Browse content similar to 14/05/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
It's Sunday morning and this is the Sunday Politics. | :00:37. | :00:40. | |
Theresa May unveils plans to build many more affordable homes | :00:41. | :00:43. | |
in England, but with no price tag, timetable or building targets - | :00:44. | :00:46. | |
Labour takes aim at the City with what it calls a Robin Hood Tax | :00:47. | :00:53. | |
to fund public services, but will traders just | :00:54. | :00:55. | |
Don't look at the polls - Jeremy Corbyn, at least, | :00:56. | :00:59. | |
insists he can win this election - so which way will | :01:00. | :01:02. | |
We'll hear from a focus group in Leeds. | :01:03. | :01:07. | |
Hello, I'm Lucie Fisher, coming up on the Sunday Politics | :01:08. | :01:09. | |
The fishermen questioning the government's promise to take | :01:10. | :01:13. | |
and here, what the parties are saying about tackling the air | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
pollution problem in London. And with me, our own scientifically | :01:18. | :01:25. | |
selected focus group of political pundits - | :01:26. | :01:29. | |
they're not so much undecided as clueless - | :01:30. | :01:31. | |
Tom Newton Dunn, Isabel Oakeshott They'll be tweeting | :01:32. | :01:33. | |
throughout the programme. So, we've got two new | :01:34. | :01:40. | |
policies this morning. Labour say they will introduce | :01:41. | :01:42. | |
a financial transaction tax if they win the general election | :01:43. | :01:44. | |
and what they're calling "the biggest crackdown on tax | :01:45. | :01:47. | |
avoidance in the country's history". The Conservatives say they'll work | :01:48. | :01:49. | |
with local authorities in England to build council houses | :01:50. | :01:52. | |
with the right to buy. Theresa May says the policy | :01:53. | :01:54. | |
"will help thousands of people get on the first rung | :01:55. | :01:56. | |
of the housing ladder". Steve, what do you make of them? I | :01:57. | :02:09. | |
have been conditioned after doing tax and spend debates in | :02:10. | :02:13. | |
pre-election periods for many decades to treat policy is not as | :02:14. | :02:17. | |
literal but as arguments. In other words if you look back to 2015 the | :02:18. | :02:22. | |
Tory plan to wipe out the deficit was never going to happen and yet it | :02:23. | :02:26. | |
framed and large event. In that sense the Robin Hood tax is a | :02:27. | :02:30. | |
sensible move for Labour to make at this point because it is part of a | :02:31. | :02:35. | |
narrative of reconfiguring taxation to be fair. Treating it as an | :02:36. | :02:38. | |
argument rather than something that would happen in day one of Labour | :02:39. | :02:46. | |
government is sensible. In terms of building houses Theresa May said | :02:47. | :02:48. | |
right from the beginning when she was in Number Ten that there is a | :02:49. | :02:51. | |
housing deficit in this country rather than the economic deficit | :02:52. | :02:55. | |
George Osborne was focusing on, and this is an example of trying to get | :02:56. | :03:00. | |
house-building going. It seems entirely sensible, not sure how it | :03:01. | :03:04. | |
works with right to buy but again as framing of a 90 minute it makes | :03:05. | :03:09. | |
sense. I disagree with Steve on one front which is how sensible Theresa | :03:10. | :03:17. | |
May's policy is on the housing announcement. I think more broadly | :03:18. | :03:21. | |
these two announcements have something in common which is that | :03:22. | :03:25. | |
over the next 24 hours both will probably unravel in different ways. | :03:26. | :03:31. | |
Ye of little faith! The Mayor of London has already said he doesn't | :03:32. | :03:35. | |
agree with this, and when people see the actual impact of what looks like | :03:36. | :03:41. | |
a populist tax will very potentially affect people's pensions, it might | :03:42. | :03:46. | |
become a lot less popular. On the Tory housing plans, I think it is | :03:47. | :03:50. | |
difficult to imagine how they are going to implement this huge, what | :03:51. | :03:55. | |
looks like a huge land and property grab. Through compulsory purchase | :03:56. | :04:01. | |
orders, which are not a simple instrument. They say they will | :04:02. | :04:05. | |
change the law but really the idea of paying people below the market | :04:06. | :04:08. | |
value for their assets is not something I can see sitting easily | :04:09. | :04:13. | |
with Tory backbenchers or the Tories in the House of Lords. Tom. Both | :04:14. | :04:20. | |
would appear superficially to be appealing to traditional left and | :04:21. | :04:24. | |
traditional right bases. What is more Tory than right to buy, then | :04:25. | :04:31. | |
councils sell on these houses, and Labour slapping a massive tax on the | :04:32. | :04:38. | |
city. The Tories' plan, I would say look a bit deeper and all of the | :04:39. | :04:42. | |
Tory narrative from the last six years which hasn't worked well is | :04:43. | :04:46. | |
talking about the private sector increasing supply in the market. Now | :04:47. | :04:50. | |
Mrs May is talking about the role for the state after all so this is | :04:51. | :04:58. | |
the shift creeping in. On the Labour transaction tax, one of the most | :04:59. | :05:02. | |
interesting things I heard in days was from Paul Mason, former BBC | :05:03. | :05:09. | |
correspondent, now a cog in Easter extreme. On Newsnight he said don't | :05:10. | :05:12. | |
worry about whether the Labour manifesto will add up, I'm promising | :05:13. | :05:17. | |
it will, the bigger Tory attack line should be what on earth will be the | :05:18. | :05:24. | |
macroeconomic effect of taking so much tax out of the system. Very | :05:25. | :05:30. | |
well, we shall see. At least we have some policies to talk about. | :05:31. | :05:32. | |
Now, on Tuesday Labour will launch its manifesto. | :05:33. | :05:34. | |
But we've already got a pretty good idea of what's in it - | :05:35. | :05:37. | |
that's because most of its contents were leaked to the media | :05:38. | :05:39. | |
Labour has a variety of spending pledges including an extra | :05:40. | :05:48. | |
?6 billion a year for the NHS, an additional ?8 billion for social | :05:49. | :05:51. | |
care over the lifetime of the next parliament, | :05:52. | :05:53. | |
as well as a ?250 billion in infrastructure over | :05:54. | :05:55. | |
The party will support the renewal of the Trident submarine system, | :05:56. | :06:03. | |
although any Prime Minister should be extremely cautious | :06:04. | :06:04. | |
about its use, and the party will hold a strategic defence | :06:05. | :06:07. | |
and security review immediately after the election. | :06:08. | :06:10. | |
In terms of immigration, Labour will seek "reasonable | :06:11. | :06:12. | |
management of migration", but it will not make "false | :06:13. | :06:15. | |
Elsewhere, university tuition fees will be abolished, | :06:16. | :06:21. | |
and the public sector pay cap, which limits pay rises | :06:22. | :06:23. | |
for public sector workers to 1%, will be scrapped. | :06:24. | :06:27. | |
The party also aims to renationalise the railways, the Royal Mail | :06:28. | :06:30. | |
and the National Grid, as well as creating at least one | :06:31. | :06:37. | |
A senior Labour backbencher described it to the Sunday Politics | :06:38. | :06:42. | |
as a manifesto for a leadership who don't "give a toss | :06:43. | :06:45. | |
about the wider public", and several other Labour candidates | :06:46. | :06:47. | |
told us they thought it had been deliberately | :06:48. | :06:49. | |
leaked by the leadership, with one suggesting | :06:50. | :06:53. | |
the leak was intended to "bounce the National Executive" | :06:54. | :06:55. | |
And we're joined now from Salford by the Shadow Business Secretary, | :06:56. | :06:58. | |
Welcome to the programme. The draft manifesto proposed to renationalise | :06:59. | :07:07. | |
the number of industry. You will wait for the franchises to run out | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
rather than buy them out at the moment so can you confirm the | :07:12. | :07:16. | |
railways will not be wholly nationalised until 2030, after three | :07:17. | :07:20. | |
Labour governments, and Jeremy Corbyn will be 80? I'm not going to | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
comment on leaks, you will just have to be patient and wait to see what | :07:27. | :07:33. | |
is in our manifesto. But you have already announced you will | :07:34. | :07:37. | |
nationalise the railways, so tell me about it. We have discussed taking | :07:38. | :07:42. | |
the franchises into public ownership as they expire, however the detail | :07:43. | :07:46. | |
will be set out in the manifesto so I'm not prepared to go into detail | :07:47. | :07:51. | |
until that policy is formally laid out on Tuesday. That doesn't sound | :07:52. | :07:55. | |
very hopeful but let's carry on. You will also nationalise the National | :07:56. | :08:02. | |
Grid, it has a market capitalisation of ?40 billion, why do you want to | :08:03. | :08:07. | |
nationalise that? Again, I'm not going to speculate on leaks, you | :08:08. | :08:12. | |
will just have to be patient. But you said you will nationalise the | :08:13. | :08:18. | |
National Grid so tell's Y. The leaks have suggested but you will just | :08:19. | :08:22. | |
have to wait and see what the final manifesto states on that one. So is | :08:23. | :08:27. | |
it a waste of time me asking you how you will pay for something that | :08:28. | :08:31. | |
costs 40 billion? Be patient, just couple of days to go, but what I | :08:32. | :08:37. | |
would say is there is growing pressure from the public to reform | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
the utilities sector. The Competition and Markets Authority | :08:42. | :08:45. | |
stated in 2015 that bill payers were paying over till debt -- ?2 billion | :08:46. | :08:50. | |
in excess of what they should be paying so there is a clear need for | :08:51. | :08:56. | |
reform. The bills we get are from the energy companies, you are not | :08:57. | :09:00. | |
going to nationalise them, you are going to nationalise the | :09:01. | :09:03. | |
distribution company and I wondered what is the case for nationalising | :09:04. | :09:08. | |
the distribution company? As I said, our full plans will be set out on | :09:09. | :09:13. | |
Tuesday. In relation to the big six energy companies, we know in recent | :09:14. | :09:17. | |
years they have been overcharging customers... There's no point in | :09:18. | :09:24. | |
answering questions I am not asking. I am asking what is the case for | :09:25. | :09:30. | |
nationalising the National Grid? There is a case for reforming the | :09:31. | :09:33. | |
energy sector as a whole and that looks at the activities of the big | :09:34. | :09:38. | |
six companies and it will look at other aspects too. You will have to | :09:39. | :09:43. | |
be patient and wait until Tuesday. What about the Royal Mail? Again, | :09:44. | :09:50. | |
you will have to wait until Tuesday. Why can't you just be honest with | :09:51. | :09:54. | |
the British voter? We know you are going to do this and you have a duty | :09:55. | :10:01. | |
to explain. I'm not even arguing whether it is right or wrong. The | :10:02. | :10:07. | |
Royal Mail was sold off and we know it was sold under value and British | :10:08. | :10:11. | |
taxpayers have a reason to feel aggrieved about that. There is a | :10:12. | :10:15. | |
long-term strategy that would ensure the Royal Mail was classified as a | :10:16. | :10:19. | |
key piece of infrastructure but the details of that will be set out in | :10:20. | :10:25. | |
our manifesto because we want to ensure businesses and households | :10:26. | :10:27. | |
ensure the best quality of service when it comes to their postal | :10:28. | :10:32. | |
providers. You plan to borrow an extra 25 billion per year, John | :10:33. | :10:37. | |
McDonnell has already announced this, on public investment, on top | :10:38. | :10:41. | |
of the around 50 billion already being planned for investment. You | :10:42. | :10:47. | |
will borrow it all so that means, if you can confirm, that many years | :10:48. | :10:54. | |
after the crash by 2021, Labour government would still be borrowing | :10:55. | :11:01. | |
75 billion a year. Is that correct? We have set out ?250 billion of | :11:02. | :11:07. | |
capital investment, and ?250 billion for a national investment bank. Our | :11:08. | :11:11. | |
financial and fiscal rules dictate we will leave the Government in a | :11:12. | :11:15. | |
state of less debt than we found it at the start of the parliament so we | :11:16. | :11:18. | |
won't increase the national debt at the end of our Parliamentary term. | :11:19. | :11:25. | |
How can you do that if by 2021 you will still be borrowing around 75 | :11:26. | :11:29. | |
billion a year, which is more than we borrow at the moment? The 500 | :11:30. | :11:36. | |
billion figure is set out over a period of ten years, it's a figure | :11:37. | :11:40. | |
that has been suggested by Peter Helm from Oxford University as a | :11:41. | :11:43. | |
figure that is necessary to bring us in line with other industrial | :11:44. | :11:48. | |
competitors. Similar figures have been suggested by groups such as the | :11:49. | :11:56. | |
CBI. By the way I have not included all 500 billion, just the 250 | :11:57. | :12:00. | |
billion on public spending, not the extra money. You talk about the | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
fiscal rules. The draft manifesto said you will leave debt as a | :12:06. | :12:09. | |
proportion of trend GDP law at the end of each parliament, you have | :12:10. | :12:16. | |
just said a version of that. What is trend GDP? In clear terms we will | :12:17. | :12:20. | |
ensure the debt we acquire will be reduced by the end of the | :12:21. | :12:24. | |
parliament. We won't leave the Government finances in a worse state | :12:25. | :12:32. | |
than we found them. OK, but what is trend GDP? Our rule is we will | :12:33. | :12:36. | |
ensure public sector net debt is less than we found it when we came | :12:37. | :12:40. | |
to power in Government on June the 8th. But that is not what your draft | :12:41. | :12:48. | |
manifesto says. I'm not going to comment on leaks, you are just going | :12:49. | :12:51. | |
to have to wait until Tuesday to look at the fine detail and perhaps | :12:52. | :12:57. | |
we will have another chat then. You have published your plans for | :12:58. | :13:00. | |
corporation tax and you will increase it by a third and your | :13:01. | :13:04. | |
predictions assumed that will get an extra 20 billion a year by the end | :13:05. | :13:09. | |
of the parliament. But that assumes the companies don't change their | :13:10. | :13:14. | |
behaviour, that they move money around, they leave the country or | :13:15. | :13:18. | |
they generate smaller profits. Is that realistic? You are right to | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
make that point and you will see when we set out our policies and | :13:25. | :13:27. | |
costings in the manifesto that we haven't spent all of the tax take. | :13:28. | :13:33. | |
We have allowed for different differentials and potential changes | :13:34. | :13:35. | |
in market activity because that would be approved and direction to | :13:36. | :13:40. | |
take. But corporation tax is allowed to be cut in France and the United | :13:41. | :13:48. | |
States, it's only 12.5% in Dublin. Many companies based in Britain are | :13:49. | :13:51. | |
already wondering whether they should relocate because of Brexit, | :13:52. | :13:56. | |
if you increase this tax by a third couldn't that clinch it for a number | :13:57. | :14:01. | |
of them? No, we will still be one of the lowest corporation tax rate in | :14:02. | :14:07. | |
the G7. Let's look at what's important for business. Cutting | :14:08. | :14:11. | |
corporation tax in itself doesn't improve productivity, or business | :14:12. | :14:15. | |
investment and there's no suggestion cutting corporation tax in recent | :14:16. | :14:18. | |
years has achieved that. Businesses need an investment in tools in | :14:19. | :14:25. | |
things they need to thrive and prosper, they also need to reduce | :14:26. | :14:29. | |
the burden at the lower end of the tax scale, before we get to the | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
Prophet stage. One key example is business rates. We have made the | :14:35. | :14:41. | |
proposal to government to in -- exclude machinery so businesses can | :14:42. | :14:44. | |
invest and grow operations in the future but the Government refused. | :14:45. | :14:51. | |
Corporation tax has been cut since 2010. When it was 28% it brought in | :14:52. | :15:01. | |
?43 billion a year. Now it is down to 20%, it brought in ?55 billion a | :15:02. | :15:08. | |
year. By cutting it in the last year, it brought in 21% more, so | :15:09. | :15:14. | |
what is the problem? It might have brought in more money, but has it | :15:15. | :15:18. | |
increased business investment in the long term. It is not just about | :15:19. | :15:24. | |
cutting corporation tax, but it is on the ability of businesses to | :15:25. | :15:28. | |
thrive and prosper. Business investment in the UK is below are | :15:29. | :15:34. | |
industrial competitors. Wages are stagnating which doesn't indicate | :15:35. | :15:41. | |
businesses are not doing well. Let me get it right, you are arguing if | :15:42. | :15:46. | |
we increase business tax by a third, that will increase investment? I am | :15:47. | :15:52. | |
not saying that. You just did. Know I didn't, I said reducing business | :15:53. | :16:00. | |
tax isn't enough, you have to invest in the things businesses need to | :16:01. | :16:04. | |
thrive and prosper. You have also got to lessen the burden on | :16:05. | :16:16. | |
business. You have announced a financial transaction tax. Your own | :16:17. | :16:20. | |
labour Mayor of London said he has vowed to fight it. He said I do not | :16:21. | :16:25. | |
want a unilateral tax on business in our city, so why are you proceeding | :16:26. | :16:31. | |
with it? This isn't a new initiative, there is a growing | :16:32. | :16:34. | |
global pressure to make sure we have fairness in the financial sector. | :16:35. | :16:38. | |
Ordinary British people are paying for our banking crisis they didn't | :16:39. | :16:44. | |
cause. Another important point, stamp duty reserve tax was brought | :16:45. | :16:49. | |
in in the 1600 and there have been little reforms. The sector has | :16:50. | :16:53. | |
changed and we have do provide changes to the system for that | :16:54. | :16:58. | |
change. High-frequency trading where we have a state of affairs where a | :16:59. | :17:03. | |
lot of shares are traded on computers within milliseconds. We | :17:04. | :17:07. | |
need a tax system that keeps up with that. What happens if they move the | :17:08. | :17:14. | |
computers to another country? Emily Thornaby said this morning, other | :17:15. | :17:19. | |
countries had already introduced a financial transaction tax, what | :17:20. | :17:22. | |
other countries have done that? There are ten countries looking at | :17:23. | :17:30. | |
introducing a transaction tax. Which ones have done it so far? They will | :17:31. | :17:37. | |
be later announcing a final package, going through the finer detail at | :17:38. | :17:42. | |
the moment. But the European Commission tried to get this done in | :17:43. | :17:46. | |
2011 and it still hasn't happened in any of these countries. But you are | :17:47. | :17:51. | |
going to go ahead unilaterally and risk these businesses, which | :17:52. | :17:56. | |
generate a lot of money, moving to other jurisdictions. There is not a | :17:57. | :18:00. | |
significant risk of that happening. The stamp duty reserve tax is levied | :18:01. | :18:11. | |
at either where the person or company is domiciled or where the | :18:12. | :18:16. | |
instrument is issued rather than worth the transaction takes place. | :18:17. | :18:21. | |
This tax in itself is not enough to make people leave this country in | :18:22. | :18:24. | |
terms of financial services because there is more to keep these | :18:25. | :18:29. | |
businesses here in terms of the investment we are making, the | :18:30. | :18:33. | |
economy that Labour will build, in terms of productivity improvement we | :18:34. | :18:37. | |
will see. Thank you very much, Rebecca Long-Bailey. | :18:38. | :18:42. | |
And listening to that was the Home Office Minister, Brandon Lewis. | :18:43. | :18:47. | |
Over the years, you have got corporation tax by 20%, it is lower | :18:48. | :18:53. | |
than international standards, so why are so many global companies who | :18:54. | :19:00. | |
make money out of Great Britain, still not paying 20%? It is one of | :19:01. | :19:05. | |
the problems with the point Labour were making and Rebecca could not | :19:06. | :19:08. | |
answer, these companies can move around the world. One of the | :19:09. | :19:14. | |
important things is having a low tax economy but these businesses, it | :19:15. | :19:18. | |
encourages them to come at a rate they are prepared to pay. People may | :19:19. | :19:23. | |
say they are right, if they were paying 19, 20% incorporation tax. | :19:24. | :19:29. | |
But they are not. Google runs a multi-million pound corporation and | :19:30. | :19:38. | |
did not pay anywhere near 20%. There are companies that are trading | :19:39. | :19:42. | |
internationally and that is why we have to get this work done with our | :19:43. | :19:50. | |
partners around the world. Has there been an improvement? It is more than | :19:51. | :19:54. | |
they were paying before. Whether it is Google or any other company, | :19:55. | :19:58. | |
alongside them being here, apart from the tax they pay, it is the | :19:59. | :20:04. | |
people they employ. The deal was, if you cut the business tax, the | :20:05. | :20:08. | |
corporation tax on profits, we would get more companies coming here and | :20:09. | :20:13. | |
more companies paying their tax. It seems it doesn't matter how low, a | :20:14. | :20:17. | |
number of companies just pay a derisory amount and you haven't been | :20:18. | :20:24. | |
able to change that. As you outlined, the income taken from the | :20:25. | :20:26. | |
changing corporation tax has gone up. That is from established British | :20:27. | :20:34. | |
companies, not from these international companies. It is | :20:35. | :20:37. | |
because more companies are coming here and paying tax. That is a good | :20:38. | :20:42. | |
thing. There is always more to do and that is why we want to crack | :20:43. | :20:47. | |
down. In the last few weeks in the Finnish Parliament, Labour refused | :20:48. | :20:51. | |
to put to another ?8.7 billion of tax take we could have got by | :20:52. | :20:57. | |
cracking down further. You claim to have made great progress on cracking | :20:58. | :21:02. | |
down on people and companies to pay the tax they should. But the tax gap | :21:03. | :21:07. | |
is the difference between what HMRC takes in and what it should take in. | :21:08. | :21:13. | |
It has barely moved in five years, so where is the progress? He have | :21:14. | :21:19. | |
brought in 150 billion more where we have cracked down on those tax | :21:20. | :21:23. | |
schemes. The gap is still the same as it was five years ago. It's gone | :21:24. | :21:33. | |
from 6.8, 26.5. It has gone down. The Prime Minister and the | :21:34. | :21:35. | |
Chancellor said they want to continue work on to get more money | :21:36. | :21:40. | |
on these companies while still having a competitive rate to | :21:41. | :21:46. | |
encourage these companies. While big business and the wealthy continue to | :21:47. | :21:51. | |
prosper, the Office for Budget Responsibility tell us those on | :21:52. | :21:54. | |
average earnings in this country will be earning less in real terms | :21:55. | :22:00. | |
by 2021 than they did in 2008. How can that be fair? I don't see it | :22:01. | :22:06. | |
that way. I haven't seen the figures you have got. What I can say to you, | :22:07. | :22:10. | |
Andrew, we have made sure the minimum wage has gone up, the actual | :22:11. | :22:16. | |
income tax people pay has gone down. So in their pocket, real terms, | :22:17. | :22:25. | |
people have more money. You are the self-styled party of work. We keep | :22:26. | :22:27. | |
emphasising work. Under your government you can work for 13 years | :22:28. | :22:31. | |
and still not earn any more at the end of it, and you did at the start. | :22:32. | :22:38. | |
Where is the reward for effort in that? I have not seen those figures. | :22:39. | :22:44. | |
There are 2.8 million more people, more jobs in economy than there was. | :22:45. | :22:50. | |
1000 jobs every day and people are working and developing through their | :22:51. | :22:53. | |
careers. This is what I thought was odd in what Rebecca was saying, | :22:54. | :22:57. | |
investing in people is what the apprenticeship levy is about, | :22:58. | :23:02. | |
companies are investing their works force to take more opportunities | :23:03. | :23:07. | |
that there. We are talking about fairness, politicians talk about | :23:08. | :23:10. | |
hard-working people and we know the average earnings are no higher than | :23:11. | :23:15. | |
they were in 2008. We know the pay and bonuses of senior executives | :23:16. | :23:20. | |
have continued to grow and the Institute for Fiscal Studies has | :23:21. | :23:23. | |
shown 3 million of the poorest households will lose an average of | :23:24. | :23:29. | |
?2500 a year in the next Parliament, benefits frozen, further sanctions | :23:30. | :23:35. | |
kick in. 3 million of the poorest losing 2500. Under the Tories, one | :23:36. | :23:40. | |
law for the rich and another for the poor. It is quite wrong. First of | :23:41. | :23:45. | |
all, we have got to be fair to the taxpayer who is funding the welfare | :23:46. | :23:50. | |
and benefit system. Which is why the welfare was right. Get more people | :23:51. | :23:56. | |
in work and then it is important to get more people upscaling. As that | :23:57. | :24:03. | |
allowance rises, people have more of the money they earn in their pocket | :24:04. | :24:08. | |
to be able to use in the economy. People will be worse off. 2500, | :24:09. | :24:14. | |
among the poorest already. They will have more money in their pocket as | :24:15. | :24:20. | |
we increase the allowance before people pay tax. We have seen | :24:21. | :24:26. | |
millions of people coming out of tax altogether. The reason I ask these | :24:27. | :24:30. | |
questions, you and the Prime Minister go on and on about the just | :24:31. | :24:35. | |
about managing classes. I am talking about the just about managing and | :24:36. | :24:39. | |
below that. It is all talk, you haven't done anything for them. We | :24:40. | :24:43. | |
have made sure they have an increasing minimum wage, it has gone | :24:44. | :24:48. | |
up more under us than any other previous government. Their wages | :24:49. | :24:55. | |
will be still lower in real terms. Let me come on to this plan for | :24:56. | :24:59. | |
housing. We have announced a new plan to increase affordable housing, | :25:00. | :25:04. | |
social housing, some council housing and social housing built by the | :25:05. | :25:08. | |
associations. How much money is behind this? It is part of the 1.4 | :25:09. | :25:12. | |
billion announced in the Autumn Statement. How many homes will you | :25:13. | :25:20. | |
get for 1.4 billion? That depends on the negotiations with local | :25:21. | :25:23. | |
authorities. It is local authorities, who know the area best. | :25:24. | :25:30. | |
I will not put a number on that. 1.4 billion, if you price the house at | :25:31. | :25:34. | |
100,000, which is very low, particularly for the South, back at | :25:35. | :25:40. | |
you 14,000 new homes. That is it. What we have seen before, how the | :25:41. | :25:45. | |
local government can leveraged to build thousands more homes. That is | :25:46. | :25:49. | |
what we want to see across the country. It is not just about the | :25:50. | :25:53. | |
money, for a lot of local authorities it is about the | :25:54. | :25:56. | |
expertise and knowledge on how to do this. That is why support from the | :25:57. | :26:02. | |
housing communities minister will help. What is the timescale, how | :26:03. | :26:08. | |
many more affordable homes will be built? I will not put a number on | :26:09. | :26:13. | |
it. You announced it today, so you cannot tell me how many more or what | :26:14. | :26:18. | |
the target is? It is a matter of working with the local authorities | :26:19. | :26:22. | |
who know what their local needs are, what land they have got available. | :26:23. | :26:26. | |
What we saw through the local elections with the Metro mayors, | :26:27. | :26:30. | |
they want to deliver in their areas, whether it is the West of England, | :26:31. | :26:33. | |
the north-east, Liverpool, Manchester and we want to work with | :26:34. | :26:39. | |
them. You have said variations of this for the past seven years and I | :26:40. | :26:42. | |
want some credibility. When you cannot tell us how much money, what | :26:43. | :26:48. | |
the target and timescale is, and this government, under which | :26:49. | :26:51. | |
affordable house building has fallen to a 24 year low. 1.2 million | :26:52. | :26:57. | |
families are on waiting lists for social housing to rent. That is your | :26:58. | :27:03. | |
record. Why should we believe a word you say? This is different to what | :27:04. | :27:07. | |
we have been doing over the last two years. We want to develop and have a | :27:08. | :27:12. | |
strong and stable economy that can sustain that 1.4 billion homes. This | :27:13. | :27:19. | |
is important. In 2010, we inherited the lowest level of house building, | :27:20. | :27:25. | |
75,000 new homes. That is about 189,000 over the last four years. | :27:26. | :27:30. | |
That is a big step forward after the crash, getting people back into the | :27:31. | :27:34. | |
industry. More first-time buyers onto the market. Final question, in | :27:35. | :27:45. | |
2010, 2011, your first year in government, there were 60,000 | :27:46. | :27:50. | |
affordable homes built. May not be enough, but last day it was 30 2000. | :27:51. | :27:58. | |
So why should we trust anything you say about this? On housing, we have | :27:59. | :28:06. | |
delivered. We have delivered more social housing. Double what Labour | :28:07. | :28:11. | |
did in 13 years, in just five years. This is what this policy is about, | :28:12. | :28:15. | |
working with local authorities to deliver more homes to people in | :28:16. | :28:16. | |
their local areas. Thank you. Now, they have a deficit | :28:17. | :28:20. | |
of between 15 and 20% in the polls, but Jeremy Corbyn and those | :28:21. | :28:23. | |
around him insist Labour can win. If the polls are right they've got | :28:24. | :28:26. | |
three and half weeks to change voters' minds and persuade those | :28:27. | :28:29. | |
fabled undecided voters We enlisted the polling organisation | :28:30. | :28:31. | |
YouGov to help us find out how the performance of party leaders | :28:32. | :28:36. | |
will affect behaviour Leeds, a city of three quarters | :28:37. | :28:38. | |
of a million people, eight Parliamentary seats and home | :28:39. | :28:48. | |
to our very own focus group. Our panel was recruited | :28:49. | :28:52. | |
from a variety of backgrounds and the majority say they haven't | :28:53. | :28:55. | |
decided who to vote for yet. Watching behind the glass, | :28:56. | :28:59. | |
two experts on different sides Giles Cunningham, who headed up | :29:00. | :29:01. | |
political press at Downing Street under David Cameron | :29:02. | :29:08. | |
and Aaron Bastani, Corbin supporter, under David Cameron | :29:09. | :29:15. | |
and Aaron Bastani, Corbyn supporter, I think Theresa May sees herself | :29:16. | :29:17. | |
as a pound shop Thatcher. Milliband's policies but when it | :29:18. | :29:21. | |
came about who you want, | :29:22. | :29:41. | |
if you wake up on maybe a 2015, We found in a couple of focus | :29:42. | :29:45. | |
groups, people saying we'd be quite relieved, | :29:46. | :29:49. | |
even though some of those same people have been saying we quite | :29:50. | :29:51. | |
like the Labour policies. I think the fact that Corbyn's | :29:52. | :29:53. | |
going so hard on his values, this is a really progressive | :29:54. | :29:58. | |
manifesto, they live But I think that's a new challenge, | :29:59. | :30:00. | |
that wasn't there in 2015. Is there anyone here that | :30:01. | :30:04. | |
you don't recognise? After a little warm up, | :30:05. | :30:06. | |
the first exercise, recognising I think it's nice to have a strong | :30:07. | :30:08. | |
woman in politics, I do. But I've got to say, | :30:09. | :30:15. | |
when she comes on the news, I kind of do think, | :30:16. | :30:17. | |
here we go again. Tell me about Tim Farron, what | :30:18. | :30:20. | |
are your impressions of Tim Farron? It isn't going to do anything, | :30:21. | :30:23. | |
it isn't going to change anything. You'll be surprised to hear it's | :30:24. | :30:27. | |
actually the Greens. Strong and stable leadership | :30:28. | :30:36. | |
in the national interest. Yes, Team May, it's | :30:37. | :30:48. | |
the British equivalent of make What do we think about this one | :30:49. | :30:53. | |
for the many and not the few? It's not quite as bad | :30:54. | :31:03. | |
as strong and stable, but it will probably get | :31:04. | :31:05. | |
on our nerves after a while. We must seize that chance today | :31:06. | :31:08. | |
and every day until June the 8th. But that's not quite my | :31:09. | :31:18. | |
question, my question is, if you are Prime Minister, | :31:19. | :31:26. | |
we will leave, come hell or high water, whatever is on the table | :31:27. | :31:29. | |
at the end of the negotiations? If we win the election, | :31:30. | :31:32. | |
we'll get a good deal with Europe. Assertive and in control | :31:33. | :31:35. | |
and he felt comfortable But the second one, I thought | :31:36. | :31:36. | |
he was very hesitant. I thought he was kind of, | :31:37. | :31:41. | |
hovering around, skirting around and that's the second | :31:42. | :31:50. | |
time I've seen a similar interview with the question | :31:51. | :31:53. | |
being asked regarding Brexit. I don't think I'd have | :31:54. | :31:55. | |
any confidence with him You think you are going up | :31:56. | :31:57. | |
against some quite strong people, how are you going to stand | :31:58. | :32:01. | |
up for us? When you are in negotiations, | :32:02. | :32:03. | |
you need to be tough. And actually is right | :32:04. | :32:08. | |
to be tough sometimes, particularly when you are doing | :32:09. | :32:10. | |
something for the country. There's a reason for talking | :32:11. | :32:12. | |
about strong and stable leadership. It's about the future | :32:13. | :32:14. | |
of the country, it's It's just that people kind of listen | :32:15. | :32:16. | |
to that kind of thing and think Both on The One Show | :32:17. | :32:21. | |
and in the news. She attracts the public better | :32:22. | :32:26. | |
than what Corbyn does. She didn't answer the question | :32:27. | :32:32. | |
in a more articular way than Corbyn Imagine that Theresa | :32:33. | :32:35. | |
May is an animal. So, in your minds, | :32:36. | :32:41. | |
what animal is coming to mind I've done a Pekinese because I think | :32:42. | :32:44. | |
she's all bark and no bite. Alpaca because she's | :32:45. | :32:59. | |
superior looking and woolly I don't think his policies | :33:00. | :33:05. | |
are for the modern, real world. A mouse because they are weak | :33:06. | :33:20. | |
and they can be easily bullied, but also they can catch | :33:21. | :33:24. | |
you by surprise if you're What do you take away | :33:25. | :33:26. | |
from what you saw then, and what message would you send back | :33:27. | :33:34. | |
to the Tories now? I think what came over is people see | :33:35. | :33:37. | |
Theresa May as a strong politician, not everyone likes her, | :33:38. | :33:40. | |
but you don't need to be liked to be elected, | :33:41. | :33:43. | |
because ultimately it's about who do you trust with your future | :33:44. | :33:45. | |
and your security. I think what I also take out | :33:46. | :33:47. | |
of that focus group, was it was a group of floating | :33:48. | :33:50. | |
voters, there was no huge appetite for the Lib Dems and there was no | :33:51. | :33:53. | |
huge appetite for Ukip. So my messaged back to CCHQ | :33:54. | :33:56. | |
would be stick to the plan. I thought the response | :33:57. | :33:58. | |
to the manifesto was excellent. It's clear that people aren't | :33:59. | :34:02. | |
particularly keen on Theresa May, There are some associations with her | :34:03. | :34:04. | |
about strength and stability, which is exactly what the Tory party | :34:05. | :34:09. | |
want of course, but they are not positive and nobody thinks | :34:10. | :34:13. | |
that she has a vision So, what I'd say the Jeremy Corbyn, | :34:14. | :34:15. | |
what I'd say to the Labour Party is, they need to really emphasise | :34:16. | :34:21. | |
the manifesto in Jeremy Corbyn himself has to perform | :34:22. | :34:23. | |
out of his skin and I think he has to reemphasise those | :34:24. | :34:29. | |
characteristics which may be have come to the fore may be | :34:30. | :34:32. | |
over the last 12 months, resilience, strength and the fact | :34:33. | :34:34. | |
that he's come this far, why not take that final step and go | :34:35. | :34:37. | |
into ten Downing Street? We're joined now by the American | :34:38. | :34:40. | |
political consultant For the sake of this discussion, | :34:41. | :34:47. | |
assume the polls at the moment are broadly right, is there any hope for | :34:48. | :34:54. | |
Mr Corbyn in the undecided voters? Know, and this is a very serious | :34:55. | :35:00. | |
collection with serious consequences to who wins. Nobody cares whether | :35:01. | :35:03. | |
you can draw and what animal they represent, they want to know where | :35:04. | :35:08. | |
they stand, and I felt that was frivolous. I come to Britain to | :35:09. | :35:12. | |
watch elections because I learned from here. Your elections are more | :35:13. | :35:17. | |
substantial, more serious, more policy and less about personality | :35:18. | :35:21. | |
and that peace was only about personality. That's partly because | :35:22. | :35:26. | |
Mrs May has decided to make this a presidential election. You can see | :35:27. | :35:36. | |
on the posters it is all Team May. I agree with that, and in her language | :35:37. | :35:43. | |
she says not everyone benefits from a Conservative government, I don't | :35:44. | :35:47. | |
see how using anything Republicans have used in the past. In fact her | :35:48. | :35:52. | |
campaign is more of a centrist Democrats but it is a smart strategy | :35:53. | :35:57. | |
because it pushes Corbyn further to the left. Of course you said Hillary | :35:58. | :36:02. | |
Clinton have won. On election night the polling was so bad in America, | :36:03. | :36:07. | |
the exit polls that were done, the BBC told America she had won. No, I | :36:08. | :36:13. | |
was anchoring the programme that night, I ignored your tweet. The BBC | :36:14. | :36:21. | |
had the same numbers. Yes, but we did not say she had won, I can | :36:22. | :36:25. | |
assure you of that. Because of people like you we thought she had | :36:26. | :36:31. | |
but we didn't broadcast it. That was a smart approach. My point is other | :36:32. | :36:38. | |
than teasing you, maybe there is hope for Jeremy Corbyn. I think you | :36:39. | :36:43. | |
will have one of the lowest turnout in modern history and I think Labour | :36:44. | :36:48. | |
will fall to one of the lowest percentages, not percentage of | :36:49. | :36:52. | |
number of seats they have had, and this will be a matter of | :36:53. | :36:56. | |
soul-searching for both political parties. What you do with a sizeable | :36:57. | :37:01. | |
majority, and she has a responsibility to tell the British | :37:02. | :37:04. | |
people exactly what happens as she moves forward. He and Labour will | :37:05. | :37:10. | |
have to take a look at whether they still represent a significant slice | :37:11. | :37:15. | |
of the British population. Do you see a realignment in British | :37:16. | :37:20. | |
politics taking place? I see a crumbling of the left and yet there | :37:21. | :37:24. | |
is still a significant percentage of the British population that once | :37:25. | :37:28. | |
someone who is centre-left. And they like a lot of Mr Corbyn's policies. | :37:29. | :37:37. | |
I'm listening to Michael foot. I went to school here in the 1980s and | :37:38. | :37:40. | |
I feel like I'm watching the Labour Party of 35 years ago, in a | :37:41. | :37:43. | |
population that wants to focus on the future, not the past. Thank you. | :37:44. | :37:49. | |
It's just gone 11.35, you're watching the Sunday Politics. | :37:50. | :37:51. | |
We say goodbye to viewers in Scotland, who leave us now | :37:52. | :37:54. | |
Coming up here in 20 minutes, the Week Ahead. | :37:55. | :38:04. | |
Hello, I'm Lucie Fisher, coming up on the Sunday Politics | :38:05. | :38:07. | |
The fishermen questioning the government's promise to take | :38:08. | :38:12. | |
And for the next twenty minutes, I'm joined by the Conservative | :38:13. | :38:26. | |
parliamentary candidate for Plymouth Moor View Jonny Mercer | :38:27. | :38:27. | |
and the Labour candidate for South East Cornwall Gareth Derrick - | :38:28. | :38:32. | |
Theresa May has indicated she will allow | :38:33. | :38:35. | |
Conservative MPs a free vote on whether to bring | :38:36. | :38:37. | |
The use of hunting with dogs has been banned since 2004 | :38:38. | :38:43. | |
when Tony Blair's government voted for an end to the sport. | :38:44. | :38:45. | |
Mrs May was asked her views on the subject at a question | :38:46. | :38:48. | |
and answer session in Leeds earlier this week. | :38:49. | :38:57. | |
This is the situation on which individuals have one view pro or | :38:58. | :39:06. | |
against. As it happens, I have always been in favour of fox | :39:07. | :39:13. | |
hunting. We maintain our commitment, hunting. We maintain our commitment, | :39:14. | :39:18. | |
we have had a commitment to allow a free vote at the Conservative Party. | :39:19. | :39:21. | |
That is what we would allow Parliament the opportunity to take | :39:22. | :39:25. | |
the decision on this. Do you think Mrs May is genuine, prepare to say | :39:26. | :39:29. | |
what she thinks even if it is unpopular. It is an absurd thing to | :39:30. | :39:34. | |
be raising this time. Far more important things we should be | :39:35. | :39:37. | |
talking about in this election. If it came back to Parliament, forced | :39:38. | :39:41. | |
majority, it would be insult to the majority, it would be insult to the | :39:42. | :39:44. | |
British people who have made it quite clear we don't have any | :39:45. | :39:47. | |
interest going back to that part of fox hunting. The callous and cruel | :39:48. | :39:50. | |
killing of animals by wild dogs. Going further than that, if we did | :39:51. | :39:55. | |
bring it back into law, how embarrassing would that be on the | :39:56. | :39:58. | |
international scene? An embarrassment for Britain to take | :39:59. | :40:02. | |
that backward step. Reading is well and truly a box of faded, colonial | :40:03. | :40:10. | |
power. Is it absurd? Quite stringent, Mrs May? I was not | :40:11. | :40:16. | |
expecting it. Not an issue that has come up on the doors too much in | :40:17. | :40:21. | |
Plymouth, we have not seen the hunt going down Tavistock Road for some | :40:22. | :40:28. | |
time. Is it toxic for the party? I don't think it is toxic the | :40:29. | :40:31. | |
perception around hunting is different from the reality. If you | :40:32. | :40:35. | |
push up into Dartmoor, there are country communities focused around | :40:36. | :40:39. | |
country sports. They say eight in ten members of the public against | :40:40. | :40:43. | |
the? Could be up highly unpopular move? It could go to a free vote, | :40:44. | :40:48. | |
let's see what happened. Country sports can be enjoyed without | :40:49. | :40:52. | |
killing. The enjoyment part of sport is going about the killing of the | :40:53. | :40:58. | |
animals. How will you vote? I do a thing called direct democracy, which | :40:59. | :41:04. | |
I did since 2015. It has many flaws, but I will be doing it. You ask | :41:05. | :41:10. | |
members of the public? I will ask people in Plymouth as to which way I | :41:11. | :41:14. | |
will vote. What would you vote in the poll? In this direct democracy | :41:15. | :41:20. | |
I'll be representing people in Plymouth. Both of you service | :41:21. | :41:26. | |
personnel. Very lucky, former service personnel. Joined by you in | :41:27. | :41:34. | |
a week where military was top of the agenda. | :41:35. | :41:37. | |
First there was the Conservative promise to spend a bit | :41:38. | :41:39. | |
more money on defence, then Labour's Jeremy Corbyn said | :41:40. | :41:41. | |
And all this watched closely in Plymouth where past elections | :41:42. | :41:44. | |
have been a very tight fight between the two parties. | :41:45. | :41:47. | |
It is the biggest naval base in western Europe. Covering 650 acres. | :41:48. | :41:58. | |
Devonport is usually important to the local economy in Plymouth, | :41:59. | :42:03. | |
employing 2500 people and hundreds of local firms. In the run-up to a | :42:04. | :42:08. | |
general election, when political parties start talking about defence | :42:09. | :42:12. | |
spending, people here tend to listen. The best defence for Britain | :42:13. | :42:19. | |
is a government actively engaged in seeking political solutions to the | :42:20. | :42:24. | |
world's problems. In a week in which Labour's manifesto was leaked to the | :42:25. | :42:29. | |
press, Jeremy Corbyn was forced to clarify the party's position on | :42:30. | :42:35. | |
defence. I accept military action under international law is a | :42:36. | :42:38. | |
circumstances is necessary. His circumstances is necessary. His | :42:39. | :42:42. | |
message was not well received on the high street in Devonport. With | :42:43. | :42:46. | |
Corbett not wanting a nuclear deterrent, every country, we need | :42:47. | :42:52. | |
it, all these tinpot countries, like North Korea, you have to watch those | :42:53. | :43:00. | |
countries. It has not been all plain sailing for the Conservatives. In | :43:01. | :43:05. | |
2015, rumours and the press, that Plymouth -based HMS Ocean, fresh | :43:06. | :43:14. | |
after refit was to be decommissioned. Rubbished by the Dem | :43:15. | :43:18. | |
candidate Johnny Mercer. Concerned by the governorship would go out of | :43:19. | :43:25. | |
service in 2018. The city's Royal commander Citadel base will close in | :43:26. | :43:29. | |
the next ten years. The first time I've done myself. Inside this newly | :43:30. | :43:35. | |
opened pasty shop, uncertainty about which way they will vote. Everybody | :43:36. | :43:39. | |
promises this and that. Generally getting in, we will forget about | :43:40. | :43:44. | |
that from now. We will bring this in. I honestly don't know. We're | :43:45. | :43:51. | |
quite well-known for our services. That is why we get left alone. This | :43:52. | :43:55. | |
week in a letter to the Prime Minister a group of former military | :43:56. | :44:00. | |
top brass criticised the current level of defence spending. Currently | :44:01. | :44:05. | |
two percent of GDP. This we are going to spend two percent is | :44:06. | :44:09. | |
needs is about 3%, the money spent needs is about 3%, the money spent | :44:10. | :44:14. | |
on front line military capabilities, and for the pensions. All the other | :44:15. | :44:18. | |
things that do not deliver front line key abilities to be taken out | :44:19. | :44:22. | |
of the defence budget. The Conservatives five back they had | :44:23. | :44:25. | |
raised the defence budget in each year Parliament if they win the | :44:26. | :44:29. | |
election. Labour says they would maintain concurrent defence spending | :44:30. | :44:36. | |
levels. Johnny Kimura former British Army officer. A volatile world out | :44:37. | :44:40. | |
ballistic missiles, China has become ballistic missiles, China has become | :44:41. | :44:45. | |
Middle East. Our Tories taking Middle East. Our Tories taking | :44:46. | :44:50. | |
defence spending seriously enough? There are real challenges around the | :44:51. | :44:54. | |
fence. I made no secret about that in my first two years in Parliament. | :44:55. | :44:58. | |
I want to see an increase in defence expenditure. The idea we have a | :44:59. | :45:01. | |
military incapable, poorly equipped and so once, it is all relative. Our | :45:02. | :45:08. | |
capabilities, we have lost people, but our capabilities are phenomenal. | :45:09. | :45:13. | |
You look at the reach of our UK operations, and so forth. They are | :45:14. | :45:18. | |
exponentially getting better. Should we be doing more? Yes. The idea we | :45:19. | :45:24. | |
are driving around in a tinpot military, offensive. We don't need | :45:25. | :45:29. | |
3%? I would argue for as much as we can. It is not about the figure. It | :45:30. | :45:34. | |
is about the capability we can project with our Armed Forces. Two | :45:35. | :45:40. | |
percent, 3%, whatever. We need to configure ourselves to face the | :45:41. | :45:43. | |
threats we are facing. What do you make of the Tory pledge? I would | :45:44. | :45:50. | |
jump in there. To say that the capability is increasing | :45:51. | :45:52. | |
exponentially is ridiculous. Very consistent what we're hearing from | :45:53. | :45:56. | |
the very top, Theresa May, Michael Fallon. We are at the point where | :45:57. | :46:00. | |
defence spending is at a 20 year low. It was 1.9% of GDP last year | :46:01. | :46:07. | |
this they are pledging to increase it by a very minor amount, 0.5% per | :46:08. | :46:11. | |
year. Not going to address the very real problems. We have a very | :46:12. | :46:15. | |
diminished fleet. Only 19 service ships. That they have the drop in | :46:16. | :46:20. | |
the future. There is not the money to bring on a new fleet. You are | :46:21. | :46:27. | |
former Commodore in the Royal Navy. The assertion our defence ability is | :46:28. | :46:33. | |
diminished is nonsense. It does not matter about the figures, it is the | :46:34. | :46:37. | |
capability we can project. Having gone through the 2003 Afghanistan | :46:38. | :46:42. | |
operations, it is simply not true. However loudly shouted our defensive | :46:43. | :46:47. | |
ability has fallen off the planet, we have challenges around spending, | :46:48. | :46:51. | |
better, looking after our people. better, looking after our people. | :46:52. | :46:56. | |
I'm a chief protagonist for that in Parliament. The idea we have a poor | :46:57. | :47:02. | |
monetary, Inc incapable... That is not... How would the defence be | :47:03. | :47:10. | |
better under Labour? Labour would be committed to holding firm on the two | :47:11. | :47:15. | |
percent Nato commitments, putting in place a more balanced capability in | :47:16. | :47:19. | |
the future. The Tories are saying they will have the two percent plus | :47:20. | :47:24. | |
money. For example, we are investing huge amounts of money in the two | :47:25. | :47:28. | |
aircraft carriers which are a good thing in many respects. Forcing the | :47:29. | :47:32. | |
whole of the Armed Forces to come out we cannot sustain that kind of | :47:33. | :47:36. | |
percent of our Armed Forces without percent of our Armed Forces without | :47:37. | :47:39. | |
spending which they are not going to bring. We would have approached | :47:40. | :47:43. | |
bringing more balance. Does this all boil down to trust? Do people trust | :47:44. | :47:50. | |
the Tories they will come good? You did say before the last election HMS | :47:51. | :47:55. | |
Ocean would be safe. Subsequent to the election, it was scrapped. What | :47:56. | :48:01. | |
I said in the tweet, HMS Ocean would be scrapped, that is nonsense. The | :48:02. | :48:08. | |
decisions around equipment and procurement go around all the time. | :48:09. | :48:11. | |
Looking at the threats we face. Spending priorities. When it comes | :48:12. | :48:17. | |
down to trust, I understand the Labour Party have on their manifesto | :48:18. | :48:21. | |
commitment, but ultimately you are led by someone who's a member of | :48:22. | :48:25. | |
CND, he does not believe in it. A vote for Labour for summer like | :48:26. | :48:29. | |
Plymouth be catastrophic. Here we go, trying to bring the argument up | :48:30. | :48:34. | |
to Jeremy Corbyn. He is your leader. What signalled does give to the | :48:35. | :48:39. | |
people in Plymouth that HMS Ocean refitted at 65 million cost in 2015, | :48:40. | :48:47. | |
a predictive life in 2025, scrapped. What if we get the Tied 26s down | :48:48. | :48:53. | |
here to replace that. That is the nature of the fence. What signal | :48:54. | :48:57. | |
does it send around the amphibious capability? Very briefly, people on | :48:58. | :49:06. | |
the doorstep, they think Jeremy Corbyn 's antinuclear? Does that | :49:07. | :49:10. | |
make a difference to how people will vote? The Labour Party is absolutely | :49:11. | :49:16. | |
and seriously committed to an independent nuclear deterrent. | :49:17. | :49:22. | |
Jeremy Corbyn has a personal view about being antinuclear, and many | :49:23. | :49:26. | |
people do. He said he was not a pacifist. We had to move on. Many | :49:27. | :49:33. | |
people see reducing nuclear armaments as a huge thing for our | :49:34. | :49:35. | |
society and world. It was at the centre of last | :49:36. | :49:36. | |
year's EU referendum, and in many parts of the South West | :49:37. | :49:40. | |
it'll be a big issue in this No surprise then that | :49:41. | :49:43. | |
the Environment Secretary was in the region meeting | :49:44. | :49:46. | |
fishermen this week. She was one of the stars of the | :49:47. | :49:59. | |
League campaign. We need to take back control and vote leave on | :50:00. | :50:02. | |
Thursday. Environment Secretary Andrea Leadsom. In Cornwall this | :50:03. | :50:08. | |
week, hanging out in the fishing communities who voted the way she | :50:09. | :50:12. | |
did. I gather Andrea Leadsom was in the patch. Not keen to answer | :50:13. | :50:17. | |
questions about the planned to take back control. A visit intended to be | :50:18. | :50:22. | |
private, apparently. Some of them are, I'm told. For those who did get | :50:23. | :50:28. | |
to meet, a chance to remind her promises made. We were front and | :50:29. | :50:33. | |
centre in the Brexit campaign, prepared to be used then. The | :50:34. | :50:41. | |
negotiators, pray Brexit, and overfishing. Nervousness that a | :50:42. | :50:48. | |
leaving present, exclusive use of the fishing waters up to 12 miles | :50:49. | :50:51. | |
off the British coast could be bargained away. If the final outcome | :50:52. | :50:56. | |
is the UK Government saving a few jobs in the city of London and and | :50:57. | :51:03. | |
betraying the producers and fishermen here, the general public | :51:04. | :51:06. | |
will not be very happy with that. Only yesterday the campaign group | :51:07. | :51:12. | |
Fishing for Leave was due to meet, with the fishing minister, George | :51:13. | :51:15. | |
Eustis. The cancellation of the meeting at short notice has caused | :51:16. | :51:19. | |
some to suppose the government is getting tied up in knots. Somewhere | :51:20. | :51:23. | |
behind the scenes there is a change in policy. Someone cannot say what | :51:24. | :51:28. | |
they were intending to say. Rather than saying the situation has | :51:29. | :51:32. | |
changed, political things are difficult. They have said sorry I | :51:33. | :51:34. | |
cannot come to the meeting. That seems bad. The fishermen here were | :51:35. | :51:41. | |
already a bit worried, the cancellation of this weekend's | :51:42. | :51:45. | |
meeting has unnerved them even more. Some reckon the politicians don't | :51:46. | :51:47. | |
want to answer difficult questions about something called the London | :51:48. | :51:55. | |
Convention. Drawn up before we joined the EU, the London Convention | :51:56. | :51:58. | |
gives other European countries access to the waters between six and | :51:59. | :52:03. | |
12 miles off the British coast. It could still apply even after we | :52:04. | :52:07. | |
leave. And that the government is yet to serve notice on the agreement | :52:08. | :52:10. | |
is seen by some as a potential problem. Perhaps even assign | :52:11. | :52:14. | |
ministers are not serious about a new fishing deal. If it was me, and | :52:15. | :52:21. | |
I was in Andrea Leadsom's or George Eustis's shoes, I would have given | :52:22. | :52:25. | |
notice to clear the ground of any potential trip hazards. Let's be | :52:26. | :52:29. | |
clear, we have raised that. The fishing minister told us this week a | :52:30. | :52:31. | |
Conservative government would definitely take back control the | :52:32. | :52:34. | |
British fishing waters. The fishermen reckon, if you are serious | :52:35. | :52:39. | |
about taking back control he would have torn up the London Convention? | :52:40. | :52:43. | |
It is not about tearing it up. The London Convention have the provision | :52:44. | :52:47. | |
you can give two years notice to leave. Some lawyers would say the | :52:48. | :52:50. | |
common fisheries policy superseded the agreement. We are looking | :52:51. | :52:55. | |
closely at all of the issues. As the prime ministers said, we had to be | :52:56. | :52:58. | |
to make an announcement on this soon. For now Mr Eustis is sticking | :52:59. | :53:03. | |
to the line he gave us back in March. Whether a commitment to get | :53:04. | :53:06. | |
rid of the London Convention makes it into the Conservative manifesto | :53:07. | :53:07. | |
remains to be seen. To discuss this we are joined by the | :53:08. | :53:15. | |
Ukip candidate in South West Devon, Ian Ross. And from our true arose | :53:16. | :53:21. | |
studio, the candidate for St Ives, Andrew George. Ian, if we come to | :53:22. | :53:28. | |
you first, Ukip has launched its policy for fishing, you say you are | :53:29. | :53:32. | |
completely going to take back control of our waters. Would that | :53:33. | :53:37. | |
not antagonise the European union before negotiations? No, I think | :53:38. | :53:43. | |
absolutely not. We're trying to get to the position where we are truly | :53:44. | :53:47. | |
sovereign and independent country again. Most countries in the world | :53:48. | :53:52. | |
who have maritime exclusion zones controlled them exclusively. That is | :53:53. | :53:57. | |
to say, the fishing rights in them are done by those nationals of the | :53:58. | :54:03. | |
country concerned. You will Tarrabt the London agreement, which means | :54:04. | :54:08. | |
the 12 miles outside of our coasts, we could start fishing in | :54:09. | :54:13. | |
straightaway, stop foreign, European vessels fishing. The London | :54:14. | :54:21. | |
Convention affects fishing in the six to 12 mile zone. The late rest | :54:22. | :54:25. | |
of the waters up to 200 miles out, the solution zone is governed by the | :54:26. | :54:30. | |
common fisheries Convention. When we leave the EU, we will drop out of | :54:31. | :54:34. | |
that. They'll be a scenario where EU ships can come in the six and 12 | :54:35. | :54:40. | |
mile zone. Andrew, we were speaking to fishermen this week, he told us | :54:41. | :54:45. | |
you personally have been very perceptive to their arguments. | :54:46. | :54:48. | |
Actually the Liberal Democrat party is not so much. What would you say | :54:49. | :54:54. | |
to that? Well, in fact the party and myself when I was fisheries | :54:55. | :54:57. | |
spokesman for the party argued very strong links for the end of the | :54:58. | :55:03. | |
London Convention. What we need to do is bring fisheries regulations up | :55:04. | :55:08. | |
to date. Allowing access between the six and 12 mile zone is in fact | :55:09. | :55:15. | |
rather archaic, as the hysterical entitlement of foreign vessels are | :55:16. | :55:19. | |
indeed vessels that have been scrapped years ago. And the power | :55:20. | :55:24. | |
and effectiveness of those vessels coming from France and other | :55:25. | :55:28. | |
countries into those six and 12 mile zone are not. Should the government | :55:29. | :55:35. | |
have served notice on this already present this is something which | :55:36. | :55:38. | |
could have happened years ago, did not require Brexit to negotiate the | :55:39. | :55:43. | |
six and 12 mile zone. Something which could, and we have been | :55:44. | :55:46. | |
arguing for years, should have been part of the renegotiation and | :55:47. | :55:49. | |
modernisation of the common fisheries policy. Does not require | :55:50. | :55:55. | |
Brexit in any sense, to actually regularise and bring up to date | :55:56. | :56:01. | |
something. Johnny, as a Conservative, why haven't you done | :56:02. | :56:05. | |
this? The Prime Minister was asked about this in the last PMQs, before | :56:06. | :56:11. | |
parliament broke up. I think there will be something on this in a | :56:12. | :56:15. | |
manifesto. That is my feeling. I have no insight into that. On this I | :56:16. | :56:21. | |
will plead the fifth. If we sit here in a week's Tymon is not in a | :56:22. | :56:24. | |
manifesto, let's have a conversation about it. It is clear, you heard | :56:25. | :56:29. | |
challenge around this area. The challenge around this area. The | :56:30. | :56:32. | |
Conservative government is committed to the UK fishing. Something which | :56:33. | :56:38. | |
may be in the Tory manifesto? I don't know. We have been talking | :56:39. | :56:41. | |
about it the years from the triggering of Article 50 was a | :56:42. | :56:45. | |
perfect opportunity to clear the slate, taking back for control of | :56:46. | :56:48. | |
our fisheries, starting the negotiation from there. I am | :56:49. | :56:51. | |
concerned personally the Tory party are hanging back with their real | :56:52. | :56:56. | |
feelings until after the election. Part of their negotiating package. | :56:57. | :57:01. | |
That may not be negotiation that helps and supports our fishermen in | :57:02. | :57:04. | |
the south-west. That might be part of a bigger deal to help people in | :57:05. | :57:08. | |
the south-east get their rights for bankers. Could you reply to that? | :57:09. | :57:17. | |
The idea, we have been through the whole argument about using EU | :57:18. | :57:19. | |
nationals at negotiating chips, very emotive. All Theresa May and the | :57:20. | :57:24. | |
government and George Eustis is trying to do is get the best deal | :57:25. | :57:27. | |
fishermen. You will see more detail fishermen. You will see more detail | :57:28. | :57:32. | |
on that in the manifesto. Could fishermen suffer as part of getting | :57:33. | :57:38. | |
a good negotiating deal? I think fishermen have been sold a cruel | :57:39. | :57:43. | |
hoax. Through the leaving process. You might as well put the reclaiming | :57:44. | :57:47. | |
of the fishing waters out of a 200 mile limit on the site of a red | :57:48. | :57:54. | |
campaign bus. There is no way which that can be achieved unless you are | :57:55. | :57:58. | |
prepared to enforce that with gunboats, and be on a war footing. | :57:59. | :58:02. | |
What we need is to be very realistic about what can be achieved outside | :58:03. | :58:12. | |
of the 12 mile limit. It is, the fishermen themselves have been let | :58:13. | :58:14. | |
down. I have to leave it there. Thank you. | :58:15. | :58:21. | |
There is a full list of candidates standing on June the 8th on the BBC | :58:22. | :58:25. | |
website. Now our regular round-up | :58:26. | :58:28. | |
of the political week Exeter's Labour MP Ben Bradshaw | :58:29. | :58:42. | |
refused to endorse his own party's league manifesto, when asked about | :58:43. | :58:47. | |
this week. I have my own manifesto. Support it? I support my Exeter | :58:48. | :58:52. | |
manifesto. Meanwhile Labour rejected the Green Party's offer not to stand | :58:53. | :58:59. | |
in Exeter, in exchange for not starting in the Isle of Wight. When | :59:00. | :59:07. | |
we are told when the election would be, and suddenly moving forward | :59:08. | :59:11. | |
three years, making a nonsense of democracy for smaller parties. | :59:12. | :59:16. | |
Secondary schools in Devon say they're cutting hundreds of jobs, | :59:17. | :59:19. | |
removing the number of courses on offer to balance their books. Not | :59:20. | :59:23. | |
good enough to say there is not enough money. This is the future of | :59:24. | :59:28. | |
our country and children. A row erupting over the use of children as | :59:29. | :59:32. | |
political props, after a visit from Tim Farron. Let's look at this row, | :59:33. | :59:47. | |
Tim Farren using children as political props. Tim Farron was at a | :59:48. | :59:52. | |
school which your children attend, and your wife put up some footage, | :59:53. | :59:56. | |
unhappy enough to stay during protest up the road. In favour of | :59:57. | :00:01. | |
the Tory party. She tweeted, your children should not be used as | :00:02. | :00:04. | |
political props. This is something you support. I support my wife. She | :00:05. | :00:11. | |
said, and I think she has a clear point. During a general election | :00:12. | :00:15. | |
campaign schools should not be used to launch campaign policies. I | :00:16. | :00:19. | |
support in that. Everybody is entitled to different view. Even if | :00:20. | :00:25. | |
it is about school policy. Those children don't have a choice about | :00:26. | :00:28. | |
being there. I go out on the campaign trail with my children all | :00:29. | :00:31. | |
the time. I believe people are looking at me, I want them to know | :00:32. | :00:35. | |
me and my family, know what motivates me. There are pictures of | :00:36. | :00:41. | |
you sitting with children? During a campaign period, no, that was what | :00:42. | :00:44. | |
was said. Gareth, we saw Ben Bradshaw there. I am being told, | :00:45. | :00:51. | |
that is the end of the programme. That is the Sunday holed politics. | :00:52. | :00:53. | |
Thanks to both my guess. I hand Tories are saying. It is a very | :00:54. | :00:58. | |
emotive subject and we have run out of time. | :00:59. | :01:05. | |
On Thursday nominations closed in the 650 parliamentary | :01:06. | :01:10. | |
seats across the country, so now we know exactly who's | :01:11. | :01:12. | |
We've been analysing the parties' candidates to find out | :01:13. | :01:19. | |
what they might tell us about the make-up of the House | :01:20. | :01:22. | |
Well, we know Theresa May is committed to delivering Brexit and | :01:23. | :01:26. | |
analysis of Conservative candidates has shown that | :01:27. | :01:31. | |
in their top 100 target seats, 37 candidates supported leave | :01:32. | :01:34. | |
during last year's referendum campaign | :01:35. | :01:42. | |
and 20 supported remain; 43 have not made public | :01:43. | :01:44. | |
In the last parliament, the vast majority of Labour MPs | :01:45. | :01:50. | |
were hostile to Jeremy Corbyn so how supportive are Labour | :01:51. | :01:52. | |
Well, of 50 of Labour's top 100 target seats | :01:53. | :01:59. | |
17 candidates have expressed support for Mr Corbyn. | :02:00. | :02:01. | |
20 candidates supported Owen Smith in last year's leadership contest | :02:02. | :02:06. | |
or have expressed anti-Corbyn sentiment, and | :02:07. | :02:10. | |
If they won those, the Labour benches would be | :02:11. | :02:16. | |
marginally more sympathetic to Mr Corbyn than they are now. | :02:17. | :02:18. | |
What do the figures tell us about where the other | :02:19. | :02:20. | |
Well, the Lib Dems have decided not to stand against the Greens | :02:21. | :02:24. | |
in Brighton Pavilion, and are fielding 629 | :02:25. | :02:26. | |
candidates this year - that's two fewer than 2015. | :02:27. | :02:29. | |
The number of Ukip candidates has fallen dramatically. | :02:30. | :02:33. | |
They are standing in 247 fewer constituencies than 2015, | :02:34. | :02:39. | |
throwing their support behind solidly pro-Brexit Tories | :02:40. | :02:41. | |
in some areas such as Lewes and Norfolk North. | :02:42. | :02:46. | |
The Greens are fielding 103 fewer candidates | :02:47. | :02:49. | |
than at the last election, standing down to help | :02:50. | :03:00. | |
other progressive candidates in some places. | :03:01. | :03:06. | |
The most liking statistic is the demise in Ukip candidates, is this | :03:07. | :03:19. | |
their swansong? And I think so. It is remarkable how few Ukip | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
candidates are standing. It is hard to see they will suddenly revive in | :03:26. | :03:29. | |
the next couple of years. I think this is probably the end. Frank | :03:30. | :03:39. | |
Luntz mentioned the fragmentation of the left was a feature of this | :03:40. | :03:43. | |
election, but also there is the consolidation of the right, and if | :03:44. | :03:46. | |
you take the things together that could explain why the polls are | :03:47. | :03:51. | |
where they are. Absolutely, that's precisely what happened at the start | :03:52. | :03:56. | |
of the 1980s, the right was incredibly united and that's when we | :03:57. | :04:01. | |
started talking about majorities of over 100 or so. No matter what the | :04:02. | :04:08. | |
size of Theresa May's majority, it will be the total collapse of Ukip, | :04:09. | :04:12. | |
but not just because we are now leaving the EU and that was their | :04:13. | :04:18. | |
only reason for being, but a whole lot of people voted for Ukip because | :04:19. | :04:22. | |
they felt the Tories were no longer listening. Theresa May has given the | :04:23. | :04:30. | |
impression that she is listening, and that is the biggest possible | :04:31. | :04:33. | |
thing that could happen to the Tory vote. Fragmentation of the left, | :04:34. | :04:42. | |
consolidation of the right? It's one of the lessons that is never learnt, | :04:43. | :04:48. | |
it happened in the 1980s, it doesn't take much for the whole thing to | :04:49. | :04:52. | |
fracture so now you have on the centre-left the SNP, the Labour | :04:53. | :04:58. | |
Party, the Greens, the Liberal Democrats all competing for the same | :04:59. | :05:03. | |
votes and when you have, fleetingly perhaps, large numbers coalescing on | :05:04. | :05:07. | |
the right in one party, there is only going to be one outcome. It | :05:08. | :05:13. | |
happens regularly. It doesn't mean the Tories haven't got their own | :05:14. | :05:18. | |
fragility. Two years ago, David Cameron and George Osborne the | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
dominant figures, neither are in Parliament now which is a symptom of | :05:23. | :05:26. | |
the fragility this election is disguising. Mrs May's position in a | :05:27. | :05:32. | |
way reminds me of Mrs Thatcher in the 1980s, I won't be outflanked on | :05:33. | :05:37. | |
the right, Nicolas Sarkozy in France, I won't be outflanked on the | :05:38. | :05:41. | |
right, so the National Front didn't get through either timed he ran to | :05:42. | :05:44. | |
the second round on like this time, and now Mrs May on Brexit won't be | :05:45. | :05:51. | |
outflanked Iver and as a result has seen off right flank. And also she | :05:52. | :05:55. | |
is looking to the left as well with some of the state interventions. | :05:56. | :05:59. | |
What was interesting about the analysis you showed a few minutes | :06:00. | :06:02. | |
ago was the number of Tory candidates who have apparently not | :06:03. | :06:07. | |
declared which way they voted in the referendum, and you would have | :06:08. | :06:11. | |
thought if this election was all about Brexit, as some would claim, | :06:12. | :06:15. | |
that would become an unsustainable position, and actually more it's | :06:16. | :06:20. | |
about leadership. But the point that I'm now hearing from a number of | :06:21. | :06:25. | |
Labour candidates that they are seeing Tory leaflets that don't even | :06:26. | :06:31. | |
have the Tory candidate's name on them, it is just about Theresa May. | :06:32. | :06:36. | |
I am glad they are keeping to the law because by law they have to put | :06:37. | :06:41. | |
it on. It has been harder for some of the smaller parties too because | :06:42. | :06:47. | |
of the speed of the election being called. We have the manifesto is | :06:48. | :06:53. | |
coming out this week. I think Labour Forshaw on Tuesday, we are not yet | :06:54. | :06:57. | |
sure when the Tories will bring bears out. I suggest one thing, it | :06:58. | :07:01. | |
will at least for people like me bring an end to the question you | :07:02. | :07:09. | |
will have to wait for the manifesto. And Rebecca Long baby will never | :07:10. | :07:12. | |
have that excuse again, isn't it wonderful! She is not the only one. | :07:13. | :07:22. | |
When you are trying to take the north and Midlands from Labour, I | :07:23. | :07:28. | |
would go to one or the other. For me, I can barely hold back my | :07:29. | :07:33. | |
excitement over the Tory manifesto. This will be, I think, the most | :07:34. | :07:36. | |
important day for the British government for the next five years. | :07:37. | :07:45. | |
That wasn't irony there? You actually meant that? I'm not even | :07:46. | :07:50. | |
being cynical at all on Sunday Politics! This is a huge day and | :07:51. | :07:57. | |
it's because I think we will see... I don't think Mrs May will play it | :07:58. | :08:01. | |
safe and I don't think we will get the broadbrush stuff that she might | :08:02. | :08:07. | |
be advised to do. I think she will lay out precisely what you want to | :08:08. | :08:11. | |
do over the next five years and take some big risks. Then finally after a | :08:12. | :08:16. | |
year of this guessing and theorising, we will finally work out | :08:17. | :08:20. | |
what Mrs May is all about. She will say she doesn't want the next | :08:21. | :08:23. | |
parliament to be all about Brexit, though she knows that's the next | :08:24. | :08:27. | |
important thing she has to deliver in some way, so she gets a mandate | :08:28. | :08:31. | |
for that if the polls are right but she | :08:32. | :08:42. | |
does have very different ideas from Mr Cameron about how to run a | :08:43. | :08:47. | |
country. She will I assume one to mandate for what these different | :08:48. | :08:49. | |
ideas are. Otherwise there is no point in holding an early election. | :08:50. | :08:51. | |
You will get a majority, but if you get a mandate to carry on | :08:52. | :08:55. | |
implementing the Cameron and Osborne manifesto it would be utterly | :08:56. | :08:58. | |
pointless. I agree, it is the pivotal event of the election and it | :08:59. | :09:01. | |
will be interesting to see the degree to which she expands on the | :09:02. | :09:05. | |
line which interests me about its time to look at the good that | :09:06. | :09:10. | |
government can do. Because in a way this moves the debate on in UK | :09:11. | :09:17. | |
politics from, from 97 the Blair Brown governments were insecure | :09:18. | :09:20. | |
about arguing about the role of government. Cameron Osborne | :09:21. | :09:25. | |
government similarly so, so here you have a Labour Party talking about | :09:26. | :09:29. | |
the role of government and the state, and Tory leader apparently | :09:30. | :09:33. | |
doing so was well. I think that will be really interesting to see whether | :09:34. | :09:37. | |
it is fleshed out in any significant way. And it is not a natural Tory | :09:38. | :09:43. | |
message. Harold Macmillan talked about the role of the state, Ted | :09:44. | :09:50. | |
Heath Mark two was pretty big on the state, the industrial policy and so | :09:51. | :09:55. | |
on, and even if it is not thought to be that Tory, does she get away with | :09:56. | :09:59. | |
it because she deliver such a big victory if that's what she does | :10:00. | :10:04. | |
deliver? Just inject a little note of scepticism, I wonder how much of | :10:05. | :10:10. | |
this is authentically Theresa May. I was interested to and talk to | :10:11. | :10:18. | |
someone who used to sit in cabinet meetings during which Theresa May | :10:19. | :10:21. | |
never expressed an opinion on anything outside the Home Office | :10:22. | :10:24. | |
briefs. Other ministers were roving all over their colleagues' briefs. | :10:25. | :10:33. | |
So where are the ideas coming from? I think we can point to Nick | :10:34. | :10:40. | |
Timothy. One of her closest advisers in Downing Street. It will be | :10:41. | :10:45. | |
interesting to see how that evolves. On Thursday I think we will all be | :10:46. | :10:51. | |
talking about something called Urdington Toryism. Urdington is the | :10:52. | :11:01. | |
suburb of Birmingham where Nick Timothy comes from, who is very much | :11:02. | :11:06. | |
Theresa May's policy brain and leading inspiration. Urdington | :11:07. | :11:11. | |
Toryism is about connecting the party with traditional working class | :11:12. | :11:16. | |
voters, and their belief to do that is not just taking away government | :11:17. | :11:20. | |
out of their lives but showing them that government can actually help | :11:21. | :11:24. | |
their lives. It can be a force for good to rebuild the trust. A lot of | :11:25. | :11:36. | |
what Mrs May talks about is all... It is talk and then a lot of it | :11:37. | :11:40. | |
suddenly goes by the wayside. What happened to worker directors on the | :11:41. | :11:49. | |
boards. It is designed to appeal to that constituency and then nothing | :11:50. | :11:53. | |
happens. She had an excuse before in the sense that it wasn't in the 2015 | :11:54. | :11:58. | |
manifesto and she had a small majority so therefore she arguably | :11:59. | :12:02. | |
had to water down some of the stuff for example in her Tory conference | :12:03. | :12:07. | |
speech, which had a lot of this active government material in it. If | :12:08. | :12:11. | |
she puts it in the manifesto, it is a sign she plans to do it and will | :12:12. | :12:16. | |
have no excuse if she then gets nervous afterwards because it will | :12:17. | :12:20. | |
be in there. If it wasn't for Brexit, this great overwhelming | :12:21. | :12:25. | |
issue, I think this election will be seen as quite a significant | :12:26. | :12:28. | |
development in terms of an argument around the role of government, | :12:29. | :12:33. | |
much-needed. But Brexit unfortunately overshadows it all. As | :12:34. | :12:38. | |
much as we like our arguments over the role of government we will hear | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
strong and stable, stable and strong ad nauseam, aren't we? Absolutely, | :12:43. | :12:50. | |
and we heard the same old lines from the Labour Party as well so they are | :12:51. | :12:56. | |
all at it. It will be a fascinating week, stop talking it down! Thanks | :12:57. | :12:59. | |
to our panel. The Daily Politics will be | :13:00. | :13:02. | |
back on BBC Two at noon I'll be back here at the same time | :13:03. | :13:04. | |
on BBC One next Sunday. Remember - if it's Sunday, | :13:05. | :13:09. | |
it's the Sunday Politics. When it came to my TV habits, | :13:10. | :13:43. | |
I'd watch anything... But now I can sign in online | :13:44. | :13:46. | |
and get more of what I love. I'm kept up to date | :13:47. | :13:51. | |
with the shows I love and I get suggestions | :13:52. | :13:53. | |
on subjects I'll like. A new personalised BBC | :13:54. | :13:56. | |
is on its way. To tailor the benefits to you, | :13:57. | :14:09. | |
sign in and introduce yourself. | :14:10. | :14:13. |