Browse content similar to 29/10/2017. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Morning, everyone. | 0:00:37 | 0:00:39 | |
I'm Sarah Smith, and welcome
to The Sunday Politics, | 0:00:39 | 0:00:41 | |
where we always bring you everything
you need to know to understand | 0:00:41 | 0:00:44 | |
what's going on in politics. | 0:00:44 | 0:00:45 | |
Coming up on today's programme... | 0:00:45 | 0:00:49 | |
The Government says | 0:00:49 | 0:00:51 | |
the international trade minister
Mark Garnier will be investigated | 0:00:51 | 0:00:54 | |
following newspaper allegations
of inappropriate behaviour | 0:00:54 | 0:00:56 | |
towards a female staff member. | 0:00:56 | 0:00:58 | |
We'll have the latest. | 0:00:58 | 0:01:04 | |
The Prime Minister says she can
agree a deal with the EU and plenty | 0:01:04 | 0:01:07 | |
of time for Parliament to vote on it
before we leave in 2018. Well | 0:01:07 | 0:01:14 | |
Parliament play ball? New evidence
cast out on the | 0:01:14 | 0:01:24 | |
In
cast out on the | 0:01:24 | 0:01:24 | |
In the
cast out on the | 0:01:24 | 0:01:24 | |
In the West,
cast out on the | 0:01:24 | 0:01:24 | |
In the West, the
cast out on the | 0:01:24 | 0:01:25 | |
In the West, the University
cast out on the | 0:01:25 | 0:01:25 | |
In the West, the University
challenge to. There are more cause | 0:01:25 | 0:01:27 | |
for the head of Bath University | 0:01:27 | 0:01:28 | |
on from the abortion act white MPs
are lobbying the Home Secretary to | 0:01:29 | 0:01:32 | |
stop the alleged harassment of women
attending abortion clinics. | 0:01:32 | 0:01:38 | |
All that coming up in the programme. | 0:01:38 | 0:01:41 | |
And with me today to help make sense
of all the big stories, | 0:01:41 | 0:01:44 | |
Julia Hartley-Brewer,
Steve Richards and Anne McElvoy. | 0:01:44 | 0:01:47 | |
Some breaking news this morning. | 0:01:47 | 0:01:50 | |
The Government has announced
that it will investigate | 0:01:50 | 0:01:52 | |
whether the International Trade
Minister Mark Garnier broke | 0:01:52 | 0:01:54 | |
the Ministerial Code
following allegations | 0:01:54 | 0:01:55 | |
of inappropriate behaviour. | 0:01:55 | 0:02:01 | |
It comes after reports in the Mail
on Sunday which has spoken to one | 0:02:01 | 0:02:04 | |
of Mr Garnier's former employees. | 0:02:04 | 0:02:05 | |
News of the investigation
was announced by the Health | 0:02:05 | 0:02:07 | |
Secretary Jeremy Hunt
on the Andrew Marr show earlier. | 0:02:07 | 0:02:09 | |
The stories, if they are true,
are totally unacceptable | 0:02:09 | 0:02:13 | |
and the Cabinet Office will be
conducting an investigation | 0:02:13 | 0:02:15 | |
as to whether there has been
a breach of the ministerial code | 0:02:15 | 0:02:18 | |
in this particular case. | 0:02:18 | 0:02:19 | |
But as you know the
facts are disputed. | 0:02:19 | 0:02:21 | |
This is something that covers
behaviour by MPs of all parties | 0:02:21 | 0:02:24 | |
and that is why the other thing
that is going to happen | 0:02:24 | 0:02:28 | |
is that today Theresa May
is going to write to John Bercow, | 0:02:28 | 0:02:31 | |
the Speaker of the House of Commons,
to ask for his advice as to how | 0:02:31 | 0:02:34 | |
we change that culture. | 0:02:34 | 0:02:40 | |
That was Jeremy Hunt a little
earlier. I want to turn to the panel | 0:02:40 | 0:02:44 | |
to make sense of this news. This is
the government taking these | 0:02:44 | 0:02:49 | |
allegations quite seriously. What
has changed in this story is they | 0:02:49 | 0:02:52 | |
used to be a bit of delay while
people work out what they should say | 0:02:52 | 0:02:57 | |
about it, how seriously to take it.
As you see now a senior cabinet | 0:02:57 | 0:03:02 | |
member out there, Jeremy Hunt, with
an instant response. He does have | 0:03:02 | 0:03:07 | |
the worry of whether the facts are
disputed, but what they want to be | 0:03:07 | 0:03:10 | |
seen doing is to do something very
quickly. In the past they would say | 0:03:10 | 0:03:15 | |
it was all part of the rough and
tumble of Westminster. Mark Garnier | 0:03:15 | 0:03:20 | |
does not deny these stories, which
is that he asked an employee to buy | 0:03:20 | 0:03:24 | |
sex toys, but he said it was just
high jinks and it was taken out of | 0:03:24 | 0:03:29 | |
context. Is this the sort of thing
that a few years ago in a different | 0:03:29 | 0:03:33 | |
environment would be investigated?
Not necessarily quite the frenzy | 0:03:33 | 0:03:38 | |
that it is nowadays. The combination
of social media, all the Sunday | 0:03:38 | 0:03:46 | |
political programmes were ministers
have to go on armed with a response | 0:03:46 | 0:03:48 | |
means that you get these we have to
be seen to be doing something. That | 0:03:48 | 0:03:56 | |
means there is this Cabinet Office
investigation. You pointed out to us | 0:03:56 | 0:04:00 | |
before the programme that he was not
a minister before this happened. It | 0:04:00 | 0:04:04 | |
does not matter whether he says yes,
know I did this or did not, | 0:04:04 | 0:04:09 | |
something has to be seen to be done.
Clearly ministers today are being | 0:04:09 | 0:04:13 | |
armed with that bit of information
and that Theresa May will ask John | 0:04:13 | 0:04:17 | |
Bercow the speaker to look into the
whole culture of Parliament in this | 0:04:17 | 0:04:21 | |
context. That is the response to
this kind of frenzy. If we do live | 0:04:21 | 0:04:27 | |
in an environment where something
has to be seen to be done, does that | 0:04:27 | 0:04:30 | |
always mean the right thing gets
done? Absolutely not. We are in | 0:04:30 | 0:04:36 | |
witch hunt territory. All of us work
in the Commons over many years and | 0:04:36 | 0:04:40 | |
anyone would think it was a scene
out of Benny Hill or a carry on | 0:04:40 | 0:04:45 | |
film. Sadly it is not that much fun
and it is rather dull and dreary. | 0:04:45 | 0:04:50 | |
Yes, there are sex pests, yes, there
is sexual harassment, but the idea | 0:04:50 | 0:04:55 | |
this is going on on a huge scale is
nonsense. Doesn't matter whether it | 0:04:55 | 0:04:59 | |
is a huge scale or not? Or just a
few instances? Any workplace where | 0:04:59 | 0:05:06 | |
you have the mixing of work and
social so intertwined and you throw | 0:05:06 | 0:05:11 | |
a huge amount of alcohol and late
night and people living away from | 0:05:11 | 0:05:15 | |
home you will have this happen. That
does not make it OK. It makes sexual | 0:05:15 | 0:05:21 | |
harassment not OK as it is not
anywhere. This happens to men as | 0:05:21 | 0:05:26 | |
well and if they have an issue into
it there are employment tribunal 's | 0:05:26 | 0:05:30 | |
and they can contact lawyers. I do
not think this should be a matter of | 0:05:30 | 0:05:34 | |
the speaker, it should be someone
completely independent of any party. | 0:05:34 | 0:05:40 | |
People think MPs are employees of
the party or the Commons, they are | 0:05:40 | 0:05:45 | |
not. Because they are self-employed
to whom do you go if you are a | 0:05:45 | 0:05:49 | |
researcher? That has to be
clarified. I agree you need a much | 0:05:49 | 0:05:54 | |
clearer line of reporting. It was a
bit like the situation when we came | 0:05:54 | 0:06:00 | |
into the media many years ago, the
Punic wars in my case! You were not | 0:06:00 | 0:06:06 | |
quite sure who to go to. If you work
worried that it might impede your | 0:06:06 | 0:06:13 | |
career, and you had to talk to
people who work next to you, that is | 0:06:13 | 0:06:18 | |
just one example, but in the Commons
people do not know who they should | 0:06:18 | 0:06:22 | |
go to. Where Theresa May might be
making a mistake, it is the same | 0:06:22 | 0:06:26 | |
mistake when it was decided to
investigate through Levinson the | 0:06:26 | 0:06:30 | |
culture of the media which was like
nailing jelly to a wall. Look at the | 0:06:30 | 0:06:36 | |
culture of anybody's job and the
environment they are in and there is | 0:06:36 | 0:06:39 | |
usually a lot wrong with it. When
you try and make it general, they | 0:06:39 | 0:06:45 | |
are not trying to blame individuals,
or it say they need a better line on | 0:06:45 | 0:06:50 | |
reporting of sexual harassment,
which I support, the Commons is a | 0:06:50 | 0:06:54 | |
funny place and it is a rough old
trade and you are never going to | 0:06:54 | 0:06:58 | |
iron out the human foibles of that.
Diane Abbott was talking about this | 0:06:58 | 0:07:03 | |
earlier. | 0:07:03 | 0:07:07 | |
When I first went into Parliament so
many of those men had been to all | 0:07:07 | 0:07:10 | |
boys boarding schools and had really
difficult attitudes towards women. | 0:07:10 | 0:07:17 | |
The world has moved on and
middle-aged women are less likely | 0:07:17 | 0:07:21 | |
than middle-aged men to believe that
young research are irresistibly | 0:07:21 | 0:07:31 | |
attracted to them. We have seen the
issues and we have seen one of our | 0:07:31 | 0:07:36 | |
colleagues been suspended for quite
unacceptable language. | 0:07:36 | 0:07:42 | |
That is a point, Jarrod O'Mara, a
Labour MP who has had the whip | 0:07:42 | 0:07:46 | |
suspended, this goes across all
parties. The idea that there is a | 0:07:46 | 0:07:51 | |
left or right divide over this is
absurd. This is a cultural issue. In | 0:07:51 | 0:07:57 | |
the media and in a lot of other
institutions if this is going to | 0:07:57 | 0:08:02 | |
develop politically, the frenzy will
carry on for a bit and other names | 0:08:02 | 0:08:06 | |
will come out over the next few
days, not just the two we have | 0:08:06 | 0:08:10 | |
mentioned so far in politics. But it
also raises questions about how | 0:08:10 | 0:08:16 | |
candidates are selected for example.
There has been a huge pressure for | 0:08:16 | 0:08:22 | |
the centre to keep out of things. I
bet from now on there will be much | 0:08:22 | 0:08:26 | |
greater scrutiny of all candidates
and tweets will have to be looked at | 0:08:26 | 0:08:31 | |
and all the rest of it. Selecting
candidates is interesting. Miriam | 0:08:31 | 0:08:38 | |
Gonzalez, Nick Clegg's wife, says
that during that election they knew | 0:08:38 | 0:08:42 | |
about Jarrod O'Mara and the Lib Dems
knew about it, so it is difficult to | 0:08:42 | 0:08:46 | |
suggest the Labour Party did not as
well. There is very clear evidence | 0:08:46 | 0:08:52 | |
the Labour Party did know. But we
are in a situation of how perfect | 0:08:52 | 0:08:57 | |
and well-behaved does everyone have
to be? If you look at past American | 0:08:57 | 0:09:03 | |
presidents, JFK and Bill Clinton,
these men were sex pest | 0:09:03 | 0:09:08 | |
extraordinaire, with totally
inappropriate behaviour on a regular | 0:09:08 | 0:09:11 | |
basis. There are things you are not
allowed to say if you are feminists. | 0:09:11 | 0:09:15 | |
Young women are really attracted to
powerful men. I was busted for the | 0:09:15 | 0:09:20 | |
idea that there are young women in
the House of commons who are | 0:09:20 | 0:09:24 | |
throwing themselves at middle-aged,
potbellied, balding, older men. We | 0:09:24 | 0:09:31 | |
need to focus on the right things.
When it is unwanted, harassing, | 0:09:31 | 0:09:37 | |
inappropriate and criminal,
absolutely, you come down like a | 0:09:37 | 0:09:40 | |
tonne of bricks. It is not just
because there are more women in the | 0:09:40 | 0:09:44 | |
Commons, it is because there are
more men married to women like us. | 0:09:44 | 0:09:49 | |
We have to leave it there. | 0:09:49 | 0:09:51 | |
As attention turns in
Westminster to the hundreds | 0:09:51 | 0:09:54 | |
of amendments put down on the EU
Withdrawal Bill, David Davis has | 0:09:54 | 0:09:56 | |
caused a stir this week by saying
it's possible Parliament won't get | 0:09:56 | 0:09:59 | |
a vote on the Brexit deal
until after March 2019 - | 0:09:59 | 0:10:02 | |
when the clock runs out
and we leave the EU. | 0:10:02 | 0:10:04 | |
Let's take a look at how
the controversy played out. | 0:10:04 | 0:10:07 | |
And which point do you envisage
Parliament having a vote? | 0:10:07 | 0:10:11 | |
As soon as possible thereafter. | 0:10:11 | 0:10:12 | |
This Parliament? | 0:10:12 | 0:10:16 | |
As soon as possible
possible thereafter, yeah. | 0:10:16 | 0:10:18 | |
As soon as possible thereafter. | 0:10:18 | 0:10:19 | |
So, the vote in Parliament... | 0:10:19 | 0:10:20 | |
The other thing... | 0:10:20 | 0:10:21 | |
Could be after March 2019? | 0:10:21 | 0:10:23 | |
It could be, yeah, it could be. | 0:10:23 | 0:10:24 | |
The... | 0:10:24 | 0:10:26 | |
It depends when it concludes. | 0:10:26 | 0:10:27 | |
Mr Barnier, remember,
has said he'd like... | 0:10:27 | 0:10:30 | |
Sorry, the vote of our Parliament,
the UK Parliament, could be | 0:10:30 | 0:10:32 | |
after March 2019? | 0:10:32 | 0:10:34 | |
Yes, it could be. | 0:10:34 | 0:10:35 | |
Could be. | 0:10:35 | 0:10:37 | |
The thing to member... | 0:10:37 | 0:10:38 | |
Which would be... | 0:10:38 | 0:10:40 | |
Well, it can't come
before we have the deal. | 0:10:40 | 0:10:42 | |
You said that it is POSSIBLE that
Parliament night not vote | 0:10:42 | 0:10:45 | |
on the deal until AFTER
the end of March 2019. | 0:10:45 | 0:10:49 | |
I'm summarising correctly
what you said...? | 0:10:49 | 0:10:50 | |
Yeah, that's correct. | 0:10:50 | 0:10:52 | |
In the event we don't do
the deal until then, yeah. | 0:10:52 | 0:10:54 | |
Can the Prime Minister please
explain how it's possible | 0:10:54 | 0:10:56 | |
to have a meaningful vote
on something that's | 0:10:56 | 0:10:58 | |
already taken place? | 0:10:58 | 0:11:03 | |
As the honourable gentleman knows,
we're in negotiations | 0:11:03 | 0:11:07 | |
with the European Union, but I am
confident that the timetable under | 0:11:07 | 0:11:10 | |
the Lisbon Treaty does give time
until March 2019 | 0:11:10 | 0:11:13 | |
for the negotiations to take place. | 0:11:13 | 0:11:15 | |
But I'm confident, because it is in
the interests of both sides, | 0:11:15 | 0:11:18 | |
it's not just this Parliament that
wants to have a vote on that deal, | 0:11:18 | 0:11:22 | |
but actually there will be
ratification by other parliaments, | 0:11:22 | 0:11:24 | |
that we will be able to achieve that
agreement and that negotiation | 0:11:24 | 0:11:29 | |
in time for this Parliament
to have a vote that we committed to. | 0:11:29 | 0:11:32 | |
We are working to reach
an agreement on the final deal | 0:11:32 | 0:11:35 | |
in good time before we leave
the European Union in March 2019. | 0:11:35 | 0:11:37 | |
Clearly, we cannot say
for certain at this stage | 0:11:37 | 0:11:40 | |
when this will be agreed. | 0:11:40 | 0:11:42 | |
But as Michel Barnier said,
he hopes to get a draft deal | 0:11:42 | 0:11:44 | |
agreed by October 2018,
and that's our aim is well. | 0:11:44 | 0:11:50 | |
agreed by October 2018,
and that's our aim as well. | 0:11:50 | 0:11:53 | |
I'm joined now by the former
Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary | 0:11:53 | 0:11:55 | |
Benn, who is the chair
of the Commons Brexit Committee, | 0:11:55 | 0:11:58 | |
which David Davis was
giving evidence to. | 0:11:58 | 0:12:01 | |
Good morning. When you think a
parliamentary vote should take place | 0:12:01 | 0:12:07 | |
in order for it to be meaningful? It
has to be before we leave the | 0:12:07 | 0:12:13 | |
European Union. Michel Barnier said
at the start of the negotiations | 0:12:13 | 0:12:15 | |
that he wants to wrap them up by
October of next year, so we have | 0:12:15 | 0:12:20 | |
only got 12 months left, the clock
is ticking and there is a huge | 0:12:20 | 0:12:24 | |
amount of ground to cover. You do
not think there is any point in | 0:12:24 | 0:12:28 | |
having the vote the week before we
leave because you could then not go | 0:12:28 | 0:12:39 | |
and re-negotiate? That would not be
acceptable. We will not be given a | 0:12:39 | 0:12:41 | |
bit of paper and told to take it or
leave it. But the following day | 0:12:41 | 0:12:44 | |
Steve Baker, also a minister in the
department, told our committee that | 0:12:44 | 0:12:48 | |
the government now accepts that in
order to implement transitional | 0:12:48 | 0:12:51 | |
arrangements that it is seeking, it
will need separate legislation. I | 0:12:51 | 0:12:56 | |
put the question to him if you are
going to need separate legislation | 0:12:56 | 0:13:00 | |
to do that, why don't you have a
separate bill to implement the | 0:13:00 | 0:13:04 | |
withdrawal agreement rather than
seeking to use the powers the | 0:13:04 | 0:13:07 | |
government is proposing to take in
the EU withdrawal bill. If we stick | 0:13:07 | 0:13:12 | |
to the timing, you have said you do
not think it is possible to | 0:13:12 | 0:13:15 | |
negotiate a trade deal in the next
12 months. You say the only people | 0:13:15 | 0:13:20 | |
who think that is possible British
ministers. If you do not believe we | 0:13:20 | 0:13:24 | |
can get a deal negotiated, how can
we get a vote on it in 12 months' | 0:13:24 | 0:13:29 | |
time? If things go well, and there
is still a risk of no agreement | 0:13:29 | 0:13:34 | |
which would be disastrous for the
economy and the country, if | 0:13:34 | 0:13:48 | |
things go there will be a deal on
the divorce issues, there will be a | 0:13:53 | 0:13:56 | |
deal on the nature of the
transitional arrangement and the | 0:13:56 | 0:13:58 | |
government is to set out how it
thinks that will work, and then an | 0:13:58 | 0:14:00 | |
agreement between the UK and the 27
member states saying, we will now | 0:14:00 | 0:14:03 | |
negotiate a new trade and market
access arrangement, and new | 0:14:03 | 0:14:05 | |
association agreement between the
two parties, and that will be done | 0:14:05 | 0:14:07 | |
in the transition period. Parliament
will be voting in those | 0:14:07 | 0:14:09 | |
circumstances on a deal which leads
to the door being open. But we would | 0:14:09 | 0:14:14 | |
be outside the EU at that point, so
how meaningful can vote be where you | 0:14:14 | 0:14:19 | |
take it or leave it if we have
already left the EU? Surely this has | 0:14:19 | 0:14:25 | |
to happen before March 2019 for it
to make a difference? I do not think | 0:14:25 | 0:14:31 | |
it is possible to negotiate all of
the issues that will need to be | 0:14:31 | 0:14:34 | |
covered in the time available. Then
it is not possible to have a | 0:14:34 | 0:14:40 | |
meaningful vote on it? Parliament
will have to have a look at the deal | 0:14:40 | 0:14:51 | |
presented to it. It is likely to be
a mix agreement so the approval | 0:14:51 | 0:14:53 | |
process in the rest of Europe,
unlike the Article 50 agreement, | 0:14:53 | 0:14:56 | |
which will be a majority vote in the
European Parliament and in the | 0:14:56 | 0:14:59 | |
British Parliament, every single
Parliament will have a vote on it, | 0:14:59 | 0:15:02 | |
so it will be a more complex process
anyway, but I do not think that is | 0:15:02 | 0:15:07 | |
the time to get all of that sorted
between now and October next year. | 0:15:07 | 0:15:13 | |
Whether it is before or after we
have left the EU, the government | 0:15:13 | 0:15:17 | |
have said it is a take it or leave
it option and it is the Noel Edmonds | 0:15:17 | 0:15:21 | |
option, deal or no Deal, you say yes
or no to it. You cannot send them | 0:15:21 | 0:15:28 | |
back to re-negotiate. | 0:15:28 | 0:15:33 | |
If it is a separate piece of
legislation, when Parliament has a | 0:15:33 | 0:15:38 | |
chance to shape the nature of that
legislation. But it can't change | 0:15:38 | 0:15:43 | |
what has been negotiated with the
EU? Well, you could say to the | 0:15:43 | 0:15:47 | |
government, we're happy with this
but was not happy about that chukka | 0:15:47 | 0:15:52 | |
here's some fresh instructions, go
back in and... It seems to me what | 0:15:52 | 0:15:58 | |
they want is the maximum access to
the single market for the lowest | 0:15:58 | 0:16:02 | |
possible tariffs, whilst able to
control migration. If they've got to | 0:16:02 | 0:16:06 | |
get the best deal that they can on
that, how on earth is the Labour | 0:16:06 | 0:16:10 | |
Party, saying we want a bit more,
owing to persuade the other 27? We | 0:16:10 | 0:16:15 | |
certainly don't want the lowest
possible tariffs, we want no tariffs | 0:16:15 | 0:16:18 | |
are taught. My personal view is
that, has made a profound mistake in | 0:16:18 | 0:16:23 | |
deciding that it wants to leave the
customs union. If you want to help | 0:16:23 | 0:16:28 | |
deal with the very serious question
of the border between Northern | 0:16:28 | 0:16:32 | |
Ireland and the Republic of Ireland,
the way you do that is to stay in | 0:16:32 | 0:16:36 | |
the customs union and I hope, will
change its mind. But the Labour | 0:16:36 | 0:16:42 | |
Party is simply saying in the House
of Commons, we want a better deal | 0:16:42 | 0:16:45 | |
than what, has been able to get? It
depends how the negotiations unfold. | 0:16:45 | 0:16:52 | |
, has ended up on the transitional
arrangements in the place that Keir | 0:16:52 | 0:16:57 | |
Starmer set out on behalf of the
shadow cabinet in August, when he | 0:16:57 | 0:17:03 | |
said, we will need to stay in the
single market and the customs union | 0:17:03 | 0:17:07 | |
for the duration of the transition,
and I think that is the position, | 0:17:07 | 0:17:10 | |
has now reached. It has not been
helped by differences of view within | 0:17:10 | 0:17:15 | |
the Cabinet, and a lot of time has
passed and there's proved time left | 0:17:15 | 0:17:19 | |
and we have not even got on to the
negotiations. -- there's very little | 0:17:19 | 0:17:24 | |
time left. On phase two, the labour
Party have set out six clear tests, | 0:17:24 | 0:17:30 | |
and two of them are crucial. You say
you want the exact same benefits we | 0:17:30 | 0:17:34 | |
currently have in the customs union
but you also want to be able to | 0:17:34 | 0:17:38 | |
ensure the fair migration to control
immigration, basically, which does | 0:17:38 | 0:17:42 | |
sound a bit like having your cake
and eating it. You say that you will | 0:17:42 | 0:17:46 | |
vote against any deal that doesn't
give you all of that, the exact same | 0:17:46 | 0:17:50 | |
benefits of the single market, and
allowing you to control migration. | 0:17:50 | 0:17:54 | |
But you say no deal would be
catastrophic if so it seems to me | 0:17:54 | 0:17:57 | |
you're unlikely to get the deal that
you could vote for but you don't | 0:17:57 | 0:18:01 | |
want to vote for no deal? We
absolutely don't want a no deal. | 0:18:01 | 0:18:06 | |
Businesses have sent a letter to the
Prime Minister saying that a | 0:18:06 | 0:18:11 | |
transition is essential because the
possibility of a no deal and no | 0:18:11 | 0:18:14 | |
transitional would be very damaging
for the economy. We fought the | 0:18:14 | 0:18:17 | |
general election on a policy of
seeking to retain the benefits of | 0:18:17 | 0:18:20 | |
the single market and the customs
union. Keir Starmer said on behalf | 0:18:20 | 0:18:24 | |
of the shadow government that as far
as the longer term arrangements are | 0:18:24 | 0:18:29 | |
concerned, that should leave all
options on the table, because it is | 0:18:29 | 0:18:32 | |
the end that you're trying to
achieve and you then find the means | 0:18:32 | 0:18:36 | |
to support it. So we're setting out
very clearly those tests. If you | 0:18:36 | 0:18:41 | |
were to vote down an agreement
because it did not meet your tests, | 0:18:41 | 0:18:45 | |
and there was time to send, back to
the EU to get a better deal, then | 0:18:45 | 0:18:50 | |
you would have significantly
weakened their negotiating hand | 0:18:50 | 0:18:52 | |
chukka that doesn't help them? I
don't think, has deployed its | 0:18:52 | 0:18:57 | |
negotiating hand very strongly thus
far. Because we had a general | 0:18:57 | 0:19:01 | |
election which meant that we lost
time that we would have used for | 0:19:01 | 0:19:04 | |
negotiating. We still don't know
what kind of long-term trade and | 0:19:04 | 0:19:08 | |
market access deal, wants. The Prime
Minister says, I don't want a deal | 0:19:08 | 0:19:15 | |
like Canada and I don't want a deal
like the European Economic Area. But | 0:19:15 | 0:19:19 | |
we still don't know what kind of
deal they want. With about 12 months | 0:19:19 | 0:19:24 | |
to go, the other thing, needs to do
is to set out very clearly above all | 0:19:24 | 0:19:28 | |
for the benefit of the other 27
European countries, what kind of | 0:19:28 | 0:19:32 | |
deal it wants. When I travel to
Europe and talk to those involved in | 0:19:32 | 0:19:36 | |
the negotiations, you see other
leaders saying, we don't actually | 0:19:36 | 0:19:41 | |
know what Britain wants. With a year
to go it is about time we made that | 0:19:41 | 0:19:44 | |
clear. One related question on the
European Union - you spoke in your | 0:19:44 | 0:19:50 | |
famous speech in Syria about the
international brigades in Spain, and | 0:19:50 | 0:19:54 | |
I wonder if your solidarity with
them leads you to think that the UK | 0:19:54 | 0:19:58 | |
Government should be recognising
Catalonia is an independent state? | 0:19:58 | 0:20:01 | |
No, I don't think so. It is a very
difficult and potentially dangerous | 0:20:01 | 0:20:06 | |
situation in Catalonia at the
moment. Direct rule from Madrid is | 0:20:06 | 0:20:12 | |
not a long-term solution. There
needs to be a negotiation, and | 0:20:12 | 0:20:17 | |
elections will give Catalonia the
chance to take that decision, but I | 0:20:17 | 0:20:20 | |
am not clear what the declaration of
independence actually means. Are | 0:20:20 | 0:20:27 | |
they going to be borders, is they're
going to be an army? There will have | 0:20:27 | 0:20:31 | |
to be some agreement. Catalonia has
already had a high degree of | 0:20:31 | 0:20:34 | |
autonomy. It may like some more, and
it seems to me if you look at the | 0:20:34 | 0:20:39 | |
experience here in the United
Kingdom, that is the way to go, not | 0:20:39 | 0:20:44 | |
a constitutional stand-off. And I
really hope nobody is charged with | 0:20:44 | 0:20:47 | |
rebellion, because actually that
would make matters worse. | 0:20:47 | 0:20:52 | |
Now, the Government has this
week reopened the public | 0:20:52 | 0:20:56 | |
consultation on plans for a third
runway at Heathrow. | 0:20:56 | 0:20:58 | |
While ministers are clear
the £18 billion project | 0:20:58 | 0:21:00 | |
is still the preferred option,
new data raises further questions | 0:21:00 | 0:21:02 | |
about the environmental
impact of expansion, | 0:21:02 | 0:21:04 | |
and offers an improved
economic case for a second | 0:21:04 | 0:21:06 | |
runway at Gatwick instead. | 0:21:06 | 0:21:07 | |
So, with opponents on all sides
of the Commons, does the Government | 0:21:07 | 0:21:10 | |
still have the votes to get
the plans off the ground? | 0:21:10 | 0:21:12 | |
Here's Elizabeth Glinka. | 0:21:12 | 0:21:22 | |
The debate over the expansion
of Heathrow has been | 0:21:26 | 0:21:28 | |
going on for decades. | 0:21:28 | 0:21:29 | |
Plans for a third runway
were first introduced | 0:21:29 | 0:21:32 | |
by the Labour government in 2003. | 0:21:32 | 0:21:33 | |
Then, after spending millions
of pounds, finally, in 2015, | 0:21:33 | 0:21:37 | |
the airport commission recommended
that those plans go ahead, | 0:21:37 | 0:21:42 | |
and the government position
appeared to be fixed. | 0:21:42 | 0:21:46 | |
But, of course, since then,
we've had a general election. | 0:21:46 | 0:21:48 | |
The Government have lost
their Commons majority. | 0:21:48 | 0:21:52 | |
And with opposition on both front
benches, the Parliamentary | 0:21:52 | 0:21:55 | |
arithmetic looks a little bit up
in the air. | 0:21:55 | 0:22:00 | |
A lot has changed since the airport
commission produced its report, | 0:22:00 | 0:22:03 | |
and that don't forget
was the bedrock for the Government's | 0:22:03 | 0:22:05 | |
decision, that's why the government
supposedly made the decision | 0:22:05 | 0:22:07 | |
that it made. | 0:22:07 | 0:22:09 | |
But most of the assumptions
made in that report have | 0:22:09 | 0:22:12 | |
been undermined since,
by data on passenger numbers, | 0:22:12 | 0:22:14 | |
on economic benefits, and more
than anything, on pollution. | 0:22:14 | 0:22:17 | |
There's demand from international
carriers to get into Heathrow. | 0:22:17 | 0:22:20 | |
More and more people want to fly. | 0:22:20 | 0:22:22 | |
And after the referendum,
connectivity post-Brexit | 0:22:22 | 0:22:25 | |
is going to be absolutely critical
to the UK economy, so if anything, | 0:22:25 | 0:22:29 | |
I think the case is stronger
for expansion at Heathrow. | 0:22:29 | 0:22:35 | |
A vote on expansion had been due
to take place this summer. | 0:22:35 | 0:22:38 | |
But with Westminster somewhat
distracted, that didn't happen. | 0:22:38 | 0:22:40 | |
Now, fresh data means
the Government has had to reopen | 0:22:40 | 0:22:43 | |
the public consultation. | 0:22:43 | 0:22:48 | |
But it maintains the case
for Heathrow is as strong as ever, | 0:22:48 | 0:22:52 | |
delivering benefits of up
to £74 billion to the wider economy. | 0:22:52 | 0:22:57 | |
And in any case, the Government
says, action must be taken, | 0:22:57 | 0:22:59 | |
as all five of London's airports
will be completely | 0:22:59 | 0:23:04 | |
full by the mid-2030s. | 0:23:04 | 0:23:08 | |
Still, the new research does cast
an alternative expansion at Gatwick | 0:23:08 | 0:23:11 | |
in a more favourable economic light,
while showing Heathrow | 0:23:11 | 0:23:15 | |
is now less likely to meet
its environmental targets. | 0:23:15 | 0:23:22 | |
Campaigners like these in Hounslow
sense the wind is shifting. | 0:23:22 | 0:23:27 | |
We're feeling encouraged,
because we see all kinds | 0:23:27 | 0:23:29 | |
of weaknesses in the argument. | 0:23:29 | 0:23:31 | |
Certainly, quite a few MPs,
I think certainly Labour MPs, | 0:23:31 | 0:23:34 | |
are beginning to think perhaps it's
not such a great idea | 0:23:34 | 0:23:37 | |
to have a third runway. | 0:23:37 | 0:23:40 | |
Their MP is convinced colleagues
can now be persuaded | 0:23:40 | 0:23:42 | |
to see things their way. | 0:23:42 | 0:23:44 | |
The Labour Party quite
rightly set four key tests | 0:23:44 | 0:23:46 | |
for a third runway at Heathrow. | 0:23:46 | 0:23:49 | |
And in my view,
Heathrow is not able... | 0:23:49 | 0:23:52 | |
The Heathrow option is not able
to pass any of those. | 0:23:52 | 0:23:56 | |
So, I see a lot of colleagues
in the Labour Party around | 0:23:56 | 0:23:59 | |
the country beginning
to think twice. | 0:23:59 | 0:24:02 | |
And if you look at the cross-party
MPs supportin this anti-Heathrow | 0:24:02 | 0:24:07 | |
And if you look at the cross-party
MPs supporting this anti-Heathrow | 0:24:07 | 0:24:11 | |
protest this week, you will see
some familiar faces. | 0:24:11 | 0:24:13 | |
You know my position -
as the constituency MP, | 0:24:13 | 0:24:15 | |
I'm totally opposed. | 0:24:15 | 0:24:16 | |
I think this is another indication
of just the difficulties | 0:24:16 | 0:24:19 | |
the Government have got off
of implementing this policy. | 0:24:19 | 0:24:21 | |
I don't think it's going to happen,
I just don't think | 0:24:21 | 0:24:24 | |
it's going to happen. | 0:24:24 | 0:24:25 | |
So, if some on the Labour
front bench are, shall | 0:24:25 | 0:24:27 | |
we say, not supportive,
what about the other side? | 0:24:27 | 0:24:30 | |
In a free vote, we could have had up
to 60 Conservative MPs | 0:24:30 | 0:24:33 | |
voting against expansion,
that's the number that is normally | 0:24:33 | 0:24:35 | |
used and I think it's right. | 0:24:35 | 0:24:37 | |
In the circumstances where it
requires an active rebellion, | 0:24:37 | 0:24:39 | |
the numbers would be fewer. | 0:24:39 | 0:24:40 | |
I can't tell you what that
number is, but I can tell | 0:24:40 | 0:24:43 | |
you that there are people right
the way through the party, | 0:24:43 | 0:24:46 | |
from the backbenches
to the heart of the government, | 0:24:46 | 0:24:48 | |
who will vote against
Heathrow expansion. | 0:24:48 | 0:24:50 | |
And yet the SNP, whose Commons
votes could prove vital, | 0:24:50 | 0:24:53 | |
are behind the Heathrow plan,
which promises more | 0:24:53 | 0:24:55 | |
connecting flights. | 0:24:55 | 0:24:56 | |
And other supporters are convinced
they have the numbers. | 0:24:56 | 0:25:00 | |
There is a majority of members
of Parliament that support Heathrow | 0:25:00 | 0:25:04 | |
expansion, and when that is put
to the test, whenever that will be, | 0:25:04 | 0:25:07 | |
I think that will be
clearly demonstrated. | 0:25:07 | 0:25:08 | |
Any vote on this issue
won't come until next summer. | 0:25:08 | 0:25:11 | |
For both sides, yet more time
to argue about weather | 0:25:11 | 0:25:13 | |
the plans should take off
or be permanently grounded. | 0:25:13 | 0:25:20 | |
Elizabeth Glinka there. | 0:25:24 | 0:25:25 | |
And I'm joined now by the former
Cabinet minister Theresa Villiers, | 0:25:25 | 0:25:28 | |
who oversaw aviation policy
as a transport minister | 0:25:28 | 0:25:30 | |
under David Cameron. | 0:25:30 | 0:25:37 | |
Thanks for coming in. You have made
your opposition to a third runway at | 0:25:37 | 0:25:42 | |
Heathrow consistently clear. , have
reopened this consultation but it is | 0:25:42 | 0:25:46 | |
still clearly their preferred
option? It is but what I have always | 0:25:46 | 0:25:50 | |
asked is, why try to build a new
runway at Heathrow when you can | 0:25:50 | 0:25:53 | |
build one at Gatwick in half the
time, for half the cost and with a | 0:25:53 | 0:25:57 | |
tiny fraction of the environment
will cost average is that true, | 0:25:57 | 0:26:01 | |
though? Private finance is already
to go at Heathrow, because that's | 0:26:01 | 0:26:04 | |
where people want to do it and
that's where the private backers | 0:26:04 | 0:26:08 | |
want to put it. It would take much
longer to get the private finance | 0:26:08 | 0:26:11 | |
for Gatwick? Part of that private
finance is passengers of the future, | 0:26:11 | 0:26:16 | |
but also, the costs of the surface
transport needed to expand Heathrow | 0:26:16 | 0:26:21 | |
is phenomenal. I mean, TfL estimates
vary between £10 billion and £15 | 0:26:21 | 0:26:29 | |
billion. And there's no suggestion
that those private backers are going | 0:26:29 | 0:26:33 | |
to meet those costs. So, this is a
hugely expensive project as well as | 0:26:33 | 0:26:38 | |
one which will create very
significant damage. Heathrow is | 0:26:38 | 0:26:42 | |
ultimately where passengers and
airlines want to go to, isn't it? | 0:26:42 | 0:26:44 | |
Every slot is practically full.
Every time a new one comes up, it is | 0:26:44 | 0:26:49 | |
up immediately, it's a very popular
airport. Gatwick is not where they | 0:26:49 | 0:26:55 | |
want to go? There are many airlines
and passengers who do want to fly | 0:26:55 | 0:26:58 | |
from Gatwick, and all the forecasts
indicate that a new runway there | 0:26:58 | 0:27:02 | |
would be full of planes very
rapidly. But I think the key thing | 0:27:02 | 0:27:06 | |
is that successive elements have
said, technology will deliver a way | 0:27:06 | 0:27:12 | |
to resolve the around noise and air
quality. I don't have any confidence | 0:27:12 | 0:27:17 | |
that science has demonstrated that
technology will deliver those | 0:27:17 | 0:27:22 | |
solutions to these very serious
environmental limbs which have | 0:27:22 | 0:27:26 | |
stopped Heathrow expansion for
decades. Jim Fitzpatrick in the film | 0:27:26 | 0:27:28 | |
was mentioning that people think
there is a need for even more | 0:27:28 | 0:27:33 | |
collectivity in Britain post-Brexit.
We know that business has been | 0:27:33 | 0:27:36 | |
crying out for more routes, they
really think it hurts business | 0:27:36 | 0:27:40 | |
expansion that we don't get on with
this. More consultation is just | 0:27:40 | 0:27:44 | |
going to lead to more delay, isn't
it? This is a hugely controversial | 0:27:44 | 0:27:48 | |
decision. There is a reason why
people have been talking about | 0:27:48 | 0:27:51 | |
expanding Heathrow for 50 years and
it is never happened, it's because | 0:27:51 | 0:27:55 | |
it's a bad idea. So, inevitably the
legal processes are very complex. | 0:27:55 | 0:28:00 | |
One of my anxieties about, pursuing
this option is that potentially it | 0:28:00 | 0:28:04 | |
means another lost decade for
airport expansion. Because the | 0:28:04 | 0:28:07 | |
problems with Heathrow expansion are
so serious, I believe that's one of | 0:28:07 | 0:28:13 | |
the reasons why I advocated, anyone
who wants a new runway in the | 0:28:13 | 0:28:16 | |
south-east should be backing Gatwick
is a much more deliverable option. | 0:28:16 | 0:28:20 | |
Let me move on to Brexit. We were
talking with Hilary Benn about a | 0:28:20 | 0:28:26 | |
meaningful vote being given to the
House of Commons chukka how | 0:28:26 | 0:28:29 | |
important do you think that is? Of
course the Commons will vote on | 0:28:29 | 0:28:32 | |
this. The Commons is going to vote
on this many, many times. We have | 0:28:32 | 0:28:38 | |
also had a hugely important vote not
only in the referendum on the 23rd | 0:28:38 | 0:28:41 | |
of June but also on Article 50. But
will that vote allow any changes to | 0:28:41 | 0:28:45 | |
it? Hilary Benn seemed to think that
the Commons would be able to shape | 0:28:45 | 0:28:51 | |
the deal with the vote. But actually
is it going to be, saying, take it | 0:28:51 | 0:28:55 | |
or leave it at all what we have
negotiated? Our Prime Minister | 0:28:55 | 0:29:00 | |
negotiates on our behalf
internationally. It's | 0:29:00 | 0:29:05 | |
well-established precedent that
after an agreement is reached | 0:29:05 | 0:29:08 | |
overseas, then it is considered in
the House of Commons. What if it was | 0:29:08 | 0:29:13 | |
voted down in the House of Commons?
Well, the legal effect of that would | 0:29:13 | 0:29:18 | |
be that we left the European Union
without any kind of deal, because | 0:29:18 | 0:29:20 | |
the key decision was on the voting
of Article 50 as an irreversible | 0:29:20 | 0:29:25 | |
decision. Is it irreversible,
though? We understand, may have had | 0:29:25 | 0:29:31 | |
legal advice saying that Yukon
stopped the clock on Article 50. | 0:29:31 | 0:29:34 | |
Would it not be possible if the
Commons voted against to ask the | 0:29:34 | 0:29:38 | |
European Union for a little bit more
time to try and renegotiate? There | 0:29:38 | 0:29:41 | |
is a debate about the reversibility
of Article 50. But the key point is | 0:29:41 | 0:29:50 | |
that we are all working for a good
deal for the United Kingdom and the | 0:29:50 | 0:29:55 | |
I'm concerned that some of the
amendments to the legislation are | 0:29:55 | 0:30:00 | |
not about the nature of the deal at
the end of the process, they're just | 0:30:00 | 0:30:03 | |
about frustrating the process. I
think that would be wrong. I think | 0:30:03 | 0:30:09 | |
we should respect the result of the
referendum. Will it be by next | 0:30:09 | 0:30:12 | |
summer, so there is time for
Parliament and for other | 0:30:12 | 0:30:15 | |
parliaments? I certainly hope that
we get that agreement between the | 0:30:15 | 0:30:18 | |
two sides, and the recent European
summit seemed to indicate a | 0:30:18 | 0:30:24 | |
willingness from the European side
to be constructive. But one point | 0:30:24 | 0:30:27 | |
where I think Hilary Benn has a
point, if we do secure agreement on | 0:30:27 | 0:30:32 | |
a transitional deal, that does
potentially give us more time to | 0:30:32 | 0:30:35 | |
work on the details of a trade
agreement. I hope we get as much as | 0:30:35 | 0:30:39 | |
possible in place before exit day.
But filling out some of that detail | 0:30:39 | 0:30:43 | |
is made easier if we can secure that
two-year transitional deal. | 0:30:43 | 0:30:52 | |
That is interesting because a lot of
Brexiteers what the deal to be done | 0:30:52 | 0:30:58 | |
by the inflammation period, it is
not a time for that. I fully | 0:30:58 | 0:31:06 | |
recognise we need compromise, I am
keen to work with people across my | 0:31:06 | 0:31:11 | |
party in terms of spectrum of
opinion, and with other parties as | 0:31:11 | 0:31:14 | |
well to ensure we get the best
outcome. Let me ask you briefly | 0:31:14 | 0:31:20 | |
before you go about the possible
culture of sexual harassment in the | 0:31:20 | 0:31:24 | |
House of commons and Theresa May
will write to the Speaker of the | 0:31:24 | 0:31:29 | |
House of Commons to make sure there
is a better way that people can | 0:31:29 | 0:31:32 | |
report sexual harassment in the
House of commons. Is that necessary? | 0:31:32 | 0:31:37 | |
A better procedure is needed. It is
sad it has taken this controversy to | 0:31:37 | 0:31:42 | |
push this forward. But there is a
problem with MPs who are individual | 0:31:42 | 0:31:47 | |
employers. If you work for an MP and
have a complaint against them, | 0:31:47 | 0:31:52 | |
essentially they are overseeing
their own complaints process. I | 0:31:52 | 0:31:56 | |
think a role for the House of
commons authorities in ensuring that | 0:31:56 | 0:32:00 | |
those complaints are properly dealt
with I think would be very helpful, | 0:32:00 | 0:32:04 | |
so I think the Prime Minister's
letter was a sensible move. So you | 0:32:04 | 0:32:09 | |
think there is a culture of sexual
harassment in the House of commons? | 0:32:09 | 0:32:12 | |
I have not been subjected to it or
seen evidence of it, but obviously | 0:32:12 | 0:32:19 | |
there is anxiety and allegations
have made their way into the papers | 0:32:19 | 0:32:23 | |
and they should be treated
appropriately and properly | 0:32:23 | 0:32:26 | |
investigated. Thank you for talking
to us. | 0:32:26 | 0:32:28 | |
Thank you for talking to us. | 0:32:28 | 0:32:30 | |
Next week the Lord Speaker's
committee publishes its final report | 0:32:30 | 0:32:33 | |
into reducing the size
of the House of Lords. | 0:32:33 | 0:32:35 | |
With over 800 members the upper
house is the second largest | 0:32:35 | 0:32:37 | |
legislative chamber in the world
after the National People's | 0:32:37 | 0:32:39 | |
Congress of China. | 0:32:39 | 0:32:40 | |
The report is expected to recommend
that new peerages should be | 0:32:40 | 0:32:43 | |
time-limited to 15 years and that
in the future political peerage | 0:32:43 | 0:32:46 | |
appointments will also be tied
to a party's election performance. | 0:32:46 | 0:32:50 | |
The government has been under
pressure to take action to cut | 0:32:50 | 0:32:53 | |
members of the unelected chamber,
where they are entitled | 0:32:53 | 0:32:56 | |
to claim an attendance
allowance of £300 a day. | 0:32:56 | 0:33:00 | |
And once again these expenses
have been in the news. | 0:33:00 | 0:33:03 | |
The Electoral Reform Society
discovered that 16 peers had claimed | 0:33:03 | 0:33:06 | |
around £400,000 without speaking
in any debates or submitting any | 0:33:06 | 0:33:09 | |
questions for an entire year. | 0:33:09 | 0:33:12 | |
One of the Lords to be
criticised was Digby Jones, | 0:33:12 | 0:33:15 | |
the crossbencher and former trade
minister, he hasn't spoken | 0:33:15 | 0:33:18 | |
in the Lords since April 2016
and has voted only seven times | 0:33:18 | 0:33:22 | |
during 2016 and 2017. | 0:33:22 | 0:33:25 | |
Yet he has claimed around
£15,000 in this period. | 0:33:25 | 0:33:28 | |
When asked what he does
in the House he said, | 0:33:28 | 0:33:31 | |
"I go in and I will invite for lunch
or meet with inward | 0:33:31 | 0:33:34 | |
investors into the country. | 0:33:34 | 0:33:36 | |
I fly the flag for Britain." | 0:33:36 | 0:33:39 | |
Well, we can speak now
to Lord Jones who joins us | 0:33:39 | 0:33:41 | |
from Stratford Upon Avon. | 0:33:41 | 0:33:45 | |
Thank you very much for talking to
us. You provide value for money in | 0:33:45 | 0:33:50 | |
the House of Lords do you think?
Definitely. I am, by the way, very | 0:33:50 | 0:33:57 | |
keen on reform. I want to see that
15 year tide. I would like to see a | 0:33:57 | 0:34:02 | |
time limit, an age limit of 75 or
80. I would like attendants | 0:34:02 | 0:34:08 | |
definitely define so the whole
public understood what people are | 0:34:08 | 0:34:12 | |
paying for and why. The £300, as a
crossbencher I get no support, and | 0:34:12 | 0:34:18 | |
nor do I want any, speech writing,
secretarial assistance, none of | 0:34:18 | 0:34:26 | |
that, and the £300 goes towards
that. Whilst you are in there | 0:34:26 | 0:34:31 | |
because we will talk about the
reform of the Lords in general, but | 0:34:31 | 0:34:35 | |
in terms of you yourself, you say
you invite people in for lunch, is | 0:34:35 | 0:34:39 | |
it not possible for you to take part
in debates and votes and ask | 0:34:39 | 0:34:43 | |
questions at the same time? Have you
ever listened to a debate in the | 0:34:43 | 0:34:48 | |
laws? Yes, many times. Yes, many
times. You have to put your name | 0:34:48 | 0:35:00 | |
down in advance and you have to be
there for the whole debate. You have | 0:35:00 | 0:35:08 | |
to be around when the vote is called
and you do not know when the book is | 0:35:08 | 0:35:12 | |
called, you have no idea when the
boat is going to be called. This is | 0:35:12 | 0:35:16 | |
part of being a member of the House
of Lords and what it means. If you | 0:35:16 | 0:35:22 | |
are not prepared to wait or take
part in debates, why do you want to | 0:35:22 | 0:35:26 | |
be a member? It is possible to
resign from the House of Lords. | 0:35:26 | 0:35:30 | |
There are many things members of the
Lords do that does not relate to | 0:35:30 | 0:35:34 | |
parrot fashion following somebody
else, which I refuse to do, about | 0:35:34 | 0:35:39 | |
speaking to an empty chamber, or
indeed hanging on sometimes for | 0:35:39 | 0:35:44 | |
hours to vote. There are many other
things that you do. You quote me as | 0:35:44 | 0:35:49 | |
saying I will entertain at lunchtime
or show people around the House, | 0:35:49 | 0:35:54 | |
everything from schoolchildren to
inward investors. I will meet | 0:35:54 | 0:35:57 | |
ministers about big business issues
or educational issues, and at the | 0:35:57 | 0:36:01 | |
same time I will meet other members
of the Lords to get things moving. | 0:36:01 | 0:36:06 | |
None of that relates to going into
the House and getting on your hind | 0:36:06 | 0:36:09 | |
legs, although I do go in and sit
there and learn and listen to | 0:36:09 | 0:36:13 | |
others, which, if more people would
receive and not transmit, we might | 0:36:13 | 0:36:20 | |
get a better informed society. At
the same time many times I will go | 0:36:20 | 0:36:23 | |
after I have listened and I am
leaving and if I have not heard the | 0:36:23 | 0:36:28 | |
debate, I will not vote. Voting is
an essential part of being part of a | 0:36:28 | 0:36:34 | |
legislative chamber. This is not
just an executive committee, it is a | 0:36:34 | 0:36:40 | |
legislature, surpassing that law is
essential, is it not? Do you really | 0:36:40 | 0:36:45 | |
believe that an MP or a member of
the Lords who has not heard a moment | 0:36:45 | 0:36:49 | |
of the debate, who is then listening
to the Bell, walks in and does not | 0:36:49 | 0:36:55 | |
know which lobby, the whips tell
him, they have not heard the debate | 0:36:55 | 0:36:59 | |
and they do not know what they are
voting on and they go and do it? | 0:36:59 | 0:37:04 | |
That is your democracy? Voting seems
to be an essential part of this | 0:37:04 | 0:37:10 | |
chamber, and you have your ideas
about reforming the chamber. It | 0:37:10 | 0:37:15 | |
sounds as though you would reform
yourself out of it. You say people | 0:37:15 | 0:37:18 | |
who are not voting and who are not
taking part in debate should no | 0:37:18 | 0:37:22 | |
longer be members of the House. I
did not say that. I said we ought to | 0:37:22 | 0:37:29 | |
redefine what attendance means and
then if you do not attend on the new | 0:37:29 | 0:37:33 | |
criteria, you do not have to come
ever again, we will give you your | 0:37:33 | 0:37:37 | |
wish. I agree attendance might mean
unless you speak, you are going. | 0:37:37 | 0:37:43 | |
Fair enough, if that is what is
agreed, yes. Sometimes I would speak | 0:37:43 | 0:37:48 | |
and sometimes I would not. If I did
not, then off I go. Similarly after | 0:37:48 | 0:37:54 | |
15 years, off you go. If you reach
75 or 80, off you go. Why do we have | 0:37:54 | 0:38:00 | |
92 members who are only there
because of daddy. You are talking | 0:38:00 | 0:38:05 | |
about hereditary peers. You would
like to reduce the House to what | 0:38:05 | 0:38:08 | |
kind of number? I would get it down
to 400. You would get rid of half | 0:38:08 | 0:38:15 | |
the peers there at the moment? You
think you are active enough to | 0:38:15 | 0:38:19 | |
remain as one of the 400? No, I said
that might well include me. Let's | 0:38:19 | 0:38:26 | |
get a set of criteria, let's push it
through, because the laws is losing | 0:38:26 | 0:38:31 | |
respect in the whole of the country
because there are too many and all | 0:38:31 | 0:38:35 | |
these things about what people pay
for. I bet most people think the | 0:38:35 | 0:38:39 | |
money you get is paid. It is not, it
is re-funding for all the things you | 0:38:39 | 0:38:44 | |
have to pay for yourself. But I
understand how respect has been lost | 0:38:44 | 0:38:50 | |
in society. Let's change it now.
Let's get it through and then, yes, | 0:38:50 | 0:38:55 | |
if you do not meet the criteria, you
have got to go and that includes me. | 0:38:55 | 0:39:00 | |
Lloyd Jones, thank you for talking
to us. | 0:39:00 | 0:39:02 | |
Lloyd Jones, thank
you for talking to us. | 0:39:02 | 0:39:04 | |
It's coming up to 11.40,
you're watching the Sunday Politics. | 0:39:04 | 0:39:07 | |
Coming up on the programme,
we'll be talking to the former | 0:39:07 | 0:39:09 | |
business minister and Conservative
MP Anna Soubry about the Brexit | 0:39:09 | 0:39:12 | |
negotiations and claims of sexual
harassment in Parliament. | 0:39:12 | 0:39:23 | |
Hello and welcome to
Sunday Politics, here | 0:39:23 | 0:39:25 | |
in the glorious west of England. | 0:39:25 | 0:39:27 | |
I hope you remembered
to put your clocks back. | 0:39:27 | 0:39:31 | |
Well, coming up this week,
just how much do university | 0:39:31 | 0:39:33 | |
bosses deserve to be paid? | 0:39:33 | 0:39:35 | |
How does £500,000 sound? | 0:39:35 | 0:39:38 | |
It's what the vice-chancellor
of the University of Bath gets. | 0:39:38 | 0:39:41 | |
And now she is under increasing
pressure to stand down. | 0:39:41 | 0:39:47 | |
Well, I'm joined this week by two
MPs who are worth every penny | 0:39:47 | 0:39:50 | |
of our generous appearance fees,
which is nothing. | 0:39:50 | 0:39:52 | |
They do it because they love you. | 0:39:52 | 0:39:54 | |
They are the Conservative MP
for Cheltenham Alex Chalk. | 0:39:54 | 0:39:57 | |
As well as the Lib Dem MP
for Bath, Wera Hobhouse. | 0:39:57 | 0:40:00 | |
Welcome to you both. | 0:40:00 | 0:40:05 | |
Let's start with the latest
developments over Brexit. | 0:40:05 | 0:40:07 | |
Wera, do you think there
is going to be a deal or not? | 0:40:07 | 0:40:11 | |
I think it looks more and more
as if the government is struggling | 0:40:11 | 0:40:14 | |
to come up with a deal in time
that we can all vote on it. | 0:40:14 | 0:40:17 | |
That is obviously the democracy
that we want to see back in Britain. | 0:40:17 | 0:40:23 | |
If Parliament will not be able
to vote on the deal, | 0:40:23 | 0:40:25 | |
there is going to be a big disaster. | 0:40:25 | 0:40:35 | |
Do you think your friends in Europe
have got any intention | 0:40:35 | 0:40:38 | |
of giving us a deal? | 0:40:38 | 0:40:39 | |
I don't think it is up
for our friends in Europe to set | 0:40:39 | 0:40:42 | |
the timetable entirely. | 0:40:42 | 0:40:43 | |
But they are not
compromising the are they? | 0:40:43 | 0:40:45 | |
I think the government has got
also cards in their hand | 0:40:45 | 0:40:48 | |
that they can put on the table. | 0:40:48 | 0:40:49 | |
I'd say the first thing
would be moving towards | 0:40:49 | 0:40:51 | |
a solution on the money. | 0:40:52 | 0:40:53 | |
How much would you pay? | 0:40:53 | 0:40:56 | |
I wouldn't want to put
a sum on the table. | 0:40:56 | 0:40:59 | |
Come on. | 0:40:59 | 0:41:00 | |
20 billion? | 0:41:00 | 0:41:01 | |
30 billion? | 0:41:01 | 0:41:02 | |
40? | 0:41:02 | 0:41:04 | |
It is about headlines
that the government is making | 0:41:04 | 0:41:06 | |
in order to reassure their European
partners that the British | 0:41:06 | 0:41:08 | |
government is actually
going to stick to its commitment. | 0:41:08 | 0:41:16 | |
Alex, do you think there
is going to be a deal or not? | 0:41:16 | 0:41:19 | |
Well, I'm much more positive
than they are actually. | 0:41:19 | 0:41:21 | |
I think if you listen to the mood
music that is coming | 0:41:21 | 0:41:24 | |
from Angela Merkel, Donald Tusk,
it is quite clear that they think | 0:41:24 | 0:41:27 | |
it's in the interest of the EU 27
as well as in the interest of the UK | 0:41:27 | 0:41:31 | |
and it seems to be,
as I say, far more positive. | 0:41:31 | 0:41:33 | |
So, yeah, I'm pretty optimistic
and I'm optimistic that December | 0:41:33 | 0:41:36 | |
will be the time when they indicate
that we can move on to that | 0:41:36 | 0:41:39 | |
second stage, which,
as little as two weeks ago, | 0:41:39 | 0:41:41 | |
people were thinking
might never happen. | 0:41:41 | 0:41:43 | |
But across the channel they look
at Britain and they see | 0:41:43 | 0:41:45 | |
the government apparently all over
the place with different factions | 0:41:45 | 0:41:48 | |
and they think, well,
let's push for a harder settlement | 0:41:48 | 0:41:50 | |
than we might otherwise
get because they are | 0:41:50 | 0:41:52 | |
so divided among themselves. | 0:41:52 | 0:41:53 | |
Look, I think sometimes these
things are overblown. | 0:41:53 | 0:41:55 | |
Of course there are differences
of emphasis but the government | 0:41:55 | 0:41:57 | |
and the Cabinet are absolutely
united around the Florence speech. | 0:41:57 | 0:42:00 | |
There is a real sense of mission
and solidity and, you know, | 0:42:00 | 0:42:03 | |
I think we're in good shape
and I think from December we're | 0:42:03 | 0:42:06 | |
going to negotiate a deal. | 0:42:06 | 0:42:07 | |
That's only a month
away so we shall see. | 0:42:07 | 0:42:09 | |
We must move on because I think we
might be talking about Brexit again. | 0:42:09 | 0:42:12 | |
Just a thought. | 0:42:12 | 0:42:13 | |
A former Labour minister weighed
into the row over the head | 0:42:13 | 0:42:16 | |
of Bath University's pay this week. | 0:42:16 | 0:42:17 | |
Dame Glynis Breakwell has attracted
widespread criticism | 0:42:17 | 0:42:19 | |
for her pay packet of nearly
£500,000 plus perks. | 0:42:19 | 0:42:21 | |
Well, now Lord Adonis has offered
to do her job for free and to sell | 0:42:21 | 0:42:25 | |
up her grace and favour house
and give the money to the students. | 0:42:25 | 0:42:32 | |
Is your pay justified,
Professor Breakwell? | 0:42:32 | 0:42:34 | |
It's a question she hasn't
yet publicly answered. | 0:42:34 | 0:42:37 | |
Under attack for months,
Glynis Breakwell was escorted | 0:42:37 | 0:42:39 | |
away after a meeting
of Bath University's | 0:42:39 | 0:42:41 | |
governing council. | 0:42:41 | 0:42:46 | |
They had just announced changes. | 0:42:46 | 0:42:48 | |
She will stand down
from the committee which sets | 0:42:48 | 0:42:50 | |
the pay of senior staff
and there will be | 0:42:50 | 0:42:53 | |
a governance review. | 0:42:53 | 0:42:54 | |
Reaction was mixed. | 0:42:54 | 0:42:55 | |
Too little, too late. | 0:42:55 | 0:42:56 | |
If they were serious about it
they could have done this years ago. | 0:42:56 | 0:42:59 | |
They could have had some
proper transparency, | 0:42:59 | 0:43:03 | |
they could have brought in staff
and students to look | 0:43:03 | 0:43:05 | |
at the performance of
the Vice Chancellor. | 0:43:05 | 0:43:08 | |
It is not something
that we are proud of, it is damaging | 0:43:08 | 0:43:11 | |
to the University's reputation. | 0:43:11 | 0:43:14 | |
And the fact that they
are taking these steps | 0:43:14 | 0:43:16 | |
is really positive to see. | 0:43:16 | 0:43:18 | |
He knows there is a lot more to be
done to placate students angry | 0:43:18 | 0:43:22 | |
at how their fees are being spent. | 0:43:22 | 0:43:28 | |
We talk about it a lot
and it's just anger. | 0:43:28 | 0:43:30 | |
No one really agrees with the fact
that she gets paid to much. | 0:43:30 | 0:43:33 | |
I do think it's a bit of an outrage
that she's earning so much really | 0:43:33 | 0:43:37 | |
because as it's in the news a lot
at the moment, public sector | 0:43:37 | 0:43:40 | |
pay is kind of limited. | 0:43:40 | 0:43:41 | |
And seeing as though we are paying
nine grand a year, yeah, | 0:43:41 | 0:43:44 | |
it's a bit of a sting. | 0:43:44 | 0:43:45 | |
After months of adverse
publicity about her pay, | 0:43:45 | 0:43:54 | |
expenses and interest-free car
loan and the grand house | 0:43:54 | 0:43:57 | |
she lives in rent-free,
there are calls for her to go. | 0:43:57 | 0:43:59 | |
My own view is that the Vice
Chancellor should now stand down. | 0:43:59 | 0:44:02 | |
Get the University back onto an even
keel, recruit a successor, | 0:44:02 | 0:44:05 | |
sell this multi-million pound house
in the middle of Bath, | 0:44:05 | 0:44:07 | |
which the university has no
reason for owning at all. | 0:44:07 | 0:44:10 | |
Give that money back to student
and then I think the reputation | 0:44:10 | 0:44:12 | |
of the University will rapidly
recover because it has very good | 0:44:12 | 0:44:15 | |
academic staff, very good students. | 0:44:15 | 0:44:16 | |
It is being held back
by the Vice Chancellor | 0:44:16 | 0:44:18 | |
and the scandal over her salary
and that of other top managers. | 0:44:18 | 0:44:21 | |
Others are more understanding. | 0:44:21 | 0:44:22 | |
For while student numbers
have risen rapidly, | 0:44:22 | 0:44:24 | |
universities must compete hard. | 0:44:24 | 0:44:30 | |
There are many universities that
have seen their numbers drop, | 0:44:30 | 0:44:33 | |
as other universities have grown. | 0:44:33 | 0:44:34 | |
And this University in particular
has seen growth so, yes, | 0:44:34 | 0:44:37 | |
we're doing quite well but that
will be at the cost of other | 0:44:37 | 0:44:40 | |
universities around UK. | 0:44:40 | 0:44:41 | |
Does that mean then you think it's
justified to have salaries | 0:44:41 | 0:44:44 | |
as high as £450,000? | 0:44:44 | 0:44:46 | |
I think that salary is high but that
would be for Bath University | 0:44:46 | 0:44:49 | |
to determine as to whether or not
it's the right salary. | 0:44:49 | 0:44:53 | |
He gets no fancy house and his pay
is almost half that amount | 0:44:53 | 0:44:57 | |
but he will still have to explain it
when the government's new regulator, | 0:44:57 | 0:45:00 | |
the office for students,
starts work in January. | 0:45:00 | 0:45:03 | |
Universities in the future
will have to justify | 0:45:03 | 0:45:09 | |
paying their Vice Chancellors more
than the Prime Minister. | 0:45:09 | 0:45:12 | |
But places like this aren't the only
publicly funded organisations | 0:45:12 | 0:45:20 | |
with senior staff earning more
than £150,000 a year. | 0:45:20 | 0:45:22 | |
From local government
and the police to the NHS, | 0:45:22 | 0:45:25 | |
there are plenty of high earners. | 0:45:25 | 0:45:26 | |
In the West, Avon and Somerset's
Chief Constable earns £154,000. | 0:45:26 | 0:45:28 | |
Swindon borough council's chief exec
gets £164,000 and some NHS | 0:45:28 | 0:45:31 | |
consultants in Bristol
are paid £230,000. | 0:45:31 | 0:45:32 | |
But but as for it in the £450,000
mark, nationally, the BBC's | 0:45:32 | 0:45:42 | |
But as for hitting the £450,000
mark, nationally, the BBC's | 0:45:45 | 0:45:47 | |
director-general is among
the few who do. | 0:45:47 | 0:45:49 | |
Overall, though, top pay has come
down across most of the public | 0:45:49 | 0:45:52 | |
sector in recent years. | 0:45:52 | 0:45:53 | |
That is largely as a result
of falling funding. | 0:45:53 | 0:45:59 | |
Something universities
with their growing student numbers | 0:45:59 | 0:46:01 | |
have not experienced. | 0:46:01 | 0:46:02 | |
I'm pleased to say I'm joined
by Professor Len Shackleton | 0:46:02 | 0:46:05 | |
from the free-market think tank
the Institute of Economic Affairs. | 0:46:05 | 0:46:07 | |
He has written in defence of
the amount vice chancellors are paid | 0:46:07 | 0:46:10 | |
and he's in Westminster for us. | 0:46:10 | 0:46:11 | |
Thanks for coming on. | 0:46:11 | 0:46:13 | |
Is Dame Glynis worth every penny? | 0:46:13 | 0:46:17 | |
Well, I think that's
not for me to decide, | 0:46:17 | 0:46:19 | |
it's not for the Twitter
storm to decide. | 0:46:19 | 0:46:29 | |
I think it's for the governing body
at Bath University to decide | 0:46:29 | 0:46:32 | |
and it's up to them. | 0:46:32 | 0:46:33 | |
I really don't like the way
in which people are being picked | 0:46:33 | 0:46:36 | |
on and it's very interesting,
of course, in another part | 0:46:36 | 0:46:40 | |
of the woods people moan
about the gender pay back | 0:46:40 | 0:46:45 | |
and so forth got a lady
here who is one of the highest | 0:46:45 | 0:46:48 | |
earning vice chancellors in Britain
and of course she's been attacked. | 0:46:48 | 0:46:51 | |
Vice chancellors in the UK earn just
a fraction of what comparable people | 0:46:51 | 0:46:54 | |
do in the United States, Canada,
Australia, you name it. | 0:46:54 | 0:46:56 | |
So, yeah, I think she's probably
worth what she gets but as I say, | 0:46:56 | 0:46:59 | |
it's not my job to decide this. | 0:47:00 | 0:47:01 | |
It's not your job either. | 0:47:01 | 0:47:02 | |
No. | 0:47:02 | 0:47:03 | |
But she is running a charity,
so it's not a business | 0:47:03 | 0:47:06 | |
that can go bust. | 0:47:06 | 0:47:12 | |
And the students, the customers,
are taking out huge loans worried | 0:47:12 | 0:47:17 | |
whereas she's got an interest-free
loan for a car. | 0:47:17 | 0:47:19 | |
Well, talking about cars of course,
I mean, cars are a very | 0:47:19 | 0:47:22 | |
expensive consumer item,
cost as much as university places | 0:47:22 | 0:47:24 | |
but we don't insist that the chief
executive of car companies are paid | 0:47:24 | 0:47:27 | |
no more than the Prime Minister. | 0:47:27 | 0:47:29 | |
So, you know, it depends how
you pick these things. | 0:47:29 | 0:47:33 | |
Remember, universities are not
in the public sector, | 0:47:33 | 0:47:36 | |
they're not recognised
as being public sector by the OECD, | 0:47:36 | 0:47:38 | |
by international measurements. | 0:47:38 | 0:47:39 | |
They are private bodies and really,
when we lay down this kind of thing, | 0:47:39 | 0:47:43 | |
we should be really careful
I think. | 0:47:43 | 0:47:45 | |
OK, don't go away,
I shall come back to you. | 0:47:45 | 0:47:47 | |
Alex, do you agree? | 0:47:47 | 0:47:49 | |
Its free-market economics
and she's worth it. | 0:47:49 | 0:47:56 | |
No, Professor Shackleton,
with respect, has got it | 0:47:56 | 0:47:57 | |
completely wrong to suggest
their private bodies. | 0:47:57 | 0:47:59 | |
He ignores the fact that the tax
puts in, through teaching fees, | 0:47:59 | 0:48:02 | |
through research fees,
well over £10 billion a year. | 0:48:02 | 0:48:04 | |
And when you consider that
students as well as putting | 0:48:04 | 0:48:07 | |
in that kind of money,
it's absolutely right that | 0:48:07 | 0:48:09 | |
universities should have to justify,
not just to themselves, | 0:48:09 | 0:48:11 | |
but publicly as well
those sorts of things. | 0:48:11 | 0:48:16 | |
but publicly as well
those sorts of fees. | 0:48:16 | 0:48:18 | |
And my instinct is something
like over £500,000, that is very, | 0:48:18 | 0:48:21 | |
very difficult to justify and people
just got to get real. | 0:48:21 | 0:48:24 | |
He says it's up to the University. | 0:48:24 | 0:48:25 | |
Well, I don't think
that's good enough. | 0:48:25 | 0:48:27 | |
I mean, it's all very well for them
to justify it to themselves | 0:48:27 | 0:48:30 | |
but I think the public rightly
expects some kind of transparency | 0:48:30 | 0:48:33 | |
so that we can know that given that
public money is going in, | 0:48:33 | 0:48:36 | |
billions and billions
of scarce public resources, | 0:48:36 | 0:48:40 | |
that where there is exceptional pay,
there is exceptional | 0:48:40 | 0:48:42 | |
justification. | 0:48:42 | 0:48:43 | |
And that has got to be
a public judgment. | 0:48:43 | 0:48:45 | |
Let's hear from Wera. | 0:48:45 | 0:48:46 | |
She is your constituent. | 0:48:46 | 0:48:47 | |
She is. | 0:48:47 | 0:48:48 | |
So are you going to defend her? | 0:48:48 | 0:48:50 | |
I have never wanted
to pick on an individual. | 0:48:50 | 0:48:52 | |
It is about the governance
structure of the University. | 0:48:52 | 0:48:54 | |
And we need independent
oversight and good governance | 0:48:54 | 0:48:56 | |
so that the remuneration panel can
make a decision that is | 0:48:56 | 0:48:59 | |
open and transparent. | 0:48:59 | 0:49:00 | |
So it is not about picking
on individuals, it is | 0:49:00 | 0:49:03 | |
about the governance. | 0:49:03 | 0:49:13 | |
She's really been
pillared in the press | 0:49:14 | 0:49:15 | |
and virtually everywhere
about this, actually. | 0:49:15 | 0:49:17 | |
Do you think it crushes a woman? | 0:49:17 | 0:49:18 | |
Oh, an interesting point. | 0:49:18 | 0:49:19 | |
I don't think so. | 0:49:19 | 0:49:20 | |
I think it is because her pay
is exceptionally high and one | 0:49:20 | 0:49:23 | |
of the highest in the country. | 0:49:23 | 0:49:27 | |
It is important to stress
that the success of a University, | 0:49:27 | 0:49:29 | |
is not just down to one person. | 0:49:29 | 0:49:31 | |
The success of the University
is down to the lecturers, | 0:49:31 | 0:49:33 | |
the support staff and the students
themselves. | 0:49:33 | 0:49:35 | |
So just to justify that higher pay
because it is believed that one | 0:49:35 | 0:49:38 | |
person has made that success
of the University | 0:49:38 | 0:49:40 | |
is also not correct. | 0:49:40 | 0:49:41 | |
Let's go back to
Professor Shackleton. | 0:49:41 | 0:49:49 | |
Do you think that vastly overpaid
is the point that Alex is putting | 0:49:49 | 0:49:52 | |
in and the government pays
in billions into universities. | 0:49:52 | 0:49:57 | |
Well, government doesn't pay
directly from a large chunk | 0:49:57 | 0:49:59 | |
of what universities do and,
you know, a large proportion of | 0:49:59 | 0:50:02 | |
students now our overseas students. | 0:50:02 | 0:50:03 | |
We compete in world market
and I think we need people | 0:50:03 | 0:50:06 | |
who are able to take on challenge. | 0:50:06 | 0:50:08 | |
I just repeat the point that
universities are not | 0:50:08 | 0:50:10 | |
in the public sector. | 0:50:10 | 0:50:13 | |
Whereas the BBC for example
is and Andrew Neil and Fiona Bruce | 0:50:13 | 0:50:16 | |
and John Humphrys and all these
people are paid a lot more | 0:50:16 | 0:50:26 | |
than Glynis Breakwell. | 0:50:27 | 0:50:28 | |
Sergei think that is justified? | 0:50:28 | 0:50:29 | |
By the same token? | 0:50:29 | 0:50:30 | |
How can you condemn one
section and not another? | 0:50:30 | 0:50:33 | |
I'm not condemning any of them. | 0:50:33 | 0:50:34 | |
She was also on the
remuneration committee. | 0:50:34 | 0:50:36 | |
She has stood down now. | 0:50:36 | 0:50:37 | |
Of the University. | 0:50:37 | 0:50:38 | |
So they sat around, I guess,
and said, well, look, | 0:50:38 | 0:50:40 | |
I'm going to set your pay,
your pay, your paid. | 0:50:40 | 0:50:43 | |
Now you've got to set mine. | 0:50:43 | 0:50:44 | |
I'll go outside. | 0:50:44 | 0:50:45 | |
That doesn't sound terribly
transparent or clear to me. | 0:50:45 | 0:50:49 | |
Well, that may be an issue
which is worth suing | 0:50:49 | 0:50:54 | |
Well, that may be an issue
which is worth pursuing | 0:50:54 | 0:50:56 | |
and the governance requirements etc
looking up time time. | 0:50:56 | 0:50:58 | |
But there are other highly paid vice
chancellors who don't benefit | 0:50:58 | 0:51:01 | |
from those kind of arrangements. | 0:51:01 | 0:51:02 | |
I come back to, this
is an international market. | 0:51:02 | 0:51:06 | |
British universities have
to compete big-time... | 0:51:06 | 0:51:07 | |
Yeah, but there's also places,
you mentioned the United States | 0:51:07 | 0:51:10 | |
and Canada, but there are places
like Poland which will be | 0:51:10 | 0:51:15 | |
and Canada, but there are places
like Poland which won't be | 0:51:15 | 0:51:17 | |
paying that sort of money. | 0:51:17 | 0:51:18 | |
Well, yes, that's our
comparator, is it, Poland? | 0:51:18 | 0:51:20 | |
Well, what is wrong with that? | 0:51:20 | 0:51:22 | |
We have independent universities. | 0:51:22 | 0:51:23 | |
Polish universities
are controlled by the state. | 0:51:23 | 0:51:25 | |
British universities have a long
tradition of independence and not | 0:51:25 | 0:51:31 | |
and autonomy and I think that's
what we ought to preserve rather | 0:51:31 | 0:51:34 | |
than having some jumped up proconsul
deciding that we should not pay | 0:51:34 | 0:51:37 | |
anybody more than an arbitrary
figure of £150,000. | 0:51:37 | 0:51:39 | |
OK, thank you for your contribution
but I am going to give the final | 0:51:39 | 0:51:42 | |
word on this to Alex. | 0:51:42 | 0:51:44 | |
The Conservatives are
all free-market people, | 0:51:44 | 0:51:46 | |
so it's just not quite clear why
you don't let the free | 0:51:46 | 0:51:49 | |
market take its course. | 0:51:49 | 0:51:51 | |
Well, the proper balance to strike
if to say is you want to justify | 0:51:51 | 0:51:55 | |
exceptional pay because you want
to attract people from | 0:51:55 | 0:51:59 | |
overseas or whatever,
that's fine but do it publicly. | 0:51:59 | 0:52:02 | |
What is not acceptable is for each
university to set its own rules | 0:52:02 | 0:52:08 | |
with effectively mates sitting
around a table deciding | 0:52:08 | 0:52:10 | |
who's going to get what. | 0:52:10 | 0:52:11 | |
They should be open and transparent. | 0:52:11 | 0:52:13 | |
If there needs to be a payment
above £150,000, just make the case. | 0:52:13 | 0:52:16 | |
And if it's a good case,
no doubt it will be justified. | 0:52:16 | 0:52:19 | |
OK, we must move on. | 0:52:19 | 0:52:20 | |
It was where I began my career
all those years ago, | 0:52:20 | 0:52:23 | |
on locals newspapers,
writing for the newspapers | 0:52:23 | 0:52:25 | |
and keeping the town | 0:52:25 | 0:52:27 | |
informed about what's
going on in their parish. | 0:52:27 | 0:52:30 | |
But does the digital revolution
threaten to put an end to all that? | 0:52:30 | 0:52:34 | |
It was one of the big topics at this
week's BBC Future Of News debate | 0:52:34 | 0:52:38 | |
and Robin Markwell was there. | 0:52:38 | 0:52:42 | |
And now, over to a conference
at one of the big national | 0:52:42 | 0:52:45 | |
newspapers, The Daily Sketch. | 0:52:45 | 0:52:46 | |
At the head of the table
sits the editor. | 0:52:46 | 0:52:48 | |
On his left, the managing editor. | 0:52:48 | 0:52:50 | |
Fleet Street in its prime. | 0:52:50 | 0:52:52 | |
Newspapers hot off the press
couldn't be handed out fast enough. | 0:52:52 | 0:52:58 | |
Several editions a day were rushed
out to a grateful reading public. | 0:52:58 | 0:53:01 | |
And they are distributed
in places as far away | 0:53:01 | 0:53:03 | |
as Lands End to a news-hungry
public. | 0:53:03 | 0:53:06 | |
In proportion to our population,
the sale of newspapers in Britain | 0:53:06 | 0:53:09 | |
is greater than that of any other
country in the world. | 0:53:09 | 0:53:12 | |
That was then, this is now. | 0:53:12 | 0:53:16 | |
Read all about! | 0:53:16 | 0:53:18 | |
300 local papers closed
in the last decade! | 0:53:18 | 0:53:22 | |
17 alone during this summer,
says Press Gazette. | 0:53:22 | 0:53:26 | |
This month, two Gloucestershire
papers, which have been printing | 0:53:26 | 0:53:31 | |
daily editions since the 1870s,
switched to printing weekly. | 0:53:31 | 0:53:33 | |
The reason, they're
sliding circulation. | 0:53:33 | 0:53:38 | |
The Gloucester Citizen
and the Gloucestershire Echo's | 0:53:38 | 0:53:40 | |
sales now hover around
a mere 8,000 copies. | 0:53:40 | 0:53:44 | |
The paper's owners say the future
lies with a younger, | 0:53:44 | 0:53:46 | |
larger audience online. | 0:53:46 | 0:53:51 | |
People look at newspapers
like they look at red phone boxes. | 0:53:51 | 0:53:55 | |
Like they look at
Route Master buses. | 0:53:55 | 0:53:59 | |
There is a nostalgia
about a golden era of newspapers | 0:53:59 | 0:54:02 | |
but from my perspective
as a journalist it | 0:54:02 | 0:54:05 | |
never really existed. | 0:54:05 | 0:54:07 | |
And I think we just
have to accept that, | 0:54:07 | 0:54:09 | |
with the death of the pound note, | 0:54:09 | 0:54:13 | |
at some point in the future
there might be a move from a print | 0:54:13 | 0:54:16 | |
product into a new evolved form
of delivering local news. | 0:54:16 | 0:54:20 | |
In a BBC debate this week
on the future of news, | 0:54:20 | 0:54:24 | |
she went on to predict
even her weekly paper may no longer | 0:54:24 | 0:54:27 | |
exist in 20 years' time. | 0:54:27 | 0:54:29 | |
From a quick straw poll,
it was easy to see why. | 0:54:29 | 0:54:33 | |
So how many people here have
bought a local newspaper | 0:54:33 | 0:54:35 | |
this week last week? | 0:54:35 | 0:54:38 | |
Would you raise your hand? | 0:54:38 | 0:54:41 | |
A very small minority. | 0:54:41 | 0:54:44 | |
One former Citizen
paperboy-turned-politician worries | 0:54:44 | 0:54:45 | |
the decline | 0:54:45 | 0:54:47 | |
of the paper may mean
a decline in journalism. | 0:54:47 | 0:54:50 | |
He says he's seeing fewer
journalists covering council | 0:54:50 | 0:54:53 | |
meetings once their bread
and butter of news. | 0:54:53 | 0:54:58 | |
Over the years, the journalists
have been disappearing. | 0:54:58 | 0:55:00 | |
First from the sub committees,
then from the major committees | 0:55:00 | 0:55:09 | |
now from the council meetings. | 0:55:09 | 0:55:11 | |
At the last council meeting,
there was no journalist | 0:55:11 | 0:55:13 | |
there from the Gloucester Citizen. | 0:55:13 | 0:55:15 | |
And what they've been relying
on more and more is cutting | 0:55:15 | 0:55:18 | |
and pasting of press releases coming
out of the council and you don't get | 0:55:18 | 0:55:21 | |
the digging around that you got
in the old days from journalists. | 0:55:21 | 0:55:27 | |
We have local journalists
on the ground, in the communities | 0:55:27 | 0:55:29 | |
that they are living
in as well as reporting on. | 0:55:29 | 0:55:32 | |
I can't comment on what
other traditional print | 0:55:32 | 0:55:34 | |
publishers are doing. | 0:55:34 | 0:55:35 | |
But certainly in my newsroom,
in the newsrooms within | 0:55:35 | 0:55:38 | |
the region that I work,
we have a patch reporters. | 0:55:38 | 0:55:44 | |
We have caught reporters, we have
dedicated political reporters. | 0:55:44 | 0:55:51 | |
We have agenda reporters looking
into investigative stories. | 0:55:51 | 0:55:55 | |
If there are fewer journalists
asking the right questions, | 0:55:55 | 0:55:57 | |
knowing where to get
the information, knowing how | 0:55:57 | 0:55:59 | |
to dig and delve for it,
and trained in matters of law | 0:55:59 | 0:56:02 | |
and so on. | 0:56:02 | 0:56:03 | |
Unless there is a professional
cohort of journalists | 0:56:03 | 0:56:04 | |
holding power to account,
then the problem quite | 0:56:04 | 0:56:06 | |
clearly will be that
democracy will be the loser. | 0:56:06 | 0:56:11 | |
With even editors predicting
their newspapers are heading | 0:56:11 | 0:56:21 | |
the same way as the trusty old red
phone box, should we consign them | 0:56:22 | 0:56:25 | |
to history now or do we risk leaving
traditional readers short-changed? | 0:56:25 | 0:56:28 | |
Well, I for one, love red telephone
boxes and local newspapers | 0:56:28 | 0:56:31 | |
but there will soon be highlights
from the BBC debate | 0:56:31 | 0:56:33 | |
on our BBC website. | 0:56:33 | 0:56:34 | |
Now, the freelance journalist
Phil Chamberlain was also | 0:56:34 | 0:56:41 | |
there and he's head of the School
of Journalism at the University | 0:56:41 | 0:56:44 | |
of the West of England. | 0:56:44 | 0:56:45 | |
Welcome along, thanks for coming. | 0:56:45 | 0:56:46 | |
Is it the beginning, do you think,
of the end for printed news? | 0:56:46 | 0:56:49 | |
No. | 0:56:49 | 0:56:50 | |
And I worked with Rachel
at the Bath Chronicle back | 0:56:50 | 0:56:53 | |
in the day and I'm hoping to turn
out graduates who will be | 0:56:53 | 0:56:56 | |
working in print products
for a number of years yet. | 0:56:56 | 0:56:59 | |
I think we may have thought that
radio was going to be killed off | 0:56:59 | 0:57:02 | |
by television and yet it flourishes
in different forms. | 0:57:02 | 0:57:04 | |
I also think that if you look
at the way print products | 0:57:04 | 0:57:07 | |
are thriving in areas such
as Private Eye and specialist | 0:57:07 | 0:57:10 | |
magazines like that,
that do extremely well and things | 0:57:10 | 0:57:12 | |
like the Voice series in Bristol
that have been delivering | 0:57:12 | 0:57:14 | |
a particular product
to a very specific audience. | 0:57:14 | 0:57:16 | |
I think they're really thriving. | 0:57:16 | 0:57:22 | |
There are real opportunities. | 0:57:22 | 0:57:24 | |
But the days of mass
circulation of local evening | 0:57:24 | 0:57:26 | |
newspapers, for example,
is gone, isn't it? | 0:57:26 | 0:57:28 | |
I think the market has changed
enormously by thing to say | 0:57:28 | 0:57:31 | |
that it is going to go the same
as red phone boxes I think | 0:57:31 | 0:57:34 | |
is too pessimistic. | 0:57:34 | 0:57:35 | |
I think actually there is a future
just in myriad different forms. | 0:57:35 | 0:57:38 | |
Wera, does it matter if people don't
read the local news? | 0:57:38 | 0:57:42 | |
I think there is definitely still
a place for good local journalism. | 0:57:42 | 0:57:45 | |
Whether that is delivered
in print paper or that is | 0:57:45 | 0:57:48 | |
delivered digitally online. | 0:57:48 | 0:57:51 | |
I think the point that was made
about democracy and how we report | 0:57:51 | 0:57:54 | |
on local council meetings,
that is a very important point. | 0:57:54 | 0:57:57 | |
But I do believe very good
journalism can be done | 0:57:57 | 0:58:00 | |
through digital media. | 0:58:00 | 0:58:02 | |
In fact, at the Bath Chronicle,
we just got a very young reporter | 0:58:02 | 0:58:06 | |
who is going to get a reward. | 0:58:06 | 0:58:08 | |
For doing exactly that,
videos and clips. | 0:58:08 | 0:58:11 | |
What is his name? | 0:58:11 | 0:58:12 | |
Sam Petherick. | 0:58:12 | 0:58:14 | |
Congratulations to you. | 0:58:14 | 0:58:19 | |
Alex, what do you reckon? | 0:58:19 | 0:58:21 | |
I mean, if people don't want to read
what's going on in councils, | 0:58:21 | 0:58:24 | |
parish councils, then there's no
point in sending | 0:58:24 | 0:58:26 | |
reporters along to it. | 0:58:26 | 0:58:28 | |
Yeah, but I knew at distinguishing
between two things. | 0:58:28 | 0:58:31 | |
There is definitely a huge
appetite for local news. | 0:58:31 | 0:58:33 | |
So in Cheltenham, people are really
interested in what's going on. | 0:58:33 | 0:58:36 | |
But they're not because they
are not buying the Echo. | 0:58:36 | 0:58:38 | |
They might not be necessarily
buying the print media | 0:58:38 | 0:58:40 | |
but they are increasingly consuming
media, as I am, I very rarely | 0:58:40 | 0:58:43 | |
actually buy a printed copy
of newspapers but I do look | 0:58:43 | 0:58:46 | |
at things on a tablet. | 0:58:46 | 0:58:47 | |
That appetite is still there. | 0:58:47 | 0:58:48 | |
So what the market has got to do
is work out how to deliver it. | 0:58:48 | 0:58:52 | |
I do deprecate the loss
of daily newspapers, | 0:58:52 | 0:58:59 | |
I'm quite nostalgic for them
and I know they serve an important | 0:58:59 | 0:59:02 | |
community purpose because people go
to see the newsagent | 0:59:02 | 0:59:04 | |
except but you can't
hold back the tide. | 0:59:04 | 0:59:06 | |
But I do think that the market
will continue to meet that demand | 0:59:06 | 0:59:09 | |
because it is certainly there. | 0:59:09 | 0:59:10 | |
Are the big media companies prepared
to invest in the local journalism? | 0:59:10 | 0:59:13 | |
Because in the days when they were
earning millions of pounds, | 0:59:13 | 0:59:15 | |
when they had all the classified ads
and the estate agent adds, | 0:59:15 | 0:59:18 | |
when they had all the classified ads
and the estate agent ads, | 0:59:18 | 0:59:23 | |
why didn't they then bring in star
writers, | 0:59:23 | 0:59:25 | |
paid them large salaries and build
up a real editorial base? | 0:59:25 | 0:59:28 | |
I think this funding issue is key. | 0:59:28 | 0:59:30 | |
Alex talked about the market
we're probably operating | 0:59:30 | 0:59:32 | |
in different forms of markets. | 0:59:32 | 0:59:36 | |
You've got people like Google
and Facebook who have a different | 0:59:36 | 0:59:38 | |
kind of business model and that
perhaps earning in some ways off | 0:59:38 | 0:59:41 | |
the backs of the products that
newspapers are putting out. | 0:59:41 | 0:59:43 | |
Actually, local newspaper
companies are profitable, | 0:59:43 | 0:59:45 | |
they are very profitable. | 0:59:45 | 0:59:46 | |
They have always been profitable. | 0:59:46 | 0:59:47 | |
It is how they choose to spend that. | 0:59:47 | 0:59:49 | |
They have got very
high profit margins. | 0:59:49 | 0:59:51 | |
Supermarkets have very low
profit margins and make | 0:59:51 | 0:59:53 | |
enormous profits as well. | 0:59:53 | 0:59:54 | |
It's about how they wish
to organise their model. | 0:59:54 | 0:59:58 | |
Newspapers are profitable,
it's just how they choose | 0:59:58 | 1:00:00 | |
to spend that as well. | 1:00:00 | 1:00:01 | |
You've got differing economic models
if you like competing, | 1:00:01 | 1:00:10 | |
so you might have bloggers
who are doing it out of love | 1:00:10 | 1:00:13 | |
and then you've got professional,
if you like in inverted commas... | 1:00:13 | 1:00:18 | |
So you need that core
of professionals, don't you, | 1:00:18 | 1:00:20 | |
otherwise you could get a load
of fake news. | 1:00:20 | 1:00:22 | |
Absolutely. | 1:00:22 | 1:00:23 | |
And I think that is exactly
the place for good local journalism. | 1:00:23 | 1:00:26 | |
And a paper like our local paper,
the Bath Chronicle, | 1:00:26 | 1:00:28 | |
is a trusted brand and people
want to get their information | 1:00:28 | 1:00:31 | |
from a trusted brand. | 1:00:31 | 1:00:32 | |
Trust I think is key. | 1:00:32 | 1:00:34 | |
That is a real sellable
commodity I think. | 1:00:34 | 1:00:35 | |
I think that will be
just as important. | 1:00:35 | 1:00:37 | |
We have to leave it there. | 1:00:37 | 1:00:39 | |
Unlike newspapers, we can't just
print an extra page. | 1:00:39 | 1:00:41 | |
Our time is up. | 1:00:41 | 1:00:42 | |
And there's always news
on local television. | 1:00:42 | 1:00:44 | |
You've done your bit
for the Bath Chronicle today. | 1:00:44 | 1:00:46 | |
They'll be thrilled. | 1:00:46 | 1:00:47 | |
What about the Gloucestershire Echo? | 1:00:47 | 1:00:49 | |
And the Echo, and the citizen
and evening Post. | 1:00:49 | 1:00:52 | |
Before we go, just time
for our round-up of the political | 1:00:52 | 1:00:54 | |
week with our Robin. | 1:00:55 | 1:01:01 | |
It was a bleak week
for the Council in Swindon. | 1:01:01 | 1:01:03 | |
Around 400 jobs are to go,
that's 15% of its workforce as it | 1:01:03 | 1:01:06 | |
adjusts to funding cuts. | 1:01:06 | 1:01:10 | |
The NHS dismissed rumours that
Cheltenham's downgraded A&E | 1:01:10 | 1:01:12 | |
might eventually close. | 1:01:12 | 1:01:15 | |
There have been concern
from councillors following a pilot | 1:01:15 | 1:01:18 | |
scheme to transfer some orthopaedic
patients to the | 1:01:18 | 1:01:20 | |
Gloucestershire Royal. | 1:01:20 | 1:01:26 | |
perhaps it's the first male MP
in the chamber, I too very proudly | 1:01:26 | 1:01:29 | |
paint my nails today. | 1:01:29 | 1:01:30 | |
The Bristol MP Darren Jones sported
nail polish in the Commons. | 1:01:30 | 1:01:33 | |
It was part of the police's
let's nail it campaign. | 1:01:33 | 1:01:36 | |
It's targeted at modern slavery
in places like nail bars. | 1:01:36 | 1:01:43 | |
Ruby! | 1:01:43 | 1:01:44 | |
And there was disappointment
for that Cheltenham MP | 1:01:44 | 1:01:47 | |
in the Westminster dog
of the year awards. | 1:01:47 | 1:01:50 | |
His pooch, Ruby, failed to place. | 1:01:50 | 1:01:52 | |
Second spot went to
the member for Taunton Deane | 1:01:52 | 1:01:54 | |
and her beagle, Bonnie. | 1:01:54 | 1:01:55 | |
Both were rescued dogs
in need of new homes. | 1:01:55 | 1:02:04 | |
Oh, what a week. | 1:02:04 | 1:02:06 | |
Well, we're off to paint our nails. | 1:02:06 | 1:02:09 | |
My thanks to all my guests
for joining me here but now | 1:02:09 | 1:02:12 | |
we will return to London and Sarah,
who is waiting for us. | 1:02:12 | 1:02:15 | |
With that, it's back to Sarah. | 1:02:16 | 1:02:25 | |
Now, the much anticipated
EU Withdrawal Bill, | 1:02:25 | 1:02:28 | |
which will transfer EU law into UK
law in preparation for Brexit, | 1:02:28 | 1:02:31 | |
is expected to be debated
by MPs later next month. | 1:02:31 | 1:02:36 | |
Critics have called it a "power
grab" as it introduces so-called | 1:02:36 | 1:02:39 | |
Henry VIII powers for Whitehall
to amend some laws without | 1:02:39 | 1:02:41 | |
consulting parliament,
and it faces fierce resistance | 1:02:41 | 1:02:45 | |
from opposition parties
as well as many on the government's | 1:02:45 | 1:02:49 | |
own backbenches, with 300 amendments
and 54 new clauses tabled on it. | 1:02:49 | 1:02:54 | |
We're joined now by the Conservative
MP Anna Soubry who has been a strong | 1:02:54 | 1:02:57 | |
critic of the legislation. | 1:02:57 | 1:03:01 | |
Thank you very much for joining us.
Before we talk about the withdrawal | 1:03:01 | 1:03:06 | |
bill, I would like to bring up with
you that the Prime Minister has just | 1:03:06 | 1:03:11 | |
sent a letter to the Commons Speaker
John Bercow asking for an | 1:03:11 | 1:03:15 | |
independent body to be established
to investigate claims of sexual | 1:03:15 | 1:03:19 | |
harassment in Parliament. What are
your thoughts on that? A very good | 1:03:19 | 1:03:24 | |
idea, sounds like a great deal of
common sense. I had already this | 1:03:24 | 1:03:28 | |
morning sent a request to the
speaker asking for an urgent | 1:03:28 | 1:03:31 | |
statement from the Leader of the
House as to what could now be done | 1:03:31 | 1:03:35 | |
to make sure that any complaints
actually against anybody working in | 1:03:35 | 1:03:41 | |
Parliament, to extend the
protections that workers throughout | 1:03:41 | 1:03:44 | |
the rest of businesses and in other
workplaces have, they should now be | 1:03:44 | 1:03:49 | |
extended into Parliament and asking
for an urgent statement from the | 1:03:49 | 1:03:52 | |
leader. Clearly the PM is well onto
this and it is a good idea. We have | 1:03:52 | 1:03:57 | |
to make sure everybody who works in
Parliament enjoys exactly the same | 1:03:57 | 1:04:01 | |
protections as other workers, so I
welcome this. This should maybe have | 1:04:01 | 1:04:06 | |
happened a long time ago. We hear
stories of harassment that has been | 1:04:06 | 1:04:11 | |
going on for decades, but until now
it has been difficult to work out | 1:04:11 | 1:04:14 | |
who you could complain to about it.
It is my understanding that my Chief | 1:04:14 | 1:04:20 | |
Whip and the previous deputy Chief
Whip, and Milton, shared that view | 1:04:20 | 1:04:24 | |
and have shared that view for some
time but found it difficult to get | 1:04:24 | 1:04:29 | |
all the agreement necessary. Anyway,
we are where we are and we are | 1:04:29 | 1:04:33 | |
making that progress, but | 1:04:33 | 1:04:45 | |
my Chief Whip and the previous
deputy Chief Whip wanted this done | 1:04:46 | 1:04:48 | |
some time ago. That is an
interesting point. Let's move on to | 1:04:48 | 1:04:51 | |
the much anticipated EU withdrawal
bill which will finally be debated. | 1:04:51 | 1:04:53 | |
You have put your name to an
amendment which is calling for a | 1:04:53 | 1:04:55 | |
vote on the final agreement in
essence, do you really believe that | 1:04:55 | 1:04:58 | |
that will be a meaningful both
offered to the Commons? Yes, if you | 1:04:58 | 1:05:02 | |
look at the terms of the amendment,
it would deliver exactly that. It | 1:05:02 | 1:05:07 | |
would give members of Parliament the
opportunity to debated and voted on | 1:05:07 | 1:05:12 | |
it. It would be an effective piece
of legislation and would go through | 1:05:12 | 1:05:16 | |
both houses and should be done. One
of the problems with this process is | 1:05:16 | 1:05:21 | |
that Parliament has been excluded
from the sort of debate and | 1:05:21 | 1:05:25 | |
decisions that would have enabled
the government to move forward in | 1:05:25 | 1:05:30 | |
progress and form a consensus so we
get the very best Brexit deal. We | 1:05:30 | 1:05:40 | |
have been excluded, that has been
wrong in my view, but by the end we | 1:05:40 | 1:05:43 | |
should not be excluded. The
government have made it clear that | 1:05:43 | 1:05:46 | |
whilst there may well be a boat if
you win on this amendment, it will | 1:05:46 | 1:05:49 | |
be a take it or leave it vote. This
is a deal you should accept, or | 1:05:49 | 1:05:54 | |
there will be no deal. If you look
at the amendment we put forward | 1:05:54 | 1:06:00 | |
there will be other alternatives.
This is all hypothetical because we | 1:06:00 | 1:06:04 | |
want a good deal and it is difficult
to see that the government would not | 1:06:04 | 1:06:07 | |
bring a good deal to the House in
any event. But this is hypothetical, | 1:06:07 | 1:06:13 | |
it would mean Parliament would say
to government, go back and seek an | 1:06:13 | 1:06:18 | |
extension as we know it is there in
Article 50. It is perfectly possible | 1:06:18 | 1:06:24 | |
with the agreement of the other
members of the EU to seek an | 1:06:24 | 1:06:28 | |
extension so we continue the
negotiations and we get a deal that | 1:06:28 | 1:06:32 | |
is good for our country. It keeps
all options open and that is the | 1:06:32 | 1:06:36 | |
most important thing. How many
Conservative MPs really would take | 1:06:36 | 1:06:41 | |
that option in those circumstances?
It is only if you get enough votes | 1:06:41 | 1:06:46 | |
that you would be able to ask the
government to go back and | 1:06:46 | 1:06:49 | |
re-negotiate. | 1:06:49 | 1:07:00 | |
Have you for that? For give me, but
you are jumping way down the line. I | 1:07:03 | 1:07:06 | |
am talking about an amendment that
keeps the options open. I am not | 1:07:06 | 1:07:08 | |
speculating as to what would happen,
I am not going there, it is far too | 1:07:08 | 1:07:12 | |
speculative. Let's get this bill in
good shape. The principle of this | 1:07:12 | 1:07:15 | |
bill is right and we need to put
into British domestic law existing | 1:07:15 | 1:07:21 | |
EU laws and regulations into our
substantive law. We all agree that | 1:07:21 | 1:07:26 | |
must happen. It is the means by
which we do it that causes problems | 1:07:26 | 1:07:31 | |
and we have this argument and debate
about what we call the endgame. I am | 1:07:31 | 1:07:37 | |
sure we will talk about this many
more times before we get to that | 1:07:37 | 1:07:41 | |
vote. I will turn to our panel of
political experts. Listening to the | 1:07:41 | 1:07:46 | |
tone of what the remainders are
trying to achieve with the EU | 1:07:46 | 1:07:52 | |
withdrawal bill, will be achieved?
You can hear that tussled there, | 1:07:52 | 1:07:57 | |
they want the maximum space and room
for Parliament to have a say. But | 1:07:57 | 1:08:02 | |
they have to be careful. The reason
is that clock is ticking and if you | 1:08:02 | 1:08:08 | |
have a situation which may seem to
be more interested in finding | 1:08:08 | 1:08:14 | |
different things to object to and
saying no to, it is not getting a | 1:08:14 | 1:08:18 | |
good deal and it does not look good
for the remainders in this argument | 1:08:18 | 1:08:22 | |
and they will have to come through
with their proposals. I do not mind | 1:08:22 | 1:08:27 | |
Parliament saying it should have a
big say, but what do you do if | 1:08:27 | 1:08:31 | |
Parliament says this is not good
enough? The government must simply | 1:08:31 | 1:08:37 | |
say, I am sorry we have run out of
time. The 27 will say they cannot be | 1:08:37 | 1:08:42 | |
bothered to have another round
either. They have to be strong, but | 1:08:42 | 1:08:47 | |
realistic about what their role in
this is. Do you think the people | 1:08:47 | 1:08:51 | |
putting this amendment who say they
want a binding vote in parliament | 1:08:51 | 1:08:56 | |
are doing it because they think
Parliament should have a say or | 1:08:56 | 1:08:59 | |
because they want to obstruct it?
They do not think people should have | 1:08:59 | 1:09:04 | |
a say in the first place, they think
people got it wrong, so they need | 1:09:04 | 1:09:09 | |
more clever people than the voters
to have final say. Or they believed | 1:09:09 | 1:09:16 | |
taking back control means Parliament
should have the final say. | 1:09:16 | 1:09:19 | |
Parliament said they would like to
give that decision back to the | 1:09:19 | 1:09:22 | |
people. This is the issue. It seems
to me that people like Anna Soubry | 1:09:22 | 1:09:28 | |
are trying to delay of the
transition period a bit longer. | 1:09:28 | 1:09:32 | |
These negotiations will take as long
as they have got. The EU will take | 1:09:32 | 1:09:37 | |
it to the wire and if we do not get
a decent deal, and one of the | 1:09:37 | 1:09:45 | |
reasons is the level of incompetence
on this government's part I have to | 1:09:45 | 1:09:48 | |
say and the other one will be the
people who want to remain | 1:09:48 | 1:09:53 | |
undermining them. They undermined
the government at every single stage | 1:09:53 | 1:09:59 | |
and they undermine Britain's
interests. It is the timing of all | 1:09:59 | 1:10:03 | |
of this that is crucial and whether
the government can get a deal in | 1:10:03 | 1:10:06 | |
time. There will be a meaningful
vote, whether it is an shined in | 1:10:06 | 1:10:13 | |
legislation or not, there cannot be
an historic development as big as | 1:10:13 | 1:10:18 | |
this without Parliament having a
meaningful vote. I meaningful, | 1:10:18 | 1:10:23 | |
having the power to either stop it
or endorse it. You cannot have a | 1:10:23 | 1:10:27 | |
government doing something like this
with no vote in the House of | 1:10:27 | 1:10:30 | |
commons. When you say it will go to
the last minute I completely agree, | 1:10:30 | 1:10:37 | |
but last-minute in reality means
next summer. It has got to get | 1:10:37 | 1:10:42 | |
through the European Parliament and
the Westminster Parliament and quite | 1:10:42 | 1:10:45 | |
a few others as well. The trouble
with invoking Parliament is if it is | 1:10:45 | 1:10:52 | |
driven solely by remain, I would
love to say what people in the | 1:10:52 | 1:10:57 | |
league side think. I disagree with
Julia, I do not think you could say | 1:10:57 | 1:11:04 | |
people had their say and the terms
with which we leave are left open | 1:11:04 | 1:11:09 | |
and only the government should have
a say in it, Parliament clearly | 1:11:09 | 1:11:12 | |
should have a say in it. Do we want
a good deal or not? It does not mean | 1:11:12 | 1:11:21 | |
anything if you do not do it by next
summer I suggest. Does that leave | 1:11:21 | 1:11:26 | |
Parliament any room for changing the
deal or is it simply take it or | 1:11:26 | 1:11:30 | |
leave it? It will have to have that
rule because it cannot simply be | 1:11:30 | 1:11:35 | |
another of these binary votes were
you accept the deal or no Deal. | 1:11:35 | 1:11:39 | |
There has to be some space. How can
a few MPs in the House of Commons | 1:11:39 | 1:11:45 | |
change a deal that has been agreed
by the member states? Because of the | 1:11:45 | 1:11:50 | |
sequence, a huge if by the way, if
they vote down the deal that the | 1:11:50 | 1:11:56 | |
government has negotiated, the
government will have to re-negotiate | 1:11:56 | 1:11:59 | |
or there will have to be an
election. This will be a moment of | 1:11:59 | 1:12:03 | |
huge crisis, our government not
getting through its much topped | 1:12:03 | 1:12:06 | |
about... It is a mini Catalonia. I
think it would be as big as | 1:12:06 | 1:12:15 | |
Catalonia, but with the implication
that there would have to be a | 1:12:15 | 1:12:18 | |
practical change in the deal because
if Parliament has not supported | 1:12:18 | 1:12:21 | |
it... It is a remain fantasy that
this deal can be put off and off | 1:12:21 | 1:12:27 | |
until they get something that is as
close to remaining as they can | 1:12:27 | 1:12:32 | |
possibly get. I am very much for
trying to get the best and avoiding | 1:12:32 | 1:12:37 | |
the worst, but there is an unreality
to that position if you keep trying | 1:12:37 | 1:12:43 | |
to do it again and again, at some
point people will want clarity. I | 1:12:43 | 1:12:49 | |
labour putting forward a realistic
proposition? I thought Hilary Benn | 1:12:49 | 1:12:55 | |
was very realistic this morning, I
wish he was more in the driving seat | 1:12:55 | 1:12:59 | |
of Labour policy. He made clear
where he disagreed and he made clear | 1:12:59 | 1:13:04 | |
where he thought the negotiations
had gone off track or were bogged | 1:13:04 | 1:13:07 | |
down. I worry a bit about the Labour
position being incoherent, but that | 1:13:07 | 1:13:16 | |
is kept that way by the present
leadership because as far as they | 1:13:16 | 1:13:19 | |
are concerned the government is
suffering enough, why should they | 1:13:19 | 1:13:23 | |
have a position? Hilary Benn said we
needed to have clarity about the | 1:13:23 | 1:13:29 | |
timetable. It is like reading an
insurance contract and finding the | 1:13:29 | 1:13:32 | |
bit where you might get away with
it. That is not a policy. | 1:13:32 | 1:13:35 | |
That is not a policy. | 1:13:35 | 1:13:38 | |
That's all for today. | 1:13:38 | 1:13:39 | |
Join me again next Sunday
at 11 here on BBC One. | 1:13:39 | 1:13:42 | |
Until then, bye bye. | 1:13:42 | 1:13:46 |