :02:02. | |
more pressure on public services. The Prime Minister was asked | :02:03. | :02:07. | |
about the claims on the Robert Peston programme on | :02:08. | :02:09. | |
ITV. Every country has a veto, | :02:10. | :02:12. | |
and let's be clear, as Boris himself said, Turkey | :02:13. | :02:16. | |
joining the EU is not remotely on the cards. At the current rate of | :02:17. | :02:21. | |
progress, this would be decades, literally decades, | :02:22. | :02:24. | |
before this even had a prospect of happening, and even at that stage, | :02:25. | :02:26. | |
we would be able to say no. Well, that was David | :02:27. | :02:31. | |
Cameron this morning. But here's what he had to say | :02:32. | :02:34. | |
in a speech in Istanbul in 2010. But here's what he had to say | :02:35. | :02:45. | |
in a speech in Ankara in 2010. It makes me angry that your progress | :02:46. | :02:54. | |
towards EU membership can be frustrated. My view is clear. I | :02:55. | :02:59. | |
believe it is wrong to say that Turkey can guard the camp, but not | :03:00. | :03:04. | |
be allowed to sit in the tent. So why will remain your strongest | :03:05. | :03:09. | |
possible advocate for EU membership and for greater influence at the top | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
table of European diplomacy. The Prime Minister six years ago after | :03:16. | :03:16. | |
becoming Prime Minister. Is it a proper issue for this | :03:17. | :03:25. | |
referendum or is it a red herring? It is an issue and quite frankly, | :03:26. | :03:30. | |
the Leave campaign will be delighted that we are now talking about | :03:31. | :03:34. | |
Turkey, because every time you talk about Turkey, you conjure up the | :03:35. | :03:39. | |
image of more migration, uncontrolled immigration from a | :03:40. | :03:42. | |
poorer countries so it is a Leave win. I am not sure that the Prime | :03:43. | :03:53. | |
Minister is right to engage in this one. But he has been called about | :03:54. | :03:57. | |
this from someone whose judgment he also calls into question. But is a | :03:58. | :04:05. | |
strange thing, his own Armed Forces Minister. The Prime Minister is | :04:06. | :04:10. | |
right to say we have a veto, every EU member has a veto in new members, | :04:11. | :04:14. | |
but if the Prime Minister is in favour of Turkey joining, which is | :04:15. | :04:20. | |
said he was in Ankara, then the veto does not matter? Absolutely. What a | :04:21. | :04:24. | |
great clip that was the Prime Minister in 2010, when he set out | :04:25. | :04:29. | |
Ray clearly what his position is. He supports Turkey joining the EU in | :04:30. | :04:37. | |
whatever time frame that may be. It does not do for the Prime Minister | :04:38. | :04:40. | |
to say we have a veto. The question is, will you use that veto? If he is | :04:41. | :04:44. | |
saying we would use our veto against Turkey, that is big news and can we | :04:45. | :04:50. | |
hear it? It would be a big U-turn. It could be moot, couldn't it? There | :04:51. | :04:57. | |
is no prospect of Turkey joining in the future, is there? The telling | :04:58. | :05:01. | |
thing about this conversation as we are focusing on our veto and the | :05:02. | :05:06. | |
veto possessed by all existing EU members and not focusing on Turkey | :05:07. | :05:10. | |
itself. Is that country as keen on joining as was a decade ago? The | :05:11. | :05:16. | |
change and internal politics in Turkey suggests they are less keen | :05:17. | :05:20. | |
on membership or less keen on doing the things necessary to successfully | :05:21. | :05:25. | |
apply for EU mentorship than they were a while ago. I think for | :05:26. | :05:29. | |
reasons on the Turkish side and on the European side, it will not | :05:30. | :05:33. | |
happen until I am a very old man. But it is entirely legitimate for | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
Leave to play up this issue and every day we talk about migration is | :05:38. | :05:40. | |
a day we're not spending talking about the economy and I think that | :05:41. | :05:45. | |
is their only route to victory four weeks' time. There are plenty of | :05:46. | :05:50. | |
forces in Germany and France, two countries about to have elections | :05:51. | :05:56. | |
next year, who are not going to agree to Turkey joining any time | :05:57. | :06:01. | |
soon. And if you were to be fair to the prime and Vista, you would say | :06:02. | :06:04. | |
he made that speech in 2010 in Ankara, me and a whole load of | :06:05. | :06:08. | |
political hacks were in the room when he said it... Were you there? I | :06:09. | :06:15. | |
was there. At one stage he says he was passionate about Turkish | :06:16. | :06:21. | |
president. He was very keen to suck up to President Erdogan at the time | :06:22. | :06:27. | |
because he wanted more trade. That was pre-migration crisis. That has | :06:28. | :06:34. | |
changed everything not just in British politics but for Angela | :06:35. | :06:38. | |
Merkel and Francois Hollande. It may be acceptable for the Prime Minister | :06:39. | :06:45. | |
to do a 180 degrees U-turn on this issue. We will see as the day | :06:46. | :06:48. | |
develops. So, the head of the NHS in England, | :06:49. | :06:50. | |
Simon Stevens, says the health service would be worse off | :06:51. | :06:53. | |
if we decide to leave the EU. Two of his predecessors have also | :06:54. | :06:56. | |
written a joint article in the Sunday Times | :06:57. | :06:59. | |
saying that they think, for the NHS at least, | :07:00. | :07:01. | |
staying in the EU is Mr Stevens was on the Andrew | :07:02. | :07:03. | |
Marr Show this morning. When Mark Carney says that the risk | :07:04. | :07:06. | |
of a slowdown in economic growth, possibly a recession, | :07:07. | :07:11. | |
if we end up exiting the EU, if Mark Carney is right, | :07:12. | :07:15. | |
then that is a severe concern for the National Health Service, | :07:16. | :07:19. | |
because it would be very dangerous if at precisely the moment the NHS | :07:20. | :07:23. | |
is going to need extra funding, actually the economy goes | :07:24. | :07:28. | |
into a tailspin and that funding Leave campaigners, unsurprisingly, | :07:29. | :07:30. | |
take a different view - they argue that remaining in the EU | :07:31. | :07:36. | |
will place further strain on the NHS due to continued free movement | :07:37. | :07:39. | |
of people and the accession What is the relationship | :07:40. | :07:42. | |
between our membership The Department of Health estimates | :07:43. | :07:55. | |
that the cost to the NHS in England from visitors and non-permanent | :07:56. | :08:00. | |
residents who come from the European economic area, | :08:01. | :08:02. | |
that is the EU plus Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway, | :08:03. | :08:04. | |
is around ?340 million a year. To put that in context, | :08:05. | :08:08. | |
the total annual expenditure in England's NHS was | :08:09. | :08:10. | |
?113 billion in 2014-15. There are around 3 million people | :08:11. | :08:15. | |
from other EU countries resident in the UK and all are entitled | :08:16. | :08:18. | |
to use NHS services. All those would be entitled to stay | :08:19. | :08:24. | |
in the UK, even if we were to leave the EU, due to the rights under | :08:25. | :08:30. | |
the Vienna Convention. In 2015, around 257,000 EU | :08:31. | :08:33. | |
nationals migrated to the UK. But whether that number would come | :08:34. | :08:39. | |
down if we vote to leave depends on the deal the UK strikes | :08:40. | :08:42. | |
with the EU following an exit. NHS England says the total number | :08:43. | :08:46. | |
of staff coming from EU countries was just over 53,000, | :08:47. | :08:52. | |
or 4.6% of the total NHS workforce. A total of 9% of NHS England's | :08:53. | :08:58. | |
hospital doctors, 6% of its nurses and health visitors, | :08:59. | :09:02. | |
come from other EU countries, however, all would be entitled | :09:03. | :09:07. | |
to stay in the event of a vote to leave, and without knowing | :09:08. | :09:11. | |
what any future deal might be, it is impossible to know | :09:12. | :09:13. | |
if there would be any impact A one-time pro-European | :09:14. | :09:16. | |
Foreign Secretary, he is now campaigning for the UK to leave | :09:17. | :09:23. | |
the European Union. Good morning, David Owen. Let me | :09:24. | :09:35. | |
come straight to the remarks by the man currently running the NHS in | :09:36. | :09:39. | |
England, Simon Stevens. He said it would be better for the NHS if we | :09:40. | :09:44. | |
remain in the EU. What is your response? Let's be quite clear. | :09:45. | :09:50. | |
Simon Stevens is the manager of the NHS, which is currently ?3 billion | :09:51. | :09:55. | |
in debt. This man has presided now for a sufficient time to judge his | :09:56. | :10:01. | |
management skills. In almost every part of the National Health Service, | :10:02. | :10:06. | |
there is an acute crisis. He spent ten years in America, with an | :10:07. | :10:10. | |
American health care company, effectively arguing for the TTIP, | :10:11. | :10:21. | |
this treaty between America and the European Union, which could be | :10:22. | :10:30. | |
introduced, and an assessment makes it very clear that TTIP will be very | :10:31. | :10:36. | |
damaging to the National Health Service, if it is drafted in the way | :10:37. | :10:43. | |
that it is. Simon Stevens should stick to his Lee which is to manage | :10:44. | :10:48. | |
the health service more effectively. He is an individual, he has a view | :10:49. | :10:53. | |
on the European Union which is fine, but his basic job is to look after | :10:54. | :10:57. | |
the NHS, and at the moment he is making a very considerable mess of. | :10:58. | :11:05. | |
It is not just Simon Stevens, two of his predecessors say staying in the | :11:06. | :11:12. | |
EU is the preferable option. Identifying, if there is any danger | :11:13. | :11:18. | |
to the NHS, it is in staying in, with all the elements of the NHS | :11:19. | :11:23. | |
which are now involved with the EU. -- I don't think. For the first 20 | :11:24. | :11:28. | |
years of our membership, with the common market, we had no involvement | :11:29. | :11:33. | |
with the NHS at all. Now the NHS procurement policy, the NHS | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
competition policy is all impact in, because we have started to Mark ties | :11:39. | :11:43. | |
the NHS in 2002 under Labour. It continued under the coalition with | :11:44. | :11:48. | |
the Liberal Democrats of this present Conservative government, and | :11:49. | :11:50. | |
it has continued under this Conservative government. If you | :11:51. | :11:56. | |
treat health like water or electricity or gas, as a utility, | :11:57. | :12:01. | |
and you treat them all as customers, then you will be under market | :12:02. | :12:05. | |
pressures, and the problem with the NHS is we lost what it was, it | :12:06. | :12:12. | |
fortunately still is in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, but | :12:13. | :12:17. | |
in England it is a marker ties to health service modelling itself on | :12:18. | :12:20. | |
the United States of America. If you wanted to make changes, you would be | :12:21. | :12:25. | |
wiser to stick to Germany or France, not go the United States model. Let | :12:26. | :12:30. | |
me put a point to you. Michael Gove, part of the Leave campaign, he says | :12:31. | :12:34. | |
the NHS could be overwhelmed by continued migration if we stay in | :12:35. | :12:40. | |
the EU. He predicts an extra 5 million plus by 2030. These | :12:41. | :12:47. | |
predictions suggest that Turkey, Macedonia and Albania all join the | :12:48. | :12:53. | |
EU by 2020. That is not on the cards, is it? Let's be clear about | :12:54. | :12:58. | |
your programme so far and analyse what has been said already. It is | :12:59. | :13:04. | |
not the Prime Minister what he said in Istanbul, the Prime Minister nine | :13:05. | :13:08. | |
weeks ago signed up to the European Council meeting on the 18th of | :13:09. | :13:18. | |
March, and he said, to re-energise the accession process for Turkey to | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
join the EU, and to make preparatory work for the opening of other | :13:25. | :13:30. | |
chapters will continue at an accelerating pace. This is a Prime | :13:31. | :13:33. | |
Minister who is getting used to saying one thing one time, another | :13:34. | :13:39. | |
thing another. Nine weeks ago, we were committed to increasing the | :13:40. | :13:44. | |
speed of entry for Turkey into the European Union. I am passionate | :13:45. | :13:49. | |
about keeping Turkey inside Nato, and with one foot in the EU and with | :13:50. | :13:54. | |
one foot in the Middle East. Why? Because Turkey is essentially | :13:55. | :14:00. | |
important country, as a member of Nato in dealing with Isil, Syria, | :14:01. | :14:04. | |
Iraq and many other problems around the world. But you will not make it | :14:05. | :14:09. | |
by bringing them prematurely into the European Union. What we should | :14:10. | :14:13. | |
be doing is encouraging them to come into the single market which has | :14:14. | :14:18. | |
non-EU countries associated, but without this issue of freedom of | :14:19. | :14:30. | |
movement of Labour. You are Foreign Secretary... Let me ask this | :14:31. | :14:35. | |
question. You must surely know, that Turkey's chances of joining the EU | :14:36. | :14:40. | |
in the foreseeable future are remote. Isn't that the reality? No, | :14:41. | :14:45. | |
I think what was said by your commentator earlier in the | :14:46. | :14:50. | |
programmers that has been a change of foreign policy. If the Prime | :14:51. | :14:53. | |
Minister commits nine weeks ago to speeding up Turkey's membership, and | :14:54. | :14:59. | |
then does not deliver on it, what will be the consequences? Turkey | :15:00. | :15:02. | |
will feel they have been lied to or rejected by the Europeans and they | :15:03. | :15:07. | |
will, in my view, come out of Nato with very profound consequences. At | :15:08. | :15:12. | |
the moment, let's treat Turkey with respect, let's try and ensure they | :15:13. | :15:16. | |
make the necessary changes on human rights and in many other areas. | :15:17. | :15:20. | |
There are a lot of worrying aspects about Turkish policy, but mention | :15:21. | :15:25. | |
above the European Union in my view is not the issue. It is how to make | :15:26. | :15:32. | |
them more committed to Europe. Don't avoid this question. If we are in | :15:33. | :15:37. | |
the European Union, we are committed to freedom of movement of Labour in | :15:38. | :15:42. | |
every aspect of EU membership. That is a problem. David Owen, thank you, | :15:43. | :15:44. | |
we will have to leave it there. The Confederation Of British | :15:45. | :15:48. | |
Industry calls itself the "voice of business", | :15:49. | :15:50. | |
claiming to speak on behalf of 190,000 businesses, | :15:51. | :15:52. | |
employing up to 7 million people. And according to the CBI, | :15:53. | :15:55. | |
British businesses overwhelmingly back the idea of remaining | :15:56. | :15:57. | |
in the EU. What's more, they've been | :15:58. | :16:00. | |
encouraging their members to talk to staff about the referendum | :16:01. | :16:04. | |
to give them "the choice to hear what impact a Brexit | :16:05. | :16:08. | |
would have on company growth, their jobs and their | :16:09. | :16:10. | |
local community". As you can imagine, Leave | :16:11. | :16:11. | |
campaigners are not amused. The chair of the Vote Leave business | :16:12. | :16:19. | |
council, John Longworth, a former director-general | :16:20. | :16:21. | |
of the British Chambers Of Commerce, said the call was an | :16:22. | :16:23. | |
"anti-democratic abuse of power He added: "It's highly regrettable | :16:24. | :16:26. | |
to see big corporate bosses plotting to gang up on their staff, | :16:27. | :16:32. | |
and lecture them on how to vote." Well, we're joined | :16:33. | :16:37. | |
now by the director general of the CBI, | :16:38. | :16:39. | |
Carolyn Fairbairn. Welcome to the programme. Good | :16:40. | :16:59. | |
morning. If big business told its workers how to vote in a general | :17:00. | :17:01. | |
election, there would be broad, so why are you encouraging your members | :17:02. | :17:04. | |
to warn their workers about the dangers of Brexit? That is not what | :17:05. | :17:07. | |
we have said. We have said that people working today in economy want | :17:08. | :17:09. | |
to hear from their employers about what it means on either side of the | :17:10. | :17:12. | |
debate. That is not what you said, you said what impact Brexit would | :17:13. | :17:16. | |
have on growth, jobs and the local community. Positive for negative. | :17:17. | :17:21. | |
You did not say that? It is clear this is not about warning anybody. | :17:22. | :17:26. | |
This is about the questions that people are now asking about what it | :17:27. | :17:29. | |
means for them. We were clean about that. Most of your members, you | :17:30. | :17:35. | |
claim, are in favour of staying in the European Union. The message | :17:36. | :17:39. | |
going out to the workforce will be overwhelmingly about remaining in | :17:40. | :17:43. | |
the EU. The main thing is that people who are going to vote on June | :17:44. | :17:49. | |
23 have as good an understanding as they possibly can about what it | :17:50. | :17:52. | |
means for their jobs, families and communities. That was the key | :17:53. | :17:58. | |
message, nothing about telling people how to vote. We learned this | :17:59. | :18:03. | |
week that one of your members, Circle, was planning uproar EU | :18:04. | :18:07. | |
campaign with the Prime Minister, even before the renegotiations were | :18:08. | :18:12. | |
finished. With the CBI or any of your members have similar | :18:13. | :18:16. | |
discussions with the government? To my knowledge, no. The conversations | :18:17. | :18:22. | |
that businesses, universities, all parts of our society have with | :18:23. | :18:27. | |
government go on every day. Were you planning the pro-union-mac campaign | :18:28. | :18:30. | |
with the government even before the renegotiations? No. But Circle was? | :18:31. | :18:39. | |
No. Everything the CBI has done is a result of the things we have done | :18:40. | :18:44. | |
and a half of our members. Circle has contracts with the government | :18:45. | :18:48. | |
worth several million pounds. The taxpayer pays for that. Its boss was | :18:49. | :18:54. | |
offering to help the Prime Minister do what he could to help keep | :18:55. | :18:59. | |
Britain in the EU. It was a behind closed doors stitch up between big | :19:00. | :19:02. | |
government and big business, wasn't it? The important thing is to | :19:03. | :19:07. | |
understand what businesses across the country of all sizes are seeing. | :19:08. | :19:13. | |
You're focusing on one company. What we are seeing is that the majority | :19:14. | :19:20. | |
of businesses want to stay in the European Union. I understand that. I | :19:21. | :19:27. | |
am asking you if the way this company has handled this... It | :19:28. | :19:30. | |
smells of a stitch up? I do not think this is a stitch up. It is | :19:31. | :19:34. | |
about voices of business being heard on issues of jobs, growth and the | :19:35. | :19:40. | |
future prosperity of our country. People can make their decisions on | :19:41. | :19:44. | |
polling day about a whole variety of factors, but businesses who are | :19:45. | :19:47. | |
trading with the European Union everyday, having their voices | :19:48. | :19:51. | |
clearly heard. The voice of this company was certainly clearly heard. | :19:52. | :20:02. | |
He saw the Prime Minister, Mr Soames. This is what he did in the | :20:03. | :20:05. | |
follow-up letter. He spoke about backing the prime and is to's | :20:06. | :20:07. | |
campaign to keep us in the EU. This is even though the renegotiations | :20:08. | :20:10. | |
were not finished. He went on to lobby for business. He said... He | :20:11. | :20:18. | |
wants more business at the same time. It really does add to the | :20:19. | :20:24. | |
sense that this is big business feathering its own nest. That is not | :20:25. | :20:28. | |
what is going on. There are conversations all the time. Why he | :20:29. | :20:33. | |
wise to do that, to lobby for more business at the same time as | :20:34. | :20:39. | |
lobbying to stay in the EU? I think there are conversations happening | :20:40. | :20:42. | |
all the time. Is that conversation appropriate? Those are questions for | :20:43. | :20:48. | |
other people. The CBI represents mainly businesses across the UK and | :20:49. | :20:52. | |
Europe picking on one. The important thing is the voices of the many are | :20:53. | :20:58. | |
heard in this. Are they heard? You give the impression you like the EU | :20:59. | :21:02. | |
because it is a one-stop club for big business. There are 30,000 | :21:03. | :21:06. | |
lobbyists in Brussels, most of them are doing for the interests of your | :21:07. | :21:11. | |
kind of members, the business. Ordinary folk do not get a look in? | :21:12. | :21:16. | |
I do not think that is true. We have had 20 business surveys since the | :21:17. | :21:19. | |
beginning of the year, for all different sizes of business, and it | :21:20. | :21:24. | |
is not unanimous, but they are all seeing broadly the same thing. We | :21:25. | :21:28. | |
have had the creative industries Forum coming out with the survey. | :21:29. | :21:34. | |
93%, because they are big exporters. This is not just big business. It is | :21:35. | :21:39. | |
all sizes of business. Let's look at how the EU is good for your members | :21:40. | :21:45. | |
but not necessarily the rest of us. The European Court of Justice has | :21:46. | :21:49. | |
forced Her Majesty is Customs and revenue to hand back almost ?8 | :21:50. | :21:55. | |
billion in tax paid by big British companies, overruling tax laws made | :21:56. | :21:58. | |
by our government and our Parliament. That is good for big | :21:59. | :22:03. | |
business but not public services? There are areas where we share | :22:04. | :22:07. | |
sovereignty, in order to have a level playing field across Europe | :22:08. | :22:11. | |
for businesses overall. We are not always going to like all of the | :22:12. | :22:16. | |
rules. It is a question of whether the benefits outweigh the costs. The | :22:17. | :22:20. | |
benefits to your members are clear, they are paying a billion less in | :22:21. | :22:27. | |
tax. The independent office of budget responsibility expected HMRC | :22:28. | :22:30. | |
to pay another 8 billion back by the end of the decade. This is about | :22:31. | :22:36. | |
lowering tax regimes and not allowing HMRC to get the proper tax. | :22:37. | :22:42. | |
That is not fear to ordinary people? To be clear, the CBI can businesses | :22:43. | :22:46. | |
overall do not support aggressive tax avoidance. We support the moves | :22:47. | :22:51. | |
that have been taken at the OECD level to sort this out. This is not | :22:52. | :22:58. | |
something we support. Your members will be 16 billion better off. | :22:59. | :23:03. | |
British schools, hospitals, public services, will be 16 billion worse | :23:04. | :23:09. | |
off. If the HMRC goes down in all these cases, we could be 40 billion | :23:10. | :23:16. | |
worse off. Good for big business, but not local hospitals? I do not | :23:17. | :23:19. | |
know the exact details of those numbers, but I would say that the | :23:20. | :23:24. | |
moves to improve tax policy are absolutely supported by members. The | :23:25. | :23:29. | |
CBI has been wrong about Britain in the EU in the past. Why should we | :23:30. | :23:35. | |
listen to you now? This is becoming a distraction. You are right that | :23:36. | :23:39. | |
when the euro was debated at the end of the 1980s, in principle, the CBI | :23:40. | :23:47. | |
had a principle of support with caveats. You supported the principle | :23:48. | :23:50. | |
of the European exchange mechanism. That ended in recession. Many people | :23:51. | :23:57. | |
lost their homes and jobs. You then became enthusiastic about UK | :23:58. | :24:00. | |
membership of the monetary union, the euro. I ask again, if you were | :24:01. | :24:08. | |
wrong then, why should we listen to you now? Two important points, if | :24:09. | :24:13. | |
you had continued to scroll down, you would seem that there were | :24:14. | :24:18. | |
caveats, conditions that had to be met. Conditions around harmonisation | :24:19. | :24:23. | |
of inflation and the economy. They were never met. By 2000 the CBI had | :24:24. | :24:29. | |
moved its position to neutral. The discussion we are having now is | :24:30. | :24:33. | |
about something very different. It is about the experience that we as | :24:34. | :24:37. | |
an economy have had the European Union for 43 years. We have thrived. | :24:38. | :24:41. | |
We have gone from being the sick man of Europe to being the strong man. | :24:42. | :24:46. | |
His Mrs are doing well. The benefit from being in a single market. The | :24:47. | :24:51. | |
euro was about something which people were imagining in the future, | :24:52. | :24:56. | |
a different debate. Let's come to the current debate. We saw your | :24:57. | :25:00. | |
stance on the euro then. You know think we would be better off if we | :25:01. | :25:04. | |
remain. That is the clear fight -- the clear-cut view of the CBI. You | :25:05. | :25:12. | |
commissioned an organisation to assess the impact of leaving the EU. | :25:13. | :25:17. | |
That is the result of the survey. If we remain, they think the economy | :25:18. | :25:26. | |
will grow by 41% by 2030. Even if we were to come out, the economy would | :25:27. | :25:30. | |
still grow by 39%, even if we did not have any free trade against, it | :25:31. | :25:37. | |
would grow by 36%. It is hardly game changing either way? We have | :25:38. | :25:41. | |
deliberately taken optimistic, balance and areas of the future. | :25:42. | :25:46. | |
You're right, economies recover and adapt. You have not shown the | :25:47. | :25:51. | |
short-term impact of several years of uncertainty. What we believe, and | :25:52. | :25:55. | |
many others believe as well, is there could be significant | :25:56. | :26:01. | |
short-term impacts, no sunlit uplands. You can get to 39%. Your | :26:02. | :26:08. | |
own study shows are economy would be almost 40% bigger by 2030, even if | :26:09. | :26:14. | |
we were to leave. That is if we do a trade deal with the US, if we are | :26:15. | :26:20. | |
able to form new relationships with the EU. These are optimistic | :26:21. | :26:24. | |
assumptions. Take the non-optimistic on, the World Trade Organisation. We | :26:25. | :26:30. | |
just trade on existing rules. It is 36%, it is still a massive rise. Of | :26:31. | :26:35. | |
course we would continue to grow. No one has ever said we would not | :26:36. | :26:40. | |
continue to grow. But will we be more prosperous? We would be 36% | :26:41. | :26:46. | |
more prosperous. In the short-term, by 2020, we estimate there would be | :26:47. | :26:52. | |
a million fewer jobs and 4-5% hate to GDP. Do we want to do that to | :26:53. | :26:57. | |
school leavers? We've just come out of recession. You accept that the | :26:58. | :27:01. | |
difference is not massive? It is entirely possible the economy would | :27:02. | :27:06. | |
adapt. But only with significant short-term impact, and particularly | :27:07. | :27:09. | |
an impact on the next generation of school leavers. The CBI claims that | :27:10. | :27:14. | |
each household benefits to the tune of six -- ?3000 a year. Observers | :27:15. | :27:21. | |
have condemned that as a dishonest figure. Do you stand by it? We do. | :27:22. | :27:28. | |
It was a literature sturdy of existing studies. We wanted to put | :27:29. | :27:35. | |
together a figure that was easy to understand. -- literature study. | :27:36. | :27:40. | |
Estimates like that are difficult to do. There was a range good around | :27:41. | :27:46. | |
it. To be clear, standards of living have doubled. That is since the UK | :27:47. | :27:52. | |
joined the European Union. They have gone from ?20,000 household income | :27:53. | :27:56. | |
to about ?40,000. We are seeing a proportion of that has been a result | :27:57. | :28:01. | |
of membership of the European Union, and independent studies would | :28:02. | :28:05. | |
support that. You did no original research for this at all. We never | :28:06. | :28:10. | |
claimed to. I have explained that to our viewers. You simply did a survey | :28:11. | :28:15. | |
of research papers. But when you look, you cherry picked the research | :28:16. | :28:24. | |
papers that had pro-union-mac inclusions. That is not true. I have | :28:25. | :28:27. | |
got the ones that you did not use, you omitted the IUD, you omitted the | :28:28. | :28:30. | |
National Institute for economic and social research. Even omitted the US | :28:31. | :28:35. | |
Trade Commission survey of what it meant, or to get this ?3000 figure. | :28:36. | :28:42. | |
You know tell me it is not accurate. That is not true. The evaluation we | :28:43. | :28:47. | |
did of the different surveys, we omitted as many on one side as the | :28:48. | :28:52. | |
other. There is a 20 page paper on this which anyone can go and read. | :28:53. | :28:56. | |
It sets out the methodology accurately. You seem to be biased | :28:57. | :28:59. | |
against those that did not come to the conclusion you want. Channel 4's | :29:00. | :29:06. | |
respected fact checked included, the figure is not based on any real | :29:07. | :29:12. | |
evidence. The chairman of the Treasury Select Committee described | :29:13. | :29:15. | |
it as a scandalous misuse of data and intellectually miss honest. We | :29:16. | :29:19. | |
went to him and we set out the facts. I do not think he had read | :29:20. | :29:24. | |
the paper. It is not intended to be anything other than an assessment of | :29:25. | :29:29. | |
consensus views over the last ten years. You did not include other | :29:30. | :29:38. | |
papers. The important thing is to be focusing on what this would mean for | :29:39. | :29:42. | |
the decision for the country. You're telling people that households would | :29:43. | :29:47. | |
be ?3000 a year worse off if we were to leave? That is not what we are | :29:48. | :29:53. | |
saying. Are you saying that we are ?3000 better off by remaining? As a | :29:54. | :29:59. | |
result of having joined, about 15% of the increase in living standards | :30:00. | :30:02. | |
over the time since joining is a result of being part of the European | :30:03. | :30:06. | |
Union. That is a reasonable thing to have said. Is the CBI still keen on | :30:07. | :30:10. | |
principle to join the euro? Absolutely not. | :30:11. | :30:17. | |
Would you welcome a further expansion of the EU to include the | :30:18. | :30:22. | |
five countries already in the queue? I think it has to depend on the | :30:23. | :30:26. | |
conditions at the time. The thing that is clear is we have a sovereign | :30:27. | :30:31. | |
choice over those additional countries. Turkey is a huge market, | :30:32. | :30:36. | |
it could be good for British business, would you welcome it? We | :30:37. | :30:40. | |
have not had that discussion with our members. We would have a | :30:41. | :30:51. | |
discussion at that time and have a point of view at that time. The CBI | :30:52. | :30:54. | |
welcomed both the Nice Treaty and Lisbon Treaty. Would you welcome a | :30:55. | :30:58. | |
further transfer of powers if we voted to remain? No. I think one | :30:59. | :31:02. | |
thing which is clear is we pool sovereignty when it is in the | :31:03. | :31:06. | |
benefits of our economy and we don't wear it is not. I would say one | :31:07. | :31:10. | |
thing, in terms of the opt out from the working Time directive, a very | :31:11. | :31:15. | |
important part of our special arrangement, if you like, of the | :31:16. | :31:20. | |
European Union, the CBI was fully part of and helped to negotiate. | :31:21. | :31:24. | |
Thank you. Depending on which polls you look | :31:25. | :31:26. | |
at, Britain is either scoffing at the idea of leaving the EU | :31:27. | :31:29. | |
or it's marching swiftly One telephone poll this week gave | :31:30. | :31:32. | |
Remain an eight point lead. An online poll, meanwhile, | :31:33. | :31:36. | |
gave it to Leave by four points. The problem is that both | :31:37. | :31:38. | |
those polls were done Our society and our electorate | :31:39. | :31:40. | |
is made up of unique individuals, every one of them different and yet | :31:41. | :31:49. | |
they share many attributes: gender, age, race, religion, | :31:50. | :31:52. | |
economic background, education, political views, | :31:53. | :31:54. | |
and social attitudes. Pollsters, therefore, | :31:55. | :32:02. | |
can only ever try to tell us terms of a specific question, | :32:03. | :32:06. | |
but it's only ever going to be a snapshot of wildly | :32:07. | :32:11. | |
interpretable data. That snapshot is simply a moment | :32:12. | :32:13. | |
in time, and is always, inevitably, slightly inaccurate | :32:14. | :32:16. | |
to varying degrees, and what makes | :32:17. | :32:20. | |
political polling even harder is it is like trying to | :32:21. | :32:22. | |
hit a moving target from a moving platform | :32:23. | :32:30. | |
in the And you would think in this EU | :32:31. | :32:32. | |
referendum the simplicity of the question would help, | :32:33. | :32:35. | |
should we leave It makes the whole thing | :32:36. | :32:37. | |
much more complicated. The problem is a slew of polls | :32:38. | :32:46. | |
giving very different signals. Given the problems | :32:47. | :32:48. | |
pollsters had getting the general election right, and some | :32:49. | :32:50. | |
of them didn't, this matters. Some have it neck and neck, | :32:51. | :32:55. | |
some Remain ahead, others ahead It is a minefield in | :32:56. | :32:58. | |
terms of working out When I apply different technical | :32:59. | :33:08. | |
methods to my raw data, I can move the Remain or Leave lead | :33:09. | :33:17. | |
in both directions. I tell you what, if I do not | :33:18. | :33:19. | |
know having done this opinion polling lark for 21 years, | :33:20. | :33:24. | |
I am not sure who does. Some of this is down to how | :33:25. | :33:28. | |
the polls are done, how they get a truly | :33:29. | :33:32. | |
representative sample of society in the first place, | :33:33. | :33:35. | |
either by phone or online panels. Which is best is a bone | :33:36. | :33:41. | |
of contention that in recent days has even | :33:42. | :33:44. | |
spilt onto social media, The problem is it has become | :33:45. | :33:46. | |
harder and harder to get Online samples are by their nature | :33:47. | :33:52. | |
self-selecting so have biases Phone samples used to be | :33:53. | :33:57. | |
considered far more representative, but in recent years, | :33:58. | :34:03. | |
the response rates to phone polls have dropped so low it is hard | :34:04. | :34:05. | |
now to consider them to be So both modes have an element | :34:06. | :34:09. | |
of self-selection. Can I ask you a few questions about | :34:10. | :34:13. | |
about yourself? Would you say you are likely to vote | :34:14. | :34:16. | |
or will definitely vote? Fewer of us use landlines | :34:17. | :34:20. | |
or want to be cold called, thus more calls then ever before | :34:21. | :34:26. | |
have to be made just to get But you do avoid those who, | :34:27. | :34:29. | |
with online polling, And phone contact through | :34:30. | :34:34. | |
persistence is better at eventually reaching those who are | :34:35. | :34:39. | |
harder to get hold of. Would it be all right | :34:40. | :34:44. | |
if we call you back later? There is a growing narrative | :34:45. | :34:50. | |
amongst some pollsters that phone polling | :34:51. | :34:56. | |
is probably the more accurate, which, | :34:57. | :34:59. | |
given recent phone polling We look at samples and try to check | :35:00. | :35:00. | |
them to see we have the right number of people who vote, | :35:01. | :35:07. | |
do we believe that all the people | :35:08. | :35:09. | |
in our sample who tell us they're going to vote actually | :35:10. | :35:12. | |
will, are we missing people who really just do not care | :35:13. | :35:14. | |
about the referendum referendum and aren't going to vote, | :35:15. | :35:20. | |
are we missing the great unwashed who do | :35:21. | :35:23. | |
not have degrees? All those things, | :35:24. | :35:24. | |
when we make adjustments for all of those things, Remain is | :35:25. | :35:26. | |
still ahead. We would have to be very, | :35:27. | :35:29. | |
very wrong indeed for Remain, at the moment, on the | :35:30. | :35:31. | |
polling so far, not to win this Online pollsters, who use panels | :35:32. | :35:34. | |
of signed up people, are perhaps not surprisingly | :35:35. | :35:38. | |
pointing to weaknesses So much so that the online pollsters | :35:39. | :35:39. | |
YouGov have conducted some phone polling | :35:40. | :35:44. | |
about phone polling. What we found from that comparison, | :35:45. | :35:49. | |
both to the national picture and to our online polls, | :35:50. | :35:53. | |
was that telephone polls were underestimating the people | :35:54. | :35:57. | |
who are not university educated, and that is | :35:58. | :35:59. | |
hugely important in the EU referendum because we know | :36:00. | :36:03. | |
that is one of the great social cleavages, in other words, | :36:04. | :36:06. | |
one of the great things that divides So phone polls are missing | :36:07. | :36:08. | |
potential Leave voters. Online are accused | :36:09. | :36:12. | |
of overstating them, there are two other that vital: | :36:13. | :36:18. | |
are are you going to vote? Turnout will be | :36:19. | :36:27. | |
crucial on June 23rd. The higher it is the more it favours | :36:28. | :36:29. | |
Remain, and what happens when the mass of "don't | :36:30. | :36:32. | |
knows" make up their mind? With more questions and mixed | :36:33. | :36:34. | |
answers, and four weeks to go, | :36:35. | :36:35. | |
most pollsters might reasonably fear | :36:36. | :36:39. | |
the result of a poll that asked us all, | :36:40. | :36:41. | |
"Do pollsters really have a It's just gone 11.35, | :36:42. | :36:43. | |
you're watching the Sunday Politics. We say goodbye to viewers | :36:44. | :36:51. | |
in Scotland who leave us now It's just gone 11.35, | :36:52. | :36:54. | |
you're watching the Sunday Politics. Hello and welcome to Sunday Politics | :36:55. | :37:02. | |
in Northern Ireland. The countdown is on to D-Day - | :37:03. | :37:06. | |
that's the day the D'hondt method of sharing out the Ministerial posts | :37:07. | :37:09. | |
will take place at Stormont. The Justice Ministry | :37:10. | :37:11. | |
is still at the heart of negotiations - even though | :37:12. | :37:14. | |
the DUP and Sinn Fein say there's no doubt they will be in a position | :37:15. | :37:17. | |
to form a full We'll hear from | :37:18. | :37:20. | |
Professor Peter Shirlow and Allison Morris from | :37:21. | :37:22. | |
the Irish News on how Plus, education was one of the big | :37:23. | :37:25. | |
issues on the doorsteps in the run up to the election - | :37:26. | :37:32. | |
and the threat of budget cuts, teacher redundancies and bigger | :37:33. | :37:34. | |
class sizes looms large for the new Minister who'll | :37:35. | :37:38. | |
take charge this week. Deirdre Gillespie from St Mary's | :37:39. | :37:41. | |
in Magherafelt and Ralph Magee from Andrews Memorial | :37:42. | :37:45. | |
Primary School in Comber - So the week to come is set | :37:46. | :37:47. | |
to be as fascinating After the drama of the SDLP's | :37:48. | :37:57. | |
move into opposition and the Alliance Party not quite yet | :37:58. | :38:01. | |
definitively following them out the door, we're | :38:02. | :38:05. | |
still looking forward to the big reveal of who will | :38:06. | :38:07. | |
take the Justice post. Here, a bit earlier than normal | :38:08. | :38:10. | |
on the programme, is the drama of the week gone past in 60 seconds - | :38:11. | :38:13. | |
with Stephen Walker. In the justice ministry is being | :38:14. | :38:30. | |
discussed at the minute. It wasn't just the weather that was | :38:31. | :38:33. | |
changeable, the face of Government took a different turn. Further | :38:34. | :38:39. | |
deputy and first-Minister, it was keep Cam and carry on. We have both | :38:40. | :38:44. | |
campaign to be in Government. Others did not campaign in the same way. | :38:45. | :38:50. | |
The SDLP decided that was not good enough. We will go into opposition | :38:51. | :38:57. | |
to form a constructive opposition to remain party executive. Remember | :38:58. | :39:02. | |
Arlene's 5-point plan during the election, Alliance have five demands | :39:03. | :39:06. | |
of their own in the negotiations for the justice post. There was list was | :39:07. | :39:10. | |
rejected. At the moment it would appear that I'm not interested and | :39:11. | :39:14. | |
that proposition. They say they are confident they can go ahead without | :39:15. | :39:20. | |
as. If they do not take justice, who will? I will as a compliment that | :39:21. | :39:27. | |
they did not ask me. -- did not dare ask me. | :39:28. | :39:29. | |
So let's discuss the drama of the past seven days - | :39:30. | :39:31. | |
and the options for how things might play out | :39:32. | :39:33. | |
over the coming week, with Allison Morris and Pete Shirlow. | :39:34. | :39:37. | |
Welcome to you both. There is an opposition but Jim Allister has | :39:38. | :39:46. | |
known that for some time. Do you think this was the right thing for | :39:47. | :39:50. | |
the Ulster Unionist and the SDLP to do? Clearly what did also does is | :39:51. | :39:57. | |
allow policies to develop, allows criticism of policies that are put | :39:58. | :40:02. | |
out by Sinn Fein to be articulated. It allows those parties to create | :40:03. | :40:08. | |
policies. The fundamental problems was a lecturer Lee. They were not | :40:09. | :40:13. | |
going to go anywhere with junior partners. It allows them to regroup | :40:14. | :40:18. | |
and allows them to think about the credentials. It allows a proper | :40:19. | :40:22. | |
critique of Government, that is another step to normalisation. There | :40:23. | :40:28. | |
is another view and we have heard some commentators articulate that | :40:29. | :40:32. | |
this is the road to nowhere, the road to political irrelevance. We | :40:33. | :40:34. | |
are hearing that from the two vertical parties. I think Peter is | :40:35. | :40:43. | |
right. It was opposition or die for the SDLP. I think for them to | :40:44. | :40:46. | |
survive in the long running opposition was the best route to go | :40:47. | :40:54. | |
down. Even one lone person and opposition can put pressure on the | :40:55. | :41:02. | |
parties. Very few places of two pieces of legislation was passed | :41:03. | :41:05. | |
before. Do you think it has a hand in the negotiations with its 5-point | :41:06. | :41:09. | |
shopping list and apparently no room to manoeuvre? I think not, I think | :41:10. | :41:14. | |
it's the opposite. What we did was, do you want us or not? They set out | :41:15. | :41:19. | |
some kind of idea of what they wanted in return was clearly quite | :41:20. | :41:23. | |
robust and basically saying, are we contingent to being in Government? | :41:24. | :41:27. | |
The answer came back no and we know what our position is, we're not a | :41:28. | :41:31. | |
patsy and we're not going to follow you and do what you want to do. | :41:32. | :41:33. | |
Walking away seems logical. Well, let's hear what the Sinn Fein | :41:34. | :41:35. | |
president Gerry Adams had to say to reporters | :41:36. | :41:38. | |
on Friday afternoon. Our political correspondent | :41:39. | :41:40. | |
Stephen Walker asked Mr Adams if his party would accept | :41:41. | :41:42. | |
a DUP Justice Minister. Well, we had the Executive elected | :41:43. | :41:54. | |
on Wednesday. If we do not go into another election, we have a series | :41:55. | :41:59. | |
of options to mixture of the Executive is elected. Arlene Foster | :42:00. | :42:06. | |
says she want have Sinn Fein justice minister. Is that the basis for a | :42:07. | :42:12. | |
partnership in Government? Well, look, let's not underestimate the | :42:13. | :42:18. | |
challenges that Irish republicans have working with the Democratic | :42:19. | :42:21. | |
Unionist Party. Let's not underestimate that. Is the | :42:22. | :42:28. | |
Government that we have in place the one that we would choose? No, it is | :42:29. | :42:34. | |
not. Clearly we are united Ireland is and we went to see United system. | :42:35. | :42:39. | |
We are resolute in pursuing that. We want to build peace and build | :42:40. | :42:47. | |
partnership and build equality and to end division. We work with the | :42:48. | :42:52. | |
DUP, notwithstanding the faculties. They would say the same thing about | :42:53. | :42:58. | |
us. We are a progressive party, a party which believes absolutely | :42:59. | :43:03. | |
inequality and unity of citizens. I'm not going to rise to these | :43:04. | :43:12. | |
suggestions or put downs. We have a job of work to do, we are elected to | :43:13. | :43:15. | |
do that and that is what we're going to do. Is the DUP Justice Minister | :43:16. | :43:20. | |
better than another election? If there's going to be another | :43:21. | :43:23. | |
election, we will fight that election on the positive platform. | :43:24. | :43:29. | |
Would you go for a DUP does Minster before an election? In other words, | :43:30. | :43:34. | |
if that is the choice? Well, let's say this, if there is an election, | :43:35. | :43:39. | |
Sinn Fein will fight that election. Our focus at the moment is to get a | :43:40. | :43:49. | |
fool executive and just as minute collected on Wednesday. How | :43:50. | :43:51. | |
difficult is it for Sinn Fein to have the DUP ruling out a Republican | :43:52. | :43:58. | |
in the justice post? The DUP has been very clear in saying this time | :43:59. | :44:03. | |
they want accept a Sinn Fein justice minister. Gerry Adams did not rule | :44:04. | :44:06. | |
out having a DUP justice minister. He just said, we will see. That | :44:07. | :44:11. | |
looks like one of the likely prospects. An independent take up | :44:12. | :44:18. | |
the post. They have put out feelers to try and take the post. Of all | :44:19. | :44:22. | |
those people decline, that would be the possibility of a DVD justice | :44:23. | :44:26. | |
minister. For Republicans, policing is one of the... It is quite | :44:27. | :44:34. | |
controversial. One of the options would be, it hasn't been discussed a | :44:35. | :44:38. | |
lot but it would be Arlene Foster ticking on the job of justice | :44:39. | :44:41. | |
minister alongside first-Minister, which you could do and she could | :44:42. | :44:45. | |
appoint a shin pain junior minister. That is a possibility -- Sinn Fein. | :44:46. | :44:52. | |
When you hear that commentary and when they walked out of Stormont | :44:53. | :44:55. | |
house and they had confidence that there would be a justice minister, | :44:56. | :44:58. | |
there is something in the back pocket. I think it's one thing this | :44:59. | :45:06. | |
collection shows us is that people want these two to be a partnership | :45:07. | :45:10. | |
together. People are voting for a Sinn Fein DUP are to lead | :45:11. | :45:15. | |
Government. Even people who do not vote, say they want them to be the | :45:16. | :45:20. | |
Government. There is no alternative to that. Clearly this is something | :45:21. | :45:24. | |
that is going to show us a very different strand of politics between | :45:25. | :45:28. | |
now and the next election. We don't want to have another election. Sinn | :45:29. | :45:32. | |
Fein did not have a good election. I don't think they would want to go | :45:33. | :45:33. | |
back and have another election. Stephen Walker was busy for us | :45:34. | :45:36. | |
on Friday, he also spoke to the senior DUP MLA, | :45:37. | :45:38. | |
Simon Hamilton, and put it to him that if a Justice Minister couldn't | :45:39. | :45:41. | |
be agreed, then we're facing I don't believe it will get to that. | :45:42. | :45:49. | |
We are very confident we will have a solution, we have asked the business | :45:50. | :45:53. | |
committee to convene the Assembly for next Wednesday. That is going to | :45:54. | :45:58. | |
take place. We heard the Deputy First Ministers say they will have | :45:59. | :46:03. | |
an executive in place. It will get down to its business on Thursday | :46:04. | :46:06. | |
next week and get on with what the people want, try to move Northern | :46:07. | :46:13. | |
Ireland forward. Penny except a Sinn Fein justice minister? We have made | :46:14. | :46:21. | |
our vision clear. We are examining a range of options but we believe it | :46:22. | :46:26. | |
should be satisfactory to everyone as well. It will allow us to have a | :46:27. | :46:31. | |
justice minister in place and we will command confidence and allowed | :46:32. | :46:34. | |
the wider executive to be formed and get down to its work over the next | :46:35. | :46:40. | |
years. Is Claire Sugden is serious candidate for justice minister? I | :46:41. | :46:45. | |
think she is a very good Assembly minister and I think she has the | :46:46. | :46:49. | |
skills and ability to be a minister. We have been speaking to her in the | :46:50. | :46:53. | |
last couple of days and had a very good discussion with her yesterday. | :46:54. | :46:57. | |
We are having a discussion and we will continue and we will continue | :46:58. | :47:02. | |
to consider it between the parties at Stormont. Would you be happy to | :47:03. | :47:07. | |
see her as justice minister? I have had the pleasure of working with her | :47:08. | :47:11. | |
over the last few years and she has been very good Assembly met Merck | :47:12. | :47:17. | |
and keeping ministers like me to account -- Assembly member. She is | :47:18. | :47:21. | |
somebody who I think to do a job in the Executive. What about Stephen | :47:22. | :47:27. | |
Agnew? We had a conversation with him yesterday. The Alliance party | :47:28. | :47:32. | |
made requests and they wanted to see these things in the programme for | :47:33. | :47:35. | |
Government and wanted to see implemented to dig up the blaze in | :47:36. | :47:38. | |
the Executive. Some would be difficult for the DUP to agree to. | :47:39. | :47:47. | |
We are having a discussion including discussing with other parties and | :47:48. | :47:51. | |
Sinn Fein as well. There is a big irony, isn't there? The DUP quite | :47:52. | :47:58. | |
happy for Sinn Fein to educate children and looking after unwell | :47:59. | :48:03. | |
people but not justice? A lot of people wonder what partnership | :48:04. | :48:05. | |
Government is about if you do not trust the other party enough? I | :48:06. | :48:13. | |
think it is they had always assumed if the justice minister had been | :48:14. | :48:17. | |
appointed it would have been somebody from Sinn Fein with the | :48:18. | :48:21. | |
taint of a Republican past. For the DUP and voters that was a step too | :48:22. | :48:25. | |
far. There is obviously something in the back pocket. I don't think going | :48:26. | :48:30. | |
to have another election. Claire Sugden is a very capable Assembly | :48:31. | :48:35. | |
member. She got elected as an independent. Does she want to be | :48:36. | :48:39. | |
bolstering up the two parties? Could she do the job's is it realistic was | :48:40. | :48:45. | |
my everyone can do the job. As an independent? Of course she can. If | :48:46. | :48:50. | |
they ask to do it and you does it, simple as that. It is not | :48:51. | :48:54. | |
problematic. The processors allow that to happen. Procedures allow | :48:55. | :48:59. | |
that happen. At the end of the day, these two are the main parties. They | :49:00. | :49:02. | |
should form a Government together and find a way to solve these | :49:03. | :49:06. | |
problems as best they can. That is what the electorate have said. | :49:07. | :49:10. | |
You're the two main parties, get on and make it a normalised to go | :49:11. | :49:14. | |
system. That is how we move forward. Thank you for now. | :49:15. | :49:18. | |
Thank you both for now - and if all goes to plan as the DUP | :49:19. | :49:22. | |
and Sinn Fein see it, then some new faces will be sitting | :49:23. | :49:24. | |
around the Executive table, some of them heading | :49:25. | :49:27. | |
To begin at the top, the awkwardly titled... Becomes simply the | :49:28. | :49:37. | |
Executive office. There is no change at the Department of Finance. The | :49:38. | :49:41. | |
Department of Health remains just that, as does the Department of | :49:42. | :49:45. | |
Justice. The Department for Education keeps its name, although | :49:46. | :49:50. | |
it takes over a range of children's services, currently dispersed among | :49:51. | :49:54. | |
other departments. After that, it is all change. The new Department of | :49:55. | :50:01. | |
agricultural Department, combines agriculture. The rest of the GOP is | :50:02. | :50:06. | |
taken up by the Department of infrastructure, along with the | :50:07. | :50:11. | |
Department of regional development. A new Department of the economy, | :50:12. | :50:14. | |
eats up the old Department of trade and investment. The new Department | :50:15. | :50:23. | |
for communities sees the Department of culture, arts and leisure | :50:24. | :50:25. | |
amalgamate with the Department of social development. | :50:26. | :50:27. | |
Hope you followed that - and, of course, one of the big | :50:28. | :50:29. | |
stories of the next week is likely to be who the new Education Minister | :50:30. | :50:33. | |
is in the new Executive, because he or she will be walking | :50:34. | :50:36. | |
into a situation where there are unprecedented fears over school | :50:37. | :50:38. | |
With me in the studio now are Deirdre Gillespie, | :50:39. | :50:43. | |
the Principal of St Mary's Grammar School in Magherafelt, | :50:44. | :50:45. | |
and Ralph Magee, the Principal of Andrews Memorial Primary | :50:46. | :50:47. | |
In the weeks leading up to the election we heard serious | :50:48. | :50:56. | |
concerns about the increasing costs that schools are facing | :50:57. | :50:58. | |
and the effect on class sizes and subjects being offered. | :50:59. | :51:00. | |
There's been a lot of talk about opposition since the election - | :51:01. | :51:04. | |
but presumably you just want to get an Education Minister | :51:05. | :51:06. | |
Absolutely. Schools are facing unprecedented financial pressure at | :51:07. | :51:20. | |
present. Schools in my sector have deficits ranging from 100,000 to | :51:21. | :51:25. | |
500,000 over a period of three years. The situation at the moment | :51:26. | :51:31. | |
is unsustainable. That has almost come out of nowhere? Absolutely. I | :51:32. | :51:36. | |
left school around Easter with, I thought, a surplus of 1000 and came | :51:37. | :51:40. | |
back with a deficit of ?190,000. This is, on the back of successive | :51:41. | :51:45. | |
cuts over the years were schools have put in cost saving measures and | :51:46. | :51:50. | |
we had nowhere else to go. I have cut my teaching workforce over the | :51:51. | :51:54. | |
last four years by 10%. If I have to balance might looks, that would mean | :51:55. | :51:58. | |
more cuts in staff, which would result in bigger class sizes, less | :51:59. | :52:03. | |
subject choice and not being able to deliver on key policies. Is it the | :52:04. | :52:07. | |
same situation in the primary sector? In terms of the outworking | :52:08. | :52:12. | |
deficits, yes, it is. It is a slightly different look when the | :52:13. | :52:15. | |
impact is looked at in terms of primary because we're not talking | :52:16. | :52:18. | |
about subject choices, we are talking about having a teacher in | :52:19. | :52:22. | |
the classroom. The scary side to this is we are looking at schools | :52:23. | :52:27. | |
across the board in all sectors, sustainable schools over as the | :52:28. | :52:31. | |
tv-mac oversubscribed schools, popular schools, who now face a | :52:32. | :52:36. | |
situation of having to cut cord teacher star. You will have children | :52:37. | :52:41. | |
with no teachers. That result in huge class sizes. Key stage one, we | :52:42. | :52:46. | |
have to ask permission from the Department to go above 30, that is | :52:47. | :52:51. | |
going to disappear. It is frightening prospect. Deidre, we had | :52:52. | :52:54. | |
the Donaldson report on health, which topped about the need for bald | :52:55. | :53:01. | |
but good decision-making where services should be minting or not | :53:02. | :53:05. | |
maintained depending on value for money. It was going to be on | :53:06. | :53:11. | |
politicians to grasp the nettle and make tough choices. They may be | :53:12. | :53:15. | |
unpopular. Is this same scenario beginning to emerge in education? | :53:16. | :53:18. | |
There are two issues that any minister needs to grasp quickly, | :53:19. | :53:23. | |
that is the allocation of funding directly to schools. Currently, 41% | :53:24. | :53:26. | |
of the school budget goes to administration. It leaves only 59% | :53:27. | :53:34. | |
directly to schools. That is in contrast to the jurisdictions in the | :53:35. | :53:38. | |
UK, 90% goes to the front line. There is an urgent need to look at | :53:39. | :53:43. | |
the allocation of funding to schools, to ensure our young people | :53:44. | :53:47. | |
have the facilities that would lead to high quality education. Might it | :53:48. | :53:51. | |
mean we need to seriously sit down and look at school closures? There | :53:52. | :53:54. | |
was a report couple of years ago that said we have 1200 schools. We | :53:55. | :54:00. | |
need about 700. Absolutely. These are the hard decisions they will | :54:01. | :54:04. | |
have to make. Last year of education committee put together a draft paper | :54:05. | :54:09. | |
on -based planning. They said they were 56 surplus places in primary | :54:10. | :54:16. | |
school we have six forms that do not comply to 100 or more, which would | :54:17. | :54:21. | |
equate to a value for money. There is a serious need to look at the | :54:22. | :54:27. | |
school estate. Is that what the new education Minister needs to tackle | :54:28. | :54:32. | |
when he or she sits down behind a desk next Friday, the possibility of | :54:33. | :54:38. | |
closing schools across Northern Ireland? Well, as we have both said, | :54:39. | :54:44. | |
and the facts speak for themselves. The current situation is | :54:45. | :54:47. | |
unsustainable. You have a huge number of schools in Northern | :54:48. | :54:51. | |
Ireland, which will be thrown into financial crisis. Nobody wants to be | :54:52. | :54:54. | |
responsible for that, that's the reality. We know we have too many | :54:55. | :54:59. | |
schools, we also have too many sectors. We have too much. | :55:00. | :55:03. | |
Administration Those are really hard things to talk about in a divided | :55:04. | :55:08. | |
society. They have to be talked about because increasingly we are | :55:09. | :55:11. | |
talking in terms of public service, education is one of them. We are not | :55:12. | :55:17. | |
talking about learning and the excitement, we're talking about | :55:18. | :55:20. | |
money. We are talking about making cuts. In a nutshell, if the nettle | :55:21. | :55:26. | |
is not grasped and the Minister and people working for the minister did | :55:27. | :55:29. | |
not deal with this issue, what happens? Well, you ultimately have a | :55:30. | :55:35. | |
board of governors who are handing in financial plans that will not be | :55:36. | :55:39. | |
approved by the education authority, and they will ultimately, if the | :55:40. | :55:43. | |
governor says no, we cannot do any more, they are going to say over the | :55:44. | :55:47. | |
next number of weeks or are seeing now, the board or education | :55:48. | :55:50. | |
authority will have to run them for them. They will not be able to do | :55:51. | :55:55. | |
that because they will have to cut people. Primary, we will have no | :55:56. | :55:58. | |
teachers. That is something that is going to happen. It is an | :55:59. | :56:04. | |
apocalyptic scenario. If you follow logically and what needs to be done | :56:05. | :56:08. | |
is not done, it's a disaster? Absolutely. The people who are going | :56:09. | :56:12. | |
to suffer in all of this our young people. We're not going to be able | :56:13. | :56:15. | |
to provide the quality of education that we do. They will be a | :56:16. | :56:19. | |
generation of lost opportunity. Let's bring Pete and Alison in. | :56:20. | :56:25. | |
Pete, you are an educationist. You followed this closely. How would you | :56:26. | :56:29. | |
deal with the apparent contradictions that I presenting? | :56:30. | :56:33. | |
First of all, what Deidre said is wrong. You should be -- you should | :56:34. | :56:43. | |
not be having bad management. That should be corrected by the Assembly | :56:44. | :56:48. | |
wrong, because it is happening? You expect the majority of the pound to | :56:49. | :56:52. | |
go to what you are facilitating. More physical control? The other | :56:53. | :56:58. | |
issue is the education system. RB ever going to get rid of -- are we | :56:59. | :57:06. | |
ever going to get rid... Why are we producing people to become teachers, | :57:07. | :57:10. | |
we have three different sites in Northern Ireland. That costs a lot | :57:11. | :57:14. | |
of money. One of the knock on is that to be University of Ulster have | :57:15. | :57:19. | |
led to redundancies and students have come out and protest it. This | :57:20. | :57:26. | |
is a mess. This is a mess. It is a challenge about the past, how do we | :57:27. | :57:33. | |
get rid of the education system. If we went to allow a good health | :57:34. | :57:36. | |
service, an investment in the society, we want to need to make | :57:37. | :57:42. | |
hard decisions in the education sector. That will save money and | :57:43. | :57:46. | |
protect the long-term future. You will have to swallow some bitter | :57:47. | :57:51. | |
pills now. We need to do that to have a normalised functioning budget | :57:52. | :57:55. | |
for the society. But the challenges for the politicians but, Alison, | :57:56. | :57:59. | |
very often in Northern Ireland politicians are not enthusiastic | :58:00. | :58:02. | |
about taking those difficult decisions. In the last | :58:03. | :58:06. | |
administration, the Sinn Fein education minister, had he shut down | :58:07. | :58:12. | |
a rule school in a Protestant area,... Ill expect we're going to | :58:13. | :58:17. | |
have a DUP Minister. Should they shut down an Irish language school, | :58:18. | :58:21. | |
they are going to be accused of being sectarian. It is very | :58:22. | :58:24. | |
difficult to take those decisions without being accused of feeding | :58:25. | :58:30. | |
into some sort of sectarian diatribe. What Pete said about | :58:31. | :58:33. | |
education, we do not speak about that any more. I think we have just | :58:34. | :58:40. | |
given up. Let's go back to the principles, do you think there could | :58:41. | :58:43. | |
be good in terms of delivering the change that needs to happen? We will | :58:44. | :58:46. | |
have some kind of formalised opposition? Do think that would help | :58:47. | :58:51. | |
the debate around these difficult decisions? Are supposed to give the | :58:52. | :58:56. | |
party in opposition the freedom to object and to voice their opinions | :58:57. | :58:59. | |
and concerns. And to call the Minister to account? Absolutely. The | :59:00. | :59:05. | |
bottom line is, I hate to repeat the word unsustainable, but it is | :59:06. | :59:09. | |
unsustainable. We cannot have a system running like this. Perhaps | :59:10. | :59:13. | |
this budget, this finance issue, has brought things to a head. We | :59:14. | :59:18. | |
definitely have to start discussing. Deidre, opposition a good thing? | :59:19. | :59:21. | |
Absolutely. They will hold Government to account and there will | :59:22. | :59:26. | |
be a voice, hopefully, for education. Just a final thought, | :59:27. | :59:30. | |
we've been talking about parties fighting over education. It could | :59:31. | :59:33. | |
become Wednesday the all running away from education board portfolio. | :59:34. | :59:41. | |
There are problems and minefields. Clearly, a Government will be set | :59:42. | :59:45. | |
up. These two parties have too realised the competition against | :59:46. | :59:49. | |
them is not there. The DP looking over the shoulder, Sinn Fein looking | :59:50. | :59:52. | |
over their shoulder, they have to stop doing that. -- DUP. That is it | :59:53. | :59:56. | |
from all of it is therefore the public | :59:57. | :59:58. | |
as well as serving a useful purpose To you both, thank you very much | :59:59. | :00:02. | |
indeed. And with that, it is | :00:03. | :00:04. | |
back to you, Andrew. Treasury warnings on Brexit, | :00:05. | :00:08. | |
is Labour on course for 2020, and are there enough women | :00:09. | :00:11. | |
in the referendum campaign? And joining me and my panel | :00:12. | :00:13. | |
of so-called experts, is the former Deputy Leader | :00:14. | :00:24. | |
of the Labour Party Harriet Harman. Wellcome, it is nice to see you | :00:25. | :00:36. | |
again. The Treasury has already told us how bad the economy will be in | :00:37. | :00:41. | |
2030, but nobody really knows. This is about, in their view, the | :00:42. | :00:47. | |
immediate impact on interest rates, mortgages, jobs, house prices, | :00:48. | :00:51. | |
before the autumn is out. This I would suggest is politically more | :00:52. | :00:57. | |
significant? Yes, and it is absolutely the Remain campaign's | :00:58. | :01:01. | |
biggest howitzer which is why they are firing it now. This is the last | :01:02. | :01:09. | |
time they can deploy the full mast ranks of the government's resources | :01:10. | :01:14. | |
into the campaign. Most people disagree passionately in this | :01:15. | :01:17. | |
campaign about whether over the long-term the British economy will | :01:18. | :01:20. | |
prosper or not outside the EU. Pretty much everybody, I think apart | :01:21. | :01:25. | |
from Boris Johnson has admits it there might be some short-term | :01:26. | :01:32. | |
problems. It is the same with retail. We have heard from the Prime | :01:33. | :01:37. | |
Minister today. And mortgages, smacking people as hard as they can | :01:38. | :01:43. | |
in their pockets. Even Boris Johnson said there would be a fall because | :01:44. | :01:48. | |
he hopes it will go up. People may be nervous that when they get onto | :01:49. | :01:52. | |
that tick it does not stop falling. It will be a difficult one for the | :01:53. | :01:58. | |
Leave campaign? Guess, and I am picking up a lot of concern in the | :01:59. | :02:03. | |
various Brexit camps. They look as if they have conceded the argument | :02:04. | :02:08. | |
on the economy. Of course, they emphatically argue the opposite | :02:09. | :02:11. | |
direction is that we can do even better out, but there is a lot of | :02:12. | :02:14. | |
concern among those who want to leave, that those who are | :02:15. | :02:17. | |
representing them in these campaigns, are not putting the | :02:18. | :02:21. | |
argument strongly enough and are almost backing of it which is why we | :02:22. | :02:25. | |
are hearing arguments about Turkey and immigration and other things. I | :02:26. | :02:29. | |
think Leave has to come out really strongly and rebut what the Treasury | :02:30. | :02:34. | |
is saying point by point, whether it is on food prices, and there is a | :02:35. | :02:40. | |
compelling argument that the Common Agricultural Policy example | :02:41. | :02:42. | |
massively distorts prices. Food may not be more expensive when we come | :02:43. | :02:46. | |
out so we need to rebut it line by line. -- they need to rebut it. The | :02:47. | :02:53. | |
polling suggests if you are worried about the economy you will more | :02:54. | :02:58. | |
likely to vote Remain, if you are more worried about public services, | :02:59. | :03:01. | |
you will be more likely to vote Leave. This will create a sense of | :03:02. | :03:09. | |
economic uncertainty? Yes, and it will be interesting if they make a | :03:10. | :03:14. | |
GDP prediction. We are talking about food prices and employment but will | :03:15. | :03:17. | |
they predict a technical recession in GDP which I imagine will happen | :03:18. | :03:22. | |
if we vote to leave. The Bank of England has admitted that is a | :03:23. | :03:26. | |
possibility. I can think of people who are very high up in British | :03:27. | :03:37. | |
public life who are downplaying their view about how bad the GDP | :03:38. | :03:40. | |
crisis will be in the short-term. I agree with Isobel, it is strange to | :03:41. | :03:42. | |
concede the short-term economic argument. You cannot say here is the | :03:43. | :03:46. | |
reality of a short-term recession. In return, there is the prospect of | :03:47. | :03:53. | |
a longer-term economic benefit which realises in 2030. Labour does not | :03:54. | :03:59. | |
normally think very much of Tory forecasts. Will you accept this? We | :04:00. | :04:03. | |
are very concerned about jobs and prices and we are very concerned | :04:04. | :04:07. | |
about the cavalier sense that it might be a bit of a problem in the | :04:08. | :04:11. | |
short-term but it will be fine in the long-term, two reasons. | :04:12. | :04:16. | |
Obviously, the Treasury forecasts will be very well worth picking | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
through and looking through and will be very persuasive. As far as the | :04:21. | :04:24. | |
short-term is concerned, we are trying to find our way out of a | :04:25. | :04:28. | |
global financial crisis, and the idea that it would not cause major | :04:29. | :04:32. | |
uncertainty and instability to leave an economic union that we have been | :04:33. | :04:39. | |
part of four decades, it is a no-brainer even before tomorrow. You | :04:40. | :04:44. | |
think the short-term is a problem if we vote to leave? It will be a | :04:45. | :04:50. | |
problem about jobs, a problem about prices. Why on earth would we want | :04:51. | :04:55. | |
to try and distance ourselves from this biggest trading block of 500 | :04:56. | :05:00. | |
million people. Why would we want to struggle for keeping our head above | :05:01. | :05:04. | |
water in the longer term when we are in the EU as we are? I think it is | :05:05. | :05:09. | |
cavalier from people who are not worried about prices and to feel | :05:10. | :05:12. | |
happy that their jobs are fine, let's make this bid for freedom. I | :05:13. | :05:20. | |
think it is reckless. Reckless? I think there is an accession among | :05:21. | :05:24. | |
the Remain camp and it is interesting that Harriet brings this | :05:25. | :05:29. | |
up, constantly bringing up trade associations. We can trade without | :05:30. | :05:34. | |
trade deals. We talk about the Remain camp focuses highly on the | :05:35. | :05:39. | |
importance of the trade deals have, but we are a service economy run | :05:40. | :05:43. | |
airily, and those trade deals do not cover the service sector. We can | :05:44. | :05:47. | |
trade but if you look without trade deals, that means paying tariffs, | :05:48. | :05:51. | |
for example. If you look at the food in our supermarkets which comes in | :05:52. | :05:55. | |
from Europe, they can put tariffs on that to make it cost more, and why | :05:56. | :06:01. | |
wouldn't they, if we opt out of that free trade area? They would not put | :06:02. | :06:05. | |
tariffs on food coming into Britain. We might do that, but they would not | :06:06. | :06:10. | |
do that. We would take off the tariffs from the food that comes | :06:11. | :06:15. | |
from America, Australia and New Zealand. We are in an established | :06:16. | :06:20. | |
range of trading which has been going on for decades and has seen | :06:21. | :06:26. | |
food prices going down. That is a big issue if you are on a low | :06:27. | :06:34. | |
income. Why would we take that risk? The former chief executives of | :06:35. | :06:40. | |
supermarkets, and they have not got any skin in the game because they | :06:41. | :06:44. | |
are former chief executives, they have said because of these | :06:45. | :06:47. | |
established arrangements, prices are likely to go up. We will hear more | :06:48. | :06:52. | |
of that this week with the Treasury report which is coming out tomorrow | :06:53. | :06:57. | |
morning. Talking about the economy, let's hear a word from John | :06:58. | :07:01. | |
McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor about Labour in the economy. This is | :07:02. | :07:03. | |
what he had to say yesterday. Our whole society could do so much | :07:04. | :07:08. | |
better than we are at the moment. What we have attempted over the last | :07:09. | :07:11. | |
eight months is to lay out the framework by which Labour can | :07:12. | :07:14. | |
win the next election, and then set about the fundamental | :07:15. | :07:17. | |
business of transforming capitalism. We should aim at nothing | :07:18. | :07:19. | |
less than that. So, socialism in one parliament, | :07:20. | :07:31. | |
that must excite you? He is talking about a new economic policy which | :07:32. | :07:36. | |
will talk about fairness and investment and he says we will be on | :07:37. | :07:40. | |
a listening exercise as they put the flesh on the bones. He is talking | :07:41. | :07:46. | |
about remaking capitalism, not reforming it, not liberalising it, | :07:47. | :07:51. | |
remaking capitalism. Is that realistic? I think there is a bit of | :07:52. | :07:57. | |
remaking to be done, for example, remaking the responsibilities of big | :07:58. | :08:02. | |
businesses to repay their taxes, do we think it is all sorted? It is | :08:03. | :08:10. | |
certainly not. Every government tells me they will put more | :08:11. | :08:14. | |
apprentices and you look carefully and they don't really. This | :08:15. | :08:19. | |
government, a lot of the apprentices are not what the Germans or | :08:20. | :08:22. | |
Austrians would regard as apprentices. Chasing that tax seems | :08:23. | :08:30. | |
to be in a never-ending chase as you try and close the loopholes. Because | :08:31. | :08:35. | |
it has not necessarily been done so far, and all credit to Margaret | :08:36. | :08:38. | |
Hodge and the Public Accounts Committee in exposing all of this, | :08:39. | :08:41. | |
does not mean it cannot be done. We could have lots more investment if | :08:42. | :08:47. | |
people paid their tax and we could have much more prosperity in the | :08:48. | :08:52. | |
economy, but he is recognising we have to convince people that they | :08:53. | :08:57. | |
can trust us on the economy. Are you happy with the direction he is | :08:58. | :09:01. | |
taking you? I think the principles he is setting out is right. We got | :09:02. | :09:05. | |
the wrong answer in the general election last time and we got to be | :09:06. | :09:09. | |
the opposition rather than the government, and we have to get a | :09:10. | :09:13. | |
different answer next time and that means convincing the public. It is | :09:14. | :09:17. | |
about setting up a framework that also making sure we are listening to | :09:18. | :09:22. | |
what the public's concerns are about us, not what we want to hear but | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
what they are saying. You don't think there are enough women | :09:28. | :09:31. | |
involved in the referendum campaign? Would it not be fair to say that it | :09:32. | :09:36. | |
is really the Remain side which has the female problem. The Leave site | :09:37. | :09:42. | |
has Gisela Stuart, Kate Hoey, pretty Patel, Penny Mordaunt and so on. It | :09:43. | :09:47. | |
is your side which is lacking the women -- pretty Patel. There is | :09:48. | :09:57. | |
hardly anything between either side. Really? Could you do a list like | :09:58. | :10:05. | |
that? One of the things we are saying is actually, being in the EU | :10:06. | :10:11. | |
has helped back-up women at work. It is paradoxical, and it might seem | :10:12. | :10:15. | |
unlikely, but the EU has been a strong friend to women at work and | :10:16. | :10:19. | |
these directives which governments always do not like, either Labour or | :10:20. | :10:24. | |
the Tories don't like the idea of directives from Europe, but they | :10:25. | :10:29. | |
have been backing up part-time workers... I understand that but I | :10:30. | :10:33. | |
am looking at the fact that you have said there are not enough female | :10:34. | :10:37. | |
voices in the campaign. Do you agree with that? I would agree with you. | :10:38. | :10:45. | |
The Leave women are pretty loud. Where is Theresa May? She is the | :10:46. | :10:53. | |
single biggest female voice and she is almost mute. The idea that the | :10:54. | :10:59. | |
Leave side is in some post feminist political nirvana is for the | :11:00. | :11:03. | |
absolute birds. And I think of the Leave side I think of Boris Johnson | :11:04. | :11:06. | |
and Nigel Farage and I cannot bear to think about it. I just gave you a | :11:07. | :11:16. | |
list. And Iain Duncan Smith. Five prominent women campaigners. Are you | :11:17. | :11:23. | |
saying they are a post feminist haven? No, I don't think they would | :11:24. | :11:28. | |
know what that is. I am trying to work out if your side has more of a | :11:29. | :11:33. | |
problem, but let's move on. You say the EU is a beacon of gender | :11:34. | :11:38. | |
equality. I would like you to look at this. These are all the top jobs | :11:39. | :11:43. | |
in the European Union. Something probably strikes you about that. | :11:44. | :11:48. | |
Where is the gender equality in the EU in the top seven jobs? That is | :11:49. | :11:53. | |
why it is an irony that actually, the directives and European court | :11:54. | :11:58. | |
judgments have backed up women at work. Except in the EU itself? But | :11:59. | :12:06. | |
if you look at the Treaty of Rome, which was very much ahead of its | :12:07. | :12:09. | |
time, saying you have to pay women equally and treat women equally... | :12:10. | :12:15. | |
It is do as I say, not as I do. It looks like a boys' club up there. | :12:16. | :12:19. | |
And the other thing that strikes me about this row of men. Who are these | :12:20. | :12:25. | |
people? Could you recognise all those people? Could you even | :12:26. | :12:29. | |
recognise one of them? I do know who they are and I don't like the fact | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
they are all men... That tells you about the EU and our sovereignty. | :12:36. | :12:40. | |
No, it does not. The directives from Europe have backed up women at work, | :12:41. | :12:44. | |
part-timers, low-paid women, women having babies. If our own government | :12:45. | :12:49. | |
would have done it, more better. Why haven't they read the directives? I | :12:50. | :12:56. | |
don't know who they are. That speaks for itself. They are the people you | :12:57. | :12:59. | |
think should be running us and you don't know who they are! I am | :13:00. | :13:04. | |
talking about the facts of the impact for women at work about us | :13:05. | :13:10. | |
being in the EU and our rights on maternity and equal pay. The | :13:11. | :13:14. | |
directives have helped us even when our own government have not. They do | :13:15. | :13:21. | |
not seem to have got the message. You have picked them at random! No, | :13:22. | :13:27. | |
they are not! Bayard the top seven jobs in the EU. Ranks to all our | :13:28. | :13:36. | |
guests, good to see Harry it back. -- thanks to all our guests, good to | :13:37. | :13:43. | |
see Harry it back. Remember, if it is Sunday, it is the Sunday | :13:44. | :13:46. | |
Politics, unless it is the Whitsun bank holiday. | :13:47. | :13:52. |