Browse content similar to 12/03/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
It's Sunday morning and this is the Sunday Politics. | :00:33. | :00:38. | |
David Davis tells MPs to leave the Brexit bill untouched, | :00:39. | :00:42. | |
ahead of a week which could see Britain begin the process | :00:43. | :00:45. | |
We'll talk to a Tory rebel and Ukip's Nigel Farage. | :00:46. | :00:50. | |
Phillip Hammond's first budget hit the rocks thanks to a tax rise | :00:51. | :00:53. | |
But how should we tax those who work for themselves? | :00:54. | :01:01. | |
And remember Donald Trump's claim that Barack Obama had ordered | :01:02. | :01:03. | |
We'll talk to the former Tory MP who set the whole story rolling. | :01:04. | :01:14. | |
In the south, should the rights of EU nationals living in the UK be | :01:15. | :01:19. | |
guaranteed? We meet those who want And joining me for all of that, | :01:20. | :01:29. | |
three self-employed journalists who definitely don't | :01:30. | :01:31. | |
deserve a tax break. It's Steve Richards, | :01:32. | :01:35. | |
Julia Hartley-Brewer They'll be tweeting throughout | :01:36. | :01:36. | |
the programme with all the carefree abandon of Katie Hopkins before | :01:37. | :01:40. | |
a libel trial. BBC lawyers have suddenly got | :01:41. | :01:48. | |
nervous! So first today, the government | :01:49. | :01:51. | |
is gearing up to trigger Article 50, perhaps in the next 48 hours, | :01:52. | :01:53. | |
and start negotiating Britain's Much has been written | :01:54. | :01:56. | |
about the prospect of the Commons getting a "meaningful vote" | :01:57. | :01:59. | |
on the deal Britain negotiates. Brexit Secretary David Davis | :02:00. | :02:02. | |
was on the Andrew Marr programme earlier this morning | :02:03. | :02:04. | |
and he was asked what happens Well, that is what is called | :02:05. | :02:06. | |
the most favoured nation status deal There we go out, as it | :02:07. | :02:17. | |
were, on WTO rules. That is why of course we do | :02:18. | :02:21. | |
the contingency planning, to make The British people decided | :02:22. | :02:24. | |
on June the 23rd last year My job, and the job | :02:25. | :02:32. | |
of the government, is to make the terms on which that happens | :02:33. | :02:37. | |
as beneficial as possible. There we have it, clearly, either | :02:38. | :02:50. | |
Parliament votes for the deal when it is done or it out on World Trade | :02:51. | :02:57. | |
Organisation rules. That's what the government means by a meaningful | :02:58. | :02:58. | |
vote. I think we get over obsessed about | :02:59. | :03:05. | |
whether there will be a legal right for Parliament to have a vote. If | :03:06. | :03:09. | |
there is no deal or a bad deal, I think it would be politically | :03:10. | :03:12. | |
impossible for the government to reject Parliament's desire for a | :03:13. | :03:15. | |
vote because the atmosphere of politics will be completely | :03:16. | :03:19. | |
different by then. I take David Davies seriously. Within Whitehall | :03:20. | :03:23. | |
he has acquired a reputation as being the most conscientious and | :03:24. | :03:27. | |
details sadly... And well briefed. Absolutely and well travelled in | :03:28. | :03:31. | |
terms of European capitals of the three Brexit ministers. It is quite | :03:32. | :03:34. | |
telling he said what he did and it is quite telling that within | :03:35. | :03:37. | |
cabinet, two weeks ago he was floating the idea of no deal at all. | :03:38. | :03:43. | |
Being if not the central estimate than a completely plausible | :03:44. | :03:46. | |
eventuality. It is interesting. I would suggest the prospect of no | :03:47. | :03:52. | |
deal is moving up the agenda. It is still less likely than more likely | :03:53. | :03:56. | |
to happen. But it's no longer a kind of long tail way out there in the | :03:57. | :04:00. | |
distance. Planning for no deal is the same as having contents | :04:01. | :04:03. | |
insurance or travel insurance, plan for the worse case scenarios are | :04:04. | :04:05. | |
prepared it happens. Even the worst case scenario, it's not that bad. | :04:06. | :04:11. | |
Think of the Jeep 20, apart from the EU, four members of the G20 | :04:12. | :04:16. | |
economies are successful members of the EU. The rest aren't and don't | :04:17. | :04:20. | |
have trade deals but somehow these countries are prospering. They are | :04:21. | :04:24. | |
growing at a higher rate. You are not frightened? Not remotely. We are | :04:25. | :04:28. | |
obsessed with what we get from the EU and the key thing we get from | :04:29. | :04:31. | |
leaving the EU is not the deal but the other deals we can finally make | :04:32. | :04:35. | |
with other trading partners. They have higher growth than virtually | :04:36. | :04:38. | |
every other EU country apart from Germany. It is sensible as a | :04:39. | :04:41. | |
negotiating position for the government to say if there is no | :04:42. | :04:46. | |
deal, we will accept there is no deal. We're not frightened of no | :04:47. | :04:50. | |
deal. It was clear from what David Davies was saying that there will be | :04:51. | :04:54. | |
a vote in parliament at the end of the process but there won't be a | :04:55. | :04:58. | |
third option to send the government back to try to get a better deal. It | :04:59. | :05:03. | |
is either the deal or we leave without a deal. In reality, that | :05:04. | :05:08. | |
third option will be there. We don't know yet whether there will be a | :05:09. | :05:11. | |
majority for the deal if they get one. What we do know now is that | :05:12. | :05:17. | |
there isn't a majority in the Commons for no deal. Labour MPs are | :05:18. | :05:22. | |
absolutely clear that no deal is worth then a bad deal. I've heard | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
enough Tory MPs say the same thing. But they wouldn't get no deal | :05:28. | :05:32. | |
through. When it comes to this vote, if whatever deal is rejected, there | :05:33. | :05:39. | |
will then be, one way or another, the third option raised of go back | :05:40. | :05:42. | |
again. But who gets to decide what is a bad deal? The British people | :05:43. | :05:47. | |
will have a different idea than the two thirds of the Remain supporting | :05:48. | :05:50. | |
MPs in the Commons. In terms of the vote, the Commons. Surely, if the | :05:51. | :05:57. | |
Commons, which is what matters here, if the Commons were to vote against | :05:58. | :06:03. | |
the deal as negotiated by the government, surely that would | :06:04. | :06:07. | |
trigger a general election? If the government had recommended the deal, | :06:08. | :06:11. | |
surely the government would then, if it still felt strongly about the | :06:12. | :06:14. | |
deal, if the other 27 had said, we're not negotiating, extending it, | :06:15. | :06:20. | |
it would in effect become a second referendum on the deal. In effect it | :06:21. | :06:24. | |
would be a no-confidence vote in the government. You've got to assume | :06:25. | :06:27. | |
that unless something massively changes in the opposition before | :06:28. | :06:30. | |
then, the government would feel fairly confident about a general | :06:31. | :06:35. | |
election on those terms. Unless the deal is hideously bad and obviously | :06:36. | :06:39. | |
basso every vote in the country... The prior minister said if it is | :06:40. | :06:42. | |
that bad she would have rather no deal. So that eventuality arrives. | :06:43. | :06:48. | |
-- the Prime Minister has said. Not a second referendum general election | :06:49. | :06:52. | |
in two years' time. Don't put any holidays for! LAUGHTER | :06:53. | :06:55. | |
-- don't look any. So the Brexit bill looks likely | :06:56. | :06:58. | |
to clear Parliament this week. That depends on the number | :06:59. | :07:00. | |
of Conservative MPs who are prepared to vote against their government | :07:01. | :07:04. | |
on two key issues. Theresa May could be | :07:05. | :07:06. | |
in negotiations with our European partners within days, | :07:07. | :07:10. | |
but there may be some wheeler-dealings she has to do | :07:11. | :07:12. | |
with her own MPs, too. Cast your mind back | :07:13. | :07:14. | |
to the beginning of month. The bill to trigger Article | :07:15. | :07:18. | |
50 passed comfortably But three Conservatives voted | :07:19. | :07:20. | |
for Labour's amendments to ensure the rights of EU citizens already | :07:21. | :07:29. | |
in the UK. Seven Tory MPs voted to force | :07:30. | :07:33. | |
the government to give Parliament a say on the deal struck with the EU | :07:34. | :07:36. | |
before it's finalised. But remember those numbers, | :07:37. | :07:41. | |
they're important. On the issue of a meaningful vote | :07:42. | :07:45. | |
on a deal, I'm told there might have been more rebels had it not been | :07:46. | :07:49. | |
for this assurance from I can confirm that the government | :07:50. | :07:51. | |
will bring forward a motion on the final agreement to be | :07:52. | :07:57. | |
approved by both Houses And we expect, and intend, | :07:58. | :07:59. | |
that this will happen before the European Parliament debates | :08:00. | :08:04. | |
and votes on the final agreement. When the government | :08:05. | :08:10. | |
was criticised for reeling back from when and what it would offer | :08:11. | :08:16. | |
a vote on. The bill then moved into the Lords, | :08:17. | :08:20. | |
where peers passed it And the second, that Parliament be | :08:21. | :08:22. | |
given a meaningful vote on the terms of the deal or indeed a vote | :08:23. | :08:30. | |
in the event of there The so-called Brexit bill | :08:31. | :08:33. | |
will return to Commons Ministers insist that both | :08:34. | :08:37. | |
amendments would weaken the government's negotiating hand | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
and are seeking to overturn them. But, as ever, politics | :08:42. | :08:44. | |
is a numbers game. Theresa May has a working | :08:45. | :08:50. | |
majority of 17. On Brexit, though, | :08:51. | :08:51. | |
it's probably higher. At least six Labour MPs | :08:52. | :08:56. | |
generally vote with Plus, eight DUP MPs, | :08:57. | :08:58. | |
two from the Ulster Unionist party If all Conservatives vote | :08:59. | :09:02. | |
with the government as well, Therefore, 26 Conservative rebels | :09:03. | :09:08. | |
are needed for the government to be So, are there rough waters | :09:09. | :09:14. | |
ahead for Theresa May? What numbers are we looking at, | :09:15. | :09:21. | |
in terms of a potential rebellion? I think we're looking at a large | :09:22. | :09:24. | |
number of people who are interested This building is a really | :09:25. | :09:27. | |
important building. It's symbolic of a huge | :09:28. | :09:29. | |
amount of history. And for it not to be involved | :09:30. | :09:31. | |
in this momentous time would, But he says a clear verbal statement | :09:32. | :09:35. | |
from the government on a meaningful vote on any deal would be enough | :09:36. | :09:42. | |
to get most Tory MPs onside. It was already said | :09:43. | :09:48. | |
about David Jones. It's slightly unravelled | :09:49. | :09:50. | |
a little bit during I think this is an opportunity | :09:51. | :09:52. | |
to really get that clarity through so that we can all vote | :09:53. | :09:57. | |
for Article 50 and get We've have spoken to several Tory | :09:58. | :10:00. | |
MPs who say they are minded to vote One said the situation | :10:01. | :10:04. | |
was sad and depressing. The other said that the whips must | :10:05. | :10:08. | |
be worried because they don't A minister told me Downing Street | :10:09. | :10:11. | |
was looking again at the possibility of offering a vote in the event | :10:12. | :10:18. | |
of no deal being reached. But that its position | :10:19. | :10:22. | |
was unlikely to change. And, anyway, government sources have | :10:23. | :10:24. | |
told the Sunday Politics they're not That those Tory MPs who didn't back | :10:25. | :10:27. | |
either amendment the first time round would look silly | :10:28. | :10:34. | |
if they did, this time. It would have to be a pretty hefty | :10:35. | :10:37. | |
lot of people changing their minds about things that have already been | :10:38. | :10:40. | |
discussed in quite a lot of detail, last time it was in the Commons, | :10:41. | :10:44. | |
for things to be reversed this time. There's no doubt that a number | :10:45. | :10:48. | |
of Tory MPs are very concerned. Labour are pessimistic | :10:49. | :10:51. | |
about the chances of enough Tory rebels backing either | :10:52. | :10:53. | |
of the amendments in the Commons. The important thing, I think, | :10:54. | :10:56. | |
is to focus on the fact that this is the last chance | :10:57. | :10:59. | |
to have a say on this. If they're going to vote with us, | :11:00. | :11:02. | |
Monday is the time to do it. Assuming the bill does pass | :11:03. | :11:06. | |
the Commons unamended, it will go back to the Lord's | :11:07. | :11:08. | |
on Monday night where Labour peers have already indicated | :11:09. | :11:11. | |
they won't block it again. It means that the Brexit bill | :11:12. | :11:15. | |
would become law and Theresa May would be free to trigger Article | :11:16. | :11:18. | |
50 within days. Her own deadline was | :11:19. | :11:22. | |
the end of this month. But one minister told me there | :11:23. | :11:24. | |
were advantages to doing it early. We're joined now from Nottingham | :11:25. | :11:30. | |
by the Conservative MP Anna Soubry. She's previously voted against | :11:31. | :11:33. | |
the government on the question of whether Parliament should | :11:34. | :11:35. | |
have a final say over the EU deal. Anna Soubry, I think it was clear | :11:36. | :11:45. | |
this morning from David Davies that what he means by meaningful vote is | :11:46. | :11:49. | |
not what you mean by a meaningful vote. He thinks the choice for | :11:50. | :11:52. | |
Parliament would be to either vote for the deal and if Parliament | :11:53. | :11:59. | |
doesn't, we leave on World Trade Organisation rules, on a bare-bones | :12:00. | :12:03. | |
structure. In the end, will he accept that in the Commons tomorrow? | :12:04. | :12:07. | |
No, because my problem and I don't think it is a problem, but my | :12:08. | :12:12. | |
problem, the government's problem is that what I want is then to answer | :12:13. | :12:15. | |
this question. What happens in the event of their not being any deal? | :12:16. | :12:20. | |
David Davies made it very clear that in the event of there being no deal, | :12:21. | :12:26. | |
Parliament would have no say. It means through your elected | :12:27. | :12:28. | |
representatives, the people of this country would have no say on what | :12:29. | :12:32. | |
happens if the government doesn't get a deal. I think the request that | :12:33. | :12:38. | |
Parliament should have a say on Parliamentary sovereignty, is | :12:39. | :12:41. | |
perfectly reasonable. That is what I want David to say. If he says that, | :12:42. | :12:47. | |
I won't be rebelling. If he does... They have refused to say that. | :12:48. | :12:52. | |
Sorry. If he continues to say what he said the BBC this morning, which | :12:53. | :12:56. | |
means that the vote will be either to accept the as negotiated or to | :12:57. | :13:04. | |
leave on WTO rules, will you rebel on that question but no, no, sorry, | :13:05. | :13:08. | |
if there's a deal, Parliament will have a say. So that's fine. And we | :13:09. | :13:12. | |
will see what the deal is and we will look at the options two years | :13:13. | :13:16. | |
down the road. When who knows what'll happen in our economy and | :13:17. | :13:20. | |
world economy. That is one matter which I am content on. The Prime | :13:21. | :13:24. | |
Minister, a woman of her word has said that in the event of a deal, | :13:25. | :13:27. | |
Parliament will vote on any deal. I don't difficulty. To clarify, I will | :13:28. | :13:34. | |
come onto that. These are important matters. I want to clarify, not | :13:35. | :13:38. | |
argue with you. You are content that if there is a deal, we will come | :13:39. | :13:41. | |
under no deal in a second, but if there is a deal, you are content | :13:42. | :13:45. | |
with the choice of being able to vote for that deal or leaving on WTO | :13:46. | :13:51. | |
terms? No, you're speculating as to what might happen in two years' | :13:52. | :13:57. | |
time. What the options might be. Personally I find it inconceivable | :13:58. | :14:00. | |
that the government will come back with a rubbish deal. They will | :14:01. | :14:03. | |
either come back with a good deal, which I won't have a problem with or | :14:04. | :14:07. | |
they will come back with no deal. To speculate about coming back with a | :14:08. | :14:12. | |
deal, there is a variety of options. I understand that that is what the | :14:13. | :14:15. | |
Lord amendments are about. They are about a vote at the end of the | :14:16. | :14:19. | |
process. Do forgive me, the Lords amendment is not the same that I've | :14:20. | :14:26. | |
voted for in Parliament. What we call the Chris Leslie amendment, | :14:27. | :14:29. | |
which was talking about whatever the agreement is, whatever happens at | :14:30. | :14:31. | |
the end of the negotiations, Parliament will have a vote. | :14:32. | :14:35. | |
Parliament will have a say. The Lords amendment is a bit more | :14:36. | :14:39. | |
technical. It is the principle of no deal that is agitating us. Let's | :14:40. | :14:44. | |
clarify on this. They are complicated matters. What do you | :14:45. | :14:48. | |
want the government to say? What do you want David Davis to say tomorrow | :14:49. | :14:52. | |
on what should the Parliamentary process should be if there is no | :14:53. | :14:56. | |
deal? Quite. I want a commitment from him that in the event of no | :14:57. | :15:01. | |
deal, it will come into Parliament and Parliament will determine what | :15:02. | :15:09. | |
happens next. It could be that in the event of no deal, the best thing | :15:10. | :15:12. | |
is for us to jump off the cliff into WTO tariff is. I find it unlikely | :15:13. | :15:15. | |
but that might be the reality. There might be other alternatives. Most | :15:16. | :15:20. | |
importantly, including saying to the government, go back, carry on. The | :15:21. | :15:24. | |
question that everybody has to ask is, why won't the government give | :15:25. | :15:29. | |
My fear is what this is about is asked deliberately, not the Prime | :15:30. | :15:38. | |
Minister, but others deliberately ensuring we have no deal and no deal | :15:39. | :15:42. | |
pretty soon and in that event, we jumped off the cliff onto WTO | :15:43. | :15:47. | |
tariffs and nobody in this country and the people of this country do | :15:48. | :15:51. | |
not have a say. My constituents did not vote for hard Brexit. | :15:52. | :15:58. | |
You do not want the government to have the ability if there is no deal | :15:59. | :16:03. | |
to automatically fall back on the WTO rules? Quite. It is as simple as | :16:04. | :16:08. | |
that. We are now speculating about what will happen in two years. I | :16:09. | :16:12. | |
want to find out what happens tomorrow. What will you do if you | :16:13. | :16:19. | |
don't get that assurance? I will either abstain, or I will vote to | :16:20. | :16:24. | |
keep this amendment within the Bill. I will either vote against my | :16:25. | :16:28. | |
government, which I do not do likely, I have never voted against | :16:29. | :16:32. | |
my government until the Chris Leslie clause when the Bill was going | :16:33. | :16:36. | |
through, or I will abstain, which has pretty much the same effect | :16:37. | :16:40. | |
because it comes into the Commons with both amendments so you have | :16:41. | :16:44. | |
positively to vote to take the map. Can you give us an idea of how many | :16:45. | :16:48. | |
like-minded conservative colleagues there are. I genuinely do not know. | :16:49. | :16:56. | |
You must talk to each other. I do not talk to every member of my | :16:57. | :17:01. | |
party. You know people who are like-minded. I do. I am not doing | :17:02. | :17:09. | |
numbers games. I know you want that but I genuinely do not know the | :17:10. | :17:14. | |
figure. I think this is an uncomfortable truth. People have to | :17:15. | :17:21. | |
understand what has happened in our country, two particular newspapers, | :17:22. | :17:23. | |
creating an atmosphere and setting an agenda and I think many people | :17:24. | :17:27. | |
are rather concerned, some frightened, to put their head over | :17:28. | :17:33. | |
the parapet. There are many millions of people who feel totally excluded | :17:34. | :17:39. | |
from this process. Many of them voted to remain. And they have lost | :17:40. | :17:43. | |
their voice. We have covered the ground I wanted to. | :17:44. | :17:44. | |
We're joined now by the Ukip MEP and former leader Nigel Farage. | :17:45. | :17:51. | |
Article 50 triggered, we are leaving the EU, the single market and the | :17:52. | :17:58. | |
customs union. What is left you to complain about? All of that will | :17:59. | :18:03. | |
happen and hopefully we will get the triggered this week which is good | :18:04. | :18:08. | |
news. What worries me a little I'm not sure the government recognises | :18:09. | :18:12. | |
how strong their handers. At the summit in Brussels, the word in the | :18:13. | :18:15. | |
corridors is that we are prepared to give away fishing waters as a | :18:16. | :18:18. | |
bargaining chip and the worry is what deal we get. Are we leaving, | :18:19. | :18:25. | |
yes I am pleased about that. You are under relevant voice in the deal | :18:26. | :18:28. | |
because the deal will be voted on in Parliament and you have one MP. You | :18:29. | :18:33. | |
are missing the point, the real vote in parliament is not in London but | :18:34. | :18:37. | |
Strasbourg. This is perhaps the biggest obstacle the British | :18:38. | :18:41. | |
Government faces. Not what happens in the Commons that the end of the | :18:42. | :18:45. | |
two years, the European Parliament could veto the deal. What that means | :18:46. | :18:51. | |
is people need to adopt a different approach. We do not need to be | :18:52. | :18:54. | |
lobbying in the corridors of Brussels to get a good deal, we need | :18:55. | :18:59. | |
is a country to be out there talking to the German car workers and | :19:00. | :19:03. | |
Belgian chocolate makers, putting as much pressure as we can on | :19:04. | :19:08. | |
politicians from across Europe to come to a sensible arrangement. It | :19:09. | :19:11. | |
is in their interests more than ours. In what way is the vision of | :19:12. | :19:17. | |
Brexit set out by David Davis any different from your own? I am | :19:18. | :19:24. | |
delighted there are people now adopting the position I argued for | :19:25. | :19:30. | |
many years. Good. But now... Like Douglas Carswell, he said he found | :19:31. | :19:35. | |
David Davis' performers this morning reassuring. It is. And just as when | :19:36. | :19:42. | |
Theresa May was Home Secretary every performance she gave was hugely | :19:43. | :19:46. | |
reassuring. She was seen to be a heroine after her conference | :19:47. | :19:49. | |
speeches and then did not deliver. I am concerned that even before we | :19:50. | :19:57. | |
start we are making concessions. You described in the EU's divorce bill | :19:58. | :20:01. | |
demands, 60 billion euros is floated around. You said it is laughable and | :20:02. | :20:08. | |
I understand that. Do you maintain that we will not have to pay a penny | :20:09. | :20:12. | |
to leave? It is nine months since we voted exit and assuming the trigger | :20:13. | :20:21. | |
of Article 50, we would have paid 30 billion in since we had a vote. We | :20:22. | :20:26. | |
are still members. But honestly, I do not think there is an appetite | :20:27. | :20:29. | |
for us to pay a massive divorce Bill. There are assets also. Not a | :20:30. | :20:37. | |
penny? There will be some ongoing commitments, but the numbers talked | :20:38. | :20:42. | |
about our 50, ?60 billion, they are frankly laughable. I am trying to | :20:43. | :20:48. | |
find out if you are prepared to accept some kind of exit cost, it | :20:49. | :20:53. | |
may be nowhere near 60 billion. We have to do a net agreement, the | :20:54. | :20:57. | |
government briefed about our share of the European Union investment | :20:58. | :21:04. | |
bank. Would you accept a transitional arrangement, deal, | :21:05. | :21:07. | |
five, ten billion, as part of the divorce settlement? We are painted | :21:08. | :21:12. | |
net ?30 million every single day at the moment, ?10 billion plus every | :21:13. | :21:18. | |
year. That is just our contribution. We are going to make a massive | :21:19. | :21:22. | |
saving on this. What do you make of what Anna Soubry said, that if there | :21:23. | :21:28. | |
is no deal, and it is being talked about more. Maybe the government | :21:29. | :21:33. | |
managing expectations. There is an expectation we will have a deal, but | :21:34. | :21:39. | |
if there is no deal, that the government cannot just go to WTO | :21:40. | :21:43. | |
rules, but it has to have a vote in parliament? By the time we get to | :21:44. | :21:47. | |
that there will be a general election coming down the tracks and | :21:48. | :21:53. | |
I suspect that if at the end of the two-year process there is no deal | :21:54. | :21:57. | |
and by the way, no deal is a lot better for the nation than where we | :21:58. | :22:01. | |
currently are, because we freed of regulations and able to make our own | :22:02. | :22:06. | |
deals in the world. I think what would happen, and if Parliament said | :22:07. | :22:13. | |
it did not back, at the end of the negotiation a general election would | :22:14. | :22:18. | |
happen quickly. According to reports this morning, one of your most | :22:19. | :22:24. | |
senior aides has passed a dossier to police claiming Tories committed | :22:25. | :22:28. | |
electoral fraud in Thanet South, the seat contested in the election. What | :22:29. | :22:33. | |
evidence to you have? I read that in the newspapers as you have. I am not | :22:34. | :22:38. | |
going to comment on it. Will you not aware of the contents of the | :22:39. | :22:44. | |
dossier? I am not aware of the dossier. He was your election | :22:45. | :22:48. | |
strategists. I am dubious as to whether this dossier exists at all. | :22:49. | :22:53. | |
Perhaps the newspapers have got this wrong. Concerns about the | :22:54. | :23:00. | |
downloading of data the took place in that constituency, there are. | :23:01. | :23:09. | |
Allegedly, he has refuted it, was it done by your MP to give information | :23:10. | :23:14. | |
to the Tories, do you have evidence about? We have evidence Mr Carswell | :23:15. | :23:19. | |
downloaded information, we have no evidence what he did with it. It is | :23:20. | :23:26. | |
not just your aide who has been making allegations against the | :23:27. | :23:31. | |
Conservatives in Thanet South and other seats, if the evidence was to | :23:32. | :23:37. | |
be substantial, and if it was to result in another by-election being | :23:38. | :23:43. | |
called an Thanet South had to be fought again, would you be the Ukip | :23:44. | :23:47. | |
candidate? I probably would. You probably would? Yes. Just probably? | :23:48. | :23:51. | |
Just probably. It would be your eighth attempt. Winning seats in | :23:52. | :23:57. | |
parliament under first past the post is not the only way to change | :23:58. | :24:01. | |
politics in Britain and I would like to think I proved that. Let's go | :24:02. | :24:07. | |
back to Anna Soubry. The implication of what we were saying on the panel | :24:08. | :24:11. | |
at the start of the show and what Nigel Farage was saying there would | :24:12. | :24:17. | |
be that if at the end of the process whatever the vote, if the government | :24:18. | :24:21. | |
were to lose it, it would provoke a general election properly. I think | :24:22. | :24:25. | |
that would be right. Let's get real. The government is not going to come | :24:26. | :24:28. | |
to Parliament with anything other than something it believes is a good | :24:29. | :24:37. | |
deal and if it rejected it, would be unlikely, there would be a de facto | :24:38. | :24:41. | |
vote of no confidence and it would be within the fixed term Parliaments | :24:42. | :24:46. | |
act and that be it. The problem is, more likely, because of the story | :24:47. | :24:52. | |
put up about the 50 billion, 60 billion and you look at the way | :24:53. | :24:56. | |
things are flagged up that both the Prime Minister and Boris Johnson | :24:57. | :24:59. | |
saying, we should be asking them for money back, I think the big fear and | :25:00. | :25:03. | |
the fear I have is we will be crashing out in six months. You | :25:04. | :25:09. | |
think we could leave as quickly as six months. Explain that. I think | :25:10. | :25:14. | |
they will stoke up the demand from the EU for 50, 60 billion back and | :25:15. | :25:20. | |
my real concern is that within six months, where we're not making much | :25:21. | :25:25. | |
progress, maybe nine months, and people are getting increasingly fed | :25:26. | :25:29. | |
up with the EU because they are told it wants unreasonable demands, and | :25:30. | :25:34. | |
then the crash. I think what is happening is the government is | :25:35. | :25:37. | |
putting in place scaffolding at the bottom of the cliff to break our | :25:38. | :25:42. | |
fall when we come to fall off that cliff and I think many in government | :25:43. | :25:48. | |
are preparing not for a two-year process, but six, to nine months, | :25:49. | :25:53. | |
off the cliff, out we go. That is my fear. That is interesting. I have | :25:54. | :25:58. | |
not heard that express before by someone in your position. I suspect | :25:59. | :26:03. | |
you have made Nigel Farage's date. It is a lovely thought. I would say | :26:04. | :26:10. | |
to Anna Soubry she is out of date with this. 40 years ago there was a | :26:11. | :26:14. | |
good argument for joining the common market because tariffs around the | :26:15. | :26:19. | |
world was so high. That has changed with the World Trade Organisation. | :26:20. | :26:24. | |
We are leaving the EU and rejoining a great big world and it is | :26:25. | :26:33. | |
exciting. She was giving an interesting perspective on what | :26:34. | :26:35. | |
could happen in nine months rather than two years. I thank you both. | :26:36. | :26:39. | |
It was Philip Hammond's first budget on Wednesday - | :26:40. | :26:42. | |
billed as a steady-as-she-goes affair, but turned out to cause | :26:43. | :26:48. | |
uproar after the Chancellor appeared to contradict a Tory manifesto | :26:49. | :26:50. | |
commitment with an increase in national insurance contributions. | :26:51. | :26:52. | |
The aim was to address what some see as an imbalance in the tax system, | :26:53. | :27:01. | |
where employees pay more National Insurance | :27:02. | :27:03. | |
The controversy centres on increasing the so-called class 4 | :27:04. | :27:06. | |
rate for the self-employed who make a profit of more than ?8,060 a year. | :27:07. | :27:09. | |
It will go up in stages from 9% to 11% in 2019. | :27:10. | :27:16. | |
The changes mean that over one and a half million will pay | :27:17. | :27:20. | |
on average ?240 a year more in contributions. | :27:21. | :27:24. | |
Some Conservative MPs were unhappy, with even the Wales Minister saying: | :27:25. | :27:30. | |
"I will apologise to every voter in Wales that read | :27:31. | :27:33. | |
the Conservative manifesto in the 2015 election." | :27:34. | :27:34. | |
The Sun labelled Philip Hammond "spite van man". | :27:35. | :27:40. | |
The Daily Mail called the budget "no laughing matter". | :27:41. | :27:42. | |
By Thursday, Theresa May said the government | :27:43. | :27:45. | |
One of the first things I did as Prime Minister was to commission | :27:46. | :27:51. | |
Matthew Taylor to review the rights and protections that were available | :27:52. | :27:55. | |
to self-employed workers and whether they should be enhanced. | :27:56. | :27:58. | |
People will be able to look at the government paper | :27:59. | :28:00. | |
when we produce it, showing all our changes, and take | :28:01. | :28:03. | |
And, of course, the Chancellor will be speaking, as will his ministers, | :28:04. | :28:08. | |
to MPs, businesspeople and others to listen to the concerns. | :28:09. | :28:12. | |
Well, the man you heard mentioned there, Matthew Taylor, | :28:13. | :28:14. | |
has the job of producing a report into the future | :28:15. | :28:17. | |
Welcome. The Chancellor has decided the self-employed should pay almost | :28:18. | :28:30. | |
the same in National Insurance, not the same but almost, as the employed | :28:31. | :28:34. | |
will stop what is left of your commission? The commission has a | :28:35. | :28:39. | |
broader frame of reference and we are interested in the quality of | :28:40. | :28:44. | |
work in the economy at the heart of what I hope will be proposing is a | :28:45. | :28:49. | |
set of shifts that will improve the quality of that work so we have an | :28:50. | :28:54. | |
economy where all work is fair and decent and all jobs give people | :28:55. | :28:57. | |
scope for development and fulfilment. The issue of taxes a | :28:58. | :29:04. | |
small part. You will cover that? We will, because the tax system and | :29:05. | :29:09. | |
employment regulation system drive particular behaviours in our labour | :29:10. | :29:14. | |
market. You approve I think of the general direction of this policy of | :29:15. | :29:18. | |
raising National Insurance on the self-employed. Taxing them in return | :29:19. | :29:24. | |
perhaps for more state benefits. Why are so many others on the left | :29:25. | :29:29. | |
against it from Tim Farron to John McDonnell? Tax rises are unpopular | :29:30. | :29:33. | |
and it is the role of the opposition parties to make capital from | :29:34. | :29:38. | |
unpopular tax rises. I think as tax rises go this is broadly | :29:39. | :29:42. | |
progressive. There are self-employed people on low incomes and they will | :29:43. | :29:46. | |
be better off. It is economic league rational because the reason for the | :29:47. | :29:50. | |
difference in National Insurance -- economically. It was to do with | :29:51. | :29:55. | |
state entitlements. The government is consulting about paid parental | :29:56. | :29:59. | |
leave. A series of governments have not been good about thinking about | :30:00. | :30:04. | |
medium sustainability of the tax base. Self-employment is growing. | :30:05. | :30:09. | |
But it is eroding the tax base. It is important to address those | :30:10. | :30:14. | |
issues. A number of think tanks have said this is a progressive move. | :30:15. | :30:19. | |
Yet, a number of left-wing politicians have been against it. | :30:20. | :30:25. | |
And a number of Tories have said this is a progressive move and not a | :30:26. | :30:30. | |
Tory government move, the balance of you will pay more tax, but you will | :30:31. | :30:35. | |
get more state benefits is not a Tory approach to things. That a Tory | :30:36. | :30:39. | |
approach will be you will pay less tax but entitled to fewer benefits | :30:40. | :30:41. | |
as well. I preferred in and policies to | :30:42. | :30:52. | |
politics -- I prefer policies. When people look at the policy and when | :30:53. | :30:55. | |
they look the fact that there is no real historical basis for that big | :30:56. | :30:58. | |
national insurance differential, they see it is a sensible policy. I | :30:59. | :31:02. | |
don't have to deal with the politics. There has been a huge | :31:03. | :31:06. | |
growth in self-employment from the turn of the millennium. It's been | :31:07. | :31:09. | |
strongest amongst older workers, women part-timers. | :31:10. | :31:14. | |
Do you have any idea, do you have the data in your commission that | :31:15. | :31:20. | |
could tell us how many are taking self-employment because they like | :31:21. | :31:23. | |
the flexibility and they like the tax advantages that come with it, | :31:24. | :31:29. | |
too, or they are being forced into it by employers who don't want the | :31:30. | :31:33. | |
extra costs of employment? Do we know the difference? We do, broadly. | :31:34. | :31:38. | |
Most surveys on self-employment and flexible forms of employment suggest | :31:39. | :31:43. | |
about two thirds to three quarters enjoy it, they like the flexibility, | :31:44. | :31:48. | |
they like the autonomy and about a third to one quarter are less happy. | :31:49. | :31:52. | |
That tends to be because they would like to have a full-time permanent | :31:53. | :31:55. | |
job. It is not necessary that they don't enjoy what they are doing, | :31:56. | :31:58. | |
they would like to do other things. And some of the protections that | :31:59. | :32:02. | |
come with it? Yes. There are some people who are forced into southern | :32:03. | :32:07. | |
employees by high-risk but also some people feel like they can't get a | :32:08. | :32:11. | |
proper job as it were. -- self-employment by people who hire | :32:12. | :32:15. | |
them. It is on the narrow matter of tax revenues but if you are employed | :32:16. | :32:22. | |
on ?32,000 the state will take over ?6,000 in national insurance | :32:23. | :32:24. | |
contributions, that is quite chunky. If you are self-employed it is | :32:25. | :32:30. | |
?2300. But the big difference between those figures isn't what the | :32:31. | :32:34. | |
employee is paying, it's the employer's contributions up to | :32:35. | :32:40. | |
almost 14%, and cupped for as much as you are paid. What do you do | :32:41. | :32:46. | |
about employers' contributions for the self employed? -- it is uncapped | :32:47. | :32:52. | |
for as much. What I recommend is that we should probably move from | :32:53. | :32:56. | |
taxing employment to taxing labour. We should probably have a more level | :32:57. | :33:01. | |
playing field so it doesn't really matter... Explained that I thought | :33:02. | :33:06. | |
it was the same thing. If you are a self-employed gardener, you are a | :33:07. | :33:08. | |
different tax regime to a gardener who works for a gardening firm. On | :33:09. | :33:13. | |
the individual side and on the firm side. As we see new business models, | :33:14. | :33:21. | |
so-called gig working, partly with technology, we need a more level | :33:22. | :33:24. | |
playing field saying that we're taxing people's work, not the form | :33:25. | :33:30. | |
in which they deliver that. That is part of the reason we have seen the | :33:31. | :33:33. | |
growth of particular business models. They are innovative and | :33:34. | :33:37. | |
creative and partly driven by the fact that if you can describe | :33:38. | :33:41. | |
yourself as self-employed there are tax advantages. Coming out in June? | :33:42. | :33:46. | |
Will you come back and talk to us? Yes. | :33:47. | :33:48. | |
We say goodbye to viewers in Scotland, who leave us now | :33:49. | :33:53. | |
Coming up here in 20 minutes, we'll be talking to the former | :33:54. | :33:57. | |
Tory MP who was the root of Donald Trump's allegation | :33:58. | :34:12. | |
On today's show: Should they stay or should they go? | :34:13. | :34:17. | |
The EU nationals who are wrestling about whether to apply for permanent | :34:18. | :34:20. | |
residency now in case the Brexit negotiations don't guarantee | :34:21. | :34:24. | |
First, let's meet the two politicians here for the 20 minutes. | :34:25. | :34:31. | |
Conor Burns is the Conservative MP for Bournemouth West. | :34:32. | :34:34. | |
Alan Whitehead is the Labour MP for Southampton Test. | :34:35. | :34:39. | |
The budget wasn't even 48 hours old before the Prime Minister | :34:40. | :34:51. | |
was announcing a postponement of what turned out to be a rather | :34:52. | :34:54. | |
Increasing the national insurance contributions for self-employed. | :34:55. | :34:57. | |
This is just another pasty tax, isn't it? | :34:58. | :34:59. | |
It's a proper approach by the Chancellor that is recognising | :35:00. | :35:05. | |
the changes that have been made to other entitlements | :35:06. | :35:07. | |
There was always a quite large difference between what employed | :35:08. | :35:15. | |
and self-employed people paid in a national insurance because of | :35:16. | :35:17. | |
the difference they received in pension entitlement. | :35:18. | :35:23. | |
Of course, the government has moved to guarantee pension universally | :35:24. | :35:26. | |
to employed and self-employed and this I think is an adjustment | :35:27. | :35:28. | |
that reflects the changing benefits received. | :35:29. | :35:37. | |
But surely it is the manifesto commitment not to increase national | :35:38. | :35:46. | |
insurance that has caused a furore and the promise | :35:47. | :35:49. | |
Repeated in the manifesto, repeated by David Cameron, | :35:50. | :35:52. | |
we won't increase national insurance, and know it is going up. | :35:53. | :35:54. | |
We were very clear that we legislate for the commitments | :35:55. | :35:57. | |
made and that we did after the last general election. | :35:58. | :36:02. | |
I sat on the Finance Bill and there was not a word when we legislated | :36:03. | :36:05. | |
to guarantee the commitments on national insurance, | :36:06. | :36:07. | |
on class of national insurance, that was on that. | :36:08. | :36:09. | |
The manifesto commitment was not for one class, | :36:10. | :36:11. | |
it was for national insurance, and it is going up. | :36:12. | :36:13. | |
I'm prepared to dance around the head of the pin on this | :36:14. | :36:16. | |
but I think you need to look at the wider thing the Chancellor | :36:17. | :36:19. | |
was trying to achieve, which is a greater balance | :36:20. | :36:22. | |
between self-employed and employed people. | :36:23. | :36:23. | |
That gap had been very large when the benefits | :36:24. | :36:27. | |
gap was now diminishing and that was what the Chancellor | :36:28. | :36:30. | |
And the principle of keeping your promises has | :36:31. | :36:34. | |
It's the principle of keeping up-to-date with the with the labour | :36:35. | :36:38. | |
market is changing and making sure people are making an appropriate | :36:39. | :36:40. | |
contribution for the benefits they will receive. | :36:41. | :36:42. | |
No, this is dancing on the head of a pain. | :36:43. | :36:45. | |
There was a clear manifesto pledge at the last election | :36:46. | :36:50. | |
from the Conservatives that they would not have any taxes | :36:51. | :36:54. | |
going up and quite simply national insurance for a weight | :36:55. | :36:57. | |
Yes, there is a case to look at what is self employment and some | :36:58. | :37:11. | |
people are more appropriately self-employed and others. | :37:12. | :37:14. | |
It might have been prudent to look at who is self-employed and how that | :37:15. | :37:18. | |
works first and decide what to do afterwards because what this | :37:19. | :37:24. | |
increase has done is it's caught everybody who is self-employed, | :37:25. | :37:33. | |
from solicitors to butchers to hairdressers to people who drive | :37:34. | :37:38. | |
taxis to people who do deliveries, and those are all in | :37:39. | :37:41. | |
So you don't disagree with the principle that | :37:42. | :37:44. | |
self-employed people should be paying more national insurance | :37:45. | :37:48. | |
and you haven't made that manifesto commitment so why not say it | :37:49. | :37:51. | |
What I'm saying is that there is a case to look at | :37:52. | :37:55. | |
what self-employment consists of in a changing labour market | :37:56. | :37:57. | |
but it is not this case to be made at this budget to put national | :37:58. | :38:00. | |
insurance contributions up for everybody who is self-employed, | :38:01. | :38:02. | |
regardless of their actual circumstances. | :38:03. | :38:07. | |
What is interesting is that the Prime Minister has | :38:08. | :38:10. | |
started to take part in the unravelling of the budget | :38:11. | :38:17. | |
by saying it will be voted on until the autumn. | :38:18. | :38:23. | |
At that time it may be the case that a commission that has been set up | :38:24. | :38:27. | |
to look at what the status of self-employed is | :38:28. | :38:31. | |
Kicked into the long grass, possibly. | :38:32. | :38:33. | |
It shouldn't have happened in this way and... | :38:34. | :38:40. | |
The first point is, as Alan acknowledges, | :38:41. | :38:42. | |
the government has already appointed Matthew Taylor to look | :38:43. | :38:44. | |
at the self-employed as a whole to see what changes may be needed | :38:45. | :38:47. | |
Both in terms of additional contribution but also | :38:48. | :38:50. | |
The second point to make is that overall the self-employed | :38:51. | :38:54. | |
15% of people are self employed, over 60% of these people will be | :38:55. | :38:58. | |
The people who earn less than 16,000. | :38:59. | :39:00. | |
And that is a very, very important thing. | :39:01. | :39:03. | |
I think it is a regret that, at the same time as we extended | :39:04. | :39:07. | |
the pension entitlement, we didn't make these changes then. | :39:08. | :39:09. | |
I think it is a shame we disconnected them. | :39:10. | :39:15. | |
People would have understood there was a give as well as a take. | :39:16. | :39:18. | |
You know that in both our constituencies and number of people | :39:19. | :39:20. | |
who are the lifeblood of our local areas who are working | :39:21. | :39:23. | |
in local businesses, who are working in local shops, | :39:24. | :39:25. | |
are now far worse off than they were before the budget. | :39:26. | :39:28. | |
For no other reason than they are properly self-employed. | :39:29. | :39:30. | |
I don't agree it looks like a shambles. | :39:31. | :39:34. | |
I do agree we could have done a better job of explaining | :39:35. | :39:36. | |
But I think the changes the Chancellor made are sound. | :39:37. | :39:50. | |
The Brexit Bill is back in the Commons this week for the next | :39:51. | :39:53. | |
One of the two amendments added in the Lords and which the government | :39:54. | :39:57. | |
says it will remove is to guarantee the rights of EU nationals | :39:58. | :40:01. | |
That's not to be as many as 3 million people, | :40:02. | :40:04. | |
many of whom have been living here for decades. | :40:05. | :40:06. | |
The uncertainty they are facing has led to an unprecedented increase | :40:07. | :40:09. | |
in the applications for permanent residency but, as our reporter has | :40:10. | :40:11. | |
discovered, that represents for them a real fear for the future. | :40:12. | :40:16. | |
Two women, two different lives, but they both have the same concern. | :40:17. | :40:19. | |
I don't know what is going to happen to me. | :40:20. | :40:22. | |
So I would have to lead but where would I go? | :40:23. | :40:34. | |
I don't want to leave here because my life this year. | :40:35. | :40:36. | |
I've got a son, I've got stepchildren. | :40:37. | :40:43. | |
These anxieties and worries are widely shared among EU citizens | :40:44. | :40:45. | |
There are hundreds of thousands of people like them, | :40:46. | :40:53. | |
eager to apply for permanent residency, the guaranteed right | :40:54. | :40:55. | |
It might suddenly be a very hard thing that comes out of it. | :40:56. | :41:08. | |
There's no point sticking your head in the sand. | :41:09. | :41:12. | |
Elly came here in the 60s from Holland. | :41:13. | :41:14. | |
She's an artist and worked all her life. | :41:15. | :41:16. | |
The statements by the government are so heartless in a way | :41:17. | :41:22. | |
and ignorant sometimes, very ignorant of what | :41:23. | :41:25. | |
people have actually contributed to this country. | :41:26. | :41:29. | |
If I stay here I shall pay taxes until my dying day. | :41:30. | :41:39. | |
Another Dutch National has just finished her Ph.D. | :41:40. | :41:48. | |
in Oxford and has lived in the UK since the early 90s. | :41:49. | :41:51. | |
Suddenly I am looking at that I could be deported and where do I go? | :41:52. | :41:55. | |
We are suddenly up against needing a permanent residence card | :41:56. | :42:00. | |
If you want to apply for permanent residency, | :42:01. | :42:07. | |
It is an 85 page document that requires an awful of added | :42:08. | :42:17. | |
paperwork, including five years worth of P60s, historic utility | :42:18. | :42:20. | |
bills are and, even in some cases, a diary of all the times you may | :42:21. | :42:24. | |
The toll it takes emotionally and psychologically. | :42:25. | :42:26. | |
You spend so much time worrying about it, asking questions, | :42:27. | :42:29. | |
The tax people and the banks say after seven years you don't have | :42:30. | :42:43. | |
Now I need those papers and I haven't got them anymore. | :42:44. | :42:50. | |
You have to fight off anxiety because you are thinking | :42:51. | :42:52. | |
Permanent residency status isn't mandatory while we are still part | :42:53. | :43:05. | |
of the EU and experts say there is no rush to apply | :43:06. | :43:09. | |
but there has already been an increase in applications | :43:10. | :43:11. | |
There's a whole list of criteria to qualify for permanent residency. | :43:12. | :43:18. | |
For at least five years you need to have worked, been self-employed, | :43:19. | :43:24. | |
a student or self-sufficient person who has been living in the UK. | :43:25. | :43:27. | |
But there is a major stumbling block. | :43:28. | :43:29. | |
Students and self-sufficient people such as pensioners or those | :43:30. | :43:32. | |
who are able to support themselves financially need comprehensive | :43:33. | :43:34. | |
Being a student and not having the CSI, I can't apply even though | :43:35. | :43:43. | |
I have worked for long enough and I have got the state pension | :43:44. | :43:50. | |
I do not need CSI as long as I can prove my work history but I haven't | :43:51. | :44:02. | |
got any P60s or whatever else you need to prove and that is why | :44:03. | :44:07. | |
The Home Office didn't have anybody available to speak to us | :44:08. | :44:15. | |
but they did say there has been no change to EU immigration law | :44:16. | :44:18. | |
For now, it is not necessary to apply but uncertainty looms. | :44:19. | :44:30. | |
These two feel that since the referendum there has been a very | :44:31. | :44:33. | |
I thought, what has been lying under the surface that I wasn't aware of? | :44:34. | :44:48. | |
Suddenly you are being made to feel that you are not welcome. | :44:49. | :44:51. | |
But of course everyone always says, but we don't mean you. | :44:52. | :44:55. | |
But all the other people are just like me. | :44:56. | :44:59. | |
So for people like that life has changed overnight. | :45:00. | :45:09. | |
Our guest is from the 3 Million group. | :45:10. | :45:11. | |
You have also applied and have got your permanent residence. | :45:12. | :45:14. | |
But also having heard those voices, is it the outages that has shifted | :45:15. | :45:20. | |
in the country or a new experience the system that has made | :45:21. | :45:23. | |
I've started to realise what the Home Office rules are. | :45:24. | :45:28. | |
After the referendum I thought I will apply | :45:29. | :45:33. | |
for citizenship because I want to solidify my position. | :45:34. | :45:37. | |
I realised then I would have to apply for permanent residence | :45:38. | :45:39. | |
which was only introduced in November 2015 as a | :45:40. | :45:42. | |
I got rejected on a technicality, got unbelievable bureaucratic | :45:43. | :45:48. | |
treatment at the hands of the Home Office. | :45:49. | :45:53. | |
And in this process I started learning about all these people do | :45:54. | :45:55. | |
You can have been here for ten years but if you take a job abroad | :45:56. | :46:04. | |
for a couple of years your clock starts again and you | :46:05. | :46:06. | |
And they were saying about having to keep all the records which people | :46:07. | :46:11. | |
There are women whose utility bills have all been in their husband's | :46:12. | :46:15. | |
I know somebody who is an EU national, divorced from her British | :46:16. | :46:24. | |
husband, is on benefits because she has an adult disabled | :46:25. | :46:28. | |
son, cannot possibly afford CSI, nobody even knew about CSI. | :46:29. | :46:31. | |
I get really cross when the newspapers say anyone who has | :46:32. | :46:37. | |
been here over five years is fine because that is not actually true. | :46:38. | :46:41. | |
Because you got to be able to prove it and it feels | :46:42. | :46:44. | |
It is more than being able to prove it. | :46:45. | :46:48. | |
There are some people who do not qualify according | :46:49. | :46:51. | |
There is such a disconnect between what politicians | :46:52. | :46:54. | |
and the media are saying about these five years. | :46:55. | :46:58. | |
Peter Bone on Newsnight said, I will help you fill in the form, | :46:59. | :47:00. | |
totally patronising us as though it was just a question | :47:01. | :47:04. | |
And all the documents you have to provide. | :47:05. | :47:07. | |
I only qualified by the skin of my teeth because I happen to know | :47:08. | :47:13. | |
you have a five-year block but I took a couple of years off | :47:14. | :47:16. | |
It affects students and so many people but the really important | :47:17. | :47:22. | |
When the Home Office says you don't need to do anything, | :47:23. | :47:33. | |
nothing changes, it matters because immigration here | :47:34. | :47:34. | |
is delegated down to landlords and banks and all sorts of things | :47:35. | :47:38. | |
so people are struggling to get jobs, they are being turned down | :47:39. | :47:41. | |
for jobs, turned down for rented accommodation. | :47:42. | :47:43. | |
The phrase used in the report was sanctioned racism. | :47:44. | :47:50. | |
I know know people who are speaking French on the tube and date | :47:51. | :48:01. | |
gets addressed with, you need to speak English here. | :48:02. | :48:04. | |
Which wouldn't have happened, do you think, before the vote? | :48:05. | :48:06. | |
Like you say, it's sanctioned racism. | :48:07. | :48:09. | |
Would it be alleviated if we were told everyone | :48:10. | :48:14. | |
Following the referendum result, we've got to urgently and at a very | :48:15. | :48:26. | |
early stage regularise the position of EU nationals living in the UK | :48:27. | :48:35. | |
and the easiest way to do that is to say that, | :48:36. | :48:37. | |
if you are an EU national living in the UK at the time | :48:38. | :48:40. | |
of the referendum, July, then you have status | :48:41. | :48:42. | |
But that's not our fault that we can't do that at the moment. | :48:43. | :48:46. | |
If the EU were to say, yes, we will do a deal, | :48:47. | :48:49. | |
it is important that people are treated properly. | :48:50. | :48:51. | |
I think it is our fault because it is inconceivable | :48:52. | :48:56. | |
to my mind that we could really end up banging our fists on the table | :48:57. | :49:05. | |
in negotiation with the EU saying we will chuck our EU nationals out | :49:06. | :49:12. | |
if you don't let our nationals stay in your country or whatever. | :49:13. | :49:14. | |
Not only is it something we need to do the people who have lived | :49:15. | :49:18. | |
in the UK for years and years and years and paid their taxes | :49:19. | :49:21. | |
and had their lives in the UK, but also that is important | :49:22. | :49:24. | |
One tenth of those people working in the General Hospital | :49:25. | :49:28. | |
in Southampton are UK nationals and we can't conceivably throw | :49:29. | :49:30. | |
all those people out of the country and we ought to sort it out | :49:31. | :49:34. | |
at the earliest possible opportunity. | :49:35. | :49:36. | |
We are not going to tell people like our guest they have | :49:37. | :49:39. | |
It is not going to happen and we are making them feel | :49:40. | :49:43. | |
Firstly, the contribution that EU citizens make | :49:44. | :49:46. | |
to the UK is immense, it is welcome, they are an integral | :49:47. | :49:52. | |
part of our society, our economy, our way of life. | :49:53. | :49:57. | |
You are absolutely right on the question | :49:58. | :49:59. | |
We wanted to do this really early on. | :50:00. | :50:02. | |
The Prime Minister made this offer to her fellow European | :50:03. | :50:05. | |
Angela Merkel said, we couldn't do that until the process began. | :50:06. | :50:10. | |
I regret we didn't do this, the offer Theresa May | :50:11. | :50:15. | |
We've now been very clear that this is something we want to achieve | :50:16. | :50:22. | |
right up front at the beginning of the negotiations. | :50:23. | :50:24. | |
Of course there is no question of deporting anybody. | :50:25. | :50:26. | |
Goodness me, a country like Britain deporting people | :50:27. | :50:28. | |
So it is a hollow threat to be making to Angela Merkel anyway. | :50:29. | :50:34. | |
No, because these are quite complex matters. | :50:35. | :50:37. | |
The other point is that we have lots of British nationals living | :50:38. | :50:41. | |
in other European Union countries and we want at the same time | :50:42. | :50:45. | |
as we guarantee the rights of EU nationals living here to get them | :50:46. | :50:52. | |
the right to remain, we want guarantees for them too. | :50:53. | :50:54. | |
It's not fair because you haven't listened | :50:55. | :50:57. | |
They have been wanting to speak to the government and there have | :50:58. | :51:01. | |
been newspaper reports that they have not been | :51:02. | :51:03. | |
Because they want their rights guaranteed in Europe as well. | :51:04. | :51:08. | |
Yes, they do but they have written really strongly, | :51:09. | :51:14. | |
I have quotes that I can't read out now, but they have written | :51:15. | :51:17. | |
to say that they want us to get unilateral... | :51:18. | :51:19. | |
They have come to give evidence at the Brexit select committee | :51:20. | :51:22. | |
to say they also want unilateral rights to be given to us | :51:23. | :51:26. | |
because they do not want to be part of a negotiation. | :51:27. | :51:33. | |
Your very language to say it is down to Germany not agreeing, | :51:34. | :51:36. | |
you are going back to it being a negotiation. | :51:37. | :51:39. | |
Which bit of unilateral do you not understand | :51:40. | :51:41. | |
If it is not a negotiation, it's unilateral. | :51:42. | :51:51. | |
If you forgive me, I will absolutely defend the rights of the government | :51:52. | :51:54. | |
of the United Kingdom to guarantee the rights of United Kingdom | :51:55. | :51:57. | |
citizens living in the European Union at the same time | :51:58. | :51:59. | |
as those rights given to those already here | :52:00. | :52:01. | |
Why don't you at least guarantee the rights that are already | :52:02. | :52:06. | |
Why don't you say something to them about maintaining | :52:07. | :52:10. | |
Say something about continuing to pay for their health care? | :52:11. | :52:13. | |
All the concerns that the British people in Europe that we work with, | :52:14. | :52:16. | |
because we're not trying to just speak out on us. | :52:17. | :52:19. | |
The question you have posed goes to the heart of the complexity | :52:20. | :52:30. | |
of the mutuality of the assurances that we are seeking in negotiations. | :52:31. | :52:34. | |
You should just say that we should be OK. | :52:35. | :52:37. | |
Of course it should be because it's about pension rights to crude | :52:38. | :52:42. | |
entitlements and we can make sure that those living in Germany | :52:43. | :52:44. | |
and Spain and Portugal and France, our citizens living there, | :52:45. | :52:46. | |
can also get those reciprocal rights. | :52:47. | :52:48. | |
That has to be part of a whole agreement and Angela Merkel has been | :52:49. | :52:51. | |
clear that we can't do that except as part of a negotiation. | :52:52. | :52:54. | |
But you are still saying that it is part of a negotiation | :52:55. | :52:57. | |
and if Mrs Merkel, after triggering Article 50, doesn't get you XYZ | :52:58. | :53:00. | |
you are going to take away some of our XYZ rights | :53:01. | :53:03. | |
because it is a negotiation and that goes to the heart of it. | :53:04. | :53:05. | |
It's about getting the best rights for our citizens in the EU and EU | :53:06. | :53:09. | |
Let's just bring in Alan before we go. | :53:10. | :53:13. | |
Which ever way you cut it, if you take that line, | :53:14. | :53:16. | |
it is a negotiation and there is everything to gain | :53:17. | :53:18. | |
and nothing to lose by treating this unilaterally. | :53:19. | :53:20. | |
EU citizens in the UK should unilaterally have the right to stay | :53:21. | :53:27. | |
now and we can do that now and it should not be part | :53:28. | :53:30. | |
Is there any chance the government will change its mind? | :53:31. | :53:33. | |
No, the purpose of a negotiation is to get the best deal mutually | :53:34. | :53:37. | |
for our citizens in the EU and EU citizens here. | :53:38. | :53:39. | |
Now, our regular round-up of the political week | :53:40. | :53:45. | |
Air pollution in Oxford could be cut by a low emissions zone. | :53:46. | :53:53. | |
They go away from the Thames Valley only to discover their | :53:54. | :53:59. | |
Fog started to clear around government negotiations | :54:00. | :54:04. | |
with Surrey County Council to stop a 15% tax rise. | :54:05. | :54:08. | |
In a secret recording the leader referred to... | :54:09. | :54:11. | |
How much did the government offer Surrey County Council | :54:12. | :54:20. | |
Documents reveal a deal drawn up but dropped at the last minute. | :54:21. | :54:27. | |
There was some help in the budget for businesses whose | :54:28. | :54:33. | |
We've got rent increase and we've got rate increase, | :54:34. | :54:36. | |
Fears of a flood of sewage could delay the ?3 million | :54:37. | :54:41. | |
They are worried a sewer upgrade won't be ready. | :54:42. | :54:49. | |
I'm begging Thames Water to come and activate this process now. | :54:50. | :54:54. | |
I've spent several evenings this week going through the release | :54:55. | :54:59. | |
of documents to do with Surrey County Council | :55:00. | :55:01. | |
I guess all councils try and get a deal, don't they? | :55:02. | :55:06. | |
That is the job of government and local authorities coming | :55:07. | :55:12. | |
up to the settlement, is to try and get the best | :55:13. | :55:15. | |
I think Surrey have bargained very hard with government. | :55:16. | :55:27. | |
The adult social care problem is a massive one | :55:28. | :55:29. | |
We confronted it in Bournemouth and Poole and there was a sense | :55:30. | :55:33. | |
amongst all local authorities that what the government had done | :55:34. | :55:35. | |
to date was not enough to meet the shortfall. | :55:36. | :55:37. | |
The Chancellor was listening, aside from what they were talking | :55:38. | :55:43. | |
to Surrey about, and he recognised that an extra | :55:44. | :55:46. | |
?2 billion over three years for local authorities | :55:47. | :55:48. | |
I think that is the big issue, is the government confronting | :55:49. | :55:52. | |
the reality of adult social care on the ground at meeting | :55:53. | :55:59. | |
I will come back to you on whether or not they should have ever denied | :56:00. | :56:04. | |
there was any sort of arrangement that was being negotiated | :56:05. | :56:06. | |
but it is not a sweetheart deal for Surrey County Council. | :56:07. | :56:09. | |
All this is frankly more fishy than a very large plate of haddock. | :56:10. | :56:12. | |
So why is Jeremy Corbyn banging on about it? | :56:13. | :56:14. | |
It is clearly, as revealed by the e-mails and recordings, | :56:15. | :56:20. | |
Surrey thought they had a sweetheart deal in the bag and clearly a lot | :56:21. | :56:23. | |
the lines of there would be a sweetheart deal. | :56:24. | :56:31. | |
I have been a local authority leader in my time and I've never had that | :56:32. | :56:35. | |
sort of arrangement with any government minister or department. | :56:36. | :56:36. | |
There was a sweetheart deal in the budget. | :56:37. | :56:42. | |
It was ?2 billion extra for adult social care | :56:43. | :56:44. | |
A great sweetheart deal, a great Chancellor delivering | :56:45. | :56:49. | |
That's the Sunday Politics in the South. | :56:50. | :56:55. | |
Thank you to my guests, Conor Burns from Bournemouth, | :56:56. | :56:57. | |
You can keep up-to-date with Southern politics, | :56:58. | :57:16. | |
Now the government plans for new grammar schools. | :57:17. | :57:19. | |
The Education Secretary Justine Greening was | :57:20. | :57:21. | |
speaking to a conference of headteachers on Friday. | :57:22. | :57:23. | |
They're normally a pretty polite bunch, but they didn't | :57:24. | :57:25. | |
Broadcasters weren't allowed into the speech, | :57:26. | :57:31. | |
but this was captured on a camera phone. | :57:32. | :57:36. | |
And we have to recognise actually for grammars, in terms of | :57:37. | :57:39. | |
disadvantaged children, that they have, they really | :57:40. | :57:43. | |
do help them close the attainment gap. | :57:44. | :57:45. | |
And at the same time we should recognise that | :57:46. | :57:47. | |
..That parents also want choice for their children and that | :57:48. | :57:55. | |
those schools are often very oversubscribed. | :57:56. | :58:02. | |
I suppose it is a rite of passage for and education secretaries to | :58:03. | :58:11. | |
have this at a head teachers conference book the head are usually | :58:12. | :58:16. | |
more polite. Isn't part of the problem, whether one is for or | :58:17. | :58:19. | |
against the expansion of grammar schools, the government plans are | :58:20. | :58:25. | |
complicated, you cannot sum them up in a sentence. The proof of that is | :58:26. | :58:30. | |
they can still get away with denying they are expanding grammar schools. | :58:31. | :58:34. | |
They will find an alternative formulation because it is not as | :58:35. | :58:37. | |
simple as a brute creation of what we used to know is grammar schools | :58:38. | :58:41. | |
with the absolute cut-off of the 11 plus. I am surprised how easy they | :58:42. | :58:48. | |
found it politically. We saw the clip of Justine Greening being | :58:49. | :58:52. | |
jeered a little bit but in the grand scheme, compared to another | :58:53. | :58:56. | |
government trying this idea a decade ago they have got away with it | :58:57. | :59:00. | |
easily and I think what is happening is a perverse consequence of Brexit | :59:01. | :59:04. | |
and the media attention on Brexit, the government of the day can just | :59:05. | :59:09. | |
about get away with slightly more contentious domestic policies on the | :59:10. | :59:13. | |
correct assumption we will be too busy investing our attention in | :59:14. | :59:18. | |
Article 50 and two years of negotiations, WTO terms at | :59:19. | :59:22. | |
everything we have been discussing. I wonder if after grammar schools | :59:23. | :59:27. | |
there will be examples of contentious domestic policies | :59:28. | :59:30. | |
Theresa May can slide in stock because Brexit sucks the life out, | :59:31. | :59:39. | |
takes the attention away. You are a supporter. Broadly. Are you happy | :59:40. | :59:44. | |
with the government approach? They need to have more gumption and stop | :59:45. | :59:49. | |
being apologetic. It is a bazaar area of public policy where we judge | :59:50. | :59:53. | |
the policy on grammar schools based on what it does for children whose | :59:54. | :59:58. | |
parents are unemployed, living on sink estates in Liverpool. It is | :59:59. | :00:03. | |
absurd, we don't judge any other policy like that. It is simple, not | :00:04. | :00:07. | |
contentious, people who are not sure, ask them if they would apply | :00:08. | :00:11. | |
to send their child there, six out of ten said they would. Parents want | :00:12. | :00:18. | |
good schools for their children, we should have appropriate education | :00:19. | :00:20. | |
and they should be straightforward, this is about the future of the | :00:21. | :00:24. | |
economy and we need bright children to get education at the highest | :00:25. | :00:28. | |
level, education for academically bright children. It is supposed to | :00:29. | :00:34. | |
be a signature policy of the Theresa May administration that marks a | :00:35. | :00:37. | |
government different from David Cameron's government who did not go | :00:38. | :00:41. | |
down this road. The signature is pretty blurred, it is hard to read. | :00:42. | :00:46. | |
It is. She is trying to address concerns about those who fail to get | :00:47. | :00:54. | |
into these selective schools and tried to targeted in poorer areas | :00:55. | :00:57. | |
and the rest of it. She will probably come across so many | :00:58. | :01:01. | |
obstacles. It is not clear what form it will take in the end. It is | :01:02. | :01:05. | |
really an example of a signature policy not fully thought through. I | :01:06. | :01:08. | |
think it was one of her first announcements. It was. It surprised | :01:09. | :01:12. | |
everybody. Surprised at the speed and pace at which they were planning | :01:13. | :01:17. | |
to go. Ever since, there have been qualifications and hesitations en | :01:18. | :01:22. | |
route with good cause, in my view. I disagree with Juliet that this is... | :01:23. | :01:26. | |
We all want good schools but if you don't get in there and you end up in | :01:27. | :01:29. | |
a less good school. They already do that. We have selection based on the | :01:30. | :01:33. | |
income of parents getting into a good catchment area, based on the | :01:34. | :01:37. | |
faith of the parents. That becomes very attainable! I might been too | :01:38. | :01:43. | |
shot run christenings for these. -- I have been. | :01:44. | :01:46. | |
Now, you may remember this time last week we were talking | :01:47. | :01:48. | |
about the extraordinary claims by US President Donald Trump, | :01:49. | :01:51. | |
on Twitter of course, that Barack Obama had ordered | :01:52. | :01:53. | |
And there was me thinking that wiretaps went out | :01:54. | :01:56. | |
Is it legal for a sitting President to do so, he asked, | :01:57. | :02:01. | |
concluding it was a "new low", and later comparing it to Watergate. | :02:02. | :02:10. | |
Since then, the White House has been pressed to provide evidence for this | :02:11. | :02:13. | |
It hasn't, but it seems it may have initially come from a report on a US | :02:14. | :02:20. | |
website by the former Conservative MP Louise Mensch. | :02:21. | :02:22. | |
She wrote that the FBI had been granted a warrant to intercept | :02:23. | :02:25. | |
communications between Trump's campaign and Russia. | :02:26. | :02:33. | |
Well, Louise Mensch joins us now from New York. | :02:34. | :02:41. | |
Louise, you claimed in early November that the FBI had secured a | :02:42. | :02:48. | |
court warrants to monitor communications between trump Tower | :02:49. | :02:52. | |
in New York at two Russian banks. It's now four months later. Isn't it | :02:53. | :02:56. | |
the case that nobody has proved the existence of this warrant? | :02:57. | :03:01. | |
First of all, forgive me Andrew, one takes 1's life in one's hand when it | :03:02. | :03:07. | |
is you but I have to correct your characterisation of my reporting. It | :03:08. | :03:11. | |
is very important. I did not report that the FBI had a warrant to | :03:12. | :03:15. | |
intercept anything or that Trump tower was any part of it. What I | :03:16. | :03:20. | |
reported was that the FBI obtained a warrant is targeted on all | :03:21. | :03:24. | |
communications between two Russian banks and were, therefore, allowed | :03:25. | :03:28. | |
to examine US persons in the context of their investigation. What the | :03:29. | :03:34. | |
Americans call legally incidental collection. I certainly didn't | :03:35. | :03:40. | |
report that the warrant was able to intercept or that it had location | :03:41. | :03:43. | |
basis, for example Trump tower. I just didn't report that. The reason | :03:44. | :03:49. | |
that matters so much is that I now believe based on the President's | :03:50. | :03:54. | |
reaction, there may well be a wiretap act Trump Tower. If so, | :03:55. | :03:58. | |
Donald Trump has just tweeted out evidence in an ongoing criminal case | :03:59. | :04:01. | |
that neither I nor anybody else reported. He is right about | :04:02. | :04:05. | |
Watergate because he will have committed obstruction of justice | :04:06. | :04:09. | |
directly from his Twitter account. Let me come back as thank you for | :04:10. | :04:13. | |
clarifying. Let me come back to the question. -- and thank you. We have | :04:14. | :04:20. | |
not yet got proof that this warrant exists, do we? No and we are most | :04:21. | :04:25. | |
unlikely to get it because it would be a heinous crime for Donald Trump | :04:26. | :04:29. | |
to reveal its existence. In America they call it a Glomar response. I | :04:30. | :04:33. | |
can neither confirm nor deny. That is what all American officials will | :04:34. | :04:36. | |
have to say legally. If you are looking for proof, you won't get it | :04:37. | :04:41. | |
until and unless a court cases brought. But that doesn't mean it | :04:42. | :04:46. | |
doesn't exist. The BBC validated this two months after me in their | :04:47. | :04:49. | |
reporting by the journalist Paul Wood. The Guardian, they also | :04:50. | :04:54. | |
separately from their own sources validated the existence of the | :04:55. | :04:58. | |
warrant. If you are in America, you would know that CNN and others are | :04:59. | :05:01. | |
reporting that the investigation in ongoing. Let me come onto the wider | :05:02. | :05:05. | |
point. You believe the Trump campaign including the president | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
were complicit with the Russians during the 2016 election campaign to | :05:11. | :05:13. | |
such an extent that Mr Trump should be impeached. What evidence did you | :05:14. | :05:15. | |
have? That is an enormous amount of | :05:16. | :05:25. | |
evidence. You could start with him saying, hey, Russia, if you are | :05:26. | :05:28. | |
listening, please release all the Hillary Clinton's e-mails. That's | :05:29. | :05:33. | |
not evidence. I think it rather is, actually. Especially if you look at | :05:34. | :05:36. | |
some of the evidence that exists on Twitter and elsewhere of people | :05:37. | :05:40. | |
talking directly to his social media manager, Dan should be no and | :05:41. | :05:44. | |
telling him to do that before it happened. There is a bit out there. | :05:45. | :05:49. | |
The BBC itself reported that in April of last year, a six agency | :05:50. | :05:54. | |
task force, not just the FBI, but the Treasury Department, was looking | :05:55. | :05:57. | |
at this. I believe there is an enormous amount of evidence. And | :05:58. | :06:01. | |
then there is the steel dossier which was included in an official | :06:02. | :06:03. | |
report of the US intelligence committee. You've also ... Just to | :06:04. | :06:12. | |
be clear, we don't have hard evidence yet whether this warrant | :06:13. | :06:16. | |
exists. It may or may not. There is doubt about... There are claims | :06:17. | :06:19. | |
about whether there is evidence about Mr Trump and the Russians. | :06:20. | :06:22. | |
That is another matter. You claimed that President Putin had Andrew | :06:23. | :06:29. | |
Breitbart murdered to pave the way for Steve Bannon to play a key role | :06:30. | :06:35. | |
in the Trump administration. I haven't. You said that Steve Bannon | :06:36. | :06:39. | |
is behind bomb threats to Jewish community centres. Aren't you in | :06:40. | :06:44. | |
danger of just peddling wild conspiracy theories? No. Festival, I | :06:45. | :06:48. | |
haven't. No matter how many times people say this, it's not going to | :06:49. | :06:53. | |
be true -- first of all. I said in twitter I believe that to be the | :06:54. | :06:56. | |
case about the murder of Andrew Breitbart. You believe President | :06:57. | :07:03. | |
Putin murdered him. I didn't! You said I reported it, but I believed | :07:04. | :07:07. | |
it. You put it on twitter that you believed it but you don't have a | :07:08. | :07:12. | |
shred of evidence. I do. Indeed, I know made assertions. What is the | :07:13. | :07:17. | |
evidence that Mr Putin murdered Andrew Breitbart? I said I believe | :07:18. | :07:22. | |
it. You may believe there are fairies at the bottom of your | :07:23. | :07:26. | |
garden, it doesn't make it true. I may indeed. And if I say so, that's | :07:27. | :07:31. | |
my belief. If I say I am reporting, as I did with the Fisa warrant | :07:32. | :07:39. | |
exists, I have a basis in fact. They believe is just a belief. I know you | :07:40. | :07:45. | |
are relatively new to journalism. Let me get the rules right. Andrew, | :07:46. | :07:52. | |
jealousy is not your colour... If it is twitter, we don't believe it but | :07:53. | :07:55. | |
if it is on your website, we should believe it? If I report something | :07:56. | :08:00. | |
and I say this happened, then I am making an assertion. If I describe a | :08:01. | :08:04. | |
belief, I am describing a belief. Subtlety may be a little difficult | :08:05. | :08:10. | |
for you... No, no. If you want to be a journalist, beliefs have to be | :08:11. | :08:17. | |
backed up with evidence. Really? Do you have a faith? It's not a matter | :08:18. | :08:21. | |
of faith, maybe in your case, that President Putin murdered Andrew | :08:22. | :08:26. | |
Breitbart. A belief and a report at two different things and no matter | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
how often you say that they are the same, they will never be the same. | :08:31. | :08:35. | |
You've said in today's Sunday Times here in London that you've turned | :08:36. | :08:42. | |
into" a temporary superpower" where you "See things really clearly". | :08:43. | :08:48. | |
Have you become delusional? No. I am describing a biological basis for | :08:49. | :08:54. | |
ADHD, which I have. As any of your viewers who are doctors will know. | :08:55. | :08:57. | |
It provides people with unfortunately a lot of scattered | :08:58. | :09:01. | |
focus, they are very messy and absent-minded but when they are | :09:02. | :09:03. | |
interested in things and they have ADHD they can have a condition which | :09:04. | :09:08. | |
is hyper focus. You concentrate very hard on a given subject and you can | :09:09. | :09:11. | |
see patterns and connections. That is biological. Thank you for | :09:12. | :09:17. | |
explaining that. And for getting up early in New York. The first time | :09:18. | :09:23. | |
ever I have interviewed a temporary superpower. Thank you. You are so | :09:24. | :09:27. | |
lucky! You are so lucky! I don't think it's going to happen again. | :09:28. | :09:31. | |
Please don't ask us to comment on that interview! I will not ask you, | :09:32. | :09:35. | |
viewers will make up their own minds. Let's come back to be more | :09:36. | :09:39. | |
mundane world of Article 50. Stop the killing! | :09:40. | :09:43. | |
Will it get through at the government wanted it? Without the | :09:44. | :09:49. | |
Lords amendment falling by the way that? I am sure the Lord will not | :09:50. | :09:52. | |
try to ping-pong this back and forth. So we are at the end of this | :09:53. | :09:56. | |
particular legislative phase. The fact that all three Brexit Cabinet | :09:57. | :10:00. | |
ministers, number ten often don't like one of them going out on a | :10:01. | :10:03. | |
broadcast interview on a Sunday, they've all been out and about. That | :10:04. | :10:07. | |
suggests to me they are working on the assumption it will be triggered | :10:08. | :10:12. | |
this week. This week. The negotiations will begin or at least | :10:13. | :10:16. | |
the process begins. The negotiation process may be difficult, given all | :10:17. | :10:19. | |
of the European elections. The Dutch this week. And then the French and | :10:20. | :10:25. | |
maybe the Italians and certainly the Germans by the end of September, | :10:26. | :10:28. | |
which is less predictable than it was. Given all that, what did you | :10:29. | :10:34. | |
make of Anna Soubry's claim, Viacom on her part, that we may just end up | :10:35. | :10:38. | |
crashing out in six months question -- fear on her part. It was not just | :10:39. | :10:44. | |
that that we made that deliberately organising. I want us to get on with | :10:45. | :10:46. | |
the deals. Everyone knows a good deal is the | :10:47. | :10:53. | |
best option. Who knows what is going to be on the table when we finally | :10:54. | :10:58. | |
go out? Fascinatingly, the demand for some money back, given the | :10:59. | :11:03. | |
amount of money... Net gains and net costs in terms of us leaving for the | :11:04. | :11:07. | |
EU. It is all to play for. That will be a possible early grounds for a | :11:08. | :11:14. | |
confrontation between the UK and the EU. My understanding is that they | :11:15. | :11:19. | |
expect to do a deal on reciprocal rights of EU nationals, EU nationals | :11:20. | :11:23. | |
here, UK citizens there, quite quickly. They want to clear that up | :11:24. | :11:27. | |
and that will be done. Then they will hit this problem that the EU | :11:28. | :11:31. | |
will be saying you've got to agree the divorce Bill first before we | :11:32. | :11:36. | |
talk about the free trade bill. David Davis saying quite clearly, | :11:37. | :11:39. | |
no, they go together because of the size of the bill. It will be | :11:40. | :11:44. | |
determined, in our part, by how good the access will be. The mutual | :11:45. | :11:48. | |
recognition of EU residents' rights is no trouble. A huge amount of fuss | :11:49. | :11:51. | |
is attracted to that subject but it is the easiest thing to deal with, | :11:52. | :11:56. | |
as is free movement for tourists. Money is what will make it | :11:57. | :11:59. | |
incredibly acrimonious. Incredibly quickly. I imagine the dominant | :12:00. | :12:02. | |
story in the summer will be all about that. This was Anna Soubry's | :12:03. | :12:06. | |
implication, members of the governors could strongly argue, | :12:07. | :12:10. | |
things are so poisonous and so unpleasant at the moment, the | :12:11. | :12:13. | |
dealers are advancing -- members of the government. Why not call it a | :12:14. | :12:18. | |
day and go out on WTO terms while public opinion is still in that | :12:19. | :12:22. | |
direction in that Eurosceptic direction? No buyers' remorse about | :12:23. | :12:25. | |
last year's referendum. The longer they leave it, view more opportunity | :12:26. | :12:30. | |
there is for some kind of public resistance and change of mind to | :12:31. | :12:34. | |
take place. The longer believe it, the more people who voted for Brexit | :12:35. | :12:38. | |
and people who voted Remain and think we didn't get world War three | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
will start being quite angry with the EU for not agreeing a deal. In | :12:43. | :12:45. | |
terms of the rights of EU nationals he and Brits abroad, by all | :12:46. | :12:51. | |
accounts, 26 of the 27 have agreed individually. Angela Merkel is the | :12:52. | :12:55. | |
only person who has held that up. That will be dealt with in a matter | :12:56. | :12:58. | |
of days. The chances of a deal being done is likely but in ten seconds... | :12:59. | :13:05. | |
It would not be a bad bet to protect your on something not happening, you | :13:06. | :13:08. | |
might get pretty good odds? The odds are going up that a deal doesn't | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
happen. But, as I said earlier, the House of Commons will not endorse no | :13:14. | :13:18. | |
deal. We are either in an early election or she has to go back | :13:19. | :13:23. | |
again. Either way, you will need us! We will be back at noon tomorrow on | :13:24. | :13:28. | |
BBC Two ahead of what looks like being a big week in politics. We | :13:29. | :13:30. | |
will be back here same time, same place. | :13:31. | :13:34. | |
Remember, if it's Sunday, it's the Sunday Politics. | :13:35. | :14:38. | |
They're calling it an entertainment extravaganza | :14:39. | :14:46. |