Browse content similar to 27/10/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, folks. Welcome to the Sunday Politics. Hope you enjoyed | :00:36. | :00:40. | |
the extra hour in bed, and that you've realised it's not 12:45. It's | :00:41. | :00:45. | |
11:45! It's getting stormy outside. But they're already battening down | :00:46. | :00:48. | |
the hatches at Number Ten because coalition splits are back, with | :00:49. | :00:51. | |
bust-ups over free schools and power bills. We'll speak to the Lib Dems, | :00:52. | :00:56. | |
and ask Labour who's conning whom over energy. | :00:57. | :01:00. | |
EU leaders have been meeting in Brussels. But how's David Cameron | :01:01. | :01:03. | |
getting on with that plan to change our relationship with Europe? We | :01:04. | :01:13. | |
were there to ask him. Have we got any powers back yet? DS! | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
Foreign companies own everything from our energy companies to our | :01:18. | :01:19. | |
railways. Does it matter who Maximum Temperature 17 Celsius. | :01:20. | :01:20. | |
Goodbye. as many daily journeys made by bus | :01:21. | :01:35. | |
than by tube, so why is the planned investment in buses not keeping | :01:36. | :01:43. | |
pace? And with me, three journalists | :01:44. | :01:46. | |
who've bravely agreed to hunker down in the studio while Britain braces | :01:47. | :01:48. | |
itself for massive storm winds, tweeting their political forecasts | :01:49. | :01:51. | |
with all the accuracy of Michael Fish on hurricane watch. Helen | :01:52. | :01:59. | |
Lewis, Janan Ganesh and Nick Watt. Now, sometimes coalition splits are | :02:00. | :02:01. | |
over-egged, or dare we say even occasionally stage-managed. But this | :02:02. | :02:06. | |
week, we've seen what looks like the genuine article. It turns out Nick | :02:07. | :02:10. | |
Clegg has his doubts about the coalition's flagship free schools | :02:11. | :02:13. | |
policy. David Cameron doesn't much like the green levies on our energy | :02:14. | :02:16. | |
bills championed by the Lib Dems. Neither of them seems to have | :02:17. | :02:20. | |
bothered to tell the other that they had their doubts. Who better to | :02:21. | :02:24. | |
discuss these flare-ups than Lib Dem Deputy Leader Simon Hughes? He joins | :02:25. | :02:34. | |
me now. Welcome. Good morning. The Lib Dems spent three years of | :02:35. | :02:38. | |
sticking up for the coalition when times were grim. Explain to me the | :02:39. | :02:42. | |
logic of splitting from them when times look better. We will stick | :02:43. | :02:48. | |
with it for five years. It is working arrangement, but not | :02:49. | :02:52. | |
surprisingly, where there right areas on which we disagree over | :02:53. | :02:56. | |
where to go next, we will stand up. It is going to be hard enough for | :02:57. | :03:00. | |
the Lib Dems to get any credit for the recovery, what ever it is. It | :03:01. | :03:06. | |
will be even harder if you seem to be semidetached and picky. The | :03:07. | :03:09. | |
coalition has led on economic policy, some of which were entirely | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
from our stable. The one you have heard about most often, a Lib Dem | :03:16. | :03:19. | |
initiative, was to take people on blowing comes out of tax. The | :03:20. | :03:24. | |
recovery would not have happened, there would not have been confidence | :03:25. | :03:28. | |
in Britain, had there not been a coalition government with us in it, | :03:29. | :03:34. | |
making sure the same policies produced fair outcomes. We are not | :03:35. | :03:38. | |
going to leave the credit for any growth - and there has been very | :03:39. | :03:42. | |
good news this week. We have played a part in that, and without us, it | :03:43. | :03:47. | |
would not have happened. Does it not underline the trust problem you | :03:48. | :03:51. | |
have? You promised to abolish tuition fees. You oppose nuclear | :03:52. | :03:56. | |
power, now you are cheerleading the first multi-billion pounds | :03:57. | :04:02. | |
investment in nuclear generation. You are dying out on your enthusiasm | :04:03. | :04:07. | |
on green levies, and now they are up for renegotiation. Why should we | :04:08. | :04:11. | |
trust a word you say? In relation to green levies, as you well know, just | :04:12. | :04:20. | |
under 10% is to do with helping energy and helping people. Unless | :04:21. | :04:27. | |
there is continuing investment in renewables, we will not have the | :04:28. | :04:31. | |
British produced energy at cheaper cost to keep those bills down in the | :04:32. | :04:36. | |
future. At cheaper cost? Explain that to me. Off-shore energy is | :04:37. | :04:46. | |
twice the market rate. The costs of renewables will increasingly come | :04:47. | :04:49. | |
down. We have fantastic capacity to produce the energy and deliver lots | :04:50. | :04:54. | |
of jobs in the process. The parts of the energy bill that may be up for | :04:55. | :04:59. | |
renegotiation seems to be the part where we subsidise to help either | :05:00. | :05:03. | |
poor people pay less, or where we do other things. Too insulated the | :05:04. | :05:11. | |
homes? Are you up to putting that to general taxation? Wouldn't that be | :05:12. | :05:15. | |
progressive? I would. It would be progressive. I would like to do for | :05:16. | :05:19. | |
energy bills what the Chancellor has done for road traffic users, | :05:20. | :05:24. | |
drivers, which is too fuelled motor fuel -- to freeze new to fall. That | :05:25. | :05:30. | |
would mean there would be an immediate relief this year, not | :05:31. | :05:34. | |
waiting for the election. So there is a deal to be done there? Yes We | :05:35. | :05:39. | |
understand we have to take the burden off the consumer, and also | :05:40. | :05:43. | |
deal with the energy companies, who look as if they are not paying all | :05:44. | :05:47. | |
the tax they should be, and the regulator, which doesn't regulate | :05:48. | :05:50. | |
quickly enough to deal with the issues coming down the track. We can | :05:51. | :05:55. | |
toughen the regulator, and I hope that the Chancellor, in the Autumn | :05:56. | :05:59. | |
statement, was signalled that energy companies will not be allowed to get | :06:00. | :06:03. | |
away with not paying the taxes they should. And this deal will allow | :06:04. | :06:10. | |
energy prices to come down? Yes How could David Laws, one of your | :06:11. | :06:15. | |
ministers, proudly defend the record of unqualified teachers working in | :06:16. | :06:20. | |
free schools, and then stand side-by-side with Mr Clegg, as he | :06:21. | :06:25. | |
says he is against them? David Laws was not proudly defending the fact | :06:26. | :06:30. | |
that it is unqualified teachers He said that some of the new, | :06:31. | :06:34. | |
unqualified teachers in free schools are doing a superb job. But you want | :06:35. | :06:41. | |
to get rid of them? We want to make sure that everybody coming into a | :06:42. | :06:45. | |
free school ends up being qualified. Ends up? Goes through a process that | :06:46. | :06:51. | |
means they have qualifications. Just as we said very clearly at the last | :06:52. | :06:55. | |
election that the manifesto curriculum in free schools should be | :06:56. | :07:01. | |
the same as other schools. It looks like Mr Clegg is picking a fight | :07:02. | :07:06. | |
just for the sake of it. Mr Clegg was taught by people who didn't have | :07:07. | :07:10. | |
teaching qualifications in one of the greatest schools in the land, if | :07:11. | :07:15. | |
not the world. It didn't seem to do him any harm. What is the problem? | :07:16. | :07:21. | |
If you pay to go to a school, you know what you're getting. But that | :07:22. | :07:27. | |
is what a free school is. No, you don't pay fees. A free school is | :07:28. | :07:31. | |
parents taking the decisions, not you, the politicians. We believe | :07:32. | :07:36. | |
they would expect to guarantee is, firstly that the minimum curriculum | :07:37. | :07:40. | |
taught across the country is taught in the free schools, and secondly, | :07:41. | :07:44. | |
that the teachers there are qualified. Someone who send their | :07:45. | :07:47. | |
kids to private schools took a decision to take -- to send their | :07:48. | :07:54. | |
children there, even if the teachers were unqualified, because they are | :07:55. | :07:59. | |
experts in their field. Someone who send their kids to free schools is | :08:00. | :08:05. | |
because -- is their decision, not yours. Because some of the free | :08:06. | :08:11. | |
schools are new, and have never been there before, parents need a | :08:12. | :08:14. | |
guarantee that there are some basics in place, whatever sort of school. | :08:15. | :08:21. | |
So they need you to hold their hand? It is not about holding hands, it is | :08:22. | :08:25. | |
about having a minimum guarantee. Our party made clear at our | :08:26. | :08:29. | |
conference that this is a priority for us. Nick Clegg reflects the view | :08:30. | :08:34. | |
of the party, and I believe it is an entirely rational thing to do. Nick | :08:35. | :08:37. | |
Clegg complained that the Prime Minister gave him only 30 minutes | :08:38. | :08:45. | |
notice on the Prime Minister Buzz 's U-turn on green levies. That is | :08:46. | :08:50. | |
almost as little time as Nick Clegg gave the Prime Minister on his | :08:51. | :08:55. | |
U-turn on free schools. Aren't you supposed to be partners? Green | :08:56. | :09:03. | |
levies were under discussion in the ministerial group before Wednesday, | :09:04. | :09:06. | |
because we identified this as an issue. We do that in a practical | :09:07. | :09:10. | |
way. Sometimes there is only half an hour's notice. We had even less than | :09:11. | :09:17. | |
half an hour this morning! Simon Hughes, thank you. | :09:18. | :09:23. | |
So the price of energy is the big battle ground in politics at the | :09:24. | :09:28. | |
moment. 72% of people say that high bills will influence the way they | :09:29. | :09:33. | |
vote at the next election. Ed Miliband has promised a price freeze | :09:34. | :09:36. | |
after the next election, but will the coalition turned the tables on | :09:37. | :09:43. | |
Labour, with its proposal to roll back green levies. Caroline Flint | :09:44. | :09:52. | |
joins us from Sheffield. It looks like the coalition will be able to | :09:53. | :09:59. | |
take ?50 of energy bills, by removing green levies. It is quite | :10:00. | :10:04. | |
clear that different parts of the government are running round waking | :10:05. | :10:07. | |
up to the fact that the public feel that this government has not done | :10:08. | :10:10. | |
enough to listen to their concerns. Last week, there was a classic case | :10:11. | :10:15. | |
of the Prime Minister making up policy literally at the dispatch | :10:16. | :10:20. | |
box. Let's see what they say in the autumn statement. The truth is, | :10:21. | :10:23. | |
whatever the debate around green levies, and I have always said we | :10:24. | :10:28. | |
should look at value for money at those green levies. Our argument is | :10:29. | :10:46. | |
about acknowledging there is something wrong with the way the | :10:47. | :10:49. | |
market works, and the way those companies are regulated. Behind our | :10:50. | :10:51. | |
freeze for 20 months is a package of proposals to reform this market I | :10:52. | :10:53. | |
understand that, but you cannot tell as the details about that. I can. | :10:54. | :10:56. | |
You cannot give us the details about reforming the market. We are going | :10:57. | :10:59. | |
to do three things, and I think I said this last time I was on the | :11:00. | :11:03. | |
programme. First, we are going to separate out the generation side | :11:04. | :11:06. | |
from the supply side within the big six. Secondly, we will have a energy | :11:07. | :11:14. | |
pool, or power exchange, where all energy will have to be traded in | :11:15. | :11:19. | |
that pool. Thirdly, we will establish a tougher regulator, | :11:20. | :11:22. | |
because Ofgem is increasingly being seen as not doing the job right I | :11:23. | :11:28. | |
notice that you didn't mention any reform of the current green and | :11:29. | :11:33. | |
social taxes on the energy bill Is it Labour's policy to maintain the | :11:34. | :11:39. | |
existing green levies? In 2011, the government chose to get rid of warm | :11:40. | :11:43. | |
front, which was the publicly funded through tracks a scheme to support | :11:44. | :11:48. | |
new installation. When they got rid of that, it was the first time we | :11:49. | :11:53. | |
had a government since the 70s that didn't have such a policy. What is | :11:54. | :11:59. | |
your policy? We voted against that because we believe it is wrong. We | :12:00. | :12:04. | |
believe that the eco-scheme, a government intervention which is ?47 | :12:05. | :12:14. | |
of the ?112 on our bills each year, is expensive, bureaucratic and isn't | :12:15. | :12:17. | |
going to the fuel poor. I am up for a debate on these issues. I am up | :12:18. | :12:21. | |
for a discussion on what the government should do and what these | :12:22. | :12:25. | |
energy companies should do. We cannot let Cameron all the energy | :12:26. | :12:28. | |
companies off the hook from the way in which they organise their | :12:29. | :12:33. | |
businesses, and expect us to pay ever increasing rises in our bills. | :12:34. | :12:39. | |
There is ?112 of green levies on our bills at the moment. Did you vote | :12:40. | :12:44. | |
against any of them? We didn't, but what I would say ease these were | :12:45. | :12:50. | |
government imposed levies. When they got rid of the government funded | :12:51. | :12:55. | |
programme, Warm Front, they introduced the eco-scheme. The | :12:56. | :13:04. | |
eco-project is one of the ones where the energy companies are saying | :13:05. | :13:09. | |
it's too bureaucratic, and it is proving more expensive than | :13:10. | :13:12. | |
government estimates, apparently doubled the amount the government | :13:13. | :13:16. | |
thought. These things are all worth looking at, but don't go to the | :13:17. | :13:23. | |
heart of the issue. According to official figures, on current plans, | :13:24. | :13:31. | |
which you support, which you voted for, households will be paying 1% | :13:32. | :13:36. | |
more per unit of electricity by 2030. It puts your temporary freeze | :13:37. | :13:48. | |
as just a blip. You support a 4 % rise in our bills. I support making | :13:49. | :13:52. | |
sure we secure for the future access to energy that we can grow here in | :13:53. | :13:57. | |
the UK, whether it is through nuclear, wind or solar, or other | :13:58. | :14:03. | |
technologies yet to be developed. We should protect ourselves against | :14:04. | :14:09. | |
energy costs we cannot control. The truth is, it is every fair for you | :14:10. | :14:14. | |
to put that point across, and I accept that, but we need to hear the | :14:15. | :14:18. | |
other side about the cost for bill payers if we didn't invest in new, | :14:19. | :14:23. | |
indigenous sources of energy supply for the future, which, in the long | :14:24. | :14:27. | |
run, will be cheaper and more secure, and create the jobs we | :14:28. | :14:32. | |
need. I think it is important to have a debate about these issues, | :14:33. | :14:36. | |
but they have to be seen in the right context. If we stay stuck in | :14:37. | :14:41. | |
the past, we will pay more and we will not create jobs. How can you | :14:42. | :14:46. | |
criticise the coalition's plans for a new nuclear station, when jeering | :14:47. | :14:52. | |
13 years of a Labour government you did not invest in a single nuclear | :14:53. | :14:57. | |
plant? You sold off all our nuclear technology to foreign companies | :14:58. | :15:07. | |
Energy provision was put out to private hands and there has been no | :15:08. | :15:13. | |
obstacle in British law against ownership outside the UK. Part of | :15:14. | :15:25. | |
this is looking ahead. Because your previous track record is so bad | :15:26. | :15:30. | |
What we did decide under the previous government, we came to the | :15:31. | :15:34. | |
view, and there were discussions in our party about this, that we did | :15:35. | :15:40. | |
need to support a nuclear future. At the time of that, David Cameron | :15:41. | :15:45. | |
was one of those saying that nuclear power should be a last | :15:46. | :15:50. | |
resort. And as you said, the Liberals did not support it. We | :15:51. | :15:54. | |
stood up for that. We set in train the green light of 10 sites, | :15:55. | :15:59. | |
including Hinkley Point, for nuclear development. I am glad to | :16:00. | :16:03. | |
see that is making progress and we should make more progress over the | :16:04. | :16:08. | |
years ahead. We took a tough decision when other governments had | :16:09. | :16:14. | |
not done. You did not build a new nuclear station. When you get back | :16:15. | :16:23. | |
into power, will you build HS2? That has not had a blank cheque | :16:24. | :16:29. | |
from the Labour Party. I am in favour of good infrastructure. Are | :16:30. | :16:34. | |
you in favour of?, answer the question? I have answered the | :16:35. | :16:40. | |
question. It does not have a blank cheque. If the prices are too high, | :16:41. | :16:45. | |
we will review the decision when we come back to vote on it. We will be | :16:46. | :16:49. | |
looking at it closely. We have to look for value for money and how it | :16:50. | :16:54. | |
benefits the country. Have you stocked up on jumpers this winter? | :16:55. | :17:01. | |
I am perfectly all right with my clothing. What is important, it is | :17:02. | :17:07. | |
ridiculous for the Government to suggest that the answer to the loss | :17:08. | :17:11. | |
of trust in the energy companies is to put on another jumper. | :17:12. | :17:21. | |
The coalition has taken a long time to come up with anything that can | :17:22. | :17:27. | |
trump Ed Miliband's simple freezing energy prices, vote for us. Are | :17:28. | :17:33. | |
they on the brink of doing so? I do not think so. They have had a | :17:34. | :17:36. | |
problem that has dominated the debate, talking about GDP, the | :17:37. | :17:41. | |
figures came out on Friday and said, well, and went back to talking | :17:42. | :17:48. | |
about energy. My problem with what David Cameron proposes is he agrees | :17:49. | :17:53. | |
with the analysis that the Big Six make too many profits. He wants to | :17:54. | :17:58. | |
move the green levies into general taxation, so that he looks like he | :17:59. | :18:01. | |
is protecting the profits of the energy companies. If the coalition | :18:02. | :18:08. | |
can say they will take money off the bills, does that change the | :18:09. | :18:14. | |
game? I do not think the Liberal Democrats are an obstacle to | :18:15. | :18:19. | |
unwinding the green levies. I think Nick Clegg is open to doing a deal, | :18:20. | :18:25. | |
but the real obstacle is the carbon reduction targets that we signed up | :18:26. | :18:30. | |
to during the boom years. They were ambitious I thought at the time | :18:31. | :18:34. | |
From that we have the taxes and clocking up of the supply-side of | :18:35. | :18:39. | |
the economy. Unless he will revise that, and build from first | :18:40. | :18:43. | |
principles a new strategy, he cannot do more than put a dent into | :18:44. | :18:49. | |
green levies. He might say as I have got to ?50 now and if you | :18:50. | :18:54. | |
voters in in an overall majority, I will look up what we have done in | :18:55. | :18:58. | |
the better times and give you more. I am sure he will do that. It might | :18:59. | :19:05. | |
be ?50 of the Bill, but it will be ?50 on your general taxation bill, | :19:06. | :19:09. | |
which would be more progressive They will find it. We will never | :19:10. | :19:16. | |
see it in general taxation. The problem for the Coalition on what | :19:17. | :19:22. | |
Ed Miliband has done is that it is five weeks since he made that | :19:23. | :19:25. | |
speech and it is all we are talking about. David Cameron spent those | :19:26. | :19:29. | |
five weeks trying to work out whether Ed Miliband is a Marxist or | :19:30. | :19:33. | |
whether he is connected to Middle Britain. That is why Ed Miliband | :19:34. | :19:38. | |
set the agenda. The coalition are squabbling among themselves, | :19:39. | :19:44. | |
looking petulant, on energy, and on schools. Nobody is taking notice of | :19:45. | :19:50. | |
the fact the economy is under way, the recovery is under way. Ed | :19:51. | :19:55. | |
Miliband has made the weather on this. | :19:56. | :20:02. | |
It UK has a relaxed attitude about selling off assets based -- to | :20:03. | :20:12. | |
companies based abroad. But this week we have seen the Swiss owner | :20:13. | :20:14. | |
of one of Scotland's largest industrial sites, Grangemouth, come | :20:15. | :20:17. | |
within a whisker of closing part of it down. So should we care whether | :20:18. | :20:20. | |
British assets have foreign owners? Britain might be a nation of | :20:21. | :20:23. | |
homeowners, but we appear to have lost our taste for owning some of | :20:24. | :20:28. | |
our biggest businesses. These are among the crown jewels sold off in | :20:29. | :20:31. | |
the past three decades to companies based abroad. Roughly half of | :20:32. | :20:38. | |
Britain's essential services have overseas owners. The airport owner, | :20:39. | :20:40. | |
British Airports Authority, is owned by a Spanish company. | :20:41. | :20:43. | |
Britain's largest water company Thames, is owned by a consortium | :20:44. | :20:46. | |
led by an Australian bank. Four out of six of Britain's biggest energy | :20:47. | :20:49. | |
companies are owned by overseas giants, and one of these, EDF | :20:50. | :20:52. | |
Energy, which is owned by the French state, is building Britain's | :20:53. | :20:55. | |
first nuclear power plant in a generation, backed by Chinese | :20:56. | :21:02. | |
investors. It's a similar story for train operator Arriva, bought by a | :21:03. | :21:07. | |
company owned by the German state. So part of the railways privatised | :21:08. | :21:10. | |
by the British government was effectively re-nationalised by the | :21:11. | :21:19. | |
German government. But does it matter who owns these companies as | :21:20. | :21:22. | |
long as the lights stay on, the trains run on time, and we can | :21:23. | :21:27. | |
still eat Cadbury's Dairy Milk? We are joined by the general | :21:28. | :21:32. | |
secretary of the RMT, Bob Crow, and by venture capitalist Julie Meyer. | :21:33. | :21:39. | |
They go head to head. Have we seen the consequences of | :21:40. | :21:46. | |
relying for essential services to be foreign-owned? Four of the Big | :21:47. | :21:53. | |
Six energy companies, Grangemouth, owned by a tax exile in Switzerland. | :21:54. | :21:59. | |
It is not good. I do not think there is a cause and effect | :22:00. | :22:04. | |
relationship between foreign ownership and consumer prices. That | :22:05. | :22:08. | |
is not the right comparison. We need to be concerned about | :22:09. | :22:13. | |
businesses represented the future, businesses we are good at | :22:14. | :22:16. | |
innovating for example in financial services and the UK has a history | :22:17. | :22:22. | |
of building businesses, such as Monotypes. If we were not creating | :22:23. | :22:33. | |
businesses here -- Monotise. Like so many businesses creating | :22:34. | :22:40. | |
products and services and creating the shareholders. Should we allow | :22:41. | :22:48. | |
hour essential services to be in foreign ownership? It was | :22:49. | :22:52. | |
demonstrated this week at Grangemouth. If you do not own the | :22:53. | :22:58. | |
industry, you do not own it. The MPs of this country and the | :22:59. | :23:02. | |
politicians in Scotland have no say, they were consultants. | :23:03. | :23:06. | |
Multinationals decide whether to shut a company down. If that had | :23:07. | :23:13. | |
been Unite union, they are the ones who saved the jobs. They | :23:14. | :23:18. | |
capitulated. They will come back, like they have for the past 150 | :23:19. | :23:23. | |
years, and capture again what they lost. If it had closed, they would | :23:24. | :23:29. | |
have lost their jobs for ever. If the union had called the members up | :23:30. | :23:33. | |
without a ballot for strike action, there would have been uproar. This | :23:34. | :23:38. | |
person in Switzerland can decide to shut the entire industry down. The | :23:39. | :23:43. | |
coalition, the Labour Party, as well, when Labour was in government, | :23:44. | :23:49. | |
they played a role of allowing industries to go abroad, and it | :23:50. | :23:52. | |
should be returned to public ownership. Nestor. It has | :23:53. | :24:05. | |
demonstrated that the Net comes from new businesses. We must not | :24:06. | :24:13. | |
be... When Daly motion was stopped by the French government to be sold, | :24:14. | :24:20. | |
it was an arrow to the heart of French entrepreneurs. We must not | :24:21. | :24:24. | |
create that culture in the UK. Every train running in France is | :24:25. | :24:29. | |
built in France. 90% of the trains running in Germany are built in | :24:30. | :24:36. | |
Germany. In Japan, it has to be built in that country, and now an | :24:37. | :24:44. | |
energy company in France is reducing its nuclear capability in | :24:45. | :24:48. | |
its own country and wants to make profits out of the British industry | :24:49. | :24:52. | |
to put back into it state industry. That happened with the railway | :24:53. | :24:56. | |
industry. They want to make money at the expense of their own state | :24:57. | :25:02. | |
companies. We sold off energy production. How did we end up in a | :25:03. | :25:09. | |
position where our nuclear capacity will be built by a company owned by | :25:10. | :25:15. | |
a socialist date, France, and funded by a communist one, China, | :25:16. | :25:24. | |
for vital infrastructure? I am not suggesting that is in the national | :25:25. | :25:27. | |
interest. I am saying we can pick any one example and say it is a | :25:28. | :25:33. | |
shame. The simple matter of the fact is the owners are having to | :25:34. | :25:36. | |
make decisions. Not just Grangemouth, businesses are making | :25:37. | :25:40. | |
decisions about what is the common good. Not just in the shareholders' | :25:41. | :25:47. | |
interest. For employees, customers. What is in the common good when | :25:48. | :25:52. | |
prices go up by 10% and the reason is that 20 years ago they shut | :25:53. | :25:56. | |
every coal pit down in this country, the Germans kept theirs open and | :25:57. | :26:01. | |
subsidised it and now we have the Germans doing away with nuclear | :26:02. | :26:07. | |
power and they have coal. Under the Labour government, in 2008, the | :26:08. | :26:14. | |
climate change Act was passed. Well before that, and you know yourself, | :26:15. | :26:18. | |
they shut down the coal mines to smash the National Union of | :26:19. | :26:22. | |
Mineworkers because they dared to stand up for people in their | :26:23. | :26:28. | |
community. Even if we wanted to reopen the coalmines, it would be | :26:29. | :26:32. | |
pointless. Under the 2008 Act, we are not meant to burn more coal | :26:33. | :26:40. | |
The can, as if you spent some of the profits, you could have carbon | :26:41. | :26:47. | |
catch up. That does not exist on a massive scale. You are arguing the | :26:48. | :26:51. | |
case, Julie Meyer, for entrepreneurs to come to this | :26:52. | :26:56. | |
country. Even Bob Crow is not against that. We are trying to | :26:57. | :27:02. | |
argue, should essential services be in foreign hands? Not those in | :27:03. | :27:10. | |
Silicon round about doing start ups. I am trying to draw a broader | :27:11. | :27:15. | |
principle than just energy. Something like broadband services, | :27:16. | :27:19. | |
also important to the functioning of the economy. I believe in the | :27:20. | :27:26. | |
UK's ability to innovate. When we have businesses that play off | :27:27. | :27:31. | |
broadband companies to get the best prices for consumers. These new | :27:32. | :27:36. | |
businesses and business models are the best way. Not to control, but | :27:37. | :27:43. | |
to influence. It will be a disaster. Prices will go up and up as a | :27:44. | :27:48. | |
result. Nissan in Sunderland, a Japanese factory, some of the best | :27:49. | :27:54. | |
cars and productivity. You want that to be nationalised and bring | :27:55. | :27:57. | |
it down to the standard of British Leyland? It is not bring it down to | :27:58. | :28:02. | |
the standard. The car manufacturing base in this country has been | :28:03. | :28:07. | |
wrecked. We make more cars now for 20 years -- than in 20 years. | :28:08. | :28:13. | |
Ford's Dagenham produced some of the best cars in the world. Did you | :28:14. | :28:20. | |
buy one? I cannot drive. They moved their plants to other countries | :28:21. | :28:27. | |
where it was cheaper labour. Would you nationalise Nissan? There | :28:28. | :28:31. | |
should be one car industry that produces cars for people. This week | :28:32. | :28:38. | |
the EU summit was about Angela Merkel's mobile phone being tapped, | :28:39. | :28:45. | |
they call it a handy. We sent Adam to Brussels and told him to ignore | :28:46. | :28:49. | |
the business about phone-tapping and investigate the Prime | :28:50. | :28:51. | |
Minister's policy on Europe instead. I have come to my first EU summit to | :28:52. | :29:08. | |
see how David Cameron is getting on with his strategy to claim power was | :29:09. | :29:12. | |
back from Brussels. Got any powers back yet? Yes! Which ones? Sadly, | :29:13. | :29:21. | |
his fellow leaders were not as forthcoming. Chancellor, are you | :29:22. | :29:25. | |
going to give any powers back to Britain? Has David Cameron asked you | :29:26. | :29:32. | |
for any powers back? The president of the commission just laughed, and | :29:33. | :29:39. | |
listen to the Lithuanian President. How is David Cameron's renegotiation | :29:40. | :29:50. | |
strategy going? What's that? He wants powers back for Britain. No | :29:51. | :29:55. | |
one knows what powers David Cameron actually wants. Even our usual | :29:56. | :29:59. | |
allies, like Sweden, are bit baffled. We actually don't know yet | :30:00. | :30:07. | |
what is going through the UK membership. We will await the | :30:08. | :30:14. | |
finalisation of that first. You should ask him, and then tell us! | :30:15. | :30:20. | |
Here is someone who must know, the Dutch Prime Minister, he is doing | :30:21. | :30:25. | |
what we are doing, carrying out a review of the EU powers, known as | :30:26. | :30:30. | |
competencies in the jargon, before negotiating to get some back. Have | :30:31. | :30:34. | |
you had any negotiations with David Cameron over what powers you can | :30:35. | :30:39. | |
bring back from Brussels? That is not on the agenda of this summit. | :30:40. | :30:46. | |
Have you talked to him about it This is not on the schedule for this | :30:47. | :30:50. | |
summit. David Cameron's advises tummy it is | :30:51. | :30:59. | |
because he is playing the long game. -- David Cameron's advisers tell me. | :31:00. | :31:07. | |
At this summit, there was a task force discussing how to cut EU red | :31:08. | :31:15. | |
tape. Just how long this game is was explained to me outside the summit, | :31:16. | :31:19. | |
by the leader of the Conservatives in the European Parliament. I think | :31:20. | :31:25. | |
the behind-the-scenes negotiations will start happening when the new | :31:26. | :31:28. | |
commissioner is appointed later next year. I think the detailed | :31:29. | :31:34. | |
negotiations will start to happen bubbly after the UK general | :31:35. | :31:38. | |
election. That is when we will start getting all of the detail of the | :31:39. | :31:43. | |
horse trading, and real, Lake night negotiations. Angela Merkel seems | :31:44. | :31:50. | |
keen to rewrite the EU's main treaties to deal with changes in the | :31:51. | :31:55. | |
Eurozone, and that is the mechanism David Cameron would use to | :31:56. | :31:59. | |
renegotiate our membership. Everyone here says his relationship with the | :32:00. | :32:03. | |
German Chancellor is strong. So after days in this building, here is | :32:04. | :32:08. | |
how it looks. David Cameron has a mountain to climb. It is climbable, | :32:09. | :32:13. | |
but he isn't even in the foothills yet. Has he even started packing his | :32:14. | :32:19. | |
bags for the trip? Joining us now, a man who knows a | :32:20. | :32:23. | |
thing or two about the difficulties Prime Minister 's face in Europe. | :32:24. | :32:29. | |
Former Deputy Prime Minister, Michael Heseltine. We are nine | :32:30. | :32:32. | |
months from David Cameron's defining speech on EU renegotiation. Can you | :32:33. | :32:41. | |
think of one area of progress? I don't know. And you don't know. And | :32:42. | :32:46. | |
that's a good thing. Why is it a good thing? Because the real | :32:47. | :32:52. | |
progress goes on behind closed doors. And only the most naive, | :32:53. | :33:03. | |
because the real progress goes on behind closed doors. Because, in | :33:04. | :33:11. | |
this weary world, you and I, Andrew, know full well that the moment you | :33:12. | :33:16. | |
say, I making progress, people say, where? And the machine goes to work | :33:17. | :33:21. | |
to show that the progress isn't enough. So you are much better off | :33:22. | :33:27. | |
making progress as best you can in the privacy of private diplomacy. It | :33:28. | :33:37. | |
is a long journey ahead. In this long journey, do you have a clear | :33:38. | :33:41. | |
sense of the destination? Do you have a clear sense of what powers Mr | :33:42. | :33:47. | |
Cameron wants to negotiate? I have a clear sense of the destination, | :33:48. | :33:52. | |
which is a victory for the campaign that he will win to stay inside the | :33:53. | :33:58. | |
European community. That is the agenda, and I have total support for | :33:59. | :34:06. | |
that. I understand that, but if he is incapable of getting any tangible | :34:07. | :34:12. | |
sign of renegotiation, if he is able only to do what Wilson did in 1975, | :34:13. | :34:18. | |
which was to get a couple of token changes to our membership status, he | :34:19. | :34:23. | |
goes into that referendum without much to argue for. He has everything | :34:24. | :34:29. | |
to argue for. He's got Britain's vital role as a major contributor to | :34:30. | :34:37. | |
the community. He's got Britain's self interest as a major | :34:38. | :34:43. | |
beneficiary, and Britain's vital role in the City of London. He's got | :34:44. | :34:49. | |
everything to argue for. He could argue for that now. He could have a | :34:50. | :34:54. | |
referendum now. He doesn't want one now. I haven't any doubt that he | :34:55. | :35:02. | |
will come back with something to talk about. But it may be slightly | :35:03. | :35:11. | |
different to what his critics, the UK isolationist party people, want. | :35:12. | :35:17. | |
He may, for example, have found that allies within the community want | :35:18. | :35:23. | |
change as well, and he may secure changes in the way the community | :35:24. | :35:28. | |
works, which would be a significant argument within the referendum | :35:29. | :35:32. | |
campaign. Let me give you an example. I think it is a scandal | :35:33. | :35:37. | |
that the European Commission don't secure the auditing of some of the | :35:38. | :35:44. | |
accounts. Perhaps that could be on the agenda. He might find a lot of | :35:45. | :35:49. | |
contributing countries, like Germany, like Colin and, would be | :35:50. | :35:57. | |
very keen. -- like Holland. David vetoed the increase in the European | :35:58. | :36:02. | |
budgets the other day, and he had a lot of allies. So working within | :36:03. | :36:08. | |
Europe on the things that people paying the European bills want is | :36:09. | :36:13. | |
fertile ground. Is John Major right to call for a windfall tax on the | :36:14. | :36:20. | |
energy companies? John is a very cautious fellow. He doesn't say | :36:21. | :36:24. | |
things without thinking them out. So I was surprised that he went for a | :36:25. | :36:31. | |
windfall tax. First of all, it is retrospective, and secondly, it is | :36:32. | :36:35. | |
difficult to predict what the consequences will be. I am, myself, | :36:36. | :36:41. | |
more interested in the other part of his speech, which was talking about | :36:42. | :36:44. | |
the need for the Conservative Party to seek a wider horizon, to | :36:45. | :36:50. | |
recognise what is happening to the Conservative Party in the way in | :36:51. | :36:54. | |
which its membership is shrinking into a southeastern enclave. Are you | :36:55. | :37:04. | |
in favour of a windfall tax? I am not in favour of increasing any | :37:05. | :37:15. | |
taxes. Do you share Iain Duncan Smith's point of view on welfare | :37:16. | :37:22. | |
reform? I think Iain Duncan Smith is right. It is extremely difficult to | :37:23. | :37:31. | |
do, but he is right to try. I think public opinion is behind him, but it | :37:32. | :37:40. | |
isn't easy, because on the fringe of these issues there are genuine hard | :37:41. | :37:45. | |
luck stories, and they are the ones that become the focus of attention | :37:46. | :37:50. | |
the moment you introduce change. It requires a lot of political skill to | :37:51. | :37:56. | |
negotiate your way through that. But isn't Iain Duncan Smith right to | :37:57. | :38:01. | |
invoke the beverage principle, that you should be expected to make a | :38:02. | :38:05. | |
contribution for the welfare you depend on? Yes, he is. I will let | :38:06. | :38:11. | |
you get your Sunday lunch. Thanks for joining us. | :38:12. | :38:16. | |
Coming up in just over 20 minutes, I will be looking | :38:17. | :38:26. | |
Hello once again from the Midlands. I'm Patrick Burns. And our guests | :38:27. | :38:33. | |
today both entered Parliament at the last election, share an interest in | :38:34. | :38:36. | |
Pakistan and Kashmir, and beyond that have absolutely nothing in | :38:37. | :38:39. | |
common. Andrew Griffiths, Conservative MP for Burton, is a | :38:40. | :38:43. | |
tireless campaigner for cuts in beer duty. Perhaps he should have a word | :38:44. | :38:51. | |
with the Shadow Treasury Minister, Shabana Mahmood, Labour MP for | :38:52. | :38:57. | |
Birmingham Ladywood. Let's begin though by finding out | :38:58. | :39:01. | |
what they make of that extension to the pilot badger cull in | :39:02. | :39:04. | |
Gloucestershire. Natural England have been given a licence to | :39:05. | :39:07. | |
continue shooting for a further eight weeks, after only 30% of the | :39:08. | :39:10. | |
area's badgers were killed during the original six`week period. To be | :39:11. | :39:14. | |
effective against bovine TB, it's believed 70% of badgers need to be | :39:15. | :39:18. | |
killed, much to the horror of some campaigners. | :39:19. | :39:27. | |
Keep telling us this is led by science. It has gone beyond any | :39:28. | :39:34. | |
scientific justification there could have been for killing badgers and | :39:35. | :39:40. | |
that was bad enough to begin with. Andrew, this is beginning to look | :39:41. | :39:47. | |
like a bit of embarrassing scenario for the government. There is ill | :39:48. | :39:51. | |
feeling from the countryside. We recognise this is a difficult | :39:52. | :39:56. | |
decision and thing to do. But I have seen in my own constituency the | :39:57. | :40:01. | |
devastation that TB can cost of farmers and it can devastate | :40:02. | :40:06. | |
generations of work. The taxpayer over the past ten years has had to | :40:07. | :40:12. | |
spend ?5 million on fighting TB in cattle and badgers. The situation | :40:13. | :40:16. | |
gets worse every year. We cannot continue and the way that we have | :40:17. | :40:21. | |
been doing so. We must do something. Shabana, I recall the early days of | :40:22. | :40:29. | |
the Tony Blair government. The agricultural Minister then talked | :40:30. | :40:33. | |
about this issue. Andrew has talked about the cost and damage to | :40:34. | :40:37. | |
farmers. At least we can get this problem. The last time the | :40:38. | :40:42. | |
government commissioned a ten year trial project to see what difference | :40:43. | :40:46. | |
Collingwood make the problem of bovine TB, the scientific evidence | :40:47. | :40:53. | |
was against any cull. It can only at best aspect 16% of the problem so | :40:54. | :40:56. | |
you still have a day for percent of the problem to deal with and the | :40:57. | :41:00. | |
government's only evidence of its current badger cull shows that it | :41:01. | :41:03. | |
will cost farmers more money than it will save. So that man in the clip | :41:04. | :41:12. | |
suggested that it is bad science and politically wet. If you look at | :41:13. | :41:18. | |
countries like Australia and New Zealand, they have seen it TB fall | :41:19. | :41:22. | |
through tackling it. And Ireland, they have had it since 2000, they | :41:23. | :41:28. | |
have seen a drop of 45%. No one talks about the 300,000 cattle that | :41:29. | :41:32. | |
have been needlessly slaughtered because of TB. Do you understand the | :41:33. | :41:39. | |
sensitivities of people who view strongly about killing badgers on | :41:40. | :41:44. | |
such a scale? Of course I do but it is a dangerous issue. Having badgers | :41:45. | :41:50. | |
with bovine TB in the population is not something we must put up with. I | :41:51. | :41:57. | |
do not think Andrew has done the cause of scientific experts, | :41:58. | :42:02. | |
world`renowned experts, any good at all. They are basing their positions | :42:03. | :42:06. | |
on scientific fact, that is a problem with this badger cull, it is | :42:07. | :42:11. | |
a shot in the dark and bad for farmers. We will watch how it | :42:12. | :42:14. | |
progresses with interest. Coming up a little later: How do you | :42:15. | :42:18. | |
keep ex`offenders on the straight and narrow and stop the revolving | :42:19. | :42:21. | |
door of crime? The government's "revolution" in the Probation | :42:22. | :42:24. | |
Service could bring round yet more work for G4S and Serco. We'll have | :42:25. | :42:33. | |
more on this in a few minutes time. Who said what to whom, and when? | :42:34. | :42:39. | |
"Plebgate" is as much about what wasn't said. The word "pleb", for a | :42:40. | :42:42. | |
start, according to Andrew Mitchell. When three Police Federation | :42:43. | :42:44. | |
representatives were hauled before the Home Affairs Select Committee, | :42:45. | :42:48. | |
they had to account for what they'd said to the press, after a meeting | :42:49. | :42:51. | |
with the Sutton Coldfield MP just over a year ago. Then their chief | :42:52. | :42:57. | |
constables had to explain why they'd rejected calls to discipline them. | :42:58. | :43:00. | |
Ben Godfrey asks if 45 seconds in Downing Street could do lasting | :43:01. | :43:07. | |
damage to the Police. Who would have thought that a few | :43:08. | :43:10. | |
words uttered by Andrew Mitchell at the end of a long and tiring day, | :43:11. | :43:15. | |
more than a year ago, would have the power to summon three Midlands chief | :43:16. | :43:17. | |
constables before a parliamentary committee, and in a humbled mode? | :43:18. | :43:22. | |
My officers got involved in a political campaign which was | :43:23. | :43:25. | |
ill`thought through and has led to a lot of public confidence issues for | :43:26. | :43:32. | |
us. All three came to offer Mr Mitchell | :43:33. | :43:35. | |
an apology, but remained divided about whether disciplinary action | :43:36. | :43:37. | |
should be taken following an investigation into three Police | :43:38. | :43:40. | |
Federation officers who briefed against the Sutton Coldfield MP last | :43:41. | :43:47. | |
October. I've taken the decision that the | :43:48. | :43:49. | |
decision`making process should be revisited and I've sought for that | :43:50. | :43:53. | |
to be done independently. My deputy chief constable, who in | :43:54. | :43:57. | |
this case took the decision that there was no action, he had all the | :43:58. | :44:01. | |
evidence available to him when he made that decision. | :44:02. | :44:04. | |
So you disagree with what Mr Shaw is doing? | :44:05. | :44:14. | |
Yes. If you look closely at the evidence, I think you'd almost | :44:15. | :44:17. | |
certainly expect there to be a different decision for the three | :44:18. | :44:19. | |
officers because their involvement and their specifics of the | :44:20. | :44:22. | |
allegations made is very, very different. | :44:23. | :44:26. | |
MPs were obviously frustrated. In one force, the chap will face | :44:27. | :44:29. | |
misconduct proceedings and the two other people who took part in the | :44:30. | :44:33. | |
same event will escape. Are you going to be comfortable with that | :44:34. | :44:40. | |
state of affairs? I'm afraid, Mr Parker, Mr Sims, that | :44:41. | :44:43. | |
we think you've made the wrong decision and we feel you all should | :44:44. | :44:48. | |
have done the same thing by having a redetermination. | :44:49. | :44:50. | |
So after five hours of witnesses, Plebgate will now spawn another | :44:51. | :44:57. | |
report. Yes, on and on it goes. John God, | :44:58. | :45:02. | |
the public relations consultant who briefed the media about that suppose | :45:03. | :45:06. | |
it private meeting in Andrew Mitchell's constituency office. | :45:07. | :45:13. | |
Shabana, do you think there has been an element of conspiracy about this? | :45:14. | :45:17. | |
I think this whole affair has been barred from start to finish. We are | :45:18. | :45:23. | |
not beyond the other finish! Yes, and it only seems to be getting | :45:24. | :45:27. | |
worse at the moment. It has knocked public confidence in the police. It | :45:28. | :45:33. | |
has denied Andrew Mitchell some truth and resolution. It has cost | :45:34. | :45:36. | |
him his cabinet can be at least up until now and I think all of the | :45:37. | :45:41. | |
individuals who have a stake in this must get a grip and sort it out and | :45:42. | :45:45. | |
recognise how much damage this is doing. The police do a fantastic job | :45:46. | :45:49. | |
and put their lives on the link to protect us. When things go wrong we | :45:50. | :45:52. | |
must have confidence in the process that means we will get screwed and | :45:53. | :46:00. | |
resolution at the end of it and we are not getting that at the moment | :46:01. | :46:04. | |
from wide gate. We are now hearing there is a serious proposition that | :46:05. | :46:07. | |
the police may be equipped now with cameras and recording equipment that | :46:08. | :46:09. | |
they would wear to protect the public. It was only because one of | :46:10. | :46:13. | |
Andrew Mitchell's assistants chose to record that situation that this | :46:14. | :46:19. | |
hearing is taking place at all. It is correct to say that the vast | :46:20. | :46:23. | |
majority of police officers up and down the country to a brilliant job. | :46:24. | :46:27. | |
But the evidence in this case as there for all to see. The recording | :46:28. | :46:32. | |
shows Mr Mitchell giving a full explanation of what happened, but he | :46:33. | :46:36. | |
said, all of those things were laid out in front of those officers, and | :46:37. | :46:40. | |
yet, they went out in front of the press and hold a completely | :46:41. | :46:44. | |
different view. Cannot have a situation where that happens to a | :46:45. | :46:49. | |
Cabinet Minister, because if it happens to a Cabinet Minister, it | :46:50. | :46:51. | |
could happen to an ordinary member of the public. There is clearly an | :46:52. | :46:56. | |
issue of trust here and it comes to a trade`off as to whether the public | :46:57. | :47:01. | |
trust the police or politicians, both who are now mistrusted slightly | :47:02. | :47:06. | |
by the public. But we must try to rebuild this fabric of upholding the | :47:07. | :47:11. | |
law as we know what. That is true and as a starting .1 thing we have | :47:12. | :47:16. | |
recently been talking about is getting rid of the IPCC, the | :47:17. | :47:19. | |
Independent Police Complaints Commission, because this affair has | :47:20. | :47:23. | |
showed that they are not able to bring complaints that are made to a | :47:24. | :47:28. | |
full and proper resolution and eBay that the public would expect. We | :47:29. | :47:32. | |
could replace that with a new authority that would have the power | :47:33. | :47:35. | |
to repel disciplinary action if it is necessary because this affair has | :47:36. | :47:42. | |
shown that the IPCC does not have the keys to do any of those things. | :47:43. | :47:48. | |
We have heard already about budgets and changes to terms and conditions | :47:49. | :47:53. | |
of the police. It is a poor show that negotiations between the | :47:54. | :47:56. | |
government and the police has got to the stage where frankly the | :47:57. | :47:58. | |
relationship is breaking down. That is correct. It is a huge mistake on | :47:59. | :48:10. | |
behalf of the Police Federation. You talk about cuts and we have seen | :48:11. | :48:13. | |
record falls in crime. We have seen crime at a record low. For which the | :48:14. | :48:20. | |
police should be congratulated. Of course they should. We have seen the | :48:21. | :48:24. | |
police union is trying to use the Andrew Mitchell affair as a | :48:25. | :48:27. | |
bargaining chip in order to break down the government's resolve. That | :48:28. | :48:34. | |
is no way for the police to act. The starting point should be looking at | :48:35. | :48:37. | |
how we resolve complaints when they are made about the police so that we | :48:38. | :48:41. | |
can restore trust and confidence that when complaints are made they | :48:42. | :48:44. | |
will be properly dealt with. Thank you both. | :48:45. | :48:51. | |
It is nothing less than a revolution in the Probation Service and the | :48:52. | :48:54. | |
government wants to think about privatising it. Companies and | :48:55. | :48:58. | |
charities must have bids and by next April by a series of | :48:59. | :49:01. | |
payment`by`results contract with the new system due to be rolled out in | :49:02. | :49:06. | |
one year's time. With reoffending rates sharply down in our part of | :49:07. | :49:15. | |
the country, what now? Cath Mackie no reports. | :49:16. | :49:22. | |
Pip Singleton has written an open letter to the burglar who ransacked | :49:23. | :49:26. | |
her sister's home in Worcester. He stole a bracelet designed by | :49:27. | :49:29. | |
their oldest sister who died of cancer. The police felt that they | :49:30. | :49:35. | |
were not first timers and they were possible regular offenders because | :49:36. | :49:40. | |
of the way that they got in through the back door. | :49:41. | :49:42. | |
Not that long ago, the burglar may well have been Ben. I was 18 when I | :49:43. | :49:48. | |
first committed a crime. Now 22, he's come to West Bromwich | :49:49. | :49:52. | |
Police Station ` this time as a reformed offender meeting those who | :49:53. | :49:55. | |
helped him rehabilitate back into society. Whilst I was in jail I did | :49:56. | :50:06. | |
a fresh start course. When I got out I got in touch with the West | :50:07. | :50:11. | |
Midlands Police. I did the programme with the Princes trust and that has | :50:12. | :50:13. | |
helped me. Upstairs police and probation | :50:14. | :50:16. | |
officers sit together trying to stop persistent reoffenders across | :50:17. | :50:23. | |
Sandwell. I think it is a huge challenge for the individual. It is | :50:24. | :50:26. | |
like changing your whole lifestyle. It is not something you can do at a | :50:27. | :50:33. | |
flick of a switch. We should discuss how they have got on in prison, what | :50:34. | :50:38. | |
things they have achieved and what rehabilitation measures have been | :50:39. | :50:43. | |
put in place. We will look at things like accommodation needs, making | :50:44. | :50:49. | |
sure their finances and benefits issues are going to be sorted and | :50:50. | :50:52. | |
resolved upon release. The result is one of the lowest | :50:53. | :50:55. | |
reoffending rates in the country. You might be thinking at this point, | :50:56. | :51:03. | |
"Well, what's the problem?" Well, there is a big problem nationally, | :51:04. | :51:06. | |
according to the Justice Secretary Chris Grayling. He says 600,000 | :51:07. | :51:08. | |
crimes are committed annually by reoffenders, costing the country ?13 | :51:09. | :51:11. | |
billion, and his verdict is "This can't go on". | :51:12. | :51:14. | |
Arguably his most controversial proposal is to privatise the | :51:15. | :51:16. | |
Probation Service for low`risk offenders on a payment`by`results | :51:17. | :51:19. | |
basis, prompting a call for strike action from staff. Many poor things | :51:20. | :51:31. | |
it repugnant morally that this should take place. The justice | :51:32. | :51:35. | |
system must be independent and not answerable to shareholders. | :51:36. | :51:38. | |
Serious concern too from some police and crime commissioners. If our key | :51:39. | :51:44. | |
partners are disrupted and place by people without a track record or the | :51:45. | :51:48. | |
experience and this area, clearly that could be a major blow to the | :51:49. | :51:52. | |
achievements we have got in the West Midlands. | :51:53. | :51:54. | |
But away from the politics, the victims live with the consequences | :51:55. | :52:00. | |
of reoffending. Please do the right thing and give it back to us, Pip | :52:01. | :52:07. | |
Singleton. Since Cath Mackie completed at the | :52:08. | :52:10. | |
port media that Probation Service staff will strike on Tuesday and | :52:11. | :52:16. | |
Wednesday next week and processed `` in protest against the government's | :52:17. | :52:21. | |
future plans. We are joined by the head of | :52:22. | :52:23. | |
Britain's oldest penal reform charity. They believe that prison | :52:24. | :52:30. | |
does not work. We have heard from the Justice Secretary Chris Grayling | :52:31. | :52:35. | |
who says there are 600,000 claims committed each year by the | :52:36. | :52:39. | |
offenders, costing the country ?13 billion each year. To borrow from my | :52:40. | :52:43. | |
rather inelegant sentence earlier on, it is broke, the system does | :52:44. | :52:50. | |
need a shake`up. Yes, the system is in a terrible place. It is very | :52:51. | :52:55. | |
difficult to see positive outcomes across the justice system. | :52:56. | :53:02. | |
Particularly with regard to prisons. Our charity believes that the prison | :53:03. | :53:06. | |
does have a purpose, and that is to lock people who are dangerous away | :53:07. | :53:09. | |
from the rest of us and that could be for long periods of time in some | :53:10. | :53:15. | |
cases. What it is not there to do is to fill it with people that we find | :53:16. | :53:18. | |
simply annoying and not dangerous and to have committed crimes of | :53:19. | :53:24. | |
property, time and again, it is not there to put these people are way | :53:25. | :53:28. | |
for short periods of time. That is why short`term prison sentences are | :53:29. | :53:33. | |
so unsuccessful because it is impossible for them to have area | :53:34. | :53:37. | |
ability to purpose and it is impossible to do anything positive | :53:38. | :53:39. | |
in the community for these people when better alternatives exist. Do | :53:40. | :53:45. | |
you not welcome the government's and arrived in these reforms which is | :53:46. | :53:48. | |
about concentrating what is in the public service, the Probation | :53:49. | :53:53. | |
Service, and that minority of high`risk offenders, who most need | :53:54. | :54:01. | |
the services of the probation staff? There is great concern around the | :54:02. | :54:04. | |
changes made by the government as regards taking control away from | :54:05. | :54:08. | |
local, specialist probation trusts, who will be stripped down so that | :54:09. | :54:14. | |
perhaps only one third, as little of 20%, could be covered by National | :54:15. | :54:25. | |
Probation Service. They are suggesting that only 10% of the | :54:26. | :54:28. | |
money given to private companies will be paid by results, it could be | :54:29. | :54:33. | |
as little as 5%, but we are very concerned that it will create poor | :54:34. | :54:37. | |
incentives and that companies will be able to benefit from that. | :54:38. | :54:45. | |
One of the other authorities that have played into the smaller the | :54:46. | :54:48. | |
date in terms of policy making, the Policy Exchange, they say this | :54:49. | :54:53. | |
offers tremendous opportunities and greater discretion for staff and the | :54:54. | :55:00. | |
potential for innovation. If you look at the justice as a whole, the | :55:01. | :55:05. | |
police do an excellent job and their performance is good. The Probation | :55:06. | :55:08. | |
Service to an excellent job. Do not just listen to me, ask the Minister | :55:09. | :55:14. | |
of Justice for the performance is the sticks. Many in this region, | :55:15. | :55:22. | |
including West Mercia and Warwickshire are judged been | :55:23. | :55:27. | |
exceptional. Why destroy these institutions that have been built up | :55:28. | :55:33. | |
over 100 years? Because they simply are not working. Let us look at the | :55:34. | :55:37. | |
facts. If you come out of prison, almost half of those who do commit a | :55:38. | :55:42. | |
crime after 12 months. If you have had a small sentence, 55% of those | :55:43. | :55:46. | |
offenders will be commit a crime within 12 months. They have a 43% | :55:47. | :55:52. | |
success rate. That is not good enough. 600,000 claims as 600,000 | :55:53. | :55:57. | |
victims and that is who should be at the front of this debate. Is the | :55:58. | :56:02. | |
merit of the government's proposals is precisely that the new | :56:03. | :56:05. | |
arrangement will concentrate the efforts and the public's Probation | :56:06. | :56:09. | |
Service and that minority, those most likely to reoffend? Even though | :56:10. | :56:17. | |
the Probation Service under these plans would focus on the high | :56:18. | :56:20. | |
offenders, you must do something about the risk of reoffending for | :56:21. | :56:23. | |
those who are not in that category and the problem with this proposal | :56:24. | :56:27. | |
is Chris Grayling is the minister who set up the Work Programme, | :56:28. | :56:30. | |
another payment`by`results system designed to get people back into | :56:31. | :56:34. | |
work, which on the government's owns this this text has shown it to be | :56:35. | :56:39. | |
worse than doing nothing. We cannot face that risk and the Probation | :56:40. | :56:43. | |
Service, especially when crime is rising and other areas. Let us pause | :56:44. | :56:50. | |
for the moment. As we have heard from Mark, West Mercia's Probation | :56:51. | :56:57. | |
Service as only five of those rated outstanding. | :56:58. | :57:01. | |
Staff and other local partners are planning to bid for one of the new | :57:02. | :57:04. | |
contracts themselves. But first they're having to go through an | :57:05. | :57:07. | |
elaborate process to form themselves into a kind of mutual society. We | :57:08. | :57:10. | |
asked the Conservative MP for Kenilworth and Southam if this | :57:11. | :57:13. | |
wasn't weighting the process too heavily in favour of private | :57:14. | :57:15. | |
companies. An existing probation trust is a | :57:16. | :57:19. | |
public sector body and if you have a payment`by`results system which says | :57:20. | :57:21. | |
to someone, "Look, we will pay you the full contract value only if you | :57:22. | :57:24. | |
succeed in getting reoffending down," you're asking them to put | :57:25. | :57:28. | |
some of their payment at risk. If it's a solely public sector body, | :57:29. | :57:32. | |
then the money they're using to put at risk is still public money, so | :57:33. | :57:38. | |
the system doesn't work like that. There you are, Shabana, a precise | :57:39. | :57:42. | |
response, he is seen payment`by`results as the way to go. | :57:43. | :57:47. | |
He is completely wrong. It has failed and the Work Programme and | :57:48. | :57:50. | |
there is every indication that it will not work for the Probation | :57:51. | :57:53. | |
Service. We are seeing some radical reform. For the first time, people | :57:54. | :57:59. | |
going on a short sentence will get rehabilitation support and mentoring | :58:00. | :58:02. | |
when they come out. For the first time we are guaranteeing that | :58:03. | :58:05. | |
everyone will have 12 months of support. It is important to try and | :58:06. | :58:09. | |
break the cycle and work with people. Mark, we know there will be | :58:10. | :58:15. | |
a strike next week, is this a helpful response by the staff? I can | :58:16. | :58:21. | |
understand why it is happening. No other country in the world has done | :58:22. | :58:24. | |
this. The companies who may bid and when these contracts are under | :58:25. | :58:28. | |
investigation from the Serious Fraud Office. We must leave that | :58:29. | :58:33. | |
discussion therefore the moment. Now our regular round`up of the | :58:34. | :58:37. | |
political week in the Midlands in 60 Seconds, brought to us this week by | :58:38. | :58:40. | |
our Hereford and Worcester political reporter, Matthew Bone. | :58:41. | :58:44. | |
Macmillan Cancer Support is backing a radical plan to provide | :58:45. | :58:46. | |
co`ordinated cancer care for more than a million people in | :58:47. | :58:51. | |
Staffordshire. You have to look at a local health | :58:52. | :58:56. | |
system in a different way ` in its entirety and look at a patient | :58:57. | :58:59. | |
pathway from someone suspecting of their cancer right through to end of | :59:00. | :59:04. | |
life. But no plan's been published yet | :59:05. | :59:07. | |
about the future of Stafford Hospital. The health regulator | :59:08. | :59:09. | |
Monitor's asked for a 40`day extension while it looks at | :59:10. | :59:14. | |
finances. The Fire Brigades Union in Hereford | :59:15. | :59:17. | |
and Worcester has turned up the heat by saying that ?4.7 million of cuts | :59:18. | :59:21. | |
over the next three years could cost lives. | :59:22. | :59:23. | |
Meanwhile, Dudley and Herefordshire Council also had gloomy news about | :59:24. | :59:26. | |
the impact of cuts. Dudley needs to save ?32 million more than | :59:27. | :59:29. | |
originally thought by 2017. Herefordshire says it needs to | :59:30. | :59:36. | |
increase council tax bills by 5%. Finally, the Staffordshire Moorlands | :59:37. | :59:38. | |
came out top as the Midland's most happy place in a survey this week. | :59:39. | :59:42. | |
But Wolverhampton had the lowest happiness rating. | :59:43. | :59:53. | |
And they also say, Shabana, that Birmingham is below the national | :59:54. | :59:59. | |
average. I thought the city was supposed to be one happy family! I | :00:00. | :00:04. | |
thought we were! I am surprised to find us in that place. Hopefully we | :00:05. | :00:11. | |
will be on top next time. East Staffordshire, you need a feel`good | :00:12. | :00:16. | |
factor. They are only slightly more happy than Wolverhampton. People are | :00:17. | :00:20. | |
happy if we are confident about their families and jobs and feeling | :00:21. | :00:24. | |
safe. In Burton we have had the lowest unemployment levels for five | :00:25. | :00:28. | |
years. We have record falls in crime, that will make people happy. | :00:29. | :00:33. | |
There is a disconnect with places like Wolverhampton and stalked | :00:34. | :00:35. | |
because the economic process is not working. I could argue that they are | :00:36. | :00:41. | |
all run by Labour councils. And the government that is failing to tackle | :00:42. | :00:45. | |
the cost of living traces that is having a huge impact up and down the | :00:46. | :00:53. | |
country. We will call that 15`15. My thanks to Shabana and Andrew. | :00:54. | :00:56. | |
Next week, Felicity Norman will be here for the Green Party and Lorely | :00:57. | :01:00. | |
Burt for the Liberal Democrats. I wonder if they see something of | :01:01. | :01:03. | |
their own early campaigning zeal in the remarkable Malala Yousafzai, the | :01:04. | :01:06. | |
Pakistani teenager shot by the Taliban for speaking out about | :01:07. | :01:09. | |
educating girls? It's a year since she came to Birmingham for treatment | :01:10. | :01:13. | |
and to start a new life. Inside Out tomorrow at 7:30pm here on BBC One | :01:14. | :01:17. | |
in the West Midlands will reveal how she's adjusting.This though, is | :01:18. | :01:18. | |
where free school area for into that | :01:19. | :01:31. | |
Is Labour about to drop its support category. Thank you. | :01:32. | :01:31. | |
Is Labour about to drop its support for High Speed 2, a rail line the | :01:32. | :01:36. | |
party approved while in government? for High Speed 2, a rail line the | :01:37. | :01:47. | |
these green shoots? These are all questions for The Week Ahead. | :01:48. | :01:59. | |
So, HS2. Miss Flint wouldn't answer the question. She's in northern MP | :02:00. | :02:04. | |
too. Ed Balls is comparing it to the Millennium Dome. | :02:05. | :02:09. | |
too. Ed Balls is comparing it to the minute's silence for HS2? It will | :02:10. | :02:13. | |
not be quite as crude as that. They will not stand up and say, we | :02:14. | :02:19. | |
not be quite as crude as that. They senior Labour person said to me it | :02:20. | :02:19. | |
would be a bit senior Labour person said to me it | :02:20. | :02:21. | |
that Gordon Brown and Ed Balls set for the euro back in 97. They will | :02:22. | :02:27. | |
be chucking lots of questions into the air, and the questions will | :02:28. | :02:31. | |
create doubt, and will create the grounds for Labour to say, at some | :02:32. | :02:38. | |
point, we think there is a much much better way of spending the money. It | :02:39. | :02:43. | |
isn't ?42 billion, because that includes a contingency. Let's see | :02:44. | :02:49. | |
what Peter Mandelson had to say about HS2. He was in the government | :02:50. | :02:57. | |
when Labour supported it. Frankly, there was too much of the argument | :02:58. | :03:01. | |
that if everyone else has got a high-speed train, we should have won | :03:02. | :03:08. | |
too. Regardless of need, regardless of cost, and regardless of | :03:09. | :03:13. | |
alternatives. As a party, to be frank, we didn't feel like being | :03:14. | :03:19. | |
trumped by the zeal of the then opposition's support for the | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
high-speed train. We wanted, if anything, to upstage them. So they | :03:26. | :03:30. | |
didn't really need it, and we're only talking about ?50 billion. Why | :03:31. | :03:37. | |
would you take a decision involving ?50 billion in a serious way? For | :03:38. | :03:42. | |
David Cameron, if it becomes clear Labour is against it, he cannot | :03:43. | :03:47. | |
proceed. He indicated last week that he wouldn't proceed if the certainty | :03:48. | :03:52. | |
wasn't there. For Labour, HS2 is really a debate about the deficit by | :03:53. | :03:56. | |
proxy. They think that if you don't go ahead with HS2, that releases | :03:57. | :04:01. | |
tens of billions of pounds to spend on other things, such as public | :04:02. | :04:05. | |
services, without going into boring. I don't think that works because | :04:06. | :04:28. | |
there was a difference between cancelling something that already | :04:29. | :04:30. | |
exists to pay for something else, and cancelling something that does | :04:31. | :04:32. | |
not yet exist and will be paid for over decades to pay for something | :04:33. | :04:35. | |
here and now. Can Labour do this? I know that the line will be, we are | :04:36. | :04:38. | |
not going to build this railway because we are going to build | :04:39. | :04:40. | |
200,000 houses a year. Can they do this without political cost? I think | :04:41. | :04:43. | |
there will be political costs, but they will play this card of we have | :04:44. | :04:47. | |
changed our mind. I think Cameron's line has been very clever, saying we | :04:48. | :04:53. | |
cannot do it without labour. You can put it in two ways. Sorry, we cannot | :04:54. | :04:58. | |
go ahead with it, but Labour has ruined your chance of prosperity, or | :04:59. | :05:02. | |
they can tie themselves to it, and then Labour cannot attack it on | :05:03. | :05:08. | |
great grounds when costs do spire. You can write Labour's script right | :05:09. | :05:14. | |
now. They can say, if we were in charge, the financial management | :05:15. | :05:22. | |
would be much better. This raises some really important questions for | :05:23. | :05:27. | |
the government. They have utterly failed to make the case for HS2 | :05:28. | :05:33. | |
There is a real case to make. Between London and Birmingham it is | :05:34. | :05:37. | |
about capacity not speed. North of Birmingham, it is about | :05:38. | :05:42. | |
connectivity. It is a simple case to make, but it is only in the last | :05:43. | :05:45. | |
month that they have been making that case. It shows really terrible | :05:46. | :05:49. | |
complacency in the coalition that they haven't done that. We'll HS2 | :05:50. | :05:57. | |
happen or not? I think it will. For the reasons that Nick outlined, | :05:58. | :06:01. | |
there is not of a constituency for it amongst Northern areas. -- there | :06:02. | :06:10. | |
is enough of a constituency for it. There is private investment as well. | :06:11. | :06:17. | |
It isn't like Heathrow. I say no, because I think Labour will drop | :06:18. | :06:23. | |
their support for it. Caroline Flint said she was in favour of the | :06:24. | :06:27. | |
concept of trains generally, but will it go further than that? It is | :06:28. | :06:32. | |
difficult to see how it will go ahead if Labour will not support it | :06:33. | :06:38. | |
after setting five tests that it clearly will not meet. Some will | :06:39. | :06:45. | |
breathe a sigh of relief. Some will say, even in the 20th century, we | :06:46. | :06:50. | |
cannot build a proper rail network. The economy was another big story of | :06:51. | :06:56. | |
the week. We had those GDP figures. There is a video the Tories are | :06:57. | :07:01. | |
releasing. The world premiere is going to be here. Where's the red | :07:02. | :07:05. | |
carpet? It gives an indication of how the Tories will hand Mr Miliband | :07:06. | :07:09. | |
and labour in the run-up to the election. Let's have a look at it. | :07:10. | :07:43. | |
These graphics are even worse than the ones we use on our show! How on | :07:44. | :07:49. | |
earth would you expect that to go viral? It did have a strange feel | :07:50. | :07:58. | |
about it. It doesn't understand the Internet at all. Who is going to | :07:59. | :08:02. | |
read those little screens between it? Put a dog in it! However, | :08:03. | :08:14. | |
putting that aside, I have no idea that that is going to go viral. The | :08:15. | :08:20. | |
Tories are now operating - and I say Tories rather than the coalition - | :08:21. | :08:26. | |
on the assumption that the economy is improving and will continue to | :08:27. | :08:30. | |
improve, and that that will become more obvious as 2014 goes on. We | :08:31. | :08:36. | |
just saw their how they will fight the campaign. Yes, and at the | :08:37. | :08:42. | |
crucial moment, you will reach the point where wages. To rise at a | :08:43. | :08:47. | |
faster pace than inflation, and then people will start to, in the words | :08:48. | :08:51. | |
of Harold Macmillan, feel that they have never had it so good. That is | :08:52. | :08:56. | |
the key moment. If the economy is growing, there is a rule of thumb | :08:57. | :09:05. | |
that the government should get a benefit. But it doesn't always work | :09:06. | :09:08. | |
like that. The fundamental point here is that Ed Miliband has had a | :09:09. | :09:11. | |
great month. He has totally set the agenda. He has set the agenda with | :09:12. | :09:17. | |
something - freezing energy prices - that may not work. That video shows | :09:18. | :09:21. | |
that the Conservatives want to get the debate back to the | :09:22. | :09:25. | |
fundamentals. That this is a party that told us for three years that | :09:26. | :09:32. | |
this coalition was telling us to -- was taking us to hell on a handcart. | :09:33. | :09:37. | |
That doesn't seem to have happened. The energy price was a very clever | :09:38. | :09:44. | |
thing, at the party conference season, which now seems years ago. | :09:45. | :09:49. | |
They saw that the recovery was going to happen, so they changed the | :09:50. | :09:55. | |
debate to living standards. Some economists are now privately | :09:56. | :09:59. | |
expecting growth to be 3% next year, which was inconceivable for five | :10:00. | :10:04. | |
months ago. If growth is 3% next year, living standards will start to | :10:05. | :10:07. | |
rise again. Where does Labour go then? I would go further, and say | :10:08. | :10:13. | |
that even though Ed Miliband has made a small political victory on | :10:14. | :10:18. | |
living standards, it hasn't registered in the polls. Those polls | :10:19. | :10:25. | |
have been contracted since April -- have been contracting since April. | :10:26. | :10:29. | |
That macro economic story matters more than the issue of living | :10:30. | :10:34. | |
standards. The interesting thing about the recovery is it confounds | :10:35. | :10:37. | |
everybody. No one was predicting, not the Treasury, not the media not | :10:38. | :10:44. | |
the IMF, not the academics, and the only people I can think of... I fit | :10:45. | :10:51. | |
-- I thought they knew everything! The only people I know who did are | :10:52. | :10:56. | |
one adviser who is very close to George Osborne, and the clever hedge | :10:57. | :11:00. | |
fund is who were buying British equities back in January. Because | :11:01. | :11:05. | |
the Treasury's record is so appalling, no one believe them, but | :11:06. | :11:09. | |
they were saying around February, March this year, that by the end of | :11:10. | :11:14. | |
the summer, the recovery would be gathering momentum. For once, they | :11:15. | :11:22. | |
turned out to be right! They said that the economy would be going gang | :11:23. | :11:26. | |
bust is! Where did the new Tory voters come from? I agree, if the | :11:27. | :11:33. | |
economic recovery continues, the coalition will be stronger. But | :11:34. | :11:42. | |
where will they get new voters from? For people who sign up to help to | :11:43. | :11:46. | |
buy, they will be locked into nice mortgages at a low interest rate, | :11:47. | :11:51. | |
and just as you go into a general election, if you are getting 3% | :11:52. | :11:57. | |
growth and unemployment is down the Bank of England will have to review | :11:58. | :12:00. | |
their interest rates. People who are getting nice interest rates now may | :12:01. | :12:04. | |
find that it is not like that in a few months time. The point John | :12:05. | :12:11. | |
Major was making implicitly was that Mrs Thatcher could speak to people | :12:12. | :12:15. | |
on low incomes. John Major could not speak to them -- John Major could | :12:16. | :12:20. | |
speak to them. But this coalition cannot speak to them. This idea | :12:21. | :12:25. | |
about the reshuffle was that David Cameron wanted more Northern voices, | :12:26. | :12:32. | |
more women, to make it look like it was not a party of seven men. When | :12:33. | :12:38. | |
David Cameron became leader, John Major said, I do not speak very | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
often, but when I do, I will help you, because I think you are good | :12:43. | :12:47. | |
thing and I do not want to be like Margaret Thatcher. But that speech | :12:48. | :12:51. | |
was clearly a lament for the party he believed that David Cameron was | :12:52. | :12:56. | |
going to lead and create, but that isn't happening. And energy prices | :12:57. | :13:02. | |
continue into this coming week. We have the companies going before a | :13:03. | :13:06. | |
select committee. My information is they are sending along the secondary | :13:07. | :13:11. | |
division, not the boss. How can they get along -- get away with that I | :13:12. | :13:16. | |
got the letter through from British Gas this week explaining why my | :13:17. | :13:21. | |
bills are going up, and at no point since this became a story have any | :13:22. | :13:24. | |
of the big companies handled it well. I will have to leave it there. | :13:25. | :13:30. | |
Make sure you pay your bill! That's it for today. The Daily Politics is | :13:31. | :13:36. | |
back on BBC Two tomorrow. I will be back here on BBC One next Sunday. | :13:37. | :13:43. | |
Remember, if it's Sunday, it is The Sunday Politics. | :13:44. | :13:51. |